The embodiments disclosed herein relate to pressure sensing mats, in particular the disclosure relates to the manufacture and system testing of a pressure sensing mat comprising crossed parallel strip electrodes forming a pressure sensing matrix.
A pressure sensing mat comprising crossed parallel strip electrodes forming a pressure sensing matrix is described for example in the applicant's copending PCT patent application number PCT/IL2010/000294 although the current disclosure may be applicable to other sensing mats.
Where pressure sensing mats are used it is important to ensure equipment meets quality standards. It will be appreciated that there is therefore a need for a method of manufacture which integrates construction with continued quality assurance and system testing. The disclosure herein addresses this need.
According to a first aspect of the current disclosure, a method is presented for the manufacture of a pressure sensing mat, the method comprising the steps of: (a) preparing two conductive layers, each conductive layer comprising an array of conducting strips mounted upon a substrate arranged in a parallel fashion, wherein the conducting strips of the first conductive layer are oriented perpendicularly in relation to the conducting strips of the second conductive layer; (b) for each conductive layer, connecting each of said conducting strips to a communication line; (c) sandwiching a compressible layer between said two conductive layers; and (d) performing a pressure reading standardization test to said mat.
In certain embodiments, the conductive strips are laminated with an insulating material.
In certain embodiments, the step of preparing two conductive layers, step (a) above, comprises the steps of: (i) affixing said conductive strips to a substrate in a parallel orientation; and (ii) measuring the resistance between at least one pair of adjacent conductive strips.
In certain embodiments, the conductive strips are connected to a test monitor through a test probe. Alternatively, two of said conductive strips are connected to a test monitor through a test probe, and the test probe is moved sequentially from one pair of adjacent conductive strips to the next until all the strips have been tested.
In certain embodiments, the step of, for each conductive layer, connecting each of said conducting strips to a communication line, step (b) above, is followed by a testing procedure comprising the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to said conducting plate; and (iii) measuring voltage between each of the conducting strips and ground.
In certain embodiments, the step of, for each conductive layer, connecting each of said conducting strips to a communication line, step (b) above, is followed by a testing procedure comprising the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to each of said conducting strips; and (iii) for each conducting strip measuring voltage between the conducting plate and ground.
In certain embodiments, the step of, for each conductive layer, connecting each of said conducting strips to a communication line, step (b) above, is followed by a testing procedure comprising the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to all conducting strips except one selected conducting strip; and (iii) measuring voltage between the selected strip and ground.
In certain embodiments, the step of, for each conductive layer, connecting each of said conducting strips to a communication line, step (b) above, is followed by a testing procedure comprising the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to one selected conducting strip; and (iii) measuring voltage between all conducting strips except the selected strip and ground.
In certain embodiments, the conducting plate is laminated with an insulating material.
In certain embodiments, the step of performing a pressure reading standardization test to said mat, step (d) above, comprises the steps of: (i) exerting a known pressure upon at least one region of said pressure detection mat; (ii) measuring a pressure reading recorded by said pressure detection mat; and (iii) comparing said pressure reading with a look up table.
According to a second aspect of the current disclosure, a method is disclosed for testing a pressure sensing mat comprising a first conductive layer comprising an array of parallel conducting strips, a compressible layer situated upon the first array and a second conductive layer comprising an array of parallel conducting strips situated upon the compressible layer, the conducting strips of each conductive layer being connected to a communication line, the method comprising the step of: (a) for each conductive layer, measuring the resistance between at least one pair of adjacent conducting strips.
In certain embodiments, the conductive strips are laminated with an insulating material.
In certain embodiments, for the step of, for each conductive layer, measuring the resistance between at least one pair of adjacent conducting strips, step (a) above, each of said conductive strips is connected to a test monitor through a test probe. Alternatively, two of said conductive strips are connected to a test monitor through a test probe, and the test probe is moved sequentially from one pair of adjacent conductive strips to the next until all the strips have been tested.
In certain embodiments, the method of testing the pressure sensing mat further comprises the step of: (b) testing the electrical connection between each of said conducting strips and the communication line.
Optionally, step (b) comprises the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to said conducting plate; and (iii) measuring voltage between each of the conducting strips and ground.
Optionally, step (b) comprises the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to each of said conducting strips; and (iii) for each conducting strip measuring voltage between the conducting plate and ground.
Optionally, step (b) comprises the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to all conducting strips except one selected conducting strip; and (iii) measuring voltage between the selected strip and ground.
Optionally, step (b) comprises the steps of: (i) placing a conducting plate across said conducting strips; (ii) applying an alternating potential to one selected conducting strip; and (iii) measuring voltage between all conducting strips except the selected strip and ground.
In certain embodiments, the method of testing the pressure sensing mat further comprises the step of: (c) performing a pressure reading standardization test to said mat.
Optionally, step (c) comprises the steps of: (i) exerting a known pressure upon at least one region of said pressure detection mat; (ii) measuring a pressure reading recorded by said pressure detection mat; and (iii) comparing said pressure reading with a look up table.
For a better understanding of the embodiments and to show how it may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, purely by way of example, to the accompanying drawings.
With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of selected embodiments only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding; the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several selected embodiments may be put into practice. In the accompanying drawings:
Reference is now made to
The two conductive layers 220A, 220B made of conductive material are separated by the compressible layer 230. Each of the conductive layers 220A, 220B typically consists of an array of parallel conductive strips 222, 224 (respectively). Further, the two arrays may be arranged orthogonally such that in the first conductive layer 220A, the array of conductive strips 222 are horizontal and in the second conductive layer 220B, the array of conductive strips 224 are vertical. It is particularly noted that each conducting strip 222, 224 is insulated from, and not in conductive contact with, other conducting strips in its respective layer.
The controller communication lines 225A, 225B provide a line of communication between the sensors 210 and a system controller (not shown). Each of the conductive strips 222, 224 may be connected to a controller communication line 225A, 225B via an individual connector 227. Optionally, the communication lines 225A, 225B may comprise a bundle of conductors such as a multi-core cable, a flat cable or the like.
Each sensor 210 may be a capacitance sensor based upon the capacitance between the overlapping sections of the conducting strips at each junction of a vertical conductive strip 222 with a horizontal conductive strip 224. These capacitance sensors are configured such that pressing anywhere on their surface changes the spacing between the two conductive layers 220A, 220B, and consequently the capacitance of the intersection. A controller may provide an electric potential selectively to each vertical strip via a first communication line 225A and the electrical potential may be monitored on each horizontal strip via a second communication line 225B such that the capacitance of the sensor 210 of the overlapping section may be determined.
It is noted that by providing an oscillating electric potential across each sensor and monitoring the alternating current produced thereby, the impedance of the intersection may be calculated and the capacitance of the intersection determined. The alternating current varies with the potential across a capacitor according to the formula:
Iac=2πfCVac
where Iac is the root mean squared value of the alternating current, Vac is the root mean squared value of the oscillating potential across the capacitor, f is the frequency of the oscillating potential and C is the capacitance of the capacitor.
Thus where the values of Vac and Iac are known at a known frequency f, the capacitance C of a sensor may be calculated. Accordingly, where the mechanical properties of the sensor are known, the pressure applied upon the sensor may be deduced.
It will be appreciated that during the manufacture and initialization of a pressure detection mat such as described hereinabove, there is a need to ensure that each conducting strip is electrically isolated from the other conducting strips and electrically connected to the communication lines. Furthermore, the relationship between capacitance values determined for the sensors and the pressure exerted upon the mat should be determined.
The disclosure hereinbelow presents possible systems and methods for the manufacture and system testing of a pressure sensing mat.
Referring now to the flowchart of
I. Conductive Strip Preparation
II. Communication Line Preparation
III. Pressure Mat Assembly
IV. Pressure Reading Standardization
During the Conductive Strip Preparation phase, the conductive strips 222, 224 may be affixed to a substrate I1 and tested for stray connections which may form short circuits between adjacent strips I3. The substrate may be formed from a variety of suitable materials, such as a sheet of fabric, polymer, plastic, leather, thermo poly urethane (TPU) or the like. Optionally, the conductive strips may be laminated I2 to improve electrical insulation and to protect the conductors. One possible system for testing the electrical isolation of the conductive strips is described hereinbelow in relation to
During the Communication Line Preparation phase, a communication line 225A, 225B may be affixed to the substrate II1, connected to the conductive strips 222, 224, II2 and the connections tested II3. Possible systems for testing the connections between the communication line and the conducting strips are described hereinbelow in relation to
During the Pressure Mat Assembly phase III, a compressible layer, such as a sheet of foam, or some such spongy material is sandwiched between two prepared layers having crossed conductive strips. Where required, the layers may be sewn together; alternatively, the layers may be left unsewn until after the Pressure Reading Standardization phase.
During the Pressure Reading Standardization phase, known pressures may be applied to the assembled pressure mat IV1 and electrical readings recorded IV2. In this way, the electrical readings of the mat may be calibrated to pressure measurements IV3. Alternatively or additionally, thereby the mat may be tested to conform to predefined standards IV4. Possible standardization tests are described hereinbelow.
Reference is now made to
Referring now to
With reference to
A test monitor (not shown), which may comprise a processor, computer, microprocessor or other controller, may be connected to the probe 20 and operable to select and test pairs of adjacent probe terminals 24. It will be appreciated that each pair of adjacent probe terminals 24 corresponds to a pair of adjacent conducting strips 12. For example, in the embodiment represented in
Accordingly, by applying a potential difference between each selected pair of terminals and measuring the current produced thereby, the resistance between the corresponding conducting strips may be monitored. Any stray connections forming short circuits between the conducting strips may be readily detected as particularly low resistance connections.
Referring now to
Using such a test probe, the faulty conductive layer 10′ may be identified and the fault pinpointed so that it may be fixed before connection of the communication line or assembly of the pressure sensing mat.
It will be appreciated that although only a multi-terminal test probe is described hereinabove, various other test probes may be used as suit requirements. Referring now to
Reference is now made to
In order to provide reliable communication between the controller and the pressure sensor there is a need for good electrical connection 13 between each conducting strip 12A-H and the controller communication line 14. Testing the quality of the connection 13 is a surprisingly difficult task, in part this is because the distal portion 16 of the conducting strips 12A-H may be laminated or otherwise insulated. Consequently, it may not be possible to connect a probe to the distal portion 16 of the conducting strips 12A-H.
In order to overcome this problem, various creative solutions are taught herein allowing the conductive connections between the strips and the communication lines to be tested. It will be appreciated that such solutions may have application beyond the scope of the pressure sensing systems such as described herein.
Reference is now made to
The conducting plate 32 is laid across the conducting strips 12 and electrically isolated therefrom by an insulating layer 31. Variously, the insulating layer 31 may be a separate sheet of insulating material, a laminate coating of the conducting plate 32, the conducting strips 12 or combinations thereof, as suit requirements.
The conducting plate 32 may be wired to an AC source 34. The switching unit 38, such as a multiplexer for example, is connected to control communication line 14, possibly via a flat cable connection or the like. The switching unit 38 may selectively connect each conducting strip via the controller communication line 14 to the voltage monitor 36.
The conducting plate 32 forms a capacitor with each of the conducting strips 12A-H. Thus although the conducting plate 32 is insulated from the conducting strips 12A-H the alternating voltage applied thereto produces a significant response in the voltage monitor 36. The voltage recorded by the system 30 may serve as an indication of quality of the connections 13 between the conducting strips 12A-H and the control communication line 14. If all the connections are good, the voltage monitor 36 may record similar values regardless of which conducting strip is connected thereto. Where a connection is not good, the voltage monitor may produce an anomalous record, for example not recording a voltage, recording a low voltage, recording a high voltage or the like.
With reference to
Referring now to
Optionally, a conducting plate 32 may be placed across all the conducting strips 12A-H which may improve voltage readings. By placing the conducting plate 32 laterally across the conducting strips, the capacitance of the overlapping area between the strip 12A being tested and the plate 32 is relatively large in comparison with the capacitance between the associated connecting wire 14A and the rest of the bundle 14. Thus if the connection 13A between one connecting wire 14A and its associated conducting strip 12A is broken, then the voltage reading will be significantly different from that of unbroken connections.
Alternatively, the capacitance between the conductive strip 12A being tested and the other conductive strips 12B-H may be sufficient to produce significant voltage readings.
It will be appreciated that the solution described in relation to
As noted hereinabove a pressure sensing mat may be assembled by sandwiching a compressible layer, such as a sheet of foam, or some such spongy material, between two prepared conductive layers having crossed conductive strips as described hereinabove in relation to in
Reference is now made to
The pressure detection mat 5000 may be attached to a surface in such a way that prevents movement of the mat relative to the surface. A feature of the embodiment of the mat 5000 is that the cover sheet 5400 may include a coupling mechanism for securing the mat to a seat or a back of a mattress, a bed, a chair, a bench, a sofa, a wheelchair or the like. The coupling mechanism may include for example at least one strap 5200 having an attachment means 5240 configured to secure the straps 5200 to the seat or to each other such that the pressure detection mat is held securely. This may be useful to prevent folding, wrinkling or other movement of the detection mat which may contribute to the creation of shear forces which are known to encourage the formation of external pressure sores. Suitable attachment means include for example, hook-and-eye materials such as Velcro®, buckles, adhesives, buttons, laces or the like, as suit requirements.
A variety of standardization tests may be performed upon the pressure detection mat 5000 for the purposes of calibration, quality assurance and the like. According to one such test, weights 42A-E of known value and size are applied to a plurality of test points upon the mat and the responses recorded. Optionally, between three to ten test points may be tested for standard testing. In one example, six test points are selected and weights no smaller than the size of one pixel of the sensor matrix are applied thereupon.
According to requirements, the standardization tests may be carried out before the pressure sensing matrix is sewn into the overlay. Alternatively or additionally standardization tests may be carried out after the sensing matrix is sewn into the overlay.
Pressure may be applied, for example, and progressively more weights may be placed upon the mat until, say, five sample pressure values have been tested for each test point. Alternatively, in other embodiments, a mechanical mechanism such as a spring, hydraulic cylinder, pneumatic cylinder or the like, may apply a known force upon a pressing member urged onto the pressure detection mat. Still other pressure application methods will occur to those skilled in the art.
The readings, thus produced, may be used variously for calibration of the particular mat or to check the mats conformity to standards. For example a look up table may be compiled to calibrate the particular mat. Accordingly, calibration data may be stored for reference by a controller associated with that mat. Alternatively, the readings may be compared to a precompiled look-up table to check if they lie within a certain tolerance of the data values in that table.
The scope of the disclosed subject matter is defined by the appended claims and includes both combinations and sub combinations of the various features described hereinabove as well as variations and modifications thereof, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.
In the claims, the word “comprise”, and variations thereof such as “comprises”, “comprising” and the like indicate that the components listed are included, but not generally to the exclusion of other components.
This application is the U.S. national phase of PCT Appln. No. PCT/IB2012/053538 filed Jul. 11, 2012 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/507,418 filed Jul. 13, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2012/053538 | 7/11/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/15/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/008187 | 1/17/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4503286 | Kubo et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4526043 | Boie | Jul 1985 | A |
4554930 | Kress | Nov 1985 | A |
4758815 | Lovell | Jul 1988 | A |
4795998 | Dunber et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4827763 | Bourland | May 1989 | A |
4929803 | Yoshida et al. | May 1990 | A |
5010772 | Bourland et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030508 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033291 | Podoloff et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5086652 | Kropp | Feb 1992 | A |
5102727 | Pittman et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5131259 | Kropp | Jul 1992 | A |
5162135 | Gregory et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5276432 | Travis | Jan 1994 | A |
5505072 | Oreper | Apr 1996 | A |
5571973 | Taylot | Nov 1996 | A |
5642096 | Leyerer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656785 | Trainor | Aug 1997 | A |
5720892 | DeAngelis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5756904 | Oreper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5808552 | Wiley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5856644 | Burgess | Jan 1999 | A |
5905209 | Oreper | May 1999 | A |
5942733 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970789 | Meyer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993400 | Rincoe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014346 | Malone | Jan 2000 | A |
6032542 | Warnick et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067019 | Scott | May 2000 | A |
6155120 | Taylor | Dec 2000 | A |
6216545 | Taylor | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216546 | Bahr | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225814 | Oreper et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244272 | Montant et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6287253 | Ortega et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6367106 | Gronsman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386051 | Yoshimi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6417777 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6432737 | Webster | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438776 | Ferrand et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6441742 | Lovely et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6543299 | Taylor | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546813 | Hubbard, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6721980 | Price et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6897781 | Cooper et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6945115 | Wang | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6964205 | Papakostas et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987232 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993954 | George et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7030764 | Smith et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7090647 | Mimura et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7119696 | Borugian | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7201063 | Taylor | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7258026 | Papakostas et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304580 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319386 | Collins, Jr. et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330127 | Price et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7377133 | Sandbach et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7378975 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7464605 | Douglas et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480951 | Weismiller et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7531203 | Tao et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7557718 | Petrosenko et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7559106 | Crousore et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568246 | Weismiller et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591165 | Papakostas et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7629890 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7652581 | Gentry et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656299 | Gentry et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7714238 | Skinner et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7746218 | Collins, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752926 | Caminade et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7825814 | Lokhorst et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849545 | Flocard et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7852208 | Collins, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7868740 | McNeely et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8011041 | Hann | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8117701 | Bobey et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8121800 | Altman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8272276 | Gorjanc et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8413271 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020034166 | Barany et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020121146 | Manaresi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030105389 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040046668 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059199 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050076715 | Kuklis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165284 | Gefen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060028350 | Bhai | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065060 | Ito et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060152378 | Lokhorst et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060213286 | De Arenaza | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060293613 | Fatehi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008156 | Ueda et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070234825 | Loomis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235231 | Loomis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080009686 | Hendrich | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080060138 | Price et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078030 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080169931 | Gentry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183048 | Zhang | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080202251 | Serban | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080275326 | Kasielke et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090044334 | Parsell et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069727 | Neustaedter et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070939 | Hann | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099480 | Salgo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119843 | Rodgers et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129031 | Someya et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129556 | Ahn | May 2009 | A1 |
20090256817 | Perlin | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100052917 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100162832 | Brauers | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100268122 | Drennan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298742 | Perlman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110001622 | Gentry et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030141 | Soderberg et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035057 | Receveur et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046498 | Klap et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110068932 | Flocard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110156915 | Brauers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110234408 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263950 | Larson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302719 | Schwirian et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308019 | Terawaki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120184862 | Foo et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120253142 | Meger et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277637 | Vahdatpour et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323501 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130091961 | Taylor | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101109769 | Jan 2008 | CN |
3227550 | Jan 1983 | DE |
0264047 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0480471 | Apr 1992 | EP |
1211633 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2392304 | Dec 2011 | EP |
H02-078925 | Mar 1990 | JP |
02232050 | Sep 1990 | JP |
6201502 | Jul 1994 | JP |
H06281516 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H07-65943 | Jul 1995 | JP |
10024073 | Jan 1998 | JP |
20020126007 | May 2002 | JP |
2004-245822 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004245822 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-363759 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005237684 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006094903 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2008027030 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-216016 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2010012335 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010-043881 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2007106040 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007121586 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009048617 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009065109 | May 2009 | WO |
2009138976 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010092517 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010102309 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010119441 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010119441 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011091517 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011111021 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011113070 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012056405 | May 2012 | WO |
2012114298 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013008187 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013021376 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013105028 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013156907 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014024094 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014024094 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014064596 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report for the corresponding European Patent Application No. 12810788.5 mailed Feb. 2, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/881,169 dated May 7, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/IB2015/051822 dated Jul. 6, 2015, 4 pages. |
International Written Opinion for PCT/IB2015/051822 dated Jul. 6, 2015, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, Office Action for the corresponding European Patent Application No. 10 720 826.6 dated Apr. 16, 2014. |
International Searching Authority, The International Search Report and the Written Opinion for the corresponding International Application No. PCT/IB13/59499 mailed May 20, 2014. |
Muhammad Ahsen Khan, Dyeing of Wood and Silk Fibres with a Conductive Polyelectrolyte and Comparing Their Conductance, Report No. 2011.7.10, Masters in Textile Technology, University of Boras 2011. |
Mehdi Nouri, et al. Iranian Polymer Journal, Archive of SID, Conductivity of Textile Fibers Treated with Aniline, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 8, 2000. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/881,169 dated Sep. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IL2010/000294 dated Oct. 26, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2011/051016 dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2011/054773 dated Jun. 15, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB12/50829 dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2012/053538 dated Dec. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/050173 dated Jul. 1, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/52878 dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/056287 dated Feb. 10, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140373594 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61507418 | Jul 2011 | US |