In certain embodiments, a method is disclosed for establishing a fly height parameter for a hard disc drive. The method includes receiving a set of testing data associated with the hard disc drive and subjecting the hard disc drive to a fly-height test at a first, nominal temperature to generate fly-height data. Based on the set of testing data and the fly-height data, the method includes predicting the hard disc drive's fly-height data for a fly-height test at a second temperature different from the first, nominal temperature. The method further includes establishing the fly-height parameter for the hard disc drive in response to the fly-height data and the predicted fly-height data.
In certain embodiments, a method is disclosed for establishing a fly height parameter for a hard disc drive. The method includes receiving a set of testing data associated with the hard disc drive and receiving fly-height data associated with the hard disc drive and generated from a fly-height test performed at a first, nominal temperature. Based on the set of testing data and the fly-height data, the method includes predicting the hard disc drive's fly-height data for a fly-height test at a second temperature different from the first, nominal temperature. The method further includes establishing a curve of the predicted fly-height data and generating modified predicted fly-height data by deleting predicted fly-height data that are outliers with the established curve. The method includes establishing the fly-height parameter for the hard disc drive in response to the fly-height data and the modified predicted fly-height data.
In certain embodiments, a system is disclosed for establishing a fly height parameter for a hard disc drive. The system includes a computing device comprising a trained artificial neural network, a processor, and a memory. The computing device is configured to: receive a set of testing data associated with the hard disc drive, receive fly-height data associated with the hard disc drive and generated from a fly-height test performed at a first, nominal temperature, compute fly-height data for a fly-height test at a second temperature using the trained artificial neural network, the received set of testing data, and the received fly-height data, and compute a plurality of fly-height parameters for the hard disc drive based on at least the received fly-height data and the computed fly-height data.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the disclosure to the particular embodiments described but instead is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope the appended claims.
Certain embodiments of the present disclosure relate to establishing fly-height parameters for hard disc drives.
In operation, the read/write head 116 “flies” over the magnetic recording discs 106 as shown in
As noted above, head-to-media spacing is affected as hard disc drives 100 operate across a range of environments such as different temperature ranges. To compensate for different temperature ranges, the hard disc drives 100 are subjected to a series of tests during manufacture that determine how each hard disc drive's head-to-media spacing changes with changes in temperature. These tests may involve placing hard disc drives 100 into ovens (or some other temperature-controlled environment) and gathering data while causing read/write heads 116 to protrude and contact the magnetic recording discs 106. The head-to-media contact is performed at different temperatures, and the resulting data is used to establish fly-height parameters that describe how the hard disc drive's head-to-media spacing changes with temperature. One example of a fly-height parameter is called a thermal clearance slope (TCS), which is a function—usually linear—that describes how the hard disc drive's head-to-media spacing changes with temperature. The TCS is used in the hard disc drives 100 to change the fly height of the read/write heads 116 in response to detected changes in temperature to ensure that the read/write heads 116 are consistently spaced from the magnetic recording discs 106 in different operating environments. For example, the TCS determined during manufacture may be stored in a hard disc drive's memory (e.g., in firmware) and used during operation of the hard disc drive. In certain embodiments, a different TCS is used during data-reading operations and during data-writing operations.
Certain embodiments of the present disclosure relate to establishing fly-height parameters with fewer steps and/or at a single, nominal temperature (e.g., +/−5 degrees Celsius, +/−2 degrees Celsius, +/−1 degree Celsius). As will be described in more details below, many of the approaches disclosed herein are able to save time by removing certain steps from the process discussed above, and may increase reliability of hard disc drives by removing steps involving contact between the read/write head 116 and the magnetic recording disc 106. For example, in certain embodiments, artificial neural networks are used to replace certain steps typically used to establish fly-height parameters.
During each test in the series of tests, data is collected about the hard disc drive's performance and features. For example, when calibrating servo parameters as part of step 404, the collected data includes information about the data tracks, such as their eccentricity with respect to the magnetic recording disc 106 and/or a position error signal (PES). In another example, when scanning for flaws as part of step 406, the collected data includes information about the number of flaws and/or the location of particular areas of the magnetic recording disc 106 that may be unusable. In another example, when performing fly height tests in step 408, the collected data includes information about how the read/write head 104 responds to differences in heater power at a single, nominal temperature. More specifically, this collected data can include measurements regarding head-to-media spacing taken during read operations, measurements regarding head-to-media spacing taken during write operations, and information about the tracks (e.g., track radius) at which the measurements were taken.
The data described above (or portions thereof) can be used to predict—directly or indirectly—a fly-height parameter (e.g., TCS) without subjecting the hard disc drive to tests at a second, nominal temperature. As described above, this saves time by removing certain steps and may increase reliability of hard disc drives by removing steps involving contact between the read/write head 116 and the magnetic recording disc 106. In certain embodiments, the fly-height parameter or an input to calculating the fly-height parameter is predicted using one or more computing devices 410 that include an artificial neural network 412.
Generally speaking, artificial neural networks are computational models based on structures and functions of biological neural networks. Artificial neural networks can be implemented under a variety of approaches, including a multilayer feedforward network approach (as described below) or a recurrent neural network approach, among others. One artificial neural network approach involves identifying various inputs and target outputs for training an artificial neural network. For example, a set of “training data”—with known inputs and known outputs—is used to train the artificial neural network. The training data can be data samples for multiple types or categories of data and corresponding known target results for each data sample. The known inputs and outputs are fed into the artificial neural network, which processes that data to train itself to resolve/compute results for additional sets of data, this time with new inputs and unknown results. As a result, the artificial neural network can predict target outputs from a set of inputs. In this manner, a trained artificial neural network can use inputs that, individually, may not be direct parameters for particular tests or testing schemes and that may include different classes of parameters/data, to produce desired target outputs for those tests or testing schemes.
A visualization of an artificial neural network 500 is shown in
An adaptive weight is associated with each connection 504 between the nodes 502. The adaptive weight, in some embodiments, is a coefficient applied to a value of the source node (e.g., 502A) to produce an input to the target node 506. The value of the target node is, therefore, a function of the source node inputs 502A, 502B, etc., multiplied by their respective weighting factors. For example, a target node 506 may be some function involving a first node 502A multiplied by a first weighting factor, a second node 502B multiplied by a second weighting factor, and so on.
Next, error 604 is computed for hidden nodes 508. Based on the computed errors, weighting factors from the connections 504 are adjusted between the hidden nodes 508 and target nodes 506. Weighting factors are then adjusted between the input nodes 502 and the hidden nodes 508. To continue to update the weighting factors (and therefore train the artificial neural network 500), the process restarts where activations are propagated from the input nodes 502 to hidden layer nodes 506 for each input node 502. The artificial neural network 500 is “trained” once little to no error is computed, with weighting factors relatively settled. Essentially, the trained artificial neural network 500 learns what nodes (and therefore, inputs) should be given more weight when computing the target output.
In certain embodiments, the target output is a determination of one or more fly-height parameters or inputs used to calculate fly-height parameters. For example, the target output could be data predictive of head-to-media spacing during read operations at a second temperature, data predictive of head-to-media spacing during write operations at the second temperature, and/or associated information about the tracks (e.g., track radius) and the read and write head-to-media spacing.
As referred to above,
As mentioned above and described below, in certain embodiments, the artificial neural network 412 is trained to compute a target output based on the inputted datasets (step 706). For example, the predicted target output may include data predictive of head-to-media spacing during read operations at a second temperature, data predictive of head-to-media spacing during write operations at the second temperature, and associated information about the tracks (e.g., track radius) and/or the read and write head-to-media spacing at the second temperature. Although only one artificial neural network is described above, the computing device 410 can include multiple artificial neural networks and compute multiple predicted performance metrics.
Once the target output is computed, the computing device 410 can compute a fly-height parameter (step 708). For example, the computing device 410 may use the target output as input to calculating a TCS on a head-by-head and zone-by-zone basis. In addition to the target output, the computing device 410 may use fly-height data (e.g., head-to-media spacing) generated from fly-height tests performed at the first temperature as input to calculating a TCS on a head-by-head and zone-by-zone basis. In certain embodiments, the computing device 410 calculates a separate TCS to be used during read operations versus write operations. In such embodiments, the artificial neural network 412 may use different inputs to compute the “read” target output compared to the “write” target output. For example, the “write” target output may be based on certain writer-specific test data (e.g., write errors detected during tests and associated information) compared to data for the “read” target output. As described above, the target output essentially replaces the fly-height tests typically performed at a second temperature—thus reducing overall manufacturing time and increasing reliability of the manufactured hard disc drives. The calculated TCS values can be stored in a hard disc drive's memory for use during operation such that the hard disc drive stays within a preferred range of head-to-media spacings at different operating temperatures.
In certain embodiments, the method 700 also includes one or more steps involving rejecting and/or replacing outlier target outputs (step 710).
As described above, the artificial neural network 412 is trained before being used to compute the target output. The process 900 of training the artificial neural networks is outlined in
In certain embodiments, the training batch of hard disc drives is a small percentage of the overall number of hard disc drives manufactured, such that only a small percentage of hard disc drives are used to train the artificial neural networks. The first batch of hard disc drives subjected to the fly-height tests at the second temperature should be representative of the second batch hard disc drives that will not be subjected to such tests. In certain embodiments, data from the training batch of hard disc drives are used to fly-height data at a second temperature of an entire hard disc drive product line. In certain embodiments, the artificial neural networks are retrained when certain manufacturing processes are changed, as those changes may affect how representative the original training data is for hard disc drives manufactured under a different process.
The number of “training” hard disc drives used can vary. In certain embodiments, ten percent or less of a model or batch of hard disc drives are subjected to fly-height tests at the second temperature train the artificial neural networks, while the remaining ninety percent or more of the model or batch of hard disc drives are “tested” through the trained artificial neural networks. Of course, other percentages (e.g., 20%, 30%, 40%) of models or batches of hard disc drives can be used to train the artificial neural networks. Using a greater number of hard disc drives to train the artificial neural networks may improve reliability of the trained artificial neural network but decrease the test time savings.
Various modifications and additions can be made to the embodiments disclosed without departing from the scope of this disclosure. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this disclosure also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the described features. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is intended to include all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as falling within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6574754 | Smith | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6930844 | Yeh et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7269525 | Gough et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7468856 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7679857 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7773336 | Che et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7948704 | Ellis | May 2011 | B2 |
7961420 | Park | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8169734 | Tsunoda et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8316263 | Gough et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8521670 | Paguio | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9177599 | Camilig et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
10073123 | Miao | Sep 2018 | B1 |
20050046985 | Morinaga | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050185312 | Ueda | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060158769 | Ono | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070030593 | Hiroyuki | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070188907 | Satoh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070268615 | McFadyen | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080043363 | Yamashita | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090141390 | Oyamada et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153996 | Ellis | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090268335 | Huang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100002328 | Sato | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033860 | Tomita | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100208387 | Ehrlich | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110141607 | Ramamoorthy | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110211276 | Tsunoda et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249361 | Mathew | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120056612 | Mathew et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120229928 | Sakai | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130250446 | Zeng et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |