Patent Application
20180351670
The following references are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes:
U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0268225 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/784,414, filed May 20, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling” (hereinafter “Cronie I”);
U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0302478 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/982,777, filed Dec. 30, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Power and Pin Efficient Chip-to-Chip Communications with Common-Mode Resilience and SSO Resilience” (hereinafter “Cronie II”);
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/030,027, filed Feb. 17, 2011, naming Harm Cronie, Amin Shokrollahi and Armin Tajalli, entitled “Methods and Systems for Noise Resilient, Pin-Efficient and Low Power Communications with Sparse Signaling Codes” (hereinafter “Cronie III”); and
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/463,742, filed May 3, 2012, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Finite State Encoders and Decoders for Vector Signaling Codes” (hereafter called “Cronie IV”).
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/603,107, filed Sep. 9, 2012, naming Brian Holden and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Methods and Systems for Selection of Unions of Vector Signaling Codes for Power and Pin Efficient Chip-To-Chip Communication” (hereinafter called “Holden I”).
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/671,426, filed Nov. 7, 2012, naming Brian Holden and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Crossbar Switch Decoder for Vector Signaling Codes” (hereinafter called “Holden II”).
The following additional references to prior art have been cited in this application:
[Buchwaldl] U.S. Pat. No. 6,509,773, filed Apr. 30, 2001 by Buchwald et al., entitled “Phase interpolator device and method.”
In communication systems, information may be transmitted from one physical location to another. Furthermore, it is typically desirable that the transport of this information is reliable, is fast and consumes a minimal amount of resources. One of the most common information transfer mediums is the serial communications link, which may be based on a single wire circuit relative to ground or other common reference, multiple such circuits relative to ground or other common reference, or multiple circuits used in relation to each other. An example of the latter utilizes differential signaling (DS). Differential signaling operates by sending a signal on one wire and the opposite of that signal on a paired wire; the signal information is represented by the difference between the wires rather than their absolute values relative to ground or other fixed reference.
Differential signaling enhances the recoverability of the original signal at the receiver, over single ended signaling (SES), by cancelling crosstalk and other common-mode noise, but a side benefit of the technique is that the Simultaneous Switching Noise (SSN) transients generated by the two signals together is nearly zero; if both outputs are presented with an identical load, the transmit demand on its power supply will be constant, regardless of the data being sent. Any induced currents produced by terminating the differential lines in the receiver will similarly cancel out, minimizing noise induction into the receiving system.
There are a number of signaling methods that maintain the desirable properties of DS while increasing pin-efficiency over DS. Many of these attempts operate on more than two wires simultaneously, using binary signals on each wire, but mapping information in groups of bits.
Vector signaling is a method of signaling. With vector signaling, pluralities of signals on a plurality of wires are considered collectively although each of the plurality of signals may be independent. Each of the collective signals is referred to as a component and the number of plurality of wires is referred to as the “dimension” of the vector. In some embodiments, the signal on one wire is entirely dependent on the signal on another wire, as is the case with DS pairs, so in some cases the dimension of the vector may refer to the number of degrees of freedom of signals on the plurality of wires instead of the number of wires in the plurality of wires.
With binary vector signaling, each component takes on a coordinate value (or “coordinate”, for short) that is one of two possible values. As an example, eight SES wires may be considered collectively, with each component/wire taking on one of two values each signal period. A “code word” of this binary vector signaling is one of the possible states of that collective set of components/wires. A “vector signaling code” or “vector signaling vector set” is the collection of valid possible code words for a given vector signaling encoding scheme. A “binary vector signaling code” refers to a mapping and/or set of rules to map information bits to binary vectors.
With non-binary vector signaling, each component has a coordinate value that is a selection from a set of more than two possible values. A “non-binary vector signaling code” refers to a mapping and/or set of rules to map information bits to non-binary vectors.
Examples of vector signaling methods are described in Cronie I, Cronie II, Cronie III, and Cronie IV.
While non-binary vector signaling methods can provide substantial improvements regarding the tradeoff of pin-efficiency, power efficiency and noise resilience as compared to traditional signaling methods, there are some applications wherein additional improvements are possible.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, processes and apparatuses provide for transmitting data over physical channels such that the signals transmitted are resilient to common mode noise, do not require a common reference at the transmission and reception points, and can produce a pin-efficiency of 100% with relatively low power dissipation for encoding and decoding. Corresponding decoders at reception points are also disclosed. In some embodiments of the invention, different voltage, current, etc. levels are used for signaling and more than two levels may be used, such as a ternary sparse signaling code wherein each wire signal has one of three values.
Hardware elements may be provided to provide storage for symbols of input information used for selecting code words, processing hardware to convert symbols to signals, parsing symbols into separate partitions, storing results, and providing the partitions in sequence as signals. Various embodiments are given with reference to specific hardware implementations of small area and low power dissipation. Embodiments are described which discriminate between different subsets of code words in a power and pin efficient matter.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, advanced methods of detection for vector signaling codes are described, including vector signaling detection by means of generalized comparators and vector signaling detection by means of generalized on-level slicing. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, advanced methods of communicating vector signaling codes are also presented, including vector signaling utilizing generalized pseudo differential signaling and vector signaling utilizing temporal signaling.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, techniques are presented to compensate for channel skew, including receive-side sub unit interval analog skew compensation, receive-side skew compensation utilizing generalized comparators, receive-side skew compensation utilizing temporal signaling, and transmitter-side skew compensation. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, techniques are described which avoid the impact of channel skew, including receive-side skew avoidance utilizing generalized pseudo-differential signaling, and receive-side skew avoidance utilizing temporal signaling.
This Brief Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Brief Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Other objects and/or advantages of the present invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the Detailed Description and the included drawings.
Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings. Same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
This disclosure is organized in two parts. The first part describes several types of advanced detectors for vector signaling communication links. The second part describes several types of skew avoidance and skew tolerance circuits for vector signaling communications links.
Cronie I, Cronie II, and Holden I describe methods of detecting the symbols that have been sent on a vector signaling link. This disclosure describes several additional methods.
A detection mechanism called maximum-likelihood decoding has been described for use where permutation modulation coding is used for chip-to-chip communication. Holden I teaches a decoder using comparators that compare signal values on two communication wires, producing results that inform sorting or ranking actions within such decoder.
The operation of such a comparator can be succinctly described using the “sign” notation, given in the following: sign(x)=+1 if x>0, sign(x)=−1 if x<0, and sign(x) is undefined if x=0. That is, if two values entering a comparator are equal, or close to equal, then the value output by the comparator can be a +1 or a −1, and it is not clear a-priori which of these values is output. Such comparators are called “simple comparators” hereinafter.
In some applications, it may be the case that simple comparators are not sufficient to detect the codewords of a vector signaling code. As an example, consider the union of two PM-codes, one generated as permutations of the vector (1,0,0,−1), and one generated as permutations of the vector (1,1,−1,−1). This union contains 18 codewords, whereas each constituent PM-code contains at most 12 codewords, versus the 16 unique codewords needed to represent a four-bit data value. It is therefore not possible to transmit 4 bits on 4 wires using one PM-code alone, whereas with the union of these two PM-codes a full pin-efficient transmission on 4 wires is possible. Such transmission will be feasible if detection of the codewords can be done with efficient circuitry. It is easy to see that even a full set of 6 simple comparators between pairs of wires is not sufficient to detect a codeword, as those comparisons give no information as to which of the two constituent PM-codes include the received word.
In an application where the values on n communication wires need to be ranked, the number of simple comparators needed is n*(n−1)/2, the number of all un-ordered pairs of integers in the range 1, 2, . . . , n. In some applications this number may be too large. For example, where n is 10, the number of simple comparators required is 45, which may be too large to permit implementation in a given application.
For these reasons, it is important to devise circuits that can be implemented more efficiently than those requiring unacceptable numbers of simple comparators, as well as enabling detection of codewords that would otherwise be undetectable. Such circuits will be described, using an element that hereinafter is termed a multi-input comparator.
A multi-input comparator with coefficients a0, a1, . . . , am−1 is a circuit that accepts as its input a vector (x0, x1, . . . , xm−1) and outputs
sign(a0*x0+ . . . +am−1*xm−1), Eqn. 1
with the definition of the sign-function given above. As such, a simple comparator may be seen to be a two input multi-input comparator with coefficients 1 and −1, hence may be considered to be a special case of a multi-input comparator.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, the coefficients of a multi-input comparator are integers. In such cases, one circuit implementation of a multi-input comparator is given with reference to
Another multi-input comparator also having the same coefficients is illustrated using a simplified notation in
A multi-input comparator is common mode resistant if the sum of all its coefficients is zero. It is easy to see that if a multi-input comparator is common mode resistant, then simultaneously increasing the values of its inputs by the same amount will not result in any change of the output of the multi-input comparator.
Multi-input comparators may be susceptible to more thermal noise than simple comparators. If the inputs of a multi-input comparator are independently changed by additive white Gaussian noise of mean 0 and variance σ2, the output of the comparator is perturbed by additive white Gaussian noise of mean 0 and variance
σ2(a02, + . . . +am−12) Eqn. 2
If, for a given input (x0, x1, x2, . . . , xm−1) and (y0, y1, y2, . . . , yt−1) the value
is nonzero, then the error probability of this multi-input comparator is Qσ(α), wherein Qσ(x) is the probability that a normal random variable of mean 0 and variance σ2 has a value larger than or equal to x. Hereinafter we call a the “sensitivity” of the multi-input comparator with respect to its input. Note that by definition sensitivity is nonzero, i.e. if the input of a multi-input comparator is such that the value a as defined in Eqn. 3 is zero, then the sensitivity of the comparator with respect to that particular input is “undefined.”
A set S of multi-input comparators is said to “detect” a vector signaling code C if the following holds: For any two codewords c and d, there is a multi-input comparator in the set S such that the value of that comparator on both c and d is not undefined, and the values are different. This means that the codewords of the vector signaling code are uniquely determined by the outputs of all the multi-input comparators in S when the codeword is used as the input. If a set of S of multi-input comparators detects the vector signaling code C, then we define the “minimum sensitivity” of S with respect to C as the minimum sensitivity of any of the comparators applied to any of the codewords, provided that the sensitivity is defined. The notion of minimum sensitivity stands for the maximum amount of thermal noise that can be applied to the codewords while guaranteeing a given detection error probability. Several examples below will illustrate this notion.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a set of 6 multi-input comparators with the coefficients of Table 1 are shown to detect the vector signaling PM-code generated as permutations of the vector (1,0,0,0,−1). A minimum of 10 simple comparators would be needed to provide the same detection capability, thus using multi-input comparators reduces the number of comparators by a factor of almost 2.
The 20 codewords of this PM-code are given in the leftmost five columns of
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a set of 8 multi-input comparators with the coefficients of Table 2 are shown to detect the vector signaling code obtained as the union of the PM-code generated as permutations of the vector (1,0,0,−1) and the PM-code generated as permutations of the vector (1,1,−1,−1). Note that it is not possible to detect this code using simple comparators alone.
The codewords of this code are given by the leftmost four columns of
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a set of 8 comparators with the coefficients of Table 3 are also shown to detect the same code as used in the previous example.
These comparators indeed detect the code, as can be seen by a simple calculation using the codewords given by the leftmost four columns of
In situations where thermal noise is not a big issue the behavior of these signaling methods is significantly better than that of PAM-4 since the alphabet they use is ternary rather than quaternary. In practice, this means that the eye diagrams observed at the receiver have a larger vertical opening. This means that these schemes would not require as much equalization as PAM-4 signaling, and hence require less power.
Using multi-input comparators, it is thus possible to construct signaling schemes with simple detection mechanisms that have at least the same pin-efficiency as PAM-4, but perform much better in practice in terms of noise resilience.
A further embodiment of detection of vector signaling codes uses a generalized set of slicers that have their slicing point set to the levels of differences between symbols on the wires. This is a specific special case of the use of multi-input comparators.
Traditional single ended communications receivers use a reference level that is placed at or near the vertical mid-point of the eye. For example, if the symbol levels for a single-ended link are 0 and 1 volt, the reference level is set at ½ volts. If the receive level is greater than ½ volt, the receiver decides that the received symbol level is greater than the reference, then a one is received. If the received symbol level is less than ½ volt, then the receiver decides that a zero is received. A more sophisticated single ended receiver generates a reference signal that is at the mid-point of the range of actual received input values averaged over a moderate period of time. This method allows the receiver to be robust to a variety of impairments on the link, but adds complexity.
Differential receivers use the complementary signal that is sent on the opposite wire of the differential pair as the reference. A differential receiver uses a differential amplifier at the input of said receiver to determine which of the input signals is higher than the other signal. The resulting difference value is amplified. Said amplified signal is then compared against a fixed reference, typically set at a value that represents the midpoint of the amplified signal. Said reference is typically related only to the operating parameters of said input differential amplifier circuit.
Vector signaling code receivers, as taught by Holden I and Holden II, typically compare the signals that are on the input wires, as an example, using six differential amplifiers across each combination of four input wires. An example vector signaling code transmitter may emit three-level symbols, also known as ternary symbols, on each of the four wires. Thus, each of said differential amplifiers compares two ternary symbols. When two ternary symbols are compared, the difference has five possible values. For example, if the ternary symbols have values of +1, 0, −1, the difference will have the possible values +2, +1, 0, −1, −2. The differential amplifier plus slicer circuit used in the example vector signaling code receiver output a 1 signal when the difference is +2 or +1, an indeterminate value when the difference is 0, and a 0 value when the difference is −1 or −2, these outputs being presented as inputs to a decoder circuit that can use the slicer outputs to discriminate between the input codewords that must have been sent to produce that slicer output. Said decoder can work around the uncertainty caused by the said indeterminate values because of the design of the code which, among other properties, has its Hamming distance set to a minimum of two. The receiver has a “global error” of one bit because if it cannot distinguish between inputs that are at the same value, but the code can distinguish between any two input conditions that have less than two bits of error. Since the differential plus slicer circuit does not need to distinguish between any three adjacent input levels, the noise tolerance of the receiver is also improved.
More information can be obtained about the input conditions by extending this concept. By adding or subtracting offsets equal to one symbol level difference from one of the two input signals before taking the input signal difference, additional knowledge about the input can be derived. The use of said additional knowledge is dependent on the codes that the decoder is trying to discriminate. In general, codewords with many non-zero values are most easily discriminated using this technique.
As an example, an embodiment of generalized on-level slicing is applied to a four wire ternary vector signaling system where the input wires are labeled A, B, C and D. Using the vector signaling system disclosed in Holden I, simple comparators would be assigned to the differences A−B, A−C, A−D, B−C, B−D and C−D. However, the example embodiment instead uses twelve multi-input comparators to determine the value of the differences A−1−B, A+1−B, A−1−C, A+1−C, A−1−D, A+1−D, B−1−C, B+1−C, B−1−D, B+1−D, C−1−D and C+1−D. Further, a code is employed whose values are more at the extremes of the range of values. One such code for a four wire system is (+,+,−,−), (+,−,+,−), (+,−,−,+), (−,+,+,−), (−,+,−,+), (−,−,+,+), with the twelve comparators above forming a discriminator for said code, wherein a “+” stands for the value +1, and a “−” stands for the value “−1”.
As was demonstrated in the previous example, reference voltages or input offsets may be used with both simple comparators and multi-input comparators to bias results away from ambiguous output states, and/or to facilitate detection of codeword attributes such as symbol sum. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, examples of use include bias voltage 303 in
The previous example describes a code having a maximum extent ranging from +1 to −1 on any one wire, leading to a maximum difference between any pair of wires (that is, seen by any one comparator) ranging from +2 to −2, a span of 4 units. However, the actual received signal levels corresponding to said difference are likely to be attenuated by the channel, so in this example the actual maximum signal extent appearing at any one comparator under the existing conditions may be 400 mv. By using a four to one voltage divider, that actual value representing four units of span may be reduced to a voltage of 100 mv, which thus corresponds to one unit difference at the receiver in actual practice. This 100 mv voltage may then be added to or subtracted from the appropriate comparator input to provide the desired 1 unit offset.
The result of this circuit is that the value at which the comparator output is indeterminate is shifted. Revising the earlier ternary signaling example to include this +1 offset: if the input difference not including the offset is +2, +1 or 0, the slicer output is 1. If the difference is −1, the slicer output is indeterminate. If the difference is −2, the slicer output is 0. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, introduction of such offsets may be used to minimize indeterminate comparator results, increase noise immunity, and/or improve codeword detection.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, the most recent sample that has been subsequently determined by the decoder to be of the desired symbol value is used as the offset. This type of circuit is known as a decision feedback circuit. As shown in
Generalized pseudo-differential vector signaling increases the alphabet size of the code using additional symbols, and may add additional wires to the transmission lines on which this extended symbol alphabet is transmitted, or use some of the existing transmission lines to transmit information needed for the detection circuitry, while using the other transmission lines for sending data. In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, these wires are grouped into pairs and correlated signals are transmitted across these pairs. This signaling system may offer tradeoffs between noise tolerance, skew tolerance, and total throughput.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention a ternary alphabet is used for transmission over 4 transmission lines. The elements of the alphabet may be identified as −1, 0, or 1. A further embodiment adds two additional elements to the alphabet, which may for example be the elements ½ and −½ and, optionally, two additional wires to the transmission line which carry at every clock cycle either the values (½, −½), or (−½, ½). The other 4 wires may carry any ternary values, or elements from a ternary code designed to combat noise on the wires.
Since in every case the compared values are distinct, (that is, in no case are the expected values being compared identical,) the comparators will unambiguously yield either a value of +1, meaning that the first input to the comparator is bigger than the second input, or a value of −1 meaning that the first input to the comparator is smaller than the second input. Given those comparator outputs, the actual values of the transmitted codeword represented by A, B, C, D, E, F may be obtained in the following way:
A=(x0+x1)/2
B=(x2+x3)/2
C=(x4+x5)/2
D=(x6+x7)/2
E=x8/2
F=−x8/2
It should be noted that these results for A, B, C, D represent absolute ternary values (i.e. +1, 0, or −1) even though the comparators used to obtain the results are binary and operate differentially, that is, between inputs rather than from one input to a fixed reference such as ground.
If the original vector signaling (or other type of ternary) code on the first four wires is capable of transmitting b bits, then the new code is capable of transmitting b+1 bits, wherein the additional bit is given by x8.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, the elements of the vector signaling code are sent over one or more wires at different times. For example, a vector consisting of four symbols can be sent in one clock cycle over four wires, in two clock cycles over two wires, or in four clock cycles over a single wire. Similarly, a vector of eight symbols can be sent over eight wires on one clock cycle, four wires on two clock cycles, two wires on four clock cycles, or one wire on eight clock cycles. When the vector is sent over more than one clock cycle, the receiver must have a means of determining which vector element or elements are represented within each received clock cycle. That is, this method of signaling requires that the vector codes be recovered with the aid of a form of framing of the codes on the wires. Two general types of framing are compatible with this method: boot-time training, and continuous statistical framing.
Boot-time training is a well-known method of aligning a receiver by sending a known pattern at link initialization or boot-time to synchronize framing at the transmitter and receiver. This method is common in computer-system links, such as the boot-time training used by the PCI Express specification to align the skew of the lanes that make up a PCI Express link.
Statistical framing is another well-known method of synchronizing transmitter and receiver framing. This method organizes the stream of codewords comprising the communication so as to have a unique reserved sequence or statistically repeating signature that can be found by a statistical framer. The reserved sequence technique uses a designated codeword or other transmission sequence that is periodically introduced into the transmitted data stream and has an unambiguous framing interpretation. Ambiguity may be eliminated by reserving that pattern exclusively for this use, or by disallowing competing patterns from being used. The repeating signature technique of statistical framing utilizes a characteristic of a properly-framed data stream such as maintenance of correct error-detection or error-correction sequence, which would be statistically unlikely to appear in an improperly framed sequence.
Statistical framing methods are commonly used in telecommunication links because of the robustness of said technique to line impairments including impairments in which the receiver erroneously receives too many or too few bits. Both the SONET/SDH telecommunications and 10 Gigabit Ethernet families of specifications employ this sort of framing. This well-known method is robust because the receiver is always checking as to whether it sees the pattern in the incoming link. If the receiver does not see the pattern, said receiver drops into a mode where said receiver hunts for a regular reoccurrence of the pattern.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention four symbols are sent in two clock times over 2 wires. The vector signaling code used in this example is the union of the permutation modulation codes generated by the vectors (1,0,0,−1) and (1,1,−1,−1). The code thus consists of 18 codewords, of which 12 are permutations of the vector (1,0,0,−1) and six are permutations of the vector (1,1,−1,−1). In the following, the symbol “+” is used for the value +1 and the symbol “−” for the value −1.
Sixteen of the 18 available codewords are used to encode four bits of user data. To illustrate use of the statistical framing technique with this example, the codeword (+,+,−,−) is used as one of the 16 data-encoding codewords and as the framing identifier, and the codeword (−, +, +) is reserved from use to insure the framing identifier is unique. The remaining codeword or codewords may be assigned to auxiliary functions. One embodiment in accordance with the invention assigns a reserved codeword as an alternative to one of the sixteen codewords used for data encoding; as examples, transmission of the alternative code instead of the normal code may then represent transmission of one bit of data in a secondary serial communications channel, may introduce a desirable signal transition on a run-length-limited wire, or may introduce a desirable transition of the common mode voltage of the wire pair.
An illustration of the transmitting operation in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention is shown in
An illustration of a receiving operation in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention is shown in
The six pairwise comparison results from comparators 703 and the one sum comparison result 714 are input to a decoder 704, which recovers four bits of data 705 from the seven inputs, and optionally may also produce auxiliary output 708. The four bits of data are then descrambled 705 using the same method as was applied at the transmitter to produce four bits of output data 707.
If the statistical framing technique is used, a telecom-style statistical framer circuit 710 is used to monitor identification of the +,+ to −,− transition on both lines that represents the correct framing of the unique codeword +,+,−,− which is sent as +,+ during the first clock time and −,− during the second clock time. This pattern may be further identified by the codeword decoder, which may issue a specific output 709 to the framer when that codeword is identified. The scrambler circuit employed on the input data ensures that the pattern will happen regularly, statistically occurring on average approximately every 32 clock times. While the design of framer circuits in general is well known, use of a framer circuit to detect a particular pattern simultaneously occurring on two lines may be novel.
If the boot-time framer technique is used, the transmitter must emit a known vector or sequence of values on the wires when the link is first enabled, to permit the framer 710 to determine which set of samples is the first and which is the second. The decoder may similarly identify this indication 709, or it may be identified by a circuit within the framer 710 itself. Once so identified, the correct sample sequence is thereafter maintained by the framer's counting of clock times.
The example embodiment may have up to two Simultaneous Switched Output signals within a single symbol time frame, but collectively has a SSO of 0 over a two clock time interval. Signals generated by this embodiment may be passed through AC coupling capacitors. As this signaling method introduces imbalance between the two wires, the electromagnetic interference emitted using this method may be higher than that of a pure differential circuit, so shielding or ground-plane techniques may be required for the signal path.
The encoder and decoder circuits for the described four symbol vector embodiment in accordance with the invention preferably uses two clocks to transmit one vector, but other implementations are possible. Similarly, an eight symbol vector embodiment in accordance with the invention preferably uses four clocks to transmit one vector, but other implementations are possible.
The described embodiment utilizing a four symbol vector transmitted over two wires in two clock intervals can realize PAM-4 throughput with nearly PAM-3 signal-to-noise ratio, in a reasonably sized pair-oriented design that has good SSO properties and only moderate common mode rejection impairment. The throughput gain can be even larger when longer vector signaling codes are employed.
In traditional differential circuits, the wires in the system are provisioned in pairs with tight intra-pair skew requirements and loose inter-pair skew requirements. Most modern standards for systems are written with this set of requirements for at least some high speed circuits in the system, including PCIe and Backplane Ethernet.
Vector signaling circuits rely on the property of the wires of a system being provisioned as a set with minimal intra-ensemble skew. That is, the entire collection of wires is treated as a set. For optimal performance, skew must be compensated for across such a set of wires in a vector-signaling circuit. Vector signaling circuits that have had their skew compensated for will not perform with as good common-mode noise rejection as those which natively have low skew, but they will perform with the same Gaussian noise properties as a natively low skew circuit. Said compensated circuits will also produce somewhat more electromagnetic interference than ensembles that are wired with no skew.
Various circuits and methods exist in prior art which compensate for skew on the wires as long as the skew is less than one Unit Interval (UI). One example is provided by [Buchwaldl], which teaches selection among multiple reference clocks having different predetermined phases, allowing receiver sampling to occur with different reference phases on each wire, thereby compensating a skew of up to 1 UI among the wires. Said methods are referred to in this disclosure as Sub-UI De-Skew (SubUIDS).
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a SubUIDS circuit corrects inter-wire skew of up to one symbol period or UI by re-aligning the analog signals of each wire using, as an example, sample-and-hold circuits 702 in the receive signal path of each channel as shown in
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a skew tolerant vector signaling system may require the skew amount to be known only at the receiver. This technique assumes that a SubUIDS circuit has been employed in the receiver to align the receiver input data to the clock used by the subsequent circuit.
For each pair of wires an associated code is chosen, wherein a code is a subset of S2 and S is a finite alphabet. If there are p pairs of wires available and the corresponding codes are denoted by C0, . . . , Cp−1, then the transmission code on the 2p wires of which the transmission lines is comprised is given by the set of all vectors of the form (x0, x1, x2, x3, . . . , x2(p−1), x2p−1) is an wherein (x0, x1) is an element of C0, (x2, x3) is an element of C1, . . . , and (x2(p−1), x2p−1) is an element of Cp−1. The number of elements in this transmission code is therefore the product of the number of elements in C0, . . . , Cp−1. This code is skew-tolerant since every word received is a valid codeword, no matter what the skew on the wires is.
The detection and decoding of the skew can be done in a variety of ways. A preferred embodiment uses multi-input comparators, as described previously.
In a first example, the number p of pairs of wires is 2 to transmit 3 bits of data, the code C0 is the code {(−1,−1),(−1,1),(1,−1),(1,1)} and the code C1 is the differential code {(1,−1),(−1,1)}.
The codewords of this transmission code are given below, with the indices A, B, C, and D used to name the 4 wires.
This code is binary. An encoding process for this code is as follows: given three bits (b0, b1, b2), the values on the wires A, B, C, D are given as (−1)b0, (−1)b1, −(−1)b2, (−1)b2. One embodiment of multi-input comparators to detect this code is:
x0=sign(2*A−(C+D))
x1=sign(2*B−(C+D))
x2=sign(2*C−(B+D))
which are also shown schematically as multi-input comparators in simplified notation in
The minimum sensitivity of this set of comparators is (2/√{square root over (6)}). This leads to a coding scheme that is about 5 dB better than a PAM-4 transmission, or 4.5 dB worse than differential signaling. The pin-efficiency of this scheme is ¾, which is much better than the pin-efficiency of differential signaling.
A further embodiment in accordance with the invention based on a transmission system of more than 2 pairs of wires incorporates a variation of the previous method to increase pin-efficiency. If there are p pairs available, then the vector signaling codes C0, . . . , Cp−2 can be chosen to equal to {(−1,−1),(−1,1),(1,−1),(1,1)} whereas the vector signaling code Cp−1 can be chosen to be {(1,−1),(−1,1)}. Very similar detection schemes as the above can be used for this code, leading to a skew-tolerant code with pin-efficiency 2*(p−1)/2p, and a noise immunity that is 5 dB better than that of a PAM-4 transmission, without suffering from reference generation noise as PAM-4 does.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a slightly higher pin-efficiency is obtained using a code on 4 wires in which C0={(−1,1),(1,−1),(0,0)} and C1={(−1,1),(1,−1),(−1,−1),(1,1)}. The codewords of this transmission code are given below, with the indices A, B, C, and D used to name the 4 wires.
A detector for this code is comprised of the four multi-input comparators:
x0=sign(A+2*B−3*C)
x1=sign(A+2*B−3*D)
x2=sign(A+2*C−3*B)
x3=sign(B+2*C−3*A)
which are also shown schematically as multi-input comparators in simplified notation in
A further embodiment of the invention for a transmission system of more than 2 pairs of wires provides an additional increase of pin-efficiency. If there are p pairs available, then the vector signaling codes C0, . . . , Cp−2 can be chosen to equal to {(−1,−1),(−1,1),(1,−1),(1,1)} whereas the vector signaling code Cp−1 can be chosen to be {(1,−1),(−1,1)}. Very similar detection schemes as the above can be used for this code, leading to a skew-tolerant code with pin-efficiency 2*(p−1)/2p, and a noise immunity that is 1.3 dB better than that of a PAM-4 transmission, and does not suffer from reference generation noise as PAM-4 does.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention a four wire transmission system uses the codes C0={(−1,1),(1,−1)} and C1={(−1,−1),(−1,0), (−1,1), (0,−1), (0,1), (1,−1),(1,0),(1,1)} to obtain a pin-efficiency of one or larger. Using the indices A, B, C, D to name the four wires, the codewords of this transmission code are given below.
A detector for this code is comprised of the five multi-input comparators:
x0=sign(3*C+D−4*B)
x1=sign(3*D+C−4*B)
x2=sign(3*C+D−4*A)
x3=sign(3*D+C−4*A)
x4=sign(A+3*D−4*C)
which are also shown schematically as multi-input comparators in simplified notation in
A further embodiment of the invention may be applied to transmission systems having more than two pairs of wires. If there are p pairs available, then the vector signaling codes C1, . . . , Cp−1 can be chosen to equal {(−1,−1),(−1,0), (−1,1), (0,−1), (0,1), (1,−1),(1,0),(1,1)} whereas the vector signaling code C0 can be chosen to be {(1,−1),(−1,1)}. Very similar detection schemes as the above can be used for this code, leading to a skew-tolerant code with pin-efficiency 1.5-1/p, and a noise immunity that is 1.3 dB worse than that of a PAM-4 transmission, without suffering from reference generation noise as PAM-4 does. The pin-efficiency of this scheme is significantly higher than that of PAM-4, whereas its thermal noise immunity is only slightly worse.
Generalized pseudo-differential signaling, as described earlier in this disclosure, can be used to counter skew on the transmission wires. Referring to the example given above, detection of the signals is based on comparison with the differential pair (e,f) comprising the last two wires only, and this comparison uniquely determines the values on the wires. Once these values are known, they may be stored, and later retrieved by a skew compensation unit that knows the amount of skew on every wire relative to the (e,f) differential pair. The values thus obtained may then be provided to a decoder to retrieve the bits.
This technique is preferentially used with a SubUIDS circuit in the receiver to align the receiver input data to the clock used by the subsequent circuits.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, it is assumed as an example that the end-to-end propagation delay of the 4 wires in units of symbol intervals is 3, 3, 2, 2 respectively, and the end-to-end propagation delay of the additional two wires is 1. This is illustrated in
Because of these discrepancies in propagation time, at any time instance t the receiver receives on wires a and b the symbols transmitted at time instance t−3, on wires c and d the symbols transmitted at time t−2, and on wires e and f the symbols transmitted at time instance t−1. For the purposes of this description, we may suppose that the encoder is using a union of the PM codes generated by (+1,0,0,−1), augmented by the four vectors (+1,−1,+1,−1), (+1,−1,−1,+1), (−1,+1,+1,−1), (−1,+1,−1,+1), leading to transmission of four bits on four wires. Suppose that the following sequence of 5 bit vectors is to be transmitted over 7 clock cycles over the four original and 2 additional transmission wires:
The sequence of values transmitted on the 6 wires over the 7 clock cycles may then be:
Because of the skew, the values received on wires a, b, c, d, e at the various time instances follow the pattern:
with the entries in this matrix corresponding to the time instance the corresponding value was sent on the corresponding wire. For example, the value “t” in row “d” of column “Time t+2” means that the value received on wire d at time instance t+2 is the value that was sent on that wire at time instance t.
Based on this, the received values on the wires at the various clock cycles will be:
Herein, an “x” means that the corresponding value is outside the time window considered in this example.
The values on the wires are determined using the previously described generalized pseudo-differential vector signaling receive processing. These values may be stored, and then recombined using the knowledge of the skew amounts on the wires obtained by the receiver to obtain f. For example, at time t+6 the receiver may determine the values transmitted at time t+3 on the wires as (1,−1,1,−1,−½, ½). This can then be decoded to the bit values (1,1,0,1,1).
This receive skew compensation process in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Additional embodiments utilizing this aspect of the invention are possible. For example, the additional two wires may not carry any information, and always be at signal levels of ½ and −½, or vice-versa. As another example, the additional two wires may simply alternate ½ and −½ values, providing a reference clock to the receiver. Where the code on the original wires uses an alphabet of size a, and a is odd, a−1 pairs of additional wires may be added to the transmission lines wherein each pair carries complementary values and wherein these values may be additional values added to the alphabet leading to a transmission alphabet of size 2*a−1.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a vector signaled code may be communicated in the presence of inter-pair skew by having the transmitter send the symbols from a vector on fewer wires or wire pairs than there are symbols in successive time intervals. As one example, a receiver recovers the vector from successive samples transmitted on a single wire pair as shown in
This detection in the presence of inter-pair skew assumes that a SubUIDS circuit has been employed in the receiver to align the receiver input data to the clock used by the subsequent circuit if more than two wires are used in the circuit and optionally if two wires are used.
It is observed that any form of vector signaling will have impaired high-frequency Receive-end Common-Mode Rejection (RxCMR) in the presence of skew. If a given embodiment must have some common mode rejection impairment, then it is acceptable to spread that impairment between its transmit and receive ends. This method spreads this high-frequency RxCMR impairment into a combination of Transmit-side Common-Mode Rejection (TxCMR) and RxCMR impairment. In some circuits, particularly chip to chip interconnect circuits, Common-Mode rejection is not the dominant requirement placed on the circuit. For example, in a situation where the pin-out and the semiconductor process node are both fixed and the chip to chip link is not overly long, by sending a vector signaling codeword over a pair of wires in time succession, the throughput can be greatly increased over the throughput possible with conventional differential signaling.
Said time-based receive side skew compensation circuit can also be used on code vectors of more than four symbols. The vector codes that employ six or eight symbols provide more throughput as compared to four symbols. The use of four analog samples has the property of keeping the cutoff frequency for the TxCMR and RxCMR impairment to the frequency that corresponds to just one symbol time of difference between the times that each pair of symbols was on the wire. The use of additional symbols lowers cutoff frequency for good TxCMR and RxCMR. The period over which the collective Simultaneous Switching Noise (SSN) is equal to 0 but in which the instantaneous SSN is not equal to zero, increases with the number of symbols. The imbalance caused by non-zero instantaneous SSN may cause additional power supply noise within both the transmitter and the receiver. Additionally, the electromagnetic interference emitted also gets worse as the number of signals increases.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, skew may be compensated at the transmitter through the use of a multiple-constraint encoder-decoder circuit, when both the transmitter and the receiver can agree on the inter-pair skew that the circuit is experiencing. This technique assumes that a SubUIDS circuit has been employed in the receiver to align the receiver input data to the clock used by the subsequent circuit. An encoder and decoder pair is used, which in some embodiments may have a higher complexity.
The operation of the encoder is illustrated in
A receiver containing a storage device as previously described in
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, the available codewords that meet all of the constraints are unequally distributed throughout the range of possible codewords resulting in an unequal throughput for the encoder-decoder pair. In the absence of an additional circuit, this type of circuit would not be able to deliver a predictable throughput to the circuit utilizing the link.
However, in certain situations, the throughput of the next time period after each possible symbol that can be send during this time period is known at design time. In one embodiment, an additional throughput balancing encoder-decoder pair is used, which assigns more selective input codewords to choices that will lead to lower throughput on the next clock and less selective input codewords to choices that will lead to higher throughput on the next clock. The decoder reverses this process.
Said throughput-balancing encoder-decoder pair can be implemented such that the throughput is constant or roughly constant, independent of what the input data is.
An example throughput-balancing encoder-decoder pair in accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention operates as follows: Let us say that we need to transmit three bits of information each time period. Because of the combined effects of the various constraints on the transmitter, if we send either a 000b or a 111b in this time period, we will only be able to send two bits of information next time period, but we will be able to send at least three bits on the time period after that. If we send either a 011b or 100b this period, we will be able to send four bits of information next time period. If we send any of the four other code words this period, we will be able to send three bits of information during the next period. For each of the last two cases, the number of bits of information that can be sent during the time period after the next time period depends on what information is sent.
To handle this situation, the encoder accepts six bits every two time periods, following this algorithm:
When we can send two bits: send two of the input bits.
When we can send three bits, send four of the input bits as follows:
Input code word 0000b is mapped to line code word 000b (four bits worth).
Input code words 0001b and 0010b are mapped to line code word 001b (three bits worth).
Input code words 0011b and 0100b are mapped to line code word 010b (three bits worth).
Input code words 0101b, 0110b and 0111b are mapped to line code word 011b (a little more than two bits worth).
Input code words 1000b, 1001b and 1010b are mapped to line code word 100b (a little more than two bits worth).
Input code words 1011b and 1100b are mapped to line code word 101b (three bits worth).
Input code words 1101b and 1110b are mapped to line code word 110b (three bits worth).
Input code words 1111b is mapped to line code word 111b (four bits worth).
When we can send four bits: send four of the input bits.
With this balancing coder, we send more information in the case that during the next period that we will be able to send less next time. Similarly, we send less information during this period in the case that we will be able to send more next period.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, a specific example is given where four bits are transmitted over four wires, leading to a pin-efficiency of 1. The transmitter of this example uses an encoder as shown in
The codec pair operates as follows:
We proceed with an example. In this example, the code C is the union of the permutation modulation codes generated by the vector (1,1,0,−1) and (−1,−1,0,1) minus the four codewords (0,−1,1,1), (−1,0,1,1), (1,0,−1,−1), and (0,1,−1,−1) having the same last two entries. This code has 20 codewords. The codewords in this code are denoted by (Ai|Bi) where Ai denotes the first two coordinates of the codewords, and Bi denotes the last two coordinates. We assume that after the 0 through 1 UI de-skew, the values on the second set of wires arrive t UI's after the values transmitted on the first pair of wires. In other words, if a codeword (Ai|Bi) is transmitted at time i, then the vector (Ai|Bi−t) is received at time i. This notation assumes that the reference wire pair has less propagation delay than other wires, but this assumption is only meant to make the subsequent description easier. Anyone with moderate skill in the art will be able to modify the description to account for propagation delays on the other wires that are either greater or less than that of the reference pair.
According to the description above, for all time instances i, the vector (Ai|Bi−t) needs to be an element in the code. Moreover, since at time i the vector (Ai|Bi) is sent on the wires, the sum of the entries in the vector Ai plus the sum of the entries in the vector Bi should be between −2 and 2. Since at the time of transmission of the vector (Ai|Bi) the value of Bi−t is already fixed, the coding problem becomes the following: Given Bi−t find at least 16 pairs (Ai|Bi) such that (Ai|Bi−t) is a codeword and the sum of the entries of the vector (Ai|Bi) is between −2 and 2. It is indeed possible to find, for any given Bi−t 16 such pairs. This is demonstrated in Table 4, where for ease of notation a “1” is denoted by “+”, and a “−1” is denoted by “−”.
Said transmitter acts without waiting by looking back the N clocks to see what was put on wires A and B, and then combines that with the new binary values that were input in order to come up with the new ternary values. The receiver waits the full duration of the skew and combines the stored post-skew voting results on all of the wires together with the latest voting results on the wires that were skewed. The combination of these six ternary values is enough to recover the four input binary values.
The unique part of the encoder design is its triple-constraint nature. Each value that the encoder puts on the wires must satisfy all of the following constraints simultaneously: the encoder's local pre-skew SSN constraint, the receiver's post-skew code-set constraint, and the encoding requirements for the data being communicated.
This example is illustrated in
Channel transmit drivers 1405 convert symbols 1403 into physical signals which are sent over the multiple channels of communications media 1410 at transmission interface 1450.
Channel receivers 1422 detect the physical signals received over the multiple channels of communications media 1410 at reception interface 1451, producing receive symbols 1423.
Because of differing propagation delays among the multiple channels, the set of symbols received simultaneously at reception interface 1451 may not correspond with the set of symbols that were transmitted simultaneously at transmission interface 1450. SubUIDS circuit 1420 corrects up to one symbol transmission interval of reception time variation, by introducing small individually adjustable delays between each channel input 1410 and each SubUIDS output 1421. The clock-aligned received signals from SubUIDS outputs 1421 are detected by receivers 1422 producing receive symbols 1423. This detection process is facilitated by having channel outputs 1421 synchronized to a common receive clock by action of SubUIDS circuit 1420.
The remainder of the differential channel reception delay is corrected as receive symbols 1423 are stored 1424 for a period equal to the longest relative propagation delay of the multiple channels 1410. Stored receive symbols are then retrieved 1425 and presented to decoder 1426 to produce output data 1430.
Vector signaling code encoder 1402 operates under multiple constraints. The symbols it produces must satisfy all of the criteria:
To enable these criteria to be satisfied, store 1404 provides previously transmitted symbols to encoder 1402, allowing the encoder to select symbols that immediately satisfy criterion 1, and which after experiencing the various propagation delays of multiple channels 1410, will satisfy criterion 2. Store 1424 allows decoder 1426 to combine symbols, including those received at different times over different channels, to produce a time-coherent codeword satisfying criterion 3.
The examples presented herein illustrate the use of vector signaling codes for point-to-point wire communications. However, this should not been seen in any way as limiting the scope of the described invention. The methods disclosed in this application are equally applicable to other communication media including optical and wireless communications. Thus, descriptive terms such as “voltage” or “signal level” should be considered to include equivalents in other measurement systems, such as “optical intensity”, “RF modulation”, etc. As used herein, the term “physical signal” includes any suitable behavior and/or attribute of a physical phenomenon capable of conveying information. Physical signals may be tangible and non-transitory.
Interpreting a set of signals as selecting an object (e.g., a data object) can include selecting the object based at least in part on the set of signals and/or one or more attributes of the set of signals. Interpreting a set of signals as representing an object (e.g., a data object) can include determining and/or selecting the object based at least in part on a representation corresponding to the set of signals. A same set of signals may be used to select and/or determine multiple distinct objects (e.g., data objects).
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/816,941, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication”, filed Nov. 17, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/084,280, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication”, filed Mar. 29, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/842,740, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication”, filed Mar. 15, 2013, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15816941 | Nov 2017 | US |
| Child | 16057559 | US | |
| Parent | 15084280 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Child | 15816941 | US | |
| Parent | 13842740 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 15084280 | US |
