The disclosed subject matter relates to methods and systems for separating carbon nanotubes.
Carbon nanotubes are allotropes of carbon containing one or more layers of graphene rolled into a cylindrical shape. Although carbon nanotubes can have lengths of up to several millimeters, their diameters are on the nanoscale, e.g., from less than one nanometer to about 50 nanometers. Carbon nanotubes can exhibit important mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties, and therefore can have great potential in a variety of applications.
The specific structure of a carbon nanotube can determine its properties. For example, carbon nanotubes can be semiconducting or metallic, depending on the chiral angle of the graphene. Semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes can be useful for different applications, and thus it can be desirable to isolate carbon nanotubes based on these electrical properties. Such isolated carbon nanotubes can find use in, for example, supercapacitors, ion battery electrodes, fuel cells, solar cells, lightweight electromagnetic shielding, sensors, and transistors.
Certain methods of separating semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes are known in art. For example, gel electrophoresis or density gradient ultracentrifugation have been used to separate carbon nanotubes. However, these methods can be cumbersome and expensive. U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,107 describes a method of separating carbon nanotubes by performing dielectrophoresis on a solution containing carbon nanotubes and a solvent. The method applies a non-homogeneous electric alternating field to the solution to cause the carbon nanotubes to migrate and separate.
The dielectrophoretic force (FDEP) that a particle experiences when dispersed in a solution is approximately proportional to the gradient of the applied electric field intensity profile (E2({right arrow over (r)})) multiplied by the Clausius Mossotti Function (CMF), as represented by Formula 1:
FDEP({right arrow over (r)})∝[CMF]∇E2({right arrow over (r)}) (Formula 1)
The high frequency limit gives a dominating term of the Clausius Mossotti Function, and is approximated by Formula 2.
In Formula 2, ω represents frequency, ∈p represents particle permittivity, and ∈l represents liquid permittivity. Thus, applying a non-homogeneous electric alternating field to a solution containing semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes, having particle permittivities ∈p(s) and ∈p(m), respectively, can separate the semiconducting carbon nanotubes and the metallic carbon nanotubes as long as one particle permittivity is less than the liquid permittivity and the other particle permittivity is greater than the liquid permittivity, as represented in Formula 3.
∈p(s)<∈l<∈p(m) (Formula 3)
In certain methods, the electric field is provided as an electromagnetic wave. However, due to its transience, only a small portion of the energy in the wave goes to separating the carbon nanotubes. Therefore, although such methods can separate semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes, it is accomplished at a loss of power.
Thus, there remains a need in the art for improved techniques for separating carbon nanotubes.
The disclosed subject matter provides methods and systems for separating carbon nanotubes, e.g., semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes.
In certain embodiments, an exemplary method of separating semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes contained within a solution includes providing electromagnetic waves travelling in one or more resonance modes and scattering at least a portion of the electromagnetic waves to form an electric gradient with the scattered waves. The method can further include recycling at least a portion of the scattered waves to the one or more resonance modes and separating at least a portion of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes and the metallic carbon nanotubes using the electric gradient.
In certain embodiments, the method can further include removing at least one of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes and the metallic carbon nanotubes. In certain embodiments, the electromagnetic waves can be provided by a wave source. For example, the wave source can be a magnetron. In certain embodiments, the electromagnetic waves can travel in a single resonance mode. The electromagnetic waves can be scattered by a concentrating apparatus.
In certain embodiments, the solution can include a solvent. For example, the solvent can contain water, toluene, anisole, dimethylformamide (DMF), ethanol, benzene, acetone and/or combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the particle permittivity of the metallic carbon nanotubes is not equal to the particle permittivity of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes. In particular embodiments, the solvent can have a liquid permittivity that is less than the particle permittivity of the metallic carbon nanotubes, but more than the particle permittivity of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes. In other particular embodiments, the solvent can have a liquid permittivity that is less than the particle permittivity of the metallic carbon nanotubes, and less than or about equal to the particle permittivity of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes.
In certain embodiments, the electromagnetic waves can have a frequency from about 300 MHz to about 300 GHz. For example, the electromagnetic waves can have a frequency from about 2 GHz to about 4 GHz.
The presently disclosed subject matter also provides systems for separating semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes within a cavity. An exemplary system can include a wave source, adapted for placement within the cavity, for providing electromagnetic waves to the cavity. At least a portion of the electromagnetic waves can travel in a resonance mode. The system can further include a concentrating apparatus, adapted for placement within the cavity, for scattering the electromagnetic waves, and a sample chamber within the concentrating apparatus. The sample chamber can include a solution containing the semiconducting carbon nanotubes and the metallic carbon nanotubes, and at least a portion of the scattered waves can travel through the sample chamber.
In certain embodiments, the length of the cavity can be an integer half multiple of the effective transverse wavelength (λeff) of the electromagnetic waves. In certain embodiments, the length of the cavity can be equal to the effective transverse wavelength of the electromagnetic waves. The system can further include one or more polarizers for attenuating any electromagnetic waves that are not traveling in the resonance mode. The polarizers can have a width of ⅛λeff. The wave source can be located a distance of ¼λeff from a first end of the cavity. The scattering apparatus can further include one or more concentrators. The concentrator(s) can be located a distance of ¼λeff from a second end of the cavity that is opposite the first end.
In certain embodiments, the wave source can be a magnetron. The sample chamber can be located within a cooling bath that is also within the concentrating apparatus. The system can further include a capillary for removing semiconducting carbon nanotubes and/or metallic carbon nanotubes from the sample chamber.
The presently disclosed subject matter provides techniques for separating carbon nanotubes, e.g., semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes. The disclosed methods and systems can be used to isolate semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, “a,” “an” and “the” can mean “one or more.”
As used herein, the term “about” or “approximately” means within an acceptable error range for the particular value as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, which will depend in part on how the value is measured or determined, i.e., the limitations of the measurement system. For example, “about” can mean a range of up to 20%, up to 10%, up to 5%, and or up to 1% of a given value.
As used herein, the phrase “at least a portion” can refer to any fraction, section, or division of an entire amount. For example, “at least a portion” can mean at least 1%, at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, or at least 70%. In certain circumstances, “at least a portion” can mean the entirety or 100% of an amount.
The presently disclosed subject matter provides methods of separating carbon nanotubes.
In certain embodiments, the solution can include semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes. The semiconducting carbon nanotubes can have a particle permittivity represented by ∈p(s), and the metallic carbon nanotubes can have a particle permittivity represented by ∈p(m). In certain embodiments, ∈p(m) is not equal to ∈p(s). For example, ∈p(m) can be greater than ∈p(s). In certain embodiments, ∈p(m) can be much greater than ∈p(s), as represented by Formula 4.
∈p(s)<<∈p(m) (Formula 4)
By way of example, and not limitation, ∈p(m) can be greater than ∈p(s) by at least one order of magnitude or at least two orders of magnitude. The particle permittivities ∈p(m) and ∈p(s) are the relative permittivities of the particles with respect to a vacuum. For example, in particular embodiments where the particles are metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes, ∈p(m) can range from about 100 to about 100,000, or from about 1,000 to about 10,000. In particular embodiments where the particles are semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes, ∈p(s) can range from about 1 to about 15, or from about 2 to about 5.
In certain embodiments, the solution can further include a solvent. In certain embodiments, the solvent can have a liquid permittivity represented by ∈l. The liquid permittivity ∈l is the relative permittivity of the liquid with respect to a vacuum. As used herein, “particle permittivity” and “liquid permittivity” can alternatively be termed the “dielectric constant.” In certain embodiments, ∈l can be less than ∈p(m) and more than ∈p(s), as represented by Formula 3, described above. In other certain embodiments, ∈l can be less than or equal to ∈p(s), as represented by Formula 5.
∈l≤∈p(s)<∈p(m) (Formula 5)
The solvent for use in the presently disclosed subject matter can be any suitable polar or non-polar solvent. By way of example, and not limitation, the solvent can include water, toluene, anisole, dimethylformamide (DMF), ethanol, benzene, acetone, or a combination thereof. By way of example, ∈l can range from about 1 to about 150, from about 2 to about 100, or from about 4 to about 80, depending on the composition of the solvent. In certain embodiments, the solvent can be water, which has an ∈l of about 80. In other certain embodiments, the solvent can be a mixture of toluene and anisole having an ∈l from about 2 to about 5. In certain embodiments, a mixture of toluene and anisole can have an ∈l of about 4.
With further reference to
In certain embodiments, the electromagnetic waves are provided to a cavity resonator. The electromagnetic waves can travel in a resonance mode, i.e., can form standing waves such that the electric field vector points in a fixed direction. In certain embodiments, any electromagnetic waves that are not traveling in the resonance mode can be attenuated, e.g., by polarizers or internal structures within the cavity. In certain embodiments, the electromagnetic waves can travel in multiple resonance modes.
With further reference to
The method 100 can include recycling at least a portion of the scattered waves to the resonance mode 104. For example, at least a portion of the scattered waves can be reflected to the polarizers such that any scattered waves which are not traveling in the resonance mode are attenuated. The polarizers ensure that all waves travel in a single resonance mode. Recycling the scattered waves to the resonance mode can capture energy that would otherwise be released to free space if the cavity was open to free space. This can provide increased efficiency by reducing the amount of power needed to separate a certain amount of carbon nanotubes. A person having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the presently disclosed method can be operable with waves traveling in multiple resonance modes, and thus the scattered waves need not be recycled to a single resonance mode. In such embodiments, the scattered waves can be recycled to multiple resonance modes, e.g., by the natural attenuation of waves within a cavity resonator.
The method 100 can include separating semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes using the electric gradient 105. In certain embodiments, at least a portion of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes are separated from the metallic carbon nanotubes. The carbon nanotubes can be separated by dielectrophoresis. For example, and with reference to Formula 3, if the semiconducting carbon nanotubes have a particle permittivity (∈p(s)) that is less than the liquid permittivity of the solvent (∈l) and the metallic carbon nanotubes have a particle permittivity (∈p(m)) that is more than the liquid permittivity of the solvent, then the carbon nanotubes can migrate to opposite ends of the electric gradient.
Alternatively, with reference to Formula 5, if the solvent has a liquid permittivity that is less than the particle permittivities of both the semiconducting carbon nanotubes and the metallic carbon nanotubes, the metallic carbon nanotubes, which can have a higher particle permittivity compared to the semiconducting carbon nanotubes (see Formula 4), will migrate to one end of the electric gradient. The semiconducting carbon nanotubes will also migrate to the same end of the electric gradient, but to a lesser extent, and therefore the solution will become highly concentrated with metallic carbon nanotubes at that end of the electric gradient. In either case, the metallic carbon nanotubes can migrate to a collection area to be extracted from the solution, resulting in an extract containing metallic carbon nanotubes.
In certain embodiments, the method can further include removing purified semiconducting carbon nanotubes and/or metallic carbon nanotubes, e.g., via a capillary. The methods of the presently disclosed subject matter can provide purified semiconducting carbon nanotubes and/or metallic carbon nanotubes.
In certain embodiments, the method can include removing an extract containing purified metallic carbon nanotubes from the solution. For example, the extract can contain greater than about 50%, greater than about 70%, greater than about 80%, greater than about 90%, greater than about 95%, greater than about 97%, greater than about 99%, or greater than about 99.9% metallic carbon nanotubes, as compared to semiconducting carbon nanotubes. A person having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the purity of the carbon nanotubes will depend on various factors, including for example the solvent composition, solvent liquid permittivity (∈l), power input, and electric field intensity.
In certain embodiments, a higher purity extract can be produced. For example, the method can be performed using a first solution to create a first extract, and then repeated using the first extract to create a higher purity second extract. In certain embodiments, the method can be repeated for at least two cycles, at least three cycles, or at least four cycles. In certain embodiments, the method can be operated continuously, e.g., by continuously removing an extract and providing additional solution containing both semiconducting carbon nanotubes and metallic carbon nanotubes. Additionally, operating the method continuously can be further advantageous for increasing throughput.
The presently disclosed subject matter further provides systems for separating carbon nanotubes. For the purpose of illustration, and not limitation,
The system 200 can be configured to minimize energy loss from the system. In certain embodiments, the system contains no outlets large enough for waves to escape from the system. In these embodiments, the system can be referred to as a “closed” system, while recognizing that certain energy losses are unavoidable. In certain embodiments, the system can include a cavity 201, which defines the boundaries of the system. The interior of the cavity can be made from a suitable conductive material, e.g., copper, silver, or gold. In particular embodiments, the interior of the cavity can be made from copper. In other certain embodiments, the interior of the cavity can be made from a dielectric material. In certain embodiments, the cavity includes one or more waveguides (see Example 2).
The system 200 can further include a wave source 202. The wave source can be any device suitable for supplying electromagnetic waves. In certain embodiments, the wave source can be one or more isotropic radiators. In certain embodiments, the wave source is suitable for supplying microwaves. For example, and not limitation, the wave source can include one or more magnetrons, klystrons, or vacuum tubes. In particular embodiments, the wave source includes one or more magnetrons. The wave source can operate at high power levels, e.g., in the kilowatt to megawatt power range.
Using a wave source that can supply microwaves provides certain advantages. Microwaves can have a wavelength from about 1 mm to about 1 m. In certain embodiments, the wavelength can be about 12.2 cm. Microwave wavelengths can be more manageable than other types of electromagnetic waves, such as radio waves (which can have wavelengths up to about 100,000 km) and infrared waves (which can have wavelengths from about 750 nm to about 1 mm). Furthermore, using a magnetron provides certain additional advantages. For example, magnetrons are a readily available and relatively inexpensive compared to certain other wave sources. Furthermore, magnetrons can reliably provide high power for the separation.
The wave source 202 can provide waves having a certain effective transverse wavelength to the cavity 201. The cavity can have a length that is equal to any integer (n) half multiple of the effective transverse wavelength (λeff), as represented by Formula 6:
In certain embodiments, the cavity 201 can have a length equal to the effective transverse wavelength (see Example 1). For example, in
The system 200 can further include at least two polarizers 203, i.e., internal structures within the cavity 201. In certain embodiments, the polarizers can be perpendicular to the wave source 202. With reference to
It should be noted that although this exemplary system 200 includes polarizers, polarizers are not required in all systems according to the disclosed subject matter. For example, a system could be designed to match the frequency of the wave source 203 to the size of the cavity 201, such that all waves travel in a resonance mode and polarizers are not needed to attenuate non-conforming waves. Further, as noted above, because systems according to the disclosed subject matter are operable with waves traveling in multiple resonance modes, the polarizers are not a necessary component of these systems as the cavity will naturally attenuate any waves not travelling in a resonance mode.
In certain embodiments, the system 200 can include a concentrating apparatus 204. The concentrating apparatus can include a pair of concentrators 205 separated by a small gap 206. Some waves can travel through the gap between the concentrators and provide an electric gradient to a sample chamber 208. Other waves can strike the concentrators and be reflected and recycled. In certain embodiments where the length of the cavity 207 is equal to the effective wavelength (λeff), the concentrators can be located at a distance of ¼λeff from the back wall of the cavity, such that the waves are at a maximum when they strike the concentrators.
For the purpose of illustration, and not limitation,
With further reference to
Although the foregoing methods and systems are described with respect to carbon nanotubes, a person having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that these methods and systems can be used to separate particles having diverse properties. For example, the disclosed methods and systems can be used to separate other particles beyond carbon nanotubes based on their electronic structures.
The methods and systems of the presently disclosed subject matter can provide advantages over certain existing technologies. Exemplary advantages include increased energy efficiency and recycling scattered waves to the electric gradient for dielectrophoresis. The disclosed methods and systems can be scaled up to commercial levels because less power is consumed compared to certain existing technologies.
The presently disclosed subject matter will be better understood by reference to the following Examples. These Examples are provided as merely illustrative of the disclosed methods and systems, and should not be considered as a limitation in any way.
In this Example, the effective transverse wavelength is calculated for one specific exemplary system of the presently disclosed subject matter. In this Example, a magnetron is used to provide waves having a frequency of 2.45 GHz and a wavelength of about 12.2 cm. A WR284 radar waveguide is used to convert waves into a single resonance mode. The waveguide has a cross-section of 7.214 cm by 3.404 cm. The waveguide has a lowest order resonance mode (TE1,0) having a cut-off frequency of 2.07 GHz. All other cut-off frequencies exceed 4 GHz. Thus, supplying waves using a 2.45 GHz magnetron ensures wave propagation in only the TE1,0 resonance mode. The effective transverse wavelength (λeff1,0), as given by the effective wave number (κm,n), can be calculated using Formulas 7 and 8.
Thus, the effective transverse wavelength of the system of this Example is about 23.1 cm. The length of the waveguide can be truncated to ensure that its length is equivalent to the effective transverse wavelength, such that the waves traveling in the resonance mode undergo a single wavelength across the length of the system.
In this Example, the quality factor is calculated for exemplary systems of the presently disclosed subject matter. The quality factor (Q) of a resonance system describes how much energy is lost over time, taking into account the materials of the system. It can be generally described as the angular frequency (ω) multiplied by the energy stored over the power lost to the finite conductivities of the materials, as represented by Formula 9.
The quality factor can be calculated for systems including a single waveguide, or multiple waveguides in parallel.
If the waveguide is truncated such that its length is equal to the effective transverse wavelength, as described in Example 1, the electromagnetic waves will travel in a single resonance mode TE1,0,2 (i.e., a single mode standing wave having two antinodes). The quality factor of TE1,0,2 can be expressed in terms of impedance (η=√{square root over (μ/∈)}) and surface resistance
as represented by Formula 10, where a, b, and c are, respectively, the y, x, and z dimensions of the waveguide.
Using the same magnetron and waveguide described above, and where the waveguide is copper (σ≈5.7×107 S/m) and filled with air, the quality factor is about 8551.66. Thus, this system can provide a high quality factor, corresponding to high energy efficiency.
Quality Factor with Multiple Waveguides
However, in certain embodiments, due to the limited cross-sectional area of a single waveguide, it can be desirable to provide a larger system. Therefore, multiple waveguides can be provided in parallel to increase the volume of the system. For example, multiple WR284 radar waveguides can be combined by placing them in parallel and removing the interior walls (while leaving portions of the interior walls in place as polarizers) to form a polarizing cavity. The polarizers are ⅛ of the effective transverse wavelength (λeff1,0), or about 2.89 cm. In such a cavity, power losses, which negatively impact quality factor, are primarily due to the surface resistance of the interior of the cavity (i.e., proportional to the interior surface area). Thus, it is clear that the quality factor of this cavity, in which the interior walls of the waveguides are removed, will be higher than the quality factor of a system having the same number of waveguides in a series configuration. Therefore, the quality factor of the cavity can be represented as in Formula 11.
Even assuming that the quality factor of the cavity (Qcavity) is equal to the quality factor of a series configuration (Qseries), which is the worst case scenario, a cavity containing four waveguides (i=4) has a quality factor of about 2128. Therefore, high quality factors can be achieved even using multiple waveguides.
In this Example, the methods of the presently disclosed subject matter were simulated using finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations to determine the power density (i.e., electric field strength) of the electric gradient. Four simulations were performed, each for 240 periods of simulation. The final periods were averaged to give the following results.
The first simulation modeled an unloaded case (i.e., simulated an empty sample chamber). The maximum power density of the electric field was 526.4 a.u. (all power densities are expressed in terms of arbitrary units). Because this was an unloaded case, the resonance (i.e., the standing waves) was unperturbed.
The second simulation modeled a non-polar solvent having a liquid permittivity (∈l) of about 4. For example, the non-polar solvent can be a mixture of toluene and anisole. The maximum power density of the electric field was 2796.4 a.u. Compared to the first simulation (the unloaded case), the resonance was slightly perturbed.
The third simulation modeled a polar solvent having a liquid permittivity (∈l) of about 80. For example, the polar solvent can be water. The maximum power density of the electric field was 357.46 a.u. Although the resonance was more perturbed than in the first and second simulations, the third simulation still created the desired electric field. That is, the maximum electric field still occurred in the gap between the concentrators. These data show that a broad range of polar and non-polar solvents can be used without destroying the resonance.
The fourth simulation modeled the same non-polar solvent as the second simulation, but introduced apertures to simulate the radiative losses, e.g., of certain existing methods. The maximum power density of the electric field was 13.04 a.u., by far the lowest of all the simulations.
For the purpose of illustration,
In addition to the various embodiments depicted and claimed, the disclosed subject matter is also directed to other embodiments having other combinations of the features disclosed and claimed herein. As such, the particular features presented herein can be combined with each other in other manners within the scope of the disclosed subject matter such that the disclosed subject matter includes any suitable combination of the features disclosed herein. The foregoing description of specific embodiments of the disclosed subject matter has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosed subject matter to those embodiments disclosed.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the methods and systems of the disclosed subject matter without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosed subject matter. Thus, it is intended that the disclosed subject matter include modifications and variations that are within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a Continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/062900, filed Nov. 18, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/278,072, filed Jan. 13, 2016, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7074310 | Smalley et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7161107 | Krupke et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7247670 | Malenfant et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8097141 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8193430 | Papadimitrakopoulos et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246928 | Rao et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8365923 | Raston et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8697026 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8916395 | Adiga et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8961762 | Ihara et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9079766 | Picconatto et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9079775 | Howard et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9102527 | Burke et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9114995 | Wainerdi et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20030042128 | Harutyunyan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040191157 | Harutyunyan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060231399 | Smalley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242741 | Krupke et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070075263 | Gorrell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095667 | Lau et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070264185 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090252946 | Marsh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090283405 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100044227 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110024333 | Han | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110108422 | Heller et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110155649 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174701 | Gallaway | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130259085 | Green et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140346044 | Chi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2012177222 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO 2014136981 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burke, “Nanodielectrophoresis: Electronic Nanotweezers,” Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, X:1-19 (2003). |
Fitzhugh, Scalable Dielectrophoresis of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Thesis, Jul. 24, 2015 (67 pages). |
International Search Report dated Apr. 7, 2017 in International Application No. PCT/US16/62900. |
Krupke et al., “Separation of Metallic from Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Science, 301:344-347 (2003). |
Krupke et al., “Thin Films of Metallic Carbon Nanotubes Prepared by Dielectrophoresis,” Advanced Materials, 18:1468-1470 (2006). |
Krupke et al., “Surface Conductance Induced Dielectrophoresis of Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Nano Letters 4(8):1395-1399 (2004). |
Mendes et al., “Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Separation by Type Using Dielectrophoresis,” J. Phys. Chem. B 112(25):7467-7477 (2008). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180327266 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62278072 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2016/062900 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 16028066 | US |