Methods for disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation and devices thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10791088
  • Patent Number
    10,791,088
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 19, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 29, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Methods, non-transitory computer readable media, network traffic management apparatuses, and network traffic management systems that obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request. With this technology, connections associated with a same subscriber can advantageously be disaggregated to the same traffic management process.
Description
FIELD

This technology generally relates to processing network traffic in a multiprocessor environment and, more particularly, to methods and devices for disaggregating subscribers via dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) address translation.


BACKGROUND

Clustered multiprocessor architectures allow the simultaneous use of multiple processors, referred to herein as processing cores, in order to increase the overall performance of a computing device. With a multiprocessor architecture, processes and threads can run simultaneously on different processing cores instead of merely appearing to run simultaneously as in single processor architectures utilizing multitasking and context switching.


One such computing device benefiting from a multiprocessor architecture is a network traffic management apparatus which can run an instance of a traffic management application on each processing core, for example. The traffic management processes can be configured to manage network traffic by performing functions, such as accounting, load balancing, rate limiting, compression, encryption, application acceleration, or packet filtering for example.


In order to distribute network traffic to a processing core of a multiprocessor architecture, to be handled by an instance of a traffic management application executing on the processing core, one or more disaggregators can be provided between the processing cores and the client devices originating the network traffic. Accordingly, the disaggregator(s) are effectively a hardware or software load balancer configured to distribute traffic flows or connections across the processing cores and traffic management application instances executing on the processing cores.


In some networks, such as carrier networks, client devices are assigned arbitrary Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. Currently, connections with the client devices are disaggregated across processing cores of a network traffic management apparatus. Accordingly, connections from multiple client devices associated with a same subscriber may be handled by different processing cores executing different instances of a traffic management application.


The separation of connections across different processing cores for client devices associated with a same subscriber is undesirable and negatively impacts the scalability and performance of the network traffic management apparatus. In one particular example, accounting relating to data usage on a carrier network for a subscriber requires more resources when the accounting functionality for different client devices associated with the subscriber is provided by different instances of a traffic management application executing on different processing cores.


SUMMARY

A method for disaggregating subscribers via Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) address translation implemented by a network traffic management system comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server devices, client devices, or resource server devices includes obtaining an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.


A network traffic management apparatus that includes memory including programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.


A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation that includes executable code, which when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.


A network traffic management system that includes one or more network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server devices, client devices, or resource server devices including memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.


This technology has a number of associated advantages including providing methods, non-transitory computer readable media, network traffic management apparatuses, and network traffic management systems that improve scalability and performance of multiprocessor devices in subscriber networks. With this technology, client connections associated with a same subscriber can advantageously be disaggregated to the same traffic management processing core and associated process, thereby significantly improving processing efficiency.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a system diagram of a network environment with an exemplary network traffic management system;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary network traffic management apparatus of the network traffic management system shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for disaggregating client connections associated with a same subscriber across processing cores and associated traffic management application instances;



FIG. 4 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for processing client requests and server responses in order to facilitate connection persistence; and



FIG. 5 is a timing diagram illustrating an exemplary method for disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an exemplary network environment, which incorporates an exemplary network traffic management apparatus 12, is illustrated. The network traffic management apparatus 12 is coupled to a dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) server device 14, a plurality of client devices 16(1)-16(n) via a local area network (LAN) 18, and a plurality of resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) via a wide area network (WAN) 20, although the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), and resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may be coupled together via other topologies. Additionally, the network environment 10 may include other network devices such as one or more routers and/or switches, for example, which are well known in the art and thus will not be described herein. This technology provides a number of advantages including methods, non-transitory computer readable media, network traffic management apparatuses, and network traffic management systems that advantageously disaggregate connections with client devices associated with a same subscriber to a same processing core using Internet Protocol (IP) address translation, thereby facilitating improved scalability and performance.


Referring to FIGS. 1-2, the network traffic management apparatus 12 may perform any number of functions including accounting services, rate limiting, proxying connections, or accelerating or securing network traffic, for example. The network traffic management apparatus 12 includes a plurality of processors referred to herein as processing cores 24(1)-24(n), a memory 26, and a communication interface 28 with a disaggreagtor 30, which are coupled together by a bus 32 or other communication link, although the network traffic management apparatus 12 can include other types and numbers of elements in other configurations.


The processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 may execute programmed instructions stored in the memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 for the any number of the functions identified above. Each of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) may be a CPU or general purpose processor and the processing cores may be located on a same chip or on different chips in a multiprocessor architecture.


The memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 stores these programmed instructions for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated herein, although some or all of the programmed instructions could be stored elsewhere. A variety of different types of memory storage devices, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, solid state drives, flash memory, or other computer readable medium which is read from and written to by a magnetic, optical, or other reading and writing system that is coupled to the processor(s), can be used for the memory 26.


Accordingly, the memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 can store one or more applications that can include computer executable instructions that, when executed by the network traffic management apparatus 12, cause the network traffic management apparatus 12 to perform actions, such as to transmit, receive, or otherwise process network messages, for example, and to perform other actions described and illustrated below with reference to FIGS. 3-5. The application(s) can be implemented as modules or components of other applications. Further, the application(s) can be implemented as operating system extensions, module, plugins, or the like.


Even further, the application(s) may be operative in a cloud-based computing environment. The application(s) can be executed within or as virtual machine(s) or virtual server(s) that may be managed in a cloud-based computing environment. Also, the application(s), and even the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself, may be located in virtual server(s) running in a cloud-based computing environment rather than being tied to one or more specific physical network computing devices. Also, the application(s) may be running in one or more virtual machines (VMs) executing on the network traffic management apparatus 12. Additionally, in one or more embodiments of this technology, virtual machine(s) running on the network traffic management apparatus 12 may be managed or supervised by a hypervisor.


In this particular example, the memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 includes a translation module 34, a traffic management application 36, and a state table 38, although the memory 26 can include other policies, modules, databases, data structures, tables, or applications, for example. The translation module 34 in this example is configured to translate between IP addresses assigned by the DHCP server 14 and modified versions of the assigned IP addresses generated by the network traffic management apparatus 12 in order to facilitate connections between the client devices 16(1)-16(n) and the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later.


The traffic management application 36 can be configured to provide traffic management functionality, such as accounting services in a subscriber network for example. Instances of the traffic management application 36 can be executed on the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) as processes. Each traffic management process can provide traffic management functionality for connections with the client devices 16(1)-16(n) that are disaggregated to one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) on which a traffic management process 36 is executing, as described and illustrated in more detail later.


The state table 38 in this example maintains an indication of each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) for which a connection is currently maintained by an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12. The indication of each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated in the state table 38 with an indication of one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) on which an instance of the traffic management application 36 handling the network traffic associated with the connection for each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is executing.


Accordingly, the state table 38 can be used by the network traffic management apparatus 12 to disaggregate connections associated with a same subscriber and multiple of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) to a same one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later. The state table 38 can also store a correspondence of assigned IP addresses and modified IP addresses for the client devices 16(1)-16(n) that can be used by the translation module 34.


The communication interface 28 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 operatively couples and communicates between the network traffic management apparatus 12, the DHCP server 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), and the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), which are all coupled together by the LAN 18 and WAN 20, although other types and numbers of communication networks or systems with other types and numbers of connections and configurations to other devices and elements can also be used.


In this particular example, the communication interface 28 includes a disaggregator 30, although the disaggregator 30 can be disposed separate from the communication interface 28 and more than one disaggregator can be provided in the network traffic management apparatus 12. The disaggregator 30 is an intelligent load balancer for distributing network traffic connections to the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and the instances of the traffic management application 36 executing on the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later. The disaggregator 30 can be implemented in hardware, software, or any combination of hardware or software, for example.


By way of example only, the LAN 18 and/or WAN 20 can use TCP/IP over Ethernet and industry-standard protocols, although other types and numbers of protocols and/or communication networks can be used. The LAN 18 and/or WAN 20 in this example can employ any suitable interface mechanisms and network communication technologies including, for example, teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice, modem, and the like), Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Ethernet-based Packet Data Networks (PDNs), combinations thereof, and the like. The LAN 18 and/or WAN 20 can also include direct connection(s) (e.g., for when a device illustrated in FIG. 1, such as the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), or resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) operate as virtual instances on the same physical machine).


While the network traffic management apparatus 12 is illustrated in this example as including a single device, the network traffic management apparatus 12 in other examples can include a plurality of devices or blades each having one or more processors (each processor with one or more processing cores) that implement one or more steps of this technology. In these examples, one or more of the devices can have a dedicated communication interface or memory. Alternatively, one or more of the devices can utilize the memory, communication interface, or other hardware or software components of one or more other devices included in the network traffic management apparatus 12.


Additionally, one or more of the devices that together comprise the network traffic management apparatus 12 in other examples can be standalone devices or integrated with one or more other devices or apparatuses, such as one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) or the DHCP server device 14, for example. Moreover, one or more of the devices of the network traffic management apparatus 12 in these examples can be in a same or a different communication network including one or more public, private, or cloud networks, for example.


Each of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) in this example includes one or more processors, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used. The resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) in this example process requests received from the client devices 16(1)-16(n) via the communication network(s) according to the HTTP-based application RFC protocol, for example. Various applications may be operating on the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) and transmitting resources (e.g., files or Web pages) to the client devices 16(1)-16(n) via the network traffic management apparatus 12 in response to requests from the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may be hardware or software or may represent a system with multiple servers in a pool, which may include internal or external networks.


Although the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) are illustrated as single devices, one or more actions of each of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may be distributed across one or more distinct network computing devices that together comprise one or more of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n). Moreover, the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) are not limited to a particular configuration. Thus, the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may contain a plurality of network computing devices that operate using a master/slave approach, whereby one of the network computing devices of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) operate to manage and/or otherwise coordinate operations of the other network computing devices. The resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may operate as a plurality of network computing devices within a cluster architecture, a peer-to peer architecture, virtual machines, or within a cloud architecture, for example.


Thus, the technology disclosed herein is not to be construed as being limited to a single environment and other configurations and architectures are also envisaged. For example, one or more of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) can operate within the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself rather than as a stand-alone server device communicating with the network traffic management apparatus 12 via the WAN 20. In this example, the one or more resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) operate within the memory of the network traffic management apparatus 12.


Each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in this example includes any type of computing device that can request, receive, and/or render web resources including web pages, web applications, or other data, such as mobile computing devices, desktop computing devices, laptop computing devices, tablet computing devices, virtual machines (including cloud-based computers), or the like. Each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in this example includes a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used.


The client devices 16(1)-16(n) may run interface applications, such as standard web browsers or standalone client applications, that may provide an interface to make requests for, and receive resources stored on, one or more of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) via the LAN 18 and/or WAN 20. The client devices 16(1)-16(n) may further include a display device, such as a display screen or touchscreen, and/or an input device, such as a keyboard for example.


The DHCP server device 14 in this example includes one or more processors, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used. The DHCP server device 14 distributes configuration parameters to the client devices 16(1)-16(n), including IP addresses, utilizing the DHCP protocol. One of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) may be a mobile computing device on a subscriber network that requests an IP address from the DHCP server device 14 as part of configuring itself on the subscriber network, for example. In response, the DHCP server device 14 assigns an IP address to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), which is intercepted by the network traffic management apparatus 12 and processed as described and illustrated in more detail later. In another example, the DHCP server device 14 is implemented as part of the network traffic management apparatus 12, such as a module within the memory 26, for example, rather than as a separate device.


Although the exemplary network environment 10 with the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), LAN 18, and WAN 20 are described and illustrated herein, other types and numbers of systems, devices, components, and elements in other topologies can be used. It is to be understood that the systems of the examples described herein are for exemplary purposes, as many variations of the specific hardware and software used to implement the examples are possible, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant art(s).


One or more of the components depicted in the network environment 10, such as the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), or resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), for example, may be configured to operate as virtual instances on the same physical machine. In other words, one or more of the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), or resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may operate on the same physical device rather than as separate devices communicating through communication network(s). Additionally, there may be more or fewer network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server device, client devices, or server devices than illustrated in FIG. 1. The client devices 16(1)-16(n) could also be implemented as applications on the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself as a further example.


In addition, two or more computing systems or devices can be substituted for any one of the systems or devices in any example. Accordingly, principles and advantages of distributed processing, such as redundancy and replication also can be implemented, as desired, to increase the robustness and performance of the devices and systems of the examples. The examples may also be implemented on computer system(s) that extend across any suitable network using any suitable interface mechanisms and traffic technologies, including by way of example only teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice and modem), wireless traffic networks, cellular traffic networks, Packet Data Networks (PDNs), the Internet, intranets, and combinations thereof.


The examples may also be embodied as one or more non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated by way of the examples herein. The instructions in some examples include executable code that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the processors to carry out steps necessary to implement the methods of the examples of this technology that are described and illustrated herein.


An exemplary method of disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation will now be described with reference to FIGS. 1-5. Referring more specifically to FIG. 3, a method for facilitating disaggregation of client connections associated with a same subscriber across processing cores and associated traffic management application instances is illustrated.


In step 300, the network traffic management apparatus 12 receives an address request for an IP address from one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) can generate the address request as part of the process of configuring itself to join the LAN 18 or another communications network, such as a subscriber network associated with a carrier, for example. The address request can be directed to the DHCP server device 14, but intercepted by the network traffic management apparatus 12 in step 300.


In step 302, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proxies the address request to the DHCP server device 14 and receives a response from the DHCP server device 14. The response from the DHCP server device 14 includes an IP address assigned by the DHCP server device 14 as part of a lease that is granted to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). In other examples, the network traffic management apparatus 12 can include the DHCP server device, and can therefore generate the assigned IP address, and other methods of obtaining the assigned IP address can also be used in other examples.


In step 304, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) for which connection(s) are currently being handled by an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).


In order to determine whether the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), the network traffic management apparatus 12 can query a database or other data structure, that is stored locally or remotely within the LAN 18 or carrier network for example, that includes identifying information for the client device(s) 16(1)-16(n) associated with each of a plurality of subscribers.


The network traffic management apparatus 12 can correlate the query results with the state table 38 in the memory 26 in order determine in step 304 whether the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) for which a connection is currently maintained. The state table 38 can be populated as described and illustrated in more detail later with reference to step 306 of FIG. 3.


In this particular example, the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) and the at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) are associated with a same subscriber in the context of a carrier network. However, the term subscriber as used herein includes a group, an account, or any other type of association of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) that may exist in other contexts or types of network environments. Accordingly, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 304 that the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the Yes branch is taken to step 306.


In step 306, the network traffic management apparatus 12 modifies the assigned IP address based on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) associated with the at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) associated with the same subscriber as the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The network traffic management apparatus 12 can identify the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on an association of the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) with an indication of the at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in the state table 38, for example, although other methods for identifying the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can also be used in other examples.


Optionally, the modified IP address hashes to an indication of the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) such that the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can subsequently be determined based on an application of a hash function to the modified IP address. However, other methods for modifying the assigned IP address can also be used in other examples. The network traffic management apparatus 12 also updates the state table 38 to include an indication of the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) associated with the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and sends the modified IP address to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in response to the address request received in step 300.


Referring back to step 304, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is not associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the No branch is taken to step 308. In step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 selects one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and modifies the assigned IP address based on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).


The one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be selected randomly, based on a stored policy, or based on a load balancing decision based on the load on the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), for example, although other methods for selecting the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can also be used. Optionally, as with the IP address modified as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 306, the IP address can be modified in step 308 to hash to an indication of the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).


Additionally, in step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 sends the modified IP address to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in response to the address request received in step 300. Subsequent to responding to the address request in step 306 or step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proceeds back to step 300 and receives another address request from another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), although one or more of steps 300-308 can also be performed by the network traffic management apparatus 12 in parallel for any number of the client devices 16(1)-16(n).


Referring more specifically to FIG. 4, a method for processing client requests and server responses in order to facilitate connection persistence is illustrated. In step 400 in this example the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether a request including one or more packets is received from one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The request can be for a web page or other web content hosted by one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), for example. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a request has been received from one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the Yes branch is taken to step 402.


In step 402, the network traffic management apparatus 12 identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on the source IP address in the request and sends the request to an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). The one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be identified, optionally by the disaggregator 30, based on applying a hash function to the source IP address, which corresponds with a modified IP address sent to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 306 or 308 of FIG. 3. Other methods of identifying the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can also be used in other examples.


In step 404, the network traffic management apparatus 12 processes the request, translates the source IP address to generate an assigned IP address, replaces the source IP address in the request with the IP address assigned by the DHCP server device 14, and sends the request to one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n). The source IP address, which corresponds with a modified version of the assigned IP address, can be translated into the assigned IP address based on a secure network address translation (SNAT) process using an established function or the state table 38 or other data structure storing a correspondence of modified IP addresses and assigned IP addresses, for example, although other methods of translating the source IP address can also be used. The processing of the request can be performed by the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and can include performing accounting services, for example, although other types of processing can also be performed.


In step 406, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether a response is received from the one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) to the request sent to the one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) in step 404. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a response has not been received, then the No branch is taken back to step 400 and the network traffic management apparatus 12 receives another request from the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) or another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). However, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 406 that a response has been received, then the Yes branch is taken to step 408.


In step 408, the network traffic management apparatus 12 translates a destination IP address in the response, which corresponds to an IP address assigned by the DHCP server device 14, to obtain a modified version of the assigned IP address, identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on the modified IP address, and sends the server response to an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).


Accordingly, the translation of the destination IP address results in the modified IP address sent to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) as described and illustrated in more detail earlier with reference to step 306 or 308 of FIG. 3, which corresponds with the source IP address of the request received in step 400. The destination IP address can be translated into the modified IP address based on an SNAT process using an established function or the state table 38 or other data structure storing a correspondence of modified IP addresses and assigned IP addresses, for example, although other methods of translating the destination IP address can also be used.


Additionally, the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be identified, optionally by the disaggregator 30, based on applying a hash function to the modified IP address, although other methods of identifying the one processing core can also be used in other examples. Accordingly, the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) identified in step 408 will be the same as the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) identified in step 404 in this example.


In step 410, the network traffic management apparatus 12 processes the response and sends the response to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The processing of the response can be performed by the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and can include performing accounting services, for example, although other types of processing can also be performed. Subsequent to sending the response to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), the network traffic management apparatus 12 proceeds back to step 400 and receives another request from the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) or another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n).


Referring back to step 400, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a request has not been received from one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the No branch is taken to step 412. In step 412, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether a lease provided by the DHCP server device 14 for one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) has expired. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a lease has expired for one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the Yes branch is taken to step 414.


In step 414, the network traffic management apparatus 12 updates the state table 38 to reflect that the lease has expired. By updating the state table 38, the network traffic management apparatus 12 may subsequently modify an assigned IP address, as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 306 of FIG. 3, for another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) associated with the same subscriber, instead of modifying the assigned IP address as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 308 of FIG. 3, when the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) was the only client device 16(1)-16(n) associated with a particular subscriber.


However, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 412 that a lease for one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) has not expired, then the No branch is taken to step 406 and the network traffic management apparatus 12 again determines whether a response is received from one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n). Accordingly, the network traffic management apparatus 12 effectively waits to receive a request, receive a server response, or identify a lease expiration in this particular example.


Referring more specifically to FIG. 5, a timing diagram for a method of disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation is illustrated. In step 500 in this example, the client device 16 sends an address request toward the DHCP server device 14, which is intercepted by the network traffic management apparatus 12. In step 502, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proxies the address request to the DHCP server device 14 and, in step 504, the DHCP server device 14 sends an assigned IP address in a response to the address request.


In step 506, the network traffic management apparatus 12 modifies the assigned IP address. The modified IP address can be generated based on a load balancing policy when the client device 16 is not associated with a same subscriber as another client device for which a connection is currently established with the network traffic management apparatus 12.


Alternatively, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that the client device 16 is associated with a same subscriber as another client device 12 for which a connection is currently established, then the assigned IP address is modified based on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) on which an instance of a traffic management application 36 managing the connection is executing.


In one example, the assigned IP address is modified so that it hashes to a value corresponding to the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). By modifying the assigned IP address based on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), network traffic originating from the client device 16 and another client device associated with the same subscriber can advantageously be handled by the same instance of the traffic management application 36.


In step 508, the network traffic management apparatus 12 sends the modified IP address to the client device 16 in response to the address request. In step 510, the client device 16 sends a request including one or more IP packets, such as a request for a web page hosted by the resource server device 22, for example. In step 512, the network traffic management apparatus 12 identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 based on the modified IP address, included in the request as a source IP address, obtains an assigned IP address, and routes the request to the identified one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). The one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be identified by applying a hash function to the source IP address in the request, which corresponds to the modified IP address generated in step 506. The assigned IP address can be obtained based on a SNAT using a function or a state table 38, for example.


In step 514, the network traffic management apparatus 12 replaces the source IP address in the request with the assigned IP address and sends the request to the resource server device 22. Optionally, the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 also processes the request, such as to provide accounting services, for example.


In step 516, the resource server device 22 sends a response including one or more packets and having a destination IP address corresponding to the assigned IP address. In step 518, the network traffic management apparatus 12 intercepts the response, obtains the modified IP address, identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on the modified IP address, and routes the response to the identified one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). The modified IP address can be determined from the assigned IP address based on a SNAT using a function or a state table 38, for example, and the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can again be identified based on an application of a hash function to the modified IP address.


In step 520, the network traffic management apparatus 12 replaces the destination IP address in the response with the modified IP address and sends the response to the client device 16 in response to the request. Optionally, the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 can also process the response, such as to provide accounting services, for example.


With this technology, connections associated with a same subscriber and originating with different client devices can advantageously be disaggregated to the same traffic management process on an intermediary network traffic management apparatus. Since all network traffic associated with client devices corresponding to a same subscriber are handled by the same traffic management process, traffic management services, such as accounting services, can advantageously be provided more efficiently using fewer resources, and scalability of network traffic management apparatuses is improved with this technology.


Having thus described the basic concept of the invention, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method for disaggregating subscribers via Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) address translation implemented by a network traffic management system comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server devices, or resource server devices, the method comprising: assigning two client addresses in response to one address request received from a client, wherein assigning the two client addresses comprises: obtaining a DHCP-assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server;selecting one of a plurality of processing cores to process network traffic associated with the client using a traffic management process is executing on the selected processing core; andmodifying the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, to generate a modified IP address;sending the modified IP address to the client in response to the received address request;receiving a subsequent request from the client, the request comprising the modified IP address in a source address field;identifying the selected processing core using the modified IP address;sending the subsequent request to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;translating the modified IP address to obtain the DHCP-assigned IP address;replacing the modified IP address in the source address of the subsequent request with the DHCP-assigned IP address to generate a translated subsequent request; andsending the translated subsequent request to a resource server.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected processing core is selected because network traffic associated with another client associated with a same subscriber as the client is assigned to be processed by the selected processing core.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein modifying the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, comprises choosing the modified IP address to hash to an indication of the selected processing core when a hash function is applied to the modified IP address.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a response to the translated subsequent request from the resource server, the response comprising the DHCP-assigned IP address in a destination address field;translating the DHCP-assigned IP address to the modified IP address;identifying the selected processing core using the modified IP address;sending the response to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;replacing the DHCP-assigned IP address in the destination address of the response with the modified IP address to generate a translated response; andsending the translated response to the client.
  • 5. A network traffic management apparatus, comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to execute the stored programmed instructions, wherein the instructions, upon execution, cause the network traffic management apparatus to: assign two client addresses in response to one address request received from a client, wherein assigning the two client addresses comprises: obtain a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)-assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server;select one of a plurality of processing cores to process network traffic associated with the client using a traffic management process is executing on the selected processing core; andmodify the DHCP-assigned IP address based on the selected processing core, to generate a modified IP address;send the modified IP address to the client in response to the received address request;receive a subsequent request from the client, the request comprising the modified IP address in a source address field;identify the selected processing core using the modified IP address;send the subsequent request to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;translate the modified IP address to obtain the DHCP-assigned IP address;replace the modified IP address in the source address of the subsequent request with the DHCP-assigned IP address to generate a translated subsequent request; andsend the translated subsequent request to a resource server.
  • 6. The network traffic management apparatus of claim 5, wherein the selected processing core is selected because network traffic associated with another client associated with a same subscriber as the client is assigned to be processed by the selected processing core.
  • 7. The network traffic management apparatus of claim 5, wherein modifying the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, comprises choosing the modified IP address to hash to an indication of the selected processing core when a hash function is applied to the modified IP.
  • 8. The network traffic management apparatus of claim 5, wherein the instructions, upon execution, further cause the network traffic management apparatus to: receive a response to the translated subsequent request from the resource server, the response comprising the DHCP-assigned IP address in a destination address field;translate the DHCP-assigned IP address to the modified IP address;identify the selected processing core using the modified IP address;send the response to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;replace the DHCP-assigned IP address in the destination address of the response with the modified IP address to generate a translated response; andsend the translated response to the client.
  • 9. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for disaggregating subscribers via Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) address translation comprising executable code which when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to: assign two client addresses in response to one address request received from a client, wherein assigning the two client addresses comprises: obtain a DHCP-assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server;select one of a plurality of processing cores to process network traffic associated with the client using a traffic management process executing on the selected processing core; andmodify the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, to generate a modified IP address;send the modified IP address to the client in response to the received address request receive a subsequent request from the client, the request comprising the modified IP address in a source address field;identify the selected processing core using the modified IP address;send the subsequent request to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;translate the modified IP address to obtain the DHCP-assigned IP address;replace the modified IP address in the source address of the subsequent request with the DHCP-assigned IP address to generate a translated subsequent request; andsend the translated subsequent request to a resource server.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the selected processing core is selected because network traffic associated with another client associated with a same subscriber as the client is assigned to be processed by the selected processing core.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein modifying the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, comprises choosing the modified IP address to hash to an indication of the selected processing core when a hash function is applied to the modified IP.
  • 12. The computer readable memory of claim 9, wherein the instructions further comprise executable code which when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to: receive a response to the translated subsequent request from the resource server, the response comprising the DHCP-assigned IP address in a destination address field;translate the DHCP-assigned IP address to the modified IP address;identify the selected processing core using the modified IP address;send the response to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;replace the DHCP-assigned IP address in the destination address of the response with the modified IP address to generate a translated response; andsend the translated response to the client.
  • 13. A network traffic management system, comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) server devices, or resource server devices, the network traffic management system comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to execute the stored programmed instructions to: assign two client addresses in response to one address request received from a client, wherein assigning the two client addresses comprises: obtain a DHCP-assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server;select one of a plurality of processing cores to process network traffic associated with the client using a traffic management process is executing on the selected processing core; andmodify the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, to generate a modified IP address;send the modified IP address to the client in response to the received address request;receive a subsequent request from the client, the request comprising the modified IP address in a source address field;identify the selected processing core using the modified IP address;send the subsequent request to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;translate the modified IP address to obtain the DHCP-assigned IP address;replace the modified IP address in the source address of the subsequent request with the DHCP-assigned IP address to generate a translated subsequent request; andsend the translated subsequent request to a resource server.
  • 14. The network traffic management system of claim 13, wherein the selected processing core is selected because network traffic associated with another client associated with a same subscriber as the client is assigned to be processed by the selected processing core.
  • 15. The network traffic management system of claim 13, wherein modifying the DHCP-assigned IP address, based on the selected processing core, comprises choosing the modified IP address to hash to an indication of the selected processing core when a hash function is applied to the modified IP address.
  • 16. The network traffic management system of claim 13, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute the stored programmed instructions to: receive a response to the translated subsequent request from the resource server, the response comprising the DHCP-assigned IP address in a destination address field;translate the DHCP-assigned IP address to the modified IP address;identify the selected processing core using the modified IP address;send the response to the traffic management process executing on the selected processing core;replace the DHCP-assigned IP address in the destination address of the response with the modified IP address to generate a translated response; andsend the translated response to the client.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/351,379 filed Jun. 17, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (473)
Number Name Date Kind
3950735 Patel Apr 1976 A
4644532 George et al. Feb 1987 A
4897781 Chang et al. Jan 1990 A
4965772 Daniel et al. Oct 1990 A
5023826 Patel Jun 1991 A
5053953 Patel Oct 1991 A
5167024 Smith et al. Nov 1992 A
5299312 Rocco, Jr. Mar 1994 A
5327529 Fults et al. Jul 1994 A
5367635 Bauer et al. Nov 1994 A
5371852 Attanasio et al. Dec 1994 A
5406502 Haramaty et al. Apr 1995 A
5475857 Dally Dec 1995 A
5517617 Sathaye et al. May 1996 A
5519694 Brewer et al. May 1996 A
5519778 Leighton et al. May 1996 A
5521591 Arora et al. May 1996 A
5528701 Aref Jun 1996 A
5581764 Fitzgerald et al. Dec 1996 A
5596742 Agarwal et al. Jan 1997 A
5606665 Yang et al. Feb 1997 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5663018 Cummings et al. Sep 1997 A
5752023 Choucri et al. May 1998 A
5761484 Agarwal et al. Jun 1998 A
5768423 Aref et al. Jun 1998 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5790554 Pitcher et al. Aug 1998 A
5802052 Venkataraman Sep 1998 A
5812550 Sohn et al. Sep 1998 A
5825772 Dobbins et al. Oct 1998 A
5832283 Chou et al. Nov 1998 A
5875296 Shi et al. Feb 1999 A
5892914 Pitts Apr 1999 A
5892932 Kim Apr 1999 A
5898876 James Apr 1999 A
5919247 Van Hoff et al. Jul 1999 A
5936939 Des Jardins et al. Aug 1999 A
5941988 Bhagwat et al. Aug 1999 A
5946690 Pitts Aug 1999 A
5949885 Leighton Sep 1999 A
5951694 Choquier et al. Sep 1999 A
5959990 Frantz et al. Sep 1999 A
5974460 Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. Oct 1999 A
5983281 Ogle et al. Nov 1999 A
5988847 McLaughlin et al. Nov 1999 A
6006260 Barrick, Jr. et al. Dec 1999 A
6006264 Colby et al. Dec 1999 A
6026452 Pitts Feb 2000 A
6028857 Poor Feb 2000 A
6051169 Brown et al. Apr 2000 A
6078956 Bryant et al. Jun 2000 A
6085234 Pitts et al. Jul 2000 A
6092196 Reiche Jul 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6111876 Frantz et al. Aug 2000 A
6128279 O'Neil et al. Oct 2000 A
6128657 Okanoya et al. Oct 2000 A
6160874 Dickerman et al. Dec 2000 A
6170022 Linville et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178423 Douceur et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182139 Brendel Jan 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6233612 Fruchtman et al. May 2001 B1
6246684 Chapman et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249801 Zisapel et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253226 Chidambaran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253230 Couland et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263368 Martin Jul 2001 B1
6289012 Harrington et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298380 Coile et al. Oct 2001 B1
6327622 Jindal et al. Dec 2001 B1
6343324 Hubis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347339 Morris et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360270 Cherkasova et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374300 Masters Apr 2002 B2
6396833 Zhang et al. May 2002 B1
6430562 Kardos et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434618 Cohen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434801 Johnson et al. Aug 2002 B2
6480476 Willars Nov 2002 B1
6484261 Wiegel Nov 2002 B1
6490624 Sampson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6510135 Almulhem et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510458 Berstis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519643 Foulkes et al. Feb 2003 B1
6601084 Bhaskaran et al. Jul 2003 B1
6636503 Shiran et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636894 Short et al. Oct 2003 B1
6650640 Muller et al. Nov 2003 B1
6650641 Albert et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654701 Hatley Nov 2003 B2
6661802 Homberg et al. Dec 2003 B1
6683873 Kwok et al. Jan 2004 B1
6691165 Bruck et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694517 James et al. Feb 2004 B1
6708187 Shanumgam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718380 Mohaban et al. Apr 2004 B1
6742045 Albert et al. May 2004 B1
6751663 Farrell et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754228 Ludwig Jun 2004 B1
6760775 Anerousis et al. Jul 2004 B1
6772219 Shobatake Aug 2004 B1
6779039 Bommareddy et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781986 Sabaa et al. Aug 2004 B1
6798777 Ferguson et al. Sep 2004 B1
6804542 Haartsen Oct 2004 B1
6816901 Sitaraman et al. Nov 2004 B1
6816977 Brakmo et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826698 Minkin et al. Nov 2004 B1
6829238 Tokuyo et al. Dec 2004 B2
6868082 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876629 Beshai et al. Apr 2005 B2
6876654 Hegde Apr 2005 B1
6888836 Cherkasova May 2005 B1
6928082 Liu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6947985 Hegli et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950434 Viswanath et al. Sep 2005 B1
6954780 Susai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957272 Tallegas et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959394 Brickell et al. Oct 2005 B1
6975592 Seddigh et al. Dec 2005 B1
6986040 Kramer et al. Jan 2006 B1
6987763 Rochberger et al. Jan 2006 B2
7007092 Peiffer Feb 2006 B2
7058633 Gnagy et al. Jun 2006 B1
7113993 Cappiello et al. Sep 2006 B1
7133944 Song et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139792 Mishra et al. Nov 2006 B1
7185359 Schmidt et al. Feb 2007 B2
7228422 Morioka et al. Jun 2007 B2
7287082 O'Toole, Jr. Oct 2007 B1
7295827 Liu et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308703 Wright et al. Dec 2007 B2
7308709 Brezak et al. Dec 2007 B1
7310339 Powers et al. Dec 2007 B1
7319696 Inoue et al. Jan 2008 B2
7321926 Zhang et al. Jan 2008 B1
7333999 Njemanze Feb 2008 B1
7343413 Gilde et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349391 Ben-Dor et al. Mar 2008 B2
7383570 Pinkas et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398552 Pardee et al. Jul 2008 B2
7433962 Janssen et al. Oct 2008 B2
7437478 Yokota et al. Oct 2008 B2
7454480 Labio et al. Nov 2008 B2
7490162 Masters Feb 2009 B1
7500243 Huetsch et al. Mar 2009 B2
7500269 Huotari et al. Mar 2009 B2
7505795 Lim et al. Mar 2009 B1
7516492 Nisbet et al. Apr 2009 B1
7522581 Acharya et al. Apr 2009 B2
7526541 Roese et al. Apr 2009 B2
7558197 Sindhu et al. Jul 2009 B1
7580971 Gollapudi et al. Aug 2009 B1
7590732 Rune Sep 2009 B2
7624424 Morita et al. Nov 2009 B2
7644137 Bozak et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668166 Rekhter et al. Feb 2010 B1
7689710 Tang et al. Mar 2010 B2
7724657 Rao et al. May 2010 B2
7725093 Sengupta et al. May 2010 B2
7742479 Kotha Jun 2010 B1
7769845 Baron Aug 2010 B2
7778187 Chaturvedi et al. Aug 2010 B2
7801978 Susai et al. Sep 2010 B1
7808913 Ansari et al. Oct 2010 B2
7831662 Clark et al. Nov 2010 B2
7908314 Yamaguchi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925908 Kim Apr 2011 B2
7930365 Dixit et al. Apr 2011 B2
7933946 Livshits et al. Apr 2011 B2
7945908 Waldspurger et al. May 2011 B1
7984141 Gupta et al. Jul 2011 B2
8041022 Andreasen et al. Oct 2011 B1
8103781 Wu et al. Jan 2012 B1
8130650 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 2012 B2
8149819 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2012 B2
8189567 Kavanagh et al. May 2012 B2
8199757 Pani et al. Jun 2012 B2
8205246 Shatzkamer et al. Jun 2012 B2
8239954 Wobber et al. Aug 2012 B2
8274895 Rahman et al. Sep 2012 B2
8321908 Gai et al. Nov 2012 B2
8351333 Rao et al. Jan 2013 B2
8380854 Szabo Feb 2013 B2
8417817 Jacobs Apr 2013 B1
8447871 Szabo May 2013 B1
8447970 Klein et al. May 2013 B2
8452876 Williams et al. May 2013 B1
8464265 Worley Jun 2013 B2
8468247 Richardson et al. Jun 2013 B1
8468267 Yigang Jun 2013 B2
8521851 Richardson et al. Aug 2013 B1
8521880 Richardson et al. Aug 2013 B1
8359224 Henderson et al. Sep 2013 B2
8566474 Kanode et al. Oct 2013 B2
8578050 Craig et al. Nov 2013 B2
8606921 Vasquez et al. Dec 2013 B2
8615022 Harrison et al. Dec 2013 B2
8646067 Agarwal et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665868 Kay Mar 2014 B2
8701179 Penno et al. Apr 2014 B1
8725836 Lowery et al. May 2014 B2
8726338 Narayanaswamy et al. May 2014 B2
8737304 Karuturi et al. May 2014 B2
8778665 Glide et al. Jul 2014 B2
8804504 Chen Aug 2014 B1
8819109 Krishnamurthy et al. Aug 2014 B1
8819419 Carlson et al. Aug 2014 B2
8830874 Cho et al. Sep 2014 B2
8873753 Parker Oct 2014 B2
8875274 Montemurro et al. Oct 2014 B2
8886981 Baumann et al. Nov 2014 B1
8908545 Chen et al. Dec 2014 B1
8954080 Janakiraman et al. Feb 2015 B2
9036529 Erickson et al. May 2015 B2
9037166 de Wit et al. May 2015 B2
9047259 Ho et al. Jun 2015 B1
9077554 Szabo Jul 2015 B1
9083760 Hughes et al. Jul 2015 B1
9172753 Jiang et al. Oct 2015 B1
9246819 Thirasuttakorn Jan 2016 B1
9319921 Kuroda Apr 2016 B2
20010009554 Katseff et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010023442 Masters Sep 2001 A1
20010052016 Skene et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020010783 Primak et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020027504 Davis Mar 2002 A1
20020032777 Kawata et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020046291 O'Callaghan et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049842 Huetsch et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059428 Susai et al. May 2002 A1
20020083067 Tamayo Jun 2002 A1
20020095498 Chanda et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020112061 Shih et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138615 Schmeling Sep 2002 A1
20020161913 Gonzalez et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020194342 Lu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198993 Cudd et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030037070 Marston Feb 2003 A1
20030046291 Fascenda Mar 2003 A1
20030058839 D'Souza Mar 2003 A1
20030065653 Overton et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030065951 Igeta et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069918 Lu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069974 Lu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070069 Belapurkar et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030086415 Bernhard et al. May 2003 A1
20030105807 Thompson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105983 Brakmo et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120948 Schmidt et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030128708 Inoue et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135509 Davis et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145062 Sharma et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145233 Poletto et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030163578 Janssen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030200311 Baum Oct 2003 A1
20030208596 Carolan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225485 Fritz et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003287 Zissimopoulos et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040072569 Omae et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078487 Cernohous et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103283 Hornak May 2004 A1
20040111523 Hall et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111621 Himberger et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117493 Bazot et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148520 Talpade et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151186 Akama Aug 2004 A1
20040190522 Aerrabotu et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040268358 Li et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199762 Carlson et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210663 Phillips et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225713 Abbasi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040255000 Simionescu et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264472 Oliver et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264481 Darling et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267920 Hydrie et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267948 Oliver et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004887 Igakura et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021736 Carusi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027869 Johnson Feb 2005 A1
20050044213 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050052440 Kim et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055435 Gbadegesin et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071283 Randle et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050078604 Yim Apr 2005 A1
20050122942 Rhee et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122977 Lieberman Jun 2005 A1
20050129001 Backman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154837 Keohane et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187866 Lee Aug 2005 A1
20050188220 Nilsson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198310 Kim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050262238 Reeves et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050288939 Peled et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002405 Le Sauze et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031520 Bedekar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036764 Yokota et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060059267 Cugi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060077902 Kannan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060077986 Rune Apr 2006 A1
20060083205 Buddhikot et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095573 Carle et al. May 2006 A1
20060106802 Giblin et al. May 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu et al. May 2006 A1
20060112272 Morioka et al. May 2006 A1
20060129684 Datta Jun 2006 A1
20060135198 Lee Jun 2006 A1
20060156416 Huotari et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161577 Kulkarni et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168070 Thompson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171365 Borella Aug 2006 A1
20060179153 Lee et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060182103 Martini et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184647 Dixit et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060209853 Hidaka et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230148 Forecast et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233106 Achlioptas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242300 Yumoto et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060268704 Ansari et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060291483 Sela Dec 2006 A1
20060294054 Kudo et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070006293 Balakrishnan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016662 Desai et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019658 Park et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070050843 Manville et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070058670 Konduru et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070064661 Sood et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083646 Miller et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088822 Coile et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106796 Kudo et al. May 2007 A1
20070107048 Halls et al. May 2007 A1
20070118879 Yeun May 2007 A1
20070174491 Still et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070220598 Salowey et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233809 Brownell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255848 Sewall et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070258451 Bouat Nov 2007 A1
20070297410 Yoon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297551 Choi Dec 2007 A1
20080008202 Terrell et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025297 Kashyap Jan 2008 A1
20080028456 O'Rourke et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031258 Acharya et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080034136 Ulenas Feb 2008 A1
20080072303 Syed Mar 2008 A1
20080120370 Chan et al. May 2008 A1
20080130812 Eom et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080133518 Kapoor et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080134311 Medvinsky et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080148340 Powell et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159145 Muthukrishnan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165801 Sheppard Jul 2008 A1
20080178278 Grinstein et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201331 Eriksen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201599 Ferraiolo et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205613 Lopez Aug 2008 A1
20080209053 Shen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080222646 Sigal et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080225710 Raja et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080229415 Kapoor et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235508 Ran et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080239986 Xu et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253395 Pandya Oct 2008 A1
20080256224 Kaji et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080279200 Shatzkamer et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080282354 Wobber et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288661 Galles Nov 2008 A1
20080301760 Lim Dec 2008 A1
20080316922 Riddle et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090028337 Balabine et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090040926 Li et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049230 Pandya Feb 2009 A1
20090070617 Arimilli et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077619 Boyce Mar 2009 A1
20090094610 Sukirya Apr 2009 A1
20090119504 van Os et al. May 2009 A1
20090125496 Wexler et al. May 2009 A1
20090125532 Wexler et al. May 2009 A1
20090125622 O'Sullivan et al. May 2009 A1
20090125625 Shim et al. May 2009 A1
20090138749 Moll et al. May 2009 A1
20090141891 Boyen et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157678 Turk Jun 2009 A1
20090193126 Agarwal et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193513 Agarwal et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090196282 Fellman et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090228956 He et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248893 Richardson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287935 Aull et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296624 Ryu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300407 Kamath et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100011420 Drako et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011434 Kay Jan 2010 A1
20100017846 Huang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023582 Pedersen et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100042693 Eriksson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100071048 Novak et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100115236 Bataineh et al. May 2010 A1
20100122091 Huang et al. May 2010 A1
20100150154 Viger et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100154031 Montemurro et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165877 Shukla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100188976 Rahman et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189052 Kavanagh et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100242092 Harris et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251330 Kroeselberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100088417 Amemiya et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279733 Karsten et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287227 Goel Nov 2010 A1
20100299451 Yigang et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100322250 Shetty et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325277 Muthiah et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029654 Takeda et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040889 Garrett et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047620 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110066718 Susai et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110107077 Henderson et al. May 2011 A1
20110141900 Jayawardena et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153822 Rajan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154443 Thakur et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110173295 Bakke et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184733 Yu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110197059 Klein et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202676 Craig et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110246800 Accpadi et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110271005 Bharrat et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110273984 Hsu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277016 Hockings et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282997 Prince et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110314178 Kanode et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110321122 Mwangi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016994 Nakamura et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120030341 Jensen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120039341 Latif et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041965 Vasquez et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120063314 Pignataro et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066489 Ozaki et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120079055 Robinson Mar 2012 A1
20120101952 Raleigh et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120124372 Dilley et al. May 2012 A1
20120143883 Chen et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120191847 Nas et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120198043 Hesketh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120198512 Zhou et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120210416 Mihelich et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120210417 Shieh Aug 2012 A1
20120224531 Karuturi et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120259925 Braudes Oct 2012 A1
20120311153 Morgan Dec 2012 A1
20120317266 Abbott Dec 2012 A1
20130003106 Lowery et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130029726 Berionne et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130044757 Rai et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130091002 Christie et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130163758 Swaminathan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130198322 Oran et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130205361 Narayanaswamy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212127 Kitamura Aug 2013 A1
20130297765 Zisapel Nov 2013 A1
20130336122 Baruah et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130339429 Richardson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140040478 Hsu et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140059678 Parker Feb 2014 A1
20140095661 Knowles et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140162705 de Wit et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171089 Janakiraman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140269484 Dankberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140317404 Carlson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140362807 Bhatnagar Dec 2014 A1
20150127830 Brown et al. May 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0744850 Nov 1996 EP
WO 9114326 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9505712 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9709805 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9745800 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9905829 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9906913 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9910858 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9939373 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9964967 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0004422 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0004458 Jan 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
“A Process for Selective Routing of Servlet Content to Transcoding Modules,” Research Disclosure 422124, Jun. 1999, pp. 889-890, IBM Corporation.
“BIG-IP Controller with Exclusive OneConnect Content Switching Feature Provides a Breakthrough System for Maximizing Server and Network Performance,” F5 Networks, Inc. Press Release, May 8, 2001, 2 pages, Las Vegas, Nevada.
“Servlet/Applet/HTML Authentication Process With Single Sign-On,” Research Disclosure 429128, Jan. 2000, pp. 163-164, IBM Corporation.
“Traffic Surges; Surge Queue; Netscaler Defense,” 2005, PowerPoint Presentation, slides 1-12, Citrix Systems, Inc.
“Windows Server 2003 Kerberos Extensions,” Microsoft TechNet, 2003, 8 pages, (Updated Jul. 31, 2004), http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738207, Microsoft Corporation.
Abad, C., et al., “An Analysis on the Schemes for Detecting and Preventing ARP Cache Poisoning Attacks”, IEEE, Computer Society, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07), 2007, pp. 1-8.
Crescendo Networks, “Application Layer Processing (ALP),” 2003-2009, pp. 168-186, Chapter 9, CN-5000E/5500E, Foxit Software Company.
European Search Report for corresponding EP Application No. 14753736.9, dated Sep. 23, 2016, pp. 1-8.
F5 Networks Inc., “Configuration Guide for Local Traffic Management,” F5 Networks Inc., Jan. 2006, version 9.2.2, 406 pgs.
F5 Networks. BIG-IP GTM and BIG-IP Link Controller, Release Notes, Jul. 20, 2015, v.11.6.0.
F5 Networks. BIG-IP Virtual, Release Notes, Dec. 8, 2014, Edition 11.6.0.
F5 Networks. BIG-IP® Global Traffic Manager™: Implementations, Manual, Aug. 20, 2014, pp. 1-118, v11.6.
F5 Networks. BIG-IP® TMOS®: Routing Administration, Manual, Apr. 10, 2015, pp. 1-140, v11.6.
F5 Networks. Local Traffic Manager and Global Traffic Manager Operations Guide, Manual, Dec. 12, 2014, pp. 1-160, v1.0.
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-162.
Floyd et al., “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance,” Aug. 1993, pp. 1-22, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, California.
Hochmuth, Phil, “F5, CacheFlow pump up content-delivery lines,” Network World Fusion, May 4, 2001, 1 page, Las Vegas, Nevada.
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026615 (dated Jul. 4, 2013).
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/018431 (dated Jul. 9, 2014).
Macvittie L., “Message-Based Load Balancing,” Technical Brief, 2009, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc.
OWASP, “Testing for Cross site scripting”, OWASP Testing Guide v2, Table of Contents, Sep. 5, 2013, pp. 1-5, (www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing_for_Cross_site_scripting).
Schaefer, Ken, “IIS and Kerberos Part 5—Protocol Transition, Constrained Delegation, S4U2S and S4U2P,” Jul. 18, 2007, 21 pages, itnp://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2007/07/19/8460.aspx.
Williams et al., “The Ultimate Windows Server 2003 System Administrator's Guide: Forwarding Authentication,” 2003, 2 pages, Figure 10.7, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, Massachusetts.
F5 Networks, Inc., “BIG-IP® Local Traffic Management: Basics”, Manual, Oct. 20, 2015, pp. 1-68, version 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc.
F5 Networks, Inc., “F5 BIG-IP TMOS: Operations Guide”, Manual, Mar. 5, 2015, pp. 1-238, F5 Networks, Inc.
F5 Networks, Inc., “BIG-IP® System: SSL Administration”, Manual, Jul. 22, 2016, pp. 1-110, version 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc.
F5 Networks, Inc., “BIG-IP® Local Traffic Manager™: Implementations”, Manual, May 25, 2016, pp. 1-284, version 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62351379 Jun 2016 US