The present invention relates to subterranean treatments and, more particularly, in one or more embodiments, to introducing a relative permeability modifier into a subterranean interval ahead of, or in conjunction with, a chelating agent.
Chelating agents may be useful in a variety of subterranean operations including, but not limited to, chemical stimulation operations, damage removal operations, scale removal operations, filter cake removal operations, and acid-soluble cement removal operations. Chelating agents may be used to prevent precipitation of various compounds, which may be dissolved in the treatment fluid, by keeping ions in a soluble form until the treatment fluid can be returned to the surface. Chelating agents may also be useful for removal operations in acid sensitive formations.
When using chelating agents, it is often desired to treat an interval of a subterranean formation having sections of varying permeability. Consequently it may be difficult to obtain a uniform distribution of the chelating agent through the entire interval. For instance, the chelating agent may preferentially enter portions of a subterranean formation with high permeability at the expense of portions of the subterranean formation with lesser permeability. In some instances, these intervals with variable permeability may be water-producing intervals.
In an attempt to facilitate the uniform distribution of chelating agents throughout an entire interval, a variety of techniques have been used to divert the chelating agents to less permeable portions of a subterranean formation. Such techniques have involved, among other things, the injection of particulates, foams, or blocking polymers (e.g., crosslinked aqueous gels) into the subterranean formation so as to plug off the high-permeability portions of the subterranean formation, thereby diverting subsequently injected fluids to less permeable portions of the subterranean formation. While each of these diversion techniques has been used successfully, there may be disadvantages. In some instances, plugging off the high-permeability sections may not be suitable for a producing formation, for example, because the injected solution (or material) may reduce or stop the flow of hydrocarbons in addition to the achieving a desired diversion of the treatment fluid. Therefore, to return the formation to production, expensive and/or time-consuming remedial treatments may be required to remove the injected solution (or material). Furthermore, techniques geared toward injecting solutions (or materials) designed to plug off high-permeability portions of the subterranean formation may require expensive zonal isolation, which may be inaccurate, leading to inadvertent plugging of and/or damage to the hydrocarbon-bearing sections.
The present invention relates to subterranean treatments and, more particularly, in one or more embodiments, to introducing a relative permeability modifiers into a subterranean interval ahead of, or in conjunction with a chelating agent.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method comprising: providing a treatment fluid comprising an aqueous fluid, a relative permeability modifier, and a chelating agent; introducing the treatment fluid into a well bore that penetrates a subterranean formation; and allowing at least a first portion of the treatment fluid to penetrate into a portion of the subterranean formation so as to substantially divert a second portion of the treatment fluid to another portion of the subterranean formation.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method comprising: providing a first treatment fluid comprising an aqueous fluid and a relative permeability modifier; introducing the first treatment fluid into a well bore that penetrates a subterranean formation; allowing at least a portion of the first treatment fluid to penetrate into a portion of the subterranean formation thereby reducing the permeability of the portion of the subterranean formation to aqueous liquids without substantially reducing the permeability to hydrocarbons; and introducing a second treatment fluid comprising a chelating agent into the well bore, wherein the second treatment fluid is substantially diverted from the portion of the subterranean formation to a less permeable portion of the subterranean formation.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method comprising: providing a treatment fluid comprising an aqueous fluid, a relative permeability modifier, and a chelating agent; introducing the treatment fluid into a well bore that penetrates a subterranean formation; allowing at least a first portion of the treatment fluid to penetrate into a portion of the subterranean formation so as to substantially divert a second portion of the treatment fluid to another portion of the subterranean formation; and allowing the chelating agent to dissolve an acid-soluble component in the subterranean formation.
Other and further features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of the preferred embodiments that follows.
The present invention relates to subterranean treatments and, more particularly, in one or more embodiments, to introducing a relative permeability modifier into a subterranean interval ahead of, or in conjunction with, a chelating agent. As used herein, the term “relative permeability modifier” refers to a compound that is capable of reducing the permeability of a subterranean formation to aqueous fluids without substantially changing the formation's permeability to hydrocarbons. As used herein, the term “chelating agent” refers to a compound that is capable of forming a complex wherein a metal ion is bonded to two or more atoms of the chelating agent.
In certain embodiments, the methods of the present invention generally comprise providing a treatment fluid that comprises an aqueous fluid, a relative permeability modifier, and optionally a chelating agent; introducing the treatment fluid into a well bore that penetrates a subterranean formation; and allowing at least a first portion of the treatment fluid to penetrate into a portion of the subterranean formation. In some embodiments of the present invention, the relative permeability modifier and the chelating agent may be introduced into a well bore in the same treatment fluid. In other embodiments of the present invention, the relative permeability modifier and the chelating agent may be introduced into a well bore in separate treatment fluids. As used herein, the term “treatment fluid” refers generally to any fluid that may be used in a subterranean application in conjunction with a desired function and/or for a desired purpose. The term “treatment fluid” does not imply any particular action by the fluid or any component thereof. The presence of the relative permeability modifier in the portion of the subterranean formation should at least partially divert a second portion of the treatment fluid or another aqueous treatment fluid comprising a chelating agent to another portion of the subterranean formation. By way of example, the second portion of the treatment or the other aqueous treatment fluid may be diverted to a less permeable portion of the formation. The methods of the present invention may be useful in a variety of subterranean operations, such as chemical stimulation operations, damage removal operations, scale removal operations, and filter cake removal operations, where diversion may be required.
The treatment fluids of the present invention generally comprise an aqueous fluid, a relative permeability modifier, and optionally a chelating agent. A variety of additional additives suitable for use in subterranean operations also may be included in the treatment fluids as desired. The aqueous fluid of the treatment fluids of the present invention may include freshwater, saltwater, brine (e.g., saturated saltwater), or seawater. Generally, the aqueous fluid may be from any source, provided that it does not contain components that may adversely affect other components in the treatment fluid.
As described above, a relative permeability modifier may be introduced into at least a portion of a subterranean formation, in accordance with certain embodiments. In general, suitable relative permeability modifiers may be any of a variety of compounds that are capable of selectively reducing the effective permeability of a formation to water-based fluids without a comparable reduction of the formation's effective permeability to hydrocarbons. Suitable relative permeability modifiers generally include water-soluble polymers that attach to surfaces within the formation, reducing the water permeability without a comparable reduction in hydrocarbon permeability. As used in this disclosure, “water soluble” refers to at least about 0.01 weight percent soluble in distilled water at room temperature (about 72° F.). In certain embodiments, the water-soluble polymer is at least about 0.45 weight percent soluble in distilled water at room temperature. In certain embodiments, the water-soluble polymer is at least about 0.6 weight percent soluble in distilled water at room temperature.
Those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that a variety of different water-soluble polymers may be suitable for use as the relative permeability modifiers. Examples of suitable water-soluble polymers include, but are not limited to, homo-, co-, and terpolymers of acrylamide, 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, vinyl pyrrolidone, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, acrylic acid, dimethylaminopropylmethacrylamide, vinyl amine, vinyl acetate, trimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate chloride, methacrylamide, hydroxyethyl acrylate, vinyl sulfonic acid, vinyl phosphonic acid, methacrylic acid, vinyl caprolactam, N-vinylformamide, N,N-diallylacetamide, dimethyldiallyl ammonium halide, itaconic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, methacrylamidoethyltrimethyl ammonium halide, quaternary salt derivatives of acrylamide, quaternary salt derivatives of acrylic acid, and combinations thereof.
In addition, water-soluble polymers suitable for use as relative permeability modifiers also may include hydrophobically modified polymers. As used in this disclosure, the terms “hydrophobically modified,” “hydrophobic modification,” and the like refer to the incorporation into the hydrophilic polymer structure of hydrophobic groups, wherein the alkyl chain length is about 4 to about 22 carbons. While these hydrophobically modified polymers have hydrophobic groups incorporated into the hydrophilic polymer structure, they should remain water soluble. In some embodiments, a mole ratio of a hydrophilic monomer to the hydrophobic compound in the hydrophobically modified polymer is in the range of from about 99.98:0.02 to about 90:10, wherein the hydrophilic monomer is a calculated amount present in the hydrophilic polymer. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobically modified polymers may comprise a polymer backbone that comprises polar heteroatoms. Generally, the polar heteroatoms present within the polymer backbone of the hydrophobically modified polymers include, but are not limited to, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, or phosphorous.
Example hydrophobically modified polymers may contain a hydrophilic polymer backbone and a hydrophobic branch, wherein the hydrophobic branch includes an alkyl chain of about 4 to about 22 carbons. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobic branch may have an alkyl chain length of about 7 to about 22 carbons. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobic branch may have an alkyl chain length of about 12 to about 18 carbons. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobic branch may be a branched chain structure.
Additional examples of suitable hydrophobically modified polymers include a polymer that has been hydrophobically modified with an alkyl group present on an amino group (in the polymer backbone or as a pendant group) in quatemized form. For example, an alkyl group may be present on a dialkyl amino pendant group in quatemized form. In one embodiment, the dialkyl amino pendant group comprises a dimethyl amino pendant group. One specific example of a hydrophobically modified polymer includes a polydimethylaminoethylmethacrylate or polydimethylaminopropylmethacrylamide that has been hydrophobically modified with an alkyl group with 4 carbons to 22 carbons (e.g., 4 carbons, 6, carbons, 8 carbons, 10 carbons, 12 carbons, 14 carbons, 16 carbons, 18 carbons, 20 carbons, 22 carbons, etc.) on a dimethylamino group. An example of a suitable hydrophobically modified polymer is HPT-1υ relative permeability modifying polymer available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Duncan, Okla.
Examples of suitable hydrophobically modified polymers that may be utilized include, but are not limited to, acrylamide/octadecyldimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate bromide copolymer, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/vinyl pyrrolidone/hexadecyldimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate bromide terpolymer, and acrylamide/2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid/2-ethylhexyl methacrylate terpolymer. Another example of a suitable hydrophobically modified polymer comprises an amino methacrylate/alkyl amino methacrylate copolymer. An example of a suitable amino methacrylate/alkyl amino methacrylate copolymer includes a dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/alkyl-dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate copolymer. An example of a suitable dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/alkyl-dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate copolymer includes a dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/hexadecyl-dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate copolymer. As discussed in more detail below, these copolymers may be formed, in embodiments, by reactions with a variety of alkyl halides. For example, in some embodiments, the hydrophobically modified polymer may comprise a dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/hexadecyl-dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate bromide copolymer.
Example hydrophobically modified polymers may be synthesized utilizing any suitable technique. For example, the hydrophobically modified polymers may be a reaction product of a reaction comprising a hydrophilic polymer and a hydrophobic compound. By way of further example, the hydrophobically modified polymers may be prepared from a polymerization reaction comprising a hydrophilic monomer and a hydrophobically modified hydrophilic monomer. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobically modified polymers may be pre-reacted before they are placed into the well bore. Alternatively, in some embodiments, the hydrophobically modified polymers may be prepared by an appropriate in situ reaction. Suitable hydrophobically modified polymers and methods for their preparation are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,476,169 and 7,117,942, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to determine other suitable methods for the synthesis of suitable hydrophobically modified polymers.
In certain embodiments, suitable hydrophobically modified polymers may be synthesized by the hydrophobic modification of a hydrophilic polymer via reaction with a hydrophobic compound. As described above, hydrophobic modification refers to incorporation into the hydrophilic polymer structure of hydrophobic groups, wherein the alkyl chain length is from about 4 to about 22 carbons. The hydrophilic polymers suitable for forming the hydrophobically modified polymers used in the present invention should be capable of reacting with hydrophobic compounds. Suitable hydrophilic polymers include, homo-, co-, or terpolymers such as, but not limited to, polyacrylamides, polyvinylamines, poly(vinylamines/vinyl alcohols), alkyl acrylate polymers in general, and combinations thereof. Additional examples of alkyl acrylate polymers include polydimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, polydimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide, poly(acrylamide/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(methacrylic acid/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(acrylamide/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide), poly (acrylic acid/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide), poly(methacrylic acid/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide), and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise a polymer backbone and reactive amino groups in the polymer backbone or as pendant groups, the reactive amino groups capable of reacting with hydrophobic compounds. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise dialkyl amino pendant groups. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise a dimethyl amino pendant group and a monomer comprising dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate or dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide. In certain embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise a polymer backbone that comprises polar heteroatoms, wherein the polar heteroatoms present within the polymer backbone of the hydrophilic polymers include oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, or phosphorous. Suitable hydrophilic polymers that comprise polar heteroatoms within the polymer backbone include homo-, co-, or terpolymers, such as, but not limited to, celluloses, chitosans, polyamides, polyetheramines, polyethyleneimines, polyhydroxyetheramines, polylysines, polysulfones, gums, starches, and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the starch is a cationic starch. A suitable cationic starch may be formed by reacting a starch, such as corn, maize, waxy maize, potato, tapioca, or the like, with the reaction product of epichlorohydrin and trialkylamine.
The hydrophobic compounds that are capable of reacting with the hydrophilic polymers include alkyl halides, sulfonates, sulfates, organic acids, and organic acid derivatives. Examples of suitable organic acids and derivatives thereof include, but are not limited to, octenyl succinic acid; dodecenyl succinic acid; and anhydrides, esters, imides, and amides of octenyl succinic acid or dodecenyl succinic acid. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobic compounds may have an alkyl chain length of from about 4 to about 22 carbons. In another embodiment, the hydrophobic compounds may have an alkyl chain length of from about 7 to about 22 carbons. In another embodiment, the hydrophobic compounds may have an alkyl chain length of from about 12 to about 18 carbons. For example, where the hydrophobic compound is an alkyl halide, the reaction between the hydrophobic compound and hydrophilic polymer may result in the quaternization of at least some of the hydrophilic polymer amino groups with an alkyl halide, wherein the alkyl chain length is from about 4 to about 22 carbons.
As previously mentioned, in certain embodiments, suitable hydrophobically modified polymers also may be prepared from a polymerization reaction comprising a hydrophilic monomer and a hydrophobically modified hydrophilic monomer. The hydrophobically modified polymers synthesized from the polymerization reactions may have estimated molecular weights in the range of from about 100,000 to about 10,000,000 and mole ratios of the hydrophilic monomer(s) to the hydrophobically modified hydrophilic monomer(s) in the range of from about 99.98:0.02 to about 90:10.
A variety of hydrophilic monomers may be used to form the hydrophobically modified polymers useful in the present invention. Examples of suitable hydrophilic monomers include, but are not limited to, acrylamide, 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, vinyl pyrrolidone, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, acrylic acid, dimethylaminopropylmethacrylamide, vinyl amine, vinyl acetate, trimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate chloride, methacrylamide, hydroxyethyl acrylate, vinyl sulfonic acid, vinyl phosphonic acid, methacrylic acid, vinyl caprolactam, N-vinylformamide, N,N-diallylacetamide, dimethyldiallyl ammonium halide, itaconic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, methacrylamidoethyltrimethyl ammonium halide, quaternary salt derivatives of acrylamide, quaternary salt derivatives of acrylic acid, and combinations thereof.
A variety of hydrophobically modified hydrophilic monomers also may be used to form the hydrophobically modified polymers useful in certain embodiments. Examples of suitable hydrophobically modified hydrophilic monomers include, but are not limited to, alkyl acrylates, alkyl methacrylates, alkyl acrylamides, alkyl methacrylamides alkyl dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate halides, and alkyl dimethylammoniumpropyl methacrylamide halides, wherein the alkyl groups have from about 4 to about 22 carbon atoms. In another embodiment, the alkyl groups have from about 7 to about 22 carbons. In another embodiment, the alkyl groups have from about 12 to about 18 carbons. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobically modified hydrophilic monomer comprises octadecyldimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate bromide, hexadecyldimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate bromide, hexadecyldimethylammoniumpropyl methacrylamide bromide, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, or hexadecyl methacrylamide.
In addition, water-soluble polymers suitable for use as relative permeability modifiers also may include hydrophilically modified polymers. As used in this disclosure, the terms “hydrophilic modification,” “hydrophilically modified,” and the like refer to the incorporation into the hydrophilic polymer structure of hydrophilic groups, such as to introduce branching or to increase the degree of branching in the hydrophilic polymer. The hydrophilically modified polymers of certain embodiments typically have molecular weights in the range of from about 100,000 to about 10,000,000. In certain embodiments, the hydrophilically modified polymers comprise a polymer backbone, the polymer backbone comprising polar heteroatoms. Generally, the polar heteroatoms present within the polymer backbone of the hydrophilically modified polymers include, but are not limited to, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, or phosphorous.
The hydrophilically modified polymers may be synthesized using any suitable method. In one example, the hydrophilically modified polymers may be a reaction product of a hydrophilic polymer and a hydrophilic compound. In certain embodiments, suitable hydrophilically modified polymers may be formed by additional hydrophilic modification, for example, to introduce branching or to increase the degree of branching, of a hydrophilic polymer. Those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to determine other suitable methods for the preparation of suitable hydrophilically modified polymers.
The hydrophilic polymers suitable for forming the hydrophilically modified polymers used in certain embodiments should be capable of reacting with hydrophilic compounds. In certain embodiments, suitable hydrophilic polymers include, homo-, co-, or terpolymers, such as, but not limited to, polyacrylamides, polyvinylamines, poly(vinylamines/vinyl alcohols), and alkyl acrylate polymers in general. Additional examples of alkyl acrylate polymers include, but are not limited to, polydimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, polydimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide, poly(acrylamide/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(methacrylic acid/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid/dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(acrylamide/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide), poly(acrylic acid/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide), and poly(methacrylic acid/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide). In certain embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise a polymer backbone and reactive amino groups in the polymer backbone or as pendant groups, the reactive amino groups capable of reacting with hydrophilic compounds. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise dialkyl amino pendant groups. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise a dimethyl amino pendant group and at least one monomer comprising dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate or dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide. In other embodiments, the hydrophilic polymers comprise a polymer backbone comprising polar heteroatoms, wherein the polar heteroatoms present within the polymer backbone of the hydrophilic polymers include, but are not limited to, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, or phosphorous. Suitable hydrophilic polymers that comprise polar heteroatoms within the polymer backbone include homo-, co-, or terpolymers, such as, but not limited to, celluloses, chitosans, polyamides, polyetheramines, polyethyleneimines, polyhydroxyetheramines, polylysines, polysulfones, gums, starches, and derivatives thereof. In one embodiment, the starch is a cationic starch. A suitable cationic starch may be formed by reacting a starch, such as corn, maize, waxy maize, potato, tapioca, and the like, with the reaction product of epichlorohydrin and trialkylamine.
Hydrophilic compounds suitable for reaction with the hydrophilic polymers include, but are not limited to: polyethers that comprise halogens; sulfonates; sulfates; organic acids; and organic acid derivatives. Examples of suitable polyethers include, but are not limited to, polyethylene oxides, polypropylene oxides, and polybutylene oxides, and copolymers, terpolymers, and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the polyether comprises an epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethylene oxide methyl ether.
The hydrophilically modified polymers formed from the reaction of a hydrophilic polymer with a hydrophilic compound may have estimated molecular weights in the range of from about 100,000 to about 10,000,000 and may have weight ratios of the hydrophilic polymers to the polyethers in the range of from about 1:1 to about 10:1. Examples of suitable hydrophilically modified polymers having molecular weights and weight ratios in the ranges set forth above include, but are not limited to, the reaction product of polydimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethyleneoxide methyl ether; the reaction product of polydimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide and epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethyleneoxide methyl ether; and the reaction product of poly(acrylamide/dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide) and epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethyleneoxide methyl ether. In some embodiments, the hydrophilically modified polymer comprises the reaction product of a polydimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethyleneoxide methyl ether having a weight ratio of polydimethylaminoethyl methacrylate to epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethyleneoxide methyl ether of about 3:1.
Sufficient concentrations of a suitable relative permeability modifier should be present in embodiments of the treatment fluids of the present invention to provide the desired degree of diversion. The amount of the relative permeability modifier to include in the treatment fluid depends on a number of factors including, the composition of the fluid to be diverted, the porosity and/or permeability of the formation, injection pressure limitations, and the like. In some embodiments, a relative permeability modifier may be present in a treatment fluid of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 0.02% to about 10% by weight of the fluid. In some embodiments, a relative permeability modifier may be present in an amount in the range of from about 0.05% to about 1.0% by weight of the fluid. In certain embodiments of the present invention, the relative permeability modifier may be provided in a concentrated aqueous solution prior to its combination with the other components necessary to form a treatment fluid of the present invention.
The chelating agents useful in the present invention may be any suitable chelating agent that is suitable for use in subterranean operations. Examples of suitable chelating agents include ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydroxyethyl ethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), glutamic acid diacetic acid (GLDA), propylene diamine tetraacetic acid (PDTA), ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), diethanolglycine (DEG), ethanoldiglycine (EDG), glucoheptonate, citric acid, phosphates, amines, citrates, and salts thereof. Other suitable chelating agents may include chelating agents classified as polyphosphates, aminocarboxylic acids, aminopolycarboxylates, 1,3-diketones, hydroxycarboxylic acids, polyamines, aminoalcohols, aromatic heterocyclic bases, phenols, aminophenols, oximes, Schiff bases, tetrapyrroles, sulfur compounds, synthetic macrocyclic compounds, polymers, phosphonic acids, and mixtures and derivatives thereof. In some embodiments, the chelating agents may be present in the treatment fluids of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 2% to about 50% by weight of the treatment fluid. In other embodiments, the chelating agent may be present in the treatment fluids of the present invention in an amount of from about 5% to about 20% by weight of the treatment fluids. In other embodiments, the chelating agent may be present in the treatment fluid of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 10% to about 15% by weight of the treatment fluid. In some embodiments, the chelating agent may be present in the treatment fluid comprising the relative permeability modifier. In some embodiments, the chelating agent may be present in a treatment fluid introduced subsequent to the treatment fluid comprising the relative permeability modifier.
Additional additives may be included in the treatment fluids of the present invention as deemed appropriate for a particular application by one skilled in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure. Examples of such additives include, but are not limited to, acids, weighting agents, surfactants, scale inhibitors, antifoaming agents, bactericides, salts, foaming agents, fluid loss control additives, viscosifying agents, gel breakers, clay stabilizers, exchange metals, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, exchange metals may be used to control the reaction rate of the chelating agents. For example, in some embodiments an exchange metal comprising magnesium may be used in conjunction with a chelating agent to slow the reaction rate of the chelating agent.
The treatment fluids of the present invention may be used for the diversion of chelating agents in a variety of subterranean operations, such as in chemical stimulation operations, damage removal operations, scale removal operations, and filter cake removal operations. In some embodiments, the methods comprise: providing a treatment fluid of the present invention that comprises an aqueous fluid, a relative permeability modifier, and optionally a chelating agent; introducing the treatment fluid into a well bore that penetrates a subterranean formation; and allowing at least a first portion of the treatment fluid to penetrate into a portion of the subterranean formation so that the relative permeability modifier present in the portion of the subterranean formation substantially diverts a second portion of the treatment fluid or another aqueous fluid comprising a chelating agent to another portion of the subterranean formation. It is believed that the relative permeability modifier attaches to surfaces within the porosity of the portion of the subterranean formation. Among other things, the presence of the relative permeability modifier in the portion of the subterranean formation should reduce the permeability thereof to aqueous fluids without substantially changing its permeability to hydrocarbons. Due to the reduction in the permeability of the portion of the subterranean formation, any aqueous fluid subsequently introduced into the well bore should be substantially diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation. Additionally, the relative permeability modifiers also may act to reduce subsequent problems associated with water flowing into the well bore from the subterranean formation. In some embodiments, the water-soluble, relative permeability modifier may be mixed with the aqueous fluid and introduced into a portion of the subterranean formation between stages of a treatment or as a pretreatment. In some embodiments, the treatment fluids of the present invention may be self diverting. For example, in some embodiments, the relative permeability modifier may be included in the treatment fluid comprising the chelating agent during the subterranean treatment. In these embodiments, the relative permeability modifier may progressively divert the treatment fluid to another portion of the subterranean formation. For instance, in some embodiments, as a first portion of the treatment fluid penetrates into a portion of the subterranean formation a second portion of the treatment fluid may be diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation.
In chemical stimulation operations, in some embodiments, a treatment fluid of the present invention may be introduced into the subterranean formation between stages of the chemical stimulation operation, as a pretreatment, or as a combination thereof. For example, when the chemical stimulation operation is performed in stages, in the first stage a treatment fluid comprising a chelating agent may be introduced into a portion of the subterranean formation, followed by a treatment fluid of the present invention optionally comprising a chelating agent. The relative permeability modifier present in the particular treatment fluid of the present invention should reduce the permeability of the portion of the subterranean formation to aqueous fluids. The second stage of the treatment fluid and/or a portion of the treatment fluid of the present invention then may be substantially diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation. Alternating stages of the chemical stimulation fluid and the treatment fluid of the present invention may be continued as desired. In other embodiments, the treatment fluids of the present invention may be used as a pretreatment. For instance, a treatment fluid of the present invention may be introduced in a portion of the subterranean formation, wherein the relative permeability modifier present in the treatment fluid of the present invention reduces the permeability of the portion of the subterranean formation to aqueous fluids. Any aqueous fluids introduced into the well bore after the pretreatment, such as a chemical stimulation fluid comprising a chelating agent, may be substantially diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation. In other embodiments, the chemical stimulation fluid may be self-diverting. In the self-diverting embodiments, at least a portion of the chemical stimulation fluid may be a treatment fluid of the present invention that further comprises a chelating agent. In these embodiments, the relative permeability modifier may progressively divert the treatment fluid to other portions of the subterranean formation. For instance, in some embodiments, as a first portion of the treatment fluid penetrates into a portion of the subterranean formation a second portion of the treatment fluid may be diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation.
The methods of the present invention may be used in scale removal, damage removal, and filter cake removal operations. In a these removal operations, an aqueous fluid that comprises a chelating agent may be introduced into a portion of the subterranean formation between stages of the removal operation, as a pretreatment, or as a combination thereof. For example, when the removal operation is performed in stages, in the first stage an aqueous fluid comprising a chelating agent may be introduced into a portion of the subterranean formation, followed by a treatment fluid of the present invention optionally comprising a chelating agent. The relative permeability modifier present in the particular treatment fluid of the present invention should reduce the permeability of the portion of the subterranean formation to aqueous fluids. The second stage of the aqueous fluid and/or a portion of the treatment fluid of the present invention then may be substantially diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation. Alternating stages of the aqueous fluid and the treatment fluid of the present invention may be continued as desired. In other embodiments, the treatment fluids of the present invention may be used as a pretreatment. For instance, a treatment fluid of the present invention may be introduced in a portion of the subterranean formation, wherein the relative permeability modifier present in the treatment fluid of the present invention reduces the permeability of the portion of the subterranean formation to aqueous fluids. Any aqueous fluids introduced into the well bore after the pretreatment, such as removal fluids comprising a chelating agent, may be substantially diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation. In other embodiments, the removal fluid may be self-diverting. In the self-diverting embodiments, at least a portion of the removal fluid may be a treatment fluid of the present invention that further comprises a chelating agent. In these embodiments, the relative permeability modifier may progressively divert the treatment fluid to other portions of the subterranean formation. For instance, in some embodiments, as a first portion of the treatment fluid penetrates into a portion of the subterranean formation a second portion of the treatment fluid may be diverted to another portion of the subterranean formation.
To facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, the following examples of specific embodiments are given. In no way should the following examples be read to limit, or to define, the scope of the invention.
A relative permeability modifier useful in the present invention was prepared by mixing 47.7 grams (“g”) of deionized water, 0.38 g of (n-hexadecyl) dimethylammonium ethyl methacrylate bromide, and 1.1 g of acrylamide, and sparging with nitrogen for approximately 30 minutes. Thereafter, a polymerization initiator, such as 0.0127 g of 2,2′-azo bis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride, was added. The resulting solution was then heated, with stirring, to 110° F. and held for 18 hours to produce a highly viscous polymer solution.
A relative permeability modifier useful in the present invention was prepared by mixing 41.2 g of deionized water, 0.06 g of octadecyl methacrylate, 0.45 g of cocoamidopropyl betaine surfactant, and 1.26 g of acrylamide. Thereafter, a polymerization initiator, such as 0.0127 g of 2,2′-azo bis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride, was added. The resulting solution was then heated, with stirring, to 110° F. and held for 18 hours to produce a highly viscous polymer solution.
A relative permeability modifier useful in the present invention was prepared as follows. First, a polymer was made by mixing 1,968 g of deionized water, 105 g of dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and sparging with nitrogen for 30 minutes. Thereafter, the pH was adjusted to approximately 7.9 with sulfuric acid and a polymerization initiator, such as 00.46 g of 2,2′-azo bis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride was added. The resulting solution was then heated, with stirring, to 110° F. and held for 18 hours to produce poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate).
The poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) was then hydrophobically modified by adding 71.0 g of poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) to a 250 ml round flask, followed by 15% NaOH to achieve a pH of approximately 8.9. Next, 54.6 g of water, 0.36 g of C16 alkyl (n-hexadecyl) bromide, and 0.39 g of benzylcetyldimethylammonium bromide surfactant were added to quatemize the poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) homopolymer and form a dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/hexadecyl-dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate copolymer. This mixture was then heated, with stirring, to 140° F. and held for 24 hours to produce a highly viscous polymer solution.
A relative permeability modifier useful in the present invention was prepared as follows. First, a polymer was made by mixing 45.0 g of dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, 6.8 g acrylic acid, 372.0 g of water and sparging with nitrogen for 30 minutes. Thereafter, the pH was adjusted to approximately 5.3 with 5.7 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid, followed by the addition of 0.2 mL of 2-mercaptoethanol and 1.3 g of 2,2′-azo bis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride. The resulting solution was then heated to 71° C., with stirring, and held for 18 hours to produce poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/acrylic acid).
The poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/acrylic acid) was then hydrophilically modified by adding 95.0 g of the polymer to a 250 mL roundbottom flask, followed by the addition of 5.7 g of a 65% solution of an epichlorohydrin-terminated polyethylene oxide methyl ether and 8.0 g of sodium chloride. Approximately 17 mL of 3% active sodium hydroxide solution was then added to reach a pH of approximately 8.2. The mixture was then heated, with stirring, to 71° C. The viscosity of the solution was monitored, and when the viscosity reached 2000 centipoise (as measured with a Brookfield LVT viscometer, #2 spindle at 12 rpm, 25° C.) the reaction was terminated by removing the heat source and adding 5 mL of 17% hydrochloric acid, 2.0 g sodium chloride and 14.7 g water.
Tests were performed to illustrate how a relative permeability modifier useful in the present invention may affect the diversion of aqueous fluids in carbonate lithology. The cores used in these tests were Bedford limestone cores having dimensions of 6 inches in length by a 1-inch diameter. The water core was a Bedford limestone core at residual water saturation. The oil core was a Bedford limestone core at residual oil saturation. The tests were performed at 175° F. and a differential pressure of 22 atmospheres across the core.
The sample treatment fluid used in this example contained 2,000 ppm of a relative permeability modifier in a 2% by weight potassium chloride brine. Thus, the sample treatment fluid used comprised 2% of KCl by weight and 0.2% of a relative permeability modifier by weight. The relative permeability modifier was a dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate/hexadecyl-dimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate copolymer prepared as described in Example 3.
For the flow sequences listed in this example, the water was an API brine of 9% NaCl by weight and 1% CaCl2 by weight, the acid was aqueous solution containing 0.5% HCl by weight, the oil was kerosene, and the spacer fluid was an aqueous solution containing 5% NH4Cl by weight.
The following procedure was used for this series of tests. The cores were connected such that a sample treatment fluid could enter either core using a parallel flow system. The parallel flow system may represent, for example, bullheading a treatment fluid into a well with layered water-producing and oil-producing zones. Parallel flow tests are described in “Structure and Process Optimization for Use of a Polymeric Relative-Permeability Modifier in Conformance Control,” SPE 64985 presented at the 2001 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry held in Houston, Tex., February 13-16, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporate herein by reference.
Once the cores were placed in parallel, a control test was first performed by flowing 200 ml of the acid into the parallel flow system. The acid preferentially entered the water core with 142 ml of the acid entering the water core and 58 ml of the acid entering the oil core. The results of the control test are shown in Table 1.
After the control test, the cores were placed in parallel so that the sample treatment fluid could enter either core. Subsequent to the core's placement in parallel, the parallel flow system experienced a treatment flow sequence of sample treatment fluid-spacer fluid-acid. After treatment with the sample treatment fluid, the majority of the acid was diverted from the water core to the oil core. 175 ml of the acid entered the oil core and 25 ml of the acid entered the water core. The results of the treatment are shown in Table 1.
Therefore, Example 5 indicates that a relative permeability modifier useful in the present invention may be suitable for the diversion of aqueous fluids.
Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the present invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the present invention. While compositions and methods are described in terms of “comprising,” “containing,” or “including” various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components and steps. All numbers and ranges disclosed above may vary by some amount. Whenever a numerical range with a lower limit and an upper limit is disclosed, any number and any included range falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, every range of values (of the form, “from about a to about b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a to b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a-b”) disclosed herein is to be understood to set forth every number and range encompassed within the broader range of values. Also, the terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee. Moreover, the indefinite articles “a” or “an”, as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one or more than one of the element that it introduces. If there is any conflict in the usages of a word or term in this specification and one or more patent or other documents that may be incorporated herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with this specification should be adopted.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/122,836 filed on May 5, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,278,250, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/760,443 filed on Jan. 20, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,759,292, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/440,337 filed on May 16, 2003 now abandoned, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/612,271 filed on Jul. 2, 2003 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,136 on Feb. 27, 2007, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2278838 | Groote et al. | Apr 1942 | A |
2670329 | Jones | Feb 1954 | A |
2689244 | Jones | Sep 1954 | A |
2819278 | De Groots et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
2843573 | Melamed | Jul 1958 | A |
2863832 | Perrine | Dec 1958 | A |
2877179 | Hughes et al. | Mar 1959 | A |
2910436 | Fatt et al. | Oct 1959 | A |
3008898 | Hughes et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
3052298 | Mallot | Sep 1962 | A |
3065247 | De Groots et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3215199 | Dilgren | Nov 1965 | A |
3251415 | Bombardieri et al. | May 1966 | A |
3251778 | Dickson et al. | May 1966 | A |
3258428 | Dickson et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3265512 | Dickson et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3271307 | Dickson et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3297090 | Dilgren | Jan 1967 | A |
3307630 | Dilgren et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3326890 | Engelskirchen et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3336980 | Rike | Aug 1967 | A |
3347789 | Dickson et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3382924 | Veley et al. | May 1968 | A |
3404114 | Snyder et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3434971 | Atkins | Mar 1969 | A |
3441085 | Gidley | Apr 1969 | A |
3451818 | Wareham | Jun 1969 | A |
3489222 | Millhone et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3601194 | Gallus | Aug 1971 | A |
3647507 | Ashcraft | Mar 1972 | A |
3647567 | Schweri | Mar 1972 | A |
3689418 | Cenci et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3689468 | Warminster | Sep 1972 | A |
3708013 | Dismukes | Jan 1973 | A |
3709298 | Pramann | Jan 1973 | A |
3744566 | Szabo et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3902557 | Shaughnessy et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3910862 | Barabas et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3943060 | Martin et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3983941 | Fitch | Oct 1976 | A |
4052343 | Cunningham | Oct 1977 | A |
4052345 | Austin et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4129183 | Kalfoglou | Dec 1978 | A |
4129534 | Cunningham | Dec 1978 | A |
4142595 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4152274 | Phillips et al. | May 1979 | A |
4158521 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4158726 | Kamada et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4228277 | Landoll | Oct 1980 | A |
4299710 | Dupre et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4306981 | Blair, Jr. | Dec 1981 | A |
4337828 | Blair, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4366071 | McLaughlin et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4366072 | McLaughlin et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4366073 | McLaughlin et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4366074 | McLaughlin et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4374739 | McLaughlin et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4393939 | Smith et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4395340 | McLaughlin | Jul 1983 | A |
4401789 | Gideon | Aug 1983 | A |
4439334 | Borchardt | Mar 1984 | A |
4440649 | Loftin et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4441556 | Powers et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4447342 | Borchardt et al. | May 1984 | A |
4460627 | Weaver et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4462718 | McLaughlin et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4499214 | Sortwell | Feb 1985 | A |
4532052 | Weaver et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4536297 | Loftin et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4536303 | Borchardt | Aug 1985 | A |
4536305 | Borchardt et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4552670 | Lipowski et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4554081 | Borchardt et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4563292 | Borchardt | Jan 1986 | A |
4604216 | Irvin et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608139 | Craun et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4619776 | Mondshine | Oct 1986 | A |
4625802 | Sydansk | Dec 1986 | A |
4627926 | Peiffer et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4662448 | Ashford et al. | May 1987 | A |
4671883 | Connell | Jun 1987 | A |
4693639 | Hollenbeak et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4699722 | Dymond et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702319 | Bock et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4730028 | Bock et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4814096 | Evani | Mar 1989 | A |
4828725 | Lai et al. | May 1989 | A |
4828726 | Himes et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856590 | Caillier | Aug 1989 | A |
4870167 | Zody et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4941537 | Langemeier et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956104 | Cowan et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959432 | Fan et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4960876 | Molteni et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5051197 | Kalfayan et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5071934 | Peiffer | Dec 1991 | A |
5097904 | Himes | Mar 1992 | A |
5105886 | Strubhar et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5146986 | Dalrymple | Sep 1992 | A |
5160642 | Schield et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197544 | Himes | Mar 1993 | A |
5208216 | Williamson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5244042 | Dovan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248665 | Hale et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5256651 | Phelps et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5271466 | Harms | Dec 1993 | A |
5342530 | Aften et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5379841 | Pusch et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382371 | Stahl et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5424284 | Patel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5445223 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5473059 | Yeh | Dec 1995 | A |
5482116 | El-Rabaa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5566760 | Harris | Oct 1996 | A |
5597783 | Audibert et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607902 | Smith et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5637556 | Argillier et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643460 | Marble et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646093 | Dino | Jul 1997 | A |
5669456 | Audibert et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681796 | Nimerick | Oct 1997 | A |
5704426 | Rytlewski et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720347 | Audibert et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728653 | Audibert et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735349 | Dawson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755286 | Ebinger | May 1998 | A |
5887653 | Bishop et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908814 | Patel et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5944106 | Dalrymple et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5972848 | Audibert et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979557 | Card et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990052 | Harris | Nov 1999 | A |
6020289 | Dymond | Feb 2000 | A |
6070664 | Dalrymple et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6124245 | Patel | Sep 2000 | A |
6187839 | Eoff et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194356 | Jones et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209646 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228812 | Dawson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237687 | Barbee, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242390 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248697 | Goodhue, Jr. et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253851 | Schroeder, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277900 | Oswald et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281172 | Warren et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283210 | Soliman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291404 | House | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6358889 | Waggenspack et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6359047 | Thieu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364016 | Dalrymple et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380137 | Heier et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6476169 | Eoff et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476283 | Devore et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497283 | Eoff et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516885 | Munday | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6562762 | Cowan et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569983 | Treybig et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6601648 | Ebinger | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605570 | Miller et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607035 | Reddy et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609578 | Patel et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626241 | Nguyen | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627719 | Whipple et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637517 | Samuel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656885 | House et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6710107 | Audibert et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6743288 | Eoff et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764981 | Eoff et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6767867 | Chatterji et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767869 | DiLullo et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780822 | Cowan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787506 | Blair et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790812 | Halliday et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803348 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6846420 | Reddy et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855672 | Poelker et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872820 | Weber et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6884760 | Brand et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6933381 | Mallon et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6962203 | Funchess | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978836 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981552 | Reddy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007752 | Reddy et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7008908 | Chan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036587 | Munoz, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7036589 | Nguyen | May 2006 | B2 |
7056868 | Benton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081439 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091159 | Eoff et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114568 | Eoff et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117942 | Dalrymple et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159656 | Eoff et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182136 | Dalrymple et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207387 | Eoff et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216707 | Eoff et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220708 | Zamora et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7273099 | East, Jr. et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7398825 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7493957 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7632787 | Mirakyan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7759292 | Eoff et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8008235 | Eoff et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8091638 | Dusterhoft et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8592353 | Dalrymple et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8631869 | Sierra et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20030139298 | Fu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040209780 | Harris et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220058 | Eoff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229756 | Eoff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229757 | Eoff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050107503 | Couillet et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050155796 | Eoff et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164894 | Eoff et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194140 | Dalrymple et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199396 | Sierra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050211439 | Willett et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060016596 | Pauls et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060137875 | Dusterhoft et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060234874 | Eoff et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240994 | Eoff et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266522 | Eoff et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283592 | Sierra et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029087 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070114032 | Stegent et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080070805 | Munoz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070807 | Munoz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070808 | Munoz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080110624 | Nguyen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139411 | Harris et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173448 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196897 | Nguyen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100276152 | De Wolf et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110294704 | Eoff et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120048550 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 250 552 | Apr 1974 | DE |
0 383 337 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 896 122 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1 033 378 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 193 365 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 312 753 | May 2003 | EP |
2 128 659 | May 1984 | GB |
2 221 940 | Feb 1990 | GB |
2 335 428 | Sep 1999 | GB |
WO 9315164 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9949183 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9950530 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0078890 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 02097236 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03056130 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004022667 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004094781 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004101706 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Definition of “chelating agent” from Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary, http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/default.cfm, 2002. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/862,132 dated Dec. 30, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,595 dated Feb. 5, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,836 dated Feb. 22, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/102,062 dated Feb. 24, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/760,443 dated Feb. 8, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/862,132 dated Apr. 1, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/806,894 dated Apr. 1, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,215 dated Jun. 9, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/102,062 dated Jun. 29, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,595 dated Jun. 29, 2010. |
Botermans, C. Wouter, et al, Relative Permeability Modifiers: Myth or Reality?, SPE eLibrary Paper No. 68973, 2001, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc., presented at SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 21-22, pp. 1-2. |
Eoff, Larry, et al, Structure and Process Optimization for the Use of a Polymeric Relative-Permeability Modifier in Conformance Control, SPE eLibrary Paper No. 64985, 2001, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc., presented at SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, TX, Feb. 13-16, pp. 1-2. |
Inikori, Solomon Ovueferaye, Numerical Study of Water Coning Control with Downhole Water Sink (DWS) Well Completions in Vertical and Horizontal Wells, A Dissertation, Aug. 2002, Title Page, Contents, Abstract and pp. 17-18, Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, The Department of Petroleum Engineering. |
Zhou, Z. J., et al, Controlling Formation Damage Using Clay Stabilizers: A Review, Paper 95-71, The Petroleum Society of CIM, 1995, presented at the 46th Annual Technical Meeting of the Petroleum Society of CIM in Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 14-17, 1995. |
Halliburton, 2001 Press Releases, Halliburton Technology Uses Revolutionary Polymer System to Control Unwanted Water Production, 2002 Halliburton, pp. 1-2. |
Halliburton, 2001 Press Releases, First Halliburton H2Zero™ Conformance Solution Job Performed for a Producing Well in Egypt, 2002 Halliburton, pp. 1-2. |
Halliburton, 2001 Press Releases, Halliburton Performs First H2Zero™ Conformance Solution Job in North America, 2002 Halliburton, pp. 1-2. |
BJ Services Company, Aquacon, Product Information, Aug. 1, 2001, pp. 1-2. |
BJ Services Company, Aquatrol I, Product Information, Dec. 14, 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Proett, et al., Advanced Dual Probe Formation Tester with Transient, Harmonic, and Pulsed Time-Delay Testing Methods Determines Permeability, Skin, and Anisotropy, SPE 64650, 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China held in Beijing, China, Nov. 7-10, 2000. |
Proett, et al., Advanced Permeability and Anisotropy Measurements While Testing and Sampling in Real-time Using a Dual Probe Formation Tester, SPE 62919, 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the 2000 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Dallas, Texas, Oct. 1-4, 2000. |
Bai, et al., Improved Determination of Stress-Dependent Permeability for Anisotropic Formations, SPE/ISRM 78188, 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference held in Irving, Texas, Oct. 20-23, 2002. |
Parker, et al., Laser Drilling: Effects of Beam Application Methods on Improving Rock Removal, SPE 84353, 2003, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, Oct. 5-8, 2003. |
Xu, et al., Modeling of Laser Spallation Drilling of Rocks for Gas—and Oilwell Drilling, SPE 95746, 2005, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the 2005 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Dallas, Texas, Oct. 9-12, 2005. |
Batarseh, et al., Well Perforation Using High-Power Lasers, SPE 84418, 2003, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, Oct. 5-8, 2003. |
Gahan, et al., Analysis of Efficient High-Power Fiber Lasers for Well Perforation, SPE 90661, 2004, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Houston, Texas, Sep. 26-29, 2004. |
Gahan, et al., Effect of Downhole Pressure Conditions on High-Power Laser Perforation, SPE 97093, 2005, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at the 2005 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Dallas, Texas, Oct. 9-12, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,647, filed Apr. 4, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,836 dated Jul. 22, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,199 dated Sep. 8, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,215 dated Sep. 8, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/806,894 dated Oct. 5, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/102,062 dated Nov. 18, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,836 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/806,894 dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/102,062 dated Mar. 23, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,199 dated Feb. 8, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,215 dated Feb. 8, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,595 dated Feb. 8, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,595 dated Jun. 27, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,215 dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/102,062 dated Jun. 29, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/485,199 dated Jul. 27, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090291863 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11122836 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 12533150 | US | |
Parent | 10760443 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 11122836 | US | |
Parent | 10440337 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10760443 | US | |
Parent | 10612271 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10440337 | US |