The present invention relates to determining the concentration of asphaltenes in solutions using two-dimensional low field NMR measurement. The present invention further relates to NMR logging and analysis of subterranean formations.
Asphaltenes can be defined as the fraction of petroleum that is soluble in aromatics such as toluene and benzene and insoluble in paraffins such as hexane, heptane and decane. Better understanding of asphaltene concentration distributions in reservoirs would be helpful because of the huge dependence of crude oil viscosity on asphaltene content and the difficulties asphaltenes can present. Asphaltene precipitation and deposition in the oil field, which directly relate to asphaltene content in a hydrocarbon reservoir, are notorious for clogging subsurface formations, wells, flowlines, and surface facilities and can cause enormous disruption in oil production.
The current existing methods for in-situ measuring asphaltene content in producing reservoirs include downhole fluid analysis (DFA) in which measurements are made using optical filters that provide for identification of the color of the fluid in the reservoir. However, DFA focuses on the compositional analysis and is therefore of limited utility in determining the concentration distribution of asphaltenes.
Low-field NMR has been applied widely to well logging and the study of hydrocarbon samples in the petroleum industry. One-dimensional NMR (1D NMR), which usually measures transverse relaxation time, also referred to as spin-spin relaxation time, transverse relaxation time or T2, is limited in identification and quantitative evaluation of reservoir fluid components since the signals from different reservoir fluid components coexisting in local pores sometimes overlap each other in the T2 spectrum. This is particularly common in heavy oil reservoirs.
Improved in-situ quantification of asphaltene content in crude oils would be of significant benefit to the industry.
In one aspect, a method for determining the concentration of asphaltenes in a solution is provided. First, a model is established for estimating the concentration of asphaltenes in a solution. The model is established by preparing multiple samples of solutions of asphaltenes in a solvent. The multiple samples have varying concentrations of asphaltenes and the asphaltene concentration is known for each sample. The diffusivity and relaxation time are measured for each sample using two-dimensional NMR. The ratio of diffusivity to relaxation time for each sample is then calculated. A linear equation is determined to fit the relationship between the ratio of diffusivity to relaxation time and the asphaltene concentration by weight for the multiple samples, thus creating the model. For a given solution sample for which the concentration of asphaltenes is desired to be determined, diffusivity and relaxation time are determined using two-dimensional NMR, and the ratio of diffusivity to relaxation time is calculated. This ratio is then used with the model, so that the linear equation can be solved for the asphaltene concentration in the given solution sample.
In another aspect, a system is provided for determining the concentration of asphaltenes in a solution. The system includes an NMR probe located in contact with a fluid solution for determining diffusivity and relaxation time of the fluid solution. The system further includes a computer processor for receiving the diffusivity and relaxation time of the fluid solution from the NMR probe. The computer processor is capable of calculating the ratio of diffusivity to relaxation time for the fluid solution, accessing a linear equation describing the relationship between the ratio of diffusivity to relaxation time and the asphaltene concentration by weight, and solving the linear equation to determine the asphaltene concentration by weight in the fluid solution using the ratio of diffusivity to relaxation time for the fluid solution.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:
NMR is a known test method for obtaining information about a sample of a substance. Test measurements involve generating a magnetic field within a sample, emitting electromagnetic pulses, also referred to as RF pulses, into the sample, and detecting NMR responses from the sample. NMR has been used to characterize many properties of fluids in the hydrocarbon reservoirs. One of the NMR measured parameters is spin-lattice relaxation time, also referred to as T1. This refers to the time it takes for an assembly of magnetic moments to align along the direction of a magnetic is applied. Another related and frequently used NMR measured parameter is the spin-spin relaxation time T2, also referred to as transverse relaxation time, which is a relaxation time related to non-homogeneities in the local magnetic field in the test sample.
In low-frequency two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, also referred to as low frequency two-dimensional NMR and low-frequency 2-D NMR, the measurement of two-dimensional distribution functions between two dissipative quantities, such as relaxation and diffusion, is based on sequences where two or more independent times are varied in such a way that the kernel separates out. These experiments are analogous to conventional multidimensional NMR spectroscopy, where the kernels are typically phase factors of an exponential form and the distribution function is obtained from the measured magnetization by multidimensional Fourier transformation. By contrast, in low-frequency 2-D NMR, the kernels for relaxation and diffusion measurements are generally of an exponential form, and the data inversion requires a multidimensional inverse Laplace transformation.
In one embodiment, two-dimensional NMR is used in a method for determining the concentration of asphaltenes in a solution. First, multiple samples of solutions of asphaltenes in a solvent are prepared. In one embodiment, the solvent is toluene. Each of the multiple samples has a different concentration of asphaltenes in toluene. For each of the samples, the concentration of the sample is known. The diffusivity, also referred to as the diffusion coefficient and D, is measured for each sample using NMR. Transverse Relaxation time also referred to as T2, is also measured for each sample using NMR. The ratio of diffusivity to T2 for each sample can then be calculated. A linear equation can then be fitted to a plot of the ratio of diffusivity to T2 and the asphaltene concentration by weight for the multiple samples. The resulting linear equation is the model for estimating the concentration of asphaltenes in a solution.
The model determined as described above can then be used to determine the concentration of asphaltenes for a given solution sample for which the concentration of asphaltenes is unknown and desired to be determined. For the given solution sample, diffusivity and T2 are determined using NMR. The ratio of diffusivity to T2 is calculated. The model is then solved for the asphaltene concentration in the given solution sample.
In one embodiment, a system is provided for performing the above-described method. The system includes an NMR probe, a transmitter capable of generating RF pulses to be emitted by the probe, and a receiver capable of being tuned to detect and amplify signals received in the NMR probe. The probe is connected to the transmitter and the receiver. The system also includes a processor for processing the signals detected and amplified by the receiver. The processor is connected to the receiver.
The probe includes one or more RF coils tuned to the proper frequencies for the substances being measured in a given magnetic field and the proper impedance. The coils both emit the pulses and detect NMR signals. The probe also includes a network of capacitors. The RF coils and network of capacitors the couple the probe circuit. The probe can also include the necessary hardware to control the sample temperature.
The NMR probe is located proximate a given solution sample for which the concentration of asphaltenes is desired to be determined. In some embodiments, the NMR probe can surround, but not contact directly, the solution sample. In some embodiment, the NMR probe can contain the solution sample therein. In some embodiments, the NMR probe can be configured to be surrounded by the sample to be measured. In another embodiment, the NMR probe can be configured to be located a distance away from the sample to be measured.
In one embodiment, a test apparatus 10 as shown in
In some embodiments, such as that illustrated in the system 100
As shown in
In some embodiments, the NMR probe is located at the surface. In such cases, one or more surface coils and/or antennae can be used to emit RF pulses to make NMR measurements of subsurface hydrocarbons.
The processor 122 is capable of receiving signals indicative of the diffusivity and T2 determined for a given solution sample. The processor 122 is capable of calculating the ratio of diffusivity to T2 for the given solution sample. The processor is further capable of accessing the linear equation, also referred to as the model, and solving the linear equation using the ratio of diffusivity to T2 for the given solution sample to determine the asphaltene concentration in the given solution sample.
Experiments were performed on two different types of samples, crude oils with different asphaltene contents and toluene with different asphaltene contents. The experimental samples were prepared as follows.
For the crude oil samples, dry asphaltenes were extracted from two crude oils, referred to as A Crude Oil A and Crude Oil B, using hot heptane filtration. The crude oil samples were dispersed in n-heptane at 60° C. and filtered through a glass-fiber pad. The insoluble material was washed, dried and weighed.
The dry asphaltenes extracted from Crude Oil A were gradually added to Crude Oil A to achieve different asphaltene concentrations. Likewise, the dry asphaltenes extracted from Crude Oil B were gradually added to Crude Oil B to achieve different asphaltene concentrations. The dissolution of the dry asphaltenes in the crude oils was facilitated by an ultrasonic bath (AmericanBrand™, available from American Scientific Products, McGaw Park, Ill.). The weight of crude oil and added asphaltenes were recorded. The asphaltene content was calculated based on weight. In addition to Crude Oil A and Crude Oil B, eight other crude oil samples from different locations around the world with different original asphaltene concentrations were employed for D and T2 NMR measurements, for a total of 10 samples. Crude Oil A was prepared in four different concentrations, i.e., the original concentration and three higher concentrations of asphaltene. Crude Oil B was prepared in two different concentrations, i.e., the original concentration and one higher concentration. The remaining eight different crude oils were prepared with their original concentrations.
For the toluene solutions, different amounts of dry asphaltenes extracted from Crude Oil B were added to 100% toluene to generate a series of toluene-asphaltene solutions that covered a wide range of asphaltene concentrations. Again, the dissolution of the dry asphaltenes in the toluene was facilitated by an ultrasonic bath. Samples with eight different concentrations were prepared.
D and T2 NMR measurements were performed on each crude oil-asphaltene and toluene-asphaltene sample. The NMR spectrometer console was obtained from Oxford Instruments plc (Abingdon, England), model Maran® Ultra. The operating software for the NMR spectrometer was RINMR, Version 5.3.0.0 available from Oxford Instruments plc. The NMR spectrometer was operated at a frequency of 6.017 MHz. A D-T2 two-dimensional sequence was applied to obtain diffusivity (D) and transverse relaxation time (T2) of the target sample simultaneously. The NMR probe was located surrounding but not contacting the target samples. The obtained D and T2 NMR data for the crude oils and toluene solutions were organized in the form of D/T2 Ratio vs. Asphaltene Concentration by Weight as shown in
y=63.362x+1.0127
This linear equation can be solved for an additional sample to determine the asphaltene concentration once D and T2 have been measured for the sample.
Advantageously, in one embodiment, a model is provided of the correlation between D/T2 ratio and asphaltene content in either crude oils or toluene solvent. Using the model, asphaltene content can be determined with high accuracy (R2>0.95). In one embodiment, the correlation can be incorporated in 2D NMR logging technology for in-situ quantitative evaluation of asphaltene content in hydrocarbon producing formations. In one embodiment, the correlation can be incorporated in Downhole Fluid Analysis (DFA) technology for quantitative analysis of asphaltene in reservoir fluids at downhole conditions. DFA technology combines a set of tools having different functions that can be applied downhole.
While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for purpose of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to alteration and that certain other details described herein can vary considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.
It should be noted that only the components relevant to the disclosure are shown in the figures, and that many other components normally part of a two-dimensional NMR measurement system are not shown for simplicity.
Unless otherwise specified, the recitation of a genus of elements, materials or other components, from which an individual component or mixture of components can be selected, is intended to include all possible sub-generic combinations of the listed components and mixtures thereof. Also, “comprise,” “include” and its variants, are intended to be non-limiting, such that recitation of items in a list is not to the exclusion of other like items that may also be useful in the materials, compositions, methods and systems of this invention.
From the above description, those skilled in the art will perceive improvements, changes and modifications, which are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4710713 | Strikman | Dec 1987 | A |
4717876 | Masi et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4717877 | Taicher et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4717878 | Taicher et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4827761 | Vinegar et al. | May 1989 | A |
5023551 | Kleinberg et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5055787 | Kleinberg et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5055788 | Kleinberg et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5200699 | Baldwin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212447 | Paltiel | May 1993 | A |
5280243 | Miller | Jan 1994 | A |
5291137 | Freedman | Mar 1994 | A |
5309098 | Coates et al. | May 1994 | A |
5363041 | Sezginer | Nov 1994 | A |
5381092 | Freedman | Jan 1995 | A |
5412320 | Coates | May 1995 | A |
5459677 | Kowalski | Oct 1995 | A |
5486762 | Freedman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517115 | Prammer | May 1996 | A |
5557200 | Coates | Sep 1996 | A |
5585720 | Edwards | Dec 1996 | A |
5680043 | Hurlimann et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696448 | Coates et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5796252 | Kleinberg et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5936405 | Prammer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6005389 | Prammer | Dec 1999 | A |
6032101 | Freedman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6049205 | Taicher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069477 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070662 | Ciglenec et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6072314 | Oraby | Jun 2000 | A |
6114851 | Kruspe et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133735 | Hurlimann et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147489 | Freedman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166543 | Sezginer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6255818 | Heaton et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6316940 | Akkurt | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344744 | Taicher et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6366087 | Coates et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369567 | Song et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6429653 | Kruspe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6462542 | Venkataramanan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477516 | Colaiocco et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492809 | Speier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522136 | Hurlimann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559639 | Minh et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6559640 | Taicher | May 2003 | B2 |
6570382 | Hurlimann et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573715 | King et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577125 | Prammer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583621 | Prammer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597171 | Hurlimann et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6745833 | Aronstam et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6833699 | Galford et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6937014 | Sun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959246 | Herron | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6977499 | Kiesl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984980 | Kruspe et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7193414 | Kruspe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7398837 | Hall et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7452930 | Kawakami et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7605716 | Peter et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624794 | Freedman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7683613 | Freedman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7733086 | Prammer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755354 | Akkurt | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7893692 | Minh | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8016036 | Kirkwood et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20020067164 | Venkataramanan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020105326 | Hurlimann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030094946 | Galford et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030155915 | Kruspe et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040169511 | Minh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189296 | Sun et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050030021 | Prammer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20090157350 | Salazar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090256562 | Gao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090302847 | Knizhnik | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100156409 | Nikolin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110050223 | Balcom et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110198078 | Harrigan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110284231 | Becker | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120092016 | Kruspe | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120169334 | Hopper | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192640 | Minh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223235 | Maucec | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130103627 | Maddinelli et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130293228 | Walsh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140035574 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140088878 | Chen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140229112 | Datey et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232391 | Viswanathan | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140320126 | Heaton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140340082 | Yang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150268323 | Song | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102062742 | May 2011 | CN |
2121799 | Jul 1982 | DE |
1397661 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2584381 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2489005 | Sep 2012 | GB |
03167291 | Jul 1991 | JP |
1999045234 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0142817 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2007106810 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008082325 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2011014456 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011133859 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012068219 | May 2012 | WO |
2013023011 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013148516 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013184404 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wang, Jianxin et al. “Asphaltene stability in crude oil and aromatic solvents—the influence of oil composition.” Energy and Fuels (2003) 17 1445-1451. |
Martinez et al., “Lanosterol and cholesterol-indueced variations in Bilayer elasticity probed by H NMR relaxation,” Langmuir, (2003). |
Mohnke O Et Al. “Smooth and block inversion of surface NMR amplitudes and decay times using simulated annealing” Journal of Applied Geophysics—Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, May 2002 Elsevier NL, vol. 50, No. 1-2, May 2002. |
Sun et al., “Methods and limitations of NMR data inversion for fluid typing,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 169 (2004). |
Brunger et al., “New applications of simulated annealing in X-ray crystallography and solution NMR,” Structure, 1997, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 325-336. |
Sun et al: “In situ fluid typing and quantification with 1D 2D NMR logging” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tarrytown, NY, US, vol. 25, No. 4, May 4, 2007 ( May 4, 2007) pp. 521-524. |
Song et al: “Novel NMR techniques for porous media research” Cement and Concrete Research, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, US, vol. 37, No. 3, Feb. 22, 2007 (Feb. 22, 2007), pp. 325-328. |
Parker R L et al: “Assigning uncertainties in the inversion of NMR relaxation data” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, US, vol. 174, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2005 (Jun. 1, 2005), pp. 314-324. |
Press W.H.: “Numerical Recipes in C” 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 394-397, p. 444-p. 445. |
Arns C H et al: “Multidimensional NMR inverse laplace spectroscopy in petrophysics” Petrophysics Oct. 2007 Society of Well Log Analystists Inc. US, vol. 48, No. 5, Oct. 2007 (Oct. 2007), pp. 380-392. |
K. Binder, The Monte Carlo Method in Condensed Matter Physics, Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 71 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, 22 pages. |
Sun et al., A global inversion method for multi-dimensional NMR logging, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 172, 2005, pp. 152-160. |
Miller et al., “A New Method for Estimating T2 Distributions from NMR Measurements”, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 16, Nos. 5/6, 1998, pp. 617-619. |
Salazar et al., “Simulated Annealing Using Hybrid Monte Carlo”, Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 89, Nos. 5/6, 1997, pp. 1047-1060. |
English, A.E., Whittall, K.P., Joy, M.L.G., and Henkelman, R.M., Quantitative Two-Dimensional Time Correlation Relaxometry, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 22, 425-434, 1991. |
Lee, J-H., Labadie, C., Springer, C. S., and Harbison, G. S., Two-Dimensional Inverse Laplace Transform NMR: Altered Relaxation Times Allow Detection of Exchange Correlation, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 7761-7764, 1993. |
Akkurt, R., Vinegar, H. J., Tutunjian, P.N., and Guillory, A.J., NMR Logging of Natural Gas Reservoirs, The Log Analyst, 33-42, Nov.-Dec. 1996. |
Dunn, K-J. and Latorraca, G.A., The Inversion of NMR Log Data Sets with Different Measurement Errors, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 140, 153-161, 1999. |
Chen, S., Georgi, D.T., Withjack, E.M., Minetto, C., Olima, O., and Gamin, H., Estimation of Oil Viscosity with Multiple TE Dual Wait-Time MRIL Logs, Petrophysics, vol. 41, No. 1, 33-39, Jan.-Feb. 2000. |
Freedman, R., Sezginer, A., Flaum, M., Matteson, A., Lo, S., and Hirasaki, G.J., A New NMR Method of Fluid Characterization in Reservoir Rocks: Experimental Confirmation and Simulation Results, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE Paper 63214), 1-15, 2000. |
Dunn, K-J., Appel, M., Freeman, J.J., Gardner, J. S., Hirasaki, G.J., Shafer, J.L., and Zhang, G., Interpretation of Restricted Diffusion and Internal Field Gradients in Rock Data, Published in the Proceedings of 42nd Annual Symposium of Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Houston, TX, Paper AAA, 1-12, 2001. |
Venkataramanan, L., Song, Y-Q., and Hürlimann, M.D., Solving Fredholm Integrals of the First Kind with Tensor Product Structure in 2 and 2.5 Dimensions, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, No. 5, 1017-1026, May 2002. |
Hürlimann, M.D., Venkataramanan, L., Flaum, C., Speier, P., Karmonik, C., Freedman, R., and Heaton, N., Diffusion-Editing: New NMR Measurement of Saturation and Pore Geometry, SPWLA 43rd Annual Logging Symposium, Paper FFF, 1-14, Jun. 2-5, 2002. |
Dunn, K-J., Enhanced Transverse Relaxation in Porous Media Due to Internal Field Gradients, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 156, 1-10, 2002. |
Hürlimann, M.D., and Venkataramanan, L., Quantitative Measurement of Two-Dimensional Distribution Functions of Diffusion and Relaxation in Grossly Inhomogeneous Fields, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 157, 31-42, 2002. |
Sun, B. and Dunn, K-J., Probing the Internal Field Gradients of Porous Media, The American Physical Society, Physical Review E, vol. 65, 051309, 1-7, 2002. |
Godefroy, S., et al.; “Temperature Effect on NMR Surface Relaxation in Rocks for Well Logging Applications”; J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002, vol. 106,pp. 11183-11190, XP-002729750. |
Han, H., et al.; “High Pressure Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Metallic Vessels”; Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2011, vol. 213, DD. 90-97. |
Anderson, Robert J., et al.; “NMR Methods of Characterizing the Pore Structures and Hydrogen Storage Properties of Microporous Carbons”; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, vol. 132, pp. 8618-8626. |
Kausik, Ravinath, et al.; “Characterization of Gas Dynamics in Kerogen Nanopores by NMR”; Oct.-Nov. 2011, SPE 147198, pp. 1-16. |
Mitchell, J., et al.; “Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Cryoporometry”; 2008, Physics Reports, vol. 461, pp. 1-36. |
Musharfi, Nedhal, et al.; “Combining Wireline Geochemical, NMR, and Dielectric Data for Formation Evaluation and Characterization of Shale Reservoirs”; SPWLA 53rct Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 2012, pp. 1-16. |
Peterson, Ronald W., et al.; “Self Contained High Pressure Cell, Apparatus and Procedure for the Preparation of Encapsulated Proteins Dissolved in Low Viscosity Fluids for NMR Spectroscopy”; Sep. 2005, Rev. Sci. Instmm., 76(9); pp. 1-7. |
Song, Y.-Q., et al.; “T1-T2 Correlation Spectra Obtained Using a Fast Two-Dimensional Laplace Inversion”; 2002, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 154, DD. 261-268. |
Sun, Boqin, et al.; “A Global Inversion Method for Multi-Dimensional NMR Logging”; 2005, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 172,pp, 152-160. |
Sun, Boqin, et al.; “Core Analysis with Two Dimensional NMR”; SCA2002-38, pp. 1-12. |
Sun, Boqin, et al.; “NMR Inversion Methods for Fluid Typing”; SPWLA 44tn Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 2003, pp. 1-12. |
Sun, Boqin, et al.; “NMR Isotherm Studies of Gas Shales”; SPWLA 57tn Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 2016, DD. 1-14. |
Wang, Hai-Jing, et al.; “High-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Observation of Gas Shale Fracturing by Methane Gas”; Energy & Fuels, 2014, vol. 28, DD. 3638-3644. |
Wang, Hai-Jing, et al.; “Water Adsorption in Nanoporous Carbon Characterized by in Situ NMR: Measurements of Pore Size and Pore Size Distribution”; 2014, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 118, DD. 8474-8480. |
Mitchell, J. et al. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Laboratory Petrophysical Core Analysis”, Physics Reports, 2014, vol. 526, pp. 165-225. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160169820 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |