Methods for analyzing DNA

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10724082
  • Patent Number
    10,724,082
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 8, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 28, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The invention generally relates to methods for increasing the amount of DNA available for analysis when using partitioned samples and parallel processing. For example, double-stranded DNA can be dissociated into two single-stranded components, and the single strands partitioned into different droplets prior to analysis. The disclosed methods are useful for performing digital PCR analysis on samples where the target DNA is not in abundance, for example when the sample originates from a body fluid or an FFPE sample.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to methods for analyzing DNA in samples, in particular samples having small amounts of detectable DNA, such as fine needle aspirates, blood plasma, forensic samples, or FFPE samples.


BACKGROUND

Several breakthrough medical assays depend on an ability to quantify amounts of DNA in a sample. For example, copy number variation assays can be used to type cancers. For a patient identified as having lung cancer, a copy number variation assay can determine whether the patient has non-small-cell cancer by measuring the number of extra copies of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genes present is a sample from a patient. Based up the copy number variation results, a prognosis can be made quicker and suitable treatment can be started. Other medical assays, such as gene expression assays, use quantitative DNA detection to assess the progression of a disease. For example, a blood sample may be assayed for absolute amounts of DNA corresponding to biomarkers indicative of a disease, e.g., cystic fibrosis. The quantity of biomarkers from an identified panel can give information about the stage of the disease or whether treatments are improving the disease.


DNA quantification is also useful for evaluating the DNA from a sample prior to performing expensive analytical assays such as sequencing. For example, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens, which have been stored at room temperature for years can provide a wealth of genetic material for various molecular biology studies, such as expression profiling and sequence analysis. However, the DNA in some FFPE tissue samples degrades extensively during the storage, while the DNA in other samples is mostly intact. The amount of degradation can severely diminish the value of sequencing results. The ability to know prior to sequencing (or PCR) how much valuable DNA is present avoids wasting resources on samples without recoverable DNA. Pre-sequencing evaluation of the quantity of DNA present is also helpful in forensic science, where a blood stain, etc., may not have valuable DNA present.


Improved methods for quantifying DNA are available. In particular, real-time PCR has greatly improved the analysis of DNA from both throughput and quantitative perspectives. While traditional PCR typically relies on end-point, and sometimes semi-quantitative, analysis of amplified DNA targets via agarose gel electrophoresis, real-time PCR (or qPCR) is geared toward accurately quantifying exponential amplification as the PCR reaction progresses. Typically, qPCR reactions are monitored either using a variety of highly sequence-specific fluorescent probe technologies, or by using non-specific DNA intercalating fluorogenic dyes.


Stochastic sampling of PCR results in counting errors, especially when the starting material has little DNA, or when the sample containing the DNA targeted for counting also has large amounts of background DNA. Stochastic errors arise when random fluctuations are amplified, as is the case when a DNA sample is amplified during or before counting. In some instances, a target DNA will be missed in the first round of amplification leading to a final DNA count smaller than it should be. In other instances, a non-target DNA will be mistakenly amplified in the first round (or subsequent rounds) of amplification leading to a final DNA count higher than it should be. Thus, the resulting biased post-amplification DNA count does not represent the true condition of the sample from which it was obtained. Such errors have real consequences when the counting assay is relied upon for directing treatment for a disease.


Digital PCR (dPCR) is an alternative quantitation method in which dilute samples are divided into many separate reactions. See for example, Brown et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,143,496 and 6,391,559) and Vogelstein et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,440,706, 6,753,147, and 7,824,889), the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Typically, dPCR is conducted in a “terminal dilution” regime wherein there are at least two containers for each target molecule, however in practice there are typically more than two containers for each target molecule. At terminal dilution, the vast majority of reactions contain either one or zero target DNA molecules. The principle advantage of digital compared to qPCR is that it avoids any need to interpret the time dependence of fluorescence intensity—an analog signal—while avoiding the uncertainty of non-exponential amplification during early PCR cycles. That is, PCR amplifying a partitioned sample in the terminal dilution regime should be “all or nothing;” either a target DNA was in the partitioned sample or not. Additionally, it is more reliable to assess a “yes/no” answer with respect to a fluorescent event, as opposed to correlating a fluorescence intensity with a number of fluorescent moieties.


Nonetheless, digital PCR methods are still subject to stochastic sampling errors during sample partitioning. That is, some partitioned samples will contain more than one target DNA molecule, skewing counting methods based upon the digital readout. See, Fu et al., “Counting Individual DNA Molecules by the Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels,” PNAS, 108(22), 9026-9031 (2011), incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In the terminal dilution regime, this error is negligible when there is sufficient target DNA to achieve a meaningful number of counts. When there is little target DNA in the original sample, however, the stochastic errors become meaningful, and the resultant DNA counts must be reported with much larger errors. See Fu et al.


SUMMARY

When assaying samples with less than optimum amounts of target DNA, the invention can be used to effectively double the number of target molecules in a sample available for analysis, thereby reducing the errors associated with the small sample size. Such samples may be, for example, blood serum (cell-free DNA samples), fine needle aspirates, or samples recovered from FFPE tissues. However, the method is generally applicable to any DNA sample. The methods generally involve dissociating a target double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) sequence into its component strands, i.e., single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), and then separately partitioning each strand prior to amplification and counting.


Using the methods of the invention, DNA assays that partition DNA from a sample and then analyze the partitioned portions in parallel, e.g., using multi-well plates or droplet processing, will be improved. The invention allows the number of targets per sample to be doubled, while not providing additional DNA. In some instances, the improvement in target number in a sample will allow a sample to be assayed for a disease when that sample would have been rejected using conventional techniques, i.e., partitioning the double-stranded DNA from the sample. For example, using conventional techniques, a DNA assay may be meaningless because the signal (e.g., DNA counts) is similar in size to the random errors present in the assay. However, using the methods of the invention, the DNA count signal can be doubled, making it discernible from the noise, and giving meaning to the assay.


In one instance, the invention is a method for detecting DNA in a sample. The method includes dissociating a double-stranded DNA from a sample into a first strand and a second strand, partitioning the first strand and the second strand into different partitioned portions, and detecting the presence of the first strand or the second strand in a partitioned portion. In some embodiments, the detection is done by performing a PCR reaction in the partitioned portion, thereby changing a fluorescent property of the partitioned portion, for example, because a fluorescent label is incorporated into an amplicon during the PCR reaction. After the PCR reaction is complete, the fluorescent property of the partitioned portion can be analyzed to determine the presence of DNA in the sample. The disclosed methods for detecting DNA in a sample can be used to evaluate the quantity and quality of DNA that is obtained from a biological sample, e.g., a blood sample. The invention allows the DNA to be evaluated for quantity and quality, e.g., number of relevant sequences, prior to amplification and/or sequencing. Thus, using the methods of the invention, it is possible to avoid performing expensive measurements (e.g., sequencing) on a sample that does not contain sufficient DNA.


In another instance, the invention is a method for determining an amount of DNA in a sample. The method includes dissociating a plurality of double-stranded DNAs from a sample into a plurality of first strands and a plurality of second strands, partitioning the plurality of first strands and the plurality of second strands into a plurality of partitioned portions (at least some of the partitioned portions having only a first strand or only a second strand), detecting the presence or absence of a first strand or a second strand in a plurality of partitioned portions, and comparing the presence of a first strand or a second strand in a plurality of partitioned portions to the absence of a first strand or a second strand in a plurality of partitioned portions to determine an amount of DNA present in a sample. In some embodiments, detecting the presence or absence of a first strand or a second strand is done by performing a PCR reaction in at least some of the partitioned portions, thereby changing a fluorescent property in at least some of the partitioned portions, for example, because a fluorescent label is incorporated into an amplicon in at least some of the partitioned portions during the PCR reaction. After the PCR reaction is complete, the fluorescent property of the partitioned portions can be analyzed to determine the presence or absence of DNA in a partitioned portion, thereby allowing the determination of an amount of DNA in the sample.


The disclosed methods can be expanded and used to determine the progression of a disease in a subject. Such a method includes obtaining a biological sample comprising a plurality of double-stranded DNAs from a subject, dissociating the plurality of double-stranded DNAs into a plurality of first strands and a plurality of second strands, partitioning the plurality of first strands and the plurality of second strands into a plurality of partitioned portions, at least some of the partitioned portions having only a first strand or only a second strand, detecting the presence or absence of a targeted sequence in the plurality of partitioned portions, and determining the number of occurrences of the targeted sequence, wherein the number of occurrence of the targeted sequence is indicative of a progression of a disease. Again, detecting the presence or absence of a targeted sequence may be done by performing a PCR reaction in at least some of the partitioned portions, thereby changing a fluorescent property in at least some of the partitioned portions, for example, because a fluorescent label is incorporated into an amplicon in at least some of the partitioned portions during the PCR reaction.


The invention includes various methods for dissociating double-stranded DNA and subsequently partitioning the single strands prior to amplification and reacting with hybridization probes, for example. In one embodiment, the dsDNA is incubated at an elevated temperature, e.g., 90° C. or greater, for a time sufficient to dissociate the two strands. In an embodiment, the ssDNAs are subsequently rapidly cooled to prevent reannealing. In some embodiments, the rapid cooling is done prior to partitioning. In other embodiments, the ssDNAs can be prevented from reannealing by adding a chemical species, e.g., a salt, or by adding single-stranded DNA-binding protein to maintain the ssDNA in solution. In other embodiments, the ssDNAs can be prevented from reannealing by limiting their diffusion by dilution or addition of a chemical reagent.


In one embodiment, the dissociating methods are used to form droplets containing single-stranded DNA. One method involves heating a sample fluid comprising a plurality of double stranded DNAs to at least about 90° C., thereby dissociating the double stranded DNAs into single-stranded DNA and contacting the sample fluid with reagents for conducting amplification and generation of specific fluorescent signals (e.g. PCR primers, probes, polymerase, dNTPs, buffer) prior to introduction into separate compartments (e.g. microfluidic droplets). In another embodiment, the dissociated ssDNA molecules are contacted with a carrier fluid in a microfluidic channel to thereby form droplets containing single-stranded DNA.


In another embodiment, the ssDNA is used to create a first fluid comprising the ssDNA. The first fluid is then partitioned into a large number of reactors. In an embodiment, each reactor is a droplet. In an embodiment, most of the reactors will be populated with only one ssDNA or with no ssDNA. In one embodiment, the first fluid comprises reagents for conducting amplification and generation of specific fluorescent signals (e.g. PCR primers, probes, polymerase, dNTPs, buffers). In another embodiment, the first fluid does not comprise reagents for conducting amplification and generation of specific fluorescent signals, and a second fluid is added (either continuous, or discontinuous as in droplets), containing the reagents for conducting amplification and generation of specific fluorescent signals. Using massive parallel qPCR amplification, the single stranded DNA in each reactor is amplified and allowed to bind to or incorporate probes. Each reactor is then analyzed for the presence of the probe or a change in probe properties. The probe analysis provides information about the number of target DNAs present in the original sample. This information can then be used to evaluate the progression of a disease in a patient, for example.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts a droplet formation device.



FIG. 2 depicts a portion of the droplet formation device of FIG. 1.



FIGS. 3A-3C depict an exemplary microfluidic system for droplet generation and readout. FIG. 3A depicts the droplet generation chip; FIG. 3B depicts the droplet spacing for readout; and FIG. 3C depicts a cartoon of droplet readout by fluorescence.



FIGS. 4A-4C depict the serial dilution of template DNA quantified by dPCR. FIG. 4A shows droplet fluorescence during readout for the most concentrated sample. Each discrete burst of fluorescence corresponded to an individual droplet. Two different groups of droplets were evident: PCR(+) droplets peaking at ˜0.8 V and PCR(−) droplets at ˜0.1 V; FIG. 4B shows a histogram of the peak fluorescence intensities of droplets from the complete data trace in (a). PCR(+) and PCR(−) droplets appeared as two very distinct populations centered at 0.78 and 0.10 V, respectively; FIG. 4C shows the serial dilution of template DNA. Open circles: measured occupancies; solid line: the best fit to Eqn 2 (A=0.15, f=4.8, R2−0.9999).



FIGS. 5A-5E are a series of schematic depicting one-color detection of a genetic sequence with a microfluidic device. FIG. 5A depicts a template DNA that is amplified with a forward primer (F1) and a reverse primer (R1). FIG. 5B depicts droplets containing the target sequence emit fluorescence and are detected by laser. FIG. 5C depicts fluorescence detected by a laser. The number of microcapsules either containing or not containing the target sequence is shown in a histogram (FIG. 5D) and quantified (FIG. 5E).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention provides a method for increasing the number of DNA samples that can be partitioned into separate reactors (e.g., containers or droplets) when using sample partition methods for DNA counting, such as digital PCR, e.g. digital droplet PCR. Using the methods of the invention, the number of DNA samples that are available for counting can be effectively doubled. In the case of a sample that has only small amounts of target DNA, doubling the sample size can dramatically reduce the error rates in the final count. Thus, the disclosed methods are most valuable when performing DNA counting assays (e.g., copy number variation, genetic profiling) on samples with less than optimum levels of target DNA. Such conditions are commonly found when assaying samples obtained with less-invasive techniques, such as blood, aspirates, urine, or sputum. Low target DNA levels are also common in FFPE samples and forensic samples, which may have been improperly collected or stored for long periods of time.


The invention broadly applies to digital nucleic acid detection techniques and, in specific embodiments, digital PCR in droplets. Using such techniques, a DNA sample is typically digested or fragmented, and then partitioned into a number of reactors, each reactor having a single segment of double-stranded DNA. Each dsDNA can then be amplified, labeled, and detected, as required by the goals of the assay. As an improvement to the known techniques, the disclosed methods allow the DNA sample to be partitioned into reactors such that each reactor contains a target molecule, e.g., a single-stranded DNA target. As a result of this improvement, it is possible to double the amount of PCR positive droplets (i.e., double the amplicon yield) without the need for more DNA. As such, errors due to stochastic sampling of a sample, especially a sample having only a small amount of DNA, are reduced.


The invention includes various methods that can be used for dissociating double-stranded DNA and subsequently stabilizing the single strands for partitioning and reacting with hybridization probes, for example. In one embodiment, the dsDNA is incubated at an elevated temperature, e.g., 90° C. or greater, for a time to dissociate the two strands. In an embodiment, the ssDNAs are subsequently rapidly cooled to prevent reannealing prior to partitioning. In other embodiments, the ssDNAs can be prevented from reannealing by adding a chemical species, e.g., a salt, or by adding single-stranded DNA-binding protein to maintain the ssDNA in solution. In other embodiments, the ssDNAs can be prevented from reannealing by limiting their diffusion by dilution or addition of a chemical reagent.


In one embodiment, a first fluid comprising the ssDNA is contacted with a second fluid containing reagents for conducting amplification and generation of specific fluorescent signals (e.g. PCR primers, probes, polymerase, dNTPs, buffer) prior to introduction into separate compartments (e.g. microfluidic droplets). Typically, most of the reactors will be populated with only one ssDNA or with no ssDNA.


In another embodiment the dissociated ssDNA molecules are first partitioned into a large number of reactors, e.g., droplets. To the reactors, e.g., droplets, a second fluid is added (either continuous, or discontinuous as in droplets). The second fluid contains one or more primer pairs, and one or more probes specific for the target DNA. The second fluid may also contain reagents for conducting a PCR reaction, such as a polymerase and dNTPs. Using massive parallel qPCR amplification, the single stranded DNA in each reactor is amplified and allowed to bind to or incorporate probes. Each reactor is then analyzed for the presence of the probe or a change in probe properties. The probe analysis provides information about the number of target DNAs present in the original sample. This information can then be used to evaluate the progression of a disease in a patient, for example.


The second fluid includes probes, which typically include a detectable label. The second fluid may have multiple labels, for example multiple copies of the same detectable label, or different detectable labels. The detectable labels may be fluorescent labels, or the labels may be moieties that will bind to fluorescent labels. The labels may also be sequences that are unique and identifiable with sequencing. The plurality of probes can include one or more groups of probes at varying concentrations. The one or more groups of probes can include the same detectable label which varies in intensity upon detection, due to the varying probe concentrations.


The first and second fluids can each be in droplet form. Any technique known in the art for forming droplets may be used with methods of the invention. An exemplary method involves flowing a stream of the sample fluid containing the ssDNAs such that it intersects two opposing streams of flowing carrier fluid. The carrier fluid is immiscible with the sample fluid. Intersection of the sample fluid with the two opposing streams of flowing carrier fluid results in partitioning of the sample fluid into individual sample droplets containing the first fluid. An exemplary sample fluid is an aqueous fluid and an exemplary carrier fluid is oil. In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid includes a surfactant, such as a fluorosurfactant. The same method may be applied to create individual droplets from the second fluid containing the primer pairs (and, in some implementations, the amplification reagents). Either the droplets containing the first fluid, the droplets containing the second fluid, or both, may be formed and then stored in a library for later merging, aspects of certain implementations of which are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/504,764, hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Once formed, droplets containing the first and second fluids can be merged to form single droplets containing a single ssDNA template and heterogeneous mixture of primer pairs and probes. Merging can be accomplished, for example, in the presence of an electric field. Moreover, it is not required that both fluids be in the form of droplets when merging takes places. One exemplary method for merging of fluid portions with droplets is taught, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/729,462, hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In an embodiment, the ssDNA is amplified in the droplets. Any method known in the art may be used to amplify the target nucleic acids either linearly or exponentially. A preferred method is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For purposes of the invention, other amplification techniques commonly known in the art, such as rolling circle amplification, isothermal amplification, or any combination of amplification methods using loci specific primers, nested-primers, or random primers (such primers, and/or primers used for PCR, are included in the term “amplification reagents”), may be used. In one embodiment, the ssDNA template in each of the merged/formed droplets is amplified by thermocycling the droplets under temperatures/conditions sufficient to conduct a PCR reaction.


The resulting amplicons in the droplets can then be analyzed. For example, the presence or absence of the ssDNA in one or more droplets can be detected optically, e.g., by the detectable label on the plurality of probes. In another embodiment, the amplicons may be sequenced.


In certain embodiments, analyzing the droplets involves determining a number of droplets that contain a target ssDNA and a number of droplets that contain no ssDNA. In these embodiments, the mere presence of the target ssDNA is indicative of a disease. For example, the ssDNA may be pathogenic ssDNA, e.g., originating from a bacterium. Determining an amount of ssDNA present in the sample will provide information about the severity of the pathogenic infection. The presence of specific ssDNA may also be indicative of a stage of disease, e.g., pathogenic infection.


In another embodiment, analysis will involve determining a number of a first ssDNA and a number of a second ssDNA. In these embodiments the relative amount of first ssDNA is indicative of the presence of, or the progression of, a disease. The number of second ssDNAs may be used to normalize the measured level of first ssDNA. The second ssDNA may be a sequence that is highly conserved in the species from which the sample was obtained, and the amount of the second ssDNA may be unlikely to vary substantially between subjects of the species. In other embodiments, a plurality of ssDNAs may be analyzed and normalized in order to measure an expression level of a gene profile.


Generally, the presence of a greater number of target ssDNAs than expected is indicative of a disease, such as cancer. In other embodiments, e.g., in which a disease is associated with the downregulation of a gene, the absence of an expected number of target ssDNAs is indicative of a disease, such as cancer. The methods may also be used to determine the severity of a disease, or a response to drug therapy.


In another embodiment, the methods can be used for detecting a recurrence of a cancer in a patient. Those methods may involve forming sample droplets containing a single target ssDNA derived from a patient sample, flowing the sample droplets through a channel, amplifying the ssDNA in the droplets, detecting the amplified target in the droplets, and analyzing the droplets to determine the presence of an amount of target ssDNA. In certain embodiments, the analyzing step includes capturing amplicons obtained from the droplets using labeled capture probes. The sample may be a human tissue or body fluid. Exemplary body fluids are pus, sputum, semen, urine, blood, saliva, stool, and cerebrospinal fluid. In other aspects of the invention generally provide a method for forensic identification of low levels of target nucleic acid in an environment having multiple other sources of nucleic acid, e.g., DNA. Such methods may also be practiced using fluids compartmentalized in containers other than or in addition to droplets.


Methods in accordance with the invention also encompass the use of a primer. The methods include providing a fluid comprising the sample ssDNA and a primer, wherein the primer has at least one unique related probe and is selected to be complementary to a targeted sequence. The method also includes partitioning the fluid into a plurality of partitions, wherein at least a first portion of the partitions comprise one molecule of ssDNA having sequence(s) complementary to the primer, and at least one related probe, and a second portion of the partitions comprising no molecules of ssDNA having sequence(s) complementary to the primer. The method further includes conducting a PCR reaction in the partitioned portions, thereby changing a fluorescent property of the first portion of the partitions, detecting the fluorescent property of each partition, and determining the number of occurrences in the sample nucleic acid of one or targeted sequences based on the detecting step. In some aspects of the invention, the method further includes comparing a first number of occurrences of a first targeted sequence to a second number of occurrences of a second targeted sequence.


Additional embodiments of the invention contemplate the use of a primer as well as rely on something other than a probe for detecting the amplified sequence. In certain embodiments, the method comprises dissociating dsDNA in a sample and partitioning the sample comprising ssDNA into a plurality of partitioned portions, wherein each portion comprises, on average a single ssDNA molecule. The method further includes introducing at least two primers, in which each primer is specific for a first or a second location on the ssDNA, the first and second locations being spaced apart from each other. The method further includes amplifying the nucleic acid in the partitioned portions, detecting the amplicons in the partitioned portions, and determining a nucleic acid make-up of the sample based on the results of the detecting step.


Methods in accordance with the invention also encompass the analysis of cell-free DNA in a biological sample. Collecting and assaying cell-free DNA provides advantages over analysis of cellular DNA in that anomalies, e.g., mutations, are easier to identify in the absence of massive quantities of normal DNA. For example, circulating cell-free tumor DNA has been detected in the serum, plasma, and blood of cancer patients. Cell-free DNA is versatile in that it can be analyzed to detect the presence of mutations, or epigenetic markers of a disease. Cell-free DNA can also be used to identify the presence of foreign pathogens, e.g., a bacterial infection. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be blood, saliva, sputum, urine, semen, transvaginal fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, sweat, breast milk, breast fluid (e.g., breast nipple aspirate), stool, a cell or a tissue biopsy.


In some instances cell-free DNA is greatly degraded, for example, because the DNA was partially digested by normal metabolic processes in the body. The invention allows the cell-free DNA to be evaluated for quality, e.g., continuity, prior to amplification and sequencing. Thus, a cell-free DNA sample can be partitioned into samples comprising ssDNA of different lengths, primers can be introduced along with appropriate probes, the ssDNA amplified, and the make-up, e.g., the continuity of the cell-free DNA sample can be determined.


dsDNA Dissociation and ssDNA Stabilization


A number of methods may be used to dissociate dsDNA into its component single strands. Typically, the goal of the dissociation process is to disrupt the hydrogen bonds between the paired complimentary bases on each of the strands, thereby allowing the two strands to separate. For example, an aqueous solution comprising dsDNA may be dissociated by heating the solution. Typically, it is necessary to heat the aqueous solution comprising dsDNA to at least about 75° C., e.g., at least about 80° C., e.g., at least about 85° C., e.g., at least about 90° C., e.g., at least about 95° C., to dissociate the two strands. Typically, an aqueous solution comprising dsDNA is maintained at an elevated temperature for at least 10 seconds or longer, e.g., at least 20 seconds or longer, e.g., at least 30 seconds or longer, e.g., at least 1 minute or longer, e.g., at least 5 minutes or longer, in order to achieve 90% or greater dissociation of the dsDNA. In other embodiments, the hydrogen bonding between the complimentary base pairs can be disrupted by changing the ionic strength of the solution, for example, by adding acids, bases, or salts to the aqueous solution comprising dsDNA. In another embodiment enzymes, such as helicases, can be used to dissociate the dsDNA into the ssDNA components.


In one embodiment, the ssDNAs are partitioned into a plurality of reactors, e.g., for digital PCR, while the conditions of the solution are more favorable to ssDNA than dsDNA. For example, a solution containing dsDNA may be raised to 90° C. or greater, allowing the dsDNA to dissociate into ssDNA, and then the solution containing ssDNA partitioned into a plurality of reactors, e.g., droplets. In an embodiment, the ssDNA can be partitioned such that each reactor contains only one, or no, ssDNA.


In other embodiments, the ssDNA may be thermally- or chemically-stabilized prior to partitioning. For example, a solution containing dsDNA may be raised to 90° C. or greater, allowing the dsDNA to dissociate into ssDNA, and then the solution containing ssDNA rapidly (snap) cooled to less than 20° C., e.g., less than 15° C., e.g., less than 10° C. The reduction in temperature is typically achieved very quickly, e.g., in two minutes or less, e.g., in one minute or less, e.g., in 45 seconds or less, e.g., in 30 seconds or less, e.g., in 20 seconds or less. At these lower temperatures, the ssDNAs are unlikely to reanneal, because the dynamic motion of the ssDNAs has been greatly reduced, making it difficult for two ssDNAs to arrange themselves for complimentary annealing. Rapid cooling may be achieved with various techniques, including ice baths, cold fingers, Peltier (thermoelectric) cooling, or liquid nitrogen. The solution containing ssDNA can then be partitioned at this lower temperature.


After partitioning, the reactors are typically returned to a condition that is favorable for the formation of dsDNA. For example, the reactors may be heated (or cooled) to 37° C. Returning the ssDNA to normal physiologic conditions will be necessary when PCR amplification in used in subsequent assay steps. That is, during the PCR process, an environment conducive to ssDNA-nucleic acid binding must be provided so that template DNA's can anneal with primers and dNTPs. In embodiments where the dsDNA is disrupted by modifying the chemical environment of the dsDNA prior to partitioning, it will be necessary to return the partitioned portion to physiologic conditions prior to performing additional assay steps, e.g., PCR.


Digital PCR


Ideally, the sensitivity of digital PCR is limited only by the number of independent amplifications that can be analyzed, which has motivated the development of several ultra-high throughput miniaturized methods allowing millions of single molecule PCR reactions to be performed in parallel (discussed in detail elsewhere). In a preferred embodiment of the invention, digital PCR is performed in aqueous droplets separated by oil using a microfluidics system. In another preferred embodiment, the oil is a fluorinated oil such as the FLUORINERT oils (3M). In a still more preferred embodiment the fluorinated oil contains a surfactant, such as PFPE-PEG-PFPE triblock copolymer, to stabilize the droplets against coalescence during the amplification step or at any point where they contact each other. Microfluidic approaches allow the rapid generation of large numbers (e.g., 106 or greater) of very uniformly sized droplets that function as picoliter volume reactors (see reviews of droplet-based microfluidics). The invention is not limited to dPCR performed in water-in-oil emulsions, but rather is general to all methods of reaction compartmentalization for dPCR. In much of the Detailed Description, the invention is described in terms of the use of droplets for reactors, but it is understood that this choice of description is not limiting for the invention, and that all of the methods of the invention are compatible with other methods for partitioning a sample for parallel processing, e.g., well-plates.


Nucleic Acid Target Molecules


Nucleic acid molecules include deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and/or ribonucleic acid (RNA). Nucleic acid molecules can be synthetic or derived from naturally occurring sources. The invention is primarily concerned with DNA because it naturally exists as two strands that can be separated under the proper conditions. In one embodiment, DNA is isolated from a biological sample containing a variety of other components, such as proteins, lipids and non-template nucleic acids. DNA can be obtained from any cellular material, obtained from an animal, plant, bacterium, fungus, or any other cellular organism. In certain embodiments, the DNA is obtained from a single cell. Biological samples for use in the present invention include viral particles or preparations. DNA can be obtained directly from an organism or from a biological sample obtained from an organism, e.g., from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, seminal fluid, saliva, sputum, stool and tissue. Any tissue or body fluid specimen may be used as a source for DNA for use in the invention. DNA can also be isolated from cultured cells, such as a primary cell culture or a cell line. The cells or tissues from which DNA is obtained can be infected with a virus or other intracellular pathogen. In certain embodiments, the DNA binds or is allowed to bind to other target molecules such as proteins, enzymes, substrates, antibodies, binding agents, beads, small molecules, peptides, or any other molecule and serve as a surrogate for quantifying and/or detecting the target molecule. Generally, DNA can be extracted from a biological sample by a variety of techniques such as those described by Maniatis, et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp. 280-281 (1982).


Droplet Formation


Methods of the invention involve forming sample droplets where some droplets contain zero target ssDNA, some droplets contain one target ssDNA, and some droplets may or may not contain multiple ssDNAs (corresponding to limiting or terminal dilution, respectively, as defined above). In the preferred embodiment, the distribution of ssDNAs within droplets obeys the Poisson distribution. However, methods for non-Poisson loading of droplets are known to those familiar with the art, and include but are not limited to active sorting of droplets, such as by laser-induced fluorescence, or by passive one-to-one loading. The description that follows assumes Poisson loading of droplets, but such description is not intended to exclude non-Poisson loading, as the invention is compatible with all distributions of DNA loading that conform to limiting or terminal dilution.


The droplets are aqueous droplets that are surrounded by an immiscible carrier fluid. Methods of forming such droplets are shown for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163), Stone et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,949 and U.S. patent application number 2010/0172803), Anderson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481 and which reissued as RE41,780) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc. The content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of a device 100 for droplet formation. Device 100 includes an inlet channel 101, an outlet channel 102, and two carrier fluid channels 103 and 104. Device 100 may additionally comprise a temperature block 120 to control the temperature of the fluids during droplet formation. Temperature block 120 may be used to heat or cool the fluids as needed, and may be connected to a temperature controller (not shown) to control the temperature during droplet formation. Channels 101, 102, 103, and 104 meet at a junction 105. Inlet channel 101 flows sample fluid to the junction 105. Carrier fluid channels 103 and 104 flow a carrier fluid that is immiscible with the sample fluid to the junction 105. Inlet channel 101 narrows at its distal portion wherein it connects to junction 105 (see FIG. 2). Inlet channel 101 is oriented to be perpendicular to carrier fluid channels 103 and 104. Droplets are formed as sample fluid flows from inlet channel 101 to junction 105, where the sample fluid interacts with flowing carrier fluid provided to the junction 105 by carrier fluid channels 103 and 104. Outlet channel 102 receives the droplets of sample fluid surrounded by carrier fluid.


The sample fluid is typically an aqueous buffer solution, such as ultrapure water (e.g., 18 mega-ohm resistivity, obtained, for example by column chromatography), 10 mM Tris HCl and 1 mM EDTA (TE) buffer, phosphate buffer saline (PBS) or acetate buffer. Any liquid or buffer that is physiologically compatible with nucleic acid molecules can be used. The carrier fluid is one that is immiscible with the sample fluid. The carrier fluid can be a non-polar solvent, decane (e g., tetradecane or hexadecane), fluorocarbon oil, silicone oil or another oil (for example, mineral oil).


In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid contains one or more additives, such as agents which increase, reduce, or otherwise create non-Newtonian surface tensions (surfactants) and/or stabilize droplets against spontaneous coalescence on contact. Surfactants can include Tween, Span, fluorosurfactants, and other agents that are soluble in oil relative to water. In some applications, performance is improved by adding a second surfactant, or other agent, such as a polymer or other additive, to the sample fluid. Surfactants can aid in controlling or optimizing droplet size, flow and uniformity, for example by reducing the shear force needed to extrude or inject droplets into an intersecting channel. This can affect droplet volume and periodicity, or the rate or frequency at which droplets break off into an intersecting channel. Furthermore, the surfactant can serve to stabilize aqueous emulsions in fluorinated oils from coalescing.


In certain embodiments, the droplets may be coated with a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants. Preferred surfactants that may be added to the carrier fluid include, but are not limited to, surfactants such as sorbitan-based carboxylic acid esters (e.g., the “Span” surfactants, Fluka Chemika), including sorbitan monolaurate (Span 20), sorbitan monopalmitate (Span 40), sorbitan monostearate (Span 60) and sorbitan monooleate (Span 80), and perfluorinated polyethers (e.g., DuPont Krytox 157 FSL, FSM, and/or FSH). Other non-limiting examples of non-ionic surfactants which may be used include polyoxyethylenated alkylphenols (for example, nonyl-, p-dodecyl-, and dinonylphenols), polyoxyethylenated straight chain alcohols, polyoxyethylenated polyoxypropylene glycols, polyoxyethylenated mercaptans, long chain carboxylic acid esters (for example, glyceryl and polyglycerl esters of natural fatty acids, propylene glycol, sorbitol, polyoxyethylenated sorbitol esters, polyoxyethylene glycol esters, etc.) and alkanolamines (e.g., diethanolamine-fatty acid condensates and isopropanolamine-fatty acid condensates).


In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid may be caused to flow through the outlet channel so that the surfactant in the carrier fluid coats the channel walls. In one embodiment, the fluorosurfactant can be prepared by reacting the perflourinated polyether DuPont Krytox 157 FSL, FSM, or FSH with aqueous ammonium hydroxide in a volatile fluorinated solvent. The solvent and residual water and ammonia can be removed with a rotary evaporator. The surfactant can then be dissolved (e.g., 2.5 wt %) in a fluorinated oil (e.g., FLUORINERT (3M)), which then serves as the carrier fluid.


One approach to merging sample fluids, using a device called a lambda injector, involves forming a droplet, and contacting the droplet with a fluid stream, in which a portion of the fluid stream integrates with the droplet to form a mixed droplet. In this approach, only one phase needs to reach a merge area in a form of a droplet. Further description of such method is shown in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/371,222, the content of which is incorporated y reference herein in its entirety.


According to a method for operating the lambda injector, a droplet is formed as described above. After formation of the sample droplet from the first sample fluid, the droplet is contacted with a flow of a second sample fluid stream. Contact between the droplet and the fluid stream results in a portion of the fluid stream integrating with the droplet to form a mixed droplet.


The droplets of the first sample fluid flow through a first channel separated from each other by immiscible carrier fluid and suspended in the immiscible carrier fluid. The droplets are delivered to the merge area, i.e., junction of the first channel with the second channel, by a pressure-driven flow generated by a positive displacement pump. While droplet arrives at the merge area, a bolus of a second sample fluid is protruding from an opening of the second channel into the first channel. Preferably, the channels are oriented perpendicular to each other. However, any angle that results in an intersection of the channels may be used.


The bolus of the second sample fluid stream continues to increase in size due to pumping action of a positive displacement pump connected to channel, which outputs a steady stream of the second sample fluid into the merge area. The flowing droplet containing the first sample fluid eventually contacts the bolus of the second sample fluid that is protruding into the first channel. Contact between the two sample fluids results in a portion of the second sample fluid being segmented from the second sample fluid stream and joining with the first sample fluid droplet to form a mixed droplet. In certain embodiments, each incoming droplet of first sample fluid is merged with the same amount of second sample fluid.


In certain embodiments, an electric charge is applied to the first and second sample fluids. Description of applying electric charge to sample fluids is provided in Link et al. (U.S. patent application number 2007/0003442) and European Patent Number EP2004316 to Raindance Technologies Inc, the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Electric charge may be created in the first and second sample fluids within the carrier fluid using any suitable technique, for example, by placing the first and second sample fluids within an electric field (which may be AC, DC, etc.), and/or causing a reaction to occur that causes the first and second sample fluids to have an electric charge, for example, a chemical reaction, an ionic reaction, a photocatalyzed reaction, etc.


The electric field, in some embodiments, is generated from an electric field generator, i.e., a device or system able to create an electric field that can be applied to the fluid. The electric field generator may produce an AC field (i.e., one that varies periodically with respect to time, for example, sinusoidally, sawtooth, square, etc.), a DC field (i.e., one that is constant with respect to time), a pulsed field, etc. The electric field generator may be constructed and arranged to create an electric field within a fluid contained within a channel or a microfluidic channel. The electric field generator may be integral to or separate from the fluidic system containing the channel or microfluidic channel, according to some embodiments.


Techniques for producing a suitable electric field (which may be AC, DC, etc.) are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, in one embodiment, an electric field is produced by applying voltage across a pair of electrodes, which may be positioned on or embedded within the fluidic system (for example, within a substrate defining the channel or microfluidic channel), and/or positioned proximate the fluid such that at least a portion of the electric field interacts with the fluid. The electrodes can be fashioned from any suitable electrode material or materials known to those of ordinary skill in the art, including, but not limited to, silver, gold, copper, carbon, platinum, copper, tungsten, tin, cadmium, nickel, indium tin oxide (“ITO”), etc., as well as combinations thereof. In some cases, transparent or substantially transparent electrodes can be used.


The electric field facilitates rupture of the interface separating the second sample fluid and the droplet. Rupturing the interface facilitates merging of bolus of the second sample fluid and the first sample fluid droplet. The forming mixed droplet continues to increase in size until it a portion of the second sample fluid breaks free or segments from the second sample fluid stream prior to arrival and merging of the next droplet containing the first sample fluid. The segmenting of the portion of the second sample fluid from the second sample fluid stream occurs as soon as the shear force exerted on the forming mixed droplet by the immiscible carrier fluid overcomes the surface tension whose action is to keep the segmenting portion of the second sample fluid connected with the second sample fluid stream. The now fully formed mixed droplet continues to flow through the first channel.


In other embodiments, the rupture of the interface can be spontaneous, or the rupture can be facilitated by surface chemistry. The invention is not limited in regard to the method of rupture at the interface, as rupture can be brought about by any means.


In the context of PCR, in a preferred embodiment, the first sample fluid contains ssDNA templates. Droplets of the first sample fluid are formed as described above. Those droplets will include the ssDNA templates. In certain embodiments, some of the droplets will include only one single ssDNA template while other droplets contain no ssDNA template, and thus digital PCR can be conducted. In a preferred embodiment, the droplets are formed in the presence of reagents and enzymes needed for subsequent PCR reactions. In other embodiments, a second sample fluid contains reagents for the PCR reaction. Such reagents generally include Taq polymerase, deoxynucleotides of type A, C, G and T, magnesium chloride, and forward and (optionally) reverse primers, all suspended within an aqueous buffer. The second fluid also includes detectably labeled probes for detection of the amplified target nucleic acid, the details of which are discussed below. In an embodiment in which the PCR reagents are in a separate droplet, a droplet containing the nucleic acid is caused to merge with the PCR reagents in the second fluid as described above, producing a droplet that includes Taq polymerase, deoxynucleotides of type A, C, G and T, magnesium chloride, forward and reverse primers, detectably labeled probes, and the target nucleic acid. In another embodiment, the first fluid can contain the template DNA and PCR master mix (defined below), and the second fluid can contain the forward and reverse primers and the probe. The invention is not restricted in any way regarding the constituency of the first and second fluidics for PCR or digital PCR. For example, in some embodiments, the template DNA is contained in the second fluid inside droplets.


Target Amplification


Methods of the invention further involve amplifying the target nucleic acid in each droplet. Amplification refers to production of additional copies of a nucleic acid sequence and is generally carried out using polymerase chain reaction or other technologies well known in the art (e.g., Dieffenbach and Dveksler, PCR Primer, a Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, N.Y. [1995]). The amplification reaction may be any amplification reaction known in the art that amplifies nucleic acid molecules, such as polymerase chain reaction, nested polymerase chain reaction, ligase chain reaction (Barany F. (1991) PNAS 88:189-193; Barany F. (1991) PCR Methods and Applications 1:5-16), ligase detection reaction (Barany F. (1991) PNAS 88:189-193), strand displacement amplification, transcription based amplification system, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, rolling circle amplification, and hyper-branched rolling circle amplification.


In certain embodiments, the amplification reaction is the polymerase chain reaction. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) refers to methods by K. B. Mullis (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195 and 4,683,202, hereby incorporated by reference) for increasing concentration of a segment of a target sequence in a mixture of genomic DNA without cloning or purification. The process for amplifying the target sequence includes introducing an excess of oligonucleotide primers to a DNA mixture containing a desired target sequence, followed by a precise sequence of thermal cycling in the presence of a DNA polymerase. The primers are complementary to their respective strands of the double stranded target sequence.


To effect amplification, primers are annealed to their complementary sequence within the target molecule. Following annealing, the primers are extended with a polymerase so as to form a new complementary strand. The steps of denaturation, primer annealing and polymerase extension can be repeated many times (i.e., denaturation, annealing and extension constitute one cycle; there can be numerous cycles) to obtain a high concentration of an amplified segment of a desired target sequence. The length of the amplified segment of the desired target sequence is determined by relative positions of the primers with respect to each other and by cycling parameters, and therefore, this length is a controllable parameter.


Methods for performing PCR in droplets are shown for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163), Anderson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481 and which reissued as RE41,780) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc. The content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


The sample droplet may be pre-mixed with a primer or primers, or the primer or primers may be added to the droplet. In some embodiments, droplets created by segmenting the starting sample are merged with a second set of droplets including one or more primers for the target nucleic acid in order to produce final droplets. The merging of droplets can be accomplished using, for example, one or more droplet merging techniques described for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.


In embodiments involving merging of droplets, two droplet formation modules are used. In one embodiment, a first droplet formation module produces the sample droplets consistent with limiting or terminal dilution of target ssDNA. A second droplet formation or reinjection module inserts droplets that contain reagents for a PCR reaction. Such droplets generally include the “PCR master mix” (known to those in the art as a mixture containing at least Taq polymerase, deoxynucleotides of type A, C, G and T, and magnesium chloride) and forward and reverse primers (known to those in the art collectively as “primers”), all suspended within an aqueous buffer. The second droplet also includes detectably labeled probes for detection of the amplified target nucleic acid, the details of which are discussed below. Different arrangements of reagents between the two droplet types is envisioned. For example, in another embodiment, the template droplets also contain the PCR master mix, but the primers and probes remain in the second droplets. Any arrangement of reagents and template DNA can be used according to the invention.


Primers can be prepared by a variety of methods including but not limited to cloning of appropriate sequences and direct chemical synthesis using methods well known in the art (Narang et al., Methods Enzymol., 68:90 (1979); Brown et al., Methods Enzymol., 68:109 (1979)). Primers can also be obtained from commercial sources such as Operon Technologies, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Sigma, and Life Technologies. The primers can have an identical melting temperature. The lengths of the primers can be extended or shortened at the 5′ end or the 3′ end to produce primers with desired melting temperatures. Also, the annealing position of each primer pair can be designed such that the sequence and, length of the primer pairs yield the desired melting temperature. The simplest equation for determining the melting temperature of primers smaller than 25 base pairs is the Wallace Rule (Td=2(A+T)+4(G+C)). Another method for determining the melting temperature of primers is the nearest neighbor method Computer programs can also be used to design primers, including but not limited to Array Designer Software (Arrayit Inc.), Oligonucleotide Probe Sequence Design Software for Genetic Analysis (Olympus Optical Co.), NetPrimer, and DNAsis from Hitachi Software Engineering. The TM (melting or annealing temperature) of each primer is calculated using software programs such as Oligo Design, available from Invitrogen Corp.


In one embodiment, the droplet formation modules are arranged and controlled to produce an interdigitation of sample droplets and PCR reagent droplets flowing through a channel. Such an arrangement is described for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.


A sample droplet is then caused to merge with a PCR reagent droplet, producing a droplet that includes the PCR master mix, primers, detectably labeled probes, and the target nucleic acid. Droplets may be merged for example by: producing dielectrophoretic forces on the droplets using electric field gradients and then controlling the forces to cause the droplets to merge; producing droplets of different sizes that thus travel at different velocities, which causes the droplets to merge; and producing droplets having different viscosities that thus travel at different velocities, which causes the droplets to merge with each other. Each of those techniques is further described in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc. Further description of producing and controlling dielectrophoretic forces on droplets to cause the droplets to merge is described in Link et al. (U.S. patent application number 2007/0003442) and European Patent Number EP2004316 to Raindance Technologies Inc.


In another embodiment, called simple droplet generation, a single droplet formation module, or a plurality of droplet formation modules are arranged to produce droplets from a mixture already containing the template DNA, the PCR master mix, primers, and detectably labeled probes. In yet another embodiment, called co-flow, upstream from a single droplet formation module two channels intersect allowing two flow streams to converge. One flow stream contains one set of reagents and the template DNA, and the other contains the remaining reagents. In the preferred embodiment for co-flow, the template DNA and the PCR master mix are in one flow stream, and the primers and probes are in the other. However, the invention is not limited in regard to the constituency of either flow stream. For example, in another embodiment, one flow stream contains just the template DNA, and the other contains the PCR master mix, the primers, and the probes. On convergence of the flow streams in a fluidic intersection, the flow streams may or may not mix before the droplet generation nozzle. In either embodiment, some amount of fluid from the first stream, and some amount of fluid from the second stream are encapsulated within a single droplet. Following encapsulation, complete mixing occurs.


Once final droplets have been produced by any of the droplet forming embodiments above, or by any other embodiments, the droplets are thermal cycled, resulting in amplification of the target nucleic acid in each droplet. In certain embodiments, the droplets are collected off-chip as an emulsion in a PCR thermal cycling tube and then thermally cycled in a conventional thermal cycler. Temperature profiles for thermal cycling can be adjusted and optimized as with any conventional DNA amplification by PCR.


In certain embodiments, the droplets are flowed through a channel in a serpentine path between heating and cooling lines to amplify the nucleic acid in the droplet. The width and depth of the channel may be adjusted to set the residence time at each temperature, which can be controlled to anywhere between less than a second and minutes.


In certain embodiments, the three temperature zones are used for the amplification reaction. The three temperature zones are controlled to result in denaturation of double stranded nucleic acid (high temperature zone), annealing of primers (low temperature zones), and amplification of single stranded nucleic acid to produce double stranded nucleic acids (intermediate temperature zones). The temperatures within these zones fall within ranges well known in the art for conducting PCR reactions. See for example, Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 2001).


In certain embodiments, the three temperature zones are controlled to have temperatures as follows: 95° C. (TH), 55° C. (TL), 72° C. (TM). The prepared sample droplets flow through the channel at a controlled rate. The sample droplets first pass the initial denaturation zone (TH) before thermal cycling. The initial preheat is an extended zone to ensure that nucleic acids within the sample droplet have denatured successfully before thermal cycling. The requirement for a preheat zone and the length of denaturation time required is dependent on the chemistry being used in the reaction. The samples pass into the high temperature zone, of approximately 95° C., where the sample is first separated into single stranded DNA in a process called denaturation. The sample then flows to the low temperature, of approximately 55° C., where the hybridization process takes place, during which the primers anneal to the complementary sequences of the sample. Finally, as the sample flows through the third medium temperature, of approximately 72° C., the polymerase process occurs when the primers are extended along the single strand of DNA with a thermostable enzyme. Methods for controlling the temperature in each zone may include but are not limited to electrical resistance, Peltier junction, microwave radiation, and illumination with infrared radiation.


The nucleic acids undergo the same thermal cycling and chemical reaction as the droplets passes through each thermal cycle as they flow through the channel. The total number of cycles in the device is easily altered by an extension of thermal zones or by the creation of a continuous loop structure. The sample undergoes the same thermal cycling and chemical reaction as it passes through N amplification cycles of the complete thermal device.


In other embodiments, the temperature zones are controlled to achieve two individual temperature zones for a PCR reaction. In certain embodiments, the two temperature zones are controlled to have temperatures as follows: 95° C. (TH) and 60° C. (TL). The sample droplet optionally flows through an initial preheat zone before entering thermal cycling. The preheat zone may be important for some chemistry for activation and also to ensure that double stranded nucleic acid in the droplets are fully denatured before the thermal cycling reaction begins. In an exemplary embodiment, the preheat dwell length results in approximately 10 minutes preheat of the droplets at the higher temperature.


The sample droplet continues into the high temperature zone, of approximately 95° C., where the sample is first separated into single stranded DNA in a process called denaturation. The sample then flows through the device to the low temperature zone, of approximately 60° C., where the hybridization process takes place, during which the primers anneal to the complementary sequences of the sample. Finally the polymerase process occurs when the primers are extended along the single strand of DNA with a thermostable enzyme. The sample undergoes the same thermal cycling and chemical reaction as it passes through each thermal cycle of the complete device. The total number of cycles in the device is easily altered by an extension of block length and tubing.


In another embodiment the droplets are created and/or merged on chip followed by their storage either on the same chip or another chip or off chip in some type of storage vessel such as a PCR tube. The chip or storage vessel containing the droplets is then cycled in its entirety to achieve the desired PCR heating and cooling cycles.


In another embodiment the droplets are collected in a chamber where the density difference between the droplets and the surrounding oil allows for the oil to be rapidly exchanged without removing the droplets. The temperature of the droplets can then be rapidly changed by exchange of the oil in the vessel for oil of a different temperature. This technique is broadly useful with two and three step temperature cycling or any other sequence of temperatures.


The invention is not limited by the method used to thermocycle the droplets. Any method of thermocycling the droplets may be used.


Target Detection


After amplification, droplets are flowed to a detection module for detection of amplification products. For embodiments in which the droplets are thermally cycled off-chip, the droplets require re-injection into either a second fluidic circuit for read-out—that may or may not reside on the same chip as the fluidic circuit or circuits for droplet generation—or in certain embodiments the droplets may be reinjected for read-out back into the original fluidic circuit used for droplet generation. The droplets may be individually analyzed and detected using any methods known in the art, such as detecting the presence or amount of a reporter. Generally, the detection module is in communication with one or more detection apparatuses. The detection apparatuses can be optical or electrical detectors or combinations thereof. Examples of suitable detection apparatuses include optical waveguides, microscopes, diodes, light stimulating devices, (e.g., lasers), photo multiplier tubes, and processors (e.g., computers and software), and combinations thereof, which cooperate to detect a signal representative of a characteristic, marker, or reporter, and to determine and direct the measurement or the sorting action at a sorting module. Further description of detection modules and methods of detecting amplification products in droplets are shown in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.


In certain embodiments, amplified target are detected using detectably labeled probes. In particular embodiments, the detectably labeled probes are optically labeled probes, such as fluorescently labeled probes. Examples of fluorescent labels include, but are not limited to, Atto dyes, 4-acetamido-4′-isothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′disulfonic acid; acridine and derivatives: acridine, acridine isothiocyanate; 5-(2′-aminoethyl)aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (EDANS); 4-amino-N-[3-vinylsulfonyl)phenyl]naphthalimide-3,5 disulfonate; N-(4-anilino-1-naphthyl)maleimide; anthranilamide; BODIPY; Brilliant Yellow; coumarin and derivatives; coumarin, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC, Coumarin 120), 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcouluarin (Coumaran 151); cyanine dyes; cyanosine; 4′,6-diaminidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); 5′5″-dibromopyrogallol-sulfonaphthalein (Bromopyrogallol Red); 7-diethylamino-3-(4′-isothiocyanatophenyl)-4-methylcoumarin; diethylenetriamine pentaacetate; 4,4′-diisothiocyanatodihydro-stilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid; 4,4′-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid; 5-[dimethylamino]naphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride (DNS, dansylchloride); 4-dimethylaminophenylazophenyl-4′-isothiocyanate (DABITC); eosin and derivatives; eosin, eosin isothiocyanate, erythrosin and derivatives; erythrosin B, erythrosin, isothiocyanate; ethidium; fluorescein and derivatives; 5-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 5-(4,6-dichlorotriazin-2-yl)aminofluorescein (DTAF), 2′,7′-dimethoxy-4′5′-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein, fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate, QFITC, (XRITC); fluorescamine; IR144; IR1446; Malachite Green isothiocyanate; 4-methylumbelliferoneortho cresolphthalein; nitrotyrosine; pararosaniline; Phenol Red; B-phycoerythrin; o-phthaldialdehyde; pyrene and derivatives: pyrene, pyrene butyrate, succinimidyl 1-pyrene; butyrate quantum dots; Reactive Red 4 (Cibacron™ Brilliant Red 3B-A) rhodamine and derivatives: 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), 6-carboxyrhodamine (R6G), lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl chloride rhodamine (Rhod), rhodamine B, rhodamine 123, rhodamine X isothiocyanate, sulforhodamine B, sulforhodamine 101, sulfonyl chloride derivative of sulforhodamine 101 (Texas Red); N,N,N′,N′tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA); tetramethyl rhodamine; tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC); riboflavin; coumarin, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC, Coumarin 120), 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcouluarin (Coumaran 151); cyanine dyes; cyanosine; 4′,6-diaminidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); 5′5″-dibromopyrogallol-sulfonaphthalein (Bromopyrogallol Red); 7-rosolic acid; terbium chelate derivatives; Cy3; Cy5; Cy5.5; Cy7; IRD 700; IRD 800; La Jolta Blue; phthalo cyanine; and naphthalo cyanine. Preferred fluorescent labels are FAM and VIC™ (from Applied Biosystems). Labels other than fluorescent labels are contemplated by the invention, including other optically-detectable labels.


In certain aspects, the droplets of the invention contain a plurality of detectable probes that hybridize to amplicons produced in the droplets. Members of the plurality of probes can each include the same detectable label, or a different detectable label. The plurality of probes can also include one or more groups of probes at varying concentration. The groups of probes at varying concentrations can include the same detectable label which vary in intensity, due to varying probe concentrations.


In some embodiments, the droplets of the invention contain a plurality of barcodes that hybridize to amplicons produced in the droplets or are incorporated into the amplicons. The barcodes may be used in lieu of fluorescent probes, to detect the presence of a target sequence, or the barcodes can be used in addition to fluorescent probes, to track a multitude of sample sources. A detectable barcode-type label can be any barcode-type label known in the art including, for example, barcoded magnetic beads (e.g., from Applied Biocode, Inc., Santa Fe Springs, Calif.), and nucleic acid sequences. Nucleic acid barcode sequences typically include a set of oligonucleotides ranging from about 4 to about 20 oligonucleotide bases (e.g., 8-10 oligonucleotide bases) and uniquely encode a discrete library member without containing significant homology to any sequence in the targeted sample.


The barcode sequence generally includes features useful in sequencing reactions. For example, the barcode sequences are designed to have minimal or no homopolymer regions, i.e., 2 or more of the same base in a row such as AA or CCC, within the barcode sequence. The barcode sequences are also designed so that they are at least one edit distance away from the base addition order when performing base-by-base sequencing, ensuring that the first and last base do not match the expected bases of the sequence. In certain embodiments, the barcode sequences are designed to be correlated to a particular subject, allowing subject samples to be distinguished. Designing barcodes is shown U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,475, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.


In some instances, the primers used in the invention may include barcodes such that the barcodes will be incorporated into the amplified products. For example, the unique barcode sequence could be incorporated into the 5′ end of the primer, or the barcode sequence could be incorporated into the 3′ end of the primer. In some embodiments, the barcodes may be incorporated into the amplified products after amplification. For example, a suitable restriction enzyme (or other endonuclease) may be introduced to a sample, e.g., a droplet, where it will cut off an end of an amplification product so that a barcode can be added with a ligase.


Attaching barcode sequences to nucleic acids is shown in U.S. Pub. 2008/0081330 and PCT/US09/64001, the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Methods for designing sets of barcode sequences and other methods for attaching barcode sequences are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,138,077; 6,352,828; 5,636,400; 6,172,214; 6,235,475; 7,393,665; 7,544,473; 5,846,719; 5,695,934; 5,604,097; 6,150,516; RE39,793; 7,537,897; 6,172,218; and 5,863,722, the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


In a separate embodiment the detection can occur by the scanning of droplets confined to a monolayer in a storage device that is transparent to the wavelengths or method or detection. Droplets stored in this fashion can be scanned either by the movement of the storage device by the scanner or the movement of the scanner over the storage device.


The invention is not limited to the TaqMan assay, as described above, but rather the invention encompasses the use of all fluorogenic DNA hybridization probes, such as molecular beacons, Solaris probes, scorpion probes, and any other probes that function by sequence specific recognition of target DNA by hybridization and result in increased fluorescence on amplification of the target sequence.


Digital PCR Performance in Droplets


An exemplary microfluidic system for droplet generation and readout is depicted in FIGS. 3A-3C. The microfluidic system is capable of both droplet generation and readout. As shown in FIG. 3A (droplet generation chip), a continuous aqueous phase containing the PCR master mix, primers, and probes, and template DNA flows into the fluidic intersection from the left, and the carrier oil enters from the top and bottom. An emerging bolus of aqueous liquid is imaged inside the intersection just prior to snapping off into a discrete 4 pL droplet as the fluidic strain begins to exceed the surface tension of the aqueous liquid. The steady train of droplets leaving the intersection toward the right is collected off chip as a stable emulsion for thermal cycling. FIG. 3B depicts the droplet spacing for readout. Flows are arranged as in 3A, except instead of a continuous phase, the emulsion from (A) is injected from the left into the intersection after thermal cycling. The oil is drained from the emulsion during off-chip handling, hence the emulsion appears tightly packed in the image before the intersection. The oil introduced in the intersection separates the droplets and the fluorescence of each droplet is measured at the location marked by the arrow. FIG. 3C depicts a cartoon of droplet readout by fluorescence. The relatively infrequent PCR(+) droplets (light gray) flow along with the majority of PCR(−) droplets (dark gray) toward the detector. The droplets are interrogated sequentially by laser induced fluorescence while passing through the detection region.


In a serial dilution, the average number of target DNA molecules per droplet—called the “occupancy” from this point forward—decreases in direct proportion to the DNA concentration. The occupancy is calculated from Poisson statistics using the following equation well known to those experienced in the art:










occupancy
=

ln


(


P
+
N

N

)



,




(
1
)








where P and N are the numbers of PCR(+) and PCR(−) droplets respectively.


Droplets are analyzed by fluorescence while flowing through the readout chip to count the numbers of PCR(+) and PCR(−) droplets (see FIG. 3C). As each droplet passes the detection zone (marked with an arrow in FIG. 3B), a burst of fluorescence is observed. To account for small run-to-run differences in the fluorescence intensity that can occur due to different chip positioning, etc., each set of data is scaled such that the average fluorescence intensity of the empty droplets is 0.1 V. FIG. 4A shows a very short duration of a typical trace of fluorescence bursts from individual droplets for the sample with the highest DNA concentration in the series. PCR(+) and PCR(−) droplets are easily discriminated by fluorescence intensity. The two large bursts of fluorescence peaking at ˜0.8 V arise from the PCR(+) droplets, whereas smaller bursts, due to incomplete fluorescence quenching in the PCR(−) droplets, peak at ˜0.1 V. A histogram of peak intensities from the complete data set reveals two clear populations centered at 0.10 and 0.78 V (FIG. 4B), demonstrating that the trend evident in the short trace in FIG. 4A is stable over much longer periods of time. Integration over the two populations in FIG. 4B yields a total of 197,507 PCR(+) and 1,240,126 PCR(−) droplets. Hence the occupancy was 0.15 for this sample by Eqn. 1, corresponding to the expected occupancy of 0.18 based on the measured DNA concentration of 110 ng/μL. The occupancy is measured for each sample in the serial dilution and fit to the dilution equation:











occupancy
(
n
)

=

A

f
n



,




(
2
)








where n is the number of dilutions, A is the occupancy at the starting concentration (n=0), and f is the dilution factor. The linear fit was in excellent agreement with the data, with an R2 value of 0.9999 and the fitted dilution factor of 4.8 in close agreement with the expected value of 5.0.


Copy Number Assay


Traditional digital PCR methods involve the use of a single labeled probe specific for an individual target. FIGS. 5A-5E are a schematics depicting one-color detection of a target dsDNA sequence using droplet based digital PCR. The method depicted in FIGS. 5A-5E is most useful for amplifying ssDNA that has been expanded to a dsDNA using, for example, a reverse transcriptase. As shown in FIG. 5A, a template DNA is amplified with a forward primer (F1) and a reverse primer (R1). Probe (P1) labeled with a fluorophore of color 1 binds to the target genetic sequence (target 1). Microdroplets are made of diluted solution of template DNA under conditions of limiting or terminal dilution. Droplets containing the target sequence emit fluorescence and are detected by laser (FIGS. 5B-5C). The number of microcapsules either containing or not containing the target sequence is shown in a histogram (FIG. 5D) and quantified (FIG. 5E). In embodiments where a ssDNA is initially amplified only the forward primer (F1) is needed, however the PCR master mix will always contain two primers because half of the ssDNA will bind with F1 and half of the ssDNA will bind with F2.


Data Analysis


One method of the invention involves histogram-based data presentation and analysis for identifying and characterizing populations of statistically similar droplets that arise from unique probe signatures (color and intensity), and for discriminating one population of droplets from the others. Another method of the invention involves histogram-based data presentation and analysis for identifying and selecting populations of droplets based on unique signatures from optical labels. Examples of one and two-dimensional histograms have been provided for these methods, but the invention is not limited in this regard. As described above, it is anticipated that greater numbers of colors will be used for both multiplexing and for optical labels. Hence, embodiments of the invention include histograms of dimensionality greater than two, such as 3, or 4, or up to 10, or up to 20. Histograms of dimensionality greater than 20 are also incorporated into the invention.


Another method of the invention involves the selection of droplets within histograms, either for counting, or for assay selection as in the use of optical labels, or for any other purpose. Methods of the invention include selections by boundaries, either closed or unclosed, of any possible shape and dimension. Methods of the invention also include selections of droplets that exhibit fluorescence from single types of fluorophores, or from multiple types of fluorophores, such as arising from multiple probes against a common DNA target.


In some embodiments, the analysis is based on counting, i.e., determining a number of droplets that contain only wild-type target, and determining a number of droplets that contain only a variant of the target. Such methods are well known in the art. See, e.g., Lapidus et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,670,325 and 5,928,870) and Shuber et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,203,993 and 6,214,558), the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


Generally, the presence of droplets containing only variant ssDNA is indicative of a disease, such as cancer. In certain embodiments, the variant is an allelic variant, such as an insertion, deletion, substitution, translocation, or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).


Biomarkers that are associated with cancer are known in the art. Biomarkers associated with development of breast cancer are shown in Erlander et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,504,214), Dai et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,514,209 and 7,171,311), Baker et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,056,674 and 7,081,340), Erlander et al. (US 2009/0092973). The contents of the patent application and each of these patents are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Biomarkers associated with development of cervical cancer are shown in Patel (U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,765), Pardee et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,700), Kim (U.S. Pat. No. 6,905,844), Roberts et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,208), Schlegel (US 2008/0113340), Kwok et al. (US 2008/0044828), Fisher et al. (US 2005/0260566), Sastry et al. (US 2005/0048467), Lai (US 2008/0311570) and Van Der Zee et al. (US 2009/0023137). Biomarkers associated with development of vaginal cancer are shown in Giordano (U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,506), Kruk (US 2008/0009005), Hellman et al. (Br J Cancer. 100(8):1303-1314, 2009). Biomarkers associated with development of brain cancers (e.g., glioma, cerebellum, medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, ependymoma, glioblastoma) are shown in D'Andrea (US 2009/0081237), Murphy et al. (US 2006/0269558), Gibson et al. (US 2006/0281089), and Zetter et al. (US 2006/0160762). Biomarkers associated with development of renal cancer are shown in Patel (U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,765), Soyupak et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,482,129), Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Raitano (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,541), and Becker et al. (US 2007/0292869). Biomarkers associated with development of hepatic cancers (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma) are shown in Home et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,974,667), Yuan et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,018), Hanausek-Walaszek et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,653), and Liew et al. (US 2005/0152908). Biomarkers associated with development of gastric, gastrointestinal, and/or esophageal cancers are shown in Chang et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,532), Bae et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,255), Muramatsu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,983), Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Chow et al. (US 2008/0138806), Waldman et al. (US 2005/0100895), Goldenring (US 2008/0057514), An et al. (US 2007/0259368), Guilford et al. (US 2007/0184439), Wirtz et al. (US 2004/0018525), Filella et al. (Acta Oncol. 33(7):747-751, 1994), Waldman et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,704), and Lipkin et al. (Cancer Research, 48:235-245, 1988). Biomarkers associated with development of ovarian cancer are shown in Podust et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,510,842), Wang (U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,142), O'Brien et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,291,462, 6,942,978, 6,316,213, 6,294,344, and 6,268,165), Ganetta (U.S. Pat. No. 7,078,180), Malinowski et al. (US 2009/0087849), Beyer et al. (US 2009/0081685), Fischer et al. (US 2009/0075307), Mansfield et al. (US 2009/0004687), Livingston et al. (US 2008/0286199), Farias-Eisner et al. (US 2008/0038754), Ahmed et al. (US 2007/0053896), Giordano (U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,506), and Tchagang et al. (Mol Cancer Ther, 7:27-37, 2008). Biomarkers associated with development of head-and-neck and thyroid cancers are shown in Sidransky et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,233), Skolnick et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,815), Budiman et al. (US 2009/0075265), Hasina et al. (Cancer Research, 63:555-559, 2003), Kebebew et al. (US 2008/0280302), and Ralhan (Mol Cell Proteomics, 7(6):1162-1173, 2008). The contents of each of the articles, patents, and patent applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Biomarkers associated with development of colorectal cancers are shown in Raitano et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,541), Reinhard et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,501,244), Waldman et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,376); Schleyer et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,198,899); Reed (U.S. Pat. No. 7,163,801), Robbins et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,472), Mack et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,682,890), Tabiti et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,746), Budiman et al. (US 2009/0098542), Karl (US 2009/0075311), Arjol et al. (US 2008/0286801), Lee et al. (US 2008/0206756), Mori et al. (US 2008/0081333), Wang et al. (US 2008/0058432), Belacel et al. (US 2008/0050723), Stedronsky et al. (US 2008/0020940), An et al. (US 2006/0234254), Eveleigh et al. (US 2004/0146921), and Yeatman et al. (US 2006/0195269). Biomarkers associated with development of prostate cancer are shown in Sidransky (U.S. Pat. No. 7,524,633), Platica (U.S. Pat. No. 7,510,707), Salceda et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,432,064 and 7,364,862), Siegler et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,361,474), Wang (U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,142), Ali et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,529), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), O'Brien et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,291,462), Golub et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,949,342), Ogden et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,841,350), An et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,796), Bergan et al. (US 2009/0124569), Bhowmick (US 2009/0017463), Srivastava et al. (US 2008/0269157), Chinnaiyan et al. (US 2008/0222741), Thaxton et al. (US 2008/0181850), Dahary et al. (US 2008/0014590), Diamandis et al. (US 2006/0269971), Rubin et al. (US 2006/0234259), Einstein et al. (US 2006/0115821), Paris et al. (US 2006/0110759), Condon-Cardo (US 2004/0053247), and Ritchie et al. (US 2009/0127454). Biomarkers associated with development of pancreatic cancer are shown in Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Rataino et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,541), Schleyer et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,476,506), Domon et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,473,531), McCaffey et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,231), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Chan et al. (US 2005/0095611), Mitchl et al. (US 2006/0258841), and Faca et al. (PLoS Med 5(6):e123, 2008). Biomarkers associated with development of lung cancer are shown in Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Hutteman (U.S. Pat. No. 7,473,530), Bae et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,255), Wang (U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,142), Nacht et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,590), Gure et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,314,721), Patel (U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,765), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), O'Brien et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,291,462 and 6,316,213), Muramatsu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,983), Carson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,576,420), Giordano (U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,506), Guo (US 2009/0062144), Tsao et al. (US 2008/0176236), Nakamura et al. (US 2008/0050378), Raponi et al. (US 2006/0252057), Yip et al. (US 2006/0223127), Pollock et al. (US 2006/0046257), Moon et al. (US 2003/0224509), and Budiman et al. (US 2009/0098543). Biomarkers associated with development of skin cancer (e.g., basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma) are shown in Roberts et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,208), Polsky (U.S. Pat. No. 7,442,507), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Genetta (U.S. Pat. No. 7,078,180), Carson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,576,420), Moses et al. (US 2008/0286811), Moses et al. (US 2008/0268473), Dooley et al. (US 2003/0232356), Chang et al. (US 2008/0274908), Alani et al. (US 2008/0118462), Wang (US 2007/0154889), and Zetter et al. (US 2008/0064047). Biomarkers associated with development of multiple myeloma are shown in Coignet (U.S. Pat. No. 7,449,303), Shaughnessy et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,308,364), Seshi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,049,072), and Shaughnessy et al. (US 2008/0293578, US 2008/0234139, and US 2008/0234138). Biomarkers associated with development of leukemia are shown in Ando et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,371), Coignet (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,479,370 and 7,449,303), Davi et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,416,851), Chiorazzi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,316,906), Seshi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,049,072), Van Baren et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,130,052), Taniguchi (U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,729), Insel et al. (US 2009/0131353), and Van Bockstaele et al. (Blood Rev. 23(1):25-47, 2009). Biomarkers associated with development of lymphoma are shown in Ando et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,371), Levy et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,280), and Arnold (U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,655). Biomarkers associated with development of bladder cancer are shown in Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Orntoft (U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,417), Haak-Frendscho et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,003), Feinstein et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,998,232), Elting et al. (US 2008/0311604), and Wewer et al. (2009/0029372). The content of each of the above references is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Devices and methods described herein may be used to assess the quality of a sample to be analyzed for methylation. DNA methylation is a chemical modification of DNA performed by enzymes called methyltransferases, in which a methyl group (m) is added to certain cytosines (C) of DNA, to yield 5-methylcytosine. This non-mutational (epigenetic) process (mC) is a critical factor in gene expression regulation. See, e.g., J. G. Herman, Seminars in Cancer Biology, 9: 359-67, 1999. Research suggests genes with high levels of 5-methylcytosine in a promoter region are transcriptionally silent, which allows unchecked cell proliferation. Additionally, it is likely that there a correlation between gene transcription and undermethylation. Methylation patterns of DNA from cancer cells are significantly different from those of normal cells. Therefore, detection of methylation patterns in appropriately selected genes of cancer cells can lead to discrimination of cancer cells from normal (i.e., non-cancerous) cells, thereby providing an approach to early detection of cancer.


In certain embodiments, methods of the invention may be used to monitor a patient for recurrence of a cancer. Since the patient has already been treated for the cancer, the genetic profile and particular mutation(s) associated with that patient's cancer are already known. Probes may be designed that specifically hybridize to the region of the nucleic acid that contains the mutation(s) that is indicative of the cancer for which the patient was previously treated. A patient's sample (e.g., pus, sputum, semen, urine, blood, saliva, stool, or cerebrospinal fluid) may then be analyzed as described above to determine whether the mutant allele(s) is detected in the sample, the presence of which being indicative of recurrence of the cancer.


Release of Target from Droplet


Methods of the invention may further involve releasing amplified target molecules from the droplets for further analysis. Methods of releasing amplified target molecules from the droplets are shown in for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to RainDance Technologies Inc.


In certain embodiments, sample droplets are allowed to cream to the top of the carrier fluid. By way of non-limiting example, the carrier fluid can include a perfluorocarbon oil that can have one or more stabilizing surfactants. The droplet rises to the top or separates from the carrier fluid by virtue of the density of the carrier fluid being greater than that of the aqueous phase that makes up the droplet. For example, the perfluorocarbon oil used in one embodiment of the methods of the invention is 1.8, compared to the density of the aqueous phase of the droplet, which is 1.0.


The creamed liquids are then placed onto a second carrier fluid which contains a de-stabilizing surfactant, such as a perfluorinated alcohol (e.g. 1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluoro-1-octanol). The second carrier fluid can also be a perfluorocarbon oil. Upon mixing, the aqueous droplets begins to coalesce, and coalescence is completed by brief centrifugation at low speed (e.g., 1 minute at 2000 rpm in a microcentrifuge). The coalesced aqueous phase can now be removed and the further analyzed.


The released amplified material can also be subjected to further amplification by the use tailed primers and secondary PCR primers. In this embodiment the primers in the droplet contain an additional sequence or tail added onto the 5′ end of the sequence specific portion of the primer. The sequences for the tailed regions are the same for each primer pair and are incorporated onto the 5′ portion of the amplicons during PCR cycling. Once the amplicons are removed from the droplets, another set of PCR primers that can hybridize to the tail regions of the amplicons can be used to amplify the products through additional rounds of PCR. The secondary primers can exactly match the tailed region in length and sequence or can themselves contain additional sequence at the 5′ ends of the tail portion of the primer. During the secondary PCR cycling these additional regions also become incorporated into the amplicons. These additional sequences can include, but are not limited to adaptor regions utilized by sequencing platforms for library preparation and sequencing, sequences used as a barcoding function for the identification of samples multiplexed into the same reaction. molecules for the separation of amplicons from the rest of the reaction materials such as biotin, digoxin, peptides, or antibodies and molecules such as fluorescent markers that can be used to identify the fragments.


In certain embodiments, the amplified target molecules are sequenced. In a particular embodiment, the sequencing is single-molecule sequencing-by-synthesis. Single-molecule sequencing is shown for example in Lapidus et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,169,560), Quake et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,395), Harris (U.S. Pat. No. 7,282,337), Quake et al. (U.S. patent application number 2002/0164629), and Braslaysky, et al., PNAS (USA), 100: 3960-3964 (2003), the contents of each of these references is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


Briefly, a single-stranded nucleic acid (e.g., DNA or cDNA) is hybridized to oligonucleotides attached to a surface of a flow cell. The single-stranded nucleic acids may be captured by methods known in the art, such as those shown in Lapidus (U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,593). The oligonucleotides may be covalently attached to the surface or various attachments other than covalent linking as known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be employed. Moreover, the attachment may be indirect, e.g., via the polymerases of the invention directly or indirectly attached to the surface. The surface may be planar or otherwise, and/or may be porous or non-porous, or any other type of surface known to those of ordinary skill to be suitable for attachment. The nucleic acid is then sequenced by imaging the polymerase-mediated addition of fluorescently-labeled nucleotides incorporated into the growing strand surface oligonucleotide, at single molecule resolution.


Determining the Nucleic Acid Make-Up of a Sample


Further aspects of the invention include methods for determining the nucleic acid make-up of a sample. Specifically, the method can determine the presence of a contiguous, intact nucleic acid, i.e., an unbroken chain of nucleotides, between two locations on the nucleic acid. Presence of a contiguous nucleic acid is determined via detection of both a first and second detectably labeled probe that hybridizes to a first and second location on the nucleic acid (e.g., a sequence, an oligomer, a polymer, a template, dsDNA). The detection of only one probe indicates a fragmented nucleic acid, in other words, a nucleic acid that is not contiguous through the entirety of the two aforementioned locations on the nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the method involves partitioning a sample comprising nucleic acid of different lengths into a plurality of partitioned portions, wherein each portion comprises, on average, a single nucleic acid molecule, introducing first and second primer pairs and first and second detectably labeled probes to the partitioned portions, wherein the first and second primer pairs are specific for first and second locations on the nucleic acid, the first and second locations being spaced apart from each other, and wherein the first probe hybridizes to the first location and the second probe hybridizes to the second location, amplifying the nucleic acid in the partitioned portions, the presence of signal from both probes indicating the presence of a nucleic acid that is contiguous between the first and second locations, and determining a nucleic acid make-up of the sample based upon results of the detecting step.


Specific methods for the partitioning, introducing, amplifying, and detecting steps have been presented throughout the present disclosure. Further detail on determination step is now presented. As mentioned above, determination of contiguous or intact nucleic acid involves detecting a first and second detectably labeled probe that hybridizes to a first and second location on a nucleic acid. The detection of only one probe indicates the presence of a fragment of the longer nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the determining step may involve comparing relative amounts of contiguous nucleic acid to relative amounts of non-contiguous nucleic acid. In other embodiments, the determining step involves comparing amount of contiguous nucleic acid or non-contiguous nucleic acid to a total amount of amino acid.


For sequencing and other extensive molecular biology studies, a sample comprising mostly intact nucleic acid is desirable and is conducive to accurate results. The presence of a relatively large population of nucleic acid fragments, i.e., non-contiguous nucleic acids, may indicate that a sample is not suitable for sequencing. Because sequencing is relatively expensive, knowing the make-up of the sample prior to testing is advantageous. This is especially so when the sample is an FFPE sample or some other form of preserved sample in which the nucleic acid of interest has degraded into fragments. In some embodiments, if less than 90% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 80% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 70% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 50% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 40% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 30% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 20% of the nucleic acid sample, e.g., less than 10% of the nucleic acid sample is fragmented, the nucleic acid sample is suitable for further sequencing. Accordingly, once the nucleic acid make-up of a sample is determined, a further step may involve sequencing the sample, enriching the sample, or sequencing the sample after enrichment. Furthermore, because the method of determining the nucleic acid make-up incorporates the dPCR methods described throughout the present disclosure, extremely small amounts of sample can be tested successfully. In some embodiments, the test sample may contain 50 ng or less of DNA or RNA.


The methods described herein are not limited to the use of two probes, however. In some embodiments a plurality of probes are used to give additional information about the properties of nucleic acids in a sample. For example, three probes could be used wherein one probe was one color (e.g., VIC™), and two probes were another color (e.g., FAM). Differences in intensity or polarization make it possible to distinguish between the probes of the same color, as discussed previously. Analysis using such a method may make it possible to determine the presence of multiple different contiguous lengths of nucleic acid molecules.


While methods described herein can encompass the use of several primer pairs, methods in accordance with the invention also encompass the use of a single primer or a single primer pair. In some embodiments, the method includes providing a fluid comprising the sample nucleic acid and a plurality of one or more primer pairs, wherein each primer pair has at least one unique related probe and is selected to be complementary to one or more sequences of known length. The method also includes partitioning the fluid into a plurality of partitions, wherein at least a first portion of the partitions comprise one molecule of the nucleic acid sample having sequences complementary to one or more of the primer pairs, and at least one related probe, and a second portion of the partitions comprise no molecules of the sample nucleic acid having sequences complementary to one or more of the primer pairs. The method further includes conducting a PCR reaction in the partitions, thereby changing a fluorescent property of the first portion of the partitions, detecting the fluorescent property of each partition, and determining the number of occurrences in the sample nucleic acid of one or more sequences of known length based on the detecting step. In some aspects of the invention, the method further includes comparing a first number of occurrences of a first sequence of known length to a second number of occurrences of a second sequence of a second known length.


Additional embodiments of the invention may also contemplate the use of a single primer or a single primer pair as well as rely on something other than a probe for detecting the amplified sequence. In certain embodiments, the method comprises partitioning a sample comprising nucleic acid of different lengths into a plurality of partitioned portions, wherein each portion comprises, on average a single nucleic acid molecule. The method further includes introducing at least one primer pair, in which each primer of the pair is specific for a first and second location on the nucleic acid, the first and second locations being spaced apart from each other. The method further includes amplifying the nucleic acid in the partitioned portions, detecting the amplicons in the partitioned portions, and determining a nucleic acid make-up of the sample based on the results of the detecting step. In certain embodiments, the amplicons may be detected with a probe, for example, a fluorescently labeled probe. In other embodiments, the amplicon may be detected with a dye that intercalates within the nucleic acid. The invention also contemplates any other means of detecting nucleic acid sequences known in the art that do not interfere with the other steps described herein.


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.


EQUIVALENTS

The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method for detecting DNA in a sample, the method comprising: denaturing a double-stranded DNA in the sample into a first strand and a second strand;partitioning the first strand and the second strand into a plurality of droplets, wherein each droplet contains only the first strand or only the second strand;detecting a presence of the first strand or the second strand in each droplet; andquantifying a number of droplets in which the first strand or the second strand is present, wherein quantifying comprises counting droplets.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein detecting comprises conducting a PCR reaction in each droplet, thereby changing a fluorescent property of each droplet, and assessing the fluorescent property of each droplet.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein conducting a PCR reaction comprises annealing a first strand and a second strand independently with a primer.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the primer anneals with a human sequence mutation.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the primer anneals with a pathogenic sequence.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the primer anneals with a genetic marker for a disease.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein denaturing comprises heating the double-stranded DNA.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein heating comprises raising the temperature of the double-stranded DNA to at least 90° C.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, further comprising rapidly cooling the first strand and the second strand after heating the double-stranded DNA.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein rapidly cooling comprises reducing the temperature of the first or second strand to less than 20° C. in less than 60 seconds.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein each droplet is substantially surrounded by an immiscible carrier fluid in a microfluidic device.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising detecting an absence of the first strand or the second strand in each droplet.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an amount of DNA in the sample based on the quantifying step.
  • 14. A method for determining the progression of a disease in a subject, the method comprising: obtaining a biological sample comprising a plurality of double-stranded DNAs from a subject;dissociating the plurality of double-stranded DNAs into a plurality of first strands and a plurality of second strands;partitioning the plurality of first strands and the plurality of second strands into a plurality of partitioned portions, at least some of the partitioned portions having only a first strand or only a second strand;detecting the presence or absence of a targeted sequence in the plurality of partitioned portions; anddetermining the number of occurrences of the targeted sequence by counting droplets comprising either the first strand or the second strand, wherein the number of occurrences of the targeted sequence is indicative of a progression of a disease.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/058,799, filed Oct. 21, 2013, which claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Application 61/716,992, filed Oct. 22, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (1003)
Number Name Date Kind
3301258 Werner Jan 1967 A
3617880 Cormack et al. Nov 1971 A
3789841 Antoshkiw Feb 1974 A
3841308 Tate Oct 1974 A
4140364 Yamashita et al. Feb 1979 A
4274423 Mizuno et al. Jun 1981 A
4344438 Schultz Aug 1982 A
4398791 Dorsey Aug 1983 A
4432370 Hughes et al. Feb 1984 A
4552554 Gould et al. Nov 1985 A
4577543 Wilson Mar 1986 A
4676980 Segal et al. Jun 1987 A
4682895 Costello Jul 1987 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4744619 Cameron May 1988 A
4762129 Bonzel Aug 1988 A
4766386 Oliver et al. Aug 1988 A
4771774 Simpson et al. Sep 1988 A
4794931 Yook Jan 1989 A
4800886 Nestor Jan 1989 A
4803639 Steele et al. Feb 1989 A
4816567 Cabilly et al. Mar 1989 A
4819740 Warrington Apr 1989 A
4821731 Martinelli et al. Apr 1989 A
4824435 Giesy et al. Apr 1989 A
4830023 de Toledo et al. May 1989 A
4834093 Littleford et al. May 1989 A
4841977 Griffith et al. Jun 1989 A
4864578 Proffitt et al. Sep 1989 A
4873690 Adams Oct 1989 A
4877314 Kanamori Oct 1989 A
4887606 Yock et al. Dec 1989 A
4917085 Smith Apr 1990 A
4917097 Proudian et al. Apr 1990 A
4928693 Goodin et al. May 1990 A
4932413 Shockey et al. Jun 1990 A
4932419 de Toledo Jun 1990 A
4948229 Soref Aug 1990 A
4951677 Crowley et al. Aug 1990 A
4969742 Falk et al. Nov 1990 A
4987412 Vaitekunas et al. Jan 1991 A
4993412 Murphy-Chutorian Feb 1991 A
4998972 Chin et al. Mar 1991 A
5000185 Yock Mar 1991 A
5024234 Leary et al. Jun 1991 A
5025445 Anderson et al. Jun 1991 A
5032123 Katz et al. Jul 1991 A
5037169 Chun Aug 1991 A
5039193 Snow et al. Aug 1991 A
5040548 Yock Aug 1991 A
5041108 Fox et al. Aug 1991 A
5054492 Scribner et al. Oct 1991 A
5065010 Knute Nov 1991 A
5065769 de Toledo Nov 1991 A
5085221 Ingebrigtsen et al. Feb 1992 A
5095911 Pomeranz Mar 1992 A
5100424 Jang et al. Mar 1992 A
5120308 Hess Jun 1992 A
5125137 Corl et al. Jun 1992 A
5135486 Eberle et al. Aug 1992 A
5135516 Sahatjian et al. Aug 1992 A
5155439 Holmbo et al. Oct 1992 A
5158548 Lau et al. Oct 1992 A
5163445 Christian et al. Nov 1992 A
5167233 Eberle et al. Dec 1992 A
5174295 Christian et al. Dec 1992 A
5176141 Bom et al. Jan 1993 A
5176674 Hofmann Jan 1993 A
5178159 Christian Jan 1993 A
5183048 Eberle Feb 1993 A
5188632 Goldenberg Feb 1993 A
5201316 Pomeranz et al. Apr 1993 A
5202745 Sorin et al. Apr 1993 A
5203779 Muller et al. Apr 1993 A
5220922 Barany Jun 1993 A
5224953 Morgentaler Jul 1993 A
5226421 Frisbie et al. Jul 1993 A
5240003 Lancee et al. Aug 1993 A
5240437 Christian Aug 1993 A
5242460 Klein et al. Sep 1993 A
5243988 Sieben et al. Sep 1993 A
5257974 Cox Nov 1993 A
5266302 Peyman et al. Nov 1993 A
5267954 Nita Dec 1993 A
5301001 Murphy et al. Apr 1994 A
5312425 Evans et al. May 1994 A
5313949 Yook May 1994 A
5313957 Little May 1994 A
5319492 Dorn et al. Jun 1994 A
5321501 Swanson et al. Jun 1994 A
5325198 Hartley et al. Jun 1994 A
5336178 Kaplan et al. Aug 1994 A
5346689 Peyman et al. Sep 1994 A
5348017 Thornton et al. Sep 1994 A
5348481 Ortiz Sep 1994 A
5353798 Sieben Oct 1994 A
5358409 Obara Oct 1994 A
5358478 Thompson et al. Oct 1994 A
5368037 Eberle et al. Nov 1994 A
5373845 Gardineer et al. Dec 1994 A
5373849 Maroney et al. Dec 1994 A
5375602 Lancee et al. Dec 1994 A
5377682 Ueno et al. Jan 1995 A
5383853 Jung et al. Jan 1995 A
5387193 Miraki Feb 1995 A
5396328 Jestel et al. Mar 1995 A
5397355 Marin et al. Mar 1995 A
5405377 Cragg Apr 1995 A
5411016 Kume et al. May 1995 A
5419777 Hofling May 1995 A
5421338 Crowley et al. Jun 1995 A
5423806 Dale et al. Jun 1995 A
5427118 Nita et al. Jun 1995 A
5431673 Summers et al. Jul 1995 A
5436759 Dijaili et al. Jul 1995 A
5439139 Brovelli Aug 1995 A
5443457 Ginn et al. Aug 1995 A
5453575 O'Donnell et al. Sep 1995 A
5456693 Conston et al. Oct 1995 A
5459570 Swanson et al. Oct 1995 A
5480388 Zadini et al. Jan 1996 A
5485845 Verdonk et al. Jan 1996 A
5492125 Kim et al. Feb 1996 A
5496997 Pope Mar 1996 A
5507761 Duer Apr 1996 A
5512044 Duer Apr 1996 A
5514128 Hillsman et al. May 1996 A
5529674 Hedgcoth Jun 1996 A
5541730 Chaney Jul 1996 A
5546717 Penczak et al. Aug 1996 A
5546948 Hamm et al. Aug 1996 A
5565332 Hoogenboom et al. Oct 1996 A
5573520 Schwartz et al. Nov 1996 A
5581638 Givens et al. Dec 1996 A
5586054 Jensen et al. Dec 1996 A
5592939 Martinelli Jan 1997 A
5596079 Smith et al. Jan 1997 A
5598844 Diaz et al. Feb 1997 A
5609606 O'Boyle Mar 1997 A
5630806 Inagaki et al. May 1997 A
5651366 Liang et al. Jul 1997 A
5660180 Malinowski et al. Aug 1997 A
5667499 Welch et al. Sep 1997 A
5667521 Keown Sep 1997 A
5672877 Liebig et al. Sep 1997 A
5674232 Halliburton Oct 1997 A
5693015 Walker et al. Dec 1997 A
5713848 Dubrul et al. Feb 1998 A
5745634 Garrett et al. Apr 1998 A
5771895 Slager Jun 1998 A
5779731 Leavitt Jul 1998 A
5780958 Strugach et al. Jul 1998 A
5798521 Froggatt Aug 1998 A
5800450 Lary et al. Sep 1998 A
5803083 Buck et al. Sep 1998 A
5814061 Osborne et al. Sep 1998 A
5817025 Alekseev et al. Oct 1998 A
5820594 Fontirroche et al. Oct 1998 A
5824520 Mulligan-Kehoe Oct 1998 A
5827313 Ream Oct 1998 A
5830222 Makower Nov 1998 A
5848121 Gupta et al. Dec 1998 A
5851464 Davila et al. Dec 1998 A
5857974 Eberle et al. Jan 1999 A
5872829 Wischmann et al. Feb 1999 A
5873835 Hastings et al. Feb 1999 A
5882722 Kydd Mar 1999 A
5912764 Togino Jun 1999 A
5916194 Jacobsen et al. Jun 1999 A
5921931 O'Donnell et al. Jul 1999 A
5925055 Adrian et al. Jul 1999 A
5949929 Hamm Sep 1999 A
5951586 Berg et al. Sep 1999 A
5974521 Akerib Oct 1999 A
5976120 Chow et al. Nov 1999 A
5978391 Das et al. Nov 1999 A
5997523 Jang Dec 1999 A
6021240 Murphy et al. Feb 2000 A
6022319 Willard et al. Feb 2000 A
6031071 Mandeville et al. Feb 2000 A
6036889 Kydd Mar 2000 A
6043883 Leckel et al. Mar 2000 A
6050949 White et al. Apr 2000 A
6059738 Stoltze et al. May 2000 A
6068638 Makower May 2000 A
6074362 Jang et al. Jun 2000 A
6078831 Belef et al. Jun 2000 A
6080109 Baker et al. Jun 2000 A
6091496 Hill Jul 2000 A
6094591 Foltz et al. Jul 2000 A
6095976 Nachtomy et al. Aug 2000 A
6097755 Guenther, Jr. et al. Aug 2000 A
6099471 Torp et al. Aug 2000 A
6099549 Bosma et al. Aug 2000 A
6102938 Evans et al. Aug 2000 A
6106476 Corl et al. Aug 2000 A
6120445 Grunwald Sep 2000 A
6123673 Eberle et al. Sep 2000 A
6134003 Tearney et al. Oct 2000 A
6139510 Palermo Oct 2000 A
6141089 Thoma et al. Oct 2000 A
6146328 Chiao et al. Nov 2000 A
6148095 Prause et al. Nov 2000 A
6151433 Dower et al. Nov 2000 A
6152877 Masters Nov 2000 A
6152878 Nachtomy et al. Nov 2000 A
6159225 Makower Dec 2000 A
6165127 Crowley Dec 2000 A
6176842 Tachibana et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179809 Khairkhahan et al. Jan 2001 B1
6186949 Hatfield et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190353 Makower et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200266 Shokrollahi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200268 Vince et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203537 Adrian Mar 2001 B1
6208415 De Boer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210332 Chiao et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210339 Kiepen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6212308 Donald Apr 2001 B1
6231518 Grabek et al. May 2001 B1
6245066 Morgan et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249076 Madden et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254543 Grunwald et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256090 Chen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258052 Milo Jul 2001 B1
6261246 Pantages et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275628 Jones et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283921 Nix et al. Sep 2001 B1
6283951 Flaherty et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295308 Zah Sep 2001 B1
6299622 Snow et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312384 Chiao Nov 2001 B1
6325797 Stewart et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328696 Fraser Dec 2001 B1
6343168 Murphy et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343178 Bums et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350240 Song et al. Feb 2002 B1
6364841 White et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366722 Murphy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367984 Stephenson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373970 Dong et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375615 Flaherty et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375618 Chiao et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375628 Zadno-Azizi et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376830 Froggatt et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379352 Reynolds et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381350 Klingensmith et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387124 Buscemi et al. May 2002 B1
6396976 Little et al. May 2002 B1
6398792 O'Connor Jun 2002 B1
6417948 Chowdhury et al. Jul 2002 B1
6419644 White et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421164 Tearney et al. Jul 2002 B2
6423012 Kato et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426796 Pulliam et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428041 Wohllebe et al. Aug 2002 B1
6428498 Uflacker Aug 2002 B2
6429421 Meller et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440077 Jung et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443903 White et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450964 Webler Sep 2002 B1
6457365 Stephens et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459844 Pan Oct 2002 B1
6468290 Weldon et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475149 Sumanaweera Nov 2002 B1
6480285 Hill Nov 2002 B1
6491631 Chiao et al. Dec 2002 B2
6491636 Chenal et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501551 Tearney et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504286 Porat et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508824 Flaherty et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514237 Maseda Feb 2003 B1
6520269 Geiger et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520677 Iizuka Feb 2003 B2
6535764 Imran et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538778 Leckel et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544217 Gulachenski Apr 2003 B1
6544230 Flaherty et al. Apr 2003 B1
6545760 Froggatt et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546272 MacKinnon et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551250 Khalil Apr 2003 B2
6566648 Froggatt May 2003 B1
6570894 Anderson May 2003 B2
6572555 White et al. Jun 2003 B2
6579311 Makower Jun 2003 B1
6584335 Haar et al. Jun 2003 B1
6592612 Samson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594448 Herman et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602241 Makower et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611322 Nakayama et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611720 Hata et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612992 Hossack et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615062 Ryan et al. Sep 2003 B2
6615072 Izatt et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621562 Durston Sep 2003 B2
6631284 Nutt et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638227 Bae Oct 2003 B2
6645152 Jung et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646745 Verma et al. Nov 2003 B2
6655386 Makower et al. Dec 2003 B1
6659957 Vardi et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660024 Flaherty et al. Dec 2003 B1
6663565 Kawagishi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665456 Dave et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669716 Gilson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671055 Wavering et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673015 Glover et al. Jan 2004 B1
6673064 Rentrop Jan 2004 B1
6685648 Flaherty et al. Feb 2004 B2
6689056 Kilcoyne et al. Feb 2004 B1
6689144 Gerberding Feb 2004 B2
6696173 Naundorf et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701044 Arbore et al. Mar 2004 B2
6701176 Halperin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709444 Makower Mar 2004 B1
6712836 Berg et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714703 Lee et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719717 Johnson et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725073 Motamedi et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726677 Flaherty et al. Apr 2004 B1
6730107 Kelley et al. May 2004 B2
6733474 Kusleika May 2004 B2
6738144 Dogariu May 2004 B1
6740113 Vrba May 2004 B2
6746464 Makower Jun 2004 B1
6780157 Stephens et al. Aug 2004 B2
6795188 Ruck et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795196 Funakawa Sep 2004 B2
6798522 Stolte et al. Sep 2004 B2
6822798 Wu et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830559 Schock Dec 2004 B2
6832024 Gerstenberger et al. Dec 2004 B2
6842639 Winston et al. Jan 2005 B1
6847449 Bashkansky et al. Jan 2005 B2
6855115 Fonseca et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856138 Bohley Feb 2005 B2
6856400 Froggatt Feb 2005 B1
6856472 Herman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860867 Seward et al. Mar 2005 B2
6866670 Rabiner et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878113 Miwa et al. Apr 2005 B2
6886411 Kjellman et al. May 2005 B2
6891984 Petersen et al. May 2005 B2
6895106 Wang et al. May 2005 B2
6898337 Averett et al. May 2005 B2
6900897 Froggatt May 2005 B2
6912051 Jensen Jun 2005 B2
6916329 Zhao Jul 2005 B1
6922498 Shah Jul 2005 B2
6937346 Nebendahl et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937696 Mostafavi Aug 2005 B1
6943939 DiJaili et al. Sep 2005 B1
6947147 Motamedi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6947787 Webler Sep 2005 B2
6949094 Yaron Sep 2005 B2
6952603 Gerber et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954737 Kalantar et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958042 Honda Oct 2005 B2
6961123 Wang et al. Nov 2005 B1
6966891 Ookubo et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969293 Thai Nov 2005 B2
6969395 Eskuri Nov 2005 B2
6985234 Anderson Jan 2006 B2
7004963 Wang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006231 Ostrovsky et al. Feb 2006 B2
7010458 Wilt Mar 2006 B2
7024025 Sathyanarayana Apr 2006 B2
7027211 Ruffa Apr 2006 B1
7027743 Tucker et al. Apr 2006 B1
7033347 Appling Apr 2006 B2
7035484 Silberberg et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037269 Nix et al. May 2006 B2
7042573 Froggatt May 2006 B2
7044915 White et al. May 2006 B2
7044964 Jang et al. May 2006 B2
7048711 Rosenman et al. May 2006 B2
7049306 Konradi et al. May 2006 B2
7058239 Singh et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060033 White et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060421 Naundorf et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063679 Maguire et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068852 Braica Jun 2006 B2
7074188 Nair et al. Jul 2006 B2
7095493 Harres Aug 2006 B2
7110119 Maestle Sep 2006 B2
7113875 Terashima et al. Sep 2006 B2
7123777 Rondinelli et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130054 Ostrovsky et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139440 Rondinelli et al. Nov 2006 B2
7153299 Tu et al. Dec 2006 B1
7171078 Sasaki et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175597 Vince et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177491 Dave et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190464 Alphonse Mar 2007 B2
7215802 Klingensmith et al. May 2007 B2
7218811 Shigenaga et al. May 2007 B2
7236812 Ballerstadt et al. Jun 2007 B1
7245125 Harer et al. Jul 2007 B2
7245789 Bates et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249357 Landman et al. Jul 2007 B2
7291146 Steinke et al. Nov 2007 B2
7292715 Furnish Nov 2007 B2
7292885 Scott et al. Nov 2007 B2
7294124 Eidenschink Nov 2007 B2
7300460 Levine et al. Nov 2007 B2
7335161 Von Arx et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337079 Park et al. Feb 2008 B2
7355716 de Boer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356367 Liang et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358921 Snyder et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359062 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359554 Klingensmith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7363927 Ravikumar Apr 2008 B2
7366376 Shishkov et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382949 Bouma et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387636 Cohn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391520 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397935 Kimmel et al. Jul 2008 B2
7399095 Rondinelli Jul 2008 B2
7408648 Kleen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7414779 Huber et al. Aug 2008 B2
7440087 Froggatt et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447388 Bates et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449821 Dausch Nov 2008 B2
7450165 Ahiska Nov 2008 B2
RE40608 Glover et al. Dec 2008 E
7458967 Appling et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463362 Lasker et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463759 Klingensmith et al. Dec 2008 B2
7491226 Palmaz et al. Feb 2009 B2
7515276 Froggatt et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527594 Vardi et al. May 2009 B2
7534251 WasDyke May 2009 B2
7535797 Peng et al. May 2009 B2
7547304 Johnson Jun 2009 B2
7564949 Saltier et al. Jul 2009 B2
7577471 Camus et al. Aug 2009 B2
7583857 Xu et al. Sep 2009 B2
7603165 Townsend et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612773 Magnin et al. Nov 2009 B2
7633627 Choma et al. Dec 2009 B2
7645229 Armstrong Jan 2010 B2
7658715 Park et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660452 Zwim et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660492 Bates et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666204 Thornton et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672790 McGraw et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680247 Atzinger et al. Mar 2010 B2
7684991 Stohr et al. Mar 2010 B2
7711413 Feldman et al. May 2010 B2
7720322 Prisco May 2010 B2
7728986 Lasker et al. Jun 2010 B2
7734009 Brunner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736317 Stephens et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742795 Stone et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743189 Brown Jun 2010 B2
7762954 Nix et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766896 Komkven Volk et al. Aug 2010 B2
7773792 Kimmel et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775981 Guracar et al. Aug 2010 B1
7777399 Eidenschink et al. Aug 2010 B2
7781724 Childers et al. Aug 2010 B2
7783337 Feldman et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787127 Galle et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792342 Barbu et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801343 Unal et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801590 Feldman et al. Sep 2010 B2
7813609 Petersen et al. Oct 2010 B2
7831081 Li Nov 2010 B2
7846101 Eberle et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853104 Oota et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853316 Milner et al. Dec 2010 B2
7860555 Saadat Dec 2010 B2
7862508 Davies et al. Jan 2011 B2
7872759 Tearney et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880868 Aoki Feb 2011 B2
7881763 Brauker et al. Feb 2011 B2
7909844 Alkhatib et al. Mar 2011 B2
7921854 Hennings et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927784 Simpson Apr 2011 B2
7929148 Kemp Apr 2011 B2
7930014 Huennekens et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930104 Baker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7936462 Jiang et al. May 2011 B2
7942852 Mas et al. May 2011 B2
7947012 Spurchise et al. May 2011 B2
7951186 Eidenschink et al. May 2011 B2
7952719 Brennan, III May 2011 B2
7972353 Hendriksen et al. Jul 2011 B2
7976492 Brauker et al. Jul 2011 B2
7977950 Maslen Jul 2011 B2
7978916 Klingensmith et al. Jul 2011 B2
7981041 McGahan Jul 2011 B2
7981151 Rowe Jul 2011 B2
7983737 Feldman et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993333 Oral et al. Aug 2011 B2
7995210 Tearney et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996060 Trofimov et al. Aug 2011 B2
7999938 Wang Aug 2011 B2
8021377 Eskuri Sep 2011 B2
8021420 Dolan Sep 2011 B2
8036732 Milner Oct 2011 B2
8040586 Smith et al. Oct 2011 B2
8047996 Goodnow et al. Nov 2011 B2
8049900 Kemp et al. Nov 2011 B2
8050478 Li et al. Nov 2011 B2
8050523 Younge et al. Nov 2011 B2
8052605 Muller et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057394 Dala-Krishna Nov 2011 B2
8059923 Bates et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070800 Lock et al. Dec 2011 B2
8080800 Hoctor et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088102 Adams et al. Jan 2012 B2
8100838 Wright et al. Jan 2012 B2
8104479 Glynn et al. Jan 2012 B2
8108030 Castella et al. Jan 2012 B2
8114102 Galdonik et al. Feb 2012 B2
8116605 Petersen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8125648 Milner et al. Feb 2012 B2
8126239 Sun et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133199 Weber et al. Mar 2012 B2
8133269 Flechsenhar et al. Mar 2012 B2
8140708 Zaharia et al. Mar 2012 B2
8148877 Jiang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167932 Bourang et al. May 2012 B2
8172757 Jaffe et al. May 2012 B2
8177809 Mavani et al. May 2012 B2
8187191 Hancock et al. May 2012 B2
8187267 Pappone et al. May 2012 B2
8187830 Hu et al. May 2012 B2
8199218 Lee et al. Jun 2012 B2
8206429 Gregorich et al. Jun 2012 B2
8208995 Tearney et al. Jun 2012 B2
8222906 Wyar et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233681 Aylward et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233718 Klingensmith et al. Jul 2012 B2
8238624 Doi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8239938 Simeral et al. Aug 2012 B2
8277386 Ahmed et al. Oct 2012 B2
8280470 Milner et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289284 Glynn et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289522 Tearney et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298147 Huennekens et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298149 Hastings et al. Oct 2012 B2
8301000 Sillard et al. Oct 2012 B2
8309428 Lemmerhirt et al. Nov 2012 B2
8317713 Davies et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323201 Towfiq et al. Dec 2012 B2
8329053 Martin et al. Dec 2012 B2
8336643 Harleman Dec 2012 B2
8349000 Schreck Jan 2013 B2
8353945 Andreas et al. Jan 2013 B2
8353954 Cai et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357981 Martin et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361097 Patel et al. Jan 2013 B2
8386560 Ma et al. Feb 2013 B2
8398591 Mas et al. Mar 2013 B2
8412312 Judell et al. Apr 2013 B2
8417491 Trovato et al. Apr 2013 B2
8449465 Nair et al. May 2013 B2
8454685 Hariton et al. Jun 2013 B2
8454686 Alkhatib Jun 2013 B2
8475522 Jimenez et al. Jul 2013 B2
8478384 Schmitt et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486062 Belhe et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486063 Werneth et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491567 Magnin et al. Jul 2013 B2
8500798 Rowe et al. Aug 2013 B2
8550911 Sylla Oct 2013 B2
8594757 Boppart et al. Nov 2013 B2
8597349 Alkhatib Dec 2013 B2
8600477 Beyar et al. Dec 2013 B2
8600917 Schimert et al. Dec 2013 B1
8601056 Lauwers et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620055 Barratt et al. Dec 2013 B2
8644910 Rousso et al. Feb 2014 B2
9840734 Samuels Dec 2017 B2
9944977 Link Apr 2018 B2
20010007940 Tu et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010029337 Pantages et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010037073 White et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046345 Snyder et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049548 Vardi et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020034276 Hu et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020041723 Ronnekleiv et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020069676 Kopp et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020089335 Williams Jul 2002 A1
20020099289 Crowley Jul 2002 A1
20020163646 Anderson Nov 2002 A1
20020186818 Arnaud et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196446 Roth et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020197456 Pope Dec 2002 A1
20030004412 Izatt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030016604 Hanes Jan 2003 A1
20030018273 Corl et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023153 Izatt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032886 Dgany et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030050871 Broughton Mar 2003 A1
20030065371 Satake Apr 2003 A1
20030069723 Hegde Apr 2003 A1
20030077043 Hamm et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030085635 Davidsen May 2003 A1
20030090753 Takeyama et al. May 2003 A1
20030092995 Thompson May 2003 A1
20030093059 Griffin et al. May 2003 A1
20030103212 Westphal et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030152259 Belykh et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181802 Ogawa Sep 2003 A1
20030187369 Lewis et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194165 Silberberg et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195419 Harada Oct 2003 A1
20030208116 Liang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212491 Mitchell et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030219202 Loeb et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220749 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030228039 Green Dec 2003 A1
20040015065 Panescu et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023317 Motamedi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040028333 Lomas Feb 2004 A1
20040037742 Jen et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042066 Kinoshita et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054287 Stephens Mar 2004 A1
20040067000 Bates et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040068161 Couvillon Apr 2004 A1
20040082844 Vardi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040092830 Scott et al. May 2004 A1
20040106853 Moriyama Jun 2004 A1
20040111552 Arimilli et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126048 Dave et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143160 Couvillon Jul 2004 A1
20040146546 Gravett et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040186369 Lam Sep 2004 A1
20040186558 Pavcnik et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040195512 Crosetto Oct 2004 A1
20040220606 Goshgarian Nov 2004 A1
20040225220 Rich Nov 2004 A1
20040239938 Izatt Dec 2004 A1
20040242990 Brister et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040248439 Gemhardt et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260236 Manning et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050013778 Green et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050031176 Hertel et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036150 Izatt et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050078317 Law et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101859 Maschke May 2005 A1
20050140582 Lee et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050140682 Sumanaweera et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050140981 Waelti Jun 2005 A1
20050140984 Hitzenberger Jun 2005 A1
20050147303 Zhou et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165439 Weber et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171433 Boppart et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171438 Chen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182297 Gravenstein et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050196028 Kleen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197585 Brockway et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213103 Everett et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215942 Abrahamson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234445 Conquergood et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050243322 Lasker et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050249391 Kimmel et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251567 Ballew et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050254059 Alphonse Nov 2005 A1
20050264823 Zhu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060013523 Childlers et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015126 Sher Jan 2006 A1
20060029634 Berg et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036167 Shina Feb 2006 A1
20060038115 Maas Feb 2006 A1
20060039004 de Boer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041180 Viswanathan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045536 Arahira Mar 2006 A1
20060055936 Yun et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058622 Tearney et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064009 Webler et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060067620 Shishkov et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060072808 Grimm et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074442 Noriega et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098927 Schmidt et al. May 2006 A1
20060100694 Globerman May 2006 A1
20060106375 Werneth et al. May 2006 A1
20060132790 Gutin Jun 2006 A1
20060135870 Webler Jun 2006 A1
20060142703 Carter et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142733 Forsberg Jun 2006 A1
20060173299 Romley et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179255 Yamazaki Aug 2006 A1
20060184048 Saadat Aug 2006 A1
20060187537 Huber et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195269 Yeatman et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204119 Feng et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229591 Lee Oct 2006 A1
20060239312 Kewitsch et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241342 Macaulay et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241465 Huennekens et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241503 Schmitt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244973 Yun et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060258895 Maschke Nov 2006 A1
20060264743 Kleen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267756 Kates Nov 2006 A1
20060270976 Savage et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276709 Khamene et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279742 Tearney et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279743 Boesser et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285638 Boese et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287595 Maschke Dec 2006 A1
20060293597 Johnson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070015969 Feldman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016029 Donaldson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016034 Donaldson Jan 2007 A1
20070016062 Park et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027390 Maschke et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036417 Argiro et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038061 Huennekens et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038121 Feldman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038125 Kleen et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043292 Camus et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043597 Donaldson Feb 2007 A1
20070049847 Osborne Mar 2007 A1
20070060973 Ludvig et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065077 Childers et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066888 Maschke Mar 2007 A1
20070066890 Maschke Mar 2007 A1
20070066983 Maschke Mar 2007 A1
20070084995 Newton et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100226 Yankelevitz et al. May 2007 A1
20070135887 Maschke Jun 2007 A1
20070142707 Wiklof et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156019 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161893 Milner et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161896 Adachi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161963 Smalling Jul 2007 A1
20070162860 Muralidharan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070165141 Srinivas et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167710 Unal et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167804 Park et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070191682 Rolland et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201736 Klingensmith et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206193 Pesach Sep 2007 A1
20070208276 Komkven Volk et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225220 Ming et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225590 Ramos Sep 2007 A1
20070229801 Tearney et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070232872 Prough et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070232874 Ince Oct 2007 A1
20070232890 Hirota Oct 2007 A1
20070232891 Hirota Oct 2007 A1
20070232892 Hirota Oct 2007 A1
20070232893 Tanioka Oct 2007 A1
20070232933 Gille et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238957 Yared Oct 2007 A1
20070241068 Pamula Oct 2007 A1
20070247033 Eidenschink et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250000 Magnin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250036 Volk et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070258094 Izatt et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260138 Feldman et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278389 Ajgaonkar et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070287914 Cohen Dec 2007 A1
20080002183 Yatagai et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080013093 Izatt et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021275 Tearney et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027481 Gilson et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080043024 Schiwietz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045842 Furnish Feb 2008 A1
20080051660 Kakadaris et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080063304 Russak et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080085041 Breeuwer Apr 2008 A1
20080095465 Mullick et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080095714 Castella et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097194 Milner Apr 2008 A1
20080101667 Begelman et al. May 2008 A1
20080108867 Zhou May 2008 A1
20080114254 Matcovitch et al. May 2008 A1
20080119739 Vardi et al. May 2008 A1
20080124495 Horn et al. May 2008 A1
20080125772 Stone et al. May 2008 A1
20080139897 Ainsworth et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080143707 Mitchell Jun 2008 A1
20080146941 Dala-Krishna Jun 2008 A1
20080147111 Johnson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154128 Milner Jun 2008 A1
20080161696 Schmitt et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080171944 Brenneman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175465 Jiang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080177183 Courtney et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080180683 Kemp Jul 2008 A1
20080181477 Izatt et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187201 Liang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228086 Ilegbusi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247622 Aylward et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247716 Thomas et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262470 Lee et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262489 Steinke Oct 2008 A1
20080269599 Csavoy et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281205 Naghavi et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281248 Angheloiu et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285043 Fercher et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080287795 Klingensmith et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080291463 Milner et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292173 Hsieh et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294034 Krueger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298655 Edwards Dec 2008 A1
20080306766 Ozeki et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090009801 Tabuki Jan 2009 A1
20090018393 Dick et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090034813 Dikmen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043191 Castella et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046295 Kemp et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090052614 Hempel et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069843 Agnew Mar 2009 A1
20090079993 Yatagai et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088650 Corl Apr 2009 A1
20090093980 Kemp et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122320 Petersen et al. May 2009 A1
20090138544 Wegenkittl et al. May 2009 A1
20090149739 Maschke Jun 2009 A9
20090156941 Moore Jun 2009 A1
20090174886 Inoue Jul 2009 A1
20090174931 Huber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177090 Grunwald et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177183 Pinkernell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090195514 Glynn et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090196470 Carl et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198125 Nakabayashi et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090203991 Papaioannou et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090264768 Courtney et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090269014 Winberg et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090270695 McEowen Oct 2009 A1
20090284322 Harrison et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090284332 Moore et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090284749 Johnson et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090290167 Flanders et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292048 Li et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299195 Muller et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090299284 Holman et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090318951 Kashkarov et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326634 Vardi Dec 2009 A1
20100007669 Bethune et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030042 Denninghoff et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100061611 Xu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063400 Hall et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100087732 Eberle et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094125 Younge et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094127 Xu Apr 2010 A1
20100094135 Fang-Yen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094143 Mahapatra et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100113919 Maschke May 2010 A1
20100125238 Lye et al. May 2010 A1
20100125268 Gustus et al. May 2010 A1
20100125648 Zaharia et al. May 2010 A1
20100128348 Taverner May 2010 A1
20100152717 Keeler Jun 2010 A1
20100160788 Davies et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161023 Cohen et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168714 Burke et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179421 Tupin Jul 2010 A1
20100179426 Davies et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100220334 Condit et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100226607 Zhang et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234736 Corl Sep 2010 A1
20100249601 Courtney Sep 2010 A1
20100256616 Katoh et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272432 Johnson Oct 2010 A1
20100284590 Peng et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290693 Cohen et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100331950 Strommer Dec 2010 A1
20110010925 Nix et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021926 Spencer et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110025853 Richardson Feb 2011 A1
20110026797 Declerck et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110032533 Izatt et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110034801 Baumgart Feb 2011 A1
20110044546 Pan et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110066073 Kuiper et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071401 Hastings et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072405 Chen et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077528 Kemp et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080591 Johnson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110087104 Moore et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110137140 Tearney et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144502 Zhou et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152771 Milner et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110157597 Lu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160586 Li et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110178413 Schmitt et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110190586 Kemp Aug 2011 A1
20110216378 Poon et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110220985 Son et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238061 van der Weide et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238083 Moll et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110245669 Zhang Oct 2011 A1
20110249094 Wang et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257545 Suri Oct 2011 A1
20110264125 Wilson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110274329 Mathew et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282334 Groenhoff Nov 2011 A1
20110301684 Fischell et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110306995 Moberg Dec 2011 A1
20110319752 Steinberg et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004529 Tolkowsky et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120004668 Wallace et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013914 Kemp et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016344 Kusakabe Jan 2012 A1
20120016395 Olson Jan 2012 A1
20120022360 Kemp Jan 2012 A1
20120026503 Lewandowski et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120029007 Graham et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059253 Wang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059368 Takaoka et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062843 Ferguson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065481 Hunter et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071823 Chen Mar 2012 A1
20120071838 Fojtik Mar 2012 A1
20120075638 Rollins et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120083696 Kitamura Apr 2012 A1
20120095340 Smith Apr 2012 A1
20120095372 Sverdlik et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120108943 Bates et al. May 2012 A1
20120113108 Dala-Krishna May 2012 A1
20120116353 Arnold et al. May 2012 A1
20120130243 Balocco et al. May 2012 A1
20120130247 Waters et al. May 2012 A1
20120136259 Milner et al. May 2012 A1
20120136427 Palmaz et al. May 2012 A1
20120137075 Vorbach May 2012 A1
20120155734 Barratt et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158101 Stone et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162660 Kemp Jun 2012 A1
20120165661 Kemp et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170848 Kemp et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120172698 Teo et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120176607 Ott Jul 2012 A1
20120184853 Waters Jul 2012 A1
20120184859 Shah et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120184977 Wolf Jul 2012 A1
20120215094 Rahimian et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220836 Alpert et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220851 Razansky et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220865 Brown et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220874 Hancock et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120220883 Manstrom et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120224751 Kemp et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120226153 Brown et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120230565 Steinberg et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120232400 Dickinson et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238869 Schmitt et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120238956 Yamada et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120244043 Leblanc et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120250028 Schmitt et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253186 Simpson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253192 Cressman Oct 2012 A1
20120253276 Govari et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257210 Whitney et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120262720 Brown et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265077 Gille et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265268 Blum et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265296 McNamara et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271170 Emelianov et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271175 Moore et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271339 O'Beirne et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120274338 Baks et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120276390 Ji et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120277722 Gerber et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120279764 Jiang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120283758 Miller et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120289987 Wilson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299439 Huang Nov 2012 A1
20120310081 Adler et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120310332 Murray et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120319535 Dausch Dec 2012 A1
20120323075 Younge et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323127 Boyden et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120330141 Brown et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130015975 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023762 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023763 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130026655 Lee et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030295 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030303 Ahmed et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030410 Drasler et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130053949 Pintor et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130109958 Baumgart et al. May 2013 A1
20130109959 Baumgart et al. May 2013 A1
20130137980 Waters et al. May 2013 A1
20130150716 Stigall et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158594 Carrison et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130218201 Obermiller et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218267 Braido et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223789 Lee et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223798 Jenner et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130296704 Magnin et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130303907 Corl Nov 2013 A1
20130303920 Corl Nov 2013 A1
20130310698 Judell et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130331820 Itou et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338766 Hastings et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130339958 Droste et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140039294 Jiang Feb 2014 A1
20140180067 Stigall et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180128 Corl Jun 2014 A1
20140200438 Millett et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150247191 Zhang Sep 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (79)
Number Date Country
1041373 Oct 2000 EP
01172637 Jan 2002 EP
2438877 Apr 2012 EP
2280261 Jan 1995 GB
2000-262461 Sep 2000 JP
2000-292260 Oct 2000 JP
2001-125009 May 2001 JP
2001-272331 Oct 2001 JP
2002-374034 Dec 2002 JP
2003-143783 May 2003 JP
2003-172690 Jun 2003 JP
2003-256876 Sep 2003 JP
2003-287534 Oct 2003 JP
2005-274380 Oct 2005 JP
2006-184284 Jul 2006 JP
2006-266797 Oct 2006 JP
2006-313158 Nov 2006 JP
2007-024677 Feb 2007 JP
2009-233001 Oct 2009 JP
2011-56786 Mar 2011 JP
9101156 Feb 1991 WO
9216865 Oct 1992 WO
9306213 Apr 1993 WO
9308829 May 1993 WO
9838907 Sep 1998 WO
9857583 Dec 1998 WO
0011511 Mar 2000 WO
00044296 Aug 2000 WO
0111409 Feb 2001 WO
03062802 Jul 2003 WO
03073950 Sep 2003 WO
2004010856 Feb 2004 WO
2004023992 Mar 2004 WO
2004096049 Nov 2004 WO
2005047813 May 2005 WO
2005106695 May 2005 WO
2006029634 Mar 2006 WO
2006037132 Apr 2006 WO
2006039091 Apr 2006 WO
2006061829 Jun 2006 WO
2006068875 Jun 2006 WO
2006111704 Oct 2006 WO
2006119416 Nov 2006 WO
2006121851 Nov 2006 WO
2006130802 Dec 2006 WO
2007002685 Jan 2007 WO
2007025230 Mar 2007 WO
2007045690 Apr 2007 WO
2007058895 May 2007 WO
2007067323 Jun 2007 WO
2007084995 Jul 2007 WO
2008058084 May 2008 WO
2008069991 Jun 2008 WO
2008107905 Sep 2008 WO
2009009799 Jan 2009 WO
2009009801 Jan 2009 WO
2009046431 Apr 2009 WO
2009121067 Oct 2009 WO
2009137704 Nov 2009 WO
201106886 Jan 2011 WO
2011038048 Mar 2011 WO
2011081688 Jul 2011 WO
2012003369 Jan 2012 WO
2012061935 May 2012 WO
2012071388 May 2012 WO
2012087818 Jun 2012 WO
2012098194 Jul 2012 WO
2012109676 Aug 2012 WO
2012130289 Oct 2012 WO
2012154767 Nov 2012 WO
2012155040 Nov 2012 WO
2013033414 Mar 2013 WO
2013033415 Mar 2013 WO
2013033418 Mar 2013 WO
2013033489 Mar 2013 WO
2013033490 Mar 2013 WO
2013033592 Mar 2013 WO
2013126390 Aug 2013 WO
2014109879 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (190)
Entry
Abdi et al., 2010, Principal component analysis, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2:433-459.
Adler et al., 2007, Phase-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography at up to 370,000 Lines Per Second Using Buffered Fourier Domain Mode-Locked Lasers, Optics Letters, 32(6):626-628.
Agresti, 1996, Models for Matched Pairs, Chapter 8, An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley-Interscience A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Akasheh et al., 2004, Development of piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers, Sensors and Actuators A Physical, 111:275-287.
Amini et al., 1990, Using dynamic programming for solving variational problems in vision, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(9):855-867.
Bail et al., 1996, Optical coherence tomography with the “Spectral Radar”—Fast optical analysis in volume scatterers by short coherence interferometry, Optics Letters 21(14):1087-1089.
Bain, 2011, Privacy protection and face recognition, Chapter 3, Handbook of Face Recognition, Stan et al., Springer-Verlag.
Barnea et al., 1972, A class of algorithms for fast digital image registration, IEEE Trans. Computers, 21(2):179-186.
Blanchet et al., 1993, Laser Ablation and the Production of Polymer Films, Science, 262(5134):719-721.
Bonnema, 2008, Imaging Tissue Engineered Blood Vessel Mimics with Optical Tomography, College of Optical Sciences dissertation, University of Arizona (252 pages).
Bouma et al., 1999, Power-efficient nonreciprocal interferometer and linear-scanning fiber-optic catheter for optical coherence tomography, Optics Letters, 24(8):531-533.
Breiman, 2001, Random Forests, Machine Learning 45:5-32.
Brown, 1992, A survey of image registration techniques, ACM Computing Surveys 24(4):325-376.
Bruining et al., 2009, Intravascular Ultrasound Registration/Integration with Coronary Angiography, Cardiology Clinics, 27(3):531-540.
Brummer, 1997, An euclidean distance measure between covariance matrices of speechcepstra for text-independent speaker recognition, in Proc. South African Symp. Communications and Signal Processing:167-172.
Burr et al., 2005, Searching for the Center of an Ellipse in Proceedings of the 17th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry:260-263.
Canny, 1986, A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8:679-698.
Cavalli et al., 2010, Nanosponge formulations as oxygen delivery systems, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 402:254-257.
Choma et al., 2003, Sensitivity Advantage of Swept Source and Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography, Optics Express 11(18):2183-2189.
Clarke et al., 1995, Hypoxia and myocardial ischaemia during peripheral angioplasty, Clinical Radiology, 50(5):301-303.
Collins, 1993, Coronary flow reserve, British Heart Journal 69:279-281.
Communication Mechanisms for Distributed Real-Time Applications, NI Developer Zone, http://zone.ni.eom/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3105, accessed Jul. 23, 2007.
Cook, 2007, Use and misuse of receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction, Circulation 115(7):928-35.
D'Agostino et al., 2001, Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction score: results of a multiple ethnic group investigation, JAMA 286:180-187.
David et al., 1974, Protein iodination with solid-state lactoperoxidase, Biochemistry 13:1014-1021.
Davies et al., 1985, Plaque fissuring—the cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden ischaemic death, and crescendo angina, British Heart Journal 53:363-373.
Davies et al., 1993, Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content, British Heart Journal 69:377-381.
Deterministic Data Streaming in Distributed Data Acquisition Systems, NI Developer Zone, “What is Developer Zone?”, http://zone.ni.eom/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3105, accessed Jul. 23, 2007.
Eigenwillig, 2008, K-Space Linear Fourier Domain Mode Locked Laser and Applications for Optical Coherence Tomography, Optics Express 16(12):8916-8937.
Elghanian et al., 1997, Selective colorimetric detection of polynucleotides based on the distance-dependent optical properties of gold nanoparticles, Science, 277(5329):1078-1080.
Ergun et al., 2003, Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers:Theory and Technology, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 16(2):76-84.
Evans et al., 2006, Optical coherence tomography to identify intramucosa carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus, Clin Gast Hepat 4(1):38-43.
Fatemi et al., 1999, Vibro-acoustography: an imaging modality based on ultrasound-stimulated acoustic emission, PNAS U.S.A., 96(12):6603-6608.
Felzenszwalb et al., 2005, Pictorial Structures for Object Recognition, International Journal of Computer Vision, 61(1):55-79.
Ferring et al., 2008, Vasculature ultrasound for the pre-operative evaluation prior to arteriovenous fistula formation for haemodialysis: review of the evidence, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 23(6):1809-1815.
Fischler et al., 1973, The representation and matching of pictorial structures, IEEE Transactions on Computer 22:67-92.
Fleming et al., 2010, Real-time monitoring of cardiac radio-frequency ablation lesion formation using an optical coherence tomography forward-imaging catheter, Journal of Biomedical Optics 15 (3):030516-1 (3 pages).
Fookes et al., 2002, Rigid and non-rigid image registration and its association with mutual information:A review, Technical Report ISBN:1 86435 569 7, RCCVA, QUT.
Forstner & Moonen, 1999, A metric for covariance matrices, In Technical Report of the Dpt of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Stuttgart University, 113-128.
Goel et al., 2006, Minimally Invasive Limited Ligation Endoluminal-assisted Revision (MILLER) for treatment of dialysis access-associated steal syndrome, Kidney Int 70(4):765-70.
Gotzinger et al., 2005, High speed spectral domain polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography of the human retina, Optics Express 13(25):10217-10229.
Gould et al., 1974, Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis, American Journal of Cardiology, 33:87-94.
Griffiths et al., 1993, Human anti-self antibodies with high specificity from phage display libraries, The EMBO Journal, 12:725-734.
Griffiths et al., 1994, Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires, The EMBO Journal, 13(14):3245-3260.
Grund et al., 2010, Analysis of biomarker data:logs, odds, ratios and ROC curves, Curr Opin HIV AIDS 5(6):473-479.
Harrison et al., 2011, Guidewire Stiffness: What's in a name?, J Endovasc Ther, 18(6):797-801.
Huber et al., 2005, Amplified, Frequency Swept Lasers for Frequency Domain Reflectometry and OCT Imaging: Design and Scaling Principles, Optics Express 13(9):3513-3528.
Huber et al., 2006, Fourier Domain Mode Locking (FDML): A New Laser Operating Regime and Applications for Optical Coherence Tomography, Optics Express 14(8):3225-3237.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75675, filed Dec. 17, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/075353, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 2, 2012, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US12/53168, filed Aug. 30, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 14, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076148, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076015, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/075328, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76093, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (6 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 9, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75089, filed Dec. 13, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 21, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76053, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 21, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076965, filed Dec. 20, 2013 (6 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75416, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75653, filed Dec. 17, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75990, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 16, 2009, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/78963 filed on Oct. 6, 2008 (7 Pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 30, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/21659, filed Mar. 7, 2014 (15 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 10, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076212, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76173, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/76449, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076502, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076788, filed Dec. 20, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US13/75349, filed Dec. 16, 2013 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076587, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076909, filed Dec. 20, 2013 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076304, filed Dec. 18, 2013 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076480, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076512, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/076531, filed Dec. 19, 2013 (10 pages).
Jakobovits et al., 1993, Analysis of homozygous mutant chimeric mice:deletion of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain joining region blocks B-cell development and antibody production, PNAS USA 90:2551-255.
Jakobovits et al., 1993, Germ-line transmission and expression of a human-derived yeast artificial chromosome, Nature 362:255-258.
Jang et al., 2002, Visualization of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques in Patients Using Optical Coherence Tomography: Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 39:604-609.
Jiang et al., 1992, Image registration of multimodality 3-D medical images by chamfer matching, Proc. SPIE 1660, Biomedical Image Processing and Three-Dimensional Microscopy, 356-366.
Johnson et al., 1993, Human antibody engineering: Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 3:564-571.
Jones et al., 1986, Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse, Nature, 321:522-525.
Juviler et al., 2008, Anorectal sepsis and fistula-in-ano, Surgical Technology International, 17:139-149.
Karapatis et al., 1998, Direct rapid tooling:a review of current research, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 4(2):77-89.
Karp et al., 2009, The benefit of time-of-flight in PET imaging, J Nucl Med 49:462-470.
Kelly et al., 2005, Detection of Vascular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression Using a Novel Multimodal Nanoparticle, Circulation Research 96:327-336.
Kemp et al., 2005, Depth Resolved Optic Axis Orientation in Multiple Layered Anisotropic Tissues Measured with Enhanced Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography, Optics Express 13(12):4507-4518.
Kersey et al., 1991, Polarization insensitive fiber optic Michelson interferometer, Electron. Lett. 27:518-520.
Kheir et al., 2012, Oxygen Gas-Filled Microparticles Provide Intravenous Oxygen Delivery, Science Translational Medicine 4(140):140ra88 (10 pages).
Khuri-Yakub et al., 2011, Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy, J Micromech Microeng. 21(5):054004-054014.
Kirkman, 1991, Technique for flow reduction in dialysis access fistulas, Surg Gyn Obstet, 172(3):231-3.
Kohler et al., 1975, Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, Nature, 256:495-7.
Koo et al., 2011, Diagnosis of IschemiaCausing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms, J Am Coll Cardiol 58(19):1989-1997.
Kozbor et al., 1984, A human hybrid myeloma for production of human monoclonal antibodies, J. Immunol., 133:3001-3005.
Kruth et al., 2003, Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering, Assembly Automation, 23(4):357-371.
Kumagai et al., 1994, Ablation of polymer films by a femtosecond high-peak-power Ti:sapphire laser at 798 nm, Applied Physics Letters, 65(14):1850-1852.
Larin et al., 2002, Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring with Optical Coherence Tomography: a pilot study in human subjects, Diabetes Care, 25(12):2263-7.
Larin et al., 2004, Measurement of Refractive Index Variation of Physiological Analytes using Differential Phase OCT, Proc of SPIE 5325:31-34.
Laufer, 1996, Introduction to Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK:156-162.
Lefevre et al., 2001, Stenting of bifurcation lesions:a rational approach, J. Interv. Cardiol., 14(6):573-585.
Li et al., 2000, Optical Coherence Tomography: Advanced Technology for the Endoscopic Imaging of Barrett's Esophagus, Endoscopy, 32(12):921-930.
Little et al., 1991, The underlying coronary lesion in myocardial infarction:implications for coronary angiography, Clinical Cardiology, 14(11):868-874.
Loo, 2004, Nanoshell Enabled Photonics-Based Imaging and Therapy of Cancer, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 3(1):33-40.
Machine translation of JP 2000-097846, Publication year: 2000.
Machine translation of JP 2000-321034, Publication year: 2000.
Machine translation of JP 2000-329534, Publication year: 2000.
Machine translation of JP 2004-004080, Published Aug. 1, 2004.
Maintz et al., 1998, An Overview of Medical Image Registration Methods, Technical Report UU-CS, (22 pages).
Mamas et al., 2010, Resting Pd/Pa measured with intracoronary pressure wire strongly predicts fractional flow reserve, Journal of Invasive Cardiology 22(6):260-265.
Marks et al., 1991, By-passing Immunization Human Antibodies from V-gene Libraries Displayed on Phage, J. Mol. Biol. 222:581-597.
Marks et al., 1992, By-Passing Immunization:Building High Affinity Human Antibodies by Chain Shuffling, BioTechnol., 10:779-783.
Maruno et al., 1991, Fluorine containing optical adhesives for optical communications systems, J. Appl. Polymer. Sci. 42:2141-2148.
McCafferty et al., 1990, Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains, Nature 348:552-554.
Mendieta et al., 1996, Complementary sequence correlations with applications to reflectometry studies, Instrumentation and Development 3(6):37-46.
Mickley, 2008, Steal Syndrome-strategies to preserve vascular access and extremity, Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:19-24.
Miller et al., 2010, The MILLER banding procedure is an effective method for treating dialysis-associated steal syndrome, Kidney International 77:359-366.
Milstein et al., 1983, Hybrid hybridomas and their use in immunohistochemistry, Nature 305:537-540.
Mindlin et al., 1936, A force at a point of a semi-infinite solid, Physics, 7:195-202.
Morrison et al., 1984, Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains, PNAS 81:6851-6855.
Munson et al., 1980, Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems, Analytical Biochemistry, 107:220-239.
Nezam, 2008, High Speed Polygon-Scanner-Based Wavelength-Swept Laser Source in the Telescope-Lee Configurations with Application in Optical Coherence Tomography, Optics Letters 33(15):1741-1743.
Nissen, 2001, Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound, American Journal of Cardiology, 87 (suppl):15A-20A.
Nitenberg et al., 1995, Coronary vascular reserve in humans: a critical review of methods of evaluation and of interpretation of the results, Eur Heart J. 16(Suppl 1):7-21.
Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal dated Apr. 30, 2013, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-508677 for Optical Imaging Catheter for Aberation Balancing to Volcano Corporation, which appliation is a Japanese national stage entry of PCT/US2009/043181 with international filing date May 7, 2009, of the same title, published on Nov. 12, 2009, as WO 2009/137704, and accompanying English translation of the Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal and machine translations of JP11-56786 and JP2004-290548 (56 pages).
Nygren, 1982, Conjugation of horseradish peroxidase to Fab fragments with different homobifunctional and heterobifunctional cross-linking reagents. A comparative study, J. Histochem. and Cytochem. 30:407-412.
Oesterle et al., 1986, Angioplasty at coronary bifurcations: single-guide, two-wire technique, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn., 12:57-63.
Okuno et al., 2003, Recent Advances in Optical Switches Using Silica-based PLC Technology, NTT Technical Review 1(7):20-30.
Oldenburg et al., 1998, Nanoengineering of Optical Resonances, Chemical Physics Letters 288:243-247.
Oldenburg et al., 2003, Fast-Fourier-Domain Delay Line for In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography with a Polygonal Scanner, Applied Optics, 42(22):4606-4611.
Othonos, 1997, Fiber Bragg gratings, Review of Scientific Instruments 68(12):4309-4341.
Owens et al., 2007, A Survey of General-Purpose Computation on Graphics Hardware, Computer Graphics Forum 26(1):80-113.
Pain et al., 1981, Preparation of protein A-peroxidase mono conjugate using a heterobifunctional reagent, and its use in enzyme immunoassays, J Immunol Methods, 40:219-30.
Park et al., 2005, Real-time fiber-based multi-functional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 um., Optics Express 13(11):3931-3944.
Pasquesi et al., 2006, In vivo detection of exercise induced ultrastructural changes in genetically-altered murine skeletal muscle using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography, Optics Express 14(4):1547-1556.
Pepe et al., 2004, Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker, American Journal of Epidemiology 159(9):882-890.
Persson et al., 1985, Acoustic impedance matching of medical ultrasound transducers, Ultrasonics, 23(2):83-89.
Placht et al., 2012, Fast time-of-flight camera based surface registration for radiotherapy patient positioning, Medical Physics 39(1):4-17.
Rabbani et al., 1999, Review: Strategies to achieve coronary arterial plaque stabilization, Cardiovascular Research 41:402-417.
Radvany et al., 2008, Plaque Excision in Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease with the SilverHawk Atherectomy Catheter, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 25(1):11-19.
Reddy et al., 1996, An FFT-Based Technique for Translation, Rotation, and Scale-Invariant Image Registration, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 5(8):1266-1271.
Riechmann et al., 1988, Reshaping human antibodies for therapy, Nature, 332:323-327.
Rivers et al., 1992, Correction of steal syndrome secondary to hemodialysis access fistulas: a simplified quantitative technique, Surgery, 112(3):593-7.
Robbin et al., 2002, Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Maturity: US Evaluation, Radiology 225:59-64.
Rollins et al., 1998, In vivo video rate optical coherence tomography, Optics Express 3:219-229.
Sarunic et al., 2005, Instantaneous Complex Conjugate Resolved Spectral Domain and Swept-Source OCT Using 3×3 Fiber Couplers, Optics Express 13(3):957-967.
Satiani et al., 2009, Predicted Shortage of Vascular Surgeons in the United States, J. Vascular Surgery 50:946-952.
Schneider et al., 2006, T-banding: A technique for flow reduction of a hyper-functioning arteriovenous fistula, J Vase Surg. 43(2):402-405.
Sen et al., 2012, Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 59(15):1392-1402.
Setta et al., 2005, Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Human Reproduction, 20(11):3114-3121.
Seward et al., 1996, Ultrasound Cardioscopy: Embarking on New Journey, Mayo Clinic Proceedings 71(7):629-635.
Shen et al., 2006, Eigengene-based linear discriminant model for tumor classification using gene expression microarray data, Bioinformatics 22(21):2635-2642.
Sihan et al., 2008, A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intraluminal optical coherence tomography imaging, Comput. Cardiol:1089-1092.
Siwy et al., 2003, Electro-responsive asymmetric nanopores in polyimide with stable ion-current signal, Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 76:781-785.
Smith et al., 1989, Absolute displacement measurements using modulation of the spectrum of white light in a Michelson interferometer, Applied Optics, 28(16):3339-3342.
Smith, 1997, The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing, California Technical Publishing, San Diego, CA:432-436.
Boller, 2003, Polarization diverse optical frequency domain interferometry:All coupler implementation, Bragg Grating, Photosensitivity, and Poling in Glass Waveguides Conference MB4:30-32.
Song et al., 2012, Active tremor cancellation by a “Smart” handheld vitreoretinal microsurgical tool using swept source optical coherence tomography, Optics Express, 20(21):23414-23421.
Stenqvist et al., 1983, Stiffness of central venous catheters, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., 2:153-157.
Strickland, 1970, Time-Domain Reflectometer Measurements, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, (107 pages).
Strobl et al., 2009, An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning:Rationale, Application and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging and Random Forests, Psychol Methods., 14(4):323-348.
Sutcliffe et al., 1986, Dynamics of UV laser ablation of organic polymer surfaces, Journal of Applied Physics, 60(9):3315-3322.
Suzuki, 2013, A novel guidewire approach for handling acute-angle bifurcations, J Inv Cardiol 25(1):48-54.
Tanimoto et al., 2008, A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection, Cathet Cardiovascular Intervent., 72(2):228-235.
Tearney et al., 1997, In vivo Endoscopic Optical Biopsy with Optical Coherence Tomography, Science, 276:2037-2039.
Tonino et al., 2009, Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention, The New England Journal of Medicine, 360:213-224.
Toregeani et al., 2008, Evaluation of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula maturation by color-flow Doppler ultrasound, J Vasc. Bras. 7(3):203-213.
Translation of Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal dated Apr. 30, 2014, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-508677, (5 pages).
Translation of Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal dated May 25, 2012, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-536425, (3 pages).
Translation of Notice of Reason(s) for Refusal dated Nov. 22, 2012, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-516304, (6 pages).
Traunecker et al., 1991, Bispecific single chain molecules (Janusins) target cytotoxic lymphocytes on HIV infected cells, EMBO J., 10:3655-3659.
Trolier-McKinstry et. al., 2004, Thin Film Piezoelectric for MEMS, Journal of Electroceramics 12:7-17.
Tuniz et al., 2010, Weaving the invisible thread: design of an optically invisible metamaterial fibre, Optics Express 18(17):18095-18105.
Turk et al., 1991, Eigenfaces for Recognition, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(1):71-86.
Tuzel et al., 2006, Region Covariance: A Fast Descriptor for Detection and Classification, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).
Urban et al., 2010, Design of a Pressure Sensor Based on Optical Bragg Grating Lateral Deformation, Sensors (Basel), 10(12):11212-11225.
Vakhtin et al., 2003, Common-path interferometer for frequency-domain optical coherence tomography, Applied Optics, 42(34):6953-6958.
Vakoc et al., 2005, Phase-Resolved Optical Frequency Domain Imaging, Optics Express 13(14):5483-5493.
Verhoeyen et al., 1988, Reshaping human antibodies: grafting an antilysozyme activity, Science, 239:1534-1536.
Villard et al., 2002, Use of a blood substitute to determine instantaneous murine right ventricular thickening with optical coherence tomography, Circulation, 105:1843-1849.
Wang et al., 2002, Optimizing the Beam Patten of a Forward-Viewing Ring-Annular Ultrasound Array for Intravascular Imaging, Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 49(12).
Wang et al., 2006, Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death, The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(25):2631-2639.
Wang et al., 2009, Robust Guidewire Tracking in Fluoroscopy, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—CVPR 2009:691-698.
Wang et al., 2011, In vivo intracardiac optical coherence tomography imaging through percutaneous access: toward image-guided radio-frequency ablation, J. Biomed Opt. 0001 16(11):110505-1 (3 pages).
Waterhouse et. al., 1993, Combinatorial infection and in vivo recombination: a strategy for making large phage antibody repertoires, Nucleic Acids Res., 21:2265-2266.
Wegener, 2011, 3D Photonic Metamaterials and Invisibility Cloaks: The Method of Making, MEMS 2011, Cancun, Mexico, Jan. 23-27, 2011.
West et al., 1991, Arterial insufficiency in hemodialysis access procedures: correction by banding technique, Transpl Proc 23(2):1838-40.
Wyawahare et al., 2009, Image registration techniques: an overview, International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 2(3):11-28.
Yaqoob et al., 2006, Methods and application areas of endoscopic optical coherence tomography, J. Biomed. Opt., 11, 063001-1-063001-19.
Yasuno et al., 2004, Polarization-sensitive complex Fourier domain optical coherence tomography for Jones matrix imaging of biological samples, Applied Physics Letters 85(15):3023-3025.
Zhang et al., 2004, Full range polarization-sensitive Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, Optics Express, 12(24):6033-6039.
Zitova et al., 2003, Image registration methods: A survey. Image and Vision Computing, 21(11):977-1000.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180100185 A1 Apr 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61716992 Oct 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14058799 Oct 2013 US
Child 15835697 US