The field of the invention is analyte testing supplies, more specifically, test unit cartridges.
Analyte testing devices play a critical roll in modern diagnosis and management of health-related issues. For example, a sample of human blood, urine, and/or saliva can be tested for glucose, fructosamine, hematocrit, hemoglobin blood oxygen saturation, lactates, iron, pH, cholesterol, liver enzymes (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase/GGT, LDH, bilirubin, etc), hormones, and other compounds.
For many diabetic patients, monitoring glucose levels is inconvenient and uncomfortable, since it requires repeatedly pricking the finger or some other body member in order to draw a blood sample. It would be advantageous to maximize the utility of a blood sample by collecting more than one kind of health data using the same meter, and even more preferably from the same “stick”. For example, while a diabetes patient is primarily concerned with monitoring glucose levels, it would be advantageous for diabetic patients to simultaneously, or in close time proximity, collect pH, iron, fructosamine or other health data. Such additional health data can be used as a baseline for later medical reference, or alternatively, for proactively monitoring for other potential health problems.
Several known references are directed at a single test unit that simultaneously tests for two or more analytes. For example, each of U.S. Pat. No. 7,955,791 (Dinello), US20110124130 (Wagner), and US2010/0312137 (Gilmour) disclose test strips that test for two or more analytes using one strip. However, none of those references teach a cartridge (i.e., a magazine, cassette or other housing or enclosure) for holding two or more non-fungible test units.
US 2007/0007183 to Schulat discloses a magazine that holds a plurality of test units for measuring analytes like glucose. However, Schulat fails to contemplate that a magazine can hold test units that test for different analytes.
US 2010/0151488 to Smith discloses a test unit (referred to as a cassette) that has two test spots, i.e., two analyte sensors. One is for measuring glycated albumin, and the other is for measuring total albumin (for diabetes management). Smith, however, still does not contemplate a cassette that carries two or more different types of test units (i.e., non-fungible test units).
Thus, while known prior art has appreciated the advantages of a test unit that tests for two or more analytes, the known prior art has failed to provide a cartridge for holding a plurality of test units, wherein at least two of the test units are non-fungible (e.g., a first test unit configured to detect a first analyte and a second test unit configured to test a second analyte that is different from the first analyte). It would therefore be advantageous to provide a cartridge that includes different test units for detecting different analytes. For example, an inventive cartridge holding twenty separate test units could include glucose-detecting analyte sensors on every test unit, and fructosamine-detecting analyte sensors on every fifth test unit (i.e., every fifth test unit has two analyte sensors). Furthermore, it would be advantageous for that device to automatically store and monitor both glucose and fructosamine levels. In this manner, a diabetic patient primarily concerned with glucose levels could simultaneously collect other important health data, thus maximizing the utility of each blood sample.
Thus, there is still a need for test unit cartridges that include non-fungible test units.
The inventive subject matter provides apparatus, systems, and methods in which a test unit cartridge houses: (i) a first test unit having a first analyte sensor that includes a first reagent used to detect a first analyte; and (ii) a second test unit having a second analyte sensor that includes a second reagent used to detect a second analyte different from the first analyte, such that the first test unit is not functionally fungible with the second test unit.
In one aspect of some preferred embodiments, the test unit comprises a single strip. As used herein, the term “strip” means a thin (less than 5 mm thick) elongated object having at least one analyte sensor. A test unit can also comprise a non-strip configuration, such as a capsule more that 5 mm thick, or a disk.
In yet other aspects of preferred embodiments, the first test unit has no other analyte sensors besides the first analyte sensor. Alternatively, the first test unit can include an additional analyte sensor that detects the second analyte.
In another aspect of some preferred embodiments, the cartridge includes a “sacrificial” test unit disposed at a beginning of an order of use of the cartridge. The sacrificial test unit is configured to provide a moisture barrier by corking and sealing all apertures of the cartridge. The “sacrificial” test unit can optionally include at least two analyte sensors for detecting multiple analytes. It is also contemplated that each test unit can include features that cork the apertures of the cartridge such that the test units are protected from moisture and dust when not in use.
In one aspect of preferred embodiments, the test unit cartridge includes a third through twentieth test unit, each of which is functionally fungible with the first test unit.
In yet other aspects of preferred embodiments, the first reagent and second reagent are different. For example, the first reagent is configured to bind with a first analyte and the second reagent is configured to bind with a second analyte.
In some aspects of preferred embodiments, the cartridge includes pull-away labels that cover every aperture of the cartridge in order to provide a seal and barrier from moisture and dust.
In yet other aspects, the cartridge includes an aperture that allows an electrical contact of the first test unit to directly couple with an electrical contact of an analyte testing device.
The inventive subject matter also provides apparatus, systems, and methods in which a test unit cartridge has a plurality of test units, wherein at least one of the test units has a first and second analyte sensor configured to detect a first and second analyte, respectively. The first and second analyte sensors can be completely non-overlapping, partly overlapping, or completely overlapping. In some aspects of preferred embodiments, the first and second analyte sensors are physically separated by a distance.
Yet still, the inventive subject matter provides apparatus, systems, and methods in which a test unit cartridge includes a calibration test unit and an operating test unit. As used herein, the term “calibration test unit” means a test unit having a known analyte presence and configured to test the accuracy of an analyte testing device (e.g., glucose meter). As used herein, the term “operating test unit” means a test unit having an analyte sensor that is configured to detect an analyte.
The inventive subject matter also provides apparatus, systems, and methods in which a test unit cartridge has a plurality of test units and a spring. The spring is disposed in a manner such that each test unit is advanced into a usable position after a previous test strip has been laterally ejected from the cartridge.
The inventive subject matter also provides apparatus, systems, and methods in which a test unit cartridge houses a plurality of test units in a stacked configuration.
From a method perspective, an analyte testing device can be used by: (i) inserting a lancet cartridge into the device; (ii) inserting a test unit cartridge into the device, wherein the test unit cartridge has a plurality of nonfungible test units; (iii) operating a mechanically advantaged actuator on the device, which operates a mechanism that (a) readies a lancing device, (b) exposes an analyte sensor of a test unit, and (c) advances the lancet cartridge; (iv) deploying the lancing device in order to prick a body part and draw a blood sample; and (v) contacting the analyte sensor to the blood sample.
Preferred methods further include reading an output of the device; ejecting and disposing of the test unit; replacing the lancet cartridge with a refill lancet cartridge; and replacing the test unit cartridge with a refill test unit cartridge. In addition, the nonfungible test units preferably comprise at least one test unit configured to detect a first and second analyte.
Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the inventive subject matter will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, along with the accompanying drawing figures in which like numerals represent like components.
The following discussion provides many example embodiments of the inventive subject matter. Although each embodiment represents a single combination of inventive elements, the inventive subject matter is considered to include all possible combinations of the disclosed elements. Thus if one embodiment comprises elements A, B, and C, and a second embodiment comprises elements B and D, then the inventive subject matter is also considered to include other remaining combinations of A, B, C, or D, even if not explicitly disclosed.
Cartridge 100 can include any appropriate number of test units, preferably between 15 and 25 test units, more preferably between 18 and 22 test units, and most preferably 20 test units. Cartridge 100 includes test units configured to test for different analytes. For example, test unit 110a has an analyte sensor 115a, which includes an analyte-binding reagent configured to test for glucose. Test unit 110b has two analyte sensors (sensor 115b and sensor 116b) for detecting two different analytes (e.g., glucose and iron) using only one fluid sample. Cartridge 100 also has a calibration test unit 110c that has two analyte sensors: sensor 115c is for detecting glucose and calibration sensor 116c is for checking the accuracy of an analyte meter.
Unless the context dictates the contrary, all ranges set forth herein should be interpreted as being inclusive of their endpoints, and open-ended ranges should be interpreted to include commercially practical values. Similarly, all lists of values should be considered as inclusive of intermediate values unless the context indicates the contrary.
Cartridge 100 can include a test unit that is functionally fungible with 110b or 110c at every nth test unit within the plurality of test units 110 in order to ensure that certain health data is gathered at particular intervals. For example, in one preferred embodiment cartridge 100 holds twenty test units, wherein the first and third through twentieth test units are configured to detect glucose, and the second test unit is configured to detect glucose and fructosamine. In this manner, fructosamine levels are monitored at every second test unit of every test unit cartridge.
The housing of cartridge 100 can be made of plastic, metal, composite, or any other material with structural and mechanical properties suitable for housing a plurality of test units. Cartridge 100 is preferably compact, with a height no more than 25 mm, a width no more than 15 mm, and a length no more than 50 mm. In especially preferred embodiments, the height is no more than 20 mm, a width is no more than 8 mm, and a length is no more than 40 mm.
Cartridge 100 also preferably includes an inner desiccant liner (not shown) for protecting the plurality of test units from exposure to moisture. For example, a liner can be disposed between the test units and the inner wall of cartridge 100, thus surrounding all the test units (e.g., an inner sleeve). In some embodiments, the liner comprises a crystalline structure configured to absorb moisture and prevent moisture from reaching the analyte sensors. Liners are well known and all materials suitable for absorbing and/or blocking moisture are contemplated. In addition, all cartridge apertures are preferably sealed with a pull-away adhesive label. For example, pull-away label 131 has been placed over slot 129 in order to seal slot 129, thus protecting test units 110 from exposure to moisture and dust. Preferably, slot 132, slot 133 and all other orifices/apertures of cartridge 100 are sealed with a pull-away label. The labels can be removed just prior to loading cartridge 100 into device 600 (see
Cartridge 100 also includes a spring 175, which is disposed below the plurality of test units 110 and is configured to push the test units 110 upward. In this manner, each test unit is pushed up into a usable position after the previous test unit is laterally ejected out of slot 132.
Cartridge 100 provides several advantages. First, by providing a plurality of test units in one disposable and replaceable cartridge, methods and devices for monitoring analytes is significantly simplified. Second, cartridge 100 provides a means for ensuring that secondary health data is gathered at predetermined intervals. For example, a diabetes patient monitoring glucose levels (i.e., primary health data) will nonetheless monitor secondary health data (e.g., fructosamine levels) when test unit 110b is used. Third, cartridge 100 allows primary and secondary health data to be gathered simultaneously in a single blood sample. Fourth, cartridge 100 provides an enclosure that protects a plurality of test units from exposure to moisture and dust. Finally, cartridge 100 provides a simple mechanism for advancing each test unit into place after the previous test unit has been removed and disposed.
Test unit 110a also advantageously includes a first sealing surface 134 and a second sealing surface 135, configured to restrict entry of moisture into the interior of cartridge 100 via slots 132 and 133, respectively. Test unit 110a is disposed at the beginning of the order of use of the plurality of test units 110 in cartridge 100 (i.e., on top of the stack of test units 110, see
While
Test unit 110a and test unit 110b are “functionally nonfungible” since unit 110a tests for glucose while unit 110b detects glucose and fructosamine. An example of two functionally fungible test units is a first test unit that test for glucose and iron, and a second test unit that tests for glucose and iron.
Device 600 can further include a docking station and data management software. Acceptable docking stations and data management systems that could be adapted for use within the existing subject matter is described in co-pending patent application having Ser. No. 13/187,360 titled to Shaanan et al. “Analyte Testing System With Docking Station For Data Management” filed on Jul. 20, 2011.
In one aspect of some preferred embodiments, the actuator is mechanically advantaged and the step of operating the actuator comprises cocking a lever.
As used herein, and unless the context dictates otherwise, the term “coupled to” is intended to include both direct coupling (in which two elements that are coupled to each other contact each other) and indirect coupling (in which at least one additional element is located between the two elements). Therefore, the terms “coupled to” and “coupled with” are used synonymously.
It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/165,621 filed Jun. 21, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4794926 | Munsch et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4936833 | Sams | Jun 1990 | A |
5064098 | Hutter, III et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5196025 | Ranalletta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5269762 | Armbruster et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5322511 | Armbruster et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5569186 | Lord et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5637095 | Nason et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5728074 | Castellano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5871494 | Simons et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5971941 | Simons et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6045537 | Klitmose | Apr 2000 | A |
6071294 | Simons et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6228100 | Schraga | May 2001 | B1 |
6332871 | Douglas et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6364889 | Kheiri et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6454746 | Bydlon et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468287 | Baugh | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472220 | Simons et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474219 | Klitmose et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482186 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6582404 | Klitgaard et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585698 | Packman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616616 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6783537 | Kuhr et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6827899 | Maisey et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849237 | Housefield et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872358 | Hagen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6997343 | May et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025774 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066909 | Peter et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7094221 | Veasey et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7175642 | Briggs et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192405 | DeNuzzio et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198615 | Langley et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211096 | Kuhr et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7220248 | Mernoe | May 2007 | B2 |
7258693 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261691 | Asomani | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7291132 | DeRuntz et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7344507 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360045 | Maezawa | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7430825 | Vanek et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7534226 | Mernoe et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7582063 | Wurster et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7662065 | Kahn et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7704231 | Pongpairochana et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708717 | Estes et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7713238 | Mernoe | May 2010 | B2 |
7753879 | Mernoe | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776030 | Estes et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785288 | Mernoe et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785338 | Kuhr et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789859 | Estes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794426 | Briones et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794427 | Estes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794428 | Estes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794430 | Langley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828528 | Estes et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833196 | Estes et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848765 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7879026 | Estes et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7883015 | Ackermann et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887511 | Mernoe et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887512 | Estes et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887682 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892183 | Boecker et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892185 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892199 | Mhatre et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914742 | Arbogast et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922708 | Estes et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922971 | Bryer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935063 | Roe | May 2011 | B2 |
7935076 | Estes et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7935105 | Miller et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7938803 | Mernoe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7951114 | Rush et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955791 | Dinello et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967784 | Pongpairochana et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981084 | Estes et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981102 | Patel et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021345 | Veasey et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032226 | Miller et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057436 | Causey et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8105279 | Mernoe et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109921 | Estes et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8152765 | Briones et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8192394 | Estes et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020170823 | Housefield et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177761 | Orloff et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030083685 | Freeman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030153900 | Aceti et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191415 | Moerman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040044272 | Moerman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082878 | Baldwin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098009 | Boecker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127819 | Roe | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172284 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050015020 | LeVaughn et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050238538 | Braig et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060229502 | Pollock et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245131 | Ramey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279431 | Bakarania et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281187 | Emery et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070007183 | Schulat et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073590 | Cosentino et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088271 | Richards | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173740 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179404 | Escutia et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080139910 | Mastrototaro et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167578 | Bryer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200838 | Goldberger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217407 | Ackermann et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090010802 | Joseph et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090050491 | Brown | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090138207 | Cosentino et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171589 | Kovatchev | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090270765 | Ghesquiere et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322513 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100069730 | Bergstrom et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087754 | Rush et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094205 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100151488 | Smith et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100212675 | Walling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218132 | Soni et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100262380 | Matievich et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270149 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286563 | Bryer et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312137 | Gilmour et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317935 | Roe et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331653 | Stafford | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009775 | Roe | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040165 | Williams, III | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054390 | Searle et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110118771 | Ruan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124130 | Wagner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124996 | Reinke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132759 | Petyt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2526543 | Jan 2005 | CA |
2544953 | Oct 2006 | CA |
2599573 | Nov 2006 | CA |
2607437 | Dec 2006 | CA |
2646279 | Oct 2007 | CA |
2669302 | Jun 2008 | CA |
2327127 | Aug 2010 | CA |
1399059 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1717942 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1328192 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2284747 | Feb 2011 | EP |
1664783 | May 2011 | EP |
2195050 | May 2011 | EP |
WO 9935487 | Jul 1999 | WO |
02094092 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03047426 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2006122741 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006133435 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007112034 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008069932 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009146379 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010009870 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010049669 | May 2010 | WO |
2010054205 | May 2010 | WO |
2010068617 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010120563 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010134969 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011008520 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011019657 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011026053 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011060923 | May 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13165621 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13187397 | US |