Patent Application
20150225696
The sequence listing found in text computer-readable form in a *.txt file entitled, “2013-168-02_SequenceListing_ST25.txt”, created on Apr. 15, 2015, is hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods for efficient immortalization of normal human epithelial cells and screening using these cells.
2. Related Art
The lack of knowledge about the process of human epithelial cell telomerase reactivation and immortalization has impeded efforts to target this process therapeutically. Although there has been work to understand telomerase activity in immortal cells, and to target the telomerase enzyme, there has been almost no effort to target the process of immortalization, to examine the regulation of telomerase in pre-malignant cells, or to determine how telomerase is reactivated during carcinoma progression. Part of the difficulty in doing this, in additional to the absence of short-lived animal models that accurately model human cell immortalization, has been the absence of human cell culture models. Previous methods to immortalize human epithelial cells in vitro, that employed oncogenic agents that might reflect processes that occur during in vivo carcinogenesis, produced only rare clonal lines with genomic errors. This situation made it difficult to experimentally examine the immortalization process as it occurred. To get around this problem, many labs immortalized human cells by experimentally introducing and overexpressing into finite cells the gene for the telomerase enzyme, hTERT. Doing so precludes understanding what errors occur during carcinogenesis that are responsible for the reactivation of the endogenous telomerase gene. HMEC immortalized by hTERT show properties unlike either normal or abnormal HMEC in vivo. Another approach other labs have utilized to more immortalize human cells has been by employing the oncogenes present in oncogenic viruses like HPV16 or 18, or SV40. However, SV40 does not efficiently immortalize and is not an etiological agent for human cancers except under unusual (immunosuppressed) conditions and thus does not provide a model that reflects in vivo carcinogenesis. HPV is not an etiologic agent for breast cancer, though it has been implicated in cervical and oral cancer. However, it confers many distinct and undefined effects on cells, and its role in immortalization (e.g., whether or not it is the same process as occurs during in vivo immortalization during cervical carcinogenesis) is not definitively known.
There is almost no current effort to address this question of the mechanisms involved in reactivation of telomerase/immortalization as it occurs during in vivo carcinogenesis in humans, as there is currently no easy method to do so, and, as above, the importance of immortalization in human cancer progression has tended to be ignored since it is not a significant barrier for mice and rat “models”. Some labs and companies are addressing ways to inhibit telomerase. A recent paper examines regulation of the hTERT gene integrated into a mouse genome during murine SV40T mediated carcinogenesis—a method that cannot accurately reflect all the specific mechanisms that regulate hTERT during human carcinogenesis. Our studies and hypotheses have further pointed out that telomere maintenance in cancer cells appears to be distinct from the (usually low level) telomere/telomerase regulation seen in normal telomerase expressing human stem and progenitor cells, i.e., cancer cells have short stable telomere lengths that may be regulated similar to telomerase regulation in the unicellular yeast organism. We are unaware of anyone else making this observation.
We hypothesize that this difference in telomere regulation in cancer cells may require an active process as cells immortalize, including epigenetic changes; we further hypothesize that this is represented by the conversion process we see as part of HMEC in vitro immortalization. Such processes, which would be unique to cells becoming cancerous and not present in any other cell type in the body, could be a basis for the existence of unique (no collateral damage to normal cell mechanisms) therapeutically targetable mechanisms.
In short, this problem has been largely ignored, despite the essential and critical role of immortalization in human solid cancer progression. Indeed, many of the top scientists and journals refer to non-malignant immortally transformed human epithelial cells (i.e., cells that have acquired all the errors needed to overcome the main tumor suppressor barriers and transform finite cells to immortality) as “normal” or “untransformed”, thereby ignoring the importance of all the errors that needed to occur to transform normal finite cells to immortality.
Therefore, what is needed is a method for efficient reproducible immortalization of HMEC that uses pathologically relevant agents and could be employed to examine the process of human epithelial cell immortalization as it might occur during in vivo carcinogenesis. Further, there is currently no method for inducing immortalization in the absence of pervasive “passenger” errors. Such a method would permit easier examination of the underlying mechanisms of cancer progression and would enable the production of immortal lines lacking gross genomic errors as the currently available immortal lines.
Immortalization, associated with telomerase reactivation, is necessary for progression of most human carcinomas, and could therefore be a valuable therapeutic target. However, the paucity of experimentally tractable model systems that can examine human epithelial cell immortalization as it might occur during carcinogenesis has limited this potential. The prevalence of many genomic errors in primary human cancers makes it difficult to identify the driver errors responsible for immortalization using only in vivo tissues.
Herein is described an efficient reproducible method to immortalize cultured human epithelial cells by directly targeting the two main tumor-suppressive senescence barriers. The resultant lines exhibit normal karyotypes, indicating that genomic instability is not necessary per se for immortalization. This method of achieving non-clonal immortalization in the absence of “passenger” genomic errors should facilitate examination of this critical step in cancer progression, as well as exploration of agents that may prevent immortalization. That transduction of only shRNA to p16 and c-Myc can immortally transform normal human epithelial cells validates our model of the two main senescence barriers: (i) stasis, a stress-associated arrest independent of telomere length and extent of replication, and (ii) replicative senescence due to telomere dysfunction.
Thus in one embodiment, a method to efficiently and reproducibly immortalize normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC). This method, described in
In various embodiments, a method to immortalize normal human epithelial cells, the method comprising the steps of: a) providing normal pre-stasis epithelial cells in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing into normal pre-stasis epithelial cells a first pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form and allowing said epithelial cells to enter stasis, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing the epithelial cells that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the epithelial cells have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) introducing into the post-stasis epithelial cells a post-stasis polynucleotide construct that will induce expression of human Telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and/or telomerase activity, wherein such introduction of the post-stasis polynucleotide construct occurs prior to telomere dysfunction from eroded telomeres, and whereby said introduction induces errors that reactivate sufficient telomerase activity; and e) reactivating telomerase activity thereby inducing immortalization of said post-stasis epithelial cells.
Herein is described direct targeting of the two main tumor-suppressive senescence barriers, using agents implicated in in vivo carcinogenesis enables examination of HMEC immortalization as it occurs. It is shown that early passages of immortalized cells that bypassed the senescence barriers through direct targeting possess a normal karyotype. This result highlights the importance of telomere dysfunction-induced genomic instability prior to immortalization in the generation of cancer-associated genomic errors (driver and passenger).
Thus, a method to efficiently and reproducibly immortalize normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC), the method comprising the steps of: a) providing HMEC in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing into pre-stasis HMEC a first pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form and allowing said HMEC to enter stasis, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing HMEC that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the HMEC have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) introducing into the post-stasis HMEC a post-stasis polynucleotide construct that will induce expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and/or telomerase activity, wherein such introduction of the post-stasis polynucleotide construct occurs prior to telomere dysfunction from eroded telomeres, and whereby said introduction induces errors that reactivate sufficient telomerase activity; and e) reactivating telomerase activity thereby inducing immortalization of said post-stasis HMEC.
The low-stress inducing medium can be M87A or a medium that does not produce a rapid rise of the stress-induced molecule cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A, isoforms 1/2/3 (p16INK4A) in the HMEC.
The first polynucleotide construct for transduction of pre-stasis HMEC can be a p16 shRNA, a cyclin D1/cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) fusion protein, a mutant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) protein, an RB shRNA, or an inhibitory molecule to inactivate RB function. In some embodiments, the first polynucleotide construct is a p16 shRNA.
The method may further comprise a step of introducing into pre-stasis HMEC a second pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that targets either direct loss of RB function or inactivation of p53A comprehensive panel of lineally related normal to malignant HMEC used for analysis of hTERT epigenetic marks to show a lack of correlation between marks examined and telomerase activity.
The second pre-stasis polynucleotide construct can be an RB shRNA to target direct loss of RB function or p53 shRNA or GSE p53 inhibitor to inactivate p53.
Herein we describe support for the model of the senescence barriers encountered by cultured HMEC, by illustrating the functional distinctions between stasis (a stress-associated arrest independent of both telomere length and extent of replication), and replicative senescence due to telomere dysfunction. At the basic level, it is shown that genomic instability is not required per se for immortalization, but is needed to generate the errors that bypass/overcome senescence barriers.
At a practical level, the presently described method of generating immortalized lines that lack “passenger” errors should greatly facilitate examination of the mechanisms underlying this crucial, but still poorly understood step in human carcinogenesis.
At a potential translational level, the process of immortalization could be a valuable therapeutic target for multiple cancer types. The absence of good model systems of human epithelial cell cancer-associated immortalization has hampered examination of ways to prevent or reverse this process.
A non-clonal immortalized human mammary epithelial cell having 75 or less genes exhibiting gene expression log 2-fold change as compared to its finite parent cell.
A comprehensive panel of lineally related normal to malignant HMEC used for analysis of hTERT epigenetic marks to show a lack of correlation between marks examined and telomerase activity.
Using the non-clonal immortalized cells produced by the methods described herein, further methods of screening are provided. A method for screening the effect of toxin on cancer progression comprising the steps of: a) providing human cells in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing a toxin to said pre-stasis cells, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing cells that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the cells have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) screening said post-stasis cells for differential expression profiles from the normal cells and/or sequencing said post-stasis cells to compare the genetic errors induced to bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis.
A method for screening the effect of toxin on cancer progression comprising the steps of: a) providing cells in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing into pre-stasis cells a first pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form and allowing said cells to enter stasis, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing cells that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the cells have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) introducing to the post-stasis cells a toxin to determine if the toxin induces expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and/or telomerase activity, wherein such introduction of the post-stasis polynucleotide construct occurs prior to telomere dysfunction from eroded telomeres; and e) screening for induction of errors that reactivate telomerase activity and thereby inducing immortalization of said post-stasis cells.
In some embodiments, such methods can be carried out using cells immortalized from any human cell type. In various embodiments, the cells are epithelial cells. In some embodiments, the cells are breast or mammary cells.
Table 1. Karyology of non-clonally immortalized lines at early passage. The 184Fp16sMY, 184Dp16sMY, 240Lp16sMY lines were non-clonally immortalized from non-clonal post-stasis cultures. The 184AaMY, 184BeMY, 184CeMY lines were non-clonally immortalized from clonal post-stasis cultures that had been exposed to the chemical carcinogen BaP.
Table 1,
Table 2 MassARRAY primers sequences used for the Sequenom MassARRAY analysis of the TERT promoter. The SEQ ID NO: is also provided.
Acquisition of sufficient telomerase activity to maintain stable telomere lengths is necessary for immortalization of most human epithelial cells. In turn, immortalization appears essential for development and progression of malignant human carcinomas. While normal finite human epithelial cells contain an intact genome, immortal, telomerase-expressing carcinoma cells usually exhibit many genomic errors and genomic instability. During in vivo carcinoma progression, short telomeres and widespread genomic instability can first be observed in many pre-malignant lesions, such as DCIS in breast [1,2]. We have postulated that the genomic instability caused by the critically shortened telomeres present in finite lifespan cells as they approach replicative senescence may give rise to rare errors permissive for telomerase reactivation, and underlie many of the passenger errors seen in carcinomas [3].
Despite the crucial role of telomerase and immortalization in human carcinogenesis, the mechanisms that control telomerase expression, and the aberrations that allow telomerase reactivation during malignant progression, are still poorly understood. It is difficult to determine which errors are responsible for driving cancer-associated immortalization using in vivo human tissues, given the background of many passenger errors. The lack of appropriate experimentally tractable model systems of human cancer-associated telomerase reactivation and immortalization has also contributed to this knowledge gap. In addition, murine cells are known to have significant differences from human in their regulation of telomerase, including less stringent telomerase repression than exists in adult human somatic cells [4,5]. Thus, telomerase activity is not limiting in most murine carcinoma model systems. Moreover, there is a paucity of human epithelial cell immortalization models suitable for experimental examination of telomerase reactivation during carcinogenesis. Immortalization models employing transduction of ectopic hTERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, preclude identifying the errors responsible for telomerase reactivation during in vivo human carcinogenesis.
Immortalization, associated with reactivation of telomerase activity, is an essential but poorly understood step in human epithelial cell carcinogenesis, due in part to the paucity of experimentally tractable model systems that can examine human epithelial cell immortalization as it might occur in vivo.
Senescence barriers suppress tumorigenesis and malignant progression is dependent upon disabling these barriers. We have developed an integrated model of these barriers in cultured HMEC, consistent with what is known about carcinogenesis in vivo. We believe that increased understanding and use of this model could illuminate carcinogenesis mechanisms and enable new therapeutic approaches to cancer prevention and treatment.
Cultured HMEC first arrest at stasis, a stress-associated barrier independent of telomere length and extent of replication, mediated by the RB pathway. Stasis can be bypassed or overcome by errors in the RB pathway; in cultured HMEC, loss of p16 function is common. We hypothesize that getting past stasis correlates with early clonal expansion/atypical hyperplasia in vivo. Post-stasis HMEC exhibit ongoing telomere attrition, leading to replicative senescence, the telomere dysfunction barrier due to critically short telomeres. Post-stasis HMEC with telomere dysfunction show properties similar to DCIS (short telomeres, genomic instability). Cells that aberrantly reactivate sufficient telomerase can overcome this barrier and immortalize, while also gaining resistance to oncogene-induced senescence (OIS). Thus, subsequent expression of any of numerous oncogenes into non-malignant immortal cells will readily induce malignancy-associated properties rather than OIS. Non-malignant immortal lines share many aberrant properties with malignant cells, and differ significantly from normal HMEC, which are all finite.
There is confusion in the field due to the failure to distinguish between stasis and replicative senescence (a critical barrier in human carcinoma progression not present in murine models). Many cell types experience acute stresses (e.g. oxidative damage) leading to a DNA damage response (DDR) and a p53-dependent p21 stasis arrest. This DNA damage response has been confused with the DDR resulting from critically short telomeres. The critical importance of the immortalization step in human carcinogenesis—for example, necessary for development of all breast cancer subtypes—has been obscured, hindering efforts to therapeutically target the immortalization process.
Herein is described efficient non-clonal immortalization of normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) by directly targeting the two main senescence barriers encountered by cultured HMEC. The stress-associated stasis barrier, mediated by elevated levels of p16INK4a, was bypassed using shRNA to p16. The replicative senescence barrier, a consequence of critically shortened telomeres, was bypassed in post-stasis HMEC by c-Myc transduction. These results demonstrate that just two oncogenic agents are needed to immortally transform normal HMEC. We additionally validated that the genomic instability commonly present in human carcinomas is not required per se for immortal transformation, but needed to generate genomic errors, some of which may function to overcome tumor suppressive senescence barriers. Early passage non-clonal immortalized lines exhibited normal karyotypes. Methods based on this model of efficient HMEC immortalization, in the absence of “passenger” genomic errors, will facilitate examination of telomerase regulation and immortalization during human carcinoma progression.
Thus, in one embodiment, a method to efficiently and reproducibly immortalize normal human cells. In various embodiments, a method as shown schematically in
In some embodiments, a method to efficiently and reproducibly immortalize normal human cells from tissues including but not limited to lung, prostate, colon, ovary, intestinal, pancreatic, breast, skin, kidney, liver, thyroid, esophageal, lymphatic, urinary, vaginal, testicular, stomach, cartilage, bone, muscle, brain, etc. In some embodiments, the tissue is from epithelial tissues. In other embodiments, the tissue is mammary or breast tissue.
In various embodiments, a method to immortalize normal human epithelial cells, the method comprising the steps of: a) providing normal pre-stasis epithelial cells in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing into normal pre-stasis epithelial cells a first pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form and allowing said epithelial cells to enter stasis, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing the epithelial cells that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the epithelial cells have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) introducing into the post-stasis epithelial cells a post-stasis polynucleotide construct that will induce expression of human Telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and/or telomerase activity, wherein such introduction of the post-stasis polynucleotide construct occurs prior to telomere dysfunction from eroded telomeres, and whereby said introduction induces errors that reactivate sufficient telomerase activity; and e) reactivating telomerase activity thereby inducing immortalization of said post-stasis epithelial cells.
In one embodiment, a method to efficiently and reproducibly immortalize normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC), the method comprising the steps of: a) providing HMEC in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing into pre-stasis HMEC a first pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form and allowing said HMEC to enter stasis, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing HMEC that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the HMEC have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) introducing into the post-stasis HMEC a post-stasis polynucleotide construct that will induce expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and/or telomerase activity, wherein such introduction of the post-stasis polynucleotide construct occurs prior to telomere dysfunction from eroded telomeres, and whereby said introduction induces errors that reactivate sufficient telomerase activity; and e) reactivating telomerase activity thereby inducing immortalization of said post-stasis HMEC.
In various embodiments, the human cells are grown in a low stress-inducing medium such as M87A (e.g., a medium that does not produce a rapid rise of the stress-induced molecule p16INK4A which is described in US Pat. Pub. No. US 2010-0022000-A1, WO2007115223, or as described in Garbe et al. Can Res 2009, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). Other non-stress inducing or low stress-inducing medium may be used. In some embodiments, the medium may contain other inducers to study the effect of stress and environment on the cells and the ability to overcome or bypass the stasis senescence barrier.
In some embodiments, a polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form is introduced to pre-stasis HMEC prior to the induction of p16. Examples of a polynucleotide construct include but are not limited to, a p16 shRNA, overexpression of a cyclin D1/CDK2 fusion protein, a mutant CDK4 protein, shRNA to Retinoblastoma. In some embodiments, other methods to inactivate RB function may be used. Inactivation of RB allows non-clonal bypass of the stasis senescence barrier by the cells to provide for populations of post-stasis cells.
In some embodiments, a polynucleotide construct that will induce expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)/telomerase activity is then introduced to the post-stasis cells derived as above. In some embodiments, transduction of c-Myc will perform this function, and allow non-clonal immortalization of the post-stasis population. Other means for inducing telomerase activity or expression of hTERT are possible, and can be determined by testing additional potential hTERT inducers in the non-clonal post-stasis HMEC derived from unstressed pre-stasis HMEC.
In some embodiments, in vivo or other human cells in vitro may also employ p53-dependent p21 to enforce stasis. In those cases, non-clonal bypass of stasis may require either direct loss of RB function (e.g., by shRNA), or inactivation of p53 (e.g., by shRNA or a GSE) in addition to method steps listed above.
The immortality of the resultant lines is shown by their expression of telomerase activity and their indefinite replicative potential. The lack of gross genomic changes (passenger errors) can be shown by karyotype analysis and/or comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis soon after immortalization. While lines without gross genomic errors can be generated, these lines may not necessarily remain genomically stable upon extensive passage due to potential errors cause by insertional mutagenesis (from the viral vectors used to transduce genetic elements) or instability instigated by deregulated c-Myc. For example, cells with an error that provides a growth advantage could become more prominent in the population.
The methods described herein differ from currently used methods in that the present method uses pathologically relevant agents and can be applied to cells from multiple individuals to obtain an immortal line from any individual's cells that can be grown in primary culture before becoming highly stressed. This approach may applicable to other human epithelial cells; however HMEC are particularly useful due to the absence of p53-dependent p21 at stasis. In cell types that also engage p53 at stasis, both p16 and p53 can be inactivated (e.g., by shRNA, or by GSE inhibitor to p53) to bypass stasis, and cells then immortalized by c-Myc. While this situation may also provide immortal lines lacking gross genomic changes to start, the absence of functional p53 will likely make the resultant lines more vulnerable to genomic alterations upon stress exposures.
This method in turn provides an experimentally tractable system to examine the mechanisms underlying human cell and epithelial cell immortalization as it might occur during in vivo carcinogenesis, something that is currently largely unknown. The absence of passenger errors during the immortalization process greatly facilitates such a usage. In some embodiments, the methods and immortalized cells that are created by this process allow for comparison of the immortalized lines (lacking passenger errors) with their immediate finite precursors, to determine what properties (e.g., gene expression, epigenetic properties, etc.) differ between the isogeneic immortal and finite cells. In some embodiments, methods for testing of potential therapeutics in the resultant cells and cell lines to see if the therapeutics can prevent or reverse immortalization are provided. In other embodiments, methods for testing the post-stasis cells to determine what agents besides c-Myc may promote immortalization. In another embodiment, methods for utilizing the HMEC cultures generated from the above method to identify genes or processes that may be required to attain or maintain immortalization.
In some embodiments, finite (pre- and post-stasis) HMEC are compared to newly immortalized non-clonal HMEC lines to determine molecular differences. The assays to do this include, but are not limited to, global gene expression and global epigenetic landscape analysis. Gene expression analysis using RNA-seq and smRNA-seq reveals protein coding genes, long non-coding RNAs and miRNAs that changed expression during immortalization. Analysis of epigenetic landscape includes DNA methylation (MeDIP-seq, MRE-seq), various histone modifications (ChIP-seq) and chromatin conformation (e.g. FAIR-seq) to track the epigenetic changes linked to immortalization that might be responsible for stabilization of changes in gene expression.
To determine the statistical significance of the differences between finite and immortal HMEC and identify potential candidate relevant changes, data generated from the combined comprehensive epigenomic and genomic analyses can be analyzed using described tools (Genome analysis tools at the MIT website web.wi.mit.edu/young/research pages) with corrections for variable parameters. Based on variance between replicates and variance between experimental treatments, a global error model will be applied to each type of microarray using the adjusted log ratios to identify probes with significant changes. The significance threshold will be adjusted to account for the problem of multiple testing using the Benjamini Hochburg False Discovery Rate method with the false discovery rate set to 0.05. Genes passing these filters will be labeled as direct genetic or epigenetic targets. Genomic and epigenomic data will be analyzed in the R programming environment using Bioconductor packages (Website for r-project; Website for Bioconductor), using well-described approaches. Normalization of all data will use the Limma package. Control for false discovery rate will use a multiple testing correction method. Genes are considered statistically significant if the adjusted p-value is p<0.05. To obtain high resolution, high precision analysis of candidate genes, gene expression will be analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. Histone modifications will be monitored using ChIP coupled to real-time PCR. DNA methylation state will be analyzed primarily by Sequenom MassArray technology.
Thus, here in are described methods and processes for direct targeting of the two senescence barriers, stasis and replicative senescence, can reproducibly and efficiently generate immortal lines with no gross genomic changes. These data support the hypothesis that the widespread genomic changes seen in breast carcinomas are needed to generate errors that can overcome senescence barriers, but genomic instability per se is not necessary for transformation. The inherent genomic instability preceding replicative senescence may induce most genomic errors—those needed for immortalization as well as many “passenger” errors.
The diploid, non-clonal lines produced by the present methods can allow identification of immortalization-specific changes in the absence of widespread passenger mutations. Since immortalization is essential for malignancy, such changes could be therapeutic targets to prevent progression.
Therefore, the immortalization step in human carcinoma progression should be viewed as essential and rate-limiting, with many key cancer properties determined prior to immortalization (in vivo, by the DCIS stage).
In some applications, the present methods provide the ability to determine whether observed changes and/or candidate genes are needed to attain or maintain immortality, and candidate genes are tested for their effect on immortalization and conversion. Genes with increased expression can be targeted via shRNA constructs while genes with decreased expression can be transduced using retroviral vectors. In some embodiments, methods and observation of the ability of candidate genes to inhibit immortalization of post-stasis HMEC transduced with c-Myc, since this protocol produces uniform immortalization. In other embodiments, methods and observation for the ability of candidate gene to prevent conversion using newly immortalized lines for which sufficient pre-conversion cell stocks are known or at hand. The potential for candidate genes to revert immortal lines to a finite state are tested using several different types of fully immortal lines.
Differences consistently shown between the post-stasis and immortal HMEC cultures will point out potential additional players in the immortalization process, and assays can assess whether these changes are necessary for the immortal state. These genes/processes could be therapeutic targets to prevent or reverse immortalization. Particularly noted is the possibility that immortalization requires epigenetic changes, since these may be more amenable to therapeutic targeting.
In some embodiments, only two oncogenic agents are sufficient to immortally transform normal finite HMEC. In other embodiments, three or more oncogenic agents are sufficient to malignantly transform normal finite HMEC. In various embodiments, methods for screening for those oncogenic agents is provided.
In some embodiments, a method for screening the effect of toxin on cancer progression comprising the steps of: a) providing normal cells in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing a toxin to said pre-stasis cells, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing HMEC that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the cells have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) screening said post-stasis cells for differential expression profiles from the normal HMEC and/or sequencing said post-stasis cells to compare the genetic errors induced to bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis.
In another embodiment, a method for screening the effect of toxin on cancer progression comprising the steps of: a) providing cells in a low stress-inducing medium; b) introducing into pre-stasis HMEC a first pre-stasis polynucleotide construct that prevents the cell-cycle control protein Retinoblastoma (RB) from staying in an active form and allowing said cells to enter stasis, wherein such introduction occurs prior to the induction of Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) and induces errors that bypass or overcome the RB block and stasis; c) providing cells that have entered stasis from the previous step, wherein the cells have entered stasis by bypassing and overcoming the RB block; d) introducing to the post-stasis cells a toxin to determine if the toxin induces expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and/or telomerase activity, wherein such introduction of the post-stasis polynucleotide construct occurs prior to telomere dysfunction from eroded telomeres; and e) screening for induction of errors that reactivate telomerase activity and thereby inducing immortalization of said post-stasis cells.
Such toxins that may be tested using the resultant cells may include but are not limited to common ions and chemicals, household and environmental chemicals and toxins found in consumer products, pathogens, carcinogens, analytes, agents, proteins, polynucleotides, hormones, polymers, foods, preservatives, drugs, therapeutics, small molecules, organic molecules, or other environmental agents such as radiation, soil, gas levels, or other organic matter.
Our previous studies have used pathologically relevant agents to transform normal finite lifespan human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) to immortality 6-9. However, immortalization was clonal with multiple genomic errors present in immortalized lines 1, and the alterations specifically responsible for immortalization were not fully identified. The sporadic nature of the immortalization events has prevented examining the immortalization process as it occurs. We therefore sought to define a reproducible protocol, using agents that might recapitulate molecular alterations occurring during in vivo breast cancer progression, which could achieve non-clonal transformation of normal HMEC to immortality. Design of this protocol was based on our model of the tumor-suppressive senescence barriers normal HMEC need to bypass or overcome to attain immortality and malignancy 6, 10 (see
By exposing normal pre-stasis HMEC to different culture conditions and oncogenic agents, we have generated numerous post-stasis and immortal HMEC with distinct phenotypes. HMEC grown in our original MM medium ceased growth at stasis after ˜15-30 population doublings (PD) (
In the current studies, additional, independently derived BaP post-stasis cultures also showed induction of telomerase activity and uniform immortalization following c-MYC transduction. However, these BaP-exposed p16(−) cells harbor BaP-induced small genomic and epigenomic errors (18, 20; Severson et al. in prep). We therefore generated and examined the effect of c-MYC transduction on HMEC populations made post-stasis by transduction of shRNA to p16 (p16sh) into unstressed pre-stasis cells. In addition to trying to achieve reproducible non-clonal immortalization, we wanted to examine whether direct targeting of the stasis and replicative senescence barriers could produce immortalized lines without gross genomic changes. We report that transduction of p16sh to bypass stasis, followed by transduced c-MYC to induce hTERT, efficiently immortalized pre-stasis HMEC populations grown in low stress-inducing media. Resultant immortalized lines possessed a normal karyotype at early passages, and none to few genomic copy number changes at higher passages. The failure of c-MYC to immortalize the p16(−) post-selection post-stasis HMEC was not due to differences in the hTERT gene locus DNA methylation state, or repressive (H3K27me3) or permissive (H3K4me3) histone modifications. These data indicate that just two oncogenic agents are sufficient to immortally transform unstressed normal HMEC, and support our hypothesis that the genomic instability commonly present in human carcinomas may not be required per se for transformation, but is needed to generate errors that can overcome tumor suppressive barriers.
Immortalization of HMEC by p16sh and c-MYC
In contrast, c-MYC transduction into the BaP post-stasis culture, 184Aa, produced continuous cell growth with increasing TRAP activity (
We then examined the effect of transduced c-MYC on HMEC made post-stasis by direct knockdown of p16 using p16sh (
Almost all pre-stasis HMEC receiving c-MYC alone ceased growth at stasis; however clonal outgrowths of rare cells that escaped stasis by unknown means produced clonal immortal lines (184DMY3, 184FMY2, 240LMY;
Exposure of pre-stasis HMEC to high culture stress also influenced the ability of hTERT to produce efficient immortalization. Previous studies indicated that hTERT could not immortalize pre-stasis HMEC grown in high stress media such as MCDB170/MEGM 21, and yielded only one p16(−) clonal line (184FTERT) when transduced into 3p HMEC grown in moderate stress MM medium 22. In contrast, hTERT transduced into 3p HMEC grown in low stress M87A efficiently immortalized the population, with no growth slowdown at the stasis barrier (184DTERT,
We previously reported that proliferative pre-stasis HMEC grown in MM exhibit low levels of TRAP activity at 4p 23. Pre-stasis HMEC from specimen 184 grown in M85/M87A also show low TRAP activity at early passages, but activity is not detectable when the cells approach stasis (
The effect of transduced p16sh in reducing p16 protein expression is shown by Western analysis in
Altogether, these data indicate that post-selection post-stasis HMEC are refractory to c-MYC-induced telomerase induction and immortalization, while other p16(−) post-stasis types are readily immortalized by c-MYC, and are more vulnerable to immortalization from errors generated during telomere dysfunction. Most significantly, the data show that normal HMEC can be efficiently immortalized with endogenous telomerase reactivation by just two pathologically relevant oncogenic agents, p16sh and c-MYC.
The studies described above have produced at least 12 new non-hTERT immortalized HMEC lines (
The karyotype of all three p16sh-MYC-derived lines, and one of the three BaP-MYC lines (184CeMY), showed no abnormalities at early passage. At higher passages, 1-2 copy-number changes were observed in 184Dp16sMY (30p) and 240Lp16sMY (25p). Both contained small deletions in the p16 locus on 9p21 that would not be obvious by karyology (FIG. S3B), and a subpopulation of 240Lp16sMY showed a 1q amplification. MYC-induced genomic instability 24 and/or retroviral-induced insertional mutagenesis 9 could have produced a 1q error conferring preferential growth to a 240Lp16sMY cell. The origin of the 9p deletion in lines that had received both p16sh and c-MYC is currently unknown. The gross genomic errors in 184AaMY1 and 184BeMY are likely due to these post-stasis cultures being transduced by c-MYC close to the point of agonescence (
In summary, by targeting the stasis and telomere dysfunction barriers with p16sh and c-MYC respectively, we could transform normal finite lifespan pre-stasis HMEC to immortality in the absence of gross genomic changes. These data are consistent with our hypothesis that cancer-associated genomic changes are needed to overcome tumor suppressive barriers and gain malignant properties, but gross genomic changes per se are not inherently necessary for cancer-associated immortalization.
Epigenetic State of the hTERT Promoter in the Cultured HMEC
The above data showed that c-MYC can induce telomerase activity and immortalization in p16(−) BaP and p16sh post-stasis, but not post-selection post-stasis HMEC. One possible basis for this difference could be distinct hTERT chromatin states that affect accessibility of c-MYC, an hTERT transactivator. To evaluate this possibility and to gain better understand of HMEC telomerase regulation, the hTERT gene locus was examined for DNA methylation and permissive (H3K4me3) or repressive (H3K27me3) histone modifications using 5-methylcytosine and chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP) coupled to custom tiling microarray hybridization. Post-stasis BaP, post-selection, and p16sh cultures were examined along with other HMEC with different levels of TRAP activity, ranging from normal pre-stasis 184D (low activity,
The unmethylated region immediately surrounding the TSS of the hTERT gene suggests a state permissive to transcription, so the absence of TRAP activity in some of these cultures might be due to other epigenetic marks. Using ChIP linked microarray, we analyzed the HMEC for two histone modifications at the hTERT gene region—H3K27me3, a polycomb-mediated repressive modification 28, and H3K4me3, a permissive modification present on all active and even some inactive promoters 29.
Overall, the data show that the epigenetic states of the hTERT locus in the analyzed HMEC samples, with respect to DNA methylation, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3, are indistinguishable from one another and therefore do not appear to play a role in the differential response of post-stasis types to c-MYC transduction.
The newly developed lines were characterized for lineage markers by FACS and immunofluorescence, and for AIG. Most of the lines did not display the malignancy-associated property of AIG (
FACS analyses using the cell surface markers CD227 (Muc-1) and CD10 (Calla) can distinguish CD227+/CD10− luminal from CD227−/CD10+ myoepithelial lineages in normal pre-stasis HMEC (
Antibodies recognizing the surface antigens CD44 and CD24 have been widely used in the putative identification of carcinoma cells with tumor-initiating properties 30, 31. Normal pre-stasis 240L HMEC are predominantly CD44hi/CD24hi, with a small CD44lo/CD24hi subpopulation. Almost all the lines exhibited co-expression of CD44 and CD24 at varying levels in all cells, but some had separate subpopulations with increased CD44 and decreased CD24, e.g., 184CeMY and 240Lp16sMY. Interestingly, the 184FMY2 cell line with AIG exhibited a very prominent CD44hi/CD24low population and evidence of EMT (Vrba, Garbe, Stampfer, Futscher unpublished), but no tumor-forming ability when injected subcutaneously in immune-compromised mice (data not shown). In general, these immortalized lines derived from young reduction mammoplasty specimens displayed basal-like phenotypes compared to the heterogeneous composition of their normal pre-stasis populations.
Immortalization of normal cultured HMEC using agents associated with breast cancer pathogenesis in vivo has been difficult to achieve. We report here that reproducible non-clonal immortalization was attained by targeting two tumor suppressive senescence barriers, stasis and replicative senescence, and that resultant immortalized lines exhibit normal karyotypes at early passage. Our prior studies have indicated that stasis is enforced in cultured HMEC by elevated p16 levels maintaining RB in an active state. Unlike some other human epithelial cell types, e.g., keratinocytes 32, p53-dependent p21 is not upregulated in cultured HMEC at stasis 10, 12, 13; consequently, transduction of shRNA to p16 can be sufficient to bypass stasis. Overcoming the telomere dysfunction barrier at replicative senescence requires, at minimum, sufficient levels of telomerase activity to maintain stable telomere lengths. Transduction of c-MYC could induce telomerase activity and immortalization in some, but not all types of p16(−) post-stasis HMEC. These results demonstrate that bypassing these two barriers is sufficient to transform normal finite HMEC to immortality; genomic instability and gross genomic errors are not required. The data also validate our model of the functionally and molecularly distinct tumor suppressive senescence barriers encountered by cultured HMEC: stasis, a stress-associated arrest independent of telomere length and extent of replication, and replicative senescence due to ongoing replication in the absence of sufficient telomerase producing critically short telomeres and telomere dysfunction 6, 10
Expression of sufficient telomerase activity is crucial for human carcinoma progression. Almost all human breast cancer cell lines and tissues have detectable telomerase 33, 34; the ALT method for telomere maintenance is very rare 35. The presence of short telomeres and genomic instability in most DCIS, as well as in pre-malignant lesions from other human organ systems, indicates that these lesions did not develop from cells expressing sufficient telomerase for telomere maintenance 4, 5, 36, 37. While malignancy requires immortality to support ongoing tumor cell proliferation, telomerase can also provide significant additional malignancy-promoting properties 38. Telomerase reactivation has been associated with gaining resistance to OIS 11, 15 39, and expression of hTERT can confer resistance to TGF-β growth inhibition 22 and affect other signaling pathways 38, 40. Given the importance of telomerase and immortalization for human carcinogenesis, it is surprising that so little is known about the regulation of hTERT as normal cells transform to cancer. The lack of appropriate experimentally tractable model systems has contributed to this knowledge gap. Unlike humans, small short-lived animals such as mice do not exert stringent repression of telomerase activity in adult cells, which can spontaneously immortalize in culture 2, 3. Comparison of the human and mouse TERT gene shows significant differences in regulatory regions 41. The importance of telomerase in murine carcinogenesis has been demonstrated using animals engineered to lack telomerase activity 42, however such models do not address the mechanisms that allow endogenous hTERT to become reactivated during human carcinogenesis. There has also been a lack of human epithelial cell systems that model immortalization as it might occur during in vivo tumorigenesis. The use of ectopic hTERT to achieve immortalization precludes study of the factors that regulate endogenous hTERT in vivo, while viral oncogenes such as HPVE6E7 or SV40T are not etiologic agents for most human carcinomas, including breast, and have many characterized and uncharacterized effects.
We have employed reduction mammoplasty-derived primary HMEC grown under different culture conditions and exposed to a number of oncogenic agents, to generate cell types that may represent the different stages and heterogeneity of in vivo malignant progression. 6-9, 11. Prior studies revealed divergence in transformation pathways at the earliest stage, becoming post-stasis. Post-selection post-stasis HMEC exhibited ˜200 DMR, most of which are also found in breast cancer cells, compared to ˜10 in BaP and ˜5 in p16sh post-stasis HMEC 18. Of note, it has been suggested that post-selection post-stasis HMEC (also referred to as vHMEC 43, and sold commercially as “normal” primary HMEC (Lonza CC-2551; Life Technologies A10565)) may be on a pathway to metaplastic cancer 44. Here we show an additional difference among post-stasis types: the inability of post-stasis post-selection HMEC to become immortalized by transduced c-MYC. While the molecular processes underlying this difference remain unknown, we note an association with prior exposure to culture stress. Post-selection HMEC overcame stasis following growth in medium that rapidly induces p16, whereas p16sh post-stasis HMEC bypassed stasis prior to p16 induction. The distinct properties of the post-selection HMEC may result from their prior experience of p16-inducing stresses. Current studies are addressing the hypothesis that mechanical stressors may influence telomerase expression. Functionally, our results suggest that neither post-selection HMEC, nor pre-stasis HMEC cultured in MCDB170-type media, would be suitable substrates for the immortalization protocol presented here.
The molecular phenotype of cancer cells likely varies depending upon initial target cell as well as the specific errors that promote transformation. Progenitor cell types have been suggested to be the initial target in some situations 45-47. Our M87A/85 media support proliferation of pre-stasis HMEC with progenitor lineage markers, and allow robust proliferation prior to p16 upregulation 10, 48. Such lower stress/p16-inducing conditions may be reflective of early stage carcinogenesis in vivo, if unstressed progenitor cells are initial targets.
Our results support the hypothesis that genomic errors are needed to overcome tumor suppressive barriers, but instability and aneuploidy per se may not be required for transformation 6, 10. While all our clonally derived lines exhibit multiple genomic alterations 1, 8, 9, non-clonal lines without gross genomic errors could be generated by directly targeting the two main barriers to immortality, stasis and replicative senescence. Most human carcinomas contain many genomic changes, however, only a small number of these are estimated to play a driving role in carcinogenesis 49. Several hypotheses have addressed the causes of genomic instability and aneuploidy in carcinomas, including mutator phenotype 50, DNA damage 51, and altered genomic copy number models 52, 53. We, and others, have proposed that the inherent genomic instability during telomere dysfunction at replicative senescence may be responsible for initiating most of the genomic errors seen in primary breast cancers 4, 6, 10, 54, 55. This instability will render most cells non-proliferative or dead, but rare cells that generate errors allowing telomerase reactivation may immortalize, carrying with them all the other errors accumulated to that point. Consequently, genomic instability in pre-malignant cells may be the source of many of the “passenger” mutations present in carcinomas, as well as of “driver” mutations that influence prognosis. If bridge-fusion-breakage cycles have begun, immortalized cells will maintain some ongoing instability 9. This hypothesis is consistent with DCIS cells possessing short telomeres, genomic instability, and many breast cancer-associated properties, including specific genomic errors and aggressiveness 56-59, as well as detection of telomerase activity in some DCIS tissues. Further, our results suggest that once a cell acquires the errors that allow stasis bypass, and then maintains proliferation to telomere dysfunction, no external agents may be needed to support rare progression to immortality. Although gross genomic changes were not required for immortalization of post-stasis HMEC by transduced c-MYC, epigenetic changes might be needed: changes have been observed associated with immortalization, even in non-clonally immortalized lines with no gross karyotypic abnormalities (18 and unpublished). Our genomically normal non-clonal immortalized lines lack malignancy-associated properties; however, we and others have seen that these OIS-resistant populations can be readily further transformed to AIG and/or tumorigenicity by transduction of individual oncogenes 1, 11, 60. Genomic analysis of non-clonal lines malignantly transformed at early passage will be needed to determine whether a malignant phenotype can be achieved without gross genomic errors.
Our DNA methylation and histone modification analysis of the TERT locus provides an overview of the hTERT epigenetic state in normal to malignant cells, with varying expression of telomerase activity, from one organ system. We did not find any changes in DNA methylation or histone modification state that could explain the distinct responses to transduced c-MYC by post-selection post-stasis HMEC compared to the BaP and p16sh post-stasis types. Overall, we did not find a correlation between DNA methylation or histone modification and TRAP activity in all the HMEC examined. Specifically, the CpG-rich region that immediately surrounds the TERT TSS is DNA unmethylated in pre-stasis, post-stasis, and TRAP(+) immortal HMEC cultures. These results using isogenic HMEC indicate that the lack of DNA methylation in this region may be permissive for, but is not by itself indicative of telomerase activity 61. This DNA methylation state is similar to what is seen in TERT-expressing human embryonic stem cells (hESC) or induced pluripotent stem cells (Human methylome page in the Neomorph website for the Salk Institute). Outside of the TERT TSS region, the rest of the TERT promoter is densely DNA methylated in most of the examined HMEC, consistent with previous reports for human cancer cells 61, 62, as is the large CpG island that extends from the promoter to approximately 5kb into the gene itself, similar to hESC and iPSC (Human methylome page in the Neomorph website for the Salk Institute). Our histone modification analysis did not detect the H3K4me3 mark at the TERT promoter/TSS in HMEC with and without telomerase activity. The polycomb-specific H3K27me3 mark was detected both upstream and downstream of the TSS region, but similar to DNA methylation, the H3K27me3 levels decreased near the TSS. These results are in contrast to hESC cells, where the TERT promoter exists in a bivalent state, occupied by both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 (Human methylome page in the Neomorph website for the Salk Institute). Altogether, these analyses highlight some unusual qualities of the hTERT locus, in addition to the absence of any obvious epigenetic regulation correlated with TRAP activity. The absence of permissive H3K4me3 mark and the presence of two distinct repressive epigenetic marks at the HMEC TERT promoter suggests it exists in a repressed or inactive chromatin state, regardless of TRAP activity or finite vs immortal status. This type of redundant chromatin repression may reflect human cells general need, as part of tumor suppression, to limit TERT induction to prevent sustained aberrant overexpression and cell immortalization. Further support of this possibility is the presence of very high DNA methylation levels in the unusually large CpG island at the 5′ end of the hTERT gene, a structure usually associated with transcriptional repression and heterochromatic state. Additionally, since TERT expression is usually very low and dynamic, being predominant during S-phase, at a given moment promoters permissive for transcription may be present only in a small proportion of the cells, making it difficult to detect active chromatin.
The process of telomerase reactivation during human carcinogenesis may present a valuable target for clinical intervention. While breast cancers are known to be heterogeneous, both among and within a given tumor, the requirement for immortalization is common to almost all human carcinomas. Further, unlike the signaling pathways involved in cell growth and survival, there are no commonly used alternative pathways to telomerase reactivation during HMEC immortalization, thus decreasing the possibility for emergence of therapeutic resistance. However, development of potential therapeutics has been limited by the lack of information on the mechanisms underlying human epithelial cell immortalization, and by the absence of a significant immortalization barrier in murine carcinogenesis, precluding usage of murine models for testing pharmacologic interventions in immortalization. The reproducible immortalization of HMEC in the absence of “passenger” errors that is achievable with our system can facilitate further examination of the mechanisms involved in hTERT regulation during carcinogenesis. Better understanding of hTERT regulation may offer new clinical opportunities that involve not just targeting telomerase activity but the reactivation process itself.
Cell Culture.
Finite lifespan HMEC from specimens 184, 240L, and 48R were obtained from reduction mammoplasty tissue of women aged 21, 19, and 16 respectively. Pre-stasis 184 (batch D), 240L (batch B), 48R (batch T) HMEC were grown in M87A supplemented with 0.5 ng/ml cholera toxin (CT), and 0.1 nM oxytocin (X) (Bachem); pre-stasis 184 (batch F) were grown in M85+CT, as described 10. Post-selection post-stasis HMEC 184 (batch B, agonescence at ˜passage (p) 15; batch S, agonescence at ˜22p), and 48R batch S, agonescence at ˜22p, as well as BaP post-stasis 184Aa, 184Be, and 184Ce HMEC (agonescence at ˜16p, 10p, 15p respectively) were grown in serum-free MCDB170 medium (commercially available versions MEGM, Lonza, or M171, Life Technologies) plus supplements 19. Total PD level was calculated as described 10. Anchorage-independent growth (AIG) was assayed as described 9 using 1.5% methylcellulose solution made up in M87A+CT+X. Details on the derivation and culture of these HMEC can be found at HMEC website for LBNL. Research was conducted under LBNL Human Subjects Committee IRB protocols 259H001 and 108H004.
Retroviral Transduction.
The p16 shRNA vector (MSCV) was obtained from Greg Hannon Narita, 63. The p16-containing construct was pLenti-p16-neo vector, plasmid 22260, Addgene. One of the p16 shRNA sequences used is ctgcccaacgcaccgaatagttacggtcgg (SEQ ID NO:3).
Four different c-Myc vectors were used: LXSN for 184B, 184S, 184Aa, 184F; pBabe-hygro (BH2) for 184Be, 184Ce, 184D, 240LB; LNCX2-MYC-ires-GFP for 48RS60; Myc:ER for 184S, 184B 64. The hTERT vector pBabe-hygro-TERT was obtained from Bob Weinberg 65. The c-MYC sequences used are shown in SEQ ID NOS:1 and 2. The construct used was the SPARQ™ Cumate Switch inducible lentivector Cat#QM800A-1 (System Biosciences, Mountain View, Calif.) where the c-Myc inserted at SalI and EcoR1 site.
Retroviral stocks were generated, supernatants collected in MCDB170 medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin or M87A medium, and infections performed as described in Stampfer M R, Garbe J, Nijjar T, Wigington D, Swisshelm K, Yaswen P. Loss of p53 function accelerates acquisition of telomerase activity in indefinite lifespan human mammary epithelial cell lines. Oncogene 2003; 22:5238-51, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
TRAP Assays.
Telomerase activity assays employed the TRAPeze Telomerase detection kit (Millipore) using 0.2 μg of protein extract per reaction. Reaction products were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and visualized using a Storm 860 imaging system (Molecular Dynamics).
DNA Isolation.
Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer protocol and quantified spectrophotometrically.
Comparative Genomic Hybridizations (CGH) and Karyology.
CGH was performed at the Genomics Shared Service of the Arizona Cancer Center using the Agilent human genome CGH microarray with 44,000 probes per array, and analyzed using Bioconductor in an R environment 66. Low passage isogenic pre-stasis HMEC were used as a reference. CGH for the 184F lines was performed as described 5. Karyology was performed as described 67
Epigenetic Analysis of the hTERT Gene.
Methyl cytosine DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), sample labeling and microarray hybridization were performed as described 68. Microarray data were analyzed in R 66 as described 68(GEO Accession number GSE48504). DNA methylation analysis by MassARRAY was performed as described in Novak P, Jensen T J, Garbe J C, Stampfer M R, Futscher B W. Step-wise DNA methylation changes are linked to escape from defined proliferation barriers and mammary epithelial cell immortalization. Cancer research 2009; 67:5251-8, hereby incorporated by reference. Primer sequences are listed in Table 2; oligonucleotides were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies.
Western and ELISA Analysis.
Protein lysates for p16 were collected and processed as described 23 and 50 μg samples were resolved on a 4-12% Novex Bis/Tris gel (Invitrogen). Protein lysates for c-MYC were prepared using cell extraction buffer (Invitrogen cat#FNN0011) with protease inhibitors (Sigma Cat.#P2714). For detection of c-MYC by western blot, 25 μg of extracts were separated on a 4-12% Criterion TGX gel (Biorad). Separated proteins were transferred to Immobilon PVDF membrane (Millipore) and blocked in PBS 0.05% Tween20 with 1% nonfat milk for 1 hour. Binding of mAb Y69 to c-MYC (Abcam) and mAb G175-405 to p16 (BD Biosciences) was detected by chemiluminescence using the VersaDoc MP imaging system and quantified using Quanity-One software (Biorad). The total c-MYC ELISA assay (Invitrogen cat#KH02041) was performed following manufacturer's directions.
Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence.
Immunohistochemical analysis for p16 was performed as described using the JC8 22 or MAB G175-405 antibody (BD Bioscience). Immunofluorescence was performed as described 23 using anti-K14 (1:500, Thermo, polyclonal) and anti-K19 (1:500, Sigma, clone A53-B/A2). Cells were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma) and imaged with an epifluorescence Axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss).
FACS.
Cells were trypsinized and resuspended in ice-cold M87A media. Cells were stained for surface antigens using anti-CD227-FITC (Becton Dickinson, clone HMPV), anti-CD10-PE or -APC (BioLegend, clone HI10a), anti-CD24-Alexa488 (Biolegend, clone ML5), or anti-CD44-PE (BioLegend, clone IM7). Results were obtained on a FACS Calibur (Becton Dickenson) analysis platform as described in Garbe J C, Pepin F, Pelissier F A, Sputova K, Fridriksdottir A J, Guo D E, Villadsen R, Park M, Petersen O W, Borowsky A D, et al. Accumulation of multipotent progenitors with a basal differentiation bias during aging of human mammary epithelia. Cancer research 2012; 72:3687-701, hereby incorporated by reference.
The above examples are provided to illustrate the invention but not to limit its scope. Other variants of the invention will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art and are encompassed by the appended claims. All publications, databases, and patents cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
This application is a non-provisional application of and claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/886,021, filed on Oct. 2, 2013, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Grant Nos. CA24844, AG033176, AG040081, CA23074 and CA65662 awarded by the National Institutes of Health, under Grant No. BCRP 060444 awarded by the Department of Defense, and under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61886021 | Oct 2013 | US |
