The field of the invention is printing presses, and more particularly, inking systems for printing presses.
An offset printing press typically includes a plate cylinder carrying one or more printing plates. The printing plates have oleophilic surfaces defining an image area, and hydrophilic surfaces defining a non-image area. An inker applies ink to the printing plate which collects on the oleophilic surfaces to form an image which can be transferred to a blanket cylinder which transfers the image to media. By transferring the image from the printing plate onto a blanket roller, and then onto the media, the printing plate does not directly print the image on the media, hence the term offset printing.
The inker applies ink carried on one or more form rollers to the printing plate. When the form roller in the inker engages the printing plate, the ink film on the form roller contacting image areas on the printing plate is split such that approximately one-half of the thickness of the ink film is applied to the image area of the printing plate leaving approximately one-half the ink on the form roller causing a condition referred to as starvation. The ink film on the form roller contacting non-image areas on the printing plate remains on the form roller causing a condition called accumulation.
This combination of accumulation and starvation results in undesirable “ghosted” images and image repeats being formed on the final printed product. In order to minimize this problem, conventional inkers include a plurality of form rollers which each apply a small amount.
The printed product is monitored to determine when ink density has degraded beyond an acceptable level. In order to control the quality of the printing, conventional printer inkers also include a plurality of adjustable keys to control the amount of ink being applied to the form roller. These keys require constant adjustment to maintain the quality of the printed product.
One attempt to provide a keyless inker incorporated a reverse rotating roller in pressural indentation contact with a main form roller to meter the ink and erase the previous image on the form roller. This prior art inker provided an even film of ink on the printing plate, and inhibited the accumulation and starvation of ink on the form roller. This reverse roller imposed a counter rotating force to the main form roller which increased the power requirements for operating the printing press. In addition the friction caused by the counter-rotating roller generated a tremendous amount of heat that had to be “taken away,” resulting in more horse power and satellite refrigeration equipment at each printing assembly.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,463, an inker is disclosed for a lithographic printing press in which dampening fluid is applied to a resilient form roller. A blade is mounted to remove the dampening fluid and excess ink directly from the resilient form roller surface. The form roller is rotated into the leading edge of the doctor blade, which is pressure indented to the form roller, and increases the power requirements for rotating the form roller. Furthermore, the blade has a tendency to damage the form roller resilient surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,527,479 discloses a method and apparatus for continuously using ink and dampening fluid in a printing system which includes removing ink and dampening fluid from a form roller after the form roller engages the printing plate. Unused printing ink and dampening fluid is removed from the form roller by an idler roller, and a scraping off means scrapes the mixture directly from the idler roller. The mixture is then returned to the reservoir. The ink and dampening fluid removed from the form roller are blended in the reservoir with fresh ink, and recirculated to a distributor line for application to the form roller. This concept works well for a printing press using a low viscosity news print ink which does not dry quickly onto a continuous media. However, for high quality multi colored sheet fed products, the circulation of ink and wash-up requirements is prohibitive.
Another attempt to solve the problem of ghosting is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,315,930 entitled “KEYLESS INKING SYSTEM FOR A PRINTING PRESS.” This patent discloses an inking system for a printing press having an ink injector for supplying ink under pressure, and a device for pumping and metering the ink flow in the injector. The ink injector supplies ink to a fountain roller having an outer brush surface. The fountain roller applies the ink to a pick up roller which transfers the ink through a series of rollers to an applicator roller. The applicator roller has a resilient surface, and applies the ink to two form rollers. A scraper roller engages the applicator roller to remove excess ink therefrom. A scraper blade scrapes ink from the scraper roller. Ink scraped from the scraper roller is transported to an ink reservoir, and is then recirculated using a pump to the ink injector. The inking system in U.S. Pat. No. 5,315,930 has multiple form rollers, and does not provide any means for removing excess ink from the form rollers. In addition, the inking system requires ink recirculation which requires a lengthy wash-up time.
All of the patents referred to above have sought to solve “ghosting,” starvation, and accumulation problems in inking systems. However, the solutions have complicated the printing press assemblies, require circulating the ink which complicates washing the inker for a color change, and can cause damage to the single form roller.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an inking system which reduces or eliminates “ghosting,” repeat, starvation and accumulation problems normally associated with prior inking systems.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a relatively uncomplicated inking apparatus which provides uniform inking.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an effective inker having a single form roller for applying a uniform film of ink on a printing plate.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an inking system having effective control of the ink so that it is applied uniformly across the plate two-dimensionally.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an inking system in which wash-up may be efficiently accomplished with minimal use of wash-up fluids or solvents.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an inker that does not require ink circulation to simplify wash-up when changing ink colors.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an inking system having effective control of the ink film applied uniformly across the plate by varying the speed of the ink applicator roller.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an inking system having effective control of the ink being removed from the surface of the form roller.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an inking system in which wash-up may be efficiently accomplished without press assist. The ink applicator and subtractive roll motors provide the inker rotation for wash-up.
These and other objects and features will be apparent from the written description and drawings contained herein.
The invention disclosed herein provides a printing press having a keyless inking system. A conventional key adjusted inking system is an attempt to solve a two dimensional ink distribution problem with a one-dimensional control system (i.e. a row of keys arranged along the width of the press). The present invention controls the two dimensional ink distribution on the surface of a single form roller which inks the printing plate(s).
The inking system of the present invention employs a form roller for applying ink to a printing plate, and a transfer roller adjacent the form roller for removing excess ink from the form roller after printing. A subtractive roller adjacent the transfer roller removes excess ink from the transfer roller, and a scraper blade adjacent the subtractive roller scrapes excess ink from said subtractive roller. An ink reservoir adjacent the scraper blade receives ink scraped from the subtractive roller, and supplies ink for application onto the form roller. An applicator roller adjacent the ink reservoir receives ink from the ink reservoir, and applies the ink to the form roller.
The scraper blade and doctor blade are preferably mounted in a common blade holder which is movable for simultaneously positioning the scraper blade in engagement with the smooth-surfaced ink subtractive roller and the doctor blade in engagement with the surface of the applicator roller. Space between the scraper blade and the doctor blade forms an ink fountain which receives ink from the subtractive roller and applies ink to the applicator roller. Thus, an inker is provided which has an ink reservoir interposed between a subtractive roller which deposits excess ink from the form roller therein, and an applicator roller which receives ink from the ink reservoir for application onto the form roller.
Embodiments of the present invention include a printing system having a rotating plate cylinder carrying a printing plate and a single form roller for applying ink to the printing plate. In accordance with this aspect of the invention the plate cylinder and the form roller are rotated at the same rpm so that the same areas on the form roller contact the same areas on the printing plate during each revolution of the plate cylinder. The plate cylinder and the form roller are configured to have different diameters and, thus, have different surface speeds at a nip formed there between. The system may be equipped with the keyless, subtractive inking system described above. In operation the system is capable of producing an ink film on the two-dimensional surface of the single form roller which essentially eliminates ghosting, repeats, accumulation and starvation. Through simple speed adjustments of the applicator roller, an essentially uniform film of ink may be applied to the image areas of the printing plate. Repeats and ghostings caused by a lack of registration between surfaces of the printing plate and the form roller are eliminated.
In preferred embodiments of the printing system of the present invention, the form roller is of similar size to the plate cylinder. The form roller may be constructed with a removable covering to facilitate maintenance procedures and to reduce the need to remove the relatively large form roller from the press.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the applicator roller has a hard surface formed with an array of wells, adjacent ones of which are interconnected by at least one channel. A doctor blade, which forms part of the ink reservoir, meters ink from the ink reservoir onto the applicator roller. The amount of ink applied to the form roller and then to the printing plate may be adjusted by adjusting the speed of the applicator roller relative to the press speed.
Preferred embodiments of the printing system of the present invention are designed to facilitate efficient and effective ink wash-up. These systems may include mechanisms for disengaging the press drive from the inker and for separately driving the inking system during wash-up. One or more spray bars may be used for applying wash-up fluid to at least one roller in the inking system. In operation the ink subtractive roller may be used to remove a mixture of wash-up fluid and residual ink from the inker system and deposit the mixture into a wash common reservoir during wash-up.
The foregoing is intended to provide a convenient summary of the present disclosure. However, the invention intended to be protected is set forth in the claims hereof.
Drawings of preferred embodiments of the invention are annexed hereto so that the invention may be better and more fully understood.
FIG. 6(a) is a detail of
FIGS. 10(a), (b) & (c) are illustrations of various printed images;
FIG. 11(a) is a detail of
Numeral references are employed to designate like parts or aspects throughout the various figures of the drawings.
Referring to
Each printing assembly 11 includes a plate cylinder 12 carrying a printing plate 14 containing an image for printing on the media. The image is formed by image areas on the plate 14 which receive ink from a single form roller 15 of an inker 21. Ink is applied to the printing plate 14 by the inker 21 to form a transferable inked image thereon corresponding to the image areas on the printing plate 14. The plate cylinder 12 is rotated to engage the printing plate 14 with a rotatably mounted blanket cylinder 16, and transfer the inked image onto the blanket cylinder 16. The blanket cylinder 16 then transfers the inked image to the media which is pinched between the blanket cylinder 16 and an impression cylinder 19. A transfer cylinder 23 adjacent the impression cylinder 19 facilitates the transfer of the media 13 to an adjacent printing assembly 11 for applying a different color image to the media 13. Optionally, a dampener system 22 may be provided to apply dampening fluid to the form roller 15.
Referring to
The single form roller 15 has a resilient surface, and is mounted in rolling engagement with the printing plate 14. Ink on the form roller 15 corresponding to image areas on the printing plate 14 is applied to the printing plate 14, while ink on the form roller 15 corresponding to non-image areas on the printing plate 14 remains on the form roller 15. Preferably, the circumference of the form roller 15 is not equal to the circumference of the printing plate cylinder 12.
A rotatably mounted applicator roller adjacent the form roller 15 receives ink from the ink reservoir 50, and applies it to the form roller 15. Preferably, the applicator roller is an anilox roller 40 having a smooth hard durable surface, such as provided by a ceramic coating, with reservoirs formed therein for carrying ink to the surface of form roller 15. Ink in the ink reservoir 50 flows onto the surface of the anilox roller 40, and is metered by a doctor blade 42 such that a precisely controlled volume of ink is carried by the anilox roller 40 to the form roller 15. Preferably, as shown in
Referring back to
Resilient covered oscillator roller 18 and resilient covered oscillator roller 35 oscillate longitudinally in opposite directions for conditioning the image carried on the surface of form roller 15. It should be readily apparent that, if oscillator roller 35 is moving at a surface speed greater than the surface speed of the form roller 15, it will act as a transfer roller, and carry more ink out of the flat nip 35a than is carried out of the nip on the surface of form roller 15. Preferably, the surface speed of roller 35 is adjustable for controlling the rate at which ink is removed from the surface of form roller 15. As best shown in the detail of
Oscillator roller 35 removes excess ink from the surface of the form roller 15 to prevent ink accumulation, and transfers it to the smooth surface of a subtractive roller 30. Preferably, as shown in
Preferably, subtractive roller 30 is rotatably driven by a variable speed motor 39, shown in FIG. 5. The gear 34G on subtractive roll 30 engages gear 37 to drive the oscillating roller 35. Roller 30 is preferably driven by the variable speed motor 39 such that the rate at which ink is removed from the form roller 15 can be controlled. Although, a single motor driving roller 35 and roller 30 is preferred, each roller 30 and 35 can be individually motor driven without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The oscillating roller 35, subtractive roller 30, and anilox roller 40 are preferably rotatably driven at surface speeds different from the surface speed of the form roller 15. The oscillating roller 35 is preferably driven in a range between about 1% and 10% faster than the surface speed of form roller 15 and more preferably between 2% and 5% faster than the surface speed of form roller 15 for removing more than one-half of the ink film from the surface of form roller 15. Thus, the oscillating transfer roller 35 is capable of efficiently removing ink from the surface of form roller 15 after it contacts the printing plate to prevent accumulation of excess ink on the form roller 15 surface.
As shown in
The ink reservoir 50 includes an adjustable blade holder 34 having a doctor blade 42 and a scraper blade 32 mounted thereto. The blades 32, 42 form a trough extending past the length of the anilox roller 40 and the subtractive roller 30. The trough holds a mass of the ink, commonly referred to as an “ink fountain.”
The blade holder 34 is adjustable relative to each of the rollers 30 and 40 to position the trough therebetween. Blade holder 34 is adjustable vertically in a slide block (not shown) for positioning scraper blade 32 and doctor blade 42 in engagement with the subtractive roller 30 and the anilox roller 40, respectively. Blade holder 34 preferably is rotatable about its longitudinal axis relative to the slide block for adjusting pressure of scraper blade 32 relative to the pressure of doctor blade 42.
As shown in the detail of FIG. 6(a) the blade holder 34 comprises a base 52 having a pair of projections 33 and 43 extending outwardly from opposite sides thereof with a relieved area 54 forming shoulders 32a and 42a adjacent opposite ends thereof for positioning scraper blade 32 and doctor blade 42. A blade clamp 44 is configured to be received in the base relieved area 54, and has projections 33a and 43a adjacent opposite sides thereof. A bolt 45 extends through blade clamp 44, and is received in a threaded aperture in base 52 for grippingly engaging scraper blade 32 and doctor blade 42 between the blade clamp 44 and base 52.
When clamped on the blade holder 34, the scraper blade 32 extends away from one side of the blade holder 34, and engages the subtractive roller 30 to scrape excess ink therefrom. The doctor blade 42 extends away from the opposite side of the blade holder 34 toward the anilox roller 40 to meter the application of ink thereon. Preferably, the scraper blade 32 and doctor blade 42 scrape and meter the respective rollers 30 and 40 above a line extending through longitudinal axes of the rollers 30, 40, and may be formed of, for example, fiber glass material.
End dams 46 are positioned adjacent opposite ends of blade holder 34, scraper blade 32, and doctor blade 42 for capping each end of the trough. A cavity is formed in an inwardly directed face of each end dam 46 to receive the blade holder 34 and blades 32, 42, and sealingly cap the ends of the trough. The volume of ink extends above upper ends of scraper blade 32 and doctor blade 42 to assure that ink is always present to provide lubrication between the scraper blade 32 and the surface of subtractive roller 30, and to provide sufficient ink between the doctor blade 42 and the surface of the anilox roller 40 for application to the surface of the form roller 15.
As best illustrated in
As shown in
As shown in
Preferably, the blade clamp 44, scraper blade 32, and doctor blade 42 are assembled as a single removable unit from blade holder base 52, such as by attaching the blades 32, 42 to the blade clamp 44 using methods known in the art, such as bolting, welding, and the like, to simplify the color change procedure in the printing assembly 11. The removable unit is removed from the inker 21 during color change for inker wash-up purposes, and replaced with a wash-up assembly 70, shown in FIG. 8. The wash-up assembly 70 is installed in the removable unit location to collect wash-up solution and ink cleaned out of the printing assembly 11.
As shown in
Another preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
In offset printing, the plate cylinder 102 is rotated to engage one or more removable printing plates 106 with a rotatably mounted blanket cylinder 108. The blanket cylinder 108 then transfers inked image(s) to the media which is pinched between the blanket cylinder 108 (a portion of which is shown in
The inking system 104 may include a keyless, subtractive inking system using a single form roller 110 such as previously described. The plate cylinder and the form roller have different diameters and have different surface speeds at a nip 112 formed between the plate cylinder and the form roller. The differential speed produces sharper printed images and tends to remove debris from the plate surface. It also tends to eliminate repeats and inker related streaks produced by conventional inkers. Advantageously, the difference in surface speeds at the nip 112 is greater than one foot per minute, for example, between four and ten feet per minute.
In preferred embodiments, the plate cylinder 102 and the form roller may be rotated at the same rpm, so that the same areas on the form roller contact the same areas on printing plate(s) 106 during each revolution of the plate cylinder. This may be accomplished by appropriate selection of conventional drives, for example, the chain coupled drive 114 and drive motor 116 shown in FIG. 9.
The rotation of the single form roller and plate cylinder at the same rotational speed eliminates repeats or ghostings caused by a lack of registration between surfaces of the printing plate and the form roller. This effect may be explained with reference to FIG. 10.
FIG. 10(a) illustrates a layout 200 which is difficult or impossible to print without ghosting, or repeats with conventional printing systems. The arrows in the figure represent the direction the sheet is transported through the press. Difficulties arise from the fact that printing of the inked areas 202 (cross-hatched areas) tends to deplete ink on the corresponding areas of the form roller, while the unprinted areas 204 correspond to areas where build up of unused ink occurs on the form roller.
FIG. 10(b) illustrates the result of these effects on a subsequently printed sheet 206. For example, the area 208 is affected by the buildup of ink on the form roller caused by the printing of the corresponding area 208’ in the previously printed page. The result of this build-up is ghosting in areas 210 (dotted areas) and greater ink density in repeat area 212 (dotted and cross-hatched area). The result is an inferior printed product which does not faithfully replicate the desired image depicted in FIG. 10(a) and which contains phantom lines (for example, lines 209) at the edges of the ghosting and repeat areas.
By employing the above described techniques, registration between the surfaces of the printing plate and the form roller is achieved, thus minimizing this kind of ghosting and repeating. It will be understood, however, that such a system may cause a more rapid build up of ink in the areas on the form roller corresponding to areas 204. This problem may be addressed by use of a subtractive inking system such as described herein.
The difference in surface speeds is achieved by employing somewhat different radii for the form roller 110 and plate cylinder 102. These radii are represented in
The keyless subtractive inking system 104 of
The ink application system 126 may include an applicator roller 130 and a doctor blade 132. Ink on the applicator roller 130 is deposited on the form roller at nip 134. The structure and operation of the ink application system is described in greater detail in FIG. 11.
In use, ink 142 maintained in the ink reservoir flows downward to ink fountain 144. The wiper blade 132 meters ink from the reservoir onto the applicator roller. Ink at the fountain is picked up in the cells 138 of the applicator roller 130 and deposited onto the form roller 110.
The applicator roller 130 is driven to rotate by a variable speed driver 146. The driver may be a variable speed motor, variable gear or belt drive or the equivalent. Applicants have determined that the roller speed difference at nip 134 effects the amount of ink applied to the form roller 110. Varying the rotational speed of the applicator roller may be used to vary the amount of ink applied to the form roller, and ultimately the amount of ink applied to the printed media.
With reference again to
An aspect of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 10(c). FIG. 10(c) is an example of a printed image produced when the ink subtraction subsystem 124 is disengaged. FIG. 10(c) shows the upper left hand corner of the image of FIG. 10(a) as it might be printed if the ink subtractive subsystem had been disengaged. Ink buildup would occur on the form roller in the area corresponding to the unprinted stripe 210. The oscillation roller 156 would tend to move portions of the ink buildup stripe. Without the subtraction subsystem 124, this buildup would not be removed, resulting in oscillating phantom stripe 212, which forms ghosting regions 214 (dotted area) and repeat regions 216 (dotted and cross-hatched region) in a subsequently printed page.
Referring once more to
The apparatus of
The form roller 110 of the inker is rotatably mounted on inker chassis 318. The inker chassis is pivotably mounted on the printer chassis 320. During printing the form roller 110 of the inker is rotated by a series of gears 322, 324, 326, 328 and 330 which rotate in synchrony with the plate cylinder 102 and the press drive.
During wash-up, hydraulic cylinder 332 is actuated to rotate the inker chassis 318 about axis 334 through, for example, about a 5° angle as indicated by the arrow 336.
This movement disengages the surface of the form roller from the printing plate. Air clutch 338 may be used to disengage gear 322 from the form roller 110 and, thereby, disengage the form roller from the press drive so that the press cylinders and form roller may be rotated separately from one another. In this configuration the form roller may, for example, be rotated during wash-up by functional engagement with the rotating transfer roller 147 of the subtractive system described in connection with FIG. 9.
Referring once more to
The wash-up process proceeds essentially automatically and harnesses the ink subtraction system to remove and collect the mixture. The wash-up procedure may be performed using a smaller amount of wash-up fluid relative to convention wash-up processes, with consequential material savings and environmental benefits. Because the inking system is disengaged from the press drive and plate cylinder during wash-up, maintenance can be simultaneously performed on the press, plates may be cleaned and replaced, etc.
while there has been shown and described what are at present considered the preferred embodiment of the invention, it will be obvious to those skill in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein with out departing from the scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/813,887, filed Mar. 22, 2001, issued Jan. 6, 2004 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,672,211, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/507,549, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,571,710, issued on Jun. 3, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/122,765 filed on Mar. 3, 1999, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2285052 | Roesen | Jun 1942 | A |
2613600 | McWhorter | Oct 1952 | A |
2986088 | Chase et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
2821133 | Brodie | Jan 1958 | A |
3467008 | Domotor | Sep 1969 | A |
3504626 | Worthington | Apr 1970 | A |
3587463 | Granger | Jun 1971 | A |
3611924 | Harrison | Oct 1971 | A |
3701316 | Sylvester et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3800702 | Roberts | Apr 1974 | A |
3842735 | Southam et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3897726 | Junghans | Aug 1975 | A |
3937141 | Dahlgren | Feb 1976 | A |
3986450 | Zimmer | Oct 1976 | A |
4040348 | Gertsch et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4041864 | Dahlgren et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4066017 | Garcowaki et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4158333 | Navi | Jun 1979 | A |
4223603 | Faddis et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4254709 | Arnolds | Mar 1981 | A |
4263848 | Matalia et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4308796 | Satterwhite | Jan 1982 | A |
4373442 | Dahlgren et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4373443 | Matalia et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4404908 | Simeth | Sep 1983 | A |
4428288 | Harper et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4428291 | Darow | Jan 1984 | A |
4432282 | Jurinak | Feb 1984 | A |
4453463 | Dahlgren et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4493257 | Kubert et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4497250 | Dressler | Feb 1985 | A |
4527471 | Dahlgren et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4527479 | Dahlgren et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4542693 | Mourrellone | Sep 1985 | A |
4621574 | Faddis et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4685414 | DiRico | Aug 1987 | A |
4690055 | Fadner et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4864925 | Van Kanegan et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4967657 | Popkin | Nov 1990 | A |
5033380 | Sonobe et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046416 | Freyer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5178065 | Reder et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178678 | Koehler et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5205216 | Okamura et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213044 | Elia | May 1993 | A |
5218905 | Bolte et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5243910 | Burch | Sep 1993 | A |
5259313 | Gibson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5297488 | Bunch, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315930 | Niemiro | May 1994 | A |
5355796 | Kobler et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355799 | Lutz | Oct 1994 | A |
5425809 | Person | Jun 1995 | A |
5447102 | Pfeiffer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452660 | Stein | Sep 1995 | A |
5540149 | Hoge | Jul 1996 | A |
5603262 | Vera et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5709147 | Uera et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5865116 | Keller | Feb 1999 | A |
5908505 | Bargenquest et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915302 | Baba et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5983799 | Lane, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006664 | Hummel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006665 | Stuchlik et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041706 | Murray | Mar 2000 | A |
6055907 | Endisch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065402 | Feller et al. | May 2000 | A |
6116161 | Voge et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6382098 | Inoue et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401618 | Cheung | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409645 | Paasonen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6588337 | Kreckel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20010032559 | Freeman | Oct 1991 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11 30 453 | May 1962 | DE |
44 24 581 | Oct 1995 | DE |
61 106254 | May 1986 | JP |
8304003 | Nov 1983 | WO |
00 51817 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040103803 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60122765 | Mar 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09813887 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10720254 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09507549 | Feb 2000 | US |
Child | 09813887 | US |