Patent Grant
11111552
Field of the Technology
The present disclosure relates to methods for thermomechanically processing metal alloys.
Description of the Background of the Technology
When a metal alloy workpiece such as, for example, an ingot, a bar, or a billet, is thermomechanically processed (i.e., hot worked), the surfaces of the workpiece cool faster than the interior of the workpiece. A specific example of this phenomenon occurs when a bar of a metal alloy is heated and then forged using a radial forging press or an open die press forge. During the hot forging, the grain structure of the metal alloy deforms due to the action of the dies. If the temperature of the metal alloy during deformation is lower than the alloy's recrystallization temperature, the alloy will not recrystallize, resulting in a grain structure composed of elongated unrecrystallized grains. If, instead, the temperature of the alloy during deformation is greater than or equal to the recrystallization temperature of the alloy, the alloy will recrystallize into an equiaxed structure.
Since metal alloy workpieces typically are heated to temperatures greater than the alloy's recrystallization temperature before hot forging, the interior portion of the workpiece, which does not cool as fast as the workpiece surfaces, usually exhibits a fully recrystallized structure on hot forging. However, the surfaces of the workpiece can exhibit a mixture of unrecrystallized grains and fully recrystallized grains due to the lower temperatures at the surfaces resulting from relatively rapid cooling. Representative of this phenomenon,
Prior attempts to eliminate unrecrystallized grains in the surface region of a thermomechanically processed metal alloy workpiece, such as a forged bar, for example, have proven unsatisfactory. For example, excessive growth of grains in the interior portion of alloy workpieces has occurred during treatments to eliminate surface region unrecrystallized grains. Extra large grains also can make ultrasonic inspection of metal alloys difficult. Excessive grain growth in interior portions also can reduce fatigue strength of an alloy workpiece to unacceptable levels. In addition, attempts to eliminate unrecrystallized grains in the surface region of a thermomechanically processed alloy workpiece have resulted in the precipitation of deleterious intermetallic precipitates such as, for example, sigma-phase (σ-phase). The presence of such precipitates can decrease corrosion resistance.
It would be advantageous to develop methods for thermomechanically processing metal alloy workpieces in a way that minimizes or eliminates unrecrystallized grains in a surface region of the workpiece. It would also be advantageous to develop methods for thermomechanically processing metal alloy workpieces so as to provide an equiaxed recrystallized grain structure through the cross-section of the workpiece, and wherein the cross-section is substantially free of deleterious intermetallic precipitates, while limiting the average grain size of the equiaxed grain structure.
According to one non-limiting aspect of the present disclosure, a method of processing a metal alloy comprises heating a metal alloy to a temperature in a working temperature range. The working temperature range is from the recrystallization temperature of the metal alloy to a temperature just below the incipient melting temperature of the metal alloy. The metal alloy is then worked at a temperature in the working temperature range. After working the metal alloy, a surface region of the metal alloy is heated to a temperature in a working temperature range. The surface region of the metal alloy is maintained within the working temperature range for a period of time sufficient to recrystallize the surface region of the metal alloy, and to minimize grain growth in the internal region of the metal alloy. The metal alloy is cooled from the working temperature range to a temperature and at a cooling rate that minimize grain growth in the metal alloy.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a non-limiting embodiment of a method of processing a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy comprises heating a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy to a temperature in an intermetallic phase dissolution temperature range. The intermetallic phase dissolution temperature range may be from the solvus temperature of the intermetallic phase to just below the incipient melting temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment, the intermetallic phase is the sigma-phase (σ-phase), comprised of Fe—Cr—Ni intermetallic compounds. The superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is maintained in the intermetallic phase dissolution temperature range for a time sufficient to dissolve the intermetallic phase and minimize grain growth in the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. Subsequently, the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is worked at a temperature in the working temperature range from just above the apex temperature of the time-temperature-transformation curve for the intermetallic phase of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy, to just below the incipient melting temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. Subsequent to working, a surface region of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is heated to a temperature in an annealing temperature range, wherein the annealing temperature range is from a temperature just above the apex temperature of the time-temperature-transformation curve for the intermetallic phase of the alloy to just below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy The temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy does not cool to intersect the time-temperature-transformation curve during the time period from working the alloy to heating at least a surface region of the alloy to a temperature in the annealing temperature range. The surface region of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is maintained in the annealing temperature range for a time sufficient to recrystallize the surface region, and minimize grain growth in the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. The alloy is cooled to a temperature and at a cooling rate that inhibit formation of the intermetallic precipitate of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy, and minimize grain growth.
According to another non-limiting aspect of the present disclosure, a hot worked superaustenitic stainless steel alloy comprises, in weight percent based on total alloy weight, up to 0.2 carbon, up to 20 manganese, 0.1 to 1.0 silicon, 14.0 to 28.0 chromium, 15.0 to 38.0 nickel, 2.0 to 9.0 molybdenum, 0.1 to 3.0 copper, 0.08 to 0.9 nitrogen, 0.1 to 5.0 tungsten, 0.5 to 5.0 cobalt, up to 1.0 titanium, up to 0.05 boron, up to 0.05 phosphorus, up to 0.05 sulfur, iron, and incidental impurities. The superaustenitic stainless steel alloy includes an equiaxed recrystallized grain structure through a cross-section of the alloy, and an average grain size in a range of ASTM 00 to ASTM 3. The equiaxed recrystallized grain structure of the hot worked superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is substantially free of an intermetallic sigma-phase precipitate.
The features and advantages of methods, alloys, and articles described herein may be better understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The reader will appreciate the foregoing details, as well as others, upon considering the following detailed description of certain non-limiting embodiments according to the present disclosure.
It is to be understood that certain descriptions of the embodiments described herein have been simplified to illustrate only those steps, elements, features, and/or aspects that are relevant to a clear understanding of the disclosed embodiments, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other steps, elements, features, and/or aspects. Persons having ordinary skill in the art, upon considering the present description of the disclosed embodiments, will recognize that other steps, elements, and/or features may be desirable in a particular implementation or application of the disclosed embodiments. However, because such other steps, elements, and/or features may be readily ascertained and implemented by persons having ordinary skill in the art upon considering the present description of the disclosed embodiments, and are therefore not necessary for a complete understanding of the disclosed embodiments, a description of such steps, elements, and/or features is not provided herein. As such, it is to be understood that the description set forth herein is merely exemplary and illustrative of the disclosed embodiments and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention as defined solely by the claims.
Also, any numerical range recited herein is intended to include all sub-ranges subsumed therein. For example, a range of “1 to 10” is intended to include all sub-ranges between (and including) the recited minimum value of 1 and the recited maximum value of 10, that is, having a minimum value equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value of equal to or less than 10. Any maximum numerical limitation recited herein is intended to include all lower numerical limitations subsumed therein and any minimum numerical limitation recited herein is intended to include all higher numerical limitations subsumed therein. Accordingly, Applicants reserve the right to amend the present disclosure, including the claims, to expressly recite any sub-range subsumed within the ranges expressly recited herein. All such ranges are intended to be inherently disclosed herein such that amending to expressly recite any such sub-ranges would comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. § 132(a).
The grammatical articles “one”, “a”, “an”, and “the”, if and as used herein, are intended to include “at least one” or “one or more”, unless otherwise indicated. Thus, the articles are used herein to refer to one or more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical objects of the article. By way of example, “a component” means one or more components, and thus, possibly, more than one component is contemplated and may be employed or used in an implementation of the described embodiments.
Any patent, publication, or other disclosure material that is said to be incorporated, in whole or in part, by reference herein is incorporated herein only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein is only incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material.
The present disclosure includes descriptions of various embodiments. It is to be understood that all embodiments described herein are exemplary, illustrative, and non-limiting. Thus, the invention is not limited by the description of the various exemplary, illustrative, and non-limiting embodiments. Rather, the invention is defined solely by the claims, which may be amended to recite any features expressly or inherently described in or otherwise expressly or inherently supported by the present disclosure.
It is possible to eliminate unrecrystallized surface grains in a hot worked metal alloy bar or other workpiece by performing an anneal heat treatment whereby the alloy is heated to an annealing temperature exceeding the recrystallization temperature of the alloy and held at temperature until recrystallization is complete. However, superaustenitic stainless steel alloys and certain other austenitic stainless steel alloys are susceptible to the formation of a deleterious intermetallic precipitate, such as a sigma-phase precipitate, when processed in this way. Heating larger size bars and other large mill forms of these alloys to an annealing temperature, for example, can cause the deleterious intermetallic compounds to precipitate, particularly in a center region of the mill forms. Therefore, annealing times and temperatures must be selected not only to recrystallize surface region grains, but also to solution any intermetallic compounds. To ensure that intermetallic compounds are solutioned through the entire cross-section of a large bar, for example, it may be necessary to hold the bar at the elevated temperature for a significant time. Bar diameter is a factor in determining the minimum necessary holding time to adequately solution deleterious intermetallic compounds, but minimum holding times can be as long as one to four hours, or longer. In non-limiting embodiments, minimum holding times are 2 hours, greater than 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, or 5 hours. While it may be possible to select a temperature and holding time that both solutions intermetallic compounds and recrystallizes surface region unrecrystallized grains, holding at the solution temperature for long periods may also allow grains to grow to unacceptably large dimensions. For example, the macrostructure of a radial forged bar of ATI Datalloy HP™ superaustenitic stainless steel alloy that was annealed at a high temperature (2150° F.) for a long period is illustrated in
ATI Datalloy HP™ alloy is generally described in, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/331,135, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The measured chemistry of the ATI Datalloy HP™ superaustenitic stainless steel alloy bar shown in
Referring to
Once heated to a temperature within the working temperature range, the metal alloy is worked 14 within the working temperature range. In a non-limiting embodiment, working the metal alloy within the working temperature range results in recrystallization of the grains of at least an internal region of the metal alloy. Because the surface region of the metal alloy tends to cool faster due to, for example, cooling from contact with the working dies, grains in the surface region of the metal alloy may cool below the working temperature range and may not recrystallize during working. In various non-limiting embodiments herein, a “surface region” of a metal alloy or metal alloy workpiece refers to a region from the surface to a depth of 0.001 inch, 0.01 inch, 0.1 inch, or 1 inch or greater into the interior of the alloy or workpiece. It will be understood that the depth of a surface region that does not recrystallize during working 14 depends on multiple factors, such as, for example, the composition of the metal alloy, the temperature of the alloy on commencement of working, the diameter or thickness of the alloy, the temperature of the working dies, and the like. The depth of a surface region that does not recrystallize during working is easily determined by a skilled practitioner without undue experimentation and, as such, the surface region that does not recrystallize during any particular non-limiting embodiment of the method of the present disclosure need not to be discussed further herein.
Because a surface region may not recrystallize during working, subsequent to working the metal alloy, and prior to any intentional cooling of the alloy, at least the surface region of the alloy is heated 18 to a temperature in the working temperature range. Optionally, after working 14 the metal alloy, the alloy is transferred 16 to a heating apparatus. In various non-limiting embodiments, the heating apparatus comprises at least one of a furnace, a flame heating station, an induction heating station, or any other suitable heating apparatus known to a person having ordinary skill in the art. It will be recognized that a heating apparatus may be in place at the working station, or dies, rolls, or any other hot working apparatus at the working station may be heated to minimize cooling of the contacted surface region of the alloy during working.
After at least the surface region of the metal alloy is heated 18 to within the working temperature range, the temperature of the surface region is maintained 20 in the working temperature range for a period of time sufficient to recrystallize the surface region of the metal alloy, so that the entire cross-section of the metal alloy is recrystallized. As applied to superaustenitic stainless steel alloys and austenitic alloys, the temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy or austenitic stainless steel alloy does not cool to intersect the time-temperature-transformation curve during the time period from working 14 the alloy to heating 18 at least a surface region of the alloy to a temperature in the annealing temperature range. This prevents deleterious intermetallic phases, such as, for example, sigma phase, from precipitating in the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy or austenitic alloy. This limitation is explained further below. In certain non-limiting embodiments of the methods according to the present disclosure applied to superaustenitic stainless steel alloys and other austenitic stainless steel alloys, the period of time during which the temperature of the heated surface region is maintained 20 within the annealing temperature range is a time sufficient to recrystallize grains in the surface region and dissolve any deleterious intermetallic precipitate phases.
After maintaining 20 the metal alloy in the working temperature range to recrystallize the surface region of the alloy, the alloy is cooled 22. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the metal alloy may be cooled to ambient temperature. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the metal alloy may be cooled from the working temperature range at a cooling rate and to a temperature sufficient to minimize grain growth in the metal alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment, a cooling rate during the cooling step is in the range of 0.3 Fahrenheit degrees per minute to 10 Fahrenheit degrees per minute. Exemplary methods of cooling according to the present disclosure include, but are not limited to, quenching (such as, for example, water quenching and oil quenching), forced air cooling, and air cooling. It will be recognized that a cooling rate that minimizes grain growth in the metal alloy will be dependent on many factors including, but not limited to, the composition of the metal alloy, the starting working temperature, and the diameter or thickness of the metal alloy. The combination of the steps of heating 18 at least a surface region of the metal alloy to the working temperature range and maintaining 20 the surface region within the working temperature range for a period of time to recrystallize the surface region may be referred to herein as “flash annealing”.
As used herein in connection with the present methods, the term “metal alloy” encompasses materials that include a base or predominant metal element, one or more intentional alloying additions, and incidental impurities. As used herein, “metal alloy” includes “commercially pure” materials and other materials consisting of a metal element and incidental impurities. The present method may be applied to any suitable metal alloy. According to a non-limiting embodiment, the method according to the present disclosure may be carried out on a metal alloy selected from a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy, an austenitic stainless steel alloy, a titanium alloy, a commercially pure titanium, a nickel alloy, a nickel-base superalloy, and a cobalt alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment, the metal alloy comprises an austenitic material. In a non-limiting embodiment, the metal alloy comprises one of a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy and an austenitic stainless steel alloy. In another non-limiting embodiment, the metal alloy comprises a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. In certain non-limiting embodiments, an alloy processed by a method of the present disclosure is selected from the following alloys: ATI Datalloy HP™ alloy (UNS unassigned); ATI Datalloy 2® ESR alloy (UNS unassigned); Alloy 25-6HN (UNS N08367); Alloy 600 (UNS N06600); Hastelloy®G-2™ alloy (UNS N06975); Alloy 625 (UNS N06625); Alloy 800 (UNS N08800); Alloy 800H (UNS N08810), Alloy 800AT (UNS N08811); Alloy 825 (UNS N08825); Alloy G3 (UNS N06985); Alloy 2535 (UNS N08535); Alloy 2550 (UNS N06255); and Alloy 316L (UNS S31603).
ATI Datalloy 2® ESR alloy is available from ATI Allvac, Monroe, N.C. USA, and is generally described in International Patent Application Publication No. WO 99/23267, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. ATI Datalloy 2® ESR alloy has the following nominal chemical composition, in weight percent based on total alloy weight: 0.03 carbon; 0.30 silicon; 15.1 manganese; 15.3 chromium; 2.1 molybdenum; 2.3 nickel; 0.4 nitrogen; and balance iron and incidental impurities. In general ATI Datalloy 2® alloy comprises in percent by weight based on total alloy weight: up to 0.05 carbon; up to 1.0 silicon; 10 to 20 manganese; 13.5 to 18.0 chromium; 1.0 to 4.0 nickel; 1.5 to 3.5 molybdenum; 0.2 to 0.4 nitrogen; iron; and incidental impurities.
Superaustenitic stainless steel alloys do not fit the classic definition of stainless steel because iron constitutes less than 50 weight percent of superaustenitic stainless steel alloys. Compared with conventional austenitic stainless steels, superaustenitic stainless steel alloys exhibit superior resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in environments containing halides.
The step of working a metal alloy at an elevated temperature according to the present method may be conducted using any of known technique. As used herein, the terms “forming”, “forging”, and “radial forging” refer to thermomechanical processing (“TMP”), which also may be referred to herein as “thermomechanical working” or simply as “working”. As used herein, unless otherwise specified, “working” refers to “hot working”. “Hot working”, as used herein, refers to a controlled mechanical operation for shaping a metal alloy at temperatures at or above the recrystallization temperature of the metal alloy. Thermomechanical working encompasses a number of metal alloy forming processes combining controlled heating and deformation to obtain a synergistic effect, such as improvement in strength, without loss of toughness. See, for example, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J. R. Davis, ed., ASM International (1992), p. 480.
In various non-limiting embodiments of the method 10 according to the present disclosure, and with reference to
In certain non-limiting embodiments of methods according to the present disclosure, and again referring to
In certain non-limiting embodiments of methods according to the present disclosure, and again referring to
Additionally, in non-limiting embodiments of the present methods applied to superaustenitic stainless steel alloys and austenitic stainless steel alloys, the alloy preferably is worked 14, the surface region heated 18, and the alloy maintained 20 at temperatures within the working temperature range that are sufficiently high to keep intermetallic phases that are detrimental to mechanical or physical properties of the alloys in solid solution, or to dissolve any precipitated intermetallic phases into solid solution during these steps. In a non-limiting embodiment, keeping the intermetallic phases in solid solution comprises preventing the temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy and austenitic stainless steel alloy from cooling to intersect the time-temperature-transformation curve during the time period of working the alloy to heating at least a surface region of the alloy to a temperature in the annealing temperature range. This is further explained below. In certain non-limiting embodiments of methods according to the present disclosure applied to superaustenitic stainless steel alloys and austenitic stainless steel alloys, the period of time during which the temperature of the heated surface region is maintained 20 within the working temperature range is a time sufficient to recrystallize grains in the surface region, dissolve any deleterious intermetallic precipitate phases that may have precipitated during the working 14 step due to unintentional cooling of the surface region during working 14, and minimize grain growth in the alloy. It will be recognized that the length of such a time period depends on factors including the composition of the metal alloy and the dimensions (e.g., diameter or thickness) of the metal alloy form. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the surface region of the metal alloy may be maintained 20 within the working temperature range for a period of time in a range of 1 minute to 2 hours, 5 minutes to 60 minutes, or 10 minutes to 30 minutes.
In certain non-limiting embodiments of the methods according to the present disclosure wherein the metal alloy is one of a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy and an austenitic stainless steel alloy, heating 12 comprises heating to a working temperature range from the solvus temperature of the intermetallic precipitate phase to just below the incipient melting temperature of the metal alloy. In certain non-limiting embodiments of the methods according to the present disclosure wherein the metal alloy is one of a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy and an austenitic stainless steel alloy, the working temperature range during the step of working 14 the metal alloy is from a temperature just below a solvus temperature of an intermetallic sigma-phase precipitate of the metal alloy to a temperature just below the incipient melting temperature of the metal alloy.
Without intending to be bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the intermetallic precipitates principally form in austenitic stainless steel alloys and superaustenitic stainless steel alloys because the precipitation kinetics are sufficiently rapid to permit precipitation to occur in the alloy as the temperature of any portion of the alloy cools to a temperature at or below the temperature of the nose, or apex, of the isothermal transformation curve of the alloy for the precipitation of a particular intermetallic phase.
When methods according to the present disclosure are conducted on austenitic stainless steel alloys or on superaustenitic stainless steel alloys, the step of cooling 22 the metal alloy may comprise cooling at a rate sufficient to inhibit precipitation of an intermetallic sigma-phase precipitate in the metal alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment, a cooling rate is in the range of 0.3 Fahrenheit degrees per minute to 10 Fahrenheit degrees per minute. Exemplary methods of cooling according to the present disclosure include, but are not limited to, quenching, such as, for example water quenching and oil quenching, forced air cooling, and air cooling.
Specific examples of austenitic materials that may be processed using methods according to the present disclosure include, but are not limited to: ATI Datalloy HP™ alloy (UNS unassigned); ATI Datalloy 2® ESR alloy (UNS unassigned); Alloy 25-6HN (UNS N08367); Alloy 600 (UNS N06600); Hastelloy®G-2™ alloy (UNS N06975); Alloy 625 (UNS N06625); Alloy 800 (UNS N08800); Alloy 800H (UNS N08810), Alloy 800AT (UNS N08811); Alloy 825 (UNS N08825); Alloy G3 (UNS N06985); Alloy 2550 (UNS N06255); Alloy 2535 (UNS N08535); and Alloy 316L (UNS S31603).
Referring now to
Method 50 comprises heating 52 a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy, for example, to a temperature in an intermetallic phase precipitate dissolution temperature range from the solvus temperature of the intermetallic phase precipitate in the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy to a temperature just below the incipient melting temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. In a specific non-limiting method embodiment for Datalloy HP™ alloy, the intermetallic precipitate dissolution temperature range is from greater than 1900° F. to 2150° F. In a non-limiting embodiment, the intermetallic phase is the sigma-phase (σ-phase), which is comprised of Fe—Cr—Ni intermetallic compounds.
The superaustenitic stainless steel is maintained 53 in the intermetallic phase precipitate dissolution temperature range for a time sufficient to dissolve the intermetallic phase precipitates, and to minimize grain growth in the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy. In non-limiting embodiments, a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy or an austenitic stainless steel alloy may be maintained in the intermetallic phase precipitate dissolution temperature range for a period of time in a range of 1 minute to 2 hours, 5 minutes to 60 minutes, or 10 minutes to 30 minutes. It will be recognized that the minimum time required to maintain 53 a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy or austenitic stainless steel alloy in the intermetallic phase precipitate dissolution temperature range to dissolve the intermetallic phase precipitate depends on factors including, for example, the composition of the alloy, the thickness of the workpiece, and the particular temperature in the intermetallic phase precipitate dissolution temperature range that is applied. It will be understood that a person of ordinary skill, on considering the present disclosure, could determine the minimum time required for dissolution of the intermetallic phase without undue experimentation.
After the maintaining step 53, the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is worked 54 at a temperature in a working temperature range from just above the apex temperature of the TTT curve for the intermetallic phase precipitate of the alloy to just below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy.
Because the surface region may not recrystallize during working 54, subsequent to working the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy, and prior to any intentional cooling of the alloy, at least a surface region of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy is heated 58 to a temperature in an annealing temperature range. In a non-limiting embodiment, the annealing temperature range is from a temperature just above the apex temperature (see, for example,
Optionally, after working 54 the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy, the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy may be transferred 56 to a heating apparatus. In various non-limiting embodiments, the heating apparatus comprises at least one of a furnace, a flame heating station, an induction heating station, or any other suitable heating apparatus known to a person having ordinary skill in the art. For example, a heating apparatus may be in place at the working station, or the dies, rolls, or any hot working apparatus at the working station may be heated to minimize unintentional cooling of the contacted surface region of the metal alloy.
Subsequent to working 54, a surface region of the alloy is heated 58 to a temperature in an annealing temperature range. In the heating 58 step, the annealing temperature range is from a temperature just above the apex temperature (see, for example,
In a non-limiting embodiment, with reference to
Again referring to
Another aspect of the present disclosure is directed to certain metal alloy mill products. Certain metal alloy mill products according to the present disclosure comprise or consist of a metal alloy that has been processed by any of the methods according to the present disclosure, and that has not been processed to remove an unrecrystallized surface region by grinding or another mechanical material removal technique. In certain non-limiting embodiments, a metal alloy mill product according to the present disclosure comprises or consists of an austenitic stainless steel alloy or a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy that has been processed by any of the methods according to the present disclosure. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the grain structure of the metal alloy of the metal alloy mill product comprises an equiaxed recrystallized grain structure through a cross-section of the metal alloy, and an average grain size of the metal alloy is in an ASTM grain size number range of 00 to 3, or 00 to 2, or 00 to 1, as measured according to ASTM Designation E112-12. In a non-limiting embodiment, the equiaxed recrystallized grain structure of the metal alloy is substantially free of an intermetallic sigma-phase precipitate.
According to certain non-limiting embodiments, a metal alloy mill product according to the present invention comprises or consists of a superaustenitic stainless steel alloy or an austenitic stainless steel alloy having an equiaxed recrystallized grain structure throughout a cross-section of the mill product, wherein an average grain size of the alloy is in an ASTM grain size number range of 00 to 3, or 00 to 2, or 00 to 1, or 3 to 4, or an ASTM grain size number greater than 4, as measured according to ASTM Designation E112-12. In a non-limiting embodiment, the equiaxed recrystallized grain structure of the alloy is substantially free of an intermetallic sigma-phase precipitate.
Examples of metal alloys that may be included in a metal alloy mill product according to this disclosure include, but are not limited to, any of ATI Datalloy HP™ alloy (UNS unassigned); ATI Datalloy 2® ESR alloy (UNS unassigned); Alloy 25-6HN (UNS N08367); Alloy 600 (UNS N06600);®G-2™ (UNS N06975); Alloy 625 (UNS N06625); Alloy 800 (UNS N08800); Alloy 800H (UNS N08810), Alloy 800AT (UNS N08811); Alloy 825 (UNS N08825); Alloy G3 (UNS N06985); Alloy 2535 (UNS N08535); Alloy 2550 (UNS N06255); Alloy 2535 (UNS N08535); and Alloy 316L (UNS S31603).
Concerning various aspects of this disclosure, it is anticipated that the grain size of metal alloy bars or other metal alloy mill products made according to various non-limiting embodiments of methods of the present disclosure may be adjusted by altering temperatures used in the various method steps. For example, and without limitation, the grain size of a center region of a metal alloy bar or other form may be reduced by lowering the temperature at which the metal alloy is worked in the method. A possible method for achieving grain size reduction includes heating a worked metal alloy form to a temperature sufficiently high to dissolve any deleterious intermetallic precipitates formed during prior processing steps. For example, in the case of Datalloy HP™ alloy, the alloy may be heated to a temperature of about 2100° F., which is a temperature greater than the sigma-phase solvus temperature of the alloy. The sigma-solvus temperature of superaustenitic stainless steels that may be processed as described herein typically is in the range of 1600° F. to 1800° F. The alloy may then be immediately cooled to a working temperature of, for example, about 2050° F. for Datalloy HP™ alloy, without letting the temperature fall below the temperature of the apex of the TTT diagram for the sigma-phase. The alloy may be hot worked, for example, by radial forging, to a desired diameter, followed by immediate transfer to a furnace to permit recrystallization of the unrecrystallized surface grains, without letting the time for processing between the solvus temperature and the temperature of the apex of the TTT diagram exceed the time to the TTT apex, or without letting the temperature cool below the apex of the TTT diagram for the sigma-phase during this period, or so that the temperature of the superaustenitic stainless steel alloy does not cool to intersect the time-temperature-transformation curve during the time period of working the alloy to heating at least a surface region of the alloy to a temperature in the annealing temperature range. The alloy may then be cooled from the recrystallization step to a temperature and at a cooling rate that inhibit formation of deleterious intermetallic precipitates in the alloy. A sufficiently rapid cooling rate may be achieved, for example, by water quenching the alloy.
The examples that follow are intended to further describe certain non-limiting embodiments, without restricting the scope of the present invention. Persons having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that variations of the following examples are possible within the scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the claims.
A 20 inch diameter ingot of Datalloy HP™ alloy, available from ATI Allvac, was prepared using a conventional melting technique combining argon oxygen decarburization and electroslag remelting steps. The ingot had the following measured chemistry, in weight percent based on total alloy weight: 0.007 carbon; 4.38 manganese; 0.015 phosphorus; less than 0.0003 sulfur; 0.272 silicon; 21.7 chromium; 30.11 nickel; 5.23 molybdenum; 1.17 copper; balance iron and unmeasured incidental impurities. The ingot was homogenized at 2200° F. and upset and drawn with multiple reheats on an open die press forge to a 12.5 inch diameter billet. The forged billet was further processed by the following steps which may be followed by reference to
A 20 inch diameter ingot of Datalloy HP™ alloy, available from ATI Allvac, was prepared using a conventional melting technique combining argon oxygen decarburization and electroslag remelting steps. The ingot had the following measured chemistry, in weight percent based on total alloy weight: 0.006 carbon; 4.39 manganese; 0.015 phosphorus; 0.0004 sulfur; 0.272 silicon; 21.65 chromium; 30.01 nickel; 5.24 molybdenum; 1.17 copper; balance iron and unmeasured incidental impurities. The ingot was homogenized at 2200° F. and upset and drawn with multiple reheats on an open die press forge to a 12.5 inch diameter billet. The billet was subjected to the following process steps, which may be followed by reference to
A 20 inch diameter ingot of ATI Allvac AL-6XN® austenitic stainless steel alloy (UNS N08367) is prepared using a conventional melting technique combining argon oxygen decarburization and electroslag remelting steps. The ingot has the following measured chemistry, in weight percent based on total alloy weight: 0.02 carbon; 0.30 manganese; 0.020 phosphorus; 0.001 sulfur; 0.35 silicon; 21.8 chromium; 25.3 nickel; 6.7 molybdenum; 0.24 nitrogen; 0.2 copper; balance iron and other incidental impurities. The following process steps may be better understood with reference to
A 20 inch diameter ingot of Grade 316L (UNS S31603) austenitic stainless steel alloy is prepared using a conventional melting technique combining argon oxygen decarburization and electroslag remelting steps. The ingot has the following measured chemistry, in weight percent based on total alloy weight: 0.02 carbon; 17.3 chromium; 12.5 nickel; 2.5 molybdenum; 1.5 manganese; 0.5 silicon, 0.035 phosphorus; 0.01 sulfur; balance iron and other incidental impurities. The following process steps may be better understood by reference to
A 20 inch diameter ingot of Alloy 2535 (UNS N08535), available from ATI Allvac, is prepared using a conventional melting technique combining argon oxygen decarburization and electroslag remelting steps. The ingot is homogenized at 2200° F. and upset and drawn with multiple reheats on an open die press forge to a 12.5 inch diameter billet. The 12.5 inch diameter billet is heated (see, for example,
A 20 inch diameter ingot of Alloy 2550 (UNS N06255), available from ATI Allvac, is prepared using a conventional melting technique combining argon oxygen decarburization and electroslag remelting steps. The ingot is homogenized at 2200° F. and upset and drawn with multiple reheats on an open die press forge to a 12.5 inch diameter billet. The 12.5 inch diameter billet is heated (see, for example,
It will be understood that the present description illustrates those aspects of the invention relevant to a clear understanding of the invention. Certain aspects that would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and that, therefore, would not facilitate a better understanding of the invention have not been presented in order to simplify the present description. Although only a limited number of embodiments of the present invention are necessarily described herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will, upon considering the foregoing description, recognize that many modifications and variations of the invention may be employed. All such variations and modifications of the invention are intended to be covered by the foregoing description and the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2857269 | Vordahl | Oct 1958 | A |
| 2893864 | Harris et al. | Jul 1959 | A |
| 2932886 | Althouse | Apr 1960 | A |
| 2974076 | Vordahl | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3015292 | Bridwell | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3025905 | Haerr | Mar 1962 | A |
| 3060564 | Corral | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3082083 | Levy et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
| 3117471 | O'Connell et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
| 3313138 | Spring et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3379522 | Vordahl | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3436277 | Bomberger, Jr. et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3469975 | Bomberger, Jr. et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3489617 | Wuerfel | Jan 1970 | A |
| 3584487 | Carlson | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3605477 | Carlson | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3615378 | Bomberger, Jr. et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3622406 | Vordahl | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3635068 | Watmough et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3649259 | Heitman | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3676225 | Owczarski et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3686041 | Lee | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3802877 | Parris et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3815395 | Sass | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3835282 | Sass et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3867208 | Grekov et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3922899 | Fremont et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3979815 | Nakanose et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4053330 | Henricks et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4067734 | Curtis et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4094708 | Hubbard et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4098623 | Ibaraki et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4120187 | Mullen | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4121953 | Hull | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4138141 | Andersen | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4147639 | Lee et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4150279 | Metcalfe et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4163380 | Masoner | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4197643 | Burstone et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4229216 | Paton et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4299626 | Paton et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4309226 | Chen | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4472207 | Kinoshita et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4473125 | Addudle et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4482398 | Eylon et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4510788 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4543132 | Berczik et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4614550 | Leonard et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4631092 | Ruckle et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4639281 | Sastry et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4668290 | Wang et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4687290 | Prussas | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4688290 | Hogg | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4690716 | Sabol et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4714468 | Wang et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4798632 | Yonezawa et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4799975 | Ouchi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4808249 | Eyelon et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4842653 | Wirth et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4851055 | Eylon et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4854977 | Alheritiere et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4857269 | Wang et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4878966 | Alheritiere et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4888973 | Comley | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4889170 | Mae et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4911884 | Chang | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4917728 | Enright | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919728 | Kohl et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4943412 | Bania et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4957567 | Krueger et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4975125 | Chakrabarti et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4980127 | Parris et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5026520 | Bhowal et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5032189 | Eylon et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5041262 | Gigliotti, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5074907 | Amato et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5080727 | Aihara et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5094812 | Dulmaine et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5141566 | Kitayama et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5156807 | Nagata et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5160554 | Bania et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5162159 | Tenhover et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5169597 | Davidson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173134 | Chakrabarti et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5201457 | Kitayama et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5244517 | Kimura et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5256369 | Ogawa et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5264055 | Champin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5277718 | Paxson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5310522 | Culling | May 1994 | A |
| 5330591 | Vasseur | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332454 | Meredith et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332545 | Love | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5342458 | Adams et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5358586 | Schutz | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5359872 | Nashiki | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5360496 | Kuhlman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374323 | Kuhlman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5399212 | Chakrabarti et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5442847 | Semiatin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5472526 | Gigliotti, Jr. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5494636 | Dupioron et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5509979 | Kimura | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5516375 | Ogawa et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5520879 | Saito et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5527403 | Schirra et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5545262 | Hardee et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545268 | Yashiki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5547523 | Blankenship et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5558728 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5580665 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5600989 | Segal et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5649280 | Blankenship et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658403 | Kimura | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662745 | Takayama et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5679183 | Takagi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5698050 | El-Soudani | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5758420 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5759305 | Benz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5759484 | Kashii et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5795413 | Gorman | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5871595 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5896643 | Tanaka | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897830 | Abkowitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5904204 | Teraoka | May 1999 | A |
| 5954724 | Davidson | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5980655 | Kosaka | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002118 | Kawano et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6032508 | Ashworth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044685 | Delgado et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053993 | Reichman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059904 | Benz et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071360 | Gillespie | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077369 | Kusano et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6127044 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132526 | Carisey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139659 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143241 | Hajaligol et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6187045 | Fehring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197129 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6200685 | Davidson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209379 | Nishida et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216508 | Matsubara et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6228189 | Oyama et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6250812 | Ueda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258182 | Schetky et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6284071 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6332935 | Gorman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334350 | Shin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6334912 | Ganin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6384388 | Anderson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387197 | Bewlay et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391128 | Ueda et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6399215 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402859 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409852 | Lin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6532786 | Luttgeharm | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6536110 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6539607 | Fehring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6539765 | Gates | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6558273 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6561002 | Okada et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6569270 | Segal | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6607693 | Saito et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6632304 | Oyama et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6632396 | Tetjukhin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6663501 | Chen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6726784 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6742239 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6764647 | Aigner et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6773520 | Fehring et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6786985 | Kosaka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800153 | Ishii et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6823705 | Fukada et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6908517 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6918971 | Fujii et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6932877 | Raymond et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6954525 | Deo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6971256 | Okada et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7008491 | Woodfield | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7010950 | Cai et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7032426 | Durney et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037389 | Barbier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7038426 | Hill | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7081173 | Bahar | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7096596 | Hernandez, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7132021 | Kuroda et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7152449 | Durney et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7264682 | Chandran | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7269986 | Pfaffmann et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7332043 | Tetyukhin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7410610 | Woodfield et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7438849 | Kuramoto et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7449075 | Woodfield et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7536892 | Amino et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7559221 | Horita et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7601232 | Fonte | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7611592 | Davis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7708841 | Saller | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7837812 | Marquardt et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7879286 | Miracle et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7947136 | Saller | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7984635 | Callebaut et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8037730 | Polen et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8048240 | Hebda et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8128764 | Miracle et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8226568 | Watson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8311706 | Lu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8316687 | Slattery | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8336359 | Werz | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8408039 | Cao et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8454765 | Saller | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8499605 | Bryan | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8551264 | Kosaka et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8578748 | Huskamp et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8679269 | Goller et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8919168 | Valiev et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9034247 | Suzuki et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9327342 | Oppenheimer et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9732408 | Sanz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 20020033717 | Matsuo | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020189399 | Grubb | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030168138 | Marquardt | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040050463 | Jung | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040099350 | Manitone et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148997 | Amino et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040206427 | Iseda | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221929 | Hebda et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250932 | Briggs | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050028905 | Riffee, Jr. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047952 | Coleman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050145310 | Bewlay et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060045789 | Nasserrafi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110614 | Liimatainen | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060243356 | Oikawa et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070009858 | Hatton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070017273 | Haug et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098588 | Narita | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070178322 | Chun et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193662 | Jablokov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286761 | Miracle et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000554 | Yaguchi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103543 | Li et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107559 | Nishiyama et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202189 | Otaki | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080210345 | Tetyukhin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264932 | Hirota | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090000706 | Huron et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183804 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234385 | Cichocki et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100147247 | Qiao | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170596 | Saller et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100307647 | Marquardt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110038751 | Marquardt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110180188 | Bryan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110183151 | Yokoyama et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110290665 | Shim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120003118 | Hebda et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120012233 | Bryan | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120060981 | Forbes Jones et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120067100 | Stefansson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076611 | Bryan | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076612 | Bryan | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076686 | Bryan | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120177532 | Hebda et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120279351 | Gu et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120308428 | Forbes Jones et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130062003 | Shulkin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130118653 | Bryan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130156628 | Forbes Jones et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291616 | Bryan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140060138 | Hebda et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140076468 | Marquardt et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140076471 | Forbes Jones et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140116582 | Forbes Jones et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140238552 | Forbes Jones et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140255719 | Forbes Jones et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140260492 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140261922 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20160047024 | Bryan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160122851 | Jones et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160138149 | Bryan | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160201165 | Foltz, IV | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170058387 | Marquardt et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170146046 | Foltz, IV | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170218485 | Jones et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170321313 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170349977 | Forbes Jones et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180016670 | Bryan | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180073092 | Forbes Jones et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180195155 | Bryan | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20200032833 | Foltz, IV et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200347483 | Foltz, IV | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2787980 | Jul 2011 | CA |
| 1070230 | Mar 1993 | CN |
| 1194671 | Sep 1998 | CN |
| 1403622 | Mar 2003 | CN |
| 1816641 | Aug 2006 | CN |
| 101104898 | Jan 2008 | CN |
| 101205593 | Jun 2008 | CN |
| 101294264 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101684530 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 101637789 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 102212716 | Oct 2011 | CN |
| 102816953 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 19743802 | Mar 1999 | DE |
| 10128199 | Dec 2002 | DE |
| 102010009185 | Nov 2011 | DE |
| 0066361 | Dec 1982 | EP |
| 0109350 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0320820 | Jun 1989 | EP |
| 0535817 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 0611831 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 0834580 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0870845 | Oct 1998 | EP |
| 0707085 | Jan 1999 | EP |
| 0683242 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0969109 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 1083243 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| 1136582 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1302554 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1302555 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1433863 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1471158 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1605073 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1612289 | Jan 2006 | EP |
| 1375690 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1717330 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1882752 | Jan 2008 | EP |
| 2028435 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 2281908 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 1546429 | Jun 2012 | EP |
| 2545104 | Nov 1984 | FR |
| 847103 | Sep 1960 | GB |
| 1170997 | Nov 1969 | GB |
| 1345048 | Jan 1974 | GB |
| 1433306 | Apr 1976 | GB |
| 1479855 | Jul 1977 | GB |
| 2151260 | Jul 1985 | GB |
| 2198144 | Jun 1988 | GB |
| 2337762 | Dec 1999 | GB |
| 55-113865 | Sep 1980 | JP |
| 57-62820 | Apr 1982 | JP |
| 57-62846 | Apr 1982 | JP |
| S57-202935 | Dec 1982 | JP |
| S58-210156 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| S58-210158 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| 60-046358 | Mar 1985 | JP |
| 60-100655 | Jun 1985 | JP |
| S60-190519 | Sep 1985 | JP |
| S61-060871 | Mar 1986 | JP |
| S61-217564 | Sep 1986 | JP |
| S61270356 | Nov 1986 | JP |
| 62-109956 | May 1987 | JP |
| 62-127074 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 62-149859 | Jul 1987 | JP |
| S62-227597 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| S62-247023 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| S63-49302 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| S63-188426 | Aug 1988 | JP |
| H01-272750 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 1-279736 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 2-205661 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 3-134124 | Jun 1991 | JP |
| H03-138343 | Jun 1991 | JP |
| H03-155427 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| H03-166350 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| 03264618 | Nov 1991 | JP |
| H03-264618 | Nov 1991 | JP |
| 4-74856 | Mar 1992 | JP |
| 4-103737 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 4-143236 | May 1992 | JP |
| 4-168227 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 5-59510 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5-117791 | May 1993 | JP |
| 5-195175 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| H05-293555 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| H06-93389 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 8-300044 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 9-143650 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 9-194969 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 9-215786 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| H10-128459 | May 1998 | JP |
| H10-306335 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| H11-21642 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| H11-309521 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| H11-319958 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 11-343528 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 11-343548 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2000-153372 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000-234887 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2001-71037 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001-081537 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001-343472 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002-69591 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002-146497 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2003-55749 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003-73762 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003-74566 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003-285126 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2003-334633 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004-131761 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2005-281855 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2007-291488 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007-327118 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2008-200730 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2009-138218 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| 2009-167502 | Jul 2009 | JP |
| WO 2009142228 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2009-299110 | Dec 2009 | JP |
| 2009-299120 | Dec 2009 | JP |
| 2010-70833 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2012-140690 | Jul 2012 | JP |
| 2012-180542 | Sep 2012 | JP |
| 2015-54332 | Mar 2015 | JP |
| 920004946 | Jun 1992 | KR |
| 10-2005-0087765 | Aug 2005 | KR |
| 10-2009-0069647 | Jul 2009 | KR |
| 10-2011-0069602 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 20110069602 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 2003417 | Nov 1993 | RU |
| 1131234 | Oct 1994 | RU |
| 2156828 | Sep 2000 | RU |
| 2197555 | Jul 2001 | RU |
| 2172359 | Aug 2001 | RU |
| 2217260 | Nov 2003 | RU |
| 2234998 | Aug 2004 | RU |
| 2256713 | Jul 2005 | RU |
| 2269584 | Feb 2006 | RU |
| 2288967 | Dec 2006 | RU |
| 2364660 | Aug 2009 | RU |
| 2368695 | Sep 2009 | RU |
| 2378410 | Jan 2010 | RU |
| 2392348 | Jun 2010 | RU |
| 2393936 | Jul 2010 | RU |
| 2413030 | Feb 2011 | RU |
| 2441089 | Jan 2012 | RU |
| 2447185 | Apr 2012 | RU |
| 534518 | Jan 1977 | SU |
| 631234 | Nov 1978 | SU |
| 1077328 | May 1982 | SU |
| 1135798 | Jan 1985 | SU |
| 1088397 | Feb 1991 | SU |
| 38805 | May 2001 | UA |
| 40862 | Aug 2001 | UA |
| A200613448 | Jun 2008 | UA |
| H03-274238 | Dec 1991 | WO |
| WO 9817386 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9817836 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9822629 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 0236847 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 02070763 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 02086172 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02090607 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO 2004101838 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2007084178 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007114439 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007142379 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008017257 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008071192 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009082498 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009102233 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010084883 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2012063504 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012147742 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013081770 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013130139 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Forging Machinery, Dies, and Processes, Metals Handbook Desk Edition, ASM International, 1998, p. 839-863 (Year: 1998). |
| Types of Heat-Treating Furnaces. ASM Handbook, vol. 4: HeatTreating. 1991. p. 465-474 (Year: 1991). |
| ACOM Magazine, pp. 1-16, published in Feb. 2013. |
| David N. French Sc. D, “Austenitic Stainless Steel,” 3 pages, published winter of 1992 in the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Bulletin. |
| Superaustenitic, 3 pages, retrieved on Nov. 9, 2015, and available at http://www.atimetals.com/products/Pages/superaustenitic.aspx. |
| Hsieh and Wu, “Overview of Intermetallic Sigma Phase Precipitation in Stainless Steel,” 10 pages, available in ISRN Metallurgy vol. 2012 (2012). |
| Yaylaci et al., “Cold Working & Hot Working & Annealing,” slides 1-40, published in 2010 and retrieved on Dec. 10, 2015, available at http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/˜selis/teaching/WEBkmu479/Ppt/kmu479Presentations2010/Cold_Hot_Working_Annealing.pdf. |
| INCONEL Alloy 600, pp. 1-16, published in Sep. 2008 by Special Metals Corporation, and available at www.specialmetals.com. |
| Daniel H. Herring “Grain size and its Influence on Materials Properties,” pp. 20 and 22, published in Aug. 2005, and available at industrialheating.com. |
| ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, “Blasting or Blast Cleaning,” J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 42. |
| ATI 38-644™ Beta Titanium Alloy Technical Data Sheet, UNA R58640, Version 1, Dec. 21, 2011, 4 pages. |
| ATI 425® Alloy, Grade 38, Titanium Alloy, UNS R54250, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Nov. 25, 2013, pp. 1-6. |
| Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, vol. 14B, pp. 656-669. |
| Craighead et al., “Ternary Alloys of Titanium”, Journal of Metals, Mar. 1950, Transactions AIME, vol. 188, pp. 514-538. |
| Craighead et al., “Titanium Binary Alloys”, Journal of Metals, Mar. 1950, Transactions AIME, vol. 188, pp. 485-513. |
| Diderrich et al., “Addition of Cobalt to the Ti—6Al—4V Alloy”, Journal of Metals, May 1968, pp. 29-37. |
| Donachie Jr., M.J., “Heat Treating Titanium and Its Alloys”, Heat Treating Process, Jun./Jul. 2001, pp. 47-49, 52-53, and 56-57. |
| Glazunov et al., Structural Titanium Alloys, Moscow, Metallurgy, 1974, pp. 264-283. |
| Novikov et al., 17.2.2 Deformable (α+β) alloys, Chapter 17, Titanium and its Alloys, Metal Science, vol. II Thermal Treatment of the Alloy, Physical Matallurgy, 2009, pp. 357-360. |
| Swann, P.R. and J. G. Parr, “Phase Transformations in Titanium-Rich Alloys of Titanium and Cobalt”, Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, Apr. 1958, pp. 276-279. |
| Ti—6Al—4V, Ti64, 6Al—4V, 6-4, UNA R56400, 1 page. |
| Titanium 3Al—8V—6Cr—4Mo—4Zr Beta-C/Grade 19 UNS R58640, 2 pages. |
| Yakymyshyn et al., “The Relationship between the Constitution and Mechanical Properties of Titanium-Rich Alloys of Titanium and Cobalt”, 1961, vol. 53, pp. 283-294. |
| AFML-TR-76-80 Development of Titanium Alloy Casting Technology, Aug. 1976, 5 pages. |
| Valiev et al., “Nanostructured materials produced by sever plastic deformation”, Moscow, LOGOS, 2000. |
| Li et al., “The optimal determination of forging process parameters for Ti—6.5Al—3.5Mo—1.5Zr—0.3Si alloy with thick lamellar microstructure in two phase field based on P-map”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 210, Issue 2, Jan. 19, 2010, pp. 370-377. |
| Buijk, A., “Open-Die Forging Simulation”, Forge Magazine, Dec. 1, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Herring, D., “Grain Size and Its Influence on Materials Properties”, IndustrialHeating.com, Aug. 2005, pp. 20 and 22. |
| INCONEL® alloy 600, Special Metals Corporation, www.specialmetals.com, Sep. 2008, 16 pages. |
| Yaylaci et al., “Cold Working & Hot Working & Annealing”, http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/˜selis/teaching/WEBkmu479/Ppt/kmu479Presentations2010/Cold_Hot_Working_Annealing.pdf, 2010, 41 pages. |
| Superaustenitic, http://www.atimetals.com/products/Pages/superaustenitic.aspx, Nov. 9, 2015, 3 pages. |
| French, D., “Austenitic Stainless Steer”, The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Bulletin,1992, 3 pages. |
| Acom Magazine, outokumpu, NACE International, Feb. 2013, 16 pages. |
| ATI A286™ Iron Based Superalloy (UNS S66286) Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Apr. 17, 2012, 9 pages. |
| ATI A286™ (UNS S66286) Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 14, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Corrosion-Resistant Titanium, Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Feb. 29, 2012, 5 pages. |
| ATI 3-2.5™ Titanium (Ti Grade 9) Technical Data Sheet, ATI Wah Chang, 2010, 4 pages. |
| Grade 9 Ti 3Al 2.5V Alloy (UNA R56320), Jul. 30, 2013. http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9337, 3 pages. |
| ATI Ti—6Al—4V, Grade 5. Titanium Alloy (UNS R56400) Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Jan. 31, 2012, 4 pages. |
| Panin et al., “Low-cost Titanium Alloys for Titanium-Polymer Layered Composites”, 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, Sep. 7, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Grade Ti—4.5Al—3V—2Mo—2Fe Alloy. Jul. 9, 2013, http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9448. 2 pages. |
| Garside et al., “Mission Critical Metallics® Recent Developments in High-Strength Titanium Fasteners for Aerospace Applications”, ATI, 2013, 21 pages. |
| Foltz et al., “Recent Developments in High-Strength Titanium Fasteners for Aerospace Applications”, ATI, Oct. 22, 2014, 17 pages. |
| Kosaka et al.. “Superplastic Forming Properties of Timetal® 54M”, Henderson Technical Laboratory, Titanium Metals Corporation, ITA, Oct. 2010, Orlando, Florida, 18 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Advisory Action dated May 18, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Notice of Abandonment dated Jan. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated May 27, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Sep. 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 16, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285. |
| Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Oct. 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300, filed Jan. 12, 2015. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465. |
| Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Sep. 29, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465. |
| Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Oct. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| ATI Datalloy HP™ Alloy, UNS N08830, Technical Data Sheet Version 1, Apr. 14, 2015, 6 pages. |
| ATI Datalloy 2® Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 20, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, ASM International, Revised by ASM Committee on Forming Titanium Alloys, vol. 14B, 2 pages. |
| Bar definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 32. |
| Billet definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 40. |
| Cogging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 79. |
| Open die press forging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) pp. 298 and 343. |
| Thermomechanical working definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 480. |
| Ductility definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 131. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545. |
| Hsieh, Chih-Chun and Weite Wu, “Overview of Intermetallic Sigma Phase Precipitation in Stainless Steels”, ISRN Metallurgy, vol. 2012, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
| Handa, Sukhdeep Singh, “Precipitation of Carbides in a Ni-based Superalloy”, Degree Project for Master of Science with Specialization in Manufacturing Department of Engineering Science, University West, Jun. 30, 2014, 42 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Mar. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jun. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jun. 10, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941, filed Nov. 23, 2015. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,759. |
| Office Action dated May 6, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,759. |
| ASTM Designation F 2066/F2066M-13, “Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150)”, Nov. 2013, 6 pages. |
| Boyko et al., “Modeling of the Open-Die and Radial Forging Processes for Alloy 718”, Superalloys 718, 625 and Various Derivatives: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Metallurgy and Applications of Superalloys 718, 625 and Various Derivatives, held Jun. 23, 1992, pp. 107-124. |
| Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jan. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jan. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| Arjaan Buijk, “Open-Die Forging Simulation,” FORGE Magazine, 5 pages, Dec. 1, 2013. |
| “Allvac TiOsteum and TiOstalloy Beat Titanium Alloys”, printed from www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/TiOsteum.htm on Nov. 7, 2005. |
| “Datasheet: Timetal 21S”, Alloy Digest, Advanced Materials and Processes (Sep. 1998), pp. 38-39. |
| “Heat Treating of Nonferrous Alloys: Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online (2002). |
| “Stryker Orthopaedics TMZF® Alloy (UNS R58120)”, printed from www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/UNSR58120.htm on Nov. 7, 2005. |
| “Technical Data Sheet: Allvac® Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy” (dated Jun. 16, 2004). |
| “ASTM Designation F1801-97 Standard Practice for Corrosion Fatigue Testing of Metallic Implant Materials” ASTM International (1997) pp. 876-880. |
| “ASTM Designation F2066-01 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNA R58150),” ASTM International (2000) pp. 1-4. |
| AL-6XN® Alloy (UNS N08367) Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, 2002, 56 pages. |
| Allegheny Ludlum, “High Performance Metals for Industry, High Strength, High Temperature, and Corrosion-Resistant Alloys”, (2000) pp. 1-8. |
| Allvac, Product Specification for “Allvac Ti-15 Mo,” available at http://www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/Ti15MO.htm, last visited Jun. 9, 2003 p. 1 of 1. |
| Altemp® A286 Iron-Base Superalloy (UNS Designation S66286) Allegheny Ludlum Technical Data Sheet Blue Sheet, 1998, 8 pages. |
| ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 39. |
| ATI Datalloy 2 Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, ATI Allvac, Monroe, NC, SS-844, Version1, Sep. 17, 2010, 8 pages. |
| ATI 690 (UNS N06690) Nickel-Base, ATI Allvac, Oct. 5, 2010, 1 page. |
| Isothermal forging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis ed., Fifth Printing, Jan. 2006, ASM International, p. 238. |
| Isothermal forging, printed from http://thelibraryofmanufacturing.com/isothermal_forging.html, accessed Jun. 5, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Adiabatic definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis ed., Fifth Printing, Jan. 2006, ASM International, p. 9. |
| Adiabatic process—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_process, accessed May 21, 2013, 10 pages. |
| ASTM Designation F 2066-01, “Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150)”, May 2001, 7 pages. |
| ATI 6-2-4-2™ Alloy Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 26, 2012, 4 pages. |
| ATI 6246™ Titanium Alloy Data Sheet, accessed Jun. 26, 2012. |
| ATI 425, High-Strength Titanium Alloy, Alloy Digest, ASM International, Jul. 2004, 2 pages. |
| ATI 425® Alloy Applications, retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20100704044024/http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com/ATI425/applications/default.asp#other, Jul. 4, 2010, Way Back Machine, 2 pages. |
| ATI 425® Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20100703120218/http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com/ATI425/specifications/datasheet.asp, Jul. 3, 2010, Way Back Machine, 5 pages. |
| ATI 425®-MIL Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, May 28, 2010, pp. 1-5. |
| ATI 425®-MIL Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 2, Aug. 16, 2010, 5 pages. |
| ATI 425®-MIL Titanium Alloy, Mission Critical Metallics®, Version 3, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
| ATI 425® Titanium Alloy, Grade 38 Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 1, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
| ATI 500-MIL™ , Mission Critical Metallics®, High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 4, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
| ATI 600-MIL®, Preliminary Draft Data Sheet, Ultra High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 4, Aug. 10, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
| ATI 600-MIL™ , Preliminary Draft Data Sheet, Ultra High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 3, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-3. |
| ATI Aerospace Materials Development, Mission Critical Metallics, Apr. 30, 2008, 17 pages. |
| ATI Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy Technical Data Sheet, ATI Allvac, Monroe, NC, Mar. 21, 2008, 3 pages. |
| ATI Titanium 6Al—2Sn—4Zr—2Mo Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Sep. 17, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
| ATI Titanium 6Al—4V Alloy, Mission Critical Metallics®, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Apr. 22, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
| ATI Wah Chang, ATI™ 425 Titanium Alloy (Ti—4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe—0.2502), Technical Data Sheet, 2004, pp. 1-5. |
| ATI Wah Chang, Titanium and Titanium Alloys, Technical Data Sheet, 2003, pp. 1-16. |
| Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, ASM International, vol. 14B, 2 pages. |
| Bewlay, et al., “Superplastic roll forming of Ti alloys”, Materials and Design, 21, 2000, pp. 287-295. |
| Bowen, A. W., “Omega Phase Embrittlement in Aged Ti—15%Mo,” Scripta Metallurgica, vol. 5, No. 8 (1971) pp. 709-715. |
| Bowen, A. W., “On the Strengthening of a Metastable b-Titanium Alloy by w- and a-Precipitation” Royal Aircraft Establishment Technical Memorandum Mat 338, (1980) pp. 1-15 and Figs 1-5. |
| Boyer, Rodney R., “Introduction and Overview of Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Applications,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online (2002). |
| Cain, Patrick, “Warm forming aluminum magnesium components; How it can optimize formability, reduce springback”, Aug. 1, 2009, from http://www.thefabricator.com/article/presstechnology/warm-forming-aluminum-magnesium-components, 3 pages. |
| Callister, Jr., William D., Materials Science and Engineering, An Introduction, Sixth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 180-184 (2003). |
| Desrayaud et al., “A novel high straining process for bulk materials—The development of a multipass forging system by compression along three axes”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 172, 2006, pp. 152-158. |
| DiDomizio, et al., “Evaluation of a Ni—20Cr Alloy Processed by Multi-axis Forging”, Materials Science Forum vols. 503-504, 2006, pp. 793-798. |
| Disegi, J. A., “Titanium Alloys for Fracture Fixation Implants,” Injury International Journal of the Care of the Injured, vol. 31 (2000) pp. S-D14-17. |
| Disegi, John, Wrought Titanium—15% Molybdenum Implant Material, Original Instruments and Implants of the Association for the Study of International Fixation—AO ASIF, Oct. 2003. |
| Donachie Jr., M.J., “Titanium A Technical Guide” 1988, ASM, pp. 39 and 46-50. |
| Duflou et al., “A method for force reduction in heavy duty bending”, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, vol. 32, No. 4, 2008, pp. 460-475. |
| Elements of Metallurgy and Engineering Alloys, Editor F. C. Campbell, ASM International, 2008, Chapter 8, p. 125. |
| Fedotov, S.G. et al., “Effect of Aluminum and Oxygen on the Formation of Metastable Phases in Alloys of Titanium with .beta.-Stabilizing Elements”, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Metally (1974) pp. 121-126. |
| Froes, F.H. et al., “The Processing Window for Grain Size Control in Metastable Beta Titanium Alloys”, Beta Titanium Alloys in the 80's, ed. by R. Boyer and H. Rosenberg, AIME, 1984, pp. 161-164. |
| Gigliotti et al., “Evaluation of Superplastically Roll Formed VT-25”, Titamium'99, Science and Technology, 2000, pp. 1581-1588. |
| Gilbert et al., “Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Solution Treating and Aging”, ASM Handbook, 1991, ASM International, vol. 4, pp. 1-8. |
| Greenfield, Dan L., News Release, ATI Aerospace Presents Results of Year-Long Characterization Program for New ATI 425 Alloy Titanium Products at Aeromat 2010, Jun. 21, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1 page. |
| Harper, Megan Lynn, “A Study of the Microstructural and Phase Evolutions in Timetal 555”, Jan. 2001, retrieved from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/send-pdf.cgi/harper%20megan%20lynn.pdf?acc_num=osu1132165471 on Aug. 10, 2009, 92 pages. |
| Hawkins, M.J. et al., “Osseointegration of a New Beta Titanium Alloy as Compared to Standard Orthopaedic Implant Metals,” Sixth World Biomaterials Congress Transactions, Society for Biomaterials, 2000, p. 1083. |
| Ho, W.F. et al., “Structure and Properties of Cast Binary Ti—Mo Alloys” Biomaterials, vol. 20 (1999) pp. 2115-2122. |
| Imatani et al., “Experiment and simulation for thick-plate bending by high frequency inductor”, ACTA Metallurgica Sinica, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 1998, pp. 449-455. |
| Imayev et al., “Formation of submicrocrystalline structure in TiAl intermetallic compound”, Journal of Materials Science, 27, 1992, pp. 4465-4471. |
| Imayev et al., “Principles of Fabrication of Bulk Ultrafine-Grained and Nanostructured Materials by Multiple Isothermal Forging”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 638-642, 2010, pp. 1702-1707. |
| Imperial Metal Industries Limited, Product Specification for “IMI Titanium 205”, The Kynoch Press (England) pp. 1-5. (publication date unknown). |
| Jablokov et al., “Influence of Oxygen Content on the Mechanical Properties of Titanium-35Niobium-7Zirconium-5Tantalum Beta Titanium Alloy,” Journal of ASTM International, Sep. 2005, vol. 2, No. 8, 2002, pp. 1-12. |
| Jablokov et al., “The Application of Ti—15 Mo Beta Titanium Alloy in High Strength Orthopaedic Applications”, Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, Issue 8 (Sep. 2005) (published online Jun. 22, 2005). |
| Kovtun, et al., “Method of calculating induction heating of steel sheets during thermomechanical bending”, Kiev, Nikolaev, translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 5, pp. 105-110, May 1978, original article submitted Nov. 27, 1977, pp. 600-606. |
| Lampman, S., “Wrought and Titanium Alloys,” ASM Handbooks Online, ASM International, 2002. |
| Lee et al., “An electromagnetic and thermo-mechanical analysis of high frequency induction heating for steel plate bending”, Key Engineering Materials, vols. 326-328, 2006, pp. 1283-1286. |
| Lemons, Jack et al., “Metallic Biomaterials for Surgical Implant Devices,” BONEZone, Fall (2002) p. 5-9 and Table. |
| Long, M. et al., “Friction and Surface Behavior of Selected Titanium Alloys During Reciprocating-Sliding Motion”, Wear, 249(1-2), Jan. 17, 2001, 158-168. |
| Lutjering, G. and J.C. Williams, Titanium, Springer, New York (2nd ed. 2007) p. 24. |
| Lutjering, G. and Williams, J.C., Titanium, Springer-Verlag, 2003, Ch. 5: Alpha+Beta Alloys, p. 177-201. |
| Marquardt et al., “Beta Titanium Alloy Processed for High Strength Orthopaedic Applications,” Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, Issue 9 (Oct. 2005) (published online Aug. 17, 2005). |
| Marquardt, Brian, “Characterization of Ti—15Mo for Orthopaedic Applications, ”TMS 2005 Annual Meeting: Technical Program, San Francisco, CA, Feb. 13-17, 2005 Abstract, p. 239. |
| Marquardt, Brian, “Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy Processed for High Strength Orthopaedic Applications,” Program and Abstracts for the Symposium on Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, and Tantalum for Medical and Surgical Applications, Washington, D.C., Nov. 9-10, 2004 Abstract, p. 11. |
| Marte et al., “Structure and Properties of Ni-20CR Produced by Severe Plastic Deformation”, Ultrafine Grained Materials IV, 2006, pp. 419-424. |
| Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, Eds. Boyer et al, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994, pp. 524-525. |
| Martinelli, Gianni and Roberto Peroni, “Isothermal forging of Ti-alloys for medical applications”, Presented at the 11th World Conference on Titanium, Kyoto, Japan, Jun. 4-7, 2007, accessed Jun. 5, 2013, 5 pages. |
| McDevitt, et al., Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of ATI 425 Alloy According to the Guidelines of the Metallic Materials Properties Development & Standardization Handbook, Aeromat 2010 Conference and Exposition: Jun. 20-24, 2010, Bellevue, WA, 23 pages. |
| Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd ed., J. R. Davis ed., ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (1998), pp. 575-588. |
| Military Standard, Fastener Test Methods, Method 13, Double Shear Test, MIL-STD-1312-13, Jul. 26, 1985, superseding MIL-STD-1312 (in part) May 31, 1967, 8 pages. |
| Military Standard, Fastener Test Methods, Method 13, Double Shear Test, MIL-STD-1312-13A, Aug. 23, 1991, superseding MIL-STD-13, Jul. 26, 1985, 10 pages. |
| Murray, J.L., et al., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Second Edition, vol. 1, Ed. Massaiski, Materials Park, OH; ASM International; 1990, p. 547. |
| Murray, J.L., The Mn—Ti (Manganese-Titanium) System, Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol. 2, No. 3 (1981) p. 334-343. |
| Myers, J., “Primary Working, A lesson from Titanium and its Alloys,” ASM Course Book 27 Lesson, Test 9, Aug. 1994, pp. 3-4. |
| Naik, Uma M. et al., “Omega and Alpha Precipitation in Ti—15Mo Alloy, ”Titanium '80 Science and Technology-Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium, H. Kimura & O. Izumi Eds. May 19-22, 1980 pp. 1335-1341. |
| Nguyen et al., “Analysis of bending deformation in triangle heating of steel plates with induction heating process using laminated plate theory”, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 37, 2009, pp. 228-246. |
| Nishimura, T. “Ti—15Mo—5Zr—3Al”, Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, eds. R. Boyer et al., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994, p. 949. |
| Nutt, Michael J. et al., “The Application of Ti-15 Beta Titanium Alloy in High Strength Structural Orthopaedic Applications, ”Program and Abstracts for the Symposium on Titanium Niobium, Zirconium, and Tantalum for Medical and Surgical Applications, Washington, D.C., Nov. 9-10, 2004 Abstract, p. 12. |
| Nyakana, et al., “Quick Reference Guide for β Titanium Alloys in the 00s”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 14, No. 6, Dec. 1, 2005, pp. 799-811. |
| Pennock, G.M. et al., “The Control of a Precipitation by Two Step Ageing in β Ti—15Mo,” Titanium '80 Science and Technology—Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium, H. Kimura & O. Izumi Eds. May 19-22, 1980 pp. 1344-1350. |
| Prasad, Y.V.R.K. et al. “Hot Deformation Mechanism in Ti—6Al—4V with Transformed B Starting Microstructure: Commercial v. Extra Low Interstitial Grade”, Materials Science and Technology, Sep. 2000, vol. 16, pp. 1029-1036. |
| Qazi, J.I. et al., “High-Strength Metastable Beta-Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Applications,” JOM, Nov. 2004 pp. 49-51. |
| Roach, M.D., et al., “Comparison of the Corrosion Fatigue Characteristics of CPTi-Grade 4, Ti-6A1-4V ELI, Ti-6A1-7 Nb, and Ti-15 Mo”, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 2, Issue 7, (Jul./Aug. 2005) (published online Jun. 8, 2005). |
| Roach, M.D., et al., “Physical, Metallurgical, and Mechanical Comparison of a Low-Nickel Stainless Steel,” Transactions on the 27th Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Apr. 24-29, 2001, p. 343. |
| Roach, M.D., et al., “Stress Corrosion Cracking of a Low-Nickel Stainless Steel,” Transactions of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, 2001, p. 469. |
| Rudnev et at., “Longitudinal flux indication heating of slabs, bars and strips is no longer “Black Magic:” II”, Industrial Heating, Feb. 1995, pp. 46-48 and 50-51. |
| Russo, P.A., “Influence of Ni and Fe on the Creep of Beta Annealed Ti—62425”, Titanium '95: Science and Technology, pp. 1075-1082. |
| SAE Aerospace Material Specification 4897A (issued Jan. 1997, revised Jan. 2003). |
| SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy Bars, Forgings and Forging Stock, 6.0Al—4.0V Annealed, AMS 6931A, Issued Jan. 2004, Revised Feb. 2007, pp. 1-7. |
| SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy Bars, Forgings and Forging Stock, 6.0Al—4.0V, Solution Heat Treated and Aged, AMS 6930A, Issued Jan. 2004, Revised Feb. 2006, pp. 1-9. |
| SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate, 4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe, Annealed, AMS 6946A, Issued Oct. 2006, Revised Jun. 2007, pp. 1-7. |
| Salishchev et al., “Characterization of Submicron-grained Ti—6Al—4V Sheets with Enhanced Superplastic Properties”, Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, vols. 447-448, 2004, pp. 441-446. |
| Salishchev et al., “Mechanical Properties of Ti—6Al—4V Titanium Alloy with Submicrocrystalline Structure Produced by Multiaxial Forging”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 584-586, 2008, pp. 783-788. |
| Salishchev, et al., “Effect of Deformation Conditions on Grain Size and Microstructure Homogeneity of β-Rich Titanium Alloys”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 14(6), Dec. 2005, pp. 709-716. |
| Salishchev, G.A., “Formation of submicrocrystalline structure in large size billets and sheets out of titanium alloys”, Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems,Ufa, Russia, presented at 2003 NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Kyiv, Ukraine, Sep. 9-13, 2003, 50 pages. |
| Semiatin, S.L. et al., “The Thermomechanical Processing of Alpha/Beta Titanium Alloys,” Journal of Metals, Jun. 1997, pp. 33-39. |
| Semiatin et al., “Equal Channel Angular Extrusion of Difficult-to-Work Alloys”, Materials & Design, Elsevier Science Ltd., 21, 2000, pp. 311-322. |
| Semiatin et al., “Alpha/Beta Heat Treatment of a Titanium Alloy with a Nonuniform Microstructure”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 38A, Apr. 2007, pp. 910-921. |
| Shahan et al., “Adiabatic shear bands in titanium and titanium alloys: a critical review”, Materials & Design, vol. 14, No. 4, 1993, pp. 243-250. |
| SPS Titanium™ Titanium Fasteners, SPS Technologies Aerospace Fasteners, 2003, 4 pages. |
| Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56400), Designation: F 1472-99, ASTM 1999, pp. 1-4. |
| Takemoto Y et al., “Tensile Behavior and Cold Workability of Ti—Mo Alloys”, Materials Transactions Japan Inst. Metals Japan, vol. 45, No. 5, May 2004, pp. 1571-1576. |
| Tamarisakandala, S. et al., “Strain-induced Porosity During Cogging of Extra-Low Interstitial Grade Ti—6Al—4V”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 10(2), Apr. 2001, pp. 125-130. |
| Tamirisakandala et al., “Effect of boron on the beta transus of Ti—6Al—4V alloy”, Scripta Materialia, 53, 2005, pp. 217-222. |
| Tamirisakandala et al., “Powder Metallurgy Ti—6Al—4V—xB Alloys: Processing, Microstructure, and Properties”, JOM, May 2004, pp. 60-63. |
| Tebbe, Patrick A. and Ghassan T. Kridli, “Warm forming aluminum alloys: an overview and future directions”, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, vol. 21, Nos. 1-3, 2004, pp. 24-40. |
| Technical Presentation: Overview of MMPDS Characterization of ATI 425 Alloy, 2012, 1 page. |
| TIMET 6-6-2 Titanium Alloy (Ti—6Al—6V—2Sn), Annealed, accessed Jun. 27, 2012. |
| TIMET Timetal® 6-2-4-2 (Ti—6Al—2Sn—4Zr—2Mo—0.08Si) Titanium Alloy datasheet, accessed Jun. 26, 2012. |
| TIMET Timetal® 6-2-4-6 Titanium Alloy (Ti—6Al—2Sn—4Zr—6Mo), Typical, accessed Jun. 26, 2012. |
| Tokaji, Keiro et al., “The Microstructure Dependence of Fatigue Behavior in Ti—15Mo—5Zr—3Al Alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A., vol. 213 (1996) pp. 86-92. |
| Two new α-βtitanium alloys, KS Ti—9 for sheet and KS EL-F for forging, with mechanical properties comparable to Ti—6Al—4V, Oct. 8, 2002, ITA 2002 Conference in Orlando, Hideto Oyama, Titanium Technology Dept., Kobe Steel, Ltd., 16 pages. |
| Veeck, S., et al., “The Castability of Ti-5553 Alloy,” Advanced Materials and Processes, Oct. 2004, pp. 47-49. |
| Weiss, I. et al., “The Processing Window Concept of Beta Titanium Alloys”, Recrystallization '90, ed. by T. Chandra, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1990, pp. 609-616. |
| Weiss, I. et al., “Thermomechanical Processing of Beta Titanium Alloys—An Overview,” Material Science and Engineering, A243, 1998, pp. 46-65. |
| Williams, J., Thermo-mechanical processing of high-performance Ti alloys: recent progress and future needs, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 117 (2001), p. 370-373. |
| Zardiackas, L.D. et al., “Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Titanium Implant Materials,” Transactions of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, (2001). |
| Zeng et al., Evaluation of Newly Developed Ti-555 High Strength Titanium Fasteners, 17th AeroMat Conference & Exposition, May 18, 2006, 2 pages. |
| Zhang et al., “Simulation of slip band evolution in duplex Ti—6Al—4V”, Acta Materialia, vol. 58, (2010), Nov. 26, 2009, pp. 1087-1096. |
| Zherebtsov et al., “Production of submicrocrystalline structure in large-scale Ti—6Al—4V billet by warm severe deformation processing”, Scripta Materialia, 51, 2004, pp. 1147-1151. |
| Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate 4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe, Annealed, AMS6946 Rev. B, Aug. 2010, SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, 7 pages. |
| Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate 6AI-4V, Annealed, AMS 4911L, Jun. 2007, SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, 7 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Interview summary dated Apr. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189. |
| Interview summary dated Jun. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189. |
| Interview summary dated Jun. 15, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189. |
| Interview summary dated Jan. 6, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Advisory Action dated Jan. 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review dated Mar. 28, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Advisory Action dated Nov. 29, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Office Action dated May 31, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789. |
| Advisory Action dated Oct. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,699. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 17, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066, filed Feb. 26, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,135, filed Dec. 20, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285, filed Mar. 11, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699, filed Nov. 12, 2013. |
| E112-12 Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size, ASTM International, Jan. 2013, 27 pages. |
| ATI Datalloy 2 Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, ATI Properties, Inc., Version 1, Jan. 24, 2013, 6 pages. |
| ATI AL-6XN® Alloy (UNS N08367), ATI Allegheny Ludlum, 2010, 59 pages. |
| ATI 800™ /ATI 800H™ /ATI 800AT™ ATI Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloys (UNS N08800/N08810/N08811), 2012 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 9, 2012, 7 pages. |
| ATI 825™ Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N08825), 2013 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 2, Mar. 8, 2013, 5 pages. |
| ATI 625™ Alloy Technical Data Sheet, High Strength Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N06625), Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 4, 2012, 3 pages. |
| ATI 600™ Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N06600), 2012 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 19, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620. |
| Titanium Alloy Guide, RMI Titanium Company, Jan. 2000, 45 pages. |
| Wanhill et al, “Chapter 2, Metallurgy and Microstructure”, Fatigue of Beta Processed and Beta Heat-treated Titanium Alloys, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, 2012, pp. 5-10. |
| Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys, http://www.totalmateria.com/Article97.htm, Apr. 2004, 5 pages. |
| Grade 6Al 2Sn 4Zr 6Mo Titanium Alloy (UNS R56260), AZoM, http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9305, Jun. 20, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Gammon et al., “Metallography and Microstructures of Titanium and Its Alloys”, ASM Handbook, vol. 9: Metallography and Microstructures, ASM International, 2004, pp. 899-917. |
| Rui-gang Deng, et al. “Effects of Forging Process and Following Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of TC11 Titanium Alloy,” Materials for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 35. No. 11, Nov. 2011, 5 pages. (English abstract included). |
| Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Aug. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Aug. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Srinivasan et al., “Rolling of Plates and Sheets from As-Cast Ti—6Al—4V—0.1 B”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 18.4, Jun. 2009, pp. 390-398. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated May 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jul. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 7, 2017 in in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Office Action dated May 25, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Oct. 27, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,651. |
| Advisory Action dated Mar. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13,777,066. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 1, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707. |
| Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review dated Feb. 24, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,231. |
| Advisory Action dated Oct. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Oct. 27, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/025,588. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 19/433,759. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,140, filed Nov. 10, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2015 is U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,750. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,750. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Markovsky, P. E., “Preparation and properties of ultrafine (submicron) structure titanium alloys”, Materials Science and Engineering, 1995, A203, 4 pages. |
| Gil et al., “Formation of alpha-Widmanstatten structure: effects of grain size and cooling rate on the Widmanstatten morphologies and on the mechanical properties in Ti6Al4V alloy”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 329, 2001, pp. 142-152. |
| Enayati et al., “Effects of temperature and effective strain on the flow behavior of Ti—6Al—4V”, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 348, 2011, pp. 2813-2822. |
| Longxian et al., “Wear-Resistant Coating and Performance Titanium and Its Alloy, and properties thereof”, Northeastern University Press, Dec. 2006, pp. 26-28, 33. |
| “Acceleration and Improvement for Heat Treating Workers,” Quick Start and Improvement for Heat Treatment, ed. Yang Man, China Machine Press, Apr. 2008, pp. 265-266. |
| Advisory Action dated Aug. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Decision on Appeal dated Dec. 15. 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196. |
| Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 21, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 9, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281. |
| Advisory Action dated Sep. 12, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review dated Oct. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Advisor Action dated Jan. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,985. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,985. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633. |
| Concise Explanation for Third Party Preissuance submission under Rule 1.290 filed in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527, filed Jun. 5, 2018. |
| Guidelines for PWR Steam Generator Tubing Specifications and Repair, Electric Power Research Institute, Apr. 14, 1999, vol. 2, Revision 1, 74 pages. (accessed at https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/TR-016743-V2R1/). |
| Materials Reliability Program: Guidelines for Thermally Treated Alloy 690 Pressure Vessel Nozzels, (MRP-241), Electric Power Research Institute, Jul. 25, 2008, 51 pages. (accessed at https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/1015007/). |
| Microstructure Etching and Carbon Analysis Techniques, Electric Power Research Institute, May 1, 1990, 355 pages. (accessed at https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/NP-6720-SD/). |
| Frodigh, John, “Some Factors Affecting the Appearance of the Microstructure in Alloy 690”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, Inc., vol. 1, Aug. 10, 1997, 12 pages. |
| Kajimura et al., “Corrosion Resistance of TT Alloy 690 Manufactured by Various Melting Processes in High Temperature NaOH Solution”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, Inc., vol. 1, Aug. 10, 1997, pp. 149-156. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 20, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,985. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443. |
| Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 27, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 6, 2018 U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443. |
| Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 11, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 18, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,174, filed Sep. 5, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,450, filed Sep. 5, 2018. |
| The Japan Society for Heat Treatment, Introduction of Heat Treatment, Japan, Minoru, Kanai, Jan. 10, 1974, p. 150. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Notification of Reopening Prosecution dated Dec. 19, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Jan. 30, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,661. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,140. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,128. |
| Angeliu et al, “Behavior of Grain Boundary Chemistry and Precipitates upon Thermal Treatment of Controlled Purity Alloy 690”, Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 21A, Aug. 1990, pp. 2097-2107. |
| Park et al., “Effect of heat treatment on fatigue crack growth rate of Inconel 690 and Inconel 600”, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 231, 1996, pp. 204-212. |
| Louthan, M.R., “Optical Metallography”, ASM Handbook, vol. 10, Materials Characterizations, 1986, pp. 299-308. |
| Kolachev B.A. el al., Titanium Alloys of Different Countries, Moscow, VILS, 2000, pp. 15-16. |
| High Strength Non-Magnetic Stainless Steel for Oil Drilling DNM series, Electric Steel Making, Daido Steel Co., Ltd., Japan, Jul. 27, 2012, vol. 83(1), pp. 75-76. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 14, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/028,588. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 25, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,450. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,661. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,661. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 9, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,140. |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,140. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,128. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,128. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,128. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,174. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,450. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 21, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,450. |
| Notice of Allowability dated Jan. 21, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,128. |
| Office Action dated May 13, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,219. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/779,689, filed Feb. 3, 2020. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,174. |
| Notice of Abandonment dated Aug. 27, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,219. |
| Notice of Abandonment dated Aug. 20, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/439,859. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150129093 A1 | May 2015 | US |
