Methods and systems for the concurrent generation of multiple substantially similar X-ray beams

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12283389
  • Patent Number
    12,283,389
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 1, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2025
    a month ago
Abstract
An adjustable collimator device for collimating a beam of energy emitted from a radiation source is disclosed. The collimator has an elongated plate-like body with a front-end and a rear-end. The collimator has a first set of emission apertures equally spaced around a central axis of the body that defines a zero-degree position. The first set of emission apertures are placed on the rear-end of the body and are configured to receive and sample a beam of energy entering the adjustable collimator device. A second set of apertures are placed proximate the front-end of the body. The second set of apertures are adjustable such that a first of the second set of apertures can be configured to have a first angular offset relative to the zero-axis and a second of the second set of apertures can be configured to have a second angular offset relative to the zero-axis.
Description
FIELD

The present specification generally relates to radiographic imaging systems. More specifically the present specification relates to systems and methods for concurrently generating X-ray beams having substantially similar characteristics using an adjustable collimator.


BACKGROUND

Stereoscopic X-ray imaging methods are used to separate, in an image, each object in a detection space, which are located at different depths. The principle of stereoscopic X-ray imaging is based on the ability to perceive depth of a three-dimensional structure using binocular vision. The binocular vision is simulated by splitting the X-ray beam from a single source into two beams. The single X-ray beam is typically formed by two collimation slits that may be provided in a beam controller section of the radiographic imaging device. The two beams may be either symmetric or asymmetric with an angle between them.


U.S. Pat. No. 9,763,630, titled “Stereoscopic imaging systems and methods” provides “a stereoscopic imaging system, comprising: an X-ray source configured to emit a plurality of X-ray fan beams; a plurality of columns of detectors, wherein each column of detectors is arranged at a preset angle with respect to the X-ray source, and configured to detect a strength value of a respective one of the X-ray fan beams penetrating an object under inspection, and each column of detectors is configured to form a respective transmission image, when the object intersects, or moves along a direction intersecting with, the X-ray fan beams, with the preset angle being unchanged; and a reconstruction apparatus configured to select two transmission images from the formed transmission images, use the selected images to calculate depth information regarding the object and reconstruct a 3D image of the object based on the calculated depth information.”


However, current stereoscopic imaging methods provide limited information about the material properties of an object that may be different from the material properties of another object in the same direction. The accurate identification of material properties is critical for security applications of the imaging systems.


Multi-energy imaging methods are used to distinguish different types of materials. Imaging systems using X-rays having multiple energies, are able to discriminate between materials of varying elemental composition. However, in cases where objects with differing compositions overlap each other, the properties of one object in the overlapping volume may dominate the attenuation absorption profile while the second object's attenuation characteristics may be difficult, if not impossible to identify.


Methods for combining binocular stereoscopic imaging and multi-energy transmission methods to identify material properties of objects that overlap in the direction of an X-ray beam are well-known. U.S. Pat. No. 8,194,953, titled “Method and system of material identification using binocular stereoscopic and multi-energy transmission images” provides “material identification and imaging method using binocular stereoscopic and multi-energy transmission images comprise the following steps: 1) causing two angled X-ray beams to penetrate through objects under examination so as to obtain data of left and right transmission images, segmenting said left and right transmission images and matching the results of said segmentation; 2) creating a depth plane along the depth direction of the transmission images; 3) repeating the above process on transmission images of variation energy to obtain a depth plane of each depth plane for the variation energy; 4) merging the depth planes for different energy levels at the same position to obtain a depth plane for each depth plane and energy of a predetermined group of energy levels; 5) identifying the material of the objects for each of which a grey reconstruction in said depth plane succeeds.”


However, current collimation systems that generate X-ray beams are unable to effectively generate multiple non-parallel X-ray beams from the same source having sufficiently similar beam characteristics further having minimized, yet similar, dose drop-offs at a given angle. As a result, these systems find limited application in security inspection systems, portals, baggage, and/or cargo inspection systems. Hence, there is need for collimation systems and methods that enable the generation of multiple non-parallel X-ray beams from the same source having sufficiently similar beam characteristics.


SUMMARY

The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods, which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, and not limiting in scope. The present application discloses numerous embodiments.


In some embodiments, the present specification describes an adjustable collimator device adapted to collimate a beam of energy emitted from a radiation source, comprising: an elongated body with a front-end and a rear-end; a first plurality of emission apertures equally spaced around a longitudinal axis extending through a center of the elongated body, wherein the longitudinal axis defines a zero-degree position, wherein the first plurality of emission apertures is placed proximate the rear-end of the elongated body, and wherein the first plurality of emission apertures is configured to receive a beam of energy entering the adjustable collimator device and sample the beam of energy generated; and a second plurality of apertures placed proximate the front-end of the elongated body, wherein the second plurality of apertures are adjustable such that a first of the second plurality of apertures can be configured to have a first angular offset relative to the zero-axis and a second of the second plurality of apertures can be configured to have a second angular offset relative to the zero-axis, and wherein the first angular offset is equal to or different from the second angular offset.


Optionally, the adjustable collimator device is configured to collimate the beam of energy such that a first energy beam and a second energy beam, separate from the first energy beam, are concurrently emitted from the adjustable collimator device, wherein the first energy beam and the second energy beam have substantially similar characteristics.


Optionally, the adjustable collimator device and the radiation source are rotated around a position of the radiation source by half of an angle of separation between the first energy beam and the second energy beam, to bring either one of the first energy beam or the second energy beam perpendicular to an object being imaged by the adjustable collimator device.


Optionally, the beam of energy is an X-ray beam.


Optionally, the second plurality of emission apertures comprises first and second movable apertures.


Optionally, the first movable aperture comprises two adjustable jaws that, in combination, define the first movable aperture and are configured to adjust the first movable aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the zero axis and wherein the second movable aperture comprises two adjustable jaws that, in combination, define the second movable aperture and are configured to adjust the second movable aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the zero axis such that the first movable aperture and second movable aperture concurrently generate X-ray beams equally offset from the zero axis.


Optionally, the first plurality of emission apertures comprises third and fourth fixed apertures.


Optionally, the two adjustable jaws of each of the first and second movable apertures are positioned such that the adjustable jaws do not occlude the beam of energy.


Optionally, the substantially similar characteristics of the first energy beam and the second energy beam include dose and energy.


Optionally, the first angular offset is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.


Optionally, the second angular offset is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.


In some embodiments, the present specification describes a radiographic imaging method comprising: positioning an adjustable collimator device near a radiation source configured to generate an X-ray beam, wherein the adjustable collimator device includes a first et of collimators and a second set of collimators; collimating the X-ray beam, using the first set of collimators, to concurrently generate a first X-ray beam and a second X-ray beam, wherein the first X-ray beam and the second X-ray beam are not parallel; collimating the first X-ray beam, using a first of the second set of collimators, to generate a third X-ray beam, wherein the third X-ray beam emanates from the collimator device at a first angle of separation with respect to a central axis of the collimator device; and collimating the second X-ray beam, using a second of the second set of collimators, to generate a fourth X-ray beam, wherein the fourth X-ray beam emanates from the collimator device at a second angle of separation with respect to the central axis.


Optionally, the first angle of separation is equal to the second angle of separation.


Optionally, the first set of collimators define first and second apertures of fixed width, and wherein the first and second apertures are positioned equidistant from the central axis.


Optionally, the second set of collimators define third and fourth apertures, and wherein widths of the third and fourth apertures are adjustable.


Optionally, the third aperture is defined by first and second adjustable jaws and the fourth aperture is defined by third and fourth adjustable jaws, wherein the first and second adjustable jaws are configured to adjust the third aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the central axis, and wherein the third and fourth adjustable jaws are configured to adjust the fourth aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the central axis.


Optionally, the first and second adjustable jaws as well as the third and fourth adjustable jaws are positioned within the collimator device such that the first, second, third and fourth adjustable jaws do not occlude the first and second X-ray beams.


Optionally, the third and fourth X-ray beams have substantially similar dose and energy characteristics.


Optionally, the first angle of separation is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.


Optionally, the second angle of separation is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.


Optionally, the method further comprises generating first scan data by detecting the third X-ray beam after the third X-ray beam passes through an object being scanned; generating second scan data by detecting the fourth X-ray beam after the fourth X-ray beam passes through the object; generating first and second image data by processing the first and second scan data, respectively; and using the first and second image data, determining material composition and depth corresponding to contents of the object.


The present specification also discloses systems and methods for detecting X-ray radiation and generating an image of an object by utilizing two angled X-ray beams generated by an adjustable collimator system. In some embodiments, the adjustable collimator system for collimating a beam of energy emitted from a radiation source comprises a first plurality of emission apertures equally spaced around a zero-degree axis along an elongated plate-like body, the first plurality of emission apertures includes a fixed aperture and a movable aperture, wherein the movable aperture is provided with adjustable jaws to adjust the aperture at different angles to obtain concurrent generation of multiple collimated X-ray beams from a single radiation source. The X-ray beam from the radiation source passes through the first plurality of apertures, the first plurality of apertures samples the X-ray beam emitted from the radiation source and the two angled collimated beams exit through the second plurality of apertures at the rear-end of the adjustable collimator system. The collimated beams thus generated are concurrent with an angle of separation between them. Optionally, in an embodiment, the first plurality of emission apertures is made of materials such as but not limited to lead, tungsten, gold or uranium thereof. Moreover, the angle of separation between the two concurrent collimated beams generated by the adjustable collimator system is less than 10 degrees. Preferably the angle of separation between the two concurrent collimated beams generated by the adjustable collimator system is in the range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.


The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate various embodiments of systems, methods, and embodiments of various other aspects of the disclosure. Any person with ordinary skills in the art will appreciate that the illustrated element boundaries (e.g. boxes, groups of boxes, or other shapes) in the figures represent one example of the boundaries. It may be that in some examples one element may be designed as multiple elements or that multiple elements may be designed as one element. In some examples, an element shown as an internal component of one element may be implemented as an external component in another and vice versa. Furthermore, elements may not be drawn to scale. Non-limiting and non-exhaustive descriptions are described with reference to the following drawings. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating principles.



FIG. 1 illustrates an internal cross-sectional view of an adjustable collimator system, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 2A illustrates a perspective view of an adjustable collimator attached to a radiation source, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 2B illustrates a side view of an adjustable collimator attached to a radiation source, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 2C illustrates a front view of an adjustable collimator attached to a radiation source, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 3 illustrates an architectural representation of a radiographic imaging system, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 4A illustrates a top view of a first configuration of the radiographic imaging system of FIG. 3, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 4B illustrates a top view of a second configuration of the radiographic imaging system of FIG. 3, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 5 illustrates a top down or plan view of a radiation detection module, according to an embodiment of the present specification;



FIG. 6 illustrates a spatial distribution of X-ray photons caused around an off-axis target;



FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a plurality of exemplary steps of a method of using an adjustable collimator device to determine material composition and depth corresponding to contents of an object (or detection space), in accordance with some embodiments of the present specification; and



FIG. 8 illustrates a collimator insert having a predefined slot structure, in accordance with some embodiments of the present specification.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


In the description and claims of the application, each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated. Thus, they are intended to be equivalent in meaning and be open-ended in that an item or items following any one of these words is not meant to be an exhaustive listing of such item or items, or meant to be limited to only the listed item or items. It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.


It must also be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context dictates otherwise. Although any systems and methods similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the present disclosure, the preferred, systems and methods are now described.


In some embodiments, the present specification describes systems and methods for generating an image of an object by employing two angled X-ray beams generated by a radiographic imaging system. According to an aspect, the radiographic imaging system comprises positioning an adjustable collimator system near a radiation source with a LINAC target emitting radiation, collimating the radiation emitted from the LINAC target using the adjustable collimator system, thus generating two concurrent collimated beams simultaneously with a predefined, yet customizable, angle of separation between them, with each beam having beam characteristics substantially similar to each other. The emitted collimated beams of X-ray are poly-energetic and consists of a wide range of energies (ranging from 0 eV up to a maximum output of the LINAC), having a short wavelength and high frequencies. Furthermore, the radiographic imaging method consists of detecting the radiation that passes through the adjustable collimator system using a radiation detection module and processing an image recorded by the radiation detection module, using an image acquisition system and producing a desired image using a computer processing system thereby determining the material depth which aids in composition calculation of one or more objects in a detection space.


In some embodiments, the present specification is also directed toward systems and methods for detecting an image of an object by employing two angled X-ray beams generated by a radiographic imaging system. According to an aspect, the radiographic imaging method comprises the steps of generating two X-ray beams having an angle therebetween, using an adjustable collimation system, and directing the two angled X-ray beams to penetrate through the object under inspection in order to obtain transmission data. The transmission data is then analyzed to determine the material depth and composition of the object being inspected.



FIG. 1 is a plan cross-sectional view of an adjustable collimator system 100, in accordance with some embodiments of the present specification. In embodiments, the adjustable collimator system 100 is configured as a double-slit secondary collimator. The system 100 includes an elongated plate-like body 105 having first and second side-plates 110a, 110b positioned substantially parallel to each other and defining a gap, passage or channel 115 between the plates 110a, 110b. The body 105 is coupled to an X-ray source 120 such that a rear-end 106 is positioned proximate to the X-ray source 120 and a front-end 104 is positioned distal from the X-ray source 120. In some embodiments, the X-ray source 120 is a LINAC. A central axis 122 is indicative of a direction of a primary X-ray beam from the source 120 and is representative of a 0 degrees reference. It should be appreciated that, in some embodiments, an internal primary collimator of the LINAC source 120 is modified to remove a central axis aperture and, instead, introduce two separate apertures at equal angles from the center.


The collimator system 100 includes a first set of fixed collimating jaws 125a, 125b positioned proximate the rear-end 106 and that extend between the first and second side-plates 110a, 110b. The first set of collimating jaws 125a, 125b define first and second slits, apertures or openings 127a, 127b that serve to simultaneously or concurrently generate first and second non-parallel X-ray fan beams 132, 134. In some embodiments, the first and second slits, apertures or openings 127a, 127b are positioned equidistant from the central axis 122. In some embodiments, a width of the first and second slits, apertures or openings 127a, 127b is predefined and fixed. In some embodiments, the first and second slits, apertures or opening 127a, 127b are made of materials such as, but not limited to, lead, tungsten, gold or uranium.


It should be appreciated that the first set of collimating jaws 125a, 125b provide a “crude” collimation, mainly also catching scatter off the surface of the LINAC shielding.


The collimator system 100 further includes a second set of adjustable collimating jaws 140, 150. The collimating jaws 140 are coupled to the first side-plate 110a and include two displaceable diaphragm plates or jaws 140a, 140b defining a third slit. The collimating jaws 150 are coupled to the second side-plate 110b and include two displaceable diaphragm plates or jaws 150a, 150b defining a fourth slit. The diaphragm plates or jaws 140a, 140b and 150a, 150b of the respective collimators 140, 150 are movable relative to one another to modulate and achieve desired widths of the third and fourth slit openings. In some embodiments, the diaphragm plates or jaws 140a, 140b, 150a, 150b are offset along a direction of X-ray emission to allow for location of adjustment rods 133 (that connect the collimating jaws 140 and 150 to the sides 110a, 110b of the secondary collimator assembly 100) to not occlude the X-ray beam path.


It should be appreciated that the second set of collimating jaws 140, 150 collimate the respective X-ray beams 132, 134 down so that they only impinge on the front of the crystals on respective detector arrays.


During operation, the first X-ray fan beam 132 is collimated by the collimating jaws 140 while the second X-ray fan beam 134 is collimated by the collimating jaws 150 so that the first and second X-ray fan beams 132, 134 emanate from the system 100 at desired angles of separation with respect to the central axis 122 before entering a scan tunnel. In various embodiments, the third and fourth slits defined by the second set of collimating jaws 140, 150 are spatially separated from each other so that the first and second X-ray fan beams 132, 134 have the desired angles of separation with reference to the central axis 122.


In accordance with some aspects of the present specification, the first and second X-ray fan beams 132, 134 exiting the adjustable collimator system 100 possess substantially similar beam characteristics referred to as dose and energy, accounting for a symmetric “roll-off” in both dose and energy at equal angular displacements from the central axis 122 of X-ray generation. It should be appreciated that the spatial separation of the third and fourth slits has a bearing on changes in the X-ray spectrum of the first and second X-ray fan beams 132, 134 when measured at different angles of emission. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the spatial position (within the collimator system 100) and relative separation of the third and fourth slits is achieved so as to offset the first X-ray fan beam 132 by a first angle of separation ‘A1’ from the central axis 122 and the second X-ray fan beam 134 by a second angle of separation ‘A2’ from the central axis 122.


In some embodiments, the relative location of the two points of X-ray emission from the LINAC can be configured to minimize differences in energy and dose. In some embodiments, the first angle of separation is equal to the second angle of separation and each of the first and second angles of separation ranges from 1 degree to 5 degrees from the central axis 122. In some embodiments, a sum of the first and second angles of separation (that is, A1+A2) is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees. In some embodiments, a sum of the first and second angles of separation (that is, A1+A2) is not greater than 10 degrees. In some embodiments, a sum of the first and second angles of separation (that is, A1+A2) is in a range of 1 degree to 20 degrees, or any numerical increment therein.


In embodiments where both first and second X-ray fan beams 132, 134 are offset from the central axis 122, the radiation source 120 and the collimator assembly 100 are rotated so that one of the first and second X-ray beams 132, 134 is imaging an object under inspection, such as, for example, cargo, at 90 degrees. This results in first and second scanned images, corresponding to the first and second X-ray beams 132, 134, that are substantially similar in performance (such as, but not limited to, intensity, contrast, sharpness) since dose and energy (of the first and second X-ray beams 132, 134) is substantially symmetrical around the 0 degree central axis 122.


In some embodiments, the primary X-ray beam is sampled by the first set of fixed collimating jaws 125a, 125b to emit both the first X-ray fan beam 132 substantially along the central axis 122 (and more specifically, at a 0-degree angle) and the second X-ray fan beam 134. The first X-ray fan beam 132 is further collimated by the collimating jaws 140 for shaping the width of the beam and the second X-ray fan beam 134 is further collimated by the collimating jaws 150 and eventually emitted at an offset or angle of separation from the central axis 122. Thus, in such embodiments, the first aperture 127a is along the central axis 122 while the second aperture 127b is at a distance from the central axis 122 (so that the first X-ray beam 132 is now emitted along the central axis 122 and is collimated by the jaws 140 for shaping the width of the beam 132). Consequently, the first X-ray fan beam 132 yields the highest dose and highest energy while the second X-ray fan beam 134 has a drop off in energy and dose resulting in a corresponding off-axis scan image having performance capabilities different from the scan image corresponding to the first X-ray fan beam 132.



FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C respectively illustrate perspective, side and front views of an adjustable collimator system 205 attached to a radiation source 220, in accordance with some embodiments of the present specification. Referring to FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C simultaneously, the adjustable collimator system 205 includes an elongated plate-like body 203 having first and second side-plates 210a, 210b. The adjustable collimator system 205 is coupled or attached to the radiation source 220 using a top mount pack 208. In embodiments, the top mount pack is comprised of aluminum. In embodiments, the pack is structured as an L-shaped rack and includes a first portion for attachment to a first structure, such as the radiation source, and a second portion, perpendicular to the first portion, for attachment to a second structure, such as the adjustable collimator system. In embodiments, the top mount pack includes a mating hole and screw attachment system. In further embodiments, the top mount pack is used to provide at least one of the following: 1) a solution specific to a linac assembly to allow for attachment of a secondary collimator and/or 2) ensuring a minimum vibration/movement of the secondary collimator during operation.


As described earlier with reference to FIG. 1, the adjustable collimator system 205 includes a first set of fixed collimating jaws (not visible) positioned proximate the radiation source 220 (and towards a rear-end 206 of the system 205) along with a second set of adjustable collimating jaws 240, 250 positioned distal from the radiation source 220 (and towards a front-end 204 of the system 205). In accordance with some embodiments, width of the apertures or slits in the first set of collimating jaws is predefined and fixed whereas widths of the apertures or slits of the second set of collimating jaws 240, 250 are adjustable by moving two pairs of displaceable diaphragm plates or jaws of the second collimating jaws 240, 250.


During a scanning operation, a primary X-ray beam generated by the radiation source 220 is split by two slits or apertures of the first set of fixed collimating jaws into concurrent first and second X-ray fan beams. Further, the first X-ray fan beam is collimated by the adjustable collimating jaws 240 to exit the front-end 204 at a first angle of separation from a central longitudinal axis (identified as axis 122 in FIG. 1) of the collimator system 205 while the second X-ray fan beam is collimated by the adjustable collimating jaws 250 to exit the front-end 204 at a second angle of separation from the central longitudinal axis. The displaceable jaws of the second set of collimators 240, 250 are adjusted to modulate angles and/or widths of their respective slits or apertures in order to obtain desired first and second angles of separation.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram representation of a radiographic imaging system 300 coupled with an adjustable collimator system 306. The radiographic imaging system 300 comprises of a radiation source 302, an adjustable collimator system 306, an object being inspected 308, detector collimators 310, a radiation detection module 312, an image acquisition system 314 and a computer processing system 316. The radiation source 302 is an X-ray generator that generates X-rays of different energy levels that are collimated by the adjustable collimator system 306 before being incident on the target 304. The adjustable collimator system 306 aids in sampling the X-ray generated from the radiation source 302 into two beam sectors with a predefined angle between them. In addition, the radiographic imaging system 300 consists of target detector collimators 310 in order to reduce the scattering of X-ray radiation. The radiation detection module 312 receives the X-rays of different energy levels and converts them into electrical signals. The image acquisition system 314 receives the electrical signals from the radiation detection module 312 and generates image data from the electrical signals. The computer processing system 316, which receives the image data from the image acquisition system 314, processes the image data at different energy levels in order to determine the depth and composition of material contained within the object 308.


According to one embodiment of the present specification, FIG. 4A illustrates a top view of a first configuration 400a of a radiographic imaging system 401 coupled to an adjustable collimator system. The radiographic imaging system 401 with reference to FIG. 4A illustrates a first fixed collimator 404 splitting a primary X-ray beam 403 emanating from a radiation source 402 into first and second X-ray beams 420, 425. The first and second X-ray beams 420, 425 are further collimated by second set of adjustable slit collimators 440, 450 into two angled beams 422, 427. The two collimation slits of the second set of collimators 440, 450 shape the two X-ray beams 420, 425 to generate two angled beams 422, 427 having respective first and second angles of separation with a central axis 407. In some embodiments, each of the first and second angles of separation ranges from 1 degree to 5 degrees from the central axis 407. In some embodiments, a total angle of separation between the two beams 422, 427 ranges from 5 degrees to 10 degrees. In some embodiments, a total angle of separation between the two beams 422, 427 is less than or equal to 10 degrees.


Target detector collimators 410a, 410b help reduce the scattering of X-ray beams 422, 427 and cross-talk. A radiation detection module includes a first detector array 412a to receive the X-ray beam 422 after transmission through an object 408 and a second detector array 412b to receive the X-ray beam 427 after transmission through the object 408. The first and second detector arrays 412a, 412b generate corresponding first and second scan signals that are transmitted to corresponding image acquisition systems that generate corresponding first and second image data. Thereafter, a computer processing system 435 carries out processing of the first and second image data in order to determine the material depth which aids in composition calculation of various materials or content of the object (or detection space).


According to another embodiment of the present specification, FIG. 4B illustrates a top view of a second configuration 400b of the radiographic imaging system 401 coupled to the adjustable collimator system. To avoid repetition, like numerical references in FIGS. 4A and 4B refer to like elements. In the second configuration 400b, the first and second X-ray beams 420, 425 are offset relative to the 0-degree central axis 407 (such that the first and second beams have an angle of separation between them as in the first configuration 400a). This is done in order to achieve substantially similar beams. However, without any source rotation, this would result in the generation of two images, neither of which give a view “perpendicular” to the direction of travel of the vehicle under inspection. Therefore, in embodiments, at the same time as the offset of first and second X-ray beams 420, 425 is achieved relative to 0° central axis 407, the entire source 402 and adjustable collimation system 440, 450 are rotated around the source position (that is, yaw) by half (½) the angle of separation (existing in the first configuration 400a) between the first and second beams 420, 425. In other words, the source 402 and adjustable collimation system 440, 450 are rotated so that one of the first and second X-ray beams, that is the X-ray beam 427 in FIG. 4B, is imaging the object 408 at 90 degrees while still maintaining the energy equivalence between the first and second X-ray beams 422, 427. Rotating the source assembly including 402 and 440, 450, by an amount equal to the offset of each beam from the central axis, brings one beam (in this case beam 427) back to perpendicular and the other (beam 422) at an angle of the total separation of the two beams. This embodiment enables at least one image that is of a standard geometry of 90 degrees to the object being imaged. Thus, the second configuration 400b is also characterized by the first and second X-ray beams 422, 427 being substantially similar in performance (such as, but not limited to, intensity, contrast, sharpness) since dose and energy (of the first and second X-ray beams 422, 427) is substantially symmetrical around the 0-degree central axis 407.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 5 illustrates a top down or plan view of a radiation detection module 500. The radiation detection module 500 includes left detector array 502a and right detector array 502b arranged at a pre-calibrated angle. Preferably the pre-calibrated angle between both the arrays 502a and 502b ranges from 1 degree to 10 degrees and preferably from 5 degrees to 10 degrees. The left detector array 502a and right detector array 502b are arranged such that both the arrays maintain same source to array distance. In order to maintain the same source to array distance the radiation detection module 500 needs to be moved closer to the scan tunnel of a radiographic imaging system and maintain a pre-calibrated angle of 1 degree to 10 degrees or 5 degrees to 10 degrees between both the arrays of the radiation detection module 500.


Moreover, the radiation detection module 500 directly faces the two angled X-ray beams emitted from the adjustable collimator system. Hence, the detection module 500 scans and examines the object under inspection in a symmetric fashion and transmits the scan signals to a corresponding image acquisition system.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 6 illustrates a spatial distribution 600 of X-ray photons generated around a target. FIG. 6 demonstrates that as the X-ray energy increases, the amount of forward emission increases and as one moves away from the 0-degree angle there is a drop in energy and dose. The two collimation slits (corresponding to the displaceable second set of collimators 140, 150 of FIG. 1) of the adjustable collimation system shape the X-ray beam emitted from the radiation source into two ray beams with an angle between them. The angle of separation between the two X-ray beams generated by the adjustable collimation system is preferably in the range of 1 degree to 10 degrees, although it may be of any angular separation.


Changes in the X-ray spectrum measured at different angles of emission are referred to as dose and energy roll off. The embodiments of the present invention consider three different scenarios of splitting an X-ray beam emitted by the radiation source. With reference to FIG. 6, a first option is to maintain a first normal X-ray beam to be emitted in the direction of the electron beam which is 0 degrees, that yields the highest dose and highest energy. For example, the X-rays emitted in the direction of 0 degrees can be in a range of 20 MV. However, a second offset beam, which is not directed along the 0-degree direction but rather is offset from that direction by a predefined angle of separation (with reference to the 0 degree direction), experiences a drop off in energy and dose and therefore the first option results in two beams having substantially different characteristics.


A second option with reference to FIG. 6 is to offset both the first and second beams relative to a 0 degree centerline by, for example, positioning the adjustable collimation system, such that each of the beams is imaging the object at the same degree of offset. Therefore, the quality of X-ray inspection resulting from the two beams are closer in performance because the dose and energy are symmetrical around the 0-degree axis. In one embodiment, the preferred angle of separation between the two beams is not more than 10 degrees and is preferably equal to, or between, 1 degree to 10 degrees and more preferably in a range of 5 to 10 degrees. The benefit of a 1 degree to 10-degree separation is that, at 10 degrees or less, the dose drop off is limited and still provides sufficient penetrative capability. Additionally, from scanned image perspective, there is a desired optimal range of angles of separation for which a useful image would be generated. If the angle of separation is too small the realized benefits are negligible in identifying structures that are positioned on the 0 degree axis. Again, if the angle of separation is too large this would result in firing X-ray beams through too large an inspection volume, of an object under inspection, to reveal any additional information.


A third option with reference to FIG. 6 is to offset both the first beam and second beam relative to the 0-degree centerline (such that the first beam and the second beam have an angle of separation between them as described with reference to the second option above) and at the same time rotating the entire source and adjustable collimation system around the source position (that is, yaw) by half (½) the angle of separation between the first and second beams. In other words, the source and adjustable collimation system are rotated so that at least one of the first X-ray beam and second X-ray beam is imaging an object under inspection, such as, for example, cargo, at 90 degrees while still maintaining the energy equivalence between the first and second X-ray beams.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a plurality of exemplary steps of a method of using an adjustable collimator device to determine material composition and depth corresponding to contents of an object (or detection space), in accordance with some embodiments of the present specification. At step 702, an adjustable collimator device is positioned near a radiation source configured to generate an X-ray beam, wherein the adjustable collimator device includes first and second set of collimators.


In some embodiments, the first set of collimators define first and second apertures of fixed width, and wherein the first and second apertures are positioned equidistant from a central axis of the collimator device. In some embodiments, the second set of collimators define third and fourth apertures, and wherein widths of the third and fourth apertures are adjustable. In some embodiments, the third aperture is defined by first and second adjustable jaws and the fourth aperture is defined by third and fourth adjustable jaws, wherein the first and second adjustable jaws are configured to adjust the third aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the central axis, and wherein the third and fourth adjustable jaws are configured to adjust the fourth aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the central axis.


In some embodiments, the first and second adjustable jaws as well as the third and fourth adjustable jaws are positioned within the collimator device such that the first, second, third and fourth adjustable jaws do not occlude the first and second X-ray beams.


At step 704, the X-ray beam is collimated, using the first set of collimators, to concurrently generate first and second non-parallel X-ray beams.


At step 706, the first X-ray beam is collimated, using a first of the second set of collimators, to generate a third X-ray beam, wherein the third X-ray beam emanates from the collimator device at a first angle of separation with respect to the central axis of the collimator device. At step 708, the second X-ray beam is collimated, using a second of the second set of collimators, to generate a fourth X-ray beam, wherein the fourth X-ray beam emanates from the collimator device at a second angle of separation with respect to the central axis.


In some embodiments, the first angle of separation is equal to the second angle of separation. In some embodiments, the first angle of separation is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees. In some embodiments, the second angle of separation is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.


In some embodiments, the third and fourth X-ray beams have substantially similar dose and energy characteristics.


At step 710, first scan data is generated by detecting the third X-ray beam after the third X-ray beam passes through an object being scanned. At step 712, second scan data is generated by detecting the fourth X-ray beam after the fourth X-ray beam passes through the object. At step 714, first and second image data is generated by processing the first and second scan data, respectively. Finally, at step 716, the first and second image data are used to determine material composition and depth corresponding to contents of the object.



FIG. 8 shows a removable collimator insert 800, configured to be inserted into the shielding of an X-ray radiation housing, such as a primary shielding structure, inserted in a primary collimator of a LINAC or inserted within an existing slot extending outward from an electron beam target. The collimator insert 800 comprises a block of material 810 having two hollowed pathways or slits 802, 804 that are cored, carved, drilled or otherwise constructed within the block of material 810. The slits 802, 804 diverge at a predefined angle from each other. More specifically, the slits 802, 804 diverge distally from the entry point 801 in the collimator insert 800 at an angle of divergence relative to a central axis 806 where the angle of divergence is equal for both slits 802, 804. Therefore, upon exit 803 from the collimator insert 800 the resulting first and second fan beams 815, 820 have an equal displacement 808 and 810 relative to the central axis 806.


In accordance with some embodiments, the collimator insert 800 is a complementary modification (albeit the collimator insert will differ with different LINAC shielding configurations from different LINAC vendors) that allows for the generation of the first and second beams 815, 820 directly after the LINAC target where the X-ray beams are generated.


The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments.


It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Therefore, while the embodiments herein have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modifications.


The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the systems and methods of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An adjustable collimator device adapted to collimate a beam of X-rays emitted from a radiation source, comprising: an elongated body with a front-end and a rear-end;a first plurality of emission apertures equally spaced around a longitudinal axis extending through a center of the elongated body, wherein the longitudinal axis defines a zero-degree position, wherein the first plurality of emission apertures is placed proximate the rear-end of the elongated body, and wherein the first plurality of emission apertures is configured to receive the beam of X-rays entering the adjustable collimator device; anda second plurality of emission apertures placed proximate the front-end of the elongated body, wherein the second plurality of apertures are adjustable such that a first of the second plurality of apertures can be configured to have a first angular offset relative to the zero-axis and a second of the second plurality of apertures can be configured to have a second angular offset relative to the zero-axis, and wherein each of the second plurality of apertures is formed by two jaws having lengths which extend in the same direction as the beam of X-rays such that the beam of X-rays is collimated to yield a first beam of X-rays and a second beam of X-rays, separate from the first beam of X-rays but with substantially similar characteristics, that are concurrently emitted from the adjustable collimator device.
  • 2. The adjustable collimator device of claim 1, wherein the adjustable collimator device is configured to be rotated around a position of the radiation source by half of an angle of separation between the first beam of X-rays and the second beam of X-rays, to bring either one of the first beam of X-rays or the second beam of X-rays perpendicular to an object being imaged by the adjustable collimator device.
  • 3. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 1, wherein the first of the second plurality of apertures and the second of the second plurality of apertures are configured to be movable.
  • 4. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 3, wherein the two jaws of the first movable aperture are adjustable jaws that, in combination, define the first movable aperture and are configured to adjust the first movable aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the zero axis and wherein the two jaws of the second movable aperture are adjustable jaws that, in combination, define the second movable aperture and are configured to adjust the second movable aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the zero axis such that the first movable aperture and second movable aperture concurrently generate said first and second X-ray beams equally offset from the zero axis.
  • 5. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 4, wherein the two adjustable jaws of each of the first moveable aperture of the second plurality of apertures and second movable apertures of the second plurality of apertures are positioned such that the adjustable jaws do not occlude the beam of X-rays.
  • 6. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 1, wherein the first plurality of emission apertures comprises first and second fixed apertures.
  • 7. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 1, wherein said substantially similar characteristics of the first beam of X-rays and the second beam of X-rays comprise dose and energy.
  • 8. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 1, wherein the first angular offset is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.
  • 9. The adjustable collimator device according to claim 1, wherein the second angular offset is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.
  • 10. A radiographic imaging method comprising: positioning an adjustable collimator device near a radiation source configured to generate an X-ray beam, wherein the adjustable collimator device includes a first set of collimators and a second set of collimators, wherein the second set of collimators define a first aperture and a second aperture, wherein the first aperture is defined by first and second adjustable jaws and the second aperture is defined by third and fourth adjustable jaws and wherein each of the first, second, third, and fourth adjustable jaws have lengths which extend in the same direction as the beam of X-rays;collimating the X-ray beam, using the first set of collimators, to concurrently generate a first X-ray beam and a second X-ray beam, wherein the first X-ray beam and the second X-ray beam are not parallel;collimating the first X-ray beam, using a first of the second set of collimators, to generate a third X-ray beam, wherein the third X-ray beam emanates from the collimator device at a first angle of separation with respect to a central axis of the collimator device; andcollimating the second X-ray beam, using a second of the second set of collimators, to generate a fourth X-ray beam, wherein the fourth X-ray beam emanates from the collimator device at a second angle of separation with respect to the central axis.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first angle of separation is equal to the second angle of separation.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the first set of collimators define first and second apertures of fixed width, and wherein the first and second apertures are positioned equidistant from the central axis.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein widths of the first and second apertures of the second set of collimators are adjustable.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the first and second adjustable jaws are configured to adjust the first aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the central axis, and wherein the third and fourth adjustable jaws are configured to adjust the second aperture to a plurality of different angular offsets relative to the central axis.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the first and second adjustable jaws as well as the third and fourth adjustable jaws are positioned within the collimator device such that the first, second, third and fourth adjustable jaws do not occlude the first and second X-ray beams.
  • 16. The method of claim 10, wherein the third and fourth X-ray beams have substantially similar dose and energy characteristics.
  • 17. The method of claim 10, wherein the first angle of separation is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.
  • 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the second angle of separation is in a range of 5 degrees to 10 degrees.
  • 19. The method of claim 10, further comprising: generating first scan data by detecting the third X-ray beam after the third X-ray beam passes through an object being scanned;generating second scan data by detecting the fourth X-ray beam after the fourth X-ray beam passes through the object;generating first and second image data by processing the first and second scan data, respectively; andusing the first and second image data, determining material composition and depth corresponding to contents of the object.
CROSS-REFERENCE

The present application relies on U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 63/261,991, titled “Methods and Systems for the Concurrent Generation of Multiple Substantially Similar X-Ray Beams” and filed on Oct. 1, 2021, for priority, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (662)
Number Name Date Kind
2331586 Wasisco Oct 1943 A
2831123 Daly Apr 1958 A
2972430 Johnson Feb 1961 A
3140397 Henry Jul 1964 A
3151245 Wilson, Jr. Sep 1964 A
3275831 Martin Sep 1966 A
3603793 Warren Sep 1971 A
3766387 Heffan Oct 1973 A
3780291 Stein Dec 1973 A
3784837 Holmstrom Jan 1974 A
3898463 Noakes Aug 1975 A
3961186 Leunbach Jun 1976 A
3971948 Pfeiler Jul 1976 A
4031401 Jacob Jun 1977 A
4031545 Stein Jun 1977 A
4045672 Watanabe Aug 1977 A
4047035 Dennhoven Sep 1977 A
4064440 Roder Dec 1977 A
4139771 Dennhoven Feb 1979 A
4143273 Richey Mar 1979 A
4160165 Mccombs Jul 1979 A
4180737 Kingsley Dec 1979 A
4200800 Swift Apr 1980 A
4203036 Tschunt May 1980 A
4210811 Dennhoven Jul 1980 A
4216499 Manfred Aug 1980 A
4228357 Annis Oct 1980 A
4242583 Annis Dec 1980 A
4242588 Huang Dec 1980 A
4259582 Albert Mar 1981 A
4260898 Annis Apr 1981 A
4267446 Brown May 1981 A
4315146 Rudin Feb 1982 A
4342914 Bjorkholm Aug 1982 A
4366382 Kotowski Dec 1982 A
4380817 Harding Apr 1983 A
4389729 Stein Jun 1983 A
4420182 Kaneshiro Dec 1983 A
4430568 Yoshida Feb 1984 A
4472822 Swift Sep 1984 A
4494001 Peck Jan 1985 A
4497062 Mistretta Jan 1985 A
4497768 Caldwell Feb 1985 A
4503332 Annis Mar 1985 A
4511799 Bjorkholm Apr 1985 A
4525854 Molbert Jun 1985 A
4566113 Gerhard Jan 1986 A
4599740 Cable Jul 1986 A
4620099 Schoenig Oct 1986 A
4641330 Herwig Feb 1987 A
4646339 Rice Feb 1987 A
4667107 Wang May 1987 A
4691332 Burstein Sep 1987 A
4692937 Sashin Sep 1987 A
4718075 Horn Jan 1988 A
4736401 Donges Apr 1988 A
4754469 Harding Jun 1988 A
4788436 Koechner Nov 1988 A
4788704 Donges Nov 1988 A
4789930 Sones Dec 1988 A
4799247 Annis Jan 1989 A
4807637 Bjorkholm Feb 1989 A
4809312 Annis Feb 1989 A
4825454 Annis Apr 1989 A
4839913 Annis Jun 1989 A
4864142 Gomberg Sep 1989 A
4870670 Geus Sep 1989 A
4884289 Glockmann Nov 1989 A
4897550 Bernard Jan 1990 A
4899283 Annis Feb 1990 A
4953189 Wang Aug 1990 A
4956856 Harding Sep 1990 A
4979202 Siczek Dec 1990 A
4991189 Boomgaarden Feb 1991 A
5006299 Gozani Apr 1991 A
5007072 Jenkins Apr 1991 A
5008911 Harding Apr 1991 A
5022062 Annis Jun 1991 A
5056129 Steinmeyer Oct 1991 A
5065418 Bermbach Nov 1991 A
5068883 DeHaan Nov 1991 A
5076993 Sawa Dec 1991 A
5077771 Skillicorn Dec 1991 A
5078952 Gozani Jan 1992 A
5091924 Bermbach Feb 1992 A
5098640 Gozani Mar 1992 A
5102506 Tanielian Apr 1992 A
5103099 Bourdinaud Apr 1992 A
5114662 Gozani May 1992 A
5127030 Annis Jun 1992 A
5153439 Gozani Oct 1992 A
5162096 Gozani Nov 1992 A
5179581 Annis Jan 1993 A
5181234 Smith Jan 1993 A
5182764 Peschmann Jan 1993 A
5224144 Annis Jun 1993 A
5237598 Albert Aug 1993 A
5247561 Kotowski Sep 1993 A
5253283 Annis Oct 1993 A
5263075 McGann Nov 1993 A
5265144 Harding Nov 1993 A
5281820 Groh Jan 1994 A
5289510 Mihalczo Feb 1994 A
5302817 Yokota Apr 1994 A
5313511 Annis May 1994 A
5319547 Krug Jun 1994 A
5338927 De Groot Aug 1994 A
5343046 Smith Aug 1994 A
5367552 Peschmann Nov 1994 A
5376795 Hasegawa Dec 1994 A
5379334 Zimmer Jan 1995 A
5388128 Gozani Feb 1995 A
5391878 Petroff Feb 1995 A
5394454 Harding Feb 1995 A
5420905 Bertozzi May 1995 A
5420959 Walker May 1995 A
5430787 Norton Jul 1995 A
5446288 Tumer Aug 1995 A
5493596 Annis Feb 1996 A
5524133 Neale Jun 1996 A
5528656 Annis Jun 1996 A
5548123 Perez-Mendez Aug 1996 A
5550380 Sugawara Aug 1996 A
5600144 Worstell Feb 1997 A
5600303 Husseiny Feb 1997 A
5600700 Krug Feb 1997 A
5629515 Maekawa May 1997 A
5629523 Ngo May 1997 A
5638420 Armistead Jun 1997 A
5642393 Krug Jun 1997 A
5642394 Rothschild Jun 1997 A
5665969 Beusch Sep 1997 A
5666393 Annis Sep 1997 A
5687210 Maitrejean Nov 1997 A
5692028 Geus Nov 1997 A
5692029 Husseiny Nov 1997 A
5696806 Grodzins Dec 1997 A
5734166 Czirr Mar 1998 A
5745543 De Bokx Apr 1998 A
5751837 Watanabe May 1998 A
5763886 Schulte Jun 1998 A
5764683 Swift Jun 1998 A
5768334 Maitrejean Jun 1998 A
5783829 Sealock Jul 1998 A
5784507 Holm-Kennedy Jul 1998 A
5787145 Geus Jul 1998 A
5805660 Perion Sep 1998 A
5812720 Dannoux Sep 1998 A
5838759 Armistead Nov 1998 A
5856673 Ikegami Jan 1999 A
5866907 Drukier Feb 1999 A
5903623 Swift May 1999 A
5910973 Grodzins Jun 1999 A
5930326 Rothschild Jul 1999 A
5936240 Dudar Aug 1999 A
5940468 Huang Aug 1999 A
5968425 Bross Oct 1999 A
5974111 Krug Oct 1999 A
6018562 Willson Jan 2000 A
6031890 Bermbach Feb 2000 A
6054712 Komardin Apr 2000 A
6055111 Nomura Apr 2000 A
6058158 Eiler May 2000 A
6067344 Grodzins May 2000 A
6078052 Difilippo Jun 2000 A
6081580 Grodzins Jun 2000 A
6094472 Smith Jul 2000 A
6118850 Mayo Sep 2000 A
6128365 Bechwati Oct 2000 A
6151381 Grodzins Nov 2000 A
6188747 Geus Feb 2001 B1
6192101 Grodzins Feb 2001 B1
6192104 Adams Feb 2001 B1
6195413 Geus Feb 2001 B1
6198795 Naumann Mar 2001 B1
6203846 Ellingson Mar 2001 B1
6212251 Tomura Apr 2001 B1
6218943 Ellenbogexn Apr 2001 B1
6236709 Perry May 2001 B1
6249567 Rothschild Jun 2001 B1
6252929 Swift Jun 2001 B1
6256369 Lai Jul 2001 B1
6278115 Annis Aug 2001 B1
6282260 Grodzins Aug 2001 B1
6292533 Swift Sep 2001 B1
6301326 Bjorkholm Oct 2001 B2
6320933 Grodzins Nov 2001 B1
6327339 Chung Dec 2001 B1
6333502 Sumita Dec 2001 B1
6356620 Rothschild Mar 2002 B1
6407392 Tsuyuki Jun 2002 B1
6421420 Grodzins Jul 2002 B1
6424695 Grodzins Jul 2002 B1
6434219 Rothschild Aug 2002 B1
6435715 Betz Aug 2002 B1
6442233 Grodzins Aug 2002 B1
6445765 Frank Sep 2002 B1
6453003 Springer Sep 2002 B1
6453007 Adams Sep 2002 B2
6456684 Mun Sep 2002 B1
6459761 Grodzins Oct 2002 B1
6459764 Chalmers Oct 2002 B1
6473487 Le Oct 2002 B1
RE37899 Grodzins Nov 2002 E
6483894 Hartick Nov 2002 B2
6507025 Verbinski Jan 2003 B1
6532276 Hartick Mar 2003 B1
6542574 Grodzins Apr 2003 B2
6542578 Ries Apr 2003 B2
6542580 Carver Apr 2003 B1
6542754 Sayers Apr 2003 B1
6543599 Jasinetzky Apr 2003 B2
6546072 Chalmers Apr 2003 B1
6552346 Verbinski Apr 2003 B2
6556653 Hussein Apr 2003 B2
6563903 Kang May 2003 B2
6567496 Sychev May 2003 B1
6580778 Meder Jun 2003 B2
6584170 Aust Jun 2003 B2
6597760 Beneke Jul 2003 B2
6606516 Levine Aug 2003 B2
6621888 Grodzins Sep 2003 B2
6628745 Annis Sep 2003 B1
6636581 Sorenson Oct 2003 B2
6637266 Froom Oct 2003 B1
6645656 Chen Nov 2003 B1
6645657 Huang Nov 2003 B2
6653588 Gillard-Hickman Nov 2003 B1
6658087 Chalmers Dec 2003 B2
6663280 Doenges Dec 2003 B2
6665373 Kotowski Dec 2003 B1
6665433 Roder Dec 2003 B2
6687326 Bechwati Feb 2004 B1
6702459 Barnes Mar 2004 B2
6747705 Peters Jun 2004 B2
6763635 Lowman Jul 2004 B1
6785357 Bernardi Aug 2004 B2
6798863 Sato Sep 2004 B2
6812426 Kotowski Nov 2004 B1
6816571 Bijjani Nov 2004 B2
6837422 Meder Jan 2005 B1
6839403 Kotowski Jan 2005 B1
6843599 Le Jan 2005 B2
6859607 Sugihara Feb 2005 B2
6876719 Ozaki Apr 2005 B2
6879657 Hoffman Apr 2005 B2
6909770 Schramm Jun 2005 B2
6911251 Duclos Jun 2005 B2
6920197 Kang Jul 2005 B2
6922457 Nagata Jul 2005 B2
6922460 Skatter Jul 2005 B2
6928141 Carver Aug 2005 B2
6965662 Eppler Nov 2005 B2
7010094 Grodzins Mar 2006 B2
7039159 Muenchau May 2006 B2
7067079 Bross Jun 2006 B2
7072440 Mario Jul 2006 B2
7092485 Kravis Aug 2006 B2
7099434 Adams Aug 2006 B2
7103137 Seppi Sep 2006 B2
7106830 Rosner Sep 2006 B2
7110493 Kotowski Sep 2006 B1
7115875 Worstell Oct 2006 B1
RE39396 Swift Nov 2006 E
7162005 Bjorkholm Jan 2007 B2
7190758 Hagiwara Mar 2007 B2
7203276 Arsenault Apr 2007 B2
7207713 Lowman Apr 2007 B2
7215737 Li May 2007 B2
7217929 Hirai May 2007 B2
7218704 Adams May 2007 B1
7233645 Feda Jun 2007 B2
7253727 Jenkins Aug 2007 B2
7308076 Studer Dec 2007 B2
7322745 Agrawal Jan 2008 B2
7326933 Katagiri Feb 2008 B2
7333587 De Man Feb 2008 B2
7333588 Mistretta Feb 2008 B2
7366282 Peschmann Apr 2008 B2
7369463 Van Dullemen May 2008 B1
7369643 Kotowski May 2008 B2
7379530 Hoff May 2008 B2
7400701 Cason Jul 2008 B1
7403588 Bruder Jul 2008 B2
7409033 Zhu Aug 2008 B1
7409042 Bertozzi Aug 2008 B2
7417440 Peschmann Aug 2008 B2
7423273 Clayton Sep 2008 B2
7486768 Allman Feb 2009 B2
7496178 Turner Feb 2009 B2
7505556 Chalmers Mar 2009 B2
7505562 Dinca Mar 2009 B2
7508910 Safai Mar 2009 B2
7517149 Agrawal Apr 2009 B2
7519148 Kotowski Apr 2009 B2
7538325 Mishin May 2009 B2
7551714 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7551715 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7551718 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7555099 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7579845 Peschmann Aug 2009 B2
7583779 Tkaczyk Sep 2009 B2
7593506 Cason Sep 2009 B2
7593510 Rothschild Sep 2009 B2
7609807 Leue Oct 2009 B2
7629588 Bell Dec 2009 B1
7630472 Tsuyuki Dec 2009 B2
7672422 Seppi Mar 2010 B2
7711090 Schweizer May 2010 B2
7720195 Allman May 2010 B2
7742557 Brunner Jun 2010 B2
7742568 Smith Jun 2010 B2
7783004 Kotowski Aug 2010 B2
7783005 Kaval Aug 2010 B2
7796733 Hughes Sep 2010 B2
7796734 Mastronardi Sep 2010 B2
7809109 Mastronardi Oct 2010 B2
7817776 Agrawal Oct 2010 B2
7848480 Nakanishi Dec 2010 B2
7856079 Nielsen Dec 2010 B2
7856081 Peschmann Dec 2010 B2
7864920 Rothschild Jan 2011 B2
7876880 Kotowski Jan 2011 B2
7924979 Rothschild Apr 2011 B2
7963695 Kotowski Jun 2011 B2
7995705 Allman Aug 2011 B2
7995707 Rothschild Aug 2011 B2
7999236 Mcdevitt Aug 2011 B2
8000436 Seppi Aug 2011 B2
8045781 Nakanishi Oct 2011 B2
8054938 Kaval Nov 2011 B2
8059781 Agrawal Nov 2011 B2
8073099 Niu Dec 2011 B2
8094774 Noshi Jan 2012 B2
8135110 Morton Mar 2012 B2
8135112 Hughes Mar 2012 B2
8138770 Peschmann Mar 2012 B2
8148693 Ryge Apr 2012 B2
8194822 Rothschild Jun 2012 B2
8199996 Hughes Jun 2012 B2
8275091 Morton Sep 2012 B2
8275092 Zhang Sep 2012 B1
8275093 Rothschild Sep 2012 B2
8300763 Shedlock Oct 2012 B2
8325871 Grodzins Dec 2012 B2
8331535 Morton Dec 2012 B2
8345819 Mastronardi Jan 2013 B2
8389942 Morton Mar 2013 B2
8401147 Ryge Mar 2013 B2
8428217 Peschmann Apr 2013 B2
8433036 Morton Apr 2013 B2
8439565 Mastronardi May 2013 B2
8442186 Rothschild May 2013 B2
8451974 Morton May 2013 B2
8457274 Arodzero Jun 2013 B2
8467499 Furth Jun 2013 B2
8483356 Bendahan Jul 2013 B2
8491189 Kotowski Jul 2013 B2
8503605 Morton Aug 2013 B2
8503606 Rothschild Aug 2013 B2
8532823 Mcelroy Sep 2013 B2
8576982 Gray Nov 2013 B2
8582720 Morton Nov 2013 B2
8605859 Mastronardi Dec 2013 B2
8638904 Gray Jan 2014 B2
8654922 Bendahan Feb 2014 B2
8668386 Morton Mar 2014 B2
8674706 Peschmann Mar 2014 B2
8690427 Mastronardi Apr 2014 B2
8731137 Arroyo, Jr. May 2014 B2
8735833 Morton May 2014 B2
8750452 Kaval Jun 2014 B2
8750454 Gozani Jun 2014 B2
8774357 Morton Jul 2014 B2
8774362 Hughes Jul 2014 B2
8798232 Bendahan Aug 2014 B2
8804899 Morton Aug 2014 B2
8824632 Mastronardi Sep 2014 B2
8831176 Morton Sep 2014 B2
8842808 Rothschild Sep 2014 B2
8861684 Al-Kofahi Oct 2014 B2
8884236 Rothschild Nov 2014 B2
8885794 Morton Nov 2014 B2
8903045 Schubert Dec 2014 B2
8903046 Morton Dec 2014 B2
8908831 Bendahan Dec 2014 B2
8923481 Schubert Dec 2014 B2
8929509 Morton Jan 2015 B2
8958526 Morton Feb 2015 B2
8971487 Mastronardi Mar 2015 B2
8993970 Morton Mar 2015 B2
8995619 Gray Mar 2015 B2
9014339 Grodzins Apr 2015 B2
9020100 Mastronardi Apr 2015 B2
9020103 Grodzins Apr 2015 B2
9025731 Kotowski May 2015 B2
9036779 Morton May 2015 B2
9042511 Peschmann May 2015 B2
9052271 Grodzins Jun 2015 B2
9052403 Morton Jun 2015 B2
9057679 Morton Jun 2015 B2
9069084 Frank Jun 2015 B2
9069101 Arroyo, Jr. Jun 2015 B2
9099279 Rommel Aug 2015 B2
9117564 Rommel Aug 2015 B2
9121958 Morton Sep 2015 B2
9123519 Bendahan Sep 2015 B2
9128198 Morton Sep 2015 B2
9146201 Schubert Sep 2015 B2
9158030 Morton Oct 2015 B2
9182516 Gray Nov 2015 B2
9183647 Morton Nov 2015 B2
9194828 Turner Nov 2015 B2
9207195 Gozani Dec 2015 B2
9208988 Morton Dec 2015 B2
9223050 Kaval Dec 2015 B2
9251915 Lai Feb 2016 B2
9257208 Rommel Feb 2016 B2
9268058 Peschmann Feb 2016 B2
9274065 Morton Mar 2016 B2
9285325 Gray Mar 2016 B2
9285488 Arodzero Mar 2016 B2
9291582 Grodzins Mar 2016 B2
9291741 Gray Mar 2016 B2
9306673 Macrae Apr 2016 B1
9316760 Bendahan Apr 2016 B2
9417060 Schubert Aug 2016 B1
9435752 Morton Sep 2016 B2
9442083 Turner Sep 2016 B2
9465135 Morton Oct 2016 B2
9466456 Rommel Oct 2016 B2
9535019 Rothschild Jan 2017 B1
9541510 Arodzero Jan 2017 B2
9562866 Morton Feb 2017 B2
9576766 Morton Feb 2017 B2
9606245 Czarnecki Mar 2017 B1
9606259 Morton Mar 2017 B2
9618630 Kross Apr 2017 B2
9632205 Morton Apr 2017 B2
9651684 Kusner May 2017 B1
9658343 Arodzero May 2017 B2
9791590 Morton Oct 2017 B2
9823201 Morton Nov 2017 B2
9835756 Morton Dec 2017 B2
9841386 Grodzins Dec 2017 B2
9915752 Peschmann Mar 2018 B2
9958569 Morton May 2018 B2
10134254 Jarvi Nov 2018 B2
10168445 Morton Jan 2019 B2
10209372 Arodzero Feb 2019 B2
10228487 Mastronardi Mar 2019 B2
10266999 Rothschild Apr 2019 B2
10295483 Morton May 2019 B2
10393915 Gozani Aug 2019 B2
10408967 Morton Sep 2019 B2
10535491 Rommel Jan 2020 B2
10670740 Couture Jun 2020 B2
10698128 Morton Jun 2020 B2
10712293 Couture Jul 2020 B2
10720300 Rommel Jul 2020 B2
10724192 Rothschild Jul 2020 B2
10746674 Morton Aug 2020 B2
10754057 Bendahan Aug 2020 B2
10762998 Rothschild Sep 2020 B2
10770195 Rothschild Sep 2020 B2
10794843 Rothschild Oct 2020 B2
10830911 Couture Nov 2020 B2
10901113 Morton Jan 2021 B2
10955367 Couture Mar 2021 B2
10976465 Morton Apr 2021 B2
11119245 Morton Sep 2021 B2
11143783 Morton Oct 2021 B2
11300703 Morton Apr 2022 B2
11340361 Couture May 2022 B1
11371948 Morton Jun 2022 B2
11397276 Bendahan Jul 2022 B2
11448606 Rothschild Sep 2022 B2
11525930 Couture Dec 2022 B2
11561320 Morton Jan 2023 B2
11726218 Couture Aug 2023 B2
11822041 Morton Nov 2023 B2
20010016028 Adams Aug 2001 A1
20010046275 Hussein Nov 2001 A1
20020082492 Grzeszczuk Jun 2002 A1
20020085674 Price Jul 2002 A1
20020117625 Pandelisev Aug 2002 A1
20020121604 Katagiri Sep 2002 A1
20030002628 Wilson Jan 2003 A1
20030108146 Malamud Jun 2003 A1
20030223549 Winsor Dec 2003 A1
20040004482 Bouabdo Jan 2004 A1
20040057554 Bjorkholm Mar 2004 A1
20040086078 Adams May 2004 A1
20040104347 Bross Jun 2004 A1
20040109653 Kerr Jun 2004 A1
20040136493 Konno Jul 2004 A1
20040140431 Schmand Jul 2004 A1
20040141584 Bernardi Jul 2004 A1
20040218714 Faust Nov 2004 A1
20040251415 Verbinski Dec 2004 A1
20040256565 Adams Dec 2004 A1
20050018814 Kerschner Jan 2005 A1
20050053199 Miles Mar 2005 A1
20050058242 Peschmann Mar 2005 A1
20050069081 Kokubun Mar 2005 A1
20050073740 Phillips Apr 2005 A1
20050078793 Ikeda Apr 2005 A1
20050100124 Hsieh May 2005 A1
20050105665 Grodzins May 2005 A1
20050117700 Peschmann Jun 2005 A1
20050135560 Dafni Jun 2005 A1
20050180542 Leue Aug 2005 A1
20050185757 Kresse Aug 2005 A1
20050190878 De Man Sep 2005 A1
20050226371 Kautzer Oct 2005 A1
20050236577 Katagiri Oct 2005 A1
20060067480 Juschka Mar 2006 A1
20060078091 Lasiuk Apr 2006 A1
20060188060 Bertozzi Aug 2006 A1
20060251211 Grodzins Nov 2006 A1
20070009088 Edic Jan 2007 A1
20070019781 Haras Jan 2007 A1
20070029493 Kniss Feb 2007 A1
20070053495 Morton Mar 2007 A1
20070064875 Li Mar 2007 A1
20070098142 Rothschild May 2007 A1
20070187608 Beer Aug 2007 A1
20070206726 Lu Sep 2007 A1
20070222981 Ponsardin Sep 2007 A1
20070235655 Rhiger Oct 2007 A1
20070237294 Hoff Oct 2007 A1
20070258562 Dinca Nov 2007 A1
20070280417 Kang Dec 2007 A1
20080002806 Nishide Jan 2008 A1
20080037707 Rothschild Feb 2008 A1
20080043913 Annis Feb 2008 A1
20080099692 Poreira May 2008 A1
20080152081 Cason Jun 2008 A1
20080175351 Norman Jul 2008 A1
20080181357 Bendahan Jul 2008 A1
20080191140 Mcdevitt Aug 2008 A1
20080197279 Kang Aug 2008 A1
20080198970 Kirshner Aug 2008 A1
20080219804 Chattey Sep 2008 A1
20080273652 Arnold Nov 2008 A1
20090041197 Clayton Feb 2009 A1
20090067575 Seppi Mar 2009 A1
20090086907 Smith Apr 2009 A1
20090103686 Rothschild Apr 2009 A1
20090116617 Mastronardi May 2009 A1
20090175412 Grodzins Jul 2009 A1
20090188379 Hiza Jul 2009 A1
20090213989 Harding Aug 2009 A1
20090230295 Waring Sep 2009 A1
20090230925 Nathan Sep 2009 A1
20090257555 Chalmers Oct 2009 A1
20090268871 Rothschild Oct 2009 A1
20090274270 Kotowski Nov 2009 A1
20090283690 Bendahan Nov 2009 A1
20090309034 Yoshida Dec 2009 A1
20100061509 D Ambrosio Mar 2010 A1
20100069721 Webler Mar 2010 A1
20100072398 Fruehauf Mar 2010 A1
20100108859 Andressen May 2010 A1
20100119033 Li May 2010 A1
20100270462 Nelson Oct 2010 A1
20100276602 Clothier Nov 2010 A1
20100314546 Ronda Dec 2010 A1
20100327174 Edwards Dec 2010 A1
20110019799 Shedlock Jan 2011 A1
20110064192 Morton Mar 2011 A1
20110079726 Kusner Apr 2011 A1
20110110490 Samant May 2011 A1
20110116597 Agrawal May 2011 A1
20110204243 Bendahan Aug 2011 A1
20110206179 Bendahan Aug 2011 A1
20110215222 Eminoglu Sep 2011 A1
20110228896 Peschmann Sep 2011 A1
20110309253 Rothschild Dec 2011 A1
20110309257 Menge Dec 2011 A1
20120033791 Mastronardi Feb 2012 A1
20120043482 Prince Feb 2012 A1
20120061575 Dunleavy Mar 2012 A1
20120076257 Star-Lack Mar 2012 A1
20120104265 Workman May 2012 A1
20120147987 Calderbank Jun 2012 A1
20120148020 Arroyo, Jr. Jun 2012 A1
20120155592 Gozani Jun 2012 A1
20120199753 Chuang Aug 2012 A1
20120241628 Hesser Sep 2012 A1
20120280132 Nakamura Nov 2012 A1
20120298864 Morishita Nov 2012 A1
20130039463 Mastronardi Feb 2013 A1
20130156156 Roe Jun 2013 A1
20130188779 Chao Jul 2013 A1
20130195248 Rothschild Aug 2013 A1
20130202089 Schubert Aug 2013 A1
20130208857 Arodzero Aug 2013 A1
20130315368 Turner Nov 2013 A1
20130315369 Turner Nov 2013 A1
20140105367 Horvarth Apr 2014 A1
20140133631 Wood May 2014 A1
20140182373 Sbihli Jul 2014 A1
20140239204 Orton Aug 2014 A1
20140270034 Clayton Sep 2014 A1
20150016794 Mori Jan 2015 A1
20150055751 Funk Feb 2015 A1
20150060673 Zimdars Mar 2015 A1
20150168589 Morton Jun 2015 A1
20150185166 Tang Jul 2015 A1
20150377803 Turner Dec 2015 A1
20160025888 Peschmann Jan 2016 A1
20160025889 Morton Jan 2016 A1
20160033426 Georgeson Feb 2016 A1
20160106384 Park Apr 2016 A1
20160170044 Arodzero Jun 2016 A1
20160170077 Morton Jun 2016 A1
20160223706 Franco Aug 2016 A1
20170023695 Zhang Jan 2017 A1
20170045630 Simon Feb 2017 A1
20170059739 Mastronardi Mar 2017 A1
20170184516 Chen Jun 2017 A1
20170245819 Rothschild Aug 2017 A1
20170299526 Morton Oct 2017 A1
20170299764 Morton Oct 2017 A1
20170315242 Arodzero Nov 2017 A1
20170358380 Rothschild Dec 2017 A1
20180038969 Mccollough Feb 2018 A1
20180038988 Morton Feb 2018 A1
20180128935 Morton May 2018 A1
20180136340 Nelson May 2018 A1
20180252841 Grodzins Sep 2018 A1
20180284316 Morton Oct 2018 A1
20180286624 Rommel Oct 2018 A1
20180294066 Rothschild Oct 2018 A1
20180313770 Morton Nov 2018 A1
20180328861 Grodzins Nov 2018 A1
20190139385 Jarvi May 2019 A1
20190242834 Rothschild Aug 2019 A1
20190293810 Couture Sep 2019 A1
20190336795 Zhou Nov 2019 A1
20190346382 Rothschild Nov 2019 A1
20190383953 Arodzero Dec 2019 A1
20190391280 Couture Dec 2019 A1
20200025955 Gozani Jan 2020 A1
20200033274 Couture Jan 2020 A1
20200073008 Parikh Mar 2020 A1
20200103357 Morton Apr 2020 A1
20200103547 Morton Apr 2020 A1
20200158908 Morton May 2020 A1
20200191991 Morton Jun 2020 A1
20200233100 Rothschild Jul 2020 A1
20200326291 Rothschild Oct 2020 A1
20200326436 Couture Oct 2020 A1
20200355631 Yu Nov 2020 A1
20200355632 Morton Nov 2020 A1
20200381211 Ren Dec 2020 A1
20210018650 Morton Jan 2021 A1
20210132239 Couture May 2021 A1
20210215846 Morton Jul 2021 A1
20220003693 Rothschild Jan 2022 A1
20220091054 Rothschild Mar 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (106)
Number Date Country
1270318 Oct 2000 CN
1493176 Apr 2004 CN
1745296 Mar 2006 CN
1947001 Apr 2007 CN
101142497 Mar 2008 CN
101166469 Apr 2008 CN
101578534 Nov 2009 CN
102519988 Jun 2012 CN
104204854 Dec 2014 CN
107193034 Sep 2017 CN
107209282 Sep 2017 CN
2639631 Mar 1978 DE
4017100 Dec 1990 DE
102013102749 Oct 2013 DE
113291 Jul 1984 EP
0261984 Mar 1988 EP
0813692 Dec 1997 EP
0864884 Sep 1998 EP
0971215 Jan 2000 EP
1113291 Jul 2001 EP
1135700 Sep 2001 EP
1168249 Jan 2002 EP
1254384 Nov 2002 EP
1733213 Dec 2006 EP
2049888 Apr 2009 EP
2054741 May 2009 EP
2663885 Dec 2014 EP
3271709 Jan 2018 EP
2492159 Apr 1982 FR
1505498 Mar 1978 GB
2084829 Apr 1982 GB
2150526 Jul 1985 GB
2277013 Oct 1994 GB
2299251 Sep 1996 GB
2400480 Oct 2004 GB
2463550 Mar 2010 GB
2482024 Jan 2012 GB
58103678 Jun 1983 JP
62147349 Jul 1987 JP
S63299100 Dec 1988 JP
10232284 Feb 1997 JP
H09318757 Dec 1997 JP
H10185842 Jul 1998 JP
H10232284 Sep 1998 JP
2000515629 Nov 2000 JP
2002071816 Mar 2002 JP
2004045250 Feb 2004 JP
2006505805 Feb 2006 JP
2007532876 Nov 2007 JP
2013205122 Oct 2013 JP
3195776 Feb 2015 JP
102006132990 Dec 2006 KR
9701089 Jan 1997 WO
1997001089 Jan 1997 WO
9802763 Jan 1998 WO
1998003889 Jan 1998 WO
9805946 Feb 1998 WO
1998020366 May 1998 WO
9913323 Mar 1999 WO
9939189 Aug 1999 WO
2000033060 Jun 2000 WO
2000037928 Jun 2000 WO
0159485 Aug 2001 WO
0173415 Oct 2001 WO
02091023 Nov 2002 WO
03075037 Sep 2003 WO
2004010127 Jan 2004 WO
2004043740 May 2004 WO
2004097889 Nov 2004 WO
2005079437 Sep 2005 WO
2005098400 Oct 2005 WO
2005103759 Nov 2005 WO
2006111323 Oct 2006 WO
2006137932 Dec 2006 WO
2007051092 May 2007 WO
2008021807 Feb 2008 WO
2008024825 Feb 2008 WO
2008063695 May 2008 WO
2008105782 Sep 2008 WO
2009027667 Mar 2009 WO
2009067394 May 2009 WO
2009129816 Oct 2009 WO
2009137985 Nov 2009 WO
2010129926 Nov 2010 WO
2011008718 Jan 2011 WO
2011011583 Jan 2011 WO
2011014445 Feb 2011 WO
2011053972 May 2011 WO
2011149566 Dec 2011 WO
2011163108 Dec 2011 WO
2012058207 May 2012 WO
2012109307 Aug 2012 WO
2012142453 Oct 2012 WO
2012142456 Oct 2012 WO
2012174265 Dec 2012 WO
2013112819 Aug 2013 WO
2013116058 Aug 2013 WO
2013116549 Aug 2013 WO
2013122763 Aug 2013 WO
2014058495 Apr 2014 WO
2015020710 Feb 2015 WO
2016003547 Jan 2016 WO
2016081881 May 2016 WO
2018064434 Apr 2018 WO
2019217596 Nov 2019 WO
2020041161 Feb 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (143)
Entry
International Search Report for PCT/US22/75829, Jan. 10, 2023.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US22/75829, Jan. 10, 2023.
“Linac based photofission inspection system employing novel detection concepts”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods (2011), vol. 653, Stevenson et al., pp. 124-128.
“Multileaf collimators: modern beam shaping,” http://medphys365.blogspot.com/2012/04/multileaf-collimators.html (Year: 2012).
Accatino M R et al, “The nuclear car wash: a scanner to detect illicit special nuclear material in cargo containers”, IEEE Sensors Journal, IEEE Service Center, NY, US, vol. 5, No. 4, Aug. 1, 2005, pp. 560-564, XP011136145.
American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection Corp., U.S.D.C. (D. Mass.) Case No. 1:20-cv-11883-LTS, Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (Doc. 63), filed Oct. 12, 2021.
American Science and Engineering, Inc. 2002 Annual Report.
Appendix C—U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562 Invalidity Claim Chart.
Appendix D—U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763 Claim Charts.
AS& E's Opposition to Viken's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, Dkt. 38, Case 1:20-cv-11883 (Dist. of Mass.), Feb. 26, 2021.
AS&E pulls in $4.4M deal from U.S. agency, Apr. 27, 2009, downloaded from the following URL https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass-high-tech/2009/04/ase-pulls-in-44m-deal-from-us-agency.html.
AS&E v. Viken, Defendant Viken Detection Corp.'s Preliminary Patent Related DisclosuresCase No. 1:20-cv-11833-LTS, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Jan. 7, 2022.
Barnabe-Heider et al.: ‘Characterization of the Response of Superheated Droplet (Bubble) Detectors.’ Arxiv.org, [Online] Nov. 14, 2003, pp. 1-2 Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ex/pdf/0311/0311034v1.pdf> [retrieved on Nov. 8, 2011].
Beznosko et al., “FNAL-NICADD Extruded Scintillator,” FERMILAB-CONF-04-216-E, pp. 1-4 (Sep. 2004).
Case et al., “Wavelength-shifting fiber readout of LaC13 and LaBr3 scintillators,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5898, UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XIV, pp. 58980K-1-58980K-8 (2005).
Chambers Dictionary of Science and Tech. (1999) (definition of “weighting observation”).
Chapter 10, Ghilani, Adjustment Computations: Spatial Data Analysis, Sixth Edition, 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (“Weights of Observations”).
Cheng et al, “Dynamic radiography using a carbonnanotube-based field emission x-ray source,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 75, No. 10. Oct. 2004.
Chou, C, “Fourier coded-aperture imaging in nuclear medicine”, IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 141. No. 3, May 1994, pp. 179-184.
Declaration of Richard C. Lanza, Ph.D., Case No. IPR2022-00027, U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763, Oct. 20, 2021.
Declaration of Richard C. Lanza, Ph.D.,, Case No. IPR2021-01585; U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701, Sep. 29, 2021.
Declaration of Richard Lanza, Ph.D., Case No. IPR2022-00028; U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562, Oct. 28, 2021.
Defense Dept. contracts for X-ray tech, Apr. 7, 2009 downloaded from the following URL https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2009/04/07/Defense-Dept-contracts-for-X-ray-tech/61051239114877/.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2005/011382, Oct. 21, 2005.
European Patent Office, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US99/28266, dated Sep. 6, 2000, 3 pages.
Evans, R. D., The Atomic Nucleus, Ch. 23-25, & Appendix A, Tata McGraw-Hill, Bombay, New Delhi (1955).
Gundiah, “Scintillation properties of Eu.sup.2+-activated barium fluoroiodide,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, pp. 1-10 (Feb. 2011).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISM_band#Common_non-ISM_uses., downloaded from Internet Nov. 23, 2020.
Hutchinson et al., “Optical Readout for Imaging Neutron Scintillation Detectors,” Engineering Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 6 pages. (Nov. 2002).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2005/011382, dated Oct. 19, 2006, 7 pages.
International Seach Report for PCT/US2008/083741, Oct. 30, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/041757, Oct. 12, 2010.
International Search Report for PCT/US01/09784, Jan. 28, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US02/13595, Aug. 6, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US03/05958, Jun. 27, 2003.
International Search Report for PCT/US03/35232, Nov. 8, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US11/23143, Nov. 25, 2011.
International Search Report for PCT/US11/26369, Nov. 22, 2011.
International Search Report for PCT/US14/37571, Mar. 16, 2015.
International Search Report for PCT/US17/54211, Jan. 18, 2018.
International Search Report for PCT/US20/61866, Feb. 11, 2021.
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/011382, Oct. 21, 2005.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/060158, Jul. 5, 2007.
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/075323, Feb. 5, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/076497, Jul. 28, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/043201, Oct. 29, 2010.
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041033, Feb. 17, 2012.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/024248, Jul. 9, 2012.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/033581, Oct. 31, 2012.
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/033585, Nov. 29, 2012.
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/022715, May 15, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/023125, May 15, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/024585, Jun. 2, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/031115, Jul. 29, 2015.
International Search Report for PCT/US2016/023240, Jul. 12, 2016.
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/027242, Jul. 17, 2019.
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/027252, Aug. 2, 2019.
International Search Report for PCT/US99/29185, Sep. 27, 2000.
International Search Report, PCT/US1998/18642, dated Jul. 7, 1999, 4 pages.
International Search Report, PCT/US1999/028035, dated Sep. 15, 2000, 6 pages.
International Search Report, PCT/US2007/066936; dated: Sep. 30, 2008, 5 pages.
Jae Yul Ahn, Authorized officer Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report—Application No. PCT/US2013/024585, date of mailing Jun. 2, 2013, along with Written Opinion of the International Searchi . . . .
Johns, H., & Cunningham J. R., “The Production and Properties of X Rays,” Chapter 2, The Physics of Radiology, Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL, 4th Ed. (1983).
Jupiter, CP. and Parez, J. “A Study of the Scintillation Properties of Various Hydrogenous and Non-Hydrogenous Solutes Dissolved in Hexafluorobenzene” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Feb. 1966, pp. 692-703.
Keizer, “The optimal cosmic ray detector for High-Schools,” 21 pages (2011).
Knoll, G. F., Radiation Detection and Measurements, Ch. 2, 4, 8, & 9, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York (2000).
Little, R.C.; Chadwick, M. B.; and Myers, W.L. “Detection of Highly Enriched Uranium Through Active Interrogation” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Nuclear Reaction Mechanics in Varenna, Italy, Jun. 2006.
Maekawa et al., “Thin Beta-ray Detectors using Plastic Scintillator Combined with Wavelength-shifting Fibers for Surface Contamination Monitoring,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 886-894 (Dec. 1998).
Mertz, L.N., et al, “Rotational aperture synthesis for x rays”, Journal. Optical Society of America, vol. 3, Dec. 1986, pp. 2167-2170.
Moiseev et al., “High-efficiency plastic scintillator detector with wavelength-shifting fiber readout for the GLAST Large Area Telescope,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 583, pp. 372-381 (2007).
Motion Hearing Transcript, dated Aug. 16, 2021, Case 1:20-cv-11883 (Dist. of Mass.).
Nishikido et al. “X-ray detector made of plastic scintillators and WLS fiber for real-time dose distribution monitoring in interventional radiology,” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Reco, pp. 1272-1274 (2012).
Nittoh et al., “Discriminated neutron and X-ray radiography using multi-color scintillation detector,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 428, pp. 583-588 (1999).
Novikov, “A method for monitoring of Gd concentration in Gd-loaded scintillators,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 366, pp. 413-414 (1995).
Osswald et al. “Injection Molding Handbook”, p. 394, Chemical Industry Press, Mar. 31, 2005.
Pla-Dalmau et al., “Extruded Plastic Scintillator for Minerva,” FERMILAB-CONF-05-506-E, pp. 1298-1300 (2005).
Roderick D. Swift, Roy P. Lindquist, “Medium energy x-ray examination of commercial trucks”, Proc. SPIE 2276, Cargo Inspection Technologies, (Oct. 6, 1994); doi: 10.1117/12.189174.
Rose, Kathryn, “NuMI Off-Axis Experiment” Datasheet (online). University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, 2003. <URL: https://slideplayer.com/slide/8765673/>.
Tateno, Y., & Tanaka, H., “Low-Dosage X-Ray Imaging System Employing Flying Spot X-Ray Microbeam (Dynamic Scanner)1,” Radiation Physics, 121(1):189-195 (1976).
Tsahi Gozani et al, “Neuron threshold activation detectors (TAD) for the detection of fissions”, Nuclear Instruments & methods in physics research, section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors, and Associated Equipment, vol. 652, No. 1, Jan. 15, 2011, pp. 334-337, XP028291647, ISSN: 0168-9002.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562 Prosecution File History.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701 Prosecution File History.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763 Prosecution File History.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/423,582 (“Gray '582”), filed Dec. 15, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/737,471, filed Nov. 17, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/787,810, filed Mar. 31, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/228,335 (priority document for '763 Patent), filed Jul. 24, 2009.
Viken Detection Corporation v. AS&E, Case No. IPR2021-01585, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701, Sep. 30, 2021.
Viken Detection Corporation v. AS&E, Case No. IPR2022-00028, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562, Oct. 28, 2021.
Viken Detection Corporation v. AS&E, Petition for Inter Partes Review, Case No. IPR2022-00027, U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763, Oct. 20, 2021.
Viken's Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, Dkt. 30, Case 1:20-cv-11883 (Dist. of Mass.), Feb. 8, 2021.
Wait, G.D. “A Hexafluorobenzene Gamma Disimeter for Use in Mixed Neutron and Gamma Fields” Jan. 1968, AD0678658, Abstract.
Waiver of the Service of Summons, Oct. 20, 2020; Dkt. 6, Case 1:20-cv-11883, (Dist. of Mass.).
Williams et al.:“PET Detector Using Waveshifting Optical Fibers and Microchannel Plate PMT with Delay Line Readout”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 45, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1998 (Apr. 1, 1998), pp. 195-205, XP011087844, ISSN: 0018-9499, DOI: 10.1109/23.664171.
Wolf, A., Moreh, R., “Utilization of teflon-covered GE(Li) diodes for fast neutron detection,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 148, 1978, 195-197.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2007/066936, dated Sep. 30, 2008, 7 pages.
Yoshiaki et al. “Development of ultra-high sensitivity bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using firefly luciferas”, Abstract, Luminescence, vol. 16, Issue 4, Jul. 31, 2001.
Yoshimura et al., “Plastic scintillator produced by the injection-molding technique,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 406, pp. 435-441 (1998).
Z Portal for Trucks & Cargo, Multi-View, Multi-Technology, Cargo and Vehicle Screening System, 2022 downloaded from the following URL: https://www.rapiscan-ase.com/products/portal/z-portal-for-trucks-cargoscreening.
Zhang et al, “A multi-beam x-ray imaging system based on carbon nanotube field emitters”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 6142, 614204, (2006), doi: 10.1117/12.654006.
Zhang et al., “A nanotube-based field emission x-ray source for microcomputed tomography”, Review of Scientific Instruments 76, 094301 (2005).
Zhang et al., “Stationary scanning x-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters”, Applied Physics Letters 86, 184104 (2005).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,317, Sep. 9, 2008.
Applicant Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,317, Apr. 30, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, May 15, 2006.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,317, Mar. 25, 2008.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Mar. 24, 2008.
Certificate of Correction for U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701, Jul. 15, 2008.
Applicant Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Nov. 2, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Aug. 20, 2007.
Applicant Response to Final Office Action and Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Jul. 3, 2007.
Applicant Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Jun. 18, 2007.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Jun. 21, 2007.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Mar. 21, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Nov. 22, 2006.
Applicant Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Mar. 13, 2007.
Applicant Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,092, Aug. 31, 2006.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,317, Nov. 20, 2008.
Information Disclosure Statement for U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,317, Nov. 6, 2008.
Plaintiff AS&E's Infringement Contentions Chart, U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783, American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection Corp., C.A. 1:20-cv-11883, D. Mass.
https://www.vikendetection.com/news/viken-introduces-under-vehicle-scanner-cbp-plans-evaluation, Nov. 12, 2019, downloaded from Internet on Jan. 9, 2023.
Second Amended Complaint, American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection Corp., C.A. 1:20-cv-11883, Dkt. 91, D. Mass. (Apr. 1, 2022).
U.S. Appl. No. 61/224,938, filed Jul. 13, 2009.
Declaration of Richard C. Lanza, Ph.D.,, Case No. PGR2022-00047, U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783, Jul. 11, 2022.
Complaint, American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection Corp., C.A. 1:20-cv-11883, Dkt. 1, D. Mass. (Oct. 19, 2020).
Denying Institution of Post-Grant Review for U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783, Dec. 16, 2022.
Post-Grant Review Petition of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783, Jul. 11, 2022.
https://www.krgv.com/videos/cbp-to-enhance-scanning-technology-at-southern-border-land-ports/, downloaded from Internet on Jan. 9, 2023.
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/border-technology-combat-illegal-smuggling, Jun. 16, 2020, downloaded from Internet on Jan. 9, 2023.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200323005617/en/Viken-Detection-Issues-Statement-on-ASE-Lawsuit, Mar. 23, 2020, downloaded from Internet on Jan. 9, 2023.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783—Part 1 of 6.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783—Part 2 of 6.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783—Part 3 of 6.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783—Part 4 of 6.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783—Part 5 of 6.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 11,143,783—Part 6 of 6.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,505, May 17, 2021.
Applicant Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,505, Jun. 7, 2021.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,505, Jun. 29, 2021.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/195,505, Jul. 9, 2021.
International Search Report for PCT/US13/24191, Rapiscan Systems Inc., mailed on Jun. 25, 2013.
Hutchinson D P et al: “Wavelength-shifting fiber readout of scintillation detectors”, Jun. 30, 2001 (Jun. 30, 2001), pp. 1-14, XP93025861, Berlin; Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://technicalreports.ornl.gov/cppr/y2001/pres/111170.pdf [retreived on Feb. 21, 2023].
McKnight et al: “The flexible embedded-fiber neutron detector”, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Elsevier BV * North-Holland, NL, vol. 586, No. 2, Dec. 3, 2007 (Dec. 3, 2007), pp. 246-250, XP022457692, ISSN: 0168-9002, DOI: 10.1016/J.NIMA.2007.11.044.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230108499 A1 Apr 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63261991 Oct 2021 US