Patent Grant
8701769
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to methods and systems for production of hydrocarbons and/or other products from various subsurface formations such as hydrocarbon containing formations.
2. Description of Related Art
Hydrocarbons obtained from subterranean formations are often used as energy resources, as feedstocks, and as consumer products. Concerns over depletion of available hydrocarbon resources and concerns over declining overall quality of produced hydrocarbons have led to development of processes for more efficient recovery, processing and/or use of available hydrocarbon resources. In situ processes may be used to remove hydrocarbon materials from subterranean formations that were previously inaccessible and/or too expensive to extract using available methods. Chemical and/or physical properties of hydrocarbon material in a subterranean formation may need to be changed to allow hydrocarbon material to be more easily removed from the subterranean formation and/or increase the value of the hydrocarbon material. The chemical and physical changes may include in situ reactions that produce removable fluids, composition changes, solubility changes, density changes, phase changes, and/or viscosity changes of the hydrocarbon material in the formation.
Large deposits of heavy hydrocarbons (heavy oil and/or tar) contained in relatively permeable formations (for example, in tar sands) are found in North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. Tar can be surface-mined and upgraded to lighter hydrocarbons such as crude oil, naphtha, kerosene, and/or gas oil. Surface milling processes may further separate the bitumen from sand. The separated bitumen may be converted to light hydrocarbons using conventional refinery methods. Mining and upgrading tar sand is usually substantially more expensive than producing lighter hydrocarbons from conventional oil reservoirs.
In situ production of hydrocarbons from tar sand may be accomplished by heating and/or injecting fluids into the formation. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,084,637 to Todd; 4,926,941 to Glandt et al.; 5,046,559 to Glandt, and 5,060,726 to Glandt, all of which are incorporated herein by reference, describe methods of producing viscous materials from subterranean formations that includes passing electrical current through the subterranean formation. Steam may be injected from the injector well into the formation to produce hydrocarbons.
Oil shale formations may be heated and/or retorted in situ to increase permeability in the formation and/or to convert the kerogen to hydrocarbons having an API gravity greater than 10°. In conventional processing of oil shale formations, portions of the oil shale formation containing kerogen are generally heated to temperatures above 370° C. to form low molecular weight hydrocarbons, carbon oxides, and/or molecular hydrogen. Some processes to produce bitumen from oil shale formations include heating the oil shale to a temperature above the natural temperature of the oil shale until some of the organic components of the oil shale are converted to bitumen and/or fluidizable material.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,515,213 to Prats, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes circulation of a fluid heated at a moderate temperature from one point within the formation to another for a relatively long period of time until a significant proportion of the organic components contained in the oil shale formation are converted to oil shale derived fluidizable materials.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,882,941 to Pelofsky, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes recovering hydrocarbons from oil shale deposits by introducing hot fluids into the deposits through wells and then shutting in the wells to allow kerogen in the deposits to be converted to bitumen which is then recovered through the wells after an extended period of soaking.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,154 to Maher et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes in situ treatment of a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation using heat sources to produce pyrolyzed hydrocarbons. Maher also describes an in situ treatment of a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation using a heat transfer fluid such as steam. In an embodiment, a method of treating a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation may include injecting a heat transfer fluid into a formation. Heat from the heat transfer fluid may transfer to a selected section of the formation. The heat from the heat transfer fluid may pyrolyze a substantial portion of the hydrocarbons within the selected section of the formation. The produced gas mixture may include hydrocarbons with an average API gravity greater than about 25°.
As discussed above, there has been a significant amount of effort to produce hydrocarbons and/or bitumen from oil shale. At present, however, there are still many hydrocarbon containing formations that contain bitumen that cannot be economically produced. Thus, there is a need for improved methods for heating of a hydrocarbon containing formation that contains bitumen and production of bitumen and/or liquid hydrocarbons having desired characteristics from the hydrocarbon containing formation are needed.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to methods and systems for production of hydrocarbons and/or other products from various subsurface formations such as hydrocarbon containing formations.
2. Description of Related Art
Hydrocarbons obtained from subterranean formations are often used as energy resources, as feedstocks, and as consumer products. Concerns over depletion of available hydrocarbon resources and concerns over declining overall quality of produced hydrocarbons have led to development of processes for more efficient recovery, processing and/or use of available hydrocarbon resources. In situ processes may be used to remove hydrocarbon materials from subterranean formations that were previously inaccessible and/or too expensive to extract using available methods. Chemical and/or physical properties of hydrocarbon material in a subterranean formation may need to be changed to allow hydrocarbon material to be more easily removed from the subterranean formation and/or increase the value of the hydrocarbon material. The chemical and physical changes may include in situ reactions that produce removable fluids, composition changes, solubility changes, density changes, phase changes, and/or viscosity changes of the hydrocarbon material in the formation.
Large deposits of heavy hydrocarbons (heavy oil and/or tar) contained in relatively permeable formations (for example, in tar sands) are found in North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. Tar can be surface-mined and upgraded to lighter hydrocarbons such as crude oil, naphtha, kerosene, and/or gas oil. Surface milling processes may further separate the bitumen from sand. The separated bitumen may be converted to light hydrocarbons using conventional refinery methods. Mining and upgrading tar sand is usually substantially more expensive than producing lighter hydrocarbons from conventional oil reservoirs.
In situ production of hydrocarbons from tar sand may be accomplished by heating and/or injecting fluids into the formation. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,084,637 to Todd; 4,926,941 to Glandt et al.; 5,046,559 to Glandt, and 5,060,726 to Glandt describe methods of producing viscous materials from subterranean formations that includes passing electrical current through the subterranean formation. Steam may be injected from the injector well into the formation to produce hydrocarbons.
Oil shale formations may be heated and/or retorted in situ to increase permeability in the formation and/or to convert the kerogen to hydrocarbons having an API gravity greater than 10°. In conventional processing of oil shale formations, portions of the oil shale formation containing kerogen are generally heated to temperatures above 370° C. to form low molecular weight hydrocarbons, carbon oxides, and/or molecular hydrogen. Some processes to produce bitumen from oil shale formations include heating the oil shale to a temperature above the natural temperature of the oil shale until some of the organic components of the oil shale are converted to bitumen and/or fluidizable material.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,515,213 to Prats describes circulation of a fluid heated at a moderate temperature from one point within the formation to another for a relatively long period of time until a significant proportion of the organic components contained in the oil shale formation are converted to oil shale derived fluidizable materials.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,882,941 to Pelofsky describes recovering hydrocarbons from oil shale deposits by introducing hot fluids into the deposits through wells and then shutting in the wells to allow kerogen in the deposits to be converted to bitumen which is then recovered through the wells after an extended period of soaking.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,154 to Maher et al. describes in situ treatment of a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation using heat sources to produce pyrolyzed hydrocarbons. Maher also describes an in situ treatment of a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation using a heat transfer fluid such as steam. In an embodiment, a method of treating a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation may include injecting a heat transfer fluid into a formation. Heat from the heat transfer fluid may transfer to a selected section of the formation. The heat from the heat transfer fluid may pyrolyze a substantial portion of the hydrocarbons within the selected section of the formation. The produced gas mixture may include hydrocarbons with an average API gravity greater than about 25°.
As discussed above, there has been a significant amount of effort to produce hydrocarbons and/or bitumen from oil shale. At present, however, there are still many hydrocarbon containing formations that contain bitumen that cannot be economically produced. Thus, there is a need for improved methods for heating of a hydrocarbon containing formation that contains bitumen and production of bitumen and/or liquid hydrocarbons having desired characteristics from the hydrocarbon containing formation are needed.
In certain embodiments, a method of treating a hydrocarbon containing formation, includes providing heat to a first section of the hydrocarbon containing formation from a plurality of heaters located in the formation; allowing the heat to transfer from the heaters to heat a portion of the first section to mobilize formation fluid; maintaining an average temperature in a second section of the formation below a pyrolysis temperature of hydrocarbons in the second section, wherein the second section includes inorganic sulfur compounds; and producing mobilized formation fluid from the formation.
In certain embodiments, a method of treating a hydrocarbon containing formation includes: providing heat to a first section of the hydrocarbon containing formation from a plurality of heaters located in the formation; allowing the heat to transfer from the heaters to heat a portion of the first section to mobilize hydrocarbons in the section, wherein the mobilized hydrocarbons includes mercury; mobilizing at least a portion of the hydrocarbons in the first section towards a second section comprising one or more inorganic sulfur compounds; and contacting at least a portion of the pyrolyzed formation fluid comprising mercury and/or mercury compounds with at least a portion of the inorganic sulfur compounds in the second section to remove at least a portion of the mercury and/or mercury compounds from the mobilized hydrocarbons.
In certain embodiments, a method of treating a hydrocarbon containing formation, includes providing heat to a first section of the hydrocarbon containing formation from a plurality of heaters located in the formation; allowing the heat to transfer from the heaters to heat a portion of the first section to mobilize formation fluid; maintaining an average temperature in a second section of the formation below a pyrolysis temperature of hydrocarbons in the second section, wherein the second section includes inorganic nitrogen compounds; and producing mobilized formation fluid from the formation.
In further embodiments, features from specific embodiments may be combined with features from other embodiments. For example, features from one embodiment may be combined with features from any of the other embodiments.
In further embodiments, treating a subsurface formation is performed using any of the methods, systems, power supplies, or heaters described herein.
In further embodiments, additional features may be added to the specific embodiments described herein.
Advantages of the present invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art with the benefit of the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and may herein be described in detail. The drawings may not be to scale. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
The following description generally relates to systems and methods for treating hydrocarbons in the formations. Such formations may be treated to yield hydrocarbon products, hydrogen, and other products.
“API gravity” refers to API gravity at 15.5° C. (60° F.). API gravity is as determined by ASTM Method D6822 or ASTM Method D1298.
“ASTM” refers to American Standard Testing and Materials.
In the context of reduced heat output heating systems, apparatus, and methods, the term “automatically” means such systems, apparatus, and methods function in a certain way without the use of external control (for example, external controllers such as a controller with a temperature sensor and a feedback loop, PID controller, or predictive controller).
“Asphalt/bitumen” refers to a semi-solid, viscous material soluble in carbon disulfide. Asphalt/bitumen may be obtained from refining operations or produced from subsurface formations.
Boiling range distributions for the formation fluid and liquid streams described herein are as determined by ASTM Method D5307 or ASTM Method D2887. Content of hydrocarbon components in weight percent for paraffins, iso-paraffins, olefins, naphthenes and aromatics in the liquid streams is as determined by ASTM Method D6730. Content of aromatics in volume percent is as determined by ASTM Method D1319. Weight percent of hydrogen in hydrocarbons is as determined by ASTM Method D3343.
“Carbon number” refers to the number of carbon atoms in a molecule. A hydrocarbon fluid may include various hydrocarbons with different carbon numbers. The hydrocarbon fluid may be described by a carbon number distribution. Carbon numbers and/or carbon number distributions may be determined by true boiling point distribution and/or gas-liquid chromatography.
“Chemical stability” refers to the ability of a formation fluid to be transported without components in the formation fluid reacting to form polymers and/or compositions that plug pipelines, valves, and/or vessels.
“Condensable hydrocarbons” are hydrocarbons that condense at 25° C. and one atmosphere absolute pressure. Condensable hydrocarbons may include a mixture of hydrocarbons having carbon numbers greater than 4. “Non-condensable hydrocarbons” are hydrocarbons that do not condense at 25° C. and one atmosphere absolute pressure. Non-condens able hydrocarbons may include hydrocarbons having carbon numbers less than 5.
“Coring” is a process that generally includes drilling a hole into a formation and removing a substantially solid mass of the formation from the hole.
“Cracking” refers to a process involving decomposition and molecular recombination of organic compounds to produce a greater number of molecules than were initially present. In cracking, a series of reactions take place accompanied by a transfer of hydrogen atoms between molecules. For example, naphtha may undergo a thermal cracking reaction to form ethene and H2.
“Diesel” refers to hydrocarbons with a boiling range distribution between 260° C. and 343° C. (500-650° F.) at 0.101 MPa. Diesel content is determined by ASTM Method D2887.
A “fluid” may be, but is not limited to, a gas, a liquid, an emulsion, a slurry, and/or a stream of solid particles that has flow characteristics similar to liquid flow.
“Fluid pressure” is a pressure generated by a fluid in a formation. “Lithostatic pressure” (sometimes referred to as “lithostatic stress”) is a pressure in a formation equal to a weight per unit area of an overlying rock mass. “Hydrostatic pressure” is a pressure in a formation exerted by a column of water.
A “formation” includes one or more hydrocarbon containing layers, one or more non-hydrocarbon layers, an overburden, and/or an underburden. “Hydrocarbon layers” refer to layers in the formation that contain hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbon layers may contain non-hydrocarbon material and hydrocarbon material. The “overburden” and/or the “underburden” include one or more different types of impermeable materials. For example, the overburden and/or underburden may include rock, shale, mudstone, or wet/tight carbonate. In some embodiments of in situ heat treatment processes, the overburden and/or the underburden may include a hydrocarbon containing layer or hydrocarbon containing layers that are relatively impermeable and are not subjected to temperatures during in situ heat treatment processing that result in significant characteristic changes of the hydrocarbon containing layers of the overburden and/or the underburden. For example, the underburden may contain shale or mudstone, but the underburden is not allowed to heat to pyrolysis temperatures during the in situ heat treatment process. In some cases, the overburden and/or the underburden may be somewhat permeable.
“Formation fluids” refer to fluids present in a formation and may include pyrolyzation fluid, synthesis gas, mobilized hydrocarbons, and water (steam). Formation fluids may include hydrocarbon fluids as well as non-hydrocarbon fluids. The term “mobilized fluid” refers to fluids in a hydrocarbon containing formation that are able to flow as a result of thermal treatment of the formation. “Produced fluids” refer to fluids removed from the formation.
A “heat source” is any system for providing heat to at least a portion of a formation substantially by conductive and/or radiative heat transfer. For example, a heat source may include electrically conducting materials and/or electric heaters such as an insulated conductor, an elongated member, and/or a conductor disposed in a conduit. A heat source may also include systems that generate heat by burning a fuel external to or in a formation. The systems may be surface burners, downhole gas burners, flameless distributed combustors, and natural distributed combustors. In some embodiments, heat provided to or generated in one or more heat sources may be supplied by other sources of energy. The other sources of energy may directly heat a formation, or the energy may be applied to a transfer medium that directly or indirectly heats the formation. It is to be understood that one or more heat sources that are applying heat to a formation may use different sources of energy. Thus, for example, for a given formation some heat sources may supply heat from electrically conducting materials, electric resistance heaters, some heat sources may provide heat from combustion, and some heat sources may provide heat from one or more other energy sources (for example, chemical reactions, solar energy, wind energy, biomass, or other sources of renewable energy). A chemical reaction may include an exothermic reaction (for example, an oxidation reaction). A heat source may also include a electrically conducting material and/or a heater that provides heat to a zone proximate and/or surrounding a heating location such as a heater well.
A “heater” is any system or heat source for generating heat in a well or a near wellbore region. Heaters may be, but are not limited to, electric heaters, burners, combustors that react with material in or produced from a formation, and/or combinations thereof.
“Heavy hydrocarbons” are viscous hydrocarbon fluids. Heavy hydrocarbons may include highly viscous hydrocarbon fluids such as heavy oil, tar, and/or asphalt. Heavy hydrocarbons may include carbon and hydrogen, as well as smaller concentrations of sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen. Additional elements may also be present in heavy hydrocarbons in trace amounts. Heavy hydrocarbons may be classified by API gravity. Heavy hydrocarbons generally have an API gravity below about 20°. Heavy oil, for example, generally has an API gravity of about 10-20°, whereas tar generally has an API gravity below about 10°. The viscosity of heavy hydrocarbons is generally greater than about 100 centipoise at 15° C. Heavy hydrocarbons may include aromatics or other complex ring hydrocarbons.
Heavy hydrocarbons may be found in a relatively permeable formation. The relatively permeable formation may include heavy hydrocarbons entrained in, for example, sand or carbonate. “Relatively permeable” is defined, with respect to formations or portions thereof, as an average permeability of 10 millidarcy or more (for example, 10 or 100 millidarcy). “Relatively low permeability” is defined, with respect to formations or portions thereof, as an average permeability of less than about 10 millidarcy. One darcy is equal to about 0.99 square micrometers. An impermeable layer generally has a permeability of less than about 0.1 millidarcy.
Certain types of formations that include heavy hydrocarbons may also include, but are not limited to, natural mineral waxes, or natural asphaltites. “Natural mineral waxes” typically occur in substantially tubular veins that may be several meters wide, several kilometers long, and hundreds of meters deep. “Natural asphaltites” include solid hydrocarbons of an aromatic composition and typically occur in large veins. In situ recovery of hydrocarbons from formations such as natural mineral waxes and natural asphaltites may include melting to form liquid hydrocarbons and/or solution mining of hydrocarbons from the formations.
“Hydrocarbons” are generally defined as molecules formed primarily by carbon and hydrogen atoms. Hydrocarbons may also include other elements such as, but not limited to, halogens, metallic elements, nitrogen, oxygen, and/or sulfur. Hydrocarbons may be, but are not limited to, kerogen, bitumen, pyrobitumen, oils, natural mineral waxes, and asphaltites. Hydrocarbons may be located in or adjacent to mineral matrices in the earth. Matrices may include, but are not limited to, sedimentary rock, sands, silicilytes, carbonates, diatomites, and other porous media. “Hydrocarbon fluids” are fluids that include hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbon fluids may include, entrain, or be entrained in non-hydrocarbon fluids such as hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, water, and ammonia.
An “in situ conversion process” refers to a process of heating a hydrocarbon containing formation from heat sources to raise the temperature of at least a portion of the formation above a pyrolysis temperature so that pyrolyzation fluid is produced in the formation.
An “in situ heat treatment process” refers to a process of heating a hydrocarbon containing formation with heat sources to raise the temperature of at least a portion of the formation above a temperature that results in mobilized fluid, visbreaking, and/or pyrolysis of hydrocarbon containing material so that mobilized fluids, visbroken fluids, and/or pyrolyzation fluids are produced in the formation.
“Insulated conductor” refers to any elongated material that is able to conduct electricity and that is covered, in whole or in part, by an electrically insulating material.
“Karst” is a subsurface shaped by the dissolution of a soluble layer or layers of bedrock, usually carbonate rock such as limestone or dolomite. The dissolution may be caused by meteoric or acidic water. The Grosmont formation in Alberta, Canada is an example of a karst (or “karsted”) carbonate formation.
“Kerogen” is a solid, insoluble hydrocarbon that has been converted by natural degradation and that principally contains carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur. Coal and oil shale are typical examples of materials that contain kerogen. “Bitumen” is a non-crystalline solid or viscous hydrocarbon material that is substantially soluble in carbon disulfide. “Oil” is a fluid containing a mixture of condensable hydrocarbons.
“Kerosene” refers to hydrocarbons with a boiling range distribution between 204° C. and 260° C. at 0.101 MPa. Kerosene content is determined by ASTM Method D2887.
“Naphtha” refers to hydrocarbon components with a boiling range distribution between 38° C. and 200° C. at 0.101 MPa. Naphtha content is determined by ASTM Method D5307.
“Nitrogen compounds” refer to inorganic and organic compounds containing the element nitrogen. Examples of nitrogen compounds include, but are not limited to, ammonia and organonitrogen compounds. “Organonitrogen compounds” refer to hydrocarbons that contain at least one nitrogen atom. Non-limiting examples of organonitrogen compounds include, but are not limited to, amines, alkyl amines, aromatic amines, alkyl amides, aromatic amides, carbozoles, hydrogenated carbazoles, indoles pyridines, pyrazoles, pyrroles, and oxazoles.
“Nitrogen compound content” refers to an amount of nitrogen in an organic compound. Nitrogen content is as determined by ASTM Method D5762.
“Olefins” are molecules that include unsaturated hydrocarbons having one or more non-aromatic carbon-carbon double bonds.
“Oxygen containing compounds” refer to compounds containing the element oxygen. Examples of compounds containing oxygen include, but are not limited to, phenols, and/or carbon dioxide.
“P (peptization) value” or “P-value” refers to a numerical value, which represents the flocculation tendency of asphaltenes in a formation fluid. P-value is determined by ASTM method D7060.
“Perforations” include openings, slits, apertures, or holes in a wall of a conduit, tubular, pipe or other flow pathway that allow flow into or out of the conduit, tubular, pipe or other flow pathway.
“Periodic Table” refers to the Periodic Table as specified by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), November 2003. In the scope of this application, weight of a metal from the Periodic Table, weight of a compound of a metal from the Periodic Table, weight of an element from the Periodic Table, or weight of a compound of an element from the Periodic Table is calculated as the weight of metal or the weight of element. For example, if 0.1 grams of MoO3 is used per gram of catalyst, the calculated weight of the molybdenum metal in the catalyst is 0.067 grams per gram of catalyst.
“Physical stability” refers to the ability of a formation fluid to not exhibit phase separation or flocculation during transportation of the fluid. Physical stability is determined by ASTM Method D7060.
“Pyrolysis” is the breaking of chemical bonds due to the application of heat. For example, pyrolysis may include transforming a compound into one or more other substances by heat alone. Heat may be transferred to a section of the formation to cause pyrolysis.
“Pyrolyzation fluids” or “pyrolysis products” refers to fluid produced substantially during pyrolysis of hydrocarbons. Fluid produced by pyrolysis reactions may mix with other fluids in a formation. The mixture would be considered pyrolyzation fluid or pyrolyzation product. As used herein, “pyrolysis zone” refers to a volume of a formation (for example, a relatively permeable formation such as a tar sands formation) that is reacted or reacting to form a pyrolyzation fluid.
“Residue” refers to hydrocarbons that have a boiling point above 537° C. (1000° F.).
“Rich layers” in a hydrocarbon containing formation are relatively thin layers (typically about 0.2 m to about 0.5 m thick). Rich layers generally have a richness of about 0.150 L/kg or greater. Some rich layers have a richness of about 0.170 L/kg or greater, of about 0.190 L/kg or greater, or of about 0.210 L/kg or greater. Lean layers of the formation have a richness of about 0.100 L/kg or less and are generally thicker than rich layers. The richness and locations of layers are determined, for example, by coring and subsequent Fischer assay of the core, density or neutron logging, or other logging methods. Rich layers may have a lower initial thermal conductivity than other layers of the formation. Typically, rich layers have a thermal conductivity 1.5 times to 3 times lower than the thermal conductivity of lean layers. In addition, rich layers have a higher thermal expansion coefficient than lean layers of the formation.
“Subsidence” is a downward movement of a portion of a formation relative to an initial elevation of the surface.
“Sulfur containing compounds” refer to inorganic and organic sulfur compounds. Examples of inorganic sulfur compounds include, but are not limited to, hydrogen sulfide and/or iron sulfides. Examples of organic sulfur compounds (organosulfur compounds) include, but are not limited to, carbon disulfide, mercaptans, thiophenes, hydrogenated benzothiophenes, benzothiophenes, dibenzothiophenes, hydrogenated dibenzothiophenes or mixtures thereof.
“Sulfur compound content” refers to an amount of sulfur in an organic compound in hydrocarbons. Sulfur content is as determined by ASTM Method D4294. ASTM Method D4294 may be used to determine forms of sulfur in an oil shale sample. Forms of sulfur in an oil shale sample includes, but is not limited to, pyritic sulfur, sulfate sulfur, and organic sulfur. Total sulfur content in oil shale is determined by ASTM Method D4239.
“Superposition of heat” refers to providing heat from two or more heat sources to a selected section of a formation such that the temperature of the formation at least at one location between the heat sources is influenced by the heat sources.
“Synthesis gas” is a mixture including hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Additional components of synthesis gas may include water, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, and other gases. Synthesis gas may be generated by a variety of processes and feedstocks. Synthesis gas may be used for synthesizing a wide range of compounds.
“Tar” is a viscous hydrocarbon that generally has a viscosity greater than about 10,000 centipoise at 15° C. The specific gravity of tar generally is greater than 1.000. Tar may have an API gravity less than 10°.
A “tar sands formation” is a formation in which hydrocarbons are predominantly present in the form of heavy hydrocarbons and/or tar entrained in a mineral grain framework or other host lithology (for example, sand or carbonate). Examples of tar sands formations include formations such as the Athabasca formation, the Grosmont formation, and the Peace River formation, all three in Alberta, Canada; and the Faja formation in the Orinoco belt in Venezuela.
“Temperature limited heater” generally refers to a heater that regulates heat output (for example, reduces heat output) above a specified temperature without the use of external controls such as temperature controllers, power regulators, rectifiers, or other devices. Temperature limited heaters may be AC (alternating current) or modulated (for example, “chopped”) DC (direct current) powered electrical resistance heaters.
“Thermal fracture” refers to fractures created in a formation caused by expansion or contraction of a formation and/or fluids in the formation, which is in turn caused by increasing/decreasing the temperature of the formation and/or fluids in the formation, and/or by increasing/decreasing a pressure of fluids in the formation due to heating.
“Thermal oxidation stability” refers to thermal oxidation stability of a liquid. Thermal oxidation stability is as determined by ASTM Method D3241.
“Thickness” of a layer refers to the thickness of a cross section of the layer, wherein the cross section is normal to a face of the layer.
“Time-varying current” refers to electrical current that produces skin effect electricity flow in a ferromagnetic conductor and has a magnitude that varies with time. Time-varying current includes both alternating current (AC) and modulated direct current (DC).
A “u-shaped wellbore” refers to a wellbore that extends from a first opening in the formation, through at least a portion of the formation, and out through a second opening in the formation. In this context, the wellbore may be only roughly in the shape of a “v” or “u”, with the understanding that the “legs” of the “u” do not need to be parallel to each other, or perpendicular to the “bottom” of the “u” for the wellbore to be considered “u-shaped”.
“Upgrade” refers to increasing the quality of hydrocarbons. For example, upgrading heavy hydrocarbons may result in an increase in the API gravity of the heavy hydrocarbons.
“Visbreaking” refers to the untangling of molecules in fluid during heat treatment and/or to the breaking of large molecules into smaller molecules during heat treatment, which results in a reduction of the viscosity of the fluid.
“Viscosity” refers to kinematic viscosity at 40° C. unless otherwise specified. Viscosity is as determined by ASTM Method D445.
“VGO” or “vacuum gas oil” refers to hydrocarbons with a boiling range distribution between 343° C. and 538° C. at 0.101 MPa. VGO content is determined by ASTM Method D5307.
“Wax” refers to a low melting organic mixture, or a compound of high molecular weight that is a solid at lower temperatures and a liquid at higher temperatures, and when in solid form can form a barrier to water. Examples of waxes include animal waxes, vegetable waxes, mineral waxes, petroleum waxes, and synthetic waxes.
The term “wellbore” refers to a hole in a formation made by drilling or insertion of a conduit into the formation. A wellbore may have a substantially circular cross section, or another cross-sectional shape. As used herein, the terms “well” and “opening,” when referring to an opening in the formation may be used interchangeably with the term “wellbore.”
A formation may be treated in various ways to produce many different products. Different stages or processes may be used to treat the formation during an in situ heat treatment process. In some embodiments, one or more sections of the formation are solution mined to remove soluble minerals from the sections. Solution mining minerals may be performed before, during, and/or after the in situ heat treatment process. In some embodiments, the average temperature of one or more sections being solution mined may be maintained below about 120° C.
In some embodiments, one or more sections of the formation are heated to remove water from the sections and/or to remove methane and other volatile hydrocarbons from the sections. In some embodiments, the average temperature may be raised from ambient temperature to temperatures below about 220° C. during removal of water and volatile hydrocarbons.
In some embodiments, one or more sections of the formation are heated to temperatures that allow for movement and/or visbreaking of hydrocarbons in the formation. In some embodiments, the average temperature of one or more sections of the formation are raised to mobilization temperatures of hydrocarbons in the sections (for example, to temperatures ranging from 100° C. to 250° C., from 120° C. to 240° C., or from 150° C. to 230° C.).
In some embodiments, one or more sections are heated to temperatures that allow for pyrolysis reactions in the formation. In some embodiments, the average temperature of one or more sections of the formation may be raised to pyrolysis temperatures of hydrocarbons in the sections (for example, temperatures ranging from 230° C. to 900° C., from 240° C. to 400° C. or from about 250° C. to 350° C.).
Heating the hydrocarbon containing formation with a plurality of heat sources may establish thermal gradients around the heat sources that raise the temperature of hydrocarbons in the formation to desired temperatures at desired heating rates. The rate of temperature increase through the mobilization temperature range and/or the pyrolysis temperature range for desired products may affect the quality and quantity of the formation fluids produced from the hydrocarbon containing formation. Slowly raising the temperature of the formation through the mobilization temperature range and/or pyrolysis temperature range may allow for the production of high quality, high API gravity hydrocarbons from the formation. Slowly raising the temperature of the formation through the mobilization temperature range and/or pyrolysis temperature range may allow for the removal of a large amount of the hydrocarbons present in the formation as hydrocarbon product.
In some in situ heat treatment embodiments, a portion of the formation is heated to a desired temperature instead of slowly raising the temperature through a temperature range. In some embodiments, the desired temperature is 300° C., 325° C., or 350° C. Other temperatures may be selected as the desired temperature.
Superposition of heat from heat sources allows the desired temperature to be relatively quickly and efficiently established in the formation. Energy input into the formation from the heat sources may be adjusted to maintain the temperature in the formation substantially at a desired temperature.
Mobilization and/or pyrolysis products may be produced from the formation through production wells. In some embodiments, the average temperature of one or more sections is raised to mobilization temperatures and hydrocarbons are produced from the production wells. The average temperature of one or more of the sections may be raised to pyrolysis temperatures after production due to mobilization decreases below a selected value. In some embodiments, the average temperature of one or more sections may be raised to pyrolysis temperatures without significant production before reaching pyrolysis temperatures. Formation fluids including pyrolysis products may be produced through the production wells.
In some embodiments, the average temperature of one or more sections may be raised to temperatures sufficient to allow synthesis gas production after mobilization and/or pyrolysis. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons may be raised to temperatures sufficient to allow synthesis gas production without significant production before reaching the temperatures sufficient to allow synthesis gas production. For example, synthesis gas may be produced in a temperature range from about 400° C. to about 1200° C., about 500° C. to about 1100° C., or about 550° C. to about 1000° C. A synthesis gas generating fluid (for example, steam and/or water) may be introduced into the sections to generate synthesis gas. Synthesis gas may be produced from production wells.
Solution mining, removal of volatile hydrocarbons and water, mobilizing hydrocarbons, pyrolyzing hydrocarbons, generating synthesis gas, and/or other processes may be performed during the in situ heat treatment process. In some embodiments, some processes may be performed after the in situ heat treatment process. Such processes may include, but are not limited to, recovering heat from treated sections, storing fluids (for example, water and/or hydrocarbons) in previously treated sections, and/or sequestering carbon dioxide in previously treated sections.
Heat sources 202 are placed in at least a portion of the formation. Heat sources 202 may include heaters such as insulated conductors, conductor-in-conduit heaters, surface burners, flameless distributed combustors, and/or natural distributed combustors. Heat sources 202 may also include other types of heaters. Heat sources 202 provide heat to at least a portion of the formation to heat hydrocarbons in the formation. Energy may be supplied to heat sources 202 through supply lines 204. Supply lines 204 may be structurally different depending on the type of heat source or heat sources used to heat the formation. Supply lines 204 for heat sources may transmit electricity for electric heaters, may transport fuel for combustors, or may transport heat exchange fluid that is circulated in the formation. In some embodiments, electricity for an in situ heat treatment process may be provided by a nuclear power plant or nuclear power plants. The use of nuclear power may allow for reduction or elimination of carbon dioxide emissions from the in situ heat treatment process.
When the formation is heated, the heat input into the formation may cause expansion of the formation and geomechanical motion. The heat sources may be turned on before, at the same time, or during a dewatering process. Computer simulations may model formation response to heating. The computer simulations may be used to develop a pattern and time sequence for activating heat sources in the formation so that geomechanical motion of the formation does not adversely affect the functionality of heat sources, production wells, and other equipment in the formation.
Heating the formation may cause an increase in permeability and/or porosity of the formation. Increases in permeability and/or porosity may result from a reduction of mass in the formation due to vaporization and removal of water, removal of hydrocarbons, and/or creation of fractures. Fluid may flow more easily in the heated portion of the formation because of the increased permeability and/or porosity of the formation. Fluid in the heated portion of the formation may move a considerable distance through the formation because of the increased permeability and/or porosity. The considerable distance may be over 1000 m depending on various factors, such as permeability of the formation, properties of the fluid, temperature of the formation, and pressure gradient allowing movement of the fluid. The ability of fluid to travel considerable distance in the formation allows production wells 206 to be spaced relatively far apart in the formation.
Production wells 206 are used to remove formation fluid from the formation. In some embodiments, production well 206 includes a heat source. The heat source in the production well may heat one or more portions of the formation at or near the production well. In some in situ heat treatment process embodiments, the amount of heat supplied to the formation from the production well per meter of the production well is less than the amount of heat applied to the formation from a heat source that heats the formation per meter of the heat source. Heat applied to the formation from the production well may increase formation permeability adjacent to the production well by vaporizing and removing liquid phase fluid adjacent to the production well and/or by increasing the permeability of the formation adjacent to the production well by formation of macro and/or micro fractures.
More than one heat source may be positioned in the production well. A heat source in a lower portion of the production well may be turned off when superposition of heat from adjacent heat sources heats the formation sufficiently to counteract benefits provided by heating the formation with the production well. In some embodiments, the heat source in an upper portion of the production well may remain on after the heat source in the lower portion of the production well is deactivated. The heat source in the upper portion of the well may inhibit condensation and reflux of formation fluid.
In some embodiments, the heat source in production well 206 allows for vapor phase removal of formation fluids from the formation. Providing heating at or through the production well may: (1) inhibit condensation and/or refluxing of production fluid when such production fluid is moving in the production well proximate the overburden, (2) increase heat input into the formation, (3) increase production rate from the production well as compared to a production well without a heat source, (4) inhibit condensation of high carbon number compounds (C6 hydrocarbons and above) in the production well, and/or (5) increase formation permeability at or proximate the production well.
Subsurface pressure in the formation may correspond to the fluid pressure generated in the formation. As temperatures in the heated portion of the formation increase, the pressure in the heated portion may increase as a result of thermal expansion of in situ fluids, increased fluid generation and vaporization of water. Controlling rate of fluid removal from the formation may allow for control of pressure in the formation. Pressure in the formation may be determined at a number of different locations, such as near or at production wells, near or at heat sources, or at monitor wells.
In some hydrocarbon containing formations, production of hydrocarbons from the formation is inhibited until at least some hydrocarbons in the formation have been mobilized and/or pyrolyzed. Formation fluid may be produced from the formation when the formation fluid is of a selected quality. In some embodiments, the selected quality includes an API gravity of at least about 20°, 30°, or 40° Inhibiting production until at least some hydrocarbons are mobilized and/or pyrolyzed may increase conversion of heavy hydrocarbons to light hydrocarbons. Inhibiting initial production may minimize the production of heavy hydrocarbons from the formation. Production of substantial amounts of heavy hydrocarbons may require expensive equipment and/or reduce the life of production equipment.
In some hydrocarbon containing formations, hydrocarbons in the formation may be heated to mobilization and/or pyrolysis temperatures before substantial permeability has been generated in the heated portion of the formation. An initial lack of permeability may inhibit the transport of generated fluids to production wells 206. During initial heating, fluid pressure in the formation may increase proximate heat sources 202. The increased fluid pressure may be released, monitored, altered, and/or controlled through one or more heat sources 202. For example, selected heat sources 202 or separate pressure relief wells may include pressure relief valves that allow for removal of some fluid from the formation.
In some embodiments, pressure generated by expansion of mobilized fluids, pyrolysis fluids or other fluids generated in the formation may be allowed to increase because an open path to production wells 206 or any other pressure sink may not yet exist in the formation. The fluid pressure may be allowed to increase towards a lithostatic pressure. Fractures in the hydrocarbon containing formation may form when the fluid approaches minimal in situ stress. In some embodiments, the minimal in situ stress may equal to or approximate the lithostatic pressure of the hydrocarbon formation. For example, fractures may form from heat sources 202 to production wells 206 in the heated portion of the formation. The generation of fractures in the heated portion may relieve some of the pressure in the portion. Pressure in the formation may have to be maintained below a selected pressure to inhibit unwanted production, fracturing of the overburden or underburden, and/or coking of hydrocarbons in the formation.
After mobilization and/or pyrolysis temperatures are reached and production from the formation is allowed, pressure in the formation may be varied to alter and/or control a composition of produced formation fluid, to control a percentage of condensable fluid as compared to non-condensable fluid in the formation fluid, and/or to control an API gravity of formation fluid being produced. For example, decreasing pressure may result in production of a larger condensable fluid component. The condensable fluid component may contain a larger percentage of olefins.
In some in situ heat treatment process embodiments, pressure in the formation may be maintained high enough to promote production of formation fluid with an API gravity of greater than 20°. Maintaining increased pressure in the formation may inhibit formation subsidence during in situ heat treatment. Maintaining increased pressure may reduce or eliminate the need to compress formation fluids at the surface to transport the fluids in collection conduits to treatment facilities.
Maintaining increased pressure in a heated portion of the formation may surprisingly allow for production of large quantities of hydrocarbons of increased quality and of relatively low molecular weight. Pressure may be maintained so that formation fluid produced has a minimal amount of compounds above a selected carbon number. The selected carbon number may be at most 25, at most 20, at most 12, or at most 8. Some high carbon number compounds may be entrained in vapor in the formation and may be removed from the formation with the vapor. Maintaining increased pressure in the formation may inhibit entrainment of high carbon number compounds and/or multi-ring hydrocarbon compounds in the vapor. High carbon number compounds and/or multi-ring hydrocarbon compounds may remain in a liquid phase in the formation for significant time periods. The significant time periods may provide sufficient time for the compounds to pyrolyze to form lower carbon number compounds.
Generation of relatively low molecular weight hydrocarbons is believed to be due, in part, to autogenous generation and reaction of hydrogen in a portion of the hydrocarbon containing formation. For example, maintaining an increased pressure may force hydrogen generated during pyrolysis into the liquid phase within the formation. Heating the portion to a temperature in a pyrolysis temperature range may pyrolyze hydrocarbons in the formation to generate liquid phase pyrolyzation fluids. The generated liquid phase pyrolyzation fluids components may include double bonds and/or radicals. Hydrogen (H2) in the liquid phase may reduce double bonds of the generated pyrolyzation fluids, thereby reducing a potential for polymerization or formation of long chain compounds from the generated pyrolyzation fluids. In addition, H2 may also neutralize radicals in the generated pyrolyzation fluids. H2 in the liquid phase may inhibit the generated pyrolyzation fluids from reacting with each other and/or with other compounds in the formation.
Formation fluid produced from production wells 206 may be transported through collection piping 208 to treatment facilities 210. Formation fluids may also be produced from heat sources 202. For example, fluid may be produced from heat sources 202 to control pressure in the formation adjacent to the heat sources. Fluid produced from heat sources 202 may be transported through tubing or piping to collection piping 208 or the produced fluid may be transported through tubing or piping directly to treatment facilities 210. Treatment facilities 210 may include separation units, reaction units, upgrading units, fuel cells, turbines, storage vessels, and/or other systems and units for processing produced formation fluids. The treatment facilities may form transportation fuel from at least a portion of the hydrocarbons produced from the formation. In some embodiments, the transportation fuel may be jet fuel, such as JP-8.
Oil shale formations may have a number of properties that depend on a composition of the hydrocarbons within the formation. Such properties may affect the composition and amount of products that are produced from the oil shale formation during an in situ heat treatment process (for example, an in situ conversion process). Properties of an oil shale formation may be used to determine if and/or how the oil shale formation is to be subjected to the in situ heat treatment process.
Kerogen is composed of organic matter that has been transformed due to a maturation process. The maturation process for kerogen may include two stages: a biochemical stage and a geochemical stage. The biochemical stage typically involves degradation of organic material by aerobic and/or anaerobic organisms. The geochemical stage typically involves conversion of organic matter due to temperature changes and significant pressures. During maturation, oil and gas may be produced as the organic matter of the kerogen is transformed. Kerogen may be classified into four distinct groups: Type I, Type II, Type III, and Type IV. Classification of kerogen type may depend upon precursor materials of the kerogen. The precursor materials transform over time into macerals. Macerals are microscopic structures that have different structures and properties depending on the precursor materials from which they are derived.
Type I kerogen may be classified as an alginite, since it is developed primarily from algal bodies. Type I kerogen may result from deposits made in lacustrine environments. Type II kerogen may develop from organic matter that was deposited in marine environments. Type III kerogen may generally include vitrinite macerals. Vitrinite is derived from cell walls and/or woody tissues (for example, stems, branches, leaves, and roots of plants). Type III kerogen may be present in most humic coals. Type III kerogen may develop from organic matter that was deposited in swamps. Type IV kerogen includes the inertinite maceral group. The inertinite maceral group is composed of plant material such as leaves, bark, and stems that have undergone oxidation during the early peat stages of burial diagenesis. Inertinite maceral is chemically similar to vitrinite, but has a high carbon and low hydrogen content.
Vitrinite reflectance may be used to assess the quality of fluids produced from certain kerogen containing formations. Formations that include kerogen may be assessed/selected for treatment based on a vitrinite reflectance of the kerogen. Vitrinite reflectance is often related to a hydrogen to carbon atomic ratio of a kerogen and an oxygen to carbon atomic ratio of the kerogen. Vitrinite reflectance of a hydrocarbon containing formation may indicate which fluids are producible from a formation upon heating. For example, a vitrinite reflectance of approximately 0.5% to approximately 1.5% may indicate that the kerogen will produce a large quantity of condensable fluids. A vitrinite reflectance of approximately 1.5% to 3.0% may indicate a kerogen having a H/C molar ratio between about 0.25 to about 0.9. Heating of a hydrocarbon formation having a vitrinite reflectance of approximately 1.5% to 3.0% may produce a significant amount (for example, a majority) of methane and hydrogen.
In some embodiments, hydrocarbon formations containing Type I kerogen have vitrinite reflectance less than 0.5% (for example, between 0.4% and 0.5%). Type I kerogen having a vitrinite reflectance less than 0.5% may contain a significant amount of amorphous organic matter. In some embodiments, kerogen having a vitrinite reflectance less than 0.5% may have relatively high total sulfur content (for example, a total sulfur content between 1.5% and about 2.0% by weight). In certain embodiments, a majority of the total sulfur content in the kerogen is organic sulfur compounds (for example, an organic sulfur content in the kerogen between 1.3% and 1.7% by weight). In some embodiments, hydrocarbon formations having a vitrinite reflectance less than 0.5% may contain a significant amount of calcite and a relatively low amount of dolomite.
In certain embodiments, Type I kerogen formations (for example, Jordan oil shale) may have a mineral content that includes about 85% to 90% by weight calcite (calcium carbonate), about 0.5% to 1.5% by weight dolomite, about 5% to 15% by weight fluorapatite, about 5% to 15% by weight quartz, less than 0.5% by weight clays and/or less than 0.5% by weight iron sulfides (pyrite). Such oil shale formations may have a porosity ranging from about 5% to about 7% and/or a bulk density from about 1.5 to about 2.5 g/cc. Oil shale formations containing primarily calcite may have an organic sulfur content ranging from about 1% to about 2% by weight and an H/C atomic ratio of about 1.4.
In some embodiments, hydrocarbon formations having a vitrinite reflectance less than 0.5% and/or a relatively high sulfur content may be treated using the in situ heat treatment process or an in situ conversion process at lower temperatures (for example, about 15° C. lower) relative to treating Type I kerogen having vitrinite reflectance of greater than 0.5% and/or an organic sulfur content of less than 1% by weight and/or Type II-IV kerogens using an in situ conversion process or retorting process. The ability to treat a hydrocarbon formation at lower temperatures may result in energy reductions and increased production of liquid hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon formation.
In some embodiments, formation fluid produced from a hydrocarbon containing formation having a low vitrinite reflectance and/or high sulfur content using an in situ heat treatment process may have different characteristics than formation fluid produced from a hydrocarbon containing formation having a vitrinite reflectance of greater than 0.5% and/or a relatively low total sulfur content. The formation fluid produced from formations having a low vitrinite reflectance and/or high sulfur content may include sulfur compounds that can be removed under mild processing conditions.
The formation fluid produced from formations having a low vitrinite reflectance and/or high sulfur content may have an API gravity of about 38°, a hydrogen content of about 12% by weight, a total sulfur content of about 3.4% by weight, an oxygen content of about 0.6% by weight, a nitrogen content of about 0.3% by weight and a H/C ratio of about 1.8.
The produced formation fluid may be separated into a gas process stream and/or a liquid process stream using methods known in the art or as described herein. The liquid process stream may be separated into various distillate hydrocarbon fractions (for example, naphtha, kerosene, and vacuum gas oil fractions). In some embodiments, the naphtha fraction may contain at least 10% by weight thiophenes. The kerosene fraction may contain about 35% by weight thiophenes, about 1% by weight hydrogenated benzothiophenes, and about 4% by weight benzothiophenes. The vacuum gas oil fraction may contain about 10% by weight thiophenes, at least 1.5% by weight hydrogenated benzothiophenes, about 30% benzothiophenes, and about 3% by weight dibenzothiophenes. In some embodiments, the thiophenes may be separated from the produced formation fluid and used as a solvent in the in situ heat treatment process. In some embodiments, hydrocarbon fractions containing thiophenes may be used as solvation fluids in the in situ heat treatment process. In some embodiments, hydrocarbon fractions that include at least 10% by weight thiophenes may be removed from the formation fluid using mild hydrotreating conditions.
In some embodiments, amounts of ammonia and/or hydrogen sulfide produced from a hydrocarbon containing formation hydrogen may vary depending on the geology of the hydrocarbon containing formation. During an in situ heat treatment process, a hydrocarbon containing formation that has a high content of sulfur and/or nitrogen may produce a significant amount of ammonia and/or hydrogen sulfide and/or formation fluids that include a significant amount of ammonia and/or hydrogen sulfide. During heating, at least a portion of the ammonia may be oxidized to NOx compounds. The formation fluid may have to be treated to remove the ammonia, NOx and/or hydrogen sulfide prior to processing in a surface facility and/or transporting the formation fluid. Treatment of the formation fluid may include, but is not limited to, gas separation methods, adsorption methods or any known method to remove hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and/or NOx from the formation fluid. In some embodiments, the hydrocarbon containing formation includes a significant amount of compounds that off-gas ammonia and/or hydrogen sulfide such that the formation is deemed unacceptable for treatment.
The nitrogen content in the hydrocarbon containing formation may come from hydrocarbon compounds that contain nitrogen, inorganic compounds and/or ammonium feldspars (for example, buddingtonite (NH4AlSi3O8)).
The sulfur content in the hydrocarbon containing formation may come from organic sulfur and/or inorganic compounds. Inorganic compounds include, but are not limited to, sulfates, pyrites, metal sulfides, and mixtures thereof. Treatment of formations containing significant amounts of total sulfur may result in release of unpredictable amounts of hydrogen sulfide. As shown in Table 1, formations having different amounts of total sulfur produce varying amounts of hydrogen sulfide, especially when the formations contain a significant amount of organosulfur compounds and/or sulfate compounds. For example, comparing sample 3 with sample 4 in Table 1, the different amounts of hydrogen sulfide produced do not directly correlate to the total sulfur present in the sulfur.
Treatment to remove unwanted gases produced during production of hydrocarbons from a formation may be expensive and/or inefficient. Many methods have been developed to reduce the amount of ammonia and/or hydrogen sulfide by adding solutions to hydrocarbon containing formations that neutralize or complex the nitrogen and/or sulfur in the formation. Methods to produce formation fluids having reduced amounts of undesired gases (for example, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and/or NOx compounds are desired.
It has been found that the amount of hydrogen sulfide produced from a hydrocarbon containing formation correlates with the amount of pyritic sulfur in the formation. Table 2 is a tabulation of percent by weight pyritic sulfur in layers of a hydrocarbon containing formation that include pyritic sulfur and the percent by weight hydrogen sulfide produced from the layer upon heating. As shown in Table 2, the amount of hydrogen sulfide produced increases with the amount of pyritic sulfur in the layer.
In some embodiments, a hydrocarbon containing formation is assessed using known methods (for example, Fischer Assay data and/or 34S isotope data) to determine the total amount of inorganic sulfur compounds and/or total amount of inorganic nitrogen compounds in the formation. Based on the assessed amount of ammonia and/or metal sulfide (for example, pyrite) in a portion of the formation, heaters may be positioned in portions of the formation to selectively heat the formation while inhibiting the amount of hydrogen sulfide and/or ammonia produced during treatment. Such selective heating allows treatment of formations containing significant amounts of ammonia, pyrite and/or metal sulfides for production of hydrocarbons.
In some embodiments, heat is provided to a first portion of a hydrocarbon containing formation from one or more heaters and/or heat sources. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the heaters in the first section are substantially horizontal. Heat from heaters in the first section raise a temperature of the first section to above a mobilization temperature. During heating, a portion of the hydrocarbons in the first section may be mobilized. Hydrocarbons may be produced from the first section. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons in the first section are heated to a pyrolysis temperature and at least a portion of the hydrocarbons are pyrolyzed to form hydrocarbon gases.
A second section in the formation may include a significant amount of inorganic sulfur compounds and/or inorganic nitrogen compounds. In some embodiments, the second section may contain at least 0.1% by weight, at least 0.5% by weight, or at least 1% by weight pyrite. The second section may provide structural strength to the formation. Maintaining a second section below the pyrolysis and/or mobilization temperature of hydrocarbons may inhibit production of undesirable gases (for example, hydrogen sulfide and/or ammonia) from the second section. In some embodiments, the formation includes alternating layers of hydrocarbons, inorganic metal sulfides, and ammonia compounds having different concentrations. In some in situ conversion embodiments, columns of untreated portions of formation may remain in a formation that has undergone the in situ heat treatment process.
A second section of the formation adjacent to the first section may remain untreated by controlling an average temperature in the second portion below a pyrolysis and/or a mobilization temperature of hydrocarbons in the second section. In some embodiments, the average temperature of the second section may be less than 230° C. or from about 25° C. to 300° C. In some embodiments, the average temperature of the second section is below the decomposition temperature of the inorganic sulfur compounds (for example, pyrite). For example, the temperature in the second section may be less than about 300° C., less than about 230° C., or from about 25° C. to up to the decomposition temperature of the inorganic sulfur compound.
In some embodiments, an average temperature in the second section is maintained by positioning barrier wells between the first section and the second section and/or the second section and/or the third section of the formation.
In some embodiments, the untreated second section may be between the first section and a third section of the formation. Heat may be provided to the third section of the hydrocarbon containing formation. Heaters in the first section and third section may be substantially horizontal. Formation fluids may be produced from the third section of the formation. A processed formation may have a pattern with alternating treated sections and untreated sections. In some embodiments, the untreated second section may be adjacent to the first section of the formation that is subjected to pyrolysis.
In some embodiments, at least a portion of the heaters in the first section are substantially vertical and may extend into or through one or more sections of the formation (for example, through a first vertical section, a second vertical section and/or a third vertical section). The average temperature in the second section may be controlled by selectively controlling the heat produced from the portion of the heater in the second section. Heat from the second section of the heater may be controlled by blocking, turning down, and/or turning off the portion of the heater in the second section so that a minimal amount of heat or no heat is provided to the second section.
In some embodiments, formation fluid from the first section may be mobilized through the second section. The formation fluid may include gaseous hydrocarbons and/or mercury. The formation fluid may contact inorganic sulfur compounds (for example, pyrite) in the second section. Contact of the formation fluid with the inorganic sulfur compounds may remove at least a portion of the mercury from the formation fluid. Contact of the inorganic sulfur compounds may produce one or more mercury sulfides that precipitate from the formation fluid and remain in the second section.
In some embodiments, one or more portions of formation enriched in pyrite (FeS2) are heated to a temperature under formation conditions such that at least a portion of the pyrite compounds are converted to troilite (FeS) and/or one or more pyrrohotite compounds (FeSx, 1.0<x<1.23) and gaseous sulfur. For example, the second section may be heated temperatures ranging from about 250° C. to about 750° C., from about 300° C. to about 600° C., or from about 400° C. to about 500° C. Troilite and/or pyrrohotite compounds may react with mercury entrained in gaseous hydrocarbons to form mercury sulfide more rapidly than pyrite under formation conditions (for example, under a hydrogen atmosphere and/or at a pH of less than 7).
The second section may be sufficient permeability to allow gaseous hydrocarbons to flow through the section. In some embodiments, the second section contains less hydrocarbons (hydrocarbon lean) than the first section (hydrocarbon rich). After heating the second section for a period of time to convert some of the pyrite to pyrrohotite, the hydrocarbon rich first section may be heated using an in situ heat treatment process. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons are mobilized and produced from the second section. Formation fluid containing mercury from the first section may be mobilized and moved through the second section of the formation containing pyrrohotite to a third section.
Contact of the mobilized formation fluid with the pyrrohotite may remove some or all of the mercury from the formation fluid. The contacted formation fluid may be produced from the formation. In some embodiments, the contacted formation fluid is produced from a heated third section of the formation. The contacted formation fluid may be substantially free of mercury or contain a minimal amount of mercury. In some embodiments, the contacted formation fluid has a mercury amount in the contacted formation of less than 10 ppb by weight.
Heat from heaters 212 may heat portions of first section 214 and/or third section 216 of hydrocarbon layer 218. Hydrocarbon layer may be below overburden 220. As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, hydrocarbons in first section 214 may include mercury and/or mercury compounds and second section 222 contains troilite and/or pyrite. Heat from heaters 212 may heat portions of first section 214 and/or third section 216 of hydrocarbon layer 218.
Hydrocarbons may be pyrolyzed and/or mobilized in first section 214. As shown in
As shown in
As the hydrocarbons flow through second section 222, contact of hydrocarbons with inorganic sulfur (for example, pyrite and/or troilite) in the second section may complex and/or react with mercury and/or mercury compounds. Contact of mercury and/or mercury compounds with pyrite may remove the mercury and/or mercury compounds from the hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, insoluble mercury sulfides are formed that precipitate from the hydrocarbons. Mercury free hydrocarbons may be produced through productions wells 206 in second sections 222 (as shown in
In some embodiments, a hydrocarbon containing formation is treated using an in situ heat treatment process to remove methane from the formation. The hydrocarbon containing formation may be an oil shale formation and/or contain coal. In some embodiments, a barrier is formed around the portion to be heated. In some embodiments, the hydrocarbon containing formation includes a coal containing layer (a deep coal seam) underneath a layer of oil shale. The coal containing layer may contain significantly more methane than the oil shale layer. For example, the coal containing layer may have a volume of methane that is five times greater than a volume of methane in the oil shale layer. Wellbores may be formed that extend through the oil shale layer into the coal containing layer.
Heat may be provided to the hydrocarbon containing formation from a plurality of heaters located in the formation. One or more of the heaters may be temperature limited heaters and or one or more insulated conductors (for example, a mineral insulated conductor). The heating may be controlled to allow treatment of the oil shale layer while maintaining a temperature of the coal containing layer below a pyrolysis temperature.
After treatment of the oil shale layer, heaters may be extended into the coal containing layer. The temperature in the coal containing layer may be maintained below a pyrolysis temperature of hydrocarbons in the formation. In some embodiments, the coal containing layer is maintained at a temperature from about 30° C. to 40° C. As the temperature of the coal containing layer increases, methane may be released from the formation. The methane may be produced from the coal containing layer. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons having a carbon number between 1 and 5 are released from the coal continuing layer of the formation and produced from the formation.
In certain embodiments, a temperature limited heater is utilized for heavy oil applications (for example, treatment of relatively permeable formations or tar sands formations). A temperature limited heater may provide a relatively low Curie temperature and/or phase transformation temperature range so that a maximum average operating temperature of the heater is less than 350° C., 300° C., 250° C., 225° C., 200° C., or 150° C. In an embodiment (for example, for a tar sands formation), a maximum temperature of the temperature limited heater is less than about 250° C. to inhibit olefin generation and production of other cracked products. In some embodiments, a maximum temperature of the temperature limited heater is above about 250° C. to produce lighter hydrocarbon products. In some embodiments, the maximum temperature of the heater may be at or less than about 500° C.
A heat source (heater) may heat a volume of formation adjacent to a production wellbore (a near production wellbore region) so that the temperature of fluid in the production wellbore and in the volume adjacent to the production wellbore is less than the temperature that causes degradation of the fluid. The heat source may be located in the production wellbore or near the production wellbore. In some embodiments, the heat source is a temperature limited heater. In some embodiments, two or more heat sources may supply heat to the volume. Heat from the heat source may reduce the viscosity of crude oil in or near the production wellbore. In some embodiments, heat from the heat source mobilizes fluids in or near the production wellbore and/or enhances the flow of fluids to the production wellbore. In some embodiments, reducing the viscosity of crude oil allows or enhances gas lifting of heavy oil (at most about 10° API gravity oil) or intermediate gravity oil (approximately 12° to 20° API gravity oil) from the production wellbore. In certain embodiments, the initial API gravity of oil in the formation is at most 10°, at most 20°, at most 25°, or at most 30°. In certain embodiments, the viscosity of oil in the formation is at least 0.05 Pa·s (50 cp). In some embodiments, the viscosity of oil in the formation is at least 0.10 Pa·s (100 cp), at least 0.15 Pa·s (150 cp), or at least at least 0.20 Pa·s (200 cp). Large amounts of natural gas may have to be utilized to provide gas lift of oil with viscosities above 0.05 Pa·s. Reducing the viscosity of oil at or near the production wellbore in the formation to a viscosity of 0.05 Pa·s (50 cp), 0.03 Pa·s (30 cp), 0.02 Pa·s (20 cp), 0.01 Pa·s (10 cp), or less (down to 0.001 Pa·s (1 cp) or lower) lowers the amount of natural gas or other fluid needed to lift oil from the formation. In some embodiments, reduced viscosity oil is produced by other methods such as pumping.
The rate of production of oil from the formation may be increased by raising the temperature at or near a production wellbore to reduce the viscosity of the oil in the formation in and adjacent to the production wellbore. In certain embodiments, the rate of production of oil from the formation is increased by 2 times, 3 times, 4 times, or greater over standard cold production with no external heating of the formation during production. Certain formations may be more economically viable for enhanced oil production using the heating of the near production wellbore region. Formations that have a cold production rate approximately between 0.05 m3/(day per meter of wellbore length) and 0.20 m3/(day per meter of wellbore length) may have significant improvements in production rate using heating to reduce the viscosity in the near production wellbore region. In some formations, production wells up to 775 m, up to 1000 m, or up to 1500 m in length are used. Thus, a significant increase in production is achievable in some formations. Heating the near production wellbore region may be used in formations where the cold production rate is not between 0.05 m3/(day per meter of wellbore length) and 0.20 m3/(day per meter of wellbore length), but heating such formations may not be as economically favorable. Higher cold production rates may not be significantly increased by heating the near wellbore region, while lower production rates may not be increased to an economically useful value.
Using the temperature limited heater to reduce the viscosity of oil at or near the production well inhibits problems associated with non-temperature limited heaters and heating the oil in the formation due to hot spots. One possible problem is that non-temperature limited heaters can cause coking of oil at or near the production well if the heater overheats the oil because the heaters are at too high a temperature. Higher temperatures in the production well may also cause brine to boil in the well, which may lead to scale formation in the well. Non-temperature limited heaters that reach higher temperatures may also cause damage to other wellbore components (for example, screens used for sand control, pumps, or valves). Hot spots may be caused by portions of the formation expanding against or collapsing on the heater. In some embodiments, the heater (either the temperature limited heater or another type of non-temperature limited heater) has sections that are lower because of sagging over long heater distances. These lower sections may sit in heavy oil or bitumen that collects in lower portions of the wellbore. At these lower sections, the heater may develop hot spots due to coking of the heavy oil or bitumen. A standard non-temperature limited heater may overheat at these hot spots, thus producing a non-uniform amount of heat along the length of the heater. Using the temperature limited heater may inhibit overheating of the heater at hot spots or lower sections and provide more uniform heating along the length of the wellbore.
In some embodiments, a hydrocarbon formation may be treated using an in situ heat treatment process based on assessment of the stability or product quality of the formation fluid produced from the formation. Asphaltenes may be produced through thermal cracking and condensation of hydrocarbons produced during a thermal conversion. The produced asphaltenes are a complex mixture of high molecular weight compounds containing polyaromatic rings and short side chains. The structure and/or aromaticity of the asphaltenes may affect the solubility of the asphaltenes in the produced formation fluids. During heating of the formation, at least a portion of the asphaltenes in the formation may react with other asphaltenes and form coke or higher molecular weight asphaltenes. Higher molecular weight asphaltenes may be less soluble in produced formation fluid that includes lower molecular weight compounds (for example, produced formation fluid that includes a significant amount of naphtha or kerosene). As formation fluids are converted to liquid hydrocarbons and the lower boiling hydrocarbons and/or gases are produced from the formation, the type of asphaltenes and/or solubility of the asphaltenes in the formation fluid may change. In conventional processing, as the formation is heated, the weight percent of asphaltenes and/or the H/C molar ratio of the asphaltenes may decrease relative to an initial weight percent of asphaltenes and/or the H/C molar ratio of the asphaltenes. In some instances, the asphaltene content may decrease due to the asphaltenes forming coke in the formation. In other instances, the H/C molar ratio may change depending on the type of asphaltene being produced in the formation.
In some embodiments, antioxidants (for example, sulfates) are provided to a hydrocarbon formation to inhibit formation of coke. Antioxidants may be added to a hydrocarbon containing formation during formation of wellbores. For example, antioxidants may be added to drilling mud during drilling operations. Addition of antioxidants to the hydrocarbon formation may inhibit production of radicals during heating of the hydrocarbon formation, thus inhibiting production of higher molecular compounds (for example, coke).
Produced formation fluid may be separated into a liquid stream and a gas stream. The separated liquid stream may be blended with other hydrocarbon fractions, blended with additives to stabilize the asphaltenes, distilled, deasphalted, and/or filtered to remove components (for example, asphaltenes) that contribute to the instability of the liquid hydrocarbon stream. These treatments, however, may require costly solvents and/or be inefficient. Methods to produce liquid hydrocarbon streams that have good product stability are desired.
Adjustment of the asphaltene content of the hydrocarbons in situ may produce liquid hydrocarbon streams that require little to no treatment to stabilize the product with regard to precipitation of asphaltenes. In some embodiments, an asphaltene content of the hydrocarbons produced during an in situ heat treatment process may be adjusted in the formation. Changing an aliphatic content of the hydrocarbons in the formation may cause subsurface deasphalting and/or solubilization of asphaltenes in the hydrocarbons. Subsurface deasphalting of the hydrocarbons may produce solids that precipitate from the formation fluid and remain in the formation.
In some embodiments, heat from a plurality of heaters may be provided to a section located in the formation. The heat may transfer from the heaters to heat a portion of the section. In some embodiments, the portion of the section may be heated to a selected temperature (for example, the portion may be heated to about 220° C., about 230° C., or about 240° C.). Hydrocarbons in the section may be mobilized and produced from the formation. A portion of the produced hydrocarbons may be assessed using P-value, H/C molar ratio, and/or a volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point of at least 520° C. in a portion of produced formation fluids, and the stability of the produced hydrocarbons may be determined Based on the assessed value, the asphaltene content, the asphaltenes H/C molar ratio of the hydrocarbons, and/or a volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons in a portion of fluids in the formation may be adjusted.
In some embodiments, the asphaltene content of the hydrocarbons may be adjusted based on a selected P-value. If the P-value is greater than a selected value (for example, greater than 1.1 or greater than 1.5), the hydrocarbons produced from the formation may be have acceptable asphaltene stability and the asphaltene content is not adjusted. If the P-value of the portion of the hydrocarbons is less than the selected value, the asphaltene content of the hydrocarbons in the formation may be adjusted.
In some embodiments, assessing the asphaltene H/C molar ratio in produced hydrocarbons may indicate that the type of asphaltenes in the hydrocarbons in the formation is changing. Adjustment of the asphaltene content of the hydrocarbons in the formation based on the asphaltenes H/C molar ratio in at least a portion of the produced hydrocarbons or when the asphaltenes H/C molar ratio reaches a selected value may produce liquid hydrocarbons that are suitable for transportation or further processing. The asphaltene content may be adjusted when the asphaltene H/C molar ratio of at least a portion of the produced hydrocarbons is less than about 0.8, less than about 0.9, or less than about 1. An asphaltene H/C molar ratio of greater than 1 may indicate that the asphaltenes are soluble in the produced hydrocarbons. The asphaltene H/C molar ratio may be monitored over time and the asphaltene content may be adjusted at a rate to inhibit a net reduction of the assessed asphaltene H/C molar ratio over the monitored time period.
In some embodiments, a volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons in the formation may be adjusted based on an assessed volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point of at least 520° C. in a portion of produced formation fluids. Adjustment of the volume ratio may allow a portion of the asphaltenes in the formation to precipitate from formation fluid and/or maintain the solubility of the asphaltenes in the produced hydrocarbons. An assessed value of a volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point of at least 520° C. of greater than 10 may indicate adjustment of the ratio is necessary. An assessed value of a volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point of at least 520° C. of from about 0 to about 10 may indicate that asphaltenes are sufficiently solubilized in the produced hydrocarbons. Solubilization of asphaltenes in hydrocarbons in the formation may inhibit a net reduction in a weight percentage of asphaltenes in hydrocarbons in the formation over time Inhibiting a net reduction of asphaltenes may allow production of hydrocarbons that require minimal or no treatment to inhibit asphaltenes from precipitating from the produce hydrocarbons during transportation and/or further processing.
In some embodiments, the manner in which a hydrocarbon formation is heated affects where in situ deasphalting fluid is produced. A formation may be heated by energizing heaters in the formation simultaneously, or approximately at the same time, to heat one or more sections of the formation to or near the same temperature. Simultaneously heating sections of the formation to or near the same temperature may produce hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. throughout the heated formation. Mixing of hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. with mobilized hydrocarbons present in the formation may reduce the solubility of asphaltenes in the mobilized hydrocarbons and force at least a portion of the asphaltenes to precipitate from the mobilized hydrocarbons in the heated formation. Production of the mixed hydrocarbons throughout the heated formation may lead to precipitation of asphaltenes at the surface, and thus cause problems in surface facilities and/or piping.
It has been unexpectedly found that heating the hydrocarbon formation in phases may allow in situ deasphalting fluid to be formed in selected sections (for example, lower sections of the formation) of the formation. Deasphalting hydrocarbons in lower sections of the formation may sequester undesirable asphaltenes in the formation. Thus, precipitation of asphaltenes from the produced hydrocarbons is reduced or avoided.
The temperature in first section 226 may be raised to a pyrolysis temperature and pyrolysis of formation fluid in the first section may generate an in situ deasphalting fluid. The in situ deasphalting fluid may be a mixture of hydrocarbons having a boiling range distribution between −5° C. and about 300° C., or between −5° C. and about 260° C. In some embodiments, some of the in situ deasphalting fluid is produced (removed) from first section 226.
An average temperature in second section 228 may be lower than an average temperature in first section 226. Due to the lower temperature in second section 228, the in situ deasphalting fluid may drain into the second section. The temperature and pressure in second section 228 may be controlled such that substantially all of the in situ deasphalting fluid is present as a liquid in the second section. The in situ deasphalting fluid may contact hydrocarbons in second section 228 and cause asphaltenes to precipitate from the hydrocarbons in the section, thus removing asphaltenes from hydrocarbons in the second section. At least a portion of the deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from the formation through production wells 206 in an upper portion of second section 228.
Deasphalted hydrocarbons produced from the formation may be suitable for transportation, have a P-value greater than 1.5, and/or an asphaltene H/C molar ratio of at least 1. In some embodiments, the produced deasphalted hydrocarbons contain at least a portion of the in situ deasphalting fluid.
In some embodiments, the in situ deasphalting fluid mixes with mobilized hydrocarbons and changes the volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons such that asphaltenes are solubilized in the mobilized hydrocarbons. At least a portion of the hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes may be produced from production wells 206.
During the heating process and production of hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon formation, the volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons may be monitored. Initially, the volume ratio may be constant and as asphaltenes are removed from the formation (for example, through in situ deasphalting or through production) the volume ratio increases. An increase in the volume ratio may indicate that the amount of asphaltenes is diminishing and that conditions for deasphalting and/or solubilizing asphaltenes are not favorable.
Hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes produced from the formation may be suitable for transportation, have a P-value greater than 1.5, and/or an asphaltene H/C molar ratio of at least 1. In some embodiments, the produced hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes contain at least a portion of the in situ deasphalting fluid.
In some embodiments, the asphaltene content, asphaltene H/C molar ratio, and/or volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons may be adjusted by providing hydrocarbons to the formation. The hydrocarbons may include, but are not limited to, hydrocarbons having a boiling range distribution between 35° C. and 260° C., hydrocarbons having a boiling range distribution between 38° C. and 200° C. (naphtha), hydrocarbons having a boiling range distribution between 204° C. and 260° C. (kerosene), bitumen, or mixtures thereof. The hydrocarbons may be provided to the section through a production well, injection well, heater well, monitoring well, or combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the hydrocarbons added to the formation may be produced from an in situ heat treatment process.
Hydrocarbons used for in situ deasphalting may be injected into hydrocarbon layer 218 of the formation through injection well 230. Hydrocarbons may be injected at a sufficient pressure to allow mixing of the injected hydrocarbons with heavy hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon layer 218. Contact or mixing of hydrocarbons with heavy hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon layer 218 may remove at least a portion of the asphaltenes from the hydrocarbons in a section of the hydrocarbon layer. The resulting deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from the formation through production well 206B.
In some embodiment, contact or mixing of hydrocarbons with heavy hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon layer 218 may change the volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons in the section such that the hydrocarbons produced from production well 206B are deemed suitable for transportation or processing as assessed by P-value, asphaltene H/C molar ratio, volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 520° C. or other methods known in the art to assess asphaltene stability.
In some embodiments, moving hydrocarbons from one section of the formation to another section of the formation may be used to adjust the asphaltene content and/or volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons in the formation. In some embodiments, bitumen flows from section 232 into section 234 to change the volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons to solubilize asphaltenes in the mobilized hydrocarbons present in section 234 Solubilization of asphaltenes may inhibit a net reduction in a weight percentage of asphaltenes over time. The produced mobilized hydrocarbons may have an acceptable volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 520° C. and are deemed suitable for transportation or processing as assessed by P-value, asphaltene H/C molar ratio, volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 520° C. or other methods known in the art to assess asphaltene stability.
In some embodiments, a section of the formation is heated to a temperature sufficient to pyrolyze at least a portion of the formation fluids and generate hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. The generated hydrocarbons may act as an in situ deasphalting fluid. The generated hydrocarbons may move from a first section of the formation and mix with hydrocarbons in a second section of the formation. Mixing of hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. with mobilized hydrocarbons present in the formation may reduce the solubility of asphaltenes in the mobilized hydrocarbons and force at least a portion of the asphaltenes to precipitate from the mobilized hydrocarbons.
The precipitated asphaltenes may remain in the formation when the deasphalted mobilized hydrocarbons are produced from the formation. In some embodiments, the precipitated asphaltenes may form solid material. The produced deasphalted hydrocarbons may have acceptable P-values (for example, P-value greater than 1 or 1.5) and/or asphaltene H/C molar ratios (asphaltene H/C molar ratio of at least 1). The deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from the formation. The produced deasphalted hydrocarbons have acceptable asphaltene stability and are suitable for transportation or further processing. The produced deasphalted hydrocarbons may require no or very little treatment to inhibit asphaltene precipitation from the hydrocarbon stream when further processed.
In some embodiments, hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. may be generated in a first section of the formation and migrate through an upper portion of the first section to an upper portion of a second section. In the upper portion of the second section, the hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. may contact hydrocarbons in the second section of the formation. Such contact may remove at least a portion of the asphaltene from the hydrocarbons in the upper portion of second section. At least a portion of the deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from the formation.
In some embodiments, formation fluid may be produced from productions wells in a lower portion of the second section which may allow at least a portion of hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. to drain to and, in some embodiments, condense in the lower portion of the second section. Contact of the hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. with mobilized hydrocarbons in the lower portion of the second section may cause asphaltenes to precipitate from the hydrocarbons in the second section, thus removing asphaltenes from hydrocarbons in the second section. At least a portion of the deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from production wells in a lower portion of the second section. In some embodiments, deasphalted hydrocarbons are produced from other sections of the formation.
In some embodiments, contact of hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. with mobilized hydrocarbons in the upper and/or lower portion of the second section may rebalance the naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons volume ratio and solubilize asphaltenes in the mobilized hydrocarbons in the section. Solubilization of asphaltenes may inhibit a net reduction in a weight percentage of asphaltenes over time and, thus produce a more stabile product. Mobilized hydrocarbons may be produced from the formation. The mobilized hydrocarbons produced from the second section may be exhibit more stabile properties than mobilized hydrocarbons produced from the first section.
Generation and migration of hydrocarbons having a boiling point less than 260° C. may be selectively controlled using operating conditions (for example, heating rate, average temperatures in the formation, and production rates) in the first, second and/or third sections.
In some embodiments, production well 206A and/or other wells in first section 226 may be shut in to allow the in situ deasphalting fluid to mix with hydrocarbons in the lower portion of the first section. The in situ deasphalting fluid may contact hydrocarbons in first section 226 and cause at least a portion of asphaltenes to precipitate from the hydrocarbons, thus removing the asphaltenes from the hydrocarbons in the formation. The deasphalted hydrocarbons may be mobilized and produced from the formation through production wells 206B in an upper portion of first section 226.
At least a portion of in situ deasphalting fluid vaporizes in the upper portion of first section 226 and move towards an upper portion of second section 228 as shown by arrows 236. An average temperature in second section 228 may be lower than an average temperature of first section 226. Due to the lower temperature in second section 228, the in situ deasphalting fluid may condense in the second section. The temperature and pressure in second section 228 may be controlled such that substantially all of the in situ deasphalting fluid is present as a liquid in the second section. The in situ deasphalting fluid may contact hydrocarbons in second section 228 and cause asphaltenes to precipitate from the hydrocarbons in the section, thus removing asphaltenes from hydrocarbons in the second section. At least a portion of the deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from the formation through production wells 206C in an upper portion of second section 228. In some embodiments, deasphalted hydrocarbons are moved to a third section of hydrocarbon layer 218 and produced from the third section.
In some embodiments, formation fluid may be produced from productions wells 206D in a lower portion of second section 228. Production of formation fluid from production wells 206D in the lower portion of second section 228 may allow at least a portion of the in situ deasphalting fluid to drain to the lower portion of the second section. Contact of the in situ deasphalting fluid with hydrocarbons in a lower portion of second section 228 may cause asphaltenes to precipitate from the hydrocarbons in the section, thus removing asphaltenes from hydrocarbons in the second section. At least a portion of the deasphalted hydrocarbons may be produced from production wells 206E in the middle portion of second section 228. In some embodiments, deasphalted hydrocarbons are not produced in second section 228, but flow or are moved towards a third section in hydrocarbon layer 218 and produced from the third section. The third section may be substantially below or substantially adjacent to second section 228.
Deasphalted hydrocarbons produced from the formation may be suitable for transportation, have a P-value greater than 1.5, and/or an asphaltene H/C molar ratio of at least 1. In some embodiments, the produced deasphalted hydrocarbons contain at least a portion of the in situ deasphalting fluid.
In some embodiments, the in situ deasphalting fluid mixes with mobilized hydrocarbons and changes the volume ratio of naphtha/kerosene to heavy hydrocarbons such that asphaltenes are solubilized in the mobilized hydrocarbons. At least a portion of the hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes may be produced from production wells 206E in a bottom portion of second section 228. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes are produced from a third section of the formation. Hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes produced from the formation may be suitable for transportation, have a P-value greater than 1.5, and/or an asphaltene H/C molar ratio of at least 1. In some embodiments, the produced hydrocarbons containing solubilized asphaltenes contain at least a portion of the in situ deasphalting fluid.
Fractures may be created by expansion of the heated portion of the formation matrix. Heating in shallow portions of a formation (for example, at a depth ranging from about 150 m to about 400 m) may cause expansion of the formation and create fractures in the overburden. Expansion in a formation may occur rapidly when the formation is heated at temperatures below pyrolysis temperatures. For example, the formation may be heated to an average temperature of up to about 200° C. Expansion in the formation is generally much slower when the formation is heated at average temperatures ranging from about 200° C. to about 350° C. At temperatures above pyrolysis temperatures (for example, temperatures ranging from about 230° C. to about 900° C., from about 240° C. to about 400° C. or from about 250° C. to about 350° C.), there may be little or no expansion in the formation. In some formations, there may be compaction of the formation above pyrolysis temperatures.
In some embodiments, a formation includes an upper layer and lower layer with similar formation matrixes that have different initial porosities. For example, the lower layer may have sufficient initial porosity such that the thermal expansion of the upper layer is minimal or substantially none whereas the upper layer may not have sufficient initial porosity so the upper layer expands when heated.
In some embodiments, a hydrocarbon formation is heated in stages using an in situ heat treatment process to allow production of formation fluids from a shallow portion of the formation. Heating layers of a hydrocarbon formation in stages may control thermal expansion of the formation and inhibit overburden fracturing. Heating an upper layer of the formation after significant pyrolysis of a lower layer of the formation occurs may reduce, inhibit, and/or accommodate the effects of pressure in the formation, thus inhibiting fracturing of the overburden. Staged heating of layers of a hydrocarbon formation may allow production of hydrocarbons from shallow portions of the formation that otherwise could not be produced due to fracturing of the overburden.
Heating of lower layer 218A prior to heating upper layer 218B may control expansion of the upper layer and inhibit fracturing of overburden 220. Heating of the lower layer 218A at temperatures greater than pyrolyzation temperatures may create sufficient permeability and/or porosity in lower layer 218A that upon heating upper layer 218B fluids and/or materials in the upper layer may thermally expand and flow into the lower layer. Sufficient permeability and/or porosity in lower layer 218A may be created to allow pressure generated during heating of upper layer 218B to be released into the lower layer and not the overburden, and thus, fracturing of the overburden may be prevented/inhibited.
The depth of lower layer 218A and upper layer 218B in the formation may be selected to maximize expansion of the upper layer into the lower layer. For example, a depth of lower layer 218A may be at least from about 400 m to about 750 m from the surface of the formation. A depth of upper layer 218B may be about 150 m to about 400 m from the surface of the formation. In some embodiments, lower layer 218A of the formation may have different thermal conductivities and/or different thermal expansion coefficients than layer 218B. Fluid from lower layer 218A may be produced from the lower layer using production wells 206. Hydrocarbons produced from lower layer 218A prior to heating upper layer 218B may include mobilized and/or pyrolyzed hydrocarbons.
The depth of layers in the formation may be determined by simulation, calculation, or any suitable method for estimating the extent of expansion that will occur in a layer when the layer is heated to a selected average temperature. The amount of expansion caused by heating of the formation may be estimated based on factors such as, but not limited to, measured or estimated richness of layers in the formation, thermal conductivity of layers in the formation, thermal expansion coefficients (for example, a linear thermal expansion coefficient) of layers in the formation, formation stresses, and expected temperature of layers in the formation. Simulations may also take into effect strength characteristics of a rock matrix.
In certain embodiments, heaters 212 in lower layer 218A may be turned on for a selected period of time. Heaters 212 in lower layer 218A and upper layer 218B may be vertical or horizontal heaters. After heating lower layer 218A for a period of time, heaters 212 in upper layer 218B may be turned on. In some embodiments, heaters 212 in lower layer 218A are vertical heaters that are raised to upper layer 218B after the lower layer is heated for a selected period of time. Any pattern or number of heaters may be used to heat the layers.
Heaters 212 in upper layer 218B may be turned on at, or near, the completion of heating of lower layer 218A. For example, heaters 212 in upper layer 218B may be turned on, or begin heating, within about 9 months, about 24 months, or about 36 months from the time heaters 212 in lower layer 218A begin heating. Heaters 212 in upper layer 218B may be turned on after a selected amount of pyrolyzation, and/or hydrocarbon production has occurred in lower layer 218A. In one embodiment, heaters 212 in upper layer 218B are turned on after sufficient permeability in lower layer 218A is created and/or pyrolyzation of lower layer 218A has been completed. Treatment of lower layer 218A may sufficient when the layer lower layer is sufficiently compacted as determined using optic fiber techniques (for example, real-time compaction imaging) or radioactive bullets, when average temperature of the formation is at least 230° C., or greater than 260° C., and/or when production of at least 10%, at least 20%, or at least 30% of the expected volume of hydrocarbons has occurred.
Upper layer 218B may be heated by heaters 212 at a rate sufficient to allow expansion of the upper layer into lower layer 218A and thus inhibit fracturing of the overburden. Portion 238 of upper layer 218B may sag into lower layer 218A as shown in 8B. Upon heating, sagged portion 238 of upper layer 218B may expand back to the surface (for example, return to the flat shape depicted in
After and/or during of treatment of upper layer 218B, fluids from the upper and lower layer may be produced from the lower layer using production well 206. Hydrocarbons produced from production well 206 may include pyrolyzed hydrocarbons from the upper layer. In some embodiments, fluids are produced from upper layer 218B.
In some embodiments, a formation containing dolomite and hydrocarbons is treated using an in situ heat treatment process. Hydrocarbons may be mobilized and produced from the formation. During treating of a formation containing dolomite, the dolomite may decompose to form magnesium oxide, carbon dioxide, calcium oxide and water (MgCO3.CaCO3)→CaCO3+MgO+CO2. Calcium carbonate may further decompose to calcium oxide and carbon dioxide (CaO and CO2). During treating, the dolomite may decompose and form intermediate compounds. Upon heating, the intermediate compounds may decompose to form additional magnesium oxide, carbon dioxide and water.
In certain embodiments, during or after treating a formation with an in situ heat treatment process, carbon dioxide and/or steam is introduced into the formation. The carbon dioxide and/or steam may be introduced at high pressures. The carbon dioxide and/or steam may react with magnesium compounds and calcium compounds in the formation to generate dolomite or other mineral compounds in situ. For example, magnesium carbonate compounds and/or calcium carbonate compounds may be formed in addition to dolomite. Formation conditions may be controlled so that the carbon dioxide, water and magnesium oxide react to form dolomite and/or other mineral compounds. The generated minerals may solidify and form a barrier to a flow of formation fluid into or out of the formation. The generation of dolomite and/or other mineral compounds may allow for economical treatment and/or disposal of carbon dioxide and water produced during treatment of a formation. In some embodiments, carbon dioxide produced from formations may be stored and injected in the formation with steam at high pressure. In some embodiments, the steam includes calcium compounds and/or magnesium compounds.
In some embodiments, a drive process (or steam injection, for example, SAGD, cyclic steam soak, or another steam recovery process) and/or in situ heat treatment process are used to treat the formation and produce hydrocarbons from the formation. Treating the formation using the drive process and/or in situ heat treatment process may not treat the formation uniformly. Variations in the properties of the formation (for example, fluid injectivities, permeabilities, and/or porosities) may result in insufficient heat to raise the temperature of one or more portions of the formation to mobilize and move hydrocarbons due to channeling of the heat (for example, channeling of steam) in the formation. In some embodiments, the formation has portions that have been heated to a temperature of at most 200° C. or at most 100° C. After the drive process and/or in situ heat treatment process is completed, the formation may have portions that have lower amounts of hydrocarbons produced (more hydrocarbons remaining) than other parts of the formation.
In some embodiments, a formation that has been previously treated may be assessed to determine one or more portions of the formation that have not been heated to a sufficient temperature using a drive process and/or an in situ heat treatment process. Coring, logging techniques, and/or seismic imaging may be used to assess hydrocarbons remaining in the formation and assess the location of one or more of the portions. The untreated portions may contain at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 80% or at least 90% of the initial hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the portions with more hydrocarbons remaining are large portions of the formation. In some embodiments, the amount of hydrocarbons remaining in untreated portions is significantly higher than treated portions of the formation. For example, an untreated portion may have a recovery of at most about 10% of the hydrocarbons in place and a treated portion may have a recovery of at least about 50% of the hydrocarbons in place.
In some embodiments, heaters are placed in the untreated portions to provide heat to the portion. Heat from the heaters may raise the temperature in the untreated portion to an average temperature of at least about 200° C. to mobilize hydrocarbons in the untreated portion.
In certain embodiments, a drive fluid may be injected in the untreated portion after the average temperature of the portion has been raised using an in situ heat treatment process. Injection of a drive fluid may mobilize hydrocarbons in the untreated portion toward one or more productions wells in the formation. In some embodiments, the drive fluid is injected in the untreated portion to raise the temperature of the portion.
Heaters 212 may be placed in untreated portions 242 to provide additional heat to these portions. Heat from heaters 212 may raise an average temperature in portions 242 to mobilized hydrocarbons in the portions. Hydrocarbons mobilized from portions 242 may be produced from the production well 206.
In some embodiments, a drive fluid is provided to untreated portions 242 after heating with heaters 212. As shown in
In some embodiments, formation fluid produced from hydrocarbon containing formations using an in situ heat treatment process may have an API gravity of at least 20°, at least 25°, at least 30°, at least 35° or at least 40°. In certain embodiments, the in situ heat treatment process provides substantially uniform heating of the hydrocarbon containing formation. Due to the substantially uniform heating the formation fluid produced from a hydrocarbon containing formation may contain lower amounts of halogenated compounds (for example, chlorides and fluorides) arsenic or compounds of arsenic, ammonium carbonate and/or ammonium bicarbonate as compared to formation fluids produced from conventional processing (for example, surface retorting or subsurface retorting). The produced formation fluid may contain non-hydrocarbon gases, hydrocarbons, or mixtures thereof. The hydrocarbons may have a carbon number ranging from 5 to 30.
Hydrocarbon containing formations (for example, oil shale formations and/or tar sands formations) may contain significant amounts of bitumen entrained in the mineral matrix of the formation and/or a significant amounts of bitumen in shallow layers of the formation. Heating hydrocarbon formations containing entrained bitumen to high temperatures may produce of non-condensable hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbon gases instead of liquid hydrocarbons and/or bitumen. Heating shallow formation layers containing bitumen may also result in a significant amount of gaseous products produced from the formation. Methods and/or systems of heating hydrocarbon formations having entrained bitumen at lower temperatures that convert portions of the formation to bitumen and/or lower molecular weight hydrocarbons and/or increases permeability in the hydrocarbon containing formation to produce liquid hydrocarbons and/or bitumen are desired.
In some embodiments, an oil shale formation is heated using an in situ heat treatment process using a plurality of heaters. Heat from the heaters is allowed to heat portions of the oil shale formation to an average temperature that allows conversion of at least a portion of kerogen in the formation to bitumen, other hydrocarbons. Heating of the formation may create permeability in the oil shale to mobilize the bitumen and/or other hydrocarbons entrained in the kerogen. The oil shale formation may include at least 20%, at least 30% or at least 50% bitumen. The oil shale formation may be heated to an average temperature ranging from about 250° C. to about 350° C., from about 260° C. to about 340° C., or from about 270° C. to about 330° C. Heating at temperatures at or below pyrolysis temperatures may inhibit production of hydrocarbon gases and/or non-hydrocarbon gases, convert portions of the kerogen to bitumen and/or increase permeability in the mineral matrix such that the bitumen is released from the mineral matrix. The bitumen may be mobilized towards production wells and produced through production wells and/or heater wells in the oil shale formation. The produced bitumen may be processed to produce commercial products.
In some embodiments, production rates from two or more production wells located in a treatment area of a hydrocarbon containing formation are controlled to produce bitumen and/or liquid hydrocarbons having selected qualities. In some embodiments, the hydrocarbon containing formation is an oil shale formation. Selective control of operating conditions (for example, heating rate, average temperatures in the formation, and production rates) may allow production of bitumen from a first production well located in the first portion of the hydrocarbon containing formation and production of liquid hydrocarbons from one or more second production wells located in another portion of the hydrocarbon containing formation. In some embodiments, the liquid hydrocarbons produced from the second production wells contain none or substantially no bitumen. Selected qualities of the liquid hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, boiling point distribution and/or API gravity. Production of bitumen using the methods described herein from a first production well while producing mobilized and/or visbroken hydrocarbons from second production wells in a portion of the hydrocarbon formation that is at a lower temperature than other portions may inhibit coking in the second production wells. Furthermore, quality of the mobilized and/or visbroken hydrocarbons produced from the second production wells is of higher quality relative to producing hydrocarbons from a single production well since all or most of the bitumen is produced from the first production well.
In some embodiments, heat provided from heaters to the first portion of the hydrocarbon formation may be sufficient to pyrolyze hydrocarbons and/or kerogen to form an in situ drive fluid (for example, pyrolyzation fluids that contain a significant amount of gases or vaporized liquids) near heaters positioned in the first portion of the formation. In some embodiments, the heaters may be positioned around the production wells in the first portion. Pyrolysis of kerogen, bitumen, and/or hydrocarbons may produce carbon dioxide, C1-C4 hydrocarbons, C5-C25 hydrocarbons, and/or hydrogen. Pressure in one or more heater wellbores in the first portion may be controlled (for example, increased) such that the in situ drive fluid moves bitumen towards one or more production wells in the first portion. Bitumen may be produced from one or more productions wells in the first portion of the formation. In some embodiments, the production wells are heater wells and/or contain heaters. Providing heat to a production well or producing through a heater well may inhibit the bitumen from solidifying during production.
Bitumen produced from oil shale formations may have more hydrogen, more straight chain hydrocarbons, more hydrocarbons that contain heteroatoms (for example, sulfur, oxygen and/or nitrogen atoms), less metals and be more viscous than bitumen produced from a tar sands formation. Since the bitumen produced from an oil shale formation may be different from bitumen produced from a tar sands formation, the products produced from oil shale bitumen may have different and/or better properties than products produced from tar sands bitumen. In some embodiments, hydrocarbons separated from bitumen produced from an oil shale formation has a boiling range distribution between 343° C. and 538° C. at 0.101 MPa, a low metal content and/or a high nitrogen content which makes the hydrocarbons suitable for use as feed for refinery processes (for example, feed for a catalytic and/or thermal cracking unit to produce naphtha). Vacuum gas oil (VGO) made from bitumen produced from oil shale may have more hydrogen relative to heavy oil used in conventional processing. Other products (for example, organic sulfur compounds, organic oxygen compounds, and/or organic sulfur compounds) separated from oil shale bitumen may have commercial value or be used as solvation fluids during an in situ heat treatment process.
Heaters 212 provide heat to a first portion of hydrocarbon layer 218 between heaters 212 and first production well 206A. An average temperature in the first portion between heaters 212 and production well 206A may range from about 200° C. to about 250° C. or from about 220° C. to about 240° C. The mobilized bitumen may be produced from production well 206A. In some embodiments, production well 206A is a heater well. In some embodiments, bitumen is produced from heaters 212 surrounding production well 206A.
The produced bitumen may be treated at facilities at the production site and/or transported to other treatment facilities. In some embodiments, the temperature and pressure in the portion between heaters 212 and production well 206A is sufficient to allow bitumen entrained in the kerogen to flow out of the kerogen and move towards first production well 206A. The temperature and pressure in first production well 206A may be controlled to reduce the viscosity of the bitumen to allow the bitumen to be produced as a liquid.
Heat provided from heaters 212 may heat a second portion of hydrocarbon layer 218 proximate heaters 212 to an average temperature ranging from about 250° C. to about 300° C. or from about 270° C. to about 280° C. The average temperature in the second portion proximate heaters 212 may be sufficient to pyrolyze kerogen, visbreak bitumen, and/or mobilize hydrocarbons in the portion to generate formation fluid. The generated formation fluid may include some gaseous hydrocarbons, liquid mobilized, visbroken, and/or pyrolyzed hydrocarbons and/or bitumen. Maintaining the average temperature in the second portion proximate heaters 212 in a range from about 250° C. to about 280° C. may promote production of liquid hydrocarbons and bitumen instead of production of hydrocarbon gases near the heaters.
The pressure in portions of hydrocarbon layer 218 may be controlled to be below the lithostatic pressure of the portions near the heaters and/or production wells. The average temperature and pressure may be controlled in the portions proximate the heaters and/or production wells such that the permeability of the portions is substantially uniform. A substantially uniform permeability may inhibit channeling of the formation fluid through the portions. Having a substantially uniform permeable portion may inhibit channeling of the bitumen, mobilized hydrocarbons and/or visbroken hydrocarbons in the portion.
At least some of the formation fluid generated proximate heaters 212 may move towards second production wells 206B positioned in a third portion of hydrocarbon layer 218. Mobilized and/or visbroken hydrocarbon may be produced from second production wells 206B. Average temperatures in the third portion of hydrocarbon layer 218 proximate second production wells 206B may be less than average temperatures in the second portions near heaters 212 and/or the first portion between heaters 212 and first production wells 206A. In some embodiments, mobilized and/or visbroken hydrocarbons are cold produced from second production wells 206B. Temperature and pressure in the third portions proximate second production wells 206B may be controlled to produce mobilized and/or visbroken hydrocarbons having selected properties. In certain embodiments, hydrocarbons produced from second production wells 206B may contain a minimal amount of bitumen or hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 538° C. The hydrocarbons produced from production wells 206B may have an API gravity of at least 35°. In some embodiments, a majority of the hydrocarbons produced from second production wells 206B have a boiling range distribution between 343° C. and 538° C. at 0.101 MPa.
Producing mobilized and/or visbroken hydrocarbons from second production wells 206B in the third portion at a lower temperature than the first and/or second portions may inhibit coking in the second production wells and/or improve product quality of the produced mobilized and/or visbroken liquid hydrocarbons.
In some embodiments, a drive fluid is injected and/or created in the hydrocarbon containing formation to allow mobilization of bitumen and/or heavier hydrocarbons in the formation towards first production well 206A. The drive fluid may include formation fluid recovered and/or generated from the in situ heat treatment process. For example, the drive fluid may include, but is not limited to, carbon dioxide, C1-C7 hydrocarbons and/or steam recovered and/or generated from pyrolysis of hydrocarbons from the in situ heat treatment of the oil shale formation.
In some embodiments, heat provided to portions between heaters 212 and first production well 206A is sufficient to pyrolyze hydrocarbons and/or kerogen and generate the drive fluid in situ (for example, pyrolyzation fluids that are gases). Pressure in one or more heater wellbores may be controlled such that in situ drive fluid moves bitumen between second production wells 206B and first production well 206A towards the first production well 206A as shown by arrows 244 in
In some embodiments, the drive fluid and/or solvation fluid is injected in hydrocarbon layer 218 through second production wells 206B, heaters 212, or one or more injection wells 230 (shown in
In some embodiments, hydrocarbons containing heteroatoms (for example, nitrogen, sulfur and/or oxygen) are separated from the produced bitumen and used as a solvation fluid. Production and recycling of a solvation fluid containing heteroatoms may remove unwanted compounds from the bitumen. In some embodiments, organic nitrogen compounds produced from the in situ conversion process is used as a solvation fluid. The organic nitrogen compounds may be injected into a formation having a high concentration of sulfur containing compounds. The organic nitrogen compounds may react and/or complex with the sulfur or sulfur compounds and form compounds that have chemical characteristics that facilitate removal of the sulfur from the formation fluid.
In certain embodiments, high molecular organonitrogen compounds may be used as solvation fluids. The high molecular weight organonitrogen compounds may be produced from an in situ heat treatment process, injected in the formation, produced from the formation, and re-injected in the formation. Heating of the high molecular weight organonitrogen compounds in the formation may reduce the molecular weight of the organonitrogen compounds and form lower molecular weight organonitrogen compounds. Formation of lower molecular weight organonitrogen compounds may facilitate removal of nitrogen compounds from liquid hydrocarbons and/or formation fluid in surface treatment facilities.
In an embodiment, a blend made from hydrocarbon mixtures produced from an in situ heat treatment process is used as a solvation fluid. The blend may include about 20% by weight light hydrocarbons (or blending agent) or greater (for example, about 50% by weight or about 80% by weight light hydrocarbons) and about 80% by weight heavy hydrocarbons or less (for example, about 50% by weight or about 20% by weight heavy hydrocarbons). The weight percentage of light hydrocarbons and heavy hydrocarbons may vary depending on, for example, a weight distribution (or API gravity) of light and heavy hydrocarbons, an aromatic content of the hydrocarbons, a relative stability of the blend, or a desired API gravity of the blend. For example, the weight percentage of light hydrocarbons in the blend may be at most 50% by weight or at most 20% by weight. In certain embodiments, the weight percentage of light hydrocarbons may be selected to mix the least amount of light hydrocarbons with heavy hydrocarbons that produces a blend with a desired density or viscosity. In some embodiments, the hydrocarbons have an aromatic content of at least 1% by weight, at least 5% by weight, at least 10% by weight, at least 20% by weight, or at least 25% by weight.
In some embodiments, polymers and/or monomers may be used as solvation fluids. Polymers and/or monomers may solvate and/or drive hydrocarbons to allow mobilization of the hydrocarbons towards one or more production wells. The polymer and/or monomer may reduce the mobility of a water phase in pores of the hydrocarbon containing formation. The reduction of water mobility may allow the hydrocarbons to be more easily mobilized through the hydrocarbon containing formation. Polymers that may be used include, but are not limited to, polyacrylamides, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, polyacrylates, ethylenic copolymers, biopolymers, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, polystyrene sulfonates, polyvinylpyrrolidone, AMPS (2-acrylamide-2-methyl propane sulfonate), or combinations thereof. Examples of ethylenic copolymers include copolymers of acrylic acid and acrylamide, acrylic acid and lauryl acrylate, lauryl acrylate and acrylamide. Examples of biopolymers include xanthan gum and guar gum. In some embodiments, polymers may be crosslinked in situ in the hydrocarbon containing formation. In other embodiments, polymers may be generated in situ in the hydrocarbon containing formation. Polymers and polymer preparations for use in oil recovery are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,439,308 to Wang; 6,417,268 to Zhang et al.; 5,654,261 to Smith; 5,284,206 to Surles et al.; 5,199,490 to Surles et al.; and 5,103,909 to Morgenthaler et al., each of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
In some embodiments, the solvation fluid includes one or more nonionic additives (for example, alcohols, ethoxylated alcohols, nonionic surfactants, and/or sugar based esters). In some embodiments, the solvation fluid includes one or more anionic surfactants (for example, sulfates, sulfonates, ethoxylated sulfates, and/or phosphates).
In some embodiments, the solvation fluid includes carbon disulfide. Hydrogen sulfide, in addition to other sulfur compounds produced from the formation, may be converted to carbon disulfide using known methods. Suitable methods may include oxidizing sulfur compounds to sulfur and/or sulfur dioxide, and reacting sulfur and/or sulfur dioxide with carbon and/or a carbon containing compound to form carbon disulfide. The conversion of the sulfur compounds to carbon disulfide and the use of the carbon disulfide for oil recovery are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,426,959 to Wang et al., which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. The carbon disulfide may be introduced as a solvation fluid.
In some embodiments, the solvation fluid is a hydrocarbon compound that is capable of donating a hydrogen atom to the formation fluids. In some embodiments, the solvation fluid is capable of donating hydrogen to at least a portion of the formation fluid, thus forming a mixture of solvating fluid and dehydrogenated solvating fluid mixture. The solvating fluid/dehydrogenated solvating fluid mixture may enhance solvation and/or dissolution of a greater portion of the formation fluids as compared to the initial solvation fluid. Examples of such hydrogen donating solvating fluids include, but are not limited to, tetralin, alkyl substituted tetralin, tetrahydroquinoline, alkyl substituted hydroquinoline, 1,2-dihydronaphthalene, a distillate cut having at least 40% by weight naphthenic aromatic compounds, or mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the hydrogen donating hydrocarbon compound is tetralin.
A non-restrictive example is set forth below.
Examples of Subsurface Deasphalting.
STARS® simulations including a PVT/kinetic model were used to assess the subsurface deasphalting of formation fluid.
where SR is hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 520° C., SC surface conditions and RC is reservoir conditions.
Data 250 represents measured asphaltene H/C molar ratios for hydrocarbons having a boiling point greater than 520° C. after treating of the formation using an in situ heat treatment process and subsurface deasphalting conditions. As shown in
Subsurface Deasphalting Phased Heating.
A symmetry element model was used to simulate the response of a typical intermediate pattern in a hydrocarbon formation (Grosmont). The model was built on a P50 Horizontal Highway subsurface realization, honoring hydrology and capturing most probable water mobility scenario.
Comparative Example Subsurface Simultaneous Heating.
A symmetry element model was used to simulate the response of a typical intermediate pattern in a hydrocarbon formation (Grosmont). The model was built on a P50 Horizontal Highway subsurface realization, honoring hydrology and capturing most probable water mobility scenario.
It is to be understood the invention is not limited to particular systems described which may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly indicates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a core” includes a combination of two or more cores and reference to “a material” includes mixtures of materials.
In this patent, certain U.S. patents, U.S. patent applications, and other materials (for example, articles) have been incorporated by reference. The text of such U.S. patents, U.S. patent applications, and other materials is, however, only incorporated by reference to the extent that no conflict exists between such text and the other statements and drawings set forth herein. In the event of such conflict, then any such conflicting text in such incorporated by reference U.S. patents, U.S. patent applications, and other materials is specifically not incorporated by reference in this patent.
Further modifications and alternative embodiments of various aspects of the invention may be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the general manner of carrying out the invention. It is to be understood that the forms of the invention shown and described herein are to be taken as the presently preferred embodiments. Elements and materials may be substituted for those illustrated and described herein, parts and processes may be reversed, and certain features of the invention may be utilized independently, all as would be apparent to one skilled in the art after having the benefit of this description of the invention. Changes may be made in the elements described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as described in the following claims. In addition, it is to be understood that features described herein independently may, in certain embodiments, be combined.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent No. 61/322,647 entitled “METHODOLOGIES FOR TREATING SUBSURFACE HYDROCARBON FORMATIONS” to Karanikas et al. filed on Apr. 9, 2010; and U.S. Provisional Patent No. 61/322,513 entitled “TREATMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR SUBSURFACE HYDROCARBON CONTAINING FORMATIONS” to Bass et al. filed on Apr. 9, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. This patent application incorporates by reference in its entirety each of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,688,387 to Wellington et al.; 6,991,036 to Sumnu-Dindoruk et al.; 6,698,515 to Karanikas et al.; 6,880,633 to Wellington et al.; 6,782,947 to de Rouffignac et al.; 6,991,045 to Vinegar et al.; 7,073,578 to Vinegar et al.; 7,121,342 to Vinegar et al.; 7,320,364 to Fairbanks; 7,527,094 to McKinzie et al.; 7,584,789 to Mo et al.; 7,533,719 to Hinson et al.; 7,562,707 to Miller; 7,841,408 to Vinegar et al.; 7,866,388 to Bravo; and 8,281,861 to Nguyen et al.; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010-0071903 to Prince-Wright et al.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48994 | Parry | Jul 1865 | A |
| 94813 | Dickey | Sep 1885 | A |
| 326439 | McEachen | Sep 1885 | A |
| 345586 | Hall | Jul 1886 | A |
| 760304 | Butler | May 1904 | A |
| 1269747 | Rogers | Jun 1918 | A |
| 1342741 | Day | Jun 1920 | A |
| 1457479 | Wolcott | Jun 1923 | A |
| 1510655 | Clark | Jun 1924 | A |
| 1634236 | Ranney | Jun 1927 | A |
| 1646599 | Schaefer | Oct 1927 | A |
| 1660818 | Ranney | Feb 1928 | A |
| 1666488 | Crawshaw | Apr 1928 | A |
| 1681523 | Downey et al. | Aug 1928 | A |
| 1811560 | Ranney | Jun 1931 | A |
| 1913395 | Karrick | Jun 1933 | A |
| 2244255 | Looman | Jun 1941 | A |
| 2244256 | Looman | Jun 1941 | A |
| 2288857 | Subkow | Jul 1942 | A |
| 2319702 | Moon | May 1943 | A |
| 2365591 | Ranney | Dec 1944 | A |
| 2381256 | Callaway | Aug 1945 | A |
| 2390770 | Barton et al. | Dec 1945 | A |
| 2423674 | Agren | Jul 1947 | A |
| 2444755 | Steffen | Jul 1948 | A |
| 2466945 | Greene | Apr 1949 | A |
| 2472445 | Sprong | Jun 1949 | A |
| 2481051 | Uren | Sep 1949 | A |
| 2484063 | Ackley | Oct 1949 | A |
| 2497868 | Dalin | Feb 1951 | A |
| 2548360 | Germain | Apr 1951 | A |
| 2593477 | Newman et al. | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2595979 | Pevere et al. | May 1952 | A |
| 2623596 | Whorton et al. | Dec 1952 | A |
| 2630306 | Evans | Mar 1953 | A |
| 2630307 | Martin | Mar 1953 | A |
| 2634961 | Ljungstrom | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2642943 | Smith et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
| 2670802 | Ackley | Mar 1954 | A |
| 2685930 | Albaugh | Aug 1954 | A |
| 2695163 | Pearce et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
| 2703621 | Ford | Mar 1955 | A |
| 2714930 | Carpenter | Aug 1955 | A |
| 2732195 | Ljungstrom | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2734579 | Elkins | Feb 1956 | A |
| 2743906 | Coyle | May 1956 | A |
| 2757739 | Douglas et al. | Aug 1956 | A |
| 2759877 | Eron | Aug 1956 | A |
| 2761663 | Gerdetz | Sep 1956 | A |
| 2771954 | Jenks et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
| 2777679 | Ljungstrom | Jan 1957 | A |
| 2780449 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2780450 | Ljungstrom | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2786660 | Alleman | Mar 1957 | A |
| 2789805 | Ljungstrom | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2793696 | Morse | May 1957 | A |
| 2794504 | Carpenter | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2799341 | Maly | Jul 1957 | A |
| 2801089 | Scott, Jr. | Jul 1957 | A |
| 2803305 | Behning et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
| 2804149 | Kile | Aug 1957 | A |
| 2819761 | Popham et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
| 2825408 | Watson | Mar 1958 | A |
| 2841375 | Salomonsson | Jul 1958 | A |
| 2857002 | Pevere et al. | Oct 1958 | A |
| 2647306 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1958 | A |
| 2862558 | Dixon | Dec 1958 | A |
| 2889882 | Schleicher | Jun 1959 | A |
| 2890754 | Hoffstrom et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
| 2890755 | Eurenius et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
| 2902270 | Salomonsson et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
| 2906337 | Henning | Sep 1959 | A |
| 2906340 | Herzog | Sep 1959 | A |
| 2914309 | Salomonsson | Nov 1959 | A |
| 2923535 | Ljungstrom | Feb 1960 | A |
| 2932352 | Stegemeier | Apr 1960 | A |
| 2939689 | Ljungstrom | Jun 1960 | A |
| 2942223 | Lennox et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
| 2954826 | Sievers | Oct 1960 | A |
| 2958519 | Hurley | Nov 1960 | A |
| 2969226 | Huntington | Jan 1961 | A |
| 2970826 | Woodruff | Feb 1961 | A |
| 2974937 | Kiel | Mar 1961 | A |
| 2991046 | Yahn | Jul 1961 | A |
| 2994376 | Crawford et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
| 2997105 | Campion et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
| 2998457 | Paulsen | Aug 1961 | A |
| 3004601 | Bodine | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3004603 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3007521 | Trantham et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3010513 | Gerner | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3010516 | Schleicher | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3016053 | Medovick | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3017168 | Carr | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3026940 | Spitz | Mar 1962 | A |
| 3032102 | Parker | May 1962 | A |
| 3036632 | Koch et al. | May 1962 | A |
| 3044545 | Tooke | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3048221 | Tek | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3050123 | Scott | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3051235 | Banks | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3057404 | Berstrom | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3061009 | Shirley | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3062282 | Schleicher | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3095031 | Eurenius et al. | Jun 1963 | A |
| 3097690 | Terwilliger et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
| 3105545 | Prats et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
| 3106244 | Parker | Oct 1963 | A |
| 3110345 | Reed et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
| 3113619 | Reichle | Dec 1963 | A |
| 3113620 | Hemminger | Dec 1963 | A |
| 3113623 | Krueger | Dec 1963 | A |
| 3114417 | McCarthy | Dec 1963 | A |
| 3116792 | Purre | Jan 1964 | A |
| 3120264 | Barron | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3127935 | Poettmann et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3127936 | Eurenius | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3131763 | Kunetka et al. | May 1964 | A |
| 3132692 | Marx et al. | May 1964 | A |
| 3137347 | Parker | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3138203 | Weiss et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3139928 | Broussard | Jul 1964 | A |
| 3142336 | Doscher | Jul 1964 | A |
| 3149670 | Grant | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3149672 | Orkiszewski et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3150715 | Dietz | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3163745 | Boston | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3164207 | Thessen et al. | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3165154 | Santourian | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3170842 | Kehler | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3181613 | Krueger | May 1965 | A |
| 3182721 | Hardy | May 1965 | A |
| 3183675 | Schroeder | May 1965 | A |
| 3191679 | Miller | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3205942 | Sandberg | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3205944 | Walton | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3205946 | Prats et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3207220 | Williams | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3208531 | Tamplen | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3209825 | Alexander et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3221505 | Goodwin et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3221811 | Prats | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3233668 | Hamilton et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3237689 | Justheim | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3241611 | Dougan | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3246695 | Robinson | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3250327 | Crider | May 1966 | A |
| 3267680 | Schlumberger | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3272261 | Morse | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3273640 | Huntington | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3275076 | Sharp | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3284281 | Thomas | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3285335 | Reistle, Jr. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3288648 | Jones | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3294167 | Vogel | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3302707 | Slusser | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3303883 | Slusser | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3310109 | Marx et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3316344 | Kidd et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3316962 | Lange | May 1967 | A |
| 3332480 | Parrish | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3338306 | Cook | Aug 1967 | A |
| 3342258 | Prats | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3342267 | Cotter et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3346044 | Slusser | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3349845 | Holbert et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3352355 | Putman | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3358756 | Vogel | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3362751 | Tinlin | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3372754 | McDonald | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3379248 | Strange | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3380913 | Henderson | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3386508 | Bielstein et al. | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3389975 | Van Nostrand | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3399623 | Creed | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3410796 | Hull | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3410977 | Ando | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3412011 | Lindsay | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3434541 | Cook et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3455383 | Prats et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3465819 | Dixon | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3474863 | Deans et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3477058 | Vedder et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3480082 | Gilliland | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3485300 | Engle | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3492463 | Wringer et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
| 3501201 | Closmann et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3502372 | Prats | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3513913 | Bruist | May 1970 | A |
| 3515213 | Prats | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3515837 | Ando | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3526095 | Peck | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3528501 | Parker | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3529682 | Coyne et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3537528 | Herce et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3542131 | Walton et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3547192 | Claridge et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3547193 | Gill | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3554285 | Meldau | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3562401 | Long | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3565171 | Closmann | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3578080 | Closmann | May 1971 | A |
| 3580987 | Priaroggia | May 1971 | A |
| 3593789 | Prats | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3595082 | Miller et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3599714 | Messman et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3605890 | Holm | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3614986 | Gill | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3617471 | Schlinger et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3618663 | Needham | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3629551 | Ando | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3661423 | Garret | May 1972 | A |
| 3675715 | Speller, Jr. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3679812 | Owens | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3680633 | Bennett | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3700280 | Papadopoulos et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3757860 | Pritchett | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3759328 | Ueber et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3759574 | Beard | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3761599 | Beatty | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3766982 | Justheim | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3770398 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3779602 | Beard et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3794113 | Strange et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3794116 | Higgins | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3804169 | Closmann | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3804172 | Closmann et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3809159 | Young et al. | May 1974 | A |
| 3812913 | Hardy et al. | May 1974 | A |
| 3853185 | Dahl et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3881551 | Terry et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3882941 | Pelofsky | May 1975 | A |
| 3892270 | Lindquist | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3893918 | Favret, Jr. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3894769 | Tham et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3907045 | Dahl et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3922148 | Child | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3924680 | Terry | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3933447 | Pasini, III et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3941421 | Burton, III et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3943160 | Farmer, III et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3946812 | Gale et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3947683 | Schultz et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3948319 | Pritchett | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3948755 | McCollum et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3950029 | Timmins | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3952802 | Terry | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3954140 | Hendrick | May 1976 | A |
| 3958636 | Perkins | May 1976 | A |
| 3972372 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3973628 | Colgate | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3986349 | Egan | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3986556 | Haynes | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3986557 | Striegler et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3987851 | Tham | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3992474 | Sobel | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3993132 | Cram et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3994340 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3994341 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3999607 | Pennington et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4005752 | Cha | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4006778 | Redford et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4008762 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4010800 | Terry | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4014575 | French et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4016239 | Fenton | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4018280 | Daviduk et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4019575 | Pisio et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4022280 | Stoddard et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4026357 | Redford | May 1977 | A |
| 4029360 | French | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4031956 | Terry | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4037655 | Carpenter | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4037658 | Anderson | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4042026 | Pusch et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4043393 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4048637 | Jacomini | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4049053 | Fisher et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4057293 | Garrett | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4059308 | Pearson et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4064943 | Cavin | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4065183 | Hill et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4067390 | Camacho et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4069868 | Terry | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4076761 | Chang et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4077471 | Shupe et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4083604 | Bohn et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4084637 | Todd | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4085803 | Butler | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4087130 | Garrett | May 1978 | A |
| 4089372 | Terry | May 1978 | A |
| 4089373 | Reynolds et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4089374 | Terry | May 1978 | A |
| 4091869 | Hoyer | May 1978 | A |
| 4093025 | Terry | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4093026 | Ridley | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4096163 | Chang et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4099567 | Terry | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4114688 | Terry | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4119349 | Albulescu et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4125159 | Vann | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4130575 | Jorn et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4133825 | Stroud et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4138442 | Chang et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4140180 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4140181 | Ridley et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4144935 | Bridges et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4148359 | Laumbach et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4151068 | McCollum et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4151877 | French | May 1979 | A |
| RE30019 | Lindquist | Jun 1979 | E |
| 4158467 | Larson et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4162707 | Yan | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4169506 | Berry | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4183405 | Magnie | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4184548 | Ginsburgh et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4185692 | Terry | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4186801 | Madgavkar et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4193451 | Dauphine | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4194562 | Bousaid et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4197911 | Anada | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4199024 | Rose et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4199025 | Carpenter | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4216079 | Newcombe | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4228853 | Harvey et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4228854 | Sacuta | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4234230 | Weichman | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4243101 | Grupping | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4243511 | Allred | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4248306 | Van Huisen et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4250230 | Terry | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4250962 | Madgavkar et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4252191 | Pusch et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4256945 | Carter et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4258955 | Habib, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4260192 | Shafer | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4265307 | Elkins | May 1981 | A |
| 4273188 | Vogel et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4274487 | Hollingsworth et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4277416 | Grant | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4282587 | Silverman | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4285547 | Weichman | Aug 1981 | A |
| RE30738 | Bridges et al. | Sep 1981 | E |
| 4299086 | Madgavkar et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4299285 | Tsai et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4303126 | Blevins | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4305463 | Zakiewicz | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4306621 | Boyd et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4324292 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4344483 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4353418 | Hoekstra et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4359687 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4363361 | Madgavkar et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4366668 | Madgavkar et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4366864 | Gibson et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4378048 | Madgavkar et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4380930 | Podhrasky et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4381641 | Madgavkar et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4382469 | Bell et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4384613 | Owen et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4384614 | Justheim | May 1983 | A |
| 4385661 | Fox | May 1983 | A |
| 4390067 | Willman | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4390973 | Rietsch | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4396062 | Iskander | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4397732 | Hoover et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4398151 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4399866 | Dearth | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4401099 | Collier | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4401162 | Osborne | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4401163 | Elkins | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4407973 | van Dijk et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4409090 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4410042 | Shu | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4412124 | Kobayashi | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4412585 | Bouck | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4415034 | Bouck | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4417782 | Clarke et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4418752 | Boyer et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4423311 | Varney, Sr. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4425967 | Hoekstra | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4428700 | Lennemann | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4429745 | Cook | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4437519 | Cha et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4439307 | Jaquay et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4440224 | Kreinin et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4442896 | Reale et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4444255 | Geoffrey et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4444258 | Kalmar | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4445574 | Vann | May 1984 | A |
| 4446917 | Todd | May 1984 | A |
| 4448251 | Stine | May 1984 | A |
| 4449594 | Sparks | May 1984 | A |
| 4452491 | Seglin et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4455215 | Jarrott et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4456065 | Heim et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4457365 | Kasevich et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4457374 | Hoekstra et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4458757 | Bock et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4458767 | Hoehn, Jr. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4460044 | Porter | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4463988 | Bouck et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4474236 | Kellett | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4474238 | Gentry et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4479541 | Wang | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4485868 | Sresty et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4485869 | Sresty et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4487257 | Dauphine | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4489782 | Perkins | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4491179 | Pirson et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4498531 | Vrolyk | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4498535 | Bridges | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4499209 | Hoek et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4501326 | Edmunds | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4501445 | Gregoli | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4513816 | Hubert | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4518548 | Yarbrough | May 1985 | A |
| 4524826 | Savage | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4524827 | Bridges et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4530401 | Hartman et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4537252 | Puri | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4538682 | McManus et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4540882 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542648 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4544478 | Kelley | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4545435 | Bridges et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549396 | Garwood et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4552214 | Forgac et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4570715 | Van Meurs et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4571491 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4572299 | Van Egmond et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4573530 | Audeh et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4576231 | Dowling et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4577503 | Imaino et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4577690 | Medlin | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4577691 | Huang et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4583046 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4583242 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4585066 | Moore et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4592423 | Savage et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4597441 | Ware et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4597444 | Hutchinson | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4598392 | Pann | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4598770 | Shu et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4598772 | Holmes | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4605489 | Madgavkar | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4605680 | Beuther et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4608818 | Goebel et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4609041 | Magda | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4613754 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4616705 | Stegemeier et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4623401 | Derbyshire et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4623444 | Che et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4626665 | Fort, III | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4634187 | Huff et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4635197 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4637464 | Forgac et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4640352 | Van Meurs et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4640353 | Schuh | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4643256 | Dilgren et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4644283 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4645906 | Yagnik et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4651825 | Wilson | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4658215 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4662437 | Renfro et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4662438 | Taflove et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4662439 | Puri | May 1987 | A |
| 4662443 | Puri et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4663711 | Vinegar et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4669542 | Venkatesan | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4671102 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4682652 | Huang et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4691771 | Ware et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4694907 | Stahl et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4695713 | Krumme | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4696345 | Hsueh | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4698149 | Mitchell | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4698583 | Sandberg | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4701587 | Carter et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4704514 | Van Edmond et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4706751 | Gondouin | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4716960 | Eastlund et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4717814 | Krumme | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4719423 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4728892 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4730162 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733057 | Stanzel et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734115 | Howard et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4743854 | Vinegar et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4744245 | White | May 1988 | A |
| 4752673 | Krumme | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4756367 | Puri et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762425 | Shakkottai et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4766958 | Faecke | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4769602 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4769606 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4772634 | Farooque | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776638 | Hahn | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778586 | Bain et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4785163 | Sandberg | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4787452 | Jennings, Jr. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4793409 | Bridges et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4794226 | Derbyshire | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4808925 | Baird | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4814587 | Carter | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4815791 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817711 | Jeambey | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4818370 | Gregoli et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4821798 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823890 | Lang | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4827761 | Vinegar et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4828031 | Davis | May 1989 | A |
| 4842448 | Koerner et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4848460 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4848924 | Nuspl et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4849611 | Whitney et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4856341 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4856587 | Nielson | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860544 | Krieg et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4866983 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4883582 | McCants | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4884455 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4884635 | McKay et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4885080 | Brown et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4886118 | Van Meurs et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4893504 | OMeara, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4895206 | Price | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4912971 | Jeambey | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4913065 | Hemsath | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4926941 | Glandt et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4927857 | McShea, III et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4928765 | Nielson | May 1990 | A |
| 4940095 | Newman | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4974425 | Krieg et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4982786 | Jennings, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4983319 | Gregoli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4984594 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4985313 | Penneck et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4987368 | Vinegar | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4994093 | Wetzel et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5008085 | Bain et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011329 | Nelson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5014788 | Puri et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5020596 | Hemsath | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027896 | Anderson | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5032042 | Schuring et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5041210 | Merrill, Jr. et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042579 | Glandt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5043668 | Vail, III | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5046559 | Glandt | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5046560 | Teletzke et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5050386 | Krieg et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5054551 | Duerksen | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059303 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5060287 | Van Egmond | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5060726 | Glandt et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5064006 | Waters et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5065501 | Henschen et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5065818 | Van Egmond | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5066852 | Willbanks | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5070533 | Bridges et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5073625 | Derbyshire | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5082054 | Kiamanesh | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5082055 | Hemsath | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085276 | Rivas et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5097903 | Wilensky | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5099918 | Bridges et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103909 | Morgenthaler et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5103920 | Patton | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5109928 | McCants | May 1992 | A |
| 5126037 | Showalter | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5133406 | Puri | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5145003 | Duerksen | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5152341 | Kaservich | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5168927 | Stegemeier et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5182427 | McGaffigan | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5182792 | Goncalves | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5189283 | Carl, Jr. et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5190405 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193618 | Loh et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201219 | Bandurski et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207273 | Cates et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5209987 | Penneck et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5211230 | Ostapovich et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5217075 | Wittrisch | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5217076 | Masek | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5226961 | Nahm et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5229583 | van Egmond et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5236039 | Edelstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5246071 | Chu | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5255740 | Talley | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255742 | Mikus | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5261490 | Ebinuma | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5285071 | LaCount | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5285846 | Mohn | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289882 | Moore | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295763 | Stenborg et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297626 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5305239 | Kinra | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5305829 | Kumar | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306640 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5316664 | Gregoli et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318116 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5318709 | Wuest et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5325918 | Berryman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332036 | Shirley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5339897 | Leaute | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5339904 | Jennings, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340467 | Gregoli et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5349859 | Kleppe | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5358045 | Sevigny et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5360067 | Meo, III | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5363094 | Staron et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366012 | Lohbeck | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5377756 | Northrop et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388640 | Puri et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5388641 | Yee et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5388642 | Puri et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5388643 | Yee et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5388645 | Puri et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5391291 | Winquist et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392854 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5400430 | Nenniger | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402847 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5404952 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5409071 | Wellington et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5411086 | Burcham et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5411089 | Vinegar et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5411104 | Stanley | May 1995 | A |
| 5415231 | Northrop et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5431224 | Laali | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5433271 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5435666 | Hassett et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437506 | Gray | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5439054 | Chaback et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5454666 | Chaback et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456315 | Kisman et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5491969 | Cohn et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5497087 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5498960 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5512732 | Yagnik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5517593 | Nenniger et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525322 | Willms | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5541517 | Hartmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545803 | Heath et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553189 | Stegemeier et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5554453 | Steinfeld et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5566755 | Seidle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5566756 | Chaback et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571403 | Scott et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579575 | Lamome et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589775 | Kuckes | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5621844 | Bridges | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5621845 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624188 | West | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5632336 | Notz et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5652389 | Schaps et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5656239 | Stegemeier et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| RE35696 | Mikus | Dec 1997 | E |
| 5713415 | Bridges | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5723423 | Van Slyke | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751895 | Bridges | May 1998 | A |
| 5759022 | Koppang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5760307 | Latimer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769569 | Hosseini | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777229 | Geier et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782301 | Neuroth et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5802870 | Arnold et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5826653 | Rynne et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826655 | Snow et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828797 | Minott et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5861137 | Edlund | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5862858 | Wellington et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868202 | Hsu | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879110 | Carter | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5899269 | Wellington et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5899958 | Dowell et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5911898 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923170 | Kuckes | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926437 | Ortiz | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935421 | Brons et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5958365 | Liu | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5968349 | Duyvesteyn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5984010 | Pias et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984578 | Hanesian et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984582 | Schwert | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985138 | Humphreys | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992522 | Boyd et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997214 | de Rouffignac et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6015015 | Luft et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016867 | Gregoli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016868 | Gregoli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019172 | Wellington et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6022834 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023554 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026914 | Adams et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6035701 | Lowry et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039121 | Kisman | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049508 | Deflandre | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056057 | Vinegar et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6065538 | Reimers et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078868 | Dubinsky | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6079499 | Mikus et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084826 | Leggett, III | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6085512 | Agee et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088294 | Leggett, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094048 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6099208 | McAlister | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6102122 | de Rouffignac | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6102137 | Ward et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6102622 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110358 | Aldous et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112808 | Isted | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6152987 | Ma et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6155117 | Stevens et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6172124 | Wolflick et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173775 | Elias et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192748 | Miller | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193010 | Minto | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196350 | Minto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6244338 | Mones | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6257334 | Cyr et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269310 | Washbourne | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269881 | Chou et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283230 | Peters | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288372 | Sandberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6328104 | Graue | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6353706 | Bridges | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6354373 | Vercaemer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6357526 | Abdel-Halim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6388947 | Washbourne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6412559 | Gunter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6422318 | Rider | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6427124 | Dubinsky et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429784 | Beique et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6467543 | Talwani et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6485232 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6499536 | Ellingsen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6516891 | Dallas | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6540018 | Vinegar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6581684 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6584406 | Harmon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585046 | Neuroth et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6588266 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6588503 | Karanikas et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6588504 | Wellington et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6591906 | Wellington et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6591907 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6607033 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6609570 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6679332 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6684948 | Savage | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6688387 | Wellington et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6698515 | Karanikas et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6702016 | de Rouffignac et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6708758 | de Rouffignac et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712135 | Wellington et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712136 | de Rouffignac et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712137 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6715546 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6715547 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6715548 | Wellington et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6715550 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6719047 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6722429 | de Rouffignac et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6722430 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6722431 | Karanikas et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6725920 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6725928 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6729395 | Shahin, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6729396 | Vinegar et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6729397 | Zhang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6729401 | Vinegar et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732794 | Wellington et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732795 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732796 | Vinegar et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6736215 | Maher et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6739393 | Vinegar et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6739394 | Vinegar et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6742587 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6742588 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6742589 | Berchenko et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6742593 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745831 | de Rouffignac et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745832 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745837 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6749021 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752210 | de Rouffignac et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6755251 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6758268 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6761216 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6763886 | Schoeling et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6769483 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6769485 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6782947 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6789625 | de Rouffignac et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6805194 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6805195 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6820688 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6854534 | Livingstone | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854929 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6866097 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6871707 | Karanikas et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6877554 | Stegemeier et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6877555 | Karanikas et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6880633 | Wellington et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6880635 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6889769 | Wellington et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896053 | Berchenko et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6902003 | Maher et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6902004 | de Rouffignac et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6910536 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6910537 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6913078 | Shahin, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6913079 | Tubel | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6915850 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918442 | Wellington et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918443 | Wellington et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918444 | Passey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6923257 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6923258 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6929067 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6932155 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6942032 | La Rovere et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6942037 | Arnold | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6948562 | Wellington et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6948563 | Wellington et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6951247 | de Rouffignac et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6951250 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6953087 | de Rouffignac et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6958704 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6959761 | Berchenko et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6964300 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966372 | Wellington et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966374 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6969123 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973967 | Stegemeier et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6981548 | Wellington et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6981553 | Stegemeier et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991032 | Berchenko et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991033 | Wellington et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991036 | Sumnu-Dindoruk et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991045 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994160 | Wellington et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6994168 | Wellington et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6994169 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6995646 | Fromm et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 6997255 | Wellington et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6997518 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004247 | Cole et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004251 | Ward et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011154 | Maher et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7013972 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| RE39077 | Eaton | Apr 2006 | E |
| 7032660 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7032809 | Hopkins | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7036583 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7040397 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7040398 | Wellington et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7040399 | Wellington et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7040400 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7048051 | McQueen | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051807 | Vinegar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051808 | Vinegar et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7051811 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055600 | Messier et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7055602 | Shpakoff et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7063145 | Veenstra et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7066254 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7066257 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7073578 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077198 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077199 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| RE39244 | Eaton | Aug 2006 | E |
| 7086465 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7086468 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7090013 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096941 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096942 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7096953 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7100994 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7104319 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7114566 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7114880 | Carter | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7121341 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7121342 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128150 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128153 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7147057 | Steele et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7147059 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7153373 | Maziasz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7156176 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7165615 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7170424 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7204327 | Livingstone | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7219734 | Bai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225866 | Berchenko et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7259688 | Hirsch et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7320364 | Fairbanks | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7331385 | Symington et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7353872 | Sandberg et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7357180 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7360588 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7370704 | Harris | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383877 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7424915 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7431076 | Sandberg et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7435037 | McKinzie, II | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7461691 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7481274 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7490665 | Sandberg et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7500528 | McKinzie et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510000 | Pastor-Sanz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7527094 | McKinzie et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7533719 | Hinson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7540324 | de Rouffignac et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546873 | Kim | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7549470 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7556095 | Vinegar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7556096 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7559367 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7559368 | Vinegar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562706 | Li et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562707 | Miller | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7575052 | Sandberg et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7575053 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7581589 | Roes et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7584789 | Mo et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7591310 | Minderhoud et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7597147 | Vitek et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7604052 | Roes et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7610962 | Fowler | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7631689 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7631690 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635023 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635024 | Karanikas et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635025 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640980 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7644765 | Stegemeier et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7673681 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7673786 | Menotti | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7677310 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7677314 | Hsu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681647 | Mudunuri et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7683296 | Brady et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7703513 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7717171 | Stegemeier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7730945 | Pietersen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7730946 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7730947 | Stegemeier et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7735935 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7743826 | Harris | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7785427 | Maziasz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7793722 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7798220 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7798221 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7831133 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831134 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7832484 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7841401 | Kuhlman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7841408 | Vinegar | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7841425 | Mansure et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7845411 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849922 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860377 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7866385 | Lambirth | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7866386 | Beer | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7866388 | Bravo | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7931086 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7942197 | Fairbanks et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942203 | Vinegar et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7950453 | Farmayan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7986869 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8027571 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8042610 | Harris et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8070840 | Diaz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8083813 | Nair et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8113272 | Vinegar | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8146661 | Bravo et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8146669 | Mason | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8151880 | Roes et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8162043 | Burnham et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8162059 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8177305 | Burns et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8191630 | Stegemeier et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8196658 | Miller et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8200072 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8220539 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224164 | Sandberg et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224165 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225866 | de Rouffignac | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8230927 | Fairbanks et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8233782 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8238730 | Sandberg et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8240774 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8261832 | Ryan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8267170 | Fowler et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8267185 | Ocampos et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8276661 | Costello et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8281861 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8327932 | Karanikas | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8355623 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8381815 | Karanikas et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8434555 | Bos et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8450540 | Roes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8459359 | Vinegar | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8485252 | de Rouffignac et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8485256 | Bass et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 20020027001 | Wellington et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028070 | Holen | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020033253 | de Rouffignac et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020036089 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038069 | Wellington et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040779 | Wellington et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040780 | Wellington et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053431 | Wellington et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020076212 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112890 | Wentworth et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112987 | Hou et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020153141 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030029617 | Brown et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030066642 | Wellington et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079877 | Wellington et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030085034 | Wellington et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131989 | Zakiewicz | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030146002 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157380 | Assarabowski et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196789 | Wellington et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030201098 | Karanikas et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040035582 | Zupanick | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140096 | Sandberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040144540 | Sandberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146288 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006097 | Sandberg et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050045325 | Yu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050269313 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060052905 | Pfingsten et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116430 | Wentink | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060289536 | Vinegar et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070044957 | Watson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045267 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045268 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070108201 | Vinegar et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070119098 | Diaz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127897 | John et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131428 | den Boestert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133959 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133960 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070137856 | McKinzie et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070137857 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144732 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070193743 | Harris et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070246994 | Kaminsky et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080006410 | Looney et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080017380 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080017416 | Watson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080035346 | Nair et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080035347 | Brady et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080035705 | Menotti | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038144 | Maziasz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080048668 | Mashikian | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080078551 | De Vault et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080078552 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080128134 | Mudunuri et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080135253 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080135254 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080142216 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080142217 | Pietersen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080173442 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080173444 | Stone et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080174115 | Lambirth | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080185147 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217003 | Kuhlman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217016 | Stegemeier et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217321 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080236831 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277113 | Stegemeier et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283241 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090014180 | Stegemeier et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090014181 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090038795 | Kaminsky | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090071652 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090078461 | Mansure et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084547 | Farmayan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090158 | Davidson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090509 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095476 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095477 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095478 | Karanikas et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095479 | Karanikas et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095480 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101346 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120646 | Kim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090126929 | Vinegar | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090139716 | Brock et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189617 | Burns et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194269 | Vinegar | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194287 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194329 | Guimerans et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194333 | MacDonald | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194524 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200023 | Costello et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200025 | Bravo et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200031 | Miller | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200290 | Cardinal et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200854 | Vinegar | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228222 | Fantoni | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260811 | Cui et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260824 | Burns et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090272526 | Burns et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090272535 | Burns et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090272536 | Burns et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090272578 | MacDonald | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090321417 | Burns et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100071903 | Prince-Wright et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100071904 | Burns et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100089584 | Burns | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100089586 | Stanecki | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100096137 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101783 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101784 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101794 | Ryan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100108310 | Fowler et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100108379 | Edbury et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100155070 | Roes et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100258265 | Karanikas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100258290 | Bass | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100258291 | de St. Remey et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100258309 | Ayodele et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100288497 | Burnham et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110042085 | Diehl | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108269 | Van Den Berg et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110132600 | Kaminsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247802 | Deeg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247809 | Lin et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247814 | Karanikas et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247819 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247820 | Marino et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110259590 | Burnham et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120018421 | Parman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120205109 | Burnham et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 899987 | May 1972 | CA |
| 1168283 | May 1984 | CA |
| 1196594 | Nov 1985 | CA |
| 1253555 | May 1989 | CA |
| 1288043 | Aug 1991 | CA |
| 2015460 | Oct 1991 | CA |
| 107927 | May 1984 | EP |
| 130671 | Sep 1985 | EP |
| 0940558 | Sep 1999 | EP |
| 156396 | Jan 1921 | GB |
| 674082 | Jul 1950 | GB |
| 1010023 | Nov 1965 | GB |
| 1204405 | Sep 1970 | GB |
| 1454324 | Nov 1976 | GB |
| 121737 | May 1948 | SE |
| 123136 | Nov 1948 | SE |
| 123137 | Nov 1948 | SE |
| 123138 | Nov 1948 | SE |
| 126674 | Nov 1949 | SE |
| 1836876 | Dec 1990 | SU |
| 9506093 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| 9723924 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 9901640 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| 0019061 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| 0181505 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2008048448 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Japanese Patent Office, translated Office Action for JP Application No. 2009-53350, mailed Sep. 15, 2012, 3 pages. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/576,845; mailed Jul. 27, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,974; mailed Aug. 23, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,641; mailed Aug. 22, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 13/546,404; mailed Oct. 26, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,974; mailed Feb. 11, 2013. |
| Chinese Communication for Chinese Application No. 200680044203.4, mailed Nov. 23, 2012, 9 pages. |
| Chinese Communication for Chinese Application No. 200780014228.4, mailed Dec. 5, 2012, 7 pages. |
| Great Britain Communication for Great Britian Application No. GB1003951.9, mailed Aug. 1, 2011.5 pages. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,974; mailed Nov. 29, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 13/485,464; mailed Feb. 12, 2013. |
| Some Effects of Pressure on Oil-Shale Retorting, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, J.H. Bae, Sep. 1969; pp. 287-292. |
| New in situ shale-oil recovery process uses hot natural gas; The Oil & Gas Journal; May 16, 1966, p. 151. |
| Evaluation of Downhole Electric Impedance Heating Systems for Paraffin Control in Oil Wells; Industry Applications Society 37th Annual Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Bosch et al., Sep. 1990, pp. 223-227. |
| New System Stops Paraffin Build-up; Petroleum Engineer, Eastlund et al., Jan. 1989, (3 pages). |
| Oil Shale Retorting: Effects of Particle Size and Heating Rate on Oil Evolution and Intraparticle Oil Degradation; Campbell et al. In Situ 2(1), 1978, pp. 1-47. |
| The Potential for In Situ Retorting of Oil Shale in the Piceance Creek Basin of Northwestern Colorado; Dougan et al., Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, pp. 57-72, , 1970. |
| Retoring Oil Shale Underground-Problems & Possibilities; B.F. Grant, Qtly of Colorado School of Mines, pp. 39-46, 1960. |
| Molecular Mechanism of Oil Shale Pyrolysis in Nitrogen and Hydrogen Atmospheres, Hershkowitz et al.; Geochemistry and Chemistry of Oil Shales, American Chemical Society, May 1983 pp. 301-316. |
| The Characteristics of a Low Temperature in Situ Shale Oil; George Richard Hill & Paul Dougan, Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, 1967; pp. 75-90. |
| Direct Production of a Low Pour Point High Gravity Shale Oil; Hill et al., I & EC Product Research and Development, 6(1), Mar. 1967; pp. 52-59. |
| Refining of Swedish Shale Oil, L. Lundquist, pp. 621-627, 1951. |
| The Benefits of in Situ Upgrading Reactions to the Integrated Operations of the Orinoco Heavy-Oil Fields and Downstream Facilities, Myron Kuhlman, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Jun. 2000; pp. 1-14. |
| Monitoring Oil Shale Retorts by Off-Gas Alkene/Alkane Ratios, John H. Raley, Fuel, vol. 59, Jun. 1980, pp. 419-424. |
| The Shale Oil Question, Old and New Viewpoints, A Lecture in the Engineering Science Academy, Dr. Fredrik Ljungstrom, Feb. 23, 1950, published in Teknisk Trdskrift, Jan. 1951 p. 33-40. |
| Underground Shale Oil Pyrolysis According to the Ljungstroem Method; Svenska Skifferolje Aktiebolaget (Swedish Shale Oil Corp.), IVA, vol. 24, 1953, No. 3, pp. 118-123. |
| Kinetics of Low-Temperature Pyrolysis of Oil Shale by the IITRI RF Process, Sresty et al.; 15th Oil Shale Symposium, Colorado School of Mines, Apr. 1982 pp. 1-13. |
| Bureau of Mines Oil-Shale Research, H.M. Thorne, Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, pp. 77-90, 1964. |
| Application of a Microretort to Problems in Shale Pyrolysis, A. W. Weitkamp & L.C. Gutberlet, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Develop. vol. 9, No. 3, 1970, pp. 386-395. |
| Oil Shale, Yen et al., Developments in Petroleum Science 5, 1976, pp. 187-189, 197-198. |
| The Composition of Green River Shale Oils, Glenn L. Cook, et al., United Nations Symposium on the Development and Utilization of Oil Shale Resources, 1968, pp. 1-23. |
| High-Pressure Pyrolysis of Green River Oil Shale, Burnham et al., Geochemistry and Chemistry of Oil Shales, American Chemical Society, 1983, pp. 335-351. |
| Geochemistry and Pyrolysis of Oil Shales, Tissot et al., Geochemistry and Chemistry of Oil Shales, American Chemical Society, 1983, pp. 1-11. |
| A Possible Mechanism of Alkene/Alkane Production, Burnham et al., Oil Shale, Tar Sands, and Related Materials, American Chemical Society, 1981, pp. 79-92. |
| The Ljungstroem In-Situ Method of Shale Oil Recovery, G. Salomonsson, Oil Shale and Cannel Coal, vol. 2, Proceedings of the Second Oil Shale and Cannel Coal Conference, Institute of Petroleum, 1951, London, pp. 260-280. |
| Developments in Technology for Green River Oil Shale, G.U. Dinneen, United Nations Symposium on the Development and Utilization of Oil Shale Resources, Laramie Petroleum Research Center, Bureau of Mines, 1968, pp. 1-20. |
| The Thermal and Structural Properties of a Hanna Basin Coal, R.E. Glass, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 106, Jun. 1984, pp. 266-271. |
| On the Mechanism of Kerogen Pyrolysis, Alan K. Burnham & James A. Happe, Jan. 10, 1984 (17 pages). |
| Comparison of Methods for Measuring Kerogen Pyrolysis Rates and Fitting Kinetic Parameters, Burnham et al., Mar. 23, 1987, (29 pages). |
| Further Comparison of Methods for Measuring Kerogen Pyrolysis Rates and Fitting Kinetic Parameters, Burnham et al., Sep. 1987, (16 pages). |
| Shale Oil Cracking Kinetics and Diagnostics, Bissell et al., Nov. 1983, (27 pages). |
| Mathematical Modeling of Modified In Situ and Aboveground Oil Shale Retorting, Robert L. Braun, Jan. 1981 (45 pages). |
| Progress Report on Computer Model for In Situ Oil Shale Retorting, R.L. Braun & R.C.Y. Chin, Jul. 14, 1977 (34 pages). |
| Chemical Kinetics and Oil Shale Process Design, Alan K. Burnham, Jul. 1993 (16 pages). |
| Reaction Kinetics and Diagnostics for Oil Shale Retorting, Alan K. Burnham, Oct. 19, 1981 (32 pages). |
| Reaction Kinetics Between Steam and Oil Shale Char, A.K. Burnham, Oct. 1978 (8 pages). |
| General Kinetic Model of Oil Shale Pyrolysis, Alan K. Burnham & Robert L. Braun, Dec. 1984 (25 pages). |
| Moreno, James B., et al., Sandia National Laboratories, “Methods and Energy Sources for Heating Subsurface Geological Formations, Task 1: Heat Delivery Systems,” Nov. 20, 2002, pp. 1-166. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,572; mailed Mar. 14, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/576,763; mailed Jan. 27, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/576,845; mailed Jan. 19, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/576,800; mailed Jan. 12, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,364; mailed Dec. 6, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/106,008; mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,572; mailed Oct. 6, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,942; mailed Aug. 30, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,957; mailed Aug. 26, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/769,379; mailed May 31, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/769,379; mailed Feb. 22, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/769,379; mailed Aug. 17, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,572; mailed May 19, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,572; mailed Dec. 22, 2010. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,942; mailed Oct. 4, 2010. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,364; mailed Jun. 9, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/106,086; mailed Sep. 27, 2010. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/106,008; mailed Sep. 28, 2010. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/106,008; mailed Mar. 7, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,997; mailed Jul. 18, 2011. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,997; mailed Dec. 29, 2010. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,974; mailed Sep. 27, 2010. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,974; mailed Feb. 10, 2011. |
| Canadian Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,668,389 mailed Mar. 14, 2011, 3 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,668,392 mailed Mar. 2, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Canadian Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,668,385, mailed Dec. 3, 2010. |
| Australian Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's First Report” for Australian Patent Application No. 2008242797, mailed Nov. 24, 2010. |
| Rangel-German et al., “Electrical-Heating-Assisted Recovery for Heavy Oil”, pp. 1-43, 2004. |
| Kovscek, Anthony R., “Reservoir Engineering analysis of Novel Thermal Oil Recovery Techniques applicable to Alaskan North Slope Heavy Oils”, pp. 1-6 circa 2004. |
| Bosch et al. “Evaluation of Downhole Electric Impedance Heating Systems for Paraffin Control in Oil Wells,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications, 1991, vol. 28; pp. 190-194. |
| “McGee et al. ““Electrical Heating with Horizontal Wells, The heat Transfer Problem,”” International Conference on Horizontal Well Tehcnology, Calgary, Alberta Canada, 1996; 14 pages”. |
| Hill et al., “The Characteristics of a Low Temperature in situ Shale Oil” American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical & Petroleum Engineers, 1967 (pp. 75-90). |
| Rouffignac, E. In Situ Resistive Heating of Oil Shale for Oil Production—A Summary of the Swedish Data, (4 pages), published prior to Oct. 2001. |
| SSAB report, “A Brief Description of the Ljungstrom Method for Shale Oil Production,” 1950, (12 pages). |
| Salomonsson G., SSAB report, The Lungstrom in Situ-Method for Shale Oil Recovery, 1950 (28 pages). |
| “Swedish shale oil-Production method in Sweden,” Organisation for European Economic Co-operation, 1952, (70 pages). |
| SSAB report, “Kvarn Torp” 1958, (36 pages). |
| SSAB report, “Kvarn Torp” 1951 (35 pages). |
| SSAB report, “Summary study of the shale oil works at Narkes Kvarntorp” (15 pages), published prior to Oct. 2001. |
| Vogel et al. “An Analog Computer for Studying Heat Transfrer during a Thermal Recovery Process,” AIME Petroleum Transactions, 1955 (pp. 205-212). |
| “Skiferolja Genom Uppvarmning Av Skifferberget,” Faxin Department och Namder, 1941, (3 pages). |
| “Aggregleringens orsaker och ransoneringen grunder”, Av director E.F.Cederlund I Statens livesmedelskonmmission (1page), published prior to Oct. 2001. |
| Ronnby, E. “Kvarntorp-Sveriges Storsta skifferoljeindustri,” 1943, (9 pages). |
| SAAB report, “The Swedish Shale Oil Industry,” 1948 (8 pages). |
| Gejrot et al., “The Shale Oil Industry in Sweden,” Carlo Colombo Publishers-Rome, Proceedings of the Fourth World Petroleum Congress, 1955 (8 pages). |
| Hedback, T. J., The Swedish Shale as Raw Material for Production of Power, Oil and Gas, XIth Sectional Meeting World Power Conference, 1957 (9 pages). |
| Saab, “Santa Cruz, California, Field Test of the Lins Method for the Recovery of Oil from Sand”, 1955, vol. 1, (141 pages) English. |
| Saab, “Santa Cruz, California, Field Test of the Lins Method for the Recovery of Oil from Sand-Figures”, 1955 vol. 2, (146 pages) English. |
| “Santa Cruz, California, Field Test of the Lins Method for the Recovery of Oil from Sand-Memorandum re: tests”, 1955, vol. 3, (256 pages) English. |
| Helander, R.E., “Santa Cruz, California, Field Test of Carbon Steel Burner Casings for the Lins Method of Oil Recovery”, 1959 (38 pages) English. |
| Helander et al., Santa Cruz, California, Field Test of Fluidized Bed Burners for the Lins Method of Oil Recovery 1959, (86 pages) English. |
| SSAB report, “Bradford Residual Oil, Athabasa Ft. McMurray” 1951, (207 pages), partial transl. |
| “Lins Burner Test Results-English” 1959-1960, (148 pages). |
| SSAB report, “Assessment of Future Mining Alternatives of Shale and Dolomite,” 1962, (59 pages) Swedish. |
| SSAB report. “Kartong 2 Shale: Ljungstromsanlaggningen” (104 pages) Swedish, published prior to Oct. 2001. |
| SAAB, “Photos”, (18 pages), published prior to Oct. 2001. |
| SAAB report, “Swedish Geological Survey Report, Plan to Delineate Oil shale Resource in Narkes Area (near Kvarntorp),” 1941 (13 pages). Swedish. |
| SAAB report, “Recovery Efficiency,” 1941, (61 pages). Swedish. |
| SAAB report, “Geologic Work Conducted to Assess Possibility of Expanding Shale Mining Area in Kvarntorp; Drilling Results, Seismic Results,” 1942 (79 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Ojematinigar vid Norrtorp,” 1945 (141 pages). |
| SSAB report, “Inhopplingschema, Norrtorp II 20/3-17/8”, 1945 (50 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Secondary Recovery after LINS,” 1945 (78 pages). |
| SSAB report, “Maps and Diagrams, Geology,” 1947 (137 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, Styrehseprotoholl, 1943 (10 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Early Shale Retorting Trials” 1951-1952, (134 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Analysis of Lujunstrom Oil and its Use as Liquid Fuel,” Thesis by E. Pals, 1949 (83 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Environmental Sulphur and Effect on Vegetation,” 1951 (50 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Tar Sands”, vol. 135 1953 (20 pages, pp. 12-15 translated). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Assessment of Skanes Area (Southern Sweden) Shales as Fuel Source,” 1954 (54 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “From as Utre Dn Text Geology Reserves,” 1960 (93 pages). Swedish. |
| SSAB report, “Kvarntorps-Environmental Area Asessment,” 1981 (50 pages). Swedish. |
| “IEEE Recommended Practice for Electrical Impedance, Induction, and Skin Effect Heating of Pipelines and Vessels,” IEEE Std. 844-200, 2000; 6 pages. |
| Reaction Kinetics Between CO2 and Oil Shale Char, A.K. Burnham, Mar. 22, 1978 (18 pages). |
| Reaction Kinetics Between CO2 and Oil Shale Residual Carbon. I. Effect of Heating Rate on Reactivity, Alan K. Burnham, Jul. 11, 1978 (22 pages). |
| High-Pressure Pyrolysis of Colorado Oil Shale, Alan K. Burnham & Mary F. Singleton, Oct. 1982 (23 pages). |
| A Possible Mechanism of Alkene/Alkane Production in Oil Shale Retorting, A.K. Burnham, R.L. Ward, Nov. 26, 1980 (20 pages). |
| Enthalpy Relations for Eastern Oil Shale, David W. Camp, Nov. 1987 (13 pages). |
| Oil Shale Retorting: Part 3 A Correlation of Shale Oil 1-Alkene/n-Alkane Ratios With Yield, Coburn et al., Aug. 1, 1977 (18 pages). |
| The Composition of Green River Shale Oil, Glen L. Cook, et al., 1968 (12 pages). |
| Thermal Degradation of Green River Kerogen at 150o to 350o C Rate of Production Formation, J.J. Cummins & W.E. Robinson, 1972 (18 pages). |
| Retorting of Green River Oil Shale Under High-Pressure Hydrogen Atmospheres, LaRue et al., Jun. 1977 (38 pages). |
| Retorting and Combustion Processes in Surface Oil-Shale Retorts, A.E. Lewis & R.L. Braun, May 2, 1980 (12 pages). |
| Oil Shale Retorting Processes: A Technical Overview, Lewis et al., Mar. 1984 (18 pages). |
| Study of Gas Evolution During Oil Shale Pyrolysis by TQMS, Oh et al., Feb. 1988 (10 pages). |
| The Permittivity and Electrical Conductivity of Oil Shale, A.J. Piwinskii & A. Duba, Apr. 28, 1975 (12 pages). |
| Oil Degradation During Oil Shale Retorting, J.H. Raley & R.L. Braun, May 24, 1976 (14 pages). |
| Kinetic Analysis of California Oil Shale by Programmed Temperature Microphyrolysis, John G. Reynolds & Alan K. Burnham, Dec. 9, 1991 (14 pages). |
| Analysis of Oil Shale and Petroleum Source Rock Pyrolysis by Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry: Comparisons of Gas Evolution at the Heating Rate of 10oC/Min., Reynolds et al. Oct. 5, 1990 (57 pages). |
| Fluidized-Bed Pyrolysis of Oil Shale, J.H. Richardson & E.B. Huss, Oct. 1981 (27 pages). |
| Retorting Kinetics for Oil Shale From Fluidized-Bed Pyrolysis, Richardson et al., Dec. 1981 (30 pages). |
| Recent Experimental Developments in Retorting Oil Shale at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Albert J. Rothman, Aug. 1978 (32 pages). |
| The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Oil Shale Retorts, Sandholtz et al. Sep. 18, 1978 (30 pages). |
| Operating Laboratory Oil Shale Retorts in an In-Situ Mode, W. A. Sandholtz et al., Aug. 18, 1977 (16 pages). |
| Some Relationships of Thermal Effects to Rubble-Bed Structure and Gas-Flow Patterns in Oil Shale Retorts, W. A. Sandholtz, Mar. 1980 (19 pages). |
| Assay Products from Green River Oil Shale, Singleton et al., Feb. 18, 1986 (213 pages). |
| Biomarkers in Oil Shale: Occurrence and Applications, Singleton et al., Oct. 1982 (28 pages). |
| Occurrence of Biomarkers in Green River Shale Oil, Singleton et al., Mar. 1983 (29 pages). |
| An Instrumentation Proposal for Retorts in the Demonstration Phase of Oil Shale Development, Clyde J. Sisemore, Apr. 19, 1977, (34 pages). |
| Pyrolysis Kinetics for Green River Oil Shale From the Saline Zone, Burnham et al., Feb. 1982 (33 pages). |
| SO2 Emissions from the Oxidation of Retorted Oil Shale, Taylor et al., Nov. 1981 (9 pages). |
| Nitric Oxide (NO) Reduction by Retorted Oil Shale, R.W. Taylor & C.J. Morris, Oct. 1983 (16 pages). |
| Coproduction of Oil and Electric Power from Colorado Oil Shale, P. Henrik Wallman, Sep. 24, 1991 (20 pages). |
| 13C NMR Studies of Shale Oil, Raymond L. Ward & Alan K. Burnham, Aug. 1982 (22 pages). |
| Identification by 13C NMR of Carbon Types in Shale Oil and their Relationship to Pyrolysis Conditions, Raymond L. Ward & Alan K. Burnham, Sep. 1983 (27 pages). |
| A Laboratory Study of Green River Oil Shale Retorting Under Pressure in a Nitrogen Atmosphere, Wise et al., Sep. 1976 (24 pages). |
| Quantitative Analysis and Evolution of Sulfur-Containing Gases from Oil Shale Pyrolysis by Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry, Wong et al., Nov. 1983 (34 pages). |
| Quantitative Analysis & Kinetics of Trace Sulfur Gas Species from Oil Shale Pyrolysis by Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry (TQMS), Wong et al., Jul. 5-7, 1983 (34 pages). |
| Application of Self-Adaptive Detector System on a Triple Quadrupole MS/MS to High Expolsives and Sulfur-Containing Pyrolysis Gases from Oil Shale, Carla M. Wong & Richard W. Crawford, Oct. 1983 (17 pages). |
| An Evaluation of Triple Quadrupole MS/MS for On-Line Gas Analyses of Trace Sulfur Compounds from Oil Shale Processing, Wong et al., Jan. 1985 (30 pages). |
| General Model of Oil Shale Pyrolysis, Alan K. Burnham & Robert L. Braun, Nov. 1983 (22 pages). |
| Proposed Field Test of the Lins Mehtod Thermal Oil Recovery Process in Athabasca McMurray Tar Sands McMurray, Alberta; Husky Oil Company cody, Wyoming, circa 1960. |
| In Situ Measurement of Some Thermoporoelastic Parameters of a Granite, Berchenko et al., Poromechanics, A Tribute to Maurice Biot, 1998, p. 545-550. |
| Tar and Pitch, G. Collin and H. Hoeke. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, vol. A 26, 1995, p. 91-127. |
| Wellington et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/273,354, filed Mar. 5, 2001. |
| Geology for Petroleum Exploration, Drilling, and Production. Hyne, Norman J. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984, p. 264. |
| Burnham, Alan, K. “Oil Shale Retorting Dependence of timing and composition on temperature and heating rate”, Jan. 27, 1995, (23 pages). |
| Campbell, et al., “Kinetics of oil generation from Colorado Oil Shale” IPC Business Press, Fuel, 1978, (3 pages). |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,621; mailed Apr. 8, 2013. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,257; mailed May 20, 2013. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,289; mailed May 17, 2013. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,997; mailed Jun. 28, 2013. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,621; mailed Jul. 1 2013. |
| Korean Communication for Korean Application No. 2008-7012458, mailed Jun. 24, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Chinese Communication for Chinese Application No. 200680044203.4, mailed Mar. 4, 2013, 5 pages. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,272; mailed Aug. 9, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110247811 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61322647 | Apr 2010 | US | |
| 61322513 | Apr 2010 | US |
