This document relates to methods and materials involved in treating cancer (e.g., skin cancers such as melanoma). For example, this document relates to methods and materials involved in using complexes containing albumin-containing nanoparticles (e.g., Abraxane® nanoparticles) and antibodies (e.g., anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies such as Avastin®) to treat cancer. This document also relates to methods and materials involved in using Abraxane® in combination with an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody (e.g., Avastin®)to treat skin cancer.
Melanoma is the most serious form of skin cancer. It is a malignant tumor that originates in melanocytes, the cells which produce the pigment melanin that colors skin, hair, and eyes and is heavily concentrated in most moles. While it is not the most common type of skin cancer, melanoma underlies the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. About 48,000 deaths worldwide are registered annually as being due to malignant melanoma. Worldwide, there are about 160,000 new cases of melanoma each year. Melanoma is more frequent in white men and is particularly common in white populations living in sunny climates. Other risk factors for developing melanoma include a history of sunburn, excessive sun exposure, living in a sunny climate or at high altitude, having many moles or large moles, and a family or personal history of skin cancer.
Melanomas fall into four major categories. Superficial spreading melanoma can travel along the top layer of the skin before penetrating more deeply. Lentigo maligna typically appears as a flat or mildly elevated mottled tan, brown, or dark brown discoloration and is found most often in the elderly. Nodular melanoma can occur anywhere on the body as a dark, protuberant papule or a plaque that varies from pearl to gray to black. Acral-lentiginous melanoma, although uncommon, is the most common form of melanoma in blacks. It can arise on palmar, plantar, or subungual skin. Metastasis of melanoma occurs via lymphatics and blood vessels. Local metastasis results in the formation of nearby satellite papules or nodules that may or may not be pigmented. Direct metastasis to skin or internal organs can occur.
This document provides methods and materials involved in treating cancer (e.g., skin cancers such as melanoma). For example, this document provides methods and materials for using complexes containing albumin-containing nanoparticles (e.g., Abraxane® nanoparticles) and antibodies (e.g., anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies such as Avastin®) to treat cancer. This document also provides methods and materials involved in using Abraxane® in combination with an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody (e.g., Avastin®) to treat skin cancer (e.g., melanoma). Abraxane® is available from Celgene Corp. and is a nanoparticle formulation that combines paclitaxel with human albumin. Avastin® is also known as bevacizumab and is available from Genentech Corp. and Roche Corp. Avastin® is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor A. As described herein, in vitro mixing of albumin-containing nanoparticles (e.g., Abraxane® nanoparticles) and antibodies (e.g., bevacizumab, bevacizumab, trastuzamab, or rituxan) can result in the formation of macromolecular complexes, the characteristics of which (e.g., size, antibody content, or chemotherapeutic drug content) can be customized depending on need. In some cases, such macromolecular complexes can retain antibody mediated target binding specificity, can retain or exhibit enhanced chemotherapeutic tumor cell cytotoxicity, and can exhibit no additional toxicity beyond that of Abraxane® nanoparticles alone. As also described herein, contacting Abraxane® with an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody (e.g., Avastin®) prior to administration to a human (e.g., a human melanoma cancer patient) can result in a complex that, when administered as a complex, has an increased ability to treat melanoma as compared to a treatment regimen that includes administering Abraxane® and the anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody separately in a manner that does not form Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes.
The methods and materials provided herein can be used to increase the progression-free survival rate in skin cancer patients. Increasing progression-free survival can allow skin cancer patients to live longer.
In general, one aspect of this document features a method for treating a mammal having skin cancer. The method comprises, or consists essentially of, administering to the mammal a composition containing Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes (or complexes of (a) an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody and (b) human albumin-containing nanoparticles having an agent other than placitaxel) under conditions wherein the length of progression-free survival is increased. The mammal can be a human. The skin cancer can be melanoma. The skin cancer can be stage IV melanoma. In some cases, a composition comprising Abraxane®/Avastin® complexes can be administered to the mammal. The composition can comprise an alkylating agent. The alkylating agent can be a platinum compound. The platinum compound can be carboplatin. The anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody can be a humanized antibody. The anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody can be bevacizumab. The composition can be administered by injection. The progression-free survival can be increased by 25 percent. The progression-free survival can be increased by 50 percent. The progression-free survival is increased by 75 percent. The progression-free survival can be increased by 100 percent. The composition can be administered under conditions wherein the time to progression is increased.
In another aspect, this document features a method for treating a mammal having cancer. The method comprises, or consists essentially of, administering, to the mammal, a composition comprising albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes, wherein the average diameter of the complexes is greater than 1 μm (e.g., between 1.1 μm and 5 μm, between 1.5 μm and 5 μm, between 4.5 and 20 μm, or between 5 and 20 μm). The mammal can be a human. The cancer can be skin cancer. The skin cancer can be melanoma. The skin cancer can be stage IV melanoma. The albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can be Abraxane®/Avastin® complexes. The composition or the albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can comprise an alkylating agent. The alkylating agent can be a platinum compound. The platinum compound can be carboplatin. The antibodies of the albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can be anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies. The anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies can be humanized antibodies. The anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies can be bevacizumab. The composition can be administered by injection. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 25 percent. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 50 percent. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 75 percent. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 100 percent. The administration of the composition can be under conditions wherein the median time to progression for a population of mammals with the cancer is at least 150 days. The administration of the composition can be under conditions wherein the median time to progression for a population of mammals with the cancer is at least 165 days. The administration of the composition can be under conditions wherein the median time to progression for a population of mammals with the cancer is at least 170 days. The average diameter of the complexes can be from 1.1 μm to 5 μm. The average diameter of the complexes can be from 2 μm to 5 μm. The average diameter of the complexes can be from 3 μm to 5 μm. The average diameter of the complexes can be from 5 μm to 50 μm. The average diameter of the complexes can be from 10 μm to 50 μm. The average diameter of the complexes can be from 5 μm to 25 μm.
In another aspect, this document features a method for treating a mammal having cancer. The method comprises, or consists essentially of, administering, to the mammal, a composition comprising albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes, wherein the average diameter of at least 5 percent of the complexes of the composition is greater than 1 μm. The mammal can be a human. The cancer can be skin cancer. The skin cancer can be melanoma. The skin cancer can be stage IV melanoma. The albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can be Abraxane®/Avastin® complexes. The composition or the albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can comprise an alkylating agent. The alkylating agent can be a platinum compound. The platinum compound can be carboplatin. The antibodies of the albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can be anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies. The anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies can be humanized antibodies. The anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies can be bevacizumab. The composition can be administered by injection. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 25 percent. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 50 percent. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 75 percent. The administration of the composition can be effective to increase progression-free survival by 100 percent. The administration of the composition can be under conditions wherein the median time to progression for a population of mammals with the cancer is at least 150 days. The administration of the composition can be under conditions wherein the median time to progression for a population of mammals with the cancer is at least 165 days. The administration of the composition can be under conditions wherein the median time to progression for a population of mammals with the cancer is at least 170 days. The average diameter of at least 5 percent of said complexes of said composition can be from 1.1 μm to 5 μm. The average diameter of at least 5 percent of said complexes of said composition can be from 2 μm to 5 μm. The average diameter of at least 5 percent of said complexes of said composition can be from 3 μm to 5 μm. The average diameter of at least 5 percent of said complexes of said composition can be from 5 μm to 50 μm. The average diameter of at least 5 percent of said complexes of said composition can be from 10 μm to 50 μm. The average diameter of at least 5 percent of said complexes of said composition can be from 5 μm to 25 μm. The average diameter of at least 10 percent of said complexes of said composition can be greater than 1 μm. The average diameter of at least 50 percent of said complexes of said composition can be greater than 1 μm. The average diameter of at least 75 percent of said complexes of said composition can be greater than 1 μm. The average diameter of at least 90 percent of said complexes of said composition can be greater than 1 μm.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used to practice the invention, suitable methods and materials are described below. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
This document provides methods and materials involved in treating cancer (e.g., skin cancers such as melanoma). For example, this document provides methods and materials for using complexes containing albumin-containing nanoparticles (e.g., Abraxane® nanoparticles) and antibodies (e.g., anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies such as Avastin®) to treat cancer.
The methods and materials provided herein can be used to treat any type of cancer. For example, the methods and materials provided herein can be used to treat skin cancer (e.g., melanoma) and breast cancer. In some cases, the methods and materials provided herein can be used to treat cancer (e.g., skin cancer) in any type of mammal including, without limitation, mice, rats, dogs, cats, horses, cows, pigs, monkeys, and humans. When treating skin cancer, any type of skin cancer, such as melanoma, can be treated using the methods and materials provided herein. For example, stage I, stage II, stage III, or stage IV melanoma can be treated. In some cases, a lymph node positive, a lymph node negative, or a metastatic melanoma can be treated as described herein.
In some cases, complexes containing albumin-containing nanoparticles (e.g., Abraxane® nanoparticles) and antibodies (e.g., anti-VEGF polypeptide antibodies such as Avastin®) can be designed to have an average diameter that is greater than 1 μm. For example, appropriate concentrations of albumin-containing nanoparticles and antibodies can be used such that complexes having an average diameter that is greater than 1 μm are formed. In some cases, manipulations such as centrifugation can be used to form preparations of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes where the average diameter of those complexes is greater than 1 μm. In some cases, the preparations of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein can have an average diameter that is between 1 μm and 5 μm (e.g., between 1.1 μm and 5 μm, between 1.5 μm and 5 μm, between 2 μm and 5 μm, between 2.5 μm and 5 μm, between 3 μm and 5 μm, between 3.5 μm and 5 μm, between 4 μm and 5 μm, between 4.5 μm and 5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 4.5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 4 μm, between 1.1 μm and 3.5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 3 μm, between 1.1 μm and 2.5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 2 μm, or between 1.1 μm and 1.5 μm). Preparations of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein having an average diameter that is between 1 μm and 5 μm can be administered systemically (e.g., intravenously) to treat cancers located within a mammal's body. In some cases, the preparations of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein can have an average diameter that is between 5 μm and 50 μm (e.g., between 6 μm and 50 μm, between 7 μm and 50 μm, between 10 μm and 50 μm, between 15 μm and 50 μm, between 20 μm and 50 μm, between 25 μm and 50 μm, between 30 μm and 50 μm, between 35 μm and 50 μm, between 5 μm and 45 μm, between 5 μm and 40 μm, between 5 μm and 35 μm, between 5 μm and 30 μm, between 5 μm and 25 μm, between 5 μm and 20 μm, between 5 μm and 15 μm, or between 10 μm and 30 μm). Preparations of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein having an average diameter that is between 5 μm and 50 μm can be administered into a tumor (e.g., intratumorally) or in a region of a tumor located within a mammal's body.
In some cases, a preparation of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein can have greater than 60 percent (e.g., greater than 65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, or 99 percent) of the complexes having a diameter that is between 1 μm and 5 μm (e.g., between 1.1 μm and 5 μm, between 1.5 μm and 5 μm, between 2 μm and 5 μm, between 2.5 μm and 5 μ,m, between 3 μm and 5 μm, between 3.5 μm and 5 μm, between 4 μm and 5 μm, between 4.5 μm and 5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 4.5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 4 μm, between 1.1 μm and 3.5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 3 μm, between 1.1 μm and 2.5 μm, between 1.1 μm and 2 μm, or between 1.1 μm and 1.5 μm). Preparation of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein having greater than 60 percent (e.g., greater than 65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, or 99 percent) of the complexes with a diameter that is between 1 μm and 5 μm can be administered systemically (e.g., intravenously) to treat cancers located within a mammal's body. In some cases, a preparation of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein can have greater than 60 percent (e.g., greater than 65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, or 99 percent) of the complexes having a diameter that is between 5 μm and 50 μm (e.g., between 6 μm and 50 μm, between 7 μm and 50 μm, between 10 μm and 50 μm, between 15 μm and 50 μm, between 20 μm and 50 μm, between 25 μm and 50 μm, between 30 μm and 50 μm, between 35 μm and 50 μm, between 5 μm and 45 μm, between 5 μm and 40 μm, between 5 μm and 35 μm, between 5 μm and 30 μm, between 5 μm and 25 μm, between 5 μm and 20 μm, between 5 μm and 15 μm, or between 10 μm and 30 μm). Preparation of albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein having greater than 60 percent (e.g., greater than 65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, or 99 percent) of the complexes with a diameter that is between 5 μm and 50 μm can be administered into a tumor (e.g., intratumorally) or in a region of a tumor located within a mammal's body.
In general, albumin-containing nanoparticles such as Abraxane® can be contacted with an antibody such as an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody (e.g., Avastin®) prior to administration to a human to form an albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complex (e.g., an Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complex). Any appropriate albumin-containing nanoparticle preparation and any appropriate antibody can be used as described herein. For example, Abraxane® nanoparticles can be used as described herein. Examples of antibodies that can be used to form albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes as described herein include, without limitation, bevacizumab (Avastin®), trastuzamab, and rituxan. For example, an appropriate dose of Abraxane® and an appropriate dose of Avastin® can be mixed together in the same container. This mixture can be incubated at an appropriate temperature (e.g., room temperature, between 15° C. and 30° C., between 15° C. and 25° C., between 20° C. and 30° C., or between 20° C. and 25° C.) for a period of time (e.g., about 30 minutes, or between about 5 minutes and about 60 minutes, between about 5 minutes and about 45 minutes, between about 15 minutes and about 60 minutes, between about 15 minutes and about 45 minutes, between about 20 minutes and about 400 minutes, or between about 25 minutes and about 35 minutes) before being administered to a cancer patient (e.g., a melanoma patient). In some cases, Abraxane® can be contacted with an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody by injecting both Abraxane® and the anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody either individually or as a pre-mixed combination into an IV bag containing an IV bag solution. The contents of the IV bag including Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes can be introduced into the patient to be treated.
In some cases, albumin-containing nanoparticles such as Abraxane® can be contacted with an antibody such as an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody (e.g., Avastin®) to form albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) that are stored prior to being administered to a cancer patient (e.g., a melanoma patient). For example, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes can be formed as described herein and stored for a period of time (e.g., days or weeks) prior to being administered to a cancer patient.
Any appropriate method can be used to obtain albumin-containing nanoparticles such as Abraxane® and an antibody such as an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody. For example, Abraxane® can be obtained from Celgene Corp. or as described elsewhere (U.S. Pat. No. 6,537,579). Avastin® can be obtained from Genentech Corp. or Roche Corp. or as described elsewhere (U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,297).
In some cases, the combination of an albumin-containing nanoparticle such as Abraxane® and an antibody such as anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody can include one or more other agents such as an alkylating agent (e.g., a platinum compound). Examples of platinum compounds that can be used as an alkylating agent include, without limitation, carboplatin (Paraplatin®), cisplatin (Platinol®), oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®), and BBR3464. Examples of other agents that can be included within an albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complex provided herein include, without limitation, bendamustine, bortezomib, cabazitaxel, chlorambucil, dasatinib, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, erlotinib, etoposide, everolimus, gefitinib, idarubicin, hydroxyurea, imatinib, lapatinib, melphalan, mitoxantrone, nilotinib, oxaliplatin, pazopanib, pemetrexed, romidepsin, sorafenib, sunitinib, teniposide, vinblastine, and vinorelbine.
Any appropriate method can be used to administer an albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complex provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) to a mammal. For example, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes such as Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes can be administered via injection (e.g., subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, or intrathecal injection).
Before administering a composition containing an albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complex provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) to a mammal, the mammal can be assessed to determine whether or not the mammal has cancer (e.g., skin cancer). Any appropriate method can be used to determine whether or not a mammal has cancer (e.g., skin cancer). For example, a mammal (e.g., human) can be identified as having skin cancer using standard diagnostic techniques. In some cases, a tissue biopsy can be collected and analyzed to determine whether or not a mammal has skin cancer.
After identifying a mammal as having cancer (e.g., skin cancer), the mammal can be administered a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes). For example, a composition containing Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes can be administered prior to or in lieu of surgical resection of a tumor. In some cases, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered following resection of a tumor.
A composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered to a mammal in any appropriate amount, at any appropriate frequency, and for any appropriate duration effective to achieve a desired outcome (e.g., to increase progression-free survival). In some cases, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered to a mammal having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) to reduce the progression rate of the cancer (e.g., melanoma) by 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, or more percent. For example, the progression rate can be reduced such that no additional cancer progression is detected. Any appropriate method can be used to determine whether or not the progression rate of cancer (e.g., skin cancer) is reduced. For example, the progression rate of skin cancer can be assessed by imaging tissue at different time points and determining the amount of cancer cells present. The amounts of cancer cells determined within tissue at different times can be compared to determine the progression rate. After treatment as described herein, the progression rate can be determined again over another time interval. In some cases, the stage of cancer (e.g., skin cancer) after treatment can be determined and compared to the stage before treatment to determine whether or not the progression rate was reduced.
In some cases, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered to a mammal having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) under conditions where progression-free survival is increased (e.g., by 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, or more percent) as compared to the median progression-free survival of corresponding mammals having untreated cancer (e.g., untreated skin cancer) or the median progression-free survival of corresponding mammals having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) treated with Abraxane® and an antibody (e.g., an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody) without forming Abraxane®/antibody complexes (e.g., without forming Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes). In some cases, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered to a mammal having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) to increase progression-free survival by 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, or more percent as compared to the median progression-free survival of corresponding mammals having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) and having received Abraxane® or an antibody (e.g., an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody) alone. Progression-free survival can be measured over any length of time (e.g., one month, two months, three months, four months, five months, six months, or longer).
In some cases, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered to a mammal having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) under conditions where the 8-week progression-free survival rate for a population of mammals is 65% or greater (e.g., 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80% or greater) than that observed in a population of comparable mammals not receiving a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes). In some cases, a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be administered to a mammal having cancer (e.g., skin cancer) under conditions where the median time to progression for a population of mammals is at least 150 days (e.g., at least 155, 160, 163, 165, or 170 days).
An effective amount of a composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be any amount that reduces the progression rate of cancer (e.g., skin cancer), increases the progression-free survival rate, or increases the median time to progression without producing significant toxicity to the mammal. Typically, an effective amount of Abraxane® can be from about 50 mg/m2 to about 150 mg/m2 (e.g., about 80 mg/m2), and an effective amount of an anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody such as bevacizumab can be from about 5 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg (e.g., about 10 mg/kg). If a particular mammal fails to respond to a particular amount, then the amount of Abraxane® or anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody can be increased by, for example, two fold. After receiving this higher concentration, the mammal can be monitored for both responsiveness to the treatment and toxicity symptoms, and adjustments made accordingly. The effective amount can remain constant or can be adjusted as a sliding scale or variable dose depending on the mammal's response to treatment. Various factors can influence the actual effective amount used for a particular application. For example, the frequency of administration, duration of treatment, use of multiple treatment agents, route of administration, and severity of the cancer (e.g., skin cancer) may require an increase or decrease in the actual effective amount administered.
The frequency of administration can be any frequency that reduces the progression rate of cancer (e.g., skin cancer), increases the progression-free survival rate, or increases the median time to progression without producing significant toxicity to the mammal. For example, the frequency of administration can be from about once a month to about three times a month, or from about twice a month to about six times a month, or from about once every two months to about three times every two months. The frequency of administration can remain constant or can be variable during the duration of treatment. A course of treatment with a composition containing Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes can include rest periods. For example, a composition containing Abraxane®/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes can be administered over a two week period followed by a two week rest period, and such a regimen can be repeated multiple times. As with the effective amount, various factors can influence the actual frequency of administration used for a particular application. For example, the effective amount, duration of treatment, use of multiple treatment agents, route of administration, and severity of the skin cancer may require an increase or decrease in administration frequency.
An effective duration for administering a composition provided herein can be any duration that reduces the progression rate of cancer (e g , skin cancer), increases the progression-free survival rate, or increases the median time to progression without producing significant toxicity to the mammal. Thus, the effective duration can vary from several days to several weeks, months, or years. In general, the effective duration for the treatment of skin cancer can range in duration from several weeks to several months. In some cases, an effective duration can be for as long as an individual mammal is alive. Multiple factors can influence the actual effective duration used for a particular treatment. For example, an effective duration can vary with the frequency of administration, effective amount, use of multiple treatment agents, route of administration, and severity of the cancer (e.g., skin cancer).
A composition containing albumin-containing nanoparticle/antibody complexes provided herein (e.g., Abraxane®)/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes) can be in any appropriate form. For example, a composition provided herein can be in the form of a solution or powder with or without a diluent to make an injectable suspension. A composition also can contain additional ingredients including, without limitation, pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles. A pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle can be, for example, saline, water, lactic acid, mannitol, or combinations thereof.
After administering a composition provided herein to a mammal, the mammal can be monitored to determine whether or not the cancer (e.g., skin cancer) was treated. For example, a mammal can be assessed after treatment to determine whether or not the progression rate of melanoma was reduced (e.g., stopped). As described herein, any method can be used to assess progression and survival rates.
In some cases, nanoparticles containing albumin (e.g., nanoparticles with an albumin shell) and an agent other than placitaxel can be used as described herein in place of or in combination with Abraxane®. For example, albumin-containing nanoparticles designed to carry a cancer chemotherapeutic agent can be used to form nanoparticle/anti-VEGF polypeptide antibody complexes that can be used as described herein. An example of such a cancer chemotherapeutic agent includes, without limitation, vinblastine.
The invention will be further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.
Abraxane® (1 mg/mL) and Avastin (25 mg/mL) were stored at 4° C. 10 μg (10 μL) of Abraxane® nanoparticles and 500 μg (20 μL) of Avastin were mixed in a total volume of 30 μL. The Abraxane® and Avastin were incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes.
After incubation, the Abraxane® nanoparticles were spun and washed three times with 1× PBS to eliminate unbound bevacizumab. The nanoparticles were spun at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes and resuspended in 50 μL of 1× PBS.
100 ng or 500 ng of VEGF was added to each tube for 30 minutes at room temperature, and the washes were repeated to eliminate unbound VEGF. PE anti-human VEGF was added at a 1:50 dilution, and the particles were once again incubated and washed. Visualization was done by flow cytometry, and percentage of PE (VEGF) positive particles was determined (
Abraxane® nanoparticles were mixed with varying concentrations of bevacizumab (0.5, 5, 10, and 25 mg/mL). The particles were viewed by light microscopy at 4 and 24 hours after mixing. The macromolecular size of the ABX:BEV complexes was dependent on the concentration of the bevacizumab added and the Abraxane nanoparticles (
Bevacizumab was added to Abraxane® nanoparticles in varying concentrations (0.5, 5, 10, 25 mg/mL) and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature to allow complex formation. Abraxane® nanoparticles alone, ABX:BEV complexes, and 2 μm standard beads were visualized by flow cytometry. The complex size increased with increased concentrations of bevacizumab (
In another study, Abraxane® nanoparticles and bevacizumab were incubated together for 4 hours and overnight at 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL. Abraxane® nanoparticles alone were also incubated for 4 hours and overnight as a control. After the allotted time was reached, the complexes were spun down at 7500 RPM for 5 minutes. The supernatants were collected and mixed 1:1 with Laemmli buffer and boiled at 100 degrees for 3 minutes. 20 μL of sample was loaded onto a 7.5% Tris-HCl Criteron gel. A high range molecular weight marker (BioRad) was added for size determination. The gel was run for 3 hours at 75V.
After the gel ran to completion, the gel was placed in a transfer cassette so the proteins could be moved onto a PVDF membrane. The transfer took place overnight at 4° C. running at 20V. The membrane was removed and rocked in TBST containing 5% milk to block for 3 hours at room temperature. The primary antibodies used were Rabbit anti-Taxol (1:500 dilution) and goat anti-mouse IgG-Fab specific-HRP conjugated (1:500 dilution). Antibodies were diluted into 10 mL of TBST with 5% milk. Primary antibodies were allowed to bind overnight at 4° C. while rocking
Primary antibodies were removed, and the membranes were washed three times for 10 minutes with TBST. The taxol blot was incubated in a 1:1000 dilution of secondary anti-rabbit IgG-HRP for 1.5 hours rocking at room temperature. The anti-mouse IgG (Bevacizumab) membrane was incubated in ECL detection reagent (GE Amershem) for 5 minutes before it was exposed to film. Membrane was exposed for 10 seconds, 1 minute, and 5 minutes.
After the incubation in secondary antibody, the taxol blot was washed with TBST for 10 minutes three times. The membrane was then placed in ECL detection reagent for 5 minutes and exposed to film. The exposure times were 1 second, 2 seconds, and 10 seconds.
The IgG blot was specific for the mouse portion of the bevacizumab humanized antibody. A clear concentration dependent increase from complexes mixed at 1 mg/mL to 10 mg/mL was observed (
In another study, Abraxane® nanoparticles and bevacizumab were incubated for various times (1, 4, and 12 hours), and the particle size distribution of the resulting complexes was determined relative to Abraxane® nanoparticles alone using the Malvern Mastersizer 2000E. The size of the complexes generated was a function of antibody concentration and incubation time (
In
In another study, Abraxane® nanoparticles were dissolved at a concentration of 20 mg/mL, and bevacizumab was added at a final concentration of 16, 24, or 32 mg/mL. The mixtures were incubated at room temperature for various times (1, 2, and 4 hours). After this incubation, the mixture was diluted 1:4 (final concentration of Abraxane=5 mg/mL; final concentrations of bevacizumab=4, 6, or 8 mg/mL). The particle size distribution of the resulting complexes was determined relative to Abraxane® nanoparticles alone using the Malvern Mastersizer 2000E. The size of the complexes generated was a function of antibody concentration and incubation time (
Abraxane and bevacizmab were mixed and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature to allow complex formation. Mice were injected with 100 μL of the complexes containing 5 mg of Abraxane and 1 mg of bevacizumab in the dorsal tail vein. Injection of the complexes did not harm any mice.
10 μL (10 μg) of Abraxane® was added to eppendorf tubes, and 500 μg (25 μL) of avastin was added and resuspended in a final volume of 50 μL. Human plasma was titrated using 1:2 dilutions (1:2, 1:4, 1:8, or 1:16). 50 μL of plasma and 50 μL of each plasma titration were added to the tubes with Abraxane® and avastin. In some cases, human serum albumin (500 μg, 50 μg, 5 μg, 0.5 μg, or 0.05 μg/mL) or human polyclonal immunoglobulin (500 μg, 50 μg, 5 μg, 0.5 μg, and 0.05 μg/mL) was added to the tubes in place of human plasma.
After a 30 minute incubation at room temperature, the Abraxane® nanoparticles were washed in 1× PBS twice. 100 ng of VEGF was added to each tube for 30 minutes at room temperature, and the washes were repeated. PE anti-human VEGF was added at a 1:50 dilution, and particles were once again incubated and washed. Visualization was done by flow cytometry, and percentage of PE (VEGF) positive particles was determined (
The VEGF producing melanoma tumor cell line, A375, was incubated overnight in the presence of Abraxane® nanoparticles only, Abraxane®/Herceptin (non-VEGF targeting) complexes, and Abraxane®/Avastin® (ABX:BEV; VEGF targeting) complexes. Increasing doses of drug were added to the cells to give 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL of taxol. After the overnight incubation, cell proliferation was determined by measuring the level of DNA synthesis. A higher level of cell toxicity (less DNA synthesis) of cells incubated with the VEGF targeting complexes (ABX:BEV) relative the ABX alone and non-VEGF targeted complexes (ABX:HER) (
Abraxane®/Avastin® complexes were fluorescently labeled such that both the albumin of the Abraxane® and the bevacizumab were directly labeled with a fluorescent marker. The complexes were visualized by flow cytometry after 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 24, and 48 hours in 0.9% saline at room temperature and after 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes in human plasma at 37° C. The complexes were stable in saline at room temperature with only about 10% loss at 24 hours (
Abraxane® nanoparticles were incubated with cisplatin (cisplatinum or cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) for 30 minutes at 37° C. The particles were spun, and the supernatant was tested by HPLC to determine how much free cisplatin was in suspension. Cisplatin spontaneously bound to the Abraxane® nanoparticles, and the amount remaining in suspension after the 30 minute incubation with the Abraxane® nanoparticles was only about 30% of the original concentration (
In another experiment, Abraxane®/cisplatin complexes were generated as described above and added to A375 tumor cells. After an overnight incubation, proliferation of the cells was measured by determining the level of DNA synthesis. The toxicity of the Abraxane®/cisplatin complexes was measured relative to the two drugs individually. The Abraxane®/cisplatin complexes were more toxic to cells (lower level of DNA synthesis) than Abraxane® alone but less toxic than cisplatin alone (
Three therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab, trastuzamab, and rituxan) were fluorescently labeled and incubated with fluorescently labeled Abraxane® nanoparticles. The particles were spun down, washed, and visualized by flow cytometry. All three of these recombinant therapeutic antibodies spontaneously formed complexes with Abraxane® nanoparticles (
Taken together, the results provided herein demonstrate that in vitro mixing of albumin-containing nanoparticles (e.g., Abraxane® nanoparticles) and antibodies (e.g., bevacizumab, trastuzamab, or rituxan) leads to macromolecular complex formation, the characteristics of which (e.g., size, antibody content, or chemotherapeutic drug content) can be customized depending on need. These results also demonstrate that the macromolecular complexes retain antibody mediated target binding specificity, retain or exhibit enhanced chemotherapeutic tumor cell cytotoxicity, and exhibit no additional toxicity beyond that of Abraxane® nanoparticles alone.
The following was performed to determine what happens to Abraxane®/Avastin® complexes in serum over time. 6 mg or 8 mg of Avastin® were bound to Abraxane® for 30 minutes at room temperature. The complexes were incubated with serum for 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes. After this incubation, the serum/complex solution was spun down at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4° C. The supernatants were collected, separated using gel electrophoresis, and analyzed via Western blotting with an anti-paclitaxel antibody and an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody.
Incubation in the presence of serum resulted in complex disassociation, not disintegration (
The following was performed to determine if bevacizumab binds free paclitaxel. 4 mg of bevacizumab was incubated with paclitaxel (0.1, 0.5, 1, or 2 mg) for 30 minutes at room temperature. After this incubation, the mixtures were separated using gel electrophoresis and analyzed via Western blotting with an anti-paclitaxel antibody and an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody.
Bevacizumab did not bind free paclitaxel (
It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/609,689, filed Mar. 12, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/484,151, filed May 9, 2011. The disclosures of the prior applications are considered part of (and are incorporated by reference in) the disclosure of this application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4350687 | Lipton et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 5026772 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5116944 | Sivam et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5216130 | Line et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5252713 | Morgan, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5260308 | Poduslo et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5728541 | Kornblith | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736137 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 6054297 | Carter et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6147060 | Zasloff et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6416967 | Kornblith | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6537579 | Desai et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6933129 | Kornblith | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7041301 | Markovic | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7112409 | Blumenthal et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7678552 | Kornblith | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7731950 | Noessner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7758891 | Desai et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7820788 | Desai et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7906121 | Chang et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7923536 | Desai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8034375 | Desai et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8119129 | Jure-Kunkel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8138229 | Desai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8268348 | Desai et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8314156 | Desai et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8344177 | Neri et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8735394 | Desai et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8853260 | Desai et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9101543 | Desai et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9387244 | Markovic | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9427477 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9446148 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9533058 | Markovic et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9555128 | Markovic et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9566350 | Markovic et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9757453 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 10279035 | Markovic et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10279036 | Markovic | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10300016 | Markovic et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10307482 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10322084 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10376579 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10376580 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10391055 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10406224 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10413606 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10420839 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10441656 | Markovic et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10471145 | Markovic et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10478495 | Markovic et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10493150 | Markovic et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10507243 | Markovic et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10561726 | Swiss et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10596111 | Markovic et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10596112 | Markovic et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10610484 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10618969 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10624846 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10668151 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 20020111362 | Rubinfeld | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20040005318 | Davis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040077601 | Adams et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050032699 | Holash et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20060165652 | Dudley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070020232 | Rossignol et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148135 | Dang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166388 | Desai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20090004118 | Nie et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100047234 | Markovic | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092489 | Van De Winkel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112077 | Desai | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172835 | Ruoslahti et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260679 | Shachar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100311679 | Olson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110014117 | Wang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110076273 | Adler et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110097340 | Ramachandra et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104143 | Buchsbaum et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150902 | Markovic | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262525 | Wang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120263739 | Langer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120315273 | Markovic | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130028895 | Wulf | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130071403 | Rolland et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130149238 | Kavlie et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130164816 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140056909 | Markovic | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140155344 | Desai et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140161819 | Hann et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140178486 | Markovic | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140302017 | Markovic | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140314774 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150050356 | Desai et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150246122 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160095942 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160184229 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160184452 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160184453 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160235860 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160250351 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160256431 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160263241 | Markovic et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310610 | Markovic et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160324964 | Markovic et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160338961 | Markovic et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160339118 | Markovic et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170021023 | Dikstein | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170021032 | Markovic et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170021034 | Markovic et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170071897 | Markovic et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095574 | Swiss et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100492 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170106087 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128408 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128583 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128584 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128585 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128586 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128587 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128588 | Markovic et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182174 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182175 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182180 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182183 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182184 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182185 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182186 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170182187 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196831 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196832 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196833 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170216453 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170232102 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170291952 | Markovic et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180235886 | Markovic et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20190022188 | Markovic | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190038761 | Markovic et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190099498 | Markovic et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190184032 | Markovic et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190201546 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190202916 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216944 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1913947 | Apr 2008 | EP |
| 3204413 | Aug 2017 | EP |
| 3533870 | Sep 2019 | EP |
| S60146833 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| S6178731 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| H04504253 | Jul 1992 | JP |
| 2001072589 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 1020090078330 | Jul 2009 | KR |
| 2011133819 | Feb 2013 | RU |
| 8910398 | Nov 1989 | WO |
| 9749390 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| 9900113 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| 9951248 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 2004022097 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2004096224 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2006034455 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006089290 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2007027819 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007027941 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2008047272 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008057561 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008057562 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008112987 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| 2009043159 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009055343 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2010003057 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010017216 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010118365 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010124009 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010136492 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2012048223 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012088388 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012154861 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2014009774 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014037422 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| 2014055415 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014105644 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| 2014123612 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2015048520 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015191969 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2015195476 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2016057554 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| 2016059220 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| 2016089873 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| 2017031368 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| 2017062063 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| 2017120501 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| 2017139698 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| 2017165439 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| 2017165440 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| 2017176265 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| 2018027205 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| 2018045238 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018045239 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018048815 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018048816 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018048958 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Volk et al (Neoplasia, 2008, 10:613-623). |
| Bhambani et al (American Pharmaceutical Review, Jan. 2010, 13(1):31-38). |
| Taniwaki et al (Eye, 2010, 24:1628-1629). |
| Molokhia et al (Vision Research, 2010, 50:680-685). |
| “Concurrent Infusions”, J Oncol Pract., 4(4): 171, Jul. 2008. |
| Abraxane® for Injectable Suspension (paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension) (albumin-bound), [drug label], 22 pages, Sep. 2009. |
| Abraxis Bioscience, Inc., “Abraxane: For the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer administered sequentially to standard doxorubicin-containing combination chemotherapy,” Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting (available to public Aug. 4, 2006). |
| Adams et al., “(P2-11-01) Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer”, 2015, XP002775314, 2015 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, URL: http://sabcs.org/portals/sabcs2016/documents/sabcs-2015-abstracts.pdf?v=5. |
| Adams et al., “Phase Ib trial of atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)” Journal of Clinical Oncology col. 34, No. 15, May 1, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Agarwal et al., “Flow Cytometric analysis of Thl and Th2 cytokines in PBMCs as a parameter of immunological dysfunction in patients of Superficial Transitional cell carcinoma of bladder”, Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 2006, 55(6):734-743. |
| Agarwala et al., “Randomized phase III study of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with or without sorafenib as second-line treatment in patients with advanced melanoma”, J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 25(18S):8510 (Abstract). |
| Allen “Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy, Cancer”, Oct. 2002, 2(10), pp. 750-763. |
| Alley et al., “Contribution of Linker Stability to the Activities of Anticancer Immunoconjugates”, Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19(3), pp. 759-765. |
| Anonymous “Paclitaxel Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery or Gynecological Cancers”, NCT02020707, ClinicalTrials.gov, Dec. 25, 2013 (13 pages). |
| Anonymous, “A Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma”, U.S. National Institutes of Health, 2007, 3 pages. |
| Anonymous, “A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Atezolizumab (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) in Combination with Nab Paclitaxel Compared with Placebo with Nab Paclitaxel for Patients with Previously Untreated Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer”, ClinicalTrials.gov, Apr. 21, 2015, 1 page. |
| Anonymous, “Atezolizumab Plus Abraxane Promising New Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer”, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jan. 7, 2016, pp. 1-2. |
| Anonymous, “Phase I/II Study of Abraxane in Recurrent and Refractory Lymphoma”, NCT01555853, ClinicalTrials.gov, Jun. 6, 2014 (8 pages). |
| Anonymous, “Phase II trial of carboplatin, weekly paclitaxel and biweekly bevacizumab in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma”, U.S. National Institutes of Health, 2007, 4 pages. |
| Anonymous, “A Study of Bevacizumab With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma (BEAM),” ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT00434252/200703 12, dated Mar. 12, 2007, 3 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,619, office action mailed Feb. 4, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,619, office action mailed Apr. 28, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/116,619, office action mailed Sep. 10, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/432,979, office action mailed Jan. 7, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/432,979, office action mailed May 16, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/432,979, office action mailed Jun. 30, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/432,979, office action mailed Oct. 4, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/432,979, office action mailed Dec. 15, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/882,327, office action mailed May 2, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/030,567, office action mailed Sep. 7, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/030,568, office action mailed May 25, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/030,568, office action mailed Jun. 18, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/030,568, office action mailed Dec. 1, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,336, office action mailed Jan. 22, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,336, office action mailed Feb. 9, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,336, office action mailed Sep. 4, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,623, office action mailed Jan. 7, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,623, office action mailed Feb. 9, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,623, office action mailed May 19, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,623, office action mailed Jul. 9, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,623, office action mailed Nov. 25, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/060,967, office action mailed Aug. 2, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/064,396, office action mailed Aug. 9, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,403, office action mailed Apr. 2, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,403, office action mailed May 23, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,403, office action mailed Oct. 4, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,433, office action mailed Mar. 21, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,433, office action mailed May 30, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,433, office action mailed Aug. 10, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,433, office action mailed Oct. 11, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/092,433, office action mailed Dec. 12, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,672, office action mailed May 31, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,672, office action mailed Sep. 11, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,672, office action mailed Nov. 28, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/202,115, office action mailed Jan. 20, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/202,115, office action mailed Sep. 26, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,428, office action mailed Jul. 31, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,428, office action mailed Aug. 14, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,428, office action mailed Dec. 6, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,428, office action mailed Dec. 20, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,504, office action mailed Apr. 4, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,504, office action mailed Aug. 1, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,504, office action mailed Nov. 9, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,542, office action mailed Jan. 14, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,542, office action mailed Apr. 4, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,542, office action mailed Nov. 22, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,542; office action mailed Jul. 18, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/225,542; office action mailed Jul. 30, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,006, office action mailed Jan. 9, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,006, office action mailed Jan. 18, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,006, office action mailed May 16, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,024, office action mailed Jan. 6, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,024, office action mailed Feb. 10, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,024, office action mailed May 19, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,024, office action mailed Jul. 29, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,024, office action mailed Aug. 1, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,754; office action mailed Feb. 22, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/331,754; office action mailed Oct. 11, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/359,569, office action mailed Feb. 22, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/359,569, office action mailed Jun. 23, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/359,569, office action mailed Jul. 12, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/359,569, office action mailed Jul. 26, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/359,569; office action mailed Jan. 17, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,536; office action mailed Oct. 1, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,554, office action mailed Sep. 27, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,564, office action mailed Jul. 10, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,581, office action mailed Mar. 8, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,581; office action mailed Nov. 13, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,596, office action mailed Sep. 4, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,596, office action mailed Dec. 27, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,610, office action mailed Mar. 14, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,610, office action mailed Jul. 9, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/413,257; office action mailed Sep. 25, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,526; office action mailed Mar. 12, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,526; office action mailed Nov. 16, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,533; office action mailed Mar. 8, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,533; office action mailed Nov. 19, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/414,536; office action mailed Oct. 11, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,411, office action mailed May 1, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,411; office action mailed Oct. 31, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/452,669, office action mailed May 5, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/452,669, office action mailed Nov. 16, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/452,669, office action mailed Nov. 26, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/452,669; office action mailed Jun. 24, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,377; office action mailed Mar. 19, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,377; office action mailed Jul. 5, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,382; office action mailed Mar. 18, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,382; office action mailed Jul. 8, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,391; office action mailed Feb. 4, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,391; office action mailed Mar. 15, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,391; office action mailed Jul. 24, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,395; office action mailed Mar. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,395; office action mailed Aug. 14, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,399; office action mailed Mar. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/456,399; office action mailed Aug. 14, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/460,552; office action mailed Apr. 1, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/460,552; office action mailed Aug. 14, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/460,699; office action mailed Mar. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/460,699; office action mailed Aug. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/461,288; office action mailed Apr. 1, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/461,288; office action mailed Aug. 28, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/675,596; office action mailed May 28, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/675,596; office action mailed Dec. 3, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/752,155; office action mailed Feb. 7, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/752,155; office action mailed Sep. 25, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/328,146; office action mailed Feb. 26, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/328,146; office action mailed Jul. 28, 2020. |
| Arakawa et al., “Protein-Solvent Interactions in Pharmaceutical Formulations”, Pharm. Res., Mar. 1991, vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 285-291. |
| Armitage et al., “New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project” J Clin Oncol 16, 2780-2795 (1998). |
| Asadullah et al., “Interleukin-10 therapy—review of a new approach”, Pharmarcol Rev., 2003, 55(2):241-269. |
| Atkins et al., “High-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: long-term survival update”, Cancer J Sci Am., 2000, Suppl 6:SII-14. |
| Atkins, “Interleukin-2: clinical applications”, Semin Oncol., 2002, 29(3 Suppl 7):12-27. |
| Avastin® Bevacizumab, Roche, [drug label], 24 pages, Sep. 2008. |
| Baba, Oleo Science 10(1):15-18 (Jan. 2010). |
| Bairagi et al., Albumin: A Versatile Drug Carrier, Austin Therapeutics, (Nov. 17, 2015) vol. 2, No. 2, p. 1021 (pp. 1-6). |
| Balch et al., “The new melanoma staging system”, Semin Cutan Med Surg., 2003, 22(1):42-54. |
| Balch et al., “Update on the melanoma staging system: The importance of sentinel node staging and primary tumor mitotic rate”, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Aug. 19, 2011, vol. 104, Issue 4, pp. 379-385. |
| Barua et al. “Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-display nanoparticles”, PNAS 110(9):3270-3275 (2013). |
| Bauer et al., “Rituximab, ofatumumab, and other monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Review),” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 11, 125 pages (copyright 2012). |
| Baumgartner et al., “Melanoma induces immunosuppression by up-regulating FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells”, J Surg Res., 2007, 141(1): 72-77. |
| Bedu-Addo “Understanding Lyophilization Formulation Development”, Pharmaceutical Technology Lyophilization. pp. 10-18 (2004). |
| Beers et al. “CD20 as a Target for Therapeutic Type I and II Monoclonal Antibodies”, Seminars in Hematology 47(2):107-114 (2010). |
| Belani et al., “Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation”, J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 21:2933-2939. |
| Belldegrun et al. “Human Renal Carcinoma Line Transfected with Interleukin-2 and/or Interferon alpha Gene(s): Implications for Live Cancer Vaccines”, J National Cancer Institute 85(3):207-216 (1993). |
| Bird et al., “Single-chain antigen-binding proteins”, Science, Oct. 1988, 242(4877), pp. 423-426. |
| Boasberg et al., “Nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable stage III and IV melanoma”, J Clinical Oncology, 2009, 27, No. 15S, abstract #9071. |
| Boasberg et al., “Phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable melanoma”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 20, 2011, vol. 29, No. 15 Supp, 8543. |
| Bolstad et al., “A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias”, Bioinformatics, 2003, 19:185-193. |
| Buechner “Intralesional interferon alfa-2b in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma”, J Am Acad Dermatol 24:731-734 (1991). |
| Cao et al., “Response of resistant melanoma to a combination of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab”, Clin Transl Oncol, 2007, 9:119-120. |
| Carson et al., “A phase 2 trial of a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody in patients with malignant melanoma”, Proceedings of the ASCO vol. 22, No. 2873, General Poster Session, Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 31-Jun. 3, 2003, Chicago, IL, 2 pages. |
| Celis, “Overlapping human leukocyte antigen class I/II binding peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma: evidence of systemic immune dysfunction”, Cancer, 2007, 110(1):203-214. |
| Chapman et al., “Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Jun. 30, 2011, vol. 364, Issue 26, pp. 2507-2516. |
| Cheng et al. Molecularly targeted drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. Nov. 1, 2013 ;7: 1315-22 (Year: 2013). |
| Chisholm et al., “Response to influenza immunization during treatment for cancer”, Arch Dis Child, 2001, 84(6):496-500. |
| Chong et al., “Combining cancer vaccines with chemotherapy”, Expert Opin Pharmacother., 2006, 6(16):2813-2820. |
| Chuang et al. “Recombinant human serum albumin”, Drugs Today 43(8):547-561 (2007) (Abstract Only) (2 pages). |
| Cirstoiu-Hapca et al. “Benefit of anti-HER2-coated paclitaxel-loaded immuno-nanpoarticles in the treatment of disseminated ovarian cancer: Therapeutic efficacy and biodistribution in mice”, Journal of Controlled Release 144:324-331 (2010). |
| Cleland et al., “The Development of Stable Protein Formulations: A close look at protein aggregation, deamidation, and oxidation”, Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 1993, 10(4), pp. 307-377. |
| Coiffier “The Role of Rituximab in Lymphomas”, Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter., 2002, vol. 24, No. 3, ISSN: 1516-8484 (6 pages). |
| Colman, “Effects of amino acid sequence changes on antibody-antigen interactions,” Research in Immunology (145(1):33-36, (1994). |
| Davis, “Affinity separation of antibody-toxin conjugate from albumin-stabilized formulation”, Am Biotechnol Lab., 12(4):60-64, Mar. 1994. |
| Degrasse, “A Single-Stranded DNA Aptamer That Selectively Binds to Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxin B”, PLoS One, 2012, 7(3) e33410, pp. 1-7. |
| Deguchi et al., “Effect of Methotrexate-Monoclonal Anti-Prostatic Acid Phosphatase Antibody Conjugate on Human Prostate Tumor”, Cancer Research, Aug. 1986, 46, pp. 3751-3755. |
| Demirkesen et al., “The correlation of angiogenesis with metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma: a comparative analysis of microvessel density, expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblastic growth factor”, Pathology, 2006, 38:132-137. |
| Denardo et al., “Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression”, Breast Cancer Res., 2007, 9(4):212. |
| Desai et al., “Enhanced antitumor activity and safety of albumin-bound nab-docetaxel versus polysorbate 80-based docetaxel”, Eur. J. Cancer, Suppl.; 18th Symposium on molecular targets and cancer therapeutics; Prague, Czech Republic; Nov. 7-10, 2006, vol. 4, No. 12, Nov. 2006 *Nov. 2006), p. 49. |
| Desai et al., “Increased antitumor activity, intratumor paclitaxel concentrations, and endothelial cell transport of cremophor-free, albumin-bound paclitaxel, ABI-007, compared with cremophor-based paclitaxel”, Clin Cancer Res., 2006, 12(4): 1317-24. |
| Deweers et al., “Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors”, J. Immunol., 186(3): 1840-1848, Feb. 1, 2011. |
| Doveil et al. “Adjuvant Therapy of Stage IIIb Melanoma with Interferon Alfa-2b:Clinical and Immunological Relevance”, Dermatology 191:234-239 (1995). |
| Dudek et al., “Autologous large multivalent immunogen vaccine in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma”, Am. J. Clin. Oncol., Apr. 1, 2008, 31(2):173-181. |
| Edison, “MorphoSys,” 16 pages (Aug. 8, 2013). |
| Edwards et al. The Remarkable Flexibility of the Human Antibody Repertoire; Isolation of Over One Thousand Different Antibodies to a Single Protein, BLyS, J. Mol. Biol 334:103-118 (2003). |
| Elbayoumi et al., “Tumor-Targeted Nanomedicines: Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy In vivo of Doxorubicin-Loaded, Long-Circulating Liposomes Modified with Cancer-Specific Monoclonal Antibody”, Clin Cancer Res., 2009, 15(6):1973-1980. |
| Ellyard et al., “Th2-mediated anti-tumour immunity: friend or foe?”, Tissue Antigens, 2007, 70(1):1-11. |
| Elsadek et al., “Impact of albumin on drug delivery—New applications on the horizon”, J of Controlled Release, 2011, 1-25. |
| Elst et al. “Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression and Activity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia”, Blood 116:3144 (2010), abstract. |
| Emens et al.: “(OT1-01-06) A phase III randomized trial of atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel as firs tline therapy for patienst with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)”, 2015, XP002775313, 2015 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, URL: http://sabcs.org/portals/sabcs2016/documents/sabcs-2015-abstracts.pdf?v=5. |
| European Application No. 08743903.0, Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 24, 2011. |
| European Application No. 09774506.1, Extended European Search Report mailed Mar. 22, 2012. |
| European Application No. 12781802.9, Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 18, 2014. |
| European Application No. 13843209.1, Extended European Search Report mailed Sep. 5, 2016. |
| European Application No. 15806443.6, Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 11, 2017. |
| European Application No. 15809075.3, Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 21, 2017. |
| European Application No. 16837869.3, Extended European Search Report mailed Apr. 4, 2019. |
| European Application No. 17736453.6, Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 8, 2019. |
| European Application No. 17750912.2 Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 2, 2020. |
| European Application No. 17771005.0, Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 17, 2019. |
| European Application No. 17771006.8, Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 10, 2019. |
| Fabi et al, “Prospective study on nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaael in advanced breast cancer: clinical results and biological observations in taxane-pretreated patients”, Drug Design, Development and Therapy vol. 9, Nov. 1, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Ferrara et al., “The biology of VEGF and its receptors”, Nat. Med., 2003, 9:669-676. |
| Flaherty et al., “Final Results of E2603: a double-blind, randomized phase III trial comparing carboplatin (C)/paclitaxel(P) with or without sorafenib(S) in metastatic melanoma”, J. Clin Oncol., 2010, 28:15s (suppl: abstr 8511). |
| Flores et al., “Novel oral taxane therapies: recent Phase I results”, Clin. Invest. vol. 3, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2013 (Apr. 1, 2013), pp. 333-341, XP055426571, UK, ISSN: 2041-6792, DOI: 10.4155/cli.13.18. |
| Folkman, “Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease”, Nat. Med., 1995, 1, 27-31. |
| Fricke et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor-trap overcomes defects in dendritic cell differentiation but does not improve antigen-specific immune responses”, Clin. Cancer Res., 2007, 13:4840-4848. |
| Gabrilovich et al., “Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells”, Nat. Med., 1996, 2: 1096-1103. |
| Gao et al., “In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots”, Nat Biotech, 2004, 22(8):969-976. |
| Gogas et al., “Chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: time for a change?”, Cancer, 2007, 109(3): 455-464. |
| Golay et al., “Mechanism of action of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: promises and pitfalls of in vitro and in vivo assay,” Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 526(2):146-153 (2012). |
| Graells et al., Overproduction of VEGF165 concomitantly expressed with its receptors promotes growth and survival of melanoma cells through MAPK and P13K signaling, J. Invest. Dermatol., 2004, 123:1151-1161. |
| Gupta et al., “Ofatumumab, the first human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of B cell hematologic malignancies,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1263, pp. 43-56 (Jul. 25, 2012). |
| Haley et al., “Nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer treatment”, Urol. Oncol.: Seminars and Original Invest., 2008, 26:57-64. |
| Hamilton et al, “Nab-Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab/Carboplatin Chemotherapy in First-Line Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer”, Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 13, No. 6, Dec. 1, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Hara, “What is anti-HER2 antibody tubulin polymerization inhibitor complex T-DM1?,” Pharm. Monthly 56(5):734-739 (May 2014). |
| Harlow et al., Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1988 (9 pages). |
| Hassan et al: “Comparison of Different Crosslinking Methods for Preparation of Docetaxel-loaded Albumin Nanoparticles”, Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, No. 2, Apr. 2015 (Apr. 2015), pp. 385-394. |
| Hauschild et al., “Individualized therapy of disseminated cancer using malignant melanoma as a model”, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2006, 25(2): 253-256. |
| Hauschild et al., “Results of a Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Sorafenib in Combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Jun. 10, 2009, vol. 27, No. 17, pp. 2823-2830. |
| Hegde et al. “Predictive Impact of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Four Phase III Trials Evaluating Bevacizumab,” Clinical Cancer Research, Feb. 15, 2013 (Feb. 15, 2013) vol. 19, pp. 929-937. |
| Hersh et al., “A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of nab-Paclitaxel in Previously Treated and Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients With Metastatic Melanoma”, Cancer, Jan. 1, 2010, 116:155, pp. 155-163. |
| Hersh et al., “A randomized, controlled phase III trial of nab-Paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma”, Ann Oncol, 2015, epub Sep. 26, 2015. |
| Hersh et al., “Open-label, multicenter, phase II trial of ABI-007 in previously treated and previously untreated patients with metastatic malignant melanoma”, J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23(16S):7558 (Abstract). |
| Hobbs et al., “Regulation of Transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment”, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Apr. 1998, 95, pp. 4607-4612. |
| Hodi et al., “Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Aug. 19, 2010, vol. 363, No. 8, pp. 711-723. |
| Hodi et al., “Phase Il study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for malignant melanoma”, Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2002, 25:283-286. |
| Hood et al., Immunology, 1984, Benjamin, N.Y., 2nd edition. |
| Huncharek et al., “Single-agent DTIC versus combination chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 3273 patients from 20 randomized trials”, Melanoma Research, 11:75-81 (2001). |
| Hunkapiller et al., “Immunology: The growing immunoglobulin gene superfamily”, Nature, Sep. 1986, 323, pp. 15-16. |
| Huston et al., “Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: Recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Aug. 1988, vol. 85, pp. 5879-5883. |
| Ibrahim et al., “Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of ABI-007, a Cremophor-free, Protein-stabilized, Nanoparticle Formulation of Paclitaxel”, Clinical Cancer Research, May 2002, vol. 8, pp. 1038-1044. |
| Inagaki et al., “Clinical significance of serum Thl-, Th2- and regulatory T cells-associated cytokines in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma: High interleukin-5 and -10 levels are significant unfavorable prognostic factors”, Int. J. Cancer, 2006, 118(12):3054-3061. |
| Inman, “Atezolizumab/Nab-Paclitaxel Combo Shows High Response Rates in TNBC”, OneLive, Dec. 10, 2015, 4 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2008/057025, mailed Sep. 15, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/049511, mailed Jan. 5, 2011. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/037137, mailed Nov. 12, 2013. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/062638, mailed Apr. 16, 2015. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/035505, mailed Dec. 22, 2016. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/035515, mailed Dec. 29, 2016. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2015/054295 mailed Oct. 13, 2016. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2016/026270, mailed Oct. 18, 2018. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/012580, mailed Jul. 19, 2018. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/023442, mailed Oct. 4, 2018. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/023443, mailed Oct. 4, 2018. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/045643, mailed Feb. 14, 2019. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/049745, mailed Mar. 14, 2019. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/049746, mailed Mar. 14, 2019. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/050134, mailed Mar. 21, 2019. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2017/050137 mailed Mar. 21, 2019. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application PCT/US2016/026267, mailed Apr. 10, 2018. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application PCT/US2017/017553, mailed Aug. 23, 2018. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/057025, mailed Jul. 1, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/049511, mailed Feb. 2, 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037137, mailed Sep. 28, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/062638, mailed Jan. 23, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/035505, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/035515, mailed Sep. 21, 2015. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/054295, mailed Jan. 25, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/026267, mailed Jul. 12, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/026270, mailed Oct. 12, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/047641, mailed Oct. 31, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/012580, mailed Mar. 17, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/017553, mailed Feb. 10, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/023442, mailed Jun. 16, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/023443, mailed Jul. 11, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/045643, mailed Oct. 25, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/049745, mailed Dec. 15, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/049746, mailed Nov. 27, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/050134, mailed Nov. 16, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/050137, mailed Nov. 27, 2017. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/050355 mailed Jan. 30, 2018. |
| Iqbal et al. Anti-Cancer Actions of Denosumab. Curr Osteoporos Rep. Dec. 2011;9(4): 173-6. (Year: 2011). |
| Jaime et al., “Paclitaxel antibody conjugates and trehalose for preserving the immunological activity after freeze-drying,” Curr Med Chem, 2004, 11(4):439-46 Abstract Only. |
| Jain et al., “Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors”, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Nov. 2010, 7, pp. 653-664. |
| Jain et al., “Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy,” Nat. Med. 7(9):987-989 (2001). |
| Jain, “Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy,” Science 307(5706):58-62 (2005). |
| Jazirehi et al., “Rituximab (anti-CD20) selectively modifies Bcl-xl and apoptosis protease activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) expression and sensitizes human non-Hodgkin's lymphoma B cell lines to paclitaxel-induced apoptosis,” Mol. Cancer Ther. 2(11):1183-93 (2003). |
| Jiang et al., “Regulation of Immune Responses by T Cells”, N Engl J Med., 2006, 354(11): 1166-1176. |
| Jin et al., “Paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles decorated with anti-CD133 antibody: a targeted therapy for liver cancer stem cells,” J. Nanopart. Res. 2014, 16:2157 (2014). |
| Jin et al: “Docetaxel-loaded PEG-albumin nanoparticles with improved antitumor efficiency against non-small cell lung cancer”, Oncology Reports vol. 36, No. 2, Aug. 8, 2016 (Aug. 8, 2016), pp. 871-876, XP055425487, ISSN: 1021-335X, DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4863. |
| Julien et al, “Utilization of monoclonal antibody-targeted nanomaterials in the treatment of cancer”, 2011, MAbs, 3:467-478. |
| Kamat et al., “Metronomic chemotherapy enhances the efficacy of antivascular therapy in ovarian cancer”, Cancer Res., 2007, 67(1):281-288. |
| Kawai et al., “VEGF121 promotes lymphangiogenesis in the sentinel lymph nodes of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients”, Lung Cancer, 2008, 59(1):41-47. |
| Kelly et al. “Shape-Specific, Monodisperse Nano-Molding of Protein Particles,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130:5438-5439 (2008). |
| Khallouf et al. “5-Fluorouracil and Interferon-alpha Immunochemotherapy Enhances Immunogenicity of Murine Pancreatic Cancer Through Upregulation of NKG2D Ligands and MHC Class 1”, Immunother 35(3):245-253 (2012). |
| Kikuchi et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor and dendritic cells in human squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity”, Anticancer Res., 2006, 26(3A):1833-1848. |
| Kim et al., “A dual target-directed agent against interleukin-6 receptor and tumor necrosis factor a ameliorates experimental arthritis”, Scientific Rep. 6:20150 (2016). |
| Kim et al., “BEAM: A Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Activity of Bevacizumab in Combination with Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Melanoma”, Journal of Clinical Oncoloy: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Jan. 1, 2012, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 34-41. |
| Kirkwood et al., “A pooled analysis of eastern cooperative oncology group and intergroup trials of adjuvant high-dose interferon for melanoma”, Clin Cancer Res., 2004, 10(5):1670-1677. |
| Kondejewski et al., “Synthesis and characterization of carbohydrate-linked murine monoclonal antibody K20-human serum albumin conjugates”, Bioconjug Chem., 5(6):602-611, Nov.-Dec. 1994. |
| Korman et al., “Tumor immunotherapy: preclinical and clinical activity of anti-CTLA4 antibodies”, Curr Opin Invest Drugs, 2005, 6(6):582-591. |
| Korthals et al. “Monocyte derived dendritic cells generated by IFN-alpha acquire mature dendritic and natural killer cell properties as shown by gene expression analysis”, J Translated Medicine 5:46 (2007) (11 pages). |
| Kottschade et al., “A Phase II Trial of Nab-Paclitaxel (ABI-007) and Carboplatin in Patients with Unresectable Stage IV Melanoma”, Cancer, Apr. 15, 2011, 117(8), pp. 1704-1710. |
| Kottschade et al., “A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Temozolomide and Bevacizumab or nab-Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Stage IV Melanoma”,Cancer, 2013, vol. 119, Issue 3, pp. 586-592. |
| Kratz et al., “Serum proteins as drug carriers of anticancer agents: a review”, Drug Deliv., 5(4):281-299, 1998. |
| Kratz, “Albumin as a drug carrier: design of prodrugs, drug conjugates and nanoparticles”, J Control Release, 132(3):171-183, Epub May 17, 2008. |
| Krishnan et al., “Programmed death-1 receptor and interleukin-10 in liver transplant recipients at high risk for late cytomegalovirus disease”, Transpl Infect Dis. 12(4):363-370 (2010). |
| Kukowska-Latallo et al., “Nanoparticle Targeting of Anticancer Drug Improves Therapeutic Response in Animal Model of Human Epithelial Cancer”, Cancer Res, 2005, 65(12):5317-5324. |
| Kumar et al., Thl/Th2 cytokine imbalance in meningioma, anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme patients, Oncol. Ren., 2006, 15(6):1513-1516. |
| Lanzavecchia et al., “The use of hybrid hybridomas to target human cytotoxic T lymphocytes”, Eur. J. Immunol., 1987, 17, pp. 105-111. |
| Lau et al.,“Is inhibition of cancer angiogenesis and growth by paclitaxel schedule dependent?”, Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2004, 15:871-875. |
| Lee et al., “The co-delivery of paclitaxel and Herceptin using cationic micellar nanoparticles”, Biomaterials vol. 30, No. 5, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 919-927. |
| Lei et al., “Comparing cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of targeted drug carriers in cancer cell lines with different drug resistance mechanisms”, Nanomed: Nanotech, Biol, and Med., 2011, 7:324-332. |
| Lev et al., “Dacarbazine causes transcriptional up-regulation of interleukin 8 and vascular endothelial growth factor in melanoma cells: a possible escape mechanism from chemotherapy”, Mol. Cancer Ther., 2003, 2:753-763. |
| Lev et al., “Exposure of melanoma cells to dacarbazine results in enhanced tumor growth and metastasis in vivo”, J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22:2092-2100. |
| Liang et al., “IFN-alpha regulates NK cell cytotoxicity through STAT1 pathway,” Cytokine, Aug. 13, 2003 (Aug. 13, 2013), vol. 23, pp. 190-199. |
| Lin, “Salmon Calcitonin: Conformational Changes and Stabilizer Effects”, AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 695-723. |
| Liu et al. “Freeze-Drying of Proteins”. In: Walkers W., Oldenhof H. (eds) Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol. 1257. Springer, New York, NY; published online Nov. 14, 2014. |
| Lloyd et al. “Modelling the human immune response: performance of a 1011 human antibody repertoire against a broad panel of therapeutically relevant antigens”, Protein Eng. , Design & Selection 22(3):159-168 (2009). |
| Lundin et al., “Phase 2 study of alemtuzumab (anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome”, Blood (2003) vol. 101, No. 11, pp. 4267-4272. |
| Makridis, et al., “MHC class I and II antigen expression and interferon ? treatment of human midgut carcinoid tumors,” World Journal of Surgery, Aug. 1, 1993 (Aug. 1, 1993), vol. 16, Iss. 4, pp. 481-486. |
| Marcoval et al., “Angiogenesis and malignant melanoma. Angiogenesis is related to the development of vertical (tumorigenic) growth phase”, J. Cutan. Pathol., 1997, 24:212-218. |
| Markovic et al., “A phase II study of ABT-510 (thrombospondin-1 analog) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma”, Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 30(3):303-309. |
| Markovic et al., “A reproducible method for the enumeration of functional ( cytokine producing) versus non-functional peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in human peripheral blood”, Clin. Exo. Immunol., 2006, 145:438-447. |
| Markovic et al., “Peptide vaccination of patients with metastatic melanoma: improved clinical outcome in patients demonstrating effective immunization”, Am J Clin Oncol., 2006, 29(4):352-360. |
| Matejtschuk, “Lyophilization of Proteins”, Methods in Molecular Biology, Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols, Second Edition, Edited by: J.G. Day and G.N. Stacey, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ, 2007, vol. 368, pp. 59-72. |
| Matsuda et al., Preoperative oral immune-enhancing nutritional supplementation corrects TH1/TH2 imbalance in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer, Dis. Colon Rectum, 2006, 49(4):507-516. |
| Matthay et al. Promising therapeutic targets in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. May 15, 2012;18(10):2740-53. (Year: 2012). |
| Mayo Clinic, “Paclitaxel Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery”, Dec. 19, 2013, ClinicalTrials.gov., URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02020707 (Four (4) pages). |
| Mcelroy et al., “Imaging of Primary and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Using a Fluorophore-Coniugated Anti-CA19-9 Antibody for Surgical Navigation”, World J Surg., 2008, 32: 1057-1066. |
| Meadows et al. “Anti-VEGF Therapies in the Clinic,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, Oct. 1, 2012 (Oct. 1, 2012), vol. 2, pp. 1-27. |
| Melcher, “Recommendations for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations in people receiving chemotherapy”, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radion), 2005, 17(1): 12-15. |
| Merchan et al., “Increased endothelial uptake of paclitaxel as a potential mechanism for its antiangiogenic effects: potentiation by Cox-2 inhibition”, Int. J. Cancer, 2005, 113, pp. 490-498. |
| Mezzaroba et al., “New potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of B-Cell malignancies using chlorambucil/Hydroxychloroquine-Loaded Anti-CD20 Nanoparticles”, Sep. 2103, PLoS One vol. No. 8, Issue 9 pp. 1-10, e74216. |
| Middleton et al., “Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma”, J. Clin. Oncol., 2000, 18, pp. 158-166. |
| Miele et al. “Albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel (Abraxane® ABI-007) in the treatment of breast cancer”, International Journal of Nanomedicine 4:99-105 (2009). |
| Miller et al., “Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab versus Paclitaxel Alone for Metastatic Breast Cancer,” N Engl. J Med., (2007) vol. 357:2666-2676. |
| Mimura et al., Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits the function of human mature dendritic cells mediated by VEGF receptor-2, Cancer Immunol Immunother., 2007, 56(6). pp. 761-770. |
| Mirtsching et al., “A Phase II Study of Weekly Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Metastatic Breast Cancer”, Clinical Breast Cancer, 2011, 11(2):121-128. |
| Mocellin et al., “Cytokines and immune response in the tumor microenvironment”, J Immunother., 2001, 24(5), pp. 392-407. |
| Motl, “Bevacizumab in combination chemotherapy for colorectal and other cancers”, Am. J. Health-Svst. Pharm 2005, 62, pp. 1021-1032. |
| Mustacchi et al, “The role of taxanes in triple-negative breast cancer: literature review”, Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 9, Aug. 5, 2015, 16 pages. |
| Nahleh et al, “Swog S0800 (NCI CDR0000636131): addition of bevacizumba to neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer”, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 158, No. 3 Jul. 8, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Nevala et al, “Abstract B77: Targeted nano-immune conjugates to melanoma: Preclinical testing of bevacizumab targeted nab-paclitaxel”, Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 3, Oct. 1, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Nevala et al, “Antibody-targeted paclitaxel loaded nanoparticles for the treatment of CD20 B-cell lymphoma”, Scientific Reports, vol. 7, Apr. 5, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Nevala et al, “Antibody-Targeted Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Melanoma”, Cancer Research, vol. 76, No. 13, Jul. 1, 2016, pp. 3954-3964. |
| Nevala et al, “Targeted nano-immune conjugates to melanoma: Preclinical testing of bevacizumab targeted nab-paclitaxel”, Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy: A New Chapter, Dec. 1, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Ng et al., “Influence of formulation vehicle on metronomic taxane chemotherapy: albumin-bound versus cremophor EL-based paclitaxel”, Clin. Cancer Res., 2006, 12, pp. 4331-4338. |
| Ng et al., “Taxane-mediated antiangiogenesis in vitro: influence of formulation vehicles and binding proteins”, Cancer Res., 2004, 64, pp. 821-824. |
| Nilvebrant et al., “The Albumin-Binding Domain as a Scaffold for Protein Engineering”, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, Mar. 2013, vol. 6, Issue 7, e201303099, http://dx.doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201303099. |
| Nishida et al, English Translation of “Clinical Trials of New Drugs Cytotoxic Effect against Multiple Myeloma with High Expression of a CD38 Antigen and a Human CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Daratumumab:CD38 Antigen”, history of Medicine, Sep. 29, 2012, vol. 242, No. 13, pp. 1176-1181. |
| Oku et al., “Tumor growth modulation by sense and antisense vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression: effects on angiogenesis, vascular permeability, blood volume, blood flow, fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, and proliferation of human melanoma intracerebral xenografts”, Cancer Res., 1998, 58, pp. 4185-4192. |
| Ortaldo et al., “Effects of several species of human leukocyte interferon on cytotoxic activity o fNK cells and monocytes,” International Journal of Cancer, Mar. 15, 1983 (Mar. 15, 1983) vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 285-289. |
| Ouichi, “Antibody delivery—from basics to clinical test—Clinical development of antibody-drug conjugate,” Drug Deliv. Sys. 28(5):424-429 (2013). |
| Package Insert, Campath® (Alemtuzumab), Millennium and Ilex Partners, LP, 13 pages, available May 2001. |
| Parikh et al., “The vascular endothelial growth factor family and its receptors”, Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am., 2004, 18, pp. 951-971. |
| Park et al., “Anti-HER2 Immunoliposomes: Enhanced Efficacy Attributable to Targeted Delivery”, Clin. Cancer Res., 2002, 8, pp. 1172-1181. |
| Parker et al., “Targeting CLL Cells Using Rituximab-Conjugated Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Gold Nanoparticles,” Blood vol. 116, No. 21, Nov. 1, 2010, pp. 1109. |
| Perez et al., “Phase 2 Trial of Carboplatin, Weekly Paclitaxel, and Biweekly Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Stage IV Melanoma”, Cancer, 2009, vol. 115, Issue 1, pp. 119-127. |
| Petrelli et al., “Targeted Delivery for Breast Cancer Therapy: the History of Nanoparticle-Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, Jun. 1, 2010 (Jun. 1, 2010), vol. 11, pp. 1413-1432. |
| Pikal., “Freeze-drying of proteins, Part II: Formulation selection”, Biopharm, 1990, 9, pp. 26-30. |
| Polak et al., “Mechanisms of local immunosuppression in cutaneous melanoma”, Br J Cancer, 2007, 96(12), pp. 1879-1887. |
| Porrata et al., “Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma”, Blood, 2001, 98(3), pp. 579-585. |
| Porrata et al., “Timely reconstitution of immune competence affects clinical outcome following autologous stem cell transplantation”, Clin Exp Med., 2004, 4(2):78-85. |
| Powell et al., “Adoptive transfer of vaccine-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cells to patients with metastatic melanoma following lymphodepletion”, J Immunol., 2006, 177(9), pp. 6527-6539. |
| Pries et al., “Cytokines in head and neck cancer”, Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 2006, 17(3), pp. 141-146. |
| Qu Na et al: “Cabazitaxel-loaded human serum albumin nanoparticles as a therapeutic agent against prostate cancer”, International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 11, Jul. 26, 2016 (Jul. 26, 2016), pp. 3451-3459. |
| Ranieri et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a target of bevacizumab in cancer: from the biology to the clinic”, Curr. Med. Chem., 2006, 13, 1845-1857. |
| Rao et al., “Combination of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma”, Cancer, Jan. 15, 2006, vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 375-382. |
| Reck et al. “Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy in extensive-disease-small-cell lung cancer results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial”, Ann Oncol. 24(1):75-83 (2013). |
| Reynolds et al. “Phase II Trial of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in First-Line Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer”, J Thoracic Oncology 4(12):1537-1543 (2009). |
| Ribas et al., “Antitumor activity in melanoma and anti-self responses in a phase I trial with the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibody CP-675,206”, J Clin Oncol., Dec. 10, 2005, 23(35), pp. 8968-8977. |
| Robak, T. Emerging monoclonal antibodies and related agents for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Future Oneal. Jan. 2013;9(1):69-91. Abstract Only. (Year: 2013). |
| Rosenberg et al., “Tumor progression can occur despite the induction of very high levels of self/tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with melanoma”, J. Immunol., 2005, 175(9), pp. 6169-6176. |
| Roy et al., “Tumor associated release of interleukin-10 alters the prolactin receptor and down-regulates prolactin responsiveness of immature cortical thymocytes”, J Neuroimmunol., 2007, 186(1-2), pp. 112-120. |
| Rudikoff et al., “Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982 vol. 79 pp. 1979-1983. |
| Rudnicka et al., “Rituximab causes a polarization of B cells that augments its therapeutic function in NK-cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity”, Blood, 2013, 121(23):4694-4702. |
| Sadat et al., “Nano-pharmaceutical Formulations for Targeted Drug Delivery against HER2 in Breast Cancer”, Current Cancer Drug Targets, 2015, 15(1):71-86. |
| Salven et al., “Enhanced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic melanoma”, Br. J. Cancer, 1997, 76(7), pp. 930-934. |
| Samaranayake et al., “Modified taxols. 5.1 Reaction of taxol with electrophilic reagents and preparation of a rearranged taxol derivative with tubulin assembly activity”, J. Org. Chem., vol. 56, 1991, pp. 5114-5119. |
| Sandler et al., “Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer”, N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, 355:2542-2550. |
| Sato et al., “Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer”, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(51):18538-18543. |
| Schrama et al. “Antibody targeted drugs as cancer therapeutics”, Nature Reviews 5:147-159 (2006). |
| Sester et al., “Differences in CMV-specific T-cell levels and long-term susceptibility to CMV infection after kidney, heart and lung transplantation”, Am J Transplant., 5(6):1483-1489, Jun. 2005. |
| Soda et al., “Latest topics of new medicine” Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Mol. Respiratory Dis. 17(1):100-103 (Mar. 1, 2013). |
| Srivastava et al., “Angiogenesis in cutaneous melanoma: pathogenesis and clinical implications”, Microsc. Res. Tech., 2003, 60:208-224. |
| Stancovski et al., “Mechanistic aspects of the opposing effects of monoclonal antivodies to the ERBB2 receptor on tumor growth,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88: 8691-8695, (1991). |
| Streit et al., “Angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and melanoma metastasis”, Oncogene, 2003, 22, pp. 3172-3179. |
| Taieb et al., “Chemoimmunotherapy of tumors: Cyclophosphamide synergtizes with exoxome based vaccines”, J. Immunol., Mar. 1, 2006, 176(5):2722-2729. |
| Tao et al., “Inhibiting the growth of malignant melanoma by blocking the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor using an RNA interference approach”, Br. J. Dermatol., 2005, 153:715-724. |
| Tas et al., “Circulating serum levels of angiogenic factors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in melanoma patients”, Melanoma Res., 2006, 16:405-411. |
| Terheyden et al., “Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab in conjunction with chemotherapy in metastasizing melanoma”, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2007, 133(11), pp. 897-901. |
| Terui, English Translation of Molecular-Targeted Therapy for Cancer: Progresses and Challenges, “Daratumumab, Antibody Drug against Myeloma”, Pharma Med., Nov. 10, 2013, vol. 31, No. 11, p. 27-30. |
| Ugurel et al., “Increased serum concentration of angiogenic factors in malignant melanoma patients correlates with tumor progression and survival”, J. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 19:577-583. |
| Vacca et al., “Docetaxel versus paclitaxel for antiangiogenesis”, J. Hematother. Stem Cell Res., 2002, 11:103-118. |
| Varker et al., “A randomized phase 2 trial of bevacizumab with or without daily low-dose interferon alfa-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma”, Ann Surg Oncol., 14(8):2367-2376, print Aug. 2007, Epub May 2007. |
| Vence et al., “Circulating tumor antigen-specific regulatory T cells in patients with metastatic melanoma”, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(52), pp. 20884-20889. |
| Verma et al. “Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions”, Small. 6(1 ): 12-21. (2010). |
| Vishnu et al., “Safety and Efficacy of nab-Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Patients with Breast cancer,” Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. 2011. vol. 5, pp. 53-65. |
| Volk et al., “Nab-paclitaxel efficacy in the orthotopic model of human breast cancer is significantly enhanced by concurrent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor A therapy,” Neoplasia 10(6):613-623 (2008). |
| Volk-Draper et al, “Novel Model for Basaloid Triple-negative Breast Cancer: Behavior In Vivo and Response to Therapy”, vol. 14, No. 10, Oct. 1, 2012, 18 pages. |
| Wagner et al., “Enhanced drug targeting by attachment of an anti alphav integrin antibody to doxorubicin loaded human serum albumin nanoparticles”, Biomaterials., 31(8):2388-2398, Epub Dec. 23, 2009. |
| Walker et al., “Monitoring immune responses in cancer patients receiving tumor vaccines”, Int Rev Immunol., 2003, 22(3-4):283-319. |
| Wang et al., “Biofunctionalized targeted nanoparticles for therapeutic applications”, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., 2008, 8(8): 1063-1070. |
| Wang et al., “Paclitaxel at ultra low concentrations inhibits angiogenesis without affecting cellular microtubule assembly”, Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2003, vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 13-19. |
| Warner et al. “Alemtuzumab use in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a history and discussion of future rational use”, Ther Adv Hematol 3(6):375-389 (2012). |
| Washington University School of Medicine “Phase I/II Study of Abraxane in Recurrent and Refractory Lymphoma”, ClinicalTrials.gov, Dec. 6, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Weber, “Review: anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab: case studies of clinical response and immune-related adverse events”, Oncologist, Jul. 2007, 12(7), pp. 864-872. |
| Wiernik et al., “Phase I trial of taxol given as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days: responses observed in metastatic melanoma”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Aug. 1987, vol. 5, No. 8, pp. 1232-1239. |
| Wong et al., “Programmed death-1 blockade enhances expansion and functional capacity of human melanoma antigen-specific CTLs”, Int. Immunol., 2007, vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 1223-1234. |
| Wu et al., “Aptamers: Active Targeting Ligands for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy”, Theranostics, 2015, 5(4):322-344. |
| Yardley et al., “A pilot study of adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide, with trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients, in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer”, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 123:471-475. |
| Yee et al., “Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: in vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of transferred T cells”, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99(25):16168-16173. |
| Yu et al., “Interaction between bevacizumab and murine VEGF-A: a reassessment,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 49(2): 522-527, Feb. 2008. |
| Yuan et al., “Vascular Permeability in a Human Tumor Xenograft: Molecular Size Dependence and Cutoff Size”, Cancer Research, Sep. 1, 1995, 55, pp. 3752-3756. |
| Yuan et al., “Time-dependent vascular regression and permeability changes in established human tumor xenografts induced by an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor antibody,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(25):14765-14770 (1996). |
| Zhao et al. “Abraxane, the Nanoparticle Formulation of Paclitaxel Can Induce Drug Resistance by lp-Regulation of P-gp”, PLoS One 10(7):e0131429 (2015) (19 pages). |
| Zimpfer-Rechner et al., “Randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as second-line therapy in disseminated melanoma: a multicentre trial of the Dermatologic Co-operative Oncology Group (DeCOG)”, Melanoma Res., 2003, 13:531-536. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210023213 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61609689 | Mar 2012 | US | |
| 61484151 | May 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15225428 | Aug 2016 | US |
| Child | 16992229 | US | |
| Parent | 14116619 | US | |
| Child | 15225428 | US |