Devices such as multifunction peripheral (MFP) devices are capable of multiple functions such as copying, scanning and printing. These device may receive jobs such as electronic print jobs or files from a connected host device such a PC, or over a network such as a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN), and from user activation of a local front panel. If multiple users attempt to simultaneously operate an MFP from different locations, difficulties can arise.
In the following detailed description and in the several figures of the drawing, like elements are identified with like reference numerals. The figures are not to scale, and relative feature sizes may be exaggerated for illustrative purposes.
An exemplary embodiment may provide a method for operating the user interfaces (UIs) of a device such as an MFP device while the device is under simultaneous user operations from different interfaces and access points.
An exemplary operating environment is illustrated in
In this exemplary environment, each MFP may operate in multiple simultaneous job contexts, such as one for printing and another for device administration. This multi-job simultaneous handling is done through a job context switch (e.g., time sharing). The job context switch may also be responsible for handling resource conflicts between job contexts (e.g., use of the scanner).
Each job context has associated with it an instance of the device's UI. Each UI instance is a derivative of one of the device's native UI states. That is, the device creates a common virtual UI per interface access, independent of the access point. An access point adaptor converts the virtual UI into a physical UI instance.
Some job contexts may have shared UIs. For example, if two users are both viewing the device's job queue, the virtual UI for each user would be the same device UI state. In other cases, the job contexts may have different UIs. For example, if two users are entering job parameters, the virtual UI for each user may be a different instance derived from the same initial device UI state.
If a change in one virtual UI state would effect a change in one or more separate virtual UI states, the corresponding virtual UI states are updated accordingly. For example, if an administrative assistant places a device into an offline state from an administrative menu, each virtual UI associated with a job menu may be updated with an offline indicator.
An exemplary operating environment 20 is schematically illustrated in
MFP 30 has a controller 32, a local access point 34 which may be a front panel and corresponding local or native UI, a UI switch controller 36 and an access point adaptor 38. The MFP 30 is communicatively connected to at least one remote access point 52, in this example provided by host 50. MFP 40 similarly has a controller 42, a local access point 44 such as a front panel and corresponding local or native UI, a UI switch controller 48, and an access point adaptor 48. The MFP 40 is communicatively connected to at least one remote access point 56, in this example provided by host 50. In an exemplary embodiment, the device controller 32 and 42 may be implemented by a microcomputer or an ASIC, and may include a digital memory. The UI switch controller 36 and 46 may be implemented as a firmware module in the MFP.
The host 50 may be connected to the MFPs by a local area network, a wide area network, by internet connections, or by other connection technologies. For example, the MFP devices, the host 50 and remote access points may be communicatively coupled, such as by TCP/IP, Apple Talk, IEEE 1284 Parallel Port, IrDA, Bluetooth, WiFi, other wireless protocols, and local ports (e.g., serial, USB). The host 50 may be a personal computer or a server, for example, and includes a device administrator utility program 54, which may be configured to control each MFP 30 and 40.
Via the remote access point, each MFP device can project a replica of the MFP's front panel UI, such as through a web browser. Thus, the device A UI is projected through the remote access point 52 to provide a remote replica of the UI as rendered device A UI 36-A. The device B UI is projected through the remote access point 56 to provide a remote replica of the UI as rendered device B UI 46-A. Each MFP may be operated in the same manner from the remote UI 36-A and 46-A, respectively, as with the local UI 36 and 46, respectively. Changes made on the remote UI are reflected back on the local UI and vice-versa.
All the MFP's UI states are represented (either statically or dynamically) in a device independent manner. One UI state represents the root UI state, from which all other UI states are derived from. A root UI state may be anything, such as a welcome screen with an enter button, a top level job choice menu, or a user login. In an exemplary embodiment, the root UI state is the first UI presented to the user when the device is first activated.
The MFP may perform multiple simultaneous jobs which are independently initiated. Each simultaneous job has an associated sequence of UI states 60 (
For example, the MFP may be performing two print jobs 1 and 2 and a scan job 3. The MFP controller time slices operations between the jobs as to avoid resource conflicts and achieve optimal output performance. For example, the MFP may do the following time slices:
One or more of the above operations, when not in resource conflict, may also be performed in parallel.
When a job context switch is made, the current job context 60 is loaded into the device controller 32 of exemplary device 30 (
A virtual UI may be associated with a physical display as illustrated in
Inputs may also be received through the physically rendered UI 102, which are then mapped back to the access point adaptor 38, converted to the display independent format by the operation 38-2 (
When the job context is switched out, the UI state at the time of the switch out is saved back in the job context as the current UI state. Switching out a job context in this exemplary embodiment relates to parallel job processing, i.e., if the MFP device is doing two jobs at the same time, the device may do chunks of one, then the other and so forth. Switching out a job may also apply to suspending and resuming a job.
In an exemplary embodiment illustrated in
Simultaneously, the second job context (e.g., print job #2) may be associated with another remote access point, such as a remote application interface (RAI) 92 (
Simultaneously, the third job context may be associated with both a local and remote access point 94A, 94B. In this case, the virtual UI 72-3 is mapped via the access point adaptor 38 to both the physical displays associated with the local and remote access points. Both manifested UIs would be replicas of the other, within display capabilities. Inputs entered through one manifested UI would affect the same change as if entered via the other manifested UI. Any change in UI state is then propagated to each manifested UI.
For example, the user may initiate a scan-to-application job from a host PC. The application may have a remote application interface, such as remote access 52 or 56 (
In an exemplary embodiment, two or more virtual UIs may be connected as a single logical UI, such as the shared UI context state 60 (
In one mode, a logical UI has a single virtual UI. For example, two users may be using the MFP simultaneously, such as printing a print job. Each user has a job context and an associated virtual UI (V-UI) connected to a display means, i.e. a physically rendered view, e.g. a browser window, direct print application window on a host PC, etc.
In series, or in parallel, the second user at V-UI #2 generates a second activity 116 (e.g., a print job submission). The UI switch passes the second UI activity to the second job context 118. The job context may then update the current UI state 120. The UI switch then updates the V-UI for the second activity according to the current UI state.
In one mode, a logical UI has multiple virtual UIs. For example, a remote operator technician may assist a walkup user to an MFP device. Both the walkup user and the remote operator have the same job context, but with different associated V-UIs. The walkup user has a V-UI #1 connected to the front panel, while the remote operator has a V-UI #2 connected to a display means (e.g., web browser) on a host PC. The remote operator's UI can be considered a clone of the walkup user's UI.
The remote operator may then generate a second activity 216 (e.g., correcting the user's input). A UI switch passes the second UI activity to the single job context as 218. The job context may then update the current UI state 220 as a result of performing actions associated with the second UI activity. The UI switch then updates the V-UIs for both the walkup user and remote operator for the current UI state (222 and 224).
While an exemplary embodiment may be practiced on an imaging related device, other applications include other multi-user peripheral devices, such as a set-top box, a computer, a communication switch, and a gaming device.
Although the foregoing has been a description and illustration of specific embodiments of the subject matter, various modifications and changes thereto can be made by persons skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the subject matter as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4982344 | Jordan | Jan 1991 | A |
5333286 | Weinberger et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5699494 | Colbert et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5937150 | Phan | Aug 1999 | A |
7343627 | Gaebel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7895594 | Kirilline et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020122203 | Matsuda | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030053105 | Morooka et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040061729 | Green et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040260790 | Balloni et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022210 | Zintel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050162675 | Ferlitsch | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050259277 | Ferlitsch | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283735 | Ferlitsch et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060026600 | Yoshida | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039012 | Ferlitsch | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060098221 | Ferlitsch | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129746 | Porter | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158674 | Mizoguchi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070028182 | Kong | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070288857 | Boyer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080244216 | Zilavy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 293 884 | Mar 2003 | EP |
07-073011 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07-0730311 | Mar 1995 | JP |
08234945 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2002-073320 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2007-042065 | Feb 2007 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090190157 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |