This technology generally relates to methods and devices for network traffic management and, more particularly, to methods for optimizing multimedia communications and devices thereof.
H.323 is an ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) recommendation that describes protocols for the provision of audio-visual (A/V) communication sessions on all network packet. Further, the H.323 protocol provides standards for equipment, computers and services for multimedia communication across packet based networks and specifies transmission protocols for real-time video, audio and data details. Accordingly, H.323 is widely used in IP based videoconferencing, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and Internet telephony where users can communicate through the Internet and make use of a variety of products that are H.323 standard compatible.
When using the H.323 protocol, a call can be initiated using one of three techniques. One of these techniques is where a caller creates a TCP connection to a recipient using an H.225 protocol call signaling technique and then creates another TCP connection using an H.245 protocol to negotiate the necessary media and media control channels. This process is relatively straightforward to execute, but requires sequential negotiation of multiple TCP connections. A second one of these techniques is more streamlined and involves use of a data associated with negotiating the necessary media and the media control channels embedded in an H.245 tunneling bit within the one TCP connection that is established to initiate the call using an H.225 protocol. A third one of these techniques involves initiating the call using the fast start technique of the H.323 protocol, where the caller and the recipient can start media connections as soon as possible thereby making the third technique also streamlined.
Unfortunately, when this type of request to initiate a call using the second or third techniques passes through a proxy device monitoring network traffic, the streamlined, but more complex steps required by these second and third techniques results in an undesirable reduction in the performance of the proxy device monitoring network traffic.
A method for optimizing multimedia communications includes intercepting a request to initiate a call configured to utilize one of plurality of call initiation techniques from a first mobile device to a second mobile device. Next, it is determined when the one of the call initiation techniques in the intercepted request is in a subset of the plurality of call initiation techniques configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment. One or more fields of the intercepted request is modified to disable the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques that is configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment when the determination indicates the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques is in the subset. A permission is provided to the first mobile device to initiate the call with the second mobile device using a sequential call establishment and media control negotiation technique.
A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for optimizing multimedia communications comprising machine executable code which when executed by at least one processor, causes the processor to perform steps including intercepting a request to initiate a call configured to utilize one of plurality of call initiation techniques from a first mobile device to a second mobile device. Next, it is determined when the one of the call initiation techniques in the intercepted request is in a subset of the plurality of call initiation techniques configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment. One or more fields of the intercepted request is modified to disable the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques that is configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment when the determination indicates the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques is in the subset. A permission is provided to the first mobile device to initiate the call with the second mobile device using a sequential call establishment and media control negotiation technique.
A network traffic management apparatus including at least one of configurable hardware logic configured to be capable of implementing or a processor coupled to a memory and configured to execute programmed instructions stored in the memory to intercept a request to initiate a call configured to utilize one of plurality of call initiation techniques from a first mobile device to a second mobile device. Next, it is determined when the one of the call initiation techniques in the intercepted request is in a subset of the plurality of call initiation techniques configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment. One or more fields of the intercepted request is modified to disable the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques that is configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment when the determination indicates the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques is in the subset. A permission is provided to the first mobile device to initiate the call with the second mobile device using a sequential call establishment and media control negotiation technique.
A network traffic management system, comprising one or more traffic management apparatuses, client devices, or server devices, the network traffic management system comprising memory comprising programmed instructions stored thereon and one or more processors configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to intercept a request to initiate a call configured to utilize one of plurality of call initiation techniques from a first mobile device to a second mobile device. Next, it is determined when the one of the call initiation techniques in the intercepted request is in a subset of the plurality of call initiation techniques configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment. One or more fields of the intercepted request is modified to disable the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques that is configured to integrate at least a part of media control negotiation and call establishment when the determination indicates the one of the plurality of call initiation techniques is in the subset. A permission is provided to the first mobile device to initiate the call with the second mobile device using a sequential call establishment and media control negotiation technique.
This technology provides a number of advantages including providing a method, non-transitory computer readable medium, apparatus, and system that effectively assists with optimizing multimedia communications. By using the technique illustrated above, the disclosed technology is able to prevent tunneling of the H.245 protocol over the H.225 connection. Furthermore, the disclosed technology also prevents the requesting mobile device and the receiving mobile device from negotiating the media controls data during the first signaling message thereby preventing undesired behavior of the receiving mobile computing device and the requesting mobile computing device. Additionally, the disclosed technology also increases the runtime performance as less time is required to monitor and manager network traffic between the requesting mobile computing device and the receiving mobile computing device.
An example of a network environment 10 which incorporates a network traffic management system for optimizing network communication using H.323 protocol with the network traffic manager apparatus 14 is illustrated in
Referring more specifically to
The network traffic manager apparatus 14 assists with optimizing multimedia communications as illustrated and described by way of the examples herein, although the network traffic manager apparatus 14 may perform other types and/or numbers of functions. As illustrated in
The processors 18 within the network traffic manager apparatus 14 may execute one or more computer-executable instructions stored in memory 20 for the methods illustrated and described with reference to the examples herein, although the processor can execute other types and numbers of instructions and perform other types and numbers of operations. The processor 18 may comprise one or more central processing units (“CPUs”) or general purpose processors with one or more processing cores, such as AMD® processor(s), although other types of processor(s) could be used (e.g., Intel®).
The memory 20 within the network traffic manager apparatus 14 may comprise one or more tangible storage media, such as RAM, ROM, flash memory, CD-ROM, floppy disk, hard disk drive(s), solid state memory, DVD, or any other memory storage types or devices, including combinations thereof, which are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The memory 20 may store one or more non-transitory computer-readable instructions of this technology as illustrated and described with reference to the examples herein that may be executed by the processor 18. The exemplary flowchart shown in
Accordingly, the memory 20 of the network traffic manager apparatus 14 can store one or more applications that can include computer executable instructions that, when executed by the network traffic manager apparatus 14, causes the network traffic manager apparatus 14 to perform actions, such as to transmit, receive, or otherwise process messages, for example, and to perform other actions described and illustrated below with reference to
The optional configurable hardware logic device 21 in the network traffic manager apparatus 14 may comprise specialized hardware configured to implement one or more steps of this technology as illustrated and described with reference to the examples herein. By way of example only, the optional configurable logic hardware device 21 may comprise one or more of field programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), field programmable logic devices (“FPLDs”), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs”) and/or programmable logic units (“PLUs”).
The communication system 24 in the network traffic manager apparatus 14 is used to operatively couple and communicate between the network traffic manager apparatus 14, the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n), and the plurality of servers (not shown) which are all coupled together by communication network 30 such as one or more local area networks (LAN) and/or the wide area network (WAN), although other types and numbers of communication networks or systems with other types and numbers of connections and configurations to other devices and elements may be used. By way of example only, the communication network such as local area networks (LAN) and the wide area network (WAN) can use TCP/IP over Ethernet and industry-standard protocols, including NFS, CIFS, SOAP, XML, LDAP, and SNMP, although other types and numbers of communication networks, can be used. In this example, the bus 26 is a PCI Express bus in this example, although other bus types and links may be used.
Each of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) of the network traffic management system 10, include a central processing unit (CPU) or processor, a memory, input/display device interface, configurable logic device and an input/output system or I/O system, which are coupled together by a bus or other link. The plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n), in this example, may run interface applications, such as Web browsers, that may provide an interface to make voice over internet protocol (VOIP) calls and/or requests for and send and/or receive data to and/or from other plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) via the network traffic manager apparatus 14. Additionally, the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) can include any type of computing device that can receive, render, and facilitate user interaction, such as client computers, network computer, mobile computers, mobile phones, virtual machines (including cloud-based computer), or the like.
While not shown, the network environment 10 can include a plurality of servers include a central processing unit (CPU) or processor, a memory, and a communication system, which are coupled together by a bus or other link, although other numbers and/or types of network devices could be used. Generally, the plurality of servers process requests for providing access to one or more enterprise web applications received from the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n), network traffic manager apparatus 14, via the communication network 30 according to the HTTP-based application RFC protocol or the CIFS or NFS protocol in this example, but the principles discussed herein are not limited to this example and can include other application protocols. A series of applications may run on the plurality of servers that allows the transmission of applications requested by the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n), or the network traffic manager apparatus 14. The plurality of servers may provide data or receive data in response to requests directed toward the respective applications on the plurality of servers from the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) or the network traffic manager apparatus 14. It is to be understood that the plurality of servers may be hardware or software or may represent a system with multiple external resource servers, which may include internal or external networks. In this example the plurality of servers 16(1)-16(n) may be any version of Microsoft® IIS servers or Apache® servers, although other types of servers may be used.
Although the network traffic management apparatus 14 is illustrated as single device, one or more actions of the network traffic management apparatus 14 may be distributed across one or more distinct network computing devices. Moreover, the network traffic management apparatus 14 are not limited to a particular configuration. Thus, the network traffic management apparatus 14 may contain a plurality of network computing devices that operate using a master/slave approach, whereby one of the network computing devices of the network traffic management apparatus 14 operate to manage and/or otherwise coordinate operations of the other network computing devices. The network traffic management apparatus 14 may operate as a plurality of network computing devices within cluster architecture, a peer-to peer architecture, virtual machines, or within a cloud architecture.
Thus, the technology disclosed herein is not to be construed as being limited to a single environment and other configurations and architectures are also envisaged. For example, the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) depicted in
While the network traffic manager apparatus 14 is illustrated in this example as including a single device, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 in other examples can include a plurality of devices or blades each with one or more processors each processor with one or more processing cores that implement one or more steps of this technology. In these examples, one or more of the devices can have a dedicated communication interface or memory. Alternatively, one or more of the devices can utilize the memory, communication interface, or other hardware or software components of one or more other communicably coupled of the devices. Additionally, one or more of the devices that together comprise network traffic manager apparatus 14 in other examples can be standalone devices or integrated with one or more other devices or applications, such as one of the plurality of servers 16(1)-16(n) or, the network traffic manager apparatus 14, or applications coupled to the communication network(s), for example. Moreover, one or more of the devices of the network traffic manager apparatus 14 in these examples can be in a same or a different communication network 30 including one or more public, private, or cloud networks, for example.
Although an exemplary network traffic management system 10 with the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) and the network traffic manager apparatus 14, communication networks 30 are described and illustrated herein, other types and numbers of systems, devices, blades, components, and elements in other topologies can be used. It is to be understood that the systems of the examples described herein are for exemplary purposes, as many variations of the specific hardware and software used to implement the examples are possible, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant art(s).
Further, each of the systems of the examples may be conveniently implemented using one or more general purpose computer systems, microprocessors, digital signal processors, and micro-controllers, programmed according to the teachings of the examples, as described and illustrated herein, and as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art.
One or more of the components depicted in the network traffic management system, such as the network traffic manager apparatus 14 and the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n), for example, may be configured to operate as virtual instances on the same physical machine. In other words, one or more of network traffic manager apparatus 14, or the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n), illustrated in
In addition, two or more computing systems or devices can be substituted for any one of the systems or devices in any example. Accordingly, principles and advantages of distributed processing, such as redundancy and replication also can be implemented, as desired, to increase the robustness and performance of the devices and systems of the examples. The examples may also be implemented on computer system(s) that extend across any suitable network using any suitable interface mechanisms and traffic technologies, including by way of example only teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice and modem), wireless traffic media, wireless traffic networks, cellular traffic networks, G3 traffic networks, Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Packet Data Networks (PDNs), the Internet, intranets, and combinations thereof.
The examples also may be embodied as a non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon for one or more aspects of the technology as described and illustrated by way of the examples herein, which when executed by a processor (or configurable hardware), cause the processor to carry out the steps necessary to implement the methods of the examples, as described and illustrated herein.
An example of a method for optimizing multimedia communications will now be described with reference to
To further illustrate the three call initiation techniques for the H.323. protocol, different fields in a network packet for a request to initiate a call in accordance with the H.323 protocol are illustrated in
In this example, the capability negotiation provided by the H.245 field enables devices to communicate without having prior knowledge of the capabilities of the remote entity. In particular, the H.245 field assists with enabling rich multimedia capabilities, including audio, video, text, and data communication. Additionally, the H.245 field that assists with the master/slave determination (MSD) which relates to which device is the master and which is the slave as the master in a call settles all disputes between the two devices. For example, if both endpoints attempt to open incompatible media flows, it is the master who takes the action to reject the incompatible flow.
Next, once capabilities are exchanged and master/slave determination steps have completed, devices may then open logical channels or media flows. In this example, opening of logical channels or media flows is performed by sending an Open Logical Channel (OLC) message and receiving an acknowledgement message. Now, referring back to
Additionally as shown in
An example of the three calling techniques consistent with the H.323 protocol will now be illustrated. The first calling technique, i.e, the legacy calling technique will be illustrated with reference to
Next, in step 504, the requesting one of the plurality of mobile devices 12(1)-12(n) creates a second TCP connection for H.245. In step 505, the requesting one of the plurality of mobile devices 12(1)-12(n) sends a message to negotiate the media and media control channels and in step 506, the receiving one of the plurality of mobile devices 12(1)-12(n) sends an acknowledgement along with the message to negotiate the media control channels back to the requesting one of the plurality of mobile devices 12(1)-12(n). After H.245 negotiation is performed, the requesting one and the receiving one of the plurality of mobile devices 12(1)-12(n) establish some media/media control channels.
Next, the second calling technique, i.e, using the tunneling bit call setup mode, will now be illustrated using
Next, the third calling technique, i.e., using fast start, will be illustrated using
Referring back to
Next, in step 315, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 determines when the extracted tunnel bit is set to be true. In this example, by setting the tunneling bit to be true, the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) indicates that the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) intends to embed H.245 data (negotiating media and media control channels) within the H.225 call as illustrated above. An example of the extracted tunneling bit set to be true is illustrated in
Now referring back to
In step 320, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 toggles the extracted tunnel bit to false which prevents the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) from embedding the H.245 data (negotiating media and media control channels) within the H.225 call as illustrated above. An illustration of toggling the extracted tunnel bit to false is represented in line 901 of
Referring back to
Referring back to
In step 335, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 grants the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) to place the call to the receiving one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n). Subsequently, the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) attempts to establish the call with the receiving one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n).
Next in step 340, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 receives a request for permission to accept the call from the receiving one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n).
In step 345, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 grants the receiving one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) permission to accept the call. Optionally, in another example, prior to granting the permission to accept the call, the network traffic manager apparatus 14 can perform the method illustrated in steps 310-330 (that is, toggling the tunnel bit to false and rewriting the fastStart data) on the received request for permission to accept the call before granting the receiving one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) permission to accept the call. Subsequently, the receiving one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) accepts the call from the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n) and indicates connection establishment to the requesting one of the plurality of mobile computing devices 12(1)-12(n). The exemplary method ends at step 350.
An exemplary method for optimizing network communication using H.323 protocol will now be explained with reference to the sequence flow diagram illustrated in
Next in step 1206 of
Accordingly, as illustrated and described by way of the examples herein, this technology provides a number of advantages including providing methods, non-transitory computer readable media and devices for optimizing multimedia communications. By using the technique illustrated above, the disclosed technology is able to prevent tunneling of the H.245 protocol over the H.225 connection. Further, the disclosed technology also prevents the requesting mobile device and the receiving mobile device from negotiating the media controls data during the first signaling message thereby preventing undesired behavior of the receiving mobile computing device and the requesting mobile computing device. Additionally, by using the above illustrated technique, the disclosed technology also increases the runtime performance as less time is required to monitor and manager network traffic between the requesting mobile computing device and the receiving mobile computing device. Furthermore, the above illustrated technology also eliminates or minimizes routines that are used to handle the tunneling and fast start negotiation thereby improving the performance of the network traffic manager apparatus.
Having thus described the basic concept of the technology, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the technology. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the technology is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/928,049, filed Oct. 30, 2019, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4783828 | Sadjadi | Nov 1988 | A |
5537488 | Menon et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6118893 | Li | Sep 2000 | A |
6314408 | Salas et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6597702 | Caugherty | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597777 | Ho | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6748056 | Capriotti et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769066 | Botros et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7228412 | Freed et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7406606 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7441429 | Nucci et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7519834 | Dondeti et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7624447 | Horowitz et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7743415 | Poletto et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8126722 | Robb et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8185475 | Hug | May 2012 | B2 |
8370407 | Devarajan et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8572733 | Rockwood | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8832804 | Casey et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8943548 | Drokov et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943588 | Speegle et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9055093 | Borders | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9077709 | Dall et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9237021 | Mills et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9325697 | Datta et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9438419 | Aggarwal et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9444916 | Backholm | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9578055 | Khanal | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9589114 | Strom et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9628499 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9654485 | Neumann | May 2017 | B1 |
9705895 | Gutzmann | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9705902 | Call et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9800602 | Shekyan et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9900344 | Smith et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9967250 | Johansson et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10169937 | Zwink et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10574697 | McClintock et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
20020116615 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030042439 | Rusu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073091 | Krylov et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030145232 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030182447 | Schilling | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199762 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040037326 | D'Souza et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040103283 | Hornak | May 2004 | A1 |
20040170123 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050027846 | Wolfe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050111367 | Jonathan Chao et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050195840 | Krapp et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198519 | Tamura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060031483 | Lund et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031928 | Conley et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060098675 | Okuno | May 2006 | A1 |
20060288411 | Garg et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070118894 | Bhatia | May 2007 | A1 |
20070204065 | Harton | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219917 | Liu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070280114 | Chao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294187 | Scherrer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010207 | Yanagihara et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028467 | Kommareddy et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080059797 | Tokuno et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082662 | Dandliker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080196099 | Shastri | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080263215 | Schnellbaecher | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080320567 | Shulman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090052330 | Matsunaga et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090167520 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172162 | Wood | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199297 | Jarrett et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090241173 | Troyansky | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241174 | Rajan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265784 | Waizumi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100017627 | Princen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100031315 | Feng et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070451 | Hugues | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070620 | Awadallah et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100284282 | Golic | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312875 | Wilerson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325418 | Kanekar | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012586 | Montanari et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110072516 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083181 | Nazarov | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110138463 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154026 | Edstrom et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110197177 | Mony | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264621 | Burjoski | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264905 | Ovsiannikov | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110280160 | Yang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120017090 | Gould et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023090 | Holloway et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120079592 | Pandrangi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090030 | Rapaport et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120117621 | Kondamuru et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144487 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167210 | Oro Garcia et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173710 | Rodriguez | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203904 | Niemela et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233665 | Ranganathan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254386 | Smith et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120323700 | Aleksandrovich et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130080407 | Levow | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130081129 | Niemela | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130276114 | Friedrichs et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140095865 | Yerra et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140157405 | Joll et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181922 | Jakobsson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140230051 | Vallinayagam et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140289854 | Mahvi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298419 | Boubez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317739 | Be'ery et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140373088 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150026766 | Holloway et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067328 | Yin | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088662 | Noller et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150128236 | Moscicki et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150163234 | Tal et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150215334 | Bingham et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150271179 | Wang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150295945 | Canzanese, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310196 | Turgeman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150341379 | Lefebvre et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160021117 | Harmon et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160057140 | Heeter et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160080345 | Safruti et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080412 | Smith et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160127406 | Smith et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160328715 | Gideoni et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160352774 | Akcin | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381022 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170006033 | Stecher et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170063923 | Yang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170171231 | Reybok, Jr. et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170208483 | Chmiel et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170249306 | Allen et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170318053 | Singh et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180124110 | Hunt et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180124300 | Brook | May 2018 | A1 |
20180152356 | Dhariwal | May 2018 | A1 |
20190238554 | Disraeli | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010043722 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2017016454 | Feb 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“BIG-IP® Analytics: Implementations,” Version 11.3, Publication No. MAN-0357-03, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-40, Nov. 15, 2012. |
“BIG-IP® Local Traffic Manager™: Concepts,” Version 11.4., Publication No. MAN-0377-05, F5 Networks, Inc, pp. 1-178, Sep. 26, 2013. |
“BIG-IP® Local Traffic Manager™: Implementations,” Version 11.4, Publication No. MAN-0293-08, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-234, Nov. 19, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® Local Traffic Manager™: Monitors Reference”, Version 11.4, Publication No. MAN 0470-00, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-106, Nov. 26. 2013. |
“Operations Guide 1.0 F5 Local Traffic Manager and Global Traffic Manager,” Publication No. BIG-IP LTMGTMOps-01_0_0, F5 Networks, pp. 1-144, Dec. 12, 2014. |
“Release Note: BIG-IP LTM and TMOS,” Version 11.4.1, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-58, Dec. 18, 2014. |
“BIG-IP Application Security Manager Operations Guide,” Publication No. BIG-IP ASMOps 01_1, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-181, Jul. 2016. |
“BIG-IP ASM,” Version 11.5.0, Release Notes, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-44, Apr. 12, 2016. |
“BIG-IP ASM,” Version 11.6.1, Release Notes, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-18, Jun. 13, 2016. |
“BIG-IP® Analytics: Implementations,” Version 11.5, Publication No. MAN-0357-05, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-50, Aug. 25, 2015. |
“BIG-IP® Analytics: Implementations,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0357-06, F5 Networks, Inc. pp 1-62, Aug. 24, 2015. |
“BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Getting Started,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0285-09, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-78, Aug. 20, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Implementations,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0358-07, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-420, Aug. 20, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Implementations,” Version 11.5, Publication No. MAN-0358-06, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-396, Jan. 27, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® Local Traffic Management: Basics,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0538-00, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-74, Mar. 17, 2016. |
“BIG-IP® Network Firewall: Policies and Implementations,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0439-04, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-166, Aug. 20, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® Systems: DoS Protection and Protocol Firewall Implementations,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0440-03, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-108, Aug. 20, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® TMOS®: Concepts,” Version 11.5, Publication No. MAN-0378-04, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-148, May 1, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® TMOS®: Implementations,” Version 11.5, Publication No. MAN-0379-05, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-274, Sep. 2, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® DNS Services: Implementations,” Version 11.5, Publication No. MAN-0446-02, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-156, Jan. 27, 2014. |
“BIG-IP® DNS Services: Implementations,” Version 11.3, Publication No. MAN-0446-00, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-76, Feb. 5, 2016. |
“BIG-IP® Global Traffic Manger™: Implementations,” Version 11.4, Publication No. MAN-0388-03, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-106, Feb. 21, 2014. |
“F5 TMOS Operations Guide,” Version 12.1, F5 Networks, Inc., Publication No. BIG-IP TMOSOps-02_1, pp. 1-276, Jul. 2016. |
Tegeler et al., “BotFinder: Finding Bots in Network Traffic Without Deep Packet Inspection,” CoNEXT '12: Conference an Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, pp. 349-360. Dec. 10, 2012. |
Zhang et al., “Boosting the Scalability of Botnet Detection Using Adaptive Traffic Sampling,” In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 124-134, Mar. 22, 2011. |
“BIG-IP® TMOS®: Implementations,” Version 12.0, Publication No. MAN-0379-09, F5 Networks, Inc., Dec. 21, 2015. |
“BIG-IP® System and SafeNet® Luna SA HSM: Implementations,” Version 11.6, Publication No. MAN-0496-01, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-26, Oct. 21, 2016. |
Rossow et al., “Sandnet: Network Traffic Analysis of Malicious Software,” Proceedings of the First Workshop on Building Analysis Datasets and Gathering Experience Returns for Security, pp. 78-88, Apr. 10, 2011. |
“BIG-IP ASM Operations Guide,” Version 14.0, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-102, Dec. 2018. |
“BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Getting Started,” Version 12.1, Publication No. MAN-0285-11, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-70, Jul. 11, 2017. |
“BIG-IP® Applicatin Security Manager™: Attack and Bot Signatures,” Version 12.1, Publication No. MAN-0578-01, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-50, Nov. 4, 2016. |
“BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Implementations,” Version 12.1, Publicaiton No. MAN-0358-09, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-388, Sep. 29, 2017. |
UK Search Report for Application No. GB1705857.9, Date of Search Oct. 11, 2017, 1 pp. |
“BIG-IP® Application Security Manager™: Implementations,” Version 13.0, Publication No. MAN-358-10, F5 Networks, Inc., pp. 1-348. Nov. 10, 2017. |
“What is Passwordless?,” Azure Active Directory Passwordless Sign In (Preview)—Microsoft Docs, pp. 1-5, Aug. 4, 2019. |
Wang et al., “Engaging Edge Networks in Preventing and Mitigating Undesirable Network Traffic,” 2007 3rd IEEE Workshop on Secure Network Protocols, 6 pp, Oct. 16, 2007. |
BIG-IP® CGNAT: Implementations, Version 12.1, F5 Networks, Inc., Mar. 7, 2018, pp. 1-178. |
BIG-IP® CGNAT: Implementations, Version 13.0, F5 Networks, Inc., Aug. 29, 2018, pp. 1-206. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62928049 | Oct 2019 | US |