Patent Grant
9068222
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Jan. 6, 2009, is named 533USC1.txt, and is 118,670 bytes in size.
The present teachings are in the field of molecular and cell biology, specifically in the field of detecting target polynucleotides such as miRNA.
RNA interference (RNAi) is a highly coordinated, sequence-specific mechanism involved in posttranscriptional gene regulation. During the initial steps of process, a ribonuclease (RNase) II-like enzyme called Dicer reduces long double-strand RNA (dsRNA) and complex hairpin precursors into: 1) small interfering RNAs (siRNA) that degrade messenger RNA (mRNA) and 2) micro RNAs (miRNAs) that can target mRNAs for cleavage or attenuate translation.
The siRNA class of molecules is thought to be comprised of 21-23 nucleotide (nt) duplexes with characteristic dinucleotide 3′ overhangs (Ambros et al., 2003, RNA, 9 (3), 277-279). siRNA has been shown to act as the functional intermediate in RNAi, specifically directing cleavage of complementary mRNA targets in a process that is commonly regarded to be an antiviral cellular defense mechanism (Elbashir et al., 2001, Nature, 411:6836), 494-498, Elbashir et al., 2001, Genes and Development, 15 (2), 188-200). Target RNA cleavage is catalyzed by the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which functions as a siRNA directed endonuclease (reviewed in Bartel, 2004, Cell, 116 (2), 281-297).
Micro RNAs (miRNAs) typically comprise single-stranded, endogenous oligoribonucleotides of roughly 22 (18-25) bases in length that are processed from larger stem-looped precursor RNAs. The first genes recognized to encode miRNAs, lin-4 and let-7 of C. elegans, were identified on the basis of the developmental timing defects associated with the loss-of-function mutations (Lee et al., 1993, Cell, 75 (5), 843-854; Reinhart et al., 2000, Nature, 403, (6772), 901-906; reviewed by Pasquinelli et al., 2002, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 18, 495-513). The breadth and importance of miRNA-directed gene regulation are coming into focus as more miRNAs and regulatory targets and functions are discovered. To date, a total of at least 700 miRNAs have been identified in C. elegans, Drosophila (Fire et al., 1998, Nature, 391 (6669(, 805-811), mouse, human (Lagos-Quintana et al., 2001, Science, 294 (5543), 853-858), and plants (Reinhart et al., 2002, Genes and Development, 16 (13), 1616-1626). Their sequences are typically conserved among different species. Size ranges from 18 to 25 nucleotides for miRNAs are the most commonly observed to date.
The function of most miRNAs is not known. Recently discovered miRNA functions include control of cell proliferation, cell death, and fat metabolism in flies (Brennecke et al., 2003, cell, 113 (1), 25-36; Xu et al, 2003, Current Biology, 13 (9), 790-795), neuronal patterning in nematodes (Johnston and Hobert, 2003, Nature, 426 (6968), 845-849), modulation of hematopoietic lineage differentiation in mammals (Chen et al., 2004, Science, 303 (5654), 83-87), and control of leaf and flower development in plants (Aukerman and Sakai, 2003, Plant Cell, 15 (11), 2730-2741; Chen, 2003, Science, 303 (5666):2022-2025; Emery et al., 2003, Current Biology, 13 (20), 1768-1774; Palatnik et al., 2003, Nature, 425 (6955), 257-263). There is speculation that miRNAs may represent a new aspect of gene regulation.
Most miRNAs have been discovered by cloning. There are few cloning kits available for researchers from Ambion and QIAGEN etc. The process is laborious and less accurate. Further, there has been little reliable technology available for miRNA quantitation (Allawi et al., Third Wave Technologies, RNA. 2004 July; 10(7):1153-61). Northern blotting has been used but results are not quantitative (Lagos-Quitana et al., 2001, Science, 294 (5543), 853-854). Many miRNA researchers are interested in monitoring the level of the miRNAs at different tissues, at the different stages of development, or after treatment with various chemical agents. However, the short length of miRNAs has their study difficult.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method for detecting a micro RNA (miRNA) comprising; hybridizing the miRNA and a linker probe, wherein the linker probe comprises a stem, a loop, and a 3′ target-specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion base pairs with the 3′ end region of the miRNA; extending the linker probe to form an extension reaction product; amplifying the extension reaction product to form an amplification product; and, detecting the miRNA.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method for detecting a target polynucleotide comprising; hybridizing the target polynucleotide and a linker probe, wherein the linker probe comprises a stem, a loop, and a 3′ target-specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion base pairs with the 3′ end region of the target polynucleotide; extending the linker probe to form an extension reaction product; amplifying the extension reaction product to form an amplification product in the presence of a detector probe, wherein the detector probe comprises a nucleotide of the linker probe stem in the amplification product or a nucleotide of the linker probe stem complement in the amplification product; and, detecting the target polynucleotide.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method for detecting a miRNA molecule comprising; hybridizing the miRNA molecule and a linker probe, wherein the linker probe comprises a stem, a loop, and a 3′ target specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion base pairs with the 3′ end region of the target polynucleotide; extending the linker probe to form an extension reaction product; amplifying the extension reaction product in the presence of a detector probe to form an amplification product, wherein the detector probe comprises a nucleotide of the linker probe stem in the amplification product or a nucleotide of the linker probe stem complement in the amplification product, and the detector probe further comprises a nucleotide of the 3′ end region of the miRNA in the amplification product or a nucleotide of the 3′ end region of the miRNA complement in the amplification product; and, detecting the miRNA molecule.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method for detecting two different miRNAs from a single hybridization reaction comprising; hybridizing a first miRNA and a first linker probe, and a second miRNA and a second linker probe, wherein the first linker probe and the second linker probe each comprise a loop, a stem, and a 3′ target-specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion of the first linker probe base pairs with the 3′ end region of the first miRNA, and wherein the 3′ target-specific portion of the second linker probe base pairs with the 3′ end region of the second miRNA; extending the first linker probe and the second linker probe to form extension reaction products; dividing the extension reaction products into a first amplification reaction to form a first amplification reaction product, and a second amplification reaction to form a second amplification reaction product, wherein a primer in the first amplification reaction corresponds with the first miRNA and not the second miRNA, and a primer in the second amplification reaction corresponds with the second miRNA and not the first miRNA, wherein a first detector probe in the first amplification reaction differs from a second detector probe in the second amplification reaction, wherein the first detector probe comprises a nucleotide of the first linker probe stem of the amplification product or a nucleotide of the first linker probe stem complement in the first amplification product, wherein the second detector probe comprises a nucleotide of the second linker probe stem of the amplification product or a nucleotide of the second linker probe stem complement in the amplification product; and, detecting the two different miRNAs.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method for detecting two different target polynucleotides from a single hybridization reaction comprising; hybridizing a first target polynucleotide and a first linker probe, and a second target polynucleotide and a second linker probe, wherein the first linker probe and the second linker probe each comprise a loop, a stem, and a 3′ target-specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion of the first linker probe base pairs with the 3′ end region of the first target polynucleotide, and wherein the 3′ target-specific portion of the second linker probe base pairs with the 3′ end region of the second target polynucleotide; extending the first linker probe and the second linker probe to form extension reaction products; dividing the extension reaction products into a first amplification reaction to form a first amplification reaction product and a second amplification reaction to form a second amplification reaction product; and, detecting the two different miRNA molecules.
In some embodiments, the present teachings provide a method for detecting a miRNA molecule from a cell lysate comprising; hybridizing the miRNA molecule from the cell lysate with a linker probe, wherein the linker probe comprises a stem, a loop, and a 3′ target specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion base pairs with the 3′ end region of the miRNA; extending the linker probe to form an extension reaction product; amplifying the extension reaction product to form an amplification product in the presence of a detector probe, wherein the detector probe comprises a nucleotide of the linker probe stem of the amplification product or a nucleotide of the linker probe stem complement in the amplification product, and the detector probe further comprises a nucleotide of the 3′ end region of the miRNA in the amplification product or a nucleotide of the 3′ end region of the miRNA complement in the amplification product; and, detecting the miRNA molecule.
A kit comprising; a reverse transcriptase and a linker probe, wherein the linker probe comprises a stern, a loop, and a 3′ target-specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion corresponds to a miRNA.
The present teachings contemplate method for detecting a miRNA molecule comprising a step of hybridizing, a step of extending, a step of amplifying, and a step of detecting.
These and other features of the present teachings are set forth herein.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings, described below, are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings in any way.
Aspects of the present teachings may be further understood in light of the following examples, which should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present teachings in any way. The section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the described subject matter in any way. All literature and similar materials cited in this application, including but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, books, treatises, and internet web pages are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety for any purpose. When definitions of terms in incorporated references appear to differ from the definitions provided in the present teachings, the definition provided in the present teachings shall control. It will be appreciated that there is an implied “about” prior to the temperatures, concentrations, times, etc discussed in the present teachings, such that slight and insubstantial deviations are within the scope of the present teachings herein. In this application, the use of the singular includes the plural unless specifically stated otherwise. For example, “a primer” means that more than one primer can, but need not, be present; for example but without limitation, one or more copies of a particular primer species, as well as one or more versions of a particular primer type, for example but not limited to, a multiplicity of different forward primers. Also, the use of “comprise”, “comprises”, “comprising”, “contain”, “contains”, “containing”, “include”, “includes”, and “including” are not intended to be limiting. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention.
Some Definitions
As used herein, the term “target polynucleotide” refers to a polynucleotide sequence that is sought to be detected. The target polynucleotide can be obtained from any source, and can comprise any number of different compositional components. For example, the target can be nucleic acid (e.g. DNA or RNA), transfer RNA, siRNA, and can comprise nucleic acid analogs or other nucleic acid mimic. The target can be methylated, non-methylated, or both. The target can be bisulfite-treated and non-methylated cytosines converted to uracil. Further, it will be appreciated that “target polynucleotide” can refer to the target polynucleotide itself, as well as surrogates thereof, for example amplification products, and native sequences. In some embodiments, the target polynucleotide is a miRNA molecule. In some embodiments, the target polynucleotide lacks a poly-A tail. In some embodiments, the target polynucleotide is a short DNA molecule derived from a degraded source, such as can be found in for example but not limited to forensics samples (see for example Butler, 2001, Forensic DNA Typing: Biology and Technology Behind STR Markers. The target polynucleotides of the present teachings can be derived from any of a number of sources, including without limitation, viruses, prokaryotes, eukaryotes, for example but not limited to plants, fungi, and animals. These sources may include, but are not limited to, whole blood, a tissue biopsy, lymph, bone marrow, amniotic fluid, hair, skin, semen, biowarfare agents, anal secretions, vaginal secretions, perspiration, saliva, buccal swabs, various environmental samples (for example, agricultural, water, and soil), research samples generally, purified samples generally, cultured cells, and lysed cells. It will be appreciated that target polynucleotides can be isolated from samples using any of a variety of procedures known in the art, for example the Applied Biosystems ABI Prism™ 6100 Nucleic Acid PrepStation, and the ABI Prism™ 6700 Automated Nucleic Acid Workstation, Boom et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,234,809, mirVana RNA isolation kit (Ambion), etc. It will be appreciated that target polynucleotides can be cut or sheared prior to analysis, including the use of such procedures as mechanical force, sonication, restriction endonuclease cleavage, or any method known in the art. In general, the target polynucleotides of the present teachings will be single stranded, though in some embodiments the target polynucleotide can be double stranded, and a single strand can result from denaturation.
As used herein, the term “3′ end region of the target polynucleotide” refers to the region of the target to which the 3′ target specific portion of the linker probe hybridizes. In some embodiments there can be a gap between the 3′ end region of the target polynucleotide and the 5′ end of the linker probe, with extension reactions filling in the gap, though generally such scenarios are not preferred because of the likely destabilizing effects on the duplex. In some embodiments, a miRNA molecule is the target, in which case the term “3′ end region of the miRNA” is used.
As used herein, the term “linker probe” refers to a molecule comprising a 3′ target specific portion, a stem, and a loop. Illustrative linker probes are depicted in
As used herein, the term “3′ target-specific portion” refers to the single stranded portion of a linker probe that is complementary to a target polynucleotide. The 3′ target-specific portion is located downstream from the stem of the linker probe. Generally, the 3′ target-specific portion is between 6 and 8 nucleotides long. In some embodiments, the 3′ target-specific portion is 7 nucleotides long. It will be appreciated that routine experimentation can produce other lengths, and that 3′ target-specific portions that are longer than 8 nucleotides or shorter than 6 nucleotides are also contemplated by the present teachings. Generally, the 3′-most nucleotides of the 3′ target-specific portion should have minimal complementarity overlap, or no overlap at all, with the 3′ nucleotides of the forward primer; it will be appreciated that overlap in these regions can produce undesired primer dimer amplification products in subsequent amplification reactions. In some embodiments, the overlap between the 3′-most nucleotides of the 3′ target-specific portion and the 3′ nucleotides of the forward primer is 0, 1, 2, or 3 nucleotides. In some embodiments, greater than 3 nucleotides can be complementary between the 3′-most nucleotides of the 3′ target-specific portion and the 3′ nucleotides of the forward primer, but generally such scenarios will be accompanied by additional non-complementary nucleotides interspersed therein. In some embodiments, modified bases such as LNA can be used in the 3′ target specific portion to increase the Tm of the linker probe (see for example Petersen et al., Trends in Biochemistry (2003), 21:2:74-81). In some embodiments, universal bases can be used, for example to allow for smaller libraries of linker probes. Universal bases can also be used in the 3′ target specific portion to allow for the detection of unknown targets. For some descriptions of universal bases, see for example Loakes et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Volume 29, No. 12, 2437-2447. In some embodiments, modifications including but not limited to LNAs and universal bases can improve reverse transcription specificity and potentially enhance detection specificity.
As used herein, the term “stem” refers to the double stranded region of the linker probe that is between the 3′ target-specific portion and the loop. Generally, the stem is between 6 and 20 nucleotides long (that is, 6-20 complementary pairs of nucleotides, for a total of 12-40 distinct nucleotides). In some embodiments, the stem is 8-14 nucleotides long. As a general matter, in those embodiments in which a portion of the detector probe is encoded in the stem, the stem can be longer. In those embodiments in which a portion of the detector probe is not encoded in the stem, the stem can be shorter. Those in the art will appreciate that stems shorter that 6 nucleotides and longer than 20 nucleotides can be identified in the course of routine methodology and without undue experimentation, and that such shorter and longer stems are contemplated by the present teachings. In some embodiments, the stem can comprise an identifying portion.
As used herein, the term “loop” refers to a region of the linker probe that is located between the two complementary strands of the stern, as depicted in
As used herein, the term “identifying portion” refers to a moiety or moieties that can be used to identify a particular linker probe species, and as a result determine a target polynucleotide sequence, and can refer to a variety of distinguishable moieties including zipcodes, a known number of nucleobases, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, an identifying portion, or an identifying portion complement, can hybridize to a detector probe, thereby allowing detection of a target polynucleotide sequence in a decoding reaction. The terms “identifying portion complement” typically refers to at least one oligonucleotide that comprises at least one sequence of nucleobases that are at least substantially complementary to and hybridize with their corresponding identifying portion. In some embodiments, identifying portion complements serve as capture moieties for attaching at least one identifier portion:element complex to at least one substrate; serve as “pull-out” sequences for bulk separation procedures; or both as capture moieties and as pull-out sequences (see for example O'Neil, et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,638,760, 6,514,699, 6,146,511, and 6,124,092). Typically, identifying portions and their corresponding identifying portion complements are selected to minimize: internal, self-hybridization; cross-hybridization with different identifying portion species, nucleotide sequences in a reaction composition, including but not limited to gDNA, different species of identifying portion complements, or target-specific portions of probes, and the like; but should be amenable to facile hybridization between the identifying portion and its corresponding identifying portion complement. Identifying portion sequences and identifying portion complement sequences can be selected by any suitable method, for example but not limited to, computer algorithms such as described in PCT Publication Nos. WO 96/12014 and WO 96/41011 and in European Publication No. EP 799,897; and the algorithm and parameters of SantaLucia (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95:1460-65 (1998)). Descriptions of identifying portions can be found in, among other places, U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,829 (referred to as “tag segment” therein); U.S. Pat. No. 6,451,525 (referred to as “tag segment” therein); U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,829 (referred to as “tag segment” therein); U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,176 (referred to as “grid oligonucleotides” therein); U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,793 (referred to as “identifier tags” therein); and PCT Publication No. WO 01/92579 (referred to as “addressable support-specific sequences” therein). In some embodiments, the stem of the linker probe, the loop of the linker probe, or combinations thereof can comprise an identifying portion, and the detector probe can hybridize to the corresponding identifying portion. In some embodiments, the detector probe can hybridize to both the identifying portion as well as sequence corresponding to the target polynucleotide. In some embodiments, at least two identifying portion: identifying portion complement duplexes have melting temperatures that fall within a ΔTm range (Tmax−Tmin) of no more than 10° C. of each other. In some embodiments, at least two identifying portion: identifying portion complement duplexes have melting temperatures that fall within a ΔTm range of 5° C. or less of each other. In some embodiments, at least two identifying portion: identifying portion complement duplexes have melting temperatures that fall within a ΔTm range of 2° C. or less of each other. In some embodiments, at least one identifying portion or at least one identifying portion complement is used to separate the element to which it is bound from at least one component of a ligation reaction composition, a digestion reaction composition, an amplified ligation reaction composition, or the like. In some embodiments, identifying portions are used to attach at least one ligation product, at least one ligation product surrogate, or combinations thereof, to at least one substrate. In some embodiments, at least one ligation product, at least one ligation product surrogate, or combinations thereof, comprise the same identifying portion. Examples of separation approaches include but are not limited to, separating a multiplicity of different element: identifying portion species using the same identifying portion complement, tethering a multiplicity of different element: identifying portion species to a substrate comprising the same identifying portion complement, or both. In some embodiments, at least one identifying portion complement comprises at least one label, at least one mobility modifier, at least one label binding portion, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, at least one identifying portion complement is annealed to at least one corresponding identifying portion and, subsequently, at least part of that identifying portion complement is released and detected, see for example Published P.C.T. Application WO04/4634 to Rosenblum et al., and Published P.C.T. Application WO01/92579 to Wenz et al.
As used herein, the term “extension reaction” refers to an elongation reaction in which the 3′ target specific portion of a linker probe is extended to form an extension reaction product comprising a strand complementary to the target polynucleotide. In some embodiments, the target polynucleotide is a miRNA molecule and the extension reaction is a reverse transcription reaction comprising a reverse transcriptase. In some embodiments, the extension reaction is a reverse transcription reaction comprising a polymerase derived from a Eubacteria. In some embodiments, the extension reaction can comprise rTth polymerase, for example as commercially available from Applied Biosystems catalog number N808-0192, and N808-0098. In some embodiments, the target polynucleotide is a miRNA or other RNA molecule, and as such it will be appreciated that the use of polymerases that also comprise reverse transcription properties can allow for some embodiments of the present teachings to comprise a first reverse transcription reaction followed thereafter by an amplification reaction, thereby allowing for the consolidation of two reactions in essentially a single reaction. In some embodiments, the target polynucleotide is a short DNA molecule and the extension reaction comprises a polymerase and results in the synthesis of a 2nd strand of DNA. In some embodiments, the consolidation of the extension reaction and a subsequent amplification reaction is further contemplated by the present teachings.
As used herein, the term “primer portion” refers to a region of a polynucleotide sequence that can serve directly, or by virtue of its complement, as the template upon which a primer can anneal for any of a variety of primer nucleotide extension reactions known in the art (for example, PCR). It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that when two primer portions are present on a single polynucleotide, the orientation of the two primer portions is generally different. For example, one PCR primer can directly hybridize to a first primer portion, while the other PCR primer can hybridize to the complement of the second primer portion. In addition, “universal” primers and primer portions as used herein are generally chosen to be as unique as possible given the particular assays and host genomes to ensure specificity of the assay.
As used herein, the term “forward primer” refers to a primer that comprises an extension reaction product portion and a tail portion. The extension reaction product portion of the forward primer hybridizes to the extension reaction product. Generally, the extension reaction product portion of the forward primer is between 9 and 19 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the extension reaction product portion of the forward primer is 16 nucleotides. The tail portion is located upstream from the extension reaction product portion, and is not complementary with the extension reaction product; after a round of amplification however, the tail portion can hybridize to complementary sequence of amplification products. Generally, the tail portion of the forward primer is between 5-8 nucleotides long. In some embodiments, the tail portion of the forward primer is 6 nucleotides long. Those in the art will appreciate that forward primer tail portion lengths shorter than 5 nucleotides and longer than 8 nucleotides can be identified in the course of routine methodology and without undue experimentation, and that such shorter and longer forward primer tail portion lengths are contemplated by the present teachings. Further, those in the art will appreciate that lengths of the extension reaction product portion of the forward primer shorter than 9 nucleotides in length and longer than 19 nucleotides in length can be identified in the course of routine methodology and without undue experimentation, and that such shorter and longer extension reaction product portion of forward primers are contemplated by the present teachings.
As used herein, the term “reverse primer” refers to a primer that when extended forms a strand complementary to the target polynucleotide. In some embodiments, the reverse primer corresponds with a region of the loop of the linker probe. Following the extension reaction, the forward primer can be extended to form a second strand product. The reverse primer hybridizes with this second strand product, and can be extended to continue the amplification reaction. In some embodiments, the reverse primer corresponds with a region of the loop of the linker probe, a region of the stem of the linker probe, a region of the target polynucleotide, or combinations thereof. Generally, the reverse primer is between 13-16 nucleotides long. In some embodiments the reverse primer is 14 nucleotides long. In some embodiments, the reverse primer can further comprise a non-complementary tail region, though such a tail is not required. In some embodiments, the reverse primer is a “universal reverse primer,” which indicates that the sequence of the reverse primer can be used in a plurality of different reactions querying different target polynucleotides, but that the reverse primer nonetheless is the same sequence.
The term “upstream” as used herein takes on its customary meaning in molecular biology, and refers to the location of a region of a polynucleotide that is on the 5′ side of a “downstream” region. Correspondingly, the term “downstream” refers to the location of a region of a polynucleotide that is on the 3′ side of an “upstream” region.
As used herein, the term “hybridization” refers to the complementary base-pairing interaction of one nucleic acid with another nucleic acid that results in formation of a duplex, triplex, or other higher-ordered structure, and is used herein interchangeably with “annealing.” Typically, the primary interaction is base specific, e.g., A/T and G/C, by Watson/Crick and Hoogsteen-type hydrogen bonding. Base-stacking and hydrophobic interactions can also contribute to duplex stability. Conditions for hybridizing detector probes and primers to complementary and substantially complementary target sequences are well known, e.g., as described in Nucleic Acid Hybridization, A Practical Approach, B. Hames and S. Higgins, eds., IRL Press, Washington, D.C. (1985) and J. Wetmur and N. Davidson, Mol. Biol. 31:349 et seq. (1968). In general, whether such annealing takes place is influenced by, among other things, the length of the polynucleotides and the complementary, the pH, the temperature, the presence of mono- and divalent cations, the proportion of G and C nucleotides in the hybridizing region, the viscosity of the medium, and the presence of denaturants. Such variables influence the time required for hybridization. Thus, the preferred annealing conditions will depend upon the particular application. Such conditions, however, can be routinely determined by the person of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation. It will be appreciated that complementarity need not be perfect; there can be a small number of base pair mismatches that will minimally interfere with hybridization between the target sequence and the single stranded nucleic acids of the present teachings. However, if the number of base pair mismatches is so great that no hybridization can occur under minimally stringent conditions then the sequence is generally not a complementary target sequence. Thus, complementarity herein is meant that the probes or primers are sufficiently complementary to the target sequence to hybridize under the selected reaction conditions to achieve the ends of the present teachings.
As used herein, the term “amplifying” refers to any means by which at least a part of a target polynucleotide, target polynucleotide surrogate, or combinations thereof, is reproduced, typically in a template-dependent manner, including without limitation, a broad range of techniques for amplifying nucleic acid sequences, either linearly or exponentially. Exemplary means for performing an amplifying step include ligase chain reaction (LCR), ligase detection reaction (LDR), ligation followed by Q-replicase amplification, PCR, primer extension, strand displacement amplification (SDA), hyperbranched strand displacement amplification, multiple displacement amplification (MDA), nucleic acid strand-based amplification (NASBA), two-step multiplexed amplifications, rolling circle amplification (RCA) and the like, including multiplex versions or combinations thereof, for example but not limited to, OLA/PCR, PCR/OLA, LDR/PCR, PCR/PCR/LDR, PCR/LDR, LCR/PCR, PCR/LCR (also known as combined chain reaction—CCR), and the like. Descriptions of such techniques can be found in, among other places, Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning, 3rd Edition,; Ausbel et al.; PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual, Diffenbach, Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Press (1995); The Electronic Protocol Book, Chang Bioscience (2002), Msuih et al., J. Clin. Micro. 34:501-07 (1996); The Nucleic Acid Protocols Handbook, R. Rapley, ed., Humana Press, Totowa, N.J. (2002); Abramson et al., Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1993 February; 4(1):41-7, U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,998; U.S. Pat. No. 6,605,451, Barany et al., PCT Publication No. WO 97/31256; Wenz et al., PCT Publication No. WO 01/92579; Day et al., Genomics, 29(1): 152-162 (1995), Ehrlich et al., Science 252:1643-50 (1991); Innis et al., PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press (1990); Favis et al., Nature Biotechnology 18:561-64 (2000); and Rabenau et al., Infection 28:97-102 (2000); Belgrader, Barany, and Lubin, Development of a Multiplex Ligation Detection Reaction DNA Typing Assay, Sixth International Symposium on Human Identification, 1995 (available on the world wide web at: promega.com/geneticidproc/ussymp6proc/blegrad.html); LCR Kit Instruction Manual, Cat. #200520, Rev. #050002, Stratagene, 2002; Barany, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:188-93 (1991); Bi and Sambrook, Nucl. Acids Res. 25:2924-2951 (1997); Zirvi et al., Nucl. Acid Res. 27:e40i-viii (1999); Dean et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5261-66 (2002); Barany and Gelfand, Gene 109:1-11 (1991); Walker et al., Nucl. Acid Res. 20:1691-96 (1992); Polstra et al., BMC Inf. Dis. 2:18-(2002); Lage et al., Genome Res. 2003 February; 13(2):294-307, and Landegren et al., Science 241:1077-80 (1988), Demidov, V., Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002 November; 2(6):542-8, Cook et al., J Microbiol Methods. 2003 May; 53(2):165-74, Schweitzer et al., Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001 February; 12(1):21-7, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,830,711, 6,027,889, 5,686,243, Published P.C.T. Application WO0056927A3, and Published P.C.T. Application WO9803673A1. In some embodiments, newly-formed nucleic acid duplexes are not initially denatured, but are used in their double-stranded form in one or more subsequent steps. An extension reaction is an amplifying technique that comprises elongating a linker probe that is annealed to a template in the 5′ to 3′ direction using an amplifying means such as a polymerase and/or reverse transcriptase. According to some embodiments, with appropriate buffers, salts, pH, temperature, and nucleotide triphosphates, including analogs thereof, i.e., under appropriate conditions, a polymerase incorporates nucleotides complementary to the template strand starting at the 3′-end of an annealed linker probe, to generate a complementary strand. In some embodiments, the polymerase used for extension lacks or substantially lacks 5′ exonuclease activity. In some embodiments of the present teachings, unconventional nucleotide bases can be introduced into the amplification reaction products and the products treated by enzymatic (e.g., glycosylases) and/or physical-chemical means in order to render the product incapable of acting as a template for subsequent amplifications. In some embodiments, uracil can be included as a nucleobase in the reaction mixture, thereby allowing for subsequent reactions to decontaminate carryover of previous uracil-containing products by the use of uracil-N-glycosylase (see for example Published P.C.T. Application WO9201814A2). In some embodiments of the present teachings, any of a variety of techniques can be employed prior to amplification in order to facilitate amplification success, as described for example in Radstrom et al., Mol Biotechnol. 2004 February; 26(2):133-46. In some embodiments, amplification can be achieved in a self-contained integrated approach comprising sample preparation and detection, as described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,153,425 and 6,649,378. Reversibly modified enzymes, for example but not limited to those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,258, are also within the scope of the disclosed teachings. The present teachings also contemplate various uracil-based decontamination strategies, wherein for example uracil can be incorporated into an amplification reaction, and subsequent carry-over products removed with various glycosylase treatments (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,536,649, and U.S. Provisional Application 60/584,682 to Andersen et al.,). Those in the art will understand that any protein with the desired enzymatic activity can be used in the disclosed methods and kits. Descriptions of DNA polymerases, including reverse transcriptases, uracil N-glycosylase, and the like, can be found in, among other places, Twyman, Advanced Molecular Biology, BIOS Scientific Publishers, 1999; Enzyme Resource Guide, rev. 092298, Promega, 1998; Sambrook and Russell; Sambrook et al.; Lehninger; PCR: The Basics; and Ausbel et al.
As used herein, the term “detector probe” refers to a molecule used in an amplification reaction, typically for quantitative or real-time PCR analysis, as well as end-point analysis. Such detector probes can be used to monitor the amplification of the target polynucleotide. In some embodiments, detector probes present in an amplification reaction are suitable for monitoring the amount of amplicon(s) produced as a function of time. Such detector probes include, but are not limited to, the 5′-exonuclease assay (TaqMan® probes described herein (see also U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,848) various stem-loop molecular beacons (see e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,103,476 and 5,925,517 and Tyagi and Kramer, 1996, Nature Biotechnology 14:303-308), stemless or linear beacons (see, e.g., WO 99/21881), PNA Molecular Beacons™ (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,355,421 and 6,593,091), linear PNA beacons (see, e.g., Kubista et al., 2001, SPIE 4264:53-58), non-FRET probes (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,097), Sunrise®/Amplifluor® probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,548,250), stem-loop and duplex Scorpion™ probes (Solinas et al., 2001, Nucleic Acids Research 29:E96 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,743), bulge loop probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,590,091), pseudo knot probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,250), cyclicons (U.S. Pat. No. 6,383,752), MGB Eclipse™ probe (Epoch Biosciences), hairpin probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,490), peptide nucleic acid (PNA) light-up probes, self-assembled nanoparticle probes, and ferrocene-modified probes described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,485,901; Mhlanga et al., 2001, Methods 25:463-471; Whitcombe et al., 1999, Nature Biotechnology. 17:804-807; Isacsson et al., 2000, Molecular Cell Probes. 14:321-328; Svanvik et al., 2000, Anal Biochem. 281:26-35; Wolffs et al., 2001, Biotechniques 766:769-771; Tsourkas et al., 2002, Nucleic Acids Research. 30:4208-4215; Riccelli et al., 2002, Nucleic Acids Research 30:4088-4093; Zhang et al., 2002 Shanghai. 34:329-332; Maxwell et al., 2002, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:9606-9612; Broude et al., 2002, Trends Biotechnol. 20:249-56; Huang et al., 2002, Chem Res. Toxicol. 15:118-126; and Yu et al., 2001, J. Am. Chem. Soc 14:11155-11161. Detector probes can also comprise quenchers, including without limitation black hole quenchers (Biosearch), Iowa Black (IDT), QSY quencher (Molecular Probes), and Dabsyl and Dabcel sulfonate/carboxylate Quenchers (Epoch). Detector probes can also comprise two probes, wherein for example a fluor is on one probe, and a quencher is on the other probe, wherein hybridization of the two probes together on a target quenches the signal, or wherein hybridization on the target alters the signal signature via a change in fluorescence. Detector probes can also comprise sulfonate derivatives of fluorescein dyes with SO3 instead of the carboxylate group, phosphoramidite forms of fluorescein, phosphoramidite forms of CY 5 (commercially available for example from Amersham). In some embodiments, intercalating labels are used such as ethidium bromide, SYBR® Green I (Molecular Probes), and PicoGreen® (Molecular Probes), thereby allowing visualization in real-time, or end point, of an amplification product in the absence of a detector probe. In some embodiments, real-time visualization can comprise both an intercalating detector probe and a sequence-based detector probe can be employed. In some embodiments, the detector probe is at least partially quenched when not hybridized to a complementary sequence in the amplification reaction, and is at least partially unquenched when hybridized to a complementary sequence in the amplification reaction. In some embodiments, the detector probes of the present teachings have a Tm of 63-69 C, though it will be appreciated that guided by the present teachings routine experimentation can result in detector probes with other Tms. In some embodiments, probes can further comprise various modifications such as a minor groove binder (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,486,308) to further provide desirable thermodynamic characteristics. In some embodiments, detector probes can correspond to identifying portions or identifying portion complements.
The term “corresponding” as used herein refers to a specific relationship between the elements to which the term refers. Some non-limiting examples of corresponding include: a linker probe can correspond with a target polynucleotide, and vice versa. A forward primer can correspond with a target polynucleotide, and vice versa. A linker probe can correspond with a forward primer for a given target polynucleotide, and vice versa. The 3′ target-specific portion of the linker probe can correspond with the 3′ region of a target polynucleotide, and vice versa. A detector probe can correspond with a particular region of a target polynucleotide and vice versa. A detector probe can correspond with a particular identifying portion and vice versa. In some cases, the corresponding elements can be complementary. In some cases, the corresponding elements are not complementary to each other, but one element can be complementary to the complement of another element.
The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, AAB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.
As used herein, the term “reaction vessel” generally refers to any container in which a reaction can occur in accordance with the present teachings. In some embodiments, a reaction vessel can be an eppendorf tube, and other containers of the sort in common practice in modern molecular biology laboratories. In some embodiments, a reaction vessel can be a well in microtitre plate, a spot on a glass slide, or a well in an Applied Biosystems TaqMan Low Density Array for gene expression (formerly MicroCard™). For example, a plurality of reaction vessels can reside on the same support. In some embodiments, lab-on-a-chip like devices, available for example from Caliper and Fluidgm, can provide for reaction vessels. In some embodiments, various microfluidic approaches as described in U.S. Provisional Application 60/545,674 to Wenz et al., can be employed. It will be recognized that a variety of reaction vessel are available in the art and within the scope of the present teachings.
As used herein, the term “detection” refers to any of a variety of ways of determining the presence and/or quantity and/or identity of a target polynucleotide. In some embodiments employing a donor moiety and signal moiety, one may use certain energy-transfer fluorescent dyes. Certain nonlimiting exemplary pairs of donors (donor moieties) and acceptors (signal moieties) are illustrated, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,863,727; 5,800,996; and 5,945,526. Use of some combinations of a donor and an acceptor have been called FRET (Fluorescent Resonance Energy Transfer). In some embodiments, fluorophores that can be used as signaling probes include, but are not limited to, rhodamine, cyanine 3 (Cy 3), cyanine 5 (Cy 5), fluorescein, Vic™, Liz™, Tamra™, 5-Fam™, 6-Fam™, and Texas Red (Molecular Probes). (Vic™, Liz™, Tamra™, 5-Fam™, and 6-Fam™ (all available from Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). In some embodiments, the amount of detector probe that gives a fluorescent signal in response to an excited light typically relates to the amount of nucleic acid produced in the amplification reaction. Thus, in some embodiments, the amount of fluorescent signal is related to the amount of product created in the amplification reaction. In such embodiments, one can therefore measure the amount of amplification product by measuring the intensity of the fluorescent signal from the fluorescent indicator. According to some embodiments, one can employ an internal standard to quantify the amplification product indicated by the fluorescent signal. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,333. Devices have been developed that can perform a thermal cycling reaction with compositions containing a fluorescent indicator, emit a light beam of a specified wavelength, read the intensity of the fluorescent dye, and display the intensity of fluorescence after each cycle. Devices comprising a thermal cycler, light beam emitter, and a fluorescent signal detector, have been described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,928,907; 6,015,674; and 6,174,670, and include, but are not limited to the ABI Prism® 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), the ABI GeneAmp® 5700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), the ABI GeneAmp® 7300 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), and the ABI GeneAmp® 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). In some embodiments, each of these functions can be performed by separate devices. For example, if one employs a Q-beta replicase reaction for amplification, the reaction may not take place in a thermal cycler, but could include a light beam emitted at a specific wavelength, detection of the fluorescent signal, and calculation and display of the amount of amplification product. In some embodiments, combined thermal cycling and fluorescence detecting devices can be used for precise quantification of target nucleic acid sequences in samples. In some embodiments, fluorescent signals can be detected and displayed during and/or after one or more thermal cycles, thus permitting monitoring of amplification products as the reactions occur in “real time.” In some embodiments, one can use the amount of amplification product and number of amplification cycles to calculate how much of the target nucleic acid sequence was in the sample prior to amplification. In some embodiments, one could simply monitor the amount of amplification product after a predetermined number of cycles sufficient to indicate the presence of the target nucleic acid sequence in the sample. One skilled in the art can easily determine, for any given sample type, primer sequence, and reaction condition, how many cycles are sufficient to determine the presence of a given target polynucleotide. As used herein, determining the presence of a target can comprise identifying it, as well as optionally quantifying it. In some embodiments, the amplification products can be scored as positive or negative as soon as a given number of cycles is complete. In some embodiments, the results may be transmitted electronically directly to a database and tabulated. Thus, in some embodiments, large numbers of samples can be processed and analyzed with less time and labor when such an instrument is used. In some embodiments, different detector probes may distinguish between different target polynucleotides. A non-limiting example of such a probe is a 5′-nuclease fluorescent probe, such as a TaqMan® probe molecule, wherein a fluorescent molecule is attached to a fluorescence-quenching molecule through an oligonucleotide link element. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide link element of the 5′-nuclease fluorescent probe binds to a specific sequence of an identifying portion or its complement. In some embodiments, different 5′-nuclease fluorescent probes, each fluorescing at different wavelengths, can distinguish between different amplification products within the same amplification reaction. For example, in some embodiments, one could use two different 5′-nuclease fluorescent probes that fluoresce at two different wavelengths (WLA and WLB) and that are specific to two different stem regions of two different extension reaction products (A′ and B′, respectively). Amplification product A′ is formed if target nucleic acid sequence A is in the sample, and amplification product B′ is formed if target nucleic acid sequence B is in the sample. In some embodiments, amplification product A′ and/or B′ may form even if the appropriate target nucleic acid sequence is not in the sample, but such occurs to a measurably lesser extent than when the appropriate target nucleic acid sequence is in the sample. After amplification, one can determine which specific target nucleic acid sequences are present in the sample based on the wavelength of signal detected and their intensity. Thus, if an appropriate detectable signal value of only wavelength WLA is detected, one would know that the sample includes target nucleic acid sequence A, but not target nucleic acid sequence B. If an appropriate detectable signal value of both wavelengths WLA and WLB are detected, one would know that the sample includes both target nucleic acid sequence A and target nucleic acid sequence B. In some embodiments, detection can occur through any of a variety of mobility dependent analytical techniques based on differential rates of migration between different analyte species. Exemplary mobility-dependent analysis techniques include electrophoresis, chromatography, mass spectroscopy, sedimentation, e.g., gradient centrifugation, field-flow fractionation, multi-stage extraction techniques, and the like. In some embodiments, mobility probes can be hybridized to amplification products, and the identity of the target polynucleotide determined via a mobility dependent analysis technique of the eluted mobility probes, as described for example in Published P.C.T. Application WO04/46344 to Rosenblum et al., and WO01/92579 to Wenz et al. In some embodiments, detection can be achieved by various microarrays and related software such as the Applied Biosystems Array System with the Applied Biosystems 1700 Chemiluminescent Microarray Analyzer and other commercially available array systems available from Affymetrix, Agilent, Illumina, and Amersham Biosciences, among others (see also Gerry et al., J. Mol. Biol. 292:251-62, 1999; De Bellis et al., Minerva Biotec 14:247-52, 2002; and Stears et al., Nat. Med. 9:140-45, including supplements, 2003). It will also be appreciated that detection can comprise reporter groups that are incorporated into the reaction products, either as part of labeled primers or due to the incorporation of labeled dNTPs during an amplification, or attached to reaction products, for example but not limited to, via hybridization tag complements comprising reporter groups or via linker arms that are integral or attached to reaction products. Detection of unlabeled reaction products, for example using mass spectrometry, is also within the scope of the current teachings.
Exemplary Embodiments
As shown in
The present teachings also contemplate reactions comprising configurations other than a linker probe. For example, in some embodiments, two hybridized molecules with a sticky end can be employed, wherein for example an overlapping 3′ sticky end hybridizes with the 3′ end region of the target polynucleotide. Some descriptions of two molecule configurations that can be employed in the present teachings can be found in Chen et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/517,470. Viewed in light of the present teachings herein, one of skill in the art will appreciate that the approaches of Chen et al., can also be employed to result in extension reaction products that are longer that the target polynucleotide. These longer products can be detected with detector probes by, for example, taking advantage of the additional nucleotides introduced into the reaction products.
The present teachings also contemplate embodiments wherein the linker probe is ligated to the target polynucleotide, as described for example in Chen et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/575,661, and the corresponding co-filed U.S. Provisional application co-filed herewith
Further, it will be appreciated that in some embodiments of the present teachings, the two molecule configurations in Chen et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/517,470 can be applied in embodiments comprising the linker approaches discussed in Chen et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/575,661.
Generally however, the loop structure of the present teachings will enhance the Tm of the target polynucleotide-linker probe duplex. Without being limited to any particular theory, this enhanced Tm could possibly be due to base stacking effects. Also, the characteristics of the looped linker probe of the present teachings can minimize nonspecific priming during the extension reaction, and/or a subsequent amplification reaction such as PCR. Further, the looped linker probe of the present teachings can better differentiate mature and precursor forms of miRNA, as illustrated infra in Example 6.
The present teachings also contemplate encoding and decoding reaction schemes, wherein a first encoding extension reaction is followed by a second decoding amplification reaction, as described for example in Livak et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/556,162, Chen et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/556,157, Andersen et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/556,224, and Lao et al., U.S. Provisional Application 60/556,163.
The present teachings also contemplate a variety of strategies to minimize the number of different molecules in multiplexed amplification strategies, as described for example in Whitcombe et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,270,967.
In certain embodiments, the present teachings also provide kits designed to expedite performing certain methods. In some embodiments, kits serve to expedite the performance of the methods of interest by assembling two or more components used in carrying out the methods. In some embodiments, kits may contain components in pre-measured unit amounts to minimize the need for measurements by end-users. In some embodiments, kits may include instructions for performing one or more methods of the present teachings. In certain embodiments, the kit components are optimized to operate in conjunction with one another.
For example, the present teachings provide a kit comprising, a reverse transcriptase and a linker probe, wherein the linker probe comprises a stem, a loop, and a 3′ target-specific portion, wherein the 3′ target-specific portion corresponds to a miRNA. In some embodiments, the kits can comprise a DNA polymerase. In some embodiments, the kits can comprise a primer pair. In some embodiments, the kits can further comprise a forward primer specific for a miRNA, and, a universal reverse primer, wherein the universal reverse primer comprises a nucleotide of the loop of the linker probe. In some embodiments, the kits can comprise a plurality of primer pairs, wherein each primer pair is in one reaction vessel of a plurality of reaction vessels. In some embodiments, the kits can comprise a detector probe. In some embodiments, the detector probe comprises a nucleotide of the linker probe stem in the amplification product or a nucleotide of the linker probe stem complement in the amplification product, and the detector probe further comprises a nucleotide of the 3′ end region of the miRNA in the amplification product or a nucleotide of the 3′ end region of the miRNA complement in the amplification product.
The present teachings further contemplate kits comprising a means for hybridizing, a means for extending, a means for amplifying, a means for detecting, or combinations thereof.
While the present teachings have been described in terms of these exemplary embodiments, the skilled artisan will readily understand that numerous variations and modifications of these exemplary embodiments are possible without undue experimentation. All such variations and modifications are within the scope of the current teachings. Aspects of the present teachings may be further understood in light of the following examples, which should not be construed as limiting the scope of the teachings in any way.
A single-plex reaction was performed in replicate for a collection of mouse miRNAs, and the effect of the presence or absence of ligase, as well as the presence or absence of reverse transcriptase, determined. The results are shown in Table 1 as Ct values.
First, a 6 ul reaction was set up comprising: 1 ul Reverse Transcription Enzyme Mix (Applied Biosystems part number 4340444) (or 1 ul dH2O), 0.5 ul T4 DNA Ligase (400 units/ul, NEB) (or 0.5 ul dH20), 0.25 ul 2M KCl, 0.05 ul dNTPs (25 mM each), 0.25 ul T4 Kinase (10 units/ul, NEB), 1 ul 10×T4 DNA ligase buffer (NEB), 0.25 ul Applied Biosystems RNase Inhibitor (10 units/ul), and 2.2 ul dH20 Next, 2 ul of the linker probe (0.25 uM) and RNA samples (2 ul of 0.25 ug/ul mouse lung total RNA (Ambion, product number 7818) were added. Next, the reaction was mixed, spun briefly, and placed on ice for 5 minutes.
The reaction was then incubated at 16 C for 30 minutes, 42 C for 30 minutes, followed by 85 C for 5 minutes, and then held at 4 C. The reactions were diluted 4 times by adding 30 ul of dH20 prior to the PCR amplification.
A 10 ul PCR amplification was then set up comprising: 2 ul of diluted reverse transcription reaction product, 1.3 ul 10 uM miRNA specific Forward Primer, 0.7 ul 10 uM Universal Reverse Primer, 0.2 ul TaqMan detector probe, 0.2 ul dNTPs (25 mM each), 0.6 ul dH20, 5 ul 2× TaqMan master mix (Applied Biosystems, without UNG). The reaction was started with a 95 C step for 10 minutes. Then, 40 cycles were performed, each cycle comprising 95 C for 15 seconds, and 60 C for 1 minute. Table 1 indicates the results of this experiment.
Sequences of corresponding forward primers, reverse primer, and TaqMan probes are shown in Table 2.
A multiplex (12-plex) assay was performed and the results compared to a corresponding collection of single-plex reactions. Additionally, the effect of the presence or absence of ligase, as well as the presence or absence of reverse transcriptase, was determined. The experiments were performed essentially the same as in Example 1, and the concentration of each linker in the 12-plex reaction was 0.05 uM, thereby resulting in a total linker probe concentration of 0.6 uM. Further, the diluted 12-plex reverse transcription product was split into 12 different PCR amplification reactions, wherein a miRNA forward primer and a universal reverse primer and a detector probe where in each amplification reaction. The miRNA sequences, Forward primers, and TaqMan detector probes are included in Table 2. The results are shown in Table 3.
An experiment was performed to determine the effect of buffer conditions on reaction performance. In one set of experiments, a commercially available reverse transcription buffer from Applied Biosystems (part number 43400550) was employed in the hybridization and extension reaction. In a corresponding set of experiments, a commercially available T4 DNA ligase buffer (NEB) was employed in the hybridization and extension reaction. The experiments were performed as single-plex format essentially as described for Example 1, and each miRNA was done in triplicate. The results are shown in Table 4, comparing RT buffer (AB part #4340550) vs T4 DNA ligase buffer.
An experiment was performed to examine the effect of ligase and kinase in a real-time miRNA amplification reaction. Here, twelve single-plex reactions were performed in duplicate, essentially as described in Example 1. Results are shown in Table 5.
An experiment was performed to determine the effect of sample material on Ct values in a real-time miRNA amplification reaction. Here, cells, GuHCl lysate, Tris lysate, and Purified RNA were compared. The cells were NIH3T3 cells. The Purified RNA was collected using the commercially available mirVana mRNA isolation kit for Ambion (catalog number 1560). A Tris lysate, and a Guanidine lysate (GuHCl) (commercially available from Applied Biosystems), were prepared as follows:
For the Tris lysate, a 1× lysis buffer comprised 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.02% Sodium Azide, and 0.03% Tween-20. Trypsinized cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes. The growth media was removed by aspiration, being careful that the cell pellet was not disturbed. PBS was added to bring the cells to 2×103 cells/ul. Next 10 ul of cell suspension was mixed with 10 ul of a 2× lysis buffer and spun briefly. The tubes were then immediately incubated for 5 minutes at 95 C, and then immediately placed in a chilled block on ice for 2 minutes. The tubes were then mixed well and spun briefly at full speed before use (or optionally, stored at −20 C).
For the GuHCl lysate, a 1× lysis buffer comprised 2.5M GuHCl, 150 mM MES pH 6.0, 200 mM NaCl, 0.75% Tween-20. Trypsinized cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes. The growth media was removed by aspiration, being careful that the cell pellet was not disturbed. The cell pellet was then re-suspended in 1×PBS, Ca++ and Mg++free to bring cells to 2×104 cells/uL. Then, 1 volume of 2× lysis buffer was added. To ensure complete nucleic acid release, this was followed by pipetting up and down ten times, followed by a brief spin. Results are shown in Table 6.
Similar results were obtained for a variety of cell lines, including. NIH/3T3, OP9, A549, and HepG2 cells.
An experiment was performed to demonstrate the ability of the reaction to selectively quantity mature miRNA in the presence of precursor miRNA. Here, let-7a miRNA and mir-26b miRNA were queried in both mature form as well as in their precursor form. Experiments were performed essentially as described for Example 1 in the no ligase condition, done in triplicate, with varying amounts of target material as indicated. Results are shown in Table 7. The sequences examined were as follows:
An experiment was performed on synthetic let-7a miRNA to assess the number of 3′ nucleotides in the 3′ target specific portion of the linker probe that correspond with the 3′ end region of the miRNA. The experiment was performed as essentially as described supra for Example 1 for the no ligase condition, and results are shown in Table 8 as means and standard deviations of Ct values.
In some embodiments, 3′ target specific portions of linker probes preferably comprise 5 nucleotides that correspond to the 3′ end region of miRNAs. For example, miR-26a and miR-26b differ by only 2 bases, one of which is the 3′ end nucleotide of miR-26a. Linker probes comprising 5 nucleotides at their 3′ target specific portions can be employed to selectively detect miR-26a versus miR-26b.
Additional strategies for using the linker probes of the present teachings in the context of single step assays, as well as in the context of short primer compositions, can be found in filed U.S. Provisional Application “Compositions, Methods, and Kits for Identifying and Quantitating Small RNA Molecules” by Lao and Straus, as well as in Elfaitouri et al., J. Clin. Virol. 2004, 30(2): 150-156.
The present teachings further contemplate linker probe compositions comprising 3′ target specific portions corresponding to any micro RNA sequence, including but without limitation, those sequences shown in Table 9, including C. elegans (cel), mouse (mmu), human (hsa), drosophila (dme), rat (mo), and rice (osa).
Although the disclosed teachings have been described with reference to various applications, methods, kits, and compositions, it will be appreciated that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the teachings herein. The foregoing examples are provided to better illustrate the disclosed teachings and are not intended to limit the scope of the teachings herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/575,661, filed May 28, 2004, for “Methods, Compositions, and Kits for Quantifying Target Polynucleotides” by Chen and Zhou.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4800159 | Mullis et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5210015 | Gelfand et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5262311 | Pardee et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5538848 | Livak et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5874260 | Cleuziat et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876927 | Lebo et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5876930 | Livak et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5882864 | An et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5952202 | Aoyagi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6027923 | Wallace | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030787 | Livak et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030788 | Gerhold | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6037130 | Tyagi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040166 | Erlich et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6090557 | Weiss | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6114152 | Serafini et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117635 | Nazarenko et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6197563 | Erlich et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6258569 | Livak et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270967 | Whitcombe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6297016 | Egholm et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6358679 | Heid et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6403319 | Lizardi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406891 | Legerski | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6498025 | Miller | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6548250 | Sorge | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6582936 | Serafini et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6605451 | Marmaro et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6692915 | Nallur | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6764821 | Rabbani et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6777180 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6821727 | Livak et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6884583 | Livak et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7041480 | Abarzúa | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7575863 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7601495 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7642055 | Finn et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 20030050444 | Haydock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030186288 | Spivack et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030235854 | Chan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014058 | Alsobrook et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040014129 | Brown | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040175732 | Rana | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203061 | Barany et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040214196 | Aydin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050059049 | Moen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074788 | Dahlberg et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255487 | Khvorova et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260640 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266418 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272071 | Lao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272075 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060035215 | Sorge et al. | Feb 2006 | A9 |
| 20060035217 | Livak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057595 | Lao et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063163 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078924 | Finn et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194225 | Spier | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015176 | Lao et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048757 | Lao et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070111226 | Tan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070178459 | Millar et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20090087858 | Finn et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20100112573 | Chen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203545 | Finn et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1138764 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1791982 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| WO-9835058 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO-9907896 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO-0079009 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO-0194634 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO-02061143 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02090561 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-03102232 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004022784 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004057017 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005094532 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006034387 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/142,720, filed May 31, 2005. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/711,480, filed Aug. 24, 22005. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/947,460, filed Sep. 21, 2004. |
| File History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, filed Sep. 21, 2005. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/944,153, filed Sep. 16, 2004. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/750,302, filed Dec. 13, 2005. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Feb. 21, 2006 issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/33943. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2006/33642 mailed Sep. 5, 2007. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/32805 mailed Mar. 29, 2007. |
| Partial International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/32805 mailed Oct. 26, 2006. |
| International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/021172 mailed on Aug. 9, 2007. |
| Supplemental European Search Report for European Application No. 06850497.6 mailed Dec. 22, 2008. |
| Supplemental European Search Report for European Application No. 06802531.1 mailed Dec. 17, 2008. |
| 05810351.6, Office Action mailed Apr. 22, 2009. |
| 05810351.6, Office Action mailed Jul. 24, 2007. |
| 05810351.6, Response to Aug. 22, 2009 Office Action, filed Aug. 20, 2009. |
| 05810351.6, Response to Jul. 24, 2007 Office Action, filed Dec. 17, 2007. |
| 06850497.6, Response to Office Action, filed Aug. 24, 2009. |
| 06850497.6, Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2010. |
| 06802531.1, Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2010. |
| 06802531.1, Response to Jun. 29, 2010 Office Action, filed Nov. 8, 2010. |
| 06802531.1, Response to Apr. 15, 2009 Office Action, filed Aug. 24, 2009. |
| 090160607, Extended European search report mailed on Apr. 8, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/944,153, Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 3, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Office Action mailed Jan. 8, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Response to Jan. 8, 2009 Office Action, filed Jun. 5, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Response to Mar. 6, 2008 Office Action, filed Aug. 6, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Response to Jun. 14, 2007 Office Action, filed Dec. 7, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,475, Response to Nov. 12, 2008 Office Action, filed Dec. 8, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,125, Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,125, Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,125, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,460, Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,460, Office Action mailed Oct. 14, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,460, Response to Mar. 3, 2009 Office Action, filed Jul. 6, 2009. |
| 2007-532434, Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010. |
| 2007-532661, Japanese Office Action Mailed Dec. 2, 2010. |
| 2007-532661, Japanese Office action mailed Apr. 9, 2010. |
| Allawi, Hatim T. “Quantitation of MicroRNAs Using a Modified Invader Assay”, RNA, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY, vol. 10 (7) Jul. 2004 , 1153-1161. |
| Brennecke, Julius “Towards a Complete Description of the microRNA Complement of Animal Genomes”, Genome Biology vol. 4(9): Article 228 2003, 228.1-228.3. |
| Chen, “Real-time PCR: Advancing RNA Interference and MicroRNA Studies”, Pharmaceutical Discovery Online May 1, 2005, 5 pages. |
| Chen, C. “Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR”, Nucleic Acids Research. Oxford University Press. Surrey. GB, vol. 33. No. 20, XP002420559, ISSN: 0305-1048 Jan. 1, 2005, 1-9. |
| Eggerding, F. A. “A One-Step Coupled Amplification and Oligonucleotide Ligation Procedure for Multiplex Genetic Typing”, PCR Methods &Applications,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, US, vol. 4, No. 6, XP000522968, ISSN: 1054-9803 Jun. 1, 1995, 337-345. |
| Eldering, E. “Expression profiling via novel multiplex assay allows rapid assessment of gene regulation in defined signalling pathways”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, No. 23, XP002506295; ISSN: 1362-4962 Dec. 1, 2003, p. e153. |
| Grad, Y. “Computational and Experimental Identification of C. elegans MicroRNAs”, Molecular Cell, Cell Press, Cambridge, MA, vol. 11 (5) May 2003, 1253-1263. |
| Guegler, “Quantitation of Plant miRNAs by RT-PCR” published online in 2004, Publication from Applied Biosystems website, URL: http://docs.appliedbiosystems.com,retrieved on Feb. 2, 2006, 1 page. |
| Heid, Christian A. “Real Time Quantitative PCR”, Genome Research, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY, vol. 6 (10) Oct. 1996, 986- 994. |
| Lane, Michael “The Thermodynamic Advantage of DNA oligonucleotide ‘stacking hybridization’ reactions: Energetics of a DNA Nick”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25(1): 611-616, 1997. |
| Lao, K. “Multiplexing RT-PCR for the detection of multiple miRNA species in small samples”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 343 (1), Feb. 2006, 85-89. |
| Liang, Der-Cherng et al. “Multiplex RT-PCR assay for the detection of major fusion transcripts in Taiwanese children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia”,Medical and Pediatric Oncology vol. 39, No. 1, XP002506296; ISSN: 0098-1532 Jul. 2002, 12-17. |
| Schmittgen, T. D. “A high-throughput method to monitor the expression of microRNA precursors”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32 (4) Feb. 25, 2004, 1-10. |
| Strategene Catalog 1988, “Stragagene Cloning Systems: Tools and Technology for Life Sciences”, Gene Characterization Kits, 1988, 39. |
| Tse, W. T. “Reverse Transcription and Direct Amplification of Cellular RNA Transcripts by TAQ Polymerase”, Gene. Elsevier, Amsterdam. NL, XP000226751 vol. 88, No. 2, ISSN: 0378-1119 Apr. 16, 1990, 293-296. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100112573 A1 | May 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60575661 | May 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10947460 | Sep 2004 | US |
| Child | 12543466 | US |
