In a typical seismic survey, a plurality of seismic sources, such as explosives, vibrators, airguns or the like, may be sequentially activated near the surface of the earth to generate energy (i.e., seismic waves) which may propagate into and through the earth. The seismic waves may be reflected back by geological formations within the earth, and the resultant seismic wave field may be sampled by a plurality of seismic receivers, such as geophones, hydrophones and the like. Each receiver may be configured to acquire seismic data at the receiver's location, normally in the form of a seismogram representing the value of some characteristic of the seismic wave field against time. The acquired seismograms or seismic data may be transmitted wirelessly or over electrical or optical cables to a recorder system. The recorder system may then store, analyze, and/or transmit the seismic data. This data may be used to generate and image of subsurface formations in the earth and may also be used to detect the possible presence of hydrocarbons, changes in the subsurface formations and the like.
In a marine seismic survey, seismic data typically include up-going waves that are reflected off of the surface of the earth and down-going waves that are reflected from the sea surface. The up-going waves may be used to detect the possible presence of hydrocarbons, changes in the subsurface and the like. The down-going waves (i.e., sea-surface ghost waves), however, may destructively interfere with the up-going waves at certain frequencies such that the up-going waves are completely canceled out of the seismic data.
In some situations, using a coil-oriented sail path for marine seismic surveys can be beneficial and more efficient than traditional straight sail lines for acquisition. Moreover, having a streamer array that can be oriented in varying geometries, such as varying streamer depths, during a coil-based marine survey can have additional benefits over traditional marine surveys.
Accordingly, there is a need for methods and systems that can employ faster, more efficient and more accurate marine surveys, such as coil-based acquisition in varying configurations. Such methods and systems may complement or replace conventional methods and systems for marine surveys.
The above deficiencies and other problems associated with marine surveys are reduced or eliminated by the disclosed methods and devices.
Described herein are implementations of various technologies and techniques for a method for acquiring data, including, but not limited to seismic data since the method can be used successfully with other collected data domains such as electromagnetic where an array of data collectors on cables or streamers are towed.
In accordance with some embodiments, a method is performed that includes towing an array of marine streamers that includes a plurality of receivers and a plurality of steering devices along a first portion of a coil sail path; steering the array of marine streamers along two or more depths; and steering the array of marine streamers to a slant angle while maintaining the array of marine streamers at their respective two or more depths.
In accordance with some embodiments, a survey system is provided that includes a vessel, a computing system, and an array of marine streamers that includes a plurality of receivers and a plurality of steering devices. The computing system includes at least one processor, at least one memory, and one or more programs stored in the at least one memory, wherein the one or more programs are configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for configuring the survey system to: tow the array of marine streamers along a first portion of a coil sail path; steer the array of marine streamers along two or more depths; and steer the array of marine streamers to a slant angle while maintaining the array of marine streamers at their respective two or more depths.
In some embodiments, the survey system's computing system includes a first computing device and a second computing device, wherein the first computing device is configured to control the towing of the array of marine streamers along the first portion of the coil sail path and one or more additional computing devices are configured to steer one or more streamers in the array of marine streamers. In further embodiments, the first computing device is configured to at least partially control and/or assist in navigation of the vessel in the survey system so that the vessel's sail path substantially corresponds to the coil sail path. In alternate embodiments, a first computing device in the computing system is configured to control the towing of the array of marine streamers along the first portion of the coil sail path and steer the array of marine streamers.
In accordance with some embodiments, a computer readable storage medium for use in a survey system is provided, the medium having a set of one or more programs including instructions that, when executed by a computing system in the survey system, cause the computing system to configure the survey system for towing an array of marine streamers having a plurality of receivers and a plurality of steering devices along a first portion of a coil sail path. The instructions executed on the computing system also configure the survey system for steering the array of marine streamers along two or more depths; and steering the array of marine streamers to a slant angle while maintaining the array of marine streamers at their respective two or more depths.
In accordance with some embodiments, a survey system is provided that includes means for towing an array of marine streamers that include a plurality of receivers and a plurality of steering devices. The survey system also includes means for towing the array along a first portion of a coil sail path; means for steering the array of marine streamers along two or more depths; and means for steering the array of marine streamers to a slant angle while maintaining the array of marine streamers at their respective two or more depths.
In accordance with some embodiments, a method is performed that includes receiving a data set collected by a plurality of marine streamers having a plurality of receivers, wherein the received data set corresponds to a subterranean region, and while collecting the data set, the plurality of marine streamers was towed along a first portion of a coil sail path, at a slant angle, and at two or more depths; and processing the collected data, wherein the processing includes one or more techniques selected from the group consisting of stacking, imaging, full waveform inversion, inversion, deconvolution, migration, deghosting, reverse time migration, mirror migration, zero-phase Wiener deconvolution, and blueness correction.
In accordance with some embodiments, a computing system is provided that includes at least one processor, at least one memory, and one or more programs stored in the at least one memory, wherein the one or more programs are configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for receiving a data set collected by a plurality of marine streamers having a plurality of receivers, wherein the received data set corresponds to a subterranean region, and while collecting the data set, the plurality of marine streamers was towed along a first portion of a coil sail path, at a slant angle, and at two or more depths; and processing the collected data, wherein the processing includes one or more techniques selected from the group consisting of stacking, imaging, full waveform inversion, inversion, deconvolution, migration, deghosting, reverse time migration, mirror migration, zero-phase Wiener deconvolution, and blueness correction.
In accordance with some embodiments, a computer readable storage medium is provided, the medium having a set of one or more programs including instructions that when executed by a computing system cause the computing system to receive a data set collected by a plurality of marine streamers having a plurality of receivers, wherein the received data set corresponds to a subterranean region, and while collecting the data set, the plurality of marine streamers was towed along a first portion of a coil sail path, at a slant angle, and at two or more depths; and process the collected data, wherein the processing includes one or more techniques selected from the group consisting of stacking, imaging, inversion, full waveform inversion, deconvolution, migration, deghosting, reverse time migration, mirror migration, zero-phase Wiener deconvolution, and blueness correction.
In accordance with some embodiments, a computing system is provided that includes at least one processor, at least one memory, and one or more programs stored in the at least one memory; and means for receiving a data set collected by a plurality of marine streamers having a plurality of receivers, wherein the received data set corresponds to a subterranean region, and while collecting the data set, the plurality of marine streamers was towed along a first portion of a coil sail path, at a slant angle, and at two or more depths; and means for processing the collected data, wherein the processing includes one or more techniques selected from the group consisting of stacking, imaging, inversion, full waveform inversion, deconvolution, migration, deghosting, reverse time migration, mirror migration, zero-phase Wiener deconvolution, and blueness correction.
In accordance with some embodiments, an information processing apparatus for use in a computing system is provided, and includes means for receiving a data set collected by a plurality of marine streamers having a plurality of receivers, wherein the received data set corresponds to a subterranean region, and while collecting the data set, the plurality of marine streamers was towed along a first portion of a coil sail path, at a slant angle, and at two or more depths; and means for processing the collected data, wherein the processing includes one or more techniques selected from the group consisting of stacking, imaging, full waveform inversion, inversion, deconvolution, migration, deghosting, reverse time migration, mirror migration, zero-phase Wiener deconvolution, and blueness correction.
In accordance with some embodiments, a survey system is provided that includes a vessel and a steerable array of marine streamers including a plurality of receivers and a plurality of steering devices, wherein the steerable array of marine streamers is configured to be towed along two or more depths along a coil sail path, and the steerable array of marine streamers is configured to be steered to a slant angle while maintaining the array of marine streamers at their respective two or more depths.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the plurality of receivers include one or more seismic receivers.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the plurality of receivers include one or more electromagnetic receivers.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the plurality of receivers include one or more seismic receivers and one or more electromagnetic receivers.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the array of marine streamers is steered using the plurality of steering devices.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the plurality of steering devices comprises one or more birds, one or more deflectors, one or more tail buoys or combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the array of marine streamers is steered to the two or more depths using the one or more birds.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the array of marine streamers is steered to the slant angle using the deflectors.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the array of marine streamers is steered to the slant angle using the tail buoys.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the slant angle is determined at least in part based on the size of a subsurface bin from which a set of survey data is to be acquired.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that respective proximate ends of one or more streamers in the array of streamers are maintained at a first depth selected from the two or more depths; and respective distal ends of one or more streamers in the array of streamers are maintained at a second depth selected from the two or more depths.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the two or more depths increase in a cross line direction.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the slant angle includes variable depths along a length of the streamer array.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the slant angle includes variable depths along a crossline direction of the streamer array.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the slant angle includes variable depths along a crossline direction of the streamer array and variable depths along a length of the streamer array.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention involves towing one or more sources; and producing one or more energy emissions from the one or more sources while towing the array of marine streamers in the first portion of the coil sail path.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the one or more sources are towed by a first vessel, and the streamer array is towed by a second vessel.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention includes that the one or more sources and the streamer array are towed by a first vessel.
In some embodiments, an aspect of the invention involves collecting data at one or more of the plurality of receivers, wherein the collected data corresponds to respective returns from the subsurface of respective energy emissions in the one or more energy emissions emitted from the one or more sources.
Thus, the systems and methods disclosed herein are faster, more efficient methods for marine surveys. These systems and methods increase marine surveys effectiveness, efficiency, and accuracy. Such methods and systems may complement or replace conventional methods for marine surveys.
For a better understanding of the aforementioned embodiments as well as additional embodiments thereof, reference should be made to the Description of Embodiments below, in conjunction with the following drawings in which like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the figures.
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and figures. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, circuits, and networks have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments.
It will also be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first object or step could be termed a second object or step, and, similarly, a second object or step could be termed a first object or step, without departing from the scope of the invention. The first object or step, and the second object or step, are both objects or steps, respectively, but they are not to be considered the same object or step.
The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be understood that the term “and/or” as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
As used herein, the term “if” may be construed to mean “when” or “upon” or “in response to determining” or “in response to detecting,” depending on the context.
The following paragraphs provide a brief summary of various technologies and techniques directed at attenuating the effects of sea-surface ghost waves in seismic data in accordance with one or more implementations described herein. The seismic data may be acquired using a variety of survey configurations. In one implementation, streamers that include seismic receivers may be towed at various depths. For instance, each streamer may be towed at a different depth such that the streamers are arranged in an order of increasing or decreasing depth from left to right. Alternatively, the streamers may be arranged in a symmetric manner such that the two middle streamers are towed at the same depth, and the next two streamers outside the middle streamers are towed at the same depth that is deeper than the middle streamers, and so on.
In addition to towing streamers at different depths, each streamer may be towed at a slant from the inline direction, while preserving a constant streamer depth.
In another implementation, the streamers towed at the various depths and slant described above may also be towed to follow circular tracks to perform a coil survey.
After acquiring the seismic data using the survey configurations described above, a computer application which may be executed on a computing system, such as computing system 200A of
The computer application may then collect a portion of the seismic data into one or more summation contribution gathers. A summation contribution gather may be defined as a portion of the seismic data that may be added together and processed in a manner that would result in a single data trace that corresponds to the acquired seismic data.
After obtaining the summation contribution gathers, the computer application may then sum the portion of the seismic data (i.e., the traces) in the summation contribution gathers to generate seismic data that have residual ghost wavelets without deep frequency notches (i.e., without sea-surface ghost waves that destructively interfere with the up-going waves).
The computer application may then apply a suitable spectral shaping filter, for example a zero-phase Wiener deconvolution filter, to the summed seismic data to widen the seismic data amplitude spectrum. As a result, the computer application may use the filtered seismic data to obtain a sub-surface image that approximates the image that would be acquired by imaging only up-going waves in the seismic data, without performing an explicit wavefield separation into up- and down-going waves.
Survey Configurations
Attention is now directed to
Multiple Streamer/Multiple Depth Survey Configuration
The component(s) of the seismic waves 125 may be reflected and converted by seafloor surface 110 (i.e., reflector), and seismic wave reflections 126 may be received by a plurality of seismic receivers 135. Seismic receivers 135 may be disposed on a plurality of streamers (i.e., streamer array 121). The seismic receivers 135 may generate electrical signals representative of the received seismic wave reflections 126. The electrical signals may be embedded with information regarding the subsurface 105 and captured as a record of seismic data.
In one implementation, each streamer may include streamer steering devices such as a bird, a deflector, a tail buoy and the like. The streamer steering devices may be used to control the position of the streamers in accordance with the techniques described herein. The bird, the deflector and the tail buoy is described in greater detail with reference to
In one implementation, seismic wave reflections 126 may travel upward and reach the water/air interface at the water surface 140, a majority portion of reflections 126 may then reflect downward again (i.e., sea-surface ghost waves 129) and be received by the plurality of seismic receivers 135. The sea-surface ghost waves 129 may be referred to as surface multiples. The point on the water surface 140 at which the wave is reflected downward is generally referred to as the downward reflection point.
The electrical signals may be transmitted to a vessel 145 via transmission cables, wireless communication or the like. The vessel 145 may then transmit the electrical signals to a data processing center. Alternatively, the vessel 145 may include an onboard computer capable of processing the electrical signals (i.e., seismic data). Those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure will appreciate that this illustration is highly idealized. For instance, surveys may be of formations deep beneath the surface. The formations may typically include multiple reflectors, some of which may include dipping events, and may generate multiple reflections (including wave conversion) for receipt by the seismic receivers 135. In one implementation, the seismic data may be processed to generate a seismic image of the subsurface 105.
Typically, marine seismic acquisition systems tow each streamer in streamer array 121 at the same depth (e.g., 5-10 m). However, marine based survey 100 may tow each streamer in streamer array 121 at different depths such that seismic data may be acquired and processed in a manner that avoids the effects of destructive interference due to sea-surface ghost waves. For instance, marine-based survey 100 of
Alternatively, the streamers may be arranged in a symmetric manner such that the two middle streamers are towed at the same depth; the next two streamers outside the middle streamers are towed at the same depth that is deeper than the middle streamers and so on. (See
In addition to towing streamers at different depths, each streamer of a marine-based survey may be slanted from the inline direction, while preserving a constant streamer depth. (See
Multiple Streamer/Multiple Depth Coil Survey Configuration
In another implementation, streamers may be towed at different depths and towed to follow circular tracks such as that of a coil survey. (See
Coil survey 175 may include four survey vessels 143/145/147/149, two streamer arrays 121/122, and a plurality of sources 120/123/127/129. The vessels 145/147 are “receiver vessels” in that they each tow one of the streamer arrays 121/122, although they also tow one of the sources 120/127. Because the receiver vessels 145/147 also tow sources 120/127, the receiver vessels 145/147 are sometimes called “streamer/source” vessels or “receiver/source” vessels. In one implementation, the receiver vessels 145/147 may omit sources 120/127. Receiver vessels are sometimes called “streamer only” vessels if they tow streamer arrays 121/122 and do not tow sources 120/127. Vessels 143/149 are called “source vessels” since they each tow a respective source or source array 123/129 but no streamer arrays. In this manner, vessels 143/149 may be called “source only” vessels.
Each streamer array 121/122 may be “multicomponent” streamers. Examples of suitable construction techniques for multicomponent streamers may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,477,711, 6,671,223, 6,684,160, 6,932,017, 7,080,607, 7,293,520, and U.S. Pat. Application Publication 2006/0239117 (each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, respectively). Any of these alternative multicomponent streamers may be used in conjunction with the techniques described herein.
Vessel 145 may include computing apparatus 117 that controls streamer array 121 and source 120 in a manner well known and understood in the art. The towed array 121 may include any number of streamers. In one implementation, a deflector 106 may be attached to the front of each streamer. A tail buoy 109 may be attached at the rear of each streamer. Deflector 106 and tail buoy 109 may be used to help control the shape and position of the streamer. In one implementation, deflector 106 and tail buoy 109 may be used to actively steer the streamer to the slant as described above with reference to
A plurality of seismic cable positioning devices known as “birds” 112 may be located between deflector 106 and tail buoy 109. Birds 112 may be used to actively steer or control the depth at which the streamers are towed. In this manner, birds 112 may be used to actively position the streamers in various depth configurations such as those described above with reference to
In one implementation, sources 120 may be implemented as arrays of individual sources. As mentioned above with reference to
In order to perform a coil survey (e.g., FIG. 1F/1H), the relative positions of vessels 143/145/147/149, as well as the shapes and depths of the streamers 121/122, may be maintained while traversing the respective sail lines 171-174 using control techniques known to the art. Any suitable technique known to the art may be used to control the shapes and depths of the streamers such as those disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,671,223, 6,932,017, 7,080,607, 7,293,520, and U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0239117 (each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, respectively).
As shown in
Although the vessel and streamers of
In one implementation, some features and techniques may be employed during a survey, including but not limited to, streamer steering, single-sensor recording, large steerable calibrated source arrays, and improved shot repeatability, as well as benefits such as better noise sampling and attenuation, and the capability to record during vessel turns. Each vessel 143/145/147/149 may include a GPS receiver coupled to an integrated computer-based seismic navigation, source controller, and recording system. In one implementation, sources 120 may include a plurality of air gun sources controlled by one or more controllers adapted to fire respective air guns simultaneously, substantially simultaneously, in user-configurable sequences, or randomly.
Although
In a single vessel marine-based coil survey 185, vessel 145 may travel along sail line 171 which is generally circular. Streamer array 121 may then generally follow the circular sail line 171 having a radius R.
In one implementation, sail line 171 may not be truly circular once the first pass is substantially complete. Instead, vessel 145 may move slightly in the y-direction (vertical) value of DY, as illustrated in
The design parameters for practicing a single vessel marine-based coil survey may include the radius R of the circle (the radius being a function of the spread width and the coverage fold desired), DY (the roll in the y-direction), and DX (the roll in the x-direction). DX and DY are functions of streamer spread width and of the coverage fold desired to be acquired. The radius R of the circle may be larger than the radius used during the turns and is a function of the streamer spread width. The radius R may range from about 5 km to about 10 km. In one implementation, the radius R ranges from 6 km to 7 km.
As discussed, full-azimuth seismic data can be acquired with a single vessel using circular geometry, or with multiple vessels. A further example of a multi-vessel acquisition configuration 186 that is used currently is depicted in
Significantly,
In additional embodiments,
Some benefits to using a slant and/or slant-coil deployment of a streamer array can include: improved low frequency preservation due to deeper cable deployments; variable receiver ghosts from receiver to receiver: this feature will facilitate receiver ghost attenuation; improved signal-to-noise ratio due to deeper cable deployments; and full azimuth acquisition due to coil shooting geometry, though those with skill in the art will appreciate that many benefits may occur when using such an acquisition geometry.
In some embodiments, data is collected with the streamer array after one or more sources are fired (which could be first data collected from one or more sources fired during the survey and/or second data collected from sources other than the one or more sources associated with the vessel towing the seismic array, e.g., collecting data from activation of sources towed by other vessels in the same survey, collecting data from activations of sources towed by other vessels in a different survey that is relatively nearby). After the data is collected is may be processed using a computing system (e.g., computing system 200A of
Computing Systems
A processor can include a microprocessor, microcontroller, processor module or subsystem, programmable integrated circuit, programmable gate array, or another control or computing device.
The storage media 206A can be implemented as one or more computer-readable or machine-readable storage media. Note that while in the example embodiment of
It should be appreciated that computing system 200A is only one example of a computing system, and that computing system 200A may have more or fewer components than shown, may combine additional components not depicted in the example embodiment of
The steps in the processing methods described above may be implemented by running one or more functional modules in information processing apparatus such as general purpose processors or application specific chips, such as ASICs, FPGAs, PLDs, or other appropriate devices. These modules, combinations of these modules, and/or their combination with general hardware are all included within the scope of protection of the invention.
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/552973 filed Oct. 28, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2404440 | Holm | Jul 1946 | A |
2465696 | Pasley | Mar 1949 | A |
2693862 | Reiber | Nov 1954 | A |
2823375 | Camp | Feb 1958 | A |
3283293 | Pavey et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3331050 | Kilmer et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3440992 | Chance | Apr 1969 | A |
3505577 | Hirokawa | Apr 1970 | A |
3506674 | Berger | Apr 1970 | A |
3560912 | Spink et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3581273 | Hedberg | May 1971 | A |
3605674 | Weese | Sep 1971 | A |
3774570 | Pearson | Nov 1973 | A |
3806863 | Tilley et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3896756 | Pearson et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3921124 | Payton | Nov 1975 | A |
3934220 | Davis | Jan 1976 | A |
3953827 | Le Moal et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4033278 | Waters | Jul 1977 | A |
4068208 | Rice, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4074648 | Reid et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4086504 | Ezell et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4146870 | Ruehle | Mar 1979 | A |
4231111 | Neeley | Oct 1980 | A |
4290124 | Cole | Sep 1981 | A |
4353121 | Ray et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4383259 | Rader | May 1983 | A |
4404664 | Zachariadis | Sep 1983 | A |
4468663 | Kalt | Aug 1984 | A |
4486863 | French | Dec 1984 | A |
4648080 | Hargreaves | Mar 1987 | A |
4657482 | Neal | Apr 1987 | A |
4669097 | Bristol | May 1987 | A |
4709355 | Woods et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4729333 | Kirby et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4757482 | Fiske, Jr. | Jul 1988 | A |
4803668 | Berryhill et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4834181 | Uhri et al. | May 1989 | A |
4890568 | Dolengowski | Jan 1990 | A |
4912684 | Fowler | Mar 1990 | A |
4942991 | Lyons | Jul 1990 | A |
4960183 | Young, II | Oct 1990 | A |
4965773 | Marschall | Oct 1990 | A |
4970696 | Crews et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4970697 | Earley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4992990 | Langeland et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4992991 | Young et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4992992 | Dragoset, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
5031159 | Rouquette | Jul 1991 | A |
5179905 | Hossfield et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5200930 | Rouquette | Apr 1993 | A |
5300929 | MacLeod | Apr 1994 | A |
5329071 | Vatne et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5353223 | Norton et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5430689 | Rigsby et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443027 | Owsley et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
H001490 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1995 | H |
5508973 | Mallick et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5532975 | Elholm | Jul 1996 | A |
5546882 | Kuche | Aug 1996 | A |
5555531 | Booth et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5640325 | Banbrook et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5668775 | Hatteland | Sep 1997 | A |
5677893 | de Hoop et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5761152 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790472 | Workman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5973995 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978316 | Ambs et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011752 | Ambs et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011753 | Chien | Jan 2000 | A |
6044040 | Holland | Mar 2000 | A |
6061301 | Corrigan | May 2000 | A |
6144342 | Bertheas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175809 | Naville | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178381 | Padhi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6285956 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292754 | Thomsen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6343256 | Winbow et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6418378 | Nyland | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6477111 | Lunde et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477711 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493636 | DeKok | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525992 | Olivier et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529832 | Kerekes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553315 | Kerekes et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6590831 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6629037 | Nyland | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6671223 | Bittleston | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684160 | Ozbek et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691038 | Zajac | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6714873 | Bakulin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6837175 | Gieseke | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847896 | Orban et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6862531 | Horne et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865487 | Charron | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6932017 | Hillesund et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944094 | Thomsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7065449 | Brewster et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080607 | Hillesund et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7203130 | Welker | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7239577 | Tenghamn et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7293520 | Hillesund et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7377224 | Ryan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391673 | Regone et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400552 | Moldoveanu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403448 | Welker et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7616522 | Rouquette | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7660189 | Vigen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7679990 | Herkenhoff et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7952522 | Hohl | May 2011 | B2 |
7965583 | Thomas | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8004930 | Welker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8559265 | Moldoveanu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8681580 | Moldoveanu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681581 | Moldoveanu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020193947 | Chamberlain | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030067842 | Sukup et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125878 | Bakulin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040042341 | Tenghamn et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066707 | Tenghamn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125697 | Fleming | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040240319 | Carvill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018537 | Welker et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050180260 | Planke et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050180263 | Lambert et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194201 | Tenghamn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060215489 | Solheim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227657 | Tveide et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239117 | Singh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256653 | Toennessen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256654 | Paulsen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285435 | Robertsson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070064526 | Holo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104028 | Van Manen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115757 | Soerli et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127312 | Storteig et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159921 | Regone et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165486 | Moldoveanu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070274153 | Bisley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080008037 | Welker | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080239875 | Alumbaugh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253225 | Welker et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267010 | Moldoveau et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285380 | Rouquette | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285381 | Moldoveanu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090122640 | Hill et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090231953 | Welker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245019 | Falkenberg et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262601 | Hillesund et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090310439 | Hauan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310440 | Solheim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316525 | Welker | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013485 | Alumbaugh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027374 | Moldoveanu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100118645 | Welker | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142317 | Moldoveanu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100238762 | Hornbostel | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110158041 | Moldoveanu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158042 | Moldoveanu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176384 | Soubaras | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110260730 | Sudow et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110305109 | Soubaras | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120092956 | Soubaras | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120134234 | Roberts et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120213033 | Soubaras | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130242695 | Soubaras | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130301384 | Hill et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 018053 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0 018053 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0 321705 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 347019 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 562781 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0 613025 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0 613025 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 681193 | Aug 1999 | EP |
2093610 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2144854 | Mar 1985 | GB |
2342081 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2390902 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2424949 | Oct 2006 | GB |
2436206 | Sep 2007 | GB |
84-03153 | Aug 1984 | WO |
96-21163 | Jul 1996 | WO |
97-11395 | Mar 1997 | WO |
97-30361 | Aug 1997 | WO |
97-45006 | Dec 1997 | WO |
98-28636 | Jul 1998 | WO |
00-20895 | Apr 2000 | WO |
01-29580 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2004-092771 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005-062075 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006-014750 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007-070499 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008-144492 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2010-002600 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2011086149 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011086166 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011161118 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/U52012/062049 dated Feb. 25, 2013: pp. 1-8. |
Moldoveanu, “Circular Geometry for Wide-azimuth Towed-streamer Acquisition,” 70th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Jun. 2008: pp. 1-5. |
Moldoveanu et al., “What is the next step after WAZ for exploration in the Gulf of Mexico?” SEG Houston International Exposition and Annual Meeting, 2009: pp. 41-45. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2010/062419; Sep. 26, 2011. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2010/035063; Dec. 29, 2010. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2009/060864; May 1, 2010. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2009/063538; Apr. 30, 2010. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2009/047015; Feb. 24, 2010. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2009/047019; Jan. 7, 2010. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2009/045261; Dec. 23, 2009. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2008/063875; Sep. 16, 2009. |
UKIPO examination report (Aug. 10, 2009) and search report (Aug. 7, 2009) for GB 0912870.3. |
SIPO Reexamination Notice After Final (May 4, 2014); CN 200880021257.8. |
EPO Search Report (Mar. 25, 2014); EP 2010778189.0. |
EPO Office Action (Dec. 4, 2013); EP 2008755677.3. |
Mexican associate reporting dated Oct. 2013 for IMPI Office Action (Jul. 8, 2013); MX/a/2012/007769. |
UKIPO Examination Report (Oct. 16, 2012); GB 1216841.5. |
UKIPO Examination Report (Jul. 2, 2012); GB 1019201.1. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2009/031396; May 14, 2009. |
IPAU Examination Report (Jun. 21, 2012); AU 2008254856. |
SIPO Rejection Decision (Jun. 6, 2012) and SIPO Office Actions (Feb. 6, 2012 and Jul. 20, 2011); CN 200880021257.8. |
Mexican associate reportings dated Jul. 2012, Oct. 2011, and Apr. 2011 for IMPI Office Actions; MX/a/2009/012362. |
UKIPO Examination Reports (May 18, 2012 and Feb. 13, 2012); GB 1019199.7. |
Mexican associate reportings dated Aug. 2012 and Mar. 2012 for IMPI Office Actions; MX/a/2010/013018. |
IPAU Examination Report (May 16, 2008); AU 2006252148. |
SIPO Office Action (Nov. 19, 2010); CN 200710003980.0. |
UKIPO Examination Reports (Jun. 8, 2010, Mar. 17, 2010, Nov. 13, 2009, Aug. 10, 2009, and Feb. 6, 2009) and UKIPO Search Report (Jul. 18, 2007); GB 0700970.9. |
Mexican associate reporting dated Jun. 2009 for IMPI Office Action; PA/a/2007/000733. |
Moldoveanu, et al; Full Azimuth Imaging Using Circular Geometry Acquisition; Leading Edge; vol. 27, No. 7; pp. 908-913; Jul. 2008. |
Hennenfent, et al.; “Simply Denoise: Wavefield Reconstructions via Jittered Undersampling”; Geophysics; vol. 73(2); pp. v19-v28; May-Jun. 2008. |
Hennenfent, et al.; “Random Sampling: New Insights into the Reconstruction of Coarsely-Sampled Wavefields”; SEG Annual Meeting; pp. 2575-2579; Oct. 2007. |
WesternGeco Q-Technology URL: http://www.westerngeco.com/content/services/q—technology/index.asp 2006—No Longer Exists. |
Bacon, et al.; “3-D Seismic Interpretation”; Cambridge University Press; pp. 18-22 and 25-26; 2003. |
Sukup; “Wide Azimuth Marine Acquisition by the Helix Method”: The Leading Edge; pp. 791-794; Aug. 2002. |
Pan; “Single-Sensor Towed Streamer Improves Seismic Acquisition”; Offshore; Apr. 2002. |
Austad, et al.; Marine Seismic Cable Streering and Computerized Control Systems; Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts; 2000. |
Bittleston, et al; Marine Seismic Cable Streering and Control; EAGE 62nd Conference and Technical Exhibition, Glasgow, Scotland; May-Jun. 2000. |
Beasley, et al.; A New Look at Simultaneous Sources; SEG Expanded Abstracts; 1998. |
Wong, et al.; “Sampling with Hammersley and Halton Points”; 2 Journal of Graphics Tools; pp. 9-24; 1997. |
Pedersen; A Nautical Study of Towed Marine Seismic Streamer Cable Configurations; Norwegian University of Science and Technology Doctoral Thesis; 1996. |
Pedersen; Active 3-D Position Control of Marine Flexible Cylinder Cables with Extremely Large Length/Diameter-Ratio; NTH Department of Marine Hydrodynamics; 1994-1995. |
Reilly, et al; “Concentric Circle 3D: Optimization of Salt Diapir Flank Imaging UK Central North Sea”; First Break; vol. 12, No. 9; pp. 463-475; Sep. 1994. |
Shames; Mechanics of Fluids, 3rd Ed.; McGraw-Hill; pp. 666-693; 1992. |
Pedersen; A Feasibility Study of the Possibilty to Control the Horizontal Position of Seismic Streamer Cables; Division of Marine Hydrodynamics, The Norwegian Institute of Technology; Mar. 1992. |
Raven; Automatic Control Engineering, 4th Ed.; McGraw-Hill; 1987. |
Cole, et al.; “A Circular Seismic Acquisition Technique for Marine Three Dimensional Surveys”; Offshore Technology Conference, 4864; Houston, Texas; May 6-9, 1985. |
Shames; Engineering Mechanics—Statics and Dynamics, 3rd Ed.; Prentice Hall; pp. 236-244; 1980. |
Longobardo; Automatic Controls; Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers; pp. 16-33 through 16-34; 1967. |
Lee; An Algorithm for Path Connections and its Applications; IRE Transcations on Electronic Computers; pp. 346-365; Sep. 1961. |
Kalman; A New approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems; Trans of ASME—Journal of Basic Engineering; vol. 82 (Series D); pp. 35-45; 1960. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130107663 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61552973 | Oct 2011 | US |