Methods for Drilling Wellbores Using Thinner Compositions

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20210388253
  • Publication Number
    20210388253
  • Date Filed
    August 19, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    December 16, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
Techniques for drilling wellbores are described. The techniques include a) introducing a drilling fluid composition into a borehole defined by a formation; b) introducing a thinner composition including at least one tannin and at least one metal salt into the borehole; and c) contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole, wherein the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt are not complexed ex situ. The at least one metal salt includes at least one copper salt, at least one zinc salt, or both at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to methods for drilling wellbores, and more specifically, using thinner compositions for drilling natural resource wells.


BACKGROUND

Wells can be drilled to extract natural resources such as oil, gas, or water. A wellbore is surrounded by a formation, for example, shale or clay, which can influence the stability of the wellbore. For example, the formation can exert pressure on the wellbore, or fluids from the formation can enter the wellbore. A formation can include permeable regions, and fluids introduced into the wellbore can enter the permeable regions, resulting in fluid loss. Such fluid loss can affect drilling efficiency, can entail replacement of drilling fluids, and can affect the stability of the formation.


Drilling compositions, for example, drilling fluids or drilling muds, can be used to facilitate the drilling of wellbores. Drilling fluid or mud can be distributed and circulated along a wellbore to provide functions such as cooling and lubrication of drilling equipment, or to remove cuttings and clear the borehole. In addition to performing these functions, drilling compositions can also assist in promoting formation stability.


The rheology of drilling fluids affects their performance. For example, maintaining the viscosity of a drilling fluid below an upper threshold can provide better drilling fluid performance. Additives, for example, thinners, can be used to control the rheology of drilling fluids. However, there remains a need for improvements in thinners, for example, in reducing formulation costs while maintaining performance over existing thinners.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

This summary is provided to introduce various concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify required or essential features of the claimed subject matter nor is the summary intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.


In aspects, this disclosure describes techniques for drilling wellbores. The techniques include a) introducing a drilling fluid composition into a borehole defined by a formation; b) introducing a thinner composition including at least one tannin and at least one metal salt into the borehole; and c) contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole. The at least one tannin and at least one metal salt are not complexed ex situ. The at least one metal salt includes at least one copper salt, at least one zinc salt, or both at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt.


This summary and the following detailed description provide examples and are explanatory only of the disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing summary and the following detailed description should not be considered to be restrictive. Additional features or variations thereof can be provided in addition to those set forth herein, such as for example, various feature combinations and sub-combinations of these described in the detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following figures form a part of the present disclosure and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these figures in combination with the detailed description of the specific embodiments presented herein.



FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a technique for drilling a wellbore.



FIG. 2 is a chart illustrating a comparison of the thinning efficiency of thinning compositions without copper sulfate with thinning compositions including different concentrations of copper sulfate.





While the inventions disclosed herein are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, only a few specific aspects have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The figures and detailed descriptions of these specific aspects are not intended to limit the breadth or scope of the inventive concepts or the appended claims in any manner. Rather, the figures and detailed written descriptions are provided to illustrate the inventive concepts to a person of ordinary skill in the art and to enable such person to make and use the inventive concepts.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings.


Definitions

To define more clearly the terms used herein, the following definitions are provided. Unless otherwise indicated, the following definitions are applicable to this disclosure. If a term is used in this disclosure but is not specifically defined herein, the definition from the IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd Ed (1997) can be applied, as long as that definition does not conflict with any other disclosure or definition applied herein, or render indefinite or non-enabled any claim to which that definition is applied. To the extent that any definition or usage provided by any document incorporated herein by reference conflicts with the definition or usage provided herein, the definition or usage provided herein controls.


While compositions and methods are described in terms of “comprising” various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components or steps, unless stated otherwise.


The terms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include plural alternatives, e.g., at least one. The terms “including”, “with”, and “having”, as used herein, are defined as comprising (i.e., open language), unless specified otherwise.


Various numerical ranges are disclosed herein. When Applicant discloses or claims a range of any type, Applicant's intent is to disclose or claim individually each possible number that such a range could reasonably encompass, including end points of the range as well as any sub-ranges and combinations of sub-ranges encompassed therein, unless otherwise specified. For example, all numerical end points of ranges disclosed herein are approximate, unless excluded by proviso. As a representative example, if Applicants disclose in an aspect of the disclosure that the thinner composition includes from about 1% by weight to about 10% by weight of copper sulfate, this range should be interpreted as encompassing about 1% and about 10% by weight of copper sulfate.


Values or ranges may be expressed herein as “about”, from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such values or ranges are expressed, other embodiments disclosed include the specific value recited, from the one particular value, and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that there are a number of values disclosed therein, and that each value is also herein disclosed as “about” that particular value in addition to the value itself. In another aspect, use of the term “about” means±20% of the stated value, ±15% of the stated value, ±10% of the stated value, ±5% of the stated value, ±3% of the stated value, or ±1% of the stated value.


Applicant reserves the right to proviso out or exclude any individual members of any such group of values or ranges, including any sub-ranges or combinations of sub-ranges within the group, that can be claimed according to a range or in any similar manner, if for any reason Applicant chooses to claim less than the full measure of the disclosure, for example, to account for a reference that Applicant may be unaware of at the time of the filing of the application. Further, Applicant reserves the right to proviso out or exclude any individual substituents, analogs, compounds, ligands, structures, or groups thereof, or any members of a claimed group, if for any reason Applicant chooses to claim less than the full measure of the disclosure, for example, to account for a reference that Applicant may be unaware of at the time of the filing of the application.


The term “dry mix” or “dry blend” refers to a dry or substantially dry composition including two or more components that are substantially dry, except for minor amounts of moisture contained within the solid components used to formulate the dry mix or dry blend. That is, no water or liquid is added to the blend or mixture of particulate or granular solid components. The dry mix or dry blend may include compounds that include bound water of hydration (for example, FeSO4.H2O, or the like).


The term “tannin” as used herein shall mean both natural tannings and modified tannins, and refers to the class of polyphenolic molecules or species, including but not limited to phlobaphenes, derived or extracted from trees (i.e. the bark) or plants, or substituted analogs thereof, as understood by the person of ordinary skill. The term “modified tannin” refers to a natural tannin modified by a process such as hydrolysis, sulfonation, methylation, acetylation, or condensation.


The term “quebracho” refers to a powdered form of tannins such as tannic acid derived or extracted from the quebracho tree, Schinopsis, Jodina or Aspidosperma species, as understood by the person of ordinary skill.


The term “not complexed ex situ”, “substantially ex situ unreacted”, “substantially ex situ uncomplexed”, and the like refer to the combination of ingredients such as the combination of the dry tannins and metal salts ingredients disclosed herein, to which no heat is added or any other attempt to cause the reaction or complexation of the tannins with the metal salt. In some aspect, these terms refer to the combination of dry ingredients to which no solvent is added in an attempt to cause the reaction or complexation of the tannins with the metal salt, until the ingredients are added to the drilling fluid. Therefore, these terms refer to a substantially unreacted or uncomplexed state outside a site of use, for example, outside a wellbore.


The term “substituted” when used to describe a group, for example, when referring to a substituted analog of a particular group, is intended to describe the compound or group wherein any non-hydrogen moiety formally replaces hydrogen in that group or compound and is intended to be non-limiting. A compound or group can also be referred to herein as “unsubstituted” or by equivalent terms such as “non-substituted,” which refers to the original group or compound. “Substituted” is intended to be non-limiting and include inorganic substituents or organic substituents as specified and as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, unless otherwise specified or excluded.


The term “metal salt” as used herein refers to a compound formed with the hydrogen atom of an acid is replaced by a metal atom, as understood by the person of ordinary skill. Examples of metal salts include but are not limited to halide (for example, chloride or bromide), sulfate, acetate, acetate hydroxide, nitrate, phosphate, hydrogen phosphate, and the like, compounds of a metal such as copper, zinc, chromium, iron, tin, and the like.


Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the invention, the typical methods and materials are herein described.


All publications and patents mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference for the purpose of describing and disclosing, for example, the constructs and methodologies that are described in the publications, which might be used in connection with the presently described invention. The publications discussed throughout the text are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention.


The present disclosure generally relates to techniques for drilling wellbores. Controlling the rheology of drilling muds (also referred to as drilling fluids) can avoid problems associated with excessive viscosity. Thinner compositions can be added to drilling muds to control the rheology, for example, by reducing the viscosity. The effectiveness of a thinner composition can depend on one or more factors, such as salinity, solids content, chemical composition, pH, and temperature. Some additives can result in good control of rheology, but are not preferred due to their environmental effects or due to their relatively high cost.


Thinner compositions can include one or more tannins, for example, sulfomethylated quebracho. It has been shown that better effectiveness of tannins can be achieved by adding chromium salts or tin salts (also referred to as stannous salts). However, chromium salts, for example, salts including Cr6+, may be associated with environmental effects. Stannous or tin salts may be relatively expensive, and may have other deterring economic effects.


It has been found that zinc and copper salts can be used in thinner compositions as partial replacements or complete replacements for chromium salts and/or stannous salts when combined with tannins or tannin sources such as quebracho, while providing comparable or better thinning properties, for example, in water-based drilling muds. One or both of zinc salts or copper salts can also be economically effective.


Metal salts may react with or complex with tannins in thinner compositions. For example, some thinner compositions may include complexed tannins and chromium salts. It has surprisingly been found that using a thinner composition including a dry blend, which includes substantially ex situ unreacted or uncomplexed tannins and metal salts, provides comparable or better thinning properties, compared to compositions including complexed components. The components of thinner compositions according to the disclosure may complex in situ, for example, after the composition is introduced into a wellbore under wellbore conditions, including allowing the composition to contact, disperse with or mix with the drilling mud.


In aspects, this disclosure describes techniques for drilling wellbores. The techniques include a) introducing a drilling fluid composition into a borehole defined by a formation; b) introducing a thinner composition including at least one tannin and at least one metal salt into the borehole; and c) contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole. The at least one tannin and at least one metal salt are not complexed ex situ, for example, they are provided in a dry mix. The at least one metal salt includes at least one copper salt, at least one zinc salt, or both (a combination) at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt.


Turning now to the figure, FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a technique for drilling a wellbore. The technique includes introducing a drilling fluid composition into a borehole defined by a formation (10). The formation may include a subterranean formation, for example, including a reservoir of a natural resource such as oil or gas. The borehole can be a pilot hole or a wellbore being drilled with drilling apparatus such as a drill bit. The drilling fluid composition can include a water-based composition and/or an oil-based composition. The drilling fluid can include water, one or more clays, and additives. The clays can include bentonite, sepiolite, attapulgite, polymeric clays, or any suitable clay. The additives can include thickeners or viscosifiers, deflocculants, lubricants, fluid loss controllers, inert solids, weighting agents, or any other suitable drilling fluid additives, for example, barite, calcium sulfate, or sodium chloride.


The technique includes introducing a thinner composition including at least one tannin and at least one metal salt into the borehole (20). In some aspects, introducing the thinner composition into the borehole (10) includes (i) introducing a tannin composition including the at least one tannin into the borehole; and (ii) introducing a metal salt composition including the at least one metal salt into the borehole. In some aspects, the tannin composition is introduced into the borehole before or at the same time as introducing the metal salt composition into the borehole.


In some aspects, the at least one tannin includes tannic acid, quebracho, sulfomethylated quebracho, or sulfonated tannin. In some aspects, the at least one tannin includes sulfomethylated quebracho. In some aspects, the at least one tannin consists essentially of sulfomethylated quebracho.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 50% by weight of the at least one tannin. For example, the thinner composition includes at least about 50% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 60% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 70% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes about 70% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho.


The at least one tannin and at least one metal salt are not complexed ex situ. For example, the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt are not reacted with or complexed with each other or other components of the thinner composition before the thinner composition is introduced into a site of use, for example, the borehole. In an aspect, the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt do not form a reaction product, for example, in which complexation occurs. The at least one tannin and at least one metal salt may tend to react or complex after being introduced into the drilling fluid in the borehole. Thus, the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt may only form a complex or reaction product in situ.


The at least one metal salt can include at least one copper salt, at least one zinc salt, or both at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt. In some aspects, the at least one metal salt includes at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt. In some aspects, the at least one copper salt includes copper sulfate. In some aspects, the at least one zinc salt includes zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, or a combination of zinc sulfate and zinc chloride. In some aspects, the metal salt consists essentially of at least one copper salt. In some aspects, the metal salt consists essentially of copper sulfate. In some aspects, the metal salt consists essentially of at least one zinc salt. In some aspects, the metal salt consists essentially of zinc chloride. In some aspects, the metal salt consists essentially of zinc sulfate. In some aspects, the metal salt consists essentially of at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt. In some aspects, the thinner composition does not include any metal salt other than at least one copper salt and/or at least one zinc salt, and a ferrous salt, for example, ferrous sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition does not include any chromium salt. In some aspects, the thinner composition does not include any stannous salt. In some aspects, the thinner composition does not include any chromium salt or any stannous salt. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes one or both of a chromium salt and/or a stannous salt. The chromium salt may include chrome acetate, for example, chromium(III) acetate hydroxide (CAS #39430-51-8). The stannous salt may include stannous sulfate.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 1% by weight of copper sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 3% by weight of copper sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 5% by weight of copper sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes from about 1% by weight to about 10% by weight of copper sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes from about 2% by weight to about 8% by weight of copper sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes from about 3% by weight to about 7% by weight of copper sulfate. For example, in some aspects, the thinner composition can include copper sulfate in a concentration of about 1.0% by weight, about 1.5% by weight, about 2.0% by weight, about 2.5% by weight, about 3.0% by weight, about 3.5% by weight, about 4.0% by weight, about 4.5% by weight, about 5.0% by weight, about 5.5% by weight, about 6.0% by weight, about 6.5% by weight, about 7.0% by weight, about 7.5% by weight, or about 8.0% by weight.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 5% by weight of the at least one zinc salt. For example, the thinner composition may include at least about 5% by weight of zinc chloride or zinc sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 10% by weight of zinc sulfate heptahydrate.


In some aspects, introducing the thinner composition into the borehole (20) can occur after or at the same time as introducing the drilling fluid composition into a borehole (10). In other aspects, introducing the thinner composition into the borehole (20) occurs before introducing the drilling fluid composition into a borehole (10). In still further aspects, introducing the thinner composition into the borehole (20) can be substantially continuous with introducing the drilling fluid composition into a borehole (10). For example, streams of the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition can be continuously introduced into the borehole, for example, through pipes, channels, or the likes.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes a dry mix of the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt. In some such aspects, introducing the thinner composition into the borehole (20) can include introducing a powder flow, particulate flow, air or gas suspended flow, solid flow, conveyor flow, screw flow, or another dry stream of a substantially dry thinner composition into the drilling fluid. In some such aspects, introducing the thinner composition into the borehole (20) can include introducing the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt into the borehole simultaneously, such as in a dry mix, or alternatively, introducing the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt in series into a drilling fluid, a borehole, or a drilling fluid as it is being introduced to the borehole.


In some aspects, the thinner composition further includes ferrous sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 5% by weight of ferrous sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate.


In some aspects, the thinner composition further includes a dispersant, for example, lignite, causticized lignite, potassium lignite, or lignosulfonate, or any other suitable dispersant. In some aspects, the dispersant includes causticized lignite.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 8% by weight of causticized lignite. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes about 8% by weight of causticized lignite. In some aspects, the thinner composition includes at least about 15% by weight of causticized lignite.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes ferrous sulfate, causticized lignite, and at least one metal salt selected from copper sulfate, zinc sulfate, and/or zinc chloride.


In some aspects, the thinner composition includes about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate, about 70% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho, and at least about 8% by weight of causticized lignite. In some such aspects, the balance of the thinner composition includes at least one metal salt selected from copper sulfate, zinc sulfate, and/or zinc chloride.


In some aspects, the thinner composition has a thinning efficiency of at least about 30%, as measured according to Protocol A, as described elsewhere in this disclosure. In some such aspects, the thinner composition has a thinning efficiency of at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 90%.


In some aspects, the technique of FIG. 2 includes contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole (30). For example, the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition may combine, contact, disperse or mix within the borehole, for example resulting from flow, circulation, or recirculation of the drilling fluid with the thinner composition. The at least one tannin and at least one metal salt may react or complex in the borehole in response to the contacting (30).


In some aspects, the technique of FIG. 2 further includes drilling the formation to define or extend a wellbore. For example, the introducing the drilling fluid (10) can be substantially simultaneously performed with drilling the formation. In some such aspects, the introducing the thinner composition (20) and contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole (30) can be performed substantially simultaneously and continuously with the introducing the drilling fluid (10) as a continuous operation. The drilling can be stopped when a suitable depth of the wellbore is achieved.


Thus, techniques according to the disclosure can be used to control rheological properties of drilling muds while drilling wellbores.


EXAMPLES

The invention is further illustrated by the following examples, which are not to be construed in any way as imposing limitations to the scope of this invention. Various other aspects, embodiments, modifications, and equivalents thereof which, after reading the description herein, can suggest themselves to one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention or the scope of the appended claims.


Different types of base mud were prepared. Test muds were prepared by adding different amounts and types of thinners to the base muds and hot rolling at different temperatures. The rheological properties of the different muds without and with different thinners was compared. For example, the thinning efficiency of the thinners was determined based on the relative reduction in the yield point of the base mud compared to the test muds, as discussed herein.


Example 1: Preparation of First Base Mud

The first base mud (also referred to as base fluid) was prepared using a Model 50 Lab Dispersator (Premier Mill Corporation, Reading, Pa.) or equivalent. The base fluid (mud) was conditioned dynamically for 24 hours at room temperature.


The base mud was prepared according to the formulation shown in Table 1 following the order of addition and mixing times.


The drilling fluid was prepared in, or transferred to, an appropriately sized Nalgene carboy. The carboy was placed on a bottle roller and rolled at least 24 hours to allow the fluid to completely equilibrate. The mud was considered stable at this point and was stored for several months for use as needed. It is preferable to keep the bottle rolling while in storage.









TABLE 1







Preparation of the first base mud formulation














Mixing







Time
Specific
Vol
Concentration


Component
Grams
(min)
Gravity
(mL)
lbm/bbl















Deionized H2O
3000
5
1.0045
3005.5
309.73


NaCl (Reagent
19






Grade)







API Standard
700
30
2.50
280.00
72.26


Evaluation Base







Clay







API Test
250
30
2.65
94.34
25.81


Calibration







Bentonite







CaSO4 (Reagent
38
5
2.32
16.38
3.92


Grade)







Total
4007

1.180
3396.18









Example 2: Preparation of Test Muds

Test muds were prepared by adding different thinners to the base mud of Example 1. The base mud was mixed for a minimum of 5 minutes using a Model 9B Multimixer (Sterling Multi Products, Inc., Prophetstown, Ill.) equipped with a 9B29X impeller blade or equivalent prior to removing samples for preparation of the individual test sample. The formulation of individual test sample is shown in Table 2. The thinner concentrations for testing at the two temperatures (150° F. and 300° F.) are also shown in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Preparation of the individual test samples











Mixing Time


Materials
Amount (g)
(min)





Base Fluid (Mud)
395



API Test Calibration
 50
10


Barite




Thinner
1 lbm/bbl (150° F.),
 1



3 lbm/bbl (300° F.)



NaOH
to pH 10*
10





*pH was not adjusted in the comparative base mud sample without thinner when determining thinning efficiency of the test samples.






Individual test mud samples were conditioned dynamically for 16 hours in roller oven at 150° F. or 300° F. with the hot roll cells pre-pressured to 200 psi with nitrogen. After conditioning, muds were cooled to room temperature and the pH of the muds, excluding blanks, was adjusted to 10.


The sample thinner formulation added to the respective test muds are shown in Table 3. The thinning efficiencies were evaluated as discussed with reference to Example 3.









TABLE 3







Preparation of the thinner formulations
















Thinning
Thinning






efficiency
efficiency


Thinner
CL
MS

1 lbm/bbl,
3 lbm/bbl


Formulation
wt. %
wt. %
Metal Salt
150° F.
300° F.















Sample 1
16.0
5.00
stannous sulfate
36.3%
76.6%


(Drill-Thin ®)







Sample 2
16.2
4.79
stannous pyrophosphate
29.6%



Sample 3
12.5
8.50
manganese sulfate monohydrate
−29.6%



Sample 4
13.1
7.95
potassium permanganate
30.7%
82.6%


Sample 5
8.8
12.15
zinc sulfate heptahydrate
30.7%
80.8%


Sample 6
15.2
5.76
zinc chloride
35.2%
67.1%


Sample 7


Sample 6 + a small amount of
41.9%






copper sulfate




Sample 8
15.2
6.21
sodium stannate

84.4%


Sample 9
14.1
6.94
copper sulfate
42.5%
90.4%


Sample 10
16.0
5.00
copper sulfate
43.0%



Sample 11
17.0
4.00
copper sulfate
39.7%
92.2%


Sample 12
17.4
3.62
copper sulfate
34.1%
91.6%


Sample 13
18.0
3.00
copper sulfate
31.3%
95.5%


Sample 14
18.0
3.00
chrome acetate
36.3%
93.3%


(Desco ®)





CL: Causticized Lignite.


MS: Metal Salt






Each sample thinner formulation included 70 wt. % of sulfomethylated quebracho and 9 wt. % of ferrous sulfate as a dry unreacted/uncomplexed blend. The formulation of Sample 1 was similar to that of a commercially available thinner formulation, Drill-thin® (Chevron Phillips Chemical, The Woodlands, Tex.). The formulation of Sample 1 was similar to that of a commercially available thinner formulation, Drill-Thin® thinner (Chevron Phillips Chemical, The Woodlands, Tex.). The formulation of Sample 14 was similar to that of a commercially available formulation, Desco® (Chevron Phillips Chemical, The Woodlands, Tex.).


Example 3: Evaluation of Rheological Properties of Base Mud and Test Muds

The muds were individually redispersed or mixed by mixing in the Multimixer for 5 minutes and hot rolled to either 150° F. or 300° F. The viscosity was measured at 600 rpm, 300 rpm, 200 rpm, 100 rpm, 6 rpm, and 3 rpm (in terms of deflection dial readings) using a Model 35 Viscometer (Fann Instrument Company, Houston, Tex.) or equivalent at the target temperature. θrpm is the angle of deflection observed at a specific rpm. The apparent viscosity (AV in cP) was calculated as per standard API practice, using Equation 1. The plastic viscosity (PV, in cP) was calculated as per standard API practice, using Equation 2. The yield point (YP, in lbs/100 ft2) was calculated as per standard API practice, using Equation 3. The protocol of Example 3 is “Protocol A”.





AV=θ600/2  (Equation 1)





PV=θ600−θ300  (Equation 2)





YP=θ300−PV  (Equation 3)


The thinning efficiency was calculated using Equation 4.





% Thinning Efficiency=100×(YPb−YPt)/YPb  (Equation 4)


In EQUATION 2, YPb is the YP of base mud at pH 7.53, and YPt is the YP of mud treated with thinner, that is, the test mud, which has been pH adjusted to pH 10.0. A higher thinning efficiency correlates directly to better thinning performance. Thus, Protocol A may be used to determine the thinning efficiency of a thinner composition.


The rheological properties of the base mud and test muds including sample thinner formulations at 150° F. are presented in Tables 4A and 4B. Sample 8 was not tested at 150° F. The rheological properties of the base mud and test muds including sample thinner formulations at 300° F. are presented in Tables 5A and 5B. The base mud at pH 10 and Samples 2, 3, and 10 were not tested at 300° F.









TABLE 4A







Rheological properties of the base mud and test muds at 150° F.

















Base









Base
Mud pH
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base


Rheological
Mud pH
adjusted
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +


Properties
7.53
to 10
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4
Sample 5
Sample 6


















θ600
108.5
150
75
81
122
80
83
80


θ300
99
134.5
66
72
119
71
72.5
69


θ200
92
127
62.5
68
105
68
70
66


θ100
90
119
57
62
97
62
64
60


θ6
72
91
41
45
69
44
46
42


θ3
70.5
88
39
42.5
68
42
44
40


AV
54.25
75
37.5
40.5
61
40
41.5
40


PV
9.5
15.5
9
9
3
9
10.5
11


YP
89.5
119
57
63
116
62
62
58


Thinning

−33.0%
36.3%
29.6%
−29.6%
30.7%
30.7%
35.2%


Efficiency
























TABLE 4B







Rheological properties of the base mud and test muds at 150° F.














Rheo-









logi-
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base


cal
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +


Prop-
Sam-
Sam-
Sam-
Sam-
Sam-
Sam-
Sam-


erties
ple 7
ple 9
ple 10
ple 11
ple 12
ple13
ple 14

















θ600
72
68.5
69
70
75
76.5
71


θ300
62
60
60
62
67
69
64


θ200
59
58
58
58.5
64
66.5
60


θ100
54
54
53
53.5
60
62
55


θ6
40
38.5
39
40
43
45
40


θ3
39
38
38
38.5
41
42.5
38.5


AV
36
34.25
34.5
35
37.5
38.25
35.5


PV
10
8.5
9
8
8
7.5
7


YP
52
51.5
51
54
59
61.5
57


Thin-
41.9%
42.5%
43.0%
39.7%
34.1%
31.3%
36.3%


ning









Effi-









ciency
















TABLE 5A







Rheological properties of the base mud and test muds at 300° F.













Rheo-
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base


logical
Mud
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +


Prop-
pH
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


erties
7.53
1
4
5
6
7
















θ600
96.5
34.5
33.5
35
42.5
72


θ300
90
27
24
25.5
35
62


θ200
88.5
24
20
21.5
32.5
59


θ100
83
20.5
16.5
17.5
28.5
54


θ6
65
14.5
10
10.5
21
40


θ3
63
14
10
10.5
21
39


AV
48.25
17.25
16.75
17.5
21.25
36


PV
6.5
7.5
9.5
9.5
7.5
10


YP
83.5
19.5
14.5
16
27.5
52


Thin-

76.6%
82.6%
80.8%
67.1%
41.9%


ning








Effi-








ciency
















TABLE 5B







Rheological properties of the base mud and test muds at 300° F.














Base
Base
Base
Base
Base
Base



Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +


Rheological
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


Properties
8
9
11
12
13
14
















θ600
27
20
21
20.5
18
19


θ300
20
14
14
14
11
12.5


θ200
17
11.5
11.5
11.5
8.5
10


θ100
13
8.5
8.5
8.5
6
7


θ6
7.5
3
3.5
3.5
2
2.5


θ3
7.5
3
3.5
3.5
2
2.5


AV
13.5
10
10.5
10.25
9
9.5


PV
7
6
7
6.5
7
6.5


YP
13
8
7
7.5
4
6


Thinning
84.4%
90.4%
92.2%
91.6%
95.5%
93.3%


Efficiency









Selected results from Tables 4A, 4B, 5A, and 5B are presented in FIG. 2 as fractional thinning efficiency values. FIG. 2 is a chart illustrating a comparison of the thinning efficiency of thinning compositions without copper sulfate with thinning compositions including different concentrations of copper sulfate.


Thus, thinner formulations including copper sulfate and zinc chloride, alone or in combination, have similar or better thinning efficiency than thinner formulations including chromium or tin salts. Further, formulations including copper and zinc salts had surprisingly better thinning efficiency than formulations including other metal salts such as chromium, tin, or manganese salts.


Example 4: Preparation of a Second Base Mud and Evaluation of Rheological Properties of Second Base Mud and Test Muds

A second base mud was prepared, using the components set forth in Table 6, in the order and with the mixing times shown, using the general procedure according to Example 1.









TABLE 6







Preparation of the second base


mud formulation













Mixing




Quantity
Time



Component
(grams)
(min)







Distilled water
571.8





(mL)




Bentonite
30
10



Sodium Chloride
2
5



Calcium sulfate
1
5



NaOH, 100%
1
3



API Base Clay
80
10



Barite
291.48
10










Thinner formulations of Sample 1, Sample 11, Sample 12, Sample 13, and Sample 14 of Example 2 (Table 3) were added at a concentration of 1 lbm/bbl to the second base mud to prepare test muds. Rheological properties were established at 50° F. and after hot rolling at 200° F., using the technique described with reference to EXAMPLE 3. The results are set forth in Table 7 (50° F.) and Table 8 (200° F.). In Table 7 and Table 8, the thinning efficiency is measured relative to the second base mud at the pH shown in each table.









TABLE 7







Rheological properties of the second base mud and test muds at 50° C.















Second
Second
Second
Second
Second




Base
Base
Base
Base
Base



Second
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +


Rheological
Base
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


Properties
Mud
1
11
12
13
14
















pH
10.46
10.16
10.50
10.78
10.41
10.33


θ600
296.9
16.0
16.6
19.4
18.0
18.7


θ300
279.1
8.4
8.4
9.5
9.0
9.2


θ200
276.2
6.4
6.0
7.0
6.3
6.4


θ100
261.7
3.5
3.3
3.7
3.4
4.0


PV
17.8
7.6
8.2
9.9
9.0
9.5


YP
261.3
0.8
0.2
−0.4
0.0
−0.3


10 second gel
141.6
0.6
0.1
0.7
1.0
0.3


strength








(lbs/100 ft2)








10 minute gel
160.4
5.4
5.1
8.6
10.8
12.0


strength








(lbs/100 ft2)








Thinning

99.7
99.9
100.2
100.0
100.1


Efficiency
















TABLE 8







Rheological properties of the second base mud after hot rolling for 16 hours


at 200° C. and tested muds at 50° C.















Second
Second
Second
Second
Second


Rheo-

Base
Base
Base
Base
Base


logical
Second
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +


Prop-
Base
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


erties
Mud
1
11
12
13
14
















pH
10.86
9.50
10.46
10.72
10.14
10.52


θ600
42.9
23.4
33.2
30.9
31.9
28.4


θ300
42.4
12.8
21.8
19.5
21.1
18.2


θ200
42.2
11.0
22.8
19.8
19.8
14.1


θ100
42.0
8.1
21.8
14.1
18.4
11.6


PV
0.5
10.6
11.4
11.4
10.8
10.2


YP
41.9
2.2
10.4
8.1
10.3
8.0


10 second
74.7
3.1
9.3
6.9
8.8
4.9


gel strength








(lbs/100 ft2)








10 minute gel
132.4
24.8
41.3
32.3
36.2
35.8


strength








(lbs/100 ft2)








Thinning

94.7
75.2
80.7
75.4
80.9


Efficiency















Example 5: Preparation of a Third Base Mud and Evaluation of Rheological Properties of Third Base Mud and Test Muds

A third base mud was prepared by adding 200 mL deionized water to 2 L of the second base mud of Example 4.


Thinner formulations of Sample 1 and Sample 10 of Example 2 were added at a concentration of 1 lbm/bbl to the third base mud to prepare test muds. Rheological properties were established at 50° C., and after hot rolling at 200° C., using the technique described with reference to Example 3, and with a Model 900 Viscometer (OFITE®, Houston, Tex.). The results are set forth in TABLE 9 below.









TABLE 9







Rheological properties of the third base mud and test muds at 50° C. and after hot


rolling for 16 hours at 200° C. fluid properties were measured at 50° C.















Third
Third

Third
Third



Third
Base
Base
Third
Base
Base



Base
Mud +
Mud +
Base
Mud +
Mud +


Rheological Properties
Mud
Sample 1
Sample 10
Mud
Sample 1
Sample 10


















Hot rolled 200° C.










50° C.
measured at 50° C.













pH
10.73
10.33
10.43
10.59
10.30
10.99


θ600
328.4
18.7
19.4
65.7
21.2
29.1


θ300
324.2
8.6
9.4
60.6
18.2
27.9


θ200
315.9
5.4
6.2
47.5
13.0
23.6


θ100
294.2
2.8
3.3
47.2
12.2
23.0


PV
4.2
10.1
10.0
5.1
3.0
1.2


YP
320.0
−1.5
−0.6
55.5
15.2
26.7


10 second gel








strength (lbs/100 ft2)
148.4
0.0
0.5
8.9
11.7
24.6


10 minute gel strength








(lbs/100 ft2)
159.6
8.6
10.7
68.9
36.4
39.3


Thinning Efficiency

100.5
100.2

72.6
51.9









Example 6: Preparation of a Fourth Base Mud and Evaluation of Rheological Properties of Third Base Mud and Test Muds

A fourth base mud was prepared by adding 300 mL deionized water to 2 L of the second base mud of Example 4. Thinner formulations of Sample 1, Sample 10, Sample 11, Sample 13, and Sample 14 of Example 2 were added at a concentration of 1 lbm/bbl to the fourth base mud to prepare test muds. Rheological properties were established at 50° F. and after hot rolling at 200° F., using the technique described with reference to Example 3 and with a Model 900 Viscometer (OFITE®, Houston, Tex.). The results are set forth in Table 10 (50° C.) and Table 11 (after hot rolling at 200° C.) below.









TABLE 10







Rheological properties of the fourth base mud and test muds at 50° C.















Fourth
Fourth
Fourth
Fourth
Fourth




Base
Base
Base
Base
Base



Fourth
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +



Base
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


Rheological Properties
Mud
1
10
11
13
14
















pH
10.49
10.32
10.35
10.49
10.33
10.36


θ600
323.9
21.0
22.3
22.7
21.9
24.7


θ300
302.6
9.7
10.8
10.3
10.1
12.2


θ200
296.0
7.0
7.8
7.4
7.2
7.7


θ100
282.6
3.8
4.1
4.0
4.0
5.3


PV
21.3
11.3
11.5
12.4
11.8
12.5


YP
281.3
−1.6
−0.7
−2.1
−1.7
−0.3


10 second gel
157.3
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.6


strength (lbs/100 ft2)








10 minute gel strength
167.0
7.4
13.5
12.6
14.5
16.9


(lbs/100 ft2)








Thinning Efficiency

100.6
100.2
100.7
100.6
100.1
















TABLE 11







Rheological properties of the fourth base mud hot rolled for 16 hours at 200° C.,


with rheology measured at 50° C.















Fourth
Fourth
Fourth
Fourth
Fourth




Base
Base
Base
Base
Base



Fourth
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +
Mud +



Base
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


Rheological Properties
Mud
1
10
11
13
14
















pH
10.52
10.56
10.43
10.49
10.52
10.55


θ600
64.3
26.6
34.9
33.5
38.8
37.1


θ300
51.7
21.8
23.4
21.9
33.7
25.8


θ200
49.6
14.9
24.3
22.6
31.6
22.8


θ100
49.0
14.1
22.9
21.2
30.5
21.0


PV
12.6
4.8
11.5
11.6
5.1
11.3


YP
39.1
17.0
11.9
10.3
28.6
14.5


10 second gel








strength (lbs/100 ft2)
67.7
10.3
10.9
11.4
23.3
17.6


10 minute gel strength (lbs/100 ft2)
152.8
41.3
38.0
37.1
42.3
41.6


Thinning Efficiency

56.5
69.6
73.7
26.9
62.9









The invention is described above with reference to numerous aspects and embodiments, and specific examples. Many variations will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art in light of the above detailed description. All such obvious variations are within the full intended scope of the appended claims. Other aspects of the invention can include, but are not limited to, the following aspects. Many aspects are described as “comprising” certain components or steps, but alternatively, can “consist essentially of” or “consist of” those components or steps unless specifically stated otherwise.


Aspect 1. A method for drilling a wellbore, the method comprising:


a) introducing a drilling fluid composition into a borehole defined by a formation;


b) introducing a thinner composition comprising at least one tannin and at least one metal salt into the borehole; and


c) contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole;


wherein the at least one tannin and at least one metal salt are not complexed ex situ, and


wherein the at least one metal salt comprises at least one copper salt, at least one zinc salt, or a combination of at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt.


Aspect 2. The method of Aspect 1, wherein introducing the thinner composition into the borehole occurs after or at the same time as introducing the drilling fluid composition into the borehole.


Aspect 3. The method of Aspect 1, wherein introducing the at least one tannin into the borehole occurs at the same time as introducing the at least one metal salt into the borehole.


Aspect 4. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 3, wherein the thinner composition comprises a dry mix of the at least one tannin and the at least one metal salt.


Aspect 5. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 3, wherein introducing the thinner composition into the borehole comprises:


introducing a tannin composition comprising the at least one tannin into the borehole; and


introducing a metal salt composition comprising the at least one metal salt into the borehole.


Aspect 6. The method of Aspect 5, wherein the tannin composition is introduced into the borehole before or at the same time as introducing the metal salt composition into the borehole.


Aspect 7. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 6, wherein the at least one tannin comprises sulfomethylated quebracho.


Aspect 8. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 7, wherein the at least one metal salt comprises at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt.


Aspect 9. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 8, wherein the at least one copper salt comprises copper sulfate.


Aspect 10. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 9, wherein the at least one zinc salt comprises zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, or a combination of zinc sulfate and zinc chloride.


Aspect 11. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 10, wherein the thinner composition further comprises ferrous sulfate.


Aspect 12. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 11, wherein the thinner composition further comprises causticized lignite.


Aspect 13. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 7, wherein the thinner composition comprises ferrous sulfate, causticized lignite, and at least one metal salt selected from copper sulfate, zinc sulfate, and/or zinc chloride.


Aspect 14. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 1% by weight of copper sulfate.


Aspect 15. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 3% by weight of copper sulfate.


Aspect 16. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 5% by weight of copper sulfate.


Aspect 17. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises from about 1% by weight to about 10% by weight of copper sulfate.


Aspect 18. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises from about 2% by weight to about 8% by weight of copper sulfate.


Aspect 19. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises from about 3% by weight to about 7% by weight of copper sulfate.


Aspect 20. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 5% by weight of zinc chloride.


Aspect 21. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 10% by weight of zinc sulfate heptahydrate.


Aspect 22. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 21, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 60% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho.


Aspect 23. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 21, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 70% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho.


Aspect 24. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 23, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 8% by weight of causticized lignite.


Aspect 25. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 23, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 15% by weight of causticized lignite.


Aspect 26. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 25, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 5% by weight of ferrous sulfate.


Aspect 27. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 25, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate.


Aspect 28. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 23, wherein the thinner composition comprises about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate, about 70% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho, and at least about 8% by weight of causticized lignite.


Aspect 29. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 17, wherein the thinner composition has a thinning efficiency of at least about 30%, as measured according to Protocol A.


Aspect 30. The method of any one of Aspects 1 to 18, further comprising drilling the formation to define or extend a wellbore.

Claims
  • 1. A method for drilling a wellbore, the method comprising: a) introducing a drilling fluid composition into a borehole defined by a formation;b) introducing a thinner composition comprising at least one tannin and at least two metal salts into the borehole; andc) contacting the thinner composition and the drilling fluid composition in the borehole,wherein the at least one tannin and the at least two metal salts are not complexed ex situ,wherein the at least two metal salts comprises at least one copper salt and at least one zinc salt, andwherein the at least one copper salt comprises copper sulfate.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein introducing the thinner composition into the borehole occurs after or at the same time as introducing the drilling fluid composition into the borehole.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein introducing the at least one tannin into the borehole occurs at the same time as introducing the at least two metal salts into the borehole.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the thinner composition comprises a dry mix of the at least one tannin and the at least two metal salts.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein introducing the thinner composition into the borehole comprises: introducing a tannin composition comprising the at least one tannin into the borehole; andintroducing a metal salt composition comprising the at least two metal salts into the borehole.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the tannin composition is introduced into the borehole before or at the same time as introducing the metal salt composition into the borehole.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one tannin comprises sulfomethylated quebracho.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 60% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 70% by weight of sulfomethylated quebracho.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the thinner composition further comprises about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one zinc salt comprises zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, or a combination of zinc sulfate and zinc chloride.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the thinner composition further comprises ferrous sulfate.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 5% by weight of ferrous sulfate.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 9% by weight of ferrous sulfate.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the at least one zinc salt comprises zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, or a combination of zinc sulfate and zinc chloride.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the thinner composition further comprises causticized lignite.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the thinner composition further comprises causticized lignite.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 8% by weight of causticized lignite.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 15% by weight of causticized lignite.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 1% by weight of copper sulfate.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 3% by weight of copper sulfate.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the thinner composition comprises at least about 5% by weight of copper sulfate.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein the thinner composition comprises from about 1% by weight to about 10% by weight of copper sulfate.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the thinner composition comprises from about 2% by weight to about 8% by weight of copper sulfate.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the thinner composition comprises from about 3% by weight to about 7% by weight of copper sulfate.
  • 26. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one zinc salt comprises zinc chloride, and where the thinner composition comprises at least about 5% by weight of zinc chloride.
  • 27. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one zinc salt comprises zinc sulfate heptahydrate, and wherein the thinner composition further comprises at least about 10% by weight of zinc sulfate heptahydrate.
  • 28. The method of claim 1, wherein the thinner composition has a thinning efficiency of at least about 30%, as measured according to Protocol A.
  • 29. The method of claim 1, further comprising drilling the formation to define or extend a wellbore.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/843,217, filed Apr. 8, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/831,386, filed Apr. 9, 2019, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62831386 Apr 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16843217 Apr 2020 US
Child 17407139 US