The present invention relates generally to a system and a process for improving the quality of gasification slag product. More particularly, the present invention relates to systems and processes for improving the quality of the slag product from a gasification process that converts a carbonaceous feedstock into desirable gaseous products such as synthesis gas.
The product of gasification is a reactive gas predominantly comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen. This gas can be used as a fuel gas, or it can be chemically converted to other products, such as synthetic oil. During gasification, the inorganic portion of the coal forms a vitreous slag by-product, which comprises molten or partially-fused particles that come into contact with the furnace wall, flow downwards towards the bottom opening, or taphole, of the furnace, then out of the furnace. The slag then drops into a water bath where it is quenched, solidified, and broken up into a granular aggregate material. Typically, slag is removed from the water bath as a slurry.
Often, the slag produced as a byproduct of gasification processes does not meet market expectations, mainly because of high residual carbon content. Carbon content of the slag is often between 20-30%, sometimes as high as 70%, while less than 5% is normally required for the slag to be commercially marketable. Slag with a low carbon content can be used as aggregate for road or construction fill, concrete mix, roofing shingles, as sandblasting grit or for other applications.
Various processing methods have been instituted to improve slag quality and increase its marketability, such as the screening technology disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,328,805, (incorporated herein by reference). However, some slag products may not present a certain size fraction showing the carbon content is predominant, and the above mentioned screening method is not beneficial for such slag.
Accordingly, there is a need for new technology that can improve the quality of slag product produced during gasification of carbonaceous feedstocks, such that the resulting slag product is marketable.
The current invention discloses novel processes and systems that improve the quality of the slag product derived from a gasification process. To accomplish this, a hindered-bed settler is employed with an optional dewatering and water recycling unit. Hindered-bed settlers employ a counter-current water wash column to “float” lighter solid particles such as carbon, thereby separating these lighter particles from denser particles such as ash. The operation of the unit does require a generous amount of wash water flow to create the up-thrust. Dry solid feed or a slurry feed stream with high solid content is preferred so that the particles will pack together tighter in the hindered-bed settlers bed to generate a higher up-flow velocity between the particles, thereby reducing water consumption. A system to collect, clean, and re-use the wash water is often necessary to minimize net water usage and discharge
Hindered-bed settlers have been used extensively in sand and mineral industries, as well as for separation of fine coal from shale, coal from sand, etc. Hindered-bed settlers are commercially-available and relatively inexpensive to purchase. However, such an apparatus has not been used in conjunction with a gasification process, or the upgrading of a gasification slag product. It is important to note that the present invention comprises more than utilizing a hindered bed settler in conjunction with a gasification system. An additional benefit of the invention includes increasing the overall carbon conversion efficiency of the gasification process by separating out slag particles containing a high carbon content, then returning these slag particles to the gasification reactor as fuel. In addition, the current invention reduces cost and environmental impact by recycling the water utilized in the hindered-bed settler.
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide a system for improving the quality of a slag product from a gasifier. The system generally comprises a hindered-bed settler for fluidizing and segregating the slag product into an overflow stream containing carbon particles and an underflow stream; a gravity settler for separating the overflow stream into carbon stream and wash water; and a recycle water tank for recycling the wash water. The wash water in the recycle water tank is recycled back into the hindered-bed settler and the carbon stream is recycled back into the gasifier. The hindered-bed settler may further comprises a vertical section; a conical section; a distributor there in between; and an opening at the bottom of the conical section. In this design, the slag product is fluidized in the vertical section by upward rising of the wash water distributed by the distributor and is therefore segregated into 1) the overflow stream at the top of the vertical section, and 2) the underflow stream at the bottom of the conical section. The heavy solids are settled from the underflow and removed from the hindered-bed settler via an outlet orifice. In this system, slag particles in the underflow stream have a lower carbon content than particles in the overflow stream, preferably a carbon content of less than 5%. Thus, the slag particles in the underflow stream represent a commercially viable product. The hindered-bed settler may further comprises a tap hole at the bottom of the conical section. The gravity settler may be, but is not limited to, a commercially-available inclined-plate lamella settler or thickener/clarifier unit.
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide a system for improving the quality of a slag product produced by a gasification reactor. The system generally comprises: a de-waterer for concentrating the slag product into a concentrated slag stream and a first overflow stream; a hindered-bed settler for fluidizing and segregating the concentrated slag stream into second overflow stream containing carbon particles and an underflow stream; a gravity settler for separating the first and second overflow streams into carbon stream and wash water; and a recycle water tank for storing the wash water from the gravity settler. The carbon stream is recycled back to the gasification reactor and the wash water in the recycle water tank is recycled back to the hindered-bed settler. In this system, the de-waterer may be a disengager comprising: a disengager vessel for settling and concentrating the slag product into concentrated slag stream and first overflow stream; a flow distributor for evenly distributing the slag across the disengager vessel; and an overflow weir for removing the first overflow stream from the disengager vessel. The concentrated slag stream is sent to the hindered-bed settler. The underflow stream in the hinder-bed settler has a carbon content less than 5%. The de-waterer may also be a spiral de-waterer comprising an open trough for that allows sedimentation of solids; a transportation spiral for removing and dewatering the solids; and a feed distributor for evenly spreading the slag into the open trough. In such a design, solids are continuously removed by the transportation spiral and dewatered by drainage in an upper part of the transportation spiral prior to being sent to the hindered-bed settler.
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide a process for improving the quality of a slag product from a gasifier. The process generally comprises: fluidizing and segregating the slag in hindered-bed settler into an overflow stream containing carbon particles and an underflow stream; separating the overflow stream in a gravity settler into a carbon stream and wash water; conveying the wash water to a recycle water tank; recycling the water from the recycle water tank for reuse in the hindered-bed settler, and recycling the carbon stream back to the gasification reactor.
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide a process for improving the quality of a slag product from a gasifier. The process generally comprises: concentrating the slag in a de-waterer into a concentrated slag stream and a first overflow stream; fluidizing the concentrated slag stream in a hindered-bed settler, and segregating said stream into second overflow stream containing carbon particles and an underflow stream; separating the first and second overflow streams into a carbon stream and wash water using a gravity settler; conveying the wash water from gravity settler into a recycle water tank; recycling the carbon stream back to the gasification reactor, and recycling the water from recycle water tank for reuse in the hindered-bed settler.
For a more detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention references the accompanying drawings that illustrate specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. The embodiments are intended to describe aspects of the invention in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments can be utilized and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Thus, the following detailed description is not intended to be limit the scope of the invention to only the embodiments specifically disclosed. The true scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
According to one embodiment as shown in
The embodiment depicted in
Using this system, the slag slurry stream 20 is concentrated to an essentially dry solid so that the amount of wash water required by the HBS 40 is minimized. According to the embodiment as illustrated in
The spiral de-waterer 30′ as depicted in
Utilizing the methods and systems disclosed herein, the quality of slag aggregate produced by a gasification reactor can be improved to create a marketable product. An added financial benefit is that this improved slag aggregate can be sold for a profit, rather than disposed of in a landfill at a significant cost. In addition, the proposed system increases efficiency by operating continuously, thereby reducing the amount of operator attention required as compared to current methods that involve batch-wise slag collection systems. Carbon conversion efficiency is also increased through the recovery and recycling of particles with a high percentage of un-utilized carbon, thereby improving the conversion efficiency of the gasification process. Finally, the current invention should normally be less expensive to implement than currently-utilized batch-wise methodology, thereby lowering the capital cost of the new gasification projects.
The following examples are intended to be illustrative of the present invention and to teach one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention. These examples are not intended to limit the invention in any way.
The following Examples 1 and 2 were conducted utilizing a 9″W×9″L×30″H rectangular bench-scale hinder-bed-settler (HBS). The gasification slag samples used were obtained from a commercial gasification facility. All percentages are by weight, unless noted otherwise.
A slag aggregate containing 43.5% carbon was slurried with water to a concentration of 7.9% solids and fed to the HBS at 5 gpm, while a counter-current of wash water was pumped at a rate of 2 gpm into the bottom of the HBS. Without screening the sample, approximately 69% of the mineral content in the original slag was recovered in the product, which contained 3.9% carbon. Prior to addition to the HBS, a portion of the slag was sized by mesh screening into several samples with various particle distribution to obtain samples with a number of different size distributions (see TABLE 1, column one). The carbon content of these screened samples indicates that the sample with the lowest carbon content was screened through 65×100 mesh, and that the carbon content of this sized sample was still around 20%. Thus, the mesh screening technique alone did not successfully reduce the carbon content of any sample to less than 5% of total carbon content. However, following processing of the screened samples in the HBS, the carbon content of the slaf aggregate recovered from the underflow fraction was less than 5% in all but one sample containing the largest aggregate particles (Column 7).
A slag aggregate containing 31.6% carbon was slurried with water to 17.4% solids content and fed to the HBS at 5 gpm, while a counter-current of wash water was pumped at a rate of 1 gpm into the bottom of the HBS. Approximately 69% of the mineral content in the original slag was recovered in the product which contained 7.8% carbon. Again the carbon distribution in the original slag indicates that the screen size with the lowest carbon content would be 65-100 mesh, and the carbon content would still be 15.3%. Therefore utilizing a screening technique alone, it would not be possible to reduce the carbon content of any size fraction to less than 5% total carbon content.
Without screening the sample, approximately 69% of the mineral content in the original slag was recovered in the product, which contained 7.8% carbon. Again, the carbon content of screened samples indicates that the sample with the lowest carbon content was screened through 65×100 mesh, and that the carbon content of this sized sample was still around 15.3%. Thus, the mesh screening technique alone did not successfully reduce the carbon content of any sample to less than 5% of total carbon content. However, following processing of the screened samples in the HBS, the carbon content of the slag aggregate collected from the underflow fraction was less than 5% in fractions that had been pre-screened with 48×65, 65×100, and 100×325 mesh. (Column 7).
Examples 3 and 4 describe experiments conducted in a 9″W×16″L×4.5 ft. H rectangular pilot-scale HBS. A dilute slag slurry stream was concentrated using a 6″(i.d.)×6 ft. tall hydrocyclone. The concentrated slag was the fed into the HBS.
Referring to TABLE 3, A slag containing 87.1% carbon in a dilute slurry stream containing 3.2% solids was fed to a hydrocyclone at 74 gpm. The slurry was concentrated to 9.2% solids in the underflow of the hydrocyclone with a underflow output rate of 24.2 gpm. This outflow was next fed to the HBS with 8.6 gpm of counter-current wash water flowing into the bottom of the HBS. Approximately 68.6% of the solids content of the slag aggregate (and 55.6% of the mineral content) was recovered in the final product, which contained just 1.5% carbon. Processing of mesh-screened samples was likewise successful in producing a final product containing less than 5% carbon content for most samples.
0.1%
A slag containing 71.5% carbon in a slurry stream containing 2.3% solid was fed to the hydrocyclone at 58.6 gpm. The slurry was concentrated to 7.1% solid in the underflow of the hydrocyclone with an underflow output rate of 18.0 gpm. This was fed to the HBS with 14.5 gpm of counter-current wash water to the bottom of the HBS. Approximately 80.3% of the mineral content in the original slag aggregate material was recovered in the final product, which contained just 3.0% carbon. Processing of mesh-screened samples was likewise successful in producing a final product containing less than 5% carbon content for most samples.
The scope of protection is not limited by the description and examples provided herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated into the specification as an embodiment of the present invention. Thus the claims are a further description and are an addition to the preferred embodiments of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2139789 | Wuensch | Dec 1938 | A |
3544291 | Schlinger et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3957458 | Squires | May 1976 | A |
3971638 | Matthews | Jul 1976 | A |
4425254 | Langhoff et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4436617 | Moore et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4465496 | Suggitt | Aug 1984 | A |
4508542 | Langhoff et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4533464 | Smith et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4946476 | Najjar et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5622534 | Andrus, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
6264040 | Mankosa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6425485 | Mankosa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6758978 | Bedell | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6953123 | Niititi | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7328805 | Price et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20030183137 | Martin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234227 | Niitti | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080314823 | Kulick et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090120290 | Wallace et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100155309 | Niitti | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
349201 | Feb 1928 | BE |
2175027 | Aug 1994 | CN |
2476556 | Feb 2002 | CN |
2220132 | Dec 1973 | DE |
102005048960 | Apr 2007 | DE |
0101005 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0227197 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0438822 | Mar 1995 | EP |
2417326 | Sep 1979 | FR |
WO03078013 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2009064529 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Perwitz, “Extraction of Coal form Tailings/Slurries by Cleaning in an Autogenous Dense Medium” Aufbereitungs-Technik, Verlag Fuer Aufbereitung, Wiesbaden, DE, vol. 34, No. 12, (Dec. 1, 1993), pp. 625-630, XP000401853. |
PCT/US2010/020220 International Search Report (Form PCT/ISA/220) dated Aug. 16, 2010. |
Second Office Action issued Sep. 2, 2013 (w/translation) in corresponding Chinese application No. 201080004948.4 (21 pages). |
Third Office Action issued Feb. 18, 2014 (w/translation) in corresponding Chinese application No. 201080004948.4 (31 pages). |
Rejection Decision (with translation) issued Jun. 25, 2014 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201080004948.4 (28 pages). |
Notification of Reexamination issued Jan. 12, 2015 (w/translation) in corresponding Chinese application No. 201080004948.4 (31 pages). |
“Development and Application of Teetered Bed Coal Separation Technology”, Wang Jianjun et al., Coal Preparation Technology, Jun. 25, 2007, No. 3, 70-72. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100181537 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61146189 | Jan 2009 | US |