The present invention relates to a method for transmitting data in a mobile telecommunication system, to a primary station and to a secondary station associated.
This invention is, for example, relevant for the mobile networks like the UMTS, and especially for radio systems with terminals having a plurality of antennas.
The following 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) documents are incorporated by reference. In particular, they contain details about the terminology used in the present patent application. The documents are publicly available for download from www.3gpp.org.
In 3GPP a proposal called D-TxAA for Double Transmit Antenna Array, is under discussion for UMTS as a way of increasing the peak bit rate. This is derived from an existing closed loop transmit diversity scheme (TxAA mode 1) where the mobile terminal signals to the network indicators of complex weights which should be applied to the signals from each of two transmit antennas. In D-TxAA, two different data streams are transmitted using orthogonal weight vectors, one weight vector being based on those transmitted from the mobile terminal, and the other vector being derived deterministically from the first.
For the operation of D-TxAA, the following may be assumed:
In order for the Node B to determine how many codewords can be simultaneously transmitted, it needs information about how many and which beams can support the transmission of a codeword. Typically this is done by CQI reporting, which also includes information about the supportable rate for each codeword. However, frequent CQI reporting results in a high signalling load. A reduced CQI reporting rate may be used, but the Node B will then be slower to react to changes in the rank of the channel, resulting in failed transmissions of codewords on beams, which cannot support transmission, or wasted capacity when beams are not used which could support a transmission.
It is an object of the invention to propose a method of signalling quickly available resources without causing too much overhead.
It is another object of the invention to propose a method enabling to use all the available resources at any time.
To this end, according to the invention, it is proposed a method for transmitting data from a primary station to a secondary station, on a plurality of data streams, said method comprising:
at the secondary station measuring the quality of the data streams, and signalling at a first rate to the primary station in a first indicator a CQI report representative of the quality of the data streams, and signalling at a second rate, greater than the first rate, in a second indicator a quantity of data that can be transmitted on the data streams;
at the primary station transmitting the data streams on the basis of the first and second indicators.
According to the invention, a fast rank indicator is signalled from the secondary station or User Equipment (UE) to the primary station or Node B to enable rapid adjustment of the number of simultaneously-transmitted codewords without requiring CQI to be transmitted every sub-frame. The indicator may only indicate the number of available data streams that can support a codeword. Thus, the size of this indicator is reduced and, even if this indicator is sent very frequently (in each frame or subframe), it does not lead to too much overhead.
As a consequence, this second indicator permits to have a flexible control of the number of codewords allocated to the set of datastreams, preventing thus the wasting of capacity, or problems of transmissions.
The present invention also relates to a method for transmitting a plurality of data streams from a primary station to a secondary station on a plurality of transmission beams, said method comprising:
at the secondary station measuring the channel quality corresponding to each transmission beam, and signalling to the primary station a plurality of antenna weights;
at the primary station computing at least a first transmission beam on the basis of the plurality of antenna weights, and
transmitting the data streams on the transmission beams including the first transmission beam.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and will be elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
The present invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention relates to a system of communication 300 as depicted in
The radio system 300 may comprise a plurality of the primary stations 100 and/or a plurality of secondary stations 200. The primary station 100 comprises a transmitter means 110 and a receiving means 120. An output of the transmitter means 110 and an input of the receiving means 120 are coupled to an antenna array 130, including at least two antennas, by a coupling means 140, which may be for example a circulator or a changeover switch. Coupled to the transmitter means 110 and receiving means 120 is a control means 150, which may be for example a processor. The secondary station 200 comprises a transmitter means 210 and a receiving means 220. An output of the transmitter means 210 and an input of the receiving means 220 are coupled to an antenna 230, or to an antenna array, by a coupling means 240, which may be for example a circulator or a changeover switch. Coupled to the transmitter means 210 and receiving means 220 is a control means 250, which may be for example a processor. Transmission from the primary radio station 100 to the secondary station 200 takes place on a first channel 160 and transmission from the secondary radio station 200 to the first radio station 100 takes place on a second channel 260.
The first channel 160 takes place on a plurality of transmission beams. These transmission beams may be steered to be directed along at least one direction preferred by the secondary station 200. To signal the quality of the transmission beams, CQI reports are transmitted periodically. Typically, such CQI reports may indicate the quality of the beams, or a rate (or packet size) which can be transmitted successfully for each data streams.
According to the invention, a fast rank indicator is signalled from the secondary station 200 to primary station 100 to enable rapid adjustment of the number of simultaneously-transmitted codewords or data streams without requiring CQI to be transmitted every sub-frame. This fast rank indicator is coded with a low number of bits, so that the frequent transmission of this indicator does not lead to too much overhead. As illustrated on
In an embodiment, the fast rank indicator is time-multiplexed with antenna weight feedback, by observing that the relationship between the size of the codebook (and therefore the number of bits required for antenna weight feedback) and the length of the subframe (and therefore the number of physical channel bits available for transmitting antenna weight feedback) may result in one or more spare bit-positions which can be used for transmitting the fast rank indicator.
Indeed, In RAN1#45 and RAN#32, it was agreed that the MIMO scheme for Re1-7 would be a dual-codeword MIMO scheme based on D-TxAA, with the antenna weights being signalled on the HS-SCCH.
Hereafter, the term “primary beam” will be used to designate the beam that is formed on the basis of the secondary station 200 feedback. The beam that is formed using an orthogonal weight vector to that of the first beam is referred to as the “secondary beam”. However, it is possible that this secondary beam is formed with help on a second feedback from the secondary station or for instance on a spatial measurement of the noise.
With D-TxAA, the primary beam is configured according to the feedback from the UE in a similar way to the beamforming for closed-loop mode 1. A criterion for D-TxAA feedback may be chosen, so that the criterion for calculating the FBI feedback bits would allow the possibility of maximising the received SIR. This would allow the secondary station 200 with more than one receive antenna the possibility of taking into account the spatial characteristics of any strong interferer(s). In the case of spatially-white interference, this change would make no difference, but it would be especially useful in the case when the strongest eigenvector of the channel from the serving Node B happens to coincide with a strong path from an interferer. However, in a variant of the invention, it is possible to choose the feedback so that the “received power” is maximised. In order to allow the secondary stations to reuse existing algorithms, this change could be optional—i.e. allowing one of two behaviours for the secondary station (either maximising power or maximising SIR).
Concerning the signalling of feedback bits, in order to keep as much commonality as possible with the existing closed loop mode 1, it seems reasonable to use the DPCCH FBI bits for the secondary station 200 to transmit its preferred antenna weight information to the primary station 100. The fact that these bits are uncoded and may have a high error rate should have less impact than for closed loop mode 1, as the signalling of the antenna weights on the HS-SCCH should be more reliable than any antenna verification scheme implemented at the secondary station.
Some changes are, however, necessary compared to closed loop mode 1. Firstly, as the antenna weights will be signalled on the HS-SCCH in the downlink, it can be advantageous that the antenna weights in the downlink are fixed for the duration of an HS-DSCH subframe. This would also aid channel estimation and decoding in the secondary station.
This means that 3 UpLink DPCCH FBI bits are available per HS-DSCH TTI (or 6 depending on the DPCCH slot format).
It is necessary to consider the exact usage of these FBI bits, and also the calculation of the phase vector at the Node B. In closed loop mode 1, an averaging operation is employed to calculate the actual beamforming weight vector to apply at the Node B based on the FBI messages received in two consecutive slots.
A number of possibilities exist for the exact way in which the FBI bits are used and the primary beam phase vector calculated. For example:
Indeed, in a variant of the invention, the secondary station may signal to the primary station the complex weights for building the primary beam, with help of a plurality of antenna weights. The primary station constructs the primary beam by deducing it from the plurality of weights, for instance by averaging the complex weights.
For example, the primary station is able to compute the primary by deriving an average from 3 antenna weights, doubling thus the size of the primary station codebook, and adding one bit available for the signaling.
This is illustrated in the timing diagram of
The criterion for calculating the FBI feedback bits should allow the possibility of maximising the received SIR, not the “received power” as currently specified in TS25.214 for closed loop mode 1.
The antenna weights in the downlink are fixed for the duration of an HS-DSCH subframe.
The basic definition of the FBI bits, averaging at the Node B, and the codebook may be kept as in closed loop mode 1, and the redundant third FBI field is used as a fast rank indicator.
In the present specification and claims the word “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. Further, the word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed.
From reading the present disclosure, other modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Such modifications may involve other features which are already known in the art of radio communication and the art of transmitter power control and which may be used instead of or in addition to features already described herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06119342 | Aug 2006 | EP | regional |
This application claims the benefit or priority of and describes relationships between the following applications: wherein this application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/438,030 filed Feb. 19, 2009, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IB2007/053330 filed Aug. 21, 2007, which claims the priority of foreign application EP06119342.1 filed Aug. 22, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein in whole by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8675508 | Baker | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020018530 | Kim | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030185309 | Pautler | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040252797 | Lee | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060135211 | Chae | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146749 | Lundh | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070002963 | Pedersen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005749 | Sampath | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032196 | Dominique | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070070928 | Sutivong et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070243831 | Seki | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080043867 | Blanz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1879317 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2006070478 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006126655 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007072414 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3GPP Technical Report 25.876 V1.8.0 (2005), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Multiple Input Multiple Output in Utra. |
3GPP Technical Specification 25.212 V6.8.0 (Jun. 2006), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Multiplexing and Channel Coding (FDD) (Release 6). |
3GPP Technical Specification 25.214 V6.9.0 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Procedures (FDD) (Release 6). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140146774 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12438030 | US | |
Child | 14166900 | US |