Patent Grant
10377996
The mature red blood cell, or erythrocyte, is responsible for oxygen transport in the circulatory systems of vertebrates. Red blood cells carry high concentrations of hemoglobin, a protein that binds oxygen in the lungs at relatively high partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) and delivers oxygen to areas of the body with a relatively low pO2.
Mature red blood cells are produced from pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells in a process termed erythropoiesis. Postnatal erythropoiesis occurs primarily in the bone marrow and in the red pulp of the spleen. The coordinated action of various signaling pathways control the balance of cell proliferation, differentiation, survival and death. Under normal conditions, red blood cells are produced at a rate that maintains a constant red cell mass in the body, and production may increase or decrease in response to various stimuli, including increased or decreased oxygen tension or tissue demand. The process of erythropoiesis begins with the formation of lineage committed precursor cells and proceeds through a series of distinct precursor cell types. The final stages of erythropoiesis occur as reticulocytes are released into the bloodstream and lose their mitochondria and ribosomes while assuming the morphology of mature red blood cell. An elevated level of reticulocytes, or an elevated reticulocyte:erythrocyte ratio, in the blood is indicative of increased red blood cell production rates.
Erythropoietin (Epo) is widely recognized as the most significant positive regulator of erythropoiesis in post-natal vertebrates. Epo regulates the compensatory erythropoietic response to reduced tissue oxygen tension (hypoxia) and low red blood cell levels or low hemoglobin levels. In humans, elevated Epo levels promote red blood cell formation by stimulating the generation of erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow and spleen. In the mouse, Epo enhances erythropoiesis primarily in the spleen.
Various forms of recombinant Epo are used by physicians to increase red blood cell levels in a variety of clinical settings, and particularly for the treatment of anemia. Anemia is a broadly-defined condition characterized by lower than normal levels of hemoglobin or red blood cells in the blood. In some instances, anemia is caused by a primary disorder in the production or survival of red blood cells. More commonly, anemia is secondary to diseases of other systems (Weatherall & Provan (2000) Lancet 355, 1169-1175). Anemia may result from a reduced rate of production or increased rate of destruction of red blood cells or by loss of red blood cells due to bleeding. Anemia may result from a variety of disorders that include, for example, chronic renal failure, chemotherapy treatment, myelodysplastic syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and bone marrow transplantation.
Treatment with Epo typically causes a rise in hemoglobins by about 1-3 g/dL in healthy humans over a period of weeks. When administered to anemic individuals, this treatment regimen often provides substantial increases in hemoglobin and red blood cell levels and leads to improvements in quality of life and prolonged survival. Epo is not uniformly effective, and many individuals are refractory to even high doses (Horl et al. (2000) Nephrol Dial Transplant 15, 43-50). Over 50% of patients with cancer have an inadequate response to Epo, approximately 10% with end-stage renal disease are hyporesponsive (Glaspy et al. (1997) J Clin Oncol 15, 1218-1234; Demetri et al. (1998) J Clin Oncol 16, 3412-3425), and less than 10% with myelodysplastic syndrome respond favorably (Estey (2003) Curr Opin Hematol 10, 60-67). Several factors, including inflammation, iron and vitamin deficiency, inadequate dialysis, aluminum toxicity, and hyperparathyroidism may predict a poor therapeutic response, the molecular mechanisms of resistance to Epo are as yet unclear.
Thus, it is an object of the present disclosure to provide alternative compositions and methods for increasing red blood cell levels in patients.
In part, the disclosure demonstrates that GDF Traps may be used to increase red blood cell and hemoglobin levels. Variant ActRIIB polypeptides having a significantly decreased affinity for activin (e.g., activin A and/or activin B) relative to other ActRIIB ligands, such as GDF11 and/or myostatin, are referred to as GDF Traps. ActRIIB variants described herein are GDF Traps unless otherwise stated. In particular, the disclosure demonstrates that a GDF Trap which is a soluble form of ActRIIB polypeptide having an acidic residue at position 79 of SEQ ID NO: 1, when administered in vivo, increases red blood cell levels in the blood. Therefore, in certain embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for using GDF Traps to increase red blood cell and hemoglobin levels in patients and to treat disorders associated with low red blood cell or hemoglobin levels in patients in need thereof. As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/012,652, incorporated by reference herein, GDF Traps can be used to increase muscle mass and decrease fat mass.
In certain aspects, the present disclosure provides GDF Traps that are variant ActRIIB polypeptides, including ActRIIB polypeptides having amino- and carboxy-terminal truncations and sequence alterations. Optionally, GDF Traps of the invention may be designed to preferentially antagonize one or more ligands of ActRIIB receptors, such as GDF8 (also called myostatin), GDF11, Nodal, and BMP7 (also called OP-1). Examples of GDF Traps include a set of variants derived from ActRIIB that have greatly diminished affinity for activin. These variants exhibit desirable effects on red blood cells while reducing effects on other tissues. Examples of such variants include those having an acidic amino acid (e.g., aspartic acid, D, or glutamic acid, E) at the position corresponding to position 79 of SEQ ID NO. 1. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence that comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of, the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37 or 38, and polypeptides that are at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to any of the foregoing.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides pharmaceutical preparations comprising a GDF Trap that binds to an ActRIIB ligand such as GDF8, GDF11, activin (e.g., activin B), BMP7 or nodal, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Optionally, the GDF Trap binds to an ActRIIB ligand with a Kd less than 10 micromolar, less than 1 micromolar, less than 100 nanomolar, less than 10 nanomolar, or less than 1 nanomolar. Optionally, the GDF Trap inhibits ActRIIB signaling, such as intracellular signal transduction events triggered by an ActRIIB ligand. A GDF Trap for use in such a preparation may be any of those disclosed herein, including, for example, GDF Traps having an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38 or 40, or GDF Traps having an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97% or 99% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38 or 40, or GDF Traps having an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97% or 99% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38 or 40 wherein the position corresponding to L79 in SEQ ID NO: 1 is an acidic amino acid. A preferred GDF Trap for use in such a preparation consists of, or consists essentially of, the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 26. A GDF Trap may include a functional fragment of a natural ActRIIB polypeptide, such as one comprising at least 10, 20 or 30 amino acids of a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38 or 40 or a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, lacking the C-terminal 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 10 to 15 amino acids and lacking 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 amino acids at the N-terminus. A preferred polypeptide will comprise a truncation relative to SEQ ID NO: 2 or 40 of between 2 and 5 amino acids at the N-terminus and no more than 3 amino acids at the C-terminus. A GDF Trap may include one or more alterations in the amino acid sequence of an ActRIIB polypeptide (e.g., in the ligand-binding domain) relative to a naturally occurring ActRIIB polypeptide. The alteration in the amino acid sequence may, for example, alter glycosylation of the polypeptide when produced in a mammalian, insect or other eukaryotic cell or alter proteolytic cleavage of the polypeptide relative to the naturally occurring ActRIIB polypeptide.
A GDF Trap may be a fusion protein that has, as one domain, an ActRIIB polypeptide (e.g., a ligand-binding domain of an ActRIIB with one or more sequence variations) and one or more additional domains that provide a desirable property, such as improved pharmacokinetics, easier purification, targeting to particular tissues, etc. For example, a domain of a fusion protein may enhance one or more of in vivo stability, in vivo half life, uptake/administration, tissue localization or distribution, formation of protein complexes, multimerization of the fusion protein, and/or purification. GDF Trap fusion proteins may include an immunoglobulin Fc domain (wild-type or mutant) or a serum albumin. In certain embodiments, a GDF Trap fusion comprises a relatively unstructured linker positioned between the Fc domain and the extracellular ActRIIB domain. This unstructured linker may correspond to the roughly 15 amino acid unstructured region at the C-terminal end of the extracellular domain of ActRIIB (the “tail”), or it may be an artificial sequence of between 3 and 5, 15, 20, 30, 50 or more amino acids that are relatively free of secondary structure. A linker may be rich in glycine and proline residues and may, for example, contain repeating sequences of threonine/serine and glycines (e.g., TG4 (SEQ ID NO: 13) or SG4 (SEQ ID NO: 14) singlets or repeats) or a series of three glycines. A fusion protein may include a purification subsequence, such as an epitope tag, a FLAG tag, a polyhistidine sequence, and a GST fusion. In certain embodiments, a GDF Trap fusion comprises a leader sequence. The leader sequence may be a native ActRIIB leader sequence or a heterologous leader sequence. In certain embodiments, the leader sequence is a Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA) leader sequence. In an embodiment, a GDF Trap fusion protein comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in the formula A-B-C. The B portion is an N- and C-terminally truncated ActRIIB polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence corresponding to amino acids 25-131 of SEQ ID NO: 2 or 40. The A and C portions may be independently zero, one or more than one amino acids, and both A and C portions are heterologous to B. The A and/or C portions may be attached to the B portion via a linker sequence.
Optionally, a GDF Trap includes a variant ActRIIB polypeptide having one or more modified amino acid residues selected from: a glycosylated amino acid, a PEGylated amino acid, a farnesylated amino acid, an acetylated amino acid, a biotinylated amino acid, an amino acid conjugated to a lipid moiety, and an amino acid conjugated to an organic derivatizing agent. A pharmaceutical preparation may also include one or more additional compounds such as a compound that is used to treat an ActRIIB-associated disorder. Preferably, a pharmaceutical preparation is substantially pyrogen free. In general, it is preferable that a GDF Trap be expressed in a mammalian cell line that mediates suitably natural glycosylation of the GDF Trap so as to diminish the likelihood of an unfavorable immune response in a patient. Human and CHO cell lines have been used successfully, and it is expected that other common mammalian expression vectors will be useful.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides packaged pharmaceuticals comprising a pharmaceutical preparation described herein and labeled for use in increasing red blood cell levels in a human.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides GDF Traps which are soluble ActRIIB polypeptides comprising an altered ligand-binding (e.g., GDF8-binding) domain. GDF Traps with altered ligand-binding domains may comprise, for example, one or more mutations at amino acid residues such as E37, E39, R40, K55, R56, Y60, A64, K74, W78, L79, D80, F82 and F101 of human ActRIIB (numbering is relative to SEQ ID NO: 1). Optionally, the altered ligand-binding domain can have increased selectivity for a ligand such as GDF8/GDF11 relative to a wild-type ligand-binding domain of an ActRIIB receptor. To illustrate, these mutations are demonstrated herein to increase the selectivity of the altered ligand-binding domain for GDF11 (and therefore, presumably, GDF8) over activin: K74Y, K74F, K74I, L79D, L79E, and D801. The following mutations have the reverse effect, increasing the ratio of activin binding over GDF11: D54A, K55A, L79A and F82A. The overall (GDF11 and activin) binding activity can be increased by inclusion of the “tail” region or, presumably, an unstructured linker region, and also by use of a K74A mutation. Other mutations that caused an overall decrease in ligand binding affinity, include: R40A, E37A, R56A, W78A, D80K, D80R, D80A, D80G, D80F, D80M and D80N. Mutations may be combined to achieve desired effects. For example, many of the mutations that affect the ratio of GDF11:Activin binding have an overall negative effect on ligand binding, and therefore, these may be combined with mutations that generally increase ligand binding to produce an improved binding protein with ligand selectivity. In an exemplary embodiment, a GDF Trap is an ActRIIB polypeptide comprising an L79D or L79E mutation, optionally in combination with additional amino acid substitutions, additions or deletions.
Optionally, a GDF Trap comprising an altered ligand-binding domain has a ratio of Kd for activin binding to Kd for GDF8 binding that is at least 2, 5, 10, or even 100 fold greater relative to the ratio for the wild-type ligand-binding domain. Optionally, the GDF Trap comprising an altered ligand-binding domain has a ratio of IC50 for inhibiting activin to IC50 for inhibiting GDF8/GDF11 that is at least 2, 5, 10, or even 100 fold greater relative to the wild-type ActRIIB ligand-binding domain. Optionally, the GDF Trap comprising an altered ligand-binding domain inhibits GDF8/GDF11 with an IC50 at least 2, 5, 10, or even 100 times less than the IC50 for inhibiting activin. These GDF Traps can be fusion proteins that include an immunoglobulin Fc domain (either wild-type or mutant). In certain cases, the subject soluble GDF Traps are antagonists (inhibitors) of GDF8 and/or GDF11.
Other GDF Traps are contemplated, such as the following. A GDF Trap fusion protein comprising a portion derived from the ActRIIB sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and a second polypeptide portion, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 21-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 (optionally beginning at 22-25 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39) and ending at any of amino acids 109-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39, and wherein the GDF Trap fusion protein inhibits signaling by activin, myostatin and/or GDF11 in a cell-based assay. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 (optionally beginning at 22-25 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39) and ending at any of amino acids 109-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 (optionally beginning at 22-25 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39) and ending at any of amino acids 109-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 21-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 109-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 118-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 21-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 118-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 128-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 128-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 21-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 118-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 118-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 21-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at any of amino acids 128-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap fusion protein above, wherein the portion derived from ActRIIB corresponds to a sequence beginning at any of amino acids 20-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and ending at any of amino acids 128-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. Surprisingly, constructs beginning at 22-25 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 have activity levels greater than proteins having the full extracellular domain of human ActRIIB. In a preferred embodiment, the GDF Trap fusion protein comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of, an amino acid sequence beginning at amino acid position 25 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at amino acid position 131 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. In another preferred embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptide consists of, or consists essentially of, the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37 or 38. Any of the above GDF Trap fusion proteins may be produced as a homodimer. Any of the above GDF Trap fusion proteins may have a heterologous portion that comprises a constant region from an IgG heavy chain, such as an Fc domain. Any of the above GDF Trap fusion proteins may comprise an acidic amino acid at the position corresponding to position 79 of SEQ ID NO: 1, optionally in combination with one or more additional amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions relative to SEQ ID NO: 1.
Other GDF Trap proteins are contemplated, such as the following. A GDF Trap protein comprising an amino acid sequence that is at least 80% identical to the sequence of amino acids 29-109 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39, wherein the position corresponding to 64 of SEQ ID NO: 1 is an R or K, and wherein the GDF Trap protein inhibits signaling by activin, myostatin and/or GDF11 in a cell-based assay. The GDF Trap protein above, wherein at least one alteration with respect to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 is positioned outside of the ligand binding pocket. The GDF Trap protein above, wherein at least one alteration with respect to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 is a conservative alteration positioned within the ligand binding pocket. The GDF Trap protein above, wherein at least one alteration with respect to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 is an alteration at one or more positions selected from the group consisting of K74, R40, Q53, K55, F82 and L79. The GDF Trap protein above, wherein the protein comprises at least one N-X-S/T sequence at a position other than an endogenous N-X-S/T sequence of ActRIIB, and at a position outside of the ligand binding pocket.
Other GDF Traps are contemplated, such as the following. A GDF Trap protein comprising an amino acid sequence that is at least 80% identical to the sequence of amino acids 29-109 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39, and wherein the protein comprises at least one N-X-S/T sequence at a position other than an endogenous N-X-S/T sequence of ActRIIB, and at a position outside of the ligand binding pocket. The GDF Trap above, wherein the GDF Trap protein comprises an N at the position corresponding to position 24 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and an S or T at the position corresponding to position 26 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39, and wherein the GDF Trap inhibits signaling by activin, myostatin and/or GDF11 in a cell-based assay. The GDF Trap above, wherein the GDF Trap protein comprises an R or K at the position corresponding to position 64 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. The GDF Trap above, wherein the ActRIIB protein comprises a D or E at the position corresponding to position 79 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and wherein the GDF Trap inhibits signaling by activin, myostatin and/or GDF11 in a cell-based assay. The GDF Trap above, wherein at least one alteration with respect to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 is a conservative alteration positioned within the ligand binding pocket. The GDF Trap above, wherein at least one alteration with respect to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 is an alteration at one or more positions selected from the group consisting of K74, R40, Q53, K55, F82 and L79. The GDF Trap above, wherein the protein is a fusion protein further comprising a heterologous portion. Any of the above GDF Trap fusion proteins may be produced as a homodimer. Any of the above GDF Trap fusion proteins may have a heterologous portion that comprises a constant region from an IgG heavy chain, such as an Fc domain.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides nucleic acids encoding a GDF Trap polypeptide. An isolated polynucleotide may comprise a coding sequence for a soluble GDF Trap polypeptide, such as described above. For example, an isolated nucleic acid may include a sequence coding for a GDF Trap comprising an extracellular domain (e.g., ligand-binding domain) of an ActRIIB polypeptide having one or more sequence variations and a sequence that would code for part or all of the transmembrane domain and/or the cytoplasmic domain of an ActRIIB polypeptide, but for a stop codon positioned within the transmembrane domain or the cytoplasmic domain, or positioned between the extracellular domain and the transmembrane domain or cytoplasmic domain. For example, an isolated polynucleotide coding for a GDF Trap may comprise a full-length ActRIIB polynucleotide sequence such as SEQ ID NO: 4 having one or more variations, or a partially truncated version, said isolated polynucleotide further comprising a transcription termination codon at least six hundred nucleotides before the 3′-terminus or otherwise positioned such that translation of the polynucleotide gives rise to an extracellular domain optionally fused to a truncated portion of a full-length ActRIIB Nucleic acids disclosed herein may be operably linked to a promoter for expression, and the disclosure provides cells transformed with such recombinant polynucleotides. Preferably the cell is a mammalian cell such as a CHO cell.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides methods for making a GDF Trap polypeptide. Such a method may include expressing any of the nucleic acids (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31) disclosed herein in a suitable cell, such as a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell. Such a method may comprise: a) culturing a cell under conditions suitable for expression of the GDF Trap polypeptide, wherein said cell is transformed with a GDF Trap expression construct; and b) recovering the GDF Trap polypeptide so expressed. GDF Trap polypeptides may be recovered as crude, partially purified or highly purified fractions using any of the well known techniques for obtaining protein from cell cultures.
In certain aspects, a GDF Trap polypeptide disclosed herein may be used in a method for promoting red blood cell production or increasing red blood cell levels in a subject. In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for treating a disorder associated with low red blood cell counts or low hemoglobin levels (e.g., an anemia), or to promote red blood cell production, in patients in need thereof. A method may comprise administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a GDF Trap polypeptide. In certain aspects, the disclosure provides uses of GDF Trap polypeptides for making a medicament for the treatment of a disorder or condition as described herein.
In certain aspects, the disclosure provides methods for administering a GDF Trap polypeptide to a patient. In part, the disclosure demonstrates that GDF Trap polypeptides can be used to increase red blood cell and hemoglobin levels. GDF Trap polypeptides may also be used for treating or preventing other therapeutic uses such as promoting muscle growth. In certain instances, when administering a GDF Trap polypeptide for promoting muscle growth, it may be desirable to monitor the effects on red blood cells during administration of the GDF Trap polypeptide, or to determine or adjust the dosing of the GDF Trap polypeptide, in order to reduce undesired effects on red blood cells. For example, increases in red blood cell levels, hemoglobin levels, or hematocrit levels may cause increases in blood pressure.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily contains a variety of growth factors that share common sequence elements and structural motifs. These proteins are known to exert biological effects on a large variety of cell types in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Members of the superfamily perform important functions during embryonic development in pattern formation and tissue specification and can influence a variety of differentiation processes, including adipogenesis, myogenesis, chondrogenesis, cardiogenesis, hematopoiesis, neurogenesis, and epithelial cell differentiation. The family is divided into two general branches: the BMP/GDF and the TGF-beta/Activin/BMP10 branches, whose members have diverse, often complementary effects. By manipulating the activity of a member of the TGF-beta family, it is often possible to cause significant physiological changes in an organism. For example, the Piedmontese and Belgian Blue cattle breeds carry a loss-of-function mutation in the GDF8 (also called myostatin) gene that causes a marked increase in muscle mass. Grobet et al., Nat Genet. 1997, 17(1):71-4. Furthermore, in humans, inactive alleles of GDF8 are associated with increased muscle mass and, reportedly, exceptional strength. Schuelke et al., N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2682-8.
TGF-β signals are mediated by heteromeric complexes of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors, which phosphorylate and activate downstream Smad proteins upon ligand stimulation (Massagué, 2000, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1:169-178). These type I and type II receptors are transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling. Type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of Type I receptors. Type I and II activin receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of Type I receptors by Type II receptors.
Two related Type II receptors (ActRII), ActRIIA and ActRIIB, have been identified as the Type II receptors for activins (Mathews and Vale, 1991, Cell 65:973-982; Attisano et al., 1992, Cell 68: 97-108). Besides activins, ActRIIA and ActRIIB can biochemically interact with several other TGF-β family proteins, including BMP7, Nodal, GDF8, and GDF11 (Yamashita et al., 1995, J. Cell Biol. 130:217-226; Lee and McPherron, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98:9306-9311; Yeo and Whitman, 2001, Mol. Cell 7: 949-957; Oh et al., 2002, Genes Dev. 16:2749-54). ALK4 is the primary type I receptor for activins, particularly for activin A, and ALK-7 may serve as a receptor for activins as well, particularly for activin B. In certain embodiments, the present invention relates to antagonizing a ligand of ActRIIB receptors (also referred to as an ActRIIB ligand) with a subject GDF Trap polypeptide. Exemplary ligands of ActRIIB receptors include some TGF-β family members, such as activin, Nodal, GDF8, GDF11, and BMP7.
Activins are dimeric polypeptide growth factors that belong to the TGF-beta superfamily. There are three principal activin forms (A, B, and AB) that are homo/heterodimers of two closely related β subunits (βAβA, βBβB, and βAβB, respectively). The human genome also encodes an activin C and an activin E, which are primarily expressed in the liver, and heterodimeric forms containing βC or βE are also known. In the TGF-beta superfamily, activins are unique and multifunctional factors that can stimulate hormone production in ovarian and placental cells, support neuronal cell survival, influence cell-cycle progress positively or negatively depending on cell type, and induce mesodermal differentiation at least in amphibian embryos (DePaolo et al., 1991, Proc Soc Ep Biol Med. 198:500-512; Dyson et al., 1997, Curr Biol. 7:81-84; Woodruff, 1998, Biochem Pharmacol. 55:953-963). Moreover, erythroid differentiation factor (EDF) isolated from the stimulated human monocytic leukemic cells was found to be identical to activin A (Murata et al., 1988, PNAS, 85:2434). It has been suggested that activin A promotes erythropoiesis in the bone marrow. In several tissues, activin signaling is antagonized by its related heterodimer, inhibin. For example, during the release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) from the pituitary, activin promotes FSH secretion and synthesis, while inhibin prevents FSH secretion and synthesis. Other proteins that may regulate activin bioactivity and/or bind to activin include follistatin (FS), follistatin-related protein (FSRP) and α2-macroglobulin.
Nodal proteins have functions in mesoderm and endoderm induction and formation, as well as subsequent organization of axial structures such as heart and stomach in early embryogenesis. It has been demonstrated that dorsal tissue in a developing vertebrate embryo contributes predominantly to the axial structures of the notochord and pre-chordal plate while it recruits surrounding cells to form non-axial embryonic structures. Nodal appears to signal through both type I and type II receptors and intracellular effectors known as Smad proteins. Recent studies support the idea that ActRIIA and ActRIIB serve as type II receptors for Nodal (Sakuma et al., Genes Cells. 2002, 7:401-12). It is suggested that Nodal ligands interact with their co-factors (e.g., cripto) to activate activin type I and type II receptors, which phosphorylate Smad2. Nodal proteins are implicated in many events critical to the early vertebrate embryo, including mesoderm formation, anterior patterning, and left-right axis specification. Experimental evidence has demonstrated that Nodal signaling activates pAR3-Lux, a luciferase reporter previously shown to respond specifically to activin and TGF-beta. However, Nodal is unable to induce pTlx2-Lux, a reporter specifically responsive to bone morphogenetic proteins. Recent results provide direct biochemical evidence that Nodal signaling is mediated by both activin-TGF-beta pathway Smads, Smad2 and Smad3. Further evidence has shown that the extracellular cripto protein is required for Nodal signaling, making it distinct from activin or TGF-beta signaling.
Growth and Differentiation Factor-8 (GDF8) is also known as myostatin. GDF8 is a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass. GDF8 is highly expressed in the developing and adult skeletal muscle. The GDF8 null mutation in transgenic mice is characterized by a marked hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the skeletal muscle (McPherron et al., Nature, 1997, 387:83-90). Similar increases in skeletal muscle mass are evident in naturally occurring mutations of GDF8 in cattle (Ashmore et al., 1974, Growth, 38:501-507; Swatland and Kieffer, J. Anim. Sci., 1994, 38:752-757; McPherron and Lee, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94:12457-12461; and Kambadur et al., Genome Res., 1997, 7:910-915) and, strikingly, in humans (Schuelke et al., N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2682-8). Studies have also shown that muscle wasting associated with HIV-infection in humans is accompanied by increases in GDF8 protein expression (Gonzalez-Cadavid et al., PNAS, 1998, 95:14938-43). In addition, GDF8 can modulate the production of muscle-specific enzymes (e.g., creatine kinase) and modulate myoblast cell proliferation (WO 00/43781). The GDF8 propeptide can noncovalently bind to the mature GDF8 domain dimer, inactivating its biological activity (Miyazono et al. (1988) J. Biol. Chem., 263: 6407-6415; Wakefield et al. (1988) J. Biol. Chem., 263; 7646-7654; and Brown et al. (1990) Growth Factors, 3: 35-43). Other proteins which bind to GDF8 or structurally related proteins and inhibit their biological activity include follistatin, and potentially, follistatin-related proteins (Gamer et al. (1999) Dev. Biol., 208: 222-232).
Growth and Differentiation Factor-11 (GDF11), also known as BMP11, is a secreted protein (McPherron et al., 1999, Nat. Genet. 22: 260-264). GDF11 is expressed in the tail bud, limb bud, maxillary and mandibular arches, and dorsal root ganglia during mouse development (Nakashima et al., 1999, Mech. Dev. 80: 185-189). GDF11 plays a unique role in patterning both mesodermal and neural tissues (Gamer et al., 1999, Dev Biol., 208:222-32). GDF11 was shown to be a negative regulator of chondrogenesis and myogenesis in developing chick limb (Gamer et al., 2001, Dev Biol. 229:407-20). The expression of GDF11 in muscle also suggests its role in regulating muscle growth in a similar way to GDF8. In addition, the expression of GDF11 in brain suggests that GDF11 may also possess activities that relate to the function of the nervous system. Interestingly, GDF11 was found to inhibit neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium (Wu et al., 2003, Neuron. 37:197-207). Hence, GDF11 may have in vitro and in vivo applications in the treatment of diseases such as muscle diseases and neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis).
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP7), also called osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1), is well known to induce cartilage and bone formation. In addition, BMP7 regulates a wide array of physiological processes. For example, BMP7 may be the osteoinductive factor responsible for the phenomenon of epithelial osteogenesis. It is also found that BMP7 plays a role in calcium regulation and bone homeostasis. Like activin, BMP7 binds to Type II receptors, ActRIIA and ActRIIB However, BMP7 and activin recruit distinct Type I receptors into heteromeric receptor complexes. The major BMP7 Type I receptor observed was ALK2, while activin bound exclusively to ALK4 (ActRIIB) BMP7 and activin elicited distinct biological responses and activated different Smad pathways (Macias-Silva et al., 1998, J Biol Chem. 273:25628-36).
As demonstrated herein, a GDF Trap polypeptide, which is a variant ActRIIB polypeptide (ActRIIB), is more effective at increasing red blood cell levels in vivo as compared to a wild-type soluble ActRIIB polypeptide and has beneficial effects in a variety of models for anemias. It should be noted that hematopoiesis is a complex process, regulated by a variety of factors, including erythropoietin, G-CSF and iron homeostasis. The terms “increase red blood cell levels” and “promote red blood cell formation” refer to clinically observable metrics, such as hematocrit, red blood cell counts and hemoglobin measurements, and are intended to be neutral as to the mechanism by which such changes occur.
In addition to stimulating red blood cell levels, GDF Trap polypeptides are useful for a variety of therapeutic applications, including, for example, promoting muscle growth (see PCT Publication Nos. WO 2006/012627 and WO 2008/097541, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). In certain instances, when administering a GDF Trap polypeptide for the purpose of increasing muscle, it may be desirable to reduce or minimize effects on red blood cells. By monitoring various hematologic parameters in patients being treated with, or who are candidates for treatment with, a GDF Trap polypeptide, appropriate dosing (including amounts and frequency of administration) may be determined based on an individual patient's needs, baseline hematologic parameters, and purpose for treatment. Furthermore, therapeutic progress and effects on one or more hematologic parameters over time may be useful in managing patients being dosed with a GDF Trap polypeptide by facilitating patient care, determining appropriate maintenance dosing (both amounts and frequency), etc.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of this invention and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms are discussed below or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner in describing the compositions and methods of the invention and how to make and use them. The scope or meaning of any use of a term will be apparent from the specific context in which the term is used.
“About” and “approximately” shall generally mean an acceptable degree of error for the quantity measured given the nature or precision of the measurements. Typically, exemplary degrees of error are within 20 percent (%), preferably within 10%, and more preferably within 5% of a given value or range of values.
Alternatively, and particularly in biological systems, the terms “about” and “approximately” may mean values that are within an order of magnitude, preferably within 5-fold and more preferably within 2-fold of a given value. Numerical quantities given herein are approximate unless stated otherwise, meaning that the term “about” or “approximately” can be inferred when not expressly stated.
The methods of the invention may include steps of comparing sequences to each other, including wild-type sequence to one or more mutants (sequence variants). Such comparisons typically comprise alignments of polymer sequences, e.g., using sequence alignment programs and/or algorithms that are well known in the art (for example, BLAST, FASTA and MEGALIGN, to name a few). The skilled artisan can readily appreciate that, in such alignments, where a mutation contains a residue insertion or deletion, the sequence alignment will introduce a “gap” (typically represented by a dash, or “A”) in the polymer sequence not containing the inserted or deleted residue.
“Homologous,” in all its grammatical forms and spelling variations, refers to the relationship between two proteins that possess a “common evolutionary origin,” including proteins from superfamilies in the same species of organism, as well as homologous proteins from different species of organism. Such proteins (and their encoding nucleic acids) have sequence homology, as reflected by their sequence similarity, whether in terms of percent identity or by the presence of specific residues or motifs and conserved positions.
The term “sequence similarity,” in all its grammatical forms, refers to the degree of identity or correspondence between nucleic acid or amino acid sequences that may or may not share a common evolutionary origin.
However, in common usage and in the instant application, the term “homologous,” when modified with an adverb such as “highly,” may refer to sequence similarity and may or may not relate to a common evolutionary origin.
In certain aspects, the invention relates to GDF Trap polypeptides, e.g., soluble variant ActRIIB polypeptides, including, for example, fragments, functional variants, and modified forms of ActRIIB polypeptides. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptides have at least one similar or same biological activity as a corresponding wild-type ActRIIB polypeptide. For example, a GDF Trap polypeptide of the invention may bind to and inhibit the function of an ActRIIB ligand (e.g., activin A, activin AB, activin B, Nodal, GDF8, GDF11 or BMP7). Optionally, a GDF Trap polypeptide increases red blood cell levels. Examples of GDF Trap polypeptides include human ActRIIB precursor polypeptides (SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39) having one or more sequence variations, and soluble human ActRIIB polypeptides (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38, 40 and 41) having one or more sequence variations. A GDF Trap refers to an ActRIIB polypeptide having a decreased affinity for activin relative to other ActRIIB ligands, including for example GDF11 and/or myostatin.
As used herein, the term “ActRIIB” refers to a family of activin receptor type IIb (ActRIIB) proteins from any species and variants derived from such ActRIIB proteins by mutagenesis or other modification. Reference to ActRIIB herein is understood to be a reference to any one of the currently identified forms. Members of the ActRIIB family are generally transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with a cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine kinase activity. Amino acid sequences of human ActRIIA soluble extracellular domain (provided for comparison) and ActRIIB soluble extracellular domain are illustrated in
The term “ActRIIB polypeptide” includes polypeptides comprising any naturally occurring polypeptide of an ActRIIB family member as well as any variants thereof (including mutants, fragments, fusions, and peptidomimetic forms) that retain a useful activity. See, for example, WO 2006/012627. For example, ActRIIB polypeptides include polypeptides derived from the sequence of any known ActRIIB having a sequence at least about 80% identical to the sequence of an ActRIIB polypeptide, and optionally at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 99% or greater identity. For example, an ActRIIB polypeptide may bind to and inhibit the function of an ActRIIB protein and/or activin. An ActRIIB polypeptide which is a GDF Trap may be selected for activity in promoting red blood cell formation in vivo. Examples of ActRIIB polypeptides include human ActRIIB precursor polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 1 and 39) and soluble human ActRIIB polypeptides (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38, 40 and 41). Numbering of amino acids for all ActRIIB-related polypeptides described herein is based on the numbering for SEQ ID NO:1, unless specifically designated otherwise.
The human ActRIIB precursor protein sequence is as follows:
CCEGNFCNERFTHLPEAGGPEVTYEPPPTAPTLLTVLAYSLLPIGGLSLIV
The signal peptide is single underlined; the extracellular domain is in bold and the potential N-linked glycosylation sites are in boxes.
A form with an alanine at position 64 is also reported in the literature, as follows:
CCEGNFCNERFTHLPEAGGPEVTYEPPPTAPTLLTVLAYSLLPIGGLSLIV
The human ActRIIB soluble (extracellular), processed polypeptide sequence is as follows:
The alternative form with an A64 is as follows:
In some conditions, the protein may be produced with an “SGR . . . ” sequence at the N-terminus. The C-terminal “tail” of the extracellular domain is underlined. The sequence with the “tail” deleted (a Δ15 sequence) is as follows:
The alternative form with an A64 is as follows:
In some conditions, the protein may be produced with an “SGR . . . ” sequence at the N-terminus. The nucleic acid sequence encoding a human ActRIIB precursor protein is as follows: (nucleotides 5-1543 of Genbank entry NM_001106)(the sequence as shown provides an alanine at position 64, and may be modified to provide an arginine instead)
The nucleic acid sequence encoding a human ActRIIA soluble (extracellular) polypeptide is as follows (the sequence as shown provides an alanine at position 64, and may be modified to provide an arginine instead):
In a specific embodiment, the invention relates to GDF Trap polypeptides which are variant forms of soluble ActRIIB polypeptides. As described herein, the term “soluble ActRIIB polypeptide” generally refers to polypeptides comprising an extracellular domain of an ActRIIB protein. The term “soluble ActRIIB polypeptide,” as used herein, includes any naturally occurring extracellular domain of an ActRIIB protein as well as any variants thereof (including mutants, fragments and peptidomimetic forms) that retain a useful activity. For example, the extracellular domain of an ActRIIB protein binds to a ligand and is generally soluble. Examples of soluble ActRIIB polypeptides include ActRIIB soluble polypeptides (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 22, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38, 40 and 41). Other examples of soluble ActRIIB polypeptides comprise a signal sequence in addition to the extracellular domain of an ActRIIB protein, see Example 1. The signal sequence can be a native signal sequence of an ActRIIB, or a signal sequence from another protein, such as a tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) signal sequence or a honey bee melittin (HBM) signal sequence.
The disclosure identifies functionally active portions and variants of ActRIIB Applicants have ascertained that an Fc fusion protein having the sequence disclosed by Hilden et al. (Blood. 1994 Apr. 15; 83(8):2163-70), which has an Alanine at the position corresponding to amino acid 64 of SEQ ID NO: 1 (A64), has a relatively low affinity for activin and GDF-11. By contrast, the same Fc fusion protein with an Arginine at position 64 (R64) has an affinity for activin and GDF-11 in the low nanomolar to high picomolar range. Therefore, a sequence with an R64 is used as the wild-type reference sequence for human ActRIIB in this disclosure.
Attisano et al. (Cell. 1992 Jan. 10; 68(1):97-108) showed that a deletion of the proline knot at the C-terminus of the extracellular domain of ActRIIB reduced the affinity of the receptor for activin. An ActRIIB-Fc fusion protein containing amino acids 20-119 of SEQ ID NO: 1, “ActRIIB(20-119)-Fc”, has reduced binding to GDF-11 and activin relative to an ActRIIB(20-134)-Fc, which includes the proline knot region and the complete juxtamembrane domain. However, an ActRIIB(20-129)-Fc protein retains similar but somewhat reduced activity relative to the wild type, even though the proline knot region is disrupted. Thus, ActRIIB extracellular domains that stop at amino acid 134, 133, 132, 131, 130 and 129 are all expected to be active, but constructs stopping at 134 or 133 may be most active. Similarly, mutations at any of residues 129-134 are not expected to alter ligand binding affinity by large margins. In support of this, mutations of P129 and P130 do not substantially decrease ligand binding. Therefore, a GDF Trap polypeptide which is an ActRIIB-Fc fusion protein may end as early as amino acid 109 (the final cysteine), however, forms ending at or between 109 and 119 are expected to have reduced ligand binding. Amino acid 119 is poorly conserved and so is readily altered or truncated. Forms ending at 128 or later retain ligand binding activity. Forms ending at or between 119 and 127 will have an intermediate binding ability. Any of these forms may be desirable to use, depending on the clinical or experimental setting.
At the N-terminus of ActRIIB, it is expected that a protein beginning at amino acid 29 or before will retain ligand binding activity. Amino acid 29 represents the initial cysteine. An alanine to asparagine mutation at position 24 introduces an N-linked glycosylation sequence without substantially affecting ligand binding. This confirms that mutations in the region between the signal cleavage peptide and the cysteine cross-linked region, corresponding to amino acids 20-29 are well tolerated. In particular, constructs beginning at position 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 will retain activity, and constructs beginning at positions 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 are also expected to retain activity. Data shown in the Examples demonstrates that, surprisingly, a construct beginning at 22, 23, 24 or 25 will have the most activity.
Taken together, an active portion of ActRIIB comprises amino acids 29-109 of SEQ ID NO: 1, and GDF Trap constructs may, for example, comprise a portion of ActRIIB beginning at a residue corresponding to amino acids 20-29 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39 and ending at a position corresponding to amino acids 109-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. Other examples include constructs that begin at a position from 20-29 or 21-29 and end at a position from 119-134, 119-133, 129-134, or 129-133 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. Other examples include constructs that begin at a position from 20-24 (or 21-24, or 22-25) and end at a position from 109-134 (or 109-133), 119-134 (or 119-133) or 129-134 (or 129-133) of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. Variants within these ranges are also contemplated, particularly those having at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 99% identity to the corresponding portion of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptide comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of, a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to amino acid residues 25-131 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptide comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of, a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 7, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37 or 38. In preferred embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptide consists of, or consists essentially of, the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37 or 38.
The disclosure includes the results of an analysis of composite ActRIIB structures, shown in
ActRIIB is well-conserved across nearly all vertebrates, with large stretches of the extracellular domain conserved completely. Many of the ligands that bind to ActRIIB are also highly conserved. Accordingly, comparisons of ActRIIB sequences from various vertebrate organisms provide insights into residues that may be altered. Therefore, an active, human ActRIIB variant polypeptide useful as a GDF Trap may include one or more amino acids at corresponding positions from the sequence of another vertebrate ActRIIB, or may include a residue that is similar to that in the human or other vertebrate sequence. The following examples illustrate this approach to defining an active ActRIIB variant. L46 is a valine in Xenopus ActRIIB, and so this position may be altered, and optionally may be altered to another hydrophobic residue, such as V, I or F, or a non-polar residue such as A. E52 is a K in Xenopus, indicating that this site may be tolerant of a wide variety of changes, including polar residues, such as E, D, K, R, H, S, T, P, G, Y and probably A. T93 is a K in Xenopus, indicating that a wide structural variation is tolerated at this position, with polar residues favored, such as S, K, R, E, D, H, G, P, G and Y. F108 is a Yin Xenopus, and therefore Y or other hydrophobic group, such as I, V or L should be tolerated. E111 is K in Xenopus, indicating that charged residues will be tolerated at this position, including D, R, K and H, as well as Q and N. R112 is K in Xenopus, indicating that basic residues are tolerated at this position, including R and H. A at position 119 is relatively poorly conserved, and appears as P in rodents and V in Xenopus, thus essentially any amino acid should be tolerated at this position.
The disclosure demonstrates that the addition of a further N-linked glycosylation site (N-X-S/T) increases the serum half-life of an ActRIIB-Fc fusion protein, relative to the ActRIIB(R64)-Fc form. By introducing an asparagine at position 24 (A24N construct), an NXT sequence is created that confers a longer half-life. Other NX(T/S) sequences are found at 42-44 (NQS) and 65-67 (NSS), although the latter may not be efficiently glycosylated with the R at position 64. N-X-S/T sequences may be generally introduced at positions outside the ligand binding pocket defined in
Position L79 of ActRIIB may be altered to confer altered activin-myostatin (GDF-11) binding properties. L79A or L79P reduces GDF-11 binding to a greater extent than activin binding. L79E or L79D retains GDF-11 binding. Remarkably, the L79E and L79D variants have greatly reduced activin binding. In vivo experiments indicate that these non-activin receptors retain significant ability to increase red blood cells but show decreased effects on other tissues. These data demonstrate the desirability and feasibility for obtaining polypeptides with reduced effects on activin. In exemplary embodiments, the methods described herein utilize a GDF Trap polypeptide which is a variant ActRIIB polypeptide comprising an acidic amino acid (e.g., D or E) at the position corresponding to position 79 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 39, optionally in combination with one or more additional amino acid substitutions, additions, or deletions.
The variations described may be combined in various ways. Additionally, the results of the mutagenesis program described herein indicate that there are amino acid positions in ActRIIB that are often beneficial to conserve. These include position 64 (basic amino acid), position 80 (acidic or hydrophobic amino acid), position 78 (hydrophobic, and particularly tryptophan), position 37 (acidic, and particularly aspartic or glutamic acid), position 56 (basic amino acid), position 60 (hydrophobic amino acid, particularly phenylalanine or tyrosine). Thus, in each of the variants disclosed herein, the disclosure provides a framework of amino acids that may be conserved. Other positions that may be desirable to conserve are as follows: position 52 (acidic amino acid), position 55 (basic amino acid), position 81 (acidic), 98 (polar or charged, particularly E, D, R or K).
In certain embodiments, isolated fragments of ActRIIB polypeptides can be obtained by screening polypeptides recombinantly produced from the corresponding fragment of the nucleic acid encoding an ActRIIB polypeptide (e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 4 and 5). In addition, fragments can be chemically synthesized using techniques known in the art such as conventional Merrifield solid phase f-Moc or t-Boc chemistry. The fragments can be produced (recombinantly or by chemical synthesis) and tested to identify those peptidyl fragments that can function, for example, as antagonists (inhibitors) or agonists (activators) of an ActRIIB protein or an ActRIIB ligand.
In certain embodiments, GDF Trap polypeptide is a variant ActRIIB polypeptide having an amino acid sequence that is at least 75% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38, 40 or 41. In certain cases, the GDF Trap has an amino acid sequence at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38, 40 or 41. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of, an amino acid sequence at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3, 7, 11, 26, 28, 29, 32, 37, 38, 40 or 41, wherein the position corresponding to L79 of SEQ ID NO: 1 is an acidic amino acid (e.g., a D or E amino acid residue).
In certain embodiments, the present invention contemplates making functional variants by modifying the structure of a GDF Trap polypeptide for such purposes as enhancing therapeutic efficacy, or stability (e.g., ex vivo shelf life and resistance to proteolytic degradation in vivo). GDF Trap polypeptides can also be produced by amino acid substitution, deletion, or addition. For instance, it is reasonable to expect that an isolated replacement of a leucine with an isoleucine or valine, an aspartate with a glutamate, a threonine with a serine, or a similar replacement of an amino acid with a structurally related amino acid (e.g., conservative mutations) will not have a major effect on the biological activity of the resulting molecule. Conservative replacements are those that take place within a family of amino acids that are related in their side chains. Whether a change in the amino acid sequence of a GDF Trap polypeptide results in a functional variant can be readily determined by assessing the ability of the GDF Trap polypeptide to produce a response in cells relative to the unmodified GDF Trap polypeptide or a wild-type ActRIIB polypeptide, or to bind to one or more ligands, such as activin, GDF-11 or myostatin as compared to the unmodified GDF Trap polypeptide or a wild-type ActRIIB polypeptide.
In certain specific embodiments, the present invention contemplates making mutations in the extracellular domain (also referred to as ligand-binding domain) of an ActRIIB polypeptide such that the ActRIIB polypeptide has altered ligand-binding activities (e.g., binding affinity or binding specificity). In certain cases, such GDF Trap polypeptides have altered (elevated or reduced) binding affinity for a specific ligand. In other cases, the GDF Trap polypeptides have altered binding specificity for ActRIIB ligands.
For example, the disclosure provides GDF Trap polypeptides that preferentially bind to GDF8/GDF11 relative to activins. The disclosure further establishes the desirability of such polypeptides for reducing off-target effects, although such selective variants may be less desirable for the treatment of severe diseases where very large gains in red blood cell levels may be needed for therapeutic effect and where some level of off-target effect is acceptable. For example, amino acid residues of the ActRIIB protein, such as E39, K55, Y60, K74, W78, D80, and F101, are in the ligand-binding pocket and mediate binding to its ligands such as activin and GDF8. Thus, the present invention provides a GDF Trap comprising an altered ligand-binding domain (e.g., GDF8-binding domain) of an ActRIIB receptor, which comprises one or more mutations at those amino acid residues. Optionally, the altered ligand-binding domain can have increased selectivity for a ligand such as GDF8 relative to a wild-type ligand-binding domain of an ActRIIB receptor. To illustrate, these mutations increase the selectivity of the altered ligand-binding domain for GDF8 over activin. Optionally, the altered ligand-binding domain has a ratio of Kd for activin binding to Kd for GDF8 binding that is at least 2, 5, 10, or even 100 fold greater relative to the ratio for the wild-type ligand-binding domain. Optionally, the altered ligand-binding domain has a ratio of IC50 for inhibiting activin to IC50 for inhibiting GDF8 that is at least 2, 5, 10, or even 100 fold greater relative to the wild-type ligand-binding domain. Optionally, the altered ligand-binding domain inhibits GDF8 with an IC50 at least 2, 5, 10, or even 100 times less than the IC50 for inhibiting activin.
As a specific example, the positively-charged amino acid residue Asp (D80) of the ligand-binding domain of ActRIIB can be mutated to a different amino acid residue to produce a GDF Trap polypeptide that preferentially binds to GDF8, but not activin. Preferably, the D80 residue is changed to an amino acid residue selected from the group consisting of: an uncharged amino acid residue, a negative amino acid residue, and a hydrophobic amino acid residue. As a further specific example, the hydrophobic residue, L79, can be altered to the acidic amino acids aspartic acid or glutamic acid to greatly reduce activin binding while retaining GDF11 binding. As will be recognized by one of skill in the art, most of the described mutations, variants or modifications may be made at the nucleic acid level or, in some cases, by post translational modification or chemical synthesis. Such techniques are well known in the art.
In certain embodiments, the present invention contemplates GDF Trap polypeptides having specific mutations in ActRIIB so as to alter the glycosylation of the ActRIIB polypeptide. Exemplary glycosylation sites in GDF Trap polypeptides are illustrated in
This disclosure further contemplates a method of generating variants, particularly sets of combinatorial variants of a GDF Trap polypeptide, including, optionally, truncation variants; pools of combinatorial mutants are especially useful for identifying GDF Trap sequences. The purpose of screening such combinatorial libraries may be to generate, for example, GDF Trap polypeptide variants which have altered properties, such as altered pharmacokinetics, or altered ligand binding. A variety of screening assays are provided below, and such assays may be used to evaluate variants. For example, a GDF Trap polypeptide variant may be screened for the ability to bind to an ActRIIB polypeptide, to prevent binding of an ActRIIB ligand to an ActRIIB polypeptide or to interfere with signaling caused by an ActRIIB ligand.
The activity of a GDF Trap polypeptide or its variants may also be tested in a cell-based or in vivo assay. For example, the effect of a GDF Trap polypeptide variant on the expression of genes involved in hematopoiesis may be assessed. This may, as needed, be performed in the presence of one or more recombinant ActRIIB ligand proteins (e.g., activin), and cells may be transfected so as to produce a GDF Trap polypeptide and/or variants thereof, and optionally, an ActRIIB ligand. Likewise, a GDF Trap polypeptide may be administered to a mouse or other animal, and one or more blood measurements, such as an RBC count, hemoglobin levels, hematocrit levels, iron stores, or reticulocyte count may be assessed using art recognized methods.
Combinatorially-derived variants can be generated which have a selective potency relative to a reference GDF Trap polypeptide. Such variant proteins, when expressed from recombinant DNA constructs, can be used in gene therapy protocols. Likewise, mutagenesis can give rise to variants which have intracellular half-lives dramatically different than the corresponding unmodified GDF Trap polypeptide. For example, the altered protein can be rendered either more stable or less stable to proteolytic degradation or other processes which result in destruction of, or otherwise inactivation of an unmodified GDF Trap polypeptide. Such variants, and the genes which encode them, can be utilized to alter GDF Trap polypeptide levels by modulating the half-life of the GDF Trap polypeptides. For instance, a short half-life can give rise to more transient biological effects and, when part of an inducible expression system, can allow tighter control of recombinant GDF Trap polypeptide levels within the cell. In an Fc fusion protein, mutations may be made in the linker (if any) and/or the Fc portion to alter the half-life of the protein.
In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptides of the invention may further comprise post-translational modifications in addition to any that are naturally present in the ActRIIB polypeptides. Such modifications include, but are not limited to, acetylation, carboxylation, glycosylation, phosphorylation, lipidation, and acylation. As a result, GDF Trap polypeptides may contain non-amino acid elements, such as polyethylene glycols, lipids, poly- or mono-saccharide, and phosphates. Effects of such non-amino acid elements on the functionality of a GDF Trap polypeptide may be tested as described herein for other GDF Trap polypeptide variants. When a GDF Trap polypeptide is produced in cells by cleaving a nascent form of the GDF Trap polypeptide, post-translational processing may also be important for correct folding and/or function of the protein. Different cells (such as CHO, HeLa, MDCK, 293, WI38, NIH-3T3 or HEK293) have specific cellular machinery and characteristic mechanisms for such post-translational activities and may be chosen to ensure the correct modification and processing of the GDF Trap polypeptides.
In certain aspects, GDF Trap polypeptides include fusion proteins having at least a portion of an ActRIIB polypeptide and one or more fusion domains. Well known examples of such fusion domains include, but are not limited to, polyhistidine, Glu-Glu, glutathione S transferase (GST), thioredoxin, protein A, protein G, an immunoglobulin heavy chain constant region (e.g., an Fc), maltose binding protein (MBP), or human serum albumin. A fusion domain may be selected so as to confer a desired property. For example, some fusion domains are particularly useful for isolation of the fusion proteins by affinity chromatography. For the purpose of affinity purification, relevant matrices for affinity chromatography, such as glutathione-, amylase-, and nickel- or cobalt-conjugated resins are used. Many of such matrices are available in “kit” form, such as the Pharmacia GST purification system and the QIAexpress™ system (Qiagen) useful with (HIS6) (SEQ ID NO: 24) fusion partners. As another example, a fusion domain may be selected so as to facilitate detection of the GDF Trap polypeptides. Examples of such detection domains include the various fluorescent proteins (e.g., GFP) as well as “epitope tags,” which are usually short peptide sequences for which a specific antibody is available. Well known epitope tags for which specific monoclonal antibodies are readily available include FLAG, influenza virus haemagglutinin (HA), and c-myc tags. In some cases, the fusion domains have a protease cleavage site, such as for Factor Xa or Thrombin, which allows the relevant protease to partially digest the fusion proteins and thereby liberate the recombinant proteins therefrom. The liberated proteins can then be isolated from the fusion domain by subsequent chromatographic separation. In certain preferred embodiments, a GDF Trap polypeptide is fused with a domain that stabilizes the GDF Trap polypeptide in vivo (a “stabilizer” domain). By “stabilizing” is meant anything that increases serum half life, regardless of whether this is because of decreased destruction, decreased clearance by the kidney, or other pharmacokinetic effect. Fusions with the Fc portion of an immunoglobulin are known to confer desirable pharmacokinetic properties on a wide range of proteins. Likewise, fusions to human serum albumin can confer desirable properties. Other types of fusion domains that may be selected include multimerizing (e.g., dimerizing, tetramerizing) domains and functional domains (that confer an additional biological function, such as further increasing red blood cell levels).
As a specific example, the present invention provides GDF Trap that is an ActRIIB-Fc fusion protein which comprises an extracellular (e.g., ligand-binding) domain of ActRIIB polypeptide fused to an Fc domain. The sequence of an exemplary Fc domain is shown below (SEQ ID NO: 6).
Optionally, the Fc domain has one or more mutations at residues such as Asp-265, lysine 322, and Asn-434. In certain cases, the mutant Fc domain having one or more of these mutations (e.g., Asp-265 mutation) has reduced ability of binding to the Fcγ receptor relative to a wildtype Fc domain. In other cases, the mutant Fc domain having one or more of these mutations (e.g., Asn-434 mutation) has increased ability of binding to the MHC class I-related Fc-receptor (FcRN) relative to a wildtype Fc domain.
It is understood that different elements of the fusion proteins may be arranged in any manner that is consistent with the desired functionality. For example, a GDF Trap polypeptide may be placed C-terminal to a heterologous domain, or, alternatively, a heterologous domain may be placed C-terminal to a GDF Trap polypeptide. The GDF Trap polypeptide domain and the heterologous domain need not be adjacent in a fusion protein, and additional domains or amino acid sequences may be included C- or N-terminal to either domain or between the domains.
In certain embodiments, a GDF Trap fusion protein comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in the formula A-B-C. The B portion is an N- and C-terminally truncated ActRIIB polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence corresponding to amino acids 26-132 of SEQ ID NO: 26. The A and C portions may be independently zero, one or more than one amino acids, and both the A and C portions when present are heterologous to B. The A and/or C portions may be attached to the B portion via a linker sequence. Exemplary linkers are include short polypeptide linkers such as 2-10, 2-5, 2-4, 2-3 Glycine residues, such as, for example, a Gly-Gly-Gly linker. Other suitable linkers are described herein above. In certain embodiments, a GDF Trap fusion protein comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in the formula A-B-C, wherein A is a leader sequence, B consists of amino acids 26-132 of SEQ ID NO: 26, and C is a polypeptide portion that enhances one or more of in vivo stability, in vivo half life, uptake/administration, tissue localization or distribution, formation of protein complexes, and/or purification. In certain embodiments, a GDF Trap fusion protein comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in the formula A-B-C, wherein A is a TPA leader sequence, B consists of amino acids 26-132 of SEQ ID NO: 26, and C is an immunoglobulin Fc domain. A preferred GDF Trap fusion protein comprises the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 26.
In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptides of the present invention contain one or more modifications that are capable of stabilizing the GDF Trap polypeptides. For example, such modifications enhance the in vitro half life of the GDF Trap polypeptides, enhance circulatory half life of the GDF Trap polypeptides or reducing proteolytic degradation of the GDF Trap polypeptides. Such stabilizing modifications include, but are not limited to, fusion proteins (including, for example, fusion proteins comprising an GDF Trap polypeptide and a stabilizer domain), modifications of a glycosylation site (including, for example, addition of a glycosylation site to a GDF Trap polypeptide), and modifications of carbohydrate moiety (including, for example, removal of carbohydrate moieties from a GDF Trap polypeptide). In the case of fusion proteins, a GDF Trap polypeptide is fused to a stabilizer domain such as an IgG molecule (e.g., an Fc domain). As used herein, the term “stabilizer domain” not only refers to a fusion domain (e.g., Fc) as in the case of fusion proteins, but also includes nonproteinaceous modifications such as a carbohydrate moiety, or nonproteinaceous polymer, such as polyethylene glycol.
In certain embodiments, the present invention makes available isolated and/or purified forms of the GDF Trap polypeptides, which are isolated from, or otherwise substantially free of, other proteins.
In certain embodiments, GDF Trap polypeptides (unmodified or modified) of the invention can be produced by a variety of art-known techniques. For example, such GDF Trap polypeptides can be synthesized using standard protein chemistry techniques such as those described in Bodansky, M. Principles of Peptide Synthesis, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1993) and Grant G. A. (ed.), Synthetic Peptides: A User's Guide, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1992). In addition, automated peptide synthesizers are commercially available (e.g., Advanced ChemTech Model 396; Milligen/Biosearch 9600). Alternatively, the GDF Trap polypeptides, fragments or variants thereof may be recombinantly produced using various expression systems (e.g., E. coli, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, COS cells, baculovirus) as is well known in the art. In a further embodiment, the modified or unmodified GDF Trap polypeptides may be produced by digestion of recombinantly produced full-length GDF Trap polypeptides by using, for example, a protease, e.g., trypsin, thermolysin, chymotrypsin, pepsin, or paired basic amino acid converting enzyme (PACE). Computer analysis (using a commercially available software, e.g., MacVector, Omega, PCGene, Molecular Simulation, Inc.) can be used to identify proteolytic cleavage sites. Alternatively, such GDF Trap polypeptides may be produced from recombinantly produced full-length GDF Trap polypeptides such as standard techniques known in the art, such as by chemical cleavage (e.g., cyanogen bromide, hydroxylamine).
In certain aspects, the invention provides isolated and/or recombinant nucleic acids encoding any of the GDF Trap polypeptides disclosed herein. SEQ ID NO: 4 encodes a naturally occurring ActRIIB precursor polypeptide, while SEQ ID NO: 5 encodes a soluble ActRIIB polypeptide, and SEQ ID NOs: 25, 27, 30 and 31 encode soluble GDF Traps. The subject nucleic acids may be single-stranded or double stranded. Such nucleic acids may be DNA or RNA molecules. These nucleic acids may be used, for example, in methods for making GDF Trap polypeptides or as direct therapeutic agents (e.g., in a gene therapy approach).
In certain aspects, the subject nucleic acids encoding GDF Trap polypeptides are further understood to include nucleic acids that are variants of SEQ ID NOs: 5, 25, 27, 30 and 31. Variant nucleotide sequences include sequences that differ by one or more nucleotide substitutions, additions or deletions, such as allelic variants; and will, therefore, include coding sequences that differ from the nucleotide sequence of the coding sequence designated in SEQ ID NOs: 5, 25, 27, 30 and 31.
In certain embodiments, the invention provides isolated or recombinant nucleic acid sequences that are at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that nucleic acid sequences complementary to SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31, and variants of SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31, are also within the scope of this invention. In further embodiments, the nucleic acid sequences of the invention can be isolated, recombinant, and/or fused with a heterologous nucleotide sequence, or in a DNA library.
In other embodiments, nucleic acids of the invention also include nucleotide sequences that hybridize under highly stringent conditions to the nucleotide sequence designated in SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31, complement sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31, or fragments thereof. As discussed above, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand readily that appropriate stringency conditions which promote DNA hybridization can be varied. For example, one could perform the hybridization at 6.0× sodium chloride/sodium citrate (SSC) at about 45° C., followed by a wash of 2.0×SSC at 50° C. For example, the salt concentration in the wash step can be selected from a low stringency of about 2.0×SSC at 50° C. to a high stringency of about 0.2×SSC at 50° C. In addition, the temperature in the wash step can be increased from low stringency conditions at room temperature, about 22° C., to high stringency conditions at about 65° C. Both temperature and salt may be varied, or temperature or salt concentration may be held constant while the other variable is changed. In one embodiment, the invention provides nucleic acids which hybridize under low stringency conditions of 6×SSC at room temperature followed by a wash at 2×SSC at room temperature.
Isolated nucleic acids which differ from the nucleic acids as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31 due to degeneracy in the genetic code are also within the scope of the invention. For example, a number of amino acids are designated by more than one triplet. Codons that specify the same amino acid, or synonyms (for example, CAU and CAC are synonyms for histidine) may result in “silent” mutations which do not affect the amino acid sequence of the protein. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptide will be encoded by an alternative nucleotide sequence. Alternative nucleotide sequences are degenerate with respect to the native GDF Trap nucleic acid sequence but still encode for the same fusion protein. In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap having SEQ ID NO: 26 is encoded by an alternative nucleic acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 30. However, it is expected that DNA sequence polymorphisms that do lead to changes in the amino acid sequences of the subject proteins will exist among mammalian cells. One skilled in the art will appreciate that these variations in one or more nucleotides (up to about 3-5% of the nucleotides) of the nucleic acids encoding a particular protein may exist among individuals of a given species due to natural allelic variation. Any and all such nucleotide variations and resulting amino acid polymorphisms are within the scope of this invention.
In certain embodiments, the recombinant nucleic acids of the invention may be operably linked to one or more regulatory nucleotide sequences in an expression construct. Regulatory nucleotide sequences will generally be appropriate to the host cell used for expression. Numerous types of appropriate expression vectors and suitable regulatory sequences are known in the art for a variety of host cells. Typically, said one or more regulatory nucleotide sequences may include, but are not limited to, promoter sequences, leader or signal sequences, ribosomal binding sites, transcriptional start and termination sequences, translational start and termination sequences, and enhancer or activator sequences. Constitutive or inducible promoters as known in the art are contemplated by the invention. The promoters may be either naturally occurring promoters, or hybrid promoters that combine elements of more than one promoter. An expression construct may be present in a cell on an episome, such as a plasmid, or the expression construct may be inserted in a chromosome. In a preferred embodiment, the expression vector contains a selectable marker gene to allow the selection of transformed host cells. Selectable marker genes are well known in the art and will vary with the host cell used.
In certain aspects of the invention, the subject nucleic acid is provided in an expression vector comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a GDF Trap polypeptide and operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence. Regulatory sequences are art-recognized and are selected to direct expression of the GDF Trap polypeptide. Accordingly, the term regulatory sequence includes promoters, enhancers, and other expression control elements. Exemplary regulatory sequences are described in Goeddel; Gene Expression Technology: Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. (1990). For instance, any of a wide variety of expression control sequences that control the expression of a DNA sequence when operatively linked to it may be used in these vectors to express DNA sequences encoding a GDF Trap polypeptide. Such useful expression control sequences, include, for example, the early and late promoters of SV40, tet promoter, adenovirus or cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter, RSV promoters, the lac system, the trp system, the TAC or TRC system, T7 promoter whose expression is directed by T7 RNA polymerase, the major operator and promoter regions of phage lambda, the control regions for fd coat protein, the promoter for 3-phosphoglycerate kinase or other glycolytic enzymes, the promoters of acid phosphatase, e.g., Pho5, the promoters of the yeast α-mating factors, the polyhedron promoter of the baculovirus system and other sequences known to control the expression of genes of prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells or their viruses, and various combinations thereof. It should be understood that the design of the expression vector may depend on such factors as the choice of the host cell to be transformed and/or the type of protein desired to be expressed. Moreover, the vector's copy number, the ability to control that copy number and the expression of any other protein encoded by the vector, such as antibiotic markers, should also be considered.
A recombinant nucleic acid of the invention can be produced by ligating the cloned gene, or a portion thereof, into a vector suitable for expression in either prokaryotic cells, eukaryotic cells (yeast, avian, insect or mammalian), or both. Expression vehicles for production of a recombinant GDF Trap polypeptide include plasmids and other vectors. For instance, suitable vectors include plasmids of the types: pBR322-derived plasmids, pEMBL-derived plasmids, pEX-derived plasmids, pBTac-derived plasmids and pUC-derived plasmids for expression in prokaryotic cells, such as E. coli.
Some mammalian expression vectors contain both prokaryotic sequences to facilitate the propagation of the vector in bacteria, and one or more eukaryotic transcription units that are expressed in eukaryotic cells. The pcDNAI/amp, pcDNAI/neo, pRc/CMV, pSV2gpt, pSV2neo, pSV2-dhfr, pTk2, pRSVneo, pMSG, pSVT7, pko-neo and pHyg derived vectors are examples of mammalian expression vectors suitable for transfection of eukaryotic cells. Some of these vectors are modified with sequences from bacterial plasmids, such as pBR322, to facilitate replication and drug resistance selection in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Alternatively, derivatives of viruses such as the bovine papilloma virus (BPV-1), or Epstein-Barr virus (pHEBo, pREP-derived and p205) can be used for transient expression of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Examples of other viral (including retroviral) expression systems can be found below in the description of gene therapy delivery systems. The various methods employed in the preparation of the plasmids and in transformation of host organisms are well known in the art. For other suitable expression systems for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, as well as general recombinant procedures, see Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., ed. by Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989) Chapters 16 and 17. In some instances, it may be desirable to express the recombinant polypeptides by the use of a baculovirus expression system. Examples of such baculovirus expression systems include pVL-derived vectors (such as pVL1392, pVL1393 and pVL941), pAcUW-derived vectors (such as pAcUW1), and pBlueBac-derived vectors (such as the β-gal containing pBlueBac III).
In a preferred embodiment, a vector will be designed for production of the subject GDF Trap polypeptides in CHO cells, such as a Pcmv-Script vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.), pcDNA4 vectors (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and pCI-neo vectors (Promega, Madison, Wis.). As will be apparent, the subject gene constructs can be used to cause expression of the subject GDF Trap polypeptides in cells propagated in culture, e.g., to produce proteins, including fusion proteins or variant proteins, for purification.
This invention also pertains to a host cell transfected with a recombinant gene including a coding sequence (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 4, 5, 25, 27, 30 or 31) for one or more of the subject GDF Trap polypeptides. The host cell may be any prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell. For example, a GDF Trap polypeptide of the invention may be expressed in bacterial cells such as E. coli, insect cells (e.g., using a baculovirus expression system), yeast, or mammalian cells. Other suitable host cells are known to those skilled in the art.
Accordingly, the present invention further pertains to methods of producing the subject GDF Trap polypeptides. For example, a host cell transfected with an expression vector encoding a GDF Trap polypeptide can be cultured under appropriate conditions to allow expression of the GDF Trap polypeptide to occur. The GDF Trap polypeptide may be secreted and isolated from a mixture of cells and medium containing the GDF Trap polypeptide. Alternatively, the GDF Trap polypeptide may be retained cytoplasmically or in a membrane fraction and the cells harvested, lysed and the protein isolated. A cell culture includes host cells, media and other byproducts. Suitable media for cell culture are well known in the art. The subject GDF Trap polypeptides can be isolated from cell culture medium, host cells, or both, using techniques known in the art for purifying proteins, including ion-exchange chromatography, gel filtration chromatography, ultrafiltration, electrophoresis, and immunoaffinity purification with antibodies specific for particular epitopes of the GDF Trap polypeptides. In a preferred embodiment, the GDF Trap polypeptide is a fusion protein containing a domain which facilitates its purification.
In another embodiment, a fusion gene coding for a purification leader sequence, such as a poly-(His)/enterokinase cleavage site sequence at the N-terminus of the desired portion of the recombinant GDF Trap polypeptide, can allow purification of the expressed fusion protein by affinity chromatography using a Ni2+ metal resin. The purification leader sequence can then be subsequently removed by treatment with enterokinase to provide the purified GDF Trap polypeptide (e.g., see Hochuli et al., (1987) J. Chromatography 411:177; and Janknecht et al., PNAS USA 88:8972).
Techniques for making fusion genes are well known. Essentially, the joining of various DNA fragments coding for different polypeptide sequences is performed in accordance with conventional techniques, employing blunt-ended or stagger-ended termini for ligation, restriction enzyme digestion to provide for appropriate termini, filling-in of cohesive ends as appropriate, alkaline phosphatase treatment to avoid undesirable joining, and enzymatic ligation. In another embodiment, the fusion gene can be synthesized by conventional techniques including automated DNA synthesizers. Alternatively, PCR amplification of gene fragments can be carried out using anchor primers which give rise to complementary overhangs between two consecutive gene fragments which can subsequently be annealed to generate a chimeric gene sequence (see, for example, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, eds. Ausubel et al., John Wiley & Sons: 1992).
In certain aspects, the present invention relates to the use of the subject GDF Trap polypeptides (e.g., soluble variant ActRIIB polypeptides) to identify compounds (agents) which are agonist or antagonists of ActRIIB polypeptides. Compounds identified through this screening can be tested to assess their ability to modulate red blood cell, hemoglobin and/or reticulocyte levels in vivo or in vitro. These compounds can be tested, for example, in animal models.
There are numerous approaches to screening for therapeutic agents for increasing red blood cell or hemoglobin levels by targeting ActRIIB signaling. In certain embodiments, high-throughput screening of compounds can be carried out to identify agents that perturb ActRIIB-mediated effects on a selected cell line. In certain embodiments, the assay is carried out to screen and identify compounds that specifically inhibit or reduce binding of an ActRIIB polypeptide to its binding partner, such as an ActRIIB ligand (e.g., activin, Nodal, GDF8, GDF11 or BMP7). Alternatively, the assay can be used to identify compounds that enhance binding of an ActRIIB polypeptide to its binding partner such as an ActRIIB ligand. In a further embodiment, the compounds can be identified by their ability to interact with an ActRIIB polypeptide.
A variety of assay formats will suffice and, in light of the present disclosure, those not expressly described herein will nevertheless be comprehended by one of ordinary skill in the art. As described herein, the test compounds (agents) of the invention may be created by any combinatorial chemical method. Alternatively, the subject compounds may be naturally occurring biomolecules synthesized in vivo or in vitro. Compounds (agents) to be tested for their ability to act as modulators of tissue growth can be produced, for example, by bacteria, yeast, plants or other organisms (e.g., natural products), produced chemically (e.g., small molecules, including peptidomimetics), or produced recombinantly. Test compounds contemplated by the present invention include non-peptidyl organic molecules, peptides, polypeptides, peptidomimetics, sugars, hormones, and nucleic acid molecules. In a specific embodiment, the test agent is a small organic molecule having a molecular weight of less than about 2,000 Daltons.
The test compounds of the invention can be provided as single, discrete entities, or provided in libraries of greater complexity, such as made by combinatorial chemistry. These libraries can comprise, for example, alcohols, alkyl halides, amines, amides, esters, aldehydes, ethers and other classes of organic compounds. Presentation of test compounds to the test system can be in either an isolated form or as mixtures of compounds, especially in initial screening steps. Optionally, the compounds may be optionally derivatized with other compounds and have derivatizing groups that facilitate isolation of the compounds. Non-limiting examples of derivatizing groups include biotin, fluorescein, digoxygenin, green fluorescent protein, isotopes, polyhistidine, magnetic beads, glutathione S transferase (GST), photoactivatable crosslinkers or any combinations thereof.
In many drug screening programs which test libraries of compounds and natural extracts, high throughput assays are desirable in order to maximize the number of compounds surveyed in a given period of time. Assays which are performed in cell-free systems, such as may be derived with purified or semi-purified proteins, are often preferred as “primary” screens in that they can be generated to permit rapid development and relatively easy detection of an alteration in a molecular target which is mediated by a test compound. Moreover, the effects of cellular toxicity or bioavailability of the test compound can be generally ignored in the in vitro system, the assay instead being focused primarily on the effect of the drug on the molecular target as may be manifest in an alteration of binding affinity between an ActRIIB polypeptide and its binding partner (e.g., an ActRIIB ligand).
Merely to illustrate, in an exemplary screening assay of the present invention, the compound of interest is contacted with an isolated and purified ActRIIB polypeptide which is ordinarily capable of binding to an ActRIIB ligand, as appropriate for the intention of the assay. To the mixture of the compound and ActRIIB polypeptide is then added to a composition containing an ActRIIB ligand. Detection and quantification of ActRIIB/ActRIIB ligand complexes provides a means for determining the compound's efficacy at inhibiting (or potentiating) complex formation between the ActRIIB polypeptide and its binding protein. The efficacy of the compound can be assessed by generating dose response curves from data obtained using various concentrations of the test compound. Moreover, a control assay can also be performed to provide a baseline for comparison. For example, in a control assay, isolated and purified ActRIIB ligand is added to a composition containing the ActRIIB polypeptide, and the formation of ActRIIB/ActRIIB ligand complex is quantitated in the absence of the test compound. It will be understood that, in general, the order in which the reactants may be admixed can be varied, and can be admixed simultaneously. Moreover, in place of purified proteins, cellular extracts and lysates may be used to render a suitable cell-free assay system.
Complex formation between the ActRIIB polypeptide and its binding protein may be detected by a variety of techniques. For instance, modulation of the formation of complexes can be quantitated using, for example, detectably labeled proteins such as radiolabeled (e.g., 32P, 35S, 14C or 3H), fluorescently labeled (e.g., FITC), or enzymatically labeled ActRIIB polypeptide or its binding protein, by immunoassay, or by chromatographic detection.
In certain embodiments, the present invention contemplates the use of fluorescence polarization assays and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays in measuring, either directly or indirectly, the degree of interaction between an ActRIIB polypeptide and its binding protein. Further, other modes of detection, such as those based on optical waveguides (PCT Publication WO 96/26432 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,196), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), surface charge sensors, and surface force sensors, are compatible with many embodiments of the invention.
Moreover, the present invention contemplates the use of an interaction trap assay, also known as the “two hybrid assay,” for identifying agents that disrupt or potentiate interaction between an ActRIIB polypeptide and its binding partner. See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,317; Zervos et al. (1993) Cell 72:223-232; Madura et al. (1993) J Biol Chem 268:12046-12054; Bartel et al. (1993) Biotechniques 14:920-924; and Iwabuchi et al. (1993) Oncogene 8:1693-1696). In a specific embodiment, the present invention contemplates the use of reverse two hybrid systems to identify compounds (e.g., small molecules or peptides) that dissociate interactions between an ActRIIB polypeptide and its binding protein. See for example, Vidal and Legrain, (1999) Nucleic Acids Res 27:919-29; Vidal and Legrain, (1999) Trends Biotechnol 17:374-81; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,525,490; 5,955,280; and 5,965,368.
In certain embodiments, the subject compounds are identified by their ability to interact with an ActRIIB polypeptide. The interaction between the compound and the ActRIIB polypeptide may be covalent or non-covalent. For example, such interaction can be identified at the protein level using in vitro biochemical methods, including photo-crosslinking, radiolabeled ligand binding, and affinity chromatography (Jakoby W B et al., 1974, Methods in Enzymology 46: 1). In certain cases, the compounds may be screened in a mechanism based assay, such as an assay to detect compounds which bind to an ActRIIB polypeptide. This may include a solid phase or fluid phase binding event. Alternatively, the gene encoding an ActRIIB polypeptide can be transfected with a reporter system (e.g., β-galactosidase, luciferase, or green fluorescent protein) into a cell and screened against the library preferably by a high throughput screening or with individual members of the library. Other mechanism based binding assays may be used, for example, binding assays which detect changes in free energy. Binding assays can be performed with the target fixed to a well, bead or chip or captured by an immobilized antibody or resolved by capillary electrophoresis. The bound compounds may be detected usually using colorimetric or fluorescence or surface plasmon resonance.
In certain embodiments, the GDF Trap polypeptides of the present invention can be used to increase red blood cell levels in mammals such as rodents and primates, and particularly human patients. In certain embodiments, the present invention provides methods of treating or preventing anemia in an individual in need thereof by administering to the individual a therapeutically effective amount of a GDF Trap polypeptide. These methods may be used for therapeutic and prophylactic treatments of mammals, and particularly humans.
As used herein, a therapeutic that “prevents” a disorder or condition refers to a compound that, in a statistical sample, reduces the occurrence of the disorder or condition in the treated sample relative to an untreated control sample, or delays the onset or reduces the severity of one or more symptoms of the disorder or condition relative to the untreated control sample. The term “treating” as used herein includes prophylaxis of the named condition or amelioration or elimination of the condition once it has been established. In either case, prevention or treatment may be discerned in the diagnosis provided by a physician or other health care provider and the intended result of administration of the therapeutic agent.
As shown herein, GDF Trap polypeptides may be used to increase red blood cell, hemoglobin or reticulocyte levels in healthy individuals, and such GDF Trap polypeptides may be used in selected patient populations. Examples of appropriate patient populations include those with undesirably low red blood cell or hemoglobin levels, such as patients having an anemia, and those that are at risk for developing undesirably low red blood cell or hemoglobin levels, such as those patients that are about to undergo major surgery or other procedures that may result in substantial blood loss. In one embodiment, a patient with adequate red blood cell levels is treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide to increase red blood cell levels, and then blood is drawn and stored for later use in transfusions.
GDF Trap polypeptides disclosed herein may be used to increase red blood cell levels in patients having an anemia. When observing hemoglobin levels in humans, a level of less than normal for the appropriate age and gender category may be indicative of anemia, although individual variations are taken into account. For example, a hemoglobin level of 12 g/dl is generally considered the lower limit of normal in the general adult population. Potential causes include blood-loss, nutritional deficits, medication reaction, various problems with the bone marrow and many diseases. More particularly, anemia has been associated with a variety of disorders that include, for example, chronic renal failure, myelodysplastic syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, bone marrow transplantation. Anemia may also be associated with the following conditions: solid tumors (e.g. breast cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer); tumors of the lymphatic system (e.g. chronic lymphocyte leukemia, non-Hodgkins and Hodgkins lymphomas); tumors of the hematopoietic system (e.g. leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, multiple myeloma); radiation therapy; chemotherapy (e.g. platinum containing regimens); inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including, but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory arthritides, systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), acute or chronic skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis), inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis); acute or chronic renal disease or failure including idiopathic or congenital conditions; acute or chronic liver disease; acute or chronic bleeding; situations where transfusion of red blood cells is not possible due to patient allo- or auto-antibodies and/or for religious reasons (e.g. some Jehovah's Witnesses); infections (e.g. malaria, osteomyelitis); hemoglobinopathies, including, for example, sickle cell disease, thalassemias; drug use or abuse, e.g. alcohol misuse; pediatric patients with anemia from any cause to avoid transfusion; and elderly patients or patients with underlying cardiopulmonary disease with anemia who cannot receive transfusions due to concerns about circulatory overload.
GDF Trap polypeptides would be appropriate for treating anemias of hypoproliferative bone marrow, which are typically associated with little change in red blood cell (RBC) morphology. Hypoproliferative anemias include: 1) anemia of chronic disease, 2) anemia of kidney disease, and 3) anemia associated with hypometabolic states. In each of these types, endogenous erythropoietin levels are inappropriately low for the degree of anemia observed. Other hypoproliferative anemias include: 4) early-stage iron-deficient anemia, and 5) anemia caused by damage to the bone marrow. In these types, endogenous erythropoietin levels are appropriately elevated for the degree of anemia observed.
The most common type is anemia of chronic disease, which encompasses inflammation, infection, tissue injury, and conditions such as cancer, and is distinguished by both low erythropoietin levels and an inadequate response to erythropoietin in the bone marrow (Adamson, 2008, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 17th ed.; McGraw Hill, New York, pp 628-634). Many factors can contribute to cancer-related anemia. Some are associated with the disease process itself and the generation of inflamatory cytokines such as interleukin-1, interferon-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor (Bron et al., 2001, Semin Oncol 28(Suppl 8):1-6). Among its effects, inflammation induces the key iron-regulatory peptide hepcidin, thereby inhibiting iron export from macrophages and generally limiting iron availability for erythropoiesis (Ganz, 2007, J Am Soc Nephrol 18:394-400). Blood loss through various routes can also contribute to cancer-related anemia. The prevalence of anemia due to cancer progression varies with cancer type, ranging from 5% in prostate cancer up to 90% in multiple myeloma. Cancer-related anemia has profound consequences for patients, including fatigue and reduced quality of life, reduced treatment efficacy, and increased mortality.
Chronic kidney disease is associated with hypoproliferative anemia that varies in severity with the degree of renal impairment. Such anemia is primarily due to inadequate production of erythropoietin and reduced survival of red blood cells. Chronic kidney disease usually proceeds gradually over a period of years or decades to end-stage (Stage-5) disease, at which point dialysis or kidney transplantation is required for patient survival. Anemia often develops early in this process and worsens as disease progresses. The clinical consequences of anemia of kidney disease are well-documented and include development of left ventricular hypertrophy, impaired cognitive function, reduced quality of life, and altered immune function (Levin et al., 1999, Am J Kidney Dis 27:347-354; Nissenson, 1992, Am J Kidney Dis 20(Suppl 1):21-24; Revicki et al., 1995, Am J Kidney Dis 25:548-554; Gafter et al., 1994, Kidney Int 45:224-231). As demonstrated by the Applicants in a mouse model of chronic kidney disease (see Example below), a GDF Trap polypeptide can be used to treat anemia of kidney disease.
Many conditions resulting in a hypometabolic rate can produce a mild-to-moderate hypoproliferative anemia. Among such conditions are endocrine deficiency states. For example, anemia can occur in Addison's disease, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, or males who are castrated or treated with estrogen. Mild-to-moderate anemia can also occur with reduced dietary intake of protein, a condition particularly prevalent in the elderly. Finally, anemia can develop in patients with chronic liver disease arising from nearly any cause (Adamson, 2008, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 17th ed.; McGraw Hill, New York, pp 628-634).
Anemia resulting from acute blood loss of sufficient volume, such as from trauma or postpartum hemorrhage, is known as acute post-hemorrhagic anemia. Acute blood loss initially causes hypovolemia without anemia since there is proportional depletion of RBCs along with other blood constituents. However, hypovolemia will rapidly trigger physiologic mechanisms that shift fluid from the extravascular to the vascular compartment, which results in hemodilution and anemia. If chronic, blood loss gradually depletes body iron stores and eventually leads to iron deficiency. As demonstrated by the Applicants in a mouse model (see Example below), a GDF Trap polypeptide can be used to speed recovery from anemia of acute blood loss.
Iron-deficiency anemia is the final stage in a graded progression of increasing iron deficiency which includes negative iron balance and iron-deficient erythropoiesis as intermediate stages. Iron deficiency can result from increased iron demand, decreased iron intake, or increased iron loss, as exemplified in conditions such as pregnancy, inadequate diet, intestinal malabsorption, acute or chronic inflammation, and acute or chronic blood loss. With mild-to-moderate anemia of this type, the bone marrow remains hypoproliferative, and RBC morphology is largely normal; however, even mild anemia can result in some microcytic hypochromic RBCs, and the transition to severe iron-deficient anemia is accompanied by hyperproliferation of the bone marrow and increasingly prevalent microcytic and hypochromic RBCs (Adamson, 2008, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 17th ed.; McGraw Hill, New York, pp 628-634). Appropriate therapy for iron-deficiency anemia depends on its cause and severity, with oral iron preparations, parenteral iron formulations, and RBC transfusion as major conventional options. An GDF Trap polypeptide could be used to treat chronic iron-deficiency anemias alone or in combination with conventional therapeutic approaches, particularly to treat anemias of multifactorial origin.
Hypoproliferative anemias can result from primary dysfunction or failure of the bone marrow, instead of dysfunction secondary to inflammation, infection, or cancer progression. Prominent examples would be myelosuppression caused by cancer chemotherapeutic drugs or cancer radiation therapy. A broad review of clinical trials found that mild anemia can occur in 100% of patients after chemotherapy, while more severe anemia can occur in up to 80% of such patients (Groopman et al., 1999, J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1616-1634). Myelosuppressive drugs include: 1) alkylating agents such as nitrogen mustards (e.g., melphalan) and nitrosoureas (e.g., streptozocin); 2) antimetabolites such as folic acid antagonists (e.g., methotrexate), purine analogs (e.g., thioguanine), and pyrimidine analogs (e.g., gemcitabine); 3) cytotoxic antibotics such as anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin); 4) kinase inhibitors (e.g., gefitinib); 5) mitotic inhibitors such as taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel) and vinca alkaloids (e.g., vinorelbine); 6) monoclonal antibodies (e.g., rituximab); and 7) topoisomerase inhibitors (e.g., topotecan and etoposide). As demonstrated in a mouse model of chemotherapy-induced anemia (see Example below), a GDF Trap polypeptide can be used to treat anemia caused by chemotherapeutic agents and/or radiation therapy.
GDF Trap polypeptides would also be appropriate for treating anemias of disordered RBC maturation, which are characterized in part by undersized (microcytic), oversized (macrocytic), misshapen, or abnormally colored (hypochromic) RBCs.
Patients may be treated with a dosing regimen intended to restore the patient to a target hemoglobin level, usually between about 10 g/dl and about 12.5 g/dl, and typically about 11.0 g/dl (see also Jacobs et al. (2000) Nephrol Dial Transplant 15, 15-19), although lower target levels may cause fewer cardiovascular side effects. Alternatively, hematocrit levels (percentage of the volume of a blood sample occupied by the cells) can be used as a measure for the condition of red blood cells. Hematocrit levels for healthy individuals range from 41 to 51% for adult males and from 35 to 45% for adult females. Target hematocrit levels are usually around 30-33%. Moreover, hemoglobin/hematocrit levels vary from person to person. Thus, optimally, the target hemoglobin/hematocrit level can be individualized for each patient.
The rapid effect on red blood cell levels of the GDF Trap polypeptides disclosed herein indicate that these agents act by a different mechanism than Epo. Accordingly, these antagonists may be useful for increasing red blood cell and hemoglobin levels in patients that do not respond well to Epo. For example, a GDF Trap polypeptide may be beneficial for a patient in which administration of a normal to increased (>300 IU/kg/week) dose of Epo does not result in the increase of hemoglobin level up to the target level. Patients with an inadequate Epo response are found for all types of anemia, but higher numbers of non-responders have been observed particularly frequently in patients with cancers and patients with end-stage renal disease. An inadequate response to Epo can be either constitutive (i.e. observed upon the first treatment with Epo) or acquired (e.g. observed upon repeated treatment with Epo).
The GDF Trap polypeptides may also be used to treat patients that are susceptible to adverse effects of Epo. The primary adverse effects of Epo are an excessive increase in the hematocrit or hemoglobin levels and polycythemia. Elevated hematocrit levels can lead to hypertension (more particularly aggravation of hypertension) and vascular thrombosis. Other adverse effects of Epo which have been reported, some of which related to hypertension, are headaches, influenza-like syndrome, obstruction of shunts, myocardial infarctions and cerebral convulsions due to thrombosis, hypertensive encephalopathy, and red cell blood cell applasia (Singibarti, (1994) J. Clin Investig 72(suppl 6), S36-S43; Horl et al. (2000) Nephrol Dial Transplant 15(suppl 4), 51-56; Delanty et al. (1997) Neurology 49, 686-689; Bunn (2002) N Engl J Med 346(7), 522-523).
GDF traps may also be used in combination with Epo and other agents that activate the erythropoietin pathway. In some instances, this may permit lower dosing of each drug in the combination.
In certain embodiments, the present invention provides methods for managing a patient that has been treated with, or is a candidate to be treated with, a GDF Trap polypeptide by measuring one or more hematologic parameters in the patient. The hematologic parameters may be used to evaluate appropriate dosing for a patient who is a candidate to be treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide, to monitor the hematologic parameters during treatment with a GDF Trap polypeptide, to evaluate whether to adjust the dosage during treatment with a GDF Trap polypeptide, and/or to evaluate an appropriate maintenance dose of a GDF Trap polypeptide. If one or more of the hematologic parameters are outside the normal level, dosing with a GDF Trap polypeptide may be reduced, delayed or terminated.
Hematologic parameters that may be measured in accordance with the methods provided herein include, for example, red blood cell levels, blood pressure, iron stores, and other agents found in bodily fluids that correlate with increased red blood cell levels, using art recognized methods. Such parameters may be determined using a blood sample from a patient. Increases in red blood cell levels, hemoglobin levels, and/or hematocrit levels may cause increases in blood pressure.
In one embodiment, if one or more hematologic parameters are outside the normal range, or on the high side of normal, in a patient who is a candidate to be treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide then onset of administration of the GDF Trap polypeptide may be delayed until the hematologic parameters have returned to a normal or acceptable level either naturally or via therapeutic intervention. For example, if a candidate patient is hypertensive or prehypertensive, then the patient may be treated with a blood pressure lowering agent in order to reduce the patient's blood pressure. Any blood pressure lowering agent appropriate for the individual patient's condition may be used including, for example, diuretics, adrenergic inhibitors (including alpha blockers and beta blockers), vasodilators, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or angiotensin II receptor blockers. Blood pressure may alternatively be treated using a diet and exercise regimen. Similarly, if a candidate patient has iron stores that are lower than normal, or on the low side of normal, then the patient may be treated with an appropriate regimen of diet and/or iron supplements until the patient's iron stores have returned to a normal or acceptable level. For patients having higher than normal red blood cell levels and/or hemoglobin levels, then administration of the GDF Trap polypeptide may be delayed until the levels have returned to a normal or acceptable level.
In certain embodiments, if one or more hematologic parameters are outside the normal range, or on the high side of normal, in a patient who is a candidate to be treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide then the onset of administration may be not be delayed. However, the dosage amount or frequency of dosing of the GDF Trap polypeptide may be set at an amount that would reduce the risk of an unacceptable increase in the hematologic parameters arising upon administration of the GDF Trap polypeptide. Alternatively, a therapeutic regimen may be developed for the patient that combines a GDF Trap polypeptide with a therapeutic agent that addresses the undesirable level of the hematologic parameter. For example, if the patient has elevated blood pressure, then a therapeutic regimen involving administration of a GDF Trap polypeptide and a blood pressure lowering agent may be designed. For a patient having lower than desired iron stores, a therapeutic regimen of a GDF Trap polypeptide and iron supplementation may be developed.
In one embodiment, baseline parameter(s) for one or more hematologic parameters may be established for a patient who is a candidate to be treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide and an appropriate dosing regimen establish for that patient based on the baseline value(s). Alternatively, established baseline parameters based on a patient's medical history could be used to inform an appropriate GDF Trap polypeptide dosing regimen for a patient. For example, if a healthy patient has an established baseline blood pressure reading that is above the defined normal range it may not be necessary to bring the patient's blood pressure into the range that is considered normal for the general population prior to treatment with the GDF Trap polypeptide. A patient's baseline values for one or more hematologic parameters prior to treatment with a GDF Trap polypeptide may also be used as the relevant comparative values for monitoring any changes to the hematologic parameters during treatment with the GDF Trap polypeptide.
In certain embodiments, one or more hematologic parameters are measured in patients who are being treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide. The hematologic parameters may be used to monitor the patient during treatment and permit adjustment or termination of the dosing with the GDF Trap polypeptide or additional dosing with another therapeutic agent. For example, if administration of a GDF Trap polypeptide results in an increase in blood pressure, red blood cell level, or hemoglobin level, or a reduction in iron stores, then the dose of the GDF Trap polypeptide may be reduced in amount or frequency in order to decrease the effects of the GDF Trap polypeptide on the one or more hematologic parameters. If administration or a GDF Trap polypeptide results in a change in one or more hematologic parameters that is adverse to the patient, then the dosing of the GDF Trap polypeptide may be terminated either temporarily, until the hematologic parameter(s) return to an acceptable level, or permanently. Similarly, if one or more hematologic parameters are not brought within an acceptable range after reducing the dose or frequency of administration of the GDF Trap polypeptide then the dosing may be terminated. As an alternative, or in addition to, reducing or terminating the dosing with the GDF Trap polypeptide, the patient may be dosed with an additional therapeutic agent that addresses the undesirable level in the hematologic parameter(s), such as, for example, a blood pressure lowering agent or an iron supplement. For example, if a patient being treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide has elevated blood pressure, then dosing with the GDF Trap polypeptide may continue at the same level and a blood pressure lowering agent is added to the treatment regimen, dosing with the GDF Trap polypeptide may be reduce (e.g., in amount and/or frequency) and a blood pressure lowering agent is added to the treatment regimen, or dosing with the GDF Trap polypeptide may be terminated and the patient may be treated with a blood pressure lowering agent.
In certain embodiments, patients being treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide, or candidate patients to be treated with a GDF Trap polypeptide, are patients in need of muscle growth, such as patients suffering from, or at risk of developing, a neuromuscular disorder or musculogenerative disorder. For example, patients or candidate patients may be suffering from, or at risk for developing, Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS), cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome, muscular dystrophy, muscle atrophy, congestive obstructive pulmonary disease (and muscle wasting associated with COPD), muscle wasting syndrome, sarcopenia, or cachexia. Muscular dystrophy refers to a group of degenerative muscle diseases characterized by gradual weakening and deterioration of skeletal muscles and sometimes the heart and respiratory muscles. Exemplary muscular dystrophies that can be treated with a regimen including the subject GDF Trap polypeptides include: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), Becker Muscular Dystrophy (BMD), Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy (EDMD), Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD), Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSH or FSHD) (also known as Landouzy-Dejerine), Myotonic Dystrophy (MMD) (also known as Steinert's Disease), Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy (OPMD), Distal Muscular Dystrophy (DD), Congenital Muscular Dystrophy (CMD).
In certain embodiments, compounds (e.g., GDF Trap polypeptides) of the present invention are formulated with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. For example, a GDF Trap polypeptide can be administered alone or as a component of a pharmaceutical formulation (therapeutic composition). The subject compounds may be formulated for administration in any convenient way for use in human or veterinary medicine.
In certain embodiments, the therapeutic method of the invention includes administering the composition systemically, or locally as an implant or device. When administered, the therapeutic composition for use in this invention is, of course, in a pyrogen-free, physiologically acceptable form. Therapeutically useful agents other than the GDF Trap polypeptides which may also optionally be included in the composition as described above, may be administered simultaneously or sequentially with the subject compounds (e.g., GDF Trap polypeptides) in the methods of the invention.
Typically, compounds will be administered parenterally. Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for parenteral administration may comprise one or more GDF Trap polypeptides in combination with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable sterile isotonic aqueous or nonaqueous solutions, dispersions, suspensions or emulsions, or sterile powders which may be reconstituted into sterile injectable solutions or dispersions just prior to use, which may contain antioxidants, buffers, bacteriostats, solutes which render the formulation isotonic with the blood of the intended recipient or suspending or thickening agents. Examples of suitable aqueous and nonaqueous carriers which may be employed in the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention include water, ethanol, polyols (such as glycerol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and the like), and suitable mixtures thereof, vegetable oils, such as olive oil, and injectable organic esters, such as ethyl oleate. Proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of coating materials, such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersions, and by the use of surfactants.
Further, the composition may be encapsulated or injected in a form for delivery to a target tissue site (e.g., bone marrow). In certain embodiments, compositions of the present invention may include a matrix capable of delivering one or more therapeutic compounds (e.g., GDF Trap polypeptides) to a target tissue site (e.g., bone marrow), providing a structure for the developing tissue and optimally capable of being resorbed into the body. For example, the matrix may provide slow release of the GDF Trap polypeptides. Such matrices may be formed of materials presently in use for other implanted medical applications.
The choice of matrix material is based on biocompatibility, biodegradability, mechanical properties, cosmetic appearance and interface properties. The particular application of the subject compositions will define the appropriate formulation. Potential matrices for the compositions may be biodegradable and chemically defined calcium sulfate, tricalciumphosphate, hydroxyapatite, polylactic acid and polyanhydrides. Other potential materials are biodegradable and biologically well defined, such as bone or dermal collagen. Further matrices are comprised of pure proteins or extracellular matrix components. Other potential matrices are non-biodegradable and chemically defined, such as sintered hydroxyapatite, bioglass, aluminates, or other ceramics. Matrices may be comprised of combinations of any of the above mentioned types of material, such as polylactic acid and hydroxyapatite or collagen and tricalciumphosphate. The bioceramics may be altered in composition, such as in calcium-aluminate-phosphate and processing to alter pore size, particle size, particle shape, and biodegradability.
In certain embodiments, methods of the invention can be administered for orally, e.g., in the form of capsules, cachets, pills, tablets, lozenges (using a flavored basis, usually sucrose and acacia or tragacanth), powders, granules, or as a solution or a suspension in an aqueous or nonaqueous liquid, or as an oil-in-water or water-in-oil liquid emulsion, or as an elixir or syrup, or as pastilles (using an inert base, such as gelatin and glycerin, or sucrose and acacia) and/or as mouth washes and the like, each containing a predetermined amount of an agent as an active ingredient. An agent may also be administered as a bolus, electuary or paste.
In solid dosage forms for oral administration (capsules, tablets, pills, dragees, powders, granules, and the like), one or more therapeutic compounds of the present invention may be mixed with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, such as sodium citrate or dicalcium phosphate, and/or any of the following: (1) fillers or extenders, such as starches, lactose, sucrose, glucose, mannitol, and/or silicic acid; (2) binders, such as, for example, carboxymethylcellulose, alginates, gelatin, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, sucrose, and/or acacia; (3) humectants, such as glycerol; (4) disintegrating agents, such as agar-agar, calcium carbonate, potato or tapioca starch, alginic acid, certain silicates, and sodium carbonate; (5) solution retarding agents, such as paraffin; (6) absorption accelerators, such as quaternary ammonium compounds; (7) wetting agents, such as, for example, cetyl alcohol and glycerol monostearate; (8) absorbents, such as kaolin and bentonite clay; (9) lubricants, such a talc, calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, sodium lauryl sulfate, and mixtures thereof; and (10) coloring agents. In the case of capsules, tablets and pills, the pharmaceutical compositions may also comprise buffering agents. Solid compositions of a similar type may also be employed as fillers in soft and hard-filled gelatin capsules using such excipients as lactose or milk sugars, as well as high molecular weight polyethylene glycols and the like.
Liquid dosage forms for oral administration include pharmaceutically acceptable emulsions, microemulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups, and elixirs. In addition to the active ingredient, the liquid dosage forms may contain inert diluents commonly used in the art, such as water or other solvents, solubilizing agents and emulsifiers, such as ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl carbonate, ethyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, propylene glycol, 1,3-butylene glycol, oils (in particular, cottonseed, groundnut, corn, germ, olive, castor, and sesame oils), glycerol, tetrahydrofuryl alcohol, polyethylene glycols and fatty acid esters of sorbitan, and mixtures thereof. Besides inert diluents, the oral compositions can also include adjuvants such as wetting agents, emulsifying and suspending agents, sweetening, flavoring, coloring, perfuming, and preservative agents.
Suspensions, in addition to the active compounds, may contain suspending agents such as ethoxylated isostearyl alcohols, polyoxyethylene sorbitol, and sorbitan esters, microcrystalline cellulose, aluminum metahydroxide, bentonite, agar-agar and tragacanth, and mixtures thereof.
The compositions of the invention may also contain adjuvants, such as preservatives, wetting agents, emulsifying agents and dispersing agents. Prevention of the action of microorganisms may be ensured by the inclusion of various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, paraben, chlorobutanol, phenol sorbic acid, and the like. It may also be desirable to include isotonic agents, such as sugars, sodium chloride, and the like into the compositions. In addition, prolonged absorption of the injectable pharmaceutical form may be brought about by the inclusion of agents which delay absorption, such as aluminum monostearate and gelatin.
It is understood that the dosage regimen will be determined by the attending physician considering various factors which modify the action of the subject compounds of the invention (e.g., GDF Trap polypeptides). The various factors include, but are not limited to, the patient's red blood cell count, hemoglobin level or other diagnostic assessments, the desired target red blood cell count, the patient's age, sex, and diet, the severity of any disease that may be contributing to a depressed red blood cell level, time of administration, and other clinical factors. The addition of other known growth factors to the final composition may also affect the dosage. Progress can be monitored by periodic assessment of red blood cell and hemoglobin levels, as well as assessments of reticulocyte levels and other indicators of the hematopoietic process.
In certain embodiments, the present invention also provides gene therapy for the in vivo production of GDF Trap polypeptides. Such therapy would achieve its therapeutic effect by introduction of the GDF Trap polynucleotide sequences into cells or tissues having the disorders as listed above. Delivery of GDF Trap polynucleotide sequences can be achieved using a recombinant expression vector such as a chimeric virus or a colloidal dispersion system. Preferred for therapeutic delivery of GDF Trap polynucleotide sequences is the use of targeted liposomes.
Various viral vectors which can be utilized for gene therapy as taught herein include adenovirus, herpes virus, vaccinia, or an RNA virus such as a retrovirus. The retroviral vector may be a derivative of a murine or avian retrovirus. Examples of retroviral vectors in which a single foreign gene can be inserted include, but are not limited to: Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMuLV), Harvey murine sarcoma virus (HaMuSV), murine mammary tumor virus (MuMTV), and Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV). A number of additional retroviral vectors can incorporate multiple genes. All of these vectors can transfer or incorporate a gene for a selectable marker so that transduced cells can be identified and generated. Retroviral vectors can be made target-specific by attaching, for example, a sugar, a glycolipid, or a protein. Preferred targeting is accomplished by using an antibody. Those of skill in the art will recognize that specific polynucleotide sequences can be inserted into the retroviral genome or attached to a viral envelope to allow target specific delivery of the retroviral vector containing the GDF Trap polynucleotide.
Alternatively, tissue culture cells can be directly transfected with plasmids encoding the retroviral structural genes gag, pol and env, by conventional calcium phosphate transfection. These cells are then transfected with the vector plasmid containing the genes of interest. The resulting cells release the retroviral vector into the culture medium.
Another targeted delivery system for GDF Trap polynucleotides is a colloidal dispersion system. Colloidal dispersion systems include macromolecule complexes, nanocapsules, microspheres, beads, and lipid-based systems including oil-in-water emulsions, micelles, mixed micelles, and liposomes. The preferred colloidal system of this invention is a liposome. Liposomes are artificial membrane vesicles which are useful as delivery vehicles in vitro and in vivo. RNA, DNA and intact virions can be encapsulated within the aqueous interior and be delivered to cells in a biologically active form (see e.g., Fraley, et al., Trends Biochem. Sci., 6:77, 1981). Methods for efficient gene transfer using a liposome vehicle, are known in the art, see e.g., Mannino, et al., Biotechniques, 6:682, 1988. The composition of the liposome is usually a combination of phospholipids, usually in combination with steroids, especially cholesterol. Other phospholipids or other lipids may also be used. The physical characteristics of liposomes depend on pH, ionic strength, and the presence of divalent cations.
Examples of lipids useful in liposome production include phosphatidyl compounds, such as phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingolipids, cerebrosides, and gangliosides. Illustrative phospholipids include egg phosphatidylcholine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, and di stearoylphosphatidylcholine. The targeting of liposomes is also possible based on, for example, organ-specificity, cell-specificity, and organelle-specificity and is known in the art.
The invention now being generally described, it will be more readily understood by reference to the following examples, which are included merely for purposes of illustration of certain embodiments and embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the invention.
Applicants constructed a GDF Trap as follows. A polypeptide having a modified extracellular domain of ActRIIB with greatly reduced activin A binding relative to GDF11 and/or myostatin (as a consequence of a leucine-to-aspartate substitution at position 79 in SEQ ID NO: 1) was fused to a human or mouse Fc domain with a minimal linker (three glycine amino acids) in between. The constructs are referred to as ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc and ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-mFc, respectively. Alternative forms with a glutamate rather than an aspartate at position 79 performed similarly (L79E). Alternative forms with an alanine rather than a valine at position 226 with respect to SEQ ID NO: 7, below were also generated and performed equivalently in all respects tested. The aspartate at position 79 (relative to SEQ ID NO: 1, or position 60 relative to SEQ ID NO: 7) is highlighted in gray below. The valine at position 226 relative to SEQ ID NO: 7 is also highlighted in gray below.
The GDF Trap ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc is shown below as purified from CHO cell lines (SEQ ID NO: 7).
EVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVKFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQYNSTYRVVSVLTV
NQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSKLT
VDKSRWQQGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKSLSLSPGK
The ActRIIB-derived portion of the GDF Trap has an amino acid sequence set forth below (SEQ ID NO: 32), and that portion could be used as a monomer or as a non-Fc fusion protein as a monomer, dimer or greater order complex.
The GDF Trap protein was expressed in CHO cell lines. Three different leader sequences were considered:
The selected form employs the TPA leader and has the following unprocessed amino acid sequence:
MDAMKRGLCCVLLLCGAVFVSPGASGRGEAETRECIYYNANWELERTN
HTCPPCPAPELLGGPSVFLFPPKPKDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSHEDP
EVKFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQYNSTYRVVSVLTVLHQDWLNGKEY
KCKVSNKALPVPIEKTISKAKGQPREPQVYTLPPSREEMTKNQVSLTC
LVKGFYPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSKLTVDKS
RWQQGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKSLSLSPGK
This polypeptide is encoded by the following nucleic acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:12):
Purification could be achieved by a series of column chromatography steps, including, for example, three or more of the following, in any order: protein A chromatography, Q sepharose chromatography, phenylsepharose chromatography, size exclusion chromatography, and cation exchange chromatography. The purification could be completed with viral filtration and buffer exchange. In an example of a purification scheme, the cell culture medium is passed over a protein A column, washed in 150 mM Tris/NaCl (pH 8.0), then washed in 50 mM Tris/NaCl (pH 8.0) and eluted with 0.1 M glycine, pH 3.0. The low pH eluate is kept at room temperature for 30 minutes as a viral clearance step. The eluate is then neutralized and passed over a Q sepharose ion exchange column and washed in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, and eluted in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, with an NaCl concentration between 150 mM and 300 mM. The eluate is then changed into 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1.1 M ammonium sulfate and passed over a phenyl sepharose column, washed, and eluted in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0 with ammonium sulfate between 150 and 300 mM. The eluate is dialyzed and filtered for use.
Additional GDF Traps (ActRIIB-Fc fusion proteins modified so as to reduce the ratio of activin A binding relative to myostatin or GDF11) are described in PCT/US2008/001506 and WO 2006/012627, incorporated by reference herein.
An A-204 Reporter Gene Assay was used to evaluate the effects of ActRIIB-Fc proteins and GDF Traps on signaling by GDF-11 and Activin A. Cell line: Human Rhabdomyosarcoma (derived from muscle). Reporter vector: pGL3(CAGA)12 (Described in Dennler et al, 1998, EMBO 17: 3091-3100). The CAGA12 motif is present in TGF-Beta responsive genes (PAI-1 gene), so this vector is of general use for factors signaling through Smad2 and 3.
Day 1: Split A-204 cells into 48-well plate.
Day 2: A-204 cells transfected with 10 ug pGL3(CAGA)12 or pGL3(CAGA)12(10 ug)+pRLCMV (1 ug) and Fugene.
Day 3: Add factors (diluted into medium+0.1% BSA). Inhibitors need to be preincubated with Factors for 1 hr before adding to cells. 6 hrs later, cells rinsed with PBS, and lyse cells.
This is followed by a Luciferase assay. In the absence of any inhibitors, Activin A showed 10 fold stimulation of reporter gene expression and an ED50˜2 ng/ml. GDF-11: 16 fold stimulation, ED50: ˜1.5 ng/ml.
ActRIIB(20-134) is a potent inhibitor of activin, GDF-8 and GDF-11 activity in this assay. Variants were tested in this assay as well.
Variants of ActRIIB(20-134)-hFc with truncations at the N-terminus and/or C-terminus were generated and tested for activity as inhibitors of GDF-11 and activin. The activities are shown below (as measured in conditioned media):
As can be seen, truncations of three (ending with . . . PPT), six (ending with . . . YEP) or more amino acids at the C-terminus causes a threefold or greater decrease in the activity of the molecule. The truncation of the final 15 amino acids of the ActRIIB portion causes a greater loss of activity (see WO2006/012627).
Amino terminal truncations were made in the background of an ActRIIB(20-131)-hFc protein. The activities are shown below (as measured in conditioned media):
Accordingly, truncations of two, three or four amino acids from the N-terminus lead to the production of a more active protein than the versions with a full-length extracellular domain. Additional experiments show that a truncation of five amino acids, ActRIIB(25-131)-hFc has activity equivalent to the untruncated form, and additional deletions at the N-terminus continue to degrade the activity of the protein. Therefore, optimal constructs will have a C-terminus ending between amino acid 133-134 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and an N-terminus beginning at amino acids 22-24 of SEQ ID NO: 1. An N-terminus corresponding to amino acids 21 or 25 will give activity that is similar to the ActRIIB(20-134)-hFc construct. These truncations may also be used in the context of GDF Traps, such as an L79D or L79E variant.
Activity of ActRIIB-Fc proteins and GDF Traps was tested in a cell based assay, as described above. Results are summarized in the table below. Some variants were tested in different C-terminal truncation constructs. As discussed above, truncations of five or fifteen amino acids caused reduction in activity. The GDF Traps (L79D and L79E variants) showed substantial loss of activin binding while retaining almost wild-type inhibition of GDF-11.
Several variants have been assessed for serum half-life in rats. ActRIIB(20-134)-Fc has a serum half-life of approximately 70 hours. ActRIIB(A24N 20-134)-Fc has a serum half-life of approximately 100-150 hours. The A24N variant has activity in the cell-based assay (above) and in vivo assays (below) that are equivalent to the wild-type molecule. Coupled with the longer half-life, this means that over time an A24N variant will give greater effect per unit of protein than the wild-type molecule. The A24N variant, and any of the other variants tested above, may be combined with the GDF Trap molecules, such as the L79D or L79E variants.
Binding of certain ActRIIB-Fc proteins and GDF Traps to ligands was tested in a BiaCore™ assay.
The ActRIIB-Fc variants or wild-type protein were captured onto the system using an anti-hFc antibody. Ligands were injected and flowed over the captured receptor proteins. Results are summarized in the tables, below.
These data confirm the cell based assay data, demonstrating that the A24N variant retains ligand-binding activity that is similar to that of the ActRIIB(20-134)-hFc molecule, and that the L79D or L79E molecule retains myostatin and GDF11 binding but shows markedly decreased (non-quantifiable) binding to Activin A.
Other variants have been generated and tested, as reported in WO2006/012627 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) see e.g., pp. 59-60, using ligands coupled to the device and flowing receptor over the coupled ligands. Notably, K74Y, K74F, K74I (and presumably other hydrophobic substitutions at K74, such as K74L), and D801, cause a decrease in the ratio of Activin A binding to GDF11 binding, relative to the wild-type K74 molecule. A table of data with respect to these variants is reproduced below:
ActRIIB(20-134)-hFc (IgG1) was administered once a week for 1 month to male and female cynomolgus monkeys by subcutaneous injection. Forty-eight cynomolgus monkeys (24/sex) were assigned to one of four treatment groups (6 animals/sex/group) and were administered subcutaneous injections of either vehicle or ActRIIB-hFc at 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks (total of 5 doses). Parameters evaluated included general clinical pathology (hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation, and urinalysis). ActRIIB-hFc caused statistically significant elevated mean absolute reticulocyte values by day 15 in treated animals. By day 36, ActRIIB-hFc caused several hematological changes, including elevated mean absolute reticulocyte and red blood cell distribution width values and lower mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. All treated groups and both sexes were affected. These effects are consistent with a positive effect of ActRIIB-hFc on the release of immature reticulocytes from the bone marrow. This effect was reversed after drug was washed out of the treated animals (by study day 56). Accordingly, we conclude that ActRIIB-hFc stimulates erythropoiesis.
In this study the effects of the in vivo administration of ActRIIB(20-134)-mFc on the frequency of hematopoietic progenitors in bone marrow and spleen was analyzed. One group of C57BL/6 mice was injected with PBS as a control and a second group of mice administered two doses of ActRIIB-mFc at 10 mg/kg and both groups sacrificed after 8 days. Peripheral blood was used to perform complete blood counts and femurs and spleens were used to perform in vitro clonogenic assays to assess the lymphoid, erythroid and myeloid progenitor cell content in each organ. In the brief time frame of this study, no significant changes were seen in red blood cell, hemoglobin or white blood cell levels in treated mice. In the femurs there was no difference in the nucleated cell numbers or progenitor content between the control and treated groups. In the spleens, the compound treated group experienced a statistically significant increase in the mature erythroid progenitor (CFU-E) colony number per dish, frequency and total progenitor number per spleen. In addition, and increase was seen in the number of myeloid (CFU-GM), immature erythroid (BFU-E) and total progenitor number per spleen.
Animals:
Sixteen C57BL/6 female mice 6-8 weeks of age were used in the study. Eight mice were injected subcutaneously with test compound ActRIIB-mFc at days 1 and 3 at a dose of 10 mg/kg and eight mice were injected subcutaneously with vehicle control, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), at a volume of 100 μL per mouse. All mice were sacrificed 8 days after first injection in accordance with the relevant Animal Care Guidelines. Peripheral blood (PB) samples from individual animals were collected by cardiac puncture and used for complete blood counts and differential (CBC/Diff). Femurs and spleens were harvested from each mouse.
Tests Performed:
CBC/Diff Counts
PB from each mouse was collected via cardiac puncture and placed into the appropriate microtainer tubes. Samples were sent to CLV for analysis on a CellDyn 3500 counter.
Clonogenic Assays
Clonogenic progenitors of the myeloid, erythroid and lymphoid lineages were assessed using the in vitro methylcellulose-based media systems described below.
Mature Erythroid Progenitors:
Clonogenic progenitors of the mature erythroid (CFU-E) lineages were cultured in MethoCult™ 3334, a methylcellulose-based medium containing recombinant human (rh) Erythropoietin (3 U/mL).
Lymphoid Progenitors:
Clonogenic progenitors of the lymphoid (CFU-pre-B) lineage were cultured in MethoCult® 3630, a methylcellulose-based medium containing rh Interleukin 7 (10 ng/mL).
Myeloid and Immature Erythroid Progenitors:
Clonogenic progenitors of the granulocyte-monocyte (CFU-GM), erythroid (BFU-E) and multipotential (CFU-GEMM) lineages were cultured in MethoCult™ 3434, a methylcellulose-based medium containing recombinant murine (rm) Stem Cell Factor (50 ng/mL), rh Interleukin 6 (10 ng/mL), rm Interleukin 3 (10 ng/mL) and rh Erythropoietin (3 U/mL).
Methods:
Mouse femurs and spleens were processed by standard protocols. Briefly, bone marrow was obtained by flushing the femoral cavity with Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Media containing 2% fetal bovine serum (IMDM 2% FBS) using a 21 gauge needle and 1 cc syringe. Spleen cells were obtained by crushing spleens through a 70 μM filter and rinsing the filter with IMDM 2% FBS. Nucleated cell counts in 3% glacial acetic acid were then performed on the single cells suspensions using a Neubauer counting chamber so that the total cells per organ could be calculated. To remove contaminating red blood cells, total spleen cells were then diluted with 3 times the volume of ammonium chloride lysis buffer and incubated on ice 10 minutes. The cells were then washed and resuspended in IMDM 2% FBS and a second cell count were performed to determine the cell concentration of cells after lysis.
Cell stocks were made and added to each methylcellulose-based media formulation to obtain the optimal plating concentrations for each tissue in each media formulation. Bone marrow cells were plated at 1×105 cells per dish in MethoCult™ 3334 to assess mature erythroid progenitors, 2×105 cells per dish in MethoCult™ 3630 to assess lymphoid progenitors and 3×104 cells per dish in MethoCult™ 3434 to assess immature erythroid and myeloid progenitors. Spleen cells were plated at 4×105 cells per dish in MethoCult™ 3334 to assess mature erythroid progenitors, 4×105 cells per dish in MethoCult™ 3630 to assess lymphoid progenitors and 2×105 cells per dish in MethoCult™ 3434 to assess immature erythroid and myeloid progenitors. Cultures plated in triplicate dishes were incubated at 37° C., 5% CO2 until colony enumeration and evaluation was performed by trained personnel. Mature erythroid progenitors were cultured for 2 days, lymphoid progenitors were cultured for 7 days and mature erythroid and myeloid progenitors were cultured for 12 days.
Analysis:
The mean+/−1 standard deviation was calculated for the triplicate cultures of the clonogenic assays and for the control and treatment groups for all data sets.
Frequency of colony forming cells (CFC) in each tissue was calculated as follows:
Cells plated per dish
Mean CFC scored per dish
Total CFC per femur or spleen was calculated as follows:
Total CFC scored×nucleated cell count per femur or spleen (following RBC lysis)
Number of nucleated cells cultured
Standard t-tests were performed to assess if there was a differences in the mean number of cells or hematopoietic progenitors between the PBS control mice and compound treated mice. Due to the potential subjectivity of colony enumeration, a p value of less than 0.01 is deemed significant. Mean values (+/−SD) for each group are shown in the tables below.
Treatment of mice with ActRIIB(20-134)-mFc, in the brief time frame of this study, did not result in significant increases in red blood cell or hemoglobin content. However, the effect on progenitor cell content was notable. In the femurs there was no difference in the nucleated cell numbers or progenitor content between the control and treated groups. In the spleens, the compound treated group experienced a statistically significant increase in the nucleated cell number before red blood cell lysis and in the mature erythroid progenitor (CFU-E) colony number per dish, frequency and total progenitor number per spleen. In addition, an increase was seen in the number of myeloid (CFU-GM), immature erythroid (BFU-E) and total progenitor number per spleen. Accordingly, it is expected that over a longer time course, ActRIIB(20-134)-mFc treatment may result in elevated red blood cell and hemoglobin content.
Twelve-week-old male C57BL/6NTac mice were assigned to one of two treatment groups (N=10). Mice were dosed with either vehicle or with a variant ActRIIB polypeptide (“GDF Trap”) [ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc] by subcutaneous injection (SC) at 10 mg/kg twice per week for 4 weeks. At study termination, whole blood was collected by cardiac puncture into EDTA containing tubes and analyzed for cell distribution using an HM2 hematology analyzer (Abaxis, Inc).
Treatment with the GDF Trap did not have a statistically significant effect on the number of white blood cells (WBC) compared to the vehicle controls. Red blood cell (RBC) numbers were increased in the treated group relative to the controls (see table below). Both the hemoglobin content (HGB) and hematocrit (HCT) were also increased due to the additional red blood cells. The average width of the red blood cells (RDWc) was higher in the treated animals, indicating an increase in the pool of immature red blood cells. Therefore, treatment with the GDF Trap leads to increases in red blood cells, with no distinguishable effects on white blood cell populations.
Nineteen-week-old male C57BL/6NTac mice were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Mice were dosed with vehicle (10 mM Tris Buffered Saline, TBS), wild-type ActRIIB(20-134)-mFc, or GDF trap ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc by subcutaneous injection twice per week for three weeks. Blood was collected cheek bleed at baseline and after three weeks of dosing and analyzed for cell distribution using a hematology analyzer (HM2, Abaxis, Inc.)
Treatment with ActRIIB-Fc or the GDF trap did not have a significant effect on white blood cell (WBC) numbers compared to vehicle controls. The red blood cell count (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin levels were all elevated in GDF Trap treated mice compared to either the controls or the wild-type construct (see table below). Therefore, in a direct comparison, the GDF trap promotes increases in red blood cells to a significantly greater extent than a wild-type ActRIIB-Fc protein. In fact, in this experiment, the wild-type ActRIIB-Fc protein did not cause a statistically significant increase in red blood cells, suggesting that longer or higher dosing would be needed to reveal this effect.
As described in Example 1, a GDF Trap referred to as ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc was generated by N-terminal fusion of TPA leader to the ActRIIB extracellular domain (residues 20-134 in SEQ ID NO: 1) containing a leucine-to-aspartate substitution (at residue 79 in SEQ ID NO: 1) and C-terminal fusion of human Fc domain with minimal linker (three glycine residues) (
A GDF Trap with truncated ActRIIB extracellular domain, referred to as ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc, was generated by N-terminal fusion of TPA leader to truncated extracellular domain (residues 25-131 in SEQ ID NO: 1) containing a leucine-to-aspartate substitution (at residue 79 in SEQ ID NO: 1) and C-terminal fusion of human Fc domain with minimal linker (three glycine residues) (
The affinity of GDF Traps and other ActRIIB-hFc proteins for several ligands was evaluated in vitro with a Biacore™ instrument. Results are summarized in the table below. Kd values were obtained by steady-state affinity fit due to the very rapid association and dissociation of the complex, which prevented accurate determination of kon and koff.
The GDF Trap with a truncated extracellular domain, ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc, equaled or surpassed the ligand selectivity displayed by the longer variant, ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc, with pronounced loss of activin A and activin B binding and nearly full retention of GDF11 binding compared to ActRIIB-hFc counterparts lacking the L79D substitution. Note that truncation alone (without L79D substitution) did not alter selectivity among the ligands displayed here [compare ActRIIB(L79 25-131)-hFc with ActRIIB(L79 20-134)-hFc].
To generate ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc, the human ActRIIB extracellular domain with an aspartate substitution at native position 79 (SEQ ID NO: 1) and with N-terminal and C-terminal truncations (residues 25-131 in SEQ ID NO: 1) was fused N-terminally with a TPA leader sequence instead of the native ActRIIB leader and C-terminally with a human Fc domain via a minimal linker (three glycine residues) (
ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc was evaluated to determine its effect on proliferation of erythroid progenitors. Male C57BL/6 mice (8 weeks old) were treated with ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc (10 mg/kg, s.c.; n=6) or vehicle (TBS; n=6) on Days 1 and 4, then euthanized on Day 8 for collection of spleens, tibias, femurs, and blood. Cells of the spleen and bone marrow were isolated, diluted in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum, suspended in specialized methylcellulose-based medium, and cultured for either 2 or 12 days to assess levels of clonogenic progenitors at the colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E) and burst forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) stages, respectively. Methylcellulose-based medium for BFU-E determination (MethoCult M3434, Stem Cell Technologies) included recombinant murine stem cell factor, interleukin-3, and interleukin-6, which were not present in methylcellulose medium for CFU-E determination (MethoCult M3334, Stem Cell Technologies), while both media contained erythropoietin, among other constituents. For both BFU-E and CFU-E, the number of colonies were determined in duplicate culture plates derived from each tissue sample, and statistical analysis of the results was based on the number of mice per treatment group.
Spleen-derived cultures from mice treated with ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc had twice the number of CFU-E colonies as did corresponding cultures from control mice (P<0.05), whereas the number of BFU-E colonies did not differ significantly with treatment in vivo. The number of CFU-E or BFU-E colonies from bone marrow cultures also did not differ significantly with treatment. As expected, increased numbers of CFU-E colonies in spleen-derived cultures were accompanied by highly significant (P<0.001) changes in red blood cell level (11.6% increase), hemoglobin concentration (12% increase), and hematocrit level (11.6% increase) at euthanasia in mice treated with ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc compared to controls. These results indicate that in vivo administration of a GDF Trap with truncated ActRIIB extracellular domain can stimulate proliferation of erythroid progenitors as part of its overall effect to increase red blood cell levels.
Applicants investigated the effect of ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc on erythropoietic parameters in a mouse model of chemotherapy-induced anemia based on paclitaxel, which inhibits cell division by blocking microtubule polymerization. Male C57BL/6 mice (8 weeks old) were assigned to one of four treatments:
1) paclitaxel (25 mg/kg, i.p.)
2) ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc (10 mg/kg, i.p.)
3) paclitaxel+ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc
4) vehicle (TBS).
Paclitaxel was administered on Day 0, while ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc or vehicle were administered on Days 0 and 3. Blood samples were collected for CBC analysis from separate cohorts on Days 1, 3, and 5, and results for treatment groups 1-3 (above) were expressed as percent difference from vehicle at a given time point. Attrition due to paclitaxel toxicity was an issue in the paclitaxel-only cohort on Day 3 (where n=1); otherwise, n=3-5 per treatment per time point. Compared to vehicle, paclitaxel alone decreased hemoglobin concentration by nearly 13% at Day 5, whereas addition of ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc prevented this paclitaxel-induced decline (
Applicants investigated the effect of ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc on anemia in a nephrectomized mouse model of chronic kidney disease. Male C57BL/6 mice (11 weeks old) underwent either a sham operation or a unilateral nephrectomy to reduce the capacity for erythropoietin production. Mice were allowed a week for postsurgical recovery and then treated twice-weekly with ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc (10 mg/kg, i.p.; n=15 per condition) or vehicle (TBS; n=15 per condition) for a total of 4 weeks. Blood samples were collected before the onset of dosing and after 4 weeks of treatment. Whereas vehicle-treated nephrectomized mice displayed a significant decline in red blood cell number over the 4-week treatment period, treatment with ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc not only prevented the decline but increased red blood cell levels 17% (P<0.001) above baseline (
Applicants investigated the effect of ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc on erythropoietic parameters in a rat model of anemia induced by acute blood loss (acute post-hemorrhagic anemia). Male Sprague-Dawley rats (approximately 300 g) received a chronic jugular catheter at the vendor (Harlan). On Day −1, 20% of total blood volume was withdrawn from each rat over a 5-minute period via the catheter under isoflurane anesthesia. The volume of blood removed was based on a value for total blood volume calculated according to the following relationship derived by Lee and co-workers (J Nucl Med 25:72-76, 1985) for rats with body weight greater than 120 g:
Total blood volume (ml)=0.062×body weight (g)+0.0012
An equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline was replaced via the catheter at the time of blood removal. Rats were treated with ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc (10 mg/kg, s.c.; n=5) or vehicle (TBS; n=5) on Days 0 and 3. Blood samples for CBC analysis were removed via the catheter on Days −1 (baseline), 0, 2, 4, and 6.
Control rats responded to 20% blood loss with a drop of nearly 15% in red-blood-cell levels by Day 0. These levels remained significantly lower than baseline on Days 2 and 4, and had not recovered fully by Day 6 (
Two GDF Traps, ActRIIB(L79D 20-134)-hFc and ActRIIB(L79D 25-131)-hFc, were evaluated for their ability to stimulate red blood cell production in cynomolgus monkey. Monkeys were treated subcutaneously with GDF Trap (10 mg/kg; n=4 males/4 females), or vehicle (n=2 males/2 females) on Days 1 and 8. Blood samples were collected on Days 1 (pretreatment baseline), 3, 8, 15, 29, and 44, and were analyzed for red blood cell levels (
Taken together, these data demonstrate that truncated GDF Traps, as well as a full-length variants, can be used as selective antagonists of GDF11 and potentially related ligands to increase red blood cell formation in vivo.
Others have reported an alternate, soluble form of ActRIIB (designated ActRIIB5), in which exon 4, including the ActRIIB transmembrane domain, has been replaced by a different C-terminal sequence (WO2007/053775).
The sequence of native human ActRIIB5 without its leader is as follows:
An leucine-to-aspartate substitution, or other acidic substitutions, may be performed at native position 79 (underlined and highlighted) as described to construct the variant ActRIIB5(L79D), which has the following sequence:
This variant may be connected to human Fc with a TGGG (SEQ ID NO: 42) linker to generate a human ActRIIB5(L79D)-hFc fusion protein with the following sequence:
GTHTCPPCPAPELLGGPSVFLFPPKPKDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSHE
This construct may be expressed in CHO cells.
All publications and patents mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each individual publication or patent was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
While specific embodiments of the subject matter have been discussed, the above specification is illustrative and not restrictive. Many variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of this specification and the claims below. The full scope of the invention should be determined by reference to the claims, along with their full scope of equivalents, and the specification, along with such variations.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/750,249, filed Jan. 25, 2013 (now allowed), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/247,748, filed Sep. 28, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,957), which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/583,177, filed Aug. 13, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,058,229), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/189,094, filed Aug. 14, 2008. The specifications of each of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Oct. 25, 2016, is name PHPH040107_Seq.txt and is 70,999 bytes in size.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4973577 | Vale, Jr. et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5118667 | Adams et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5658876 | Crowley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5703043 | Celeste et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5760010 | Klein | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5808007 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824637 | Crowley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5847078 | Eto et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5885794 | Mathews et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6004780 | Soppet et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6034062 | Thies et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6093547 | Jin et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6132988 | Sugino et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6162896 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6287816 | Rosen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6440930 | Rinella, Jr. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6451334 | Perrine | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6537966 | Duan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6548634 | Ballinger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6599876 | Kojima | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6605699 | Ni et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6632180 | Laragh | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6656475 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6656708 | Yu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6692925 | Miyazono et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6696260 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6777205 | Carcagno et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6835544 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6891082 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6914128 | Salfeld et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 7052873 | Tsuchiya | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7192717 | Hill et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7202210 | Wolfman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7261893 | Veldman et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7320789 | Dunham et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7560441 | Wolfman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7612041 | Knopf et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7709605 | Knopf et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7842663 | Knopf et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7893213 | Mathews et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7919296 | Wang | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7947646 | Sun et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951771 | Knopf et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7960343 | Knopf et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7968091 | Woolf et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7988973 | Sherman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8007809 | Sherman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8058229 | Seehra et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8067360 | Knopf et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8110355 | Atwood et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8124830 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8128933 | Knopf et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8138142 | Seehra et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8173601 | Knopf et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8178488 | Knopf et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8216997 | Seehra et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8252900 | Knopf et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8293236 | Lin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8293881 | Seehra et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8309082 | Han et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8343933 | Knopf et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8367611 | Knopf et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8388968 | Berger et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8410043 | Sun et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435948 | Zaidi et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8501678 | Sun et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8629109 | Knopf et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8637023 | Lin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8703694 | Knopf et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8703927 | Seehra et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8716459 | Sun et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8753627 | Han et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8765663 | Seehra et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8822411 | Lee et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8865168 | Lin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8895016 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8987203 | Van Leeuwen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8999917 | Sun et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9353356 | Knopf et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9526759 | Knopf et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 20010039036 | Mathews et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20030082233 | Lyons et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083251 | Westenfelder | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030118556 | Kaspar et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144203 | Bowen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215913 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224397 | Lowman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224501 | Young et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040033511 | Pfizenmaier et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040132675 | Kuo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138129 | MacLeod | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197828 | Gaddy | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209805 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223966 | Wolfman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050014733 | Whittemore et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050106148 | Kay et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197292 | Smithson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239070 | Von Knebel-Doeberitz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244867 | Soppet et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257278 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060068468 | Knopf et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060172347 | Mellor et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178316 | Klaus et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210657 | Chou | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070048830 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117130 | Han et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070149455 | Wolfman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172956 | Magari et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184052 | Lin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249022 | Knopf et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275895 | Duan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292885 | Bejanin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080021104 | Tarallo | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080075692 | Perrine | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080089897 | Wolfman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102065 | Borges et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139590 | Qian et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261879 | Melton et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005308 | Knopf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090017019 | Shields et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090047281 | Sherman | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074768 | Knopf et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087433 | Wolfman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098113 | Knopf et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099086 | Knopf et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118188 | Knopf et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142333 | Knopf et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148436 | LaVallie et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163417 | Sherman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202471 | Khetani et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090226460 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100008918 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100015144 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100028331 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100028332 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100068215 | Seehra et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113327 | Van Leeuwen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125099 | 't Hoen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100183624 | Seehra et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272734 | Berger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279409 | Robson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316644 | Seehra et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110038831 | Seehra et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110070233 | Seehra et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092670 | Knopf et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110129469 | Koncarevic et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135638 | Seehra et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218147 | Knopf et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286998 | Gregory et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293526 | Plikus et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120003218 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120015877 | Seehra et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120052067 | Sherman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120148588 | Knopf et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120156204 | Seehra et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232021 | Martini et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120237521 | Berger et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130004489 | Knopf et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130065299 | Knopf et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130071393 | Seehra et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130108650 | Kumar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130177559 | Seehra et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130184210 | Knopf et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130195862 | Knopf et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225484 | Sun et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243743 | Seehra et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244324 | Seehra et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287765 | Zaidi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130344091 | Berger et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140056902 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140079700 | Knopf et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194355 | Sun et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140220033 | Han et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303068 | O'Hehir et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348827 | Sun et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150072927 | Lin et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150086556 | Han et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150111248 | Bancel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150139983 | Karni et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150231206 | Sun et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150258120 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150266950 | Sung et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150276766 | Sung et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150283209 | Sung et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150328249 | Gonzalez-Cadavid et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 174 149 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1 362 062 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 416 273 | May 2004 | EP |
| 2007-099764 | Apr 2007 | JP |
| WO-9204913 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO-9220793 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO-9300432 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO-9415965 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO-9426893 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO-9510611 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO-9529685 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO-97023613 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO-9818926 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO-9906559 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO-0018932 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO-0025807 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO-0043781 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-0062809 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO-0136001 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO-0143763 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0187329 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-0210214 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO-0222680 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-0240501 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO-2002036152 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO-02043759 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO-02074340 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO-02085306 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO-02094852 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-03006057 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-03053219 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03072808 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-2003087162 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004012759 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004016639 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004039948 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004069237 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004086953 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004092199 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-04108157 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005003158 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005009460 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005014650 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005028517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005053795 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005070967 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005094871 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005097825 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005113590 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006002387 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006012627 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006020884 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006039400 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006083183 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006088972 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007038703 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007053775 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007062188 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007067616 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007071023 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007075702 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007076127 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007087505 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007101060 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008015383 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008031061 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008060139 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008072723 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008073292 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008076437 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008094708 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008097541 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008100384 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008109167 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO-2006115274 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008151078 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009009059 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009019504 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009019505 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009021747 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009025651 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009058346 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009070243 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009114180 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009137075 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009137613 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009158015 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009158025 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009158033 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010019261 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010083034 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010125003 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010151426 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010144452 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011020045 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011031901 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012027065 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013006437 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013059347 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013063536 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014066487 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014064292 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014152940 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO-2015017576 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015022658 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015089575 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015108972 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015111008 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015161220 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015152183 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015162590 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO-2015192127 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO-2016183280 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Anti-human Activin RIIA Antibody,” R&D Systems, Catalog No. AF340 (Feb. 14, 2006). |
| Abaza, M.S.I., et al., “Effects of Amino acid Substitutions Outside an Antigenic Site,” J. Protein Chem., 11(5):433-444 (1992). |
| Abbiotec: ACTR-IIA Antibody: Catalog No. 251303 (http://www.abbiotec.com) Jun. 3, 2010. |
| Abrahams, B. and Ertel, S., ‘Acceleron Pharma at Wells Fargo Healthcare; Conference—Final’, published on Jun. 17, 2014, Fair Disclosure Wire (Quarterly; Earnings Reports), Accession No. 32U3101469591FDW. |
| Acceleron Pharma Presents Positive Phase 1 Results Demonstrating ACE-011 Increases Markers of Bone Formation, Acceleron Pharma, pp. 1-2, <www.acceleronpharma.com/contents/news/press-releases/detail.jsp/q/news-id/47> Downloaded from the Internet on Feb. 17, 2009. |
| Acceleron, ‘Corporate Overview’, considered published in Jul. 31, 2014,; Retrieved on Aug. 20, 2015 from the Internet. |
| Acceleron, ‘Review of the Data Presented at the European Hematology Association; 19th Annual Meeting’, considered published on Jun. 16, 2014; Retrieved on Aug. 20, 2015 from the Internet. |
| Acta Cryst., “The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography: Collaborative Computational Project, No. 4,” D50: 760-763 (1994). |
| ACTR-II (149/1): sc-57022, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.: http://datasheets.scbt.com/sc-57022.pdf, Dated Jun. 3, 2010. |
| ACTR-II (D-15): se-5669, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.: http://datasheets.scbt.com/sc-5669.pdf, dated Jun. 3, 2010. |
| ACTR-II (H-65): se-25451, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.: http://datasheets.scbt.com/sc-25451.pdf, dated Jun. 3, 2010. |
| ACTR-IIA (A-24): sc-130679, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.: http://datasheets.scbt.com/sc-130679.pdf, dated Jun. 3, 2010. |
| ACTR-IIA (N-17): sc-5667, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.: http://datasheets.scbt.com/sc-5667.pdf, dated Jun. 3, 2010. |
| Akel et al, Neutralization of Autocrine Transforming Growth Factor -β in Human Cord Blood CD34+CD38-Lin-Cells Promotes Stem-Cell-Factor-Mediated Erythropoietin-Independent Early Erythroid Progenitor Development and Reduces Terminal Differentiation. Stem Cells, 21:557-567 (2003). |
| Akpan, I., et al., “The effects of a soluble activin type IIB receptor on obesity and insulin sensitivity,” International Journal of Obesity, 33(11):1265-1273 (2009). |
| Allendorph, G.P., et al., “Structure of the ternary signaling complex of a TGF-β superfamily member,” PNAS, 103(20):7643-7648 (2006). |
| Anonymous “Ferritin” www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/ferritin?page=2 originally published 2008. |
| Anonymous “Iron and Thalassemia,” Accessed on the Internet Apr. 3, 2014 at <sickle.bwh.harvard.edu/thaliron.html>. Published Aug. 25, 1997. |
| Anonymous “Learning about Thalassemia” <http://www.genome.gov/10001221> Accessed on Internet Jul. 9, 2013. |
| Anti-ActRIIA Antibodies: Commercial Monoclonal Antibodies Against Human ActRIIA (2010). |
| Antibodies for ACVR2A: <http://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=Acvr2a> (Jun. 8, 2010). |
| Attie et al., “A Single Ascending-Dose Study of Muscle Regulator Ace-031 in Healthy volunteers,” Muscle & Nerve, pp. 1-8 (2012). |
| Banks, G.B., et al., “The Value of Mammalian Models for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in Developing Therapeutic Strategies,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 84:431-453 (2008). |
| Benny Klimek, Margaret E., et al., “Acute inhibition of myostatin-family proteins preserves skeletal muscle in mouse models of cancer cachexia,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 391:1548-1554 (2010). |
| Berenson, J.R., “Multiple Myeloma,” Multiple Myeloma: Plasma Cell Disorders: Merck Manual Professional, pp. 1-5, Jul. 2008. |
| Beutler et al., Williams Hematology, 6th Edition. McGraw Hill, p. 561, published 2001. |
| Bhatia et al., Protein Glycosylation: Implications for in Vivo Functions and Therapeutic Applications. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol. 64: 155-201 (1998). |
| Binkert, et al., “Cloning, sequence analysis and expression of a cDNA encoding a novel insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP-2),” The EMBO Journal, 8(9):2497-2502 (1989). |
| Biosis Accession No. 2015:276893 & PIGA, A. et al., ‘ACE-536 Increases Hemoglobin and Decreases Transfusion Burden and Serum Ferritin in Adults with Beta-Thalassemia: Preliminary Results from a Phase 2 Study’, Blood, vol. 124(21): p. 53 (2014). |
| Bodey, B., et al., “Failure of Cancer Vaccines: The Significant Limitations of this Approach to Immunotherapy,” Anticancer Research, 20:2665-2676 (2000). |
| Bogdanovich, S., et al., “Functional improvement of dystrophic muscle by myostatin blockade,” Nature, 420:418-421 (2002). |
| Bork, “Powers and Pitfalls in Sequence Analysis: The 70% Hurdle,” Genome Research, 10:398-400 (2000). |
| Bowie, J.U., et al., “Deciphering the Message in Protein Sequences: Tolerance to Amino Acid Substitutions,” Science, 257:1306-1310 (1990). |
| Broxmeyer, H.E., et al, “Selective and indirect modulation of human multipotential and erythroid hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation by recombinant human activin and inhibin,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:9052-9056 (1988). |
| Burdette et al., Activin A mediates growth inhibition and cell cycle arest through Smads in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Research, 65(17):7968-7975; Abstract (2005). |
| Burgess, W.H., et al., “Possible Dissociation of the Heparin-binding and Mitogenic Activities of Heparin-binding (Acidic Fibroblast) Growth Factor-1 from Its Receptor-binding Activities by Site-directed Mutagenesis of a Single Lysine Residue,” J. Cell Biol., 111:2129-2138 (1990). |
| Cadena, S.M., et al., “Administration of a Soluble Activin Type IIB Receptor Promotes Skeletal Muscle Growth Independent of Fiber Type,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 109:635-642 (2010). |
| Cannon and Nedergaard, :Neither fat nor flesh, Nature, vol. 454(7207):947-948 (2008). |
| Caricasole, A. A. D., et al., “Human Growth-Differentiation Factor 3 (HGDF3): Developmental Regulation in Human Teratocarcinoma Cell Lines and Expression in Primary Testicular Germ Cell Tumours,” Oncogene, 16:95-103 (1998). |
| Carrancio, S. et al. “An activin receptor IIA ligand trap promotes erythropoiesis resulting in a rapid induction of red blood cells and haemoglobin,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 165: 870-882 (2014). |
| Casset et al., “A Peptide mimetic of an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody by rational design,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 307:198-205 (2003). |
| CDR Definitions from Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies, (2007). |
| Centrella et al., “Activin-A Binding and Biochemical Effects in Osteoblast-Enriched Cultures from Fetal-Rat Parietal Bone,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, 11(1):250-58 (1991). |
| Chamberlain, R.S., et al., “Innovations and strategies for the development of anticancer vaccines,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 1(4):603-614 (2000). |
| Chamow, S.M., and Ashkenazi, A., “Immunoadhesins: Principles and Applications,” TIBTECH, 14: 52-60 (1996). |
| Chang, Sam S., “Exploring the Effects of Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy on Bone Health: Implications in the Management of Prostate Cancer,” Urology, vol. 52: 29-35 (2003). |
| Chantry et al., “Inhibiting Activin-A Signaling Stimulates Bone Formation and Prevents Cancer-Induced Bone Destruction in Vivo,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 25(12): 2357-2370 (2010). |
| Chapman, B., et al., “Effect of intron A from human cytomegalovirus (Towne) immediate-early gene on heterologous expression in mammalian cells,” Nucleic Acids Research, 19(14):3979-3986 (1991). |
| Chardés et al., “Efficient amplification and direct sequencing of mouse variable regions from any immunoglobulin gene family,” FEBS Lett. vol. 452(3): 386-394 (1999). |
| Chavez-Tapia, Norberto-C et al., “Insulin sensitizers in treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12(48): 7826-7831 (2006). |
| Chen et al., “Selection and Analysis of an Optimized Anti-VEGF Antibody: Crystal Structure of an Affinity-matured Fab in Complex with Antigen,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 293: 865-881 (1999). |
| Chen, Y.G., et al. “Regulation of Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Carcinogenesis by Activin,” Exp. Biol. Med., 227(2):75-87 (2002). |
| Cirillo et al., “Hematocrit, blood pressure, and hypertension. The Gubbio Population Study,” Hypertension, 20(3):319-326 (1992). |
| Coerver, et al., “Activin Signaling through Activin Receptor Type II Causes the Cachexia-Like Symptoms in Inhibin-Deficent Mice,” 10(5):534-543 (1996). |
| Collins, C.D., “Multidisciplinary Symposium: Haematological Malignancies,” Cancer Imaging 5:S119-S126 (2005). |
| Colman, P.M., et al., “Effects of amino acid sequence changes on antibody-antigen interactions,” Research of Immunology, 145(1):33-36 (1994). |
| Crisan et al., “A Reservoir of Brown Adipocyte Progenitors in Human Skeletal Muscle,” Stem Cells, vol. 26(9):2425-2433 (2008). |
| Daluiski et al., “Bone Morphogenetic Protein-3 is a Negative Regulator of Bone Density,” Nature Genetics, 27:84-88 (2001). |
| Database Geneseq [Online], “Variable heavy chain of anti-human Fas ligand antibody NOK-4,” retrieved from EBI accession No. GSP:AAW00829; Database accession No. AAW00829; abstract, sequence (1997). |
| Database Geneseq [Online]; “Monoclonal antibody 10D4 HMGB1 Vkappa domain,” retrieved from EBI accession No. GSP:ADY85028, Database accession No. GSP:ADY85028; abstract, sequence (2005). |
| Datta-Mannan et al, Addendum to “An Engineered Human Follistatin Variant: Insights into the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmocodynamic Relationships of a Novel Molecule with Broad Therapeutic Potential,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1 page (2013). |
| Deal, C., “Potential New Drug Targets for Osteoporosis,” Nature Clinical Practice, 5(1):20-27 (2009). |
| Deconinck, N., et al., “Pathophysiology of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Current Hypotheses,” Pediatr. Neurol., 36:1-7 (2007). |
| del Re et al., “Reconstitution and Analysis of Soluble Inhibin and Activin Receptor Complexes in a Cell-free System,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(51):53126-53135 (2004). |
| Delogu, G., Et al., “DNA vaccine combinations expressing either tissue plasminogen activator signal sequence fusion proteins or ubiquitin-conjugated antigens induce sustained protective immunity in a mouse model of pulmonary tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, 70(1):292-302 (2002). |
| DePaolo, L.V., et al., “Passive Immunoneutralization with a Monoclonal Antibody Reveals a Role for Endogenous Activin-B in Mediating FSH Hypersecretion during Estrus and Following Ovariectomy of Hypophysectomized, Pituitary-Grafted Rats,” Endocrinology, 130(3):1741-1743 (1992). |
| Donald et al., “SDR: a database of predicted specificity-determining residues in proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37: D191-D194 (2009). |
| Donaldson et al., GenBank: BAA06548.1: activin typeII A receptor precursor [Homo sapiens] (1992). |
| Donaldson, et al., “Activin and inhibin binding to the soluble extracellular domain of activin receptor II”, Endocrinology 140(4):1760-1766 (1999). |
| Donaldson, et al., “Molecular Cloning and Binding Properties of the Human Type II Activin Receptor”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 184(1):310-316 (1992). |
| Dussiot et al., “An activin receptor IIA ligand trap corrects ineffective erythropoiesis in B-thalassemia,” Nature Medicine, vol. 20: 398-407 (2014). |
| Ear et al., “RAP-011 Efficiently Rescues Erthropoiesis in Zebrafish Models of Diamond Blackfan Anemia,” 55 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. Abstract #3702 (2013). |
| Eijken, M., “The Activin A-Follistatin Syhstem: Potent Regulator of Human Extracellular Matrix Mineralization,” The FASEB Journal, 21:2949-2960 (2007). |
| Elliot et al., “Enhancement of therapeutic protein in vivo activities through glycoengineering,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 21: 414-421 (2003). |
| Fafioffe, et al.,“Activin and inhibin receptor gene expression in the ewe pituitary throughout the oestrous cycle,” Journal of Endocrinology, 182:55-68 (2004). |
| Fajardo, R. J., et al., “Treatment with a Soluble Receptor for Activin Improves Bone Mass and Structure in the Axial and Appendicular Skeleton of Female Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis),” Bone, 46:64-71 (2010). |
| Fan, et al., “Preclinical evaluation of Hematide, a novel erythropoiesis stimulating agent, for the treatment of anemia,” Experimental Hematology 34, pp. 1303-1311 (2006). |
| Farmer, Stephen R., “Brown Fat and Skeletal Muscle: Unlikely Cousins?,” Cell, vol. 134(5):726-727 (2008). |
| Ferguson et al., “The role of effectors of the activin signalling pathway, activin receptors IIA and IIB, and Smad2, in patterning of tooth development,” Development, vol. 128: 4605-4613 (2001). |
| Foucar, K., Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Am J Clin Pathol, vol. 132: 281-289 (2009). |
| Fournier et al., “Blockade of the activin receptor IIb activates functional brown adipogenesis and thermogenesis by inducing mitochondrial oxidative metabolism,” Mol. Cell. Biol. vol. 32(14): 2871-2879 (2012). |
| Frankel et al., “Characterization of diphtheria fusion proteins targeted to the human interleukin-3 receptor,” Protein Engineering, vol. 13(8): 575-581 (2000). |
| Frigon, N.L., et al, “Regulation of Globin Gene Expression in Human K562 Cells by Recombinant Activin A,” Blood, 79(3):765-772 (1992). |
| Fuller et al., “Activin A is an Essential Cofactor for Osteoclast Induction,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 268:2-7 (2000). |
| Funaba et al., “Expression and Localization of Activin Receptors During Endochondral Bone Development,” European Journal of Endocrinology, 144:63-71 (2001). |
| Gaddy-Kurten et al., “Inhibin Suppresses and Activin Stimulates Osteoblastogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis in Murine Bone Marrow Cultures,” Endocrinology, 143(1):74-83 (2002). |
| Gamer et al., “BMP-3 is a Novel Inhibitor of Both Activin and BMP-4 Signaling in Xenopus Embryos,” Developmental Biology, 285:156-168 (2005). |
| Ge, G., et al., “GDF11 Forms a Bone Morphogenetic Protein 1-Activated Latent Complex That Can Modulate Nerve Growth Factor-Induced Differentiation of PC12 Cells”, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 25(14):5846-5858 (2005). |
| GenBank NM_001106, Homo sapiens activin A receptor, type IIb (ACVR2B), mRNA, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&val=116734707 (Downloaded on Jan. 29, 2007). |
| GenBank NP_001607.1, Activin A Type II receptor precursor [Homo sapiens], http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/4501897?sat=34&satkey=10571517 (Apr. 22, 2005); downloaded Nov. 24, 2015). |
| Gilbert, R., et al., “Prolonged dystrophin expression and functional correction of mdx mouse muscle following gene transfer with a helper-dependent (gutted) adenovirencoding murine dystrophin,” Human Molecular Genetics, 12(11)1287-1299 (2003). |
| Gilchrist, A., et al., “Antagonists of the Receptor-G Protein Interface Block Gi-coupled Signal Transduction,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, The American Society of Biological Chemists, Inc., 273(24):14912-14919 (1998). |
| Gonzalez-Cadavid, N.F., et al., “Organization of the human myostatin gene and expression in healthy men and HIV-infected men with muscle wasting,” PNAS, 95:14938-14943 (1998). |
| Gray, et al., “Identification of a binding site on the type II activin receptor for activin and inhibin”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(5):3206-3212(2000). |
| Greenspan, N.S., et al., “Defining epitopes: It's not as easy as it seems,” Nature Biotechnology, 17:936-937 (1999). |
| Greenwald, et al., “Characterization of the Extracellular Ligand-Binding Domain of the Type II Activin Receptor,” Biochemistry, 37(47):16711-16718 (1998). |
| Greenwald, et al., “The BMP7/ActRII Extracellular Domain Complex Provides New Insights into the Cooperative Nature of Receptor Assembly,” Molecular Cell, 11:605-617 (2003). |
| Greenwald, J., et al., “Three-finger toxin fold for the extracellular ligand-binding domain of the type II activin receptor serine kinase,” Nature Structural Biology, 6(1):18-22 (1999). |
| Gregoriadis, G., et al., “Polysialic acids: potential in drug delivery,” FEBS, 315(3):271-276 (1993). |
| Guo, et al., Protein Tolerance to Random Amino Acid Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101(25):9205-9210 (Jun. 22, 2004). Epub Jun. 14, 2004. |
| Gupta, V. et al., “Transforming Growth Factor-b Superfamily: Evaluation as Breast Cancer Biomarkers and Preventive Agents,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, 4:165-182 (2004). |
| Gura, T., “Cancer Models: Systems for Identifying New Drugs Are Often Faulty,” Science, 278(5340):1041-1042 (1997). |
| Haidar et al., “Paraspinal extramedullary hematopoiesis in patients with thalassemia intermedia,” Eur Spine J., vol. 19: 871-878 (2010). |
| Hamrick et al., “Bone Mineral Content and Density in the Humerus of Adult Myostatin-Deficient Mice,” Calcified Tissue International, 71:63-68 (2002). |
| Hamrick, “Increased Bone Mineral Density in the Femora of GDF8 Knockout Mice,” The Anatomical Record, Part A 272A:388-391 (2003). |
| Hamrick, M.W., et al., “Femoral Morphology and Cross-sectional Geometry of Adult Myostatin-deficient Mice,” Bone, 27(3):343-349 (2000). |
| Harousseau et al., “Multiple Myeloma,” American Society of Hematology, pp. 237-256 (2004). |
| Harrison, C.A., et al., “An Activin Mutant with Disrupted ALK4 Binding Blocks Signaling via Type II Receptors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(27):28036-28044 (2004). |
| Harrison, et al., “Antagonists of activin signaling: mechanisms and potential biological applications,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 16(2):73-78 (2005). |
| Hashimoto et al., “Functional Regulation of Osteoblastic Cells by the Interaction of Activin-A with Follistatin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 267(7):4999-5004 (1992). |
| Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., et al., “A truncated activin receptor inhibits mesoderm induction and formation of axial structures in Xenopus embryos,” Nature, 359:609-614 (1992). |
| Herbert, W.J., et al., The Dictionary of Immunology, Academic Press, 3rd Edition, London, pp. 58-59 (1985). |
| Hilden, K., et al., “Expression of Type II Activin Receptor Genes During Differentiation of Human K562 Cells and cDNA Cloning of the Human Type IIB Activin Receptor,” Blood, 83(8):2163-2170 (1994). |
| Hill, J.J., et al., “Regulation of Myostatin in Vivo by Growth and Differentiation Factor-Associated Serum Protein-1: A Novel Protein with Protease Inhibitor and Follistatin Domains,” Molecular Endocrinology, 17(6):1144-1154 (2003). |
| Holm et al., “Functional mapping and single chain construction of the anti-cytokeratin 8 monoclonal antibody TS1,” ScienceDirect; Molecular Immunology, vol. 44(6): 1075-1084 (2007). |
| Hsieh, Matthew M, et al., “HIF-prolyl hydroxylase inhibition results in endogenous erythropoietin induction, erythrocytosis, and modest fetal hemoglobin expression in rhesus macaques,” Blood, 110(6):2140-2147 (2007). |
| Human Activin RIIA Antibody, R&D Systems, Tools for Cell Biology Research, Catalog No. MAB340 (Rev Mar. 22, 2011). |
| Ikenoue et al., “Inhibitory Effects of Activin-A on Osteoblast Differentiation During Cultures of Fetal Rat Calvarial Cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 75:206-214 (1999). |
| International Search Report, PCT/US2010/045509, dated Nov. 23, 2010. |
| Ito et al., “Presence of activin signal transduction in normal ovarian cells and epithelial ovarian carcinoma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 82(8): 1415-1420 (2000). |
| Kaiser, J., “First Pass at Cancer Genome Reveals Complex Landscape,” Science, 313:1370 (2006). |
| Kanemitsu, Fusae, “Clinical application of subforms of creatine kinase MM and macro creatine kinases,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 526: 423-438 (1990). |
| Kaspar, B.K., et al., “Retrograde Viral Delivery of IGF-1 Prolongs Survival in a Mouse ALS Model,” Science, 301:839-842 (2003). |
| Keutmann et al, “The Role of Follistatin Domains in Follistatin Biological Action,” Molecular Endocrinology, Jan; 18(1) pp. 228-240 (2003). |
| Kim, et al., “Type IIa IgG-Fc Fusion Protein, Increases Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Levels in Postmenopausal Healthy Women,” Blood, 112(11):1316 (2008). |
| Knight, “Roles of Inhibins, Activins, and Follistatin in the Female Reproductive System,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 17:476-509 (1996). |
| Koncarevic et al., “A Soluble Activin Receptor Type IIB Prevents the Effects of Angdrogen Deprivation on Body Composition and Bone Health,” Endocrinology, vol. 151(9); 4289-4300 (2010). |
| Kos et al., “Activin type II receptors in embryonic dorsal root ganglion neurons of the chicken,” J. Neurobiol., vol. 47(2): 93-108 (2001). |
| Kosaki, R., et al., “Left-Right Axis Malformations Associated With Mutations in ACVR2B, the Gene for Human Activin Receptor Type IIB,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, 82:70-76 (1999). |
| Koseki, et al., “Role of TCF-b Family in Osteoclastogenesis Induced by RANKL,” Cellular Signaling, 14:31-36 (2002). |
| Krag, T.O.B., et al., “Heregulin ameliorates the dystrophic phenotype in mdx mice,” PNAS, 101(38):13856-13860 (2004). |
| Krneta, J., et al., “Dissociation of Angiogenesis and Tumorigenesis in Follistatin- and Activin-Expressing Tumors,” Cancer Research, 66(11):5686-5695 (2006). |
| Krystal et al., Transforming Growth Factor β1 is an Inducer of Erythroid Differentiation. J. Exp. Med. vol. 180 pp. 851-860 (1994). |
| Kubanek, B., “Introduction: The Role of the Microenvironment and Cytokines on the Modulation of Erythropoiesis,” Annals New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 257-258 (1994). |
| Kumar and Tiwari, “Iron Overload in Beta Thalassaemia Major and Intermedia Patients,” MAEDICA—Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 8(4): 328-332 (2013). |
| Kumar, G. Ed., “The Illustrated Guide to Bone Marrow Diagnosis Second Edition,” originally published 2003. |
| Kumar, T.R., et al., “Regulation of FSHβ and GnRH Receptor Gene Expression in Activin Receptor II Knockout Male Mice,” Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 212(1-2):19-27 (2003). |
| Kunihro, T., et al., “Regulation of Muscle Mass and Hepatic Steatosis by Follistatin-derived Myostatin Inhibitors,” Making Muscle in the Embryo and Adult: a joint meeting of Frontiers in Myogenesis and Skeletal Muscle Stem and Satellite Cells, New York, NY, p. 45 (Abstract) (1990). |
| Kuntz, “Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery,” Science, 257(5073):1078-1082 (1992). |
| Kwiatkowski, J.L. et al., “Iron chelation therapy in sickle-cell disease and other transfusion-dependent anemias,” Hematol Oncol Clin N Am., vol. 18: 1355-1377 (2004). |
| Lazar, E., et al., “Transforming Growth Factor α: Mutation of Aspartic Acid 47 and Leucine 48 Results in Different Biological Activities,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, 8(3):1247-1252 (1988). |
| Lazar, Mitchell A., “How Now, Brown Fat?” Science, vol. 321(5892): 1048-1049 (2008). |
| Lebrun, J.J., et al, “Activin and Inhibin Have Antagonistic Effects on Ligand-Dependent Heteromerization of the Type I and Type II Activin Receptors and Human Erythroid Differentiation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, 17(3):1682-1691 (1997). |
| Lee et al., “Regulation of Muscle Growth by Multiple Ligands Signaling Through Activin Type II Receptors,” PNAS 102(50):18117-18122 (2005). |
| Lee, et al., “Regulation of Myostatin Activity and Muscle Growth,” PNAS, 98(16):9306-9311 (2001). |
| Leto et al., “Activin A Circulating Levels in Patients with Bone Metastasis from Breast or Prostate Cancer,” Clin Exp Metastasis, 23(2):117-122 (2006). |
| Li, Q., et al., “Prevention of cachexia-like syndrome development and reduction of tumor progression in inhibin-deficient mice following administration of a chimeric activin receptor type II-murine Fc protein,” Molecular Human Reproduction, 13(9):675-683 (2007). |
| Lifespan Biosciences, Activin Receptor Type 2A (ACVR2A) Mouse anti-Human Monoclonal Antibody—LS-C33835—LifeSpan Biosciences, (2010). |
| Liu et al., “Characterization of isoforms of activin receptor-interacting protein 2 that augment activin signaling,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 189: 409-421 (2006). |
| Lotinun, S., et al., “A Soluble Activin Receptor Type IIA Fusion Protein (ACE-011) Increases Bone Mass Via a Dual Anabolic-Antiresorptive Effect in Cynomolgus Monkeys,” Bone, 46:1082-1088 (2010). |
| Lu, S., et al., “Simian Immunodeficiency Virus DNA Vaccine Trial in Macaques,” Journal of Virology, 70(6):3978-3991 (1996). |
| Ludlow, H., et al., “Development of a new antibody to the human inhibin/activin βB subunit and its application to improved inhibin B ELISAs,” J. Immunol. Methods, 329:102-111 (2008). |
| Ma, “Animal Models of Disease,” Modern Drug Discovery, 30-36 (2004). |
| MacCallum et al., “Antibody-antigen Interactions: Contact Analysis and Binding site Topography,” J. Mol. Biol, vol. 262: 732-745 (1996). |
| MacLennan et al., “Multiple Myeloma,” BMJ, vol. 308:1033-1036 (1994). |
| Maguer-Satta, V., et al, “A Novel Role for Fibronectin Type 1 Domain in the Regulation of Human Hematopoietic Cell Adhesiveness Through Binding to Follistatin Domains of FLRG and Follistatin,” Experimental Cell Research, Academic Press, 312(4):434-442 (2006). |
| Maguer-Satta, V., et al, “Regulation of human erythropoiesis by activin A, BMP2, and BMP4, members of the TGFβ family,” Experimental Cell Research, 282:110-120 (2003). |
| Maguer-Satta, V., et al., “FLRG, Member of the Follistatin Family, a New Player in Hematopoiesis,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, Elsevier Ireland Ltd., 225(1-2):109-118 (2004). |
| Mallat et al., “Potential mechanisims for renal demage in beta-thalassemia,” J. Nephrol, vol. 26(5): 821-828 (2013). |
| Marri, R. et al., “Human biochemistry, Moscow,” Mir, vol. 1: 34 (1993). |
| Martens et al., “Inhibin Interferes with Activin Signaling at the Level of the Activin Receptor Complex in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 138(7): 2928-2936 (1997). |
| Mathews, L.S., et al., “Expression Cloning of an Activin Receptor, a Predicted Transmembrane Serine Kinase,” Cell, 65(6):973-982 (1991). |
| Matzuk et al., “Cloning of the human activin receptor cDNA reveals high evolutionary conservation,” Biochim Biophys Acta, 1130(1):105-108 (1992). |
| Matzuk et al., “Different phenotypes for mice deficient in either activins or activin receptor type II,” Nature, 374:356-360 (1995). |
| McCarthy et al., Monoclonal antibodies that recognize the type-2 activin receptor, ACTR2, Hybridoma, vol. 13(3):199-203 (1994) (abstract). |
| McNally, E.M., “Powerful Genes—Myostatin Regulation of Human Muscle Mass,” N. Engl. J. Med., 350(26):2642-2644 (2004). |
| McPherron and Lee, “Suppression of body fat accumulation in myostatin-deficient mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 109(5):595-601 (2002). |
| McPherron, A.C., et al., “GDF-3 and GDF-9: Two New Members of the Transforming Growth Factor-B Superfamily Containing a Novel Pattern of Cysteines,” Journal of Endocrinology, 268(5):3444-3449 (1993). |
| McPherron, A.C., et al., “Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Mice by a Bew TGF-b Superfamily Member,” Nature, 387:83-90 (1997). |
| McPherson, S.J., et al., “Growth inhibitory response to activin A and B by human prostate tumour cell lines LNCaP and DU1465”, Journal of Endocrinology, 154:535-545 (1997). |
| Menstruation: Absent Periods (Amenorrhea), Website downloaded on Jun. 14, 2010, <http://adam.about.com/reports/000101_2.htm?p=1> (11 pages). |
| Merck Manual. Iron-Utilization Anemias (Sideroblastic Anemias), pp. 1150-1151 (1992). |
| Merck Manuals Online Medical Library (online). Anemia of Chronic Disease, Jun. 10, 2008. Downloaded from the internet on Jan. 5, 2010. <http://web.archive.org/web/20080610070226/http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec11/ch130/ch130d.html> pp. 1-2. |
| Merck Manuals Online Medical Library (online). Iron Deficiency Anemia, Jun. 10, 2008. Downloaded from the internet on Jan. 5, 2010. <http://web.archive.org/web/20080610070221/http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec11/ch130/ch130d.html> pp. 1-4. |
| Meriggiola et al., “Follistatin Decreases Activin-Stimulated FSH Secretion with No Effect on GnRH-Stimulated FSH Secretion in Prepubertal Male Monkeys,” Endocrinology, 134(4):1967-1970 (1994). |
| Mickle, et al., “Genotype-Phenotype Relationships in Cystic Fibrosis,” Med. Clin. North Am., 84(3):597-607 (2000). |
| Miller et al., Ligand binding to proteins: the binding landscape model. Protein Sci., 6(10):2166-79 (1997). |
| Miura, P., et al., “Utrophin upregulation for treating Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy: how close are we?,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, 12(3):122-129 (2006). |
| Monoclonal Anti-human Activin RII Antibody, R&D Systems, Catalog No. MAB3391 (Feb. 18, 2009). |
| Moore et al., “Molecular Basis of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-15 Signaling in Granulosa Cells*,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278(1): 304-310 (2003). |
| Morrison et al., “A soluble activin type IIB receptor improves function in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,”Experimental Neurology, vol. 217:258-268 (2009). |
| Mosekilde, L., et al., “Emerging Anabolic Treatments in Osteoporosis,” Current Drug Safety, 6:62-74 (2011). |
| Murase et al., “Possible Involvement of Protein Kinases and Smad2 Signaling Pathways on Osteoclast Differentiation Enhanced by Activin A,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, 188:236-242 (2001). |
| Murata, T., et al., “Anti-activin A Antibody (IgY) Specifically Neutralizes Various Activin A Activities,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology & Medicine, 211(1):100-107 (1996). |
| Nagamine et al., “Immunohistochemical Detection of Activin A, Follistatin, and Activin Receptors during Fracture Healing in the Rat,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 16:314-321 (1998). |
| Nakamura, K., et al, “Effect of Erythroid Differentiation Factor on Maintenance of Human Hematopoietic Cells in Co-cultures with Allogenic Stromal Cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 194(3):1103-1110 (1993). |
| Nemeth, E., “Hepcidin in β-thalassemia,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1202: 31-35. Published Aug. 2, 2010. |
| Ngo, J.T., et al., “Computational Complexity, Protein Structure Prediction, and the Levinthal Paradox,” The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction, Merz et al., eds., Birkhauser, Boston, 433 and 492-495 (1994). |
| NIH website downloaded May 28, 2014 from: web.archive.org/web/20030409091558/http://www.cc.nih .gov/ccc/patient_education/pepubs/subq.pdf; Patient Information Publications: Giving a Subcutaneous Injection ( 6 pages total). |
| Nolan, V.G., et al, ‘Sickle Cell Leg Ulcers: Associations with Haemolysis and SNPs in Klotho, TEK and Genes of the TGF-β/BMP Pathway:-Sickle Cell Leg Ulcers, Genetics and Haemolysis’, British Journal of Haematology, 133(5), pp. 570-578 (2006). |
| Ogawa et al., “Bovine Bone Activin Enhances Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Induced Ectopic Bone Formation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 267(20):14233-14237 (1992). |
| Oh, S.P., et al., “Activin type IIA and IIB receptors mediate Gdf11 signaling in axial vertebral patterning,” Genes & Development, 16:2749-2754 (2002). |
| Oue et al., “Effect of Local Injection of Activin A on Bone Formation in Newborn Rats,” Bone, 15(3):361-366 (1994). |
| Padlan et al., “Identification of specificity-determining residues in antibodies,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 9:133-139 (1995). |
| Pak et al., “Suppression of hepcidin during anemia requires erythropoietic activity,” Blood, vol. 108(12): 3730-3735 (2006). |
| Pakula and Sauer, “Genetic analysis of protein stability and function,” Annu. Rev. Genet., vol. 23: 289-310 (1989). |
| Patel, K., et al., “The function of Myostatin and strategies of Myostatin blockade—new hope for therapies aimed at promoting growth of skeletal muscle,” Neuromuscular Disorders, 15:117-126 (2005). |
| Paul, William E., Fundamental Immunology, 3rd edition, Raven Press, New York, 1003: 292-295 (1999). |
| Paulson, Robert F., “Targeting a new regulator of erythropoiesis to alleviate anemia,” Nature Medicine, News and Views, vol. 20(4) (2 pages) (2014). |
| Pearsall et al., An investigative pharmacology study of a GDF-8 (myostatin) inhibitor, ACE-031, in the common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), Database Biosis, Biosciences Information Service, Accession No. PREV201200750016; Faseb Journal, vol. 22, Experimental Biology Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA Apr. 5-9, 2008 (Abstract). |
| Pearsall, et al., “A Soluble Activin Receptor Type IIA (ACTRIIA) Acts As a Novel Bone Anabolic Agent,” The Official Journal of the European Calcified Tissue Society, 34th Europena Symposium on Calcified Tissues, May 2007. |
| Pearsall, et al., “Treatment with a Soluble Activin Type II Receptor Reverses Bone Loss in Ovariectomized Mice,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2006 Abstracts, 21(1):s1-s530 (2006). |
| Pearsall, R.S., et al., “A soluble activin Type IIA receptor induces bone formation and improves skeletal integrity”, PNAS, 105(9):7082-7087 (2008). |
| Pennucci et al., Multiplexed evaluation of a cell-based assay for the detection of antidrug neutralilzing antibodies to Panitumumab in human serum using automated fluorescent microsopy,: J. Biomol. Sceen. vol. 15: 644-652 (2010). |
| Perrien, D. S., et al., “Inhibin A Is an Endocrine Stimulator of Bone Mass and Strength,” Endocrinology, 148(4):1654-1665 (2007). |
| Phillips, A.J., “The challenge of gene therapy and DNA delivery,” J. Pharm. Pharmacology, 53:1169-1174 (2001). |
| Pirollo, K.F., et al., “Targeted Delivery of Small Interfering RNA: Approaching Effective Cancer Therapies,” Cancer Res., 68(5):1247-1250 (2008). |
| Qi, et al., “Blockade of type β transforming growth factor signaling prevents liver fibrosis and dysfunction in the rat,” PNAS, 96:2345-2349 (1999). |
| R&D Systems 339-RB/CF, Recombinant Human Activin RIIB/Fc Chimera (Aug. 27, 2003). |
| R&D Systems 340-R2, Recombinant Human Activin RIIA/Fc Chimera (Aug. 27, 2003). |
| R&D Systems Catalogue No. AF339 Datasheet: Human Activin RIIB Antibody [retrieved on Feb. 13, 2013] Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.rndsystems.com/pdf/af339.pdf. |
| R&D Systems, “Antibody Reference Guide and Catalog Instructions,” [retrieved on Feb. 13, 2013]; http://web.archive.org/web/20090220022132/http://rndsystems.com/DAM_public/5658.pdf; published Mar. 14, 2009 as per the Wayback Engine. See, in particular: p. 3. |
| Raju, T.S., “Glycosylation in the Fc domain of IgG increases resistance to proteolytic cleavage by papain,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 341:797-803 (2006). |
| Rebbapragada, et al., “Myostatin Signals Through a Transforming Growth Fact b-Like Signaling Pathway to Block Adipogenesis,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, 23(20):7230-7242 (2003). |
| Reis, F.M., et al., “Activin, Inhibin and the Human Breast,” Molecular and Cellular Edocrinology, 225:77-82 (2004). |
| Risbridger, G.P, et al., “Activins and Inhibins in Endocrine and Other Tumors,” Endocrine Reviews, 22(6):836-858 (2001). |
| Robinson, G.W., et al., “Inhibins and Activins Regulate Mammary Epithelial Cell Differentiation Through Mesenchymal-epithelial Interactions,” Development, 124:2701-2708 (1997). |
| Rodriquez, J.E.S., et al., “Enhanced Osteoclastogenesis Causes Osteopenia in Twisted Gastrulation-Deficient Mice Through Increased BMP Signaling,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 24:1917-1926 (2009). |
| Rosenzweig et al., “Cloning and characterization of a human type II receptor for bone morphogenetic proteins,” PNAS, 92:7632-7636 (1995). |
| Ruckle et al., “Single-Dose, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of ACE-011 (ACTRIIA-IgG1) in Postmenopausal Women,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24(4), pp. 744-752 (2009). |
| Rund and Rachmilewitz,“Medical Progress Beta-Thalassemia,” N. England J. Medicine, vol. 35: 1135-1146 (2005). |
| Ruzek et al. Minimal Effects on Immune Parameters Following Chronic Anti-TGF-β Monoclonal Antibody Administration to Normal Mice. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, 25(2):235-257 (2003). |
| Sakai et al., “Activin Enhances Osteoclast-Like Cell Formation in Vitro,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 195(1):39-46 (1993). |
| Sakai et al., “Activin Increases Bone Mass and Mechanical Strength of Lumbar Vertebrae in Aged Ovariectomized Rats,” Bone, 27(1):91-96 (2000). |
| Sakai et al., “Activin release from bone coupled to bone resorption in organ culture of neonatal mouse calvaria,” Bone, 26(3):235-240 (2000). |
| Sakai et al., “Involvement of Activin in the Regulation of Bone Metabolism,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 180:183-188 (2001). |
| Sakai et al., “Local Administration of Activin Promotes Fracture Healing in the Rat Fibula Fracture Model,” Bone, 25(2):191-196 (1999). |
| Sakai et al., The Measurement of Activin/EDF in Mouse Serum: Evidence for Extragonadal Production. Biochecmical and Biophysical Research Communications, 188(2):921-926 (1992). |
| Sakai, et al., “Osteogenic Activity of Activin in Young Normal Rats and Young Adult and Aged Rats after Ovarlectomy,” Bone 23:(Suppl.) 467 (1998). |
| Sako, D., et al., “Characterizationof the Ligand Binding Functionality of the Extracellular Domain of Activin Receptor Type IIB,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(27):21037-21048 (2010). |
| Satoh, et al., “Hemodynamic changes by recombinant erythropoietin therapy in hemodialyzed patients,” Hypertension, 15(3):262-266 (1990). |
| Schmelzer, C.H., et al., “Purification and Characterization of Recombinant Human Activin B,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1039(2):135-141 (1990). |
| Schuelke, M., et al., “Myostatin Mutation Associated with Gross Muscle Hypertrophy in a Child,” New England Journal of Medicine, 350(26):2682-2688 (2004). |
| Seale et al., “PRDM16 controls a brown fat/skeletal muscle switch,” Nature, vol. 454(7207):961-967 (2008). |
| Shao, L., et al., “Effect of Activin A on Globin Gene Expression in Purified Human Erythroid Progenitors,” Blood, 79(3):773-781 (1992). |
| Shao, L., et al., “Efficient synthesis of globoside and isogloboside tetrasaccharides by using beta (1→3) N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase/UDP-N-acetyglucosamine C4 epimerase fusion protein,” Chem Commun.: 1422-1423 (2003). |
| Shapiro et al., “Side Effects of Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344: 1997-2008 (2001). |
| Shav-Tal, Y., et al., “The Role of Activin A in Regulation of Hemopoiesis,” Stem Cells, 20:493-500 (2002). |
| Shi et al., “Energy Balance, Myostatin, and GILZ: Factors Regulating Adipocyte Differentiation in Belly and Bone,” PPAR Research, pp. 1-12 (2007). |
| Shiozaki, M., et al, “Activin A: A Commitment Factor in Erythroid Differentiation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 242:631-635 (1998). |
| Shiozaki, M., et al, “Evidence for the participation of endogenous activin A/erythroid differentiation factor in the regulation of erythropoiesis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:1553-1556 (1992). |
| Shiozaki, M., et al., “In Vivo Treatment With Erythroid Differentiation Factor (EDF / Activin A) Increases Erythroid Precursors (CFU-E and BFU-E) in Mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 165(3):1155-1161 (1989). |
| Shoji et al., “Identification and Characterization of a PDZ Protein That Interacts with Activin Type II Receptors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275(8): 5485-5492 (2000). |
| Shuto et al., “Osteoblasts Express Types I and II Activin Receptors During Early Intramembranous and Endochondral Bone Formation,” Journal of Bone Mineral Research, 12(3):403-411 (1997). |
| Sirskyj et al., Detection of influenza A and B neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated ferrets and macaques using specific biotinstreptavidin conjugated antibodies, J. Virol. Methods. vol. 163: 459-464 (2010). |
| Smith, L. et al., “The analysis of doxorubicin resistance in human breast cancer cells using antibody microarrays,” Mol. Cancer Therapy, vol. 5: 2115-2120 (2006). |
| Smith, L. et al., The Status, Quality, and Expansion of the NIH Full-Length cDNA Project: The Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC), Genome Res., vol. 14(10b),: 2127-2127 (2004). |
| Song, J., et al., “The Type II Activin Receptors Are Essential for Egg Cylinder Growth, Gastrulation, and Rostral Head Development in Mice,” Development Biology, 213:157-169 (1999). |
| Springer, et al., “Seventh European Congress on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis,” Osteoporosis International, 18(1):S29-S75 (2007). |
| Sun Shuhan et al., “Chromosome, Gene, and Disesase,” Science Press (2009). |
| Sun, et al., “FSH Directly Regulates Bone Mass,” Cell, 125:247-260 (2006). |
| Suragani et al., “4236 ACE-536, a Modified Type II Activin Receptor Increases Red Blood Cells in Vivo by Promoting Maturation of Late Stage Erythroblasts,” 52nd ASH Annual Meeting and Expositions, Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, FL Dec. 4-7, 2010. |
| Suragani et al., “Transforming growth factor-β superfamily ligand trap ACE-536 corrects anemia by promoting late-state erythropoiesis,” Letters, Nature Medicine, Advance Online Publication (44 pages) (2014). |
| Swanson et al., “Use of Biosensors to Monitor the Immune Response,” Biologics, vol. 109: 71-78 (2000). |
| Swanson, S. J., “New Technologies for the Detection of Antibodies to Therapeutic Proteins,” Immunogenicity of Therapeutics Biological Products, vol. 112: 127-133 (2003). |
| Tanno, T. and Miller, J.L., “Iron Loading and Overloading due to Ineffective Erythropoiesis,” Advances in Hematology, Article ID 358283, Chapter 2 (Abstract) (2010). |
| The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, 17th Edition. Nyelodysplastic Syndrome, pp. 865 and 963-955 (1999). |
| The website downloaded Oct. 28, 2014 from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, themmrf.org/multiple-myeloma/symptoms/bone-lesions/, 2 pages total. |
| Thompson, et al., “Structures of an ActRIIB: activin A complex reveal a novel binding mode for TGF-beta ligand: receptor interactions”, EMBO 22(7):1555-1566 (2003). |
| Thompson, T.B., et al., “Beta A versus beta B: is it merely a matter of express?,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 225:9-17 (2004). |
| Thorpe and Swanson, “Current methods for Detecting Antibodies against Erythropoietin and Other Recombinant Proteins,” Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, vol. 12(1): 28-39 (2005). |
| Tinsley, J., et al., “Expression of full-length utrophin prevents muscular dystrophy in mdx mice,” Nature Medicine, 4(12):1441-1444 (1998). |
| Tisdale, M.J., “Cachexia in Cancer Patients,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2:862-871 (2002). |
| Tokuriki, N., et al., “Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 19:596-604 (2009). |
| Trivedi, R., et al., “Investigational Anabolic Therapies for Osteoporosis,” Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs, 19(8):995-1005 (2010). |
| Truska et al., “Bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, and 9 stimulate murine hepcidin 1 expression independently of Hfe, transferrin receptor 2 (Tfr2), and IL-6,” PNAS, vol. 103(27):10289-10293 (2006). |
| Tseng, Yu-Hua et al., “New role of bone morphogenetic protein 7 in brown adipogenesis and energy expenditure,” Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science (and Supplementary Information), vol. 454(7207): 1000-1004 (2008). |
| Tsuchida, et al., “Activin isoforms signal through type I receptor serine/threonine kinase ALK7,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 220:59-65 (2004). |
| Tu, P., et al., “Genetic Disruption of Myostatin Reduces the Development of Proatherogenic Dyslipidemia and Atherogenic Lesions in Ldlr Null Mice,” Diabetes, 58:1739-1748 (2009). |
| Type 2 Diabetes, PubMed Health, Diseases and Conditions, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD (online), Jun. 28, 2011 [retrieved on Jun. 6, 2012). Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001356/>. |
| Ukkola, et al., “Adiponectin: A Link Between Excess Adiposity and Associated Comorbidities?”, Journal of Molecular Medicine, 80(11):696-702 (2002). |
| US Biological Technical Data Sheet for A0856-10A, accessed on Feb. 20, 2013. |
| US Biological, Activin Receptor Type IIA (RIIA) A0856-05E www.usbio.net/technicalsheet.php?item=A0856-05E dated Jun. 8, 2010. |
| Utzschneider, et al., The Role of Insulin Resistance in Nonalcoholoc Fatty Liver Disease, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 91(12):4753-4761 (Dec. 2006). Epub Sep. 12, 2006. |
| Vajdos et al., “Comprehensive Functional Maps of the Antigen-binding Site of an Anti-ErbB2 Antibody Obtained with Shotgun Scanning mutagenesis,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 320(2): 415-428 (2002). |
| Vallet, S., et al., “Activin A promotes multiple myeloma-induced osteolysis and is a promising target for myeloma bone disease,” PNAS, 107(11):5124-5129 (2010). |
| Vidal, L., et al., “Making sense of antisense,” European Journal of Cancer, 41:2812-2818 (2005). |
| Wagner, K.R., et al., “A Phase I/II trial of MYO-029 in Adult Subjects with Muscular Dystrophy,” Ann. Neurol., 63:561-571 (2008). |
| Wagner, K.R., et al., “Loss of Myostatin Attenuates Severity of Muscular Dystrophy in mdx Mice,” Ann. Neurol., 52:832-836 (2002). |
| Wagner, K.R., et al., “Muscle regeneration in the prolonged absence of myostatin,” PNAS, 102(7):2519-2524 (2005). |
| Walsh, F. S, et al., “Myostatin: a modulator of skeletal-muscle stems cells,” Biochemical Society Transactions, 33(Pt.6):1513-1517 (2005). |
| Wang, et al., A single amino acid determines lysophospholipid specificity of the S1P1 (EDG1) and LPA1 (EDG2) phospholipid growth factor receptors. JBC 276:49213-49220 (2001). |
| Wang, W., et al., “GDF-3 is an adipogenic cytokine under high fat dietary condition,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Comm., 321(4):1024-1031 (2004). |
| Ward, R., “An update on disordered iron metabolism and iron overload,” Hematology, vol. 15(5): 311-317 (2010). |
| Ware, Russell E., “How I use hydroxyurea to treat young patients with sickle cell anemia,” Blood, vol. 115(26): 5300-5311 (2010). |
| Weber, et al., A slient H-bond can by mutationally activated for high-affinity interaction of BMP-2 and activin type IIB receptor, BMC Structural Biology. |
| Wells, J.A., “Additivity of Mutational Effects in Proteins,” Biochemistry, 29(37):8509-8517 (1990). |
| Welt, et al., “Activin: an endocrine or panacrine agent?,” European Journal of Endocrinology 139:469-471 (1998). |
| Wiater, et al., “Inhibin is an Antagonist of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(10):7934-7941 (2003). |
| Wolfman, N.M., et al., “Activation of latent myostatin by the BMP-1/tolloid family of metalloproteinases,” PNAS, 100(26):15842-15846 (2003). |
| Wong et al., “Validation parameters for a novel biosensor assay which simultaneously measures serum concentrations of a humanized monoclonal antibody and detects induced antibodies,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 209: 1-15 (1997). |
| Yamato et al., “Induction of apoptosis in Myeloma Cells with Activin A,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Hematology; 37th Annual Meeting, Symposium 3, Apoptosis in Blood Disorders, 37:7, pp. 564-567) (2012). (translated). |
| Yokota, T., et al., “Isolation and characterization of a mouse cDNA clone that expresses mast-cell growth-factor activity in monkey cells,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:1070-1074 (1984). |
| Yu et al., “Specific roles of activin/inhibin in human erythropoiesis in vitro.” Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 20(10):1243-1246 (1991). |
| Yu, J., et al., “Importance of FSH-releasing protein and inhibin in erythrodifferentiation,” Nature, 330:765-767 (1987). |
| Zatz et al., “Serum creatine-kinase (CK) and pyruvate-kinase (PK) activities in Duchenne (DMD) as compared with Becker (BMD) muscular dystrophy,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 102: 190-196 (1991). |
| Zhang et al., Effects of Activin A on the Activities of the Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages, Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 2(1): 63-67 ( 2005). |
| Zhao, B., et al., “Transgenic expression of myostatin propeptide prevents diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 337:248-255 (2005). |
| Guerra, Amaliris et al.; “Lack of GDF11 Does Not Ameliorate Erythropoiesis in β-Thalassemia and Does Not Prevent the Activity of the Trap-Ligand RAP-536”, Blood, 2018, 132:165 (6 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170204382 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61189094 | Aug 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12583177 | Aug 2009 | US |
| Child | 13247748 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13750249 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Child | 15336363 | US | |
| Parent | 13247748 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Child | 13750249 | US |
