This invention relates generally to light units, and more specifically, to methods and systems for use in testing a functional status of a light unit.
Colored signals are commonly used in railway systems to indicate route availability and/or speed requirements. At least some known signals include incandescent lights having colored covers. Other known signals include colored non-incandescent lights, such as light emitting diodes (LEDs). Typically, light emitting diodes are preferred because they have a longer life-span, operate with lower power consumption, and provide better visibility. Regardless of whether a railway system includes incandescent lights or LEDs, the signals are required to be tested periodically to determine their functional status.
Generally, incandescent lights are tested using known cold filament testing methods. Specifically, when the light is not in use, a plurality of repeated pulses are transmitted to the incandescent light over a predetermined time period. During the transmission of the pulses, the amount of current draw from the incandescent light is measured to ensure functionality of the light. Generally, cold filament testing is an acceptable testing methodology with incandescent lights because the lights require a warm-up time before visible light is transmitted therefrom. Because cold filament testing uses repeated pulses, the incandescent lights are not provided time to warm-up and, as such, no visible light is inadvertently emitted from the incandescent light during the testing process.
In contrast, non-incandescent lights have a quick warm-up time, and therefore, emit visible light during cold filament testing. Such light emission is unacceptable because railway operators may confuse the light emitted during testing as a warning signal. Accordingly, cold filament testing is generally unavailable when the railway system includes non-incandescent lights. One known solution to the unavailability of cold filament testing is to electrically couple the non-incandescent light to a standard VLD card and provide an intermediate set of electronics that make the non-incandescent light appear as an incandescent light to the VLD diagnostic routines. However, this approach fails to limit power requirements during testing, and increases the complexity and costs associated with testing the light unit.
In one embodiment, a method for testing a status of a light unit is provided, wherein the method includes electrically coupling the light unit to a controller and transmitting a negative voltage from the controller to the light unit. The method also includes detecting at least one of current and voltage passing through the light unit and determining a status of the light unit based on at least one of the detected current and detected voltage.
In another embodiment, a system for testing a status of a light unit is provided, wherein the system includes a light unit and a controller electrically coupled to the light unit. The controller is configured to transmit negative voltage to the light unit and to detect at least one of current and voltage passing through the light unit. The system is configured to determine a status of the light unit based on at least one of the detected current and detected voltage.
In yet another embodiment, a light emitting diode (LED) array is provided, wherein the array includes a controller and a plurality of light emitting diodes electrically coupled to the controller. The plurality of light emitting diodes are configured to receive negative voltage from the controller to facilitate testing a status of the plurality of light emitting diodes.
The present invention provides a method and system that may be used for testing the functional status of a light unit. In one embodiment, the system includes a light unit and a controller that is electrically coupled to the light unit. The controller is configured to transmit a negative voltage to the light unit and to detect the current and/or the voltage passing through the light unit. The present invention also provides a light emitting diode (LED) array that includes a plurality of light emitting diodes that are electrically coupled to a controller for receiving a negative voltage from the controller to facilitate testing the functional status of the light emitting diodes.
The present invention relates to railroad signals, and in particular, to testing the functional status of a railroad light unit. In particular, railway systems commonly use light units to indicate route availability and speed requirements. Recently, non-incandescent lights, such as light emitting diodes (LEDs), have been incorporated into railway signal systems. The present invention provides a system and method for cold-filament testing the functionality of a non-incandescent light unit. More specifically, the present invention provides a system and method that enables cold-filament testing of a non-incandescent light unit without causing light to be emitted from the light unit during the testing process. While the present invention is described in relation to railroad signals, it would be understood by one skilled in the art that the present invention may also be applicable to other signals and light units. Further, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the present invention may also have applicability to incandescent light systems.
To test light unit 102, system 100 uses cold-filament testing. Specifically, when light unit 102 is not in use, a plurality of repeated pulses 106, having a positive voltage, are transmitted to light unit 102 over a period of several seconds. When light unit 102 is functional, controller 104 receives a return signal from light unit 102 that is indicative of the functionality of light unit 102. Because, controller 104 only transmits pulses, light unit 102 is not warmed, and light unit 102 is prevented from emitting visible light during testing.
As would be understood by one skilled in the art, system 100 is inoperable with a non-incandescent light unit. Specifically, system 100 would not be operable for testing the functionality of a non-incandescent light unit. In particular, because non-incandescent lights do not require a warm-up time, as is required by incandescent lights, cold-filament testing of a non-incandescent light would cause light to be emitted from the non-incandescent light during the testing. Such conditions are generally unacceptable in a railway system because the light emitted during testing may be mistaken as a warning signal or any similar type of railway operation signal.
In the exemplary embodiment, light unit 202 includes an array of light emitting diodes (LEDs). In an alternative embodiment, light unit 202 includes only one LED. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, light unit 202 is not limited to including LEDs, but rather, may include any non-incandescent lights. In one embodiment, the LEDs are electrically coupled together in parallel. In another embodiment, the LEDs are electrically coupled together in series. In a further embodiment, the LEDs are electrically coupled together with a combination of parallel and series connections.
Moreover, in the exemplary embodiment, controller 204 is a solid state LED controller. In another embodiment, controller 204 is any controller that enables system 200 to function as described herein. Moreover, in the exemplary embodiment, diode 208 is a Zener diode. In another embodiment, diode 208 is any diode that enables system 200 to function as described herein.
During normal operation, controller 204 activates light unit 202 by transmitting a continuous positive voltage thereto, such that visible light is emitted from light unit 200. During testing, system 200 uses cold-filament testing to determine a functional status of light unit 202. However, in contrast, to the cold filament testing that is used to test system 100 (shown in
Further, during testing, resistor 206 and diode 208 cooperate to function as a fail-safe device. Specifically, resistor 206 and diode 208 facilitate preventing a violation of vital trace spacing (VTS). In the exemplary embodiment, the VTS is approximately 0.2″ or 0.25″. Further, in the exemplary embodiment, the VTS is necessary to prevent a shorted (or partially shorted) resistor 206 from emulating the LED circuit. Moreover, in the exemplary embodiment, resistor 206 and diode 208 protect light unit 202 from reverse bias, while allowing detection of light unit 202 by controller 204. Specifically, in a first mode of testing, using a positive current, the combination of resistor 206 and diode 208 will not respond to positive current and will not interfere with light unit 202. However, in the first mode of testing, light unit 202 will emit light. In a second mode of testing, using a negative current, light unit 202 will not respond, but the combination of resistor 206 and diode 208 will respond and indicate that light unit 202 is functional.
In one embodiment, a method for testing a status of a light unit is provided. The method includes electrically coupling the light unit to a controller, transmitting a negative voltage from the controller to the light unit, detecting at least one of current and voltage passing through the light unit, and determining a status of the light unit based on at least one of the detected current and detected voltage. In one embodiment, the light unit includes at least one light emitting diode (LED) and the method includes coupling the at least one LED to the controller. In another embodiments the controller is a solid state LED controller and the method includes coupling the at least one LED to the solid state LED controller. In the exemplary embodiment, the method includes transmitting negative voltage from the controller to the light unit to facilitate preventing visible light from being emitted from the light unit. In the exemplary embodiment, the method also includes electrically coupling a fail-safe resistor in parallel with the light unit. In one embodiment, the method includes coupling the fail-safe resistor in parallel with the light unit to facilitate protecting the light unit from reverse bias. In the exemplary embodiment, the method includes electrically coupling the light unit to a controller that facilitates activating the light unit when the light unit is not being tested.
The above-described systems and methods provide a system for cold-filament testing of a non-incandescent light unit. Specifically, the above-described systems and methods provide a system that enables cold-filament testing of a non-incandescent light unit without causing light to be emitted from the light unit. As such, non-incandescent railroad light units are capable of being tested without creating a false signal that may impair railway traffic and/or safety. Moreover, non-incandescent railroad light units are capable of being tested without requiring additional circuitry. As such, above described systems and methods facilitate reducing costs associated with testing, installing, and/or maintaining non-incandescent railroad light units.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural said elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
Exemplary embodiments of systems and methods for testing a functional status of a light unit are described above in detail. The systems and methods illustrated are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of the system may be utilized independently and separately from other components described herein. Further, steps described in the method may be utilized independently and separately from other steps described herein.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4309639 | Thrower, Jr. et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
5578936 | Gibson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5612680 | DeSanto | Mar 1997 | A |
6066105 | Guillen | May 2000 | A |
6097302 | Zinzell | Aug 2000 | A |
6114830 | Luo | Sep 2000 | A |
6153985 | Grossman | Nov 2000 | A |
6198403 | Dorrough et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6392553 | Mollet et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
7049769 | Boulouednine et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7250872 | Klinger | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20030042908 | St-Germain | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060015272 | Giraldo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10336973 | Mar 2005 | DE |
2007133241 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080265262 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |