Methods for gathering marine geophysical data

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9851464
  • Patent Number
    9,851,464
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 28, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 26, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
In a first embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including an array of sensor streamers extending behind said vessel, and determining a geodetic location of a streamer steering reference point at a forward end of the sensor streamers and a reference direction. At least one sensor streamer included in said array of sensor streamers is laterally deflected in response to the determined geodetic location of said streamer steering reference point and the determined reference direction.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention


The invention relates generally to the field of marine geophysical surveying. More particularly, the invention relates to methods for controlling the spatial distribution or geophysical data gathering equipment towed behind a survey vessel.


Background Art


Marine geophysical surveying systems such as seismic acquisition systems and electromagnetic survey systems are used to acquire geophysical data from formations disposed below the bottom of a body of water, such as a lake or the ocean. Marine seismic surveying systems, for example, typically include a seismic survey vessel having onboard navigation, seismic energy source control, and geophysical data recording equipment. The seismic survey vessel is typically configured to tow one, or more typically a plurality of laterally spaced apart sensor streamers through the water. At selected times, the seismic energy source control equipment causes one or more seismic energy sources (which may be towed in the water by the seismic vessel or by another vessel) to actuate. Signals generated by various sensors on the one or more streamers in response to detected seismic energy are ultimately conducted to the recording equipment. A record with respect to time is made in the recording system of the signals generated by each sensor (or groups of such sensors). The recorded signals are later interpreted to infer the structure and composition of the formations below the bottom of the body of water. Corresponding components for inducing electromagnetic fields and detecting electromagnetic phenomena originating in the subsurface in response to such imparted fields may be used in marine electromagnetic geophysical survey systems.


The one or more sensor streamers are in the most general sense long cables that have geophysical sensors disposed at spaced apart positions along the length of the cables. A typical streamer can extend behind the geophysical survey vessel for several kilometers.


Multiple streamer systems are used in what are known as three dimensional and four dimensional geophysical surveys. A four dimensional seismic survey is a three dimensional survey over a same area of the Earth's subsurface repeated at selected times.


The quality of geophysical images of the Earth's subsurface produced from three dimensional or four dimensional surveys is affected by how well the positions of the individual sensors on the streamers are controlled. Various devices are known in the art for positioning streamers laterally and/or at a selected depth below the water surface. U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,027 issued to Owsley et al., for example, describes a lateral force device for displacing a towed underwater acoustic cable that provides displacement in the horizontal and vertical directions.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,752 issued to Ambs et al. describes a seismic streamer position control module.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,144,342 issued to Bertheas et al. describes a method for controlling the navigation of a towed seismic streamer using “birds” affixable to the exterior of the streamer.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including an array of sensor streamers extending behind said vessel, and determining a geodetic location of a streamer steering reference point at a forward end of said sensor streamers and a reference direction. At least one sensor streamer included in said array of sensor streamers is laterally deflected in response to the determined geodetic location of said streamer steering reference point and said determined reference direction.


In another embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including an array of sensor streamers comprising a plurality of sensor streamer extending behind said vessel, determining a geodetic location of a vessel steering reference point at a forward end of said array of sensor streamers, and steering the survey vessel so that the vessel steering reference point follows a preselected travel path.


In yet another embodiment the invention comprises a method for gathering geophysical data, including towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, said equipment including a geophysical source and an array of sensor streamers including a plurality of sensor streamer extending behind the vessel, determining a geodetic location of a source steering reference point at a forward end of said array of sensor streamers, determining a desired source lateral position with reference to the source steering reference point, and steering said geophysical source so that said geophysical source follows the desired source lateral position.


Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an array of seismic streamers each including lateral force and depth control devices for adjusting geometry of the respective streamer.



FIG. 2 illustrates the streamer front follow mode embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates the vessel steering to keep streamer front end on a determined path embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 illustrates the energy source follow mode embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows a typical marine geophysical survey system 2 that can include a plurality of geophysical sensor streamers 20. Each of the sensor streamers can be guided through the water by one or more lateral force and depth (“LFD”) control devices 26 cooperatively engaged with each of the streamers 20. As will be explained further below, the use of LFD control devices 26 which can provide depth control capability, is a matter of choice for the system designer. It is only necessary for purposes of the invention that the devices associated with the geophysical sensor streamers provide directional control to affect the direction of the streamer parallel to the plane of the water surface as the streamer moves through a body of water.


The geophysical survey system 2 includes a survey vessel 10 that moves along the surface of a body of water 11 such as a lake or the ocean. The survey vessel 10 may include thereon equipment, shown generally at 12 and for convenience collectively referred to as a “recording system.” The recording system 12 typically includes devices (none of the following described devices shown separately) such as a data recording unit for making a record with respect to time of signals generated by various sensors in the acquisition system. The recording system 12 also typically includes navigation equipment to determine and record, at selected times, the geodetic position of the vessel 10, and using other devices to be explained below, the geodetic position each of a plurality of geophysical sensors 22 disposed at spaced apart locations on streamers 20 towed by the survey vessel 10.


In one example, the device for determining the geodetic position may be a geodetic position signal receiver such as a global positioning satellite (“GPS”) receiver, shown schematically at 12A. Other geodetic position determination devices are known in the art. The foregoing elements of the recording system 12 are familiar to those skilled in the art, and with the exception of the geodetic position detecting receiver 12A, are not shown separately in the figures herein for clarity of the illustration.


The geophysical sensors 22 can be any type of geophysical sensor known in the art. Non-limiting examples of such sensors may include particle motion-responsive seismic sensors such as geophones and accelerometers, pressure-responsive seismic sensors, pressure time gradient-responsive seismic sensors, electrodes, magnetometers, temperature sensors or combinations of the foregoing. The geophysical sensors 22 may measure, for example, seismic or electromagnetic field energy primarily reflected from or refracted by various structures in the Earth's subsurface below the bottom of the water 11 in response to energy imparted into the subsurface by an energy source 17. The energy source 17 may be, for example a seismic energy source or an array of such sources. Non-limiting examples of seismic energy sources include air guns and water guns. The energy source 17 may also be an electromagnetic source, for example, a wire loop or electrode pair (not shown for clarity). The energy source 17 may be towed in the water 11 by the survey vessel 10 as shown or a different vessel (not shown). The recording system 12 may also include energy source control equipment (not shown separately) for selectively operating the energy source 17.


In the survey system shown in FIG. 1, there are four sensor streamers 20 towed by the survey vessel 10. The number of sensor streamers shown in FIG. 1, however, is only for purposes of explaining the invention and is not a limitation on the number of streamers that may be used in any particular geophysical survey system according to the invention. In marine geophysical acquisition systems such as shown in FIG. 1 that include a plurality of laterally spaced apart streamers, the streamers 20 are typically coupled to towing equipment that is intended to secure the forward end of each of the streamers 20 at a selected lateral position with respect to adjacent streamers and with respect to the survey vessel 10. As shown in FIG. 1, the towing equipment can include two paravane tow ropes 8 each coupled to the vessel 10 at one end through a winch 19 or similar spooling device that enables changing the deployed length of each paravane tow rope 8. The distal end of each paravane tow rope 8 is functionally coupled to a paravane 14. The paravanes 14 are each shaped to provide a lateral component of motion to the various towing components deployed in the water 11 when the paravanes 14 are moved through the water 11. “Lateral” in the present context means transverse to the direction of motion of the survey vessel 10 in the water 11. The lateral motion component of each paravane 14 is opposed to that of the other paravane 14. The combined lateral motion component of the paravanes 14 separates the paravanes 14 from each other until they put into tension one or more spreader ropes or cables 24, functionally coupled end to end between the paravanes 14.


The sensor streamers 20 can each be coupled, at the axial end thereof nearest the vessel 10 (the “forward end”), to a respective lead-in cable termination 20A. The lead-in cable terminations 20A can be coupled to or associated with the spreader ropes or cables 24 so as to substantially fix the lateral positions of the streamers 20 with respect to each other. The lead-in cable terminations 20A may each include a relative position signal sensor (not shown separately, and explained further below). Electrical and/or optical connection between the appropriate components in the recording system 12 and, ultimately, the geophysical sensors 22 (and/or other circuitry) in the streamers 20 may be made using lead-in cables 18, each of which terminates in a respective lead-in cable termination 20A. One of the lead-in terminations 20A is disposed at the forward end of each streamer 20. Each of the lead-in cables 18 may be deployed by a respective winch 19 or similar spooling device such that the deployed length of each cable 18 can be changed. The type of towing equipment coupled to the forward end of each streamer shown in FIG. 1 is only intended to illustrate a type of equipment that can tow an array of laterally spaced apart streamers in the water. Other towing structures may be used in other examples of geophysical acquisition system according to the invention.


The acquisition system shown in FIG. 1 can also include a plurality of lateral force and depth (“LFD”) control devices 26 cooperatively engaged with each of the streamers 20 at selected positions along each streamer 20. Each LFD control device 26 can include one or more rotatable control surfaces (not shown separately) that when moved to a selected rotary orientation with respect to the direction of movement of such surfaces through the water 11 creates a hydrodynamic lift in a selected direction to urge the streamer 20 in any selected direction upward or downward in the water 11 or laterally along the water surface with respect to the direction of motion of the vessel 10. Thus, such LFD control devices 26 can be used to maintain the streamers 20 in a selected geometric arrangement. A non-limiting example of LFD control device that may be used in some examples is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0003129 filed by Stokkeland et al., the underlying patent application for which is commonly owned with the present invention. The particular configuration of the LFD control devices 26, however, is not a limit on the scope of the present invention. As previously explained, for purposes of the present invention it is only necessary for any devices used as the LFD control devices 26 be able to apply a selectable lateral force to the associated streamers 20. Depth control of the streamers 20 may be provided passively, such as by providing the streamers 20 with a selected overall specific gravity, or by separate depth control devices (not shown). Therefore, any reference to “depth” control as provided by the LFD control devices 26 is only intended to cover the present example implementation, such as using the device shown in the Stokkeland et al. '129 patent application publication referred to above. Any reference to active depth control of the streamers 20 is not a limit on the scope of the present invention. For purposes of defining the scope of the invention, therefore, the LFD control devices 26 need only perform the function of “lateral force” control devices, and the inclusion of depth control as a part of the function of the LFD control devices 26 explained herein is intended to ensure that those of ordinary skill in the art understand that the use of the example LFD control devices 26 disclosed herein, and any other similar examples, are within the scope of the present invention.


In the present example, each LFD control device 26 may include an associated relative position determination device. In one example, the position determination device may be an acoustic range sensing device (“ARD”) 26A. Such ARDs typically include an ultrasonic transceiver or transmitter and electronic circuitry configured to cause the transceiver to emit pulses of acoustic energy. Travel time of the acoustic energy between a transmitter and a receiver disposed at a spaced apart position such as along the same streamer and/or on a different streamer, is related to the distance between the transmitter and a receiver, and the acoustic velocity of the water. The acoustic velocity can be assumed substantially not to change during a survey, or it can be measured by a device such as a water velocity test cell. Alternatively or additionally, acoustic range sensing devices (“ARDs”) may be disposed at selected positions along each one of the streamers not collocated with the LFD control devices 26. Such additional ARDs are shown at 23 in FIG. 1. Each of the ARDs 26A, 23 may be in signal communication with the recording system 12 such that at any moment in time the distance between any two ARDs 26A, 23 on any of the streamers 20 is determinable. One or more ARDs may be placed at selected positions proximate the aft end of the vessel 10 so that relative distances between the selected positions on the vessel 10 and any of the ARDs on the streamers may also be determined. A non-limiting example of an ARD and a system used with such ARDs is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,376,045 issued to Falkenberg et al. and assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference.


The streamers 20 may additionally or alternatively include a plurality of heading sensors 29 disposed at spaced apart positions along each streamer 20. The heading sensors 29 may be geomagnetic direction sensors such as magnetic compass devices affixed to the exterior of the streamer 20. One type of compass device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,481,611 issued to Burrage and incorporated herein by reference. The heading sensors 29 provide a signal indicative of the heading (direction with respect to magnetic north) of the streamer 20 at the axial position of the heading sensor 29 along the respective streamer. Measurements of such heading at spaced apart locations along each streamer may be used to interpolate the geometry (spatial distribution) of each streamer.


Each streamer 20 may include at the distal end thereof a tail buoy 25. The tail buoy 25 may include, among other sensing devices, a geodetic position receiver 25A such as a GPS receiver that can determine the geodetic position of each tail buoy 25. The geodetic position receiver 25A in each tail buoy 25 may be in signal communication with the recording system 12.


By determining the distance between ARDs 26A, 23, including the one or more ARDs on the vessel 10, and/or by interpolating the spatial distribution of the streamers 20 from the heading sensor 29 measurements, an estimate of the geometry of each streamer 20 may be made. Collectively, the geometry of the streamers 20 may be referred to as the “array geometry.” For purposes of defining the scope of the present invention, the various position measurement components described above, including those from the heading sensors 29, from the ARDs 26A, 23, and, if used, from the additional geodetic position receivers 25A in the tail buoys 25, may be used individually or in any combination. It is only necessary for purposes of the present invention to be able to reasonably estimate the relative position of each point along each streamer 20 with reference to a geodetic position measurement at one or more points in the survey system. One such point may be on the survey vessel 10, as measured by the GPS geodetic position receiver 12A, and/or the GPS geodetic position receivers 25A in the tail buoys 25.


By appropriate selection of the positions along each streamer at which the various relative position measurement devices described above are disposed, it is possible to determine the array geometry without the need to measure, estimate or otherwise determine the absolute geodetic position at large numbers of positions along each streamer, such as by using a large number of UPS receivers. The ARDs 26A, 23 and heading sensors 29 may be referred to for convenience in defining the invention as “relative position determination” sensors. By determining relative positions at each point along each streamer with reference to a selected point on the survey vessel, streamer tail buoy 25 and/or the energy source 17, (the geodetic position of which is measured by the respective sensor thereon) is it possible to determine the geodetic position of each such streamer point. A particular example of a system for determining relative positions of the streamers using acoustic signals is described in the Falkenberg et al. patent referred to above.


In the present example, the energy source 17 may include a steering device 17B to enable separate control of the trajectory of the source 17. The energy source steering device 17B may be controlled by suitable control signals from the recording system 12.


During operation of the geophysical acquisition system shown in FIG. 1, it may be desirable to adjust the streamer array geometry in order to achieve or maintain a selected array geometry during geophysical surveying. The recording system 12 may be configured to send suitable control signals to each of the LFD control devices 26 to move associated portions of each streamer 20 laterally.


During geophysical survey operations, it is often desirable for the streamers 20 to spread out behind the vessel 10 in a selected geometry. In one implementation of the invention it may be desirable for the streamers to spread evenly behind the vessel to avoid “holes” in the coverage of measurements of the subsurface. However, other selected geometries may also be chosen. “Evenly” in the present context means that the lateral spacing between adjacent streamers 20 is the same along the length of the streamers 20, or the lateral spacing is related, e.g., proportional, to the distance along the streamers from the forward ends thereof. Deviations from even spreading may result from, for example, rip currents in the water 11 and propeller wash from the vessel 10.


1. Streamer Front End Follow Mode.


A first embodiment of the invention may be referred to as a “streamer front end follow mode.” With reference to FIG. 2, geophysical data gathering equipment 2, including an array of sensor streamers 20, is towed behind a survey vessel 10 in a body of water 11. In this embodiment the geodetic position of a streamer steering reference point 42 at the forward end of the sensor streamers 20 is determined and a reference direction 48 of said streamer steering reference point 42 is determined. The sensor streamers 20 are then controlled by means of LFD control devices 26 in response to signals from the recording system (12 in FIG. 1) so that the sensor streamers 20 seek to follow a geometry defined relative to said reference point and reference direction. At least one sensor streamer included in said array of sensor streamers 20 is deflected laterally in response to said determined geodetic location of said streamer steering reference point 42 and the determined reference direction 48.


A geodetic position of the forward end of one or more of the sensor streamers 20 may be determined by using the relative position sensor (not shown separately) in the forward end terminations 20A of the sensor streamers and calculating the geodetic position of the forward ends of the sensor streamers from the measured relative position between the forward end termination 20A and one or more of the geodetic position sensor measurements (e.g., at 12A in FIG. 1, 17A in FIG. 1 or 25A in FIG. 1). The geodetic positions thus calculated at the front end termination 20A may he used to define a streamer steering reference point 42. The streamer steering reference point 42, for example, may be in the lateral center of the front end terminations 20A. The reference point 42 may be determined, for example, by calculating an average of the geodetic positions of all the front end terminations 20A. The streamer steering reference point could also be based on one or a limited number of the streamer front end terminations 20A only, plus possibly a lateral offset. For example the streamer steering reference point may be based on two of the sensor streamers front end terminations 20A.


In addition to the streamer steering reference point, a “reference direction” 48 is determined. In one implementation of the invention the reference direction 48 may be the direction of movement of the streamer steering reference point 42 as sensor streamers 20 are towed behind survey vessel 10. To determine this reference direction, the geodetic position of the streamer steering reference point 42 may be determined repeatedly at selected time intervals (e.g., every second) to calculate a direction of travel of the streamer steering reference point 42. The streamer steering reference points may be subjected to a smoothing filter (e.g., in the recording system 12 in FIG. 1) to remove any short term noise or variations. In another implementation of the invention, the reference direction 48 may be the direction between the geodetic location of said streamer steering reference point 42 and a location 50 on said survey vessel 10 or another location in said geophysical equipment 2. A time filtered version of the reference direction 48 derived by determining the direction between the geodetic location of said streamer steering reference point 42 and a location 50 on said geophysical equipment 2 may also be used. There may also be other suitable ways of defining the reference direction. The reference direction may also be a preselected direction. The streamer steering reference point 42 and the reference direction 48 may then be utilized to determine a desired location for said sensor streamers 20. A possible desired travel path is for each of the sensor streamers 20 to follow the reference point and reference direction 48, but offset from reference point by a selected offset for each streamer or selected portions of each streamer. In the present example, a lateral offset perpendicular to the reference direction 48 may be defined for each LFD control device 26 on each streamer 20, and a final preferred position for each LFD control device 26 may be defined by the reference point 42 plus the lateral offset. The lateral offset may be calculated individually for each LFD control device, and is typically, but not necessarily, dependent on the distance of each such device from the vessel 10 as well as the respective streamer's nominal lateral offset from the vessel center line. Other factors for setting the offset could be sideways current. In cases with strong sideways currents, it might not be desirable to try to fully correct for the skew of the towing arrangement, but rather add some offset on all streamers in the direction of the current to compensate for the skew. The selected sensor geometry may be a straight line that is parallel with or at an angle to the reference direction 48, but may not be a straight line.


In one implementation of this embodiment of the invention, the streamer steering reference point is the forward end of one of said sensor streamers included in said array of sensor streamers. In a further implementation of the invention a geodetic location of a second streamer reference point of a forward end of a second one of the sensor streamers is determined, and said second streamer is laterally deflected in response to the determined geodetic location of the second streamer steering reference point for said second streamer steering reference point.


A desired position for each LFD control device 26 can be defined according to the techniques explained above, and the LFD control devices 26 can be operated such that the streamers 20 substantially travel to follow such desired position.


2. Vessel Steering to Keep Streamer Front Ends on a Determined Path.


Another embodiment of the invention may be referred to as vessel steering to keep streamer front end on a determined path 49. With reference to FIG. 3, geophysical data gathering equipment 2, including an array of sensor streamers 20, is towed behind a survey vessel 10 in a body of water 11. In this embodiment of the invention, the vessel heading 41 may be adjusted to cause a vessel steering reference point 43 at a forward end of said array of sensor streamers 20 to follow a determined geodetic path 49, for example, along a path traversed by the forward end of an array of sensor streamers in a previously conducted geophysical survey. A geodetic location of a vessel steering reference point 43 at a forward end of the array of sensor streamers 20 is determined. In one implementation of the invention, the vessel steering reference point 43 may be the same as the streamer steering reference point 42. The survey vessel 10 is steered so that the vessel steering reference point 43 follows the preselected path 49. The vessel steering will typically take into account wind and water current measurements to improve the accuracy of the vessel steering to better achieve the desired streamer front end steering. Steering a geophysical sensor array as explained above may provide certain advantages. By selecting a vessel heading 41 such that the reference point 43 follows a selected trajectory, the amount of deflecting force required proximate the forward end of each of the streamers, provided by LFD control devices 26, to maintain the array of sensor streamers 20 in a selected geometry may be substantially reduced.


3. Energy Source Follow Mode.


Another embodiment of the invention may be referred to as an energy source follow mode. With reference to FIG. 4, geophysical data gathering equipment 2, including an array of sensor streamers 20, is towed behind a survey vessel 10 in a body of water 11. In this embodiment of the invention, the energy source steering device 17B may be operated to cause the energy source 17 to move towards a lateral position which may be on a line 47 projected forward from a forward end of said array of sensor streamers 20. In a particular implementation of the invention, the source steering reference point 44 is the same as streamer steering reference point 42. A desired source lateral position may be defined by extending a line 47 forward from source steering reference point 44. Line 47 may be determined in the same manner that reference direction 48 is determined as described above in the discussion of the Streamer Front End Follow mode, by determining a direction of movement of source steering reference point 44 or the direction from source steering reference point 44 to a location on said survey vessel 10 or another location in said geophysical equipment 2. Line 47 may also be determined from a preselected reference direction. In a particular implementation of the invention, line 47 is the same as the reference point and reference direction defined with reference to the streamer front end follow mode described with reference to FIG. 2. Typically, a seismic source will include an array of individual source elements or subarrays, and a center position of the source is steered to follow the determined lateral position defined by the line 47. The desired source center position can be used to define a desired offset position for each individual source element or subarray with respect to the projected source line 47.


Methods for operating LFD control devices and controlling geometry of a sensor array according to the various aspects of the invention may provide more even coverage in marine geophysical surveying, may provide more accurate positioning of geophysical sensors, and may improve safety of the array in hostile environments. Any of the above methods (the Steamer Front End Follow Mode, the Vessel Steering to keep streamer front ends on a determined path and the Energy Source Follow Mode) may be used alone or in any combination of two or three of these modes.


While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for gathering geophysical data, comprising: towing geophysical data gathering equipment behind a survey vessel in a body of water, the equipment including an array of sensor streamers extending behind the vessel;determining a geodetic location of a first steering reference point at a forward end of the sensor streamers;determining a reference direction relative to the first steering reference point; andlaterally deflecting at least one sensor streamer included in the array of sensor streamers, wherein the laterally deflecting is based on the determined geodetic location of the first steering reference point and the determined reference direction, and wherein the laterally deflecting is based on a desired streamer geometry in which: at least a portion of the at least one sensor streamer is positioned at a selected angle relative to the determined reference direction; anda point on the at least a portion of the at least one sensor streamer is positioned at a selected offset from the first steering reference point in a direction perpendicular to the reference direction.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference direction is determined based on successive measurements of a position of the first steering reference point.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference direction is determined as a direction between the first steering reference point and a selected location on the geophysical data gathering equipment.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: steering the survey vessel to cause the first steering reference point to follow a preselected travel path.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the preselected path is a path traversed in a previously-conducted survey pass.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first steering reference point is the forward end of a particular one of the sensor streamers included in the array of sensor streamers.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising determining a geodetic location of a second steering reference point, the second steering reference point being the forward end of a second streamer of the sensor streamers included in the array of sensor streamers and laterally deflecting the second streamer in response to the determined geodetic location of the second steering reference point and the determined reference direction.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the desired streamer geometry for the at least one sensor streamer is not a straight line.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference direction is different than a direction of travel of the survey vessel.
  • 10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by a computing device to perform operations comprising: determining a geodetic location of a first steering reference point at a forward end of an array of sensor streamers, wherein the array is included in geophysical data gathering equipment towed behind a survey vessel in a body of water;determining a reference direction, wherein the reference direction is different than a direction of travel of the first steering reference point; andlaterally deflecting at least one sensor streamer included in the array of sensor streamers, wherein the laterally deflecting is based on the determined geodetic location of the first steering reference point and the determined reference direction.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein determining the reference direction is based on a direction between the first steering reference point and a location on the geophysical data gathering equipment.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein determining the reference direction is based on a preselected direction.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein determining the reference direction is based on a direction between the first steering reference point and a location on the survey vessel.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the laterally deflecting is based on a desired streamer geometry in which: at least a portion of the at least one sensor streamer is positioned at a selected angle relative to the determined reference direction; anda point on the at least a portion of the at least one sensor streamer is positioned at a selected offset from the first steering reference point in a direction perpendicular to the reference direction.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise: steering the survey vessel to cause the first steering reference point to follow a preselected travel path.
  • 16. A system, comprising: one or more processors; andone or more memories having program instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the system to perform operations comprising: determining a geodetic location of a first steering reference point at a forward end of an array of sensor streamers, wherein the array is included in geophysical data gathering equipment towed behind a survey vessel in a body of water;determining a reference direction relative to the first steering reference point;laterally deflecting at least one sensor streamer included in the array of sensor streamers, wherein the laterally deflecting is based on the determined geodetic location of the first steering reference point and the determined reference direction; andsteering the survey vessel to cause the first steering reference point to follow a preselected travel path.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the reference direction is different than a direction of travel of the survey vessel.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the laterally deflecting is based on a desired streamer geometry in which: at least a portion of the at least one sensor streamer is positioned at a selected angle relative to the determined reference direction; anda point on the at least a portion of the at least one sensor streamer is positioned at a selected offset from the first steering reference point in a direction perpendicular to the reference direction.
  • 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the operations further comprise laterally deflecting at least one geophysical source included in the geophysical data gathering equipment, based on the determined geodetic location of the first steering reference point and the determined reference direction.
  • 20. The system of claim 16, wherein the geodetic location of the first steering reference point is computed based on determined geodetic locations of a plurality of other locations on the geophysical data gathering equipment.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/803,730, filed Jul. 2, 2010, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (171)
Number Name Date Kind
1288721 Smith Dec 1918 A
2275692 Sims Mar 1942 A
2928367 Mccormick Mar 1960 A
2980052 Fehlner Apr 1961 A
3159806 Piasecki Dec 1964 A
3375800 Cole et al. Apr 1968 A
3412704 Buller et al. Nov 1968 A
3412705 Nesson Nov 1968 A
3434446 Cole Mar 1969 A
3440992 Chance Apr 1969 A
3531761 Tickell et al. Sep 1970 A
3531762 Tickell Sep 1970 A
3541989 Leonard Nov 1970 A
3560912 Spink et al. Feb 1971 A
3581273 Hedberg May 1971 A
3605674 Weese Sep 1971 A
3618555 Kelly et al. Nov 1971 A
3648642 Fetrow et al. Mar 1972 A
3774570 Pearson Nov 1973 A
3840845 Brown Oct 1974 A
3896756 Pearson et al. Jul 1975 A
3921124 Payton Nov 1975 A
3931608 Cole Jan 1976 A
3943483 Strange Mar 1976 A
3961303 Paitson Jun 1976 A
4033278 Waters Jul 1977 A
4055138 Klein Oct 1977 A
4063213 Itria et al. Dec 1977 A
4087780 Itria et al. May 1978 A
4144518 Minohara et al. Mar 1979 A
4191328 Isaacs et al. Mar 1980 A
4222340 Cole Sep 1980 A
4227479 Gertler et al. Oct 1980 A
4231111 Neeley Oct 1980 A
4290124 Cole Sep 1981 A
4313392 Guenther et al. Feb 1982 A
4323989 Huckabee et al. Apr 1982 A
4404664 Zachariadis Sep 1983 A
4408292 Nakatani et al. Oct 1983 A
4463701 Pickett et al. Aug 1984 A
4484534 Thillaye du Boullay Nov 1984 A
4486863 French Dec 1984 A
4493067 Thomas et al. Jan 1985 A
4599712 Chelminski Jul 1986 A
4646528 Marcade et al. Mar 1987 A
4671235 Hosaka Jun 1987 A
4676183 Conboy Jun 1987 A
4694435 Magneville Sep 1987 A
4709355 Woods et al. Nov 1987 A
4711194 Fowler Dec 1987 A
4719987 George, Jr. et al. Jan 1988 A
4723501 Hovden et al. Feb 1988 A
4724788 Ayers Feb 1988 A
4729333 Kirby et al. Mar 1988 A
4743996 Book May 1988 A
4745583 Motal May 1988 A
4766441 Phillips et al. Aug 1988 A
4767183 Martin Aug 1988 A
4798156 Langeland et al. Jan 1989 A
4809005 Counselman, III Feb 1989 A
4825708 Sevick May 1989 A
4843996 Darche Jul 1989 A
4885726 Myers Dec 1989 A
4890568 Dolengowski Jan 1990 A
4890569 Givens Jan 1990 A
4912684 Fowler Mar 1990 A
4992990 Langeland et al. Feb 1991 A
4998227 Rygg et al. Mar 1991 A
5031159 Rouquette Jul 1991 A
5042413 Benoit Aug 1991 A
5050133 Buddery Sep 1991 A
5052814 Stubblefield Oct 1991 A
5062583 Lipps et al. Nov 1991 A
5094406 Shafer Mar 1992 A
5117400 Penn et al. May 1992 A
5138582 Furu Aug 1992 A
5148406 Brink et al. Sep 1992 A
5200930 Rouquette Apr 1993 A
5214612 Olivier et al. May 1993 A
5353223 Norton et al. Oct 1994 A
5363343 Klein Nov 1994 A
5402745 Wood Apr 1995 A
5404339 Cole, Jr. Apr 1995 A
5443027 Owsley et al. Aug 1995 A
5507243 Williams, Jr. et al. Apr 1996 A
5517202 Patel et al. May 1996 A
5517463 Hornbostel et al. May 1996 A
5529011 Williams, Jr. Jun 1996 A
5532975 Elholm Jul 1996 A
5546882 Kuche Aug 1996 A
5619474 Kuche Apr 1997 A
5642330 Santopietro Jun 1997 A
5668775 Hatteland Sep 1997 A
5761153 Gikas et al. Jun 1998 A
5771202 Bale et al. Jun 1998 A
5784335 Deplante et al. Jul 1998 A
5790472 Workman et al. Aug 1998 A
5835450 Russell Nov 1998 A
5913280 Nielsen et al. Jun 1999 A
5920828 Norris et al. Jul 1999 A
5973995 Walker et al. Oct 1999 A
6011752 Ambs et al. Jan 2000 A
6011753 Chien Jan 2000 A
6016286 Olivier et al. Jan 2000 A
6028817 Ambs Feb 2000 A
6049507 Allen Apr 2000 A
6079882 Chien Jun 2000 A
6091670 Oliver et al. Jul 2000 A
6142091 Henriksen Nov 2000 A
6144342 Bertheas et al. Nov 2000 A
6229760 Ambs May 2001 B1
6418378 Nyland Jul 2002 B1
6459653 Kuche Oct 2002 B1
6525992 Olivier et al. Feb 2003 B1
6549653 Osawa et al. Apr 2003 B1
6618321 Brunet Sep 2003 B2
6671223 Bittleston Dec 2003 B2
6691038 Zajac Feb 2004 B2
6766253 Burns et al. Jul 2004 B2
6879542 Soreau et al. Apr 2005 B2
6932017 Hillesund et al. Aug 2005 B1
7080607 Hillesund et al. Jul 2006 B2
7092315 Olivier Aug 2006 B2
7161871 Brunet Jan 2007 B2
7162967 Hillesund et al. Jan 2007 B2
7176589 Rouquette Feb 2007 B2
7190634 Lambert et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203130 Welker Apr 2007 B1
7221620 Planke et al. May 2007 B2
7222579 Hillesund et al. May 2007 B2
7267070 Le Page et al. Sep 2007 B2
7293520 Hillesund et al. Nov 2007 B2
7377224 Ryan et al. May 2008 B2
7391674 Welker Jun 2008 B2
7403448 Welker et al. Jul 2008 B2
7415936 Storteig et al. Aug 2008 B2
7417924 Vigen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7423929 Olivier Sep 2008 B1
7433264 Vigen Oct 2008 B2
7822552 Bittleston Oct 2010 B2
8230801 Hillesund et al. Jul 2012 B2
8267031 Austad et al. Sep 2012 B2
8792297 Hillesund Jul 2014 B2
20050188908 Hillesund et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060227658 Toennessen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060231006 Hillesund et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060231007 Hillesund et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060256653 Toennessen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060260529 Hillesund et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070019504 Howlid et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070041272 Hillesund et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070064526 Holo Mar 2007 A1
20070127312 Storteig et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070165486 Moldoveanu et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070223307 Storteig et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070223308 Frivik et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080008033 Fossum et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080262738 Welker Oct 2008 A1
20080304358 Mellier et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080316859 Welker et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090003129 Stokkeland et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090003135 Mellier et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030605 Breed Jan 2009 A1
20090141587 Welker et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090211509 Olivier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090238035 Hillesund et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245019 Falkenberg et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090262601 Hillesund et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279385 Hillesund et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100118644 Seale et al. May 2010 A1
20100202249 Goujon et al. Aug 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (69)
Number Date Country
199853305 Jun 2001 AU
2002315000 Jan 2003 AU
2003231620 Sep 2003 AU
2007201855 May 2007 AU
2008200247 Feb 2008 AU
2008200248 Feb 2008 AU
2270719 Jul 1998 CA
69702673 Apr 2001 DE
0018053 Oct 1980 EP
0154968 Sep 1985 EP
0193215 Sep 1986 EP
0168959 Aug 1988 EP
0297852 Jan 1989 EP
0319716 Jun 1989 EP
0321705 Jun 1989 EP
0390987 Oct 1990 EP
0525391 Feb 1993 EP
0562781 Sep 1993 EP
0581441 Feb 1994 EP
0613025 Aug 1994 EP
0909701 Apr 1999 EP
0939910 Sep 1999 EP
1119780 Aug 2001 EP
1417515 May 2004 EP
1847851 Oct 2007 EP
1847852 Oct 2007 EP
1847853 Oct 2007 EP
1850151 Oct 2007 EP
1868011 Dec 2007 EP
2090902 Aug 2009 EP
2090903 Aug 2009 EP
2090904 Aug 2009 EP
2128654 Dec 2009 EP
2209022 Jul 2010 EP
1088469 Oct 1967 GB
2093610 Sep 1982 GB
2122562 Jan 1984 GB
2320706 Jul 1998 GB
2331971 Jun 1999 GB
2342081 Apr 2000 GB
2364388 Jan 2002 GB
2436456 Sep 2007 GB
992701 Jun 1999 NO
20074664 Apr 2001 NO
20074667 Apr 2001 NO
20074669 Apr 2001 NO
20074671 Apr 2001 NO
20074672 Apr 2001 NO
20035589 Feb 2004 NO
20074692 Feb 2004 NO
20074693 Feb 2004 NO
330507 May 2011 NO
13929 Jun 2000 RU
14681 Aug 2000 RU
31658 Aug 2003 RU
8403153 Aug 1984 WO
9531735 Nov 1995 WO
9621163 Jul 1996 WO
9711394 Mar 1997 WO
9711395 Mar 1997 WO
9730361 Aug 1997 WO
9745006 Dec 1997 WO
9828636 Jul 1998 WO
9904293 Jan 1999 WO
0020895 Apr 2000 WO
2000020895 Apr 2000 WO
0116623 Mar 2001 WO
0161380 Aug 2001 WO
02103393 Dec 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (101)
Entry
Search Report in Eurasian Patent Application No. 201690514 mailed Sep. 6, 2016, 4 pages.
Levin, et al., “Developments in Exploration Geophysics,” Geophysics, vol. 41, No. 2, Apr. 1976, pp. 209-218.
Eiken, et al., “A proven method for acquiring highly repeatable towed streamer seismic data,” Geophysics, vol. 68, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 2003, pp. 1303-1309.
Laster, “The present state of seismic data acquisition: One view,” Geophysics, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 1985, pp. 2443-2451.
Schoenberger, et al., “Hydrophone Streamer Noise,” Geophysics, vol. 39, No. 6, Dec. 1974, pp. 781-793.
Levin, “Short Note: The effect of binning on data from a feathered streamer,” Geophysics, vol. 49, No. 8, Aug. 1984, pp. 1386-1387.
Austad, et al., “Marine Seismic Cable Steering and Computerized Control Systems,” SEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts, 3 pages. [Downloaded Oct. 27, 2012 to 98.195.208.113].
Cole, et al., “Three-Dimensional Marine Seismic Data Acquisition Using Controlled Streamer Feathering,” MAR 3.5, Tensor Geophysical Service Corp., 1983, pp. 293-295. [Downloaded Oct. 27, 2012 to 98.195.208.113].
Helgaker, et al., “Marine 3-D Acquisition Using Two Parallel Streamers,” S4.5, GECO A. S., Norway, 1986, pp. 383-385.
Canter, et al., “Evolution of Positioning in Marine 3-D Seismic,” Seismic Acquisition 1: 3-D Acquisition—Wednesday Morning, SA 1.1, 1989, pp. 606-609. [Downloaded Oct. 27, 2012 to 98.195.208.113].
Bordenave, et al, “Prediction in Infill Requirements by Simulation of 3D Geometries Using 2D Data,” EAGE 58th Conference and Technical Exhibition—Geophysical Division (B046), Jun. 3-7, 1996, 2 pages.
Sando, et al., “Experiences with a Super Wide 3D Marine Acquisition in the North Sea,” EAGE 57th Conference and Technical Exhibition—EAEG Division (P039), May 29-Jun. 2, 1995, 2 pages.
Bordenave, et al., “Optimization of Shooting Scheme in Order to Reduce Infill on 3D Marine Surveys,” EAGE 57th Conference and Technical Exhibition—EAEG Division (P032), May 29-Jun. 2, 1995, 2 pages.
Bittleston, et al., “Marine Seismic Cable Steering and Control,” EAGE 62nd Conference and Technical Exhibition (L-16), May 29-Jun. 2, 2000, 4 pages.
Thevenot, “Developments Streamer Tail Positioning,” EAGE (B047), 1991, pp. 196-197.
Franklin, et al., “Equipment handling and deck space management on seismic survey ships,” First Break, vol. 7, No. 9, Sep. 1989, pp. 367-373.
Lucas, “A High Resolution Marine Seismic Survey,” Geophysical Prospecting, 22, 1974, pp. 667-682.
DigiCOURSE, Model 5000 Operation and Maintenance Manual, Order No. 4200-016 (Manual Only); 4200-017 (Manual with Chek-Out Program), Revision B, Nov. 17, 1995, 138 pages.
Input/Output, Inc., System 3 (Version 4.00) User's Manual, Order No. 4200-036-400, Revision A, 1999, 319 pages.
Bearnth, et al., “Air Gun-Slant Cable Seismic Results in the Gulf of Mexico,” SEG Abstracts, vol. 59 (SA 2.5), 1989, pp. 649-652.
Cramer, et al., “An innovative split-spread marine 3-D acquisition design for subsalt imaging,” SEG Abstracts (SA3.3), Oct. 8-13, 1995, pp. 991-994.
Barr, “Seismic Data Acquisition: Recent Advances and the Road Ahead,” Special Session 1: Recent Advances and the Road Ahead—Monday Afternoon, Sep. 27 (SS1.1), Sep. 26-30, 1993, pp. 1201-1204.
Cotton, et al., “Accuracy in Marine Streamer Positioning,” SEG Abstracts (S9.3), 1985, pp. 434-436.
Maynard, et al., “Buoytrak: The State of the Art in Seismic Streamer Tracking,” SEG Abstracts (S18.4), Nov. 2-6, 1986, pp. 642-643.
Conti, et al., “Towed Vehicle for Constant Depth and Bottom Contouring Operations,” Offshore Technology Conference, Paper No. OTC 1456, 1971, pp. II 385-II 392.
Kaiser, et al., “Advanced Bin Coverage and Monitoring System for 3-D Marine Seismics,” SEG Expanded Abstracts (MAR1.4), pp. 253-256.
Fagot, et al., “Deep-Towed Seismic System Design for Operation At Depths Up to 6000 M,” 13th Annual OTC, OTC 4082, May 4-7,1981, pp. 141-154.
Koterayama, et al., “Field Experiments on an Intelligent Towed Vehicle “Flying Fish””Proceedings of the Fifth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISBN 1-880653-16-8 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-18-4 (vol. II),1995, pp. 287-291.
Vermeer, “Streamers versus Stationary Receivers,” Offshore Technology Conference—OTC 8314, May 5-8, 1997, pp. 331-346.
Vallieres, et al., “Mini 3D for shallow gas reconnaissance,” Offshore Technology Conference—OTC 7986, May 6-9, 1996, pp. 265-275.
Brink, et al., “Marine Acquisition Technique for Both Shallow and Deep Targets,” SEG Annual Meeting (POS 1.6), Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 1989, pp. 405-407.
Amrine, et al., “Investigation of Interactions between Cable Leveling and Heading Measurement,” SEG Annual Meeting (SA 2.2), Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 1989, pp. 640-642.
Kato, “Guidance and Control of Underwater Towed Vehicle Maneuverable in Both Vertical and Horizontal Axis,” Proceedings of the Second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 1992, ISBN 1-880653-00-1 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-02-8 (vol. II), pp. 505-512.
Koterayama, et al., “A Numerical Study for Design of Depth, Pitch and Roll Control System of a Towed Vehicle,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Apr. 10-15, 1994, ISBN /-880653-10-9 (Set); ISBN 1-880653-12-5 (vol. II), pp. 337-344.
Court, “Applications of Acoustics to Streamer/Source Positioning,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1989 (SA 1.2), pp. 610-612.
International Search Report in Application No. PCT/IB99/01590 mailed Jan. 12, 2000.
International Preliminary Examination Report in Application No. PCT/IB99/01590 mailed Jan. 23, 2001, 11 pages.
Partial European Search Report in Application No. 07113028 mailed May 27, 2010, 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report in Application No. 07113028 mailed Aug. 19, 2010, 5 pages.
Extended European Search Report in Application No. 11168257.1 mailed Mar. 27, 2013, 14 pages.
Camacho, et al., “Model Predictive Control in the Process Industry,” Advances in Industrial Control, 1995, pp. 3-4, 9-10, and 62.
Maybeck, “Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control: vol. 1,” Mathematics in Science and Engineering vol. 141, 1979, pp. 1-16.
Office Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,742,347 mailed Feb. 27, 2017, 3 pages.
Allen, et al., “Centralized Marine Control System,” SEG Annual Meeting, Nov. 2-6, 1986, pp. 643-644.
Allen, et al., “Increased Flexibility in Marine Seismic Recording Systems,” ASEG/SEG Conference—Adelaide (1988), pp. 223-226.
Barry, Cavers, & Kneale, Geophysics, Report on recommended standards for digital tape formats: Geophysics, 40, No. 02, 1975, pp. 344-352.
Beckett, et al., “Reducing 3D Seismic Turnaround,” Oilfield Review (Jan. 1995), pp. 23-37.
Bedenbender, Johnston, & Neitzel, Electroacoustic Characteristics of Marine Seismic Streamers, Geophysics, vol. 35, No. 6 (Dec. 1970), pp. 1054-1072.
Biondo L. Biondi, 3D Seismic Imaging, Investigations in Geophysics Series No. 14, Chapter 9: Imaging and Partial Subsurface Illumination (2006), pp. 123-141.
Brice, et al., “Perturbations in 4D marine seismic,” ASEG 15th Geophysical Conference & Exhibition, Aug. 2001, 4 pages.
Bross & Longo, Latches for Quick-Release Fastening , Machine Design (Aug. 9, 1984), 6 pages.
Chopra, Expert Answers: Multistreamer/multisource acquisition, The Leading Edge, May 2005, pp. 472-476.
Cotton & Sanders, “The Reality of Trace Binning in 3-D Marine Surveying,” Seismic 21, S21.5 (1983), pp. 565-568.
Court, “Streamer Compass Validation and Verification,” Geophysics vol. 58 No. 4 (Apr. 1993), pp. 589-592.
Doenhoff, et al., Investigation of the Variation of Lift Coefficient with Reynolds Number at a Moderate Angle of Attack on a Low-Drag Airfoil , NACA (Nov. 1942), 21 pages.
Dowling, “The dynamics of towed flexible cylinders, Part 1: Neutrally buoyant elements,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 187 (1988), pp. 507-532.
Evans, A Handbook for Seismic Data Acquisition in Exploration, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, No. 7, 1997, pp. 4, 9, 38, 149-151, 238, and 250.
Gadallah, Reservoir Seismology: Geophysics in Nontechnical Language, PennWell Books, (1994). pp. 86, 89, 221, 223 and 368.
Gardner & Canning, “Effects of irregular sampling on 3-D prestack migration,” SP4.7, SEG Abstracts, 1994, pp. 1553-1556.
Gikas, “Least Squares Filtering and Testing for Positioning and Quality Control During 3D Marine Seismic Surveys,” Full Thesis, Department of Surveying University of Newcastle upon Tyne dated Aug. 1996, 7 pages.
Gikas, et al., The Hydrographic Journal, No. 77, Jul. 1995, pp. 11-24.
Gobat, Grosenbaugh, & Triantafyllou, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst., WHOI Cable: Time Domain Numerical Simulation of Moored and Towed Oceanographic Systems, Technical Report (Nov. 1997), 106 pages.
Gobat, Grosenbaugh, & Triantafyllou, “Generalized-α Time Integration Solutions for Hanging Chain Dynamics,” 128 J. of Engineering Mechanics, 128 (6), Jun. 2002, pp. 677-687.
Gobeli & Liner, “Bin Size and Linear v(z),” Society of Exploration Geophysics Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1996, pp. 47-50.
Goudey, “A Quick-Release Hook for Lifeboats and Offshore Rigging,” IEEE 1982, pp. 728-731.
Hartung, et.al, “Successful Introduction of New 4D Technology Into the Business—Time Lapse Seismic in Gannet-C,” EAGE 62nd Conference and Technical Exhibition, May 29-Jun. 2, 2000, 2 pages.
Hecht, City of Light: The Story of Fiber Optics, Chapter 14: Three Generations in Five Years (1999), pp. 176-200.
Houston, “Cable positioning using compasses, tailbuoys, and acoustic devices,” SEG Expanded Abstracts (1991), pp. 761-763.
Jack, Time-Lapse Seismic in Reservoir Management, SEG 1997, 291 pages.
Johnston, et. al., “Time-lapse seismic analysis of the North Sea Fulmer Field,” SEG Extended Abstracts (1997), pp. 890-893.
Jones, Marine Geophysics,University College London, 1999, p. 89.
Keggin & Ekren, 4D Seismic Repeatability Over the Gullfaks Field—Source and Receiver Positioning Issues, EAGE Winter Symposium, Reservoir Geophysics: The Road Ahead, Oct. 27-30, 1996, 2 pages.
Krail & Brysk, “The Shape of a Marine Streamer in a Cross Current,” Geophysics vol. 54, No. 3, (Mar. 1989), pp. 302-308.
Lambert, et al., “Marine Seismic Survey Positioning and Control Requirements Evolve,” Offshore, Mar. 2003, 4 pages.
Liner, Elements of 3-D Seismology, PenWell (1999), pp. 104-105, 206-209.
Loweth, Manual of Offshore Surveying for Geoscientists and Engineers, Chapters 3, 4, and 5, Chapman & Hall (1997), pp. 31-49, 51-70, 71-93.
Lumley, et al “Assessing the Technical Risk of a 4D Seismic Project,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts (1997), pp. 894-897.
Marsh, et. al., “The Use of 4D Seismic in Reservoir Management,” EAGE 63rd Conference & Technical Exhibition, Jun. 11-15, 2001, 6 pages.
Martin, et al., “Acquisition of marine point receiver seismic data with a towed streamer,” SEG Expanded Abstracts, 2000, 5 pages.
McBarnet, “Interpreting Reservoir Talk,” Offshore Engineer, Sep. 4, 2003, 6 pages.
McBarnet, “Moving up the Q,” Offshore Engineer, Jun. 2008, 3 pages.
McKeown, “Acoustic Positioning of Oceanographic Instruments,” IEEE—Engineering in the Ocean Environment Conference. vol. 2 (1974), pp. 150-54.
Morice, et al., “4D-ready marine seismic data,” 70th Annual International Meeting, SEG Expanded Abstracts (2000), pp. 1607-1610.
Morice, et al., SPE 63136: 4D-Ready Towed-Streamer Data and the Foinaven Benchmark, Oct. 2000, pp. 1-7.
Newman, Marine Hydrodynamics, Chapter 2: Model Testing (1977), 49 pages.
Osdal, et al., “Mapping the Fluid Front and Pressure Buildup using 4D Data on Norne Field,” The Leading Edge, Sep. 2006, pp. 1134-1141.
Paidoussis, Fluid-Structure Interactions: Slender Structures and Axial Flow, vol. 1, Academic Press (1998), 9 pages.
Peacock, et al., “Advanced Acoustic Design for a New Seismic Streamer,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts (1983), pp. 465-466.
Peardon, et al., “Acoustic and Mechanical Design Considerations for Digital Streamers,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts (1986), pp. 291-294.
Pennington, “A Brief History and Overview of Reservoir Geophysics,” in Methods and Applications in Reservoir Geophysics (David H. Johnston ed., 2010), pp. 21-28.
Proffitt, “A History of Innovation in Marine Seismic Data Acquisition,” Geophysics: The Leading Edge of Exploration, vol. 10 No. 3 (Mar. 1991), pp. 24-30.
Robertson, “Reservoir Management Using 3-D Seismic Data,” Geophysics: The Leading Edge of Exploration (Feb. 1989), pp. 25-31.
Satter, et al., “Integrated Reservoir Management,” Society of Petroleum Engineers (Dec. 1994), pp. 1057-1064.
Siems & Chien, “Technology for an Ultra-High-Resolution Marine Seismic Cable,” Offshore Technology Conference 6557 (1991), pp. 509-516.
Smith, It's all acquisition's fault, Exploration & Production, Mar. 2011, 4 pages.
Spector, Design Guide: Pin Fasteners: Part 2—Quick-Release Attachment, Machine Design (Dec. 12, 1957), pp. 166-173.
Triantafyllou, Dynamics of Cables, Towing Cables and Mooring Systems, 23 Shock & Vibration Dig., No. 7 (1991), 8 pages.
Watts et al., “Reservoir Monitoring of the Magnus Field through 4D time-lapse seismic analysis,” Petroleum Geoscience vol. 2 (1996), pp. 361-372.
Yilmaz, Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data, vol. 2 Chapter 6: 3-D Seismic Exploration (1987), pp. 385-395.
Zinn & Rapatz, Reliability Analysis in Marine Seismic Network, A Paper Reprinted from the Hydrographic Journal No. 76 (Apr. 1995), pp. 11-18.
Examination Report in Australian Application No. 2016204266 dated Jul. 20, 2017, 2 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150085609 A1 Mar 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12803730 Jul 2010 US
Child 14444512 US