Methods for making magnesium salts

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11769911
  • Patent Number
    11,769,911
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 7, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 26, 2023
    10 months ago
Abstract
A method of making a salt of the formula: Mg[Al(R)4]2, where R represents a compound selected from a deprotonated alcohol or thiol; an amine; or a mixture thereof. The method comprising the steps of; combining a Mg(AlH4)2 precursor with an alcohol, thiol or amine of the general formula R—H to create a reaction liquor containing Mg[Al(R)4]2; and washing the reaction liquor in an organic solvent.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2018/052537, filed Sep. 7, 2018, which claims the priority of United Kingdom Application No. 1714770.3, filed Sep. 14, 2017, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to salts of magnesium. Additionally, the present disclosure relates to a method of making the magnesium salts, and the use of the magnesium salts as electrolytes in a cell or battery.


BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

The drive to increase power densities of rechargeable batteries past those currently accessible in established lithium-ion cells for portable electronics has brought about increased interest in developing multivalent battery systems with superior theoretical energy densities. In particular, considerable research focus has been placed on magnesium-ion cells owing to the high theoretical volumetric energy density of magnesium metal anodes as well as potential safety, cost, and environmental benefits. Lithium-ion cells can also form dendrite growths, which have been found to cause short circuiting and dangerous thermal runaway. Magnesium does not readily form dendrites over multiple charge cycles. Furthermore, magnesium is highly earth-abundant and has a lower costs of production than lithium, and magnesium metal can be used directly as an anode material.


Despite being an attractive alternative to lithium-ion technology, development of magnesium-ion systems continues to be limited by a lack of electrolyte systems that are stable at both the magnesium anode and cathode materials that operate at potentials greater than 3.5 V. Many established magnesium-ion electrolyte systems gradually decompose at the electrode surfaces and result in magnesium-impermeable layers that passivate the electrodes. Additionally, many high-voltage electrolytes (stable to at least 3.4 V) are chloride-containing and are thought to result in the corrosion of common battery components such as stainless steel. Accordingly, new directions in magnesium-ion electrolyte development have focused on the synthesis and use of chloride-free salts.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides a method of making a salt of the formula:

Mg[Al(R)4]2

wherein R represents a compound selected from a deprotonated alcohol or thiol; an amine; or a mixture thereof; the method comprising: combining a Mg(AlH4)2 precursor with the deprotonated alcohol or thiol; or amine; or a mixture thereof to create a reaction liquor containing Mg[Al(R)4]2, and washing the reaction liquor in an organic solvent.


The term salt used throughout the specification is intended to cover complex magnesium salts that fall within the general formula given above. The choice of R group may allow for a more stable reaction mixture in the synthesis of the magnesium aluminate salt.


Previous synthetic methodologies to manufacture magnesium aluminate salts require the use of sufficiently nucleophilic reagents, thus limiting the number of candidate magnesium aluminates. However, the presently defined method allows for a broader range of reagents such that the electrochemical screening and identification of promising electrolyte candidates is not as limited.


In addition, the presently defined method relies on the use of a common Mg(AlH4)2 precursor, which can be used to synthesise a wide range of magnesium aluminate salts. The single precursor allows for rapid access to a range of relatively stable aluminate derivatives without the need to tune the reactivity of reagents or the solubility of the resulting products.


The method may comprise a further final step of filtering the washed reaction liquor under an inert atmosphere. The additional step of washing of the reaction products allows for the removal of insoluble impurities, such Aluminum-containing by-products.


The Mg(AlH4)2 precursor may be formed by a one-step ball milling process of NaAlH4 and MgCl2. A ball milling process is low cost and effective. A reasonable yield of the Mg(AlH4)2 precursor can be achieved via the relatively uncomplicated synthetic route.


The deprotonated alcohol or thiol; or amine may be aliphatic or aromatic. That is to say that the deprotonated alcohol or thiol; or amine may be part of a simple aromatic system, or a heterocyclic system, or be partially or fully saturated. The oxygen, nitrogen or sulphur aryl groups provide a different steric profile and electron donating ability, leading to compounds of varying stability.


The deprotonated alcohol or thiol; or amine may be fluorinated. Fluorination of the alcohol, thiol or amine increases the species reactivity and therefore increase yield of the magnesium aluminate salt and can increase the stability of the organic fragment. Based on the above, the organic moiety of the deprotonated alcohol or thiol; or amine may be based on; tert-butyl, perfluoro-tert-butyl, hexafluoro-iso-propyl, phenyl, or pentafluorophenyl.


The organic solvent may be dry DME, 2-methyl-THF, diglyme, triglyme, tetraglyme or THF. These donor solvents provide a high yield of magnesium aluminate salt. Furthermore, these solvents readily interact with the magnesium aluminate structure and can increase stability of the salt.


In some embodiments, an electrolyte comprising a salt in accordance with the above Formula (i) is included. The electrolyte may comprise the salt as an additive to a conventional electrolyte, or the salt may be used in a pure solution to form, with an appropriate solvent, an electrolyte by itself. The electrolyte may further comprises an Mg(PF6)2 additive.


In some embodiments, provided is a cell or battery comprising an electrolyte in accordance with the above Formula (i). The salts of the present disclosure do not suffer from some of the same disadvantages observed with the use of lithium salts in electrochemical cells or batteries. In addition, the salts of the present disclosure can be used in electrolytes in a number of cell or battery systems. More specifically, the cell or battery can be, for example, a lithium cell or a lithium-ion cell. However, the cell or battery using the salts of the present disclosure may be more generally described as a metal based, or a metal-ion based cell or battery. Examples of other metal or metal-ion based cells or batteries may include magnesium, calcium or aluminum metals or ions. When using the salt of the present disclosure in an electrolyte in metal cell or battery, metals such as magnesium, calcium or aluminum may be used as the metal anode without the risk of the salt decomposing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order that the present disclosure may be more readily understood, an embodiment of the disclosure will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying Figures, in which:



FIG. 1 is a linear sweep voltammetry plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium tert-butoxyaluminate (1) in THF on stainless steel (ss-316), aluminum, copper, gold, and platinum electrodes, according to some embodiments;



FIG. 2 is a linear sweep voltammetry plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium perfluoro-tert-butoxyaluminate (2) in DME on stainless steel (ss-316), aluminum, copper, gold, and platinum electrodes, according to some embodiments;



FIG. 3 is a linear sweep voltammetry plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium hexafluoro-iso-propoxyaluminate (3) in DME on stainless steel (ss-316), aluminum, copper, gold, and platinum electrodes, according to some embodiments;



FIG. 4 is a linear sweep voltammetry plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium phenoxyaluminate (4) in DME on stainless steel (ss-316), aluminum, copper, gold, and platinum electrodes, according to some embodiments;



FIG. 5 is a linear sweep voltammetry plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium perfluorophenoxyaluminate (5) in DME on stainless steel (ss-316), aluminum, copper, gold, and platinum electrodes, according to some embodiments;



FIG. 6 is a cyclic voltammogram and a columbic efficiency plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium perfluoro-tert-butoxyaluminate (2) in DME cycling at a rate of 10 mVs−1 over 50 cycles on a platinum working electrode, according to some embodiments;



FIG. 7 is a cyclic voltammogram and a columbic efficiency plot of a 0.25 M solution of magnesium phenoxyaluminate (4) in DME cycling at a rate of 10 mVs−1 over 50 cycles on a platinum working electrode, according to some embodiments; and



FIGS. 8A-8H show the charge-discharge behaviour of magnesium full cells containing Chevrel phase cathodes and magnesium anodes and 0.25 M solutions of magnesium aluminates (2) [a) and b)], (3) [c) and d)], (4) [e) and f)], and (5) [g) and h)] in DME at room temperature (rate: C/25) and 55° C. (rate: C/10), according to some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure will now be illustrated with reference to the following examples.


Example 1—Synthesis of Mg(AlH4)2 Precursor

A mixture of sodium aluminum hydride from Acros Organics and magnesium chloride from Alfa Aesar in a ratio of 2:1 was ball-milled for an hour to produce a mixture of magnesium aluminum hydride and sodium chloride, containing a theoretical 42.5 wt % of magnesium aluminum hydride (scheme below).




embedded image


The resulting magnesium aluminum hydride mixture offers a general platform for the synthesis of magnesium aluminates, as will be shown by the following examples.


Example 2—Synthesis of Magnesium Aluminates Using Alcohol

Magnesium aluminates were synthesized by treating magnesium aluminum hydride with various fluorinated/non-fluorinated alkyl and aryl alcohols in dry THF or DME (Scheme below).




embedded image


These reactions were followed by filtration under inert atmosphere to remove insoluble impurities (i.e. sodium chloride and aluminum-containing by-products). The resulting magnesium aluminates were retrieved, typically as THF or DME solvates, in moderate to high yields (77-94%). The particular alcohols that were used in the synthesis were (1) tert-butanol (Sigma-Aldrich); (2) perfluoro-tert-butanol (Alfa Aesar); (3) hexafluoro-iso-propanol (Fluorochem); (4) phenol (Sigma-Aldrich); (5) pentafluorophenol (Fluorochem).


Example 3—Use of Magnesium Aluminates as an Electrolyte Salt

All cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) experiments reported below were performed in a glovebox (MBraun) under an atmosphere of dry argon using dry solvents. Cyclic voltammetry and linear sweep voltammetry were performed using an IVIUM CompactStat.


A solution of each of the magnesium aluminates (1)-(5) in dry organic solvent was prepared at a concentration of 0.25 M. A solution of magnesium tert-butoxyaluminate (1) in THF was found to exhibit poor oxidative stability on stainless steel (ss-316), aluminum, copper, gold, and platinum electrodes, with the onset of oxidation occurring at around 1 V vs magnesium on each electrode, as shown in FIG. 1.


In contrast to magnesium tertbutoxyaluminate (1), magnesium aluminates 2-5 are soluble in DME. The solution of magnesium perfluoro-tert-butoxyaluminate (2) in DME exhibits an extended stability window on the five electrodes tested above, exhibiting onsets of oxidation between 1.9 V (copper) and 2.6 V (platinum) vs magnesium, as shown in FIG. 2. The LSV of aluminate (2) in DME on platinum exhibited a minor anodic process beginning at approximately 1.8 V vs magnesium. Without wishing to be bound by theory, this can be attributed to platinum-catalyzed decomposition of small amounts of residual alcohol starting material.


A 0.25 M solution of magnesium hexafluoro-iso-propoxyaluminate (3) made by the presently claimed method exhibits an onset of oxidation of around 2.2 V, 2.5 V, and 2.9 V vs magnesium on copper, aluminum, and gold, respectively, as shown in FIG. 3. On platinum and stainless steel, minor anodic processes are observed to begin around 1.5 V and 1.8 V vs magnesium, respectively, with more significant processes beginning around 2.8 to 3 V vs magnesium on both electrodes. As these onsets of oxidation are typically lower than the previously reported values, it is possible that the two electrolyte preparation methods result in different impurities or by-products (i.e. chlorides or Mg alkoxides) that enhance or limit the stability of the solution, and/or passivate the current collectors.


A solution of magnesium phenoxyaluminate (4) in DME exhibits moderate oxidative stability with the electrodes that were tested, showing onsets of oxidation between 1.5 V (aluminum, gold and platinum) and 2.2 V ss-316 vs magnesium, as shown in FIG. 4. A minor anodic process beginning around 1 V vs magnesium is observed on copper, followed by a larger process at approximately 2.3 V vs magnesium.


The solution of magnesium perfluorophenoxyaluminate (5) in DME exhibits an onset of oxidation below 2 V vs magnesium on all electrodes tested, with ss-316 and aluminum exhibiting the lowest onset, as shown in FIG. 5.


CV was used to examine the ability of these 0.25 M magnesium aluminate solutions to facilitate magnesium plating and stripping using a platinum working electrode.


CV measurements of magnesium aluminate (1) in THF as well as magnesium aluminates (3) and (5) in DME did not show evidence of magnesium plating/stripping behaviour between −0.5 V and 1 V vs Mg.


CV of magnesium aluminate (2) in DME shows that this solution facilitates plating and stripping of magnesium using a platinum working electrode over fifty cycles between −0.55 V and 1 V vs magnesium, as shown in FIG. 6. Plating overpotentials decrease over the 50 cycles from approximately −0.45 to −0.15 V vs magnesium. However, Coulombic efficiencies (CE) of the plating-stripping process peak at around 85% around cycle 15 and drops to 60% through cycle 50. This gradual decrease in CE suggests that the electrolyte decomposes during cycling and partially passivates the electrodes.


CV of magnesium aluminate (4) in DME shows clear plating and stripping behaviour on platinum between −0.5 V and 1 V vs magnesium over 50 voltammetric cycles, as shown in FIG. 7. Again, plating overpotentials are observed to decrease from −0.41 V to −0.29 V vs magnesium over the 50 cycles. The CEs of magnesium plating and stripping facilitated by magnesium aluminate (4) increase over the 50 cycles to roughly 95%.


The electrochemical behaviour of 0.25 M DME solutions of magnesium aluminates (2)-(5) was further examined in magnesium full cells constructed using Chevrel phase (Mo6S8) cathodes, magnesium ribbon anodes, and stainless steel current collectors both at room temperature and 55° C.


Generally, the magnesium aluminate electrolytes exhibited better reversibility, maintained higher capacities over more charge-discharge cycles, and could be cycled at higher rates at 55° C. than at room temperature, as shown in FIG. 8. At room temperature, full cells containing magnesium aluminates (2)-(4) typically reached a maximum gravimetric capacity of around 80 mAh·g-1 (FIGS. 8A, 8C, and 8E). However, at 55° C., full cells containing the same electrolytes maintained gravimetric capacities at around 100 mAh·g-1 over 10 charge-discharge cycles with small to moderate overpotentials (FIGS. 8B, 8D, and 8F).


Full cells containing magnesium aluminate (5) exhibited very poor charge-discharge behaviour and significant capacity fade within five cycles at room temperature and 55° C. The full cell performance of magnesium aluminate (5) in DME is consistent with its apparent instability as observed by LSV measurements. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the low stability of the magnesium pentafluorophenyl aluminate (5) may result from the stability of the pentafluorophenoxy anion, which could render it more labile and more easily removed from aluminum.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making an electrolyte, the method comprising: forming a Mg[AlH4]2 precursor by a one-step ball milling process of NaAlH4 and MgCl;combining the Mg[AlH4]2 precursor with a deprotonated alcohol, thiol, amine, or a mixture thereof to create a reaction liquor containing Mg[Al(R)4]2, wherein R represents the deprotonated alcohol, thiol, amine, or the mixture thereof;washing the reaction liquor in an organic solvent selected from the group consisting of dry DME, 2-methyl-THF, diglyme, triglyme, and tetraglyme to obtain a salt; andcombining the salt with an Mg(PF6)2 additive.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, comprising filtering the washed reaction liquor under an inert atmosphere.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the deprotonated alcohol, thiol, amine, or mixture thereof is aromatic.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the deprotonated alcohol, thiol, amine, or mixture thereof is fluorinated.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein an organic moiety of at least one of the deprotonated alcohol, thiol, amine, or a mixture thereof comprises tert-butyl, perfluoro-tert-butyl, hexafluoro-iso-propyl, phenyl, or pentafluorophenyl.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1714770 Sep 2017 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB2018/052537 9/7/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/053400 3/21/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (100)
Number Name Date Kind
3761500 Thomas Sep 1973 A
3993508 Erlichman Nov 1976 A
4047289 Wolff Sep 1977 A
4288381 Dozzi et al. Sep 1981 A
4299986 Cucinella Nov 1981 A
5136046 Park Aug 1992 A
5250784 Muller et al. Oct 1993 A
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995 A
5670652 Drauz et al. Sep 1997 A
5718989 Aoki et al. Feb 1998 A
6616714 Gauthier et al. Sep 2003 B1
7754384 Patoux et al. Jul 2010 B2
8153301 Jiang Apr 2012 B2
8546018 Kajiyama Oct 2013 B2
8722250 Park et al. May 2014 B2
9293766 Liu et al. Mar 2016 B2
9325030 Zidan Apr 2016 B2
9525173 Kagei et al. Dec 2016 B2
9575025 Nakayama et al. Feb 2017 B2
9593024 Thackeray et al. Mar 2017 B2
9692084 Yang et al. Jun 2017 B2
9755272 Gaben Sep 2017 B2
9768450 Song et al. Sep 2017 B2
9843041 Lopez Dec 2017 B2
9893376 Yang et al. Feb 2018 B2
9947916 Oda Apr 2018 B2
9960458 Weicker et al. May 2018 B2
9997774 Hiratsuka Jun 2018 B2
10199649 Beck et al. Feb 2019 B2
10290869 Axelbaum May 2019 B2
10629902 Yu Apr 2020 B2
11616229 Roberts et al. Mar 2023 B2
20020110733 Johnson Aug 2002 A1
20030022063 Paulsen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030129495 Yamato et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030162086 Longhi, Jr. et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040091779 Kang et al. May 2004 A1
20050014065 Jung et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050112466 Jordy et al. May 2005 A1
20060160261 Sheats Jul 2006 A1
20070238019 Laurent et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080263855 Li et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264478 Ahn et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090148764 Kwak et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090214904 Zhou Aug 2009 A1
20100090162 Mohtadi Apr 2010 A1
20100108939 Breger et al. May 2010 A1
20100233542 Endo et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248033 Kumar et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110126402 Kwak et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110129594 Kwak et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168944 Chang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110291043 Wilcox et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110294015 Pirk et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311883 Oukassi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120183855 Wohlfahrt-Mehrens et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120225199 Muthu et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120270114 Reynolds et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120312474 Kwak et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120321815 Song et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130040201 Manthiram Feb 2013 A1
20130160283 Wu Jun 2013 A1
20130260248 Seki et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130298387 Kobier et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140000100 Oh et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140007418 Song et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140120397 Kim et al. May 2014 A1
20140154555 Endoh et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140154581 Kawasato et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140178748 Chernyshov et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140227594 Song et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140227609 Frey et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140242463 Song Aug 2014 A1
20140255603 Xiao et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150010822 Nakahara et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150010872 Schindler et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150050522 Manthiram et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150064558 Seki et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150102530 Wallace et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150180031 Thackeray et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150188186 Bedjaoui et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150280201 Bhardwaj Oct 2015 A1
20160164088 Peralta et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160164092 Stottlemyer Jun 2016 A1
20160218362 Kagei et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160218364 Sakai et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160254539 Kagei et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160294010 Herb et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160372783 Min et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170133678 Ozoemena et al. May 2017 A1
20190044182 Maeda et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190115627 Rendall Apr 2019 A1
20190334171 Ozoemena Oct 2019 A1
20200280099 Keyzer et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200335786 Roberts et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200377376 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200381718 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200381724 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200381725 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200381726 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
2527207 Dec 2004 CA
1404635 Mar 2003 CN
1458706 Nov 2003 CN
1464573 Dec 2003 CN
1610154 Apr 2005 CN
101128941 Feb 2008 CN
101562245 Oct 2009 CN
101694876 Apr 2010 CN
101855770 Oct 2010 CN
102054986 May 2011 CN
102074700 May 2011 CN
102881873 Jan 2013 CN
103035900 Apr 2013 CN
103066274 Apr 2013 CN
103311513 Sep 2013 CN
103545519 Jan 2014 CN
103887562 Jun 2014 CN
105047898 Nov 2015 CN
105742607 Jul 2016 CN
105810934 Jul 2016 CN
103943844 Aug 2016 CN
106410186 Feb 2017 CN
106573795 Apr 2017 CN
104241633 Sep 2017 CN
4227720 Apr 1993 DE
1189296 Mar 2002 EP
2746288 Jun 2014 EP
2763219 Aug 2014 EP
2827430 Jan 2015 EP
3093272 Nov 2016 EP
1402544 Aug 1975 GB
2128604 May 1984 GB
45-035555 Nov 1970 JP
57-96472 Jun 1982 JP
S64-21870 Jan 1989 JP
H4-269721 Sep 1992 JP
09-237631 Sep 1997 JP
2000-149911 May 2000 JP
2002-343342 Nov 2002 JP
2003-226955 Aug 2003 JP
2005-044801 Feb 2005 JP
2005-100947 Apr 2005 JP
2005-150093 Jun 2005 JP
2005-150102 Jun 2005 JP
2006-294597 Oct 2006 JP
2007-503102 Feb 2007 JP
2009-182273 Aug 2009 JP
2009-246236 Oct 2009 JP
2009-544141 Dec 2009 JP
2010-251075 Nov 2010 JP
2011-108603 Jun 2011 JP
2012-129166 Jul 2012 JP
2013-506945 Feb 2013 JP
2014-510372 Apr 2014 JP
2014-112476 Jun 2014 JP
2014-146458 Aug 2014 JP
2014-529176 Oct 2014 JP
2014-531718 Nov 2014 JP
2014-531719 Nov 2014 JP
2017-521848 Aug 2017 JP
10-2004-0096063 Nov 2004 KR
10-2014-0081468 Jul 2014 KR
10-2016-0091172 Aug 2016 KR
10-2017-0008540 Jan 2017 KR
10-2017-0025874 Mar 2017 KR
201145648 Dec 2011 TW
2006027925 Mar 2006 WO
2006071972 Jul 2006 WO
2009055529 Apr 2009 WO
2010036723 Apr 2010 WO
2011039132 Apr 2011 WO
2011052607 May 2011 WO
2012065767 May 2012 WO
2013021955 Feb 2013 WO
2013035519 Mar 2013 WO
2013118659 Aug 2013 WO
2013146723 Oct 2013 WO
2015007586 Jan 2015 WO
2015053357 Apr 2015 WO
2015107194 Jul 2015 WO
2016001884 Jan 2016 WO
2016210419 Dec 2016 WO
2017047280 Mar 2017 WO
2017087403 May 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (77)
Entry
Birrozzi et al. (2016). “Beneficial effect of propane sultone and tris(trimethylsilyl) borate as electrolyte additives on the cycling stability of the lithium rich nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) oxide,” Journal of Power Sources 325:525-533.
Cucinella et al. (1982). “Calcium Alkoxyalanates I. Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 224(1): 1-12.
Hudson et al. (2007). “Studies on Synthesis and Dehydrogenation Behavior of Magnesium Alanate and Magnesium-Sodium Alanate Mixture,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32(18): 4933-4938.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 19, 2018, directed to International Application No. PCT/GB2018/052537; 20 pages.
Mehrotra et al. (Jan. 1978). “Preparation and Characterization of Some Volatile Double Isopropoxides of Aluminium with Alkaline Earth Metals,” Inorganica Chemica Acta 29:131-136.
Metz et al. (2002). “Weakly Coordinating A1-, Nb-, Ta-, Y-, and La-Based Perfluoroaryloxymetalate Anions as Cocatalyst Components for Single-Site Olefin Polymerization,” Organometallics 21(18): 3691-3702.
Park et al. (Apr. 2004). “Structural investigation and electrochemical behaviour of Li[NixLi(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2 compounds by a simple combustion method,” Journal of Power Sources 129: 288-295.
Park et al. (May 2010). “Suppression of O2 evolution from oxide cathode for lithium-ion batteries: VOx-impregnated 0.5Li2MnO3-0.5LiNi0.4Co0.2Mn0.4O2 cathode,” Chemical Communications, 46(23): 4190-4192.
Search Report dated May 30, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1714770.3; 2 pages.
Thackeray et al. (Aug. 2006). “Comments on the structural complexity of lithium-rich Li1+xM1-xO2 electrodes (M+Mn, Ni, Co) for lithium batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications 8(9):1531-1538.
Turova et al. (1977). “Hydrolysis and Alcoholysis of Alkali Metal Aluminium Hydrides,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, 21: 157-161.
Wu et al. (Mar. 2006). “High Capacity, Surface-Modified Layered Li[Li(1-x)/3Mn(2-x)/3Nix/3Cox/3]O2 Cathodes with Low Irreversible Capacity Loss,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 9(5): A221-A224.
Yasushi et al. (Nov. 16, 1984) “CAS No. [32843-22-4] Aluminate(1-), tetrakis(diphenylaminato)-, magnesium,” (2 pages).
Govil et al., “Some Double Ethoxides of Alkaline Earth Metals with Aluminium”, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry, vol. 5, No. 4, 1975, pp. 267-277.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052537, dated Mar. 26, 2020, 13 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052538, dated Mar. 26, 2020, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053655, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053656, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053657, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053659, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053660, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053663, dated Jul. 2, 2020, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052538, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053655, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053656, dated Feb. 15, 2019, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053657, dated Apr. 15, 2019, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053659, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053660, dated Feb. 14, 2019, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053663, dated Sep. 15, 2019, 10 pages.
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7010108, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7010109, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application 1721179.8; 2 pages.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721177.2; 2 pages.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721178.0; 2 pages.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721180.6; 2 pages.
Search Report dated May 30, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1714771.1; 2 pages.
Meese-Marktscheffel et al., “Magnesium-aluminum alkoxides: the synthesis of Mg[Al(OR)4]2 (R=Busec and Ph), structure of (thf)2Mg[(μ-OPh)2Al (OPh))2]2, and dynamic NMR of Mg[Al(OBusec)4]2”, Polyhedron, 1994, vol. 13, No. 6-7, pp. 1045-1050.
Office Action received for Japanese Application No. 2020-515116, dated Oct. 12, 2021, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document).
Breger et al. “High-resolution X-ray diffraction, DIFFaX, NMR and first principles study of disorder in the Li2MnO3-Li[Ni1/2Mn1/2]O2 solid solution”, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 178 (2005) 2575-2585.
Jiang et al “Electrochemical and structural study of the layered, “Li-excess” lithium-ion battery electrode material Li[Li1/9Ni1/3Mn5/9]O2”, Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2733-2745.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081413.3, dated Mar. 15, 2022, 17 pages (10 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552157, dated Jan. 25, 2022, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document).
Park et al., “The Effects of Ni Doping on the Performance of O3-Lithium Manganese Oxide Material”, Korean J. Chem. Eng., vol. 21, No. 5, 2004, pp. 983-988.
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552157, dated Jun. 21, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552160, dated Jul. 5, 2021, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document).
Notification of Reason(S) for Refusal received for Korean Application No. 10-2020-7018773, dated Sep. 23, 2021, 12 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552161, dated Sep. 7, 2021, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552159, dated Sep. 7, 2021, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018774, dated Sep. 23, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Peretich, A.L., Amenta, D.S., Gilje, J.W. et al. “Crystal Structure of [Me2NCH(O)]2Mg[(|j-OPri)2Al(OPri)2]2”. J Chem Crystallogr40, 716-719 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-010-9783-x.
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020552156 dated Sep. 7, 2021, 12 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document).
Jang et al., Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 1 (1) 13-16 (1998) (Year: 1998).
Xu et al. English machine translation of CN103066274A. (Year: 2013).
Zhang et al. English machine translation of CN105047898A. (Year: 2015).
Kim et al.; “Synthesis and electrochemical behavior of Li[Li0.1Ni0.35-x/2CoxMn0.55-x/2]O2 cathode materials”; Solid State Ionics 164, pp. 43-49. (Year: 2003).
Kim et al.; (“Electrochemical properties of Li[Li(1-x)/3CoxMn(2-2x)/3]O2 (0<x<1) solid solutions prepared by poly-vinyl alcohol method”; Electrochemistry Communications 9, pp. 103-108. (Year: 2007).
Sun et al.; “The preparation and electrochemical performance of solid solutions LiCoO2-Li2MnO3 as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries”; Electrochimica Acta 51, pp. 5581-5586. (Year: 2006).
Thackeray et al. “Li2MnO3-stabilized LiMO2 (M=Mn, Ni, Co) electrodes for lithium-ion batteries”; J. of Materials Chemistry, vol. 17, No. 30, pp. 3053-3272. (Year: 2007).
Xiang et al.; “Understanding the Influence of Composition and Synthesis Temperature on Oxygen Loss, Reversible Capacity, and Electrochemical Behavior of xLi2MnO3 (1-x)LiCoO2 Cathodes in the First Cycle”; J. Phys. Chem. 118, pp. 23553-23558. (Year: 2014).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552158, dated Aug. 10, 2022, 8 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018911, dated Feb. 14, 2022, 16 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018912, dated Aug. 17, 2022, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018912, dated Feb. 14, 2022, 16 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Lee et al., “High capacity Li[Li0.2Ni0.2Mn0.6]O2 cathode materials via a carbonate co-precipitation method,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 162, No. 2, Sep. 12, 2006, pp. 1346-1350.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081264.0, dated Feb. 7, 2022, 19 pages (11 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Jiang et al., “Electrochemical and thermal studies of Li[NixLi(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2 (x=1/12, 1/4, 5/12, and 1/2)”, Electrochemica Acta, vol. 50, 2005, pp. 4778-4783.
Lu et al. (Apr. 2002). “Synthesis, Structure, and Electrochemical Behavior of Li[Nixli(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 149(6): A778-A791.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081346.5, dated Jan. 27, 2022, 19 pages (11 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018752, dated Nov. 16, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Synthesis and performance studies of lithium-rich cathode materials Li[Li(1-x)/3Ni2x/3Mn(2-x)/3]O2 and Li[Li(1-x)/3NixMn(2-2x)/3]O2, Tiantian WU, China Master's Theses Full-text Database: Engineering Technology vol. II, No. 7.
Yang et al., “Porous 0.2Li2MnO3-0.8LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 nanorods as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries”, ESI for J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 2, 2013, p. 5.
Zhang et al., “Synthesis and electrochemistry of layered 0.6LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2-xLi2MnO3-yLiCoO2 (x+y=0.4) cathode materials”, Materials Letters, vol. 58, 2004, pp. 3197-3200.
Feng-min et al., “Recent Developments on Li-ion Batteries positive materials,” Battery Bimonthly, vol. 33, No. 6, Dec. 30, 2003, 3 pages.
Hu et al., “Electric Vehicles 3rd Edition” Section 2 Power Battery, vol. 3, Jan. 31, 2003, 12 pages.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081278.2, dated Jan. 26, 2022, 18 pages (10 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Second Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081278.2, dated Jun. 29, 2022, 20 pages (13 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Original Document).
Third Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081278.2, dated Oct. 19, 2022, 14 pages (9 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200220221 A1 Jul 2020 US