Methods for non-lot-based manufacturing of articles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8600540
  • Patent Number
    8,600,540
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 13, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 3, 2013
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method for continuous, non lot-based manufacturing of integrated circuit (IC) devices of the type to each have a unique fuse identification (ID) includes: reading the fuse ID of each of the IC devices; advancing multiple lots of the IC devices through, for example, a test step in the manufacturing process in a substantially continuous manner; generating data, such as test data, related to the advancement of each of the IC devices through the step in the process; and associating the data generated for each of the IC devices with the fuse ID of its associated IC device.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates in general to integrated circuit (IC) manufacturing and, more specifically, to methods for tracking IC devices in a substantially continuous flow of IC devices from multiple lots through one or more steps in an IC manufacturing process.


2. State of the Art


Integrated circuits (ICs) are small electronic circuits formed on the surface of a wafer of semiconductor material, such as silicon, in an IC manufacturing process referred to as “fabrication.” Once fabricated, ICs are probed to evaluate a variety of their electronic characteristics, cut from the wafer on which they were formed into discrete IC dice or “chips,” and then assembled for customer use using various well-known IC packaging techniques, including lead frame packaging, Chip-On-Board (COB) packaging, and flip-chip packaging.


During the manufacturing process, ICs generally undergo a variety of tests to ensure they will function properly once shipped. Testing typically involves a variety of known test steps, such as speed grading, burn-in, and final, which test ICs for defects and functionality and grade ICs for speed.


ICs are typically tracked through the fabrication, probe, assembly, and test steps described above so correlations can be found between the results of tests performed on ICs in the test steps and the “path” the ICs took through the manufacturing process. For example, by tracking a group of ICs through the manufacturing process, it might be determined that ICs wire-bonded on a particular wire-bonding machine have an unusually high failure rate when tested. Similarly, it might be determined that a test machine itself is failing a disproportionate number of ICs. In either case, tracking ICs through the manufacturing process allows the source of a problem to be pinpointed and addressed.


As shown in FIG. 1, a conventional procedure 10 for tracking ICs through a process step 12 in an IC manufacturing process involves the use of lot numbers for the ICs. Lot numbers are first assigned to wafers during fabrication. Typically, a group of 20-50 wafers receives a single unique lot number (e.g., 36/1/9970). As the group of wafers proceeds to probe, the wafers are typically split into several sub-lots, with each sub-lot being assigned a new lot number (sometimes referred to as a “sub-lot” number) that is a modified form of the group's original lot number (e.g., 36/1/9970/0, 36/1/9970/1, . . . ). As the group continues through the manufacturing process, sub-lots are split and re-split for a variety of reasons until the group is typically split into many sub-lots, all having a unique lot number that is a modified form of the group's original lot number.


In the conventional tracking procedure 10, a sub-lot (e.g., sub-lot H) is received from an input queue 14 where sub-lots wait to proceed through the process step 12. The process step 12 may be any step in the IC manufacturing process including, for example, probe, wafer saw, speed grading, burn-in, or final testing.


As a sub-lot advances through the process step 12, data 16 related to the process step 12 is generated. Such data 16 may include, for example: an identification of the processing equipment and the operating personnel for the process step 12; information regarding the set-up of the process step 12; the time and date the sub-lot advanced through the process step 12; and yield and test results from the process step 12.


Once a sub-lot has advanced through the process step 12, a process report 18 is manually or automatically generated based on the generated data 16. To associate the process report 18, and hence the data 16, with the ICs in the sub-lot, and thus track the ICs through the process step 12, the process report 18 lists the lot number (e.g., “H”) of the ICs in the sub-lot. Typically, the process report 18 also physically accompanies the sub-lot through the remainder of the manufacturing process to ensure that the data 16 is correlated with the ICs in the sub-lot, although this is not necessary if other indicia identifying the lot number of the ICs in the sub-lot physically accompany the sub-lot through the manufacturing process.


With the process report 18 generated, a processed sub-lot (e.g., sub-lot H) is cleared from equipment associated with the process step 12 to an output queue 20 to prepare the process step 12 for processing another sub-lot (e.g., sub-lot I). Once the processed sub-lot is cleared, the next sub-lot can be processed. This “clearing” process is necessary because if two sub-lots (e.g., sub-lots H and I) proceed through the process step 12 in a continuous manner, the conventional tracking procedure 10 is unable to correlate the data 16 and the process report 18 generated as each of the two sub-lots proceed with the correct sub-lot. Instead, the data 16 for the two sub-lots is mixed, causing the conventional tracking procedure 10 to fail to uniquely track the two sub-lots through the process step 12.


The conventional tracking procedure described above is problematic because it makes inefficient use of often very expensive manufacturing and test equipment and other resources by leaving sub-lots “parked” in input queues while process reports are generated and the equipment is cleared of already processed sub-lots. In process steps that use multiple machines in parallel to process a sub-lot, some machines may be idle while other machines finish their allotment from the sub-lot being processed and the next sub-lot waits in an input queue. In addition, generation of the process reports, as well as clearing a processed sub-lot from equipment, often requires laborious manual work by operating personnel. Further, a process report that must physically accompany a sub-lot through the manufacturing process may become lost or damaged, and thus is not as reliable a means of tracking ICs as is desired.


As described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,301,143, 5,294,812, and 5,103,166, some methods have been devised to aid quality control personnel in tracking ICs undergoing failure analysis back to the wafer from which they come. By tracking the ICs back to their wafer, test data related to the ICs can be correlated to the wafer to pinpoint possible problems with the wafer. Such methods take place “off” the manufacturing line and involve the use of electrically retrievable identification (ID) codes, such as so-called “fuse IDs,” programmed into individual ICs to identify the ICs. Fuse IDs and other electrically retrievable ID codes are typically programmed into ICs by blowing selected fuses or anti-fuses in circuitry on the ICs so that the circuitry outputs the ID code when accessed. Unfortunately, none of these methods addresses the inefficiency problems caused by the conventional lot-based tracking procedure described above.


Therefore, there is a need in the art for a procedure for tracking ICs through an IC manufacturing process that uses manufacturing resources more efficiently. Such a procedure should not leave equipment idle while ICs wait to be processed. In addition, such a procedure should achieve a level of reliability not reached by conventional tracking procedures.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An inventive method for tracking IC devices of the type to each have a substantially unique ID code (e.g., a fuse ID) through a step in an IC manufacturing process includes: reading the ID code of each of the IC devices; advancing multiple lots of the IC devices through the step in the manufacturing process in a substantially continuous manner; generating data, such as processing equipment data or test data, related to the advancement of each of the IC devices through the step in the process; and associating the data generated for each of the IC devices with the ID code of its associated IC device.


By associating the data with the ID codes, the inventive method allows the IC devices to be tracked through the step in the process. Further, because multiple lots of the IC devices can advance through the step in the manufacturing process continuously, manufacturing resources are used more efficiently. In addition, because the ID codes and associated data read and generated using the inventive method need not physically accompany ICs as they progress through the manufacturing process, the inventive method is more reliable than conventional tracking procedures.


In another embodiment, a method of manufacturing IC devices from semiconductor wafers includes: providing wafers in multiple lots; fabricating ICs on the wafers; causing each of the ICs to permanently store a substantially unique ID code, such as a fuse ID; separating the ICs from their wafers to form IC dice; assembling the IC dice into IC devices; reading the ID code from the IC in each of the IC devices; testing each of the IC devices; while testing the IC devices: advancing the IC devices from the multiple lots of wafers through at least one test step in a substantially continuous manner; generating data related to the advancement of each of the IC devices through the test step; and associating the data generated for each of the IC devices with the ID code of the IC in its associated IC device.


In a further embodiment, a method for correlating variables related to an IC manufacturing process with variables related to the performance of IC devices as they advance through the process includes: causing each of multiple ICs from multiple lots to permanently store a substantially unique ID code, such as a fuse ID; reading the ID code from each of the IC devices; advancing the IC devices from the multiple lots through at least one step in the manufacturing process in a substantially continuous manner; while the IC devices advance through the step in the manufacturing process, generating data related to process variables associated with the step in the process; generating data related to variables associated with the performance of at least some of the IC devices as they advance through at least one step in the manufacturing process; and associating the process variable-related data and the performance variable-related data generated for each of the IC devices with the ID code of the IC device associated with the data to correlate the process variables with the performance variables.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing a process step in a conventional lot-based IC manufacturing process; and



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing a process step in a substantially continuous, non lot-based IC manufacturing process in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As shown in FIG. 2, an inventive method 30 for tracking IC devices through a step 32 in an IC manufacturing process includes a step 34 of receiving IC devices from multiple, mixed input lots 36. It will be understood by those having skill in the field of this invention that the invention is applicable to any IC devices, including Dynamic Random Access Memories (DRAMs), Static Random Access Memories (SRAMs), Synchronous DRAMs (SDRAMs), processors, Application Specific ICs (ASICs), Read Only Memory (ROM) ICs, Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM) ICs, and to mixtures of different types of IC devices. Further, it will be understood that the process step 32 may be any step in an IC manufacturing process, including assembly and test steps. It will also be understood that the process step 32 may encompass processing by a single machine, part of a machine, many machines operating in series or parallel, or any combination thereof. In addition, it will be understood that the step 34 of receiving IC devices from multiple, mixed input lots 36 is without regard to the lots from which the IC devices come, and thus allows a more efficient use of processing equipment than traditional lot-based procedures. It will also be understood, of course, that although the present invention is described as being implemented in a single process step 32 for ease of understanding, the invention more typically is implemented on a series of process steps, such as all back-end test steps.


The IC devices are each programmed with a unique ID code, such as the well-known fuse ID described above. Briefly, a fuse ID is programmed in an IC device by selectively blowing fuses or anti-fuses in a circuit on the IC device so that when the circuit is accessed, it outputs an ID code. Although it is preferable that the ID code programmed into each IC device be unique by specifying, for example, a lot number, wafer number, and wafer position for the IC device, it is not necessary to implement the present invention. For example, if the ID code is the same for all IC devices derived from the same semiconductor wafer, or from the same lot, it will work for purposes of the present invention.


Before or after the IC devices progress through the process step 32, their ID codes are read and stored in a computer as data 38. As the IC devices progress through the process step 32, data 40 related to the process step 32 is generated for each IC device. Such data 40 may include, for example, process variables such as the processing equipment used, the operating personnel present, the set-up, and the time and date of processing for the process step 32, and performance variables such as yield and test results from the process step 32. The set-up for the process step 32 may include, for example, a standard set-up or a set-up in accordance with a Special Work Request (SWR) by engineering personnel.


The ID code data 38 and process-related data 40 may be automatically correlated by computer with data from process steps prior to the process step 32 through reference to the ID codes common to the ID code data 38 generated in the process step 32 and ID code data generated in the prior process steps. As a result, correlations can be found between process variables, such as the processing equipment used, and performance variables, such as test results. Thus, for example, it might be discerned that the IC devices derived from a particular section of the semiconductor wafers provided by a particular supplier have an unusually high failure rate at a particular test step. The process of correlation is preferably performed in real time so information is available immediately, although it is within the scope of the present invention to perform the correlation at a later time.


Once the IC devices have advanced through the process step 32, the processed IC devices are output from the process step 32 to mixed output lots 42. It should be understood that, in some cases, the processed IC devices must be cleared from processing equipment before other IC devices can be processed, and in other cases, such as in serial-feed machines, processed IC devices are being output from the process step 32 while other IC devices are advancing through the process step 32 and still other IC devices are being received by the process step 32. Any of these cases fall within the scope of the present invention.


It should be understood that by reading the ID codes of processed IC devices and associating those codes with data generated during processing, the inventive method 30 avoids the need for lot-based manufacturing altogether. The mixed input lots 36 and output lots 42 may then be mixed without regard to lots, and the processing of IC devices through the process step 32 may proceed in a substantially continuous fashion, thus dramatically improving the utilization of processing equipment. In addition, because the ID codes and associated data read and generated using the inventive method need not physically accompany ICs as they progress through the manufacturing process, the inventive method is more reliable than conventional tracking procedures.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to a particular embodiment, the invention is not limited to this described embodiment. For example, the present invention includes within its scope the manufacture of Single In-line Memory Modules (SIMMs) and Dual In-line Memory Modules (DIMMs), as well as the IC devices described above. Thus, the invention is limited only by the appended claims, which include within their scope all equivalent methods that operate according to the principles of the invention as described.

Claims
  • 1. A method of tracking an article of manufacture in a manufacturing process, the method comprising: associating an article of manufacture with a substantially unique identification (ID) code, wherein the substantially unique ID code is retrievable from the article of manufacture;advancing the article of manufacture through at least a portion of the manufacturing process with one or more other articles of manufacture without regard to a lot from which any of the articles of manufacture comes;generating data related to the advancement of the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process;associating the data with the substantially unique ID code; andoutputting the article of manufacture to a mixed output lot comprising articles of manufacture from one or more lots different from the lot with which the article of manufacture was associated before advancing through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the substantially unique ID code comprises a machine readable ID code.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein associating an article of manufacture with a substantially unique ID code comprises programming the article of manufacture with the substantially unique ID code.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least a portion of the manufacturing process comprises an act in the manufacturing process.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the article of manufacture comprises an electronic device.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the substantially unique ID code specifies, at least in part, a lot number.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the substantially unique ID code is the same for all electronic devices comprising at least one component from a common source.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the substantially unique ID code is the same for all electronic devices coming from the same lot.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising reading the substantially unique ID code before advancing the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising reading the substantially unique ID code after advancing the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising storing the substantially unique ID code before advancing the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising storing the substantially unique ID code after advancing the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the data comprises process-related data.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the data comprises a process variable.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the data comprises a performance variable.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising determining whether a correlation exists between the process variable and the performance variable.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the data comprises a performance variable.
  • 18. A method of tracking an article of manufacture in a manufacturing process, the method comprising: associating an article of manufacture with a substantially unique identification (ID) code, wherein the substantially unique ID code is retrievable from the article of manufacture;mixing the article of manufacture with other articles of manufacture without regard to lots;advancing the article of manufacture with the other articles of manufacture through at least a portion of the manufacturing process without regard to a lot from which the article of manufacture comes;generating data related to the advancement of the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process;associating the data with the substantially unique ID code; andoutputting the article of manufacture to a mixed output lot comprising articles of manufacture from one or more lots different from the lot with which the article of manufacture was associated before advancing through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
  • 19. A method of tracking an article of manufacture in a manufacturing process, the method comprising: receiving the article of manufacture from a plurality of mixed lots of articles of manufacture without regard to a lot of the plurality of mixed lots of articles of manufacture from which the article of manufacture comes;associating the article of manufacture with a substantially unique identification (ID) code, wherein the substantially unique ID code is retrievable from the article of manufacture;advancing the article of manufacture through at least a portion of the manufacturing process without regard to the lot of the plurality of mixed lots of articles of manufacture from which the article of manufacture comes;generating data related to the advancement of the article of manufacture through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process;associating the data with the substantially unique ID code; andoutputting the article of manufacture to a mixed output lot comprising articles of manufacture from one or more lots different from the lot with which the article of manufacture was associated before advancing through the at least a portion of the manufacturing process.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/776,625, filed May 10, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,315,730, issued Nov. 20, 2012, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/763,104, filed Jun. 14, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,988, issued Jun. 15, 2010, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/205,918, filed Jul. 25, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,358, issued Jun. 30, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/137,781, filed Aug. 20, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,092, issued Jul. 30, 2002, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/822,731, filed Mar. 24, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,923, issued Jan. 5, 1999, which is related to the following applications: Ser. No. 08/591,238, filed Jan. 17, 1996, now abandoned; Ser. No. 08/664,109, filed Jun. 13, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,962, issued Apr. 20, 1999; Ser. No. 08/785,353, filed Jan. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,512, issued Jul. 27, 1999; Ser. No. 08/801,565, filed Feb. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,844,803 issued Dec. 1, 1998; Ser. No. 08/806,442, filed Feb. 26, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,231, issued Jun. 22, 1999; and Ser. No. 08/871,015, filed Jun. 6, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,492, issued May 25, 1999. The disclosure of each of the previously referenced U.S. patent applications and patents is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (176)
Number Name Date Kind
4027246 Caccoma et al. May 1977 A
4032949 Bierig Jun 1977 A
4150331 Lacher et al. Apr 1979 A
4454413 Morton Jun 1984 A
4455495 Masuhara et al. Jun 1984 A
4460999 Schmidt Jul 1984 A
4510673 Shils et al. Apr 1985 A
4534014 Ames Aug 1985 A
4667403 Edinger et al. May 1987 A
4736373 Schmidt Apr 1988 A
4796194 Atherton Jan 1989 A
4871963 Cozzi et al. Oct 1989 A
4954453 Venutolo et al. Sep 1990 A
4958373 Usami et al. Sep 1990 A
4967381 Lane et al. Oct 1990 A
4985988 Littlebury et al. Jan 1991 A
5003251 Fuoco Mar 1991 A
5014208 Wolfson May 1991 A
5043657 Amazeen et al. Aug 1991 A
5103166 Jeon et al. Apr 1992 A
5105362 Kotani et al. Apr 1992 A
5110754 Lowrey et al. May 1992 A
5118369 Shamir et al. Jun 1992 A
5150331 Harris Sep 1992 A
5175774 Truax et al. Dec 1992 A
5197650 Monzen et al. Mar 1993 A
5217834 Higaki et al. Jun 1993 A
5219765 Yoshida et al. Jun 1993 A
5226118 Baker et al. Jul 1993 A
5235550 Zagar et al. Aug 1993 A
5253208 Kang Oct 1993 A
5256562 Vu et al. Oct 1993 A
5256578 Corley et al. Oct 1993 A
5271796 Miyashita et al. Dec 1993 A
5289113 Meaney et al. Feb 1994 A
5294812 Hashimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5296402 Ryou Mar 1994 A
5301143 Ohri et al. Apr 1994 A
5326709 Moon et al. Jul 1994 A
5345110 Renfro et al. Sep 1994 A
5347463 Nakamura et al. Sep 1994 A
5350715 Lee et al. Sep 1994 A
5352945 Casper Oct 1994 A
5355320 Erjavic et al. Oct 1994 A
5360747 Larson et al. Nov 1994 A
5375062 Aoki Dec 1994 A
5399531 Wu Mar 1995 A
5420796 Weling et al. May 1995 A
5424652 Hembree et al. Jun 1995 A
5428311 McClure Jun 1995 A
5440493 Doida Aug 1995 A
5442561 Yoshizawa et al. Aug 1995 A
5448488 Oshima Sep 1995 A
5450326 Black Sep 1995 A
5467304 Uchida et al. Nov 1995 A
5477493 Danbayashi Dec 1995 A
5483175 Ahmad et al. Jan 1996 A
5495417 Fuduka et al. Feb 1996 A
5504369 Dasse et al. Apr 1996 A
5511005 Abbe et al. Apr 1996 A
5516028 Rasp et al. May 1996 A
5537325 Iwakiri et al. Jul 1996 A
5538141 Gross, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5539235 Allee Jul 1996 A
5550838 Okajima Aug 1996 A
5563832 Kagami Oct 1996 A
5567927 Kahn et al. Oct 1996 A
5568408 Maeda Oct 1996 A
5570293 Tanaka et al. Oct 1996 A
5581510 Furusho et al. Dec 1996 A
5590069 Levin Dec 1996 A
5600171 Makihara et al. Feb 1997 A
5603412 Gross, Jr. et al. Feb 1997 A
5606193 Ueda et al. Feb 1997 A
5617366 Yoo Apr 1997 A
5619469 Joo et al. Apr 1997 A
5625816 Burdick et al. Apr 1997 A
5642307 Jernigan et al. Jun 1997 A
5654204 Anderson et al. Aug 1997 A
5726074 Yabe et al. Mar 1998 A
5764650 Debenham Jun 1998 A
5787012 Levitt et al. Jul 1998 A
5787190 Peng et al. Jul 1998 A
5801067 Shaw et al. Sep 1998 A
5801965 Takagi et al. Sep 1998 A
5805472 Fukasawa Sep 1998 A
5822218 Moosa et al. Oct 1998 A
5828778 Hagi et al. Oct 1998 A
5837558 Zuniga et al. Nov 1998 A
5844803 Beffa et al. Dec 1998 A
5856923 Jones et al. Jan 1999 A
5865319 Okuda et al. Feb 1999 A
5867505 Beffa et al. Feb 1999 A
5889674 Burdick et al. Mar 1999 A
5890807 Igel et al. Apr 1999 A
5895962 Zheng et al. Apr 1999 A
5907492 Akram et al. May 1999 A
5915231 Beffa et al. Jun 1999 A
5927512 Beffa et al. Jul 1999 A
5946497 Lee et al. Aug 1999 A
5950012 Shiell et al. Sep 1999 A
5963881 Kahn et al. Oct 1999 A
5976899 Farnworth et al. Nov 1999 A
5991699 Kulkarni et al. Nov 1999 A
5994915 Farnworth et al. Nov 1999 A
6000830 Asano et al. Dec 1999 A
6018686 Orso et al. Jan 2000 A
6049624 Wilson et al. Apr 2000 A
6055463 Cheong et al. Apr 2000 A
6067507 Beffa et al. May 2000 A
6072574 Zeimantz et al. Jun 2000 A
6075216 Nakamura et al. Jun 2000 A
6100486 Beffa et al. Aug 2000 A
6122563 Beffa et al. Sep 2000 A
6130442 Di Zenzo et al. Oct 2000 A
6138256 Debenham et al. Oct 2000 A
6147316 Beffa et al. Nov 2000 A
6148307 Burdick et al. Nov 2000 A
6190972 Zheng et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194738 Debenham et al. Feb 2001 B1
6208947 Beffa Mar 2001 B1
6219810 Debenham Apr 2001 B1
6226394 Wilson et al. May 2001 B1
6259520 Zeimantz Jul 2001 B1
6265232 Simmons Jul 2001 B1
6292009 Farnworth et al. Sep 2001 B1
6307171 Beffa Oct 2001 B1
6350959 Beffa Feb 2002 B1
6363295 Akram Mar 2002 B1
6363329 Beffa Mar 2002 B2
6365421 Debenham et al. Apr 2002 B2
6365860 Beffa Apr 2002 B1
6365861 Beffa Apr 2002 B1
6373011 Beffa Apr 2002 B1
6373566 Zeimantz Apr 2002 B2
6400840 Wilson et al. Jun 2002 B2
6424168 Farnworth et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427092 Jones et al. Jul 2002 B1
6437271 Beffa Aug 2002 B1
6441897 Zeimantz Aug 2002 B1
6504123 Beffa Jan 2003 B2
6529793 Beffa Mar 2003 B1
6534785 Farnworth et al. Mar 2003 B1
6553276 Akram et al. Apr 2003 B2
6588854 Wilson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6594611 Beffa Jul 2003 B2
6613590 Simmons Sep 2003 B2
6636068 Farnworth Oct 2003 B2
6654114 Zeimantz Nov 2003 B2
6703573 Beffa Mar 2004 B2
6725121 Pasadyn et al. Apr 2004 B1
6788993 Beffa Sep 2004 B2
6895538 Benedix et al. May 2005 B2
6944567 Beffa Sep 2005 B2
7107117 Beffa Sep 2006 B2
7117063 Beffa Oct 2006 B2
7120287 Wilson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120513 Akram et al. Oct 2006 B1
7124050 Beffa Oct 2006 B2
7155300 Akram et al. Dec 2006 B2
7169625 Davis et al. Jan 2007 B2
RE39518 Toprac et al. Mar 2007 E
7276672 Beffa Oct 2007 B2
7337034 Lensing et al. Feb 2008 B1
7368678 Beffa May 2008 B2
7446277 Beffa Nov 2008 B2
7502659 Beffa Mar 2009 B2
7517708 Deshpande et al. Apr 2009 B2
7555358 Jones et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561938 Akram et al. Jul 2009 B2
7682847 Beffa Mar 2010 B2
7738988 Jones et al. Jun 2010 B2
20050228606 Beffa Oct 2005 A1
20070094632 Beffa Apr 2007 A1
20090038997 Beffa Feb 2009 A1
20100222913 Jones et al. Sep 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
0849675 Jun 1998 EP
58050728 Mar 1983 JP
58052814 Mar 1983 JP
58060529 Apr 1983 JP
61120433 Jun 1986 JP
02164017 Jun 1990 JP
02246312 Oct 1990 JP
04080949 Mar 1992 JP
04318911 Nov 1992 JP
05013529 Jan 1993 JP
05074909 Mar 1993 JP
05121573 May 1993 JP
05315207 Nov 1993 JP
06013443 Jan 1994 JP
06267809 Sep 1994 JP
06349691 Dec 1994 JP
07050233 Feb 1995 JP
07066091 Mar 1995 JP
07335510 Dec 1995 JP
08162380 Jun 1996 JP
10104315 Apr 1998 JP
11008327 Jan 1999 JP
1151333 Apr 1985 SU
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Fresonke, Dean, In-Fab Identification of Silicon Wafers with Clean, Laser Marked Barcodes, Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop, 1994, IEEE/SEMI, pp. 157-160.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US1998/05921, mailed Sep. 3, 1998, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130006411 A1 Jan 2013 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 12776625 May 2010 US
Child 13615018 US
Parent 11763104 Jun 2007 US
Child 12776625 US
Parent 10205918 Jul 2002 US
Child 11763104 US
Parent 09137781 Aug 1998 US
Child 10205918 US
Parent 08822731 Mar 1997 US
Child 09137781 US