The following is related to detecting and classifying signals on channels within a spectrum of interest, and more particularly to performing signal detection and classification based on detector scans.
Wireless networks enable connectivity between different stations, nodes and the like. The different stations may reside in different locations and operate on designated frequency channels. The number of channel allocations available depends on the total amount of designated spectrum and spectrum availability.
Some networks are allowed to operate in any channel within the designated frequency spectrums as long as the channel or channels are not being used. Channels occupied by the transmission sources already operating within the designated spectrum range are to be detected and classified by transmitted signal type. Further, identification of target signals is required for network setup. The signals other than target signals are referred to as non-cooperative (NC) signals.
Errors in the detection and classification processes result in potential interference with other transmission sources and inefficiencies in target network operations. If a channel is classified incorrectly as having “No signal”, then the station operating in this channel will cause interference with other NC networks or NC transmitters that are not part of the station's network. If the target signal in a channel is misclassified as any other type, the network setup or operations will be compromised.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide further understanding of the invention and constitute a part of the specification. The figures listed below illustrate embodiments of the invention, and, together with the following description, serve to explain the subject matter of the invention.
Overview
The systems and methods described herein can detect and classify signals with a detector. Using classification algorithms, the detector determines whether the signal is present and, if a signal is present, the type of signal. Thus, the detector can be configured to monitor the spectrum over a frequency range of interest for signals of interest, which are referred to as target signals. An example target signal is a next generation (XG) signal. A target signal, however, is not limited to XG signal and can be any signal of interest of any type.
The methods for detection and classification described herein can be implemented using a cognitive radio. A cognitive radio capable of performing the disclosed methods is described in co-pending patent application titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COGNITIVE RADIO HAVING ADAPTABLE CHARACTERISTICS,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/839,496 filed on Aug. 15, 2007, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
A station actively participating in a network strives to detect non-cooperative signals as early as possible to avoid causing interference with other transmission sources. Further, the network should correctly identify a detected signal as a target signal or a non-cooperative signal.
The methods and algorithms implemented by the detector perform signal detection and classification based on a number of most recent detector spectrum scans utilizing a multi-stage classification procedure using spectrum masks and a multi-level threshold structure. The spectrum of interest is sub-divided into regions of size equal to the minimum target channel size. These regions also are referred to as “channels.” The channels may be contiguous.
The detection and classification of potential signals are performed in stages on a channel-by-channel basis. A first stage detects narrow-band signals, defined as signal bandwidths less than the minimum target signal bandwidth, based on the spectrum power profile computed using the last detector scan. A second stage executes when no narrowband signal is detected using the first stage disclosed above. During the second stage, embodiments of the present invention apply max-hold power spectrums computed using a number of spectrum power profiles determined using the last multiple number of detector scans. The max-hold spectrum power refers to the resulting envelope of the multiple overlaying spectrum power profiles. The second stage classifies signals in channels that have not been filtered out as narrowband channels during the first classification stage as target, wideband NC [non-cooperative] or “no” signals.
In some embodiments, a method for classifying a signal within a channel can be performed. The method includes classifying a signal as a narrowband signal by applying a first threshold and a second threshold. The second threshold is lower than the first threshold. The method also includes, if the signal is not a narrowband signal, classifying the signal as a target signal by applying a mask to the channel to determine a degree of correlation between the mask and the target signal. The method also includes, if the signal is not a narrowband or target signal, classifying the signal as a wideband signal.
In some embodiments, a method for detecting a narrowband signal within a channel is performed. The method includes applying a first threshold to a signal in a channel. The method also includes determining whether the signal is a narrowband signal according to the threshold. The method also includes applying a second threshold to the signal. The method also includes confirming the signal is the narrowband signal according to the second threshold.
In some embodiments, a method for detecting a wideband signal within a channel is performed. The method includes applying a first threshold to a signal within the channel. The method also includes determining the signal is a wideband signal according to the first threshold. The method also includes applying a second threshold to the signal if the first threshold indicates that signal is not a wideband signal. The method also includes confirming the signal is not the wideband signal according to the second threshold.
In some embodiments, a method for detecting a target signal is performed. The method includes determining whether a signal is a narrowband signal. The method also includes determining whether the signal is a wideband signal if the signal is not the narrowband signal. The method also includes applying a channel mask to the signal if the signal is not the narrowband signal or the wideband signal. The method also includes determining whether the signal is a target signal. The target signal correlates to the channel mask.
Detection and Classification
In some embodiments, detection and classification can be performed by determining the presence of a narrowband signal in at least one channel. Spectrum can be examined on a channel by channel basis. In such embodiments, the presence of the signal can be determined by hard limiting spectrum power profile components within the channel using a first narrowband amplitude threshold. Subsequently, the narrowband signal presence within a channel is identified by an exclusion based on the comparison of the hard-limited spectrum power profile against the narrowest target signal spectrum mask using a minimum bandwidth threshold as test criteria.
The absence of a narrowband signal in a channel is confirmed by repeating the hard limiting step above using a second nmTowband amplitude threshold. The second narrowband amplitude threshold is lower than the first narrowband amplitude threshold. The second hard-limited spectrum power profile is then compared to a second threshold using a minimum bandwidth threshold as test criteria to confirm the absence of a narrowband signal. The nanowband signal presence determination classifies narrowband conformant signals as “narrowband signals.”
The detection and classification steps also include pre-classifying narrowband non-conformant signals, if any, as wideband signal candidates and proceeding with further classification steps disclosed below. A further classification step includes computing an envelope of spectrum power profile across a frequency range of interest using N single-scan spectrums power profiles by using data collected during last N detector scans.
Steps for determining the presence of a wideband signal includes hard limiting max-hold spectrum power profile components using the first wideband amplitude threshold. The steps also include identifying potential wideband candidates within a channel by exclusion based on the comparison of the hard limited spectrum components computed above against the narrowest target signal spectrum mask using a minimum bandwidth threshold as test criteria.
Additional steps for determining the presence of the wideband signal can include confirming non-compliant wideband candidates determined previously by repeating the hard limiting step disclosed above using a second wideband amplitude threshold that is lower than the first threshold disclosed above and comparing the second hard-limited spectrum power profile to the narrowest target signal spectrum mask using a minimum bandwidth threshold. The steps also include classifying the resulting wideband nonconformant candidates into a “no-signal” category.
Other steps for classifying a signal includes classifying wideband conformant signals as target signal candidates and proceeding with further classification steps as disclosed below. The following steps for classification include identifying a target signal spanning a single channel using the correlation of the hard-limited max-hold power spectrum computed using a first wideband amplitude threshold and the narrowest target signal channel mask comprising a target signal spectrum power mask and a guard band mask.
The steps for wideband conformant classification also includes, for at least one target signal type spanning multiple channels, identifying target signals of a type using multi-channel segments of the max-hold power spectrum computed in the steps disclosed above and the target signal channel masks of the target signal type comprising target signal spectrum profiles and guard bands, and classifying target signal conformant signals as “target signals” of the type given by the matching channel masks. The steps also include classifying target signal non-conformant signals as “wideband non-cooperative signals.”
Both networks 100 and 102 include radios or stations that communicate with each other. For example, station 104 transmits and receives signals from stations 106, 108 and 110. Stations 104-110 may operate on the same channel so that each station is tuned to the same frequency. Stations 104-110 comprise network 100. Station 104 also includes detector 180 that detects and classifies signals 120
Network 102 includes stations 112, 114 and 116. Stations 112-116 transmit and receive signals 122 from each other. Due to the proximity of the networks, some signals from network 102 reach stations within network 100. For example, station 104 receives NC signals 124 and 126. Further, NC signals 124 and 126 are not necessarily identical. For example, NC signal 124 is a narrowband NC signal and signal 126 is a wideband NC signal. Detector 180 detects and classifies NC signals 124 and 126
The size of channel 202 is selected to correspond with the size of the smallest target signal. For example, if the bandwidth for the smallest target signal is about 1.75 MHz, then the bandwidth for channel 202 is about 2 MHz. A larger target signal is about 3.5, MHz, so that two 2 MHz channels are occupied by the target signal. Another target signal could be about 7 MHz and occupy four 2 MHz channels.
A detector according to the present invention scans spectrum 200 and measures the energy within a sequence of bins to determine the presence of a potential signal. The size of the bins depends on a desired detector resolution. Energy within a bin, such as bin 212, corresponds to the strength of a signal present within the frequency range of the bandwidth of the bin.
As disclosed above, the potential target signals 120 are classified into different types of signals, such as target signals, narrowband NC signals or wideband NC signals, or no signal. A potential signal is classified as “no signal” if the measured signal energy does not meet criteria for classification to the types.
The spectrum of the narrowest target signal 120 is contained within channel 202. The width of the signal's power spectrum, centered in the middle of the channel, is narrower than the channel width. The spectrum regions within the channel 202 to the left and to the right of target signal's spectrum are called guard bands.
Other types of signals include NC signals from a non-cooperative source, such as a station operating in NC network 104. NC signals can have varying bandwidths and operate within different frequency ranges, even within spectrum 200. Referring to
Wideband NC signal 126 represents a wideband NC signal that occupies a portion of spectrum 200 occupying, or spanning, more than one channel. For example, signal 126 occupies spectrum over channels 206 and 208. According to the disclosed embodiments, if a signal is not determined to be a target signal, a narrowband NC signal or “no signal,” then the signal is classified as a wideband NC signal. Referring back to
FIGS. 3 and 3A-C depict flowcharts for detecting and classifying a signal according to the disclosed embodiments. The steps disclosed by the flowchart may be implemented as steps within a program executable on a processor and stored on a computer-readable medium. The steps may be executed by detector 180 and/or station 104, disclosed above. Further, the steps disclosed below are general in nature such that variations may be made that are within the scope of the present invention.
Referring to
Step 308 executes by channelizing the spectrum scan. In other words, the scan of the spectrum of interest is broken into channels having a predetermined bandwidth and frequency boundaries. For example, if a channel has a 2 MHz bandwidth, then the spectrum may be channelized into 2 MHz channels centered around frequency fc=(2*n+1) MHz (where n is positive integer) for analysis. Channels can be overlapping in frequency with multiple successive channels. Step 309 executes by looping to the next channel within spectrum 200.
Steps 310 to 338 disclose the analysis and processes executed for each channel. After each channel, the flowchart of
If step 312 is no, then step 316 executes by declaring the channel to be a candidate to have a wideband (WB) signal. Step 318 executes by computing the max hold power spectrum across the spectrum. The computation uses data of signal power levels collected during a number of detectors scans. Thus, the max hold is a representation of spectrum as measured. Because multipath and fading channel properties may change from scan to scan, the overlaying of several scans allows the resultant representation to have a more precise picture of signals and power levels within a channel.
Step 320 executes by determining wideband signal presence in the channel. This step is disclosed in greater detail by
If yes, then step 330 executes by determining target signal presence within the channel. Before declaring a wideband signal presence, the disclosed embodiments confirm the detected signal is not a target signal. This step is disclosed in greater detail by
If yes, then step 334 executes by declaring the detection of a target signal in the channel. Various types of target signals may be present, so the disclosed embodiments also determining the type of target signal. If no, then step 336 executes by declaring the signal detected in the channel as wideband non-cooperative signal. Step 338 executes by determining whether another channel is left to analyze in spectrum 200. If not, then step 340 executes by ending the flowchart. If yes, then the flowchart goes back to step 309 and loops to the next channel.
A graph can depict signal spectrum power over a frequency range, or spectrum. The vertical axis of the graph shows the s power (P) while the horizontal axis shows the frequency (f). Other channels also may be within the spectrum.
Two NC signals occupy the channel and are centered on frequencies f3 and f4, respectively. A threshold T1 designates the power level needed for detection of signal within channel 202. Power levels above threshold T1 indicate the presence of a signal. The bandwidth of NB signals is less than the smallest bandwidth of target signal as spectrum mask M1.
Returning to
Step 3106 executes by determining whether any narrowband NC signals were detected in the channel. A narrowband NC signal is detected based on degree of correlation of the channel power spectrum hard-limited using threshold T1 and the target signal mask M1. If yes, then step 3108 executes to confirming the presence of the narrowband signal. The confirmation prevents a potential misclassification if parts of a wideband or target signal are above threshold T1. The parts of the signal above threshold T1 may appear as narrowband signals. Confirmation is performed by applying another threshold and same mask so that misclassifications are prevented.
Similar to step 3102, step 3110 executes by applying a second threshold T2 to confirm the presence of a narrowband signal. The second threshold T2, however, is lower than the first threshold T1 in order to detect weaker target signal. The confirmation prevents the potential misclassification when parts of the target signal are above the first threshold. Step 3112 executes by applying mask M1 as before to the power spectrum hard-limited using threshold T2.
Another graph can be described for a signal found using threshold T2, having a vertical axis for power (P) and a horizontal axis for frequency (f). The frequency axis includes channel 202 between frequencies f1 and f2. A target signal occurs in channel 202. The target signal includes peaks having power levels above threshold T1. Hard-limiting the signal using threshold T1 makes the signal appear as three narrowband signals because a small fraction of its spectrum components exceeds the threshold T1.
Thus, the threshold is lowered to threshold T2. Threshold T2 is placed at a power level lower than threshold T1. For example, threshold T2 may be a percentage reduction in power from threshold T1. Alternatively, threshold T2 is set at a fixed value lower than threshold T1. Applying threshold T2, the percentage of signal power above the threshold shows that the target signal is not a narrowband signal. Thus, the target signal will not be misclassified as a narrowband signal.
Referring back to
Thus, the flowchart of
Step 3204 executes by applying a channel mask to the max hold power spectrum. A high degree of correlation between the measured channel spectrum power and the channel mask indicates a high probability of the desired signal. In other words, the degree of matching the measured spectrum to the channel mask is used to determine if a target signal is present.
Referring to
The hard-limited spectrum is correlated with a channel mask for further signal classification. The threshold value impacts the shape of the hard-limited channel spectrum profile and thus the correlation output.
Referring to
Example 1 shows a target signal and its relation to thresholds T3 and T4. Example 2 shows a signal that would be misclassified as noise when threshold T3 is applied. When spectrum in Example 2 is hard-limited using threshold T3 it will poorly correlate with the channel mask resulting in “noise” classification. Using the lower threshold value T4 would yield the proper representation of the channel spectrum by its hard-limited replica resulting in high correlation of channel spectrum with channel mask. Misclassification, therefore, is avoided when threshold T4 is applied. Therefore, in example 2, threshold T3 would improperly classify target signal 404 as noise, while threshold T4 would prevent misclassification.
Example 3 of
Examples 2 and 3 illustrate why two thresholds are necessary for wideband signal detection.
Step 3206 executes by determining whether the signal is classified as a wideband signal according to the results generated from applying threshold T3 and the appropriate mask. If yes, then step 3212 is executed. If not, then step 3208 executes by applying a lower threshold T4 to ensure that a wideband signal in channel 202 is not misclassified as “no signal.”
Step 3209 executes by applying a channel mask, as disclosed above, again to determine the correlation between the appropriate mask and the detected power in the channel. Step 3210 executes by determining whether the pre-classified wideband signals classified as a wideband signal according to the results generated from applying threshold T4 and the appropriate mask.
Step 3210 is similar to step 3206 except the percentage of signal power in the spectrum, or channel 202, above threshold T4 should be different if a signal is present. If no, then step 3214 executes by classifying the power within the channel as noise or “no signal,” and goes to step 324 in
Step 3302 executes by selecting a target signal channel mask from a plurality of target signal channel masks. The target signal channel masks correspond to the different types of target signals that might be found operating in the channel. For example, referring to
Step 3306 executes by determining the degree of correlation between the signal in the channel and the target signal channel mask. The “area” of the mask is compared to the signal determined in step 322 to be within the channel, as well as mean and variance of the signal and mask. Peak-to-mean ratio, proximity to noise floor as well as other parameters playa part in the decision process, Those parts of the mask that correspond to signal power in the channel signify the degree of a correlation. A high degree of correlation indicates a strong probability that the signal corresponding to the target signal channel mask is present.
Step 3314 executes by applying some or all of the available masks to the signal determined in step 322 to be within the channel and returning to step 3304. Step 3308 executes by determining whether the applied mask matches the signal to a degree that indicates how the signal should be classified. In other words, step 3308 determines whether the degree of correlation between the applied mask and signal power is great enough to classify the signal as the type of signal associated with the mask. If the degree of correlation indicates a match, then step 3310 executes by classifying the signal as the signal type exemplified by the applied mask and going to step 334 in the flowchart of
Systems and methods for detecting and classifying denial of service (DoS) attacker in a dynamic spectrum access radio are described below. The systems and methods described below can be used for detection, identification and classification of the denial of service (DoS) attacker who seeks to introduce interference into dynamic spectrum access radio communications. Using classification algorithms, the method determines whether the DoS attacker is present and, if an attacker is present, the type of attacker.
Thus, the method monitors (in some embodiments, continuously) the interference level over a frequency range of interest for target signals. The methods and algorithms implemented by the method perform DoS attacker detection and classification based on a number of recent detector spectrum scans, as well as collected and stored spectrum history data. Parameters used in the detection process can include a target radio's statistics relating to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), receiver signal power level, bit error rate (HER) and others.
A method for classifying a DoS attacker is described below. The method includes using a collected spectrum statistics database to identify the DoS attacker. The detection and classification of potential DoS attackers can be performed in stages. A first stage monitors (in some embodiments, continuously) a target radio's statistical data for a potential presence of DoS attacker. A potential for presence of the DoS attacker exists if target radio's bit error rate (BER) and other communication quality parameters are greater than those under normal mode of operation, even though signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and power level received from other target radios are sufficient for normal operation.
A second stage executes when potential DoS attacker is detected using the first stage disclosed above. During the second stage, in some embodiments, the previously described statistical database is used to confirm the presence of the DoS attacker as well as to classify the DoS attacker.
The DoS attacker can be classified into three categories—active, re-active and static. For the purposes of classification it is assumed that an active DoS attacker introduces large amounts of interference randomly over large parts of spectrum and executes a DoS attack by virtue of introducing interference over as much continuously varying parts of spectrum as possible. For the purposes of classification it is assumed that a re-active DoS attacker intelligently introduces interference only in parts of spectrum occupied by target signals and executes DoS attack by virtue of identifying and “following” its target signal. For the purposes of classification it is assumed that a static DoS attacker introduces interference only in pre-defined static parts of spectrum.
In order to assist in detection and identification of a potential active or static DoS attacker, the target radio continuously or periodically maintains a database of spectrum history and statistics. The method can be configured to maintain and stores such spectrum statistics as signal occupancy information and detected power level, as well as other statistical data, on a per channel basis.
In order to confirm and classify an active DoS attacker, the second stage analyzes the spectrum statistics collected in the previously described spectrum database. In order for a DoS attacker to be confirmed and classified as active DoS attacker, large amounts of interference must be present over large varying parts of spectrum.
In order to confirm and classify a static DoS attacker, the second stage analyzes the spectrum statistics collected in the previously mentioned spectrum database. In order for a DoS attacker to be confirmed and classified as static DoS attacker, large amounts of interference must be present over static parts of spectrum. The algorithm looks for a degree of correlation among the spectrum data samples inside the spectrum database.
In order to assist in detection and identification of a potential re-active DoS attacker, the target radio maintains a database of how often it has been forced to change frequency of operation and re-establish connection with other target radios due to poor network operation and connectivity. At the same time the radio continues to monitor the frequencies from which it has been forced to move in order to validate whether the introduced interference is actually a useful radio system or an attempted DoS attack.
In order to confirm and classify a re-active DoS attacker, the second stage analyzes the spectrum statistics collected in the above mentioned spectrum database. As described in the definition of a re-active DoS attacker above, in order for a DoS attacker to be confirmed and classified as re-active DoS attacker, a number of connection reestablishment attempts must be present. This signals that a DoS attacker is following the target signal and attempts to introduce interference.
Many specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the description and in
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context-permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the invention is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in sel les, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times.
The teachings of the invention provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined or altered to provide further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the invention in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the invention, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the invention disclosed herein.
The terminology used in the Detailed Description is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the invention. Certain terms may even be emphasized; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this Detailed Description section. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the invention encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the invention under the claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/286,745 filed Nov. 1, 2011, entitled “Methods for Detecting and Classifying Signals Transmitted Over a Radio Frequency Spectrum”, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 11/839,503 filed Aug. 15, 2007, entitled “Methods for Detecting and Classifying Signals Transmitted Over a Radio Frequency Spectrum”, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The work leading to this invention was funded in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), grant number: FA8750-05-C-0150. The U.S. Government may have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3893064 | Nishihara et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3935572 | Broniwitz et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4107613 | Queen et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4119964 | Johannsen et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4227255 | Carrick et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4305150 | Richmond et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4398220 | Satoh | Aug 1983 | A |
4501020 | Wakeman | Feb 1985 | A |
4672657 | Dershowitz | Jun 1987 | A |
4736453 | Schloemer | Apr 1988 | A |
4783780 | Alexis | Nov 1988 | A |
4803703 | DeLuca et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4878238 | Rash et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4881271 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4918730 | Schulze | Apr 1990 | A |
4977612 | Wilson | Dec 1990 | A |
5040238 | Comroe et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5093924 | Toshiyuki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5093927 | Shanley | Mar 1992 | A |
5142690 | McMullan, Jr. et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142691 | Freeburg et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151747 | Nourrcier | Sep 1992 | A |
5155590 | Beyers, II et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162937 | Heidemann et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5177604 | Martinez | Jan 1993 | A |
5177767 | Kato | Jan 1993 | A |
5179722 | Gunmar et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5203012 | Patsiokas et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5225902 | McMullan, Jr. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239676 | Strawczynski et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247701 | Comroe et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5260974 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271036 | Lobert et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276908 | Koohgoli et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5325088 | Willard et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5375123 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5402523 | Berg | Mar 1995 | A |
5410737 | Jones | Apr 1995 | A |
5412658 | Arnold et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422912 | Asser et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5422930 | McDonald et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428819 | Wang et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5448753 | Ahl et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5475868 | Duque-Anton et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497505 | Koohgoli et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502688 | Recchione et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5511233 | Otten | Apr 1996 | A |
5548809 | Lemson | Aug 1996 | A |
5553081 | Downey et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5585850 | Schwaller | Dec 1996 | A |
5608727 | Perreault et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5655217 | Lemson | Aug 1997 | A |
5668747 | Ohashi | Sep 1997 | A |
5748678 | Valentine et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752164 | Jones | May 1998 | A |
5794151 | McDonald et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822686 | Lundberg et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828948 | Almgren et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5850605 | Souissi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862487 | Fujii et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5884181 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889821 | Arnstein et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5939887 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943622 | Yamashita | Aug 1999 | A |
5960351 | Przelomiec | Sep 1999 | A |
5999561 | Naden et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011970 | McCarthy | Jan 2000 | A |
6044090 | Grau et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047175 | Trompower | Apr 2000 | A |
6049707 | Buer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049717 | Dufour et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6141557 | Dipiazza | Oct 2000 | A |
6147553 | Kolanek | Nov 2000 | A |
6154501 | Friedman | Nov 2000 | A |
6157811 | Dent | Dec 2000 | A |
6178328 | Tang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188873 | Wickman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208858 | Antonio et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240274 | Izadpanah | May 2001 | B1 |
6269331 | Alanara et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295289 | Ionescu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304140 | Thron et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6356555 | Rakib et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380879 | Kober et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6522885 | Tang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526264 | Sugar et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529715 | Kitko et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570444 | Wright | May 2003 | B2 |
6597301 | Cerra | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606593 | Jarvinen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615040 | Benveniste | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625111 | Sudo | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6671503 | Niwamoto | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675012 | Gray | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687492 | Sugar et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690746 | Sills et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697436 | Wright et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700450 | Rogers | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714605 | Sugar et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714780 | Antonio et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728517 | Sugar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6771957 | Chitrapu | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785520 | Sugar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792268 | Benveniste et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799020 | Heidmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816832 | Alanara et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6847678 | Berezdivin et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850735 | Sugar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850764 | Patel | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862456 | Sugar et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6904269 | Deshpande et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6941110 | Kloper et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952563 | Brown et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959178 | Macedo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965762 | Sugar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990087 | Rao et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993440 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013345 | Brown et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7035593 | Miller et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054625 | Kawasaki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058383 | Sugar et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089014 | Brown et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7227974 | Kamijo et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260156 | Krupezevic et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269151 | Diener et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7313393 | Chitrapu | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7342876 | Bellur et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7424268 | Diener et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428270 | Dubuc et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430254 | Anderson | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7457295 | Saunders et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463952 | Bidou et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7483700 | Buchwald et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7532857 | Simon | May 2009 | B2 |
7564816 | McHenry et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7610036 | Teo et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613148 | Hong et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616604 | Abdelhamid et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7742764 | Gillig et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7826839 | Nicholas | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8326313 | McHenry et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010013834 | Yamazaki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010046843 | Alanara et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002052 | McHenry | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020196842 | Onggosanusi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020651 | Crilly et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027577 | Brown et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030081628 | Sugar et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099218 | Tillotson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030165187 | Tesfai et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181173 | Sugar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181211 | Razavilar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181213 | Sugar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198200 | Diener et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203743 | Sugar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040017268 | Rogers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023674 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047324 | Diener | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072546 | Sugar et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121753 | Sugar et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136466 | Tesfai et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142696 | Saunders et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040203474 | Miller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259563 | Morton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050070294 | Lyle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050119006 | Cave et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050192011 | Hong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213580 | Mayer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213763 | Owen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050270218 | Chiodini | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060075467 | Sanda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060211395 | Waltho | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220944 | Ikeda | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234716 | Vesterinen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246836 | Simon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247505 | Siddiqui | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267259 | Hatakeyama et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004358 | Moorti | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008875 | Gerhardt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019603 | Gerhardt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070046467 | Chakraborty et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047474 | Anderson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053410 | Mahonen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076745 | Manjeshwar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091839 | Abdelhamid et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091998 | Woo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100922 | Ashish | May 2007 | A1 |
20070165577 | Baker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165664 | Gerhardt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165695 | Gerhardt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183338 | Singh et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070253394 | Horiguchi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254596 | Corson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010040 | McGehee | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014880 | Hyon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031143 | Ostrosky | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069079 | Jacobs | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080228446 | Baraniuk et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259859 | Cordeiro et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261537 | Chen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267259 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284648 | Takada et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090040986 | Cordeiro et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074033 | Kattwinkel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090161610 | Kang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090190508 | Kattwinkel | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090252178 | Huttunen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100008312 | Viswanath | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100220618 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100296078 | Forrer et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110051645 | Hong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1220499 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2260879 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2004054280 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2006101489 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007034461 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007058490 | May 2007 | WO |
2007094604 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007096819 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007108963 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007108966 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007109169 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007109170 | Sep 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ackland et al., “High Performance Cognitive Radio Platform with Integrated Physical and Network Layer Capabilities,” Network Centric Cognitive Radio, Jul. 2005, pp. 1-13. |
Anticipated XG VIP Demo Invitees, 2006. |
Cabric et al., “Implementation Issues in Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios,” Berkeley Wireless Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2004, pp. 1-5. |
DARPA, “Adds Value: Spectrum Occupancy”. |
Ditri et al., “Dynamic spectrum access moves to the forefront,” RFDesign, 2008. |
Erpek, “Location-based Propagation Modeling for Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Wireless Networks,” George Mason University, 2007. |
Falconer et al., “Frequency Domain Equalization for Single-Carrier Broadband Wireless Systems”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Apr. 2002, pp. 1-9. |
Han et al., “Spectral Correlation Based Signal Detection Method for Spectrum Sensing in IEEE 802.22 WRAN Systems,” Graduate School of IT & Telecommunications INHA University, Korea, Feb. 2006, pp. 1-6. |
Leu, “Ultra Sensitive TV Detector Measurements,” New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. |
Liu et al., “Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs),” Jun. 2007, pp. 1-25. |
Mahbubani et al., “Dynamic channel allocation in wireless ad-hoc networks,” Computer Science and Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, pp. 1-12. |
Marshall et al., “XG Dynamic Spectrum Experiments, Findings and Plans Panel,” DoD Spectrum Summit, 2006. |
McHenry et al., “XG DSA Radio System,” Shared Spectrum Company, New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2008, pp. 1-11. |
McHenry et al., “XG Dynamic Spectrum Access Field Test Results,” Topics in Radio Communications, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2007, No. vol. 45, Issue: 6, pp. 1-7. |
McHenry, “Adaptive Spectrum Technology: Findings From the DARPA XG Project,” Shared Spectrum Company, Software Radio Summit, 2007. |
McHenry, “Creation of a Spectrum Sharing Innovation Test-Bed and The President's Spectrum Policy Initiative Spectrum Sharing Innovation Test-Bed,” Federal Communications Commission, 2006. |
McHenry, “Dynamic Spectrum Sharing,” Presentation to IEEE Communcations Society, 2005. |
McHenry, “The Probe Spectrum Access Method,” Shared Spectrum Company, New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, First IEEE International Symposium, 2005, pp. 1-6. |
Perich et al., “Experimental Field Test Results on Feasibility of Declarative Spectrum Management,” Shared Spectrum Company, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2008, pp. 1-10. |
Perich, “Policy-based Network Management for NeXt Generation Spectrum Access Control,” Shared Spectrum Company, 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2007, pp. 1-11. |
Ramanathan et al., “Next Generation (XG) Architecture and Protocol Development (XAP),” 2005. |
Rohde et al., “RF/Microwave Circuit Design for Wireless Applications”, Mar. 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Seelig, “A Description of the Aug. 2006 XG Demonstrations at Fort A.P. Hill,” 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2007, pp. 1-12. |
Shared Spectrum Company, “Shared Spectrum Company Successfully Demonstrates neXt Generation (XG) Wireless Communications System,” 2006. |
Shared Spectrum Company, “Shared Spectrum Company to Demonstrate XG Radio Technology At IEEE DySPAN Conference,” Apr. 2007. |
Shared Spectrum Company, “Shared Spectrum Company to Introduce Dynamic Spectrum Access Technology At WiMax Conference,” Sep. 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Shared Spectrum Company, “Thales Communications and Shared Spectrum Company Team to Add Dynamic Spectrum Access Technology to Military Radios,” Dec. 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Shared Spectrum Company, Products, 2007. |
Steadman et al., “Dynamic Spectrum Sharing Detectors,” Shared Spectrum Company, 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2007, pp. 1-7. |
Steenstrup, “Channel Selection among Frequency-Agile Nodes in Multihop Wireless Networks,” Clemson University and Stow Research LLC, 2005, pp. 1-5. |
Tenhula et al., “Policy-Based Spectrum Access Control for Public Safety Cognitive Radio Systems,” Shared Spectrum Company, 2008. |
Tenhula, “Dynamic Spectrum Sharing Bid, Lease & MVNO/MVNE: Spectrum Options for Operators,” Shared Spectrum Company, 2006. |
Tenhula, “Secondary Markets & Spectrum Leasing,” UTC Telecom 2006, Tampa, FL May 23, 2006. |
Tenhula, “Update on XG and Follow-on Programs: Cognitive Radio for Tactical and Public Safety Communications,” 2008. |
Zeng et al., “Maximum-Minimum Eigenvalue Detection for Cognitive Radio,” Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, IEEE 18th International Symposium on, 2007, pp. 1-5. |
Zhao et al., “Distributed Coordination in Dynamic Spectrum Allocation Networks,” New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, First IEEE International Symposium on, 2005, pp. 1-10. |
Zheng et al., “Device-centric Spectrum Management,” New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, First IEEE International Symposium, 2005, pp. 1-10. |
Zhou et al., “Detection Timing and Channel Selection for Periodic Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio,” School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, pp. 1-5. |
PCT Office Communication in the PCT application No. PCT/US2008/073193 dated Jun. 2, 2009. |
Supplementary European Search Report in the European Application No. 01 945944 dated Apr. 24, 2009. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Feb. 14, 2008, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US07/21940. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Feb. 8, 2002, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US01/14853. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Mar. 19, 2008, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US07/11414. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Sep. 28, 2009, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/073194. |
The International Search Report mailed Oct. 6, 2008, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US07/22356, filed Oct. 19, 2007. |
The International Search Report, mailed Mar. 25, 2005, in related International Application No. PCT/US04/17883, filed Jun. 9, 2004. |
Tenhula, Shared Spectrum Company Successfully Demonstrates Next Generation (XG) Wireless System, Sep. 20, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130072128 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11839503 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 13286745 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13286745 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13658968 | US |