Ultrasonic testing is commonly used in the aircraft industry to validate the health (e.g., integrity and fitness) of aircraft structures. The testing may be performed by scanning an ultrasonic transducer array over a surface of a structure. For large structures, the transducer array may be scanned with a robotic multi-axis scanning system.
According to an embodiment herein, an apparatus comprises a forming tool having a forming surface, and an ultrasonic transducer array on the forming surface.
According to another embodiment herein, a method comprises placing an uncured ply stack and a flexible ultrasonic transducer array on a forming surface of a forming tool.
According to another embodiment herein, an article comprises a cured fiber reinforced plastic part and a flexible ultrasonic transducer array embedded in the cured part.
These features and functions may be achieved independently in various embodiments or may be combined in other embodiments. Further details of the embodiments can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
Reference is made to
The transducer array 120 is not limited to any particular construction. As a first example, a transducer array 120 includes a pattern of individual elements 120.
As a second example, the transducer array 110 includes a thin metal foil, a film of piezoelectric material on the foil, and top electrodes on film. The thin metal foil serves as a substrate and base electrode and may be flexed. The electrodes may be printed onto a single sheet, which is on the film.
As a third example, the transducer array 110 includes a flexible mat, a receiver layer of piezoelectric material on one side of the flexible mat, and a transmitter layer of piezoelectric material on an opposite side of the flexible mat. A plurality of electrodes are on the piezoelectric material of the receiver layer, and a plurality of electrodes are on the piezoelectric material of the transmitter layer. The electrodes on the receiver layer may be perpendicular or angled with respect to the electrodes on the transmitter layer. Each transducer element 120 is formed by an overlapping portion of an electrode in the transmitter layer with an electrode in the receiver layer.
The electrodes are not limited to any particular geometry. Width and thickness may be constant or varying. Geometry may even vary. For instance, an electrode may have rectangular portions and hexagonal or circular portions.
The flexible transducer array 110 may be mounted on a flexible circuit board. The circuit board may be a made of a dielectric such as Kapton® polyimide film.
As discussed below, the flexible ultrasonic transducer array 110 will be subjected to curing temperatures and pressures. Therefore, the piezoelectric material is selected to withstand such temperatures and pressures (the temperatures and pressures will, of course, depend upon the material being cured). Examples of piezoelectric materials that can withstand temperatures and pressures for curing fiber reinforced composites include, without limitation, calcium oxyborate, langanite, and bismuth titanate.
Reference is made to
The apparatus 210 further includes a flexible ultrasonic transducer array 230 on the forming surface 224. The ultrasonic transducer array 230 may cover the entire forming surface 224 or it may partially cover the forming surface 224. For example, the transducer array 230 may only cover select areas of interest of the forming surface 224.
As used herein, the term “on the forming surface” may mean direct physical contact with the forming surface. The term “on the forming surface” may also mean spaced apart from the forming surface, for example, by a thin layer (e.g., a layer of adhesive) or spaced apart by the part being fabricated. When on the forming surface 224, the ultrasonic transducer array 230 conforms to the shape of the forming surface 224. The flexibility of the array 230 enables the array to conform to the shape of the forming surface 224.
The flexible transducer array 230 may be secured to the tool 220. For instance, the array 230 may be mechanically clamped to the tool 220, adhesively bonded to the tool 220, or vacuum bagged down against the tool 220. In some instances, the flexible transducer array 230 may not be secured and may instead sit on the tool 220.
The tool 220 may be used to fabricate a part made of a material such as fiber reinforced plastic (“FRP”). An FRP part may be fabricated by laying up a ply stack on the forming surface 224 of the forming tool 220. The ply stack may include one or more plies of fabric. For instance, the ply stack may include one or more plies of carbon fibers or some other type of reinforcing fiber. The ply stack may be pre-impregnated with resin before being deposited on the forming surface 224. In the alternative, a dry ply stack may be deposited on the forming surface 224 and thereafter infused with resin. The resin-impregnated ply stack is then cured under high temperature and pressure. Resulting is the FRP part.
The FRP part may have structural inconsistencies such as delaminations, and foreign object debris. The ultrasonic testing reveals these inconsistencies.
The apparatus 210 may further include an array controller 240 for operating the transducer array 230. If the transducer array 230 is operated in pulse echo (PE) ultrasonic mode, the controller 240 causes the transducer array 230 to generate a sound beam that enters a front surface of the FRP part, hits the back wall, and is reflected back towards the transducer array 230. The reflected signal returns to the origination transducer, which measures the reflected acoustic energy. If a structural inconsistency is in the path of the sound beam, the structural inconsistency will reflect the sound beam back to the transducer array 230. A sound beam reflected off a structural inconsistency will arrive at the transducer array 230 sooner than a sound beam reflected off the back wall.
The transducer array 230 may have multiple time gates. A time gate refers a window of analysis in time and amplitude. Gates are typically used to filter out data from wedges, front surfaces, etc. A time gate for pulse echo is usually set to find reflections within the part, after the front surface of the FRP part.
The apparatus 210 may further include a second transducer array 235 on an opposite side of the FRP part. The controller 240 may operate both transducer arrays 230 and 235 in through-testing ultrasonic (TTU) mode. The controller 240 causes one of the transducer arrays to generate sound pulses that are transmitted through a front surface of the FRP part, and continues to the other one of the transducer arrays. The controller 240 causes the other one of the transducer arrays to measure the transmitted acoustic energy transmitted through the back wall of the FRP part. For TTU, the time gate is set across the entire FRP part.
The apparatus 210 may further include equipment such as a computer 250 for processing the PE data and/or TTU data. For instance, the computer 250 may convert the PE data and/or TTU data into a data representation (e.g., a C-scan) that identifies any structural inconsistencies in the FRP part.
The apparatus 210 may be used in the aircraft industry to validate the health (e.g., integrity and fitness) of large aircraft parts. The apparatus 210 may perform ultrasonic inspection of a large FRP part without having to transfer the FRP part to a separate inspection station. Moreover, the apparatus 210 may perform the ultrasonic inspection without a robotic multi-axis scanning system scanning a transducer array over the FRP part. Ultrasonic testing with the apparatus 210 is less capital intensive, less labor expensive, and faster to perform.
The apparatus 210 also eliminates need to determine position of the transducer array 230 along the cured part. Consider conventional ultrasonic inspection that includes scanning a transducer array along an FRP part, and using an encoder to record position of the transducer array as it is being scanned. The apparatus 210 eliminates the need for the encoder, and it eliminates the need to correlate the PE data with the position, since the flexible ultrasonic transducer array 230 is fixed relative to the FRP part during inspection.
The following paragraphs will describe different configurations of the apparatus 210 and different methods of performing ultrasonic testing.
Reference is made to
At steps 3A and 3B, the flexible transducer array 230 is placed on the forming surface 224 and secured to the forming surface 224. That is, the transducer array 230 is placed on the “tool side.” The transducer array 230 conforms to the forming surface 224 and is in direct contact with the forming surface 224.
Also at step 3B, a ply stack 310 is placed on the transducer array 230, and conforms to the compound curvature of the forming surface 224. The ply stack 310 may be pre-impregnated with resin prior to being placed on the forming surface 224.
A parting layer (not shown) may be placed between the transducer array 230 and the ply stack 310. The parting layer will facilitate separating the transducer array 230 from a cured part.
If a smooth finish for the part is desired, a caul may be placed between the ply stack 310 and the transducer array 230. In the alternative, the transducer array 230 may be encapsulated in a material (e.g., rubber or silicone) that functions as a caul.
At step 3C, the ply stack 310 is bagged with a vacuum bag 320. The transducer array 230 is located underneath the vacuum bag 320.
At step 3D, the forming tool 220 is placed in an autoclave 330, wherein the ply stack 310 is exposed to curing temperature and pressure to produce an FRP part 340. Because the transducer array 230 is also underneath the vacuum bag 320 during curing, it too is exposed to the curing temperature and pressure.
At step 3E, the forming tool 220 is removed from the autoclave 330, and ultrasonic inspection of the FRP part 340 is performed. The transducer array 230 is already acoustically coupled to the FRP part 340. In some instances, the parting layer, caul, or encapsulation material may provide a coupling medium. In other instances, air coupling may be utilized. The air coupling may be utilized for lower resolution, lower frequency inspection. The transducer array 230 is connected to a controller 240, which operates the transducer array 230 in pulse echo mode to generate PE data. A computer 250 processes the PE data to determine structural health of the FRP part 340. The inspection may be performed before or after the vacuum bag 320 has been removed from the cured part 340. After the cured part 340 has been inspected, it is separated from the transducer array 230 and moved off the forming tool 220.
Certain operations may be performed on the FRP part 340 after it is removed from the autoclave 330, but prior to ultrasonic inspection. For example, the FRP part 340 may be machined prior to ultrasonic inspection.
Reference is made to
Steps 4A, 4B and 4C are performed in the same manner as steps 3A, 3B and 3C. That is, a transducer array 230 is placed on the forming surface 224 of a forming tool 220, a ply stack 410 is placed on the transducer array 230, and the ply stack 410 is bagged with a vacuum bag 420.
At step 4D, the forming tool 220 is placed in an autoclave 430, wherein the ply stack 410 is exposed to curing temperature and pressure. While the ply stack 410 is being cured, the controller 240 and computer 250 obtain and process pulse echo data from the transducer array 230.
The ply stack 410 may be cured according to a profile. Certain parameters of the profile may be changed in response to the PE data obtained during the curing. Parameters such as temperature and pressure may be adjusted according to thickness (time-of-flight) or signal attenuation information. These parameters may be adjusted on the fly, or they may be used to adjust the profile for curing future parts.
In addition, the PE data obtained during curing may be used to change tool and caul design. If the PE data identifies locations where porosity is forming, caul sheets may be adjusted to increase pressure locally.
The PE data may be used to terminate the curing prematurely. For instance, if the PE data reveals that foreign material is present early, the curing may be aborted. If the PE data reveals that the part will not pass inspection, the curing may be aborted.
The curing may be controlled by an independent curing controller 260. The computer 250 may analyze the pulse echo data and communicate the results to the curing controller 260, or the computer 250 may send the PE data to the curing controller 260, which then analyzes the PE data.
Reference is made to
At step 5D, the ply stack 510 is bagged with a vacuum bag 520, and the forming tool 220 is placed within an autoclave 530. While the ply stack 510 is being cured or after cool-down, the controller 240 and the computer 250 may obtain and process PE data from the transducer array 230. Step 5E may be performed in addition, or in the alternative, to step 5D. At step 5E, the PE data may be obtained and processed after the forming tool 220 has been removed from the autoclave 530.
Reference is made to
At step 6D, the second transducer 235 is placed on the vacuum bag 620, over the ply stack 610. The vacuum bag 620 will provide acoustic coupling for the second transducer array 235.
At step 6E, the bagged ply stack 610 and the transducer arrays 230 and 235 are placed within an autoclave 630. While the ply stack 610 is being cured or after cool-down, the controller 240 and computer 250 obtain and process TTU data from the transducer arrays 230 and 235. At step 6F, In addition, or in the alternative, the TTU data may be obtained and processed after the forming tool 220 has been removed from the autoclave 630. In addition to obtaining through transmission data from both arrays 230 and 235, one of the arrays 230 or 235 may be used to obtain PE data.
Reference is made to
The mold 220 may include first and second halves 710 and 720. First and second flexible ultrasonic transducer arrays 230 and 235 are located on forming surfaces of the first and second halves 710 and 720. PE data and/or TTU data may be collected while the part is still in the mold 220. PE data and/or TTU data may be obtained after initial shaping or injection/resin transfer, and during curing.
If resin infusion or resin transfer molding is performed, the computer 250 (not shown in
The methods described above use a forming tool for fabricating a new part. However, a method herein is not so limited. For example, the forming tool may be used to apply a repair patch to a damaged part.
Reference is made to
A flexible ultrasonic transducer array 230 is secured to a surface of the heat blanket 910, or it is embedded with the heat blanket 910.
To repair a damaged area of a composite structure 920, the damaged area is removed, and a patch (not shown) of resin-impregnated composite is placed within the removed area. The blanket 910 is placed over the patch. The blanket 910 is heated to cure the patch. During curing and/or after curing, PE data is collected from the transducer array 230. The PE data is processed to identify any structural inconsistencies in the patch during and/or after curing.
In the methods described above, the cured or molded part may be separated from the forming tool or mold. However, a method herein is not so limited. For instance, the transducer array 230 may be co-cured or co-bonded with a composite part during curing. After curing, the transducer array 230 is separated from the forming tool 220. The transducer array 230 is embedded in the part.
Reference is made to
Although not so limited, the part 1010 is shown with a rounded 3-D corner. Sharp corner radii are sometimes more difficult to inspect. The flexible ultrasonic transducer array simplifies the inspection of sharp corner radii.
The apparatus and methods described above utilize an ultrasonic transducer array that is flexible. In some instances, however, a rigid ultrasonic transducer array may be used. As a first example, a rigid array may be pre-molded to fit on the forming surface of a forming tool. As a second example, the forming surface and the transducer array may be planar.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3741117 | Bienert | Jun 1973 | A |
4455268 | Hinrichs | Jun 1984 | A |
4559810 | Hinrichs et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4856335 | Tornberg | Aug 1989 | A |
5423220 | Finsterwald et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5637800 | Finsterwald et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5680863 | Hossack et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5711058 | Frey | Jan 1998 | A |
6254812 | Goodridge et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321428 | Toda et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6585839 | Woods et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
7240556 | Georgeson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7617730 | Georgeson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7712369 | Georgeson | May 2010 | B2 |
7785098 | Appleby et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8333115 | Garvey et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8453928 | Melandsoe et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8662395 | Melandso et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9315663 | Appleby et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9816854 | Kudlaty et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20010030281 | Schulz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020087083 | Nix et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020154029 | Watters et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009300 | Giurgiutiu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029010 | Aime | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030066356 | Kanellopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093187 | Walker | May 2003 | A1 |
20060027308 | Mackenzie | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060201252 | Georgeson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080272968 | Muller | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309200 | Melandso et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090091052 | Pridie | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090133501 | Georgeson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090243128 | Nelson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259411 | Loomis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110086199 | Duqueine et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110132523 | Evens et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110189440 | Appleby et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120253698 | Cokonaj | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130075526 | Griess et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130192356 | De Graff et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140133987 | Fernandez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140316551 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150344138 | Wen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150346160 | Auffray | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Saliba, T. etal, In-situ Cure Monitoring of Advanced Composite Materials, 37th International SAMPE Symposium (Mar. 9-12, 1992), pp. 1445-1454 (Year: 1992). |
Stoven, T., F. Weyrauch, p. Mitschang, M. Neitzel, Continuous monitoring of three-dimensional resin flow through a fibre preform, Composites: Part A, vol. 34 (2003), pp. 475-480. (Year: 2003). |
Biermann, P.J., J.H. Cranmer, C.A. Nove, L.M. Brown, End-of-cure sensing using ultrasonics for autoclave fabrication of composites, Proc. SPIE 2948 Nondestructive Evaluation for Process Control in Manufacturing, (Nov. 15, 1996), pp. 72-83. (Year: 1996). |
Shih, et al., “Applications of Flexible Ultrasonic Transducer Array For Defect Detection at 150 C,” ISSN 1424-8220, www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors. |
Bowen, et al., “Flexible Piezoelectric Transducer For Ultrasonic Inspection of Non-Planar Components,” Ultrasonics 48 (2008) 367-375. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200147903 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14311016 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 16746525 | US |