The present technology relates generally to high fibrousness, high moisture extrudates.
Provided herein are exemplary methods for creating high fibrousness, high moisture extrudates by selecting a raw material for use in an extruder, selecting an additive for use in the extruder, and selecting a parameter for operating the extruder. Further methods include opening the structure and surface of extrudate, applying a needle roller to the extrudate, adding gas, steam and/or water between the extruder and a die. Additionally, the extrudate may be cooked with high water absorption, increasing water absorption from approximately 40% to approximately 80%.
According to various exemplary embodiments, the raw material may include a combination of hemp and soy, a combination of hemp and gluten, or a combination of hemp, soy and gluten. The additive may include sodium hydroxide in a range of approximately 0.05% to approximately 1.00%, and nitrogen in a range of approximately 0.01% to approximately 5.00%. The extrudate may be boiled in water to achieve a high water absorption of between approximately 20% and 120%, or boiling the extrudate in water and spice to achieve high water and spice absorption of between approximately 20% and 120%. A marinade may be added before or during the cooking, with a content of the marinade ranging from approximately 1% to approximately 20%.
The combinations of proteins, in some exemplary embodiments, is 25% hemp and 75% soy, 35% hemp and 65% soy, 45% hemp and 55% soy or 55% hemp and 45% soy.
In some embodiments the present technology is directed to a system for producing long fibers via high velocity cooling die stream inlets in a High Moisture Extrusion process, the system comprising: an extruder to mix ingredients to turn them into a protein extrudate; a cooling die to cool the protein extrudate and to cool an enhanced extrudate with ingredients added after the extruder the cooling die further comprising: one or more flow channel entrances for entry of the protein extrudate into the cooling die; one or more entrance cones to direct the movement of the protein extrudate into the one or more flow channel entrances; and one or more cooling die inlet inserts at the one or more flow channel entrances, wherein the cooling die inlet inserts are coupled with the one or more flow channel entrances to create one or more narrow high velocity entrances for the protein extrudate into the cooling die, wherein the high velocity inlets accelerate the flow of the protein extrudate as it enters the cooling die. In various embodiments the one or more narrow high velocity entrances include a diffusion pattern.
The accompanying drawings, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed disclosure and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
The methods and systems disclosed herein have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
Callout numbers originate from the underlying Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 63/305,170.
Callout numbers originate from the underlying Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 63/305,170.
Callout numbers originate from the underlying Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 63/305,170.
Meat analogues and meat alternative products made out of plant proteins (including also protein enriched flours, concentrates and isolates) and plant products are gaining in popularity, this is due to a variety of factors including increased environmental consciousness. However, in their current state, meat analogues, meat alternatives and plant-based foods and proteins may suffer from several disadvantages and shortcomings relative to natural meat. Some obvious disadvantages and shortcomings of current alternative meat products are their taste and texture, which are different from and fail to replicate the taste and texture of natural meats, these alternatives also fail to resemble meats in color and other physical aspects.
Therefore, in the field of meat analogue or meat alternative manufacturing processes, it is generally accepted that there are several goals that the final meat analogue product and the manufacturing process itself must meet; these include alternative meat products that are desirable to the senses, tasty and affordable. More specifically, the alternative meat products should have a texture very similar to that of natural meats. A meat-like texture allows the bite or crunch of a meat analogue product to feel like that of natural meats to the consumer. Other goals are for the meat analogue to taste like and have the same color and/or physically resemble natural meats.
To realize these goals, the meat analogue industry has moved towards a High Moisture Extrudate (HME) extrusion process. An HME extrusion process may include shearing. It is generally accepted that the HME extrusion process involves several standardized steps, these steps may be modifiable, altered, added to, or removed depending on the mixtures, recipes and ingredients used as well as the desired product outcome. However, the standard process includes feeding and conveying ingredients into an extruder, mixing, heating and melting the extrudate mixture and compressing the mixture and then to achieve and/or maintain the desired meat-like texture, to press the extrudate mixture into a cooling die which further cools and structures the mixture. In this process, protein and water can be mixed in a ratio of 1:1, 1:2 (one part protein and two parts water), 1:3 (one part protein and three parts water), 2:1 (two parts protein and one part water), 2:2 (two parts protein and two parts water) or in any other ratio, both materials are added to the extruder together or separately. The challenge, however, is to produce an HME material with high water absorption.
Generally, after the HME extrusion process the extrudate mixture is cut or sheared to determine the shape and size of the final product and to allow the ingress and uptake of moisture by the extrudate and then cooked in water for around 20 mins to increase juiciness, creating a meat-like feel to the bite as part of a series of post-processing steps. However, cooking in water softens the extrudate, and the longer the extrudate is cooked in water, the softer it gets, losing its meat like fiberization that was produced in the extruder and cooling die portions of the HME extrusion process.
The HME extrusion process therefore uses the extruder for mixing ingredients to form a protein extrudate/texturate, and then uses an interim plate to connect the extruder to a cooling die, where the extrudate would move through to enter the die. There is usually an inlet to the cooling die with a particular shape that would facilitate or direct the flow of the extrudate towards a certain direction to enter the die. By the time the extrudate enters the die, the extrudate has cooled for a small amount, but the primary cooling and the place where the fibers and structure of the protein mix extrudate/texturate are largely formed and the extrudate becomes difficult to alter, is after the extrudate is cooled and structured inside the cooling die. Usually, the post-cooling steps after the cooling die such as cutting, and cooling are used to add new ingredients, textures, or flavors into the protein extrudate.
Post-processing steps may also be added after the HME extrusion process after the cooling die which may include cutting and shearing the protein, or more typically after the extrudate mixture leaves the cooling die, and these steps may include cutting, shearing, cooking, freezing, storing, or adding flavors, fats and other food manufacturing and culinary additives.
A texturized product, or in other embodiments an extrudate mixture that is fed into and/or is created in an extruder may be comprised of any food manufacturing ingredient including and not limited to plant proteins, soy or pea proteins or isolates, plant protein concentrates, protein isolates, meat proteins and compositions, and protein products and concentrates, as well as additives such as flavor enhancers, preservatives, PH agents, color additives, fats, bonding agents and compositions, salts as well water, other solutions and liquids. The extrudate mixture may be pre-mixed before feeding into the extruder or separate components may be added individually into the extruder, or a combination of both.
According to various exemplary embodiments, a structure is produced that closely matches the structure of meat, preferably as a whole muscle. To achieve this goal, optimization of HME structure is aimed at different levels (process, recipe, pre- and post-processing technology).
At step 101, a high fibrousness, rubbery, firm high moisture extrudate is created.
With respect to materials to form the HME, highly structured protein is used, in some cases hemp in a range of approximately 0% to 100%, soy in a range of 0% to approximately 100% and gluten in a range of approximately 0% to 100%. Additionally, strong structure-forming protein combinations may be utilized, including:
With respect to parameter settings of the extruder, in exemplary embodiments, higher temperatures and increased shearing are employed. With respect to additives, the goal is to increase the pH (e.g., 6 or 6.8 to 7.5) for increased water uptake into the HME. It is interesting to note that the HME is sensitive to changes in pH.
The extrusion process typically involves:
At step 102, the structure and surface of the high moisture extrudate is opened. This step happens after the extrusion and after the cooling die. The structure and surface are opened and a needle roller is used to increase the uptake of water. The opening of the structure may be performed with a mechanical stress, such as with a needle roller, a roller mill or similar processes. In some exemplary embodiments, the HME material, after undergoing the HME process and passing through a control system, is precut, then fine cut into any shape via a continuous cutter or other such equipment. The extrudate may also be used as a material for the production of formed products. For this purpose, the material may be comminuted before it is used in a dough.
Additionally, gas (e.g., pure Nitrogen) is added in the extruder to make the HME more sponge-like (in some cases having a thickness of 10-12 millimeters) with the ability to increase the uptake of water. The aim here is not to create a sponge structure but to enable the structure to absorb more water. It will be sponge like as air bubbles are included, but these bubbles are super fine and cannot be seen by the naked eye directly. At the same time, the fiber is divided and less homogenous.
With respect to adding gas, steam and water between the extruder and die, in some embodiments the present technology is directed to a system for dosing and mixing ingredients in a High Moisture Extrusion process, the system comprising: an extruder to mix ingredients to turn them into a protein extrudate; a cooling die to cool the protein extrudate and to cool an enhanced extrudate with ingredients added after the extruder; an interim plate connecting the extruder and the cooling die, to add and mix further ingredients, and facilitate movement of the protein extrudate and the enhanced extrudate into the cooling die, the interim plate further comprising: one or more interim plate inlets to allow the entry of the protein extrudate from the extruder into the interim plate; one or more dosing inlets for adding new ingredients to the protein extrudate that exits the extruder and enters the interim plate, the dosing inlets being placed on any location on the interim plate; an at least one static mixer, which mixes the new ingredients with the protein extrudate to form the enhanced extrudate; one or more flow channels to facilitate the movement of the extrudate and the enhanced extrudate through the interim plate (which may also include inserts and a special feeding system to the interim plate) and into one or more channels of the cooling die; and one or more interim plate outlets to allow the flow of the protein extrudate and the enhanced extrudate into the cooling die.
In various embodiments, the system incorporates a low degree of mixing by the static mixer, when mixing new ingredients with the protein extrudate to form the enhanced extrudate. This ensures that the enhanced extrudate is not homogenized.
At step 103, the high moisture extrudate is cooked with high water absorption. In various exemplary embodiments, this process is performed with or without vacuum cooking and may last approximately 15 to 90 minutes. In various exemplary cases, water absorption increases from approximately 40% to approximately 80%.
The cooking process typically involves:
As shown by the exemplary standard HME after extrusion, the properties include:
As shown by the base juicy HME after extrusion, the properties include:
Shown in
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the present disclosure in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present disclosure and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the present disclosure for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth herein. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
The present U.S. Non-Provisional Patent application claims priority benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/305,170 filed on Jan. 31, 2022 and titled “Cooling Die High Velocity Stream Inlets,” and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2914103 | Ferris | Nov 1959 | A |
3488770 | Atkinson | Jan 1970 | A |
3496858 | Jenkins | Feb 1970 | A |
3778522 | Strommer | Dec 1973 | A |
4017646 | Hoer | Apr 1977 | A |
4132809 | Desrosier | Jan 1979 | A |
4208476 | Tsao | Jun 1980 | A |
4226576 | Hildebolt | Oct 1980 | A |
4367240 | MacLennan | Jan 1983 | A |
4555485 | Marsh | Nov 1985 | A |
4615901 | Yoshioka | Oct 1986 | A |
5565234 | Teraguchi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5909958 | Rauwendaal | Jun 1999 | A |
5919509 | Cremers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6379738 | Dingman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
8603555 | Innocenzi | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8685485 | McMindes et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9161556 | Fisk | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9750268 | Thomas | Sep 2017 | B1 |
10172380 | Varadan et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10287568 | Kale et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10499663 | Kivelä et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10745682 | Sebastian et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
11224236 | Murata | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20050064087 | Richey | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050226971 | Schuppan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080248167 | McMindes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100021593 | Denis | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100074998 | Vega et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110086130 | Axelrod | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120093994 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120207904 | Twombly | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237648 | Ortiz | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130216674 | Haines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150044334 | Walther et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150296834 | Geistlinger | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150351427 | Rose et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160326484 | Jewell | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338392 | Gillette et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170303558 | Eisner et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20190008192 | Brown et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190037893 | Ajami et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190045809 | Lee et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190200658 | Vrljic et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216106 | Geistlinger et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190246679 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200037654 | Wang | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200157506 | Bayer et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200323238 | Pibarot | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210037852 | Chessari | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210100263 | Chessari | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210106026 | Mudgal et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20220202038 | Knoch et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220202039 | Knoch | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220202040 | Knoch | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220202041 | Knoch | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220202054 | Daoust | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220202060 | Knoch | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220203593 | Knoch et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220217994 | Ellis | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20230000117 | Knoch | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230034165 | Schlüter | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230063655 | Daoust | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230189841 | Daoust et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230240350 | Schlüter et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002315573 | Jul 2005 | AU |
3100909 | Dec 2019 | CA |
104171016 | Dec 2014 | CN |
105495561 | Apr 2016 | CN |
106514983 | Mar 2017 | CN |
110623081 | Dec 2019 | CN |
111869787 | Nov 2020 | CN |
111903833 | Nov 2020 | CN |
112006152 | Dec 2020 | CN |
213153713 | May 2021 | CN |
2257593 | May 1974 | DE |
3714593 | Nov 1988 | DE |
102013220746 | Apr 2015 | DE |
1526959 | Apr 2007 | EP |
3100843 | Dec 2016 | EP |
3524059 | Jul 2020 | EP |
2165805 | Mar 2002 | ES |
H07000164 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2021508483 | Mar 2021 | JP |
WO1998049902 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO2001049474 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO2016022114 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO2016120594 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO2016151064 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO2017127416 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO2018177717 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO2019129744 | Jul 2019 | WO |
WO2019143859 | Jul 2019 | WO |
WO2019231938 | Dec 2019 | WO |
WO2020030628 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO2020037368 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO2020038541 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO2020079440 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO2020092306 | May 2020 | WO |
WO2020152689 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO2020154634 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO2020180651 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO2020208104 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO2020210547 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO2020232347 | Nov 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ducrocg et al., “Rubisco: A promising plant protein to enrich wheat-based food without impairing dough viscoelasticity and protein polymerisation”, Jun. 21, 2020, 13 pages. |
Stefano et al., “Plant RuBisCo: An Underutilized Protein for Food Applications”, Aug. 13, 2018, 12 pages. |
Thewis et al., “Livestock Production: Prospects Over the Next Decades and Alternative Protein Bioresources”, AgroLife Scientific Journal—vol. 1, 2012, 10 pages. |
Yuliarti et al., “Structuring the meat analogue by using plant-based derived composites,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 288, Jan. 2021, available on the Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110138>, 3 pages (abstract only). |
Dekkers et al., “Structuring processes for meat analogues,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 81, Nov. 2018, pp. 25-36. |
Mattice et al., “Comparing methods to produce fibrous material from zein,” Food Research International, vol. 128, Feb. 2020, available on the Internet <URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996919306908>, 3 pages (abstract only). |
Mattice, “Characterizations of Zein: Evaluating Functionality and Potential uses in Food Structuring,” Ph.D. thesis at University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 145 pages. |
Samard et al., “A comparison of physicochemical characteristics, texture, and structure of meat analogue and meats,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 99, Issue 6, Apr. 2019, pp. 2708-2715, available on the Internet <URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jsfa.9438 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jsfa.9438>, 2 pages (abstract only). |
Nieuwland et al., “Food-grade electrospinning of proteins,” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, vol. 20, Oct. 2013, pp. 269-275. |
Schreuders et al., “Comparing structuring potential of pea and soy protein with gluten for meat analogue preparation,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 261, Nov. 2019, pp. 32-39. |
Knoch, “Systems and Methods for Vacuum Cooking,” U.S. Appl. No. 17/366,720, filed Jul. 2, 2021; Specification, Claims, Abstract, and Drawings, 42 pages. |
Fiberstar, “Food Applications: Naturla Citrus Fiber | High Water Holding | Emulsification | Gelling Properties,” [online], [retrieved on Dec. 21, 2021], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://www.fiberstar.net/citrus-fiber-food-applications/>, 6 pages. |
Gelski et al., “Plant-based burgers work to duplicate flavor, texture of protein-based varieties,” Meat+Poultry, [online], [retrieved on Dec. 21, 2021], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://www.meatpoultry.com/articles/23164-plant-based-burgers-work-to-duplicate-flavor-texture-of-protein-based-varieties>, 3 pages. |
Osen et al, “High-Moisture Extrusion: Meat Analogues,” In: Reference Module in Food Science, Jan. 1, 2016, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03099-7, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.I016/B978-0-08-I00596-5.03099-7>, 7 pages. |
Mannar et al., “Micronutrient Fortification of Foods—Rationale, Application and Impact,” Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 71, Nov. 2004, [Retrieved on Feb. 23, 2022] Retrieved from Internet <URL:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02828115>, pp. 997-1002. |
Osendarp et al. “Large-Scale Food Fortification and Biofortification in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of Programs, Trends, Challenges, and Evidence Gaps,” Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 39, Issue 2, Jun. 24, 2018, [Retrieved on Feb. 23, 2022] Retrieved from Internet <URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473077/>, <DOI:10.1177/0379572118774229>, pp. 315-331. |
Vatansever S. et al, “Low- and High-Moisture Extrusion of Pulse Proteins as Plant-Based Meat Ingredients: A Review,” Cereal Foods World, vol. 65, No. 4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-4-0038, Aug. 1, 2020, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230240342 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63305170 | Jan 2022 | US |