1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to electroporation, and more particularly to systems and methods for treating restenosis sites of a patient using electroporation.
2. Description of the Related Art
Electroporation is defined as the phenomenon that makes cell membranes permeable by exposing them to certain electric pulses (Weaver, J. C. and Y. A. Chizmadzhev, Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 1996. 41: p. 135-60). The permeabilization of the membrane can be reversible or irreversible as a function of the electrical parameters used. In reversible electroporation the cell membrane reseals a certain time after the pulses cease and the cell survives. In irreversible electroporation the cell membrane does not reseal and the cell lyses. (Dev, S. B., Rabussay, D. P., Widera, G., Hofmann, G. A., Medical applications of electroporation, IEEE Transactions of Plasma Science, Vol 28 No 1, February 2000, pp 206-223).
Dielectric breakdown of the cell membrane due to an induced electric field, irreversible electroporation, was first observed in the early 1970s (Neumann, E. and K. Rosenheck, Permeablilty changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes. J. Membrane Biol., 1972. 10: p. 279-290; Crowley, J. M., Electrical breakdown of biomolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability. Biophysical Journal, 1973. 13: p. 711-724; Zimmermann, U., J. Vienken, and G. Pilwat, Dielectric breakdown of cell membranes, Biophysical Journal, 1974. 14(11): p. 881-899). The ability of the membrane to reseal, reversible electroporation, was discovered separately during the late 1970s (Kinosita Jr, K. and T. Y. Tsong, Hemolysis of human erythrocytes by a transient electric field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1977. 74(5): p. 1923-1927; Baker, P. F. and D. E. Knight, Calcium-dependent exocytosis in bovine adrenal medullary cells with leaky plasma membranes. Nature, 1978. 276: p. 620-622; Gauger, B. and F. W. Bentrup, A Study of Dielectric Membrane Breakdown in the Fucus Egg,. J. Membrane Biol., 1979. 48(3): p. 249-264).
The mechanism of electroporation is not yet fully understood. It is thought that the electrical field changes the electrochemical potential around a cell membrane and induces instabilities in the polarized cell membrane lipid bilayer. The unstable membrane then alters its shape forming aqueous pathways that possibly are nano-scale pores through the membrane, hence the term “electroporation” (Chang, D. C., et al., Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. 1992, San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, Inc.). Mass transfer can now occur through these channels under electrochemical control. Whatever the mechanism through which the cell membrane becomes permeabilized, electroporation has become an important method for enhanced mass transfer across the cell membrane.
The first important application of the cell membrane permeabilizing properties of electroporation is due to Neumann (Neumann, E., et al., Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. J. EMBO, 1982. 1: p. 841-5). He has shown that by applying reversible electroporation to cells it is possible to sufficiently permeabilize the cell membrane so that genes, which are macromolecules that normally are too large to enter cells, can after electroporation enter the cell. Using reversible electroporation electrical parameters is crucial to the success of the procedure, since the goal of the procedure is to have a viable cell that incorporates the gene.
Following this discovery electroporation became commonly used to reversible permeabilize the cell membrane for various applications in medicine and biotechnology to introduce into cells or to extract from cells chemical species that normally do not pass, or have difficulty passing across the cell membrane, from small molecules such as fluorescent dyes, drugs and radioactive tracers to high molecular weight molecules such as antibodies, enzymes, nucleic acids, HMW dextrans and DNA.
Following work on cells outside the body, reversible electroporation began to be used for permeabilization of cells in tissue. Heller, R., R. Gilbert, and M. J. Jaroszeski, Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 1999. 35: p. 119-129. Tissue electroporation is now becoming an increasingly popular minimally invasive surgical technique for introducing small drugs and macromolecules into cells in specific areas of the body. This technique is accomplished by injecting drugs or macromolecules into the affected area and placing electrodes into or around the targeted tissue to generate reversible permeabilizing electric field in the tissue, thereby introducing the drugs or macromolecules into the cells of the affected area (Mir, L. M., Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry, 2001. 53: p. 1-10).
The use of electroporation to ablate undesirable tissue was introduced by Okino and Mohri in 1987 and Mir et al. in 1991. They have recognized that there are drugs for treatment of cancer, such as bleomycin and cys-platinum, which are very effective in ablation of cancer cells but have difficulties penetrating the cell membrane. Furthermore, some of these drugs, such as bleomycin, have the ability to selectively affect cancerous cells which reproduce without affecting normal cells that do not reproduce. Okino and Mori and Mir et al. separately discovered that combining the electric pulses with an impermeant anticancer drug greatly enhanced the effectiveness of the treatment with that drug (Okino, M. and H. Mohri, Effects of a high-voltage electrical impulse and an anticancer drug on in vivo growing tumors. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, 1987. 78(12): p. 1319-21; Mir, L. M., et al., Electrochemotherapy potentiation of antitumour effect of bleomycin by local electric pulses. European Journal of Cancer, 1991. 27: p. 68-72). Mir et al. soon followed with clinical trials that have shown promising results and coined the treatment electrochemotherapy (Mir, L. M., et al., Electrochemotherapy, a novel antitumor treatment: first clinical trial. C. R. Acad. Sci., 1991. Ser. III 313(613-8)).
Currently, the primary therapeutic in vivo applications of electroporation are antitumor electrochemotherapy (ECT), which combines a cytotoxic nonpermeant drug with permeabilizing electric pulses and electrogenetherapy (EGT) as a form of non-viral gene therapy, and transdermal drug delivery (Mir, L. M., Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilzation. Bioelectrochemistry, 2001. 53: p. 1-10). The studies on electrochemotherapy and electrogenetherapy have been recently summarized in several publications (Jaroszeski, M. J., et al., In vivo gene delivery by electroporation. Advanced applications of electrochemistry, 1999. 35: p. 131-137; Heller, R., R. Gilbert, and M. J. Jaroszeski, Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 1999. 35: p. 119-129; Mir, L. M., Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry, 2001. 53: p. 1-10; Davalos, R. V., Real Time Imaging for Molecular Medicine through electrical Impedance Tomography of Electroporation, in Mechanical Engineering. 2002, University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley. p. 237). A recent article summarized the results from clinical trials performed in five cancer research centers. Basal cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, adenocarcinoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated for a total of 291 tumors (Mir, L. M., et al., Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. British Journal of Cancer, 1998. 77(12): p. 2336-2342).
Electrochemotherapy is a promising minimally invasive surgical technique to locally ablate tissue and treat tumors regardless of their histological type with minimal adverse side effects and a high response rate (Dev, S. B., et al., Medical Applications of Electroporation. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2000. 28(1): p. 206-223; Heller, R., R. Gilbert, and M. J. Jaroszeski, Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 1999. 35: p. 119-129). Electrochemotherapy, which is performed through the insertion of electrodes into the undesirable tissue, the injection of cytotoxic dugs in the tissue and the application of reversible electroporation parameters, benefits from the ease of application of both high temperature treatment therapies and non-selective chemical therapies and results in outcomes comparable of both high temperature therapies and non-selective chemical therapies.
Irreversible electroporation, the application of electrical pulses which induce irreversible electroporation in cells is also considered for tissue ablation (Davalos, R. V., Real Time Imaging for Molecular Medicine through electrical Impedance Tomography of Electroporation, in Mechanical Engineering. 2002, PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley, Davalos, R., L. Mir, Rubinsky B. “Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation” in print February 2005 Annals of Biomedical Eng,). Irreversible electroporation has the potential for becoming and important minimally invasive surgical technique. However, when used deep in the body, as opposed to the outer surface or in the vicinity of the outer surface of the body, it has a drawback that is typical to all minimally invasive surgical techniques that occur deep in the body, it cannot be closely monitored and controlled. In order for irreversible electroporation to become a routine technique in tissue ablation, it needs to be controllable with immediate feedback. This is necessary to ensure that the targeted areas have been appropriately treated without affecting the surrounding tissue. This invention provides a solution to this problem in the form of medical imaging.
Medical imaging has become an essential aspect of minimally and non-invasive surgery since it was introduced in the early 1980's by the group of Onik and Rubinsky (G. Onik, C. Cooper, H. I. Goldenberg, A. A. Moss, B. Rubinsky, and M. Christianson, “Ultrasonic Characteristics of Frozen Liver,” Cryobiology, 21, pp. 321-328, 1984, J. C. Gilbert, G. M. Onik, W. Haddick, and B. Rubinsky, “The Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring Cryosurgery,” Proceedings 6th Annual Conference, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 107-112, 1984 G. Onik, J. Gilbert, W. K. Haddick, R. A. Filly, P. W. Collen, B. Rubinsky, and L. Farrel, “Sonographic Monitoring of Hepatic Cryosurgery, Experimental Animal Model, ” American J. of Roentgenology, May 1985, pp. 1043-1047.) Medical imaging involves the production of a map of various physical properties of tissue, which the imaging technique uses to generate a distribution. For example, in using x-rays a map of the x-ray absorption characteristics of various tissues is produced, in ultrasound a map of the pressure wave reflection characteristics of the tissue is produced, in magnetic resonance imaging a map of proton density is produced, in light imaging a map of either photon scattering or absorption characteristics of tissue is produced, in electrical impedance tomography or induction impedance tomography or microwave tomography a map of electrical impedance is produced.
Minimally invasive surgery involves causing desirable changes in tissue, by minimally invasive means. Often minimally invasive surgery is used for the ablation of certain undesirable tissues by various means. For instance in cryosurgery the undesirable tissue is frozen, in radio-frequency ablation, focused ultrasound, electrical and micro-waves hyperthermia tissue is heated, in alcohol ablation proteins are denaturized, in laser ablation photons are delivered to elevate the energy of electrons. In order for imaging to detect and monitor the effects of minimally invasive surgery, these should produce changes in the physical properties that the imaging technique monitors.
The formation of nanopores in the cell membrane has the effect of changing the electrical impedance properties of the cell (Huang, Y, Rubinsky, B., “Micro-electroporation: improving the efficiency and understanding of electrical permeabilization of cells” Biomedical Microdevices, Vo 3, 145-150, 2000. (Discussed in “Nature Biotechnology” Vol 18. pp 368, April 2000), B. Rubinsky, Y Huang. “Controlled electroporation and mass transfer across cell membranes U.S. Pat. No. 6,300,108, Oct. 9, 2001).
Thereafter, electrical impedance tomography was developed, which is an imaging technique that maps the electrical properties of tissue. This concept was proven with experimental and analytical studies (Davalos, R. V., Rubinsky, B., Otten, D. M., “A feasibillty study for electrical impedance tomography as a means to monitor tissue electroporation in molecular medicine” IEEE Trans of Biomedical Engineering. Vol 49, No. 4 pp 400-404, 2002, B. Rubinsky, Y. Huang. “Electrical Impedance Tomography to control electroporation” U.S. Pat. No. 6,387,671, May 14, 2002.)
There is a need for improved systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide improved systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation.
Another object of the present invention is to provide systems and method for treating restenosis sites using electroporation using sufficient electrical pulses to induce electroporation of cells in the restenosis site, without creating a thermal damage effect to a majority of the restenosis site.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation with real time monitoring.
A further object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation where the electroporation is performed in a controlled manner with monitoring of electrical impedance;
Still a further object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation that is performed in a controlled manner, with controlled intensity and duration of voltage.
Another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation that is performed in a controlled manner, with a proper selection of voltage magnitude.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation that is performed in a controlled manner, with a proper selection of voltage application time.
A further object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation, and a monitoring electrode configured to measure a test voltage delivered to cells in the restenosis site.
Still a further object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation that is performed in a controlled manner to provide for controlled pore formation in cell membranes.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation that is performed in a controlled manner to create a tissue effect in the cells at the restenosis site while preserving surrounding tissue.
Another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation, and detecting an onset of electroporation of cells at the restenosis site.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods for treating restenosis sites using electroporation where the electroporation is performed in a manner for modification and control of mass transfer across cell membranes.
These and other objects of the present invention are achieved in, a system for reducing restenosis. A catheter apparatus is provided with at least first and second mono-polar electrodes positioned at or on an inflatable balloon. The balloon is sized to be positioned and expanded at a restenosis site. A voltage pulse generator is coupled to the first and second mono-polar electrodes. The voltage pulse generator is configured to apply an electric field, in a controlled manner, to the restenosis site in an amount sufficient to produce electroporation of the restenosis site, and below an amount that causes thermal damage to the restenosis site.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a system is provided for reducing restenosis. A catheter apparatus is provided with a bipolar electrode positioned at or on an inflatable balloon. The balloon is sized to be positioned and expanded at a restenosis site. A voltage pulse generator is coupled to the bipolar electrode. The voltage pulse generator is configured to apply an electric field, in a controlled manner, to the restenosis site in an amount sufficient to produce electroporation of the restenosis site, and below an amount that causes thermal damage to the restenosis site.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for reducing restenosis. A balloon, with first and second mono-polar electrodes, is introduced through vasculature to a restenosis site. The balloon and the first and second mono-polar electrodes are positioned at or near the restenosis site. An electric field is applied, in a controlled manner, to the restenosis site in an amount sufficient to produce electroporation of the restenosis site, and below an amount that causes thermal damage to the restenosis site.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for reducing restenosis. A balloon, with a bipolar electrode, is introduced through vasculature to a restenosis site. The balloon and the bipolar electrode are positioned at or near the restenosis site. An electric field is applied, in a controlled manner, to the restenosis site in an amount sufficient to produce electroporation of the restenosis site, and below an amount that causes thermal damage to the restenosis site.
a) illustrates an embodiment of the present invention with two mono-polar electrodes that can be utilized for electroporation with the
b) illustrates an embodiment of the present invention with three mono-polar electrodes that can be utilized for electroporation with the
c) illustrates an embodiment of the present invention with a single bi-polar electrode that can be utilized for electroporation with the
d) illustrates an embodiment of the present invention with an array of electrodes coupled to a template that can be utilized for electroporation with the
The term “reversible electroporation” encompasses permeabilization of a cell membrane through the application of electrical pulses across the cell. In “reversible electroporation” the permeabilization of the cell membrane ceases after the application of the pulse and the cell membrane permeability reverts to normal or at least to a level such that the cell is viable. Thus, the cell survives “reversible electroporation.” It may be used as a means for introducing chemicals, DNA, or other materials into cells.
The term “irreversible electroporation” also encompasses the permeabilization of a cell membrane through the application of electrical pulses across the cell. However, in “irreversible electroporation” the permeabilization of the cell membrane does not cease after the application of the pulse and the cell membrane permeability does not revert to normal and as such cell is not viable. Thus, the cell does not survive “irreversible electroporation” and the cell death is caused by the disruption of the cell membrane and not merely by internal perturbation of cellular components. Openings in the cell membrane are created and/or expanded in size resulting in a fatal disruption in the normal controlled flow of material across the cell membrane. The cell membrane is highly specialized in its ability to regulate what leaves and enters the cell. Irreversible electroporation destroys that ability to regulate in a manner such that the cell can not compensate and as such the cell dies.
“Ultrasound” is a method used to image tissue in which pressure waves are sent into the tissue using a piezoelectric crystal. The resulting returning waves caused by tissue reflection are transformed into an image.
“MRI” is an imaging modality that uses the perturbation of hydrogen molecules caused by a radio pulse to create an image.
“CT” is an imaging modality that uses the attenuation of an x-ray beam to create an image.
“Light imaging” is an imaging method in which electromagnetic waves with frequencies in the range of visible to far infrared are send into tissue and the tissue's reflection and/or absorption characteristics are reconstructed.
“Electrical impedance tomography” is an imaging technique in which a tissue's electrical impedance characteristics are reconstructed by applying a current across the tissue and measuring electrical currents and potentials
In accordance with the present invention specific imaging technologies used in the field of medicine are used to create images of tissue affected by electroporation pulses. The images are created during the process of carrying out irreversible electroporation and are used to focus the electroporation on tissue such as a restenosis site to be ablated and to avoid ablating non-target. The process of the invention may be carried out by placing electrodes, such as a needle electrode in the imaging path of an imaging device. When the electrodes are activated the image device creates an image of tissue being subjected to electroporation. The effectiveness and extent of the electroporation over a given area of tissue can be determined in real time using the imaging technology.
Reversible electroporation requires electrical parameters in a precise range of values that induce only reversible electroporation. To accomplish this precise and relatively narrow range of values (between the onset of electroporation and the onset of irreversible electroporation) when reversible electroporation devices are designed they are designed to generally operate in pairs or in a precisely controlled configuration that allows delivery of these precise pulses limited by certain upper and lower values. In contrast, in irreversible electroporation the limit is more focused on the lower value of the pulse which should be high enough to induce irreversible electroporation.
Higher values can be used provided they do not induce burning. Therefore the design principles are such that no matter how many electrodes are used the only constrain is that the electrical parameters between the most distant ones be at least the value of irreversible electroporation. If within the electroporated regions and within electrodes there are higher gradients this does not diminish the effectiveness of the probe. From these principles we can use a very effective design in which any irregular region to be ablated can be treated by surrounding the region with ground electrodes and providing the electrical pulses from a central electrode. The use of the ground electrodes around the treated area has another potential value--it protects the tissue outside the area that is intended to be treated from electrical currents and is an important safety measure. In principle, to further protect an area of tissue from stray currents it would be possible to put two layers of ground electrodes around the area to be ablated. It should be emphasized that the electrodes can be infinitely long and can also be curves to better hug the undesirable area to be ablated.
In one embodiment of the present invention, methods are provided to apply an electrical pulse or pulses to restenosis sites. The pulses are applied between electrodes and are applied in numbers with currents so as to result in irreversible electroporation of the cells without damaging surrounding cells. Energy waves are emitted from an imaging device such that the energy waves of the imaging device pass through the area positioned between the electrodes and the irreversible electroporation of the cells effects the energy waves of the imaging device in a manner so as to create an image.
Typical values for pulse length for irreversible electroporation are in a range of from about 5 microseconds to about 62,000 milliseconds or about 75 microseconds to about 20,000 milliseconds or about 100 microseconds ±10 microseconds. This is significantly longer than the pulse length generally used in intracellular (nano-seconds) electro-manipulation which is 1 microsecond or less—see published U.S. application 2002/0010491 published Jan. 24, 2002. Pulse lengths can be adjusted based on the real time imaging.
The pulse is at voltage of about 100 V/cm to 7,000 V/cm or 200 V/cm to 2000 V/cm or 300V/cm to 1000 V/cm about 600 V/cm ±10% for irreversible electroporation. This is substantially lower than that used for intracellular electro-manipulation which is about 10,000 V/cm, see U.S. application 2002/0010491 published Jan. 24, 2002. The voltage can be adjusted alone or with the pulse length based on real time imaging information.
The voltage expressed above is the voltage gradient (voltage per centimeter). The electrodes may be different shapes and sizes and be positioned at different distances from each other. The shape may be circular, oval, square, rectangular or irregular etc. The distance of one electrode to another may be 0.5 to 10 cm., 1 to 5 cm., or 2-3 cm. The electrode may have a surface area of 0.1-5 sq. cm. or 1-2 sq. cm.
The size, shape and distances of the electrodes can vary and such can change the voltage and pulse duration used and can be adjusted based on imaging information. Those skilled in the art will adjust the parameters in accordance with this disclosure and imaging to obtain the desired degree of electroporation and avoid thermal damage to surrounding cells.
Thermal effects require electrical pulses that are substantially longer from those used in irreversible electroporation (Davalos, R. V., B. Rubinsky, and L. M. Mir, Theoretical analysis of the thermal effects during in vivo tissue electroporation. Bioelectrochemistry, 2003. Vol 61(1-2): p. 99-107). When using irreversible electroporation for tissue ablation, there may be concern that the irreversible electroporation pulses will be as large as to cause thermal damaging effects to the surrounding tissue and the extent of the restenosis site ablated by irreversible electroporation will not be significant relative to that ablated by thermal effects. Under such circumstances irreversible electroporation could not be considered as an effective restenosis site ablation modality as it will act in superposition with thermal ablation. To a degree, this problem is addressed via the present invention using imaging technology.
In one aspect of the invention the imaging device is any medical imaging device including ultrasound, X-ray technologies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), light imaging, electrical impedance tomography, electrical induction impedance tomography and microwave tomography. It is possible to use combinations of different imaging technologies at different points in the process. For example, one type of imaging technology can be used to precisely locate a restenosis site, a second type of imaging technology can be used to confirm the placement of electrodes relative to the restenosis site. And yet another type of imaging technology could be used to create images of the currents of irreversible electroporation in real time. Thus, for example, MRI technology could be used to precisely locate a restenosis site. Electrodes could be placed and identified as being well positioned using X-ray imaging technologies. Current could be applied to carry out irreversible electroporation while using ultrasound technology to determine the extent of restenosis site effected by the electroporation pulses. It has been found that within the resolution of calculations and imaging the extent of the image created on ultrasound corresponds to an area calculated to be irreversibly electroporated. Within the resolution of histology the image created by the ultrasound image corresponds to the extent of restenosis site ablated as examined histologically.
Because the effectiveness of the irreversible electroporation can be immediately verified with the imaging it is possible to limit the amount of unwanted damage to surrounding tissues and limit the amount of electroporation that is carried out. Further, by using the imaging technology it is possible to reposition the electrodes during the process. The electrode repositioning may be carried out once, twice or a plurality of times as needed in order to obtain the desired degree of irreversible electroporation on the desired restenosis site.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a method may be carried out which comprises several steps. In a first step an area of restenosis site to be treated by irreversible electroporation is imaged. Electrodes are then placed in the restenosis site with the target tissue to be ablated being positioned between the electrodes. Imaging can also be carried out at this point to confirm that the electrodes are properly placed. After the electrodes are properly placed pulses of current are run between the two electrodes and the pulsing current is designed so as to minimize damage to surrounding tissue and achieve the desired irreversible electroporation of the restenosis site. While the irreversible electroporation is being carried out imaging technology is used and that imaging technology images the irreversible electroporation occurring in real time. While this is occurring the amount of current and number of pulses may be adjusted so as to achieve the desired degree of electroporation. Further, one or more of the electrodes may be repositioned so as to make it possible to target the irreversible electroporation and ablate the desired restenosis site.
Referring to
In one embodiment, at least first and second monopolar electrodes 12 are configured to be introduced at or near the restenosis site of the patient. It will be appreciated that three or more monopolar electrodes 12 can be utilized. The array 16 of electrodes is configured to be in a substantially surrounding relationship to the restenosis site. The array 16 of electrodes can employ a template 17 to position and/or retain each of the electrodes. Template 17 can maintain a geometry of the array 16 of electrodes. Electrode placement and depth can be determined by the physician.
As shown in
In one embodiment, the monopolar electrodes 12 are separated by a distance of about 5 mm to 10 cm and they have a circular cross-sectional geometry. One or more additional probes 18 can be provided, including monitoring probes, an aspiration probe such as one used for liposuction, fluid introduction probes, and the like. Each bipolar electrode 14 can have multiple electrode bands 20. The spacing and the thickness of the electrode bands 20 is selected to optimize the shape of the electric field. In one embodiment, the spacing is about 1 mm to 5 cm typically, and the thickness of the electrode bands 20 can be from 0.5 mm to 5 cm.
Referring again to
The electrodes 12, 14 and array 16 are each connected through cables to the voltage pulse generator 22. A switching device 24 can be included. The switching device 24, with software, provides for simultaneous or individual activation of multiple electrodes 12, 14 and array 16. The switching device 24 is coupled to the voltage pulse generator 22. In one embodiment, means are provided for individually activating the electrodes 12, 14 and array 16 in order to produce electric fields that are produced between pre-selected electrodes 12, 14 and array 16 in a selected pattern relative to the restenosis site. The switching of electrical signals between the individual electrodes 12, 14 and array 16 can be accomplished by a variety of different means including but not limited to, manually, mechanically, electrically, with a circuit controlled by a programmed digital computer, and the like. In one embodiment, each individual electrode 12, 14 and array 16 is individually controlled.
The pulses are applied for a duration and magnitude in order to permanently disrupt the cell membranes of cells at the restenosis site. A ratio of electric current through cells at the restenosis site to voltage across the cells can be detected, and a magnitude of applied voltage to the restenosis site is then adjusted in accordance with changes in the ratio of current to voltage.
In one embodiment, an onset of electroporation of cells at the restenosis site is detected by measuring the current. In another embodiment, monitoring the effects of electroporation on cell membranes of cells at the restenosis site are monitored. The monitoring can be preformed by image monitoring using ultrasound, CT scan, MRI, CT scan, and the like.
In other embodiments, the monitoring is achieved using a monitoring electrode 18. In one embodiment, the monitoring electrode 18 is a high impedance needle that can be utilized to prevent preferential current flow to a monitoring needle. The high impedance needle is positioned adjacent to or in the restenonsis site size, at a critical location. This is similar in concept and positioning as that of placing a thermocouple as in a thermal monitoring. Prior to the full electroporation pulse being delivered a “test pulse” is delivered that is some fraction of the proposed full electroporation pulse, which can be, by way of illustration and without limitation, 10%, and the like. This test pulse is preferably in a range that does not cause irreversible electroporation. The monitoring electrode 18 measures the test voltage at the location. The voltage measured is then extrapolated back to what would be seen by the monitoring electrode 18 during the full pulse, e.g., multiplied by 10 in one embodiment, because the relationship is linear. If monitoring for a potential complication at the restenosis site, a voltage extrapolation that falls under the known level of irreversible electroporation indicates that the restenosis site where monitoring is taking place is safe. If monitoring at that restenosis site for adequacy of electroporation, the extrapolation falls above the known level of voltage adequate for irreversible tissue electroporation.
The effects of electroporation on cell membranes of cells at the restenosis site can be detected by measuring the current flow.
In various embodiments, the electroporation is performed in a controlled manner, with real time monitoring, to provide for controlled pore formation in cell membranes of cells at the restenosis site, to create a tissue effect in the cells at the restenosis site while preserving surrounding tissue, with monitoring of electrical impedance, and the like.
The electroporation can be performed in a controlled manner by controlling the intensity and duration of the applied voltage and with or without real time control. Additionally, the electroporation is performed in a manner to provide for modification and control of mass transfer across cell membranes. Performance of the electroporation in the controlled manner can be achieved by selection of a proper selection of voltage magnitude, proper selection of voltage application time, and the like.
The system 10 can include a control board 26 that functions to control temperature of the restenosis site. In one embodiment of the present invention, the control board 26 receives its program from a controller. Programming can be in computer languages such as C or BASIC (registered trade mark) if a personnel computer is used for a controller 28 or assembly language if a microprocessor is used for the controller 28. A user specified control of temperature can be programmed in the controller 28.
The controller 28 can include a computer, a digital or analog processing apparatus, programmable logic array, a hardwired logic circuit, an application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”), or other suitable device. In one embodiment, the controller 28 includes a microprocessor accompanied by appropriate RAM and ROM modules, as desired. The controller 28 can be coupled to a user interface 30 for exchanging data with a user. The user can operate the user interface 30 to input a desired pulsing pattern and corresponding temperature profile to be applied to the electrodes 12, 14 and array 16.
By way of illustration, the user interface 30 can include an alphanumeric keypad, touch screen, computer mouse, push-buttons and/or toggle switches, or another suitable component to receive input from a human user. The user interface 30 can also include a CRT screen, LED screen, LCD screen, liquid crystal display, printer, display panel, audio speaker, or another suitable component to convey data to a human user. The control board 26 can function to receive controller input and can be driven by the voltage pulse generator 22.
In various embodiments, the voltage pulse generator 22 is configured to provide that each pulse is applied for a duration of about, 5 microseconds to about 62 seconds, 90 to 110 microseconds, 100 microseconds, and the like. A variety of different number of pulses can be applied, including but not limited to, from about 1 to 15 pulses, about eight pulses of about 100 microseconds each in duration, and the like. In one embodiment, the pulses are applied to produce a voltage gradient at the restenosis site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 8000 volt/cm.
In various embodiments, the restenosis site is monitored and the pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of, 100 degrees C. or less at the restenosis site, 75 degrees C. or less at the restenosis site, 60 degrees C. or less at the restenosis site, 50 degrees C. or less at the restenosis site, and the like. The temperature is controlled in order to minimize the occurrence of a thermal effect to the restenosis site. These temperatures can be controlled by adjusting the current-to-voltage ratio based on temperature.
In another embodiment, the system 10 is used to treat restenosis tissue sites. Referring to
The voltage pulse generator 22 can be configured to be synchronized with the heartbeat of the patient. In one embodiment, an electrocardiograph provides a signal indicative of the heart's electrical status to a synchronizer over a signal line. The synchronizer is used to synchronize the pulsing of the vessel with the electrodes with the beating of the heart. The synchronizer forms a triggering pulse, coinciding with the T wave of the electrocardiogram of the heart produced by the electrocardiograph, which it provides to the voltage pulse generator 22. The triggering pulse prevents the electroporation pulses from creating a fibrillation, or a rapid and irregular beating of the heart.
The electroporation balloon 36 is configured to use two or more mono-polar electrodes 12 or one or more bi-polar electrodes 14, and generally employs the band 20 of electrodes. In one embodiment, two or more mono-polar 12 electrodes are positioned on the electroporation balloon 36. In another embodiment, a bi-polar electrode 14 is positioned on the electroporation balloon 36 and another one is placed outside the patient's body on the skin close to the first bi-polar electrode 14. The electrodes are sized and positioned at the electroporation balloon 36 to provide for controlled electroporation of the restenosis tissue site. In one embodiment, the band 20 of electrodes extend circumferentially about the electroporation balloon 36. Portions of the electrodes can include insulation.
An area of the restenosis tissue site is imaged. A catheter 34, with the electroporation balloon 36 and two mono-polar electrodes 12, is introduced through the vasculature of a patient. The electroporation balloon 36 is positioned at the restenosis tissue site. Imaging is used to confirm that the mono-polar electrodes are properly placed. Pulses are applied with a duration of 5 microseconds to about 62 seconds each. Monitoring is preformed using ultrasound. The restenosis tissue site is monitored. In response to the monitoring, pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of no more than 100 degrees C. A voltage gradient at the restenosis tissue site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 1000 volt/cm is created. A volume of the restenosis tissue site undergoes cell necrosis.
An area of the restenosis tissue site is imaged. A catheter 34, with the electroporation balloon 36 and a bipolar electrode 14 is introduced through the vasculature of a patient. The electroporation balloon 36 is positioned at the restenosis tissue site. Imaging is used to confirm that the electroporation balloon 36 is properly placed. Pulses are applied with a duration of about 90 to 110 microseconds each. Monitoring is performed using a CT scan. The restenosis tissue site is monitored. In response to the monitoring, pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of no more than 75 degrees C. A voltage gradient at the restenosis site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 5000 volt/cm is created. A volume of the restenosis tissue site undergoes cell necrosis.
An area of the restenosis tissue site is imaged. A catheter 34, with the electroporation balloon 36 and a band 20 of mono-polar electrodes is introduced through the vasculature of a patient. The electroporation balloon 36 is positioned at the restenosis tissue site. Imaging is used to confirm that the mono-polar electrodes are properly placed. Pulses are applied with a duration of about 100 microseconds each. A monitoring electrode 18 is utilized. Prior to the full electroporation pulse being delivered a test pulse is delivered that is about 10% of the proposed full electroporation pulse. The test pulse does not cause irreversible electroporation. The restenosis tissue site is monitored. In response to the monitoring, pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of no more than 60 degrees C. A voltage gradient at the restenosis site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 8000 volt/cm is created. A volume of the restenosis tissue site undergoes cell necrosis.
An area of the restenosis tissue site is imaged. A catheter 34, with the electroporation balloon 36 and a bi-polar electrode 14, is introduced through the vasculature of a patient. The electroporation balloon 36 is positioned at the restenosis tissue site. Imaging is used to confirm that the bi-polar electrode 14 is properly placed. Pulses are applied with a duration of 5 microseconds to about 62 seconds each. Monitoring is preformed using ultrasound. The restenosis tissue site is monitored. In response to the monitoring, pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of no more than 100 degrees C. A voltage gradient at the restenosis tissue site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 1000 volt/cm is created. A volume of the restenosis tissue site undergoes cell necrosis.
An area of the restenosis tissue site is imaged. A catheter 34, with the electroporation balloon 36 and a band 20 of electrodes is introduced through the vasculature of a patient. The electroporation balloon 36 is positioned at the restenosis tissue site. Imaging is used to confirm that the electroporation balloon is properly placed. Pulses are applied with a duration of about 90 to 110 microseconds each. Monitoring is performed using a CT scan. The restenosis tissue site is monitored. In response to the monitoring, pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of no more than 75 degrees C. A voltage gradient at the restenosis site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 5000 volt/cm is created. A volume of the restenosis tissue site undergoes cell necrosis.
An area of the restenosis tissue site is imaged. A catheter 34, with the electroporation balloon 36 and a bi-polar electrode 14, is introduced through the vasculature of a patient. The electroporation balloon 36 is positioned at the restenosis tissue site. Imaging is used to confirm that the electroporation balloon 36 is properly placed. Pulses are applied with a duration of about 100 microseconds each. A monitoring electrode 18 is utilized. Prior to the full electroporation pulse being delivered a test pulse is delivered that is about 10% of the proposed full electroporation pulse. The test pulse does not cause irreversible electroporation. The restenosis tissue site is monitored. In response to the monitoring, pulses are adjusted to maintain a temperature of no more than 60 degrees C. A voltage gradient at the restenosis site in a range of from about 50 volt/cm to about 8000 volt/cm is created. A volume of the restenosis tissue site undergoes cell necrosis.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in this art. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 11/165,881, filed Jun. 24, 2005, abandoned, and is related to U.S. Ser. No. 11/165,961 filed Jun. 24, 2005, abandoned, Ser. No. 11/165,908 filed Jun. 24, 2005, abandoned, and Ser. No. 11/166,974, filed Jun. 24, 2005, abandoned, all of which applications are fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1653819 | Northcott et al. | Dec 1927 | A |
4016886 | Doss | Apr 1977 | A |
4226246 | Fragnet | Oct 1980 | A |
4262672 | Kief | Apr 1981 | A |
4407943 | Cole et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4810963 | Blake-Coleman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4907601 | Frick | Mar 1990 | A |
4946793 | Marshall, III | Aug 1990 | A |
5019034 | Weaver et al. | May 1991 | A |
5052391 | Silberstone et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5058605 | Slovak | Oct 1991 | A |
5098843 | Calvin | Mar 1992 | A |
5134070 | Casnig | Jul 1992 | A |
5173158 | Schmukler | Dec 1992 | A |
5193537 | Freeman | Mar 1993 | A |
5273525 | Hofmann | Dec 1993 | A |
5277201 | Stern | Jan 1994 | A |
5283194 | Schmukler | Feb 1994 | A |
5318563 | Malis et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328451 | Davis et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5389069 | Weaver | Feb 1995 | A |
5403311 | Abele et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425752 | Vu'Nguyen | Jun 1995 | A |
5439440 | Hofmann | Aug 1995 | A |
5458625 | Kendall | Oct 1995 | A |
5533999 | Hood et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536240 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546940 | Panescu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575811 | Reid et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5626146 | Barber et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5674267 | Mir et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687723 | Avitall | Nov 1997 | A |
5702359 | Hofmann | Dec 1997 | A |
5720921 | Meserol | Feb 1998 | A |
5778894 | Dorogi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782882 | Lerman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800378 | Edwards et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810762 | Hofmann | Sep 1998 | A |
5836905 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843026 | Edwards et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873849 | Bernard | Feb 1999 | A |
5919142 | Boone et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5919191 | Lennox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921982 | Lesh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947889 | Hehrlein | Sep 1999 | A |
5983131 | Weaver et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991697 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999847 | Elstrom | Dec 1999 | A |
6009347 | Hofmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6010613 | Walters et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016452 | Kasevich | Jan 2000 | A |
6041252 | Walker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055453 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068650 | Nanda et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085115 | Weaver et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090106 | Goble et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102885 | Bass | Aug 2000 | A |
6106521 | Blewett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109270 | Mah et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122599 | Mehta | Sep 2000 | A |
6132419 | Hofmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6159163 | Strauss et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6208893 | Hofmann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210402 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212433 | Behl | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216034 | Hofmann | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219577 | Brown et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233490 | Kasevich | May 2001 | B1 |
6241702 | Lundquist et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241725 | Cosman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261831 | Agee | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278895 | Bernard | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300108 | Rubinsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326177 | Schoenbach et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347247 | Dev et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349233 | Adams | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351674 | Silverstone | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6387671 | Rubinsky et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403348 | Rubinsky et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6470211 | Ideker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482619 | Rubinsky et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493592 | Leonard et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500173 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6526320 | Mitchell | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6562604 | Rubinsky et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6607529 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611706 | Avrahami et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613211 | McCormick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627421 | Unger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6653091 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6669691 | Taimisto | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678558 | Dimmer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692493 | McGovern et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697669 | Dev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697670 | Chomenky et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702808 | Kreindel | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6795728 | Chornenky et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801804 | Miller et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6865416 | Dev et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892099 | Jaafar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912417 | Bernard et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6927049 | Rubinsky et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6962587 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972014 | Eum et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6994706 | Chornenky et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7053063 | Rubinsky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063698 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7130697 | Chornenky et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7211083 | Chornenky et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7267676 | Chornenky et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20010044596 | Jaafar | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010491 | Schoenbach | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020055731 | Atala et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077676 | Schroeppel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099323 | Dev et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020137121 | Rubinsky et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138117 | Son | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020193831 | Smith, III | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009110 | Tu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030060856 | Chornenky et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088189 | Tu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130711 | Pearson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030170898 | Gundersen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208200 | Palanker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225360 | Eppstein et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019371 | Jaafar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059389 | Chornenky et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040146877 | Diss et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153057 | Davison | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040243107 | Mackoviak | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267189 | Mavor et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043726 | McHale et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049541 | Behar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050165393 | Eppstein | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171523 | Rubinsky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171574 | Rubinsky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182462 | Chornenky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050261672 | Deem et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288730 | Deem et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015147 | Persson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025760 | Podhajsky | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079883 | Elmouelhi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060121610 | Rubinsky et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060212078 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217703 | Chornenky et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060264752 | Rubinsky et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070043345 | Davalos et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070118069 | Persson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080052786 | Lin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
863111 | Jan 1953 | DE |
4000893 | Jul 1991 | DE |
0378132 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 935 482 | May 2005 | EP |
0935482 | May 2005 | EP |
9639531 | Dec 1996 | WO |
0020554 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0107583 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0107584 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0107585 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0181533 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2004037341 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amasha, et al., Quantitative Assessment of Impedance Tomography for Temperature Measurements in Microwave Hyperthermia, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1998, Suppl. A, 49-53. |
Andreason, Electroporation as a Technique for the Transfer of Macromolecules into Mammalian Cell Lines, J. Tiss. Cult. Meth., 15:56-62, 1993. |
Baker, et al., Calcium-Dependent Exocytosis in Bovine Adrenal Medullary Cells with Leaky Plasma Membranes, Nature, vol. 276, pp. 620-622, 1978. |
Barber, Electrical Impedance Tomography Applied Potential Tomography, Advances in Biomedical Engineering, Beneken and Thevenin, eds., IOS Press, 1993. |
Beebe, S.J., et al., Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects on cells and tissues: apoptosis induction and tumor growth inhibition. PPPS-2001 Pulsed Power Plasma Science 2001, 28th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science and 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference, Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No. 01CH37251). IEEE, Part vol. 1, 2001, pp. 211-215, vol. I, Piscataway, NJ, USA. |
Blad, et al., Impedance Spectra of Tumour Tissue in Comparison with Normal Tissue; a Possible Clinical Application for Electrical Impedance Tomography, Physiol. Meas. 17 (1996) A105-A115. |
Bown, S.G., Phototherapy of tumors. World J. Surgery, 1983. 7: p. 700-9. |
BPH Management Strategies: Improving Patient Satisfaction, Urology Times, May 2001, vol. 29, Supplement 1. |
Brown, et al., Blood Flow Imaging Using Electrical Impedance Tomography, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1992, vol. 13, Suppl. A, 175-179. |
Chandrasekar, et al., Transurethral Needle Ablation of the Prostate (TUNA)—a Propsective Study, Six Year Follow Up, (Abstract), Presented at 2001 National Meeting, Anaheim, CA, Jun. 5, 2001. |
Coates, C.W.,et al., “The Electrical Discharge of the Electric Eel, Electrophorous electricus,” Zoologica, 1937, 22(1), pp. 1-32. |
Cook, et al., ACT3: A High-Speed, High-Precision Electrical Impedance Tomograph, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, No. 8, Aug. 1994. |
Cowley, Good News for Boomers, Newsweek, Dec. 30, 1996/Jan. 6, 1997. |
Cox, et al., Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review, Europace (2004) 5, S20-S-29. |
Crowley, Electrical Breakdown of Biomolecular Lipid Membranes as an Electromechanical Instability, Biophysical Journal, vol. 13, pp. 711-724, 1973. |
Davalos, et al., Tissue Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 2005. |
Davalos, et al ., Theoretical Analysis of the Thermal Effects During In Vivo Tissue Electroporation, Bioelectrochemistry, vol. 61, pp. 99-107, 2003. |
Davalos, et al., A Feasibility Study for Electrical Impedance Tomography as a Means to Monitor T issue Electroporation for Molecular Medicine, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 4, Apr. 2002. |
Davalos, Real-Time Imaging for Molecular Medicine through Electrical Impedance Tomography of Electroporation, Dissertation for Ph.D. in Engineering-Mechanical Engineering, Graduate Division of University of California, Berkeley, 2002. |
Dean, Nonviral Gene Transfer to Skeletal, Smooth, and Cardiac Muscle in Living Animals, Am J. Physiol Cell Physiol 289: 233-245, 2005. |
Dev, et al., Sustained Local Delivery of Heparin to the Rabbit Arterial Wall with an Electroporation Catheter, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, Nov. 1998, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 337-343. |
Dev, et al., Medical Applications of Electroporation, IEEE Transactions of Plasma Science, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 206-223, Feb. 2000. |
Duraiswami, et al., Boundary Element Techniques for Efficient 2-D and 3-D Electrical Impedance Tomography, Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 52, No. 13, pp. 2185-2196, 1997. |
Duraiswami, et al., Efficient 2D and 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography Using Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Techniques, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 22, (1998) 13-31. |
Duraiswami, et al., Solution of Electrical Impedance Tomography Equations Using Boundary Element Methods, Boundary Element Technology XII, 1997, pp. 226-237. |
Edd, J., et al., In-Vivo Results of a New Focal Tissue Ablation Technique: Irreversible Electroporaton, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 (2006) p. 1409-1415. |
Erez, et al., Controlled Destruction and Temperature Distributions in Biological Tissues Subjected to Monoactive Electrocoagulation, Transactions of the ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 102, Feb. 1980. |
Foster, R.S., et al., High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of prostatic disease. Eur. Urol., 1993. 23: 44-7). |
Fox, et al., Sampling Conductivity Images via MCMC, Mathematics Department, Auckland University, New Zealand, May 1997. |
Gauger, et al., A Study of Dielectric Membrane Breakdown in the Fucus Egg, J. Membrane Biol., vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 249-264, 1979. |
Gehl, et al., In Vivo Electroporation of Skeletal Muscle: Threshold, Efficacy and Relation to Electric Field Distribution, Biochimica et Biphysica Acta 1428, 1999, pp. 233-240. |
Gençer, et al., Electrical Impedance Tomography: Induced-Current Imaging Achieved with a Multiple Coil System, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 43, No. 2, Feb. 1996. |
Gilbert, et al., Novel Electrode Designs for Electrochemotherapy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1334, 1997, pp. 9-14. |
Gilbert, et al., The Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring Cryosurgery, Proceedings 6th Annual Conference, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 107-111, 1984. |
Glidewell, et al., The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data and the Inclusion of Anisotropic Regions in Electrical Impedance Tomography, Biomed, Sci. Instrum. 1993; 29: 251-7. |
Gothelf, et al., Electrochemotherapy: Results of Cancer Treatment Using Enhanced Delivery of Bleomycin by Electroporation, Cancer Treatment Reviews 2003: 29: 371-387. |
Griffiths, et al., A Dual-Frequency Electrical Impedance Tomography System, Phys. Med. Biol., 1989, vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 1465-1476. |
Griffiths, The Importance of Phase Measurement in Electrical Impedance Tomography, Phys. Med. Biol., 1987, vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1435-1444. |
Griffiths, Tissue Spectroscopy with Electrical Impedance Tomography: Computer Simulations, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 42, No. 9, Sep. 1995. |
Gumerov, et al., The Dipole Approximation Method and Its Coupling with the Regular Boundary Element Method for Efficient Electrical Impedance Tomography, Boundary Element Technology XIII, 1999. |
Hapala, Breaking the Barrier: Methods for Reversible Permeabilization of Cellular Membranes, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 17(2): 105-122, 1997. |
Heller, et al., Clinical Applications of Electrochemotherapy, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 35, pp. 119-129, 1999. |
Ho, et al., Electroporation of Cell Membranes: A Review, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 16(4): 349-362, 1996. |
Holder, et al., Assessment and Calibration of a Low-Frequency System for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT), Optimized for Use in Imaging Brain Function in Ambulant Human Subjects, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, vol. 873, Issue 1, Electrical BI, pp. 512-519, 1999. |
Huang, et al., Micro-Electroporation: Improving the Efficiency and Understanding of Electrical Permeabilization of Cells, Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 2, pp. 145-150, 1999. |
Hughes, et al., An Analysis of Studies Comparing Electrical Impedance Tomography with X-Ray Videofluoroscopy in the Assessment of Swallowing, Physiol. Meas. 15, 1994, pp. A199-A209. |
Issa, et al., The TUNA Procedure for BPH: Review of the Technology: The TUNA Procedure for BPH: Basic Procedure and Clinical Results, Reprinted from Infections in Urology, Jul./Aug. 1998 and Sep./Oct. 1998. |
Ivanus{hacek over (s)}a, et al., MRI Macromolecular Contrast Agents as Indicators of Changed Tumor Blood Flow, Radiol. Oncol. 2001; 35(2): 139-47. |
Jaroszeski, et al., In Vivo Gene Delivery by Electroporation, Advanced Drug Delivery Review, vol. 35, pp. 131-137, 1999. |
Kinosita, et al., Hemolysis of Human Erythrocytes by a Transient Electric Field, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 74, No. 5, pp. 1923-1927, 1977. |
Liu, et al., Measurement of Pharyngeal Transit Time by Electrical Impedance Tomography, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1992, vol. 13, Suppl. A, pp. 197-200. |
Lundqvist, et al., Altering the Biochemical State of Individual Cultured Cells and Organelles with Ultramicroelectrodes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 95, pp. 10356-10360, Sep. 1998. |
Lurquin, Gene Transfer by Electroporation, Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 7, 1997. |
Lynn, et al., A New Method for the Generation and Use of Focused Ultrasound in Experimental Biology, The Journal of General Physiology, vol. 26, 179-193, 1942. |
Miklav{hacek over (c)}i{hacek over (c)}, et al., A Validated Model of an in Vivo Electric Field Distribution in Tissues for Electrochemotherapy and for DNA Electrotransfer for Gene Therapy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1523 (2000), pp. 73-83. |
Miklav{hacek over (c)}i{hacek over (c)}, et al., The Importance of Electric Field Distribution for Effective in Vivo Electroporation of Tissues, Biophysical Journal, vol. 74, May 1998, pp. 2152-2158. |
Miller, L., et al., Cancer cells ablation with irreversible electroporation, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment 4 (2005) 699-706. |
Mir, Therapeutic Perspectives of In Vivo Cell Electropermeabilization, Bioelectrochemistry, vol. 53, pp. 1-10, 2000. |
Mir, L.M., et al., Electric Pulse-Mediated Gene Delivery to Various Animal Tissues, in Advances in Genetics, Academic Press, 2005, p. 83-114. |
Mir, L.M. and Orlowski, S., The basis of electrochemotherapy, in Electrochemotherapy, electrogenetherapy, and transdermal drug delivery: electrically mediated delivery of molecules to cells, M.J. Jaroszeski, R. Heller, R. Gilbert, Editors, 2000, Humana Press, p. 99-118. |
Mir, et al., Effective Treatment of Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Malignant Tumours by Electrochemotherapy, British Journal of Cancer, vol. 77, No. 12, pp. 2336-2342, 1998. |
Mir, et al., Electrochemotherapy Potentiation of Antitumour Effect of Bleomycin by Local Electric Pulses, European Journal of Cancer, vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 68-72, 1991. |
Mir, et al., Electrochemotherapy, a Novel Antitumor Treatment: First Clinical Trial, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. III, vol. 313, pp. 613-618, 1991. |
Narayan, et al., Establishment and Characterization of a Human Primary Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Cell Line (ND-1), The Journal of Urology, vol. 148, 1600-1604, Nov. 1992. |
Naslund, Michael J., Transurethral Needle Ablation of the Prostate, Urology, vol. 50, No. 2, Aug. 1997. |
Naslund, Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Treatments and Transurethral Resection (TURP) in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), (Abstract), Presented at 2001 AUA National Meeting,, Anaheim, CA, Jun. 5, 2001. |
Neumann, et al., Gene Transfer into Mouse Lyoma Cells by Electroporation in High Electric Fields, J. Embo., vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 841-845, 1982. |
Neumann, et al., Permeability Changes Induced by Electric Impulses in Vesicular Membranes, J. Membrane Biol., vol. 10, pp. 279-290, 1972. |
Okino, et al., Effects of High-Voltage Electrical Impulse and an Anticancer Drug on In Vivo Growing Tumors, Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 78, pp. 1319-1321, 1987. |
Onik, et al., Sonographic Monitoring of Hepatic Cryosurgery in an Experimental Animal Model, AJR American J. of Roentgenology, vol. 144, pp. 1043-1047, May 1985. |
Onik, et al., Ultrasonic Characteristics of Frozen Liver, Cryobiology, vol. 21, pp. 321-328, 1984. |
Organ, L.W., Electrophysiological principles of radiofrequency lesion making, Apply. Neurophysiol., 1976. 39: p. 69-76. |
Piñero, et al., Apoptotic and Necrotic Cell Death are Both Induced by Electroporation in HL60 Human Promyeloid Leukaemia Cells, Apoptosis, vol. 2, No. 3, 330-336, Aug. 1997. |
Rols, M.P., et al., Highly Efficient Transfection of Mammalian Cells by Electric Field Pulses: Application to Large Volumes of Cell Culture by Using a Flow System, Eur. J. Biochem. 1992, 206, pp. 115-121. |
Rubinsky, B., ed, Cryosurgery. Annu Rev. Biomed. Eng. vol. 2 2000. 157-187. |
Sersa, et al., Reduced Blood Flow and Oxygenation in SA-1 Tumours after Electrochemotherapy with Cisplatin, British Journal of Cancer, 87, 1047-1054, 2002. |
Sersa, et al., Tumour Blood Flow Modifying Effects of Electrochemotherapy: a Potential Vascular Targeted Mechanism, Radiol. Oncol., 37(1): 43-8, 2003. |
Sharma, et al., Poloxamer 188 Decreases Susceptibility of Artificial Lipid Membranes to Electroporation, Biophysical Journal, vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 3229-3241, Dec. 1996. |
Shiina, S., et al, Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: results in 146 patients. AJR, 1993, 160: p. 1023-8. |
Thompson, et al., To determine whether the temperature of 2% lignocaine gel affects the initial discomfort which may be associated with its instillation into the male urethra, BJU International (1999), 84, 1035-1037. |
Vidamed, Inc., Transurethral Needle Ablation (TUNA): Highlights from Worldwide Clinical Studies, Vidamed's Office TUNA System. |
Weaver, Electroporation: A General Phenomenon for Manipulating Cells and Tissues, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 51: 426-435, 1993. |
Weaver, et al., Theory of Electroporation: A Review, Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, vol. 41, pp. 136-160, 1996. |
Zimmermann, et al., Dielectric Breakdown of Cell Membranes, Biophysical Journal, vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 881-899, 1974. |
Zlotta, et al., Possible Mechanisms of Action of Transurethral Needle Ablation of the Prostate on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Symptoms: a Neurohistochemical Study, Reprinted from Journal of Urology, vol. 157, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 894-899. |
Zlotta, et al., Long-Term Evaluation of Transurethral Needle Ablation of the Prostate (TUNA) for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Clinical Outcome After 5 Years. (Abstract) Presented at 2001 AUA National Meeting, Anaheim, CA—Jun. 5, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080021371 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11165881 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11864320 | US |