The present invention generally relates to methods for reducing intraocular pressure by creating a drainage pathway between the anterior chamber of the eye and the intra-Tenon's space.
Glaucoma is a disease in which the optic nerve is damaged, leading to progressive, irreversible loss of vision. It is typically associated with increased pressure of the fluid (i.e., aqueous humor) in the eye. Untreated glaucoma leads to permanent damage of the optic nerve and resultant visual field loss, which can progress to blindness. Once lost, this damaged visual field cannot be recovered. Glaucoma affects 1 in 200 people aged fifty and younger, and 1 in 10 over the age of eighty for a total of approximately 70 million people worldwide, and glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in the world.
The importance of lowering intraocular pressure (10P) in delaying glaucomatous progression has been well documented. When drug therapy fails, or is not tolerated, surgical intervention is warranted. Surgical filtration methods for lowering intraocular pressure by creating a fluid flow-path between the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival tissue have been described. One particular ab interno glaucoma filtration method has been described whereby an intraocular shunt is implanted by directing a needle which holds the shunt through the cornea, across the anterior chamber, and through the trabecular meshwork and sclera, and into the subconjunctival space. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,249, U.S. patent application publication number 2008/0108931 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,511.
Proper positioning of a shunt in the subconjunctival space is critical in determining the success or failure of subconjunctival glaucoma filtration surgery for a number of reasons. In particular, the location of the shunt has been shown to play a role in stimulating the formation of active drainage structures such as veins or lymph vessels. See, for example, U.S. patent application publication number 2008/0108933. In addition, it has been suggested that the conjunctiva itself plays a critical role in glaucoma filtration surgery. A healthy conjunctiva allows drainage channels to form and less opportunity for inflammation and scar tissue formation, which are frequent causes of failure in subconjunctival filtration surgery. See, for example, Yu et al., Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 28: 303-328 (2009).
The present invention generally relates to methods for deploying intraocular shunts into the subconjunctival space the eye while avoiding or minimizing contact with the conjunctiva. In particular, the present invention provides methods for deploying an intraocular shunt into the eye such that the shunt forms a drainage pathway from the anterior chamber of the eye to the region of the eye that is bound between the sclera and Tenon's capsule, referred to herein as the intra-Tenon's space. Deployment of an intraocular shunt such that the shunt inlet (i.e., the portion of the shunt that receives fluid from an anterior chamber of the eye) terminates in the anterior chamber and the shunt outlet (i.e., the portion of the shunt that directs fluid to the intra-Tenon's space) terminates in the intra-Tenon's space safeguards the integrity of the conjunctiva to allow subconjunctival drainage pathways to successfully form.
The methods of the invention involve inserting into the eye a hollow shaft that is configured to hold an intraocular shunt, deploying the shunt from the shaft such that the shunt forms a passage from the anterior chamber to the intra-Tenon's space, and withdrawing the hollow shaft from the eye. The hollow shaft may hold the shunt within the interior of hollow shaft. Alternatively, the hollow shaft may hold the shunt on an outer surface of the shaft. In certain embodiments, the methods of the invention involve the use of a hollow shaft configured to hold an intraocular shunt, as previously described, wherein a portion of the hollow shaft extends linearly along a longitudinal axis and at least one other portion of the shaft extends off the longitudinal axis, to insert and deploy the intraocular shunt into the eye such that the shunt forms a passage from the anterior chamber to the intra-Tenon's space.
Optionally, an aqueous fluid is injected into the eye simultaneously with or prior to the insertion and deployment steps of the methods of the invention. For example, an aqueous solution may be injected below Tenon's capsule to balloon the capsule away from the sclera and allow positioning of the intraocular shunt in the intra-Tenon's space.
Methods of the invention are typically conducted using an ab interno approach by inserting the hollow shaft configured to hold the intraocular shunt through the cornea, across the anterior chamber, through the sclera and into the intra-Tenon's space. Such an approach is contrasted with an ab externo approach, which involves inserting the shaft from the outside of the eye through the conjunctiva and inward through the sclera to reach a drainage structure such Schlemm's canal. Although, methods of the invention may be conducted using an ab externo approach.
Methods of the invention may be performed such that the shaft is inserted above or below the corneal limbus. Methods of the invention may also be performed such that the shaft is inserted into the eye without removing an anatomical feature of the eye, such as the trabecular meshwork, the iris, the cornea, or the aqueous humor. In certain embodiments, methods of the invention may be conducted without inducing substantial ocular inflammation such as, for example, subconjunctival blebbing or endophthalmitis. In other certain embodiments, methods of the invention may be conducted without the use of an optical apparatus, particularly an optical apparatus that directly contacts the eye, such as a goniolens. In yet other certain embodiments, the methods of the invention may be conducted using an optical apparatus that does not directly contact the eye, such as an ophthalmic microscope.
In conditions of glaucoma, the pressure of the aqueous humor in the eye (anterior chamber) increases and this resultant increase of pressure can cause damage to the vascular system at the back of the eye and especially to the optic nerve. The treatment of glaucoma and other diseases that lead to elevated pressure in the anterior chamber involves relieving pressure within the anterior chamber to a normal level.
Glaucoma filtration surgery is a surgical procedure typically used to treat glaucoma. The procedure involves placing a shunt in the eye to relieve intraocular pressure by creating a fluid-flow pathway for draining aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye. The shunt is typically positioned in the eye such that it creates a drainage pathway between the anterior chamber of the eye and a region of lower pressure. Various structures and/or regions of the eye having lower pressure that have been targeted for aqueous humor drainage include Schlemm's canal, the subconjunctival space, the episcleral vein, the suprachoroidal space, or the subarachnoid space. Methods of implanting intraocular shunts are known in the art. Shunts may be implanted using an ab externo approach (entering through the conjunctiva and inwards through the sclera) or an ab interno approach (entering through the cornea, across the anterior chamber, through the trabecular meshwork and sclera).
Ab interno approaches for implanting an intraocular shunt in the subconjunctival space are shown for example in Yu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,249 and U.S. patent publication number 2008/0108933) and Prywes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,511), the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Briefly and with reference to
While such ab interno subconjunctival filtration procedures have been successful in relieving intraocular pressure, there is a substantial risk that the intraocular shunt may be deployed too close to the conjunctiva, resulting in irritation and subsequent inflammation and/or scarring of the conjunctiva, which can cause the glaucoma filtration procedure to fail (See Yu et al., Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 28: 303-328 (2009)). Additionally, commercially available shunts that are currently utilized in such procedures are not ideal for ab interno subconjunctival placement due to the length of the shunt (i.e., too long) and/or the materials used to make the shunt (e.g., gold, polymer, titanium, or stainless steel), and can cause significant irritation to the tissue surrounding the shunt, as well as the conjunctiva, if deployed too close.
The present invention provides methods for deploying an intraocular shunt into an eye such that the shunt forms a passage from the anterior chamber of the eye to the intra-Tenon's space. The present invention further relates to intraocular shunts that are designed to form a drainage pathway between the anterior chamber of the eye and the intra-Tenon's space and are suitable for use in an ab interno glaucoma filtration procedure. Deployment and/or design of an intraocular shunt such that the inlet terminates in the anterior chamber and the outlet terminates in the intra-Tenon's space safeguards the integrity of the conjunctiva to allow subconjunctival drainage pathways to successfully form. The conjunctiva is protected from direct contact with the shunt by Tenon's capsule. Additionally, drainage into the intra-Tenon's space provides access to more lymphatic channels than just the conjunctival lymphatic system, such as the episcleral lymphatic network. Moreover, deployment and/or design of an intraocular shunt such that the outlet terminates in the intra-Tenon's space avoids having to pierce Tenon's capsule which can otherwise cause complications during glaucoma filtration surgery due to its tough and fibrous nature.
Methods for Intra-Tenon's Shunt Placement
The methods of the invention involve inserting into the eye a hollow shaft configured to hold an intraocular shunt. In certain embodiments, the hollow shaft is a component of a deployment device that may deploy the intraocular shunt. The shunt is then deployed from the shaft into the eye such that the shunt forms a passage from the anterior chamber to the intra-Tenon's space. The hollow shaft is then withdrawn from the eye.
Referring to
Numerous techniques may be employed to ensure that after piercing the sclera 205, the hollow shaft 206 does not pierce Tenon's capsule 207. In certain embodiments, the methods of the invention involve the use of a hollow shaft 206, in which a portion of the hollow shaft extends linearly along a longitudinal axis and at least one other portion of the shaft extends off the longitudinal axis. For example, the hollow shaft 206 may have a bend in the distal portion of the shaft, a U-shape, or an arcuate or V-shape in at least a portion of the shaft. Examples of such hollow shafts 206 suitable for use with the methods of the invention include but are not limited to the hollow shafts 206 depicted in
In other embodiments, a straight hollow shaft 206 having a beveled tip is employed. The angle of the beveled tip of the hollow shaft is oriented such that after piercing the sclera 205, the hollow shaft 206 does not pierce Tenon's capsule 207. In these embodiments, the shaft 206 is inserted into the eye 202 and through the sclera 205 at an angle such that the bevel of the tip is oriented to be parallel to Tenon's capsule 207, thereby pushing Tenon's capsule 207 away from the sclera 205, rather than penetrating Tenon's capsule 207, and allowing for deployment of a distal portion of the shunt 201 into the intra-Tenon's space 208.
Once a distal portion of the hollow shaft 206 is within the intra-Tenon's space 208, the shunt 201 is then deployed from the shaft 206 of the deployment device 200, producing a conduit between the anterior chamber 204 and the intra-Tenon's space 208 to allow aqueous humor to drain from the anterior chamber 204 (See
Preferably, the methods of the invention are conducted by making an incision in the eye prior to insertion of the deployment device. Although in particular embodiments, the methods of the invention may be conducted without making an incision in the eye prior to insertion of the deployment device. In certain embodiments, the shaft that is connected to the deployment device has a sharpened point or tip. In certain embodiments, the hollow shaft is a needle. Exemplary needles that may be used are commercially available from Terumo Medical Corp. (Elkington, Md.). In a particular embodiment, the needle has a hollow interior and a beveled tip, and the intraocular shunt is held within the hollow interior of the needle. In another particular embodiment, the needle has a hollow interior and a triple ground point or tip.
The methods of the invention are preferably conducted without needing to remove an anatomical portion or feature of the eye, including but not limited to the trabecular meshwork, the iris, the cornea, or aqueous humor. The methods of the invention are also preferably conducted without inducing substantial ocular inflammation, such as subconjunctival blebbing or endophthalmitis. Such methods can be achieved using an ab interno approach by inserting the hollow shaft through the cornea, across the anterior chamber, through the trabecular meshwork and sclera and into the intra-Tenon's space. However, the methods of the invention may be conducted using an ab externo approach.
In another embodiment, the methods of the invention further involves injecting an aqueous solution into the eye below Tenon's capsule in order to balloon the capsule away from the sclera. The increase in intra-Tenon's space caused by the ballooning of Tenon's capsule is helpful for positioning of the outlet of the shunt in the intra-Tenon's space. The solution is injected prior to the shaft piercing the sclera and entering the intra-Tenon's space. Suitable aqueous solutions include but are not limited to Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS), Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS), Earle's Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS), or other balanced salt solutions known in the art. In some embodiments, the methods of the invention involve injecting a viscoelastic fluid into the eye. Preferably, the methods of the invention are conducted without the use of a viscoelastic fluid.
When the methods of the invention are conducted using an ab interno approach, the angle of entry through the cornea affects optimal placement of the shunt in the intra-Tenon's space. Preferably, the hollow shaft is inserted into the eye at an angle above or below the corneal limbus, in contrast with entering through the corneal limbus. For example, the hollow shaft is inserted approximately 0.25 to 3.0 mm, preferably approximately 0.5 to 2.5 mm, more preferably approximately 1.0 mm to 2.0 mm above the corneal limbus, or any specific value within said ranges, e.g., approximately 1.0 mm, approximately 1.1 mm, approximately 1.2 mm, approximately 1.3 mm, approximately 1.4 mm, approximately 1.5 mm, approximately 1.6 mm, approximately 1.7 mm, approximately 1.8 mm, approximately 1.9 mm or approximately 2.0 mm above the corneal limbus.
Without intending to be bound by any theory, placement of the shunt farther from the limbus at the exit site, as provided by an angle of entry above the limbus, is believed to provide access to more lymphatic channels for drainage of aqueous humor, such as the episcleral lymphatic network, in addition to the conjunctival lymphatic system. A higher angle of entry also results in flatter placement in the intra-Tenon's space so that there is less bending of the shunt, less pressure on Tenon's capsule, and subsequently less erosion pressure on the conjunctiva via Tenon's capsule.
For example, as shown in
In certain embodiments, to ensure proper positioning and functioning of the intraocular shunt, the depth of penetration through the sclera is important when conducting the methods of the invention. In one embodiment, the distal tip of the hollow shaft pierces the sclera without coring, removing or causing major tissue distortion of the surrounding eye tissue. The shunt is then deployed from the shaft. Preferably, a distal portion of the hollow shaft (as opposed to the distal tip) completely penetrates the sclera before the shunt is deployed from the hollow shaft. In certain embodiments, the hollow shaft is a flat bevel needle, such as a needle having a triple-ground point. The tip bevel first pierces through the sclera making a horizontal slit. In a preferred embodiment of the methods of the invention, the needle is advanced even further such that the entire flat bevel penetrates through the sclera, as shown in
The methods of the invention may be conducted using any commercially available shunts, such as the Optonol Ex-PRESS mini Glaucoma shunt, and the Solx DeepLight Gold Micro-Shunt. However, the methods of the invention are preferably conducted using the intraocular shunts of the present invention, as described herein.
Intraocular Shunts
The present invention also provides intraocular shunts that are configured to form a drainage pathway from the anterior chamber of the eye to the intra-Tenon's space. In particular, the intraocular shunts of the invention have a length that is sufficient to form a drainage pathway from the anterior chamber of the eye to the intra-Tenon's space. The length of the shunt is important in achieving placement specifically in the intra-Tenon's space. A shunt that is too long will extend beyond the intra-Tenon's space and irritate the conjunctiva, which can cause the filtration procedure to fail, as previously described. A shunt that is too short will not provide sufficient access to drainage pathways such as the episcleral lymphatic system or the conjunctival lymphatic system.
Shunts of the invention may be any length that allows for drainage of aqueous humor from an anterior chamber of an eye to the intra-Tenon's space. Exemplary shunts range in length from approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 20 mm or between approximately 4 mm to approximately 16 mm, or any specific value within said ranges. In certain embodiments, the length of the shunt is between approximately 6 to 8 mm, or any specific value within said range, e.g., 6.0 mm, 6.1 mm, 6.2 mm, 6.3 mm, 6.4 mm, 6.5 mm, 6.6 mm, 6.7 mm, 6.8 mm, 6.9 mm, 7 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.2 mm, 7.3 mm, 7.4 mm, 7.5 mm, 7.6 mm, 7.7 mm, 7.8 mm, 7.9 mm, or 8.0 mm.
The intraocular shunts of the invention are particularly suitable for use in an ab interno glaucoma filtration procedure. Commercially available shunts that are currently used in ab interno filtration procedures are typically made of a hard, inflexible material such as gold, polymer, titanium, or stainless steel, and cause substantial irritation of the eye tissue, resulting in ocular inflammation such as subconjunctival blebbing or endophthalmitis. In contrast, the intraocular shunts of the invention are flexible, and have an elasticity modulus that is substantially identical to the elasticity modulus of the surrounding tissue in the implant site. As such, the intraocular shunts of the invention are easily bendable, do not erode or cause a tissue reaction, and do not migrate once implanted. Thus, when implanted in the eye using an ab interno procedure, such as the methods described herein, the intraocular shunts of the invention do not induce substantial ocular inflammation such as subconjunctival blebbing or endophthalmitis. Additional exemplary features of the intraocular shunts of the invention are discussed in further detail below.
Tissue Compatible Shunts
In certain aspects, the invention generally provides shunts composed of a material that has an elasticity modulus that is compatible with an elasticity modulus of tissue surrounding the shunt. In this manner, shunts of the invention are flexibility matched with the surrounding tissue, and thus will remain in place after implantation without the need for any type of anchor that interacts with the surrounding tissue. Consequently, shunts of the invention will maintain fluid flow away for an anterior chamber of the eye after implantation without causing irritation or inflammation to the tissue surrounding the eye.
Elastic modulus, or modulus of elasticity, is a mathematical description of an object or substance's tendency to be deformed elastically when a force is applied to it. The elastic modulus of an object is defined as the slope of its stress-strain curve in the elastic deformation region:
where lambda (λ) is the elastic modulus; stress is the force causing the deformation divided by the area to which the force is applied; and strain is the ratio of the change caused by the stress to the original state of the object. The elasticity modulus may also be known as Young's modulus (E), which describes tensile elasticity, or the tendency of an object to deform along an axis when opposing forces are applied along that axis. Young's modulus is defined as the ratio of tensile stress to tensile strain. For further description regarding elasticity modulus and Young's modulus, see for example Gere (Mechanics of Materials, 6th Edition, 2004, Thomson), the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The elasticity modulus of any tissue can be determined by one of skill in the art. See for example Samani et al. (Phys. Med. Biol. 48:2183, 2003); Erkamp et al. (Measuring The Elastic Modulus Of Small Tissue Samples, Biomedical Engineering Department and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109-2125; and Institute of Mathematical Problems in Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region 142292 Russia); Chen et al. (IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control 43:191-194, 1996); Hall, (In 1996 Ultrasonics Symposium Proc., pp. 1193-1196, IEEE Cat. No. 96CH35993, IEEE, New York, 1996); and Parker (Ultrasound Med. Biol. 16:241-246, 1990), each of which provides methods of determining the elasticity modulus of body tissues. The content of each of these is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The elasticity modulus of tissues of different organs is known in the art. For example, Pierscionek et al. (Br J Ophthalmol, 91:801-803, 2007) and Friberg (Experimental Eye Research, 473:429-436, 1988) show the elasticity modulus of the cornea and the sclera of the eye. The content of each of these references is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Chen, Hall, and Parker show the elasticity modulus of different muscles and the liver. Erkamp shows the elasticity modulus of the kidney.
Shunts of the invention are composed of a material that is compatible with an elasticity modulus of tissue surrounding the shunt. In certain embodiments, the material has an elasticity modulus that is substantially identical to the elasticity modulus of the tissue surrounding the shunt. In other embodiments, the material has an elasticity modulus that is greater than the elasticity modulus of the tissue surrounding the shunt. Exemplary materials includes biocompatible polymers, such as polycarbonate, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyimide, polystyrene, polypropylene, poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene), or silicone rubber.
In particular embodiments, shunts of the invention are composed of a material that has an elasticity modulus that is compatible with the elasticity modulus of tissue in the eye, particularly scleral tissue. In certain embodiments, compatible materials are those materials that are softer than scleral tissue or marginally harder than scleral tissue, yet soft enough to prohibit shunt migration. The elasticity modulus for anterior scleral tissue is approximately 2.9±1.4×106 N/m2, and 1.8±1.1×106 N/m2 for posterior sclera tissue. See Friberg (Experimental Eye Research, 473:429-436, 1988). An exemplary material is cross linked gelatin derived from Bovine or Porcine Collagen.
The invention encompasses shunts of different shapes and different dimensions, and the shunts of the invention may be any shape or any dimension that may be accommodated by the eye. In certain embodiments, the intraocular shunt is of a cylindrical shape and has an outside cylindrical wall and a hollow interior. The shunt may have an inside diameter from approximately 10 μm to approximately 250 μm, an outside diameter from approximately 190 μm to approximately 300 μm, and a length from approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 20 mm.
Shunts Reactive to Pressure
In other aspects, the invention generally provides shunts in which a portion of the shunt is composed of a flexible material that is reactive to pressure, i.e., the diameter of the flexible portion of the shunt fluctuates depending upon the pressures exerted on that portion of the shunt.
The flexible portion 51 of the shunt 23 acts as a valve that regulates fluid flow through the shunt. The human eye produces aqueous humor at a rate of about 2 μl/min for approximately 3 ml/day. The entire aqueous volume is about 0.25 ml. When the pressure in the anterior chamber falls after surgery to about 7-8 mmHg, it is assumed the majority of the aqueous humor is exiting the eye through the implant since venous backpressure prevents any significant outflow through normal drainage structures (e.g., the trabecular meshwork).
After implantation, intraocular shunts have pressure exerted upon them by tissues surrounding the shunt (e.g., scleral tissue such as the sclera channel and the sclera exit) and pressure exerted upon them by aqueous humor flowing through the shunt. The flow through the shunt, and thus the pressure exerted by the fluid on the shunt, is calculated by the equation:
where Φ is the volumetric flow rate: V is a volume of the liquid poured (cubic meters); t is the time (seconds); υ is mean fluid velocity along the length of the tube (meters/second); x is a distance in direction of flow (meters); R is the internal radius of the tube (meters); ΔP is the pressure difference between the two ends (pascals); η is the dynamic fluid viscosity (pascal-second (Pa·s)); and L is the total length of the tube in the x direction (meters).
When the pressure exerted on the flexible portion 30 of the shunt 26 by sclera 31 (vertical arrows) is greater than the pressure exerted on the flexible portion 30 of the shunt 26 by the fluid flowing through the shunt (horizontal arrow), the flexible portion 30 decreases in diameter, restricting flow through the shunt 26 (
When the pressure exerted on the flexible portion 30 of the shunt 26 by the fluid flowing through the shunt (horizontal arrow) is greater than the pressure exerted on the flexible portion 30 of the shunt 26 by the sclera 31 (vertical arrows), the flexible portion 30 increases in diameter, increasing flow through the shunt 26 (
The invention encompasses shunts of different shapes and different dimensions, and the shunts of the invention may be any shape or any dimension that may be accommodated by the eye. In certain embodiments, the intraocular shunt is of a cylindrical shape and has an outside cylindrical wall and a hollow interior. The shunt may have an inside diameter from approximately 10 μm to approximately 250 μm, an outside diameter from approximately 190 μm to approximately 300 μm, and a length from approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 20 mm.
In particular embodiments, the shunt has a length of about 6 mm and an inner diameter of about 64 μm. With these dimensions, the pressure difference between the proximal end of the shunt that resides in the anterior chamber and the distal end of the shunt that resides outside the anterior chamber is about 4.3 mmHg. Such dimensions thus allow the implant to act as a controlled valve and protect the integrity of the anterior chamber.
It will be appreciated that different dimensioned implants may be used. For example, shunts that range in length from about 0.5 mm to about 20 mm and have a range in inner diameter from about 10 μm to about 100 μm allow for pressure control from approximately 0.5 mmHg to approximately 20 mmHg.
The material of the flexible portion and the thickness of the wall of the flexible portion will determine how reactive the flexible portion is to the pressures exerted upon it by the surrounding tissue and the fluid flowing through the shunt. Generally, with a certain material, the thicker the flexible portion, the less responsive the portion will be to pressure. In certain embodiments, the flexible portion is a gelatin or other similar material, and the thickness of the gelatin material forming the wall of the flexible portion ranges from about 10 μm thick to about 100 μm thick.
In a certain embodiment, the gelatin used for making the flexible portion is known as gelatin Type B from bovine skin. An exemplary gelatin is PB Leiner gelatin from bovine skin, Type B, 225 Bloom, USP. Another material that may be used in the making of the flexible portion is a gelatin Type A from porcine skin, also available from Sigma Chemical. Such gelatin is available from Sigma Chemical Company of St. Louis, Mo. under Code G-9382. Still other suitable gelatins include bovine bone gelatin, porcine bone gelatin and human-derived gelatins. In addition to gelatins, the flexible portion may be made of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), collagen, polylactic acid, polylglycolic acid, hyaluronic acid and glycosaminoglycans.
In certain embodiments, the gelatin is cross-linked. Cross-linking increases the inter- and intramolecular binding of the gelatin substrate. Any method for cross-linking the gelatin may be used. In a particular embodiment, the formed gelatin is treated with a solution of a cross-linking agent such as, but not limited to, glutaraldehyde. Other suitable compounds for cross-linking include 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC). Cross-linking by radiation, such as gamma or electron beam (e-beam) may be alternatively employed.
In one embodiment, the gelatin is contacted with a solution of approximately 25% glutaraldehyde for a selected period of time. One suitable form of glutaraldehyde is a grade 1G5882 glutaraldehyde available from Sigma Aldridge Company of Germany, although other glutaraldehyde solutions may also be used. The pH of the glutaraldehyde solution should be in the range of 7 to 7.8 and, more particularly, 7.35-7.44 and typically approximately 7.4+/−0.01. If necessary, the pH may be adjusted by adding a suitable amount of a base such as sodium hydroxide as needed.
Methods for forming the flexible portion of the shunt are shown for example in Yu et al. (U.S. patent application number 2008/0108933), the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In an exemplary protocol, the flexible portion may be made by dipping a core or substrate such as a wire of a suitable diameter in a solution of gelatin. The gelatin solution is typically prepared by dissolving a gelatin powder in de-ionized water or sterile water for injection and placing the dissolved gelatin in a water bath at a temperature of approximately 55° C., with thorough mixing to ensure complete dissolution of the gelatin. In one embodiment, the ratio of solid gelatin to water is approximately 10% to 50% gelatin by weight to 50% to 90% by weight of water. In an embodiment, the gelatin solution includes approximately 40% by weight, gelatin dissolved in water. The resulting gelatin solution should be devoid of air bubbles and has a viscosity that is between approximately 200-500 cp and more particularly between approximately 260 and 410 cp (centipoise).
Once the gelatin solution has been prepared, in accordance with the method described above, supporting structures such as wires having a selected diameter are dipped into the solution to form the flexible portion. Stainless steel wires coated with a biocompatible, lubricious material such as polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) are preferred.
Typically, the wires are gently lowered into a container of the gelatin solution and then slowly withdrawn. The rate of movement is selected to control the thickness of the coat. In addition, it is preferred that the tube be removed at a constant rate in order to provide the desired coating. To ensure that the gelatin is spread evenly over the surface of the wire, in one embodiment, the wires may be rotated in a stream of cool air which helps to set the gelatin solution and affix film onto the wire. Dipping and withdrawing the wire supports may be repeated several times to further ensure even coating of the gelatin. Once the wires have been sufficiently coated with gelatin, the resulting gelatin films on the wire may be dried at room temperature for at least 1 hour, and more preferably, approximately 10 to 24 hours. Apparatus for forming gelatin tubes are described in Yu et al. (U.S. patent application number 2008/0108933).
Once dried, the formed flexible portions may be treated with a cross-linking agent. In one embodiment, the formed flexible portion may be cross-linked by dipping the wire (with film thereon) into the 25% glutaraldehyde solution, at pH of approximately 7.0-7.8 and more preferably approximately 7.35-7.44 at room temperature for at least 4 hours and preferably between approximately 10 to 36 hours, depending on the degree of cross-linking desired. In one embodiment, the formed flexible portion is contacted with a cross-linking agent such as gluteraldehyde for at least approximately 16 hours. Cross-linking can also be accelerated when it is performed a high temperatures. It is believed that the degree of cross-linking is proportional to the bioabsorption time of the shunt once implanted. In general, the more cross-linking, the longer the survival of the shunt in the body.
The residual glutaraldehyde or other cross-linking agent is removed from the formed flexible portion by soaking the tubes in a volume of sterile water for injection. The water may optionally be replaced at regular intervals, circulated or re-circulated to accelerate diffusion of the unbound glutaraldehyde from the tube. The tubes are washed for a period of a few hours to a period of a few months with the ideal time being 3-14 days. The now cross-linked gelatin tubes may then be dried (cured) at ambient temperature for a selected period of time. It has been observed that a drying period of approximately 48-96 hours and more typically 3 days (i.e., 72 hours) may be preferred for the formation of the cross-linked gelatin tubes.
Where a cross-linking agent is used, it may be desirable to include a quenching agent in the method of making the flexible portion. Quenching agents remove unbound molecules of the cross-linking agent from the formed flexible portion. In certain cases, removing the cross-linking agent may reduce the potential toxicity to a patient if too much of the cross-linking agent is released from the flexible portion. In certain embodiments, the formed flexible portion is contacted with the quenching agent after the cross-linking treatment and, may be included with the washing/rinsing solution. Examples of quenching agents include glycine or sodium borohydride.
After the requisite drying period, the formed and cross-linked flexible portion is removed from the underlying supports or wires. In one embodiment, wire tubes may be cut at two ends and the formed gelatin flexible portion slowly removed from the wire support. In another embodiment, wires with gelatin film thereon, may be pushed off using a plunger or tube to remove the formed gelatin flexible portion.
Multi-Port Shunts
Other aspects of the invention generally provide multi-port shunts. Such shunts reduce probability of the shunt clogging after implantation because fluid can enter or exit the shunt even if one or more ports of the shunt become clogged with particulate. In certain embodiments, the shunt includes a hollow body defining a flow path and more than two ports, in which the body is configured such that a proximal portion receives fluid from the anterior chamber of an eye and a distal portion directs the fluid to the intra-Tenon's space.
The shunt may have many different configurations.
The ports may be positioned in various different orientations and along various different portions of the shunt. In certain embodiments, at least one of the ports is oriented at an angle to the length of the body. In certain embodiments, at least one of the ports is oriented 90° to the length of the body. See for example
The ports may have the same or different inner diameters. In certain embodiments, at least one of the ports has an inner diameter that is different from the inner diameters of the other ports.
The invention encompasses shunts of different shapes and different dimensions, and the shunts of the invention may be any shape or any dimension that may be accommodated by the eye. In certain embodiments, the intraocular shunt is of a cylindrical shape and has an outside cylindrical wall and a hollow interior. The shunt may have an inside diameter from approximately 10 μm to approximately 250 μm, an outside diameter from approximately 190 μm to approximately 300 μm, and a length from approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 20 mm. Shunts of the invention may be made from any biocompatible material. An exemplary material is gelatin. Methods of making shunts composed of gelatin are described above.
Shunts with Overflow Ports
Other aspects of the invention generally provide shunts with overflow ports. Those shunts are configured such that the overflow port remains partially or completely closed until there is a pressure build-up within the shunt sufficient to force open the overflow port. Such pressure build-up typically results from particulate partially or fully clogging an entry or an exit port of the shunt. Such shunts reduce probability of the shunt clogging after implantation because fluid can enter or exit the shunt by the overflow port even if one port of the shunt becomes clogged with particulate.
In certain embodiments, the shunt includes a hollow body defining an inlet configured to receive fluid from an anterior chamber of an eye and an outlet configured to direct the fluid to the intra-Tenon's space, the body further including at least one slit. The slit may be located at any place along the body of the shunt.
While
In certain embodiments, the slit may be at the proximal or the distal end of the shunt, producing a split in the proximal or the distal end of the implant.
In certain embodiments, the slit has a width that is substantially the same or less than an inner diameter of the inlet. In other embodiments, the slit has a width that is substantially the same or less than an inner diameter of the outlet. In certain embodiments, the slit has a length that ranges from about 0.05 mm to about 2 mm, and a width that ranges from about 10 μm to about 200 μm. Generally, the slit does not direct the fluid unless the outlet is obstructed. However, the shunt may be configured such that the slit does direct at least some of the fluid even if the inlet or outlet is not obstructed.
The invention encompasses shunts of different shapes and different dimensions, and the shunts of the invention may be any shape or any dimension that may be accommodated by the eye. In certain embodiments, the intraocular shunt is of a cylindrical shape and has an outside cylindrical wall and a hollow interior. The shunt may have an inside diameter from approximately 10 μm to approximately 250 μm, an outside diameter from approximately 190 μm to approximately 300 μm, and a length from approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 20 mm. Shunts of the invention may be made from any biocompatible material. An exemplary material is gelatin. Methods of making shunts composed of gelatin are described above.
Shunts Having a Variable Inner Diameter
In other aspects, the invention generally provides a shunt having a variable inner diameter. In particular embodiments, the diameter increases from inlet to outlet of the shunt. By having a variable inner diameter that increases from inlet to outlet, a pressure gradient is produced and particulate that may otherwise clog the inlet of the shunt is forced through the inlet due to the pressure gradient. Further, the particulate will flow out of the shunt because the diameter only increases after the inlet.
In exemplary embodiments, the inner diameter may range in size from about 10 μm to about 200 μm, and the inner diameter at the outlet may range in size from about 15 μm to about 300 μm. The invention encompasses shunts of different shapes and different dimensions, and the shunts of the invention may be any shape or any dimension that may be accommodated by the eye. In certain embodiments, the intraocular shunt is via cylindrical shape and has an outside cylindrical wall and a hollow interior. The shunt may have an inside diameter from approximately 10 μm to approximately 250 μm, an outside diameter from approximately 190 μm to approximately 300 μm, and a length from approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 20 mm. Shunts of the invention may be made from any biocompatible material. An exemplary material is gelatin. Methods of making shunts composed of gelatin are described above.
Pharmaceutical Agents
In certain embodiments, shunts of the invention may be coated or impregnated with at least one pharmaceutical and/or biological agent or a combination thereof. The pharmaceutical and/or biological agent may coat or impregnate an entire exterior of the shunt, an entire interior of the shunt, or both. Alternatively, the pharmaceutical or biological agent may coat and/or impregnate a portion of an exterior of the shunt, a portion of an interior of the shunt, or both. Methods of coating and/or impregnating an intraocular shunt with a pharmaceutical and/or biological agent are known in the art. See for example, Darouiche (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,790,183; 6,719,991; 6,558,686; 6,162,487; 5,902,283; 5,853,745; and 5,624,704) and Yu et al. (U.S. patent application serial number 2008/0108933). The content of each of these references is incorporated by reference herein its entirety.
In certain embodiments, the exterior portion of the shunt that resides in the anterior chamber after implantation (e.g., about 1 mm of the proximal end of the shunt) is coated and/or impregnated with the pharmaceutical or biological agent. In other embodiments, the exterior of the shunt that resides in the scleral tissue after implantation of the shunt is coated and/or impregnated with the pharmaceutical or biological agent. In other embodiments, the exterior portion of the shunt that resides in the intra-Tenon's space or the subconjunctival space after implantation is coated and/or impregnated with the pharmaceutical or biological agent. In embodiments in which the pharmaceutical or biological agent coats and/or impregnates the interior of the shunt, the agent may be flushed through the shunt and into the area of lower pressure (e.g., the intra-Tenon's space or the subconjunctival space).
Any pharmaceutical and/or biological agent or combination thereof may be used with shunts of the invention. The pharmaceutical and/or biological agent may be released over a short period of time (e.g., seconds) or may be released over longer periods of time (e.g., days, weeks, months, or even years). Exemplary agents include anti-mitotic pharmaceuticals such as Mitomycin-C or 5-Fluorouracil, anti-VEGF (such as Lucintes, Macugen, Avastin, VEGF or steroids).
Deployment Devices
Deployment into the eye of an intraocular shunt, such as the shunts described herein, in accordance with the methods of the invention can be achieved using a hollow shaft configured to hold the shunt, as described herein. The hollow shaft can be coupled to a deployment device or part of the deployment device itself. Deployment devices that are suitable for use with the methods of the invention include but are not limited to the deployment devices described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,007,511, 6,544,249, and U.S. Publication No. US2008/0108933, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. In other embodiments, the deployment devices are devices as described in co-pending and co-owned U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 12/946,222 filed on Nov. 15, 2010, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference herein.
In still other embodiments, the methods of the invention are conducted using the deployment device 100 depicted in
Housing 101 is shown having a larger proximal portion that tapers to a distal portion. The distal portion includes a hollow sleeve 105. The hollow sleeve 105 is configured for insertion into an eye and to extend into an anterior chamber of an eye. The hollow sleeve is visible within an anterior chamber of an eye. The sleeve may include an edge at a distal end that provides resistance feedback to an operator upon insertion of the deployment device 100 within an eye of a person. Upon advancement of the device 100 across an anterior chamber of the eye, the hollow sleeve 105 will eventually contact the sclera, providing resistance feedback to an operator that no further advancement of the device 100 is necessary. The edge of the sleeve 105, prevents the shaft 104 from accidentally being pushed too far through the sclera. A temporary guard 108 is configured to fit around sleeve 105 and extend beyond an end of sleeve 105. The guard is used during shipping of the device and protects an operator from a distal end of a hollow shaft 104 that extends beyond the end of the sleeve 105. The guard is removed prior to use of the device.
Housing 101 is open at its proximal end, such that a portion of a deployment mechanism 103 may extend from the proximal end of the housing 101. A distal end of housing 101 is also open such that at least a portion of a hollow shaft 104 may extend through and beyond the distal end of the housing 101. Housing 101 further includes a slot 106 through which an operator, such as a surgeon, using the device 100 may view an indicator 107 on the deployment mechanism 103.
Housing 101 may be made of any material that is suitable for use in medical devices. For example, housing 101 may be made of a lightweight aluminum or a biocompatible plastic material. Examples of such suitable plastic materials include polycarbonate and other polymeric resins such as DELRIN and ULTEM. In certain embodiments, housing 101 is made of a material that may be autoclaved, and thus allow for housing 101 to be re-usable. Alternatively, device 100 may be sold as a one-time-use device, and thus the material of the housing does not need to be a material that is autoclavable.
Housing 101 may be made of multiple components that connect together to form the housing.
Deployment mechanism 103 includes a distal portion 109 and a proximal portion 110. The deployment mechanism 103 is configured such that distal portion 109 is movable within proximal portion 110. More particularly, distal portion 109 is capable of partially retracting to within proximal portion 110.
In this embodiment, the distal portion 109 is shown to taper to a connection with a hollow shaft 104. This embodiment is illustrated such that the connection between the hollow shaft 104 and the distal portion 109 of the deployment mechanism 103 occurs inside the housing 101. In other embodiments, the connection between hollow shaft 104 and the distal portion 109 of the deployment mechanism 103 may occur outside of the housing 101. Hollow shaft 104 may be removable from the distal portion 109 of the deployment mechanism 103. Alternatively, the hollow shaft 104 may be permanently coupled to the distal portion 109 of the deployment mechanism 103.
Generally, hollow shaft 104 is configured to hold an intraocular shunt, such as the intraocular shunts according to the invention. The shaft 104 may be any length. A usable length of the shaft may be anywhere from about 5 mm to about 40 mm, and is 15 mm in certain embodiments. In certain embodiments, the shaft is straight. In other embodiments, shaft is of a shape other than straight, for example a shaft having a bend along its length or a shaft as depicted in
A proximal portion of the deployment mechanism includes optional grooves 116 to allow for easier gripping by an operator for easier rotation of the deployment mechanism, which will be discussed in more detail below. The proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism also includes at least one indicator that provides feedback to an operator as to the state of the deployment mechanism. The indicator may be any type of indicator known in the art, for example a visual indicator, an audio indicator, or a tactile indicator.
The proximal portion 110 includes a stationary portion 110b and a rotating portion 110a. The proximal portion 110 includes a channel 112 that runs part of the length of stationary portion 110b and the entire length of rotating portion 110a. The channel 112 is configured to interact with a protrusion 117 on an interior portion of housing component 101a (
Referring back to
Reference is now made to
Additionally, in the pre-deployment configuration, a portion of the shaft 104 extends beyond the sleeve 105 (
Once the device has been inserted into the eye and advanced to a location to where the shunt will be deployed, the shunt 115 may be deployed from the device 100. The deployment mechanism 103 is a two-stage system. The first stage is engagement of the pusher component 118 and the second stage is retraction of the distal portion 109 to within the proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism 103. Rotation of the rotating portion 110a of the proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism 103 sequentially engages the pusher component and then the retraction component.
In the first stage of shunt deployment, the pusher component is engaged and the pusher partially deploys the shunt from the deployment device. During the first stage, rotating portion 110a of the proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism 103 is rotated, resulting in movement of members 114a and 114b along first portions 113a1 and 113b1 in channels 113a and 113b. Since the first portion 113a1 of channel 113a is straight and runs perpendicular to the length of the rotating portion 110a, rotation of rotating portion 110a does not cause axial movement of member 114a. Without axial movement of member 114a, there is no retraction of the distal portion 109 to within the proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism 103. Since the first portion 113b1 of channel 113b runs diagonally along the length of the rotating portion 110a, upwardly toward a distal end of the deployment mechanism 103, rotation of rotating portion 110a causes axial movement of member 114b toward a distal end of the device. Axial movement of member 114b toward a distal end of the device results in forward advancement of the pusher component 118 within the hollow shaft 104. Such movement of pusher component 118 results in partially deployment of the shunt 115 from the shaft 104.
In the second stage of shunt deployment, the retraction component is engaged and the distal portion of the deployment mechanism is retracted to within the proximal portion of the deployment mechanism, thereby completing deployment of the shunt from the deployment device. During the second stage, rotating portion 110a of the proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism 103 is further rotated, resulting in movement of members 114a and 114b along second portions 113a2 and 113b2 in channels 113a and 113b. Since the second portion 113b2 of channel 113b is straight and runs perpendicular to the length of the rotating portion 110a, rotation of rotating portion 110a does not cause axial movement of member 114b. Without axial movement of member 114b, there is no further advancement of pusher 118. Since the second portion 113a2 of channel 113a runs diagonally along the length of the rotating portion 110a, downwardly toward a proximal end of the deployment mechanism 103, rotation of rotating portion 110a causes axial movement of member 114a toward a proximal end of the device. Axial movement of member 114a toward a proximal end of the device results in retraction of the distal portion 109 to within the proximal portion 110 of the deployment mechanism 103. Retraction of the distal portion 109, results in retraction of the hollow shaft 104. Since the shunt 115 abuts the pusher component 118, the shunt remains stationary as the hollow shaft 104 retracts from around the shunt 115 (
References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/476,503, filed on Sep. 3, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/946,572, filed on Nov. 15, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,852,256, the entirety of each of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3960150 | Hussain et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4090530 | Lange | May 1978 | A |
4402308 | Scott | Sep 1983 | A |
4562463 | Lipton | Dec 1985 | A |
4583117 | Lipton et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4700692 | Baumgartner | Oct 1987 | A |
4722724 | Schocket | Feb 1988 | A |
4744362 | Grundler | May 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4787885 | Binder | Nov 1988 | A |
4804382 | Turina et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4820626 | Williams et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4826478 | Schocket | May 1989 | A |
4836201 | Patton et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848340 | Bille et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4863457 | Lee | Sep 1989 | A |
4902292 | Joseph | Feb 1990 | A |
4911161 | Schechter | Mar 1990 | A |
4915684 | MacKeen et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4934363 | Smith et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936825 | Ungerleider | Jun 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978352 | Fedorov et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5041081 | Odrich | Aug 1991 | A |
5057098 | Zelman | Oct 1991 | A |
5071408 | Ahmed | Dec 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098426 | Sklar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098443 | Parel et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5162641 | Fountain | Nov 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst | Jan 1993 | A |
5201750 | Hocherl et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207660 | Lincoff | May 1993 | A |
5275622 | Lazarus | Jan 1994 | A |
5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300020 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5333619 | Burgio | Aug 1994 | A |
5338291 | Speckman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342370 | Simon et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5360339 | Rosenberg | Nov 1994 | A |
5368015 | Wilk | Nov 1994 | A |
5370607 | Memmen | Dec 1994 | A |
5399951 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5410638 | Colgate et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5443505 | Wong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5516522 | Peyman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520631 | Nordquist et al. | May 1996 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558630 | Fisher | Sep 1996 | A |
5573544 | Simon et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5601094 | Reiss | Feb 1997 | A |
5651782 | Simon et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656026 | Joseph | Aug 1997 | A |
5665093 | Atkins et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665114 | Weadock et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676679 | Simon et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688562 | Hsiung | Nov 1997 | A |
5695474 | Daugherty | Dec 1997 | A |
5702414 | Richter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704907 | Nordquist et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707376 | Kavteladze et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722948 | Gross | Mar 1998 | A |
5763491 | Brandt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5824072 | Wong | Oct 1998 | A |
5868697 | Richter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5908449 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5932299 | Katoot | Aug 1999 | A |
5938583 | Grimm | Aug 1999 | A |
5964747 | Eaton et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968058 | Richter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6007578 | Schachar | Dec 1999 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6086543 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6146366 | Schachar | Nov 2000 | A |
6159218 | Aramant et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165210 | Lau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6203513 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228023 | Zaslaysky et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228873 | Brandt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261256 | Ahmed | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264665 | Yu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280468 | Schachar | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6413540 | Yaacobi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450937 | Mercereau et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468283 | Richter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471666 | Odrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483930 | Musgrave et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510600 | Yaron et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514238 | Hughes | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524275 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533768 | Hill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544249 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558342 | Yaron et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6595945 | Brown | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6638239 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6699210 | Williams et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726664 | Yaron et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D490152 | Myall et al. | May 2004 | S |
6736791 | Tu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6752753 | Hoskins et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6780164 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6881198 | Brown | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6936053 | Weiss | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6939298 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955656 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7008396 | Straub | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7037335 | Freeman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7041077 | Shields | May 2006 | B2 |
7094225 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118547 | Dahan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135009 | Tu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163543 | Smedley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186232 | Smedley et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7207980 | Christian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7273475 | Tu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291125 | Coroneo | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297130 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331984 | Tu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431709 | Pinchuk et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7431710 | Tu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458953 | Peyman | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481816 | Richter et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488303 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7563241 | Tu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7594899 | Pinchuk et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7625384 | Eriksson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7670310 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708711 | Tu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722549 | Nakao | May 2010 | B2 |
7815592 | Coroneo | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837644 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850638 | Theodore Coroneo | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857782 | Tu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867186 | Haffner et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867205 | Bergheim et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7879001 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7879079 | Tu et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892282 | Shepherd | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7951155 | Smedley et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8007459 | Haffner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8062244 | Tu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075511 | Tu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109896 | Nissan et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118768 | Tu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128588 | Coroneo | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8167939 | Silvestrini et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8172899 | Silvestrini et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8262726 | Silvestrini et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267882 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273050 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277437 | Saal et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308701 | Horvath et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313454 | Yaron et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8333742 | Bergheim et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337393 | Silverstrini et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337445 | Tu et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337509 | Schieber et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348877 | Tu et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377122 | Silvestrini et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425449 | Wardle et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444589 | Silvestrini | May 2013 | B2 |
8486000 | Coroneo | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486086 | Yaron et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506515 | Burns et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512404 | Frion et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529492 | Clauson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529494 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535333 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545430 | Silvestrini | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551166 | Schieber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574294 | Silvestrini et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8579846 | Tu et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585629 | Grabner et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8663303 | Horvath et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8721702 | Romoda et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8758290 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8765210 | Romoda et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801766 | Reitsamer et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8828070 | Romoda et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852136 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8852137 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8852256 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8974511 | Horvath et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9017276 | Horvath et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9044301 | Pinchuk et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9095411 | Horvath et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9095413 | Romoda et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9192516 | Horvath et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9271869 | Horvath et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9283116 | Romoda et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9326891 | Horvath et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9393153 | Horvath | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010025150 | de Juan et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010056254 | Cragg et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020099434 | Buscemi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020177856 | Richter et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193725 | Odrich | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030015203 | Makower et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050574 | Krueger | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060752 | Bergheim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030079329 | Yaron et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093084 | Nissan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097053 | Itoh | May 2003 | A1 |
20030181848 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187383 | Weber et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187384 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236483 | Ren | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236484 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040077987 | Rapacki et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040147870 | Burns et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199130 | Chornenky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210185 | Tu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210209 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215133 | Weber et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216749 | Tu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236343 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254519 | Tu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254521 | Simon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260227 | Lisk et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101967 | Weber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143363 | De Juan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050209549 | Bergheim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246023 | Yeung | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267398 | Protopsaltis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277864 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060052721 | Dunker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064112 | Perez | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074375 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084907 | Bergheim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106370 | Baerveldt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116625 | Renati et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149194 | Conston et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155238 | Shields | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155300 | Stamper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173397 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173446 | Dacquay et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195055 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195056 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200113 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241411 | Field et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241749 | Tu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070027537 | Castillejos | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070093783 | Kugler et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118065 | Pinchuk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070141116 | Pinchuk et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070172903 | Toner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202186 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263172 | Mura | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276316 | Haffner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282244 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282245 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293872 | Peyman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015633 | Abbott et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045878 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057106 | Erickson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108933 | Yu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147001 | Al-Marashi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181929 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183121 | Smedley et al. | Jul 2008 | A2 |
20080249467 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281277 | Thyzel | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312661 | Downer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090036818 | Grahn et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043321 | Conston et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090124973 | D'Agostino et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137983 | Bergheim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138081 | Bergheim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090182421 | Silvestrini et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209910 | Kugler et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216106 | Takii | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090264813 | Chang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270890 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281520 | Highley et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287136 | Castillejos | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004581 | Brigatti et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010416 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063478 | Selkee | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100098772 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100104 | Yu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119696 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121248 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121249 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134759 | Silvestrini et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137981 | Silvestrini et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173866 | Hee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185138 | Yaron et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191103 | Stamper et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249691 | Van Der Mooren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274259 | Yaron et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100328606 | Peyman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009874 | Wardle et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028883 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028884 | Theodore Coroneo | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046536 | Stegmann et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087149 | Theodore Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087150 | Theodore Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087151 | Theodore Coroneo | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092878 | Tu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098627 | Wilcox | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098629 | Juan, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105987 | Bergheim et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105990 | Silvestrini | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118745 | Yu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118835 | Silvestrini et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110230890 | Thyzel | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234976 | Kocaoglu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110306915 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120078158 | Haffner et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109040 | Smedley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123315 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123316 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123317 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123430 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123433 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123434 | Grabner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123435 | Romoda et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123436 | Reitsamer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123437 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123438 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123439 | Romoda et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123440 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165720 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165721 | Grabner et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165722 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165723 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165933 | Haffner et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197175 | Horvath et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220917 | Silvestrini et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226150 | Balicki et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253258 | Tu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310137 | Silvestrini | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006164 | Yaron et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018295 | Haffner et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018296 | Bergheim et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130110125 | Silvestrini et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149429 | Romoda et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150770 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158462 | Wardle et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184631 | Pinchuk | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130231603 | Wardle et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245532 | Tu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245573 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253404 | Tu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253405 | Tu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253406 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253528 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130281817 | Schaller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281908 | Schaller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281910 | Tu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310930 | Tu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140018720 | Horvath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066833 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081195 | Clauson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140135916 | Clauson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180189 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140213958 | Clauson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140236065 | Romoda et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236066 | Horvath et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236067 | Horvath et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243730 | Horvath | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140272102 | Romoda et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275923 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276332 | Crimaldi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277349 | Vad | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287077 | Romoda et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303544 | Haffner et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323995 | Clauson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140371651 | Pinchuk | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005689 | Horvath et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150011926 | Reitsamer et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150038893 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150045714 | Horvath et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057591 | Horvath et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150133946 | Horvath et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150290035 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150374545 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160135993 | Horvath et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160135994 | Romoda et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160158063 | Romoda et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160250071 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160256317 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160256318 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160256319 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160256320 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160256323 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160278982 | Horvath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160354244 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354245 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170172797 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172798 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172799 | Horvath | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170348150 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 296 663 | Jul 1996 | GB |
2009-542370 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2313315 | Dec 2007 | RU |
WO-9823237 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-2000056255 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-200274052 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-2007087061 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2008005873 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Horvath, U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,802, “Intraocular Shunt Implantation,” filed Sep. 13, 2017. |
Horvath, U.S. Appl. No. 15/807,503, “Manually Adjustable Intraocular Flow Regulation,” filed Nov. 8, 2017. |
Coran, (editor in chief), “Pediatric Surgery,” Elsevier Saunders, published Feb. 14, 2012, 7th Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 128, pp. 1673-1697. |
Quere, “Fluid Coating on a Fiber,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1999, 31:347-84. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160250071 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14476503 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15150063 | US | |
Parent | 12946572 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 14476503 | US |