The present invention generally relates to film grain simulation and, more particularly, to methods and system for efficient, low-cost film grain simulation implementations.
Film grain forms in motion picture images during the process of development. Film grain is clearly noticeable in HD images and becomes a distinctive cinema trait that is becoming more desirable to preserve through the whole image processing and delivery chain. Nevertheless, film grain preservation is a challenge for current encoders since compression gains related to temporal prediction cannot be exploited. Because of the random nature of the grain, visually lossless encoding is only achieved at very high bit-rates. Lossy encoders tend to suppress the film grain when filtering the high frequencies typically associated with noise and fine textures.
In the recently created H.264 I MPEG-4 AVC video compression standard, and in particular in its Fidelity Range Extensions (FRExt) Amendment 1 (JVT-K051, ITU-T Recommendation H.264 I ISO/IEC 14496-10 International Standard with Amendment 1, Redmond, USA, June 2004), a film grain Supplemental Enhancement Information (SEI) message has been defined. Such a message describes the film grain characteristics regarding attributes like size and intensity, and allows a video decoder to simulate the film grain look onto a decoded picture. The H.264 I MPEG-4 AVC standard specifies which parameters are present in the film grain SEI message, how to interpret them and the syntax to be used to encode the SEI message in binary format. The standard does not specify, however, the exact procedure to simulate film grain upon reception of the film grain SEI message.
Film grain simulation is a relatively new technology used in post-production to simulate film grain on computer-generated material, as well as during restoration of old film stocks. For this kind of applications, there exists commercial software in the market like Cineon®, from Eastman Kodak Co, Rochester, N.Y., and Grain Surgery™, from Visual Infinity. These tools require user interaction and are complex to implement, which makes them unsuitable for real-time video coding applications. Furthermore, none of these tools has the capability to interpret a film grain SEI message as specified by the H.264/AVC video coding standard.
The present invention provides a method, apparatus and system for film grain cache splitting for film grain simulation.
In one embodiment of the present invention a method for storing film grain patterns includes storing at least a first portion of film grain patterns in an internal memory and storing at least a second portion of the film grain patterns in an external memory.
In an alternate embodiment of the present invention an apparatus for film grain simulation includes a means for receiving at least an encoded image and supplemental information including film grain characterization information for use in a film grain simulation process, an internal storage means for storing at least a first portion of film grain patterns, and an external storage means for storing at least a second portion of the film grain simulation patterns.
In an alternate embodiment of the present invention a system for simulating film grain includes a decoder for receiving at least an encoded image and a supplemental information message including film grain characterization information for use in a film grain simulation process, an internal storage means for storing at least at least a first portion of film grain patterns, and an external storage means for storing at least a second portion of the film grain simulation patterns, wherein the internal storage means is located in the decoder.
The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It should be understood that the drawings are for purposes of illustrating the concepts of the invention and are not necessarily the only possible configuration for illustrating the invention. To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.
The present invention advantageously provides methods, apparatuses and systems for film grain cache splitting for film grain simulation. Although the present invention will be described primarily within the context of a video decoder subsystem for application in, for example, IC designs for consumer HD DVD players, the specific embodiments of the present invention should not be treated as limiting the scope of the invention. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and informed by the teachings of the present invention that the concepts of the present invention can be advantageously applied in any film grain simulation processes in, for example, media player/receiver devices, decoders, set-top boxes, television sets or the like.
Furthermore, although in the video decoder subsystem 100 of
In film grain simulation systems such as the video decoder subsystem 100 of
More specifically, the film grain simulation process of
In one embodiment of the present invention and in accordance with the standards specifications, the remote film grain database 104 of film grain patterns is composed of 169 patterns of 4,096 film grain samples, each representing a 64×64 film grain image. For example,
In the film grain database 104, each film grain pattern is synthesized using a different pair of cut frequencies according to a frequency filtering model of the standard specifications. The cut frequencies transmitted in the SEI message are used to access the remote film grain database 104 of film grain patterns during the film grain simulation process. The film grain database 104 is stored in ROM, Flash, or other permanent storage device, such as the film grain database 104 of the video decoder subsystem 100 of
Typically, the remote film grain database 104 is stored in the permanent storage of the host CPU 102 or at the site of the host CPU 102. However, it is the video decoder 106 and the video display and graphics engine 108 that need fast access to the film grain database 104. As such, and in accordance with the present invention, the external memory 114 and the internal cache 109 are provided for fast access to at least a subset of the film grain patterns. That is, at least a small subset of the film grain patterns needed or most implemented by the existing SEI message period is transferred to and stored in the external memory 114 and the internal cache 109 as described below.
More specifically, in accordance with the present invention, a solution that minimizes the overall design cost of a film grain simulation system, such as the video decoder subsystem 100 of
In embodiments of the present invention, different cache splits can be used for storing necessary film grain patterns. That is, in accordance with the present invention, any split is possible. The more film grain patterns that are stored in the internal cache 109, the lower the probability that the worst case external memory BW will be needed. In addition, since not all of the film grain cache is needed during a given content simulation, in many cases the memory BW is reduced significantly.
For example, in one embodiment of the present invention in which ten (10) film grain patterns are to be stored, if half (5) of the film grain patterns are stored in an internal cache, such as the internal cache 109 of the video decoder subsystem 100 of
If, in the example described above, only one (1) of the film grain patterns out of ten is to be stored in the internal cache (e.g., N=1), then only a very small amount of internal cache is needed in such an embodiment of the present invention. Such an embodiment of the present invention requires only a very small additional chip area for providing the internal cache required to store only one film grain pattern. In such an embodiment, the memory BW would be reduced by a significant amount since the most frequently implemented film grain pattern can be placed in the internal cache.
In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, an internal cache and external memory are implemented for separately storing luma and chroma components. That is, the luma can be placed in internal cache, while the chroma can be placed in external memory. In this embodiment of the present invention, it is guaranteed that the worst case memory BW for film grain simulation is 36 Mbytes/sec (chroma only) and the internal cache size only needs to hold the luma portion of the cache. However, such embodiments of the present invention require that film grain simulation specifications include a definition of the split between luma cache size and chroma cache size for configuring the internal cache and the external memory.
In an embodiment of the luma/chroma split of the present invention in which only one component of chroma is stored in the external memory, the memory BW is lowered to 18 Mbytes per second. Such an embodiment requires more internal cache but less than a maximum.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the SEI message of the film grain simulation process includes additional information indicating a priority order for the stored film grain patterns. This priority order is used by, for example, the video decoder subsystem 100 of
fg_pattern13priority−specifies the [h,v] pairs of cut frequencies in priority order.[h,v]=(comp_model_value[j][i][1], comp_model_value[j][i][2]). (1)
In another embodiment of the present invention, a priority order of film grain patterns is derived from a standardized film grain SEI message. That is, since the SEI message contains a list of intensity intervals, each one with its own film grain parameters, the intensity intervals could be listed according to their priority (instead of being listed with increasing intensity interval bounds). It should be noted that this change is compliant with the H.264 I MPEG AVC standard. Then, for each color component, the first N film grain patterns are stored in the internal cache because those first N film grain patterns are the film grain patterns most implemented. In addition, rules can be generated to prioritize between color components. For example, up to the first N/2 Y film grain patterns, up to the first N/4 U film grain patterns, and up to the first N/4 V film grain patterns are placed in the internal cache, while the remaining film grain patterns being are stored in the external memory.
Having described various embodiments for methods, apparatus and systems for film grain cache splitting for film grain simulation (which are intended to be illustrative and not limiting), it is noted that modifications and variations can be made by persons skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that changes may be made in the particular embodiments of the invention disclosed which are within the scope and spirit of the invention as outlined by the appended claims. While the forgoing is directed to various embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof. As such, the appropriate scope of the invention is to be determined according to the claims, which follow.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/630,049, filed Nov. 22, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4897775 | Kaassens | Jan 1990 | A |
4930023 | Yakame | May 1990 | A |
4935816 | Faber | Jun 1990 | A |
4998167 | Jaqua | Mar 1991 | A |
5028280 | Ihara et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5140414 | Mowry | Aug 1992 | A |
5216556 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5216886 | Ewing | Jun 1993 | A |
5262248 | Ihara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5285402 | Keith | Feb 1994 | A |
5285482 | Sehier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5335013 | Faber | Aug 1994 | A |
5374954 | Mowry | Dec 1994 | A |
5406326 | Mowry | Apr 1995 | A |
5453840 | Parker et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457491 | Mowry | Oct 1995 | A |
5461596 | Barrett | Oct 1995 | A |
5471572 | Buchner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475425 | Przyborski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5526446 | Adelson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550815 | Cloonan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5629769 | Cookingham et al. | May 1997 | A |
5641596 | Gray et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5659382 | Rybczynski | Aug 1997 | A |
5687011 | Mowry | Nov 1997 | A |
5706361 | Kent et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709972 | Cookingham et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715008 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742892 | Chaddha | Apr 1998 | A |
5751398 | Beard | May 1998 | A |
5767860 | Zimmer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805782 | Foran | Sep 1998 | A |
5817447 | Yip | Oct 1998 | A |
5831673 | Przyborski et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832172 | Jeon | Nov 1998 | A |
5845017 | Keyes | Dec 1998 | A |
5846017 | Meyer | Dec 1998 | A |
5859382 | Funaki | Jan 1999 | A |
5887875 | Salciccioli et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5917609 | Breeuwer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6067125 | May | May 2000 | A |
6067126 | Alexander | May 2000 | A |
6134200 | Timmermans | Oct 2000 | A |
6216838 | Bacher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219836 | Wells et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219838 | Cherichetti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233647 | Bentz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6269180 | Sevigny | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285711 | Ratakonda et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327304 | Miller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327391 | Ohnishi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370192 | Pearlstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373992 | Nagao | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441918 | Hori | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459699 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496221 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6559849 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587509 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6650327 | Airey et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665369 | Ukita | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667815 | Nagao | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6724942 | Arai | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728317 | Demos | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744928 | Juri et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6839152 | Fan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868190 | Morton | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6963668 | Engeldrum et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990251 | Edgar | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990252 | Shekter | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995793 | Albadawi et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7065255 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092016 | Morton et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7106907 | Lin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7245783 | Fielding | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286565 | Carr | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7362911 | Frank | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7596239 | Winger et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7630005 | Takei | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653132 | Dang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664337 | Balram et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680356 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7738722 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742655 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7856055 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7958532 | Paul et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010056568 | Hirotsu et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003903 | Engeldrum et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016103 | Behnke | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034337 | Shekter | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020106103 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133764 | Wang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154140 | Tazaki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163657 | Bogdanowicz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171649 | Fogg | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030011615 | Tidwell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031128 | Kim et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043922 | Kalker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063778 | Rowe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068097 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086623 | Berkner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101453 | Matsuyama et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030206231 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206662 | Avinash et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218610 | Mech et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006575 | Visharam et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013308 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022318 | Garrido et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040071363 | Kouri et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073926 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101059 | Joch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040179738 | Dai et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184532 | Juri et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208389 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040264795 | Fielding | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060007460 | Bogdanowicz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013320 | Oguz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060072660 | Jia et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082649 | Gomila et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083275 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083316 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083426 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083429 | Joly | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104366 | Huang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115175 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133686 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182183 | Winger | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183275 | Schoner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215767 | Gomila et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060256853 | Schlockermann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256871 | Boyce et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291557 | Tourapis | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002947 | Lu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030996 | Winger et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070034337 | Nishimoto et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036452 | Llach et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047658 | Tourapis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058866 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058878 | Gomilla et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070241 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104380 | Gomila et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117291 | Cooper et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140588 | Balram et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070269125 | Llach et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297515 | Gomila et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080152250 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080252781 | De Waele et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100104025 | Rose et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1530252 | Sep 2004 | CN |
1530852 | Sep 2004 | CN |
0364285 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0373615 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0679008 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0756281 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0788281 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0575006 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0622000 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1175091 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1215624 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1511320 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1815688 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2312124 | Oct 1997 | GB |
1156069 | Sep 1989 | JP |
3-187661 | Aug 1991 | JP |
4097681 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04349458 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5252459 | Sep 1993 | JP |
8079765 | Mar 1996 | JP |
962718 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9062718 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9-139940 | May 1997 | JP |
9139940 | May 1997 | JP |
9247681 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-509297 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-250246 | Sep 1999 | JP |
20041242 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-357090 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001357090 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001357095 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002057719 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002344514 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002374541 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-024326 | Jan 2003 | JP |
200324326 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003163853 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003179923 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-135169 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004120057 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004135169 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005080301 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2007507172 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007529945 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-529945 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2073913 | Sep 1991 | RU |
2088962 | Jun 1997 | RU |
2088962 | Aug 1997 | RU |
2138837 | Oct 1999 | RU |
2139637 | Oct 1999 | RU |
WO 9206808 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO9206409 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO9314591 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9404880 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9404960 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO9520292 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO 9710676 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO9722204 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9841026 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO9841026 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 0018109 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0018109 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0146992 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0146992 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0146992 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0174064 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0177871 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0233988 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0251160 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03005731 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO0303005731 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO2004034518 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004038829 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095829 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2004095829 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004105250 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2004104931 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2004105250 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005027045 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005027045 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005032143 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034518 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005032143 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005034518 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005039188 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005039189 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2006022705 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006055208 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006057703 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006057703 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Aug. 19, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Feb. 20, 2009. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Jun. 16, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Aug. 15, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Feb. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Jul. 31, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed Jun. 1, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed Apr. 15, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Dec. 15, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Mar. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848 mailed Jun. 26, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed May 29, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Nov. 5, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Apr. 17, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Sep. 18, 2009. |
McLean, I, et al., “Telecine Noise Reduction”, IEE Seminar Digital Restoration of Film and Video Archives (Ref. No. 01/049), IEE Seminar Digital Restoration of Film and Video Archives, London, UK. Jan. 16, 2001, pp. 2/1-2/6. |
Yan, Jacky Chun Kit, et al. “Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation for Color Images”, 1997 IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher-Order Statistics, Jul. 21-23, Banff, Alberta, Canada. pp. 73-76. |
Yan, Jacky Chun Kit, et al. “Signal Dependent Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation Based on Higher-Order Statistics”, 1997 IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher-Order Statistics, Jul. 21-23, Banff, Alberta, Canada. pp. 77-81. |
Al-Shaykh, Osama K., et al., “Restoration of Lossy Compressed Noisy Images”, IEEE Transactions of Image Processing, vol. 8. No. 10, pp. 1348-1360, Oct. 1999. |
AL-Shaykh, Osama K, et al. “Lossy Compression of Images Corrupted by Film Grain Noise”, Proceedings International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 16-19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland vol. I of III, pp. 805-808. |
Campisi, P, et al. “Signal-dependent film grain noise generation using homomorphic adaptive filtering.”, IEE Proceedings Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 3 pp. 283-287 Jun. 2000. |
Yoshida, J, “Go with the Grain, Film R&D Chief Urges, for Art's Sake”, EETimes, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=59301162 (last checked Jul. 23, 2007). |
Zhao, Lifeng, et al., “Constant Quality Rate Control for Streaming MPEG-4 FGS Video”, IEEE, 2002, pp. 544-547. |
Al-Shaykh, Osama K, et al., “Lossy Compression of Noisy Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing vol. 7, No. 12, Dec. 1998, pp. 1641-1652. |
Brightwell, PJ, et al., “Automated Correction'of Film Unsteadiness, Dirt and Grain”, International Broadcasting Convention, Sep. 16-20, 1994 Conference Publication, No. 397. |
Oktem, R, et al., “Transform Domain Algorithm for Reducing Effect of Film Grain Noise in Image Compression”, Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 21, Oct. 14, 1999, pp. 1830-1831. |
Fischer, Marco, et al., “Image Sharpening Using Permutation Weighted Medians”, Dept of Electrical Engineering, University of Delware Newark, DE, pp. 1-4. |
Shahnaz, Rubeena, et al., “Image Compression in Signal-Dependent Noise”, Applied Optics, vol. 38, No. 26, Sep. 10, 1999, pp. 5560-5567. |
Chavel, P., et al., “Film Grain Noise in Partially Coherent Imaging”, Optical Engineering, vol. 19, No. 3, May/Jun. 1980, pp. 404-410. |
Zhang, Xi Min, et al., “Constant Quality Constrained Rate Allocation for FGS Video Coded Bitstreams”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, pp. 817-827, 2002. |
Peng, Sharon, et al., Adaptive Frequency Weighting for Fine-Granularity-Scalability, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, pp. 840-849, 2002. |
Van Der Schaar, M., et al., “Fine-Granularity for Wireless Video and Scalable Storage”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4671, pp. 805-816, 2002. |
Prades-Nebot, Josep, et al., “Rate Control for Fully Fine Grained Scalable Video Coders”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, pp. 828-839, 2002. |
Yan, Rong, et al., “Efficient Video Coding with Hybrid Spatial and Fine Grain SNR Scalabilities”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4671, pp. 850-859, 2002. |
Gomila et al., “SEI Message for Film Grain Encoding”, JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, Document: JVT-H022, 8th Meeting: Geneva, CH, May 23-27, 2003. |
Gomila et al: “SEI Message for Film Grain Encoding: Syntax and Results”, JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC-29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6), 7th Meeting: San Diego, CA, Sep. 2-5, 2003. |
Schlockerman et al: “Film Grain Coding in H.264/AVC,” JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6) 9th Meeting: Sep. 2-5, 2003, San Diego. |
Schoyer et al: “Block Position Dithering in DCT-Coded Sequences”, Signal Processing: Image Communications, vol. 8 1996, pp. 545-549. |
Video Coding Experts Group: “Addition of ‘Comfort noise’ as Post Processing”, Telenor Satellite Services, ITU—Telecommunications Standardization Sector, Document: Q15-B-15, Aug. 20, 199. |
Gomila et al: SEI Message for Film Grain Encoding, May 23-27, 2003 JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG 8th Meeting, Geneva CH pp. 1-15. |
Illingworth et al: “Vision, Image and Signal Processing” Institution of Electrical Eng., Savoy Pl., London, UK. Jun. 2000, vol. 147, No. 3, UK ISSN 1350-245X, Ivipek 147(3) 193-296. |
Conklin, Greg et al: “Dithering 5-Tap Filter for Inloop Deblocking”, JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, 3rd Meeting: Fairfax, Virginia May 6-10, 2002, pp. 1-16. |
Byun H I et al., “Power efficient MPEG-4 decoder featuring low-complexity error resilience”, ASIC, 2002. PROCEEDINGS, 2002 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Aug. 6-8, 2002, Piscataway, NJ USA, IEEE, XP010602834 ISBN: 0-7803-7363-4786X. |
Takashi M et al., “A 60-MW M MPEG4 Video Codec Using Clustered Voltage Scaling with Variable Supple-Voltage Scheme” IEEE Journal Of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ US, vol. 33, No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 1772-1778 XP000875471 ISSN: 0018-9200. |
Pirsch P et al: “VLSI Architectures For Video Compression-A Survey” Proceedings of The IEEE, IEEE, New York, US, vol. 83. No. 2, Feb. 1, 1995, pp. 220-246 XP000501242 ISSN: 0018-9219. |
Zhou X et al: “Implementation of H.264 Decoder on General-Purpose Processors with Media Instructions”, Proceedings of The SPIE, SPIE, Bellingham, VA, US. vol. 5022, 2003, pp. 224-235, XP002367314. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/552,179, mailed Sep. 1, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833, mailed May 10, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833, mailed Oct. 20, 2010. |
Office Action ADV Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833, mailed Jan. 7, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833, mailed Feb. 15, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833, mailed May 10, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833, mailed Sep. 30, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148, mailed May 12, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148, mailed Sep. 10, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820, mailed Mar. 19, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820, mailed May 11, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820, mailed Sep. 30, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676, mailed Mar. 4, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676, mailed Jul. 19. 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676, mailed Oct. 26, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/581,151, mailed Jan. 21, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848, mailed Jul. 6, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848, mailed Oct. 13, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070, mailed Jul. 21, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070, mailed Nov. 12, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070, mailed Jan. 11, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070, mailed Jun. 22, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,067 mailed Aug. 4, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/285,540 mailed Nov. 23, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/285, 540 mailed Mar. 30, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,581 mailed Jun. 8, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,581 mailed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Jul. 9, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Nov. 19, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Jan. 13, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,629 mailed Apr. 22, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Sep. 15, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Dec. 5, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,846 mailed Oct. 4, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/589,217 mailed Jul. 13, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/589,217 mailed Oct. 28, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 12/589,217 mailed Dec. 2, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Jun. 7, 2010. |
McMahon, T. et al: “High Qulaity SD and HD AVC Test Results”; Joint Video Team of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/1NG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6) 5th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 9-17, 2002. |
Naderi, F. et al: “Estimation of Images Degraded by Film Grain Noise”; Applied Optics, vol. 17, Issue 8, pp. 1228-1237. Jan. 1, 1978. |
Bjontegaard, G.: “Addition of Comfort Noise as Post Processing”; ITU-Telecommunications Standardization Sector, Study Group 16, 2nd Meeting, Sunriver, Oregon, Sep. 8-11, 1997. |
Lerner, Boris: “Fixed vs. floating point: a surprisingly hard choice” EE Times, Feb. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
Wiegand, T. “Version 3 of H.264/AVC”, Joint Video Team of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG 12th Meeting, Redmond. WA, USA, Jul. 17-23, 2004. |
Sullivan et al: “The G+H.264/AVC Advanced Video Coding Standard:Overvew & Introduction to Fideilty Range Extensloris”, Apps. of Dig. Image Proc. SPIE Bellinham, WA 2004 vol. 5558. |
Oktem et al: “Transform Domain Algorthm for Reducing Effect of film Grain Noise in Image Compression”, Electronics Letters, Aug. 26, 1999. IEE 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060115175 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60630049 | Nov 2004 | US |