Patent Grant
12006403
The presently disclosed subject matter relates to a system and method for recycling the components of cotton and polyester from textiles. The presently disclosed subject matter further relates to a method of producing high quality components of cotton and polyesters enabling the production of advanced materials using an environmentally-friendly method.
In the textile industry, finished apparel and related goods have a limited lifespan. When they have ended their useful life, they typically end up in a landfill or waste incineration facility. It is estimated that more than 15 million tons of used textile waste is generated each year in the United States. Regenerated fibers have become increasingly popular as a sustainable alternative to natural virgin fibers, such as cotton. In general, textiles for recycling are generated from two primary sources, including: (1) pre-consumer sources, such as scrap created as a by-product from yarn and fabric manufacture; (2) post-consumer sources, such as garments, vehicle upholstery, household items, and others. Current textile recycling is fundamentally divided into two groups for processing. For natural textiles (such as 100% cotton), materials are shredded or pulled into fibers and then processed into yarn for re-spinning and prepared for subsequent use in weaving and/or knitting. For polyester-based textiles, garments are shredded and then granulated and processed into polyester chips. The chips are subsequently melted and used to create new fibers for use in the polyester fabrics. However, conventional methods of recycling and/or regenerating textiles are associated with significant drawbacks, such as the use of expensive and harsh hydrolyzing agents, complex recycling methods, waste water discharge, pollution, energy use that renders the process cumbersome, and significant expenditures of time. It would therefore be beneficial to overcome the shortcomings of current technology by providing a simple and cost-effective method of regenerating premium recycled fibers that significantly reduces chemical usage and waste water production.
In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter is directed to a method of producing one or both of cellulose and terephthalic acid (TPA) from waste textile material comprising essentially 100% cotton or cotton/polyester blend material. Particularly, the method comprises treating the waste textile material in a subcritical water reactor at a temperature of about 105° C. to 190° C., a pressure of about 40 to 300 psi, or both for about 0 to 90 minutes, wherein one or both of a cellulose that comprises a degree of polymerization ranging from about 150-2500 and a dissolved TPA and ethylene glycol (EG) are produced. A product comprising cellulose with a degree of polymerization of about 150-2500 and/or a product comprising a recycled terephthalic acid (TPA) is thereby produced. In some embodiments, the cellulose is further recovered, including by a dissolution process to form regenerated cellulose.
In some embodiments, the waste textile material comprises cotton/polyester blend material and the treating in the subcritical water reactor comprises a pH ranging from about 10-14. The method can further comprise recovering the TPA. The method can further comprise recovering the cellulose. The method can further comprise subjecting the recovered cellulose to a disintegration process.
In some embodiments, the waste textile material comprises cotton/polyester blend material and the treating in the subcritical water reactor comprises a first treating at a pH ranging from about 10-14, wherein the TPA is produced, and a second treating of the cellulose that is produced in the first treating at a pH ranging from about 2-4, wherein the cellulose that is produced in the second treating comprises a degree of polymerization ranging from about 150-2000. In some embodiments, the cellulose with a degree of polymerization of about 150-2500 is of a purity ranging from about 94%-98%. The method can further comprise recovering the cellulose produced after the second treating, including by subjecting the cellulose to one or more steps of wash, disintegration, sour wash, activation process, dissolution dope, or wet spinning.
The method allows for reducing the size of cellulose fibers in the waste textile material, loosening the cellulose fibers from the waste textile material, or both.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises sorting the waste textile material before or after treatment in the subcritical water reactor. In some embodiments, the sorting is based on color, composition, weight percent cellulose, non-cellulose components, or combinations thereof.
The method allows for dissolving cellulose fibers present within the waste textile material.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises a pretreatment step reducing the size of the waste textile material. The pretreatment step can be by mechanical cutting. In some embodiments, the reducing generates a particle size of about 60 mm or less.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises removing color from the waste textile material before, during, or after treating with the subcritical water reactor.
In some embodiments, the color removal comprises treatment with one or more of hydrogen peroxide, sodium peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, dimethyl sulfoxide, lithium hypochlorite, sodium perborate, ozone, oxygen, activated carbon, biochar, sodium carbonate, peracetic acid, potassium permanganate, persulfate, sodium chloride, calcium oxychloride, chloramine, chlorine dioxide, sulfur dioxide, sodium hydrosulfite, or TAED (tetra-acetyl-ethylene-di-amine).
In some embodiments, the subcritical water reactor treatment comprises one or more of methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, tetra-n-butylphosphonium bromide (TBPB), or benzyltributylammonium chloride (BTBAC), or co-polymers thereof.
In some embodiments, the ratio of waste textile material to water within the subcritical water reactor is about 1:5-1:95.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises subjecting the waste textile material to acid treatment in the subcritical water reactor. The cellulose in the waste textile material can then be subjected to a mechanical disintegration process. This method can allow for recovering the cellulose in the waste textile material to produce regenerated cellulose.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises adjusting the pH of water within the subcritical water reactor before subcritical water treatment. In some embodiments, the pH is adjusted to about 2-4. In some embodiments, the pH is adjusted to about 10-14. In some embodiments, the pH is adjusted using 0.01-5% (v/v) organic acid, 0.5-20% (w/v) sodium hydroxide, or 0.5-20% (w/v) potassium hydroxide.
In some embodiments, wherein the waste textile material comprises a cotton/polyester blend, the subcritical water reactor functions to decompose the polyester and adjust the degree of polymerization of the cellulose macromolecules.
In some embodiments, the subcritical water reactor enables the dissolution of polyester to terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG).
In some embodiments, a method is provided for producing terephthalic acid (TPA) from a polyester waste textile material, the method comprising: treating the polyester waste textile material in a subcritical water reactor at a temperature of about 105° C. to 190° C., a pressure of about 40 to 300 psi, or both for about 0 to 90 minutes, wherein a dissolved TPA and ethylene glycol (EG) is produced. The pH can range from about 10-14. The method can further comprise precipitating and recrystallizing the TPA.
In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter is directed to a regenerated cellulose material produced using the disclosed method. In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter is directed to a regenerated polyester material produced using the disclosed method. In some embodiments, the products of regenerated cellulose material include rayon, viscose rayon, lyocell, or cellulose acetate. The regenerated cellulose and TPA have properties making them suitable for fiber spinning and textile applications. For example, in one embodiment, the regenerated cellulose monofilaments of the present disclosure have a tenacity ranging from 1.3 g/den to 1.8 g/den and a strain at break of about 10% to 12%.
The previous summary and the following detailed descriptions are to be read in view of the drawings, which illustrate some (but not all) embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter.
The presently disclosed subject matter is introduced with sufficient details to provide an understanding of one or more particular embodiments of broader inventive subject matters. The descriptions expound upon and exemplify features of those embodiments without limiting the inventive subject matters to the explicitly described embodiments and features. Considerations in view of these descriptions will likely give rise to additional and similar embodiments and features without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which the presently disclosed subject matter pertains. Although any methods, devices, and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the presently disclosed subject matter, representative methods, devices, and materials are now described.
Following long-standing patent law convention, the terms “a”, “an”, and “the” refer to “one or more” when used in the subject specification, including the claims. Thus, for example, reference to “a reactor” can include a plurality of such reactors, and so forth. Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of components, conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the instant specification and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the presently disclosed subject matter.
As used herein, the term “about”, when referring to a value or to an amount of mass, weight, time, volume, concentration, and/or percentage can encompass variations of, in some embodiments +/−20%, in some embodiments +/−10%, in some embodiments +/−5%, in some embodiments +/−1%, in some embodiments +/−0.5%, and in some embodiments +/−0.1%, from the specified amount, as such variations are appropriate in the disclosed methods.
The presently disclosed subject matter is directed to a system and method of processing cellulose-comprising materials, polyester-comprising materials, and/or polycotton (polyester-cotton)-comprising materials, such as pre-consumer or post-consumer textiles, fabric scraps, and other materials that would otherwise be discarded or disposed of. Specifically, the disclosed system and method provides for treatment of textiles that include cellulose, polyester, and/or cellulose blended with polyester. Regenerated cellulose and PET filaments are produced from the waste textile materials according to the methods of the present disclosure. The terms “regenerated” and “recycled” are herein used interchangeably for the purposes of the specification and claims. Implementation of the disclosed system and method can produce regenerated fibers and textile products with improved properties using processes with low environmental impacts. For example, in one embodiment, the regenerated cellulose monofilaments of the present disclosure have a tenacity ranging from 1.3 g/den to 1.8 g/den and a strain at break of about 10% to 12%.
In the presently disclosed system and method, any material that comprises cellulose, polyester, and/or polycotton can be used as the starting material. For example, in some embodiments, the starting material can be a waste cotton and/or waste polycotton (cotton/polyester blend) material found in post-consumer waste textiles and other cellulose-containing fabrics (towels, bedding, upholstery, etc.). For the purposes of the specification and claims, the terms “polycotton” and “cotton/polyester blend” are herein used interchangeably. Cotton fiber is the only natural pure cellulose, with a cellulose content of up to about 95-97 weight percent. The term “cellulose” as used herein refers to a polysaccharide having the formula (C6H10O5)n configured as a linear chain of β(1→4) linked D-glucose units (cellobiose), as illustrated in Structure (I), below:
The individual glucose monomers in the cellulose polymer are often referred to as anhydroglucose units (or “AGU”). The number of AGU units defines as the “Degree of Polymerization” (DP) of the cellulose. In the presently disclosed system and method, viscosity measurements can be used to assess changes in the DP of cellulose in cellulosic pulp after subcritical water treatment. For the purposes of the specification and claims, the terms “cellulosic pulp”, “pulp”, “cotton pulp”, and “cotton sheet” are herein used interchangeably, and refer to the cellulose that is produced from the waste textile fabric by the subcritical water treatment of the present disclosure. The cellulose viscosity (unit in mPa·s) is determined according to TAPPI T230 om-94 (1994) (incorporated herein by reference) in cupriethylenediamine (CED) solution. The intrinsic viscosity [η] (unit in ml/g) can be calculated from Equation 1 below (Mazumder B. B. et al. 2000, Journal of Wood Science 46(5), 364-370):
[η]=954×lg(viscosity)−325 Equation 1:
The average DP can be calculated from the intrinsic viscosity using Equations 2 (Sihtola et al. 1963; Paper Ja Puu 45, 225-232) and 3, below:
DP0.905=0.75×[η] Equation 2:
DP=k×[η]; K=1.9 Equation 3:
In the presently disclosed system and method, the subcritical water-treated textile cellulosic pulp can have a viscosity range of about 3 mPa·s to about 55 mPa·s, which refers to a DP of about 150-2500, such as about 200-2000, 300-1700, 400-1500, 500-1200, 600-1000, or 700-800. Thus, the treated cellulosic pulp can have a DP of at least about (or no more than about) 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, or 2500.
Polyesters are a group of polymers commonly used in textile applications. The polymer is a very large molecule build up from smaller molecules. The most common type of polyester used in textiles is polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (Structure II, below), which can combine with cotton fiber to form polycotton.
The term “textile” is broadly used herein, and includes fibers, filaments, yarns, woven and non-woven fabrics, knits, and finished products (such as garments).
As set forth in
In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure comprise a mechanical cutting device that is configured to reduce the textile size and/or to provide a more uniform textile size prior to further treatment. Typically, textile materials that include cotton, fabric, yarn, and fibers have a fiber length of greater than 5 mm to 100 mm. In some embodiments, the cutting device reduces the fiber length to about 60 mm or less. The cutting device can include any device capable of trimming textile size, such as (but not limited to) one or more blades, needles, shredders, pullers, grinders, cutters, rippers, and the like. In some embodiments, the waste textiles are cut to a size of about 5-60 mm in length and/or width. However, the presently disclosed subject matter is not limited, and the waste materials can be cut into any desired size. Advantageously, reducing the size of the cellulosic textile material increases the surface area for further treatment (e.g., subcritical water treatment).
In some embodiments, the sorting process can be conducted by manual platform or any known current waste textile automation recycling machine to separate the materials into three streams, as shown in
The methods of the present disclosure comprise a subcritical water reactor. Particularly, the waste textiles are introduced to the reactor for treatment with subcritical water to weaken the linkage between the fibers in the textiles. The subcritical water reactor further functions to decompose the polyester and adjust the degree of polymerization of the cellulose macromolecules. In addition, the subcritical water reactor enables the dissolution of polyester to terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol.
The term “reactor” as used herein refers to a device that can be used for any number of chemical processes involving a starting material. In some embodiments, the reactor comprises a hydrothermal reactor. The term “hydrothermal” as used herein refers to an aqueous system under pressure and increased temperature, typically near or below the critical point of water (374° C., 22.1 MPa). Thus, the reactor can provide hydrothermal conditions, such as (but not limited to) a batch reactor, semi-continuous, or continuous reactor. In some embodiments, a batch reactor is preferred. The term “subcritical water” as used herein refers to liquid water at temperatures between the atmospheric boiling point (100° C.) and the critical temperature (374° C.) that present unique features with respect to its properties, such as density, dielectric constant, ion concentration, diffusivity, and solubility. In the subcritical region, the ionization constant (Kw) of water increases with temperature and is about three orders of magnitude higher than that of ambient water, and the dielectric constant of water drops from 80 to 20.
Advantageously, subcritical water is a non-toxic, environmentally benign, inexpensive, and green solvent that can be used as an alternative to harsh chemicals traditionally used in the fabric recycling industry. In the disclosed method and the system, the use of subcritical water hydrothermal treatment allows higher diffusion, activity, and ionization of water. In some embodiments, the partial hydrolysis of cellulose and the breakdown of the cross-link between the cotton cellulose and polyester in the textile can be achieved.
In some embodiments, adjustable hydrothermal reaction conditions can be applied to produce cellulose in a broad desired DP range (DP: 150-2500) that can be used to manufacture a wide variety of regenerated cellulose products, such as rayon, viscose rayon, lyocell, lyocell-like, or cellulose acetate. In some embodiments, the subcritical water reactor can mix with one or more co-solvents (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol) such that a temperature of about 105° C. to 190° C. (e.g., about 105-190, 110-180, 120-175, 130-160, 140-150, 140-170, 150-160, 160-190, 170-180, 165-190, or 175-185° C.) and/or a pressure of about 40 to 300 psi (e.g., about 40-300, 60-280, 80-250, 80-120, 110-140, 120-150, or 100-250 psi) can be achieved for residence time about 0 to 90 minutes (e.g., about 0-90, 10-80, 20-70, 30-60, 40-70, or 40-50 minutes). In some embodiments, the co-solvents can be present in an amount of from about 0-100 weight percent, such as about 1-90, 5-80, 10-70, 20-60, or 30-50 weight percent.
In some embodiments, the disclosed method can include a phase transfer catalyst (PTC) to improve the process efficiency and to reduce energy consumption. The term “phase transfer catalyst” refers to any agent capable of facilitating a reactor by virtue of the ability to dissolve as ion pairs in both aqueous and organic solvents. Any desired PTC can be used, such as (but not limited to) any commercially available ammonium or phosphonium-based PTC, such as tetra-n-butylphosphonium bromide (TBPB), benzyltributylammonium chloride (BTBAC), or co-polymers etc.
The waste textiles can be transferred to the reactor and processed for a desired amount of time. In some embodiments, the textiles can be treated in the reactor at a temperature of about 105° C. to 190° C., at a pressure of about 40 to 300 psi, or both. In some embodiments, the ratio of textile material to water is about 1:5-1:95 (e.g., 1:5, 1:10, 1:11, 1:12, 1:13, 1:14, 1:15, 1:20, 1:21, 1:22, 1:23, 1:24, 1:25, 1:30, 1:31, 1:32, 1:33, 1:34, 1:35, 1:40, 1:45, 1:50, 1:55, 1:60, 1:65, 1:70, 1:75, 1:80, 1:81, 1:82, 1:83, 1:84, 1:85, 1:86, 1:87, 1:88, 1:89, 1:90, 1:91, 1:92, 1:93, 1:94, 1:95). In some embodiments, the reaction time can be about 0-90 minutes, such as at least about (or no more than about) 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, or 90 minutes.
In the reactor, the linkage between the fibers in the textiles is weakened as a result of the temperature and/or pressure. Particularly, the high temperature and/or pressure of the subcritical water promotes molecular separation of the cellulose polymers and deconstructs intermolecular hydrogen bonds and other non-covalent bonds within the waste textiles. As a result, the cellulose-containing textiles are converted to their constituent cellulose polymers. In some embodiments, the number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the cellulosic material is reduced by at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90% after the subcritical water treatment. Thus, treatment with subcritical water provides an environmentally-friendly way to break down the cellulose in the waste textile materials.
In some embodiments, the pH of the starting material (e.g., water and textile mixture) in the reactor can be adjusted to enhance subcritical water reaction efficiency. For example, 0.01%-2% acetic acid can be used with cotton textile to adjust the pH to about 4. In some embodiments, the pH can be adjusted to a range of about 2 to 4 for cotton textile. For cotton/polyester textile blends, 0.01%-5% acetic acid can be used to generate a pH of 2-4. In embodiments where the textile comprises cotton/polyester blends and/or polyester, 0.5-20% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) can be used to achieve a pH of about 10-14. In some embodiments, polyester (PET) textile can be degraded via hydrolysis using 0.5-20% NaOH, and can further be dissolved through a subcritical water treatment. However, it should be appreciated that the acid/base is not limited, and any suitable acid or base can be used to adjust the pH to a desired level. In some embodiments, the KOH, NaOH, acetic acid, and/or other organic acids function as a reagent to increase the rate of the reaction.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, the cellulose resulting from the subcritical water reaction is washed and subjected to a disintegration process to loosen the cellulose fibers as described in EXAMPLES 1 through 4. In this manner the cellulose can be further processed for dissolution. In some embodiments, after this treatment, the disintegrated fibers are subjected to a sour wash pulp process, which entails a treatment with dilute aqueous sulfur dioxide solution using industry standard conditions. A cellulose fiber activation process may be initiated when utilizing certain dissolution systems. This involves producing a ground cellulose pulp sample in aqueous NaOH solution (e.g., 12-15% w/v), 1:20 (cellulose sample:aqueous solution), stirring at room temperature for 3-4 hours, washing to neutral pH, drying, subjecting to an acid treatment (e.g., with 1M sulfuric acid for 45-60 minutes), washing to neutral pH, and air drying. Cellulose dissolute dope can then be prepared by incorporating a dissolving component. The cellulose can be dissolved with molten organic salts (e.g., ionic liquids), such as N-alkylpyridium salts and similar agents, amine oxides (such as N-methylmorpholine-N-oxides and similar agents), and/or polar and aprotic liquids (such as N, N-dimethylacetamide/ LiCl and similar agents) to provide a dissolved cellulose suitable for regenerated fiber production utilizing industrial standard techniques.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The waste textiles can be partially or fully treated to remove coloring (e.g., pigments, dyes, etc.) and/or to improve brightness throughout the subcritical water hydrothermal process by adding about 0.5-20% NaOH. Any conventional de-coloration/dye removal element can be used. For example, in some embodiments, the de-coloration/dye removal element can be selected from one or more of hydrogen peroxide, sodium peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, dimethyl sulfoxide, lithium hypochlorite, sodium perborate, activated carbon powder, biochar, ozone, oxygen, sodium carbonate, peracetic acid, potassium permanganate, persulfate, sodium chloride, calcium oxychloride, chloramine, sulfur dioxide, sodium hydrosulfite, or TAED (tetra-acetyl-ethylene-di-amine).
Further, the disclosed system can comprise a disintegration component. Specifically, after subcritical water reaction, the cellulose can be recovered and subjected to a disintegration component where the cellulose fibers are loosened from the textile pulp as shown in
Further, the disclosed system can comprise a dissolving component wherein the cellulose is dissolved by molten organic salts (e.g., ionic liquids), such as N-alkylpyridium salts and similar agents, amine oxides (such as N-methylmorpholine-N-oxides and similar agents), and/or polar and aprotic liquids (such as N, N-dimethylacetamide/LiCl and similar agents). In some embodiments, the dissolving component can include one or more additives at a concentration of about 0.1% to 15 weight % (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 weight %). The additives can promote the production of regenerated cellulose filaments with enhanced mechanical properties (such as higher tenacity and elongation additives). Suitable additives can include (but are not limited to) glyceric acid, gluconic acid, glucuronic acid, galacturonic acid, iduronic acid, mucic acid, and/or glucaric acid. In some embodiments, the dissolving component can comprise powdered titanium dioxide (e.g., 0.1-10 weight %) to produce semi-dull or dull filaments.
After the disintegration of the cellulose fibers, the isolated cellulose molecules can be used to form regenerated cellulose fibers and textile materials. In some embodiments, “regenerated cellulose” refers to cellulose that has been prepared by regeneration (i.e., returned to solid form) from a solution that includes dissolved cellulose fibers. In some embodiments, the isolated cellulose molecules can be dissolved by molten organic salts (e.g., ionic liquids), such as N-alkylpyridium salts and similar agents, amine oxides (such as N-methylmorpholine-N-oxides and similar agents), and/or polar and aprotic liquids (such as N, N-dimethylacetamide/ LiCI and similar agents), and spun in a coagulation bath to produce regenerated cellulosic fibers, such as rayon, viscose rayon, lyocell, lyocell-like, or cellulose acetate. The newly formed fibers can be stretched and/or blown to a desired configuration, washed, dried, and cut to a desired length. The regenerated cellulosic fibers can be twisted into thread, dyed, bleached, woven into textiles, and ultimately can be cut and sewn into garments. Thus, the treated fabric can be used to manufacture a garment such as (but not limited to) shirts, pants, hats, coats, jackets, shoes, socks, uniforms, athletic clothing, and swimwear. It is also possible and contemplated that the treated fabric can be used to construct non-apparel items, such as blankets, sheets, sleeping bags, backpacks, tents, insulation materials, and the like.
Thus, in use, the disclosed system can be used to recycle one or both of cellulose and terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) from any starting textile material comprising cellulose, polyester, and/or polycotton. The recycled cellulose can be used to produce regenerated cellulose and the recycled terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) can be used to produce regenerated PET. Particularly, the waste textiles can be provided and sorted based on desired parameters (e.g., percentage cellulose, composition, color, and the like). The sorted textiles can be exposed to a cutting device, blending device, or both to ensure that the textile material is of a suitable size and uniform size for treatment. The cut and/or blended textile material can be optionally bleached to remove or decrease the amount of dyes, finishes, and/or contaminants. The textile material is introduced to a reactor where a subcritical water reaction is performed for a temperature, pressure, and time sufficient to dissolve PET and weaken the linkage between the cellulose fibers (e.g., Condition II, an appropriate pH, e.g., pH 10-pH 14, and temperature adjustment, e.g., 105° C. -190° C.). Dissolved TPA then can be precipitated through pH adjustment, filtered under vacuum, and washed to neutral condition. The washed TPA can be dried and carried forward to crystallization. Crystalized TPA can be subjected to a PET repolymerization process to produce regenerated PET. The cotton cellulose material can be recovered. In some embodiments, the recovered cellulose materials can be disintegrated and can be used to produce regenerated cellulose fibers. In some embodiments, the recovered cellulose material can be disintegrated as staple fiber to blend with either virgin cotton fibers or other fibers as recycled cotton blend yarn. In some embodiments, the recovered cellulose material can be washed and cut into in smaller pieces. The pieces can have an average size ranging from about 4-6 mm. The pieces can be subjected to a second subcritical water treatment (e.g., Condition I, an appropriate pH, e.g., pH 2-pH 4, and temperature adjustment, e.g., 105° C. -190° C.) such as described in EXAMPLES 6 through 8. Subcritical water treated waste textiles can be exposed to a disintegration component where the cellulose fibers are loosened from the pulp material such as described in Example 10. The recovered cellulose is then exposed to a dissolving component to promote dissolving of the cellulose. After the dissolving of the cellulose fibers, the isolated cellulose molecules can be used to form regenerated cellulose fibers and textile materials.
EXAMPLE 11 describes the physical properties of the regenerated polyester produced from waste polycotton textiles according to the methods of the present disclosure. As described herein, polycotton textiles are subjected to subcritical water treatment such as, for example, condition II as described in Example 6, and the resulting TPA carried forward to crystallization and PET polymerization to produce regenerated PET. An FT-IR analysis of the resulting TPA is shown in
The following Examples have been included to provide guidance to one of ordinary skill in the art for practicing representative embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter. In light of the present disclosure and the general level of skill in the art, those of skill can appreciate that the following Examples are intended to be exemplary only and that numerous changes, modifications, and alterations can be employed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter.
The method set forth in
After subcritical water treatment, a disintegration process was performed using a standard fiber disintegrator at 2-3% cellulosic pulp concentration for 10 minutes operation time to loosen the fiber binding and to produce disintegrated cellulose. The resulting cellulosic pulp product had a viscosity of 3.2 mPa·s, which was calculated based from Equations 1, 2, 3 as about DP 240-370. The disintegrated cellulose was subjected to a separation process to recover the cellulose fiber.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR; Jasco 6200 with Pike MIRacle ATR attachment. Range: 4000-600 cm −1, Number of scans: 128) testing was conducted to verify the presence and the type of polymer produced. As shown in
The method set forth in
After subcritical water treatment, a disintegration process was performed using a standard fiber disintegrator at 2-3% cellulosic pulp concentration for 10 minutes operation time to loosen the fiber binding and to produce disintegrated cellulose. The disintegrated cellulose was then subjected to a separation process to recover the cellulose fiber.
The method set forth in
After subcritical water treatment, a disintegration process was performed using a standard fiber disintegrator at 2-3% cellulosic pulp concentration for 10 minutes operation time to loosen the fiber binding and to produce disintegrated cellulose. The disintegrated cellulose was then subjected to a separation process to recover the cellulose fiber.
The method set forth in
After subcritical water treatment, a disintegration process was performed using a standard fiber disintegrator at 2-3% cellulosic pulp concentration for 10 minutes operation time to loosen the fiber binding and to produce disintegrated cellulose. The disintegrated cellulose was then subjected to a separation process to recover the cellulose fiber.
The method set forth in
The method set forth in
In addition to the TPA, the cellulose that was produced in the subcritical water treatment was also recovered. During the subcritical water reaction, the linkages between the fibers inside the textiles were weakened, and the resulting cellulosic pulp product had a viscosity of 6 mPa·s (calculated as DP 600-800). The pulp was then washed and cut into pieces, with an average size of about 5 mm. The textile pieces were introduced into a hydrothermal reactor (Parr 4553M 2-gallon reactor, available from Parr Instrument Company, Moline, Illinois) for subcritical water treatment (“Condition I”). After subcritical water treatment, the product was washed and subjected to a disintegration process at 2-3% cellulosic pulp concentration for 10 minutes operation time to loosen the fiber binding. The disintegrated fibers were subjected to a separation process to recover the cellulose fiber. The resulting cellulosic pulp product had a viscosity of 4 mPa·s (calculated as DP 300-500).
The method set forth in
For the recovered cellulosic pulp product, during the subcritical water reaction, the linkages between the fibers inside the textiles were weakened, and the resulting product had a viscosity about 50.5 mPa·s (calculated as DP 2000-2500). The pulp was then washed and cut into pieces, with an average size of about 5 mm. The pieces were introduced into a hydrothermal reactor (Parr 4553M 2-gallon reactor, available from Parr Instrument Company, Moline, Illinois) for subcritical water treatment (“Condition I”) to produce cellulosic pulp with a desired viscosity by following the methods of Example 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The method set forth in
For the recovered cellulosic pulp product, during the subcritical water reaction, the linkages between the fibers inside the textiles were weakened, and the resulting product had a viscosity about 35 mPa·s (calculated as DP 1750-2200). The pulp was then washed and cut into pieces, with an average size of about 5 mm. The pieces were introduced into a hydrothermal reactor (Parr 4553M 2-gallon reactor, available from Parr Instrument Company, Moline, Illinois) for subcritical water treatment (“Condition I”) to produce cellulosic pulp with a desired viscosity by following the methods of Example 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Polycotton textiles were subjected to the subcritical water treatment (condition II) described in Example 8. After the treatment, the TPA was dissolved, and the cellulose materials were recovered with a viscosity about 35mPa·s (calculated as DP 1750-2200). The cotton sheets were then shredded and disintegrated for use as staple fibers to blend with virgin cotton fibers or other fibers as recycled cotton blend yarn.
The cellulosic pulp product that resulted from the method of Example 6 was subjected to a sour wash process with diluted aqueous sulfur dioxide solution (pH 2-pH 3), 1:20 (cellulose sample: aqueous solution) and stirred for 1.5 hours at room temperature. The sour washed pulp was then filtered, washed with DI water until neutral pH was obtained, and air dried. A cellulose fiber activation process was performed that included producing a ground cellulose pulp sample in aqueous NaOH solution (15% w/v), 1:20 (cellulose sample: aqueous solution), stirring for 4 hrs at room temperature, then washing to neutral pH, drying, treating with 1M sulfuric acid at room temperature for about 45 mins, then washing to neutral pH, and air drying.
To make the cellulose dissolution dope, the activated cellulose sample was incorporated into Lithium Chloride (8% w/v)/N, N-dimethylacetamide with Lauryl gallate (10% w/w versus added cellulose sample) and mucic acid (5% w/w versus added cellulose sample) as the additives, stirring at 120° C. to 130° C. for about 90 mins, cooling down, then centrifugation at 2500 rpm for about 60 mins to remove the undissolved impurities and to make the dissolution cellulose dope in a solid concentration about 4% to 6%. Then the cellulose dope was used to produce continuous regenerated cellulose filament and textile products, as set forth in the schematic of
The physical properties of the regenerated cellulose monofilament were measured. The monofilament had a tenacity ranging from 1.3 g/den to 1.8 g/den and a strain at break of about 10% to 12%.
Optical microscopy images were taken of the produced regenerated cellulose filaments. Particularly,
Polycotton textiles were subjected to the subcritical water treatment (condition II) described in Example 6, and then the dissolved TPA was recovered by precipitation using a pH adjustment (e.g. pH 2-pH 4). The precipitated TPA was then carried forward to crystallization. This entailed heating an aqueous solution with precipitated TPA to a temperature of about 250° C. to 300° C., a ratio of solid: water of about 1:5, with a residence time of about 5 minutes. The crystalized TPA was then treated with ethylene glycol in batch autoclave at temperatures about 290° C. with Antimony metal (Sb2O3) as catalyst for a PET polymerization process to produce regenerated PET with a target intrinsic viscosity (IV) of 0.620 dl/g.
FT-IR (Jasco 6200 with Pike MIRacle ATR attachment. Range: 4000-600 cm −1, Number of scans: 128) testing was conducted to analyze the TPA produced during the TPA precipitation step, as shown in
NMR analysis of the crystallized TPA from water recrystallization is shown in
The Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC) of regenerated PET chip produced from 100% recycled TPA is shown in
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of regenerated PET chip produced from 100% recycled TPA is shown in
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/019,877 having a filing date of Sep. 14, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/695,969 filed on Nov. 26, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,180,629 issued on Nov. 23, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/246,044 filed on Jan. 11, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,501,599 issued on Dec. 10, 2019, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/616,543 filed on Jan. 12, 2018, the entire contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4436586 | Elmore | Mar 1984 | A |
| 5151368 | Brimhall et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5236959 | Oakley et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 6468390 | Snekkenes et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6545061 | Murdoch et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6772767 | Mua et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 7544635 | Liang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 8268126 | Fang | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8460898 | Diner | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8546560 | Kilambi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8637718 | Gupta | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8679352 | Olivier et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 9388529 | Lindstrom et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9469693 | Henriksson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9611371 | Walker | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9751955 | Lindstrom et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9902815 | Tamminen et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 10266610 | Varhimo et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10300464 | Lin et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10322395 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10392565 | Xiao et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10603651 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 20040154760 | Dean | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20070193706 | Kirov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080097120 | Jermolovicius et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20090053777 | Hennessey et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20100178677 | Dunson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20130192123 | Maschmeyer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130276801 | Byrd, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140234936 | Kusuda et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140242684 | Harlick et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275299 | Bedwell et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140331993 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140345341 | Fiato et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150225901 | I\sikainen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20160053058 | Tabor | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160311997 | Rangaswamy et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170008826 | Essaddam | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170218162 | Walker et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170362775 | Juvonen et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180002837 | Yu et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127515 | Ropponen et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180347111 | Lee | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190255506 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1139719 | Jan 1997 | CN |
| 101448581 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 102392378 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 106674588 | May 2017 | CN |
| 1383955 | Jan 2010 | EP |
| 2171154 | Apr 2010 | EP |
| 1454009 | Jun 2010 | EP |
| 2425024 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2247623 | Jan 2014 | EP |
| 2452014 | Aug 2016 | EP |
| 2817448 | Nov 2016 | EP |
| 3172267 | May 2017 | EP |
| 2678474 | Aug 2017 | EP |
| 3307950 | Apr 2018 | EP |
| 2632957 | Nov 2018 | EP |
| 2895653 | Mar 2019 | EP |
| 1562493 | Mar 1980 | GB |
| 2528495 | Jan 2016 | GB |
| 2560726 | Sep 2018 | GB |
| H11269788 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 2006241380 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2009261215 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2011032388 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2013528715 | Jul 2013 | JP |
| 646399 | Jun 2018 | JP |
| WO0202871 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO2009008822 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO2010009343 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO2011138633 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO2013124265 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO2014089412 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO2016004482 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO2016012755 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO2016034727 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO2016193542 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO2017135816 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO2018073177 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO2018104330 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO2018146386 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO2018197756 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO2020084412 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Agrupis, Shirley, et al., Industrial utilization of tobacco stalks II: preparation and characterization of tobacco pulp DY steam explosion pulping, The Japan Wood Research Society, 2000, 46, pp. 222-229. |
| EPO, Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 16808506.6-1101 dated Mar. 20, 2019. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/013270 dated Apr. 29, 2019. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/065334 dated Mar. 30, 2018. |
| Liguori, Rossana et al. “Bioreactors for lignocellulose conversion into fermentable sugars for product of high added value products”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Nov. 16, 2015 (online), pp. 597-611, vol. 100. |
| Palme, Anna, et al., Development of an efficient route for combined recycling of PET and cotton from mixed fabrics, Wextiles and Clothing Sustainability, 2017, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 1-9. |
| PCT, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, International application No. PCT/SE2008/050837, dated Aug. 1, 26009. |
| PCT, International Search Report and Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US2016/037188 dated Sep. 12, 2016. |
| PCT, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, International application No. PCT/US2016/037188 dated Dec. 12, 2017. |
| Sohail, et al., Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subcritical water technologies, Energy, 36, 2011, pp. 2328-2342. |
| WIPO; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/013270 dated Jul. 23, 2020, 7 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220348736 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62616543 | Jan 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17019877 | Sep 2020 | US |
| Child | 17850030 | US | |
| Parent | 16695969 | Nov 2019 | US |
| Child | 17019877 | US | |
| Parent | 16246044 | Jan 2019 | US |
| Child | 16695969 | US |
