The present invention pertains generally to methods and procedures for use in ophthalmic surgery. More particularly, the present invention pertains to the use of laser devises for photodisruption of tissue in the eye. The present invention is particularly, but not exclusively, useful for an ophthalmic surgical procedure involving transcorneal or fiberoptic photodisruption of tissue of the corneo scleral angle as a treatment for glaucoma.
Glaucoma refers to a series of relatively common eye disorders in which pressure within the eye is sufficiently high as to result in damage to sensitive intraocular structures, including the retina and optic nerve. Glaucomas are classified as primary (including chronic open angle glaucoma, angle closure glaucoma, mixed mechanism glaucoma and infantile glaucoma and secondary (related to other diseases of the eye). The elevation of intraocular pressure ultimately leads to irreversible destruction of the optic nerve. The clinical symptoms, which are not readily recognized in the early stages, are characterized mainly by a slow, relentless, progressive narrowing of the field of vision, and decrement in visual integration processing, including diminished dark adaptation. In the absence of treatment, the eventual outcome is total loss of vision often accompanied by severe eye pain.
In order to fully appreciate the described embodiments, a brief overview of the anatomy of the eye is provided. As schematically shown in
As shown in
The trabecular meshwork widens to about 200 μm at its base where it and the iris 19 attach to the scleral spur. The passageway through the pores in the trabecular meshwork 9 lead through a very thin, porous tissue called the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork 13, which in turn abuts the interior side of a structure called Schlemm's canal 11. Schlemm's canal 11 is filled with a mixture of aqueous humor and blood components and branches off into collector channels 12 that drain the aqueous humor into the venous system. Because aqueous humor is continuously produced by the eye, any obstruction in the trabecular meshwork, the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork or Schlemm's canal, prevents the aqueous humor from readily escaping from the anterior chamber. This results in an elevation of intraocular pressure in the eye. Increased intraocular pressure can lead to damage of the optic nerve and eventual blindness.
Present surgical techniques to lower intraocular pressure include procedures enabling fluid to drain from within the eye to extra ocular sites. However, these drainage or “filtering” procedures not only increase the risk of causing a lens cataract, but often fail by virtue of their closure resulting from the healing of the very wound created for gaining access to the surgical site. Ab inferno surgical procedures, also, if not adequately stealth eventually fail. In creating the egress by photoablation or by photodisruption less inflammation at the egress site is induced than by current techniques, thus prolonging filtration wound function.
Lasers were first used in 1965 to repair retinal detachments. The procedure involved chorioretinal coagulation in which a laser beam positioned from without the eye was used to achieve fusion of the retina and the choroid. The technique consisted of introducing a laser beam from outside the cornea, and by employing the refractive media of the eye itself, the laser radiation was directed in such a manner that it was concentrated at a selected point upon the retina/choroid so that the tissues in a very localized area were photothermally congealed.
In contrast to thermal energy produced by visible and by infrared lasers, such as Nd:YAG systems, the high photon energies of femtosecond lasers can photodisrupt the material in question, namely eye tissue, in a manner which does not cause significant target tissue temperature elevation. By photodisruption, both visible and infrared femtosecond laser radiation can be used to drastically alter the target tissue in a “cold” environment. This becomes significant for controlled removal of organic substances, such as living tissue, in contradistinction to treatments in which heat is generated, e.g. by thermal lasers, which could damage, if not destroy, delicate eye tissue adjacent to the target sites to be removed and thereby induce healing responses.
Femtosecond (“FS”) lasers used for this purpose include the group of rapidly pulsed lasers which emit at 0.4 to 2.5 μm in the visible and infrared spectra. In contrast to the thermal visible and infrared radiation from some Nd:YAG or CO2 lasers or the like, the high energy photons from femtosecond lasers at photodisruptive fluence levels are absorbed by the target tissues. This absorption creates a hot plasma at the focus, vaporizing tissue. The plasma subsequently expands supersonically launching a pressure wave. Later, a cavitation bubble forms and eventually collapses. The extent of the tissue damage caused by the pressure wave and cavitation bubble expansion is energy-dependent. Femtosecond pulses deposit very little energy while still causing breakdown, therefore producing surgical photodisruption while minimizing collateral damage.
Juhasz T, Chai D, Chaudhary G, et al.; Application of Femtosecond Laser Surgery for the Treatment of Glaucoma; in Frontiers in Optics, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2008) disclosed that FS laser pulses could be used to create partial thickness scleral channels that drain aqueous humor into the sub-conjunctival space, showing potential for the treatment of glaucoma. Toyran S, Liu Y, Singha S., et al.
Femtosecond laser photodisruption of human trabecular meshwork: an in vitro study; Exp. Eye Res. 2005; 81(3); 298-305, disclosed the use of FS lasers to perform photodisruption of human TM strips ex vivo, creating full-thickness ablation channels through the TM without collateral damage. The ideal settings for creating lesions with minimal collateral side effects on the inner surface of the TM are: Ti:Sapphire laser beam (45 fsec, 1 kHz, 800 nm) with 14.4 mJ pulse energy and an exposure time of 0.5 sec Nakamura H, Liu Y, Witt T E, et al.; Femtosecond laser photodisruption of primate trabecular meshwork: an ex vivo study; Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009; 1198-204 disclosed photodisruption by FS laser of the TM of ex vivo, intact, enucleated human and baboon eyes. The settings were 45 fsec, 1 kHz, 800 nm with 60 to 480 μJ and 0.001 to 0.3 sec exposure time. The study showed that laser ablation of the TM ab interno in ex vivo primate eyes is feasible by a custom femtosecond laser ablation system with a gonioscopic lens. The photodisruption did not reach Schlemm's canal, although this goal could easily be achieved through an alteration in laser settings and delivery methods.
However, successful use of ultrashort laser pulses, such as those produced by a FS laser, in vivo to produce channels in the TM to relieve glaucoma has not been demonstrated by the work discussed above and presents challenges not present in those experimental studies. In particular, the laser beam must be delivered to a precise location on the TM in such a way as to avoid damage to adjacent and intervening tissue. The challenges of delivering adequate photodisruptive energy in precise patterns in shapes and depths include (a) the curved surface of the target, (b) the target lies beyond the critical angle of visible ocular structures seen through the cornea unaided, (c) optical coupling systems are necessary to visualize and target the intended treatment sites, e.g. trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal, (d) the location of Schlemm's canal may be difficult to establish particularly as it lies behind the optically significant trabecular meshwork, (e) once the inner wall of Schlemm's canal therefore the “blood aqueous bather”, is penetrated, blood components may obscure the optical pathway for any future optical viewing and/or treating beams.
The present disclosure provides for the delivery of photodisruptive fluence levels of visible or infrared photons to the precise point of the target tissue of the eye by direct or fiberoptic delivery systems without impinging upon the overlying or surrounding tissue or upon the tissue at the region of beam entry into the eye for the purpose of effecting removal of select tissue in precise shapes and depths. Ultrashort laser pulses are directed into the eye either through the cornea or ab internally via fibers to enable laser radiation, including visible and infrared radiation, under gonioscopic control or through fiberoptic elements, including fiber lasers, thereby effecting precisely controlled photodisruptive removal of such target tissue of the corneo scleral angle. Such tissue may include TM, juxtacanalicular TM, and portions of Schlemm's canal, collector channels, aqueous veins and sclera. Preferably, a laser with pulse duration in the range from 20 fs to 300 ps is used, although it is to be recognized that even shorter pulse durations may be used. The laser uses an optical coupling to affect controlled photodisruption of the target.
It is to be understood that this summary is provided as a means for generally determining what follows in the drawings and detailed description and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The foregoing summary of this disclosure as well as the following detailed descriptions of the embodiments is further understood when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are included by way of example, and not by way of limitation with regard to this disclosure.
The present disclosure provides for the delivery of photodisruptive fluence levels of visible or infrared photons to the precise point of the target tissue of the eye by direct or fiberoptic delivery systems without impinging upon the overlying or surrounding tissue or upon the tissue at the region of beam entry into the eye for the purpose of effecting removal of select tissue in precise shapes and depths. Ultrashort laser pulses are directed into the eye either through the cornea or ab internally via fibers to enable laser radiation, including visible and infrared radiation, under gonioscopic control or through fiberoptic elements, including fiber lasers, thereby effecting precisely controlled photodisruptive removal of such target tissue of the corneo scleral angle. Such tissue may include TM, juxtacanalicular TM, and portions of Schlemm's canal, collector channels, aqueous veins and sclera. Preferably, a laser with pulse duration in the range from 20 fs to 300 ps is used, although it is to be recognized that even shorter pulse durations may be used. The laser uses an optical coupling to affect controlled photodisruption of the target.
A coupling system employs a goniolens or an ab interno fiberoptic that precisely targets the outflow obstructing tissues to effect removal of the outflow obstruction. Such targeting may include localization of Schlemm's canal, detected optically or otherwise, such as by OCT (optical coherence tomography) or photoaccoustic spectroscopy.
The optical system may also include features to enhance visualization of Schlemm's canal by controlling localized and diffuse pressure gradients, for example by creating relative hypotomy to induce blood reflux into Schlemm's canal. Means of coupling the globe of the eye optically to the laser beam delivery system may be included to enable the exquisite precision of the photodisruptive laser. Such systems include goniolens flange systems, including coupling capabilities such as suction, with diameters in the range of IO to 25 mm, fluidic chambers both to control intraocular pressure (“IOP”) and to maintain corneal clarity and shape. To enable optical pathways, such as planar surface to enable precision targeting, suction means for similar purposes which, in addition, exquisitely control light energy delivery registration to the target tissues. In the case of the fiber laser, the fiber may have multiple channels to control intraocular pressure, to enable visualization and optical coupling to Schlemm's canal.
Preferably, the procedure for creating openings in the trabecular meshwork comprises:
(1) imaging the target tissue, (2) locking a pattern to the image, (3) creating the pattern and controlling the depth of laser penetration, and (4) maintaining IOP to enable visualization of Schlemm's canal and concurrently controlling egress of blood to prevent optical decoupling of light obstruction for subsequent laser delivery to target tissue.
Several 20 to 200 μm partial depth openings may be created concurrently without complete penetration to prevent blood reflux or other optical pathway obscuring elements after which Schlemm's canal inner wall penetration is effected to all sites concurrently.
IOP is altered to affect this optical pathway, which is lowered to allow targeting of Schlemm's canal then elevated to prevent blood reflux.
Gonioscopic an fiberoptic delivery systems for laser surgery in the eye wherein thermal and/or radiation damage to the eye is minimized are disclosed.
In connection with glaucoma treatment, laser energy is applied gonioscopicay transcorneal or directed through the fiberoptic element. When gonioscopic, the deflecting mirror may be stationary or may have elements to adjust the mirror within the goniolens delivery system both to precisely target the subject tissue and to precisely direct femtosecond laser energy to these tissues. Such a mirror may be mechanically controllable to effect scanning. The gonioscope is coupled to the eye by various means, including prongs, clips, suction, viscoelastic, aqueous solution and inflatable balloons. The laser delivery system is also coupled both to the goniolens and via the goniolens to the target cornea-scleral angle tissues. The optical delivery is stabilized through precise control of the goniolens and goniolens mirror position and control of the femtosecond laser energy delivered to the target tissue by sensors which detect precise laser tissue interactions as they occur.
The systems may include image stabilization to enable precise laser coupling to the docked goniolens device which includes a mirroring/light deflecting system to enable viewing and treating the cameo scleral angle structure at the laser delivery system, at the goniolens or fiber or both.
In one embodiment a goniolens is applied to the cornea and a laser beam is focused on the target tissue. In another embodiment, a fiberoptic handpiece is passed through an incision in the eye where it is stabilized and secured to the globe and the laser beam is focused on the target tissue.
In one goniolens configuration, a multidimensional mobile reflective surface (e.g., a Mylar balloon) is moved (horizontally, vertical and in depth) by inflation or deflation. This system can include fluidics to control temperature within the lens system. This configuration also may include concurrent illuminating beams and treatment beams with image capture for pixel to pixel image matching to control precise targeting when coupled to a mobile or curved target.
In another goniolens configuration DLP (Digital Light Processing) optical semiconductors or equivalent are used to control the gonioscopic delivery.
In yet another configuration, the system is capable of detecting cardiac cycle pulsation and the filling and emptying causing choroid translation of outflow structures by optical or ultrasound techniques, coupling the detection system to the optical delivery system to enable precise photo disruption of target tissue by means of a combination or individually: (a) mechanically controlled mirror, (b) piezoelectric controlled mirror, (c) DLP optical semiconductor, (d) surface reflecting fluid balloons (e.g. Mylar) included at the laser and/or within a gonioscopic delivery system.
The goniolens air/surface optics are either plano or concave or convex. The mirror/light reflecting element optics are either plano, concave, convex, complex curved or in a segmented mirror array. Light altering materials include variable optical density fluid lair filled balloons, glass, plastic or metal shaped to enable photodisruption to occur at target regions which are both beyond the critical angle to the corneal surface and are curved, residing on the inner surface of a globe.
The laser beam emitted from the laser source may be parallel, convergent or divergent and it is altered by the lens mirror system to enable all forms of emitted beams to focus with a suprathreshold photodisruptive fluence at the target tissue.
In one configuration, the goniolens includes a pressure detection means to compensate for cardiac cycle translation of the entire globe/orbit structures/choroid and intraocular structures including detection of choroidal filling and emptying from cardiac cycle events, which may include pressure detectors in the goniolens or goniolens flange and software in the laser delivery system to compensate for this target translation to enable precise target photodisruption on the moving target.
A concentric ring system may be used to enable (1) registration either through suction or through a retaining mechanical device (prongs, corkscrew) (2) IOP control (3) ocular pulsation detection.
A bladder/balloon system may be used to control optical surfaces, including cornea and any internal mirroring surfaces to enable an emitter to best couple to the target tissue. In coupling the cornea, the cornea may be compressed (e.g. flattened) or the goniolens corneal surface may be curved and coupled to the corneal surface by optically neutral fluidic means, liquids and gels.
In the case of a direct (e.g. non mirror) goniolens delivery system the direct goniolens is retained in a holding device coupled to an optic delivery system with mirror external to the goniolens. Such external mirroring enables the laser source and viewing optics to be inclined at angles from 10° to 170°, often 60° to 120° and most often 80° to 110° in relation to the target tissue.
In the moving eye/goniolens complex the laser fires only when the target is optically captured and stabilized. These optical coupling mechanisms enable precise photodisruption at the target tissue in space and in depth.
In the case of an ab interno fiber, the optical delivery is stabilized through precise control of the fiber position and control of the femtosecond laser energy delivered from the fiber tip by sensors which detect precise fiber tip position and alignment to the target tissue.
The photodisruptive radiation is directed to the target tissues, namely corneoscleral angle structures comprising trabecular meshwork, juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork, components of Schlemm's canal, and in some cases adjacent cornea, sclera, and iris structures to create fluid passageways between the anterior chamber of the eye and Schlemm's canal or alternatively the suprascleral/subTenon space or alternatively the suprachoroidal space.
Photodisruptive laser energy is targeted to gonioscleral angle structures for the purpose of removing tissue which impedes aqueous outflow or to redirect outflow. Openings are created by patterns of adjacent photodisruption regions in this tissue. The patterns consist of various shapes in size ranging from surface dimensions of 20 to 200 microns and depth adequate to penetrate the inner wall of Schlemm's canal. Patterning enables openings to be created individually, sequentially or several concurrently. In one iteration, when concurrently, the depth is controlled at each opening to allow the creation of craters without entering SC until all craters are at a depth after which minimal additional tissue removal would enter SC thus enabling the optical pathway in the anterior chamber to remain clear. Only at this time would SC be perforated at each crater concurrently to minimize optical pathway obscuration by blood reflux from SC.
In other iterations, in which the IOP is regulated to prevent blood reflux from SC, other patterning options are used, to create individual openings or several concurrent openings in from 1 to 12 clock hours of the angle.
Surgical trauma to the outer wall of Schlemm's canal, or in the case of full thickness penetration to the overlying conjunctival and Tenon's tissue, all extremely subject to scarring, is thereby minimized. This is in contrast to current procedures which result in more scarring of sensitive ocular structures and therefore more rapid failure of procedures whose purpose is to control TOP.
By minimizing trauma while creating an aqueous humor egress route, the present invention minimizes healing and increases longevity of improved outflow at the site of filtration. The present invention enables a significantly greater opportunity for success, including the ability to titrate the amount of photodisruptive energy necessary to result in a measured lowering of intraocular pressure.
Referring to
Laser energy is delivered from the distal end of fiber-optic probe 23 targeting the trabecular meshwork across the anterior chamber or in contact or adjacent to the tissues sufficient to cause photodisruption. Tissues to be removed include the trabecular meshwork 9, the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork 13 and an inner wall of Schlemm's canal 11. Fiber-optic probe 23 delivered photodisruptive energy creates an aperture in the proximal inner wall of Schlemm's canal 11 but does not perforate the distal outer wall. In some embodiments, additional apertures can be created in the trabecular meshwork and the target tissue following reposition of the probe. Thus by removing outflow obstructing tissues, the resultant aperture or apertures are effective to restore relatively normal rates of drainage of aqueous humor.
Referring to
A beam 51 of pulsed radiation is generated by a femtosecond laser and delivered into the eye by the delivery system, including the goniolens 50. The beam 51 is reflected by a mirror 52 which may be controlled by a servo system 53 connected to a controller 58 to focus scanning photodisruptive energy onto the curved surface of the target tissue. The optics enable bidirectional use, one direction is used to treat the target tissue, the other direction is used to view and/or sense the x, y, z coordinates of the targeted tissue to enable precise treatment and removal of the target regions. The beam 51 has a set of pulse parameter ranges specifically selected to photodisrupt targeted tissue of the trabecular meshwork, while minimizing damage to surrounding tissue. Thus, the beam has a wavelength between 0.4 and 2.5 microns. The exact wavelength used for a particular subject depends on tradeoffs between strong absorption by the meshwork and transmission of preceding ocular structures and aqueous humor.
The pulse duration of the laser beam is chosen to have a high probability of photodisrupting material of the corneoscleral angle outflow tissues. There is an inverse relationship between the laser pulse duration and the energy required in each pulse to generate optical breakdown. The pulse duration is selected to be shorter than the thermal relaxation of the target so that only the targeted material is heated, and the surrounding tissue is unaffected. Thus, the pulse duration is between 20 fs and 300 ps. The pulse rate is between 1 and 500 KHz.
The pulse energy is chosen to facilitate photodisruption and minimize the shockwave effect of the laser light. A typical value for the pulse energy is between 300 to 1500 nJ.
The spot diameter is chosen such that sufficient laser energy density is provided to facilitate photodisruption of the trabecular meshwork tissue. The spot size is between 1 to 10 microns.
The goniolens 50 is anchored either on the sclera 17 or the cornea 15 by a suction ring 57 or prongs 56. The anchoring system is attached to a pressure regulating system 55 and an ocular pulse sensing system 54. The anchoring system is either concentric 57 or segmented 56. Scanning the spot in the x, y, and z direction effects patterns for tissue removal.
Alternatively, the TM may be approached ab externo via the semi-transparent sclera using high numerical aperture optics and a fundamental wavelength that allows deep penetration through the sclera. This produces targeted ablation of the deep corneo scleral angle structures, specifically targeting TM, JCTM and portions of Schlemm's Canal. In this instance the coupling lens could be planar or curved.
All coupling lenses, goniolenses and fibers require focusing devices at the laser which couple optically to the lenses, goniolenses and fibers to effect appropriate fluences at the target tissue to effect micro ablations and thereby tissue removal.
Preferably, the procedure for ultrashort laser pulse trabeculostomy comprises the steps that follow.
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, to exclude equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/302,965, filed May 17, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,510,813, issued Nov. 29, 2022, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/881,934, filed May 22, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,039,958, issued Jun. 22, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/008,917, filed Jun. 14, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,765,559, issued Sep. 8, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/732,627, filed Jun. 5, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,064,757, issued Sep. 4, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/464,949, filed May 4, 2012, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/482,824, filed May 5, 2011, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3858577 | Bass | Jan 1975 | A |
3884236 | Krasnov | May 1975 | A |
3982541 | L Esperance, Jr. | Sep 1976 | A |
4273109 | Enderby | Jun 1981 | A |
4391275 | Fankhauser | Jul 1983 | A |
4461294 | Baron | Jul 1984 | A |
4470407 | Hussein | Sep 1984 | A |
4497319 | Sekine | Feb 1985 | A |
4501274 | Skjaerpe | Feb 1985 | A |
4517973 | Sunago | May 1985 | A |
4538608 | L Esperance, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4551129 | Coleman | Nov 1985 | A |
4558698 | O'Dell | Dec 1985 | A |
4559942 | Eisenberg | Dec 1985 | A |
4580559 | L Esperance | Apr 1986 | A |
4583539 | Karlin | Apr 1986 | A |
4633866 | Peyman | Jan 1987 | A |
4658816 | Ector, Jr. | Apr 1987 | A |
4660546 | Herrick | Apr 1987 | A |
4671273 | Lindsey | Jun 1987 | A |
4722350 | Armeniades | Feb 1988 | A |
4729373 | Peyman | Mar 1988 | A |
4770654 | Rogers | Sep 1988 | A |
4791927 | Menger | Dec 1988 | A |
4846172 | Berlin | Jul 1989 | A |
4876250 | Clark | Oct 1989 | A |
4925299 | Meisberger | May 1990 | A |
4994060 | Rink | Feb 1991 | A |
5034010 | Kittrell | Jul 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch | Mar 1992 | A |
5123902 | Gerhard | Jun 1992 | A |
5129895 | Vassiliadis | Jul 1992 | A |
5254112 | Sinofsky | Oct 1993 | A |
5273056 | Mclaughlin | Dec 1993 | A |
5300020 | L Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5359685 | Waynant | Oct 1994 | A |
5360399 | Stegmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5371078 | Clark | Dec 1994 | A |
5607966 | Hellberg | Mar 1997 | A |
5643250 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657760 | Ying | Aug 1997 | A |
5698545 | Clark | Dec 1997 | A |
5704907 | Nordquist | Jan 1998 | A |
5713844 | Peyman | Feb 1998 | A |
5722970 | Colvard | Mar 1998 | A |
5736491 | Patel | Apr 1998 | A |
5738676 | Hammer | Apr 1998 | A |
5738677 | Colvard | Apr 1998 | A |
5785658 | Benaron | Jul 1998 | A |
5792103 | Schwartz | Aug 1998 | A |
5811453 | Yanni | Sep 1998 | A |
5865831 | Cozean | Feb 1999 | A |
5885279 | Bretton | Mar 1999 | A |
5895831 | Brasier | Apr 1999 | A |
5990099 | Clark | Nov 1999 | A |
5993438 | Juhasz | Nov 1999 | A |
5997531 | Loeb | Dec 1999 | A |
6002480 | Izatt | Dec 1999 | A |
6059772 | Hsia | May 2000 | A |
6083193 | Kadziauskas | Jul 2000 | A |
6099521 | Shadduck | Aug 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist | Aug 2000 | A |
6146375 | Juhasz | Nov 2000 | A |
6177544 | Kanai | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186974 | Allan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6251103 | Berlin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297228 | Clark | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6398809 | Hoffmann | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6450984 | Lynch | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494857 | Neuhann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6524275 | Lynch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6638239 | Bergheim | Oct 2003 | B1 |
7018376 | Webb | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7125119 | Farberov | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133137 | Shimmick | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7331984 | Tu | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431710 | Tu | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7503916 | Shimmick | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8123729 | Yamamoto | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8540659 | Berlin | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8679089 | Berlin | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9820883 | Berlin | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10064757 | Berlin | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10383689 | Berlin | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10765559 | Berlin | Sep 2020 | B2 |
11039958 | Berlin | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11510813 | Berlin | Nov 2022 | B2 |
20020013572 | Berlin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020072673 | Yamamoto | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082591 | Haefliger | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111608 | Baerveldt | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165522 | Holmen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014092 | Neuhann | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030105456 | Lin | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109907 | Shadduck | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030175324 | Robinson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212387 | Kurtz | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236483 | Ren | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040070761 | Horvath | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082939 | Berlin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092856 | Dahan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102729 | Haffner | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116909 | Neuberger | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040199149 | Myers | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216749 | Tu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228013 | Goldstein | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050043722 | Lin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050165386 | Kurtz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050240168 | Neuberger | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245916 | Connor | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279369 | Lin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021623 | Miller | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050229 | Farberov | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084954 | Zadoyan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106370 | Baerveldt | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114469 | Horvath | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129141 | Lin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155265 | Juhasz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195078 | Webb | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200113 | Haffner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224146 | Lin | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259021 | Lin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070093794 | Wang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093796 | Raksi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121120 | Schachar | May 2007 | A1 |
20070173791 | Raksi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208325 | Kurtz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219541 | Kurtz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235543 | Zadoyan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070236771 | Zadoyan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080027519 | Guerrero | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058777 | Kurtz | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082078 | Berlin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082088 | Kurtz | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091224 | Griffis, III | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080119827 | Kurtz | May 2008 | A1 |
20080278687 | Somani | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090118716 | Brownell | May 2009 | A1 |
20090118717 | Brownell | May 2009 | A1 |
20090118718 | Raksi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131921 | Kurtz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137988 | Kurtz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157062 | Hauger | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171327 | Kurtz | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090281530 | Korn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100036488 | De Juan, Jr. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100324543 | Kurtz | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028948 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028949 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028950 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028951 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028952 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028953 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028954 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028955 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028957 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110028958 | Raksi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120259321 | Vera | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283557 | Berlin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140288485 | Berlin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150080783 | Berlin | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150305939 | Vera | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305940 | Vera | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150313759 | Vera | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19840047 | Mar 2000 | DE |
0898947 | Mar 1999 | EP |
9117793 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9620742 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9901063 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9945868 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0013627 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0067687 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jean et al. “Noncontact photoacoustic spectroscopy during photoablation with a 193-nm excimer laser”, Ger. J. Ophthalmol.; vol. 2, No. 6; Nov. 1993; pp. 404-408. |
Neuhann, et al., “Excimer Laser Trabecular Ablation ab interne (EL T) in the Treatment of Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma”, Ophthalmo-Chirurgie 13:Offprint (2001). |
Olivius M.D., E., et al., “Interocular Pressure After Cataract Surgery with Healon,” American Intraocular Implant Society, vol. 11, Sep. 1985, pp. 480-482. |
Owen, David. A moving-mirror gonioscope for retinal surgery. 1997. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 61, 246-247. |
Royston, et al. Comparison of the thermal tissue effects produced by aged sapphire and silica hemispherical tips. Lasers in surgery and medicine 14.1 (1994):47-58. |
Shirato et al., “Internal Sclerostomy with Argon Contact Laser—Animal Experiment Using 5-Fluorouracil”, Japanese Journal of Opthalmol, 34(3); 190; 381-387. |
Taboada, J. et al., “An Extreme Sensitivity in the Corneal Epithelium to FAR UV ArF Excimer Laser Pulses,” Proc. of the Sci. Prog. of the Aerospace Med. Assoc., 1981, San Antonio, TX. pp. 98-99. |
Toyran, et al., Femtosecond laser photodisruption of human trabecular meshwork: an in vitro study. Exp Eye Res., Sep. 2005; 81(3):298-305. |
Translated Article of M.H. Vogel, P. Schildberg, “[Histological findings after experimental laser-trabecula-puncture (author's transl)],” Klin. Monbl Augenheilkd 1973, 163(3):353-358. |
Translated Article: “Showing translation for The ablation of the trabecular meshwork . . . ” M. Vogel, G. Scheurer, W Neu, M. Dressel, H. Gerhardt; Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk. 197 (1990) 250-253. |
Translated Article: Punktuelfe Excimerlaserablation des Trabekelwerks Klinische Ergebnisse (Punctual Excimer Laser Ablation of trabecular meshwork Clinical results) by Lauritzen and Vogel; Opthalmologe 1997 94:665-667. |
Trokel M.D., S. et al., “Excimer Laser Surgery of the Cornea,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, Dec. 1983, pp. 710-715. |
Verdaasdonk, R.M., et al., “Ray Tracing of Optically Modified Fiber Tips 1: Spherical Probes,” Applied Optics, vol. 30, No. 16, Jun. 1991, pp. 2159-2171. |
Verdaasdonk, R.M., et al., “Ray Tracing of Optically Modified Fiber Tips 2: Laser Scalpels” Applied Optics, vol. 30, No. 16, Jun. 1991, pp. 2172-2177. |
Wolbarsht, M., “Laser Surgery: C02 or HF,” Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. QE20, No. 12, Dec. 1984, pp. 1427-1432. |
“Customized Ablation: The Wave Continues to Move Forward”, Medical Laser Report, vol. 15, No. 12, Dec. 2001, pp. 4-5. |
Berlin M.D., M., “Photoablation—The Basis of Photochemical Laser Interactions,” Ophthalmic Lasers: A Second Generation, Edited by W. Mar. M.D., 1990, pp. 85-91. |
Berlin, et al. Goniophotoablation: excimer laser glaucoma filtering surgery. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 2 (1988): 17-24. |
Berlin, et al. Laser sclerostomy. The state of the art. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 6 (1993): 415-424. |
Berlin, et al. Perspectives on new laser techniques in managing glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 8 (1995): 341-363. |
Berlin, et al., Excimer laser photoablation in glaucoma filtering surgery. American journal of ophthalmology, 103.5 (1987):713. |
Berlin, M. Laser Therapy. In Becker-Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas. 1999:521-554. |
Berson, M.D., F.G., et al. “Obstruction of Aqueous Outflow by Sodium Hyaluronate in Enucleanted Human Eyes”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, No. 5, 1983, pp. 668-672. |
Brown M.D., R.H., et al. “Ab Interne Filtering Surgery Internal Sclerectomy with the Trabecuphine,” Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, vol. 1, No. 2, Dec. 1988, pp. 199-207. |
Cimberle, M. “Erbium Laser Cataract Surgery is Now Bimanual, Easier and Safer to Perform” Ocular Surgery News, Aug. 2000, 3 pages. |
Dietlein et al.; “Erbium:YAG Laser Ablation on Human Trabecular Meshwork by Contact Delivery Endoprobes”; Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers; vol. 27, No. 11; Nov. 1996; pp. 939-945. |
Dietlein, et al. Ab interno infrared laser trabecular ablation: preliminary short-term results in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 235.6 (1997): 349-353. |
Dietlein, et al. Erbium: YAG laser trabecular ablation (LTA) in the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Lasers in surgery and medicine 23.2 (1998): 104-110. |
Dietlein, et al. Morphological variability of the trabecular meshwork in glaucoma patients: implications for non-perforating glaucoma surgery. British journal of ophthalmology 84.12 (2000): 1354-1359. |
Fankhauser, et al. Optical principles related to optimizing sclerostomy procedures. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina 23(11): 752-761 (1992). |
Hill, et al. Effects of pulse width on erbium: YAG laser photothermal trabecular ablation (LTA). Lasers in surgery and medicine 13.4 (1993): 440-446. |
Hill, et al. Laser trabecular ablation (LTA). Lasers in surgery and medicine 11.4 (1991): 341-346. |
Huang, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science (New York, NY) 254.5035 (1991):1178-1181. |
Iliev, et al. The repair response following Nd: YAG laser sclerostomy ab interno in rabbits. Experimental eye research 61.3 (1995):311-321. |
International preliminary examination report dated Sep. 19, 2002 for PCT Application No. PCT/US01/16317. |
International search report dated Jul. 5, 2002 for PCT Application No. PCT/US01/16317. |
Jacobi, et al. Microendoscopic trabecular surgery in glaucoma management. Ophthalmology 106.3 (1999): 538-544. |
Juhasz, et al. Application of Femtosecond Laser Surgery for the Treatment of Glaucoma; in Frontiers in Optics. OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2008). |
L'Esperance. Jr. M.D. “Ophthalmic Lasers Photocoagulation, Photoradiation and Surgery,” The C.V. Mosby Company, 1983, pp. 529-554. |
Larson M.D. et al., “Viscoelastic Agents”, The CLAO Journal, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1989, 10 pages. |
Latina, et al. New Lasers for Glaucoma Surgery. In Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2000:600-608. |
Lee, et al. Short-pulsed neodymium-YAG laser trabeculotomy. An in vivo morphological study in the human eye. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 29.11 (1988):1698-1707. |
Leitgeb, et al. Spectral measurement of absorption by spectroscopic frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Optics letters 25.11 (2000):820-822. |
Liesegang M.D., T., Viscoelastics, Interactions Opthalmology Clinics, vol. 33, No. 4, 1993, pp. 127-147. |
Lin, C. Ph.D. Laser-Tissue Interactions. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, vol. 6, No. 3, Sep. 1993, pp. 381-391. |
M. Berlin M.D., “New Developments in Glaucoma Laser Surgery Procedures,” Ophthalmology clinics of North America. vol. 11. No, 2. Jun. 1998, pp. 187-200. |
M. Vogel, G. Scheurer, W. Neu, M. Dressel, H. Gerhardt, “Die Ablation des Trabekelwerks,” Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk. 197 (1990) 250-253. |
M.Berlin M.D., “Coreneal Photoblation, ”Ophthalmic Lasers: A second Generation, Edited by March . M.d., 1990, pp. 93-104. |
M.Berlin M.D., Excimer Laser Applications in Glaucona Surgery, Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, vol. 1, No. 2. Dec. 1988, pp. 255-263. |
M.H. Vogel, P. Schildberg, “Histologische Friihergebnisse nach experimenteller Lasertrabekulopunktur,” Klin. Mhl. Augenheilk. 163 (1973) 353-358. |
Martin Vogel, Kyra Lauritzen, “Punktuelle Excimerlaserablation des Trabekelwers Klinische Ergebnisse,” Opthalmologe 1997 94:665-667. |
McHam, et al. Erbium: YAG laser trabecular ablation with a sapphire optical fiber. Experimental eye research 65.2 (1997): 151-155. |
Muller, et al. Biophysics of the photoablation process. Lasers in Medical Science 6.3 (1991): 241-254. |
Nakamura, et al. Femtosecond laser photodisruption of primate trabecular meshwork: an ex vivo study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Mar. 2009; 50(3):1198-204. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1536. Epub Oct. 3, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230165716 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61482824 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17302965 | May 2021 | US |
Child | 18045229 | US | |
Parent | 16881934 | May 2020 | US |
Child | 17302965 | US | |
Parent | 16008917 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16881934 | US | |
Parent | 14732627 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 16008917 | US | |
Parent | 13464949 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14732627 | US |