US20190135410A1 “Toroidal Propeller”
U.S. Pat. No. 4,445,817A “Propeller construction”
U.S. Pat. No. 9,926,058B2 “Propeller”
U.S. Pat. No. 5,096,382A “Ring-shrouded propeller”
The evolution of propeller technology has seen various innovations aimed at enhancing performance, efficiency, and reducing operational challenges. Among these innovations, Cavitation Reducing Propellers (CRP) have garnered significant attention for their potential to mitigate noise, increase power, and improve maneuverability compared to traditional propeller designs. Historically, the idea of CRP has been explored for many years, with patents dating back over a century. Loop blades (LB) have emerged as a particularly promising CRP design, characterized by their unique twisted shapes. However, traditional manufacturing methods such as casting rigid alloys or CNC machining have struggled to effectively produce LB due to their complex geometry. Recent advancements in additive printing and CNC machining technology have revitalized interest in LBs. Notable patents and implementations, such as the “Toroidal Propeller” by MIT (US20190135410A1) and the innovations by Sharrow (U.S. Pat. No. 9,926,058B2), have contributed to advancements in LB design and manufacturing.
The “Toroidal Propeller” patent from MIT introduces a novel propeller design characterized by a toroidal shape, aiming to improve propulsion efficiency and reduce cavitation effects. Meanwhile, Sharrow's patents focus on unique blade designs that aim to reduce drag and increase propulsive efficiency.
Despite these advancements, challenges persist in LB manufacturing. Additive manufacturing methods, while suitable for prototyping, often come with high costs and limited material options for mass production. Similarly, traditional manufacturing techniques like metal casting or CNC machining struggle with the intricate geometry of LBs, leading to limitations in material options and increased manufacturing costs.
Overall, ongoing research and development efforts in propeller technology, including CRP designs like LB, continue to push the boundaries of performance and efficiency in propulsion systems, driving innovation in the maritime, aviation, and renewable energy sectors.
This invention describes two novel methods for creating loop blades (LBs) using readily available prefabricated and pre-shaped materials. These methods aim to simplify LB production by leveraging existing manufacturing capabilities.
The first method utilizes pre-curved tubular or helical pieces as starting materials. A single cutting operation, guided by LB specifications, transforms these pre-curved workpieces into LB with a helically twisted shape.
The second method focuses on pre-cut flat sheets or bars. A single curving operation, again guided by LB specifications, shapes these pre-cut elements into LBs with a helically twisted shape, possibly extended with straight wings.
Both methods offer advantages by:
All figures are for illustrative purpose made with 3D model program.
This invention relates to methods for creating loop blades (LB) utilizing readily available prefabricated and pre-shaped workpieces. The proposed methods for creation of LBs take advantage of existing manufacturing industry, by using widely available pre-fabricated and pre-shaped work pieces. For the purpose of the proposed methods, the pre-fabricated stock (work pieces) is categorized in two main groups: pre-cut and pre-curved. The pre-cut group comprises flat sheet pieces, cut to size and shape, while the pre-curved group includes tubular and helical shaped pieces. Both of these can be easily purchased ready-made or for custom order.
This invention proposes two methods to apply to pre-made work pieces in order to produce LB.
The first method applies a single cutting operation to pre-curved work pieces and the second method applies single curving operation to pre-cut work pieces. The resulting loop blade may have closed loop, semi-loop or partial loop length, where partial length is between semi (50%) and closed (100%) loop length. In essence, in all cases, the core of the resulting LBs is a semi-loop helically twisted shape [
The first method employs pre-curved tubular or helical shaped workpieces as starting materials. These pre-curved workpieces can be readily obtained commercially or custom-fabricated according to desired specifications.
A suitable pre-curved workpiece is selected based on the target LB specifications. Common options for pre-curved workpieces include:
Tubular shapes: These can be closed pipes (e.g.,
Helical shapes: Helical wrappers (e.g.
Step 2. Cutting Operation with Machine Setup
A cutting machine is configured, based on the chosen pre-curved workpiece and target LB specifications. The cutting parameters include:
Cutting blade material: The material selection (e.g., metal, water jet, laser, plasma) aligns with the LB material and should be specified in the LB specifications.
Cutting blade angle: For tubular workpieces, the cutting blade angle is set to match the specified LB pitch angle. The width of the cut slices should also match the intended LB width.
For helical wrappers, the wrap segment length should be equal to the total LB length as specified.
The pre-curved workpiece undergoes a single cutting operation using the configured cutting machine, transforming it into slices having the final LB form.
The second method focuses on pre-cut flat sheets or bars as starting materials. These pre-cut elements offer advantages when creating LBs with straight wings.
The selection of a pre-cut workpiece considers the desired LB specifications, including:
Curving fixture cylinder diameter and angle, corresponding to the LB pitch angle obtained from the specifications.
Flat sheets or bars can be chosen based on these parameters.
A curving/bending machine performs the process. The pre-cut bar wings are wrapped helically around a cylindrical fixture positioned at the LB pitch angle, given in the LB specifications (
Both methods offer advantages over conventional LB production methods by: Utilizing readily available prefabricated materials, minimizing procurement lead times and costs.
Requiring only a single processing step (cutting or curving), simplifying production and reducing cycle times.
Tailoring the process based on LB specifications, ensuring precise dimensional control and repeatability.
The Loop Blades (LB) attach to propeller hub in different configurations. Depending on their shape and attachment, they may have particular advantages. For example, the straight wings (long or short) have more thrust, but the pressure on the blade distributes unequally along its length. Partial loop blades have arch greater than semi-loop blades for better flexibility for coaxial arrangements (assembled in a plane, where each loop axis is coaxial to the rotation axis). They derive from closed loop blades, from helical shape, via curving, etc. Semi-loop blades, derived from closed LBs, open LBs and helical LBs are interchangeable, provided all blade parameters are the same. Currently, there is a great variety of tubular shapes in production.
Here are some possible uses:
Provisional Application No 63/468,925 from 2023 May 25.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63468925 | May 2023 | US |