This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2014/014877, filed Feb. 5, 2014, which is related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/761,016, filed Feb. 5, 2013, entitled “High Quality Syngas Production Using Composite Metal Oxides” and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/779,243, filed Mar. 13, 2013, entitled “Systems and Methods for Co-Current Chemical Looping Systems” , the teachings of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Field
The present disclosure relates to chemical looping systems and methods, and specifically to systems and methods for producing syngas from feedstock fuels.
Technical Background
There is a constant need for clean and efficient energy generation systems. Many of the commercial processes that generate energy carriers such as steam, hydrogen, synthesis gas (syngas), liquid fuels, and/or electricity are based on fossil fuels. Furthermore, the dependence on fossil fuels is expected to continue in the foreseeable future due to the lower costs compared to some renewable sources. Current conversion methods of carbonaceous fuels may emit large quantities of carbon dioxide to the environment and may require significant capital and operational costs. Sulfur and nitrogen compounds may also be generated in these processes due to the complex contents of coal.
A need is present for improved systems and methods for converting fuel, and system components therein, which can convert fuel effectively while reducing pollutants.
In one embodiment, fuel may be converted into syngas by a method comprising feeding the fuel and composite metal oxides into a reduction reactor in a co-current flow pattern relative to one another, reducing the composite metal oxides with the fuel to form syngas and reduced composite metal oxides, transporting the reduced composite metal oxides to an oxidation reactor, regenerating the composite metal oxides by oxidizing the reduced composite metal oxides with an oxidizing reactant in the oxidation reactor, and recycling the regenerated composite metal oxides to the reduction reactor for subsequent reduction reactions to produce syngas. The composite metal oxides may be solid particles comprising a primary metal oxide and a secondary metal oxide.
In another embodiment, natural gas may be used as a fuel and may be converted into syngas by a method comprising feeding the fuel and composite metal oxides into a reduction reactor in a co-current flow pattern relative to one another, reducing the composite metal oxides with the fuel to form syngas and reduced composite metal oxides, transporting the reduced composite metal oxides to an oxidation reactor, regenerating the composite metal oxides by oxidizing the reduced composite metal oxides with an oxidizing reactant in the oxidation reactor, and recycling the regenerated composite metal oxides to the reduction reactor for subsequent reduction reactions to produce syngas. The composite metal oxides may be solid particles comprising a primary metal oxide and a secondary metal oxide. The composite metal oxide may comprise iron oxide and titanium oxide, or the composite metal oxide comprises iron oxide and aluminum oxide. The iron oxide may be reduced in the reduction reaction from FeOx to FeOy and 1.5>x>1>y>0.3.
According to yet another embodiment, fuel may be converted by a method comprising reducing the composite metal oxides with the fuel to form syngas and reduced composite metal oxides, and regenerating the composite metal oxides by oxidizing the reduced composite metal oxides with an oxidizing reactant. The composite metal oxides are solid particles may comrprise primary metal oxide and a secondary metal oxide. The composite metal oxide may comprise iron oxide and titanium oxide, or the composite metal oxide may comprise iron oxide and aluminum oxide. The reducing of the composite metal oxides and the oxidizing of the composite metal oxides may be carried out in a fixed bed with a gas switching system. Alternatively, the reducing of the composite metal oxides may occur in a reduction reactor, wherein the reduction reactor is a moving bed reactor comprising two gas outlets and the reducing of the composite metal oxides produces syngas and CO2. Alternatively, the reducing and oxidizing of composite metal oxide may occur in a membrane based reactor, wherein the composite metal oxides are integrated to the fuel side of the membrane based reactor.
Additional features and advantages of the devices and methods for chemical conversion systems and methods and processes for manufacturing the same will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the embodiments described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description describe various embodiments and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the claimed subject matter. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the various embodiments, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate the various embodiments described herein, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the claimed subject matter.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Described herein are systems and method for converting fuel sources, sometimes referred to as feedstock fuels, into syngas. Generally, syngas comprises carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and may comprise some other chemicals, such as, but not limited to, carbon dioxide and steam (H2O). In one embodiment, a reduction reaction of composite metal oxides may produce syngas from a fuel and an oxidation reaction may regenerate the reduced composite metal oxides. As used herein, the reduction reaction may be referred to as a “first step” or “step one”, and the oxidation reaction may be referred to as “second step” or “step two”. The reduction reaction may take place in a reduction reactor and the oxidation reaction may take place in a separate oxidation reactor. In some embodiments, syngas may comprise at least about at least about 50 mol %, at least about 60 mol %, at least about 70 mol %, at least about 80 mol %, or even at least about 85% of the combination of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, such that the sum of the mol % of carbon monoxide and the mol % of hydrogen is at least about 50 mol %, at least about 60 mol %, at least about 70 mol %, at least about 80 mol %, or even at least about 85%. The stoichiometric ratio of carbon monoxide to hydrogen in the syngas produced may be about 1:2, such as between about 1:3 and about 1:1. However, the ratio may be controlled by the process parameters such as reaction conditions and reactants. The syngas may have little carbon dioxide and steam present, such as, for example, less than about 10 mol %, less than about 5%, or even less than about 2% of carbon dioxide and less than about 10 mol %%, less than about 5%, or even less than about 2% steam, respectively. The syngas may have little carbon formation, such as less than about 10 mol %. The syngas may be ready for use in downstream synthesis reactions to produce various hydrocarbons (C≥1) such as, but not limited to, methanol, dimethyl ether, gasoline, and diesel. The reduced composite metal oxide from the reduction reaction (after the syngas production) may be regenerated by oxidation with air, or another oxidant such as oxygen, steam, carbon dioxide, or combinations thereof, and then may be recycled back to the initial reduction reactor, such that the composite metal oxides may be recycled and may be continually used in the oxidation and reduction reactions. The cyclic reduction (endothermic) and oxidation (exothermic) reactions of composite metal oxides may form a reaction and heat integrated process loop that may perpetuate.
The fuel and composite metal oxides may flow in a co-current pattern relative to one another in the reduction reactor. For example, in one embodiment the co-current gas-solid flow may be either upward or downward. The reduction reactor may be, for example, a moving bed reactor, rotary kiln, riser, downer, or gas switching fixed bed. In one embodiment, the co-current reactor design may allow the natural gas, or other fuel, conversion to achieve completion wherein the composite metal oxides may be reduced to an oxidation state that provides a high quality of product syngas (i.e., at least about 90 mol % carbon monoxide and hydrogen). The composite metal oxides may act as a heat and oxygen transfer media to balance the energy and mass between the two steps (the oxidation and reduction reactions).
The composite metal oxides may act as oxygen carrying materials in the processes described herein. The composite metal oxides may comprise primary metal oxides and secondary metal oxides, including, but not limited to, FeOx (primary) —Al2O3 (secondary) and FeOx (primary) —TiO2 (secondary), where 0.3<x<1. The primary to secondary metal oxide weight ratios may be about 15:85 to about 85:15, which may promote high CO/CO2 and H2/H2O ratios (i.e., at least about 6) in the product syngas and to avoid carbon formation. Primary metal oxides may comprise, for example, oxides of Fe, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, W, Pb, Ce, Sn, Mo, or combinations thereof. Secondary metal oxides may comprise, for example, oxides of Ti, Al, Si, Ca, Y and Zr, or combinations thereof. The composite metal oxide may further comprise dopants/promoters, such as, but not limited to, Ca, Ce, Pt, Ru, Rh, La, Fe, Cu, oxides thereof, and combinations thereof. The dopants/promoters may assist in the oxidation and/or reduction reactions and to enhance the rate of reactions, and may serve as an inert support or binder that may enhance the mechanical properties of the composite metal oxides. Through the reduction reaction, the composite metal oxide may provide a high quality of product syngas at the outlet of the reactor. Following the reduction reaction, the reduced state composite metal oxide (any weight percentage) may comprise primary and secondary metal oxides, such as FeOx—Al2O3 or FeOx—TiO2, at oxidation states of the +0 state, i.e., Fe, and the +2 state, i.e., FeO.
In addition to natural gas, other carbonaceous fuels in the form of gas, liquid and solid may also be used, such as feedstock fuels including, but not limited to, coal, biomass, petroleum coke, naphtha, residual oil, shale gas, C2-C4 light hydrocarbons, and combinations thereof. The systems and methods described herein may convert these feedstock fuels using the same type of reactors and same types of composite metal oxides as for natural gas, to carbon monoxide and hydrogen at near the stoichiometric ratio, e.g., 1:0.6 to 1:0.8 for biomass, with little carbon dioxide presence (less than about 10 mol %). In one embodiment, feedstock fuel may be co-injected with a carbon-rich or hydrogen-rich reactant to change the carbon monoxide to hydrogen ratio of the syngas. For these feedstocks, the CO/H2 ratio of the product syngas may be adjusted to any desired ratio for downstream product synthesis, such as 1:2, by means of co-injection of these feedstock fuels with “carbon-rich” (such as CO2 and coal) or “hydrogen-rich” (such as H2O and CH4) reactants. For example, with biomass as the feedstock fuel, the CO/H2 ratio may be adjusted to 1:1 by co-injection of the biomass with methane, a hydrogen-rich reactant. Such syngas composition adjustment in the system and method described herein may require only a minimal amount of co-injecting reactants and may be significantly lower compared to the amount of the co-injecting reactants used in the conventional methods.
In another embodiment, the CO/H2 ratio may be adjusted to produce a high hydrogen content syngas by reaction of the reduced composite metal oxide with steam to produce hydrogen. The hydrogen may then be used to adjust the syngas CO/H2 ratio to a higher level in H2 contents. The steam oxidized composite metal oxide may be oxidized by air to its original oxidation state of the composite metal oxide for reuse in an oxidation reaction in an oxidation reactor.
Conventional syngas production methods from natural gas or other carbonaceous feedstocks may require cost intensive heat-exchanger type reactor, air separation unit, and/or a large amount of CO2/H2O reactants for controlling the feedstock conversion and product quality. The system and method described herein that carries out the selective oxidation reaction by the redox cycle of composite metal oxides may eliminate the need for the use of complicated reactors, air separation unit and excessive CO2/H2O reactants. The specially tailored composite metal oxides described herein coupled with the gas-solid co-current flow reactor design may directly convert the feedstock fuel to a high quality syngas yielding a high feedstock fuel conversion efficiency, flexible syngas product CO to H2 ratio, low CO2 and H2O concentrations in the product gas, and little carbon deposition. The overall process may be auto-thermal with composite metal oxides transferring heat between the reactions. The operation temperature may range from about 500° C. to about 1200° C. for the reduction (endothermic) reaction of composite metal oxide, and from about 600° C. to about 1250° C. for the oxidation (exothermic) reaction of composite metal oxide. The operation pressure may range from about 1 to about 50 bars, which may depend on the pressure of feedstocks as well as the requirement of downstream syngas conversion process. The feedstocks such as air and fuel may be preheated up to 1000° C. to increase the fuel to syngas conversion efficiency.
Syngas may be a chemical precursor for synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals. It may be a mixture of predominantly carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2) produced from the partial oxidation of a variety of feedstocks including, but not limited to, natural gas, shale gas, coal, biomass, naphtha, residual oil, petroleum coke, etc. Depending on the feedstocks and processing methods, the syngas composition and quality may vary significantly. Table 1 compares some conventional syngas production approaches, including steam methane reforming (SMR), dry methane reforming (DMR), partial oxidation (POX), autothermal reforming (ATR)/two-step reforming, dry coal gasification, and coal slurry gasification.
The CO to H2 ratio may directly affect the downstream application of the produced syngas. For example, a molar ratio of CO to H2 of 1:2 may be commonly used for the synthesis of liquid fuels such as, but not limited to, gasoline, diesel, and methanol, while a ratio of about 1:1 may be used for production of acetic acid, acetic anhydride, or formaldehyde. Ratios less than 1:3 may be used in combination with a water gas shift unit for hydrogen production and ammonia synthesis.
As shown in Table 1, a conventional SMR process may produce a hydrogen rich syngas due to the excess amount of steam introduction, which may limit its application to hydrogen and ammonia synthesis. Due to the reduced steam flow and slow CO2 reaction kinetics of DMR, carbon formation from methane decomposition may result. The reactions occurring in the SMR and DMR processes may be endothermic, favoring higher operating temperature for greater fuel conversion. Both processes may be commonly performed using costly heat exchanger type reactors, where fuel combustion externally provides the heat necessary to drive the catalytic reactions for syngas production. Considering the reactor materials, the SMR and DMR processes may operate below 900° C., thermodynamically restricting the methane conversion.
POX and dry coal gasification processes may be operated at a much higher temperature as the partial oxidation of the fuel with oxygen may be exothermic and may provide the heat for the process. The CO to H2 ratio from these processes may depend upon the atomic carbon and hydrogen content of the fuel feedstock, which may pose limitations on downstream chemical and fuel synthesis. Their associated high process temperatures also may require capital-intensive heat recovery systems. In ATR, two-step methane reforming, and coal slurry gasification processes, steam and/or water may be introduced to promote a water gas shift reaction and boost hydrogen content. H2O reactions with C and CH4 may be endothermic, which lowers the operation temperature, allowing for high fuel conversion with cost-effective reactor design and construction. However, these syngas generation technologies all require air separation units (ASU) to supply concentrated oxygen and account for 40% to 50% of the overall capital and operating costs of a chemical/liquid fuel production plant.
The content of CO2 and H2O in the syngas may be an important aspect for the syngas quality control. In many existing processes, excess amounts of O2 and H2O may be usually introduced, which may result in promoting combustion and water gas shift reactions, respectively. A significant amount of CO2 and/or H2O may exist in the syngas stream, lowering the syngas production selectivity and efficiency.
In processes such as DMR, carbon deposition and formation may occur, when the fuel may be exposed to metallic substances such as Ni and Fe in a low CO2 and low H2O content environment. The metallic substance may catalyze the methane decomposition to carbon and hydrogen, where the absence of oxidizing gas, such as CO2, H2O and O2, prevents the deposited carbon from being gasified. The negative effects of carbon deposition are two-fold: it may reduce the fuel conversion efficiency and selectivity, and may cause catalyst deactivation.
Thus, controlling the CO2/H2O ratio and concentration, and preventing carbon deposition may be two opposing challenges in many conventional syngas production processes. Many of these processes use excess CO2/H2O to suppress carbon formation. Such tradeoff may result in a syngas product stream with more than 15% CO2 and/or H2O, requiring downstream syngas purification steps and may result in a decreased fuel to syngas production efficiency. The process described herein may minimize excess CO2 and/or H2O use and production while preventing carbon formation and deposition, greatly improving the syngas production efficiency.
Described herein are chemical looping processes that have been developed for natural gas conversion to syngas. Oxides such as, but not limited to, Fe2O3, NiO, ZnO, PbO, CoO, Cr2O3, BaSO4 have been considered as oxygen carriers to partially oxidize methane to CO and H2. The reduced metal oxides and sulfates may be regenerated with air in a separate reactor. The chemical looping approach avoids the direct mixing between methane and air, and thus eliminates the need for an ASU and has the potential to significantly reduce syngas production costs.
However, in order to produce a low H2O and CO2 content syngas (less than 10 mol % respectively) from the chemical looping system, the thermodynamic phase equilibrium of single metal oxides and/or sulfates dictates that complete reduction to metallic phase or metal sulfide may be required in the fuel reactor (reduction reactor). The complete reduction may irreversibly change the oxygen carrier structure, causing its deactivation during the redox cycles. In addition, the extensive formation of the reduced metallic phase may accelerate methane decomposition resulting in carbon formation/deposition. For example, when 70% of Fe2O3 is reduced to Fe, carbon deposition may become a dominant process. Also, the reduction extent of metal oxides and sulfates affects the CO to H2 ratio, which may require a careful control of the solid circulation rate and operation condition.
The composite metal oxide may be in the form of particles, pellets, or monolith, depending on the reactor design. The pellet size may range from 300 microns to 4000 microns, which may be suitable for moving bed operation. In one embodiment, the density of the composite metal oxide may be from about 1000 to about 5000 kg/m3. The relatively large pellet size and relatively high density may also assist the separation of process fines when solid fuels are used as the feedstock fuel. The composite metal oxide materials may be chemically and physically stable during the redox cycle. The synthesis procedure includes dry/wet mixing, particle/pellet formation, and sintering. Alternative techniques include sol-gel, wet impregnation, and dry-freezing.
In addition to natural gas, the feedstock fuels may be any gas, solid, and liquid fuel, or combinations thereof. Gaseous fuels include shale gas (including dry gas and wet gas), tail gas containing light hydrocarbons from downstream syngas conversion and hydroprocessing units such as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The composite material may be effective in converting C1-C4 hydrocarbons as well as CO2 and H2O to high quality syngas from the feedstock fuels sources. In certain embodiments, the composite material may handle sulfur compound in the fuel gas without deactivation. Therefore, no fuel pretreatments, such as CO2 removal and sulfur removal, may be needed. The methods described herein may also convert solid fuels such as coal, petroleum coke, and biomass, as well as liquid fuels, such as naphtha and residual oil. In one embodiment, when solid fuels are introduced with the metal oxide composite in a moving bed process, the solid fuel may be in pellet form with a size ranging from about 300 to about 4000 microns. Such operation may ease the solid fuel injection and enhance the solid-solid distribution inside the reactor bed.
In some embodiments, solar energy may be used as a heat source for the endothermic reactions of the fuel conversion in the reduction reaction. Such arrangement may directly convert CO2 and H2O into syngas and other fuel forms for solar energy storage and utilization. In another embodiment, oxygen or oxygen releasing material may be introduced in the reduction reaction to increase reaction kinetics for syngas production. In yet another embodiment, the composite metal oxide materials may release oxygen for fuel conversion.
In one embodiment, a co-current flow reactor may be used for syngas production in the first step (reduction reaction). In one embodiment, a moving packed bed reactor may be used with both fuel and the composite metal oxides fed from the top and discharged from the bottom. The co-current downward flow moving bed reactor may ensure a full conversion of fuel into syngas as well as a desired composite metal oxide conversion which, may control the syngas product composition and may avoid carbon formation. The solid flow in the reduction reactor may be controlled by a non-mechanical valve system positioned at the bottom of the reactor. The reduced composite metal oxide may be then transported to the second step, an air fluidized bed reactor that oxidizes the composite metal oxide to a higher oxidation state. Alternative reactor designs for the first step include rotary kiln, riser, and downer, which may provide similar gas solid co-current flow patterns. The overall process may be auto-thermal with composite metal oxides transferring heat between the reactors.
In one embodiment, the two-step conversion (reduction and oxidation) may be conducted in a fixed bed reactor and a gas switching system for syngas production from gaseous fuel. The fixed bed may be filled with composite metal oxide pellets, particles or a monolithic bed structure. The fuel gas may be introduced to the fixed bed, where the composite metal oxide may be reduced within a certain extent and high quality syngas may be produced. When the composite metal oxide conversion reaches a determined state, the fuel gas may be switched to a preheated air stream for the composite metal oxide regeneration. In one exemplary embodiment, the fuel and air streams may be preheated and the gas switching system may be operated at high temperatures (at least about 1000° C.).
In yet another embodiment, a counter-current moving bed reactor may be used for the first step with fuel introduced from the bottom and composite metal oxide introduced from the top. A conversion profile of the composite metal oxide may be formed inside the moving bed reactor. There may be two gas outlets in the moving bed reactor, one at the top for concentrated CO2 and H2O production, another in the middle of the bed where the composite metal oxide conversion may be suitable for high quality syngas production. For the second step, the reduced composite metal oxide may be reoxidized with air. In this embodiment, high quality syngas may be obtained with sequestration ready CO2 stream. The yield between syngas and CO2 stream may be adjusted by the process heat balance and flowrates from the two gas outlets of the moving bed reactor.
In another embodiment, a moving bed reactor may be used for simultaneous high quality syngas and high purity CO2 productions. For the first step, the composite metal oxide may be introduced from the top, and the fuel may be introduced at the middle. Two gas outlets may be positioned at the top and bottom of the moving bed reactor. The gas coming out from the top may encounter higher oxidation state composite metal oxides resulting in high purity CO2 and H2O production, while the gas from the bottom may be high quality syngas controlled by the reduced composite metal oxide. The reduced composite metal oxide may be reoxidized by air in another reactor for the second step. For this two-step process, high quality syngas may be obtained with sequestration ready CO2 stream. The yield between syngas and CO2 stream may be adjusted by the process heat balance and the fuel split ratio in the moving bed reactor.
In another embodiment, the reduced composite metal oxide from the first step may be oxidized by H2O, CO2 or a mixture thereof, for production of H2, CO or syngas in an additional reactor. In one embodiment, the additional reactor may be a moving bed reactor with counter-current gas (H2O, CO2)—solid (reduced composite metal oxide) contacting pattern. The operation temperature may be from about 500° C. to about 1100° C.
The oxidation state of the single metal oxide may significantly affect the syngas composition and possibility of carbon formation. As shown in
The subject matter of the present disclosure may be integrated with various fuel and chemical synthesis processes in light of its ability to produce flexible CO to H2 ratio. Depending on the downstream application, the CO to H2 ratio may be adjusted to the desired value in the first step by introducing CO2 or H2O together with the fuel. The CO2 and H2O may also enhance the initial conversion of methane and carbon via reforming and gasification reactions, respectively. Thus, the need for cost and energy intensive downstream processes to adjust the syngas composition may be removed or reduced to a minimal. In some embodiments, the reduced composite metal oxide may be also used for hydrogen production by steam oxidation. The hydrogen produced may be used for hydroprocessing or product upgrading. In certain embodiments, less than 20 wt % of dopants may be added to the composite to catalyze certain reactions such as methane decomposition, carbon gasification, and tar cracking. The dopants may be selected from the group consisting of at least one of Ca, Ce, Pt, Ru, Rh, La, Fe, Cu, and oxides thereof. In yet another embodiment, the composite metal oxide material may also release oxygen for fuel conversion. Binders such as bentonite and PVC material may be also used for binding purpose in the synthesis process.
The composite metal oxide material may be chemically and physically stable during multiple redox cycles. Single metal oxide materials may not be able to sustain multiple redox cycles due to changes in mechanical and crystal structure. The composite metal oxide materials may be synthesized by dispersing active metal oxide compounds in a physically stable structure, and thus may be repeatedly used in the process with little change to its reactivity and oxygen carrying capacity.
In other embodiments, as shown in
2FeOTiO2+CH4=2FeO0.5TiO2+CO+2H2 ΔH=235 kJ@1000° C.
2FeO0.5TiO2+1/2O2=2FeOTiO2 ΔH=−359 kJ@1000° C.
Still referring to
In other embodiments, as shown in
In other embodiments, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In yet another embodiment, as shown in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Thus it is intended that the specification cover the modifications and variations of the various embodiments described herein provided such modification and variations come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In another embodiment, the fuel conversion system may be designed in compact, modular, mobile mode and used for offshore and remote well applications.
The various embodiments of systems and methods for converting fuel will be further clarified by the following examples. The examples are illustrative in nature, and should not be understood to limit the subject matter of the present disclosure.
A fixed bed experiment was conducted to study the methane to syngas reaction. The lower section of the reactor was filled with 23.1 g FeO—TiO2 particles, and the upper section was filled with 8.3 g Fe2O3—TiO2 particles. When the temperature of the reactor reached 990° C., 50 mL/min CH4 and 50 mL/min N2 was injected into the reactor by digital mass controllers. The outlet gas composition was analyzed using a CAI gas analyzer as well as a gas chromatography. The gas concentration at the outlet reached a quasi-steady state in half an hour with methane conversion >95%, CO:CO2 ratio around 10, CO:H2 ratio around 1:2.
A moving bed reactor test apparatus was constructed, as shown in
A moving bed reactor test was conducted to study the solid feedstock conversion to syngas using biomass. The corresponding molecular formula was CH1.4O0.6. The biomass material was mixed with particles at a mass ratio of 1:3 and then injected into the moving bed system from the top. The solid fuel and composite particles followed a co-current contacting mode. The composite particle flowrate was controlled to 20 g/min using the screw feeder at the bottom. The temperature was controlled to 1040° C. using the external heaters. At steady state operation, the biomass conversion was over 95% with CO:CO2 ratio around 10 and CO:H2 ratio around 1:0.8. In this case, the carbon monoxide and hydrogen concentration in the high quality syngas from the syngas production reactor was higher than 91 mol %. Additionally, CH4 was co-injected to adjust the CO:H2 ratio. The co-injection of CH4 (540 ml/min, biomass 5 g/min, particles 26 g/min) gave an almost complete fuel conversion (95%) with CO:H2 ratio about 1:1. Given longer fuel residence time, a 100% fuel conversion may be achieved.
A moving bed reactor test was conducted to study the gas feedstock to syngas reaction using methane as a feedstock.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/014877 | 2/5/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/124011 | 8/14/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
971206 | Messerschmitt | Sep 1910 | A |
1078686 | Lane | Nov 1913 | A |
1658939 | Parsons | Feb 1928 | A |
2182747 | Marshall, Jr. | Dec 1939 | A |
2198560 | Marshall, Jr. | Apr 1940 | A |
2449635 | Barr | Sep 1948 | A |
2614067 | Reed et al. | Oct 1952 | A |
2635947 | Reed et al. | Apr 1953 | A |
2686819 | Johnson | Aug 1954 | A |
2694622 | Reed et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2697686 | Leffer | Dec 1954 | A |
2899374 | Gomory | Aug 1959 | A |
3027238 | Watkins | Mar 1962 | A |
3031287 | Benson et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3338667 | Pundsack | Aug 1967 | A |
3353925 | Baumann et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3421869 | Benson | Jan 1969 | A |
3442613 | Grotz, Jr. | May 1969 | A |
3442619 | Huebler et al. | May 1969 | A |
3442620 | Huebler et al. | May 1969 | A |
3494858 | Luckenbach | Feb 1970 | A |
3523821 | Bryce et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3573224 | Strelzoff et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3619142 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3726966 | Johnston | Apr 1973 | A |
4017270 | Funk et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4057402 | Patel et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4075079 | Lang | Feb 1978 | A |
4108732 | Nuttall, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4155832 | Cox et al. | May 1979 | A |
4272399 | Davis | Jun 1981 | A |
4318711 | Smith | Mar 1982 | A |
4325833 | Scott | Apr 1982 | A |
4334959 | Green | Jun 1982 | A |
4343624 | Belke et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348487 | Goldstein et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4404086 | Oltrogge | Sep 1983 | A |
4420332 | Mori et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4521117 | Ouwerkerk et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4594140 | Cheng | Jun 1986 | A |
4778585 | Graff | Oct 1988 | A |
4842777 | Lamort | Jun 1989 | A |
4861165 | Fredriksson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869207 | Engstrom et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4902586 | Wertheim | Feb 1990 | A |
4895821 | Kainer et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5130106 | Koves et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5365560 | Tam | Nov 1994 | A |
5447024 | Ishida et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5509362 | Lyon | Apr 1996 | A |
5518187 | Bruno et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529599 | Calderon | Jun 1996 | A |
5630368 | Wagoner | May 1997 | A |
5730763 | Manulescu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5770310 | Noguchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5827496 | Lyon | Oct 1998 | A |
5858210 | Richardson | Jan 1999 | A |
6007699 | Cole | Dec 1999 | A |
6143203 | Zeng | Nov 2000 | A |
6143253 | Radcliffe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6180354 | Singh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6361757 | Shikada et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6395944 | Griffiths | May 2002 | B1 |
6412559 | Gunter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444712 | Janda | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494153 | Lyon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509000 | Choudhary et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517631 | Bland | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6631698 | Hyppanen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642174 | Gaffney et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663681 | Kinding et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667022 | Cole | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669917 | Lyon | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682714 | Kindig et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685754 | Kindig et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703343 | Park | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6797253 | Lyon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6834623 | Cheng | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875411 | Sanfilippo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6880635 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6936363 | Kordesch et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7001579 | Metzger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7244399 | Myohanen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7404942 | Sanfilippo et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7496450 | Ortiz Aleman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7767191 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7837975 | Iyer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840053 | Liao | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8116430 | Shapiro et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8192706 | Grochowski | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202349 | Molaison | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8419813 | Hoteit et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435920 | White et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8508238 | Mahalingam et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8761943 | Lou et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771549 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814963 | Apanel et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8877147 | Fan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9376318 | Fan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9616403 | Fan et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20010055559 | Sanfilippo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020011428 | Scheuerman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020179887 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006026 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024388 | Scharpf | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031291 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030119658 | Allison et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130360 | Kindig et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030180215 | Niu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188668 | Bland | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040028181 | Charles, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030214 | Schindler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040109800 | Pahlman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126293 | Geerlings et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131531 | Geerlings et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132833 | Espinoza et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138060 | Rapier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152790 | Cornaro et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040154223 | Powell et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040197612 | Keefer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213705 | Blencoe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233191 | Mukherjee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244289 | Morozumi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265224 | Papavassiliou | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002847 | Maroto-Valer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054880 | Dubois et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050175533 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050255037 | Otsuka et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265912 | Alvarez, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274648 | Goldstein et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021308 | Merkel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042565 | Hu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060094593 | Beech, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070010588 | Pearson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049489 | Becue et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157517 | Tsay | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070258878 | Sanfilippo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080031809 | Norbeck et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080161624 | Glover et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164443 | White et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209807 | Tsangaris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080314838 | Becker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000194 | Fan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042070 | Brown et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090160461 | Zangl et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100071262 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100184589 | Miyairi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187159 | Naunheimer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100258429 | Ugolin | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293845 | Zeman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332170 | Gao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005395 | Vimalchand et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011720 | Rinker | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024687 | White et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054049 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094226 | McHugh et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100274 | Kuske et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110146152 | Vimalchand et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176968 | Fan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176988 | Okamura et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110206469 | Furuyama et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110289845 | Davis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110291051 | Hershkowitz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300060 | Guillou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110303875 | Hoteit et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120159841 | Fan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167585 | Wormser | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171588 | Fan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120214106 | Sit et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130085365 | Marashded et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130149650 | Gauthier et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130255272 | Ajhar et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140034134 | Fan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072917 | Fan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140144082 | Fan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140275297 | Velazquez-Vargas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140295361 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150238915 | Fan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160023190 | Fan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030904 | Fan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160268616 | Fan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160376512 | Fan et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1329761 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1454711 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1501534 | Jun 2004 | CN |
101389734 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101426885 | May 2009 | CN |
102187153 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102612625 | Jul 2012 | CN |
0161970 | Nov 1985 | EP |
1134187 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1445018 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1580162 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1845579 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1933087 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2450420 | May 2012 | EP |
2515038 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2601443 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2924035 | May 2009 | FR |
H10249153 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2006-502957 | Jan 2006 | JP |
406055 | Sep 2000 | TW |
426728 | Mar 2001 | TW |
WO 199013773 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 199965097 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 200022690 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 2000068339 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2001042132 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2003070629 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2007082089 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007122498 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007134075 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008019079 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008071215 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008082312 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008115076 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2009007200 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009009388 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009021258 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009114309 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010037011 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010063923 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010126617 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011021161 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011031752 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011031755 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011084734 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2012064712 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012077978 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012155054 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2012155059 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013040645 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2014085243 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014195904 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2011153568 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2016053941 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abad et al., “Chemical-looping combustion in a 300 W continuously operating reactor system using a manganese-based oxygen carrier,” Fuel, 2006, vol. 85, Issue 9, pp. 1174-1185. |
Abad et al., “Reduction Kinetics of Cu-, Ni-, and Fe-Based Oxygen Carriers Using Syngas (CO + H2) for Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy Fuels, 2007, 21 (4), pp. 1843-1853. |
Abad et al., “The use of iron oxide as oxygen carrier in a chemical-looping reactor,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, Issues 7-8, pp. 1021-1035. |
Adanez et al., “Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 215-282. |
Azis et al., “On the evaluation of synthetic and natural ilmenite using syngas as fuel in chemical-looping combustion (CLC),” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2010, vol. 88, Issue 11, pp. 1505-1514. |
Balasubramanian et al., “Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process,” Chem Engr Science, 1999, 54(15-16), 3543. |
Cao et al., “Investigation of Chemical Looping Combustion by Solid Fuels. 1. Process Analysis,” Energy Fuels, 2006, 20(5), pp. 1836-1844. |
Cho et al., “Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper- and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, Issue 9, pp. 1215-1225. |
De Diego et al., “Development of Cu-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, Issue 13, pp. 1749-1757. |
Denton et al., “Simultaneous Production of High-Purity Hydrogen and Sequestration-Ready CO2 from Syngas,” 2003. |
Environmental Protection Agency, “Geological CO2 Sequestration Technology and Cost Analysis,” Technical Support Document, pp. i-vi & pp. 1-61, Jun. 2008. |
Fan et al., “Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion prospect and opportunity,” Energy Environmental Science, 2012, p. 7254-7280. |
Fan et al., “Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes,” Particuology, 2008, vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 131-142. |
Forero et al., “Syngas combustion in a 500 Wth Chemical-Looping Combustion system using an impregnated Cu-based oxygen carrier,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, vol. 90, Issue 12, pp. 1471-1479. |
Gao et al., “Production of syngas via autothermal reforming of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor over the combined CeO2—ZrO2/SiO2 supported Ni catalysts,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, vol. 33, p. 5493-5500. |
Garcia-Labiano et al., “Temperature variations in the oxygen carrier particles during their reduction and oxidation in a chemical-looping combustion system,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 851-862. |
Geldart, “Types of Gas Fluidization,” Power Technology, vol. 7, pp. 285-292, 1973. |
Ghanapragasam et al., “Hydrogen production from coal direct chemical looping and syngas chemical looping combustion systems: Assessment of system operation and resource requirements,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, vol. 34, Issue 6, pp. 2606-2615. |
Go et al., “Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, vol. 34, p. 1301-1309. |
Haque, “Microwave energy for mineral treatment processes—a brief review,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 57, pp. 1-24, 1999. |
Herzog, “Carbon Sequestration via Mineral Carbonation: Overview and Assessment,” MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environmental, http://sequestration.mit.edu/pfd/carbonates.pdf, Mar. 14, 2002. |
Hildebrandt et al., “Producing Transportation Fuels with Less Work,” Science, Mar. 27, 2009, vol. 323, pp. 1680-1681. |
Hossain et al., “Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, vol. 63, Issue 18, pp. 4433-4451. |
Hua et al., “Three Dimensional Analysis of Electrical Capacitance Tomography Sensing Fields,” 1999 IOP Publishing LTD, vol. 10, pp. 717-725. |
Huijgen et al., “Carbon dioxide sequestration by mineral carbonation,” ECN-C--03-016, www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/200e/c03016.pdf, Feb. 2003. |
Jadhav et al., “Carbonation of Mg-Bearing Minerals: Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies,” Ohio Coal Research Consortium/Ohio State University Project C3.12, www.ohiocoal.org/projects/year3/c3.12, Jul. 3, 2002. |
Jin et al., “Development of a Novel Chemical-Looping Combustion: Synthesis of a Looping Material with a Double Metal Oxide of Co0—NiO,” Energy & Fuels, 1998, vol. 12, 1272-1277. |
Johansson et al., “Combustion of Syngas and Natural Gas in a 300 W Chemical-Looping Combustor,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design Volume, 2006, vol. 84, Issue 9, pp. 819-827. |
Kaiser et al., “Precombustion and Postcombustion Decarbonization,” IEEE, Power Engineering Review, Apr. 2001, pp. 15-17. |
Leion et al., “Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion using oxide scale and unprocessed iron ore as oxygen carriers,” Fuel, 2009, vol. 88, Issue 10, pp. 1945-1954. |
Leion et al., “Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 180-193. |
Leion et al., “The use of petroleum coke as fuel in chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, Issue 12-13, pp. 1947-1958. |
Li et al., “Clean coal conversion processes—progress and challenges,” The Royal Society of Chemistry, Energy & Environmental Science, Jul. 30, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 248-267. |
Li et al., “Role of Metal Oxide Support in Redox Reactions of Iron Oxide for Chemical Looping Applications: Experiments and Density Functional Theory Calculations,” Energy Environmental Science, 2011, vol. 4, p. 3661-3667. |
Li et al., “Syngas chemical looping gasification process: Bench-scale studies and reactor simulations,” AICHE Journal, 2010, vol. 56, Issue 8, pp. 2186-2199. |
Li et al., “Syngas Chemical Looping Gasification Process: Oxygen Carrier Particle Selection and Performance,” Energy Fuels, 2009, 23(8), pp. 4182-4189. |
Lyngfelt, “Chemical Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels—Status of Development,” Applied Energy, 2014, vol. 113, p. 1869-1873. |
Lyngfelt, “Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion Operational Experience,” 1st International Conference on Chemical Looping, Mar. 2010. |
Mamman et al., “Simultaneous steam and CO2 reforming of methane to syngas over NiO/MgO/SA-5205 in presence and absence of oxygen,” Applied Catalysis A, 1998, vol. 168, p. 33-46. |
Marashdeh, Q. et al., “A Multimodal Tomography System Based on ECT Sensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, 426-433. |
Marashdeh, Q., Advances in Electrical Capacitance Tomography, Dissertation, The Ohio State University, 2006. |
Mattisson et al., “Application of chemical-looping combustion with capture of CO2,” Second Nordic Minisymposium on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Goeteborg, Oct. 26, 2001, pp. 46-51. |
Mattisson et al., “Chemical-looping combustion using syngas as fuel,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas control, 2007, vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 158-169. |
Mattisson et al., “CO 2 capture from coal combustion using chemical-looping combustion—Reactivity investigation of Fe, Ni and Mn based oxygen carriers using syngas,” Department of Energy and Environment, Division of Energy Technology and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Division of Environmental Inorganic Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, 2007. |
Mattisson et al., “Reactivity of Some Metal Oxides Supported on Alumina with Alternating Methane and Oxygen—Application for Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy & Fuels, 2003, vol. 17, pp. 643-651. |
Mattisson et al., “The use of iron oxide as an oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of methane with inherent separation of CO2,” Fuel, 2001, vol. 80, pp. 1953-1962. |
Mattisson et al., “Use of Ores and Industrial Products as Oxygen Carriers in Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy & Fuels, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 2307-2315. |
Ockwig et al., “Membranes for Hydrogen Separation,” American Chemical Society, Chem. Rev., Oct. 10, 2007, vol. 107, pp. 4078-4110. |
O'Connor et al., “Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Direct Mineral Carbonation: Results from Recent Studies and Currents Status,” Abstract, USDOE Office of Fossil Energy, 2001. |
Ohio Coal Development Office of the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, “Ohio Coal Research Consortium (OCRC)—IV, Year 3 Proposal Solicitation,” http://www.ohioquality.org/ocdo/other_pdf/Consortium_IV_Year_3_RFP.pdf (2006). |
Ortiz et al., “Hydrogen Production by Auto-Thermal Chemical-Looping Reforming in a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Reactor Using Ni-based Oxygen Carriers,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, vol. 35, p. 151-160. |
Park et al., “CO2 Mineral Sequestration: Chemically Enhanced Aqueous Carbonation of Serpentine,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2003, vol. 81, pp. 885-890. |
Park et al., “CO2 Mineral Sequestration: physically activated dissolution of serpentine and pH swing process,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, vol. 59, pp. 5241-5247. |
Pröll et al., “Syngas and a separate nitrogen/argon stream via chemical looping reforming—A 140 kW pilot plant study,” Fuel, 2010, vol. 89, Issue 6, pp. 1249-1256. |
Ruchenstein et al., “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over nickel/alkaline earth metal oxide catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A, 1995, vol. 133, p. 149-161. |
Russo et al., “Impact of Process Design of on the Multiplicity Behavior of a Jacketed Exothermic CSTR,” AICHE Journal, Jan. 1995, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 135-147. |
Ryden et al., “Synthesis gas generation by chemical-looping reforming in a continuously operating laboratory reactor,” Fuel, 2006, vol. 85, p. 1631-1641. |
Scott et al., “In situ gasification of a solid fuel and CO2 separation using chemical looping,” AICHE Journal, 2006, vol. 52, Issue 9, pp. 3325-3328. |
Shen et al., “Chemical-Looping Combustion of Biomass in a 10kWth Reactor with Iron Oxide as an Oxygen Carrier,” Energy & Fuels, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 2498-2505. |
Shen et al., “Experiments on chemical looping combustion of coal with a NiO based oxygen carrier,” Combustion and Flame, 2009, vol. 156, Issue 3, pp. 721-728. |
Sridhar et al., “Syngas Chemical Looping Process: Design and Construction of a 25 kWth Subpilot Unit,” Energy Fuels, 2012, 26(4), pp. 2292-2302. |
Steinfeld et al., “Design Aspects of Solar Thermochemical Engineering—A case Study: Two-Step Water-Splitting Cycle Using the Fe3O4/FeO Redox System,” Solar Energy, 1999, pp. 43-53. |
Steinfeld, “Solar hydrogen production via a two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycle based on Zn/ZnO redox reactions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, vol. 27, pp. 611-619. |
Tian et al., “Thermodynamic investigation into carbon deposition and sulfur evolution in a Ca-based chemical-looping combustion system,” Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, vol. 89, Issue 9, p. 1524. |
U.S. Department of Energy, NCCTI Energy Technologies Group, Office of Fossil Energy, “CO2 Capture and Storage in Geologic Formations,” pp. 34, Revised Jan. 8, 2002. |
Usachev et al., “Conversion of Hydrocarbons to Synthesis Gas: Problems and Prospects,” Petroleum Chemistry, 2011, vol. 51, p. 96-106. |
Vernon et al., “Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas,” Catalysis Letters, 1990, vol. 6, p. 181-186. |
Warsito, W. et al., Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Yamazaki et al., “Development of highly stable nickel catalyst for methane-steam reaction under low steam to carbon ratio,” Applied Catalyst A, 1996, vol. 136, p. 49-56. |
Zafar et al., “Integrated Hydrogen and Power Production with CO2 Capture Using Chemical-Looping ReformingRedox Reactivity of Particles of CuO, Mn2O3, NiO, and Fe2O3 Using SiO2 as a Support,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, 44(10), pp. 3485-3496. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2007/000956 dated Jul. 24, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2010/048121 dated Mar. 22, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2010/048125 dated Mar. 22, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2011/059736 dated May 23, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2012/037544 dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2012/037557 dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/14877 dated May 14, 2014 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/25520 dated Jul. 11, 2014 (13 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/26071 dated Jul. 10, 2014 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/000956 dated Dec. 4, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/058579 dated Aug. 3, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/048121 dated Apr. 1, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/048125 dated Dec. 17, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/059736 dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037544 dated Aug. 10, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037557 dated Aug. 13, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/027839 dated Jul. 24, 2014 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/028217 dated Jul. 28, 2014 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/018123 dated May 8, 2015 (10 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201480016427.9 dated Sep. 14, 2016 (16 pages, English translation included). |
Advisory Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jul. 11, 2013. |
Advisory Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Jun. 24, 2013. |
Examiner's Answer before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Nov. 4, 2013. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jan. 5, 2012. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jun. 5, 2012. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jun. 7, 2011. |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Feb. 23, 2016 (27 pages). |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Sep. 13, 2013. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Sep. 6, 2012. |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Dec. 18, 2014 (14 pages). |
United States Patent Office Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Jul. 2, 2015 (15 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Jan. 15, 2016 (13 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Apr. 9, 2014 (26 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Aug. 26, 2014 (16 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Dec. 30, 2014 (19 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Oct. 13, 2015 (21 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Dec. 14, 2015 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Feb. 22, 2016 (8 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,654 dated Jun. 12, 2015 (16 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,654 dated Oct. 30, 2014 (14 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,654 dated Jan. 4, 2016 (17 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,295 dated Sep. 28, 2015 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/162,199 dated Jun. 30, 2016 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 15/162,199 dated Oct. 21, 2016 (9 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/883,795 dated Jun. 20, 2016 (15 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Alowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Aug. 3, 2016 (8 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,627 dated Oct. 20, 2016 (6 Pages). |
United States Patent Office Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,636 dated Oct. 24, 2016 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,319 dated Nov. 7, 2016 (7 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/774,730 dated Nov. 16, 2016 (10 pages). |
Adanez et al., “Selection of oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Energy & Fuels, American Chemical Society, 2004, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 371-377. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Application No. 2014214982 dated Nov. 2, 2016 (3 pages). |
European Patent Office Extended Search Report for Application No. 14749268.0 dated Oct. 14, 2016 (9 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,627 dated Mar. 10, 2017 (5 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,319 dated Apr. 11, 2017 (9 pages). |
Bell et al., “H2 Production via Ammonia Decomposition Using Non-Noble Metal Catalysts: A Review,” Top Catal, 2016, 59, 1438-1457. |
Cheng et al., “Carbon Dioxide Adsorption and Activation on Ceria (110),” J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 014702. |
Cheng et al., “Methane Adsorption and Dissociation on Iron Oxide Oxygen Carrier: Role of Oxygen Vacancy,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 16423-16435. |
Cheng et al., “Propagation of Olefin Metathesis to Propene on WO3 Catalysts: A Mechanistic and Kinetic Study,” ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 59-72. |
Connell et al., “Process Simulation of Iron-Based Chemical Looping Schemes with CO2 Capture for Hydrogen and Electricity Production from Coal,” Presented at 29th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 15-18, 2012, pp. 1274-1281. |
De Klerk, “Gas-to-Liquid Conversion.” Natural Gas Conversion Technologies Workshop of ARPA-E. U.S. Department of Energy, Houston, TX. vol. 13 (2012). |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration “Annual Energy Outlook 2015 with Projections to 2040,” Apr. 2015. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, “How Much Petroleum Does the United States Import and from Where?” <https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=727&t=6> webpage available as early as Mar. 22, 2017. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Natural Gas Vented and Flared.” <https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/NG_PROD_SUM_A_EPG0_VGV_MMCF_A.htm> webpage available as early as Feb. 29, 2016. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Natural Gas Weekly Update.” <https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/> webpage available as early as Dec. 4, 2011. |
Fan et al., “Chemical-Looping Technology Platform,” AIChE Journal, 61(1), 2-22 (2015). |
Fan, “Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions,” Wiley-AIChE: Hoboken, NJ, U.S.A.; 2010. |
Ishida et al., “Evaluation of a Chemical-Looping-Combustion Power-Generation System by Graphic Exergy Analysis,” Energy, 12(2), 147-154 (1987). |
Kathe et al., “Chemical Looping Gasification for Hydrogen Enhanced Syngas Production with in-situ CO2 Capture,” United States Department of Energy, OSTI: 1185194, (2015). |
Li et al., “Ionic Diffusion in the Oxidation of Iron-effect of Support and Its Implications to Chemical Looping Applications,” Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 876-880. |
Liu et al., “Enhanced Performance of Alkali Metal Doped Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/Al2O3 Composites as Oxygen Carrier Material in Chemical Looping Combustion,” Energy Fuels. 2013, 27, 4977-4983. |
Luo et al., “Shale Gas-to-Syngas Chemical Looping Process for Stable Shale Gas Conversion to High Purity Syngas with H2:CO Ratio of 2:1,” Energy and Environmental Science, 7(12), 4104-4117, (2014). |
Makepeace et. al. “Ammonia decomposition catalysis using non-stoichiometric lithium imide,” Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 3805. |
Miller et al., “Toward Transformational Carbon Capture,” AIChE Journal, 62, 1-10 (2016). |
NETL, National Energy Technology Laboratory. U.S. Department of Energy, “Quality Guidelines for Energy System Studies—Specification for Selected Feedstocks.” Jan. 2012. |
Qin et al., “Evolution of Nanoscale Morphology in Single and Binary Metal Oxide Microparticles During Reduction and Oxidation Processes,” J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17511-17520. |
Qin et al., “Impact of 1% Lathanum Dopant on Carbonaceous Fuel Redox Reactions with an Iron-Based Oxygen Carrier in Chemical Looping Processes,” ACS Energy Letters, 2017, 2, 70-74. |
Qin et al., “Nanostructure Formation Mechanism and Ion Diffusion in Iron-Titanium Composite Materials with Chemical Looping Redox Reactions,” J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015, 3, 11302-11312. |
Quin et al., “Improved Cyclic redox reactivity of lanthanum modified iron-based oxygen carriers in carbon monoxide xhemical looping combustion,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 8 pages. |
Yin et. al., “A mini-review on ammonia decomposition catalysts for on-site generation of hydrogen for fuel cell applications,” Applied Catalysis A: General, 2004, 277, 1-9. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/027241 dated Jul. 10, 2017 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/034503 dated Aug. 15, 2017 (14 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201480016427.9 dated Jul. 6, 2017 (10 pages, English translation included). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/883,795 dated Jun. 23, 2017 (11 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,627 dated Jun. 14, 2017 (5 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/775,044 dated May 30, 2017 (15 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/774,727 dated Sep. 14, 2017 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,636 dated Nov. 7, 2017 (5 pages). |
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 14749268.0 dated Apr. 13, 2018 (5 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/647,084 dated Mar. 19, 2018 (8 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,249 dated May 22, 2018 (8 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201480016427.9 dated Feb. 23, 2018 (7 pages, English translation included). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/883,795 dated Jan. 22, 2018 (7 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/775,044 dated Feb. 26, 2018 (16 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,249 dated Dec. 28, 2017 (14 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/647,084 dated Dec. 26, 2017 (7 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,590 dated Mar. 9, 2018 (10 pages). |
Forzatti, “Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis.” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 222(1-2), 2001, 221-236. |
United States Environmental Protection Agency. “Air Pollution Control Technology Fact Sheet: Selective Catalytic Reforming,” <https://www3.epa.gov/ttncatc1/cica/files/fscr.pdf> (2003). |
Trout et al., “Analysis of the Thermochemistry of NOx Decomposition over CuZSM-5 Based on Quantum Chemical and Statistical Mechanical Calculations,” J. Phys. Chem, 100(44), 1996, 17582-17592. |
Iwamoto et al., “Influence of sulfur dioxide on catalytic removal of nitric oxide over copper ion-exchanged ZSM-5 Zeolite.” Appl. Catal., 69(2), 1991, 15-19. |
Liu et al., “Recent Advances in Catalytic DeNOx Science and Technology,” Catalysis Reviews, 48(1), 2006, 43-89. |
Imanaka et al., “Advances in Direct NOx Decomposition Catalysts,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 431-432, 2012, 1-8. |
Masui et al.,“Direct Decomposition of NO into N2 and O2 Over C-type Cubic Y2O3—Tb4O7—ZrO2,” Materials Sciences and Applications, 3(10), 2012, 733-738. |
Goellner, J. F., V. Shah, M. J. Turner, N. J. Kuehn, J. Littlefield, G. Cooney, and J. Marriott, “Analysis of Natural Gas-to-Liquid Transportation Fuels via Fischer-Tropsch,” United States Department of Energy/NETL, DOE/NETL-2013/1597, Pittsburgh, PA (2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160002034 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61761016 | Feb 2013 | US | |
61779243 | Mar 2013 | US |