The field of the present invention is the conditioning of bioprosthetic tissues for use in implants and, more particularly, for methods for smoothing and thinning sheet bioprosthetic tissue for use in prosthetic heart valves.
Medical technology has long been capable of replacing damaged or diseased heart valves through open heart surgery. Such valves have included mechanical devices as well as those using biological material from humans (homograft tissue) and animals (xenograft tissue). The two primary types of prosthetic heart valves known in the art are mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves. Bioprosthetic valves may be formed from an intact, multi-leaflet porcine (pig) heart valve, or by shaping a plurality of individual flexible leaflets out of bovine pericardial tissue or other materials, and combining the leaflets to form the valve. One advantage of bioprosthetic valves, unlike mechanical valves, is that the patient receiving the valve typically does not require long term treatment with anticoagulants.
The pericardium is a sac around the heart of vertebrate animals which contains lubricating fluid, and bovine (cow) pericardium is commonly used to make individual leaflets for prosthetic heart valves. The bovine pericardium is first harvested from the animal and then chemically fixed to crosslink collagen and elastin molecules in the tissue and increase the tissue durability, before being cut into leaflets.
A good discussion of the various physical properties of fixed bovine pericardium is given in Simionescu, et al., Mapping of Glutaraldehyde-Treated Bovine Pericardium and Tissue Selection For Bio-prosthetic Heart Valves, Journal of Bio-Medical Materials Research, Vol. 27, 697-704, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993. Simionescu, et al., recognized the sometimes striking variations in physical properties of the pericardial tissue, even in the same pericardial sac.
The pericardial sac consists of two distinct elements of tissue. The visceral or serous layer is of very thin translucent tissue most adjacent the heart which is not used to construct artificial heart valve leaflets. This inner layer of the pericardium is conical and surrounds the heart and the roots of the great blood vessels. The parietal pericardial membrane is a thicker membrane of multi-layered connective tissue covered with adipose tissue. The outside fat/adipose tissue is removed (e.g., peeled off) when harvested. The remaining multi-layered fibrous tissue primarily contains collagen fibers with a generally fibrous outer surface and a smooth inner surface. This remaining membrane is used for making the leaflets for artificial heart valves.
A number of steps in a typical commercial process for preparing pericardial tissue for heart valve leaflets are illustrated in
The section 28 is then placed flat on a platform 32 for thickness measurement using a contact indicator 34. The thickness is measured by moving the section 28 randomly around the platform 32 while a spindle 36 of the indicator 34 moves up-and-down at various points. The thickness at each point is displayed at 38 and recorded by the operator. After sorting the measured sections 28 by thickness, as indicated at 40, leaflets 42 are die cut from the sections, with thinner leaflets 42 generally being used for smaller valves, and thicker leaflets being used for larger valves. Of course, this process is relatively time-consuming and the quality of the final leaflets is dependent at several steps on the skill of the technician. Moreover, the number of leaflets obtained from each sac is inconsistent, and subject to some inefficiency from the manual selection process. One solution to this time-consuming manual process is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,378,221 to Ekholm, et al., in which a three-axis programmable controller manipulates a pericardial sheet with respect to a thickness measurement head to topographically map the sheet into similar thickness zones for later use. However, even with advanced methods the variability of the bovine pericardium results in an extremely low yield of sheet usable for heart valve leaflets; averaging less than 2 sheets per sac.
Typically, harvested bovine pericardial tissue ranges in thickness from 250 microns up to 700 microns, though most of the material is between 300-700 microns thick.
Valves using flexible leaflets, such as those made of bovine pericardial tissue, have acquired increased significance of late because these valves may be implanted by other than open heart surgery. The valves are constructed using radially expandable stents with flexible (e.g., pericardial) leaflets attached. Implant methods include compressing the valve radially by a significant amount to reduce its diameter or delivery profile, inserting the valve into a delivery tool, such as a catheter or cannula, and advancing the delivery tool to the correct anatomical position in the heart. Once properly positioned, the valve is deployed by radial expansion within the native valve annulus, either through self-expanding stent structure or with an expansion balloon. The collapsed valve in the catheter may be introduced through the vasculature, such as through the femoral artery, or more directly through an intercostal incision in the chest. The procedure can be accomplished without open heart surgery and possibly without stopping the heart during the procedure.
One example of percutaneous heart valve delivery is U.S. Pat. No. 6,908,481 to Cribier and Edwards Lifesciences of Irvine, Calif., which shows a valve prosthesis with an expandable frame on which a collapsible valvular structure is mounted. Another compressible/expandable heart valve is shown in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0036484, also from Edwards Lifesciences. Further examples of such methods and devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,948 and US Patent Publication No. 2006/0259136, and the number of other configurations of such valves is exploding as the promise of the technology grows. The disclosures of each of these references are incorporated herein by reference.
These new devices require thinner components that enable crimping of the valve down to a size that can pass through the delivery tool. One limiting component is the thickness of the bioprosthetic tissue. As mentioned, pericardial layers range from 250-700 microns, but only a small percentage of the harvested pericardium falls close to the low end, which is the most useful for compressible/expandable valves.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,064 proposes compressing bovine pericardium to reduce its thickness by about 50 percent for use in heart valve leaflets. The compression may also smooth out the tissue surface to reduce thickness non-uniformity.
Despite much research into various bioprosthetic tissue, in particular for heart valve leaflets, there remains a need for thinner and more consistent thickness tissues for use in fabricating smaller delivery profile bioprostheses.
The present invention is directed to the preparation of bioprosthetic material for cardio implantation. Bovine pericardial membrane having a fibrous surface and a smooth surface are selected. This preparation can increase the yield of cardio valve leaflets from pericardial membrane and can eliminate thrombogenic agents such as dangling fibers.
In accordance with one aspect, a method for preparing bioprosthetic tissue membrane material includes first selecting a tissue membrane (e.g., bovine pericardial membrane) having a fibrous side and a smooth side. Material is then removed from the fibrous side of the selected membrane to reduce the thickness of the membrane and smooth the fibrous side. The material may be removed by shearing with a mechanical device, such as a dermatome or vibratome. Alternatively, the material may be removed by ablation with a laser.
In the just-described method, the selected membrane may be conditioned by compressing the selected tissue membrane and cross-linking the material of the membrane while under compression. Furthermore, the method may involve treating the membrane reduced in thickness by capping of calcification nucleation sites and/or by borohydride reduction. In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises at least partially fixing the selected membrane prior to the removing step.
In accordance with another method disclosed herein, bioprosthetic tissue membrane material is prepared by first selecting a tissue membrane having a fibrous side and a smooth side, conditioning the selected tissue membrane by compression and cross-linking the membrane while under compression, and then removing conditioned material from the fibrous side of the selected tissue membrane to reduce the thickness of the membrane and smooth the fibrous side. The tissue membrane maybe pericardial membrane, such as bovine or equine. The method may involve treating the membrane reduced in thickness by capping and/or by borohydride reduction. In accordance with one aspect, the step of removing is accomplished by shearing with a mechanical device, such as a dermatome or vibratome. Or, the step of removing is accomplished by ablating the conditioned material with a laser.
In accordance with a still further aspect, a method for preparing bioprosthetic tissue membrane material comprises first selecting a tissue membrane having a fibrous side and a smooth side. The material of the membrane is the least partially cross-linked, and then infused with a second cross-linking material of a chain length to allow spending of large inter-fibril domains. Subsequently, the tissue membrane is the least partially compressed. The tissue membrane may be bovine pericardial membrane. The method may also involve lightly compressing the selected membrane prior to at least partially cross-linking the membrane. The method may include treating the membrane reduced in thickness by capping and/or by borohydride reduction. In accordance with one aspect, material is removed from the fibrous side of the lightly compressed tissue membrane.
Another aspect of the present application is a heart valve comprising a plurality of leaflets each made of sheet tissue having a first region with a uniform first thickness and a second region with a uniform second thickness greater than the first thickness. The leaflets preferably each have a cusp edge opposite a free edge, and the second region extends in a generally uniform width strip along the cusp edge. The second region also may extend in a generally uniform width strip along the free edge of each leaflet. Furthermore, the second region may extend in generally uniform width strips radially from the center of the free edge to the cusp edge. Desirably, transitions between the thicknesses of the first and second regions is gradual. In one embodiment, the heart valve includes a support frame to which peripheral edges of the leaflets attach with sutures, and the second region extends along the leaflet edges through which sutures are passed.
In a first separate aspect of the invention, a dermatome is employed with the fibrous surface of the membrane and moved relative thereto to smooth the surface and/or reduce the thickness of the membrane to a specific uniform thickness, for instance no more than 250 microns. The dermatome is constrained by spacers to control the thickness of the membrane remaining with the shaved material removed.
In a second separate aspect of the invention, the fibrous surface of the membrane is removed to smooth the surface and/or reduce the thickness of the membrane to a specific uniform thickness. The membrane is first subjected to light compression and cross-linking to smooth the fibrous surface and improve the material for ablation.
In a third separate aspect of the invention, a laser is directed at the fibrous surface of the membrane and moved relative thereto to ablate the surface to smooth the surface and/or reduce the thickness of the membrane to a specific uniform thickness. The wavelength, power and pulse rate of the laser are selected which will smooth the fibrous surface as well as ablate the surface to the appropriate thickness. The membrane may first be subjected to light compression and cross-linking to smooth the fibrous surface and improve the material for ablation.
In a fourth separate aspect of the present invention, the selected bovine pericardial membrane is first at least partially cross-linked, then infused with a second cross-linking material of a chain length to allow spanning of large inter-fibril domains. The membrane is then compressed, and may then be treated by capping and borohydride reduction.
In a fifth separate aspect of the present invention, any of the foregoing processes may be used in combination to greater advantage.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention are set forth in the following description and claims, particularly when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like parts bear like reference numerals.
The invention will now be explained and other advantages and features will appear with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings wherein:
In the primary embodiment, the preparation of leaflets for prosthetic heart valves, in particular expandable heart valves, is described. The leaflets are desirably incorporated in expandable prosthetic heart valves that are initially crimped (or even rolled) into a small delivery profile or diameter to be passed through a catheter or other delivery system and then expanded at the implantation site, typically a valve annulus. The heart valves comprise structural stent bodies with a plurality of flexible leaflets incorporated therein. Various materials are suitable for the stent body, although certain nickel-titanium alloys (i.e., Nitinol) are preferred for their super-elasticity and biocompatibility. It should also be noted that specific stent body configurations are not to be considered limiting, and various construction details may be modified.
Although forming prosthetic heart valve leaflets to be thinner helps reduce the delivery size of expandable valves, forming thinner leaflets as well as conditioning the leaflets as described herein is believed to be advantageous for conventional heart valves as well. For example, smoothing the rough surface of pericardial tissue is believed to improve durability of the leaflets by reducing loose fibers and attendant thrombogenicity.
Heart valves with durability in excess of 10 years have had bovine pericardial leaflet thicknesses ranging from 0.014-0.023 inches (˜350-580 microns), with smaller valves utilizing thinner leaflets and larger valves having thicker leaflets. Current percutaneous valves may employ porcine pericardial tissue with thicknesses down to 0.004-0.005 inches (˜100-130 microns). Although naturally-occurring porcine tissue is somewhat thinner than naturally occurring pericardial tissue, there are certain advantages to using pericardial leaflets.
Various tissues may be used for the leaflets, though a preferred tissue for use in the primary application of heart valve leaflets is bovine parietal pericardial membrane. Though the thickness and strength of bovine pericardial tissue is considered desirable for longer lasting valves, other bioprosthetic tissue such as porcine, equine and other mammalian pericardium, including human, may be used. Furthermore, tissue from other anatomical sources may be used, such as dura mater, peritoneum, diaphragm, or others. Any tissue membrane that has a suitable durability and elasticity as pericardium is a candidate, though those of skill in the art will appreciate that certain materials may be better suited for any one specific application. In general, tissues that contain fibrous collagen, in particular classed as Type I or Type III collagen, and elastic fibers or elastin may be suitable for use in fabricating heart valve leaflets. Other potential types of collagen that can be used are hybrid natural collagen solution or electrospun collagen elastin fabric. Also, certain so-called engineered tissue may be used, which are synthesized by growing collagenous tissue over a typically mesh frame or scaffold. These source are collectively referred to as “tissue membranes,” and may all benefit from the principles described herein, though some like bovine pericardium is especially well-suited for conditioning heart valve leaflets in accordance with the present application.
As mentioned above, the pericardial sac consists of two or more distinct layers, one side being relatively smooth while the opposite surface comprises connective tissue covered with adipose tissue, some of which is peeled off when harvested, and is thus fibrous. The methods described herein are particularly useful for smoothing out the fibrous side to form a consistently thick and smooth membrane. In some cases, the thickness of the fibrous adipose tissue side may also be reduced to produce a uniformly thin membrane, preferably below 300 microns for use in collapsible/expandable valves.
With reference to
Valve 50 in the illustrated embodiment generally comprises a structural frame, or stent 52, a flexible leaflet structure 54 supported by the frame, and a flexible skirt 56 secured to the outer surface of the leaflet structure. The illustrated valve 50 may be implanted in the annulus of the native aortic valve, but also can be adapted to be implanted in other native valves of the heart or in various other ducts or orifices of the body. Valve 50 has a “lower” or inflow end 60 and an “upper” or outflow end 62. Blood flows upward freely through the valve 50, but the flexible leaflet structure 54 closes to prevent reverse downward flow. The flexible leaflet structure 54 thus provides flexible fluid occluding surfaces to enable one-way blood flow.
Valve 50 and frame 52 are configured to be radially collapsible to a collapsed or crimped state for introduction into the body on a delivery catheter and radially expandable to an expanded state for implanting the valve at a desired location in the body (e.g., the native aortic valve). Frame 52 can be made of a plastically-expandable material that permits crimping of the valve to a smaller profile for delivery and expansion of the valve using an expansion device such as the balloon of a balloon catheter. Exemplary plastically-expandable materials include, without limitation, stainless steel, a nickel based alloy (e.g., a nickel-cobalt-chromium alloy), polymers, or combinations thereof. Alternatively, valve 50 can be a so-called self-expanding valve wherein the frame is made of a self-expanding material such as Nitinol. A self-expanding valve can be crimped and held in the collapsed state with a restraining device such as a sheath covering the valve. When the valve is positioned at or near the target site, the restraining device is removed to allow the valve to self-expand to its expanded, functional size.
Referring also to
Leaflet structure 54 desirably comprises three separate connected leaflets 70 such as shown in
Leaflets 70 attach to one another at their adjacent sides to form commissures 80 of the leaflet structure (see
As mentioned, the lower edge of leaflet structure 54 desirably has an undulating, curved scalloped shape. A suture line 84 visible on the exterior of the skirt 56 in
Referring again to
To assemble, the heart valve leaflets 70 are cut from a membrane such as bovine pericardium and thinned, conditioned or otherwise shaped in accordance with the principles described herein. In the expandable valve 50 described above, the leaflets 70 attach within the tubular stent fame 52 and the three adjacent pairs of free edges 74 meet in the middle of the valve at coapting lines oriented equiangularly with respect to one another. The free edges 74 billow inward to meet along the coapting lines. The assembled valve is then stored in a sterile fluid, typically glutaraldehyde, for a period prior to implantation.
Implant methods include compressing the valve 50 radially by a significant amount to reduce its diameter or delivery profile, inserting the valve into a delivery tool, such as a catheter or cannula, and advancing the delivery tool to the correct anatomical position in the heart. Once properly positioned, the valve 50 is deployed by radial expansion within the native valve annulus with the expansion balloon 92. The collapsed valve 50 in the catheter may be introduced through the vasculature, such as through the femoral artery, or more directly through an intercostal incision in the chest. It is important for the valve to be as small as possible. A large valve requires a large diameter catheter, which is difficult to push through the femoral artery, for example. To enable smaller constricted heart valves, the maker thins the tissue used to make the leaflets 70. Preferably the conditioning includes reducing the tissue thickness, but may also involve smoothing the tissue to result in a thin, constant-thickness membrane from which to cut leaflets. Or, the leaflets may be formed first and then thinned. There are a number of ways to thin the tissue including using laser ablation, as explained below.
It should again be noted that the thinned pericardial membrane described herein may be used in various types of heart valves, including conventional surgical valves. The method can also be used to merely smooth out or “heal” the tissue surface to eliminate thrombogenic agents such as dangling fibers, without any appreciable thinning Such smoothed tissue which remains relatively thick may be used in conventional surgical heart valves. One specific example, of conventional heart valves that may utilize tissue in accordance with the present invention is the Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® line of Pericardial Bioprostheses, available from Edwards Lifesciences. The basic construction of the PERIMOUNT® valve is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,281, which disclosure is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Desirably, pericardial layers used for transcatheter heart valve leaflets are in the 250-500 micron range, and preferably closer to 250 microns. Unfortunately, only a small percentage of the harvested pericardium falls close to the 250 micron thickness. Most of the material is 300-700 microns. As a result, each pericardial sac only yields about 1-2 leaflets suitable for THV. However, the pericardial tissue used for building heart valves consists of multiple layers of tissue with similar components and the majority of the collagen fibers are parallel between layers. This unique structure has made it possible to use various means, e.g., lasers, razors, to remove some of the tissue. The tissue removed desirably comes from the fibrous side from which the adipose tissue was previously removed. This creates a more defined thinner pericardial membrane with a more appropriate low profile.
With the advent of laser technology, ablation of corneal tissue has become common. Excimer lasers have been used for such procedures. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,175. Recent work with mode locking lasers with very short pulse lengths in Picosecond and Femtosecond ranges have also been considered to reduce heating. Lasers have also been used for cutting tissue, for ablation of heart muscle to treat arrhythmia and for dental applications. Two other disclosures of the use of lasers for tissue removal on humans are in U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,119 to Holha and U.S. Pat. No. 7,367,969 to Stoltz, et al. These laser references are incorporated herein by reference. Laser ablation using the laser assisted in situ keratomileusis process has also been suggested to reduce the thickness of bovine pericardium to create membrane tissue for a wide variety of uses including heart valves in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0254005, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Tissue ablation may be accomplished with the membrane 110 exposed, for example, in planar form, as indicated by the flow chart of
The specification for a laser found to be useful in the ablation of pericardium for creating heart valve leaflets includes: a dual axis scanning lens; 2× beam expansion; 1550 nm wave length; 31.5 μJ pulse energy on target; 1.6 W average power; 50 Hz repetition rate; 650 fs pulse width (ref); 30 μm laser spot size; elliptical polarization; 112 mm focal length; 400 mm/s coarse milling speed (20 μm fill spacing in cross hatch pattern); and 800 mm/s fine milling speed (20 μm fill spacing in cross hatch pattern).
A substantial amount of technology has been developed for guiding lasers and ablating tissue with great precision. Corneal ablation has been widely practiced for almost two decades. This technology using excimer lasers has become common. Reference is made again to U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,175, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Recent work with mode locking lasers having very short pulse lengths in Picosecond and Femtosecond ranges with reduce heating has also been studied.
Milling machines for such precise work not on a patient are also available. Milling machines employing a laser having the above specifications as the operative tool found to be useful for conveniently processing pericardium membranes have a 2-axis scanning laser head, tissue holders to facilitate loading the work into the machine, an X-Y table to increase working area of the laser and an automatic tissue holder loading mechanism. Mechanisms as described can be employed to selectively ablate a mounted pericardium membrane to generate patterns of different thicknesses as discussed below.
The operation of the milling machine is automated according to input data defining the pattern and the coarseness of the cut. Typically such machines are arranged to control the depth of cut based on the specific height of the surface being cut. With such an arrangement, the resulting surface will reflect the precut contour. To avoid this result, a fixed reference may be used rather than the height of the surface being cut. In this way, the entire pattern on the work will lie in a plane with each completed cut. Multiple cuts then are used to reach the desired membrane thickness.
To retain the appropriate longevity of pericardial membrane leaflets and achieve a sufficiently compact package to be inserted into position through the femoral artery, a specific tissue thickness of the leaflets is required. For instance, a uniform thickness of 250 microns has been found particularly useful, though uniform thicknesses between 250-500 microns may be suitable. The wavelength, power and pulse rate of the laser 116, 120 are selected which will smooth the fibrous surface to eliminate thrombogenic agents as well as ablate the surface to the appropriate thickness. Various wavelengths may be appropriate for this process without generating excess heat while also being efficient. If ultra-short-pulsed lasers are used, it is believed that the laser wavelength does not significantly change the result. Leaflet samples have been made utilizing a 1550 nm wavelength.
This preparation can increase the yield of cardio valve leaflets from pericardial membrane. Indeed, it is expected that at least 5 heart valve leaflets may be obtained per pericardial sac using the methods disclosed herein.
Laser ablation of pericardium is understood to be advantaged if performed on dry tissue. This may be accomplished by first fixing the specimen 110 with a glycerin-based treatment using glutaraldehyde or equivalent and drying the tissue prior to laser ablation. Such a glycerin-based drying process is disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0102,439, published May 1, 2008, to Tian et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In addition to producing a single uniform thickness, the methods described herein also may be used to selectively thin the tissue to obtain regions of uniform but different thicknesses. One particularly useful example is shown in
Finally,
As mentioned above, contoured forming molds may be used to create gradual thickness changes in the leaflets described herein.
The resulting uniform membrane is preferably treated to render it generally inert and safe for human implantation. The treatment typically includes immersing the membrane in a chemical solution such as glutaraldehyde for a predefined period of time to rid the tissue of microbial entities, or “bugs.” An exemplary quarantine period is about 14 days. Alternatively or in addition, the completed membrane may be treated using capping of calcification nucleation sites and borohydride reduction to mitigate later in vivo calcification.
For instance, one contemplated sequence for conditioning tissue includes first cross-linking the tissue (e.g., bovine pericardium) with a glutaraldehyde-buffered solution. Next, the tissue may be heat treated using a process such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,931,969 to Carpentier, issued Aug. 3, 1999, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Subsequently, the thickness of the tissue may be reduced using any of the methods disclosed in the present application. Finally, the thinner tissue may be treated with a capping and/or reducing agent to mitigate later in vivo calcification, this may also include treating with a glycerol/ethanol solution. For prosthetic heart valve leaflets, the tissue is then formed into leaflets, attached to a surrounding heart valve support frame or other such components, and sterilized such as with ethylene oxide. After the tissue has been milled, stamped, sliced, laser ablated, drawn down, or extruded to reduce its thickness, calcification nucleation sites (e.g., aldehydes and Schiff bases) may be exposed which creates a propensity for calcification. Treating with a capping agent (e.g., ethanolamine) a reducing agent (e.g., sodium borohydride) and a collagen preserving agent (e.g. glycerol) caps the nucleation sites and preserves the collagen integrity. This allows the tissue to be as durable as it was before it was reduced in thickness. Furthermore, this process will also allow the tissue to be stored in a non-liquid (i.e., glutaraldehyde) environment. In other words, the process is especially suitable for dry storage of the tissue.
As noted above, the membrane may be at least partially cross-linked or “fixed.” Cross-linking the collagenous matrix provides stability prior to implantation to retard degeneration. Further, the fixation process generally operates by blocking reactive molecules on the surface of and within the donor tissue, thereby rendering it substantially non-antigenic and suitable for implantation. Fixing bioprosthetic tissue typically involves contacting the tissue with a cross-linking agent, normally a solution. Exemplary fixing solutions for bioprosthetic tissue such as bovine pericardium include glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, other aldehydes, EDC, polyethylene glycol, etc. Other ways to fix tissue exist, including heating, irradiating, etc. The fixing step can help maintain the pericardium in a particular three-dimensional form if undertaken after the membrane is otherwise prepared.
It should be understood that although cross-linking the tissue results in a somewhat easier to handle workpiece, the thinning may occur prior to cross-linking as well. Likewise, bulk tissue sheet may be thinned first before or after fixing, or leaflets may first be cut from the bulk membrane which are then thinned before or after fixing.
In addition to laser tissue removal described above, various mechanical devices for shearing tissue such as razor or planing devices may be used to remove some of the tissue. For instance, a device having a flat platen over which a planing razor or blade translates may be substituted for the linear laser configuration of
An instrument which is a particularly attractive mechanical system for thinning a sheet of pericardial tissue is a dermatome. A dermatome is surgically used to harvest thin slices of skin from a donor area to use for skin grafts, particularly for grade 3 burns or trauma. These devices date from the 1930s and are well known surgical instruments. Dermatomes have been manually, pneumatically or electrically operated. Uniformity of thickness of skin for grafting is not important to the degree needed for a heart valve leaflet.
To overcome the laser ablated resulting surface reflecting a precut contour in another way, a first compression of the pericardial membrane may be employed. A compression sufficient to flatten surface irregularities and achieve a more uniform thickness may be undertaken before laser ablation. Flattening surface irregularities in this manner helps ensure that the laser ablation step results in a more uniform removal of the surface. Conversely, without compression the laser operation might follow the contour of an irregular surface and remove the same amount of material across its surface, resulting in an irregular end product. One other method to ensure that a regular starting surface is ablated in a manner that results in a smooth surface is to control the laser milling machine using a referencing program that tells the laser to remove material relative to a fixed, uniform surface level, as opposed to following the contours of the surface being milled.
Typical pericardial tissue is in equilibrium at around 78% water; and water can be squeezed from the tissue. Excessive compression to achieve flattening of the fibrous surface and a more uniform thickness can stretch out and break the collagen polymer backbone, eliminating the collagen “crimp” structure and destroying the tissue's intrinsic bioelasticity. Not exceeding the yield point, however, allows the intrinsic bioelasticity to rebound over time. A partial or complete fixing of the pericardial membrane while under elastic compression can retain the advantageous effect of the compression pending laser ablation. Even with reasonably minor compression, some bonds are broken, resulting in some free aldehyde, amine and acid groups. By fixing the pericardial membrane in this gently compressed state, bonds are created to retain this state. Alternatively, the pericardial membrane tends not to fully rebound immediately. Laser ablation immediately following compression can mitigate elastic reexpansion.
Alternatively, a sequence of first conditioning surface irregularities and then compressing the tissue membrane may be employed. For example, larger surface irregularities on the fibrous side of pericardial tissue may be smoothed using a laser, mill, or dermatome, after which the tissue is compressed using various methods as described herein. Preferably, the tissue is compressed while at the same time at least partially fixing the tissue to help prevent spring back. This sequence may yield a more mechanical uniform tissue construct.
As noted above, gentle compression with fixing of the pericardial membrane in the compressed state can smooth the fibrous surface of the pericardium and make the thickness more uniform. This compression and fixing may be employed before or after the thinning of the tissue. After thinning, a stabilization step using capping and borohydride reduction can mitigate later in vivo calcification.
Even greater compression is possible, with or without the ablation or machining process. If laser ablation or a machining process is used, the degree to which the tissue is fixed after compression is somewhat immaterial as a physical trimming rather than further compression is used. If fully fixed at a first, gentle compression, further compression tends to be fully elastic unless the tissue is damaged. A process of partial fixing with gentle compression and then further fixing at greater compression can be used to obtain a thinner final membrane with significant tensile strength.
An initial gentle compression and fixing step is considered above. The process can also proceed without the initial gentle compression, but rather with initially at least partially fixing the tissue. Again, glutaraldehyde or other fixing agent or method may be used. This first fixation sequence stabilizes the biomechanics of the tissue and preserves the natural “crimp” structure of the collagen. Infusion with a second fixing material of sufficient chain length to allow spanning of large inter-fibril domains can then result in a stable membrane. Di- or poly-amine material of substantial chain length may be employed. Other cross-linking materials to span large inter-fibril domains include both linear and branched polyethyleneimine, polyvinyl alcohol and various Jeffamine polymers. Alternatively, the tissue may be oxidized with, for example, sodium chlorite to convert the newly formed aldehydes to carboxylic acids. These may then be coupled with the above amines using EDC chemistry. Compression can occur either at the beginning of the process, of after the infusion with a second fixing material, or both. Laser ablation or machining may be interjected for smoothing or further thinning after either compression step, and/or after the first fixation step. The tissue may be capped and reduced following the first fixation step, or alternatively, the compressed and cross-linked tissue sheet may be stabilized by capping and borohydride reduction after the forming processes. Further treatment can include drying and sterilization. Such processing is described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0164005, published Jun. 25, 2009 to Dove et al., the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Apparatus used in any one or all compression steps is illustrated in
Another application for the thinning and conditioning processes described herein is in the field of pericardial patches, made from either bovine or equine pericardium. The pericardial patch product may be used as a construction material for tissue repair, such as aortic conduit, pericardium, vessels etc., which is very common in pediatric patients with congenital cardiovascular diseases. One such commercial bovine pericardial patch available from Edwards Lifesciences comes in size of 4×6 inches (10×15 cm), though equine patches can be smaller (3×4 inches). The pericardial patch product is usually treated with a similar process as with heart valve leaflets (may be slightly different for equine patches). One issue is that the pericardial patch may be too thick for some of those applications, so making the patch uniformly thinner would significantly improve its applicability. Also, there is often substantial variability in thickness among the patches and in different locations within any given patch. A desirable uniform thickness for the final product can be ranged from 150 to 500 microns depending on the size of the patch product. The above-described selective thinning may also benefit the patches with one edge or the entire periphery being formed thicker to help retain anchoring sutures.
Thus, improved methods for preparing pericardial material for cardio implantation have been disclosed. While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein, and it is to be understood that the words which have been used are words of description and not of limitation. Therefore, changes may be made within the appended claims without departing from the true scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/357,990, filed Nov. 21, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,092,399, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/950,154, filed Jul. 24, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,498,288, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/069,827, filed Mar. 23, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,390, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/316,801 filed on Mar. 23, 2010, and of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/381,858 filed on Sep. 10, 2010, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2393580 | Weiskopf | Jan 1946 | A |
2484813 | Bower | Oct 1949 | A |
2567929 | Fessenden | Sep 1951 | A |
3002895 | Freedman | Oct 1961 | A |
3093439 | Bothwell | Jun 1963 | A |
3870789 | Mikat | Mar 1975 | A |
3927422 | Sawyer | Dec 1975 | A |
3961097 | Gravlee, Jr. | Jun 1976 | A |
3966401 | Hancock et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4050893 | Hancock et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4067091 | Backman | Jan 1978 | A |
4082507 | Sawyer | Apr 1978 | A |
4120649 | Schechter | Oct 1978 | A |
4120991 | Ornstein et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4197658 | Fraser | Apr 1980 | A |
4207689 | Romera-Sierra et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4294753 | Urist | Oct 1981 | A |
4320157 | von Hagens | Mar 1982 | A |
4323358 | Lentz et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4328256 | Romero-Sierra et al. | May 1982 | A |
4347671 | Dias et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4350492 | Wright et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4372743 | Lane | Feb 1983 | A |
4378224 | Nimni et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4402697 | Pollock et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4405327 | Pollock | Sep 1983 | A |
4477930 | Totten et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4481009 | Nashef | Nov 1984 | A |
4553974 | Dewanjee | Nov 1985 | A |
4599084 | Nashef | Jul 1986 | A |
4624822 | Arru et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4647283 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4648881 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655773 | Grassi | Apr 1987 | A |
4676070 | Linner | Jun 1987 | A |
4729139 | Nashef | Mar 1988 | A |
4729766 | Bergentz et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4753652 | Langer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4758151 | Arru et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
4770665 | Nashef | Sep 1988 | A |
4776853 | Klement et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4786287 | Nashef et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4793344 | Cumming et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800603 | Jaffe | Jan 1989 | A |
4813964 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4831065 | Pietsch et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838888 | Nashef | Jun 1989 | A |
4865871 | Livesey et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885005 | Nashef et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4891319 | Roser | Jan 1990 | A |
4911713 | Sauvage et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4958008 | Petite et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969912 | Kelman et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4975526 | Kuberasampath et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4976733 | Girardot | Dec 1990 | A |
4990131 | Dardik et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994030 | Glowczewskie, Jr. et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994237 | Login et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996054 | Pietsch et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002566 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011494 | von Recum et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011913 | Benedict et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024830 | Linner | Jun 1991 | A |
5044165 | Linner et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5051401 | Sikes | Sep 1991 | A |
5068086 | Sklenak et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068100 | McClanahan | Nov 1991 | A |
5080670 | Imamura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094661 | Levy et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104405 | Nimni | Apr 1992 | A |
5108923 | Benedict et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116564 | Jansen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5131908 | Dardik et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5147391 | Lane | Sep 1992 | A |
5147514 | Mechanic | Sep 1992 | A |
5149621 | McNally et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149653 | Roser | Sep 1992 | A |
5154007 | Piunno et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163955 | Love et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5200399 | Wettlaufer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215541 | Nashef et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275954 | Wolfinbarger et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279612 | Eberhardt | Jan 1994 | A |
5288288 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290558 | O'Leary et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296583 | Levy | Mar 1994 | A |
5329846 | Bonutti | Jul 1994 | A |
5332475 | Mechanic | Jul 1994 | A |
5336616 | Livesey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368608 | Levy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5397353 | Oliver et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423887 | Love et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424047 | Zwingenberger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5436291 | Levy et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437287 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447536 | Girardot et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447724 | Helmus et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460962 | Kemp | Oct 1995 | A |
5476516 | Seifter et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507813 | Dowd et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509932 | Keogh et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5549666 | Hata et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554184 | Machiraju | Sep 1996 | A |
5556379 | Wolfinbarger | Sep 1996 | A |
5558875 | Wang | Sep 1996 | A |
5595571 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613982 | Goldstein | Mar 1997 | A |
5632778 | Goldstein | May 1997 | A |
5645587 | Chanda et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5674298 | Levy et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679112 | Levy et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5695820 | Davis et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697972 | Kim et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713953 | Vallana et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716399 | Love | Feb 1998 | A |
5720777 | Jaffe et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720894 | Neev et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733339 | Girardot et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746775 | Levy et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762600 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766520 | Bronshtein | Jun 1998 | A |
5769780 | Hata et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770193 | Vacanti et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773285 | Park | Jun 1998 | A |
5776182 | Bruchman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782914 | Schankereli | Jul 1998 | A |
5782915 | Stone | Jul 1998 | A |
5782931 | Yang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792603 | Dunkelman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5843180 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843181 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843182 | Goldstein | Dec 1998 | A |
5855620 | Bishopric et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856102 | Bierke-Nelson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856172 | Greenwood et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862806 | Cheung | Jan 1999 | A |
5865849 | Stone | Feb 1999 | A |
5873812 | Ciana et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879383 | Bruchman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882850 | Khor et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882918 | Goffe | Mar 1999 | A |
5899936 | Goldstein | May 1999 | A |
5902338 | Stone | May 1999 | A |
5904718 | Jefferies | May 1999 | A |
5911951 | Girardot et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913900 | Stone | Jun 1999 | A |
5919472 | Trescony et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921980 | Kirn | Jul 1999 | A |
5922027 | Stone | Jul 1999 | A |
5931969 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935168 | Yang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945319 | Keogh | Aug 1999 | A |
5977153 | Camiener | Nov 1999 | A |
5987720 | Yamamoto | Nov 1999 | A |
5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008292 | Lee et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017741 | Keogh | Jan 2000 | A |
6024735 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039726 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6063120 | Stone | May 2000 | A |
6066160 | Colvin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086580 | Mordon et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093204 | Stone | Jul 2000 | A |
6093530 | McIlroy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106555 | Yang | Aug 2000 | A |
6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121041 | Mirsch, II et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126686 | Badylak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129758 | Love | Oct 2000 | A |
6132472 | Bonutti | Oct 2000 | A |
6132473 | Williams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132986 | Pathak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156030 | Neev | Dec 2000 | A |
6156531 | Pathak et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165215 | Rottenberg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166184 | Hendriks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174331 | Moe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177514 | Pathak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190407 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193749 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203755 | Odland | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206873 | Paolini et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206917 | Williams et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210957 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214054 | Cunanan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214055 | Simionescu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231608 | Stone | May 2001 | B1 |
6231614 | Yang | May 2001 | B1 |
6251579 | Moore et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254635 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258320 | Persing et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267786 | Stone | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277555 | Duran et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287338 | Sarnowski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290991 | Roser et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302909 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312474 | Francis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322593 | Pathak et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322994 | Reid | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328762 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334873 | Lane et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352708 | Duran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364905 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372228 | Gregory | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375680 | Carlyle | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376244 | Atala | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378221 | Ekholm, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383732 | Stone | May 2002 | B1 |
6391538 | Vyavahare et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394096 | Constantz | May 2002 | B1 |
6448076 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455309 | Stone | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6468660 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471723 | Ashworth et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479079 | Pathak et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482199 | Neev | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497725 | Williams et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6506339 | Girardot et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509145 | Torrianni | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527979 | Constantz | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6528006 | Jansen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531310 | Mirsch, II et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534004 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6547827 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561970 | Carpentier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569200 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582464 | Gabbay | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586006 | Roser et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6586573 | Besman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589591 | Mansouri et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605079 | Shanks et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605667 | Badejo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613278 | Mills et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6617142 | Keogh et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630001 | Duran et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638309 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652594 | Francis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653062 | DePablo et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660265 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676654 | Balle-Petersen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676655 | McDaniel | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682559 | Myers et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685940 | Andya et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696074 | Dai et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6734018 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6753181 | Atala | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764509 | Chinn et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790229 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797000 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6828310 | Barresi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6872226 | Cali et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878168 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893666 | Spievack | May 2005 | B2 |
6908591 | MacPhee et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911043 | Myers et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919172 | DePablo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933326 | Griffey et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6939378 | Fishman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7008763 | Cheung | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022119 | Hohla | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037333 | Myers et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053051 | Hendriks et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063726 | Crouch et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078163 | Torrianni | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087723 | Besman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7122356 | Keogh et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141064 | Scott et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143769 | Stoltz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147846 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7189258 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189259 | Simionescu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201771 | Lane | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217265 | Hennings et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238200 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7318998 | Goldstein et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338757 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354749 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7358284 | Griffey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367969 | Stoltz et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7498565 | Silberberg et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7578843 | Shu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579381 | Dove | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7594974 | Cali et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621637 | Rathjen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648676 | Mills et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7682304 | Heyninck-Jantz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7871434 | Case et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7914569 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918899 | Girardot et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7919112 | Pathak et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7955788 | Zilla et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963958 | Stoltz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043450 | Cali et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8067149 | Livesey et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075615 | Eberhardt et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8136218 | Millwee et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8470022 | Johnson | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8672999 | Cali et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685185 | Guo et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8846390 | Dove | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9492230 | Schneider | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9498287 | Tian | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9498288 | Dove | Nov 2016 | B2 |
10092399 | Dove | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20010000804 | Goldstein et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010020191 | Williams et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025196 | Chinn et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027344 | Bonutti | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032024 | Cunanan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039459 | Stone | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001834 | Keogh et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020091441 | Guzik | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111532 | Pathak et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030035843 | Livesey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030125805 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135284 | Crouch et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167089 | Lane | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229394 | Ogle et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024452 | Kruse et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030381 | Shu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086543 | Keogh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040158320 | Simionescu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193259 | Gabbay | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050079200 | Rathenow et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107773 | Bergt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119736 | Zilla et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136510 | Hendriks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137682 | Justino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050211680 | Li et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060084957 | Delfyett et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099326 | Keogh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110370 | Pathak et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060159641 | Girardot et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177426 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210960 | Livesey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217804 | Dove | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217805 | Dove | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228391 | Seyedin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070010804 | Rathjen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070048340 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050014 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073392 | Heyninck-Jantz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070203576 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070254005 | Pathak et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070292459 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080097601 | Codori-Hurff et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102439 | Tian et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080195123 | Gainor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080302372 | Davidson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090041729 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090105813 | Chambers et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112309 | Jaramillo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118716 | Brownell | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130162 | Pathak et al. | May 2009 | A2 |
20090137999 | Silberberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164005 | Dove et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188900 | Cali et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090281530 | Korn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326524 | Cali et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011564 | Millwee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036484 | Hariton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100100084 | Girard et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110028957 | Raksi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110092966 | Guo et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110118609 | Goldshleger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110177150 | Pathak et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110238167 | Dove et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295363 | Girard et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035720 | Cali et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059487 | Cunanan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120067855 | Guo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120328905 | Guo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1281402 | Jan 2001 | CN |
0169259 | Jan 1986 | EP |
2169386 | Jul 1986 | GB |
8401894 | May 1984 | WO |
9511047 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9518638 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9522361 | Aug 1995 | WO |
9534332 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9604028 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9613227 | May 1996 | WO |
20199807452 | Feb 1998 | WO |
20199843556 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9958082 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0032252 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0215948 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03037227 | May 2003 | WO |
2004082536 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2006026325 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006099334 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report from corresponding PCT Case No. PCT/US2011/029654 dated Dec. 23, 2011. |
Carpentier, A., et al., “Biological Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Valvular Heterografts,”. |
Carpentier, A., et al., “Biological Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Valvular Heterografts,” Forty-ninth Meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 1969. |
Chanda, J., et al., “Heparin in Calcification Prevention of Porcine Pericardial Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 18, No. 16, ISSN: 0142-9612, Aug. 1, 1997. |
Chvapil, M., et al., “Use of Chemically Purified and Cross-Linked Bovine Pericardium as a Ligament Substitute,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1383-1394, 1987, University of Arizona Health Science Center, Tucson, AZ. |
Grant, R.A., et al., “The Effects of Irradiation with High Energy Electrons on the Structure and Reactivity of Native and Cross-Linked Collagen Fibres,” J. Cell Sci. vol. 7, 99. 387-405, 1970. |
Fahner, P., et al., “Systematic Review of Preservation Methods and Clinical Outcome of Infrainguinal Vascular Allografts,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 518-524, 2006. |
Fumoto, H., et al., “Performance of Bioprosthetic Valves After Glycerol Dehydration, Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, and Rehydration,” Innovations, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2011. |
Hauschka, P., et al., “Direct Identification of the Calcium-Binding Amino Acid, y-Carboxyglutarnate, in Mineralized Tissue,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, vol. 72, No. 10, pp. 3925-3929, Oct. 1975. |
Khora, Eugene, “Methods for the Treatment of Collagenous Tissues for Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, vol. 18, Issue 2, Jan. 1997, pp. 95-105. |
Jayakrishnan, A., et al., “Glutaraldehyde as a Fixative in Bioprostheses and Drug Delivery Matrices,” Biomaterials, vol. 17; Issue 5, 1996, pp. 471-484. |
Dahm, Manfred, et al., “Effects of Surface Seeding with Vital Cells on the Calcium Uptake of Biological Materials for Heart Valve Replacement,” J Heart Valve Dis, vol. 5, No. 2, Mar. 1996, 148-151. |
Olde Damink, L.H.H., et al., “Influence of Ethylene Oxide Gas Treatment on the in vitro Degradation Behavior of dermal Sheep Collagen,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Resarch, vol. 29, pp. 149-155, 1995. |
Ohan, M., et al., “Glucose Stabilizes Collagen Sterilized with Gamma Irradiation,” Wiley Periodicals, Inc., pp. 1188-1195, 2003. |
R Parker, et al. Storage of Heart Valve Allografts in Glycerol With Subsequent Antibiotic Sterilisation, Thorax, 1978, 638-645, vol. 33:5, British Thoracic Society, London, UK. |
Saegeman, V., et al., “Short and long term bacterial inhibiting effect of high concentrations of glycerol used in the prevention of skin allografts,” Science Direct, Burns, No. 34, Mar. 2008. |
Schmidt, C., et al., “Acellular Vascular Tissues: Natural Biomaterials for Tissue Repair and Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2215-2231, 2000. |
Zilla, P., et al., “Carbodiimide Treatment Dramatically Potentiates the Anticalcific Effect of Alpha-Amino Oleic Acid on Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Aortic Wall Tissue,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Elsevier, vol. 79, No. 3, ISSN: 0003-4975; Mar. 1, 2005. |
Al-Fagih, M.R., et al., “Aortic Valve Repair Using Bovine Pericardium for Cusp Extension,” Journal of Thoracic and cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 760-764, 1988. |
Vesely, I, “The evolution of bioprosthetic heart valve design and its impact on durability”, Cardiovascular Pathology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 277-286, Sep. 2003, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190038403 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61381858 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61316801 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15357990 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 16154353 | US | |
Parent | 13950154 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 15357990 | US | |
Parent | 13069827 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13950154 | US |