Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to the field of marine geophysical surveying. More particularly, the invention relates to methods for controlling the spatial distribution or geophysical data gathering equipment towed behind a survey vessel.
2. Background Art
Marine geophysical surveying systems such as seismic acquisition systems and electromagnetic survey systems are used to acquire geophysical data from formations disposed below the bottom of a body of water, such as a lake or the ocean. Marine seismic surveying systems, for example, typically include a seismic survey vessel having onboard navigation, seismic energy source control, and geophysical data recording equipment. The seismic survey vessel is typically configured to tow one, or more typically a plurality of laterally spaced apart sensor streamers through the water. At selected times, the seismic energy source control equipment causes one or more seismic energy sources (which may be towed in the water by the seismic vessel or by another vessel) to actuate. Signals generated by various sensors on the one or more streamers in response to detected seismic energy are ultimately conducted to the recording equipment. A record with respect to time is made in the recording system of the signals generated by each sensor (or groups of such sensors). The recorded signals are later interpreted to infer the structure and composition of the formations below the bottom of the body of water. Corresponding components for inducing electromagnetic fields and detecting electromagnetic phenomena originating in the subsurface in response to such imparted fields may be used in marine electromagnetic geophysical survey systems.
The one or more sensor streamers are in the most general sense long cables that have geophysical sensors disposed at spaced apart positions along the length of the cables. A typical streamer can extend behind the geophysical survey vessel for several kilometers.
Multiple streamer systems are used in what are known as three dimensional and four dimensional geophysical surveys. A four dimensional seismic survey is a three dimensional survey over a same area of the Earth's subsurface repeated at selected times.
The quality of geophysical images of the Earth's subsurface produced from three dimensional or four dimensional surveys is affected by how well the positions of the individual sensors on the streamers are controlled. Various devices are known in the art for positioning streamers laterally and/or at a selected depth below the water surface. U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,027 issued to Owsley et al., for example, describes a lateral force device for displacing a towed underwater acoustic cable that provides displacement in the horizontal and vertical directions.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,752 issued to Ambs et al. describes a seismic streamer position control module.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,144,342 issued to Bertheas et al. describes a method for controlling the navigation of a towed seismic streamer using “birds” affixable to the exterior of the streamer.
In a first embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including an array of sensor streamers extending behind said vessel, and determining a geodetic location of a streamer steering reference point at a forward end of said sensor streamers and a reference direction. At least one sensor streamer included in said array of sensor streamers is laterally deflected in response to the determined geodetic location of said streamer steering reference point and said determined reference direction.
In another embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including an array of sensor streamers comprising a plurality of sensor streamer extending behind said vessel, determining a geodetic location of a vessel steering reference point at a forward end of said array of sensor streamers, and steering the survey vessel so that the vessel steering reference point follows a preselected travel path.
In yet another embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including a geophysical source and an array of sensor streamers including a plurality of sensor streamer extending behind the vessel, determining a geodetic location of a source steering reference point at a forward end of said array of sensor streamers, determining a desired source lateral position with reference to the source steering reference point, and steering said geophysical source so that said geophysical source follows the desired source lateral position.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
The geophysical survey system 2 includes a survey vessel 10 that moves along the surface of a body of water 11 such as a lake or the ocean. The survey vessel 10 may include thereon equipment, shown generally at 12 and for convenience collectively referred to as a “recording system.” The recording system 12 typically includes devices (none of the following described devices shown separately) such as a data recording unit for making a record with respect to time of signals generated by various sensors in the acquisition system. The recording system 12 also typically includes navigation equipment to determine and record, at selected times, the geodetic position of the vessel 10, and using other devices to be explained below, the geodetic position each of a plurality of geophysical sensors 22 disposed at spaced apart locations on streamers 20 towed by the survey vessel 10.
In one example, the device for determining the geodetic position may be a geodetic position signal receiver such as a global positioning satellite (“GPS”) receiver, shown schematically at 12A. Other geodetic position determination devices are known in the art. The foregoing elements of the recording system 12 are familiar to those skilled in the art, and with the exception of the geodetic position detecting receiver 12A, are not shown separately in the figures herein for clarity of the illustration.
The geophysical sensors 22 can be any type of geophysical sensor known in the art. Non-limiting examples of such sensors may include particle motion-responsive seismic sensors such as geophones and accelerometers, pressure-responsive seismic sensors, pressure time gradient-responsive seismic sensors, electrodes, magnetometers, temperature sensors or combinations of the foregoing. The geophysical sensors 22 may measure, for example, seismic or electromagnetic field energy primarily reflected from or refracted by various structures in the Earth's subsurface below the bottom of the water 11 in response to energy imparted into the subsurface by an energy source 17. The energy source 17 may be, for example a seismic energy source or an array of such sources. Non-limiting examples of seismic energy sources include air guns and water guns. The energy source 17 may also be an electromagnetic source, for example, a wire loop or electrode pair (not shown for clarity). The energy source 17 may be towed in the water 11 by the survey vessel 10 as shown or a different vessel (not shown). The recording system 12 may also include energy source control equipment (not shown separately) for selectively operating the energy source 17.
In the survey system shown in
The sensor streamers 20 can each be coupled, at the axial end thereof nearest the vessel 10 (the “forward end”), to a respective lead-in cable termination 20A. The lead-in cable terminations 20A can be coupled to or associated with the spreader ropes or cables 24 so as to substantially fix the lateral positions of the streamers 20 with respect to each other. The lead-in cable terminations 20A may each include a relative position signal sensor (not shown separately, and explained further below). Electrical and/or optical connection between the appropriate components in the recording system 12 and, ultimately, the geophysical sensors 22 (and/or other circuitry) in the streamers 20 may be made using lead-in cables 18, each of which terminates in a respective lead-in cable termination 20A. One of the lead-in terminations 20A is disposed at the forward end of each streamer 20. Each of the lead-in cables 18 may be deployed by a respective winch 19 or similar spooling device such that the deployed length of each cable 18 can be changed. The type of towing equipment coupled to the forward end of each streamer shown in
The acquisition system shown in
In the present example, each LFD control device 26 may include an associated relative position determination device. In one example, the position determination device may be an acoustic range sensing device (“ARD”) 26A. Such ARDs typically include an ultrasonic transceiver or transmitter and electronic circuitry configured to cause the transceiver to emit pulses of acoustic energy. Travel time of the acoustic energy between a transmitter and a receiver disposed at a spaced apart position such as along the same streamer and/or on a different streamer, is related to the distance between the transmitter and a receiver, and the acoustic velocity of the water. The acoustic velocity can be assumed substantially not to change during a survey, or it can be measured by a device such as a water velocity test cell. Alternatively or additionally, acoustic range sensing devices (“ARDs”) may be disposed at selected positions along each one of the streamers not collocated with the LFD control devices 26. Such additional ARDs are shown at 23 in
The streamers 20 may additionally or alternatively include a plurality of heading sensors 29 disposed at spaced apart positions along each streamer 20. The heading sensors 29 may be geomagnetic direction sensors such as magnetic compass devices affixed to the exterior of the streamer 20. One type of compass device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,481,611 issued to Burrage and incorporated herein by reference. The heading sensors 29 provide a signal indicative of the heading (direction with respect to magnetic north) of the streamer 20 at the axial position of the heading sensor 29 along the respective streamer. Measurements of such heading at spaced apart locations along each streamer may be used to interpolate the geometry (spatial distribution) of each streamer.
Each streamer 20 may include at the distal end thereof a tail buoy 25. The tail buoy 25 may include, among other sensing devices, a geodetic position receiver 25A such as a GPS receiver that can determine the geodetic position of each tail buoy 25. The geodetic position receiver 25A in each tail buoy 25 may be in signal communication with the recording system 12.
By determining the distance between ARDs 26A, 23, including the one or more ARDs on the vessel 10, and/or by interpolating the spatial distribution of the streamers 20 from the heading sensor 29 measurements, an estimate of the geometry of each streamer 20 may be made. Collectively, the geometry of the streamers 20 may be referred to as the “array geometry.” For purposes of defining the scope of the present invention, the various position measurement components described above, including those from the heading sensors 29, from the ARDs 26A, 23, and, if used, from the additional geodetic position receivers 25A in the tail buoys 25, may be used individually or in any combination. It is only necessary for purposes of the present invention to be able to reasonably estimate the relative position of each point along each streamer 20 with reference to a geodetic position measurement at one or more points in the survey system. One such point may be on the survey vessel 10, as measured by the GPS geodetic position receiver 12A, and/or the GPS geodetic position receivers 25A in the tail buoys 25.
By appropriate selection of the positions along each streamer at which the various relative position measurement devices described above are disposed, it is possible to determine the array geometry without the need to measure, estimate or otherwise determine the absolute geodetic position at large numbers of positions along each streamer, such as by using a large number of GPS receivers. The ARDs 26A, 23 and heading sensors 29 may be referred to for convenience in defining the invention as “relative position determination” sensors. By determining relative positions at each point along each streamer with reference to a selected point on the survey vessel, streamer tail buoy 25 and/or the energy source 17, (the geodetic position of which is measured by the respective sensor thereon) is it possible to determine the geodetic position of each such streamer point. A particular example of a system for determining relative positions of the streamers using acoustic signals is described in the Falkenberg et al. patent referred to above.
In the present example, the energy source 17 may include a steering device 17B to enable separate control of the trajectory of the source 17. The energy source steering device 17B may be controlled by suitable control signals from the recording system 12.
During operation of the geophysical acquisition system shown in
During geophysical survey operations, it is often desirable for the streamers 20 to spread out behind the vessel 10 in a selected geometry. In one implementation of the invention it may be desirable for the streamers to spread evenly behind the vessel to avoid “holes” in the coverage of measurements of the subsurface. However, other selected geometries may also be chosen. “Evenly” in the present context means that the lateral spacing between adjacent streamers 20 is the same along the length of the streamers 20, or the lateral spacing is related, e.g., proportional, to the distance along the streamers from the forward ends thereof. Deviations from even spreading may result from, for example, rip currents in the water 11 and propeller wash from the vessel 10.
1. Streamer Front End Follow Mode.
A first embodiment of the invention may be referred to as a “streamer front end follow mode.” With reference to
A geodetic position of the forward end of one or more of the sensor streamers 20 may be determined by using the relative position sensor (not shown separately) in the forward end terminations 20A of the sensor streamers and calculating the geodetic position of the forward ends of the sensor streamers from the measured relative position between the forward end termination 20A and one or more of the geodetic position sensor measurements (e.g., at 12A in
In addition to the streamer steering reference point, a “reference direction” 48 is determined. In one implementation of the invention the reference direction 48 may be the direction of movement of the streamer steering reference point 42 as sensor streamers 20 are towed behind survey vessel 10. To determine this reference direction, the geodetic position of the streamer steering reference point 42 may be determined repeatedly at selected time intervals (e.g., every second) to calculate a direction of travel of the streamer steering reference point 42. The streamer steering reference points may be subjected to a smoothing filter (e.g., in the recording system 12 in
In one implementation of this embodiment of the invention, the streamer steering reference point is the forward end of one of said sensor streamers included in said array of sensor streamers. In a further implementation of the invention a geodetic location of a second streamer reference point of a forward end of a second one of the sensor streamers is determined, and said second streamer is laterally deflected in response to the determined geodetic location of the second streamer steering reference point for said second streamer steering reference point.
A desired position for each LFD control device 26 can be defined according to the techniques explained above, and the LFD control devices 26 can be operated such that the streamers 20 substantially travel to follow such desired position.
2. Vessel Steering to Keep Streamer Front Ends on a Determined Path.
Another embodiment of the invention may be referred to as vessel steering to keep streamer front end on a determined path 49. With reference to
3. Energy Source Follow Mode.
Another embodiment of the invention may be referred to as an energy source follow mode. With reference to
Methods for operating LFD control devices and controlling geometry of a sensor array according to the various aspects of the invention may provide more even coverage in marine geophysical surveying, may provide more accurate positioning of geophysical sensors, and may improve safety of the array in hostile environments. Any of the above methods (the Steamer Front End Follow Mode, the Vessel Steering to keep streamer front ends on a determined path and the Energy Source Follow Mode) may be used alone or in any combination of two or three of these modes.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Not applicable.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3375800 | Cole et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3412704 | Buller et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3412705 | Nesson | Nov 1968 | A |
3434446 | Cole | Mar 1969 | A |
3440992 | Chance | Apr 1969 | A |
3531761 | Tickell et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3531762 | Tickell | Sep 1970 | A |
3560912 | Spink et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3605674 | Weese | Sep 1971 | A |
3618555 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3648642 | Fetrow et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3774570 | Pearson | Nov 1973 | A |
3840845 | Brown | Oct 1974 | A |
3896756 | Pearson et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3921124 | Payton | Nov 1975 | A |
3931608 | Cole | Jan 1976 | A |
3943483 | Strange | Mar 1976 | A |
3961303 | Paitson | Jun 1976 | A |
4033278 | Waters | Jul 1977 | A |
4055138 | Klein | Oct 1977 | A |
4063213 | Itria et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4087780 | Itria et al. | May 1978 | A |
4144518 | Minohara et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4222340 | Cole | Sep 1980 | A |
4227479 | Gertler et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4290124 | Cole | Sep 1981 | A |
4313392 | Guenther et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4323989 | Huckabee et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4404664 | Zachariadis | Sep 1983 | A |
4463701 | Pickett et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4484534 | Thillaye du Boullay | Nov 1984 | A |
4486863 | French | Dec 1984 | A |
4676183 | Conboy | Jun 1987 | A |
4694435 | Magneville | Sep 1987 | A |
4709355 | Woods et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4711194 | Fowler | Dec 1987 | A |
4719987 | George, Jr. et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4723501 | Hovden et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4724788 | Ayers | Feb 1988 | A |
4729333 | Kirby et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743996 | Book | May 1988 | A |
4745583 | Motal | May 1988 | A |
4766441 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4767183 | Martin | Aug 1988 | A |
4798156 | Langeland et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4825708 | Sevick | May 1989 | A |
4843996 | Darche | Jul 1989 | A |
4890568 | Dolengowski | Jan 1990 | A |
4890569 | Givens | Jan 1990 | A |
4912684 | Fowler | Mar 1990 | A |
4992990 | Langeland et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5031159 | Rouquette | Jul 1991 | A |
5042413 | Benoit | Aug 1991 | A |
5050133 | Buddery | Sep 1991 | A |
5052814 | Stubblefield | Oct 1991 | A |
5117400 | Penn et al. | May 1992 | A |
5138582 | Furu | Aug 1992 | A |
5148406 | Brink et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5200930 | Rouquette | Apr 1993 | A |
5214612 | Olivier et al. | May 1993 | A |
5402745 | Wood | Apr 1995 | A |
5443027 | Owsley et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5507243 | Williams, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517202 | Patel et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517463 | Hornbostel et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529011 | Williams, Jr. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532975 | Elholm | Jul 1996 | A |
5546882 | Kuche | Aug 1996 | A |
5619474 | Kuche | Apr 1997 | A |
5642330 | Santopietro | Jun 1997 | A |
5668775 | Hatteland | Sep 1997 | A |
5761153 | Gikas et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771202 | Bale et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784335 | Deplante et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790472 | Workman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835450 | Russell | Nov 1998 | A |
5913280 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920828 | Norris et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973995 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6011752 | Ambs et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011753 | Chien | Jan 2000 | A |
6016286 | Olivier et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028817 | Ambs | Feb 2000 | A |
6049507 | Allen | Apr 2000 | A |
6091670 | Oliver et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6142091 | Henriksen | Nov 2000 | A |
6144342 | Bertheas et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6229760 | Ambs | May 2001 | B1 |
6418378 | Nyland | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459653 | Kuche | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6525992 | Olivier et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549653 | Osawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6618321 | Brunet | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6671223 | Bittleston | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691038 | Zajac | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6766253 | Burns et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6879542 | Soreau et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6932017 | Hillesund et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7080607 | Hillesund et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092315 | Olivier | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7161871 | Brunet | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162967 | Hillesund et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176589 | Rouquette | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190634 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203130 | Welker | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7221620 | Planke et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222579 | Hillesund et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7267070 | Le Page et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7293520 | Hillesund et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7377224 | Ryan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391674 | Welker | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7403448 | Welker et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415936 | Storteig et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417924 | Vigen et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423929 | Olivier | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7433264 | Vigen | Oct 2008 | B2 |
8230801 | Hillesund et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8267031 | Austad et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20050188908 | Hillesund et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060227658 | Toennessen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231006 | Hillesund et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231007 | Hillesund et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256653 | Toennessen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260529 | Hillesund et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070019504 | Howlid et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041272 | Hillesund et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070064526 | Holo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070127312 | Storteig et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165486 | Moldoveanu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223307 | Storteig et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223308 | Frivik et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080008033 | Fossum et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080262738 | Welker | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080304358 | Mellier et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316859 | Welker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003129 | Stokkeland et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003135 | Mellier et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030605 | Breed | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090141587 | Welker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090211509 | Olivier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090238035 | Hillesund et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245019 | Falkenberg et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262601 | Hillesund et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279385 | Hillesund et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100118644 | Seale et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100202249 | Goujon et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199853305 | Jun 2001 | AU |
2002315000 | Jan 2003 | AU |
2003231620 | Sep 2003 | AU |
2007201855 | May 2007 | AU |
2008200247 | Feb 2008 | AU |
2008200248 | Feb 2008 | AU |
2270719 | Jul 1998 | CA |
69702673 | Apr 2001 | DE |
0018053 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0154968 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0193215 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0297852 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0319716 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0321705 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0390987 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0525391 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0562781 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0581441 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0613025 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0909701 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0939910 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1119780 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1417515 | May 2004 | EP |
1847851 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1847852 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1847853 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1868011 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2128654 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2090902 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2090903 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2090904 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2128654 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2209022 | Jul 2010 | EP |
1088469 | Oct 1967 | GB |
2093610 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2122562 | Jan 1984 | GB |
2320706 | Jul 1998 | GB |
2331971 | Jun 1999 | GB |
2342081 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2364388 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2 364 388 | Aug 2002 | GB |
2436456 | Sep 2007 | GB |
992701 | Jun 1999 | NO |
20074664 | Apr 2001 | NO |
20074667 | Apr 2001 | NO |
20074669 | Apr 2001 | NO |
20074671 | Apr 2001 | NO |
20074672 | Apr 2001 | NO |
20035589 | Feb 2004 | NO |
20074692 | Feb 2004 | NO |
20074693 | Feb 2004 | NO |
330507 | May 2011 | NO |
13929 | Jun 2000 | RU |
14681 | Aug 2000 | RU |
13929 | Oct 2000 | RU |
14681 | Oct 2000 | RU |
31658 | Aug 2003 | RU |
9531735 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9621163 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9711395 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9730361 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9745006 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9828636 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9904293 | Jan 1999 | WO |
0020895 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0116623 | Mar 2001 | WO |
02103393 | Dec 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
L.I. Popova, Eurasian Patent Search Report, Mailing Date: Jan. 18, 2012. |
Matthias Meyer, Partial European Search Report, Mailing Date: Feb. 1, 2013. |
Matthias Meyer, Extended European Search Report, Mailing Date: Mar. 27, 2013. |
Levin, et al., “Developments in Exploration Geophysics,” Geophysics, vol. 41, No. 2, Apr. 1976, pp. 209-218. |
Eiken, et al., “A proven method for acquiring highly repeatable towed streamer seismic data,” Geophysics, vol. 68, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 2003, pp. 1303-1309. |
Laster, “The present state of seismic data acquisition: One view,” Geophysics, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 1985, pp. 2443-2451. |
Schoenberger, et al., “Hydrophone Streamer Noise,” Geophysics, vol. 39, No. 6, Dec. 1974, pp. 781-793. |
Levin, “Short Note: The effect of binning on data from a feathered streamer,” Geophysics, vol. 49, No. 8, Aug. 1984, pp. 1386-1387. |
Austad, et al., “Marine Seismic Cable Steering and Computerized Control Systems,” SEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts, 3 pages. [Downloaded Oct. 27, 2012 to 98.195.208.113] . |
Cole, et al., “Three-Dimensional Marine Seismic Data Acquisition Using Controlled Streamer Feathering,” MAR 3.5, Tensor Geophysical Service Corp., 1983, pp. 293-295. [Downloaded Oct. 27, 2012 to 98.195.208.113] . |
Helgaker, et al., “Marine 3-D Acquisition Using Two Parallel Streamers,” S4.5, GECO A. S., Norway, 1986, pp. 383-385. |
Canter, et al., “Evolution of Positioning in Marine 3-D Seismic,” Seismic Acquisition 1: 3-D Acquisition-Wednesday Morning, SA 1.1, 1989, pp. 606-609. [Downloaded Oct. 27, 2012 to 98.195.208.113] . |
Bordenave, et al, “Prediction in Infill Requirements by Simulation of 3D Geometries Using 2D Data,” EAGE 58th Conference and Technical Exhibition—Geophysical Division (B046), Jun. 3-7, 1996, 2 pages. |
Sando, et al., “Experiences with a Super Wide 3D Marine Acquisition in the North Sea,” EAGE 57th Conference and Technical Exhibition—EAEG Division (P039), May 29-Jun. 2, 1995, 2 pages. |
Bordenave, et al., “Optimization of Shooting Scheme in Order to Reduce Infill on 3D Marine Surveys,” Eage 57th Conference and Technical Exhibition—EAEG Division (P032), May 29-Jun. 2, 1995, 2 pages. |
Bittleston, et al., “Marine Seismic Cable Steering and Control,” EAGE 62nd Conference and Technical Exhibition (L-16), May 29-Jun. 2, 2000, 4 pages. |
Thevenot, “Developments Streamer Tail Positioning,” Eage (B047), 1991, pp. 196-197. |
Franklin, et al., “Equipment handling and deck space management on seismic survey ships,” First Break, vol. 7, No. 9, Sep. 1989, pp. 367-373. |
Lucas, “A High Resolution Marine Seismic Survey,” Geophysical Prospecting, 22, 1974, pp. 667-682. |
DigiCOURSE, Model 5000 Operation and Maintenance Manual, Order No. 4200-016 (Manual Only); 4200-017 (Manual with Chek-Out Program), Revision B, Nov. 17, 1995, 138 pages. |
Input/Output, Inc., System 3 (Version 4.00) User's Manual, Order No. 4200-036-400, Revision A, 1999, 319 pages. |
Bearnth, et al., “Air Gun-Slant Cable Seismic Results in the Gulf of Mexico,” SEG Abstracts, vol. 59 (SA 25), 1989, pp. 649-652. |
Cramer, et al., “An innovative split-spread marine 3-D acquisition design for subsalt imaging,” SEG Abstracts (SA3.3), Oct. 8-13, 1995, pp. 991-994. |
Barr, “Seismic Data Acquisition: Recent Advances and the Road Ahead,” Special Session 1: Recent Advances and the Road Ahead—Monday Afternoon, Sep. 27th (SS1.1), Sep. 26-30, 1993, pp. 1201-1204. |
Cotton, et al., “Accuracy in Marine Streamer Positioning,” SEG Abstracts (S9.3), 1985, pp. 434-436. |
Maynard, et al., “Buoytrak: The State of the Art in Seismic Streamer Tracking,” SEG Abstracts (S18.4), Nov. 2-6, 1986, pp. 642-643. |
Conti, et al., “Towed Vehicle for Constant Depth and Bottom Contouring Operations,” Offshore Technology Conference, Paper No. OTC 1456, 1971, pp. II 385-II 392. |
Kaiser, et al., “Advanced Bin Coverage and Monitoring System for 3-D Marine Seismics,” SEG Expanded Abstracts (MAR1.4), pp. 253-256. |
Fagot, et al., “Deep-Towed Seismic System Design for Operation At Depths Up to 6000 M,” 13th Annual OTC, OTC 4082, May 4-7,1981, pp. 141-154. |
Koterayama, et al., “Field Experiments on an Intelligent Towed Vehicle ”Flying Fish— Proceedings of the Fifth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISBN 1-880653-16-8 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-18-4 (vol. II),1995, pp. 287-291. |
Vermeer, “Streamers versus Stationary Receivers,” Offshore Technology Conference—OTC 8314, May 5-8, 1997, pp. 331-346. |
Vallieres, et al., “Mini 3D for shallow gas reconnaissance,” Offshore Technology Conference—OTC 7986, May 6-9, 1996, pp. 265-275. |
Brink, et al., “Marine Acquisition Technique for Both Shallow and Deep Targets,” SEG Annual Meeting (POS 1.6), Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 1989, pp. 405-407. |
Amrine, et al., “Investigation of Interactions between Cable Leveling and Heading Measurement,” SEG Annual Meeting (SA 2.2), Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 1989, pp. 640-642. |
Kato, “Guidance and Control of Underwater Towed Vehicle Maneuverable in Both Vertical and Horizontal Axis,” Proceedings of the Second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 1992, ISBN 1-880653-00-1 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-02-8 (vol. II), pp. 505-512. |
Koterayama, et al., “A Numerical Study for Design of Depth, Pitch and Roll Control System of a Towed Vehicle,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Apr. 10-15, 1994, ISBN/-880653-10-9 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-12-5 (vol. II), pp. 337-344. |
Court, “Applications of Acoustics to Streamer/Source Positioning,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1989 (SA 1.2), pp. 610-612. |
International Search Report in Application No. PCT/IB99/01590 mailed Jan. 12, 2000. |
International Preliminary Examination Report in Application No. PCT/IB99/01590 mailed Jan. 23, 2001, 11 pages. |
Partial European Search Report in Application No. 07113028 mailed May 27, 2010, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report in Application No. 07113028 mailed Aug. 19, 2010, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report in Application No. 11168257.1 mailed Mar. 27, 2013, 14 pages. |
Camacho, et al., “Model Predictive Control in the Process Industry,” Advances in Industrial Control, 1995, pp. 3-4, 9-10, and 62. |
Maybeck, “Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control: vol. 1,” Mathematics in Science and Engineering vol. 141, 1979, pp. 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120002502 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |