The present inventive concepts relate to methods for optimal interactions between people and service robots, including robotic cleaners, while they are servicing a facility.
One of the advantages of service robots is that they can do the dull and dirty jobs in human facilities, such as homes, commercial and industrial buildings, and institutions. However, that very action of robotic service itself may be unpleasant, inconvenient, disruptive, or even dangerous to a human that comes into proximity of the working robot.
Previous service robots have ignored this problem. As an example, current robot cleaners blithely treat humans the same way they treat the leg of a stool; usually by bumping into it, going around, it and continuing their work.
Although some robots built for human interaction have included the ability to recognize humans in their proximity, to date this has been used to further the interaction itself, but not to further a distinct service agenda.
The present invention has been conceived to solve the above-mentioned problems occurring in the prior art. In accordance with aspects of the present invention, provided is a system and method that allows a robot to service a facility while more effectively interacting with people.
In order to achieve the above aspects, there is provided various methods of enabling the robot to optimally respond in the presence of a person.
The robot can be configured to have a work pause, whereby when the robot senses the proximity of a person it stops working and remains still and silent.
The robot can be configured to move out of the way, whereby when the robot senses the proximity of a person it stops working and actively moves into a position of the room that is least disturbing the person. This may be away from the person or nearer the person, depending on other factors.
The robot can be configured to move out of the room, whereby when the robot sense the proximity of a person it moves to another area of the facility where it is no longer in proximity to people.
The robot can be configured to look to a person to point things out when the person enters the room. This can provide a seamless way to improve the decision making process of the robot.
The robot can be configured to keep track of a work stoppage, so that it can restart work in the area once the person has left.
The present invention will become more apparent in view of the attached drawings and accompanying detailed description. The embodiments depicted therein are provided by way of example, not by way of limitation, wherein like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating aspects of the invention. In the drawings:
Hereinafter, aspects of the present invention will be described by explaining illustrative embodiments in accordance therewith, with reference to the attached drawings. While describing these embodiments, detailed descriptions of well-known items, functions, or configurations are typically omitted for conciseness.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. are be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are used to distinguish one element from another, but not to imply a required sequence of elements. For example, a first element can be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element can be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present invention. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that when an element is referred to as being “on” or “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly on or connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements can be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present. Other words used to describe the relationship between elements should be interpreted in a like fashion (e.g., “between” versus “directly between,” “adjacent” versus “directly adjacent,” etc.).
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes” and/or “including,” when used herein, specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Spatially relative terms, such as “beneath,” “below,” “lower,” “above,” “upper” and the like may be used to describe an element and/or feature's relationship to another element(s) and/or feature(s) as, for example, illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use and/or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” and/or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “above” the other elements or features. The device may be otherwise oriented (e.g., rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly.
In accordance with aspects of the present invention, a robotic cleaner (or other type of service platform) can be configured to implement a method of more effectively interacting with people while servicing a space. The platform and method can determine that the platform is in the presence of people and implement a different servicing pattern or behavior as a function thereof. The determination that the robotic platform is in the presence of people can be accomplished using any one or more of a plurality of types of sensors mounted on, integral with, or coupled to the robotic platform or mounted elsewhere in the environment and in communication, directly or indirectly with the robotic platform.
In step 102 the robot is in the process of servicing (e.g., cleaning) a room (or area). In step 104 the robot senses whether or not a person has entered the room. A variety of different types of sensors could be used, such as, for example, motion detection sensors, video camera sensors, acoustic sensors and so on.
If in step 104 a person was not sensed, the process continues in step 102, where the robot continues to clean, in this example. Thus, the sensing can serve as an interrupt condition to the servicing condition of the robot. If in step 104 the answer was “yes” then the process continues to step 106 where the robot stops and sits still. The robot can then can then transition to a quiet, sleep, or inactive mode where it makes little or no noise and uses minimum power, e.g., at least enough to power the sensors.
In step 108 the robot senses whether the person left the room or area. If not, the process remains (or returns to) step 106 where the robot remains idle. If the person did leave the room or area, then the process continues to step 102 where the robot resumes cleaning—i.e., wakes up.
In step 202 the robot is cleaning in an area. In step 204 a determination is made of whether a person has entered the area. This is preferably an on-going sensing activity, rather than a discrete standalone step. If a person was not sensed, the process continues in step 202, where it is cleaning. However, if in step 204 it was determined that a person entered the room or area, the process continues to step 206. In this step the robot leaves the area it was cleaning. In step 208 the robot enters a new area and can begin cleaning that area, if needed. Preferably the new area is one without people.
In step 302 the robot is cleaning in an area. In step 304 a determination is made of whether a person has entered the area. This is preferably an on-going sensing activity, rather than a discrete standalone step. If a person was not sensed, the process continues in step 302, where it is cleaning. However, if in step 304 it was determined that a person entered the room or area, the process continues to step 306. In this step the robot stops cleaning and moves to another location within the area it was cleaning, e.g. a least disturbing area. A set of rules can be defined for choosing the least disturbing area, such as either within or outside a certain distance from the user, proximate to the entrance of the area through which the user entered, and so on. In step 308 the robot senses when the person leaves and then returns to step 302 and its cleaning operation.
In step 402 the robot is cleaning in an area. In step 404 a determination is made of whether a person has entered the area. This is preferably an on-going sensing activity, rather than a discrete standalone step. If a person was not sensed, the process continues in step 402, where the robot is cleaning. However, if in step 404 it was determined that a person entered the room or area, the process continues to step 406, where the robot stops cleaning. In step 408 the robot awaits commands from the person for its next action, e.g., continue cleaning, leave area, enter sleep mode, etc. In step 410 the robot executes the commands.
In step 502 the robot is cleaning in an area. In step 504 a determination is made of whether a person has entered the area. This is preferably an on-going sensing activity, rather than a discrete standalone step. If a person was not sensed, the process continues in step 502, where the robot is cleaning. However, if in step 504 it was determined that a person entered the room or area, the process continues to step 506, where the robot records its current location. The robot could record its location in an on-going basis so that it maintains a record of all areas cleaned, whether fully or partially. In step 508 the robot moves to another area to service (e.g., clean) that area. In step 510 the robot returns to the original area to finish cleaning.
In the various service robot methods, therefore, the robot can be configured to keep track of the work stoppage, so that it can restart work in that area once the person has left.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a service robot (e.g., vacuum) includes a memory for storing instructions and data, and a processor for executing the instructions. Thus, the methods discussed above can be programmed into the service robotic for execution to accomplish the functions disclosed herein.
In another implementation of the method, the sensing of the person in the area of the robot may be performed by sensors installed in the environment and communicating directly or indirectly with the service robot. In this embodiment, the sensors may be serving other functions, such as temperature control, or security sensing of the environment, and communicating with other control components of the environment. The implementation requires the spatial relationships between the robot and the sensors is known. There are many possible implementations of this including perception of the sensors by the robot, a-priori knowledge of the sensors locations in a “map”, or information provided by an environment-wide control system.
Portions of the above description refer to the robot being configured to execute different behaviors in response to the presence of people. This configuration can be implemented as a “pre-programmed” behavior, or as a “set-up” menu providing a series of optional behaviors to be executed under certain triggering conditions as is commonly available on consumer and industrial products.
Also, while the service robot was indicated as a robotic cleaner in this embodiment, those skilled in the art will appreciate that methods in accordance with the present invention could be applied to any number of service robots, and could implement any number and types of sensors.
While the foregoing has described what are considered to be the best mode and/or other preferred embodiments, it is understood that various modifications can be made therein and that the invention or inventions may be implemented in various forms and embodiments, and that they may be applied in numerous applications, only some of which have been described herein.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) from provisional application Ser. No. 61/024,019 filed on Jan. 28, 2008 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4674048 | Okumura | Jun 1987 | A |
5032775 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5086535 | Grossmeyer et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5369347 | Yoo | Nov 1994 | A |
5440216 | Kim | Aug 1995 | A |
D364840 | Oshizawa et al. | Dec 1995 | S |
5534762 | Kim | Jul 1996 | A |
5682313 | Edlund et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684695 | Bauer | Nov 1997 | A |
D395285 | Allon | Jun 1998 | S |
5867800 | Leif | Feb 1999 | A |
6076025 | Ueno et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076223 | Dair et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076230 | Harsh | Jun 2000 | A |
6119057 | Kawagoe | Sep 2000 | A |
6124694 | Bancroft et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6278904 | Ishii | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6339735 | Peless et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374155 | Wallach et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389329 | Colens | May 2002 | B1 |
6459955 | Bartsch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496754 | Song et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496755 | Wallach et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6532404 | Colens | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6539284 | Nourbakhsh et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6604022 | Parker et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611120 | Song et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6667592 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668157 | Takeda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6728608 | Ollis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732826 | Song et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760647 | Nourbakhsh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774596 | Bisset | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6841963 | Song et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868307 | Song et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870792 | Chiappetta | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879878 | Glenn et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883201 | Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6925679 | Wallach et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957712 | Song et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6968592 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984952 | Peless et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7024278 | Chiappetta et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7155308 | Jones | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162056 | Burl et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167775 | Abramson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188000 | Chiappetta et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206677 | Hulden | Apr 2007 | B2 |
D541798 | Ichida et | May 2007 | S |
7251548 | Herz et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7446766 | Moravec | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7447593 | Estkowski et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7507948 | Park et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526362 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D602931 | Kaner et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D613341 | Mar et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
7720572 | Ziegler et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7805220 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7835821 | Roh et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
D697198 | Amirouche et al. | Jan 2014 | S |
20010047231 | Peless et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016649 | Jones | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020095239 | Wallach et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120364 | Colens | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138936 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153184 | Song et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030025472 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028286 | Glenn et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030212472 | McKee | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040030571 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073337 | McKee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076324 | Burl et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083570 | Song et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040167716 | Goncalves et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168148 | Goncalves et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040204792 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207355 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050000543 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067994 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080514 | Omote et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050134209 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050216126 | Koselka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273226 | Tani | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273967 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287038 | Dubrovsky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288079 | Tani | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020369 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038521 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060216 | Woo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061476 | Patil et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095158 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060178777 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060293788 | Pogodin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070042716 | Goodall et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070135962 | Kawabe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070192910 | Vu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199108 | Angle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244610 | Ozick et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070267570 | Park et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004904 | Tran | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056933 | Moore et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086236 | Saito et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109114 | Orita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080184518 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63-222726 | Sep 1988 | JP |
5-143158 | Jun 1993 | JP |
6-314124 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07101500 | Apr 1995 | JP |
9-90026 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11-104984 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-104984 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2000-339028 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000-342498 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-67124 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-246580 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-300874 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-85305 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-254374 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-325708 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002-351305 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003006532 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-515210 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-515801 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-180587 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-225184 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003241833 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-256043 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-33340 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-97439 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-097439 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-148090 | May 2004 | JP |
2004148089 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-111603 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-124753 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-205028 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-219161 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006-007368 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-087918 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-102861 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-218005 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-252273 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-331054 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007-4527 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-309921 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-3979 | Jan 2008 | JP |
10-2002-0076153 | Oct 2002 | KR |
10-2002-0081035 | Oct 2002 | KR |
10-2002-0088880 | Nov 2002 | KR |
10-0645818 | Nov 2006 | KR |
0137060 | May 2001 | WO |
0137060 | May 2001 | WO |
0138945 | May 2001 | WO |
2007051972 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bennewitz et al., Adapting Navigation Strategies Using Motions Patterns of People, 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp. 2000-2005. |
Alami et al., Diligent: Towards a Human-Friendly Navigation System, 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 21-26. |
Lee et al., An Agent for Intelligent Spaces: Functions and Roles of Mobile Robots in Sensored, Networked and Thinking Spaces, 1997, IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation System (ITSC '97), pp. 983-988. |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 22, 2011 issued in corresponding European Application No. EP09706350. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 7, 2011 issued in corresponding European Application No. EP09705670. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 8, 2011 issued in corresponding European Application No. EP09706723. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 31, 2009 issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2009/032274. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 14, 2009 issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2009/032243. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 14, 2009 issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2009/032245. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2009 issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2009/034081. |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 12, 2013 issued in corresponding European Application No. 09710577.9. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013 issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-545106. |
Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2013 issued in related Japanese Application No. 2010-546923. |
Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2013 issued in related Japanese Application No. 2010-545107. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 29/471,328, dated Jun. 4, 2014. |
Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980108309.X, dated Jun. 4, 2014. |
Flexible & integrated unmanned command & control [online]. Howard, Courtney, 2013 [retrieved on May 24, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-24/issue-11/special-report/ flexible-integrated-unmanned-command-control.html>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090198380 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61024019 | Jan 2008 | US |