Patent Grant
10190166
The present invention concerns methods for determining if a dendritic cell belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset or to an effector dendritic cell subset, methods for determining if a patient undergoing immunotherapy, and/or who has been administered with a vaccine, is developing an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response, and methods of determining response to immunotherapy.
Dendritic cells (hereinafter abbreviated as “DCs”) are specialized antigen presenting cells that integrate a variety of incoming signals to orchestrate adaptive immune responses.
These cells have peculiar and opposite abilities, and therefore can be distinguished in two major and differently specialized subpopulations: on the one hand the effector proinflammatory DCs (also called proinflammatory DCs) and on the other hand the tolerogenic DCs (also called regulatory or DCreg).
The effector DCs, when activated, are crucial for the presentation of peptides and proteins to T and B lymphocytes and are widely recognized as professional antigen-presenting cells (APC), thanks to their ability to prime naïve T cells.
This subpopulation is involved in responses against infectious pathogens and tumors. Depending on the type of pathogen or antigen encountered and the profile of costimulatory molecules engaged, effector DCs have the capacity to induce different polarizations of T helper lymphocytes, that is to drive the development of Th1, Th2 or Th17 effector CD4+ T cells.
The effector DC subpopulation can be divided into at least three distinct cell subsets regarding the helper T cells they are able to prime: DC1 cell subset which drives the development of Th1 cells (cells producing type 1 cytokines IFN-γ and IL-2), DC2 cell subset which drives the development of Th2 cells (cells producing type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13), and DC17 cell subset which drives the development of Th17 cells (cells producing IL-17).
In contrast, tolerogenic DCs mediate the suppression of antigen (Ag)-specific immune responses via the induction of regulatory (also called suppressive) CD4+ T cells, T-cell anergy and clonal deletion of T-cells. Tolerogenic DCs are thus critically involved in promoting and maintaining clinical and/or immunological tolerance, as well as regulating excessive and undesired immune responses. Regulatory T cells exert immuno-suppressive functions which are crucial to contain autoimmunity, chronic inflammation, but also to promote allogenic stem cell engraftment and to mediate tolerance to solid tissue allografts (see the review article by Gregori. S, Tissue Antigens, 77: 89-99, 2011). Further, regulatory/tolerogenic DCs have been shown to suppress inflammatory response to inhaled allergens (Swiecki and Colonna, Eur. J. Immunol., 40:2094-2098, 2010; Kuipers, Vaccine, 23(37):4577-4588, 2005; Lambrecht, Allergy, 60(3): 271-282, 2005).
Therefore, bidirectional interactions between DCs and T cells initiate either effector or tolerogenic responses, which are crucial to establish appropriate defense mechanisms, while precluding uncontrolled inflammation and immune response.
However, since different Th-specific polarization are involved in immune responses against tumors, pathogens, allergens and in autoimmunity or graft rejection, inappropriate T helper lymphocyte polarization can be detrimental. For instance, failure of regulatory T cells function has been implicated in the development of many autoimmune diseases (Roncarolo et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol., 7:585-598, 2007). Further, when DCs initiate a tolerogenic response as opposed to an effector response in case of infectious diseases or tumors, regulatory T cells can contribute to immune escape of pathogens or tumor cells. Conversely, when DCs initiate an effector response rather than a tolerogenic response, autoimmune reactions, chronic inflammation or allergenic responses are observed.
Concerning the desensitization, a broadly accepted paradigm to explain the clinical efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy is a modulation of CD4+ T cell functions characterized by a shift from Th2 toward regulatory T cell responses. In this regard, the capacity of DCs to initiate and orient such effector or regulatory T cell responses suggests that those cells may contribute to both allergic inflammation and its resolution. For example, there is a growing body of evidence that DCs play a role in allergic sensitization through their capacity to induce and maintain allergen-specific Th2 responses (Lambrecht, Allergy, 60(3): 271-282, 2005). In contrast, tolerogenic DCs have been detected in the oral mucosa, and as such, appear to be essential in contributing to tolerance induction following sublingual immunotherapy.
Nowadays, there is a great interest in distinguishing these polarized DCs (i.e. effector DC subsets which drive the development of Th1, Th2 or Th17 effector CD4+ T, respectively termed DC1, DC2, DC17, and tolerogenic DC subsets which drive the development of suppressive/regulatory CD4+ T cells, induction of T-cell anergy and clonal deletion of T-cells) to assess the orientation of antigen-specific adaptive immune responses, and to monitor the efficacy of immunotherapy protocols.
The Inventors herein identified novel biomarkers to distinguish DC polarization, these biomarkers could be used to follow immunotherapy/vaccination protocols, in particular allergen-specific immunotherapy.
Specifically, with evidence that monocyte-derived DCs accessible in the blood express functionally relevant markers associated with various differentiation patterns, as showed by Cheong, C. et al. (Cell, 143: 416-429, 2010), the inventors focused on those cells to investigate early orientations of adaptive immune responses.
Hence, the inventors, after having developed in vitro various subsets of effector and tolerogenic human DCs, compared the whole cell proteomes of these different subsets using two complementary quantitative proteomic strategies, i.e. differential gel electrophoresis (DiGE) and label-free mass spectrometry techniques.
The inventors identified various marker proteins for effector dendritic cell subsets (in particular for DC1, DC17), as well as for tolerogenic dendritic cells.
They have also demonstrated that marker proteins are indicative of the type of response to a treatment, in particular that overexpression of C1Q (Complement C1q) and/or STAB1 (Stabilin-1) is associated with tolerogenic DCs and thus indicative of clinical responses induced by allergen-specific immunotherapy. Indeed, the expression of such tolerogenic DC markers was increased in PBMCs from grass pollen allergic patients exhibiting successful clinical responses during sublingual immunotherapy, as opposed to nonresponders or to patients treated with the placebo where the expression globally declined.
In its broadest aspect, the invention relates to the use of any one or more of the marker proteins, or of the mRNA of these proteins, disclosed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2.A to F, for determining if a dendritic cell belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset or to a effector dendritic cell subset, and for determining if a patient under immunotherapy and/or vaccinated is developing an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response. In another embodiment, the marker is used to determine the efficacy of immunotherapeutic treatment/vaccination (i.e. to distinguish between therapy responder and nonresponder patients).
Therefore, a first aspect of the invention provides an in vitro method of determining the dendritic cell subset, the method comprising detection of a marker protein listed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2.A to F, or an mRNA thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the at least one marker protein (or an mRNAs thereof) is preferably selected from the group consisting of:
In a second aspect, the in vitro method is for determining if a dendritic cell belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset or to an effector dendritic cell subset, which method comprises determining the level of expression by the dendritic cell to be tested of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2.A to F, or an mRNA thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the at least one marker protein (or an mRNAs thereof) is preferably selected from the group consisting of:
In another embodiment, the method is for determining if the dendritic cell belongs to the effector dendritic cell “DC1” subset (i.e. effector DCs which drive the development of Th1 CD4+ T cells). In this embodiment, the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.E and 2.E, more preferably at least MX1 (SEQ ID NO: 41/42), or an mRNA thereof, is determined.
In another preferred embodiment, the method is for determining if the dendritic cell belongs to the effector dendritic cell “DC17” subset (i.e. effector DCs which drive the development of Th17 CD4+ T cells). In this embodiment, the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of the proteins listed in Tables 2.C and 2.F, more preferably PGRP1 (bovine sequence recited in SEQ ID NO: 108), or an mRNA thereof, is determined.
In another preferred embodiment, the method is for determining if the dendritic cell belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset, and the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of the proteins listed in Tables 1.A and 2.A, or an mRNA thereof, is determined. In a more preferred embodiment, the at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of the proteins listed in Tables 1.A and 2.A, or an mRNA thereof, is selected from the group consisting of C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C, respectively SEQ ID Nos; 45, 46, 47), CATC (SEQ ID NO: 48), MRC1 (SEQ ID NO: 50), STAB1 (SEQ ID NO: 51), TPP1 (SEQ ID NO: 5). Advantageously, the marker proteins are at least C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C) and/or STAB1.
In a further preferred embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
a) determining the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1 A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2 A to F, or an mRNA thereof;
b) comparing said level of expression with that of a control standard or a control sample;
c) based on the comparison with the control, identifying to which subset of dendritic cell belongs the dendritic cell to be tested.
When the control sample consists of immature dendritic cells, step c) comprises:
Further, when the control sample consists of immature dendritic cells which have not been polarized towards tolerogenic or effector subsets, a dendritic cell overexpressing at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.E and 2.E, more preferably at least MX1 (SEQ ID NO: 41/42), or an mRNA thereof, is identified as belonging to the effector dendritic cell “DC1” subset.
A dendritic cell underexpressing, by comparison with the level of expression of a control sample consisting of immature dendritic cells, at least one marker protein, selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Table 2.C, and/or overexpressing at least one marker protein, selected from the group consisting of the proteins listed in Table 2.F, more preferably PGRP1 (bovine sequence recited in SEQ ID NO: 108), or an mRNA thereof, is identified as belonging to the effector dendritic cell “DC17” subset.
In a third aspect of the invention, the in vitro method is for determining if a patient is developing an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response, which method comprises determining the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1 A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2 A to F, or an mRNA thereof, in a biological sample from the patient. In a preferred embodiment, the at least one marker protein (or an mRNAs thereof) is preferably selected from the group consisting of:
In the third aspect of the invention, the patient may be a patient suffering from a disease, for instance an infectious disease, a tumor, an autoimmune disease, an allergy, or a patient who has been grafted. Further, the patient may be treated or not against said disease or against graft rejection.
In a preferred embodiment, the patient is undergoing immunotherapy and/or has been administered with a vaccine.
If the method is carried out on a sample obtained from a non treated patient, it will allow assessing which type of T cell response the patient suffering from a disease is developing.
Preferably, the method comprises the steps of:
a) determining in a biological sample from the patient the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1 A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2 A to F, or an mRNA thereof;
b) comparing said level of expression with a control standard or a control sample;
c) based on the comparison with the control, indentifying if the patient develops an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response, in particular Th1, Th2 or Th17 response.
When the patient is not treated, the control may consist of immature dendritic cells which have not been polarized towards tolerogenic or effector subsets. Alternatively, the control may be a biological sample from a healthy patient of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested (e.g. peripheral blood when the biological sample to be tested is peripheral blood, etc).
When the patient is treated, the control may consist of a sample which had been obtained before the beginning of the treatment, said biological sample being of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested.
Whatever the type of patients (i.e. treated or not treated), when the above recited controls are used, step c) is as follows:
Further, when the patient is identified as developing an immune response oriented towards an effector T cell response, the type of effector response (in particular Th1 and Th17 response) can be easily assessed by determining the level of expression of the marker proteins by the different effector dendritic cell subsets since it is known that DC1 cell subset drives the development of Th1 cells (cells producing type 1 cytokines IFN-γ and IL-2) and DC17 cell subset drives the development of Th17 cells (cells producing IL-17).
If at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.E and 2.E, more preferably at least MX1 (SEQ ID NO: 41/42), or an mRNA thereof, is overexpressed in the biological sample from the patient, the effector response is a Th1 response.
On the other hand, if at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of the proteins listed in Table 2.F, more preferably PGRP1 (bovine sequence recited in SEQ ID NO: 108), or an mRNA thereof, is overexpressed in the biological sample from the patient, the effector response is a Th17 response.
In an embodiment, the patient is undergoing immunotherapy and/or has been administered with a vaccine aiming to induce an immune response against an infectious disease or a tumor. In this embodiment, the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 2.B, 2.C and Tables 1.D, 1.E, 2.D, 2.E, 2.F, or an mRNA thereof, is determined, and wherein (i) a level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.D, 1.E, 2.D, 2.E, 2.F, more preferably at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of TFR1 (also known as CD71) (SEQ ID NO: 72), NMES1 (SEQ ID NO: 68), TRAF1 (SEQ ID NO: 75), FSCN1 (SEQ ID NO: 23), IRF4 (SEQ ID NO: 35), MX1 (SEQ ID NO: 41/42), Lamin-A/C (SEQ ID No 32) and PGRP1 (bovine sequence recited in SEQ ID NO: 108), or an mRNA thereof, which is higher than the level of expression of the control, and/or (ii) a level of expression of at least one marker protein listed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 2.B, 2.C, more preferably at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C, respectively SEQ ID Nos; 45, 46, 47), CATC (SEQ ID NO: 48), MRC1 (SEQ ID NO: 50), STAB1 (SEQ ID NO: 51), TPP1 (SEQ ID NO: 5), and ITAM (SEQ ID NO: 15), or an mRNA thereof, which is lower than the level of expression of the control, indicates that the immune response is oriented towards an effector T cell response, and also identifies the patient as likely to be a responder to the immunotherapy and/or vaccine. In this embodiment, the control preferably consists of a sample which had been harvested before the beginning of the treatment, said biological sample being of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested.
In another embodiment, the patient is undergoing an immunotherapy and/or has been administered with a vaccine aiming to treat an autoimmune disease or an allergy. In this embodiment, the level of expression of at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.A and 2.A, or an mRNA thereof, is determined, and wherein a level of expression of at least one of these marker proteins, more preferably at least one marker protein selected from the group consisting of C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C, respectively SEQ ID Nos; 45, 46, 47), CATC (SEQ ID NO: 48), MRC1 (SEQ ID NO: 50), STAB1 (SEQ ID NO: 51), TPP1 (SEQ ID NO: 5), advantageously at least C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C) and/or STAB1, or an mRNA thereof, which is higher than the level of expression of the control indicates that the immune response is oriented towards a regulator T cell response, and also identifies the patient as likely to be a responder to the immunotherapy and/or vaccine. In this embodiment, the control preferably consists of a sample which had been harvested before the beginning of the treatment, said biological sample being of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the patient is undergoing an immunotherapy that aims to treat an allergy, preferably the immunotherapy is a desensitization therapy, the immunotherapy aims to (i) reduce the immune response against the allergen(s) which trigger(s) the allergy and/or (ii) manifestation of clinical symptoms of allergy. A level of expression of at least one of the marker protein selected from the group consisting of proteins listed in Tables 1.A and 2.A, or an mRNA thereof, which is higher than the level of expression of the control (a biological sample harvested before the beginning of the treatment of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested) indicates that the immune response is oriented towards a regulatory T cell response, and also identifies the patient as likely to be a responder to the immunotherapy and/or vaccine. Advantageously, the level of expression of at least one of C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C) (SEQ ID Nos: 45, 46 and 47) and STAB-1 (SEQ ID NO: 51), or an mRNA thereof, is determined, and a level of expression of anyone of the subunit A, B and/or C of C1Q, and/or STAB1, or an mRNA thereof, which is higher than the level of expression of the control indicates that the immune response is oriented towards a regulatory T cell response and also identifies the patient as likely to be a responder to the desensitization therapy (i.e. the immune response against the allergen(s) which trigger(s) the allergy and/or (ii) the manifestation of clinical symptoms of allergy are reduced).
The invention further discloses kits that are useful in the above methods.
Accordingly, a fourth aspect of the invention relates to a kit for determining if a dendritic cell belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset or to an effector dendritic cell subset comprising:
a) means for determining the level of expression of at least one marker protein listed in Tables 1 A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2 A to F, or an mRNA thereof; and
b) optionally, instructions for the use of said kit in determining if a dendritic cell belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset or to an effector dendritic cell subset.
A fifth aspect of the invention also relates to a kit for determining if a patient is developing an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response, which kit comprises:
a) means for determining the level of expression of at least one marker protein listed in Tables 1 A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2 A to F, or an mRNA thereof; and
b) optionally, instructions for the use of said kit in determining if the immune response is oriented towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response.
For the fourth and fifth aspects of the invention, the kit comprises preferably the means for determining the level of expression of at least one, and by order of preference at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17, marker protein(s) (or (an) mRNA(s) thereof) selected from the group consisting of:
A sixth aspect of the invention concerns a kit for determining if a patient is responding to an immunotherapy which aims to treat an allergy, which kit comprises:
a) means for determining the level of expression of at least one of C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C) (SEQ ID Nos: 45, 46 and 47) and/or STAB1 (SEQ ID NO: 51), or an mRNA thereof; and
b) optionally, instructions for the use of said kit in determining if the patient is responding to the immunotherapy.
Advantageously, the kit further comprises means for determining the level of expression of at least one other protein listed in Tables 1.A, and 2.A, or an mRNA thereof.
Optionally, the kits of the fourth, fifth and sixth aspects of the invention may further comprise means for measuring the expression level of some housekeeping genes.
In a preferred embodiment, the kits according to the invention comprises, in addition to the means for determining the level of expression of at least the recited marker protein(s), or for determining the expression of an mRNA thereof, a control sample comprising a known amount of the marker protein(s) to be measured.
The kits according to the fourth aspect of the invention may further comprise:
The kits according to the fifth aspect of the invention may further comprise:
The kits according to the sixth aspect of the invention may further comprise:
Means for determining the expression level of the marker proteins, or the mRNA thereof, which are listed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2.A to F are well-known in the art. They include, e.g. reagents allowing the detection of mRNA by real-time quantitative-PCR, such as primers specific for the marker proteins to be measured. When the kit comprises means for real-time quantitative-PCR mRNA detection, the kit may further comprise a second reagent, labeled with a detectable compound, which binds to mRNA synthesized during the PCR, such as e.g. SYBER GREEN reagents or TaqMan reagents.
Means for determining the expression level of the marker proteins may also include antibodies specifically binding to the marker proteins to be measured. Such means can be labeled with detectable compound such as fluorophores or radioactive compounds. For example, the probe or the antibody specifically binding to the marker proteins may be labeled with a detectable compound. Alternatively, when the kit comprises an antibody, the kit may further comprise a secondary antibody, labeled with a detectable compound, which binds to an unlabelled antibody specifically binding to the marker protein(s) to be measured.
The means for measuring the expression level of the marker proteins may also include reagents such as e.g. reaction, hybridization and/or washing buffers. The means may be present, e.g., in vials or microtiter plates, or be attached to a solid support such as a microarray as can be the case for primers and probes.
A seventh aspect of the invention relates to an in vitro method for screening for compounds which are suitable for polarizing a dendritic cell towards a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset or towards an effector dendritic cell subset, which method comprises the steps of:
Marker Proteins
The term ‘marker protein’ includes all isoforms of said proteins. Thus, for the marker proteins described above, the term ‘marker protein’ includes the polypeptide having the amino acid sequences disclosed herein and all isoforms thereof. ‘Isoform’ refers to all alternative forms of a protein, for example amino-acid substituted forms, alternatively spliced versions and post-translationally modified forms such as glycoforms. Post-translationally modified isoforms may include acetylated, formylated, lipoylated, myristoylated, palmitoylated, alkylated, methylated, amidated, glycosylated, hyrdroxylated, nitrosylated, phosphorylated, sulphated, polysialylated and sialylated forms. Isoforms include naturally occurring variants, allelic variants, SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms), alternative splice variants and truncated or secreted forms of the protein. Alternatively spliced and truncated mRNAs encoding the marker proteins may also be detected.
Detection of the ‘level of expression’ of a marker protein may refer to the level of expression of any individual isoform of said protein; the collective level of expression of selected isoforms of said protein; or the total level of expression of said protein including the reference sequence and all isoforms.
In one embodiment, the marker proteins have the sequence corresponding to the Uni-Prot/Swiss-Prot accession number recited in Tables 1 and 2.
In some embodiments, the methods of the invention involve detection of a single marker protein or protein isoform of the proteins listed in Tables 1.A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2.A to F, or an mRNA thereof. In other embodiments, more than one protein or protein isoform listed in Tables 1 A, 1.B, 1.D, 1.E and 2 A to F, or an mRNA thereof, is detected, for example at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 or at least 30 proteins or protein isoforms, or the mRNAs thereof.
In certain embodiment, a set of biomarkers comprising at least C1Q (subunit A, B and/or C) and/or STAB1 is used.
Complement C1q (C1Q) is involved in serum complement system. In human, it is composed of 18 polypeptide chains: six A-subunits (UniProt/Swiss-Prot accession number C1QA_HUMAN, 245 amino acids long), six B-subunits (UniProt/Swiss-Prot accession number C1QB_HUMAN, 253 amino acids long), and six C-subunits (UniProt/Swiss-Prot accession number C1QCA_HUMAN, 245 amino acids). C1Q associates with the proenzymes C1r and C1s in the molar ratio of 1:2:2. to yield C1, the first component of the serum complement system.
Stabilin1 (STAB1) is a single-pass type I membrane protein, 2570 residues long in human (precursor form). It acts as a scavenger receptor for acetylated low density lipoprotein. Binds to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and may play a role in defense against bacterial infection. Two isoforms have been identified in human.
An increase or decrease in the level of expression of a protein isoform, or an mRNA thereof, may be detected in a biological sample compared to a control, as detailed below. The fold change in the patient sample compared to the control may be at least 1.2, at least 1.4, at least 1.6, at least 1.8, at least 2, at least 2.2, at least 2.4, at least 2.6, at least 2.8, at least 3, at least 3.5, at least 4, at least 4.5, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7 or at least 8-fold.
As used throughout the present specification, any reference to the “marker proteins” of the Tables 1 and 2 is meant to encompass any naturally occurring isoform of the marker proteins naturally encoded by human, but also their homologous and orthologous counterpart of other animals. The patient is preferably a mammal, such as a rodent, a feline, an equine, a bovine, an ovine, a canine or a primate, and is preferably a human, in particular a child, a woman, a man.
Depending on the origin of sample to be tested (e.g. a rodent, a feline, an equine, a bovine, an ovine, a canine or a primate . . . ), the person skilled in the art will easily determine which are the sequences of the markers to be detected by consulting the commonly known sequence databases and will therefore choose the means suitable for detecting these markers.
For instance, when the patient is a human, the term “marker proteins” is intended to mean any naturally occurring isoform of the marker proteins naturally encoded by human genome, including the protein having an amino acid sequence corresponding to the sequences of accession number listed in Tables 1 and 2, human equivalents of the non_human sequences listed in Tables 1 and 2 allelic variants thereof and splice variants thereof.
Biological Sample
The biological sample may be, without limitation, blood (e.g. peripheral blood, PBMCs), plasma, serum, mucosal (e.g. nasal secretion, saliva), bronchoalveolar cerebrospinal fluid or urine. It may as well be tissues, most particularly from mucosal surfaces. In some embodiments, said biological sample contains antigen-presenting cells (i.e. monocytes, macrophages and/or dendritic cells), more preferably dendritic cells. However, it is not necessary for the sample to contain antigen-presenting cells, as the marker protein may be secreted and may be detected in body fluids or tissues which do not contain the antigen-presenting cells themselves.
The biological sample is preferably taken before the commencement of therapy or before the planned commencement of therapy. The sample may also be taken after the commencement of therapy, for example after one round of therapy is completed in order to decide whether to proceed to further rounds. In particular, where the method comprises monitoring of a patient undergoing immunotherapy, samples taken before the commencement of therapy, during therapy and/or at the end of therapy may be required.
In all aspect of the invention relating to allergy, the biological sample is preferably peripheral blood or PBMCs, nasal secretion, saliva or bronchoalveolar fluid.
Control
The expression of the marker proteins by dendritic cells to be tested, or where appropriate in a patient biological sample, may be compared with a control standard value and/or or with the expression of said marker in a control sample as explained above, for instance a control sample of the same nature.
A standard value may be obtained by, for example, detecting the level of expression in a given subset of dendritic cells (e.g. immature dendritic cells, effector or tolerogenic dendritic cells) or in a given group of subjects (for instance healthy subjects, patients developing an immune response oriented towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response, patients previously identified as a responder to a treatment, or patients previously identified as a non-responder to a treatment) and obtaining an average or median figure.
The control sample may consist of immature dendritic cells. In the context of the invention, the term “immature dendritic cells” is intended to mean that the dendritic cells are not activated and have not been polarized towards tolerogenic or effector subsets. Immature dendritic cells may be obtained from monocytes sorted out from peripheral blood (e.g. from PBMCs) by method well known from the one skilled in the art. Such methods are for instance disclosed in Sallusto and Lanzavecchia, J Exp Med, 179:1109-1118,1994, and in the examples of the present application. Other sources of DCs include plasmacytoid DCs (from blood, PBMCs, tissues) dermal DCs and langerhans cells (from skin or mucosal tissues).
As will be clear to the skilled person, the nature of the comparison of the dendritic cell to be tested, or where appropriate in a patient biological sample to be tested, with the control and the conclusions drawn will depend on the nature of the control.
For instance, where the marker protein is disclosed herein as a protein overexpressed in the tolerogenic dendritic cell subset and the control is based on immature dendritic cells or an effector dendritic cell subset, a value the same as or similar to, or lower than, the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested does not belong to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset, whereas a value higher than the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset. Conversely, where the control is based on tolerogenic dendritic cells, a value the same as or similar to, or higher than, the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested belongs to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset, whereas a value lower than the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested does not belong to a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset.
Similarly, where the marker protein is disclosed herein as a protein overexpressed in an effector dendritic cell subset and the control is based on immature dendritic cells or a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset, a value the same as or similar to, or lower than, the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested does not belong to an effector dendritic cell subset, whereas a value higher than the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested belongs to an effector dendritic cell subset. Conversely, where the control is based on effector dendritic cells, a value the same as or similar to, or higher than, the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested belongs to an effector dendritic cell subset, whereas a value lower than the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested does not belong to an effector dendritic cell subset.
Similarly, where the marker protein is disclosed herein as a protein underexpressed in an effector dendritic cell subset and the control is based on immature dendritic cells or a tolerogenic dendritic cell subset, a value the same as or similar to, or higher than, the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested does not belong to an effector dendritic cell subset, whereas a value lower than the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested belongs to an effector dendritic cell subset. Conversely, where the control is based on effector dendritic cells, a value the same as or similar to, or lower than, the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested belongs to an effector dendritic cell subset, whereas a value higher than the control may be indicative that the dendritic cell to be tested does not belong to an effector dendritic cell subset.
The same type of reasoning applies to determine if a patient is developing an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response.
For instance, concerning the embodiments wherein the patient has not been treated, as exemplified above the control may be immature dendritic cells which have not been polarized towards tolerogenic or effector subsets, or a biological sample from a healthy patient of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested. The control may also be effector dendritic cells, tolerogenic dendritic cells, biological sample of a patient who is developing a regulatory T cell response, biological sample of a patient who is developing an effector T cell response. On the basis of a reasoning similar to that above in relation to the determination of to which dendritic cell subset belongs the DCs to be tested, depending on the type of control the person skilled in the art will be able to determine if a patient is developing an immune response oriented either towards a regulatory T cell response or towards an effector T cell response.
Regarding the embodiments wherein the patient has been treated, as exemplified above the control may be a biological sample from a patient or group of patients of the same nature as that of the biological sample to be tested, which sample has been obtained before the treatment begins (see the third aspect of the invention). Preferably, the control is a pre-treatment sample taken from the patient undergoing treatment. The control may also be effector dendritic cells, tolerogenic dendritic cells, a biological sample from a patient who is developing a regulatory T cell response, a biological sample from a patient who is developing an effector T cell response. Further, when one wishes to determine if the patient will likely be a responder or a non-responder to a treatment, the control may be a biological sample from a healthy patient, a biological sample from a patient previously identified as a responder to the treatment, a biological sample from a patient previously identified as a non-responder to the treatment (biological samples of the same nature than that of the biological sample to be tested and, where the sample is a patient sample, obtained before the beginning of treatment).
Where the marker protein is disclosed herein as a protein overexpressed in responder subjects and the control is based on a non-responder subject or group of such subjects, a value the same as or similar to, or lower than, the control may be indicative of non-responsiveness to therapy, whereas a value higher than the control may be indicative of responsiveness to therapy. Conversely, where the control is based on a responder subject or group of such subjects, a value the same as or similar to, or higher than, the control may be indicative of responsiveness to therapy, whereas a value lower than the control may be indicative of non-responsiveness to therapy. Where the control is based on an average or median value obtained from a random group of subjects, a value higher than the control may be indicative of responsiveness to therapy. Preferably, the method is intended to monitor patients during therapy to establish whether they are responding to therapy, an increase or decrease in marker protein expression during therapy is indicative of responsiveness to treatment.
Similarly, where the marker protein is disclosed herein as a protein underexpressed in responder subjects and the control is based on a non-responder subject or group of such subjects, a value the same as or similar to, or higher than, the control may be indicative of non-responsiveness to therapy, whereas a value lower than the control may be indicative of responsiveness to therapy. Where the control is based on a responder subject or group of such subjects, a value the same as or similar to, or lower than, the control may be indicative of responsiveness to therapy, whereas a value higher than the control may be indicative of non-responsiveness to therapy. Where the control is based on an average or median value obtained from a random group of subjects, a value lower than the control may be indicative of responsiveness to therapy. Where the method is intended to monitor patients during therapy to establish whether they are responding to therapy, a reduction in marker protein expression during therapy is indicative of responsiveness to treatment.
In the context of the present invention, the term “overexpression” and “overexpress” is intended to mean that the level of expression of given protein marker, or an mRNA thereof, is higher than that of the control. On the other hand, the term “underexpression” and “underexpress” is intended to mean that the level of expression of given protein marker, or an mRNA thereof, is lower than that of the control.
Detection of Marker Proteins/Determination of the Level of Expression of Markers Proteins
The level of expression of the marker protein may be determined by gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), in particular one and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (1D-, 2D-PAGE), carried out on the sample or a protein-containing extract thereof. 2D-PAGE is a well established technique in which proteins are first separated in one dimension by isoelectric focusing and further separated by SDS-PAGE along a second dimension. Protein expression may be analyzed by visualization of labeled proteins, or by western blotting (i.e. using a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody). Protein quantitation by 2D-PAGE is usually carried out by 2D-DiGE, in which proteins from a control sample and the test sample are labeled with different dyes. The dyes are of similar mass and identical charge so the labeled proteins migrate to the same position on the gel, allowing quantitation to be carried out within a single gel.
Protein expression may also be determined by mass spectrometry assays (LC-MS or LC-MS/MS). Qualitative and quantitative mass spectrometric techniques are known and used in the art. To this aim, target peptides specific for marker proteins are selected and quantified based on calibration curves established with synthetic peptides labeled with stable isotopes. Enzymatic digests, spiked with a defined amount of isotope labeled target peptides, are analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The ratio between labeled and non-labeled target peptides is measured to assess target peptide concentrations and therefore protein marker concentration.
Expression may also be determined using an antibody which binds to the protein, for example a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody, an antibody variant or fragments such as a single chain antibody, a diabody, a minibody, a single chain Fv fragment (sc(Fv)), a Sc(Fv)2 antibody, a Fab fragment or a F(ab′)2 fragment, a VHH antibody or a single domain antibody. The antibody may be mono-, bi-, tri- or multivalent. The antibody may be immobilized on a solid support. Antibodies may be used to determine protein expression in a range of immunological assays including competitive and non-competitive assay systems using techniques such as western blotting, immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence (i.e protein detection on fixed cells or tissues), radioimmunoassay such as RIA (radio-linked immunoassay), ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay), “sandwich” immunoassays, immunoprecipitation assays, immunodiffusion assays, agglutination assays, complement-fixation assays, immunoradiometric assays, fluorescent immunoassays, e.g. FIA (fluorescence-linked immunoassay), chemiluminescence immunoassays, ECLIA (electrochemiluminescence immunoassay) and protein A immunoassays. Such assays are routine and well known to the person skilled in the art.
Expression may alternatively be determined using a protein-specific aptamer. An aptamer is a short peptide capable of specifically binding to a specific protein sequence, consisting of a variable peptide loop attached at both ends to a protein scaffold. Methods for making protein aptamers are well known in the art, the most commonly used method being the yeast two-hybrid system. Such aptamers may preferably be labeled in order to allow the detection of a protein-ligand interaction. A nanotechnology-based assay could also be used.
Detection of mRNA of the Marker Proteins/Determination of the Level of Expression of mRNA of the Markers Proteins
The level of expression of mRNAs may be determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR, using primers specific for the marker proteins to be measured. This method allows the detection of mRNA in a biological sample by generating cDNA by reverse transcription using at least one primer; amplifying the cDNA so produced using gene specific polynucleotides as sense and antisense primers and detecting the presence of the amplified cDNA by methods well known to the person skilled in the art. This include cDNA amplification with specific predesigned primers using SYBR GREEN or Taqman reagents.
Therapeutic Applications
“Therapy”, “therapeutic”, “treatment” or “treating” include reducing, alleviating or inhibiting or eliminating the symptoms of diseases (e.g. infectious diseases, tumors, autoimmune diseases) or of pathological conditions (e.g. allergy and graft rejection), as well as treatment intended to reduce, alleviate, inhibit or eliminate said symptoms. These terms may include preventive treatment which is intended to, or has the effect of, reducing, alleviating, inhibiting or eliminate future symptoms. They may also include treatment of ongoing symptoms.
By “a tumor” is meant any type of cancerous (malignant) tumor.
The malignant tumor may be for instance carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, sarcomas, malignant melanomas, mesotheliomas, blastomas. The carcinoma or adenocarcinoma may for example correspond to a bladder, a colon, a kidney, an ovary, a prostate, a lung, an uterus, a breast or a prostate carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. The blastoma may for example correspond to a neuroblastoma, a glioblastoma or a retinoblastoma. The cancer is preferably selected from the group consisting of prostate cancer (e.g. prostate adenocarcinoma), lung cancer (e.g. squamous cellular carcinoma), breast cancer (e.g. infiltrated ductal carcinoma), ovary cancer (e.g. serous papillary carcinoma), uterus cancer (squamous cellular carcinoma), brain cancer (e.g. astrocytoma), colon cancer (e.g. colon adenocarcinoma), colorectal cancer, rectal cancer (e.g. rectal adenocarcinoma), cancer of the striated muscle (e.g. rhabdomyosarcoma), thyroid cancer, testicular cancer. In a most preferred embodiment, the cancer is selected from the group consisting of lung cancer, prostate cancer, ovary cancer, uterus cancer, brain cancer, colon cancer, colorectal cancer, rectal cancer and cancer of the striated muscle, bladder cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, thyroid cancer.
By “infectious disease”, also known as contagious disease or transmissible disease, is meant any disease which is due to a biological agent which can be spread from one subject to another. The biological agents may be viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa and multicellular parasites.
“Autoimmune disease” is a condition that occurs when the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys healthy body tissue. Examples of autoimmune (or autoimmune-related) disorders include Addison's disease, Celiac disease-sprue (gluten-sensitive enteropathy), Dermatomyositis, Graves disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Multiple sclerosis, Myasthenia gravis, Pernicious anemia, Reactive arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren syndrome, Systemic lupus erythematosus and Type I diabetes.
“Graft rejection” is the rejection of the graft (organs, tissues or cells) by the recipient The rejection may be based on both cell-mediated and antibody-mediated immunity directed against cells of the graft. The graft may be for instance a xenograft (i.e. tissue that is transplanted from one species to another) or an allograft (i.e. a graft of tissue obtained from a donor genetically different from, though of the same species as the recipient).
“Allergy” is a condition characterized by production of allergen-specific IgE in response to a specific allergen, usually a protein. Clinical manifestations and symptoms of allergy may include nasal congestion, nasal pruritis, ocular pruritis, tearing, rhinorrhoea, sinusitis, rhinitis, sneezing, wheezing, conjunctivitis, dermal itching, dermatitis, skin irritation and asthma.
An ‘allergen’ is a substance, usually a protein, which elicits the production of IgE antibodies in predisposed individuals. Allergens may include pollen allergens (such as tree, herb, weed and grass pollen allergens), insect allergens (such as inhalant, saliva and venom allergens, e.g. cockroach, midge and house dust mite allergens and hymenoptera venom allergens), animal hair and dander allergens (from e.g. dog, cat, horse, rat, mouse, rabbit) and food allergens. In a preferred embodiment, the patient has grass pollen allergy and the immunotherapy uses grass pollen allergen.
For instance, a protein allergen may be selected from the group consisting of a protein allergen of the genus Dermatophagoides; a protein allergen of the genus Felis; a protein allergen of the genus Ambrosia; a protein allergen of the genus Lolium; a protein allergen of the genus Cryptomeria; a protein allergen of the genus Alternaria; a protein allergen of the genus Alder, a protein allergen of the genus Betula; a protein allergen of the genus of Blomia; a protein allergen of the genus Quercus; a protein allergen of the genus Olea; a protein allergen of the genus Artemisia; a protein allergen of the genus Plantago; a protein allergen of the genus Parietaria; a protein allergen of the genus Canine; a protein allergen of the genus Blattella; a protein allergen of the genus Apis; a protein allergen of the genus Cupressus; a protein allergen of the genus Thuya; a protein allergen of the genus Chamaecyparis; a protein allergen of the genus Periplaneta; a protein allergen of the genus Agropyron; a protein allergen of the genus Secale; a protein allergen of the genus Triticum; a protein allergen of the genus Cynorhodon; a protein allergen of the genus Juniperus; a protein allergen of the genus Dactylis; a protein allergen of the genus Festuca; a protein allergen of the genus Poa; a protein allergen of the genus Lolium; a protein allergen of the genus Avena; a protein allergen of the genus Holcus; a protein allergen of the genus Anthoxanthum; a protein allergen of the genus Arrhenatherum; a protein allergen of the genus Agrostis; a protein allergen of the genus Phleum; a protein allergen of the genus Phalaris; a protein allergen of the genus Paspalum; and a protein allergen of the genus Sorghum.
Examples of various known protein allergens derived from some of the above-identified genus include: Betula (verrucosa) Bet v I; Bet v II; Blomia Blo 1 1; Blo t III; Blo t V; Blo t XII; Cynorhodon Cyn d I; Dermatophagoides (pteronyssinus or farinae) Der p I; Der p II; Der p III; Der p VII; Der f I; Der f II; Der f III; Der f VII; Felis (domesticus) Fel d I; Ambrosia (artemiisfolia) Amb a 1.1; Amb a 1.2; Amb a 1.3; Amb a 1.4; Amb a II; Lollium (perenne) Lol p I; Lot p II; Lol p III; Lot p IV; Lol p IX (Lol p V or Lol p Ib); Cryptomeria (japonica) Cry j I; Cry j II; Canis (familiaris) Can f I; Can f II; Juniperus (sabinoides or virginiana) Jun s I; Jun v I; Juniperus (ashei) Jun a I; Jun a II; Dactylis (glomerata) Dae g I; Dae g V; Poa (pratensis) Poa p I; PhI p I; PhI p V; PhI p VI and Sorghum (halepensis) Sor h I.
“Immunotherapy” is intended to mean a treatment of disease by inducing, enhancing, or suppressing an immune response by administration of substances (e.g. allergens, immunomodulators such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferons, imiquimod, cellular membrane fractions from bacteria, cytokines/interleukins (e.g. IL-2, IL-7, IL-12), various chemokines) or cells (for instance lymphocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells (NK Cell), cytotoxic T lymphocytes.
“Vaccine” refers to a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antigen and optionally an adjuvant to stimulate the immune system of an individual to develop adaptive immunity to said antigen. The antigen may for instance be biological agents (for example a viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa and multicellular parasites) or a peptide therefrom, or a tumoral antigen.
Vaccines can be prophylactic (e.g. to prevent or ameliorate the effects of a future infection by the pathogen biological agent), or therapeutic (e.g. vaccines against cancer).
The substance used in immunotherapy and the vaccine may be administered via a parenteral route, such as subcutaneously or intravenously, for example via injection, or via alternative routes such as intranasal, skin immunisation e.g. transdermal, intralymphatic administration or mucosal (administration on mucosal surfaces, e.g. a sublingual, oral, buccal, ocular, rectal, urinal, vaginal, pulmonary or otolar surface.
In relation to allergy, immunotherapy may for example consist of administering an allergen to a patient with the aim of reducing current or future immune response, such as an IgE response, and/or manifestation of clinical symptoms of allergy. Immunotherapy is conventionally carried out by administering repeatedly a monodose or incremental doses of an allergen to a patient in need thereof, thereby resulting in an adaptive immune response of the patient who becomes desensitised to the allergen. Immunotherapy may comprise administration of allergen to a mucosal surface, optionally a sublingual, oral, buccal, ocular, rectal, urinal, vaginal, pulmonary or otolar surface. In particular, immunotherapy may be sublingual immunotherapy. Alternatively, immunotherapy may comprise administration via a parenteral route, such as subcutaneously or intravenously, for example via injection, or via alternative routes such as intranasal, skin immunisation e.g. transdermal, or intralymphatic administration.
The allergen used for immunotherapy may be a single allergenic substance or a mixture of such substances, for example a mixture of proteins. It may be a partially or fully purified extract, such as a pollen extract, a recombinant protein, a hypoallergen or peptide derived therefrom. For example, where the immunotherapy is used to treat grass pollen allergy, the allergen administered for immunotherapy may be a grass pollen extract from pollen of one or several genera of grasses, such as Dactylis, Poa, Lolium, Anthoxanthum and Phleum genera. The allergen may also be an allergoid, i.e. a chemically modified form of a naturally occurring allergen which has been chemically modified (for example by aldehydation). The allergen may be administered in conjunction with an adjuvant.
“Response” of a patient to treatment indicates that the patient manifests a reduction in the clinical symptoms. Clinical symptoms may be assessed over the course of treatment, i.e. symptoms before treatment may be compared to symptoms during and after treatment. Alternatively, a reduction in symptoms may be determined by comparison to a baseline level established before treatment. Concerning allergy, this approach is particularly useful where, for example, immunotherapy is carried out in patients not currently experiencing symptoms, as may be the case for seasonal grass pollen allergy sufferers, who may be treated before the pollen season. Symptoms may be assessed by standard methods, such as patient self-assessment or record of the amount of medication required. The degree of a patient's response to treatment may be assessed by measuring the degree of reduction of severity in symptoms, for example as described in the experimental section below. A ‘responder’ subject as defined herein is a subject who responds to immunotherapy with an improvement in clinical symptoms, preferably a statistically significant improvement as compared to patients receiving placebo or no treatment. Preferably, a responder subject will demonstrate an improvement in clinical symptoms which is greater than the average or median improvement seen in a random sample of subjects. A ‘non-responder’ subject is a subject who does not manifest any improvement in clinical symptoms following immunotherapy, or who demonstrates a non-statistically significant improvement in symptoms, or who demonstrates an improvement in clinical symptoms which is less than the average or median improvement seen in a random sample of subjects. For example, where the allergy is grass pollen allergy, improvement in clinical symptoms may be detected by a reduction in the frequency or severity of nasal congestion, nasal pruritis, ocular pruritis, tearing, rhinorrhoea, sinusitis, rhinitis, sneezing, wheezing and/or conjunctivitis.
“Patient” includes any individual who is a candidate for immunotherapy or vaccine, including individuals not currently undergoing therapy.
Concerning allergy, in most cases, the patient will be an individual who has, or has had at any time in the past, clinical symptoms of allergy and/or sensitization to an allergen and/or an allergen-specific IgE response, or an individual at risk of developing such symptoms. Sensitisation to an allergen may be assessed by detecting IgE directed against allergen(s) from this source in the serum of the patient or by skin testing with a preparation containing the corresponding allergen(s). The allergen may without limitation include any of the allergens disclosed herein, in particular a grass pollen allergen.
Table 1: Proteins identified through the 2D-DIGE approach with a FDR p-value≤0.05.
Max. fold represents the ratio of the average volumes of the highest vs. lowest conditions.
Table 2: Proteins identified through the label-free MS approach with a FDR p-value<0.01. (Proteins identified with two or more peptides are included in this table)
Max. fold represents the ratio of the average volumes of the highest vs. lowest conditions.
All the sequences with the accession numbers given in the application are those present in the recited database at the date of filing. All documents referred to herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention will be further illustrated by the additional description and drawings which follow, which refer to examples illustrating the characterization of markers of dendritic cell subsets, and their role in assessing the clinical response of patients undergoing anti-allergy immunotherapy. It should be understood however that these examples are given only by way of illustration of the invention and do not constitute in any way a limitation thereof.
Total proteins were extracted from treated DCs (Ctrl-, LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs) and subjected to either 2D-DIGE or label-free MS quantitation (FASP, Filter Aided Sample Preparation; Wisniewski et al. Nat. Methods, 6: 359-362, 2009). Differentially expressed protein spots or peptides were then identified after MS/MS analysis. Candidate markers of tolerogenic DCs were validated by western blotting (WB) and/or qPCR in Ctrl-, LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs (model A), in 6 distinct tolerogenic DC types (model B) and in clinical samples (PBMCs) obtained from allergic patients undergoing allergen-specific immunotherapy. In model A, WB were performed from whole cell lysates used in proteomics experiments and additional treated DC samples were collected from 8 donors for qPCR validation. In model B, DC samples were used for both WB and qPCR validations. In the clinical study, PBMCs (n=328) were collected from 82 patients before and after immunotherapy and ex vivo restimulated or not with grass-pollen allergen extract.
Monocytes were isolated from PBMCs by negative selection and cultured 6 days in the presence of IL-4 and GM-CSF to generated moDCs. Cells were treated with either LPS (1 μg/ml), PGN (10 μg/ml) or DEX (1 μg/ml) for 24 h.
(A) Cell surface phenotype was assessed by flow cytometry after staining with Abs against CD80, CD83, CD86, ILT2, ILT3 and ILT4 (dashed line: isotype control, plain line: Ctrl-DCs, filled in grey: treated-DCs).
(B) Tolerogenic genes expression (GILZ, IDO, RALDH1 and RALDH2) was assessed by qPCR analysis.
(C) Cytokine production was analyzed by ELISA or CBA (IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-23 and TNF-a).
(D/E) DCs were cocultured with naïve CD4+ T cells during 5 days and polarization cytokines were analyzed by qPCR or CBA (IFN-g, IL-4, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A). A representative donor out of four is presented in A, whereas mean±SEM values of 4 independent donors are presented in B to E.
Proteins were considered significantly differentially expressed in DEX-DCs with a FDR p-values≤0.05 and at least a 1.2-fold change in volume (see Table 1).
(A) Representative Cy2 image obtained from a 2DDIGE gel with localization of differentially overexpressed protein spots. Whole cell extracts were fractionated using narrow range pH gradient gels (pl range of 5.3 to 6.5, 1 pH unit/24 cm) in the first dimension and a 11% SDS PAGE in the second dimension. Protein spots marked with an arrow are upregulated in DEX-DCs and described in suppl. Table 1.
(B/C) Western blot analyses of target proteins in Ctrl-, LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs. Two representative donors are presented in B whereas mean±SEM of 6 independent experiments are presented in C. *p-value≤0.05, **p-value≤0.01 were considered significant (Wilcoxon test). β-actin was used as loading control.
(D) Validation of tolerogenic genes at the mRNA level by qPCR. Data are expressed as relative amounts of mRNA in treated DCs in comparison with Ctrl-DCs. Data are normalized to amounts of β-actin and shown as mean±SEM.
Proteins significantly upregulated in effector DCs detected with 2D-DIGE (FDR p-value≤0.05 and at least a 1.2 fold change, see also Table 1) and label-free MS (FDR p-value≤0.01 and at least a 1.5 fold change, Table 2).
(A) Cy2 image obtained from a 2D-DIGE gel, with localization of differentially expressed protein spots. Whole cell extracts were fractionated using narrow range pH gradient gels (pl range of 5.3 to 6.5, 1 pH unit/24 cm) in the first dimension and a 11% SDS PAGE in the second dimension. Protein spots marked with an arrow are upregulated in LPS- and/or PGN-DCs and described in Table 1.
(B/C) Western blot analysis of target proteins in Ctrl-, LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs. Two representative donors are presented in B whereas mean±SEM of 6 independent experiments are presented in C. *p-value≤0.05, **p-value≤0.01 were considered significant (Wilcoxon test). β-actin was used as loading control.
(D) Validation of pro-inflammatory genes at the mRNA level by qPCR. Data are expressed as relative amounts of mRNA in treated DCs in comparison with Ctrl-DCs. Data are normalized to amounts of β-actin and shown as mean±SEM.
(A/B) Western blot analysis of upregulated proteins in DEX-DCs with a FDR p-value≤0.01 and at least a 1.5-fold change in abundance (see also Table 2). Two representative donors are presented in D whereas mean±SEM of 6 independent experiments are presented in E. *p-value≤0.05, **p-value≤0.01 were considered significant (Wilcoxon test). β-actin was used as loading control.
(C) Validation of tolerogenic genes at the mRNA level by qPCR. Data are expressed as relative amounts of mRNA in treated DCs in comparison with Ctrl-DCs. Data are normalized to amounts of β-actin and shown as mean±SEM.
DEX-DCs were used as a control and compared to ASP-DCs (24 h treatment), DEX, IL-10, RAPA, VitD3 or TGFb-DCs generated after treatment with pharmacological or biological agents during the differentiation step [IL-10 (10 ng/ml), TGFb (20 ng/ml), Rapamycin (10 nM), 1,25 dihydroxy-vitamin D3 (10 nM)].
(A) Cell surface phenotype was assessed by flow cytometry after staining with Abs against CD11c, CD14, ILT2, ILT3 and ILT4.
(B) Percentage of inhibition of LPS-induced expression of costimulatory molecules in differentially treated DCs.
(C) Inhibition of LPS-induced cytokine secretion in differentially treated DCs. 100% represents a complete inhibition of the expression/secretion of the molecule. A representative donor out of four is presented in A, whereas mean±SEM values of 6 independent donors are presented in B and C.
(A/B) Western blot analysis of target proteins in treated DCs. Two representative donors are presented in A whereas mean±SEM of 6 independent experiments are presented in B. *p-value≤0.05, **pvalue≤0.01 were considered significant (Wilcoxon test). GAPDH was used as loading control.
(C/D) Validation of tolerogenic genes at the mRNA level by qPCR. Data are expressed as relative amounts of mRNA in treated DCs in comparison with Ctrl-DCs. Data are normalized to amounts of GAPDH and shown as mean±SEM (n=6).
(A) mRNA expression of C1QA, C1QB, C1QC and STAB1 in unrestimulated PBMCs from 82 patients in the active group in comparison to the placebo group or in responders (% ARTSS≥43.9) versus non responders (% ARTSS<43.9) (Mann-Whitney test). Data are expressed as relative amounts of mRNA in PBMCs after treatment in comparison with PBMCs before immunotherapy. Data are normalized to amounts of b-actin and shown as a mean±SEM for each group.
(B) Correlation of mRNA expression of each individual patient with clinical improvement (% ARTSS) in the active and placebo group. R represents the Spearman correlation coefficient. 1 represents a perfect correlation, whereas a score between 0 and 1 indicates that the two variables increase or decrease together. (AR: active responders, ANR: active non responders, PR: placebo responders, PNR: placebo non responders).
Monocyte-derived DC Polarization
Human PBMCs were separated out of buffy coats obtained from healthy volunteers (Etablissement Francais du Sang, Rungis, France) by centrifugation over a Ficoll-Paque plus gradient (PAA, Les Mureaux, France). Monocytes were purified through negative selection with the untouched human monocyte kit (Dynal, Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France). To generate monocyte-derived DCs, 5 to 8.107 cells were cultured at 37° C., 5% CO2 in RPMI medium with stable glutamine supplemented with 10 μg/ml gentamycin, 50 μM 2-ME, 1% non essential amino acids (all from Invitrogen) and 10% fetal calf serum (Gentaur, Brussels, Belgium) in presence of human rGM-CSF and rIL-4 (Gentaur), using 250 and 100 ng/ml concentrations, respectively. After 6 days, a pure population of DCs was obtained, with more than 95% of CD14− CD11c+ cells detected by flow cytometry using a FC500 cytometer and the CXP analysis software (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) or Flowjo software (TreeStar, Olten, Switzerland). Up to 107 DCs were plated in presence of either medium, dexamethasone, (DEX, 1 μg/ml [2.5 μM], Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France), highly purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli (1 μg/ml, InvivoGen, Toulouse, France), or peptidoglycan from Staphylococcus aureus (PGN, 10 μg/ml, InvivoGen) for 24 h at 37° C. and 5% CO2 (Model A,
Characterization of Effector and Regulatory DCs
For immuno-fluorescence staining, cells were harvested, washed in PBS and incubated for 20 min at 4° C. with the following mAbs: FITC anti-CD14, FITC anti-CD80, PE anti-CD86, PC5 anti-CD83 (Beckman coulter), FITC anti-ILT2, PE anti-ILT4, PC5 anti-ILT3 (R&D systems) or PE-CD11c (Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France). Cells were stained with corresponding isotype-matched control mAbs and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Cytokine measurement was performed in supernatants using the cytometric bead array technology or ELISA kits. IFN-g, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-23, IL-17A and TNF-α were measured using the human inflammatory CBA kit or CBA flex sets (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) and analyzed by flow cytometry according to the manufacturer's instructions using a FACS Array instrument and the FCAP Software (BD Biosciences). IL-23 concentration was measured with an ELISA kit (Ebiosciences, Paris, France) as per the manufacturer's instructions.
DC/T coculture experiments were performed as described elsewhere (see Zimmer, A. et al. J. Immunol. 186: 3966-3976, 2011). Briefly, treated DCs were cultured with allogeneic naive CD4+ T cells at a 1:10 DCs/T ratio for 5 days. Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMCs by negative selection using the MACS naïve CD4 isolation kit II (Miltenyi Biotec), following the manufacturer's instructions. Such naive T cells were confirmed to be >95% pure based upon CD3, CD4, and CD45RA expression evaluated by flow cytometry.
Supernatants were analyzed for cytokine release as described above.
Differential Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of DC Subtypes
Polarized DCs were washed 3 times with cold PBS and cell pellets were lysed in buffer A containing 8.3 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 50 mM DTT and 24 mM spermine (all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich). After centrifugation (16 000 g, 1 h, 20° C.), supernatants were recovered and stored at −80° C. Proteins were then quantified using a Bradford assay (Biorad, Marnes La Coquette, France) and fractionated over a 4-12% gradient precast gel (NuPAGE, Invitrogen) to control protein quality.
For 2D-DIGE analysis, 100 μg of proteins were precipitated using the PerfectFocus kit from GBiosciences, resuspended in DIGE labeling buffer containing 8.3 M Urea, 2 M Thiourea, 4% CHAPS and 30 mM Tris pH 8.8, labeled with Cy2/3/5 dyes (CyDye DIGE Fluors, GE Healthcare, Velizy, France) and separated on 24 cm Immobiline pH 5.3-6.5 Drystrip gels by isoelectrofocusing (IEF) using the Ettan IPGphor system (GE Healthcare). For analytical and preparative experiments, IEF was done for a total of 132 and 145 kVh, respectively. Strips were then equilibrated in reduction and alkylation buffers (containing 6 M Urea, 50 mM Tris pH 8.8, 30% glycerol, 2% SDS and either 1% DTT or 5% iodoacetamide) before loading onto 11% SDS-polyacrylamide gels for separation according to molecular mass using an Ettan DALT Six Electrophoresis System (GE Healthcare). DIGE gels were scanned using an Ettan DIGE Imager (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Differentially expressed spots were determined by image analysis with SameSpots software (Non linear Dynamics, Newcastle, England) and selected for automatic spot picking (FDR p-value≤05 and fold change≥1.2). Principal component analysis (PCA) and dendrogram plots were also carried out using SameSpots software. The relative nearness of samples in the PCA plot indicates similarity, whereas large distances between samples indicate dissimilarity in protein abundance. The correlation analysis (dendrogram plot) was performed on log normalized protein abundance levels. Proteins were then clustered according to how closely correlated they were.
Preparative gels stained with SYPRO Ruby (Invitrogen) were used for automatic spot picking (using an EXQuest spot cutter, Biorad) of differentially expressed protein spots. Gel plugs were then washed with 200 μl of 100 mM NH4HCO3 /50% acetonitrile (ACN) for 45 min at 37° C. and then dehydrated in ACN. Each spot was digested with trypsin (10 ng/μl of 40 mM NH4HCO3/10% ACN, Sigma-Aldrich) at 37° C. overnight and subsequently 6 μl of ACN was added to the mixture prior to ultrasonication for 45 min at 30° C. NanoLC-MS/MS analysis was accomplished using the Ultimate 3000 RS nano LC system (Dionex, Voisins le Bretonneux, France) coupled to an ESI-Qq-TOF MS (Maxis 3G) from Bruker Daltonics (Wissembourg, France). H2O/ACN/FA (100/0/0.1 volume ratios, respectively) was used as solvent A and H2O/ACN/FA (20/80/0.1 volume ratios, respectively) as solvent B. Tryptic peptides diluted in 0.1% FA were injected and trapped on an Acclaim PepMap100 (100 μm×2 cm, C18, 5 μm, 100 , Dionex) with a flow rate of 12 μl/min (2% ACN, 0.1% FA). Separation was performed using an Acclaim PepMap RSLC (75 μm×15 cm, C18, 2 μm, 100
, Dionex) with a flow rate of 450 nl/min and a linear gradient (5-45% B for 45 min, 45-95% B for 1 min and 95% B for 15 min). Database search was carried out using an in-house Mascot server (Matrix Science, version 2.3) against the Swiss-Prot and NCBInr databases. Data were searched against the Homo sapiens or mammalian databases with precursor mass tolerance of 15 ppm and fragment mass deviation of 0.05 Da. The search included cysteine carbamidomethylation as a fixed modification and methionine oxidation as a variable modification. Up to two missed cleavages were allowed for protease digestion. All identifications were based on the sequencing of more than one peptide and only proteins with a Mascot score with 0.05 were considered for identification. Protein scores were derived from individual ions scores.
Label Free MS Analysis of DC Subtypes
Label-free MS of digested total protein lysates (solubilized in buffer A as described above), was conducted to compare proteomes of control, effector and regulatory DC subsets. Briefly, a common ultrafiltration device was used for detergent removal (CHAPS) to enable subsequent proteome analysis (Filter-aided sample preparation, FASP). 100 μg of proteins were mixed with urea-containing buffers in the filter unit (Amicon Ultra-0.5 ml, Ultracel-10 kDa Membrane, Millipore, Molsheim, France), reduced with 20 mM DTT, alkylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide, digested with Lys-C (37° C., 5 h, ratio 1/50, Sigma-Aldrich) and then with trypsin (37° C., overnight, ratio 1/50). After digestion, peptides were desalted using RPC18 Dynal magnetic beads (Invitrogen), acidified with FA and 1.5 to 2 μg of tryptic peptides were analyzed by nanoLC-MS or nanoLC-MS/MS.
NanoLC-MS analysis was accomplished using the Ultimate 3000 RS nano LC system (Dionex) coupled to an ESI-Qq-TOF MS (Maxis 3G) from Bruker Daltonics. H2O/ACN/FA (100/0/0.15 volume ratios respectively) was used as solvent A and H2O/ACN/FA (20/80/0.15 volume ratios respectively) as solvent B. 1.5 to 2 μg of tryptic peptides were injected (36 μl±3 μl) and trapped for 10 min on an Acclaim PepMap100 (100 μm×2 cm, C18, 5 μm, 100 , Dionex) with a flow rate of 12 μl/min (2% ACN, 0.15% FA). Separation was then performed using an Acclaim PepMap RSLC (75 μm×50 cm, C18, 2 μm, 100
, Dionex) with a flow rate of 270 nl/min, two linear gradient segments (5-25% B for 180 min, 25-45% B for 50 min) and holding at 95% B for a further 10 min before returning to 5% B for 20 min. In MS mode, full scan MS spectra were acquired from m/z 280 to 1500 (1 MS spectrum of 0.8 s) during 270 min. Ion intensities recorded in LC-MS data were analyzed using Progenesis LC-MS v3.1 software (Non Linear Dynamics) to provide reliable measurements of peptide (feature) abundance across samples. Internal calibration was performed by enabling the lock mass option in MS mode (minimum intensity>200 and mass±0.015 Da). Parameters used for peptide detection were peptide intensity>300, peptide abundance>2000 and 2+≤peptide charge≤6+. Data were then normalized by the “normalize to all features” method and comparison between the four groups (obtained from Ctrl-, LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs respectively) was performed to choose which peptides were statistically differentially represented (FDR p-value≤0.01 and fold change≥1.5). PCA and dendrogram plots were also carried out□ using Progenesis LC-MS software. Targeted nanoLC-MS/MS were accomplished by means of an inclusion mass list in the MS instrument method. Inclusion lists were generated from differentially expressed peptides and imported into MS acquisition software (mass±0.02 Da and retention time±3 min). LCMS/MS data were analyzed using an in-house Mascot server (Matrix Science, version 2.3) against the UniProt/Swiss-Prot database, taxonomy Homo sapiens or mammalia, assuming tryptic or semi-tryptic digestion. Identification parameters were identical to those described for 2D-DIGE analysis. Peptide identifications were accepted if established with a greater than 95% probability, as specified by Mascot software. For accurate mass measurements, the lock mass option was enabled in MS and MS/MS mode. Both m/z 299.2945 (methylstearate, Sigma-Aldrich) and m/z 1221.9906 ions (Chip cube high mass reference, Agilent, Massy, France) generated in the electrospray process from ambient air were used for internal recalibration.
Western Blot Analysis
NuPAGE-Western blotting was carried out according to standard procedures (NuPAGE technical guide, Invitrogen). Samples were separated on 4 to 12% MES, 3 to 8% Tris acetate or 10 to 20% Tris glycine NuPAGE, depending upon the molecular mass of target proteins. The following primary antibodies were used for immunoblotting analyses: anti-ANXA1 (Cat. no. 3299, 1/1000), anti-GAPDH (Cat. no. 14C10, 1/1000), anti-GPX1 (Cat. no. 3286, 1/1000), anti-IRF4 (Cat. no. 4964, 1/1000) and anti-TRAF1 (45D3, 1/1000) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, Mass.), anti-β-actin (Cat. no. MS-1295, 1/2000) and anti-Factor XIIIA (Cat. no. RB-1464, 1/1000) from Neomarkers (Labvision, Cheshire, England), anti-FKBP5 (Cat. no. H00002289-MO2, 1/250) and anti-MX1 (Cat. no. H00004599-B01P, 1/500) from Abnova (Taipei, Taiwan), anti-CD71 (Cat. no. TA307375, 1/1000) from Origene (Rockville, Md.), anti-CATC (Cat. no. sc-74590, 1/500), anti-NMES1 (Cat. no. sc-138479, 1/500) and anti-STAB1 (Cat. no. sc-98788, 1/500) from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, Calif.), anti-MRC1 (Cat. no. 18704-1-AP, 1/1000) from Proteintech group (Manchester, England), anti-C1Q (Cat. no. ab71089,1/1000) from Abcam (Paris, France). The rabbit polyclonal serum raised against GILZ was previously described (see Asselin-Labat, et al. Blood, 104: 215-223, 2004). Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were both obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories (Sufflok, England), and the chemiluminescence detection kit was from Pierce (SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate, Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). Western blot signals were acquired with a CCD camera (Fusion FX7, Vilber-Lourmat, Marnes La Vallée, France) and band volume was quantified using the Bio-1D software (Vilber-Lourmat). β-actin or GAPDH were used as loading controls.
RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from treated DCs or PBMCs using RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) and cDNAs were obtained using TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems, Les Ulis, France) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Messenger RNA expression was evaluated by quantitative PCR on a 7900HT real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) with predesigned Taqman gene expression assays and reagents, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Expression of the following genes was assessed in DCs or PBMCs: GILZ (Hs00608272_m1), IDO (Hs00158032_m1), RALDH-1 (Hs00167445_m1), RALDH-2 (Hs00180254_m1), ANXA1 (Hs00167549_m1), CLIC2 (Hs01574555_m)1, FKBP5 (Hs01561001_m1), F13A (Hs00173388_m1), GPX1 (Hs00829989_gH), IMDH2 (Hs00168418_m1), OSF1 (Hs00273458_m1), TPP1 (Hs00166099_m1), C1QA (Hs00381122_m1), C1QB (Hs00608019_m1), C1QC (Hs00757779_m1), CATB (Hs00947433_m1), CATC (Hs00175188_m1), STAB1 (Hs01109068_m1), MRC1 (Hs00267207_m1), CD71 (Hs00951083_m1), FSCN1 (Hs00979631_g1), IRF4 (Hs01056533_m1), MX1 (Hs00895608_m1), NMES1 (Hs00260902_m1), TRAF1 (Hs01090170_m1). Expression of the following genes was assessed in T cells: IFNg (Hs00989291_m1), IL-4 (Hs00174122_m1), IL-10 (Hs00961622_m1) and IL-17A (Hs00174383_m1). Data were interpreted for each target gene in comparison with endogenous β-actin (Hs99999903_m1) or GAPDH (Hs03929097_g1) as controls. The relative amount of target genes in each sample was calculated in comparison with the calibrator sample using the ΔΔCt The magnitude of gene induction was calculated using the formula 2−ΔΔCt=2(−ΔCt for stimulated cells−ΔCt for unstimulated cells).
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical differences between groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon test. Treatments were compared to controls and p-values≤00.05 or 0.01 were considered as significant. Statistical and graphical analyses were performed using the Prism 5 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, Calif.). Significant differences in protein expression changes were determined in the 2D-DIGE analysis using an FDR (False Discovery Rate) adjusted p-value (or FDR p-value) threshold of 0.05 (http://www.nonlinear.com/support/progenesis/samespots/faq/pq-values.aspx#qvalues). In label-free MS experiments, a FDR p-value with a threshold of 0.01 was used to determine significant changes in peptide abundance. A fold change filter of 1.2 (2D-DIGE) or 1.5 (label-free MS) was selected to target proteins with a level of differential expression readily detectable using western blotting.
Clinical Samples from VO56.07A Pollen Chamber Study
The design and protocol of the allergen specific immunotherapy study were described in Horak F et al. (J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 124: 471-477, 2009). This clinical trial assessed the efficacy and onset of action of grass-pollen tablets administered sublingually under controlled allergen exposure conditions provided in a challenge chamber. Briefly, eligible patients were men and women between 18 and 50 years old with a documented history of moderate-to-severe seasonal grass pollen-related allergic rhinoconjunctivitis for at least the previous two years. Patients were selected for inclusion based upon a positive specific skin prick test response (wheal diameter>3 mm) to a 5-grass pollen extract (Stallergenes SA) as well as a specific serum IgE level of at least 0.70 kU/I for timothy grass (assessed with the UniCAP system, Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden). In addition, patients had a confirmed symptomatic reaction to an allergen challenge test at baseline (i.e. before the administration of any treatment), defined as a rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS) encompassing sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose, nasal congestion, watery eyes, and itchy eyes. The study was a randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, conducted outside of the pollen season. After an initial screening visit, 82 eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a grass pollen or placebo tablet via the sublingual route. Challenges were performed before treatment and after 1 week and 1, 2, and 4 months of treatment. The investigational product was a 5-grass-pollen SLIT tablet (orchard, meadow, perennial rye, sweet vernal, and timothy grasses; Stallergenes SA) taken once daily before eating or drinking and, preferably, at the same time of the day throughout the 4-month treatment period (see Moingeon et al., Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 146: 338-342, 2008). Whole blood was collected before and after 4 months of treatment for serum measurements and cellular assays. PBMCs were purified from blood samples and frozen. At the end of the study, PBMCs were thawed and maintained for 24 h in culture and subsequently restimulated or not with a grass-pollen allergen extract (300 IR, Stallergenes, SA) for further 24 h. Cultured PBMCs were washed and used for RNA isolation and PCR analysis as described above. All samples were coded and processed in a blind manner by the operators.
Since patients were challenged before treatment (at visit 2), it was possible to evaluate individual clinical responses by calculating the percentage improvement of Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS) between the baseline (challenge at V2) and after the challenge at the end of treatment (Visit 7 after 4 months): (ARTSS at V2−ARTSS at V7)/ARTSS at V2×100.
To analyze potential links between changes in immunological parameters and clinical responses, the median of percentages of improvement of ARTSS in the active group corresponding to at least a 43.9% decrease of ARTSS after treatment was considered as a threshold. Subjects with an ARTSS improvement greater than or equal to the threshold were considered as responders and those lower than the threshold as non-responders. Immunological results were described using summary statistics for 4 subgroups including active responders: AR, active non-responders: ANR, placebo responders: PR and placebo non-responders: PNR. Results were expressed as individual plots for patients from the 4 subgroups.
Establishment of Effector (DC1 and DC17) and Tolerogenic Human DCs
After an initial screening of approximately 40 biological and pharmacological agents, three molecules capable of inducing either effector or tolerogenic DCs from immature monocyte derived DCs were selected. The bacterial LPS was the most potent inducer of effector DC1 (i.e. DCs supporting the differentiation of CD4+ Th1 cells) whereas the peptidoglycan (PGN) from the Staphylococcus aureus wall was the best inducer of DC17 (i.e. DCs capable to elicit CD4+ Th17 cells). As shown in
Identification of Molecular Markers for Effector and Tolerogenic Human DCs by 2D-DIGE
Potential differences in protein expression between control (Ctrl-DCs), LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs generated from 6 independent donors were subsequently investigated (
Representative proteomic and gene expression data are shown in
Identification of Molecular Markers for Effector and Tolerogenic Human DCs by Label-free MS
Whereas 2D-DIGE can resolve protein species with different pls or molecular masses, this approach overlooks proteins with extreme pls and molecular weights, as well as highly hydrophobic proteins. Thus, label free MS-based approaches to overcome these limitations were initiated and protein expression profiles between Ctrl-, LPS-, DEX- and PGN-DCs further compared (
Assessment of Candidate Marker Expression in Distinct Subtypes of Tolerogenic DCs.
Further, the expression of the most promising candidate markers in various types of regulatory DCs obtained from moDCs under distinct cell culture conditions was investigated. To generate tolerogenic DCs, monocyte-derived iDCs were treated with proteases from Aspergillus oryzae during 24 h (as described by Zimmer, A. et al. J. Immunol. 186: 3966-3976, 2011) or cultured monocytes during the differentiation step with either DEX, IL-10, Rapamycin, 1,25 dihydrovitamin D3 or TGFb during 7 days, as reported by others (Monti et al., Transplantation, 75: 137-145, 2003; Steinbrink et al., Blood, 99: 2468-2476, 2002; Van Kooten, C. & Gelderman, K. A., Methods Mol. Biol., 677: 149-159, 2011; Penna et al., J. Immunol., 178: 145-153, 2007; Ohtani et al., Immunology, 126: 485-499, 2009). Staining with CD11c, CD14, ILT2, ILT3 and ILT4 antibodies allowed us to discriminate those various tolerogenic DCs based on surface phenotype (
The expression of candidate markers identified through quantitative proteomic studies (listed in Table 3 and Tables 1 and 2) and from the literature (GILZ, IDO, RALDH1 and RALDH2) was assessed in the six types of tolerogenic DCs, by qPCR as well as western blotting based on the availability of antibodies. Representative data are shown in
Assessment of Markers for Effector/Tolerogenic DCs in PBMCs from Patients Undergoing Allergen-specific Immunotherapy.
The present inventors hypothesized that markers of effector and regulatory DCs might be useful to investigate immune changes induced in allergic patients during allergen-specific immunotherapy (such as a Th2 to Th1/Treg transition) with thus, a potential shift from effector to tolerogenic DCs. In this context, they relied upon blood samples collected during a placebo-controlled clinical study conducted in an allergen challenge chamber to evaluate a candidate allergy vaccine. Specifically, they assessed the mRNA expression of candidate markers in PBMCs from grass pollen allergic patients undergoing sublingual immunotherapy with grass-pollen tablets as described in “Materials and Methods”. To this aim, since PBMCs contain less than 0.5-1% DCs, they first selected candidate markers based on their previous patterns of expression in distinct regulatory DC models (
ANXA1, CATC, F13A, GILZ, IDO, MRC1, RALDH1 and CLIC2, identified as markers of tolerogenic DCs, did not exhibit any significant variations in their patterns of expression in PBMCs, when comparing patients in placebo or active groups, or clinical responders and non responders, respectively (data not shown). Likewise, no significant changes in effector DCs markers were detected at a group level in either unrestimulated or restimulated PBMCs, although some individual patients showed a concomitant upregulation of all effector genes (data not shown). A considerable increase in the expression of C1Q (subunits A, B and C) and STAB1, two markers of regulatory DCs, was detected in PBMCs restimulated or not with the grass-pollen extract in the active group in comparison to the placebo group. To confirm those findings, mRNA levels were assessed for these 4 genes in the entire cohort of the clinical study (i.e. 62 additional patients corresponding to 248 PBMCs samples). 4 effector genes (CD71-FSCN1-MX1-TRAF1) were also assessed in these patients, as controls.
These experiments confirmed a statistically significant upregulation of C1Q and STAB1 in the active group when compared to the placebo group in either unrestimulated PBMCs (
Collectively, these data describe two potential markers of tolerance associated with short-term efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy, namely C1Q and STAB1.
Altogether, the present inventors discovered novel markers specific of polarized effector or regulatory DCs, some of which can be easily detected in human PBMCs. Importantly, the induction of C1Q and STAB1, two markers expressed by various types of regulatory DCs, correlates with clinical efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Such an identification of candidate biomarkers for short-term efficacy provides new avenues for the clinical follow-up of patients and the development of new vaccine candidates based on allergenic extracts.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11306113 | Sep 2011 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2012/067261 | 9/5/2012 | WO | 00 | 6/23/2014 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2013/034569 | 3/14/2013 | WO | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO-2008008846 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2009026660 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2010006414 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Castellano et al., 2004, Blood, vol. 103: 3813-3820. |
| Rutella et al., 2006, Blood vol. 108: 218-227. |
| Baruah et al., 2010, Eur. J. Immunol. vol. 40: 1758-1767. |
| Passalacqua et la., All. Asthma, Clin. Immunol. vol. 2: 117-123. |
| Onyemelukwe et al., 1989, Annals of ALlergy, vol. 63: 309-312. |
| Hata et al., 2009, Innnnunol. Letters, vol. 126: 29-36. |
| Constantine L et al: “Use of genechip high-density oligonucleotide arrays for gene expression monitoring”, Life Science News, Amersham Life Science, pp. 11-14, (Jan. 1998). |
| Alexey Popov et al: “IDO-expressing regulatory dendritic cells in cancer and chronic infection”, Journal of Molecular Medicine, pp. 145-160, vol. 86, No. 2, (Sep. 2007). |
| Van Vliet S J et al: “Differential regulation of C-type lectin expression on to 1 erogenic dendritic ce 11 subsets”, Immunobiology, pp. 577-585, vol. 211, No. 6-8, (Sep. 2006). |
| “Human Genome U95Av2”, XP002215481, URL:http:www.affymetrix.com, (Oct. 2002). |
| “GeneChip Human Genome Ul33 Set”, XP002232760, URL:http:ffwww.affymetrix.com/support/technicalfdatasheetshgu133 datasheet.pdf, (Feb. 2003). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140377761 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
