1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method for forming a gate stack which minimizes or eliminates damage to the gate dielectric layer and/or the silicon substrate during gate stack formation. More particularly, the present invention relates to reducing temperature during the fabrication of the gate stack to eliminate the formation of silicon clusters within the metallic silicide film of the gate stack. The present invention also includes methods for dispersing silicon clusters prior to the gate etch step.
2. State of the Art
The operating speed of semiconductor devices in very large scale integration (“VSLI”) and ultra large scale integration (“USLI”) depends primarily on the resistivity of the conductive material (hereinafter “trace material”) used to transmit signals from one circuit component to another circuit component. Additionally, in order to increase the circuit component density and/or reduce the complexity of the metal connections between the circuit components, a highly conductive trace material layer is required on the gate stack. Thus, the trace material must be a low-resistivity material.
Metallic silicides have recently become popular for use as low-resistivity trace material. Tungsten silicide (“WSix”) has become a leading low-resistivity trace material. Various etching chemistries have been developed to pattern the WSix to form such conductors as the digitlines or wordlines used in memory devices (see commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,597, hereby incorporated herein by reference). Other metallic silicides used in gate stacks include cobalt silicide (“CoSix”), molybdenum silicide (“MoSix”), and titanium silicide (“TiSix”). These metallic silicides have lower resistivity and are easier to fabricate than other conductors used for this purpose. However, metallic silicides are prone to oxidization. Furthermore, the metal components of the metallic silicides react chemically when they contact other elements. These properties present several problems, including degradation of the semiconductor element and peeling of the metallic silicide film. To compensate for these problems, a polysilicon layer is usually disposed between a gate dielectric layer and the metallic silicide film, and a dielectric cap layer is usually disposed above the metallic silicide film to isolate the metallic silicide.
As shown in
This pitting is also illustrated in
Therefore, it would be advantageous to develop a technique which minimizes or eliminates pitting on the gate dielectric layer caused by gate stack etching, while using state-of-the-art semiconductor device fabrication techniques employing known equipment, process steps, and materials.
The present invention relates to the reduction of the temperature during the fabrication of the gate stack to eliminate the formation of silicon clusters within a metallic silicide film of the gate stack. The elimination of the formation of the silicon clusters minimizes or eliminates damage to the gate dielectric layer and/or silicon substrate during the gate stack formation. The present invention also includes methods for implanting the gate stack layers to disperse the silicon clusters (if they are present in the metallic silicide film) prior to the gate etch step.
One aspect of the method of the present invention begins by forming a gate dielectric layer on a silicon substrate. A polysilicon or amorphous silicon layer (hereinafter “polysilicon layer”) is then formed on top of the gate dielectric layer. The polysilicon layer is subjected to an ion implantation with gate impurities and a non-annealed metallic silicide film is thereafter deposited atop the polysilicon layer. A dielectric cap layer is then deposited over the metallic silicide film at a sufficiently low temperature such that the metallic silicide does not anneal. A resist mask is placed over the cap layer and the structure is etched down to the gate dielectric layer to form a gate stack.
Metallic silicides are generally represented by the formula “MSix” wherein: “M” is the metal component (i.e., cobalt “Co,” molybdenum “Mo,” titanium “Ti,” tungsten “W,”and the like), “Si” is silicon, and “x” is the number of silicon molecules per metal component molecule (“x” is usually between about 2 and 3). Metallic silicide films tend to peel when a low ratio of silicon to metal component is used for gate stack formation (e.g., when “x” is less than 2). In order to reduce the stress of metallic silicide film which causes peeling, a silicon rich metallic silicide film is used in gate stack formation. In particular with the use of WSix, an “x”of about 2.3 is preferred.
In prior art techniques, the metallic silicide is annealed to form a crystalline structured metallic silicide film 502, as illustrated in
It has been found that the pitting on the gate dielectric layer during the full gate stack (cap/metallic silicide/polysilicon) etch is caused by the presence of the silicon clusters inside the metallic silicide film. The etch rate of these silicon clusters has been found to be about 1.2 times that of the metallic silicide film (in the case of tungsten silicide film) during the gate stack etch. Thus, the etch tunnels into the metallic silicide at each silicon cluster. This tunneling is, in turn, translated into the surface of the gate dielectric layer, thereby forming the pits.
By preventing the growth and formation of the silicon clusters in the metallic silicide film, the problem of pitting on the silicon substrate during the gate stack etch can be eliminated. Although prior art techniques anneal the metallic silicide film to reduce its resistivity and consequentially forming the undesirable silicon clusters, it has been found that, for most purposes, the metallic silicide film has sufficiently low resistivity without annealing. Thus, one aspect of the method of the present invention eliminates annealing the metallic silicide film. Although the step of annealing the metallic silicide film also activates gate impurities, the activation of the gate impurities can be completed during subsequent heat cycles after the etching of the gate stack, such as during shallow junction formation.
In a preferred variation of the method, the dielectric cap is selectively deposited on an upper surface of the metallic silicide film at low temperatures. The dielectric cap material is preferably silicon nitride. The deposition of the silicon nitride layer is carried out at between about 400° C. and 600° C., which temperature does not anneal the metallic silicide film, and thus does not result in the growth and formation of silicon clusters in the metallic silicide film. It is, of course, understood that the cap can include silicon dioxide layers, or the like, so long as deposition is performed at temperatures below about 600° C. Forming the cap by selectively depositing silicon nitride by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (“PECVD”) is also preferred, since only one surface of the substrate is covered by the dielectric material which eliminates the necessity of removing the cap material from the semiconductor substrate back surface, thus providing a process cost advantage.
In situations where a high temperature heat cycle (cap deposition and/or annealing) is required, an ion implantation into the metallic silicide film can be performed to amorphize the metallic silicide film (i.e., disperse the silicon clusters back into the metallic silicide film) before masking and etching. The implantation ions can be silicon, tungsten, argon, or the like, or a dopant (phosphorous, arsenic, boron, and the like). The implantation can be performed before and/or after the cap deposition. The implantation energy is preferably between about 20 keV and 200 keV. The ion dose ranges from between about lE13 and lE16. The implantation energy and dose depend on the metallic silicide film thickness, the metallic silicide composition (i.e., ratio of silicon to metal component), the anneal heat cycle temperature, and the implantation ion used. However, it is preferred that the peak of the implantation occur at about the middle of the metallic silicide film. Furthermore, it is preferred that the dopant ion (phosphorous, arsenic, boron, and the like) amorphize the metallic silicide film. For example, for a metallic silicide film which is about 1800 Å thick and annealed at about 850° C. for about 30 minutes, a phosphorous implantation at about 75 keV and lE15 is required to amorphize the metallic silicide.
It is, of course, understood that if a lower resistivity in the metallic silicide is required for a specific application, the gate stack can be subjected to a heat cycle after gate stack etching to anneal the metallic silicide in the gate stack. However, if the gate stack is annealed after formation, the anneal temperature must be increased by about 30° C. to 50° C. to achieve the same resistivity.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming that which is regarded as the present invention, the advantages of this invention can be more readily ascertained from the following description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
A cap 110, preferably including silicon nitride, is then deposited on the metallic silicide film 108, as shown in FIG. 4. The deposition of the silicon nitride layer is carried out at between about 400° C. and 600° C. and preferably at about 500° C., by CVD (including LPCVD, APCVD, and PECVD), sputtering, spin-on techniques, or the like. In a preferred embodiment, the deposition of the silicon nitride is accomplished by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. It is, of course, understood that the cap 110 can include other dielectric material, such as silicon dioxide, as long as it deposited at temperatures below about 600° C.
A resist 112 is then formed and patterned on the cap 110, as illustrated in FIG. 5. The structure is then etched and the resist 112 stripped to form a gate stack 114, as shown in FIG. 6.
As shown in
Having thus described in detail preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is to be understood that the invention defined by the appended claims is not to be limited by particular details set forth in the above description, as many apparent variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit or scope thereof.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/073,494, filed May 6, 1998, pending, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/682,935, filed Jul. 16, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,254, issued Jul. 11, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4443930 | Hwang et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4704783 | Possin et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4755480 | Yau et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4782037 | Tomozawa et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5006421 | Yang et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5103272 | Nishiyama | Apr 1992 | A |
5183782 | Onishi et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5268330 | Givens et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5320975 | Cederbaum et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322806 | Kohno et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5428244 | Segawa et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438006 | Chang et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5472896 | Chen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492597 | Keller | Feb 1996 | A |
5512502 | Ootsuka et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518942 | Shrivastava | May 1996 | A |
5518958 | Giewont et al. | May 1996 | A |
5656546 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665646 | Kitano | Sep 1997 | A |
5728625 | Tung | Mar 1998 | A |
6087254 | Pan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6137130 | Sung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6465295 | Kitamura | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 591 086 | Apr 1994 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08682935 | Jul 1996 | US |
Child | 09073494 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09073494 | May 1998 | US |
Child | 09614113 | US |