Methods for facilitating cipher selection and devices thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11063758
  • Patent Number
    11,063,758
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 6, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 13, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Inventors
    • Amdahl; Saxon (Portola Valley, CA, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Lemma; Samson B
    • Cheema; Ali H.
    Agents
    • Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP (Rochester)
Abstract
Methods, non-transitory computer readable media, and network traffic management apparatuses that obtain one or more custom selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a graphical user interface (GUI). One or more of the custom selection rules are applied to a cipher suite database to generate a result set of cipher suites. The cipher suite database includes a plurality of cipher suite sets. One or more of the custom priority rules are applied to the result set of cipher suites to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites. A cipher string is generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites. The cipher string is stored in a secure socket layer (SSL) profile to be used during negotiation of secure network sessions.
Description
FIELD

This technology generally relates to network security and, more particularly, to facilitating improved cipher selection.


BACKGROUND

Prior to constructing a secure channel with Transport Layer Security (TLS)/Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) (referred to herein as SSL), network devices must exchange and agree upon a number of security parameters in order to provide confidentiality, authentication, and message integrity. Security parameters presented for negotiating secure network sessions are represented in a string referred to as a cipher suite. Ciphers suites can have any number of associated attributes and belong to one or more cipher suite sets (e.g., Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) or Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) cipher suite sets).


As one exemplary device, network traffic management apparatuses can facilitate SSL sessions with and between both client devices and server devices in some implementations. Network traffic management apparatuses also can implement security policies to protect server devices, and, in particular, applications hosted on the server devices, from malicious network traffic. Previously, in order to configure SSL on network traffic management apparatuses, an administrator had to translate security policies (e.g., for the applications hosted on the server devices) into a text-based list of cipher suites, ordered based on priority, which is referred to herein as a cipher string.


However, significant knowledge of cryptography is generally required in order to determine whether selected cipher suites are secure enough to meet security policy requirements, are hardware accelerated, support particular web browsers, or enable specific features (e.g., PFS), for example. Accordingly, generating cipher strings is currently a complex process that is error-prone, and often results in cipher strings that are not aligned with security policies, leading to vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious actors.


SUMMARY

A method for facilitating improved cipher selection implemented by a network traffic management system comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, administrator devices, client devices, or server devices, the method including obtaining one or more custom selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a graphical user interface (GUI). One or more of the custom selection rules are applied to a cipher suite database to generate a result set of cipher suites. The cipher suite database includes a plurality of cipher suite sets. One or more of the custom priority rules are applied to the result set of cipher suites to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites. A cipher string is generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites. The cipher string is stored in a secure socket layer (SSL) profile to be used during negotiation of secure network sessions.


A network traffic management apparatus, comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain one or more custom selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a GUI. One or more of the custom selection rules are applied to a cipher suite database to generate a result set of cipher suites. The cipher suite database includes a plurality of cipher suite sets. One or more of the custom priority rules are applied to the result set of cipher suites to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites. A cipher string is generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites. The cipher string is stored in a SSL profile to be used during negotiation of secure network sessions.


A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for facilitating improved cipher selection comprising executable code which when executed by one or more processors, causes the processors to obtain one or more custom selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a GUI. One or more of the custom selection rules are applied to a cipher suite database to generate a result set of cipher suites. The cipher suite database includes a plurality of cipher suite sets. One or more of the custom priority rules are applied to the result set of cipher suites to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites. A cipher string is generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites. The cipher string is stored in a SSL profile to be used during negotiation of secure network sessions.


A network traffic management system, comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, administrator devices, client devices, or server devices, the network traffic management system comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain one or more custom selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a GUI. One or more of the custom selection rules are applied to a cipher suite database to generate a result set of cipher suites. The cipher suite database includes a plurality of cipher suite sets. One or more of the custom priority rules are applied to the result set of cipher suites to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites. A cipher string is generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites. The cipher string is stored in a SSL profile to be used during negotiation of secure network sessions.


This technology has a number of associated advantages including providing methods, non-transitory computer readable media, network traffic management apparatuses, and network traffic management systems that facilitate more accurate cipher strings, resulting in improved network security. With this technology, custom selection and priority rules are used to more effectively facilitate generation of cipher strings. The custom selection rules advantageously support multiple constraints simultaneously, as well as exclusion of certain sets of cipher suites sharing particular attributes. Accordingly, this technology allows administrators to establish SSL configurations with cipher strings in a more efficient and accurate manner.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary network traffic management system with an network traffic management apparatus;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary network traffic management apparatus;



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for facilitating cipher selection;



FIG. 4 is a set of diagrams illustrating custom selection rules for selecting cipher suites to be included in a cipher string; and



FIG. 5 is an exemplary interface for obtaining custom selection rules and outputting a result set as a cipher string.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an exemplary network environment which incorporates an exemplary network traffic management system 10 is illustrated. The network traffic management system 10 in this example includes a network traffic management apparatus 12 that is coupled to a plurality of server devices 14(1)-14(n), a plurality of client devices 16(1)-16(n), and an administrator device 18 via communication network(s), although the network traffic management apparatus 12, server devices 14(1)-14(n), client devices 16(1)-16(n), and/or administrator device 18 may be coupled together via other topologies. Additionally, the network traffic management system 10 may include other network devices such as one or more routers and/or switches, for example, which are well known in the art and thus will not be described herein. This technology provides a number of advantages including methods, non-transitory computer readable media, network traffic management systems, and network traffic management apparatuses that more efficiently and accurately generate SSL configurations that include cipher strings, and thereby improve network security.


Referring to FIGS. 1-2, the network traffic management apparatus 12 of the network traffic management system 10 may perform any number of functions including managing network traffic, load balancing network traffic across the server devices 14(1)-14(n), accelerating network traffic associated with web applications hosted by the server devices 14(1)-14(n), or providing firewall and other security services on behalf of the server devices 14 (1)-14(n) and applications hosted thereon. The network traffic management apparatus 12 in this example includes one or more processors 22, a memory 24, and/or a communication interface 26, which are coupled together by a bus 28 or other communication link, although the network traffic management apparatus 12 can also include other types and/or numbers of elements in other configurations.


The processor(s) 22 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 may execute programmed instructions stored in the memory 24 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 for the any number of the functions identified above. The processor(s) 22 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 may include one or more CPUs or general purpose processors with one or more processing cores, for example, although other types of processor(s) can also be used.


The memory 24 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 stores these programmed instructions for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated herein, although some or all of the programmed instructions could be stored elsewhere. A variety of different types of memory storage devices, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, solid state drives, flash memory, or other computer readable medium which is read from and written to by a magnetic, optical, or other reading and writing system that is coupled to the processor(s), can be used for the memory 24.


Accordingly, the memory 24 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 can store one or more applications that can include computer executable instructions that, when executed by the network traffic management apparatus 12, cause the network traffic management apparatus 12 to perform actions, such as to transmit, receive, or otherwise process messages, for example, and to perform other actions described and illustrated below with reference to FIGS. 3-5. The application(s) can be implemented as modules or components of other applications. Further, the application(s) can be implemented as operating system extensions, module, plugins, or the like.


Even further, the application(s) may be operative in a cloud-based computing environment. The application(s) can be executed within or as virtual machine(s) or virtual server(s) that may be managed in a cloud-based computing environment. Also, the application(s), and even the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself, may be located in virtual server(s) running in a cloud-based computing environment rather than being tied to one or more specific physical network computing devices. Also, the application(s) may be running in one or more virtual machines (VMs) executing on the network traffic management apparatus 12. Additionally, in one or more embodiments of this technology, virtual machine(s) running on the network traffic management apparatus 12 may be managed or supervised by a hypervisor.


In this particular example, the memory 24 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 includes a cipher selection module 30, a cipher database 32, and SSL profile(s) 34, although the memory 24 can include other policies, modules, databases, or applications, for example. The cipher selection module 30 is configured to generate graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for facilitating the submission of custom selection and priority rules and the generation of cipher strings. The GUIs can be provided to the administrator device 18, for example, and allow an administrator to more effectively generate cipher strings that are aligned with security policies for applications hosted by the server devices 14(1)-14(n).


The cipher database 32 stores a plurality of cipher suites, optionally organized as cipher suite sets. The cipher database 32 further includes attributes associated with each of the cipher suite sets that are shared by the cipher suites that comprise the cipher suite sets, and/or attributes associated with each of the cipher suites separate from those of an associated cipher suite set, for example. The cipher database 32 can also store custom groups of cipher suites that may be generated by the cipher selection module 30, for example. Accordingly, the cipher selection module 30 can use the cipher database 32 to apply custom selection rules in order to identify the cipher suites to include in a cipher string for a configuration, as described and illustrated in more detail later.


The SSL profile(s) 34 store configurations including cipher strings that may be application or operating system specific, for example. The SSL profile(s) 34 are used by the network traffic management apparatus 12 when negotiating secure channels or SSL sessions with other network devices, such as one of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) or server devices 14(1)-14(n), for example. Accordingly, the cipher selection module 30 can output a cipher string that is stored in one of the SSL profile(s) 34 associated with an application hosted by one of the server devices 14(1)-14(n), for example, and used to facilitate communication with the application via SSL sessions.


In another example, one or more of the SSL profile(s) 34 can reference a set of rules that, when executed, can establish the configuration of cipher suites to be implemented. In this example, the rules facilitate more efficient on-going management based on rule and/or cipher database 32 updates as compared to one or more of the SSL profile(s) 34 that merely include the output from a single execution of rules (e.g., an ordered result set of cipher suites).


The communication interface 26 of the network traffic management apparatus 12 operatively couples and communicates between the network traffic management apparatus 12, the server devices 14(1)-14(n), the client devices 16(1)-16(n), and/or the administrator device 18, which are all coupled together by the communication network(s) 20, although other types and/or numbers of communication networks or systems with other types and/or numbers of connections and/or configurations to other devices and/or elements can also be used.


By way of example only, the communication network(s) 20 can include local area network(s) (LAN(s)) or wide area network(s) (WAN(s)), and can use TCP/IP over Ethernet and industry-standard protocols, although other types and/or numbers of protocols and/or communication networks can be used. The communication network(s) 20 in this example can employ any suitable interface mechanisms and network communication technologies including, for example, teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice, modem, and the like), Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Ethernet-based Packet Data Networks (PDNs), combinations thereof, and the like. The communication network(s) 20 can also include direct connection(s) (e.g., for when a device illustrated in FIG. 1, such as the network traffic management apparatus 12, one or more of the client devices 16(1)-16(n), one or more of the server devices 14(1)-14(n), or the administrator device 18 operate as virtual instances on the same physical machine).


While the network traffic management apparatus 12 is illustrated in this example as including a single device, the network traffic management apparatus 12 in other examples can include a plurality of devices or blades each having one or more processors (each processor with one or more processing cores) that implement one or more steps of this technology. In these examples, one or more of the devices can have a dedicated communication interface or memory. Alternatively, one or more of the devices can utilize the memory, communication interface, or other hardware or software components of one or more other devices included in the network traffic management apparatus 12.


Additionally, one or more of the devices that together comprise the network traffic management apparatus 12 in other examples can be standalone devices or integrated with one or more other devices or apparatuses, such as one of the server devices 14(1)-14(n), for example. Moreover, one or more of the devices of the network traffic management apparatus 12 in these examples can be in a same or a different communication network including one or more public, private, or cloud networks, for example.


Each of the server devices 14(1)-14(n) of the network traffic management system 10 in this example includes one or more processors, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and/or types of network devices could be used. The server devices 14(1)-14(n) in this example process requests received from the client devices 16(1)-16(n) via the communication network(s) 20 according to the HTTP-based application RFC protocol, for example. Various applications may be operating on the server devices 14(1)-14(n) and transmitting data (e.g., files or Web pages) to the client devices 16(1)-16(n) via the network traffic management apparatus 12 in response to requests from the client devices 16(1)-16(n). The server devices 14(1)-14(n) may be hardware or software or may represent a system with multiple servers in a pool, which may include internal or external networks.


Although the server devices 14(1)-14(n) are illustrated as single devices, one or more actions of each of the server devices 14(1)-14(n) may be distributed across one or more distinct network computing devices that together comprise one or more of the server devices 14(1)-14(n). Moreover, the server devices 14(1)-14(n) are not limited to a particular configuration. Thus, the server devices 14(1)-14(n) may contain a plurality of network computing devices that operate using a master/slave approach, whereby one of the network computing devices of the server devices 14(1)-14(n) operate to manage and/or otherwise coordinate operations of the other network computing devices. The server devices 14(1)-14(n) may operate as a plurality of network computing devices within a cluster architecture, a peer-to peer architecture, virtual machines, or within a cloud architecture, for example.


Thus, the technology disclosed herein is not to be construed as being limited to a single environment and other configurations and architectures are also envisaged. For example, one or more of the server devices 14(1)-14(n) can operate within the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself rather than as a stand-alone server device communicating with the network traffic management apparatus 12 via the communication network(s) 20. In this example, the one or more server devices 14(1)-14(n) operate within the memory 24 of the network traffic management apparatus 12.


The client devices 16(1)-16(n) of the network traffic management system 10 in this example include any type of computing device that can request and receive content stored by the server devices 14(1)-14(n) over the communication network(s) 20 using SSL, such as mobile computing devices, desktop computing devices, laptop computing devices, tablet computing devices, virtual machines (including cloud-based computers), or the like. Each of the client devices 16(1)-16(n) in this example include a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and/or types of network devices could be used.


The client devices 16(1)-16(n) may run interface applications, such as standard web browsers or standalone client applications, which may provide an interface to make requests for, and receive content stored on, one or more of the server devices 14(1)-14(n) via the communication network(s) 10. The client devices 16(1)-16(n) may further include a display device, such as a display screen or touchscreen, and/or an input device, such as a keyboard for example.


The administrator device 18 in this example includes a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other numbers and types of network devices could be used. The administrator device 18 may also include an input device and a display device and may run interface applications, such as a web browser, that may provide an interface for an administrator to manipulate GUIs provided by the cipher selection module 30 of the network traffic management apparatus 12, for example, as described and illustrated in more detail later.


Although the exemplary network traffic management system 10 with the network traffic management apparatus 12, server devices 14(1)-14(n), client devices 16(1)-16(n), administrator device 18, and communication network(s) 20 are described and illustrated herein, other types and/or numbers of systems, devices, components, and/or elements in other topologies can be used. It is to be understood that the systems of the examples described herein are for exemplary purposes, as many variations of the specific hardware and software used to implement the examples are possible, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant art(s).


One or more of the components depicted in the network traffic management system 10, such as the network traffic management apparatus 12, server devices 14(1)-14(n), client devices 16(1)-16(n), or administrator device 18, for example, may be configured to operate as virtual instances on the same physical machine. In other words, one or more of the network traffic management apparatus 12, server devices 14(1)-14(n), client devices 16(1)-16(n), or administrator device 18 may operate on the same physical device rather than as separate devices communicating through communication network(s). Additionally, there may be more or fewer network traffic management apparatus, client devices, server devices, or administrator devices than illustrated in FIG. 1. The client devices 16(1)-16(n) could also be implemented as applications on the network traffic management apparatus 12 itself as a further example.


In addition, two or more computing systems or devices can be substituted for any one of the systems or devices in any example. Accordingly, principles and advantages of distributed processing, such as redundancy and replication also can be implemented, as desired, to increase the robustness and performance of the devices and systems of the examples. The examples may also be implemented on computer system(s) that extend across any suitable network using any suitable interface mechanisms and traffic technologies, including by way of example only teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice and modem), wireless traffic networks, cellular traffic networks, Packet Data Networks (PDNs), the Internet, intranets, and combinations thereof.


The examples may also be embodied as one or more non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated by way of the examples herein. The instructions in some examples include executable code that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the processors to carry out steps necessary to implement the methods of the examples of this technology that are described and illustrated herein.


An exemplary method of facilitating cipher selection will now be described with reference to FIGS. 1-5. Referring more specifically to FIG. 3, in step 300 in this example, the network traffic management apparatus 12 of the network traffic management system 10 obtains cipher suites and associated attributes and populates the cipher database 32 with sets of the cipher suites. The cipher suites and attributes can be obtained over the communication network(s) 10, from an administrator, and/or from a manufacturer as part of a default cipher database, for example. Each of the cipher suites is a string identifying authentication, encryption, message authentication code (MAC) and/or key exchange algorithm(s) used to negotiate security settings for a network connection using SSL.


The attributes can include compatible browsers, FIPS compliance, FPS compliance, hardware acceleration support, an indication of strength or performance, and/or other compatibility information, for example, although other types and numbers of attributes can also be obtained in step 300. Optionally, a plurality of the cipher suites can be part of a default cipher suite set that is associated with a set of one or more attributes (e.g., FIPS compliance) that is shared by each of the plurality of cipher suites in the cipher suite set. Accordingly, the cipher database 32 includes a plurality of cipher suite sets and associated attributes for each of the cipher suite sets and/or one or more cipher suites within one or more of the cipher suite sets.


In step 302, the network traffic management apparatus 12 optionally determines whether creation of a new custom group or updating of a current custom group has been initiated. In one example, the network traffic management apparatus 12 can provide a GUI to the administrator device 18 that facilitates creation and updating of a custom group of cipher suites. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that creation of a new custom group or updating of a current custom group has been initiated, then the Yes branch is taken to step 304.


In step 304, the network traffic management apparatus 12 obtains via the GUI an indication of a plurality of cipher suites to be included in a new custom group or one or more cipher suites to be added to a current custom group. In one example, a list of cipher suites can be provided via the GUI and based on the contents of the cipher database 32, and a user of the administrator device 18 can select cipher suites from the list for inclusion in a new or current custom group. Upon submission of the new or updated custom group by a user of the administrator device 18, the network traffic management apparatus 12 stores the new or updated custom group comprising the selected cipher suites in the cipher database 32 as a cipher suite set.


Subsequent to storing the new or updated custom group in the cipher database 32, or if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that creation of a new custom group or updating of a current custom group has not been initiated and the No branch is taken from step 302, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proceeds to step 306. In step 306, the network traffic management apparatus 12 obtains and applies custom selection rule(s) to the cipher database 32 to generate a result set of cipher suites.


In this example, the custom selection rules include set operation(s) such as addition, subtraction, and intersection, as well as an indication of one or more of the cipher suites, cipher suite sets, and/or attributes in the cipher database 32. Accordingly, the rules can allow, restrict, and/or exclude cipher suites, based on their inclusion in particular cipher suite sets and/or their associated attributers in the cipher database 32, in order to generate a result set. Optionally, the custom selection rules can be based on a security policy for an application hosted by one of the server devices 14(1)-14(n).


Referring more specifically to FIG. 4, diagrams 400, 402, and 404 are shown illustrating custom selection rules for selecting cipher suites to be included in a cipher string. In this example, two cipher suite sets are stored in the cipher database 32 including a cipher suite set with cipher suites supporting the Chrome v40 web browser and a cipher suite set with cipher suites that are compatible with FIPS.


Accordingly, in a first diagram 400, application of an allow or addition rule will generate a result set with all of the cipher suites in both cipher suite sets. In a second diagram 402, application of an intersection or restriction rule will generate a result set with only those cipher suites that are in both cipher suite sets. In a third diagram 404, application of a subtraction or exclude rule will generate a result set with all of the cipher suites in the FIPS cipher suite set except those cipher suites that are also in the Chrome v40 cipher suite set. In other examples, the selection rules can be applied to particular attributes instead of cipher suite sets, and other types and number of custom selection rules can also be used in other examples.


Referring back to FIG. 3, in step 308, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines when a failure has occurred in the application of the custom selection rules has occurred. In this example, the custom selection rules are applied in an order. Therefore, the network traffic management apparatus 12 can determine the point during the application of the custom selection rules in which the result set becomes null, and the associated one of the custom selection rules that, when applied, resulted in the null set of cipher suites.


If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a failure has occurred in the application of the custom selection rules, then the No branch is taken to step 310. In step 310, the network traffic management apparatus 12 optionally outputs an indication of the one of the custom selection rules that resulted in the failure. The indication can be output to the administrator device 18 via the GUI, for example, although other types of outputs and notification methods can also be used. Subsequent to outputting the indication, the network traffic management apparatus 12 proceeds back to step 306 and again obtains and applies custom selection rules from the administrator in order to address the failure.


Referring back to step 308, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that a failure has not occurred, then the No branch is taken to step 312. In step 312, the network traffic management apparatus 12 obtains and applies custom priority rules to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites. The ordering of cipher suites in the result set, and generated cipher string, reflects a preference that is expressed during a negotiation of an SSL connection.


The custom priority rules can be obtained via a GUI provided to the administrator device 18, for example, and can include a recitation of cipher suite sets or attributes and their relative priorities. In one example, a custom priority rule might indicate that support for hardware acceleration is prioritized over FIPS compliance, which is prioritized over PFS compliance, for example. In this example, the network traffic management apparatus 12 applies the custom priority rules to the result set of cipher suites generated in step 306 based on the association in the cipher database 32 of the cipher suites of the result set with cipher suite sets or attributes identified in the custom priority rules. Other types and numbers of custom priority rules, and other methods for applying the custom priority rules, can also be used in other examples.


In step 314, the network traffic management apparatus 12 generates a cipher string based on the ordered result set generated in step 312. Accordingly, the cipher string is a text-based string that identifies cipher suite(s) resulting from the application of the custom selection and priority rules obtained and applied in steps 306 and 312, respectively.


In step 316, the network traffic management apparatus 12 outputs and/or stores the cipher string generated in step 314 in one of the SSL profiles. The cipher string can be output via a GUI provided to the administrator device 18, for example, which facilitates visibility, backward compatibility, and copy-paste functionality with respect to the cipher string. By storing the cipher string in one of the SSL profiles, the cipher string will be utilized when negotiating SSL connections on behalf of an associated application hosted by one of the server devices 14(1)-14(n).


Referring more specifically to FIG. 5, an exemplary interface 500 for obtaining custom selection rules and outputting a result set as a cipher string is shown. In this example, there are four custom groups or cipher suite sets 502, 504, 506, and 508, which can be expanded to show the cipher suites that are included in those sets. Three boxes 510, 512, and 514 facilitate allow, restrict, and exclude custom selection rules, respectively. Accordingly, cipher suite sets or individual cipher suites can be moved to one of the boxes 510, 512, and 514 associated with one of the rules, initiating an application of one or more custom priority rules and an output or update to the cipher string in a bottom panel 516. Other types of interfaces or GUIs for facilitating cipher selection according to this technology can also be used in other examples.


Referring back to FIG. 3, in step 318, the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines whether creation of a new SSL configuration or cipher string has been requested. If the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines that the creation of a new SSL configuration has not been initiated, such as for another application hosted by one of the server devices 14(1)-14(n), then the No branch is taken back to step 318 and the network traffic management apparatus 12 effectively waits for the initiation of a new SSL configurations. However, if the network traffic management apparatus 12 determines in step 318 that creation of a new SSL configuration has been initiated, then the Yes branch is taken back to step 302 in this example.


With this technology, custom selection and priority rules more effectively facilitate generation of cipher strings. In particular, the custom selection rules support multiple constraints simultaneously, as well as exclusion of certain sets of cipher suites sharing particular attributes. Accordingly, this technology allows administrators to establish SSL configurations with cipher strings in a more efficient manner with fewer errors, resulting in increased network security.


Having thus described the basic concept of the invention, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.

Claims
  • 1. A computer implemented method, executed by one or more hardware processors, for facilitating cipher selection implemented by a network traffic management system comprising one or more network traffic management apparatuses, client devices, or server devices, the method comprising: obtaining a plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a graphical user interface (GUI), the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including an intersection rule that generates an output set of cipher suites that are common to both a first cipher suite set and a second cipher suite set, wherein the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set are identified by using the GUI to move representations of the first and second cipher suite sets to an area associated with the intersection rule, wherein the first cipher suite set is a cipher suite set supported by a network browser, and the second cipher suite set is a standardized cipher suite set;applying, prior to negotiating a secure network session, the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules to a cipher suite database, comprising a plurality of cipher suite sets including the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set, to generate a result set of cipher suites, and one or more of the custom priority rules to the result set of cipher suites, to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites, wherein the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including performing the intersection of the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set; andstoring a cipher string, generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites, in a secure socket layer (SSL) profile used in the negotiation of the secure network session.
  • 2. The computer implemented method of claim 1, further comprising obtaining via the GUI a selection of each of a plurality of cipher suites and storing a custom cipher suite set comprising the selected cipher suites in the cipher suite database as a selectable one of the plurality of cipher suite sets.
  • 3. The computer implemented method of claim 2, further comprising: obtaining via the GUI another cipher suite to be added to the custom cipher suite set;storing the another cipher suite in the cipher suite database in the one of the plurality of cipher suite sets; andrepeating the application of the plurality of the custom cipher suite set selection rules and the one or more of the custom priority rules and the storing the cipher string.
  • 4. The computer implemented method of claim 1, further comprising: determining when a failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules resulting in a null result set of cipher suites, wherein the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules are applied in an order; andoutputting an indication of at least one of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules that resulted in the failure, when the determination indicates that the failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the standardized cipher suite set conforms to a Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) cipher suite set.
  • 6. A network traffic management apparatus, comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to: obtain a plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a graphical user interface (GUI), the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including an intersection rule that generates an output set of cipher suites that are common to both a first cipher suite set and a second cipher suite set, wherein the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set are identified by using the GUI to move representations of the first and second cipher suite sets to an area associated with the intersection rule, wherein the first cipher suite set is a cipher suite set supported by a network browser, and the second cipher suite set is a standardized cipher suite set;apply, prior to negotiating a secure network session, the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules to a cipher suite database, comprising a plurality of cipher suite sets including the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set, to generate a result set of cipher suites, and one or more of the custom priority rules to the result set of cipher suites, to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites, wherein the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including performing the intersection of the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set; andstore a cipher string, generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites, in a secure socket layer (SSL) profile used in the negotiation of the secure network session.
  • 7. The network traffic management apparatus of claim 6, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain via the GUI a selection of each of a plurality of cipher suites and store a custom cipher suite set comprising the selected cipher suites in the cipher suite database as a selectable one of the plurality of cipher suite sets.
  • 8. The network traffic management apparatus of claim 7, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to: obtain via the GUI another cipher suite to be added to the custom cipher suite set;store the another cipher suite in the cipher suite database in the one of the plurality of cipher suite sets; andrepeat the application of the plurality-of the custom cipher suite set selection rules and the one or more of the custom priority rules and the storing the cipher string.
  • 9. The network traffic management apparatus of claim 6, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to: determine when a failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules resulting in a null result set of cipher suites, wherein the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules are applied in an order; andoutput an indication of at least one of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules that resulted in the failure, when the determination indicates that the failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules.
  • 10. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for facilitating cipher selection comprising executable code that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to: obtain a plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a graphical user interface (GUI), the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including an intersection rule that generates an output set of cipher suites that are common to both a first cipher suite set and a second cipher suite set, wherein the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set are identified by using the GUI to move representations of the first and second cipher suite sets to an area associated with the intersection rule, wherein the first cipher suite set is a cipher suite set supported by a network browser, and the second cipher suite set is a standardized cipher suite set;apply, prior to negotiating, a secure network session, the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules to a cipher suite database, comprising a plurality of cipher suite sets including the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set, to generate a result set of cipher suites, and one or more of the custom priority rules to the result set of cipher suites, to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites, wherein the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including performing the intersection of the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set; andstore a cipher string, generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites, in a secure socket layer (SSL) profile used in the negotiation of the secure network session.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the executable code when executed by the one or more processors further causes the one or more processors to obtain via the GUI a selection of each of a plurality of cipher suites and store a custom cipher suite set comprising the selected cipher suites in the cipher suite database as a selectable one of the plurality of cipher suite sets.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein the executable code when executed by the one or more processors further causes the one or more processors to: obtain via the GUI another cipher suite to be added to the custom cipher suite set; store the another cipher suite in the cipher suite database in the one of the plurality of cipher suite sets; and repeat the application of the plurality-of the custom cipher suite set selection rules and the one or more of the custom priority rules and the storing the cipher string.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the executable code when executed by the one or more processors further causes the one or more processors to: determine when a failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules resulting in a null result set of cipher suites, wherein the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules are applied in an order; andoutput an indication of at least one of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules that resulted in the failure, when the determination indicates that the failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules.
  • 14. A network traffic management system, comprising one or more traffic management apparatuses, client devices, or server devices, the network traffic management system comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to: obtain a plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules and one or more custom priority rules via a graphical user interface (GUI), the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including an intersection rule that generates an output set of cipher suites that are common to both a first cipher suite set and a second cipher suite set, wherein the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set are identified by using the GUI to move representations of the first and second cipher suite sets to an area associated with the intersection rule, wherein the first cipher suite set is a cipher suite set supported by a network browser, and the second cipher suite set is a standardized cipher suite set;apply, prior to negotiating a secure network session, the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules to a cipher suite database, comprising a plurality of cipher suite sets including the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set, to generate a result set of cipher suites, and one or more of the custom priority rules to the result set of cipher suites, to generate an ordered result set of cipher suites, wherein the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules including performing the intersection of the first cipher suite set and the second cipher suite set; andstore a cipher string, generated based on the ordered result set of cipher suites, in a secure socket layer (SSL) profile used in the negotiation of the secure network session.
  • 15. The network traffic management system of claim 14, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to obtain via the GUI a plurality of cipher suites and storing a custom cipher suite set comprising the plurality of cipher suites in the cipher suite database as one of the plurality of cipher suite sets.
  • 16. The network traffic management system of claim 15, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to: obtain via the GUI another cipher suite to be added to the custom cipher suite set;store the another cipher suite in the cipher suite database in the one of the plurality of cipher suite sets; andrepeat the application of the plurality-of the custom cipher suite set selection rules and the one or more of the custom priority rules and the storing the cipher string.
  • 17. The network traffic management system of claim 14, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to: determine when a failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules resulting in a null result set of cipher suites, wherein the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules are applied in an order; andoutput an indication of at least one of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules that resulted in the failure, when the determination indicates that the failure has occurred in the application of the plurality of custom cipher suite set selection rules.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/415,607 filed Nov. 1, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (732)
Number Name Date Kind
3950735 Patel Apr 1976 A
4644532 George et al. Feb 1987 A
4897781 Chang et al. Jan 1990 A
4965772 Daniel et al. Oct 1990 A
5023826 Patel Jun 1991 A
5053953 Patel Oct 1991 A
5167024 Smith et al. Nov 1992 A
5282201 Frank et al. Jan 1994 A
5299312 Rocco, Jr. Mar 1994 A
5327529 Fults et al. Jul 1994 A
5367635 Bauer et al. Nov 1994 A
5371852 Attanasio et al. Dec 1994 A
5406502 Haramaty et al. Apr 1995 A
5475857 Dally Dec 1995 A
5517617 Sathaye et al. May 1996 A
5519694 Brewer et al. May 1996 A
5519778 Leighton et al. May 1996 A
5521591 Arora et al. May 1996 A
5528701 Aref Jun 1996 A
5550816 Hardwick et al. Aug 1996 A
5581764 Fitzgerald et al. Dec 1996 A
5596742 Agarwal et al. Jan 1997 A
5606665 Yang et al. Feb 1997 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5623490 Richter et al. Apr 1997 A
5663018 Cummings et al. Sep 1997 A
5752023 Choucri et al. May 1998 A
5761484 Agarwal et al. Jun 1998 A
5768423 Aref et al. Jun 1998 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5790554 Pitcher et al. Aug 1998 A
5802052 Venkataraman Sep 1998 A
5812550 Sohn et al. Sep 1998 A
5825772 Dobbins et al. Oct 1998 A
5832283 Chou et al. Nov 1998 A
5858009 Jonkman Jan 1999 A
5875296 Shi et al. Feb 1999 A
5892914 Pitts Apr 1999 A
5892932 Kim Apr 1999 A
5919247 Van Hoff et al. Jul 1999 A
5936939 Des Jardins et al. Aug 1999 A
5941988 Bhagwat et al. Aug 1999 A
5946690 Pitts Aug 1999 A
5949885 Leighton Sep 1999 A
5951694 Choquier et al. Sep 1999 A
5959990 Frantz et al. Sep 1999 A
5974460 Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. Oct 1999 A
5983281 Ogle et al. Nov 1999 A
5988847 McLaughlin et al. Nov 1999 A
5991302 Berl et al. Nov 1999 A
5995491 Richter et al. Nov 1999 A
6006260 Barrick, Jr. et al. Dec 1999 A
6006264 Colby et al. Dec 1999 A
6026452 Pitts Feb 2000 A
6026500 Topff et al. Feb 2000 A
6028857 Poor Feb 2000 A
6029175 Chow et al. Feb 2000 A
6041365 Kleinerman Mar 2000 A
6047356 Anderson et al. Apr 2000 A
6051169 Brown et al. Apr 2000 A
6067558 Wendt et al. May 2000 A
6078956 Bryant et al. Jun 2000 A
6085234 Pitts et al. Jul 2000 A
6092196 Reiche Jul 2000 A
6104706 Richter et al. Aug 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6111876 Frantz et al. Aug 2000 A
6128279 O'Neil et al. Oct 2000 A
6128657 Okanoya et al. Oct 2000 A
6154777 Ebrahim Nov 2000 A
6157950 Krishnan Dec 2000 A
6160874 Dickerman et al. Dec 2000 A
6170022 Linville et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178423 Douceur et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182139 Brendel Jan 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6233612 Fruchtman et al. May 2001 B1
6246684 Chapman et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253226 Chidambaran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253230 Couland et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259405 Stewart et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260070 Shah Jul 2001 B1
6263368 Martin Jul 2001 B1
6289012 Harrington et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292832 Shah et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298380 Coile et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304913 Rune Oct 2001 B1
6327622 Jindal et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330574 Murashita Dec 2001 B1
6338082 Schneider Jan 2002 B1
6343324 Hubis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347339 Morris et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353848 Morris Mar 2002 B1
6360270 Cherkasova et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363056 Beigi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370527 Singhal Apr 2002 B1
6374300 Masters Apr 2002 B2
6389462 Cohen et al. May 2002 B1
6389534 Elgamal May 2002 B1
6396833 Zhang et al. May 2002 B1
6430562 Kardos et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434081 Johnson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446108 Rosenberg et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466580 Leung Oct 2002 B1
6469983 Narayana et al. Oct 2002 B2
6480476 Willars Nov 2002 B1
6484261 Wiegel Nov 2002 B1
6490624 Sampson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6510135 Almulhem et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510458 Berstis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6513061 Ebata et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514085 Slattery et al. Feb 2003 B2
6519643 Foulkes et al. Feb 2003 B1
6542936 Mayle et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560230 Li et al. May 2003 B1
6578069 Hopmann et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601084 Bhaskaran et al. Jul 2003 B1
6615267 Whalen et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631422 Althaus et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636503 Shiran et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636894 Short et al. Oct 2003 B1
6650640 Muller et al. Nov 2003 B1
6650641 Albert et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654346 Mahalingaiah et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654701 Hatley Nov 2003 B2
6683873 Kwok et al. Jan 2004 B1
6691165 Bruck et al. Feb 2004 B1
6694517 James et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701415 Hendren, III Mar 2004 B1
6708187 Shanumgam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6708220 Olin Mar 2004 B1
6711264 Matsumoto Mar 2004 B1
6711677 Wiegley Mar 2004 B1
6718380 Mohaban et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728704 Mao et al. Apr 2004 B2
6738357 Richter et al. May 2004 B1
6742045 Albert et al. May 2004 B1
6744776 Kalkunte et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751663 Farrell et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754215 Arikawa et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754228 Ludwig Jun 2004 B1
6754699 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760337 Snyder, II et al. Jul 2004 B1
6760775 Anerousis et al. Jul 2004 B1
6772219 Shobatake Aug 2004 B1
6779039 Bommareddy et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781986 Sabaa et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795860 Shah Sep 2004 B1
6798777 Ferguson et al. Sep 2004 B1
6816901 Sitaraman et al. Nov 2004 B1
6816977 Brakmo et al. Nov 2004 B2
6804542 Haartsen Dec 2004 B1
6829238 Tokuyo et al. Dec 2004 B2
6862282 Oden Mar 2005 B1
6865593 Reshef et al. Mar 2005 B1
6868082 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 B1
6868447 Slaughter et al. Mar 2005 B1
6871221 Styles Mar 2005 B1
6876629 Beshai et al. Apr 2005 B2
6876654 Hegde Apr 2005 B1
6880017 Marce et al. Apr 2005 B1
6883137 Girardot et al. Apr 2005 B1
6886102 Lyle Apr 2005 B1
6888836 Cherkasova May 2005 B1
6895504 Zhang May 2005 B1
6904040 Salapura et al. Jun 2005 B2
6914881 Mansfield et al. Jul 2005 B1
6928082 Liu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6929518 Talagala Aug 2005 B1
6947985 Hegli et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950434 Viswanath et al. Sep 2005 B1
6954780 Susai et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957272 Tallegas et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959394 Brickell et al. Oct 2005 B1
6970475 Fraser et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970924 Chu et al. Nov 2005 B1
6971028 Lyle Nov 2005 B1
6973490 Robertson et al. Dec 2005 B1
6975592 Seddigh et al. Dec 2005 B1
6987763 Rochberger et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990074 Wan et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990114 Erimli et al. Jan 2006 B1
7003564 Greuel et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006502 Lin Feb 2006 B2
7007092 Peiffer Feb 2006 B2
7020713 Shah et al. Mar 2006 B1
7023974 Brannam et al. Apr 2006 B1
7035212 Mittal et al. Apr 2006 B1
7039061 Connor et al. May 2006 B2
7065482 Shorey et al. Jun 2006 B2
7075924 Richter et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076689 Atkinson Jul 2006 B2
7080314 Garofalakis et al. Jul 2006 B1
7089491 Feinberg et al. Aug 2006 B2
7113993 Capiello et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113996 Kronenberg Sep 2006 B2
7121460 Parsons Oct 2006 B1
7133863 Teng et al. Nov 2006 B2
7133944 Song et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139792 Mishra et al. Nov 2006 B1
7161904 Hussain et al. Jan 2007 B2
7191163 Herrara et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200234 Bousis Apr 2007 B2
7206932 Kirchhoff Apr 2007 B1
7219223 Bacchus May 2007 B1
7228359 Monteiro Jun 2007 B1
7228422 Morioka et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229009 Parsons Jun 2007 B1
7236491 Tsao et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240100 Wein et al. Jul 2007 B1
7257633 Masputra et al. Aug 2007 B2
7287082 O'Toole, Jr. Oct 2007 B1
7292541 Cs Nov 2007 B1
7295827 Liu et al. Nov 2007 B2
7296263 Jacob Nov 2007 B1
7308475 Pruitt et al. Dec 2007 B1
7308703 Wright et al. Dec 2007 B2
7309004 Muschellack et al. Dec 2007 B1
7321926 Zhang et al. Jan 2008 B1
7324533 DeLiberato et al. Jan 2008 B1
7331038 Snodgrass Feb 2008 B1
7333999 Njemanze Feb 2008 B1
7340571 Saze Mar 2008 B2
7343413 Gilde et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349391 Ben-Dor et al. Mar 2008 B2
7373438 DeBergalis et al. May 2008 B1
7398552 Pardee et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409440 Jacob Aug 2008 B1
7417990 Ikeda et al. Aug 2008 B2
7433962 Janssen et al. Oct 2008 B2
7454480 Labio et al. Nov 2008 B2
7487353 Pryor et al. Feb 2009 B2
7490162 Masters Feb 2009 B1
7500243 Huetsch et al. Mar 2009 B2
7500269 Huotari et al. Mar 2009 B2
7505795 Lim et al. Mar 2009 B1
7516492 Nisbet et al. Apr 2009 B1
7526541 Roese et al. Apr 2009 B2
7555608 Naik et al. Jun 2009 B2
7558197 Sindhu et al. Jul 2009 B1
7577723 Matsuda et al. Aug 2009 B2
7580971 Gollapudi et al. Aug 2009 B1
7624424 Morita et al. Nov 2009 B2
7640235 Shulman et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640347 Sloat et al. Dec 2009 B1
7644137 Bozak et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668166 Rekhter et al. Feb 2010 B1
7684423 Tripathi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698458 Lui et al. Apr 2010 B1
7721951 Parsons et al. May 2010 B1
7724657 Rao et al. May 2010 B2
7725093 Sengupta et al. May 2010 B2
7733859 Takahashi Jun 2010 B2
7743420 Shulman et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752662 Shulman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7778187 Chaturvedi et al. Aug 2010 B2
7801978 Susai et al. Sep 2010 B1
7822839 Pruitt et al. Oct 2010 B1
7831662 Clark et al. Nov 2010 B2
7861085 Case et al. Dec 2010 B1
7877511 Berger et al. Jan 2011 B1
7881446 Apple Feb 2011 B1
7895653 Calo et al. Feb 2011 B2
7903554 Manur et al. Mar 2011 B1
7908245 Nakano et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908314 Yamaguchi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925908 Kim Apr 2011 B2
7933946 Livshits et al. Apr 2011 B2
7945908 Waldspurger et al. May 2011 B1
7958222 Pruitt et al. Jun 2011 B1
7984141 Gupta et al. Jul 2011 B2
7984500 Khanna et al. Jul 2011 B1
7988039 Muschellack Aug 2011 B1
8015595 Benbrahim Sep 2011 B2
8024443 Jacob Sep 2011 B1
8031849 Apple Oct 2011 B1
8037528 Williams et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046504 Feinberg Oct 2011 B2
8064342 Badger Nov 2011 B2
8064580 Apple Nov 2011 B1
8069225 McCann et al. Nov 2011 B2
8081958 Soderstrom Dec 2011 B2
8117244 Marinov et al. Feb 2012 B2
8130650 Allen, Jr. et al. Mar 2012 B2
8154999 Tsuge Apr 2012 B2
8155128 Balyan et al. Apr 2012 B2
8171124 Kondamuru May 2012 B2
8180747 Marinkovic et al. May 2012 B2
8190769 Shukla et al. May 2012 B1
8199757 Pani et al. Jun 2012 B2
8261087 Fort Sep 2012 B2
8271620 Witchey Sep 2012 B2
8276140 Beda et al. Sep 2012 B1
8295446 Apple Oct 2012 B1
8351333 Rao et al. Jan 2013 B2
8380854 Szabo Feb 2013 B2
8396836 Ferguson et al. Mar 2013 B1
8447871 Szabo May 2013 B1
8463850 McCann Jun 2013 B1
8464265 Worley Jun 2013 B2
8484348 Subramanian et al. Jul 2013 B2
8560693 Wang et al. Oct 2013 B1
8601000 Stefani et al. Dec 2013 B1
8606234 Pei Dec 2013 B2
8606921 Vasquez et al. Dec 2013 B2
8615022 Harrison et al. Dec 2013 B2
8665868 Kay Mar 2014 B2
8701179 Penno et al. Apr 2014 B1
8788665 Glide et al. Jul 2014 B2
8804504 Chen Aug 2014 B1
8830874 Cho et al. Sep 2014 B2
8838817 Biswas Sep 2014 B1
8879431 Ridel et al. Nov 2014 B2
8959215 Koponen et al. Feb 2015 B2
9143451 Amdahl et al. Sep 2015 B2
9390291 Cox Jul 2016 B2
9479480 Ovsiannikov Oct 2016 B2
9893883 Chaubey Feb 2018 B1
9923923 Sharifi Mehr Mar 2018 B1
9935769 Mehr Apr 2018 B1
10171495 Bowen Jan 2019 B1
10374800 Sharifi Mehr Aug 2019 B1
10567434 Sharifi Mehr Feb 2020 B1
20010007560 Masuda et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010023442 Masters Sep 2001 A1
20020004784 Forbes Jan 2002 A1
20020010757 Granik et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012352 Hansson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032855 Neves Mar 2002 A1
20020038360 Andrews et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040400 Masters Apr 2002 A1
20020049842 Huetsch et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059428 Susai et al. May 2002 A1
20020065848 Walker et al. May 2002 A1
20020065922 Shastri May 2002 A1
20020072048 Slattery et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083067 Tamayo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085710 Ananth Jul 2002 A1
20020087571 Stapel et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087744 Kitchin Jul 2002 A1
20020099829 Richards et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099842 Jennings et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103823 Jackson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128908 Levin Sep 2002 A1
20020138615 Schmeling Sep 2002 A1
20020143819 Han et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143852 Guo et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161913 Gonzalez et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162118 Levy et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174216 Shorey et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194112 dePinto et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194342 Lu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198956 Dunshea et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198993 Cudd et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005172 Chessell Jan 2003 A1
20030009528 Sharif et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018450 Carley Jan 2003 A1
20030018585 Butler et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030034905 Anton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046291 Fascenda Mar 2003 A1
20030051045 Connor Mar 2003 A1
20030053632 Bousis Mar 2003 A1
20030055723 English Mar 2003 A1
20030065951 Igeta et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069918 Lu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069974 Lu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070069 Belapurkar et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074301 Solomon Apr 2003 A1
20030086415 Bernhard et al. May 2003 A1
20030105846 Zhao et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105983 Brakmo et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108000 Chaney et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108002 Chaney et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030128708 Inoue et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130945 Force et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030131115 Mi Jul 2003 A1
20030139934 Mandera Jul 2003 A1
20030145062 Sharma et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145233 Poletto et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030156586 Lee et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163576 Janssen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030179755 Fraser Sep 2003 A1
20030187805 Shen Oct 2003 A1
20030189936 Terrell et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191812 Agarwalla et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195813 Pallister et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195962 Kikuchi et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212954 Patrudu Nov 2003 A1
20030220835 Barnes, Jr. Nov 2003 A1
20030225485 Fritz et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229665 Ryman Dec 2003 A1
20030236995 Fretwell, Jr. Dec 2003 A1
20040003287 Zissimopoulos et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006591 Matsui et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015783 Lennon et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040017825 Stanwood et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040017913 Hawkes Jan 2004 A1
20040030627 Sedukhin Feb 2004 A1
20040030740 Stelting Feb 2004 A1
20040039924 Baldwin Feb 2004 A1
20040043758 Sorvari et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059789 Shum Mar 2004 A1
20040064544 Barsness et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064554 Kuno et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040072569 Omae et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073792 Noble Apr 2004 A1
20040093361 Therrien et al. May 2004 A1
20040096055 Williams May 2004 A1
20040103283 Hornak May 2004 A1
20040111523 Hall et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111621 Himberger et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117493 Bazot et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122926 Moore et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123277 Schrader et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133605 Chang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138858 Carley Jul 2004 A1
20040151186 Akama Aug 2004 A1
20040167967 Bastian et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040177165 Masputra et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040187036 Nakamura Sep 2004 A1
20040192312 Li et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040213156 Smallwood et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215665 Edgar et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236826 Harville et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040264472 Oliver et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264481 Darling et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267920 Hydrie et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267948 Oliver et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268358 Darling et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004887 Igakura et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050008017 Datta et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021703 Cherry et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021736 Carusi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027841 Rolfe Feb 2005 A1
20050027869 Johnson Feb 2005 A1
20050044158 Malik Feb 2005 A1
20050044213 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050052440 Kim et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055435 Gbadegesin et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060590 Bradley et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050078604 Yim Apr 2005 A1
20050117589 Douady et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122977 Lieberman Jun 2005 A1
20050137983 Bells Jun 2005 A1
20050149459 Kofman Jul 2005 A1
20050154837 Keohane et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165656 Frederick et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050174944 Legault et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175013 Le Pennec et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187866 Lee Aug 2005 A1
20050188220 Nilsson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198234 Leib et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198310 Kim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198501 Andreev Sep 2005 A1
20050213587 Cho et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234928 Shkvarchuk et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240664 Chen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251802 Bozek et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256806 Tien et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262238 Reeves et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060013229 Johansson Jan 2006 A1
20060031374 Lu et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031520 Bedekar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031778 Goodwin et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060045089 Bacher et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060045096 Farmer et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047785 Wang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060059267 Cugi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060072572 Ikeda Apr 2006 A1
20060077902 Kannan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100752 Kim et al. May 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu et al. May 2006 A1
20060112272 Morioka et al. May 2006 A1
20060112367 Harris May 2006 A1
20060123210 Pritchett et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129684 Datta Jun 2006 A1
20060130133 Andreev et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060133374 Sekiguchi Jun 2006 A1
20060135198 Lee Jun 2006 A1
20060140193 Kakani et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153201 Hepper et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060156416 Huotari et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161577 Kulkami et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171365 Borella Aug 2006 A1
20060209669 Nishio Sep 2006 A1
20060209853 Hidaka et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229861 Tatsuoka et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060230148 Forecast et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233106 Achlioptas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235998 Stecher et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242300 Yumoto et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259320 LaSalle et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264201 Zhang Nov 2006 A1
20060265484 Delia Nov 2006 A1
20060268692 Wright et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060270341 Kim et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060272008 Shulman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282442 Lennon et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282529 Nordin Dec 2006 A1
20060282545 Arwe Dec 2006 A1
20060288213 Gasparini Dec 2006 A1
20070005807 Wong Jan 2007 A1
20070006293 Balakrishnan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016613 Foresti et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016662 Desai et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019636 Lau et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038994 Davis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070058670 Konduru et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070064661 Sood et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067771 Kulbak et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083646 Miller et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088822 Coile et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106796 Kudo et al. May 2007 A1
20070107048 Halls et al. May 2007 A1
20070112775 Ackerman May 2007 A1
20070113269 Zhang May 2007 A1
20070118879 Yeun May 2007 A1
20070124415 Lev-Ran et al. May 2007 A1
20070124477 Martin May 2007 A1
20070124502 Li May 2007 A1
20070124806 Shulman et al. May 2007 A1
20070130255 Wolovitz et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070147246 Hurley et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150603 Crull Jun 2007 A1
20070162891 Burner et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168320 Borthakur et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168525 DeLeon et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174491 Still et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070192543 Naik et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070214503 Shulman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220598 Salowey et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233809 Brownell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233826 Tindal et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250560 Wein et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070274290 Takahashi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070294539 Shulman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297410 Yoon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297551 Choi Dec 2007 A1
20080004022 Johannesson et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080010372 Khedouri et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080022059 Zimmerer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025297 Kashyap Jan 2008 A1
20080034136 Ulenas Feb 2008 A1
20080034442 Nonaka et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080034443 Nonaka et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049627 Nordin Feb 2008 A1
20080072303 Syed Mar 2008 A1
20080120370 Chan et al. May 2008 A1
20080120592 Tanguay et al. May 2008 A1
20080132215 Soderstrom et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080133518 Kapoor et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080134311 Medvinsky et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080141246 Kuck et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080148340 Powell et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159145 Muthukrishnan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175393 Oba et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080178277 Oba et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080178278 Grinstein et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201599 Ferraiolo et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205613 Lopez Aug 2008 A1
20080208917 Smoot et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080209205 Rowley Aug 2008 A1
20080212783 Oba Sep 2008 A1
20080222646 Sigal et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080225710 Raja et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080229415 Kapoor et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080253395 Pandya Oct 2008 A1
20080256224 Kaji et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263401 Stenzel Oct 2008 A1
20080270564 Rangegowda et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270578 Zhang et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281908 McCann et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281944 Vorne et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288661 Gailes Nov 2008 A1
20080301760 Lim Dec 2008 A1
20080320307 Zhang et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090024853 Yeap et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028337 Balabine et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037995 Zapata Feb 2009 A1
20090049230 Pandya Feb 2009 A1
20090049438 Draper et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090052671 Bauchot et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070617 Arimilli et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077618 Pearce Mar 2009 A1
20090077619 Boyce Mar 2009 A1
20090080440 Balyan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089487 Kwon et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094311 Awadallah et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094610 Sukirya Apr 2009 A1
20090097480 Curtis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106409 Murata Apr 2009 A1
20090106413 Salo et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119504 Van Os et al. May 2009 A1
20090125496 Wexler et al. May 2009 A1
20090125532 Wexler et al. May 2009 A1
20090125625 Shim et al. May 2009 A1
20090125955 DeLorme May 2009 A1
20090131053 Sachs et al. May 2009 A1
20090138314 Bruce May 2009 A1
20090138749 Moll et al. May 2009 A1
20090141891 Boyen et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157678 Turk Jun 2009 A1
20090157882 Kashyap Jun 2009 A1
20090161542 Ho Jun 2009 A1
20090177698 Chan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187915 Chew et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090196282 Fellman et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198820 Golla et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217163 Jaroker Aug 2009 A1
20090217386 Schneider Aug 2009 A1
20090228956 He et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241176 Beletski et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248858 Sivasubramanian Oct 2009 A1
20090265396 Ram et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265467 Peles Oct 2009 A1
20090285118 Yoshikawa et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287935 Aull et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090288143 Stebila et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090289828 Hinchey Nov 2009 A1
20090292957 Bower et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296624 Ryu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300161 Pruitt et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300407 Kamath et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090316708 Yahyaoui et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319600 Sedan et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100009554 Ryu et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011434 Kay Jan 2010 A1
20100017846 Huang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017874 Piccinini et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023582 Pedersen et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100042743 Jeon et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042869 Szabo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100058054 Irvine Mar 2010 A1
20100061232 Zhou et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100064001 Daily Mar 2010 A1
20100070476 O'Keefe et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071048 Novak et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100088752 Nagulakonda et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100093318 Zhu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103837 Jungck et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100115236 Bataineh et al. May 2010 A1
20100122091 Huang et al. May 2010 A1
20100131654 Malakapalli et al. May 2010 A1
20100134818 Minamizono et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100146085 Van Wie et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150154 Viger et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100154066 Hammes et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165877 Shukla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179984 Sebastian Jul 2010 A1
20100183150 Lee Jul 2010 A1
20100199104 Van Rijnswou Aug 2010 A1
20100228814 McKenna et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228819 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100242092 Harris et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250497 Redlich et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251330 Kroeselberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274772 Samuels Oct 2010 A1
20100278733 Karsten et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287548 Zhou et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306169 Pishevar et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322250 Shelly et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100323715 Winters Dec 2010 A1
20100325277 Muthiah et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029581 Zhao Feb 2011 A1
20110040889 Garrett et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047620 Mahaffey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110055921 Narayanaswamy et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066718 Susai et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066736 Mitchell et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072321 Dhuse Mar 2011 A1
20110075667 Li et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078303 Li et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110098087 Tseng Apr 2011 A1
20110113095 Hatami-Hanza May 2011 A1
20110153822 Rajan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154443 Thakur et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110167263 Cross Jul 2011 A1
20110173295 Bakke et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184733 Yu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110185082 Thompson Jul 2011 A1
20110188415 Graziano Aug 2011 A1
20110213911 Eldus et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246651 Djabarov Oct 2011 A1
20110246800 Accpadi et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110273984 Hsu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282997 Prince et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110295996 Qiu Dec 2011 A1
20110321122 Mwangi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016994 Nakamura et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120039341 Latif et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041965 Vasquez et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120063314 Pignataro et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066489 Ozaki et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120096461 Goswami et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120101952 Raleigh et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120117028 Gold et al. May 2012 A1
20120131627 Chittelia May 2012 A1
20120140620 Hogan Jun 2012 A1
20120150805 Pafumi et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120195273 Iwamura et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120254293 Winter et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120255022 Ocepek et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257506 Bazlamacci et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120258766 Cho et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120311153 Morgan Dec 2012 A1
20120317266 Abbott Dec 2012 A1
20130058229 Casado et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130100819 Anchan Apr 2013 A1
20130182713 Giacomoni et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130198511 Yoo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130238472 Fan et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130269007 Yoshigaki Oct 2013 A1
20130336122 Baruah et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130336126 Vasseur Dec 2013 A1
20140025823 Szabo et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140040478 Hsu et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140071895 Bane et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140089384 Diaz Mar 2014 A1
20140089657 Eguchi Mar 2014 A1
20140095661 Knowles et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140099945 Singh et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140105069 Potnuru Apr 2014 A1
20140113600 El Gamal Apr 2014 A1
20140187199 Yan et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140286316 Park et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150058595 Gura et al. Feb 2015 A1
20160021110 Sugano Jan 2016 A1
20160070601 Yamamoto Mar 2016 A1
20160241389 Le Saint Aug 2016 A1
20160373414 MacCarthaigh Dec 2016 A1
20180115521 Bansal Apr 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
2080530 Apr 1994 CA
0605088 Jul 1994 EP
0744850 Nov 1996 EP
1081918 Mar 2001 EP
06-205006 Jul 1994 JP
8021924 Mar 1996 JP
2000183935 Jun 2000 JP
WO 9114326 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9505712 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9709805 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9745800 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9905829 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9906913 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9910858 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9939373 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9964967 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0004422 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0004458 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0058870 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0239696 May 2002 WO
WO 2006091040 Aug 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (92)
Entry
Authors: Ueli M. Maurer and Pierre E. Schmid “A Calculus for Secure Channel Establishment in Open Networks” pp. 18 (Year: 1994).
Getting an A+ on the Qualys SSL Test—Windows Edition by “Scott Helme” Jan. 11, 2015 pp. 23 (Year: 2015).
Redirection and cipher suite override based on SSL/TLS configuration now available Sep. 8, 2015 by Tushar Richabadas pp. 8 (Year: 2015).
Penetration testing tips for your Netscaler—From the Architect http://neil.spellings.net/ pp. 08, Jan. 12, 2014.
Getting an A+ on the Qualys SSL Test—Windows Edition by Scott Helme pp. 23 Jan. 11, 2015.
Guidelines for the Selection and Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Implementations by C. Michael Chernick, Charles Edington III, Matthew J. Fanto, Rob Rosenthal pp. 33; Jun. 2005.
F5 Networks Inc., “BIG-IP ASM 12.0.0”, Release Notes, Jul. 17, 2017, pp. 1-14, vol. 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc., Retrieved from the Internet<https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_asm/releasenotes/product/relnote-asm-12-0-0.html>.
F5 Networks Inc., “BIG-IP Application Security Manager Operations Guide”, Manual, Feb. 5, 2016, pp. 1-98, F5 Networks, Inc., Retrieved from the Internet<https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_asm/manuals/product/f5-asm-operations-guide.html>.
F5 Networks Inc., “BIG-IP® Local Traffic Management: Basics”, Manual, Mar. 17, 2016, pp. 1-68, vol. 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc.
F5 Networks Inc., “F5 BIG-IP TMOS: Operations Guide”, Manual, Mar. 5, 2015, pp. 1-236, F5 Networks, Inc., Retrieved from the Internet<https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/f5-tmos-operations-guide.html>.
F5 Networks Inc., “BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Implementations”, Manual, Sep. 28, 2017, pp. 1-372, vol. 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc., Retrieved from the Internet<https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_asm/manuals/product/ams-implementations-12-0-0.html>.
F5 Networks Inc., “BIG-IP® TMOS: Implementations”, Manual, Dec. 21, 2015, pp. 1-280, vol. 12.0, F5 Networks, Inc., Retrieved from the Internet<hhttps://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/tmos-implementations-12-0-0.html>.
“A Process for Selective Routing of Servlet Content to Transcoding Modules,” Research Disclosure 422124, Jun. 1999, pp. 889-890, IBM Corporation.
“BIG-IP Controller with Exclusive OneConnect Content Switching Feature Provides a Breakthrough System for Maximizing Server and Network Performance,” F5 Networks, Inc. Press Release, May 8, 2001, 2 pages, Las Vegas, Nevada.
“Diameter MBLB Support Phase 2: Generic Message Based Load Balancing (GMBLB)”, pp. 1-10, <https://peterpan.f5net.com/twiki/bin/view/TMOS/TMOSDiameterMBLB>, last accessed Mar. 29, 2010.
“Market Research & Releases, CMPP PoC documentation”, <http://mainstreet/sites/PD/Teams/ProdMgmt/MarketResearch/Universal>, last accessed Mar. 29, 2010.
“Market Research & Releases, Solstice Diameter Requirements”, <http://mainstreet/sites/PD/Teams/ProdMgmt/MarketResearch/Universal>, last accessed Mar. 29, 2010.
“Respond to server depending on TCP::client_port”, pp. 1-6, DevCentral Forums iRules, <http://devcentral.f5.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&forumid=5&tpage=1&v>, last accessed Mar. 26, 2010.
“Servlet/Applet/HTML authentication process with single sign-on,” Research Disclosure 429128, Jan. 2000, pp. 163-164, IBM Corporation.
“Traffic Surges; Surge Queue; Netscaler Defense,” 2005, PowerPoint Presentation, slides 1-12, Citrix Systems, Inc.
“UDDI Overview”, Sep. 6, 2000, pp. 1-21, uddi.org (http://www.uddi.org/).
“UDDI Technical White Paper,” Sep. 6, 2000, pp. 1-12, uddi-org, (http://www.uddi.org/).
“UDDI Version 3.0.1 UDDI Spec Technical Committee Specification”, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1-383, uddi.org, (http://www.uddi.org/).
“Windows Server 2003 Kerberos Extensions,” Microsoft TechNet, 2003 (Updated Jul. 31, 2004), http;//technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738207, Microsoft Corporation.
Abad, C., et al. “An Analysis on the Schemes for Detecting and Preventing ARP Cache Poisoning Attacks”, IEEE, Computer Society, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07), 2007, pp. 1-8.
ASP.NET Forums, “How to Remove Cookie Sessionid from Outgoing Response?,” at Microsoft ASP.NET, pp. 1-4 (Dec. 2009).
Baer, T., et al., “The elements of Web services” ADTmag.com, Dec. 1, 2002, pp. 1-6, (http://www.adtmag.com).
Blake-Wilson et al., “Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions,” (Apr. 2006).
Blue Coat, “Technology Primer; CIFS Protocol Optimization,” Blue Coat Systems, Inc., 2007, pp. 1-3, (http://www.bluecoat.com).
Chou, Wesley, “Inside SSL: Accelerating Secure Transactions”, IEEE(2002).
Crescendo Networks, “Application Layer Processing (ALP),” 2003-2009, pp. 168-186, Chapter 9, CN-5000E/5500E, Foxit Software Company.
Eastlake, 3rd Huawei D, “Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions,” RFC:6066 pp. 1-25 (Jan. 18, 2011).
F5 Networks Inc., “3-DNS® Reference Guide, version 4.5”, F5 Networks Inc., Sep. 202, pp. 2-1-2-28, 3-1-3-12, 5-1-5-24, Seattle Washington (2002).
F5 Networks Inc., “Big-IP® Reference Guide, version 4.5”, F5 Networks Inc., Sep. 2002, pp. 11-1-11-32, Seattle Washington.
F5 Networks Inc., “Case Information Log for ‘Issues with BoNY upgrade to 4.3’”, as early as Feb. 2008.
F5 Networks Inc., “Configuration Guide for Local Traffic Management,” F5 Networks Inc., Jan. 2006, version 9.2.2, 406 pgs.
“Deploying the BIG-IP-LTM for Diameter Load Balancing”, Deployment Guide, Version 1.0, Sep. 2010, 21 pages.
F5 Networks Inc., F5 Diameter RM, PowerPoint document, Jul. 16, 2009, pp. 1-7.
F5 Networks Inc., “F5 WANJet CIFS Acceleration”, White Paper, F5 Networks Inc., Mar. 2006, pp. 1-5, Seattle, Washington.
F5 Networks Inc., “Routing Global Internet Users to the Appropriate Data Center and Applications Using F5's 3-DNS Controller”, F5 Networks Inc., Aug. 2001, pp. 1-4, Seattle Washington, (http://www.f5.com/f5products/3dns/relatedMaterials/Using/F5.html).
F5 Networks Inc., “Using F5's-DNS Controller to Provide High Availability Between Two or More Data Centers”, F5 Networks Inc., Aug. 2001, pp. 1-4, Seattle, Washington, (http://www.f5.com/f5products/3dns/relatedMaterials/3DNSRouting.html).
F5 Networks, “BIG-IP® Local Traffic Manager™: Concept,” Version 11.1, retrieved from Internet: URL:http//support.f5.com/content/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/ltm-concepts-11-1-0/_jcr_content/pdfAttach/download/file.res/ltm-concepts-11-1-0.pdf retrieved on Apr. 3, 2013] Sections 1, 2, 5, and 11 (Nov. 10, 2011).
F5 Networks, “Configuration Guide for BIG-IP Global Traffic Manager”, version 10.2, Oct. 21, 2011, pp. 1-350, https://support.f5.com/content/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_gtm/manuals/product/gtm_config_10_2/_jcr_content/pdfAttach/download/file.res/Configuration_Guidefor_BIG-IP_Global_Traffic_Manager.pdf.
F5 Networks, Inc., “F5 and VMware Integration Streamlines App Provisioning Process”, F5 Networks Inc., Solution Overview, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. 1-2, <www.f5.com>.
Fajardo, Victor 1., “Open Diameter Software Architecture,” Jun. 25, 2004, pp. 1-6, Version 1.0.7, http://diameter.sourceforge.net/diameter-architecture/index.html.
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-162.
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2616, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-176, The Internet Society.
Floyd et al., “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance,” Aug. 1993, pp. 1-22, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, California.
Greenicicle, “Using the Silverlight HttpClient in WCF, and Still Passing Cookies,” at http://greenicicleblog.com, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 2009).
Gupta et al., “Algorithms for Packet Classification”, Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, CA, Mar./Apr. 2001, pp. 1-29.
Heinz G., “Priorities in Stream Transmission Control Protocol (SCTP) Multistreaming”, Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware, Spring 2003, pp. 1-35.
Hochmuth, Phil, “F5, CacheFlow pump up content-delivery lines,” Network World Fusion, May 4, 2001, 1 page, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Ilvesmaki M., et al., “On the capabilities of application level traffic measurements to differentiate and classify Internet traffic,” Presented in SPIE's International Symposium IT.com, Aug. 19-21, 2001, pp. 1-11, Denver, Colorado.
Imperva, “Imperva Technical Brief; SecureSphere and the OWASP Top Ten,” Imperva US Headquarters, Foster City, CA (3 pages) (2008).
IMPERVA, “Web Application Firewall,” IMPERVA Headquarters, Redwood Shores, CA (4 pages) (2010).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026615, dated Jul. 4, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026262 (dated May 17, 2013).
Internet Protocol, “DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification,” (RFC:791), Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-49.
Kawamoto D., “Amazon files for Web services patent”, CNET News.com, Jul. 28, 2005, pp. 1-2, (http://news.com).
Lamonica M., “Infravio spiffs up Web services registry idea”, CNET News.com, May 11, 2004, pp. 1-2, (http://www.news.com).
Mac Vittie, Lori, “Message-Based Load Balancing: Using F5 solutions to address the challenges of scaling Diameter, RADIUS, and message-oriented protocols”, F5 Technical Brief, 2005, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc., Seattle, WA.
MacVittie, L. “Cloud Balancing: The Evolution of Global Server Load Balancing”, White Paper, F5 Networks, Inc., Nov. 2, 2012, pp. 1-12.
Macvittie, Lori, “Message-Based Load Balancing,” Technical Brief, Jan. 2010, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc.
Masone et al., “WSKE: Web Server Key Enabled Cookies,” Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (13 pages) (2007).
Miller, “Persistent Login Cookie Best Practice,” The Fishbowl Weblog at http://fishbowl.patiche.org/, pp. 1-6 (2004).
Modiano E., “Scheduling Algorithms for Message Transmission Over a Satellite Broadcast System”, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Advanced Network Group, Nov. 1997, pp. 1-7.
Murdoch, “Hardened Stateless Session Cookies,” University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, pp. 1-9 (Apr. 2008).
NET, “Get MAC for Remote Computer,” NET Framework Developer Center at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa496123.aspx, pp. 1-2 (2008).
Nichols K., et al., “Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers”, (RFC:2474) Network Working Group, Dec. 1998, pp. 1-19, (http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2474.txt).
Oracle, “Configuring Oracle Web Cache for Session Binding and Load Balancing,” Oracle Technology Network at http://www.oracle.com/technology/index.html, pp. 1-6 (2004).
Ott D., et al., “A Mechanism for TCP-Friendly Transport-level Protocol Coordination”, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 2002, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, pp. 1-12.
OWASP, “Testing for Cross site scripting”, OWASP Testing Guide v2, Table of Contents, Feb. 24, 2011, pp. 1-5, (www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing_for_Cross_site_scripting).
Padmanabhan V., et al., “Using Predictive Prefetching to Improve World Wide Web Latency”, SIGCOM, 1996, pp. 10-15.
Prosise, “Foiling Session Hijacking Attempts,” msdn, Wicked Code at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/default.aspx, pp. 1-6 (Jul. 2004).
Rosen E., et al., “MPLS Label Stack Encoding”, (RFC:3032) Network Working Group, Jan. 2001, pp. 1-22, (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3032.txt).
Schaefer, Ken, “IIS and Kerberos Part 5—Protocol Transition, Constrained Delegation, S4U2S and S402P,” Jul. 18, 2007, 21 pages, http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2007/07/19/8460.aspx.
Schilit B., “Bootstrapping Location-Enhanced Web Services”, University of Washington, Dec. 4, 2003, (http://www.cs.washington.edu/news/cooloq.info.html).
Seeley R., “Can Infravio technology revive UDDI?”, ADTmag.com, Oct. 22, 2003, (http://adtmag.com).
Shohoud Y., “Building XML Web Services with VB .NET and VB 6”, Addison Wesley, 2002, pp. 1-14.
Sleeper B., “The Evolution of UDDI: UDDI.org White Paper”, the Stencil Group, Inc., Jul. 19, 2002, pp. 1-15, San Francisco, California.
Sleeper B., “Why UDDi Will Succeed, Quietly: Two Factors Push Web Services Forward”, The Stencil Group, Inc., Apr. 2001, pp. 1-7, San Francisco, California.
Sommers F., “Whats New in UDDI 3.0—Part 1”, Web Services Papers, Jan. 27, 2003, pp. 1-14, (http://www.webservices.org/index.php/article/articleprint/871/-1/24/.
Sommers F., “Whats New in UDDI 3.0—Part 2”, Web Services Papers, Mar. 2, 2003, pp. 1-8, (http://www.web.archive.org/web/20040620131006/).
Sommers F., “Whats New in UDDI 3.0—Part 3”, Web Services Papers, Sep. 2, 2003, pp. 1-4, (http://www.webservices.org/index.php/article/articleprint/894/-1/24).
Supportwiki, “Web: Cookies,” from SupportWiki at http://wiki.livejournal.org/index.php/Main_Page, pp. 1-3 (Feb. 2008).
Tridgell et al., “rsync,” retrieved from http://en.wilipedia.org/wiki/Rsync, 7 pages (Jan. 27, 2012).
Varjabedian, “Bullet Proof Cookies,” ASP.NET Web Development CodeProject at http://www.codeproject.com, pp. 1-6 (2007).
Wang B., “Priority and realtime data transfer over the best-effort Internet”, Dissertation Abstract, 205, ScholarWorks@UMASS (2005).
Wikipedia, “Diameter (protocol)” pp. 1-11, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamter_(protocol)>, last accessed Oct. 27, 2010.
Wilkes, S., “Automating F5 Application Services for WMware with F5 BIG-IQ Cloud”, F5 Networks, Inc., White Paper, Apr. 26, 2013, pp. 1-9, <www.f5.com>.
Williams et al., “Forwarding Authentication,” The Ultimate Windows Server 2003 System Administrator's Guide, 2003, 2 pages, Figure 10.7, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, Massachusetts.
Woo T.Y.C., “A Modular Approach to Packet Classification: Algorithms and Results”, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Mar. 2000, pp. 1-10.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62415607 Nov 2016 US