This application claims the benefit of DE 10 2012 216 897.4, filed on Sep. 20, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present embodiments relate to methods and devices for truncation in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device.
MRI devices for the examination of objects or patients by magnetic resonance tomography are known, for example, from DE10314215B4.
The scope of the present invention is defined solely by the appended claims and is not affected to any degree by the statements within this summary.
The present embodiments may obviate one or more of the drawbacks or limitations in the related art. For example, results of signal processing in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device are optimized.
To examine a body 105 (e.g., an object to be examined or a patient) with an MRI device 101 using magnetic resonance imaging, different magnetic fields that are attuned to one other as precisely as possible in terms of temporal and spatial characteristics are irradiated onto the body 105. A strong magnet (e.g., a cryomagnet 107) in a measuring cabin with, for example, a tunnel-shaped opening 103 generates a static strong main magnetic field Bo with a value of, for example, 0.2 tesla to 3 tesla or even more. A body 105 to be examined is positioned on a patient bed 104 and moved into a region of the main magnetic field B0 that is approximately homogeneous in the FOV. The nuclear spins of atomic nuclei of the body 105 are excited by magnetic high-frequency excitation pulses B1(x, y, z, t) that are radiated via a high-frequency antenna (and/or optionally a local coil arrangement) shown in
The magnetic resonance device 101 also has gradient coils 112x, 112y, 112z, with which magnetic gradient fields BG(x, y, z, t) for selective layer excitation and for spatial encoding of the measuring signal are irradiated during a measurement. The gradient coils 112x, 112y, 112z are controlled by a gradient-coil control unit 114 (and optionally via amplifiers Vx, Vy, Vz), which, like the pulse-generating unit 109, is connected to the pulse-sequence control unit 110.
Signals emitted by the excited nuclear spins (e.g., the atomic nuclei in the object to be examined) are received by the body coil 108 and/or at least one local coil arrangement 106, amplified by assigned high-frequency preamplifiers 116 and further processed and digitized by a receiving unit 117. The recorded measured data is digitized and stored as complex numerical values in a k-space matrix. An associated MR image may be reconstructed from the k-space matrix occupied by values using a multi-dimensional Fourier transformation.
For a coil that may be operated in both the transmitting and the receiving mode such as, for example, the body coil 108 or a local coil 106, the correct signal forwarding is regulated by an upstream transceiver switch 118.
An image-processing unit 119 generates an image from the measured data, which is displayed to a user via a control panel 120 and/or stored in a memory unit 121. A central computer unit 122 controls the individual system components.
In MR tomography, images with a high signal/noise ratio (SNR) are recorded with local coil arrangements (e.g., coils, local coils). The local coil arrangements are antenna systems that are attached in the immediate vicinity above (anterior) or below (posterior) or on or in the body 105. During an MR measurement, the excited nuclei induce a voltage into the individual antennas of the local coil. The induced voltage is amplified with a low-noise preamplifier (e.g., LNA, preamp) and routed to the receiving electronics. High-field systems (e.g., 1.5T-12T or more) are used to improve the signal/noise ratios, even in the case of high-resolution images. If it is possible to connect more individual antennas to an MR receiving system than there are receivers available, a switch matrix (e.g., an RCCS) is, for example, installed between the receiving antennas and receivers. This routes the currently active receiving channels (e.g., the receiving channels located precisely in the field of view of the magnet) to the available receivers. This makes it possible to connect more coil elements than there are receivers available, since, in the case of whole-body coverage, only the coils located in the FOV or in the homogeneity volume of the magnet may be read out.
A local coil arrangement 106 is, for example, generally the name given to an antenna system that may, for example, include one antenna element or, as an array coil, a plurality of antenna elements (e.g., coil elements). These individual antenna elements are embodied, for example, as loop antennas (loops), butterflies, flex coils or saddle coils. A local coil arrangement includes, for example, coil elements, a preamplifier, further electronics (e.g., baluns), a housing, supports and may include a cable with connectors with which the local coil arrangement is connected to the MRI device. A receiver 168 attached to the device filters and digitizes a signal received from a local coil 106 (e.g., by radio), and transfers the data to a digital signal-processing mechanism that may derive an image or spectrum from the data obtained by a measurement and makes the image or spectrum available to the user, for example, for subsequent diagnosis and/or storage.
In the case of fixed-point mathematical operations, it may be provided multiple times that in each case after a step, a processed bit width (e.g., the processed signal data SD) is reduced. If this is performed as shown in
If, for cost consideration, the bit width reduction (instead of with rounding) is performed with a simpler truncation (e.g., translated: mathematical rounding; omission of positions behind the decimal point after a selected position LSB), the output data (e.g., in
Since each rounding uses an additional addition (e.g., with 0.5*LSB of the output) compared to simple truncation, complexity of the rounding may almost be the same as the complexity of the actual arithmetical operations.
At the output, the effect of all processing stages is superimposed.
The rounding options partially available in field-programmable gate array (FPGA) macros may not be functionally usable. If these macros are compiled on the basis of logic cells, the macros use exactly the same logic cells as if the macros were directly encoded. Once again, the rounding corresponds to an addition with 0.5 LSB.
If these macros are available on the basis of hard macros with limited flexibility, the usability of the macros is limited to exactly the application envisaged by the manufacturer. However, this application is may not be the same as the actual application so that the rounding function may not be implemented within a hard macro. The FPGA manufacturer limits the flexibility of hard macros, since otherwise hard macros use a larger chip area.
Two embodiments for compensating the truncation offset (e.g., as offset compensation mechanism (INV1-INV12; “Coeff”; AE) for the compensation of an offset (OF)), which may in each case be used individually or also in combination, are provided. One embodiment provides the minimization of superimposition by inversion at suitable places in the processing chain. Another embodiment provides compensation of the offset by an individual sum at the input or output. In the example in
The principle of minimization by superimposition is based on the fact that during truncation, a negative (e.g., common-mode) offset occurs. If the signal is never inverted, the (scaled) errors are added to each individual processing step unidirectionally. The maximum of the error (e.g., offset) occurs at the end of the processing chain.
If, instead, at suitable places (e.g., at even numbers and/or at each second truncation along the processing of a signal and/or at each second truncation during the parallel processing of a signal), the signal to be processed is inverted (e.g., by either inverters INV1, INV2, INV3, INV4, INV5, INV6, INV7, INV8, INV9, INV10, INV11, INV12 or inversion (and inverted storage for all applications of the coefficient) of the coefficients Coeff for multiplications in a negative value), the actual output signal does not change, but the offsets that occur at the truncations mutually compensate each other. In an ideal case, complete compensation is achieved. Otherwise, good compensation is achievable.
In terms of digital technology, signal inversion may be very low on overheads and may even be achieved in that the coefficients referred to as Coeff shown in
This offset may be summarily measured at the output. Alternatively, the offset may be determined by calculation since the offset is completely or extensively dependent upon the structure of the processing chain (and the size of the coefficients that cause scaling). The offset is independent of the actual signal. Therefore, this offset may be compensated at the output by the addition of a constant value.
This correction offset may also alternatively be transformed at the input (or any other suitable place within the processing chain) and compensated there. However, a transformation beyond, for example, a mixer stage, is not simple. In this case, the compensation signal would be mixed as well.
One possible advantage may result from the great saving on logic, since a plurality of adders may be saved for the rounding. This makes it possible to use smaller and cheaper FPGAs or even to implement the complete calculating chain in a single FPGA.
Further savings may result from the power consumption and cooling due to the savings on logic.
This enables a function to be ultimately implemented in a less expensive way. The potential savings may be up to 50%.
It is to be understood that the elements and features recited in the appended claims may be combined in different ways to produce new claims that likewise fall within the scope of the present invention. Thus, whereas the dependent claims appended below depend from only a single independent or dependent claim, it is to be understood that these dependent claims can, alternatively, be made to depend in the alternative from any preceding or following claim, whether independent or dependent, and that such new combinations are to be understood as forming a part of the present specification.
While the present invention has been described above by reference to various embodiments, it should be understood that many changes and modifications can be made to the described embodiments. It is therefore intended that the foregoing description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting, and that it be understood that all equivalents and/or combinations of embodiments are intended to be included in this description.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
DE 102012216897.4 | Sep 2012 | DE | national |