METHODS OF ASSESSING ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES

Abstract
The present disclosure provides methods of assessing DAR of ADC products that provide advantages over known methods. Specifically, methods of the disclosure can be used in high-throughput applications and/or without having to dilute ADC samples during the assessment.
Description
BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of drug molecules. Their ability to locate to a specific target and deliver a potent drug makes them an attractive option for developing a target based therapeutic product. ADCs are produced by chemically linking potent drug molecules to a monoclonal antibody via a selected chemical linker. The average number of drug molecules that are conjugated to the monoclonal antibody is called drug-to-antibody ratio, (“DAR”). DAR is an important quality attribute of ADC products, because it can impact product efficacy, safety and/or stability. Accordingly, methods of assessing DAR of ADC products in a reliable and high throughput manner are desirable.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides methods of assessing DAR of ADC products that provide advantages over known methods. Specifically, methods of the disclosure can be used in high-throughput applications and/or without having to dilute ADC samples during the assessment.


UV-Vis and Beer-Lambert's Law

DAR has traditionally been measured using UV-Vis spectroscopy (see, e.g., Chen, Methods Mol. Biol. 1045:267-73 (2013)). The basis for this analysis is the Beer-Lambert law, a direct proportional relationship between the absorbance and concentration of a substance:






A=εcl,


where A is the absorbance, ε is the extinction coefficient (a physical constant of the substance), l is the path length through the cell containing the analyte, and c is the concentration.


DAR measurement for an ADC product using UV-Vis spectroscopy relies on the difference in absorption maxima for the antibody (e.g., 280 nm) and the absorption maxima for the drug (e.g., at 252 nm). For example, the average DAR can be calculated using the difference in the measured absorption at 280 nm and 252 nm for the conjugated material. Although the UV-Vis method is widely used in industry, it lacks the throughput needed for formulation screening studies. It also cannot be used without sample dilution, leading to errors associated with sample dilution.


The present disclosure is thus based, at least in part, on alternative methods for measuring DAR using size exclusion chromatography (e.g., UPLC) and slope spectroscopy. These methods were characterized and compared to UV-Vis spectroscopy with respect to reproducibility, precision and sensitivity. The data generated support use of UPLC-based DAR methods to overcome the throughput limitations of traditional UV-Vis methods. Further, the slope spectroscopy based method can be used to analyze ADC samples without sample dilution.


UPLC-Based Methods

In one embodiment, size exclusion is used to determine DAR. In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein comprise applying a sample comprising an antibody-drug conjugate to a size-exclusion chromatography matrix. In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein comprise applying to and running a sample comprising an antibody-drug conjugate through a size-exclusion chromatography matrix. In some embodiments, a total amount of ADC sample is applied to a size exclusion matrix for analysis. For example, the following UPLC-based methodology was used to assess DAR.















Column:
Waters Acquity UPLC BEH200 SEC



(Part# 186005225) 4.6 mm ×



15 cm, 1.7 μm particle size, max



pressure: 1034 bar 2 columns attached inline


Mobile Phase:
Perchlorate SEC Buffer:



10 mM Phosphate, pH 6.0



1M NaClO4


Gradient Info:
Isocratic


Flow Rate:
0.4 mL/min


Method Run Time:
12 minutes


Column Temperature:
Not controlled


Wavelength of
280 nm and 252 nm (or Amax


Detection
for conjugated drug)


Target Injection
6-150 μg ADC (no dilution)


Amount









Data collected at 280 nm were integrated using Empower's Apex Track integration method with peak shoulder detection. The retention time integration range is molecule dependent, but is usually within 3-9 minutes. The peak with largest height and area was classified as “native”, “main” or “monomer” peak. Any peaks eluting earlier than the “native” peak were classified as “HMW” peaks. Any peaks eluting later than the “native peak” were classified as “LMW” peaks.


The relative percentage of each species was calculated from the ratio of the area of individual peaks to the total area of all peaks. The relative percent area of the following was reported as an indicator of purity: % Total HMW, % Native (or Main or Monomer), and % Total LMW. The total area of all peaks was summed and used in subsequent DAR calculations. However, in some embodiments, only the area of the native peak is used.


Data collected at 252 nm were integrated using Empower's Apex Track integration method with peak shoulder detection. The retention time integration range is molecule dependent, but is usually within 3-9 minutes. The total area of all peaks was summed and used in subsequent DAR calculations. However, in some embodiments, only the area of the native peak is used.


DAR was determined from the total peak area at 280 nm (Amax for the ADC) and the total peak area at 252 nm (Amax for the drug). Although 252 nm is a common Amax for drug conjugates used for ADCs, an appropriate wavelength can be selected for a specific conjugate, e.g., using known methods. The amount of drug bound to the antibody can be determined by the difference in total peak areas at these two wavelengths, using the naked antibody as a reference standard, if applicable.


The following two equations (which were derived from the Beer-Lambert law) were verified and demonstrated consistency.









DAR
=




ε

252


nm

mAb

*
Total




Area



280


nm



-


ε

280


nm

mAb

*
Total



Area



252


nm








ε

280


nm

drug

*
Total



Area



252


nm




-


ε

252


nm


d

rug


*
Total



Area



280


nm










Equation


1







Equation 1 does not require the use of a naked antibody reference standard. However, systematic determination of extinction coefficients (E) for both the antibody and the drug at 252 nm is required. The extinction coefficient at a given wavelength can readily be calculated from the Beer-Lambert law by using a solution of either the antibody or the drug having a known concentration and measuring the absorbance at the given wavelength.









DAR
=



ε

280


nm

mAb


Total



Area

280


nm

mAb



*





Equation


2











Total



Area

252


nm

ADC

*
Total



Area

280


nm


m

A

b



-

Total



Area

280


nm

ADC

*
Total



Area

252


nm


m

A

b







ε

252


nm


d

rug


*
Total



Area

280


nm


A

D

C



-


ε

280


nm

drug

*
Total



Area

252


nm


A

D

C








Equation 2 does not require extinction coefficient determination for the antibody at 252 nm, but it does require collection of UPLC data for a naked antibody reference standard.


Although UPLC has been exemplified, other size exclusion chromatography techniques can be used in methods described herein. Size exclusion chromatography generally refers to separation of molecules by size, where the chromatographic elution time is characteristic for a particular molecule. Additional methods include, e.g., SEC-HPLC, reversed phase (RP) HPLC, RP-UPLC.


In some embodiments, an ADC sample is not diluted prior to analysis by size exclusion chromatography (e.g., HPLC or UPLC). In some embodiments, an ADC sample does not require dilution prior to analysis by size exclusion chromatography as a total amount of the ADC sample is applied to the size exclusion chromatography matrix. In some embodiments, a sample containing about 1 μg/μL to about 500 μg/μL ADC is analyzed.


Slope Spectroscopy-Based Methods

In some embodiments, DAR is determined by calculating the concentrations of antibody and drug in an ADC sample. For example, slope spectroscopy is a known method for determining the absorbance of a solution at various path lengths. The values of the absorbance at various path lengths can then be used, based on the Beer-Lambert law, to calculate the concentration of a compound in the solution. Methods and systems employing slope spectroscopy are known (see, e.g., US Publ. No. 20120130649) and commercially available (see, e.g., SoloVPE (C Technologies, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ)). Such methods and systems were adapted to measure concentrations of antibody and drug in ADC preparations, from which a DAR was determined.


For example, an ADC sample can be placed in a vessel; a probe can be moved relative to the vessel such that the probe makes contact with the bottom of the vessel; the probe can be moved relative to the vessel such that the probe moves from the bottom of the vessel through the sample by a predetermined increment such that a preselected path length through the solution is obtained; an absorbance reading can be taken at an absorption maxima for the antibody; the probe can be moved repeatedly relative to the sample and a measurement can be taken; a regression line can be generated from the absorbance and path length such that a slope of the regression line is obtained; and the concentration of the antibody can be determined by dividing the slope of the regression line by the extinction coefficient of the antibody. The steps can then be repeated using the absorption maxima for the drug to determine the concentration of the drug. DAR can be calculated from the determined drug concentration and antibody concentration.


In some embodiments, an ADC sample is not diluted prior to analysis by slope spectroscopy. In some embodiments, a sample containing about 0.1 μg/μL to about 500 μg/μL ADC is analyzed.


Antibody-Drug Conjugates

The term “antibody-drug conjugate” as used herein, refers to a protein that is created by linking an antibody to a biologically active cytotoxic payload or drug. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are generally produced through chemical modification/coupling reactions known to those skilled in the art. Any antibody-drug conjugate can be analyzed using the methods described herein.


In some embodiments, an antibody-drug conjugate includes an anti-tumor antibody (see, e.g., Adler et al., Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 26:447-81 (2012); Li et al., Drug Discov. Ther. 7:178-84 (2013); Scott et al., Cancer Immun. 12:14 (2012); and Sliwkowski et al., Science 341:1192-1198 (2013)). Table 1 presents a non-comprehensive list of certain human polypeptide antigens targeted by known, available antibody agents, and notes certain cancer indications for which the antibody agents have been proposed to be useful. Any of the antibodies in Table 1 can be included in an antibody-drug conjugate assessed using methods of the disclosure.











TABLE 1






Antibody (commercial or



Human Antigen
scientific name)
Cancer indication







CD2
Siplizumab
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma


CD3
UCHT1
Peripheral or Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma


CD4
HuMax-CD4



CD19
SAR3419, MEDI-551
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma


CD19 and CD3 or
Bispecific antibodies such as
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma


CD22
Blinatumomab, DT2219ARL



CD20
Rituximab, Veltuzumab,
B cell malignancies (Non-Hodgkin's



Tositumomab, Ofatumumab,
lymphoma, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia)



Ibritumomab, Obinutuzumab,



CD22 (SIGLEC2)
Inotuzumab, tetraxetan, CAT-
Chemotherapy-resistant hairy cell leukemia,



8015, DCDT2980S, Bectumomab
Hodgkin's lymphoma


CD30
Brentuximab vedotin



CD33
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
Acute myeloid leukemia



(Mylotarg)



CD37
TRU-016
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia


CD38
Daratumumab
Multiple myeloma, hematological tumors


CD40
Lucatumumab
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma


CD52
Alemtuzumab (Campath)
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia


CD56 (NCAM1)
Lorvotuzumab
Small Cell Lung Cancer


CD66e (CEA)
Labetuzumab
Breast, colon and lung tumors


CD70
SGN-75
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma


CD74
Milatuzumab
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma


CD138 (SYND1)
BT062
Multiple Myeloma


CD152 (CTLA-4)
Ipilimumab
Metastatic melanoma


CD221 (IGF1R)
AVE1642, IMC-A12, MK-0646,
Glioma, lung, breast, head and neck,



R150, CP 751871
prostate and thyroid cancer


CD254 (RANKL)
Denosumab
Breast and prostate carcinoma


CD261 (TRAILR1)
Mapatumumab
Colon, lung and pancreas tumors and


CD262 (TRAILR2)
HGS-ETR2, CS-1008
haematological malignancies


CD326 (Epcam)
Edrecolomab, 17-1A, IGN101,
Colon and rectal cancer, malignant ascites,



Catumaxomab, Adecatumumab
epithelial tumors (breast, colon, lung)


CD309 (VEGFR2)
IM-2C6, CDP791
Epithelium-derived solid tumors


CD319 (SLAMF7)
HuLuc63
Multiple myeloma


CD340 (HER2)
Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Ado-
Breast cancer



trastuzumab emtansine



CAIX (CA9)
cG250
Renal cell carcinoma


EGFR (c-erbB)
Cetuximab, Panitumumab,
Solid tumors including glioma, lung, breast,



nimotuzumab and 806
colon, and head and neck tumors


EPHA3 (HEK)
KB004, IIIA4
Lung, kidney and colon tumors, melanoma,




glioma and haematological malignancies


Episialin
Epitumomab
Epithelial ovarian tumors


FAP
Sibrotuzumab and F19
Colon, breast, lung, pancreas, and head and




neck tumors


HLA-DR beta
Apolizumab
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-




Hodkin's lymphoma


FOLR-1
Farletuzumab
Ovarian tumors


5T4
Anatumomab
Non-small cell lung cancer


GD3/GD2
3F8, ch14.18, KW-2871
Neuroectodennal and epithelial tumors


gpA33
huA33
Colorectal carcinoma


GPNMB
Glembatumumab
Breast cancer


HER3 (ERBB3)
MM-121
Breast, colon, lung, ovarian, and prostate




tumors


Integrin αVβ3
Etaracizumab
Tumor vasculature


Integrin α5β1
Volociximab
Tumor vasculature


Lewis-Y antigen
hu3S193, IgN311
Breast, colon, lung and prostate tumors


MET (HGFR)
AMG 102, METMAB, SCH900105
Breast, ovary and lung tumors


Mucin-1/CanAg
Pemtumomab, oregovomab,
Breast, colon, lung and ovarian tumors



Cantuzumab



PSMA
ADC, J591
Prostate Cancer


Phosphatidylserine
Bavituximab
Solid tumors


TAG-72
Minretumomab
Breast, colon and lung tumors


Tenascin
81C6
Glioma, breast and prostate tumours


VEGF
Bevacizumab
Tumour vasculature









In some embodiments, an antibody-drug conjugate includes a drug that is one or more of pro-apoptotic, cytostatic and/or cytotoxic agents, for example specifically including agents utilized and/or recommended for use in treating one or more diseases, disorders or conditions associated with undesirable cell proliferation. In many embodiments, a drug is a chemotherapeutic agent useful in the treatment of cancer. In some embodiments, a chemotherapeutic agent may be or comprise one or more alkylating agents, one or more anthracyclines, one or more cytoskeletal disruptors (e.g., microtubule targeting agents such as taxanes, maytansine and analogs thereof), one or more epothilones, one or more histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACs), one or more topoisomerase inhibitors (e.g., inhibitors of topoisomerase I and/or topoisomerase II), one or more kinase inhibitors, one or more nucleotide analogs or nucleotide precursor analogs, one or more peptide antibiotics, one or more platinum-based agents, one or more retinoids, one or more vinca alkaloids, and/or one or more analogs of one or more of the following (i.e., that share a relevant anti-proliferative activity). In some particular embodiments, a chemotherapeutic agent may be or comprise one or more of Actinomycin, All-trans retinoic acid, an Auiristatin, Azacitidine, Azathioprine, Bleomycin, Bortezomib, Carboplatin, Capecitabine, Cisplatin, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide, Curcumin, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Docetaxel, Doxifluridine, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Epothilone, Etoposide, Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Hydroxyurea, Idarubicin, Imatinib, Irinotecan, Maytansine and/or analogs thereof (e.g., DM1), Mechlorethamine, Mercaptopurine, Methotrexate, Mitoxantrone, a Maytansinoid, Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Pemetrexed, Teniposide, Tioguanine, Topotecan, Valrubicin, Vinblastine, Vincristine, Vindesine, Vinorelbine, and combinations thereof.


In some embodiments, an antibody-drug conjugate assessed using a method of the disclosure is hLL1-doxorubicin, hRS7-SN-38, hMN-14-SN-38, hLL2-SN-38, hA20-SN-38, hPAM4-SN-38, hLL1-SN-38, hRS7-Pro-2-P-Dox, hMN-14-Pro-2-P-Dox, hLL2-Pro-2-P-Dox, hA20-Pro-2-P-Dox, hPAM4-Pro-2-P-Dox, hLL1-Pro-2-P-Dox, P4/D10-doxorubicin, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, brentuximab vedotin, trastuzumab emtansine, inotuzumab ozogamicin, glembatumomab vedotin, SAR3419, SAR566658, BIIB015, BT062, CMC-544, SAR3419, CDX-011, SGN-75, SGN-CD19A, AMG-172, AMG-595, BAY-94-9343, ASG-5ME, ASG-22ME, ASG-16M8F, MDX-1203, MLN-0264, anti-PSMA ADC, RG-7450, RG-7458, RG-7593, RG-7596, RG-7598, RG-7599, RG-7600, RG-7636, ABT-414, IMGN-853, IMGN-529, IMGN-901, vorsetuzumab mafodotin, or lorvotuzumab mertansine (see, e.g., Sassoon et al., Methods Mol. Biol. 1045:1-27 (2013); Bouchard et al., Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 24:5357-5363 (2014)).


Applications

Methods of the disclosure have a variety of applications and include, e.g., quality control at different stages of manufacture of a drug substance or drug product, analysis of an ADC preparation prior to and/or after completion of a drug substance or drug product manufacture (e.g., prior to or after distribution to a fill/finish environment or facility), prior to or after release of a drug substance or drug product into commerce (e.g., before distribution to a pharmacy, a caregiver, a patient, or other end-user). In some instances, an ADC preparation is a drug substance (an active pharmaceutical ingredient or “API”) or a drug product (an API formulated for use in a subject such as a human patient). In some instances, an ADC preparation is from a stage of manufacture or use that is prior to release to care givers or other end-users; prior to packaging into individual dosage forms, such as syringes, pens, vials, or multi-dose vials; prior to determination that the batch can be commercially released, prior to production of a Certificate of Testing, Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) or Certificate of Analysis (CofA) of the preparation.


Assessments from methods described herein are useful for guiding, controlling or implementing a number of activities or steps in the process of making, distributing, and monitoring and providing for the safe and efficacious use of an ADC preparation. Thus, in an embodiment, e.g., responsive to the evaluation, e.g., depending on whether a criterion is met (e.g., a particular DAR, average DAR, and/or DAR range), a decision or step is taken. Methods described herein may include making a decision: (a) as to whether an ADC preparation may be formulated into drug substance or drug product; (b) as to whether an ADC preparation may be reprocessed (e.g., the preparation may undergo a repetition of a previous process step); and/or (c) that the ADC preparation is not suitable for formulation into drug substance or drug product. In some instances, methods comprise: formulating as referred to in step (a), reprocessing as referred to in step (b), or rendering the preparation unusable for commercial release, e.g., by labeling it or destroying it, as referred to in step (c).

Claims
  • 1. A method of determining a ratio of drug to antibody (DAR) in a sample comprising an antibody-drug conjugate using size exclusion chromatography, the method comprising: applying the sample to a size exclusion chromatography matrix;detecting absorbance of the sample at a first light wavelength (λ1), wherein the first light wavelength is a predetermined absorbance maximum of the antibody;detecting absorbance of the sample at a second light wavelength (λ2), wherein the second light wavelength is a predetermined absorbance maximum of the drug;determining a total absorbance of the sample at the first light wavelength and a total absorbance at the second light wavelength, each total absorbance is calculated by integrating peaks of absorbance responses over an elution time interval; and,calculating a DAR using the following Equation 1:
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: calculating the extinction coefficient of the antibody at the first light wavelength or at the second light wavelength based on absorbance of a solution of the antibody with a known concentration.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: calculating the extinction coefficient of the drug at the first light wavelength or at the second light wavelength based on absorbance of a solution of the drug with a known concentration.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the size exclusion chromatography comprises ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), a reversed phase (RP) UPLC, or a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample comprises 1 to 500 μg/μL of antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC).
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the antibody is an anti-tumor antibody and the drug is a pro-apoptotic, cytostatic, or cytotoxic agent.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein integrating peaks of absorbance responses over an elution time interval comprises an area of a main peak.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein integrating peaks of absorbance responses comprises detecting a peak shoulder of each peak of absorbance response.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein integrating peaks of absorbance responses over an elution time interval comprises summing an area of high molecular weight (HMW) peaks, low molecular weight (LMW) peaks, and a main peak.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, comprising, based on the DAR: (i) formulating the composition into a drug substance or drug product;(ii) reprocessing the composition; or(iii) rendering the composition unusable for commercial release.
  • 11. The method of claim 6, wherein the chemotherapeutic agent comprises a microtubule targeting agent, an epothilone, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, a topoisomerase inhibitor, a kinase inhibitor, a nucleotide analog, a nucleotide precursor analog, a peptide antibiotic, a platinum-based agent, a retinoid, or a vinca alkaloid.
  • 12. The method of claim 6, wherein the chemotherapeutic agent comprises Actinomycin, All-trans retinoic acid, an Auristatin, Azacitidine, Azathioprine, Bleomycin, Bortezomib, Carboplatin, Capecitabine, Cisplatin, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide, Curcumin, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Docetaxel, Doxifluridine, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Epothilone, Etoposide, Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Hydroxyurea, Idarubicin, Ima-tinib, Irinotecan, Maytansine, Mechlorethamine, Mercaptopurine, Methotrexate, Mitoxantrone, a Maytansinoid, Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Pemetrexed, Teniposide, Tioguanine, Topotecan, Valrubicin, Vinblastine, Vincristine, Vindesine, or Vinorelbine.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the antibody comprises Adecatumumab, Adotrastuzumab emtansine, Alemtuzumab, Anatumomab, Apolizumab, Bavituximab, Bevacizumab, Bectumomab, Blinatumomab, Brentuximab vedotin, Cantuzumab, Catumaxomab, Cetuximab, Daratumumab, Denosumab, Edrocolomab, Epitumomab, Etaracizumab, Farletuzumab, Gemtuzumab ozagamicin, Glembatumumab, Ipilimumab, Ibritumomab, Labetuzumab, Lorvotuzumab, Lucatumumab, Mapatumumab, Milatuzumab, Minretumomab, Nimotuzumab, Obinutuzumab, Ofatumumab, Oregovomab, Panitumumab, Pemtumomab, Pertuzumab, Rituximab, Sibrotuzumab, Tositumomab, Trastuzumab, Veltuzumab, or Volociximab.
  • 14. A method of determining a ratio of drug to antibody (DAR) in a first sample comprising an antibody-drug conjugate using size exclusion chromatography, the method comprising: measuring total absorbance of the first sample comprising the antibody-drug conjugate by: applying the first sample comprising the antibody-drug conjugate to a size exclusion chromatography matrix;detecting absorbance of the first sample at a first light wavelength (λ1), wherein the first light wavelength is a predetermined absorbance maximum of the antibody;detecting absorbance of the first sample at a second light wavelength (λ2), wherein the second light wavelength is a predetermined absorbance maximum of the drug;determining a total absorbance of the first sample at the first light wavelength and a total absorbance of the first sample at the second light wavelength, each total absorbance is calculated by integrating peaks of absorbance responses over an elution time interval;measuring total absorbance of a second sample comprising the antibody by: applying the second sample comprising the antibody to a size exclusion chromatography matrix;detecting absorbance of the second sample comprising the antibody at the first light wavelength (λ1);detecting absorbance of the second sample comprising the antibody at the second light wavelength (λ2); anddetermining a total absorbance of the second sample comprising the antibody at the first light wavelength and the second light wavelength, wherein each total absorbance is calculated by integrating peaks of absorbance responses over a time interval; andcalculating a DAR using the following Equation 2:
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising: calculating the extinction coefficient of the antibody at the first light wavelength or at the second light wavelength based on absorbance of a solution of the antibody with a known concentration.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, further comprising: calculating the extinction coefficient of the drug at the first light wavelength or at the second light wavelength based on absorbance of a solution of the drug with a known concentration.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the size exclusion chromatography comprises ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), a reversed phase (RP) UPLC, or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the first sample comprises 1 μg/μL to 500 μg/μL of antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC).
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the antibody is an anti-tumor antibody and the drug is a pro-apoptotic, cytostatic, or cytotoxic agent.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, wherein integrating peaks of absorbance responses over an elution time interval comprises an area of a main peak.
  • 21. The method of claim 14, wherein integrating peaks of absorbance responses comprises detecting peak shoulder of each peak of absorbance response.
  • 22. The method of claim 14, wherein integrating peaks of absorbances over an elution time interval comprises summing an area of high molecular weight (HMW) peaks, low molecular weight (LMW) peaks and a main peak.
  • 23. The method of claim 14, comprising, based on the DAR: (i) formulating the composition into a drug substance or drug product;(ii) reprocessing the composition; or(iii) rendering the composition unusable for commercial release.
  • 24. The method of claim 19, wherein the chemotherapeutic agent comprises a microtubule targeting agent, an epothilone, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, a topoisomerase inhibitor, a kinase inhibitor, a nucleotide analog, a nucleotide precursor analog, a peptide antibiotic, a platinum-based agent, a retinoid, or a vinca alkaloid.
  • 25. The method of claim 19, wherein the chemotherapeutic agent comprises Actinomycin, All-trans retinoic acid, an Auristatin, Azacitidine, Azathioprine, Bleomycin, Bortezomib, Carboplatin, Capecitabine, Cisplatin, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide, Curcumin, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Docetaxel, Doxifluridine, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Epothilone, Etoposide, Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Hydroxyurea, Idarubicin, Ima-tinib, Irinotecan, Maytansine, Mechlorethamine, Mercaptopurine, Methotrexate, Mitoxantrone, a Maytansinoid, Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Pemetrexed, Teniposide, Tioguanine, Topotecan, Valrubicin, Vinblastine, Vincristine, Vindesine, or Vinorelbine.
  • 26. The method of claim 14, wherein the antibody comprises Adecatumumab, Adotrastuzumab emtansine, Alemtuzumab, Anatumomab, Apolizumab, Bavituximab, Bevacizumab, Bectumomab, Blinatumomab, Brentuximab vedotin, Cantuzumab, Catumaxomab, Cetuximab, Daratumumab, Denosumab, Edrocolomab, Epitumomab, Etaracizumab, Farletuzumab, Gemtuzumab ozagamicin, Glembatumumab, Ipilimumab, Ibritumomab, Labetuzumab, Lorvotuzumab, Lucatumumab, Mapatumumab, Milatuzumab, Minretumomab, Nimotuzumab, Obinutuzumab, Ofatumumab, Oregovomab, Panitumumab, Pemtumomab, Pertuzumab, Rituximab, Sibrotuzumab, Tositumomab, Trastuzumab, Veltuzumab or Volociximab.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/179,734, filed on Feb. 19, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/121,909, filed on Sep. 5, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,976,241, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/556,153, filed Sep. 8, 2017, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62556153 Sep 2017 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17179734 Feb 2021 US
Child 18782279 US
Parent 16121909 Sep 2018 US
Child 17179734 US