Methods for treating objects

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6348101
  • Patent Number
    6,348,101
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 26, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 19, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Gulakowski; Randy
    • Chaudhry; Saeed
    Agents
    • Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP
Abstract
An object is treated by contacting it with an organic solvent and then removing the organic solvent by directly displacing it with a fluid comprising a drying vapor (e.g., isopropyl alcohol or IPA vapor) such that substantially no liquid droplets of organic solvent are left on the surfaces of the object to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic solvent with the fluid.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




There are numerous applications for the cleaning of sensitive components, such as spacecraft components, bearings, and electronic equipment. Electronic or electrical components can become contaminated through usage, e.g., by smoke, dust, and other airborne contaminants, or by oils or lubricants. Oils are more difficult to displace than many other contaminants due to their lower surface tensions and higher viscosities, which make them difficult to remove with many solvents and/or detergents.




A number of alcohols, fluorinated alcohols and other halogenated compounds have been found to be effective as displacing agents for contaminants, particularly oily contaminants. For example, chlorinated hydrocarbons and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), such as Freons™, are commonly used. Concentrated corrosive acids or bases have also been used as cleaning agents. These reagents are often costly, hazardous to handle and present environmental and disposal problems.




Sonic cleaning has been used for decontaminating and/or disinfecting instruments used in medical, dental, surgical or food processing, for example. This method generally involves placing the instruments in an aqueous bath and treating them with ultrasonic energy. Treatment with ultrasonic energy has long been recognized to be lethal to microorganisms suspended in a liquid, as described, for example, by Boucher in U.S. Pat. No. 4,211,744 (1980). Ultrasonic energy has also been used for cleaning and sterilizing contact lenses (U.S. Pat. No. 4,382,824 Halleck (1983)), surgical instruments (U.S. Pat. No. 4,193,818, Young et al. (1980) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,448,750 (1984)) and even body parts, such as a doctor's hands (U.S. Pat. No. 3,481,687, Fishman (1969)).




After fluid processing, the components normally need to be dried. Evaporation of rinsing liquids is not desirable since it often leads to spotting or streaking. Even the evaporation of ultra high purity water can lead to problems when drying on the surfaces of some components. For example, such water can dissolve traces of silicon and silicon dioxide on semiconductor surfaces, and subsequent evaporation will leave residues of the solute material on the wafer surface.




A device known as a spin-rinser-drier is useful for drying objects without water evaporation. These devices utilize centrifugal force to “throw ” the water off the surfaces of the object. This can cause breakage because of the mechanical stress placed on the object, particularly with larger or fragile objects. In addition, contamination control is problematic due to the mechanical complexity of the spin-rinser-drier. Since the objects conventionally travel through dry nitrogen at a high velocity, static electric charges can develop on the surface of the object. Oppositely charged airborne particles are then quickly drawn to the object's surface when the drier is opened, resulting in particulate contamination. Finally, it is difficult to avoid evaporation of water from the surface of the object during the spin cycle with the attendant disadvantages discussed above.




More recently, methods and devices have been developed for steam or chemical drying of sensitive objects. Chemical drying generally comprises two steps. First, the rinsing fluid is driven off and replaced by a non-aqueous drying fluid. Second, the non-aqueous drying fluid is evaporated using a pre-dried gas, such as nitrogen. A method for chemically drying semiconductor wafers using isopropanol is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,778,532, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,761.




It is an object of the present invention to provide a process and apparatus which can be used for degreasing, cleaning and drying of sensitive components, particularly components having complex configurations.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for cleaning the surface of an object by placing the object in an enclosed vessel and sequentially passing cleaning and/or rinsing fluids through the vessel, then drying the object under conditions which do not permit the deposition of residues on the surface of the object. The cleaning and rinsing fluids are selected based on the type of contamination to be removed and can include aqueous and non-aqueous fluids. In a preferred embodiment, sonic energy is applied to at least one of the fluids in the vessel.




The process is particularly useful for cleaning sensitive electronic components, such as complex parts, e.g., reading heads used in computer systems for reading and/or recording information on disks. The process is useful for cleaning hard disks, aerospace parts (e.g., gyroscopes, ball bearings), medical devices and other precision parts. The process can be used to deflux printed circuit boards, and for degreasing microparts, in particular, as a replacement for traditional Freon™ processing. Components having numerous interfaces and facets, that is, which are involuted, can be thoroughly cleaned and dried using the present method. The present protocols can be used on metallic, ceramic or plastic surfaces.




The apparatus comprises an enclosure for enclosing the object to be cleaned, and means for passing a flow of liquid though the enclosure and around the object disposed therein. Cleaning and rinsing liquids are preferably introduced into the vessel through a port located in the bottom of the vessel. The apparatus may include a means for agitating the liquid to permit thorough cleaning or rinsing of all surfaces. Preferably a means for generating sonic waves, which can be ultrasonic or megasonic energy, is used for this purpose. The apparatus optionally can contain spray heads for pre-cleaning the object by spraying it with a liquid to remove gross contaminants. The apparatus contains a means for removing the liquid from the enclosure which can be a second port located at the top of the vessel, and means for drying the object by filling the vessel with an organic drying solvent or vapor.




In a preferred embodiment of the invention, means for introducing inert gas or air and means for circulating the washing or rinsing liquids through the vessel are included in the apparatus. The vessel preferably comprises a port at its top so that a fluid in the vessel can be vented out the top port while a second fluid is introduced into the vessel through the bottom port. Vapor or gas is introduced through an inlet at the top to displace a fluid downwardly through the bottom. This allows one fluid to be directly replaced with another fluid without exposing the objects to air. The two ports may be connected via a line, thereby permitting a fluid to be circulated through the vessel. The apparatus preferably includes means for supplying the vessel with a washing or rinsing liquid without exposing the fluid to the air. In one embodiment, a storage tank containing the liquid is connected to the vessel via a line. The storage tank may be supplied with a means for pressurizing the tank, for example, with an inert gas. The washing or rinsing liquid is then returned to the tank after use. In another embodiment, the apparatus contains means for filtering, distilling or otherwise recycling the liquids for reuse in the present system.




The method of the invention generally involves the following steps: placing the object to be cleaned in the vessel and sealing the vessel; filling the vessel with a washing fluid to immerse the object and contact all of the surfaces of the object with the fluid; preferably, agitating the liquid using sonic energy or other agitating means; filling the vessel with a rinsing fluid to displace the washing fluid and to immerse the object; and removing rinsing fluid from the surfaces of the object using an organic drying solvent under conditions such that substantially no rinsing fluid droplets, cleaning agents or contaminants are left on the surfaces of the object after removal of the rinsing fluid. The vessel can be purged with an inert gas, such as nitrogen, and/or with air, prior to removing the object from the vessel.




In one embodiment of the method, the object of interest is cleaned using an aqueous or semi-aqueous protocol. In this embodiment, the object is immobilized in the enclosure and, optionally, prerinsed by spraying the object with water. The enclosure is then filled with rinse water to remove mechanically displaced surface contaminants or gross particulates. In the aqueous protocol, the object is then immersed in a cleaning solution comprising a water/surfactant mixture. In the semi-aqueous protocol, the cleaning liquid is preferably a hydrocarbon solvent/surfactant mixture. Ultrasonic or megasonic energy can be applied through the liquid medium if desired or needed. The resulting agitation allows even involuted or hard-to-reach surfaces of the component to be thoroughly cleaned. The parts remain stationary while the cleaning and rinsing fluids move around them. The component is rinsed again with water to remove the surfactant. In a preferred embodiment, the final rinse is followed by a drying step in which a water-miscible organic vapor, e.g., alcohol or acetone vapor, is injected into the vessel. The organic vapor drives the water from all surfaces of the component. The vessel containing the alcohol-dried component can then, optionally, be purged with nitrogen and/or air prior to removing it from the vessel. This ensures that all surfaces of the object are thoroughly dried and residue-free.




In another embodiment of the method, the object of interest is cleaned using a non-aqueous protocol. The object is immobilized in the enclosure and, optionally, prerinsed with water or an organic solvent to remove gross particulates. The object is then immersed in an organic cleaning solvent, preferably a terpene or mixture of terpenes. The terpene solvent optionally can contain a surfactant. Ultrasonic or megasonic energy is applied if necessary or desirable. The cleaning solvent is then drained from the vessel, and the vessel is filled with a rinsing solvent which solubilizes residual cleaning solvent and removes it from the surfaces of the object. This rinsing step can be followed by drying with hot organic vapor. The vessel is then purged with an inert gas which thoroughly dries the object before it is exposed to air.




The method and apparatus are particularly useful for ultracleaning of objects which must be as free as possible of contamination. The combination of precise control of solvent, washing and rinsing reagents, hydraulically full flow, ultrasonic or megasonic energization and removal of rinse droplets and/or contaminants with a drying solvent or vapor permits extraordinarily thorough cleaning and rinsing to produce essentially contaminant-free surfaces. The results achieved through use of the apparatus and process of the invention is referred to hereafter as “ultracleaning”.




The present apparatus and method incorporates many desirable features for cleaning sensitive electronic components, ball bearings, printed circuit boards, medical devices, hard disks for computers and precision parts. The apparatus and method can be used to thoroughly clean and/or decontaminate the surfaces of objects containing many small parts, involuted surfaces or having a highly complex configuration. The reaction vessel is a totally enclosed environment, therefore contact of a human operator with aggressive cleaning solvents or solvents having a strong odor, such as terpenes, is eliminated. The use of terpenes is particularly advantageous in that terpenes are naturally occurring, biodegradable, and are excellent solvents for most contaminants. Terpenes can be used for cleaning objects which traditionally required the use of Freons, which are costly and environmentally harmful. The odor associated with most terpenes is not problematic because the system is completely enclosed.




The objects to be treated are immobilized in the vessel, so fragile or sensitive parts can be cleaned with no product movement. Non-aqueous solvents can be recycled for repeated reuse. The apparatus and method provides a combined cleaning and drying tool, thereby reducing equipment cost, minimizing product movement and exposure to chemicals. The method eliminates harmful gas-liquid interfaces, which can result in flash corrosion and/or staining, and protects the cleaned product from sources of external contamination. The method can be adapted for automated chemical handling and comprehensive computer integration of the process.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing summary and objects of the invention, and the various features thereof, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description, when read together with the accompanying drawings.





FIG. 1

is a schematic cross-sectional diagram illustrating an embodiment of the apparatus of the present invention for aqueous processing.





FIG. 2

is a schematic cross-sectional diagram illustrating an embodiment of the apparatus of the present invention for aqueous processing, including drain valves for removing fluids from the vessel.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of the apparatus of the present invention for non-aqueous processing, including chemical storage tanks and conduits, valves, and associated equipment for reuse of valuable solvents.





FIG. 4

is a schematic diagram illustrating an apparatus for providing organic drying vapor to the vessel.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to the ultracleaning of objects, particularly objects having complex configurations. The present apparatus and methods will be described herein with particular reference to the ultracleaning of involuted microparts, however, the general principles apply to the cleaning of other objects.




Referring to the drawings, an apparatus suitable for carrying out the present ultracleaning method using an aqueous protocol is shown schematically in

FIG. 1. A

vessel


12


holdings the object(s) for treatment with aqueous washing and rinsing fluids, and water-miscible organic gases and drying vapors. Vessel


12


contains disposed within its chamber means


14


for supporting or otherwise holding the objects to be cleaned which can be, for example, a basket, rack, tray or other device. The configuration of holding means


14


will depend in part upon the size, type and configuration of the object(s) to be cleaned. Sealable hatch door


28


allows access to the interior of vessel


12


. Vessel


12


has a tapered bottom comprising sloping walls to facilitate draining of cleaning and rinsing fluids from the vessel. Vessel


12


is provided with valves


70


and


72


for the control of water for rinsing and/or cleaning, which may enter and exit vessel


12


for treatment of the objects.




Water is introduced via valve


70


through lines


84


,


82


and inlet


22


which allows vessel


12


to be filled with the treatment fluid. The fluid flows upwardly through vessel


12


. An inlet


74


for adding surfactant to the water is also provided. After filling of vessel


12


, valve


70


for controlling the water supply is closed. In a preferred embodiment, vessel


12


has at least one sonic transducer


16


mounted in the sides of vessel


12


for inducing ultrasonic or megasonic cavitation in a treatment fluid.




Vessel


12


optionally contains spray heads


26


mounted in the sides of the vessel. The spray heads spray water or other fluid onto the objects in the vessel to prerinse the objects in order to remove gross dirt and contaminants. The prerinsing fluid is conducted to spray heads


26


through conduit


86


by opening valve


30


.




Cleaning and rinsing fluids which are used in the process can be removed from the vessel by draining through port


24


and inlet


22


. Valve


72


is opened to permit the used liquid to be removed for disposal through line


82


. Alternatively, a first fluid in vessel


12


can be displaced by injecting a second fluid through inlet


22


and port


24


and opening port


32


, thereby forcing the first fluid to the top of the vessel through port


32


and line


24


. This method allows direct displacement of one fluid by another without exposing the objects inside the vessel to air. Line


34


can lead to a drain, or a holding tank for the fluid.




In another embodiment of the process, fluid can be circulated through a loop created by connecting line


84


with line


34


. In this aspect, shown in

FIG. 1

, lines


34


,


84


are connected by line


86


. Valves


88


and


90


are opened to form a complete loop including vessel


12


and lines


34


,


86


,


84


and


82


. This embodiment achieves purity of the treatment fluid by providing a closed fluid loop in which the treatment fluid can be circulated to provide fluids at controlled flow and temperature conditions, while permitting efficient and complete changing of the fluids in the loop. A plurality of different fluids can be mixed and delivered to the loop without contaminating or being contaminated by any mechanical parts other than the necessary valves and conduits, while efficiently conserving the fluids.




Another embodiment of the present apparatus is shown in FIG.


2


. In this embodiment, vessel


12


is provided with one or more drains


36


for removing cleaning and rinsing fluids from the vessel. In this aspect, the objects to be cleaned are placed in vessel


12


as described above. The vessel is filled with aqueous cleaning or rinsing fluid through line


82


and valve


70


. The fluids are drained out through drains


36


by opening valves


38


.




A vessel which is appropriate for use with organic solvents is shown in FIG.


3


. As shown in

FIG. 3

, one or more storage tanks


58


,


60


for storing the cleaning, rinsing or drying solvents are connected to vessel


12


via lines


66


and


64


. Each storage tank is preferably equipped with a nitrogen supply


44


,


54


and exhaust


46


,


56


. In operation, nitrogen is admitted to tank


58


or


60


to pressurize the contents, and valve


40


or


42


is opened, causing the solvent in the tank to flow into vessel


12


through inlet


62


. Once the cleaning or rinsing cycle is complete, the solvent is drained back through line


62


and returned to the tank for reuse or recycling. The apparatus can contain a gauge


68


which indicates the level of solvent in the vessel.




The apparatus contains a means for drying the objects using a drying solvent, which can be in liquid or vapor form. In a preferred embodiment, the drying solvent is a hot organic vapor. For this purpose, each apparatus shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


3


includes an inlet for introducing hot organic drying vapor into vessel


12


. As shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


3


, the organic drying vapor is introduced into vessel


12


through valves


78


and


76


. The organic vapor is supplied to the vessel from a device which vaporizes the organic solvent. An apparatus and process for utilizing drying vapor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,761, which is incorporated herein by reference. A suitable device


120


for use in the present system is shown in FIG.


4


.




As shown in

FIG. 4

, device


120


contains a boiler


24


for producing the organic drying vapor. Boiler


124


contains an inlet


126


and an outlet


128


, and is provided with heating bands


130


or other suitable heat transfer device to quickly heat the drying fluid above its boiling point. A pressure indicator


132


provides information for controlling the pressure range, and temperature indicator


134


monitors the temperature of the fluid leaving outlet


128


. The boiler


124


should always be maintained full of drying fluid so that the heat transfer services are continually immersed. For this purpose, a liquid level detector


135


and switch can be provided. A safety relief valve


136


is provided at the top of boiler


124


. A valve


138


controls access to delivery line


122


. Also connected to line


122


is a source of gas which is preferably filtered nitrogen. Valve


137


provides access to line


122


for the gas.




To effect drying of the microparts in the vessel, the pressurized organic vapor is introduced into vessel


12


through valves


78


and


76


. It is desired to dry the microparts without the formation of bubbles and without leaving droplets or residual moisture on any of the surfaces of the parts, including interior surfaces. Droplets and residual moisture may contain contaminant residues of the solutes. Removal of all residual rinsing solvent is accomplished by providing a flow of hot organic vapor into the vessel in such a manner that the vapor is introduced into the top of the vessel as the rinsing fluid is draining from the bottom, through port


24


and outlet


22


. The organic vapor is selected so that it is miscible with the rinsing liquid. In a preferred embodiment, heated isopropyl alcohol (IPA) or acetone vapor is introduced into vessel


12


, as the rinsing fluid is displaced downward. Droplets which remain on the surfaces of the microparts are carried off by the organic vapor. The IPA or acetone layer vapor combines with the rinse liquid, which is usually water or a terpene solvent, to form an azeotrope layer which evaporates at a lower temperature than either the rinse liquid or the organic drying solvent. The temperature of the medium being displaced is important. Preferably, the temperature is about 55 to 60° C. If the temperature is much higher the azeotrope layer may break down. Although the organic solvent and the water are miscible, the azeotrope layer remains distinct because of the surface tension and thermal differences between the solvent and the water. Once the rinse liquid has drained completely, vessel


12


is purged of the drying vapor with a flow of clean gas, preferably nitrogen. Nitrogen is introduced into vessel


12


through valves


80


and


76


. The azeotropic residue is carried off in the flow of the gas. The resulting microparts are ultraclean after this treatment, and all of the involuted surfaces are dry.




The system can contain spring-loaded units so that, if the failure of the control system for the various valves and units should occur, treatment fluids will flush harmlessly out of the units to the drain, and no excessive pressure buildup will occur. Suitable mechanisms are those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,899,767, the teachings of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.




The method is generally carried out according to the following procedure. The object to be cleaned is placed in vessel


12


having a chamber therewithin, serviced by at least one port


24


. The chamber of the vessel is preferably sealed. Fluids used for rinsing and/or cleaning the object are passed into the vessel through port


24


until the surfaces of the object are immersed in the fluid. Ultrasonic or megasonic energy can then be applied to at least one of the fluids in the vessel. The rinsing liquid is drained out slowly to help maintain the integrity of the azeotrope layer. The rate of descent is preferably a rate which avoids turbulence which disrupts the surface tension of the azeotrope layer and avoids leaving droplets, generally about 2 inches per minute or less. The displacement step is preferably carried out at a positive pressure of about 1 to 2 psig.




If an aqueous cleaning protocol is used, the treatment fluids are generally hot and/or cool water for rinsing, and a water/surfactant mixture for cleansing. Aqueous cleaning is the preferred method for removing salts and ionic contaminants. In the semi-aqueous cleaning protocol, hydrocarbon solvents containing one or more surfactants are used as cleaning solvents. Solvents which are useful include, for example, water-miscible alcohols and terpenes. Semi-aqueous cleaning can be used to remove both ionic and organic contaminants. Both protocols allow the contaminants to be rinsed using water. Surfactants which are useful in the cleansing step of the aqueous and semi-aqueous protocols include most types of anionic, nonionic or cationic surfactants.




If a non-aqueous protocol is used, organic solvents are used in the rinsing and cleaning steps. A variety of hydrocarbon solvents can be used for this purpose, including acetone, alcohols and trichloroethane, for example. Organic solvents which are particularly useful for cleaning sensitive electronic microparts, for example, are terpene solvents. Terpenes are organic materials which are found in nature in the essential oils of many plants. Terpenes have carbon skeletons made up of isoprene











units joined together in a regular, head-to-tail configuration. Terpene compounds include, for example, citronellol, T-terpinene, isoborneol, camphene and squalene. Terpenes can be monocyclic (e.g., dipentene), dicyclic (e.g., pinene), or acyclic (e.g., myrcene). Terpenes which are particularly useful include those available from Petroferm™, Inc., Fernadina Beach, Florida. Terpene solvents are biodegradable and non-toxic, but many have a pungent odor which limits their usefulness in most systems. However, the present system is completely closed, therefore oderous solvents like terpenes can be used. Other useful solvents include, for example, photoresist strippers which are a mixture of an aliphatic amide, such as N-methyl pyrrolidone, and an amine. Useful photoresist strippers include those manufactured by Advanced Chemical Technologies, Bethlehem, PA. These solvents are hazardous to humans, so exposure must be limited. The present totally enclosed system allows these solvents to be used safely.




The terpene solvents are preferably introduced into the bottom of the vessel, through valve


40


or


42


and port


24


(FIG.


3


), and are also drained out through the bottom of the vessel through port


24


into storage tank


58


or


60


for recycling or reuse. Terpenes can be filtered or distilled to remove contaminants and then reused, for example.




Once the object has been cleaned using the non-aqueous method, it can be rinsed and dried in the same vessel, without leaving a residue, by filling the vessel and immersing the object in an organic solvent which is miscible with the cleaning solvent. The organic solvent removes all of the residual cleaning solvent from the object, even from the involuted, hard-to-reach surfaces. The organic solvent rinse is preferably followed by drying using hot organic vapor as described above, which is added to the vessel under superatmospheric pressure, that is, under pressure of greater than one atmosphere. Organic solvents which are useful for rinsing and drying purposes include compounds having the general formula R—O—R′ wherein R and R′ comprise organic substitutes having between about two to ten carbon atoms. Isopropyl alcohol and acetone are particularly preferred. In the non-aqueous protocol, both organic solvent rinsing followed by organic vapor drying can be used. The drying step can be followed by purging the vessel with a relatively inert gas, such as nitrogen, and/or with air.




Whether solvent or water is used for the cleaning or rinsing steps will be determined primarily by the type of object to be cleaned and the type of contamination to be removed. For example, salts and ionic contaminants are best removed by an aqueous method. A mixture of ionic and organic contaminants can be removed using a semi-aqueous method, and organic contaminants can be effectively removed using the non-aqueous method. In addition, some plastic components may be attacked by certain solvents and are best cleaned using aqueous liquids. For certain metallic objects, however, the use of water may cause flash corrosion, and are best cleaned using organic liquids.




Ultrasonic or megasonic energy can be supplied, for example, by an ultrasonic or megasonic transducers


16


. The sonic transducers


16


can be positioned by or attached to the exterior walls of the vessel, thereby allowing the sonic energy to be directed at the interior of the vessel. The sonic energy causes agitation of the fluid inside the vessel. Ultrasonic energy having a frequency in the range of from about 20 kilohertz (khz) to 40 khz is used. Megasonic energy having a frequency in the range of from about 0.8 megahertz (mhz) to about 1.5 mhz is used for this purpose. Sonic transducers which are useful in the present invention, for example, those available from Ney Corporation, Bloomfield, Conn. under the tradename Prosonic™.




A preferred embodiment of the method of the invention using an aqueous protocol combines the following steps: washing the object by surfactant wet processing and sonic cavitation followed by alcohol vapor drying. Generally, the surfactant wet processing step and sonic cavitation step are performed simultaneously. The first step consists of positioning the object or objects to be cleaned in vessel


12


, which is completely enclosed except for the inlets


22


, and


34


for admitting and draining the fluids. The apparatus is preferably designed to induce plug-flow to the fluid flowing into the vessel. The term “plug-flow ” refers to a liquid flow having a front, transverse to the direction of flow, defined by a generally disc-shaped volume of liquid which contains a concentration gradient produced by the mixing of two liquids at their interface. A configuration for imparting plug-flow is described in detail, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,633,893 the teachings of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The vessel is then closed, and the object is rinsed, with hot water. A surfactant is injected into the water to form a surfactant/water mixture, and ultrasonic energy is applied to vessel


12


by transducers


16


, thereby causing cavitation of the surfactant/water mixture. For this purpose, ultrasonic transducers can be mounted directly to the processing vessel, for example. When the ultrasonic energy is applied to the solution in the vessel, cavitation occurs in the solution which is instrumental in cleaning the immersed component. Ultrasonic energy is applied for a period of time sufficient to ensure that the immersed product is thoroughly cleansed, e.g., 2 to 10 minutes. The time period will depend upon several factors, such as the configuration of the object, the nature of the contaminants to be removed and the degree of contamination. The object is then rinsed again, preferably with a cool water rinse, followed by a hot water rinse. The fluids used to treat the object are allowed to hydraulically fill the vessel from the bottom thereby surrounding the object while minimizing turbulence and thus avoiding the formation of eddies in the fluids. The term “hydraulically full ” as used herein means full of liquid, without gas pockets or phase boundaries. Suitable mechanisms for accomplishing hydraulic filling are described, for example, in U.S Pat. No. 4,795,497, which is hereby incorporated by reference.




The drying step is then performed. In the first step of this process, an ispropyl (IPA) alcohol vapor is directed into the top of the vessel, through line


122


and valves


78


and


76


. The vapor is allowed to fill the vessel as the hot water from the last rinse is removed, thereby displacing it from the top of the vessel. This alcohol vapor drying step is carried out such that substantially all traces of water are removed from the surface of the component including the involuted surfaces which are not outwardly exposed. In this step, the hot rinse water is drained out as the vessel is filled with the IPA vapor. Therefore, as the water level descends, the object emerges from the water into the warm, dry IPA vapor. The rate of descent of the IPA layer is preferably 2 inches per minute or slower. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that surface tension at the water/IPA liquid interface acts to drive particles down and out of the vessel. The IPA vapor condenses on the receding cooler liquid forming a floating layer of IPA. IPA is miscible with water, but distinct layers are maintained due to the surface tension and density differences between the IPA and water. As the IPA/water interface progresses downward, strong surface tension forces strip away all traces of rinse liquid and particles. The alcohol vapor can be then purged from the vessel by introducing an inert gas, such as nitrogen, through valves


80


and


76


.




If necessary or desired, compressed air can be injected into the vessel through valves


80


and


76


to purge any remaining traces of IPA. This process eliminates the problem of flash oxidation of metal parts, which can occur when surfaces which are still wet come in contact with air.




Another embodiment of the method utilizes a semi-aqueous protocol. In this embodiment, the microparts to be cleaned are placed in vessel


12


and the vessel is sealed. The microparts optionally can be prerinsed with water through sprayheads


26


. The vessel is then filled with a solvent via line


82


to immerse the objects completely. The solvent can contain a surfactant, and/or can be a water-miscible solvent. Sonic energy is applied to the vessel. The solvent is drained from the vessel via line


82


and valve


72


if the vessel shown in

FIG. 1

is used, or through drains


36


and valves


38


if the vessel shown in

FIG. 2

is used. The objects are rinsed with hot water. IPA vapor is then introduced into the vessel as described above directly displacing the hot rinse water. The IPA vapor is purged from the vessel with nitrogen, followed by compressed air.




Another preferred embodiment of the method of the invention using a non-aqueous protocol combines the following steps: washing the object with a terpene or mixture of terpenes, and sonic cavitation followed by removal of the terpene solvent with a miscible organic rinsing liquid, preferably IPA or acetone. The first step consists of positioning the object in vessel


12


as described above for the aqueous processing method. Optionally, the object can be pre-cleaned by spraying water or an organic gas or liquid on the parts to remove large dirt particles and oils. The terpene or mixture or terpenes is introduced into vessel


12


through valve


40


and port


24


(FIG.


3


), until the object is immersed in the solvent. The terpene solvent may contain a surfactant. Megasonic or ultrasonic energy is applied to the liquid in the vessel. Once the cleaning step is complete, the terpene solvent is drained back into its reservoir


58


through port


24


and valve


40


. An optional rinsing step can be performed. The vessel is filled with the liquid rinsing solvent, which is admitted through valve


42


. The solvent is selected so that it is miscible with and solubilizes the terpene, thereby removing residual terpene from the surfaces of the object. Water can be used to rinse some water-miscible terpenes. However, solvents, including IPA and acetone, are preferred for this purpose. The solvent is then removed from the vessel by draining it from the vessel through port


24


and through valve


42


into its reservoir


60


for recycling and/or reuse, or through valve


48


for disposal. Hot organic vapor, preferably IPA, is introduced into the top of vessel


12


through valves


78


and


76


such that the vapor displaces the terpene or rinsing solvent. Vessel


12


is then purged with nitrogen gas, to remove all traces of the drying solvent or vapor. Vessel


12


, optionally, is purged with compressed air. Following this protocol, the object is ultraclean, that is, substantially all traces of contaminants including those of submicron size have been removed.




Solvents used in the present method can be reused again and again. Terpenes which are used to clean the microparts can be drained back into the holding tank and then reused, since terpenes generally retain their cleaning power through several runs. The terpenes can be filtered by placing a filtering device in the system or can be recycled by outside of the system by distilling, for example, and then reused. IPA or other rinsing or drying solvents also can be reused filtered or recycled. Means for filtering, distilling or recycling organic solvents are well known in the art.




The combination of washing and/or rinsing of the object while applying sonic energy allows the object to be thoroughly cleaned, even if it has involuted surfaces which are not directly exposed to the cleaning liquid and which are hard to reach. For example, hard disks used in the computer industry must be free of contaminants down to the submicron level, because the head of a hard disk assembly “floats ” above the disk at a distance of about 0.5 microns or less. The presence of submicron particles on the disk can cause the assembly to “crash”. The present method removes substantially all submicron contaminants.




In order to test the cleaning and drying effectiveness of the system, a variety of microparts were tested. Parts which were tested included hard disk heads, complex shaped precision parts, miniature ball bearings and screws. The parts were weighed on a precision balance before and after treatment to determine if any water or other liquid was left behind after treatment. The presence of the liquid would increase the net weight of the parts. The results showed that using the present apparatus and methods, all liquids were removed even from the most complex mechanical structures.




Components were fixtured and placed into a 10-liter stainless steel vessel chamber where the entire cleaning and drying operation was completed. Fluids sequentially filled the chamber entering via a stationary helical spinner located at the bottom of the chamber. Ultrasonic transducers, mounted to the sidewalls of the vessel chamber, caused cavitation of the liquid surrounding the components thereby enhancing the removal of contaminants. These transducers operate to a maximum of 600 watts of power, and are manufactured by J. M. Ney Company of Bloomfield, Conn.




Process fluids flowed in from the bottom through inlet


22


filling the vessel


12


chamber and flowed out the top, through outlet


32


as shown in FIG.


1


. The chamber was just large enough to hold the parts to be cleaned, and was designed such that the fluid dynamics of the water and chemicals entering the bottom filled the chamber as a uniform plug and traverse past the parts to be cleaned in a repeatable manner, as described above.




In several of the cleaning cases, a closed loop system, as shown in

FIG. 1

, continuously circulated cleaning chemicals for uniformity and agitation. Chemical injection was accomplished by applying nitrogen gas to pressurized canisters of chemicals as shown in FIG.


2


. Hot water rinsed the chamber at flow rates of about 1 to 5 gpm. Alternately, in the non-aqueous cleaning processes, no water was used for rinsing. Instead, a drying solvent was used.




Following cleaning and rinsing, warm IPA vapor entered the top of the chamber where it condensed on the surface of the cooler, receding liquid, forming a measurable layer of liquid IPA as described in detail above. At the same time, a pump slowly drained the remaining fluid out the bottom of the chamber, through line


82


or


84


. Prior to opening the chamber, nitrogen gas purged any remaining IPA vapor, eliminating the possibility of flash oxidation.




Various parts from a variety of diverse market segments were cleaned using the present protocols. All parts were actual production components which were cleaned and tested either in the manufacturer's location or in a laboratory. The parts were tested to show the effectiveness of the cleaning equipment by measuring contaminant removal.




The primary contaminants to be removed from the majority of precision components are ionics, organics and particulates. Ionics, such as sodium chloride (NaCl) was removed by deionized water, and residual ionic material was measured with an ionograph to determine the total number of equivalents of NaCl inmicrograms (μg). Organics are non-water soluble films that were removed by solvents, or in some cases, IPA. These were measured by gas chromotography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. Particulate removal was measured by rinsing the part with water and measuring the solute with a liquid particle counter (LPC). Dryness was measured by weighing the sample with an analytical balance prior to and after the cleaning. The part was allowed to cool for several minutes prior to the measurement.




The following examples which illustrate the present invention are not intended to be limiting in any way.




EXAMPLE 1




Disk Drives




The disk-drive market has shown increasing pressure to condense more information into smaller line widths. This has created a need for cleaning all parts having the potential to release submicron-size particles. Many of the components are small and intricate with complex involuted surfaces manufactured from a variety of materials. To add to the problem, cleaning must be accomplished after assembly of many subcomponents. The following is a list a few of the major components comprising a disk-drive assembly:




Disk Aluminum or ceramic substrate w/cobal/nickel & phosphorous layer




Covers Aluminum casting with epoxy paint




Flex Cables Captain (polyamid) with acrylic adhesive




Actuator comb Aluminum, magnesium, or plastic




E-Block Aluminum actuator assembly with ceramic heads




Various 316 SS threaded components hardware




An aqueous protocol was used to clean these parts. The surfactant used was a 1% water solution of Caviclean #2 made by Turco Products, Inc. of Westminster, Cailf. This was chosen because it contains no chlorides which have deleterious effects on the ceramic heads.




Three parts, are actuator assembly, E-block assembly and bumper assembly, Were selected to be cleaned because of their complexity. The parts were weighed with an analytical balance before and after the cleaning operation.




In the evaluation of other cleaning systems, there was difficulty with drying the parts without leaving water droplets behind.




The following recipe was used:















Recipe for Cleaning Disk-Drives

























Fill Vessel with water and 1% surfactant @ 45° C.




1




minute






Soak and apply Ultrasonic energy




4




minutes






Rinse wafers with DI water @ 50° C.




5




minutes






IPA Dry




5




minutes






N2 Purge




1




minute






Air Dry




1




minute






TOTAL




17




minutes














The results are shown in the following Tables:












TABLE A











Actuator Assembly






(Pre and Post Cleaning)













Initial Weight




Final Weight




Net Change






(gms)




(gms)




Δ









5.201




5.201




0.000






5.250




5.250




0.000






5.302




5.300




−0.002






5.287




5.284




−0.003






5.224




5.222




−0.002






5.203




5.201




−0.002






5.309




5.309




0.000






5.264




5.263




−0.001






5.279




5.278




−0.001






5.279




5.280




+0.001






















TABLE A











Actuator Assembly






(Pre and Post Cleaning)













Initial Weight




Final Weight




Net Change






(gms)




(gms)




Δ









5.201




5.201




0.000






5.250




5.250




0.000






5.302




5.300




−0.002






5.287




5.284




−0.003






5.224




5.222




−0.002






5.203




5.201




−0.002






5.309




5.309




0.000






5.264




5.263




−0.001






5.279




5.278




−0.001






5.279




5.280




+0.001






















TABLE C











Bumper Assembly






(Pre and Post Cleaning)













Initial Weight




Final Weight




Net Change






(gms)




(gms)




Δ









0.403




0.405




0.002






0.398




0.400




0.002






0.390




0.391




0.001






0.398




0.399




0.001






0.394




0.398




0.004






0.396




0.396




0.000






0.393




0.394




0.001






0.391




0.392




0.001






0.400




0.401




0.001






0.394




0.398




0.004






0.396




0.397




0.001






0.398




0.399




0.001






0.395




0.396




0.001






0.385




0.385




0.000






0.380




0.383




0.003














EXAMPLE 2




As another example, an assembly consisting of an electromechanical coil of wire and a spring loaded locking device was cleaned using the method. The product was also cleaned for comparison by convectional methods using Freon™ vapor degreasers. The following recipe was used:















Recipe Used in Cleaning






Electromechanical Coils



























Fill Vessel with DI water @ 60° C.




2




minutes







Inject Surfactants to ½% concentration




2




minutes







Circulate chemical in Chamber




1




minute







Ultrasonic energy




2




minutes







Rinse with Hot DI water @ 60° C. to




10




minutes







10 Meg







IPA Dry




15




minutes







N2 Purge




3




minutes







TOTAL




40




minutes















The following results were obtained:




The number of particles rinsed from the part were measured with a Liquid Particle Counter on five samples:









Freon








Vapor





Degreaser


23.1





μg









Aqueous





clean





with





IPA





dry


3.4





μg












The average cleanliness level for five parts cleaned by each method was measured with an Ionograph 500M:









Freon








Vapor





Degreaser



35
,
050





particles

>

5





micron










Aqueous





clean





with





IPA





dry



13
,
217





particles

>

5





micron













EXAMPLE 3




Stainless Steel Screws




In another example, 200 stainless steel screws were placed in a basket to determine the cleaning and drying potential on screws “buried ” with close contact in all dimensions. The parts were cleaned using the following recipe:















Recipe Used in Cleaning Stainless Steel Screws

























Fill Vessel with water & 0.5% surfactant @ 60° C.




2




minutes






Ultrasonice Energy




2




minutes






Rinse wafers with DI water @ 60° C.




5




minutes






IPA Dry




5




minutes






N2 Purge




1




minute






Air Dry




1




minute






TOTAL




16




minutes














Again, the parts were weighed with an analytical balance before and after the cleaning operation. The results are shown in Table D:












TABLE D











Stainless Steel Screws






(Pre and Post Cleaning)















Initial Weight




Final Weight




Net Change







(gms)




(gms)




Δ




















2-56




86.391




86.378




−0.013








87.376




87.355




−0.021








83.771




83.767




−0.004







6-32




174.507




174.482




−0.025








173.764




137.719




−0.045








172.916




172.900




−0.016















The post-cleaning weights were reduced significantly, demonstrating that a measurable number of contaminants were removed from the screws.




EXAMPLE 4




Gyroscopes




Mechanical gyroscopes are manufactured from a variety of metals, plastics, epoxies, and insulated wires. The parts that must be cleaned are small and intricate, and are currently cleaned with Freon™ and 1-1-1 Trichloroethane in ultrasonic degreasers. The real challenge is in the cleaning and drying of the subassemblies, which are susceptible to cleaning solution remaining in blind holes. These assemblies were cleaned and dried in liquid IPA followed by vapor phase IPA. The assemblies were weighed with an analytical balance before and after the cleaning operation. The gyroscopes were cleaned using the following recipe:















Recipe Used in Cleaning Gyroscopes



























Fill Vessel with liquid IPA @ 60° C.




2




minutes







Ultrasonic at 100% power




2




minutes







IPA Dry




4




minutes







N2 Purge




1




minute







Air Dry




1




minute







TOTAL




10




minutes















The results are shown in Table E:












TABLE E











Gyroscope Assemblies






(Pre and Post Cleaning)













Initial Weight




Final Weight




Net Change






(gms)




(gms)




Δ
















17.292




17.285




−0.007






15.832




15.831




0.001














EXAMPLE 5




Ball Bearings




Ball bearing assemblies of stainless steel construction are traditionally cleaned using Freon™ and 1-1-1 trichloroethane in vapor degreasers. Ball bearing assemblies were cleaned using the present protocol with an aqueous solution with DI water and a surf actant, 0.2% Immunol S-6 from the Harry Miller Corporation of Philadelphia, Pa. The assemblies consisted of a ring shaped annular carrier containing a series of ball bearings within the annular cavity.




The bearings were cleaned using the following recipe:















Recipe Used in Cleaning Ball Bearings:

























Fill Vessel with water & 0.2% Immunol S-6 @ 65° C.




1




minute






Soak and apply Ultrasonic energy




10




minutes






Rinse wafers with DI water @ 65° C.




6




minutes






IPA Dry




1




minute






N2 Purge




2




minutes






Air Dry




4




minutes






TOTAL




24




minutes














The degree of cleaning was determined by visual inspection of the internal surfaces of the bearing ring after cannibalizing a cleaned assembly. No particulate contamination should be seen under a 20× power binocular microscope. Secondly, cleaned bearing races were placed under load conditions and tested for torque measurements caused by contamination.












TABLE F











Ball Bearings






Bearing Race Assemblies of Decreasing Size






(Pre and Post Cleaning)













Initial Weight




Final Weight




Net Change






(gms)




(gms)




Δ
















32.003




31.975




−0.028






31.962




31.946




−0.016






15.173




15.167




−0.006






15.228




15.213




−0.015






5.715




5.707




−0.008






5.530




5.532




−0.002






0.526




0.525




−0.001






0.485




0.482




−0.003














The results, shown in Table F, indicate that 100% yield was obtained.




EXAMPLE 6




Drill Bits




Precision drill bits used for drilling printed circuit boards were cleaned using the present protocal. Cutting oils and metal shavings must be removed from surfaces left from the machining operation. Precision drill bits are typically cleaned with Freon™ vapor degreasers. In the present example aqueous based cleaning was done with a surfactant followed by IPA vapor drying, using the following recipe:















Recipe Used in Cleaning Precision Drill Bits



























Fill Vessel with water & 1% surfactant @ 60° C.




2




minutes







Ultrasonic Energy




2




minutes







Rinse wafers with DI water @ 60° C.




5




minutes







IPA Dry




5




minutes







N2 Purge




1




minute







Air Dry




1




minute







TOTAL




16




minutes















In order to eliminate the water rinsing and reduce the recipe time, a non-aqueous recipe using IPA as the rinsing and drying agent and a terpene solvent, BIOACT 121 (Petroferm, Inc.) which is a mixture of orange terpenes were used in the cleaning process. The stainless steel rack of carbide drill bits was dipped into a bath of the BIOACT 121 for five seconds and then immediately placed into the rack into the vessel for cleaning. Liquid IPA was pumped into the vessel and then ultrasonics were applied to the solution. An IPA vapor dry was performed as the liquid IPA drained back into the reservoir. The following recipe was used:















Non-Aqueous Recipe For Drill Bits



























Dip in BIOACT 121




5




seconds







Fill Vessel with liquid IPA @ 60° C.




2




minutes







Ultrasonic




2




minutes







IPA Dry




4




minutes







N2 Purge




1




minute







Air Dry




1




minute







TOTAL




10




minutes















Cleanliness was determined by using a binocular microscope to search for particulate left on the drill bit flutes and the shank. An important consideration is the complete removal of all residual oil, especially at the points of contact with the drill bit and the stainless holder. In both recipes, aqueous and non-aqueous, the desired level of cleanliness was achieved.




EXAMPLE 7




Photoresist Stripping




The solvents traditionally used for photoresist stripping of silicon wafers are highly flammable and very aggressive, and therefore handled with care. Photoresist strippers are typically made up of two components, the base solvent is an aliphatic amide, such as N-Methyl pyrrolidone, and an amine. The problem is that plasma etching processes use to etch the parts leave chlorine atoms in the vertical profile of the etched metal. When exposed to DI water, acids are formed which etch the aluminum-copper metal ions. This is especially problematic in submicron line geometry where critical dimension loss (CD loss) can etch greater than 0.2 microns, which means that the space between metal lines has increased.




In this example a photoresist compound was used: ACTS™-CMI-A (manufactured by Advanced Chemical Technologies, Inc. of Bethlehem, Pa.), which is a positive resist stripper and is specially formulated for the removal of resists on highly corrosion-sensitive metals and metal alloys. 125 mm wafers were coated with photoresist, then cleaned and dried using two different cleaning techniques. In one run the wafers were rinsed with water after the stripping, and in the other IPA vapor was used to dry the stripper without any water. In order to insure that any salts were removed prior to stripping, a rinse and dry operation preceded the stripping operation.






















The photoresist stripping recipes were:









Rinse wafers with DI water @ 50° C.




2




minutes







IPA Dry




5




minutes







Fill Vessel with ACT-CMI-A @ 75° C.




2




minutes







Ultrasonic energy




12




minutes







Drain ACT from vessel




2




minutes







Rinse wafers with DI water @ 50° C.




5




minutes







IPA Dry




10




minutes







N2 Purge




4




minutes







TOTAL




42




minutes







and







Rinse wafers with DI water @ 50° C.




2




minutes







IPA Dry




5




minutes







Fill Vessel with ACT-CMI-A @ 75° C.




2




minutes







Ultrasonic energy




12




minutes







IPA Dry




10




minutes







N2 Purge




4




minutes







TOTAL




35




minutes















After cleaning, the wafers were tested using microfluoressence to determine whether the resist has been completely removed. The CD loss was measured for the water rinse recipe and the IPA dry recipe with no water rinsing. It was determined that the recipe with no post etch rinsing had a lower CD loss. In this case the photoresist stripper solvent was directly displaced with IPA vapor without the need for a water rinse.




EXAMPLE 8




Ceramics




Ceramics are used for everything from hard disk-drives to transducers. They are generally cleaned using Freon™ cleaning operations. In this example, ceramic sonar tranducers were cleaned without the use of an aqueous cleaner because the ceramics absorb water which distorts the resonance of the transducer. After cleaning and drying, the entire unit is encapsulated in an epoxy to prevent water from entering the pores of the ceramic. The following complete solvent clean and dry recipe was used:















Recipe Used in Cleaning Ceramics



























Fill Vessel with liquid IPA @ 60° C.




2




minutes







Ultrasonic at 100% power




2




minutes







IPA Dry




4




minutes







N2 Purge




1




minute







Air Dry




1




minute







TOTAL




10




minutes















Heated liquid IPA filled the vessel and immersed the transducers, then ultrasonics was used to help remove external contaminants. An IPA vapor dry insured that components were completely dry. This process completely eliminated the need for Freon™'s by replacing them with IPA liquid and vapor. Simultaneously, it insured that no water was absorbed into the hydroscopic ceramic surface.




Equivalents




One skilled in the art will be able to ascertain many equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the scope of the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of treating an object having one or more surfaces, comprising:placing the object in a vessel; introducing an organic solvent into the vessel; contacting the surfaces of the object with the organic solvent; and removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor by controlling conditions within the vessel such that substantially no liquid droplets of the organic solvent are left on the surfaces of the object to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic solvent with the fluid.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of introducing the organic solvent comprises introducing an organic solvent comprising an organic photoresist stripping solvent.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of introducing the organic solvent comprises introducing an organic solvent comprising N-methyl pyrrolidone.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of introducing the organic solvent comprises introducing an organic solvent comprising isopropyl alcohol.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of removing the organic solvent comprises directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor, wherein the drying vapor comprises isopropyl alcohol or acetone.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of removing the organic solvent comprises directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor, wherein the drying vapor comprises a compound of the formula R—O—R′, whereinR comprises an organic radical having between 2 to 10 carbon atoms, and R′ comprises an organic radical having between 2 to 10 carbon atoms or hydrogen.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing step comprises removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by pushing the organic solvent downwardly with the fluid comprising the drying vapor.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing step comprises removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by drawing away the organic solvent as the fluid comprising the drying vapor pushes downwardly on the organic solvent.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the placing step comprises placing the object comprising a semiconductor wafer.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the contacting step further comprises applying sonic energy to the organic solvent.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the contacting step further comprises applying sonic energy having a frequency of from about 20 to about 40 kilohertz.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the contacting step further comprises applying sonic energy having a frequency of from about 0.8 to about 1.5 megahertz.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the placing step comprises placing the object in a vessel comprising a sealable enclosure.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of holding the object stationary within the vessel during the steps of the method.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the placing step comprises placing the object in a vessel comprising a sealable enclosure.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the placing step comprises placing a plurality of the objects in a vessel.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing step comprises removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor by controlling the rate at which the fluid directly displaces the organic solvent such that substantially no liquid droplets of the organic solvent are left on the surfaces of the object to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic solvent with the fluid.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing step comprises removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor by controlling pressure in the vessel such that substantially no liquid droplets of the organic solvent are left on the surfaces of the object to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic solvent with the fluid.
  • 19. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing step comprises removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor by controlling the temperature of at least the organic solvent such that substantially no liquid droplets of the organic solvent are left on the surfaces of the object to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic solvent with the fluid.
  • 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the removing step comprises removing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object by directly displacing the organic solvent from the surfaces of the object with a fluid comprising a drying vapor by controlling the temperature of at least the fluid such that substantially no liquid droplets of the organic solvent are left on the surfaces of the object to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic solvent with the fluid.
  • 21. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of purging the vessel of the fluid comprising the drying vapor with an inert gas.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the step of purging comprises purging the vessel of the fluid comprising the drying vapor with an inert gas, wherein the inert gas comprises nitrogen or argon.
  • 23. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of introducing the organic solvent comprises introducing an organic solvent comprising an alcohol.
  • 24. A method of treating a semiconductor wafer having one or more surfaces, comprising:placing the semiconductor wafer in a vessel; introducing an organic photoresist stripping solvent into the vessel; contacting the surfaces of the semiconductor wafer with the organic photoresist stripping solvent; and removing the organic photoresist stripping solvent from the surfaces of the semiconductor wafer by directly displacing the organic photoresist stripping solvent from the surfaces of the semiconductor wafer with a fluid comprising a drying vapor by controlling conditions within the vessel such that substantially no liquid droplets of the organic photoresist stripping solvent are left on the surfaces of the semiconductor wafer to evaporate after the direct displacement of the organic photoresist stripping solvent with the fluid.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 wherein the step of introducing the organic photoresist stripping solvent comprises introducing an organic photoresist stripping solvent comprising N-methyl pyrrolidone.
  • 26. The method of claim 24 wherein the step of removing the organic photoresist stripping solvent comprises directly displacing the organic photoresist stripping solvent from the surfaces of the semiconductor wafer with a fluid comprising a drying vapor, wherein the drying vapor comprises isopropyl alcohol or acetone.
  • 27. The method of claim 24 further comprising the step of purging the vessel of the fluid comprising the drying vapor with an inert gas.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/253,629, filed Feb. 19, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,087, which is a continuation of 08/559,716, filed Nov. 15, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/169,725, filed Dec. 17, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/771,352, filed Oct. 4, 1991, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (123)
Number Name Date Kind
61571 Searle Jan 1867 A
539074 Morrow May 1895 A
539075 Morrow May 1895 A
728148 Wever May 1903 A
872494 Blackburn Dec 1907 A
1040463 Tokheim Oct 1912 A
1066993 Carey Jul 1913 A
1313160 Bianchini Aug 1919 A
1318160 Lindsay Oct 1919 A
1845139 Exley Feb 1932 A
1896004 Lewis et al. Jan 1933 A
2016926 Josepowitz Oct 1935 A
2180274 Bentley Nov 1939 A
2619974 Daley et al. Dec 1952 A
2647839 Zisman et al. Aug 1953 A
2706992 Friedman et al. Apr 1955 A
2959151 Ehrlich Nov 1960 A
2961354 Cleveland Nov 1960 A
2967120 Chaney Jan 1961 A
3005417 Swandy Oct 1961 A
3163149 Ivey Dec 1964 A
3208157 Stark Sep 1965 A
3276458 Iversen et al. Oct 1966 A
3285458 Wojciechowski Nov 1966 A
3343812 Moulton Sep 1967 A
3392780 Brown Jul 1968 A
3437543 Winings Apr 1969 A
3441035 Edwards Apr 1969 A
3443991 Kremm May 1969 A
3469686 Gutsche et al. Sep 1969 A
3481687 Fishman Dec 1969 A
3487948 Haidegger Jan 1970 A
3534862 Shambelan Oct 1970 A
3595252 Conte Jul 1971 A
3607549 Bielefeld et al. Sep 1971 A
3632462 Barrington Jan 1972 A
3746022 Fillion Jul 1973 A
3760822 Evans Sep 1973 A
3813311 Beck et al. May 1974 A
3826377 Bachmann Jul 1974 A
3834349 Dietze et al. Sep 1974 A
3870033 Faylor et al. Mar 1975 A
3871914 Goffredo et al. Mar 1975 A
3877134 Shanahan Apr 1975 A
3881328 Kleimola et al. May 1975 A
3923072 Beaud Dec 1975 A
3923156 Wallestad Dec 1975 A
3926305 Wallestad Dec 1975 A
3954644 Krezanoski May 1976 A
3957531 Tipping et al. May 1976 A
3964957 Walsh Jun 1976 A
3977926 Johnson, Jr. et al. Aug 1976 A
3982943 Feng et al. Sep 1976 A
3998333 Kamada Dec 1976 A
4015615 Weber et al. Apr 1977 A
4017343 Haas Apr 1977 A
4029260 Herrick Jun 1977 A
4039357 Bachmann Aug 1977 A
4056428 Harada et al. Nov 1977 A
4077416 Johnson Mar 1978 A
4079522 Ham Mar 1978 A
4105468 Geshner et al. Aug 1978 A
4111715 Sprengling et al. Sep 1978 A
4132567 Blackwood Jan 1979 A
4153164 Hofsmeister May 1979 A
4159917 Gluck Jul 1979 A
4164477 Whitley Aug 1979 A
4169807 Zuber Oct 1979 A
4193818 Young et al. Mar 1980 A
4197000 Blackwood Apr 1980 A
4211744 Boucher Jul 1980 A
4228902 Schulte Oct 1980 A
4235650 Chang Nov 1980 A
4246101 Selby Jan 1981 A
4256229 Lee Mar 1981 A
4264374 Beyer et al. Apr 1981 A
4280912 Berry Jul 1981 A
4282825 Nagatomo et al. Aug 1981 A
4286541 Blackwood Sep 1981 A
4318749 Mayer Mar 1982 A
4321654 Nakajo et al. Mar 1982 A
4323452 Witzenburg Apr 1982 A
4328081 Faxlin May 1982 A
4358470 Rasmussen Nov 1982 A
4368757 Finger Jan 1983 A
4382824 Helleck May 1983 A
4383884 Rozmus May 1983 A
4395348 Lee Jul 1983 A
4408960 Allen Oct 1983 A
4409999 Pedziwiatr Oct 1983 A
4426246 Kravitz et al. Jan 1984 A
4448750 Fuesting May 1984 A
4477357 Sittenfield Oct 1984 A
4479849 Frantzen Oct 1984 A
4519846 Aigo May 1985 A
4577650 McConnell Mar 1986 A
4589926 Holmstrand May 1986 A
4633893 McConnell et al. Jan 1987 A
4640719 Hayes et al. Feb 1987 A
4643774 Kishida et al. Feb 1987 A
4694527 Yoshizawa Sep 1987 A
4714086 Kishida et al. Dec 1987 A
4722752 Steck Feb 1988 A
4736758 Kusuhara Apr 1988 A
4736760 Coberly et al. Apr 1988 A
4738272 McConnell Apr 1988 A
4740249 McConnell Apr 1988 A
4746397 Maeda et al. May 1988 A
4778532 McConnell et al. Oct 1988 A
4795497 McConnell et al. Jan 1989 A
4816081 Mehta et al. Mar 1989 A
4856544 McConnell Aug 1989 A
4899767 McConnell et al. Feb 1990 A
4902350 Steck Feb 1990 A
4911761 McConnell et al. Mar 1990 A
4917123 McConnell et al. Apr 1990 A
4940494 Petit et al. Jul 1990 A
4960141 Lenck et al. Oct 1990 A
4967777 Takayama et al. Nov 1990 A
4971920 Miyashita et al. Nov 1990 A
4984597 McConnell et al. Jan 1991 A
5143103 Basso et al. Sep 1992 A
6143087 Walter Nov 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
681192 Mar 1964 CA
1205354 Jun 1986 CA
2019578 Dec 1990 CA
0198169 Oct 1986 EP
0 255 167 Feb 1988 EP
0 385 536 Sep 1990 EP
387886 Sep 1990 EP
947699 Jan 1964 GB
58-50740 Mar 1983 JP
58-66334 Apr 1983 JP
58-68933 Apr 1983 JP
58-200540 Nov 1983 JP
59-50530 Mar 1984 JP
59-88827 May 1984 JP
59-107519 Jun 1984 JP
59-117126 Jul 1984 JP
59-127838 Jul 1984 JP
60-229339 Nov 1985 JP
61-23324 Jan 1986 JP
61-78124 Apr 1986 JP
61-95530 May 1986 JP
61-96738 May 1986 JP
61-101032 May 1986 JP
61-112326 May 1986 JP
61-121336 Jun 1986 JP
61-121337 Jun 1986 JP
61-125136 Jun 1986 JP
61-152020 Jul 1986 JP
61-204942 Sep 1986 JP
61-228629 Oct 1986 JP
61-295622 Dec 1986 JP
61-295635 Dec 1986 JP
62-18037 Jan 1987 JP
62-45114 Feb 1987 JP
62-45127 Feb 1987 JP
62-115724 May 1987 JP
62-115725 May 1987 JP
62-136824 Jun 1987 JP
62-169420 Jul 1987 JP
62-195128 Aug 1987 JP
62-198126 Sep 1987 JP
62-2456391987 Oct 1987 JP
63-10528 Jan 1988 JP
63-52415 Mar 1988 JP
63-56921 Mar 1988 JP
63-1119871988 May 1988 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (60)
Entry
Marra et al., “Physical Principles of Marangoni Drying,” Langmuir, vol. 7, No. 11, 1991, pp. 2748-2755.
Leenaars et al., “Marangoni Drying: A New Extremely Clean Drying Process,” Langmuir, vol. 6, No. 11, 1990, pp. 1701-1703.
Koppenbrink et al., “Particle Reduction on Silicon Wafers as a Result of Isopropyl Alcohol Vapor Displacement Drying after Wet Processing,” pp. 235-243 of Part III of “Particles on Surfaces 2—Detection, Adhesion, and Removal” edited by K.L. Mittal (IBM US Technical Education, Thornwood, New York) and published by Plenum Publishing Corporation of New York, New York in Jan. 1990.
Rodel Products Corp., “Wet processing system,” Microcontamination, Feb. 1987, p. 64.
Skidmore, ed., “Cleaning Techniques for Wafer Surfaces,” Semiconductor International, Aug. 1987, pp. 81-85 (plus cover page).
CFM Technologies Inc., “Wet Processing Systems,” Semiconductor International, Feb. 1987, p. 123 (plus cover page and contents page).
CFM Technologies, Inc., “Full-Flow™ Semiconductor Wet Processing,” 1986, pp. 1-18(plus cover page and contents page).
CFM Technologies, “Full-Flow” document, 1985, pp. 1-23 (plus cover page and contents page).
Walter et al., “Stationary In Situ Wet Chemical Processing: The Impact on Wafer Surface Phenomena,” Fine Particle Society, Jul. 1988, p. 1-11.
McConnell, “New Solutions for Automated Wet Processing,” presented at the Fine Particle Society, 1989.
McConnell, “Investigating the Impact of Wafer History on the Removal of Particles from Silicon Surfaces,” Microcontamination, Oct. 1990.
McConnell, “Examining the Effects of Wafer Surface Chemistry on Particle Removal Using Direct-Displacement IPA Drying,” Microcontamination, Feb. 1991.
McConnell, “The Impact of Wafer History on the Removal of Particles from Silicon Surfaces,” (date unknown, but after 1989).
McConnell, “Particle Removal from Oxide, Nitride and Bare Silicon Surfaces Using Direct-Displacement IPA Drying,” presented at the Fine Particle Society, 1991.
Skidmore, “Dry Wafers Cleanly without Spinning,” Microcontamination, contributors Walter, McConnell, and Koppenbrink, Jul. 1989.
Walter et al., “Direct Displacement Wet Processing: How it Affects Wafer Surface Phenomena,” Microcontamination, Jan. 1990.
Walter, “Development of an Integrated Cleaning and Drying Process for Precision Parts,” presented at the Microcontamination Conference, Oct. 1991.
Notice Under 35 U.S.C. § 282 by Defendant Steag Microtech, Inc. dated Oct. 15, 1997.
United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 95-442-RRM, Memorandum Opinion dated Nov. 25, 1997.
United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 95-442-RRM, Judgment, and Amended Order To Enter Judgment And Setting Up Schedule For Parties To Resolve Outstanding Damages Issues each dated Jul. 8, 1998; and Order For Entry Of Judgment And Granting Injunction, and Opinion each dated Jun. 18, 1998.
Principal Brief for Appellant Steag Microtech, Inc. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (which appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 95-442-RRM, Judge Roderick R. McKelvie) dated Sep. 3, 1998.
CFM Technologies, Inc., Ultra-Flow Cleaning Systems, “A Total Solution for Precision Cleaning and Drying,” product brochure (date unknown).
CFM Technologies product brochure, “The Next Generation in Wet Processing,” (date unknown).
CFM Technologies, Inc., “Ultra-Flow™ Precision Cleaning,” product brochure, May 1, 1991.
BIOACT®* Cleaners, “Safe, High Performance, Long-Term Replacement Systems,” Apr., 1991.
Meissner et al., “Surface Tensions of Pure Liquids and Liquid Mixtures,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 39, Mass., vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 2782-2787 (1949).
Sternling et al., “Interfacial Turbulence: Hydrodynamic Instability and the Marangoni Effect,” A.I.Ch.E. Journal, v. 5, no. 4, pp. 514-523 (1959).
Scriven et al., “The Marangoni Effects, Chemical Engineering Department,” Nature, v. 187, n. 4733, pp. 186-188 (1960).
Furnridge, “Studies At Phase Interfaces I. The Sliding Drops on Solid Surfaces And Theory For Spray Retention,” J. Colloid Science 17, pp. 309-324 (1962).
Bernett et al., “Surface Chemical Displaement of Organic Liquids From Solid Surfaces,” J. Phys. Chem., v. 70, n. 4, pp. 1064-1075 (1966).
Hansen et al., “Dynamic Contact and Its Relationship to Forces of Hydrodynamic Origin,” J. Colloid & Interface Science, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 196-207 (1971).
Meeks et al., “Silicon Surface Contamination: Polishing and Cleaning,” J. Electrochem. Soc., v. 120, n. 9, pp. 1241-1246 (1973).
Dussan et al., “On the Motion of a Fluid-Fluid Interface Along a Solid Surface,” J. Fluid Mech., v. 65, pt. 1, pp. 71-95 (1974).
Tolliver, “LSI Wafer Cleaning Techniques,” Solid State Technology, pp. 33-36 (1975).
Dussan, “On The Spreading Of Liquids On Solid Surfaces: Static And Dynamic Contact Lines,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1979, v. 11, pp. 371-400 (1979).
Peters et al., “Removal Of Photoresist Film Residues Wafer Surfaces,” J. Electrochem. Soc., v. 126, n. 5, pp. 883-886 (1979).
Blake et al., “A Maximum Speed Of Wetting,” Nature, v. 282, pp. 489-491 (1979).
Ngan et al., “On The Nature Of The Dynamic Contact Angle: An Experimental Study,” J. Fluid Mech., v. 118, pp. 27-40 (1982).
Ito et al., “Properties Of Passivation Film On Silicon Due to HF-NO2, Mixed Gas Reaction,” Japanese J. of Applied Physics, v. 22, n. 4, pp. 603-610 (1983).
Duffalo et al., “Particulate Contamination and Device Performance,” Solid State Technology, pp. 109-114 (1984).
Hoenig et al., “Improved Contamination Control in Semiconductor Manufacturing Facilities,” Solid State Technology, pp. 119-123 (1984).
Tolliver, “Contamination Control: New Dimensions in VLSI Manufacturing,” Solid State Technology, pp. 129-137 (1984).
Kern, “Purifying SI and SiO2 Surfaces with Hydrogen Peroxide,” Semiconductor International, pp. 94-99 (1984).
Weiss, “Wafer Cleaning Update,” Semiconductor International, pp. 82-85 (1984).
Kugimiya et al., “Self Cleaning of the Si Surface In Molecular Beam Epitaxy,” Electrochemical Soc. Extended Abstracts, v. 85-1, pp. 164-165 (1985).
Kugimiya et al., “Self Cleaning of the Si Surface In Molecular Beam Epitaxy,” Electrochemical Soc., v. 85-7, pp. 35-44 (1985).
Wolf et al., “Wet Processing: Cleaning, Etching and Liftoff,” Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, v. 1, pp. 514-517 (1986).
Iscoff, “The Challenge For Ultrapure Water,” Semiconductor International, pp. 74-82 (1986).
Balasz, “A Summary Of New Methods For Measuring Contaminants In Ultrapure Water,” Microcontamination, pp. 35-62 (1987).
Davison et al., “Ultrapure Piranha Solution for ULSI Applications,” Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts, v. 87-1, pp. 310-311 (1987).
McConnell, “New Solutions For Automated Wet Processing,” Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts, v. 87-2, pp. 902-903 (1987).
Schmidt et al., “The Effect Of Chemical Filtration In A Centrifugal Spray System On Wafer Surface Particle Counts,” Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts, v. 87-2, pp. 902-903 (1987).
Shenai et al., “Contact Resistance of A1 + 1% Si and Mo/LPCVD W Metallizations to n− and p+ Doped Silicon for Power Devices,” Electrochemical Society Extended Abstracts, v. 87-2, pp. 1005-1006 (1987).
Osburn et al., “The Effects of Contamination on Semiconductor Manufacturing Yield,” J. Env. Sci., pp. 45-53 (1988).
Leenaars, “A New Approach to the Removal of Sub-Micron particles from Solid (Silicon) Substrates,” Symposium on Particles on Surfaces: Detection, Adhesion and Removal, pp. 361-372 (1986).
Baker et al., “Water-Displacing Fluids And Their Applications To Reconditioning And Protecting Equipment,” NRL Report C-3364 (1948).
Baker et al., “Cleaning By Surface Displacement of Water And Oils,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, v. 59, n. 6, pp. 29-40 (1967).
Bolster, “Removal of Fluid Contaminants by Surface Chemical Displacement,” Surface Contamination Genesis, Detection and Control, v. 1, pp. 359-368 (1978).
Mishima et al., “High Purity Isopropanol and its Application to Particle-Free Wafer Drying,” 9th ICCS Proceedings 1988, pp. 446-456 (1988).
Ohmi et al., “Wafer Cleaning and Drying Technology,” Ultraclean Technology Symposium, pp. 399-419 (1985).
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/253629 Feb 1999 US
Child 09/669789 US
Parent 08/559716 Nov 1995 US
Child 09/253629 US
Parent 08/169725 Dec 1993 US
Child 08/559716 US
Parent 07/771352 Oct 1991 US
Child 08/169725 US