1. Field of the Invention
Provided are methods for activating metal clusters. More specifically, provided are processes for activating Ir4 carbonyl clusters carrying phosphine ligands by using oxygen resulting in an activated, open Ir4 cluster. The resulting activated metal cluster contains a coordinatively unsaturated site comprising carbonyl vacancies and achieves catalytic rate enhancement.
2. Description of the Related Art
Increasing catalytic activity, particularly for hydrogenation catalysts, is always a valued goal. There are reports of oxidative activation of catalyst sites for homogeneous cationic complexes used in hydrosilylation. See, Organosilicon Chemistry. Part 24. Homogeneous Rhodium-catalysed Hydrosilation of Alkenes and Alkynes: The Role of Oxygen or Hydroperoxides by Parish et al. in J C S Dalton 1980, 308-313) and hydrogenation reactions (Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl-Rhodium and-Iridium Complexes Part 35 Hydrogenation Catalysts Based on [(RhC5Me5)2(OH)3) And The Border Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Systems by Maitlis et al. in J Mol. Cat. 1982, 15, 337-347. These studies are preceded by reports of increased hydrogenation activity after oxygen treatment; for instance, a 100-fold increase in hydrogenation activity of maleic acid is observed upon treating the homogeneous trans-IrX(CO)(PPh3)2, where X═Cl, Br complex with small amounts of oxygen (Kinetic study of iridium (I) complexes as homogeneous hydrogenation catalysts by James and Memon in Can J. Chem. 1968, 46:217-223). Both the Parish et al. and Maitlis et al. manuscript attribute the role of oxygen treatment as one that removes ligands (e.g., oxidizes triphenylphosphine to triphenylphosphine oxide), thereby creating a coordinatively unsaturated center that is catalytically active. The Maitlis et al. article articulates how such species are unstable and readily aggregate into larger particles in general.
The oxidative treatment has been previously used to activate soluble metal complexes for catalysis. See James, B. R.; Memon, N. A. Can. J. Chem. 1968, 46, 217-23, Strohmeier, W.; Hitzel, E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1975, 102, C37-41, van Bekkum, H.; van Rantwijk, F.; van de Putte, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 1, 1-2 and Dickers, H. M; Haszeldine, R. N.; Malkin, L. S.; Mather, A. P.; Parish, R. V. J. C. S. Dalton 1980, 308-13. However, when oxidative treatment is used on the clusters, it typically results in a cluster that, after oxidative treatment, is unstable and rapidly deactivates during catalysis. This type of cluster instability has been identified to be a universal problem and limiting issue that prevents implementation of clusters as catalysts in practice. See X, Z.; Xiao, F.-S.; Purnell, S. K.; Alexeev, O.; Kawi, S.; Deutsch, S. E.; Gates, B. C. Nature 1994, 372, 346-48.
Ligands can also be removed using harsh thermal treatment to create open and catalytically active sites in metal clusters. See Gates Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 511-22. However, such harsh thermal treatments are known to lead to unstable clusters under oxidative conditions and are incompatible with having a well-defined organic-ligand sphere complexed to the cluster. The ligands can also be treated in-situ to alter the catalytic activity of the metal cluster. Specifically, soluble metal complexes comprising most typically one and sometimes two metal atoms and containing phosphine ligands have been shown to become more catalytically active for alkene hydrogenation upon oxidation. This has been hypothesized to be due to oxidation of phosphine to phosphine oxide. See James, B. R.; Memon, N. A. Can. J. Chem. 1968, 46, 217-23, van Bekkum, H.; van Rantwijk, F.; van de Putte, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 1, 1-2 and Dickers, H. M; Haszeldine, R. N.; Malkin, L. S.; Mather, A. P.; Parish, R. V. J C. S Dalton 1980, 308-13). This phosphine oxidation is hypothesized to open up a previously occupied coordination site on the metal for reactant binding and catalysis.
An objective of the present invention is to provide a simple and efficient activation of a metal cluster, open or closed, comprising a metal polyhedra, which results in an activated metal cluster after activation. The activated metal cluster is useful as a catalyst, is stable, and demonstrates improved catalytic activity
Provided is a method for the activation of a metal carbonyl cluster for catalysis using an oxidative treatment. The resulting activated cluster is stable and can achieve catalytic rate enhancement. The method comprises reacting the metal carbonyl cluster, either closed or open, with an oxidative agent, with the oxidative agent reacting with a bound carbonyl group so as to unbind it from the cluster and leave behind other ligands in a different oxidation state. In one aspect, the metal cluster is supported on a catalytic support. The supported metal cluster is reacted with an oxidative agent in a flow reactor, with the oxidative agent reacting with a bound carbonyl group so as to unbind it from the cluster leaving behind a reactive coordinatively unsaturated site and other ligands in a different oxidation state. The resulting activated open metal cluster is used for catalysis and exhibits enhanced catalytic rate. In one aspect, the metal cluster is activated by using oxygen as an oxidative agent. Upon reacting the metal cluster with an oxidative agent, CO groups are removed, and other ligands may transform into a different oxidative state.
In one aspect, the activated open metal cluster involves having one or more carbonyls on the cluster missing. In one aspect, the site formerly held by the missing carbonyls is a coordinatively unsaturated site which is a CO vacancy. In an alternate embodiment, the closed metal cluster comprises one or more phosphine ligands. One or more of these phosphine ligands is oxidized via oxidative treatment to synthesize phosphine oxide, which are easily labile ligands and create an open site on the cluster in this fashion. In one embodiment, the activated open metal cluster is an open Ir4 cluster bound with three calixarene phosphine ligands for steric protection against aggregation.
Among other factors, it has been found that an open metal cluster can be prepared by means of a chemical reaction between an oxidative agent and metal carbonyl cluster, without the need for a thermal supported reaction that are known to lead to unstable clusters under oxidative conditions and are incompatible with having a well-defined organic-ligand sphere complexed to the cluster. The resulting activated metal cluster is stable and exhibits catalytic rate enhancement, particularly for hydrogenation reactions. The metal carbonyl cluster reacted with the oxidative agent is generally a closed metal carbonyl cluster, but further activation of an open cluster with the oxidative treatment has been found to surprisingly further enhance the catalytic rate. In one aspect, the present process permits removal of carbonyl groups and oxidation of phosphine ligands. In one aspect, the activated open metal clusters are free of aggregation by employing calixarene phosphine ligands for steric protection. The resulting activated open metal clusters have a coordinatively unsaturated site comprising carbonyl vacancy that acts as a highly active catalyst site. These sites are useful in catalysis and render the activated open metal cluster an effective catalyst. In one aspect, the activated open metal clusters serve as catalysts for hydrogenation reactions.
The present invention provides a general method for the activation of metal carbonyl clusters, which in one embodiment are bound by with three calixarene phosphine ligands for steric protection against aggregation. Open metal carbonyl clusters are clusters containing metal bonds to a bound carbonyl, which cluster can also contain other ligands such as phosphine, carbene, etc. The activated open metal clusters comprise a coordinatively unsaturated site consisting of CO vacancy. The synthesis of the activated open metal cluster requires an oxidative agent such as oxygen. Any suitable oxidative agent can be used for the treatment, but oxygen is particularly practical and effective. Peroxides, hypochlorides and permanganates are examples of other useful oxidative agents.
By an “activated open” metal cluster is meant for the purposes of the present invention having carbonyls of the metal cluster missing and different oxidation state of other ligands compared to their original oxidation state. The sites formerly held by the missing carbonyls are a vacant site altogether.
An activated open metal cluster, for the present purposes, is one where after the activated open metal cluster is used in catalysis, the site that used to be occupied by CO after oxidation, is able to be readily recarbonylated and reoccupied upon treatment with CO. This can be done, for example, upon treating the cluster with CO gas at catalytic reaction condition. If rebinding of the CO is not readily accomplished, the cluster is not considered stable catalyst.
The “activated open” nature of the metal cluster has been found possible by treating closed metal cluster with an oxidative agent such as oxygen to create the open sites and simultaneously oxidize other ligands. In general, the activating agent can be any oxygen-containing compound coordinating through oxygen. As noted above, the activated open metal clusters of the present invention can be regenerated after it has been used for catalysis by binding CO ligands to the open sites, e.g., upon treating the cluster with CO gas at catalytic reaction condition.
The example below demonstrates a present synthesis of a silica-supported closed metal cluster that is bound with three phosphine ligands. As a comparison of the two clusters L and L′ as defined in
The catalytic activity of closed metal clusters was determined by using closed metal clusters supported on a silica support. An example of a typical procedure for silica-supported organometallic cluster catalysts comprising of either L3 and L3′ is as follows: (1) silica (Degussa, Aerosil 200) was hydroxylated with deionized water by stirring and refluxing the slurry for 24 hours, (2) the slurry was cooled to room temperature and then centrifuged at 10000 rpm to separate the solid phase from the supernatant, (3) the silica paste was dried under vacuum at 200° C. for 15 hours and subsequently crushed into a powder, (4) silica powder was calcined under dry air at 500° C. for 4 hours followed by inert gas at 500° C. for 10 hours, (5) the tetrairidium carbonyl cluster precursor (e.g., L3 or L3′) was dissolved in n-hexane (EMD Chemicals, anhydrous 95%, and dried in sodium bezophenone ketyl) in a Schlenk flask and adsorbed onto the calcined silica by stirring the mixture at room temperature (approximately 23° C.) for 1 hour until the solution became colorless, (6) the solvent was evacuated under vacuum (15 mtorr) for 24 hours. Each catalyst contained about 1.0 wt % Ir. The synthesized material was stored in a glove box and subsequently handled by using moisture- and air-free techniques. The silica-supported tetrairidium carbonyl clusters are subsequently named L3 @ SiO2-500 and L3′ @ SiO2-500.
The catalytic activity of L3 @ SiO2-500 and of L3′ @ SiO2-500 (both as-made) was tested for ethylene hydrogenation. The reactions were carried out in once-through packed-bed flow reactors at a temperature of 50° C. and atmospheric pressure. The packed bed (250 mg of catalyst) was loaded into a u-shaped reactor (with air-free stopcock closures) in an argon-filled glovebox, and installed into the flow system to avoid contacting the catalyst with air. The process lines, and subsequently the packed bed, were purged with He (99.999% purity). The temperature was measured by using a thermocouple placed inside the reactor and immediately upstream of the packed bed. The reactant gases (10 mL/min H2 and 3 mL/min C2H4) were diluted in a stream of He flowing at 50 mL/min. An online MKS FTIR (Multigas 2030) was used to analyze the reaction products.
The activity of the as-made catalysts is immediate but relatively low, see
Next, the stability of these as-made catalysts is shown by following ethylene hydrogenation catalysis and recarbonylation by CO treatment processes using in-situ (time-resolved) solid-state FTIR spectroscopy as shown in
The utility of three sterically bulky groups such as calixarene phosphine for cluster stability can be demonstrated by the instability exhibited at higher temperature by a metal cluster having only one calixarene phosphine ligand. As a comparison, L1 @ SiO2-500, which contains only one bulky calixarene phosphine ligand on the Ir4 cluster, is not stable even during ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, as shown by the lack of steady-state ethane formation (
The example below demonstrates a present synthesis of an activated open Ir4 cluster that is bound with three oxidized calixarene phosphine ligands. As a comparison of the two clusters L and L′ as defined in
The reactions were carried out in once-through packed-bed flow reactors at a temperature of 50° C. and atmospheric pressure. The packed bed (250 mg of catalyst L3 @ SiO2-500 and L3′ @ SiO2-500) was loaded into a u-shaped reactor (with air-free stopcock closures) in an argon-filled glovebox, and installed into the flow system to avoid contacting the catalyst with air. The process lines, and subsequently the packed bed, were purged with He (99.999% purity). The temperature was measured by using a thermocouple placed inside the reactor and immediately upstream of the packed bed. The reactant gases (10 mL/min H2 and 3 mL/min C2H4) were diluted in a stream of He flowing at 50 mL/min. After maintaining the above conditions for 24 hours, the catalyst were subjected to a 12 hours oxidation treatment with extra dry air (Praxair, AI0.0XD) flowing at 60 mL/min and He (Praxair, 99.999% purity) flowing at 10 mL/min. The packed bed temperature was maintained at 50° C. and ambient pressure. The resulting activated open metal clusters were used as is.
One example of the utility and stability of the activated L3 @ SiO2-500 containing an Ir4 cluster is shown in the hydrogenation of ethylene. After the oxidation treatment, both catalysts (L3 @ SiO2-500 and L3′ @ SiO2-500) were more active for ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, as shown in
The stability of these catalysts (L3 @ SiO2-500 and of L3′ @ SiO2-500) can also be shown using solid-state FTIR spectroscopy for the sequence of ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, oxidation, ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, and then recarbonylation. These data are shown in
In contrast, the terminal CO band intensity for the catalyst L3′ @ SiO2-500 was not stable during the second ethylene hydrogenation catalysis (
The activation such as oxidation also irreversibly changed the metal cluster. The change affected by the oxidation treatment can be shown by following the decarbonylation during an oxidation treatment and recarbonylation by CO treatment processes using in-situ (time-resolved) solid-state FTIR spectroscopy as shown in
The stability and the irreversible changes to the catalyst L3 @ SiO2-500 after activation was followed by 31P NMR characterizing as-made catalyst, as-made catalyst after C2H4 hydrogenation catalysis, and as-made catalyst after the sequence of initial C2H4 hydrogenation catalysis, and oxidation treatment (
Other treatment conditions can affect the catalytic activity of the catalyst L3 @ SiO2-500. The catalyst following the sequence of catalysis, oxidation, and further catalysis was further exposed to pure C2H4 for 2 hours at 50° C. Subsequently, the catalytic activity for ethylene hydrogenation of the catalyst is measured (reaction conditions were the same as those used above). The formation of ethane was increased by more than 25% (Table 2), from 1241 to 1576 ppm ethane, when comparing the rate prior to C2H4 exposure. This example shows that use of other gas treatments after an oxidation and ethylene hydrogenation catalysis sequence can further enhance activity.
The following examples are provided as specific illustrations, and are not meant to be limiting.
Silica (Degussa, Aerosil 200) was hydroxylated with deionized water by stirring and refluxing the slurry for 24 hours. The resulting slurry was cooled to room temperature and then centrifuged at 10000 rpm to separate the solid phase from the supernatant. The resulting silica paste was dried under vacuum at 200° C. for 15 hours and subsequently crushed into a powder which was calcined under dry air at 500° C. for 4 hours followed by inert gas at 500° C. for 10 hours. The tetrairidium carbonyl cluster precursor (e.g., L3 or L3′) was dissolved in n-hexane (EMD Chemicals, anhydrous 95%, and dried in sodium bezophenone ketyl) in a Schlenk flask and adsorbed onto the calcined silica by stirring the mixture at room temperature (approximately 23° C.) for 1 hour until the solution became colorless. The solvent was evacuated under vacuum (15 mtorr) for 24 hours. Each resulting catalyst contained about 1.0 wt % Ir. The synthesized material was stored in a glove box and subsequently handled by using moisture- and air-free techniques. The silica-supported tetrairidium carbonyl clusters are named L3 @ SiO2-500 and L3′ @ SiO2-500.
The catalytic activity of L3 @ SiO2-500 and of L3′ @ SiO2-500 (both as-made) was tested for ethylene hydrogenation. The reactions were carried out in once-through packed-bed flow reactors at a temperature of 50° C. and atmospheric pressure. The packed bed (250 mg of catalyst) was loaded into a u-shaped reactor (with air-free stopcock closures) in an argon-filled glovebox, and installed into the flow system to avoid contacting the catalyst with air. The process lines, and subsequently the packed bed, were purged with He (99.999% purity). The temperature was measured by using a thermocouple placed inside the reactor and immediately upstream of the packed bed. The reactant gases (10 mL/min H2 and 3 mL/min C2H4) were diluted in a stream of He flowing at 50 mL/min. An online MKS FTIR (Multigas 2030) was used to analyze the reaction products.
The activity of the as-made catalysts is immediate but relatively low (
The stability studies of these as-made catalysts is measured by following ethylene hydrogenation catalysis carried out at 50° C., ambient pressure and a total flow rate of 63 mL/min (16% H2, 5% C2H4, balance He), followed by recarbonylation by CO treatment processes at 50° C. using in-situ (time-resolved) solid-state FTIR spectroscopy as shown in
Catalysts L3 @ SiO2-500 and L3′ @ SiO2-500 were subjected to 24 hours of ethylene hydrogenation catalysis condition of example 2 followed by a 12 hours oxidation treatment with extra dry air (Praxair, AI0.0XD) flowing at 60 mL/min and He (Praxair, 99.999% purity) flowing at 10 mL/min. The packed bed temperature was maintained at 50° C. and ambient pressure.
Both catalysts obtained from example 4 were separately subjected to 50° C., ambient pressure, and total flow rate of 63 mL/min (16% H2, 5% C2H4 balance He).
Both catalysts were more active for ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, as shown in
The stability of these catalysts can determined using solid-state FTIR spectroscopy for the sequence of ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, oxidation, ethylene hydrogenation catalysis, and then recarbonylation. These data are shown in
In contrast, the terminal CO band intensity for the catalyst L3′ @ SiO2-500 was not stable during the second ethylene hydrogenation catalysis (
The change affected by the oxidation treatment on L3 @ SiO2-500 can be shown by following the decarbonylation during an oxidation treatment and recarbonylation by CO treatment processes using in-situ (time-resolved) solid-state FTIR spectroscopy as shown in
The stability of the catalyst L3 @ SiO2-500 was followed by 31P NMR characterizing as-made in Example 1, Example 2 after the sequence of initial C2H4 hydrogenation catalysis, and Examples 4 and 5 after the sequence of initial C2H4 hydrogenation catalysis, oxidation treatment, and subsequent C2H4 hydrogenation catalysis catalysts (
The catalyst used in Examples 4 and 5 (after the sequence of catalysis, oxidation, and further catalysis) was exposed to pure C2H4 for 2 hours at 50° C. Subsequently, the catalytic activity for ethylene hydrogenation of the catalyst is measured (reaction conditions were the same as those used in Examples 4 and 5). The formation of ethane was increased by more than 25% (Table 2), from 1241 to 1576 ppm ethane, when comparing the rate prior to C2H4 exposure. This example shows that use of other gas treatments after an oxidation and ethylene hydrogenation catalysis sequence can further enhance activity.
Various modifications and alterations of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Other objects and advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the preceding description.
The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/719,840, filed on Oct. 29, 2012, entitled “Methods of Activating Metal Complexes for Catalysis”, the contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61719840 | Oct 2012 | US |