This technology generally relates to processing network traffic in a multiprocessor environment and, more particularly, to methods and devices for disaggregating subscribers via dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) address translation.
Clustered multiprocessor architectures allow the simultaneous use of multiple processors, referred to herein as processing cores, in order to increase the overall performance of a computing device. With a multiprocessor architecture, processes and threads can run simultaneously on different processing cores instead of merely appearing to run simultaneously as in single processor architectures utilizing multitasking and context switching.
One such computing device benefiting from a multiprocessor architecture is a network traffic management apparatus which can run an instance of a traffic management application on each processing core, for example. The traffic management processes can be configured to manage network traffic by performing functions, such as accounting, load balancing, rate limiting, compression, encryption, application acceleration, or packet filtering for example.
In order to distribute network traffic to a processing core of a multiprocessor architecture, to be handled by an instance of a traffic management application executing on the processing core, one or more disaggregators can be provided between the processing cores and the client devices originating the network traffic. Accordingly, the disaggregator(s) are effectively a hardware or software load balancer configured to distribute traffic flows or connections across the processing cores and traffic management application instances executing on the processing cores.
In some networks, such as carrier networks, client devices are assigned arbitrary Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. Currently, connections with the client devices are disaggregated across processing cores of a network traffic management apparatus. Accordingly, connections from multiple client devices associated with a same subscriber may be handled by different processing cores executing different instances of a traffic management application.
The separation of connections across different processing cores for client devices associated with a same subscriber is undesirable and negatively impacts the scalability and performance of the network traffic management apparatus. In one particular example, accounting relating to data usage on a carrier network for a subscriber requires more resources when the accounting functionality for different client devices associated with the subscriber is provided by different instances of a traffic management application executing on different processing cores.
A method for disaggregating subscribers via Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) address translation implemented by a network traffic management system comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server devices, client devices, or resource server devices includes obtaining an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.
A network traffic management apparatus that includes memory including programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.
A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation that includes executable code, which when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.
A network traffic management system that includes one or more network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server devices, client devices, or resource server devices including memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain an assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address from a DHCP server in response to an address request received from a client. One of a plurality of processing cores, on which a traffic management process is executing, is identified. The assigned IP address is modified based on the identified processing core. The modified IP address is sent to the client in response to the received address request.
This technology has a number of associated advantages including providing methods, non-transitory computer readable media, network traffic management apparatuses, and network traffic management systems that improve scalability and performance of multiprocessor devices in subscriber networks. With this technology, client connections associated with a same subscriber can advantageously be disaggregated to the same traffic management processing core and associated process, thereby significantly improving processing efficiency.
Referring to
Referring to
The processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 may execute programmed instructions stored in the memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 for the any number of the functions identified above. Each of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) may be a CPU or general purpose processor and the processing cores may be located on a same chip or on different chips in a multiprocessor architecture.
The memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 stores these programmed instructions for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated herein, although some or all of the programmed instructions could be stored elsewhere. A variety of different types of memory storage devices, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, solid state drives, flash memory, or other computer readable medium which is read from and written to by a magnetic, optical, or other reading and writing system that is coupled to the processor(s), can be used for the memory 26.
Accordingly, the memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 can store one or more applications that can include computer executable instructions that, when executed by the network traffic management apparatus 12, cause the network traffic management apparatus 12 to perform actions, such as to transmit, receive, or otherwise process network messages, for example, and to perform other actions described and illustrated below with reference to
Even further, the application(s) may be operative in a cloud-based computing environment. The application(s) can be executed within or as virtual machine(s) or virtual server(s) that may be managed in a cloud-based computing environment. Also, the application(s), and even the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself, may be located in virtual server(s) running in a cloud-based computing environment rather than being tied to one or more specific physical network computing devices. Also, the application(s) may be running in one or more virtual machines (VMs) executing on the network traffic management apparatus 12. Additionally, in one or more embodiments of this technology, virtual machine(s) running on the network traffic management apparatus 12 may be managed or supervised by a hypervisor.
In this particular example, the memory 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 includes a translation module 34, a traffic management application 36, and a state table 38, although the memory 26 can include other policies, modules, databases, data structures, tables, or applications, for example. The translation module 34 in this example is configured to translate between IP addresses assigned by the DHCP server 14 and modified versions of the assigned IP addresses generated by the network traffic management apparatus 12 in order to facilitate connections between the client devices 16(1)-16(n) and the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later.
The traffic management application 36 can be configured to provide traffic management functionality, such as accounting services in a subscriber network for example. Instances of the traffic management application 36 can be executed on the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) as processes. Each traffic management process can provide traffic management functionality for connections with the client devices 16(1)-16(n) that are disaggregated to one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) on which a traffic management process 36 is executing, as described and illustrated in more detail later.
The state table 38 in this example maintains an indication of each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) for which a connection is currently maintained by an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12. The indication of each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated in the state table 38 with an indication of one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) on which an instance of the traffic management application 36 handling the network traffic associated with the connection for each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is executing.
Accordingly, the state table 38 can be used by the network traffic management apparatus 12 to disaggregate connections associated with a same subscriber and multiple of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) to a same one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later. The state table 38 can also store a correspondence of assigned IP addresses and modified IP addresses for the client devices 16(1)-16(n) that can be used by the translation module 34.
The communication interface 28 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 operatively couples and communicates between the network traffic management apparatus 12, the DHCP server 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), and the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), which are all coupled together by the LAN 18 and WAN 20, although other types and numbers of communication networks or systems with other types and numbers of connections and configurations to other devices and elements can also be used.
In this particular example, the communication interface 28 includes a disaggregator 30, although the disaggregator 30 can be disposed separate from the communication interface 28 and more than one disaggregator can be provided in the network traffic management apparatus 12. The disaggregator 30 is an intelligent load balancer for distributing network traffic connections to the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and the instances of the traffic management application 36 executing on the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later. The disaggregator 30 can be implemented in hardware, software, or any combination of hardware or software, for example.
By way of example only, the LAN 18 and/or WAN 20 can use TCP/IP over Ethernet and industry-standard protocols, although other types and numbers of protocols and/or communication networks can be used. The LAN 18 and/or WAN 20 in this example can employ any suitable interface mechanisms and network communication technologies including, for example, teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice, modem, and the like), Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Ethernet-based Packet Data Networks (PDNs), combinations thereof, and the like. The LAN 18 and/or WAN 20 can also include direct connection(s) (e.g., for when a device illustrated in
While the network traffic management apparatus 12 is illustrated in this example as including a single device, the network traffic management apparatus 12 in other examples can include a plurality of devices or blades each having one or more processors (each processor with one or more processing cores) that implement one or more steps of this technology. In these examples, one or more of the devices can have a dedicated communication interface or memory. Alternatively, one or more of the devices can utilize the memory, communication interface, or other hardware or software components of one or more other devices included in the network traffic management apparatus 12.
Additionally, one or more of the devices that together comprise the network traffic management apparatus 12 in other examples can be standalone devices or integrated with one or more other devices or apparatuses, such as one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) or the DHCP server device 14, for example. Moreover, one or more of the devices of the network traffic management apparatus 12 in these examples can be in a same or a different communication network including one or more public, private, or cloud networks, for example.
Each of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) in this example includes one or more processors, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used. The resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) in this example process requests received from the client devices 16(1)-16(n) via the communication network(s) according to the HTTP-based application RFC protocol, for example. Various applications may be operating on the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) and transmitting resources (e.g., files or Web pages) to the client devices 16(1)-16(n) via the network traffic management apparatus 12 in response to requests from the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may be hardware or software or may represent a system with multiple servers in a pool, which may include internal or external networks.
Although the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) are illustrated as single devices, one or more actions of each of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may be distributed across one or more distinct network computing devices that together comprise one or more of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n). Moreover, the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) are not limited to a particular configuration. Thus, the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may contain a plurality of network computing devices that operate using a master/slave approach, whereby one of the network computing devices of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) operate to manage and/or otherwise coordinate operations of the other network computing devices. The resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may operate as a plurality of network computing devices within a cluster architecture, a peer-to peer architecture, virtual machines, or within a cloud architecture, for example.
Thus, the technology disclosed herein is not to be construed as being limited to a single environment and other configurations and architectures are also envisaged. For example, one or more of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) can operate within the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself rather than as a stand-alone server device communicating with the network traffic management apparatus 12 via the WAN 20. In this example, the one or more resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) operate within the memory of the network traffic management apparatus 12.
Each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in this example includes any type of computing device that can request, receive, and/or render web resources including web pages, web applications, or other data, such as mobile computing devices, desktop computing devices, laptop computing devices, tablet computing devices, virtual machines (including cloud-based computers), or the like. Each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in this example includes a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used.
The client devices 16(1)-16(n) may run interface applications, such as standard web browsers or standalone client applications, that may provide an interface to make requests for, and receive resources stored on, one or more of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) via the LAN 18 and/or WAN 20. The client devices 16(1)-16(n) may further include a display device, such as a display screen or touchscreen, and/or an input device, such as a keyboard for example.
The DHCP server device 14 in this example includes one or more processors, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used. The DHCP server device 14 distributes configuration parameters to the client devices 16(1)-16(n), including IP addresses, utilizing the DHCP protocol. One of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) may be a mobile computing device on a subscriber network that requests an IP address from the DHCP server device 14 as part of configuring itself on the subscriber network, for example. In response, the DHCP server device 14 assigns an IP address to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), which is intercepted by the network traffic management apparatus 12 and processed as described and illustrated in more detail later. In another example, the DHCP server device 14 is implemented as part of the network traffic management apparatus 12, such as a module within the memory 26, for example, rather than as a separate device.
Although the exemplary network environment 10 with the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), LAN 18, and WAN 20 are described and illustrated herein, other types and numbers of systems, devices, components, and elements in other topologies can be used. It is to be understood that the systems of the examples described herein are for exemplary purposes, as many variations of the specific hardware and software used to implement the examples are possible, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant art(s).
One or more of the components depicted in the network environment 10, such as the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), or resource server devices 22(1)-22(n), for example, may be configured to operate as virtual instances on the same physical machine. In other words, one or more of the network traffic management apparatus 12, DHCP server device 14, client devices 16(1)-16(n), or resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) may operate on the same physical device rather than as separate devices communicating through communication network(s). Additionally, there may be more or fewer network traffic management apparatuses, DHCP server device, client devices, or server devices than illustrated in
In addition, two or more computing systems or devices can be substituted for any one of the systems or devices in any example. Accordingly, principles and advantages of distributed processing, such as redundancy and replication also can be implemented, as desired, to increase the robustness and performance of the devices and systems of the examples. The examples may also be implemented on computer system(s) that extend across any suitable network using any suitable interface mechanisms and traffic technologies, including by way of example only teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice and modem), wireless traffic networks, cellular traffic networks, Packet Data Networks (PDNs), the Internet, intranets, and combinations thereof.
The examples may also be embodied as one or more non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated by way of the examples herein. The instructions in some examples include executable code that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the processors to carry out steps necessary to implement the methods of the examples of this technology that are described and illustrated herein.
An exemplary method of disaggregating subscribers via DHCP address translation will now be described with reference to
In step 300, the network traffic management apparatus 12 receives an address request for an IP address from one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) can generate the address request as part of the process of configuring itself to join the LAN 18 or another communications network, such as a subscriber network associated with a carrier, for example. The address request can be directed to the DHCP server device 14, but intercepted by the network traffic management apparatus 12 in step 300.
In step 302, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proxies the address request to the DHCP server device 14 and receives a response from the DHCP server device 14. The response from the DHCP server device 14 includes an IP address assigned by the DHCP server device 14 as part of a lease that is granted to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). In other examples, the network traffic management apparatus 12 can include the DHCP server device, and can therefore generate the assigned IP address, and other methods of obtaining the assigned IP address can also be used in other examples.
In step 304, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) for which connection(s) are currently being handled by an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).
In order to determine whether the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), the network traffic management apparatus 12 can query a database or other data structure, that is stored locally or remotely within the LAN 18 or carrier network for example, that includes identifying information for the client device(s) 16(1)-16(n) associated with each of a plurality of subscribers.
The network traffic management apparatus 12 can correlate the query results with the state table 38 in the memory 26 in order determine in step 304 whether the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) for which a connection is currently maintained. The state table 38 can be populated as described and illustrated in more detail later with reference to step 306 of
In this particular example, the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) and the at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) are associated with a same subscriber in the context of a carrier network. However, the term subscriber as used herein includes a group, an account, or any other type of association of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) that may exist in other contexts or types of network environments. Accordingly, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 304 that the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the Yes branch is taken to step 306.
In step 306, the network traffic management apparatus 12 modifies the assigned IP address based on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) associated with the at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) associated with the same subscriber as the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The network traffic management apparatus 12 can identify the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on an association of the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) with an indication of the at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in the state table 38, for example, although other methods for identifying the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can also be used in other examples.
Optionally, the modified IP address hashes to an indication of the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) such that the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can subsequently be determined based on an application of a hash function to the modified IP address. However, other methods for modifying the assigned IP address can also be used in other examples. The network traffic management apparatus 12 also updates the state table 38 to include an indication of the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) associated with the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and sends the modified IP address to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in response to the address request received in step 300.
Referring back to step 304, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) is not associated with a same subscriber as at least one other of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the No branch is taken to step 308. In step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 selects one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and modifies the assigned IP address based on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).
The one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be selected randomly, based on a stored policy, or based on a load balancing decision based on the load on the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), for example, although other methods for selecting the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can also be used. Optionally, as with the IP address modified as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 306, the IP address can be modified in step 308 to hash to an indication of the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).
Additionally, in step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 sends the modified IP address to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in response to the address request received in step 300. Subsequent to responding to the address request in step 306 or step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proceeds back to step 300 and receives another address request from another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), although one or more of steps 300-308 can also be performed by the network traffic management apparatus 12 in parallel for any number of the client devices 16(1)-16(n).
Referring more specifically to
In step 402, the network traffic management apparatus 12 identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on the source IP address in the request and sends the request to an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). The one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be identified, optionally by the disaggregator 30, based on applying a hash function to the source IP address, which corresponds with a modified IP address sent to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 306 or 308 of
In step 404, the network traffic management apparatus 12 processes the request, translates the source IP address to generate an assigned IP address, replaces the source IP address in the request with the IP address assigned by the DHCP server device 14, and sends the request to one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n). The source IP address, which corresponds with a modified version of the assigned IP address, can be translated into the assigned IP address based on a secure network address translation (SNAT) process using an established function or the state table 38 or other data structure storing a correspondence of modified IP addresses and assigned IP addresses, for example, although other methods of translating the source IP address can also be used. The processing of the request can be performed by the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and can include performing accounting services, for example, although other types of processing can also be performed.
In step 406, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether a response is received from the one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) to the request sent to the one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n) in step 404. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a response has not been received, then the No branch is taken back to step 400 and the network traffic management apparatus 12 receives another request from the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) or another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). However, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 406 that a response has been received, then the Yes branch is taken to step 408.
In step 408, the network traffic management apparatus 12 translates a destination IP address in the response, which corresponds to an IP address assigned by the DHCP server device 14, to obtain a modified version of the assigned IP address, identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on the modified IP address, and sends the server response to an instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n).
Accordingly, the translation of the destination IP address results in the modified IP address sent to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) as described and illustrated in more detail earlier with reference to step 306 or 308 of
Additionally, the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be identified, optionally by the disaggregator 30, based on applying a hash function to the modified IP address, although other methods of identifying the one processing core can also be used in other examples. Accordingly, the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) identified in step 408 will be the same as the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) identified in step 404 in this example.
In step 410, the network traffic management apparatus 12 processes the response and sends the response to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The processing of the response can be performed by the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) and can include performing accounting services, for example, although other types of processing can also be performed. Subsequent to sending the response to the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), the network traffic management apparatus 12 proceeds back to step 400 and receives another request from the one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) or another one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n).
Referring back to step 400, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a request has not been received from one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the No branch is taken to step 412. In step 412, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether a lease provided by the DHCP server device 14 for one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) has expired. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a lease has expired for one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), then the Yes branch is taken to step 414.
In step 414, the network traffic management apparatus 12 updates the state table 38 to reflect that the lease has expired. By updating the state table 38, the network traffic management apparatus 12 may subsequently modify an assigned IP address, as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 306 of
However, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 412 that a lease for one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) has not expired, then the No branch is taken to step 406 and the network traffic management apparatus 12 again determines whether a response is received from one of the resource server devices 22(1)-22(n). Accordingly, the network traffic management apparatus 12 effectively waits to receive a request, receive a server response, or identify a lease expiration in this particular example.
Referring more specifically to
In step 506, the network traffic management apparatus 12 modifies the assigned IP address. The modified IP address can be generated based on a load balancing policy when the client device 16 is not associated with a same subscriber as another client device for which a connection is currently established with the network traffic management apparatus 12.
Alternatively, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that the client device 16 is associated with a same subscriber as another client device 12 for which a connection is currently established, then the assigned IP address is modified based on one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) on which an instance of a traffic management application 36 managing the connection is executing.
In one example, the assigned IP address is modified so that it hashes to a value corresponding to the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). By modifying the assigned IP address based on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n), network traffic originating from the client device 16 and another client device associated with the same subscriber can advantageously be handled by the same instance of the traffic management application 36.
In step 508, the network traffic management apparatus 12 sends the modified IP address to the client device 16 in response to the address request. In step 510, the client device 16 sends a request including one or more IP packets, such as a request for a web page hosted by the resource server device 22, for example. In step 512, the network traffic management apparatus 12 identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 based on the modified IP address, included in the request as a source IP address, obtains an assigned IP address, and routes the request to the identified one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). The one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can be identified by applying a hash function to the source IP address in the request, which corresponds to the modified IP address generated in step 506. The assigned IP address can be obtained based on a SNAT using a function or a state table 38, for example.
In step 514, the network traffic management apparatus 12 replaces the source IP address in the request with the assigned IP address and sends the request to the resource server device 22. Optionally, the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 also processes the request, such as to provide accounting services, for example.
In step 516, the resource server device 22 sends a response including one or more packets and having a destination IP address corresponding to the assigned IP address. In step 518, the network traffic management apparatus 12 intercepts the response, obtains the modified IP address, identifies one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) based on the modified IP address, and routes the response to the identified one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n). The modified IP address can be determined from the assigned IP address based on a SNAT using a function or a state table 38, for example, and the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) can again be identified based on an application of a hash function to the modified IP address.
In step 520, the network traffic management apparatus 12 replaces the destination IP address in the response with the modified IP address and sends the response to the client device 16 in response to the request. Optionally, the instance of the traffic management application 36 executing on the one of the processing cores 24(1)-24(n) of the network traffic management apparatus 12 can also process the response, such as to provide accounting services, for example.
With this technology, connections associated with a same subscriber and originating with different client devices can advantageously be disaggregated to the same traffic management process on an intermediary network traffic management apparatus. Since all network traffic associated with client devices corresponding to a same subscriber are handled by the same traffic management process, traffic management services, such as accounting services, can advantageously be provided more efficiently using fewer resources, and scalability of network traffic management apparatuses is improved with this technology.
Having thus described the basic concept of the invention, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/351,379 filed Jun. 17, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3950735 | Patel | Apr 1976 | A |
4644532 | George et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4897781 | Chang et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4965772 | Daniel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5023826 | Patel | Jun 1991 | A |
5053953 | Patel | Oct 1991 | A |
5167024 | Smith et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5299312 | Rocco, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5327529 | Fults et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5367635 | Bauer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371852 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5406502 | Haramaty et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5475857 | Dally | Dec 1995 | A |
5517617 | Sathaye et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519694 | Brewer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519778 | Leighton et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521591 | Arora et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528701 | Aref | Jun 1996 | A |
5581764 | Fitzgerald et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596742 | Agarwal et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606665 | Yang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5663018 | Cummings et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5752023 | Choucri et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761484 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768423 | Aref et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790554 | Pitcher et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802052 | Venkataraman | Sep 1998 | A |
5812550 | Sohn et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825772 | Dobbins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832283 | Chou et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875296 | Shi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5892914 | Pitts | Apr 1999 | A |
5892932 | Kim | Apr 1999 | A |
5898876 | James | Apr 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936939 | Des Jardins et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946690 | Pitts | Aug 1999 | A |
5949885 | Leighton | Sep 1999 | A |
5951694 | Choquier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959990 | Frantz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974460 | Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983281 | Ogle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988847 | McLaughlin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006260 | Barrick, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006264 | Colby et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6028857 | Poor | Feb 2000 | A |
6051169 | Brown et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078956 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092196 | Reiche | Jul 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111876 | Frantz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128279 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128657 | Okanoya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160874 | Dickerman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170022 | Linville et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178423 | Douceur et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182139 | Brendel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233612 | Fruchtman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246684 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249801 | Zisapel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253226 | Chidambaran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253230 | Couland et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263368 | Martin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289012 | Harrington et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298380 | Coile et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327622 | Jindal et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347339 | Morris et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360270 | Cherkasova et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374300 | Masters | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6396833 | Zhang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430562 | Kardos et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434618 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434801 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6480476 | Willars | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484261 | Wiegel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490624 | Sampson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510135 | Almulhem et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510458 | Berstis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519643 | Foulkes et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601084 | Bhaskaran et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6636503 | Shiran et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636894 | Short et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650641 | Albert et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654701 | Hatley | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661802 | Homberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683873 | Kwok et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691165 | Bruck et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694517 | James et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708187 | Shanumgam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718380 | Mohaban et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742045 | Albert et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751663 | Farrell et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754228 | Ludwig | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760775 | Anerousis et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772219 | Shobatake | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779039 | Bommareddy et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781986 | Sabaa et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798777 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804542 | Haartsen | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816901 | Sitaraman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816977 | Brakmo et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826698 | Minkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829238 | Tokuyo et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6868082 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876629 | Beshai et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6876654 | Hegde | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888836 | Cherkasova | May 2005 | B1 |
6928082 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947985 | Hegli et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950434 | Viswanath et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954780 | Susai et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957272 | Tallegas et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959394 | Brickell et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6975592 | Seddigh et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6986040 | Kramer et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6987763 | Rochberger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007092 | Peiffer | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7058633 | Gnagy et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7113993 | Cappiello et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7133944 | Song et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139792 | Mishra et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7185359 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228422 | Morioka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7287082 | O'Toole, Jr. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295827 | Liu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308703 | Wright et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308709 | Brezak et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7310339 | Powers et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7319696 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321926 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7333999 | Njemanze | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343413 | Gilde et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349391 | Ben-Dor et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7383570 | Pinkas et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398552 | Pardee et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433962 | Janssen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437478 | Yokota et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454480 | Labio et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7490162 | Masters | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500243 | Huetsch et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500269 | Huotari et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505795 | Lim et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7516492 | Nisbet et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7522581 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526541 | Roese et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7558197 | Sindhu et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7580971 | Gollapudi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7590732 | Rune | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624424 | Morita et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644137 | Bozak et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668166 | Rekhter et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689710 | Tang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724657 | Rao et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725093 | Sengupta et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742479 | Kotha | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7769845 | Baron | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778187 | Chaturvedi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801978 | Susai et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7808913 | Ansari et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831662 | Clark et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7908314 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925908 | Kim | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930365 | Dixit et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933946 | Livshits et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945908 | Waldspurger et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7984141 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8041022 | Andreasen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8103781 | Wu et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8130650 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149819 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189567 | Kavanagh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199757 | Pani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205246 | Shatzkamer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239954 | Wobber et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8274895 | Rahman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8321908 | Gai et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8351333 | Rao et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8380854 | Szabo | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8447871 | Szabo | May 2013 | B1 |
8447970 | Klein et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452876 | Williams et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8464265 | Worley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468247 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8468267 | Yigang | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8521851 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521880 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8359224 | Henderson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8566474 | Kanode et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8578050 | Craig et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606921 | Vasquez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615022 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8646067 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665868 | Kay | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701179 | Penno et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8725836 | Lowery et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8726338 | Narayanaswamy et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8737304 | Karuturi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8778665 | Glide et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804504 | Chen | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819109 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819419 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830874 | Cho et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873753 | Parker | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875274 | Montemurro et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8886981 | Baumann et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8908545 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8954080 | Janakiraman et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9036529 | Erickson et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037166 | de Wit et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047259 | Ho et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9077554 | Szabo | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9083760 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9172753 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9246819 | Thirasuttakorn | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9319921 | Kuroda | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010009554 | Katseff et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010023442 | Masters | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010052016 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010783 | Primak et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027504 | Davis | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032777 | Kawata et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046291 | O'Callaghan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049842 | Huetsch et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059428 | Susai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083067 | Tamayo | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095498 | Chanda et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112061 | Shih et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138615 | Schmeling | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161913 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194342 | Lu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198993 | Cudd et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030037070 | Marston | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046291 | Fascenda | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058839 | D'Souza | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065653 | Overton et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065951 | Igeta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069918 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069974 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070069 | Belapurkar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086415 | Bernhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105807 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105983 | Brakmo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120948 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128708 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135509 | Davis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145062 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145233 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163578 | Janssen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200311 | Baum | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208596 | Carolan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225485 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003287 | Zissimopoulos et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040072569 | Omae et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078487 | Cernohous et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103283 | Hornak | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111523 | Hall et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111621 | Himberger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117493 | Bazot et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148520 | Talpade et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151186 | Akama | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190522 | Aerrabotu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040268358 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199762 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210663 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225713 | Abbasi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255000 | Simionescu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264472 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264481 | Darling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267920 | Hydrie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267948 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004887 | Igakura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021736 | Carusi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027869 | Johnson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044213 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052440 | Kim et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055435 | Gbadegesin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071283 | Randle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078604 | Yim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050122942 | Rhee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122977 | Lieberman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129001 | Backman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154837 | Keohane et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187866 | Lee | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188220 | Nilsson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198310 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262238 | Reeves et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288939 | Peled et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002405 | Le Sauze et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031520 | Bedekar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036764 | Yokota et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059267 | Cugi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077902 | Kannan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077986 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083205 | Buddhikot et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095573 | Carle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106802 | Giblin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112272 | Morioka et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129684 | Datta | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135198 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156416 | Huotari et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161577 | Kulkarni et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168070 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171365 | Borella | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179153 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182103 | Martini et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184647 | Dixit et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209853 | Hidaka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230148 | Forecast et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233106 | Achlioptas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242300 | Yumoto et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268704 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291483 | Sela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294054 | Kudo et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006293 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016662 | Desai et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019658 | Park et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050843 | Manville et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058670 | Konduru et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064661 | Sood et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083646 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088822 | Coile et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106796 | Kudo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118879 | Yeun | May 2007 | A1 |
20070174491 | Still et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220598 | Salowey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233809 | Brownell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255848 | Sewall et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258451 | Bouat | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297410 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297551 | Choi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008202 | Terrell et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025297 | Kashyap | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028456 | O'Rourke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031258 | Acharya et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034136 | Ulenas | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072303 | Syed | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120370 | Chan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130812 | Eom et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133518 | Kapoor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134311 | Medvinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148340 | Powell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159145 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165801 | Sheppard | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178278 | Grinstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201331 | Eriksen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201599 | Ferraiolo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205613 | Lopez | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209053 | Shen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222646 | Sigal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225710 | Raja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229415 | Kapoor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235508 | Ran et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239986 | Xu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253395 | Pandya | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279200 | Shatzkamer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282354 | Wobber et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288661 | Galles | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301760 | Lim | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316922 | Riddle et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090028337 | Balabine et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040926 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049230 | Pandya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070617 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077619 | Boyce | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094610 | Sukirya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119504 | van Os et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125496 | Wexler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125532 | Wexler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125622 | O'Sullivan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125625 | Shim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138749 | Moll et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141891 | Boyen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157678 | Turk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090193126 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193513 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196282 | Fellman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228956 | He et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248893 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287935 | Aull et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296624 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300407 | Kamath et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011420 | Drako et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011434 | Kay | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017846 | Huang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023582 | Pedersen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042693 | Eriksson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071048 | Novak et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115236 | Bataineh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122091 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150154 | Viger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154031 | Montemurro et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165877 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188976 | Rahman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189052 | Kavanagh et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100242092 | Harris et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251330 | Kroeselberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100088417 | Amemiya et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279733 | Karsten et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287227 | Goel | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299451 | Yigang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322250 | Shetty et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325277 | Muthiah et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029654 | Takeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040889 | Garrett et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047620 | Mahaffey et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066718 | Susai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107077 | Henderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110141900 | Jayawardena et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153822 | Rajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154443 | Thakur et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173295 | Bakke et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184733 | Yu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110197059 | Klein et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202676 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246800 | Accpadi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271005 | Bharrat et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273984 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277016 | Hockings et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282997 | Prince et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110314178 | Kanode et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321122 | Mwangi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016994 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030341 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039341 | Latif et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041965 | Vasquez et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063314 | Pignataro et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066489 | Ozaki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079055 | Robinson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124372 | Dilley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143883 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191847 | Nas et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198043 | Hesketh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198512 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210416 | Mihelich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210417 | Shieh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224531 | Karuturi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259925 | Braudes | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120311153 | Morgan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317266 | Abbott | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003106 | Lowery et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029726 | Berionne et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044757 | Rai et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130091002 | Christie et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130163758 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198322 | Oran et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205361 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212127 | Kitamura | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130297765 | Zisapel | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336122 | Baruah et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339429 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140040478 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059678 | Parker | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140095661 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140162705 | de Wit et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140171089 | Janakiraman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140269484 | Dankberg et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317404 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140362807 | Bhatnagar | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150127830 | Brown et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0744850 | Nov 1996 | EP |
WO 9114326 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9505712 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9709805 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9745800 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9905829 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9906913 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9910858 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9939373 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9964967 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0004422 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004458 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“A Process for Selective Routing of Servlet Content to Transcoding Modules,” Research Disclosure 422124, Jun. 1999, pp. 889-890, IBM Corporation. |
“BIG-IP Controller with Exclusive OneConnect Content Switching Feature Provides a Breakthrough System for Maximizing Server and Network Performance,” F5 Networks, Inc. Press Release, May 8, 2001, 2 pages, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
“Servlet/Applet/HTML Authentication Process With Single Sign-On,” Research Disclosure 429128, Jan. 2000, pp. 163-164, IBM Corporation. |
“Traffic Surges; Surge Queue; Netscaler Defense,” 2005, PowerPoint Presentation, slides 1-12, Citrix Systems, Inc. |
“Windows Server 2003 Kerberos Extensions,” Microsoft TechNet, 2003, 8 pages, (Updated Jul. 31, 2004), http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738207, Microsoft Corporation. |
Abad, C., et al., “An Analysis on the Schemes for Detecting and Preventing ARP Cache Poisoning Attacks”, IEEE, Computer Society, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07), 2007, pp. 1-8. |
Crescendo Networks, “Application Layer Processing (ALP),” 2003-2009, pp. 168-186, Chapter 9, CN-5000E/5500E, Foxit Software Company. |
European Search Report for corresponding EP Application No. 14753736.9, dated Sep. 23, 2016, pp. 1-8. |
F5 Networks Inc., “Configuration Guide for Local Traffic Management,” F5 Networks Inc., Jan. 2006, version 9.2.2, 406 pgs. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP GTM and BIG-IP Link Controller, Release Notes, Jul. 20, 2015, v.11.6.0. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP Virtual, Release Notes, Dec. 8, 2014, Edition 11.6.0. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP® Global Traffic Manager™: Implementations, Manual, Aug. 20, 2014, pp. 1-118, v11.6. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP® TMOS®: Routing Administration, Manual, Apr. 10, 2015, pp. 1-140, v11.6. |
F5 Networks. Local Traffic Manager and Global Traffic Manager Operations Guide, Manual, Dec. 12, 2014, pp. 1-160, v1.0. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-162. |
Floyd et al., “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance,” Aug. 1993, pp. 1-22, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, California. |
Hochmuth, Phil, “F5, CacheFlow pump up content-delivery lines,” Network World Fusion, May 4, 2001, 1 page, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026615 (dated Jul. 4, 2013). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/018431 (dated Jul. 9, 2014). |
Macvittie L., “Message-Based Load Balancing,” Technical Brief, 2009, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc. |
OWASP, “Testing for Cross site scripting”, OWASP Testing Guide v2, Table of Contents, Sep. 5, 2013, pp. 1-5, (www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing_for_Cross_site_scripting). |
Schaefer, Ken, “IIS and Kerberos Part 5—Protocol Transition, Constrained Delegation, S4U2S and S4U2P,” Jul. 18, 2007, 21 pages, itnp://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2007/07/19/8460.aspx. |
Williams et al., “The Ultimate Windows Server 2003 System Administrator's Guide: Forwarding Authentication,” 2003, 2 pages, Figure 10.7, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, Massachusetts. |
F5 Networks, Inc., “BIG-IP® Local Traffic Management: Basics”, Manual, Oct. 20, 2015, pp. 1-68, version 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc. |
F5 Networks, Inc., “F5 BIG-IP TMOS: Operations Guide”, Manual, Mar. 5, 2015, pp. 1-238, F5 Networks, Inc. |
F5 Networks, Inc., “BIG-IP® System: SSL Administration”, Manual, Jul. 22, 2016, pp. 1-110, version 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc. |
F5 Networks, Inc., “BIG-IP® Local Traffic Manager™: Implementations”, Manual, May 25, 2016, pp. 1-284, version 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62351379 | Jun 2016 | US |