Methods of identifying and replacing implanted heart valves

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11154394
  • Patent Number
    11,154,394
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 8, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 26, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A prosthetic heart valve configured to replace a native heart valve and for post-implant expansion and having a valve-type indicator thereon visible from outside the body post-implant. The indicator communicates information about the valve, such as the size or orifice diameter of the valve, and/or that the valve has the capacity for post-implant expansion. The indicator can be an alphanumeric symbol or other symbol or combination of symbols that represent information about the characteristics of the valve such as the valve size. The capacity for post-implant expansion facilitates a valve-in-valve procedure, where the valve-type indicator conveys information to the surgeon about whether the implanted valve is suitable for the procedure and informs the choice of the secondary valve.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to a surgical heart valve for heart valve replacement and, more particularly, to surgical heart valves having indicators visible from outside the body post-implant.


BACKGROUND

The heart is a hollow muscular organ having four pumping chambers and four heart valves: aortic, mitral (or bicuspid), tricuspid, and pulmonary. Heart valves are comprised of a dense fibrous ring known as the annulus, and leaflets or cusps attached to the annulus.


Heart valve disease is a widespread condition in which one or more of the valves of the heart fails to function properly. Diseased heart valves may be categorized as either stenotic, wherein the valve does not open sufficiently to allow adequate forward flow of blood through the valve, and/or incompetent, wherein the valve does not close completely, causing excessive backward flow of blood through the valve when the valve is closed. Valve disease can be severely debilitating and even fatal if left untreated. Various surgical techniques may be used to replace or repair a diseased or damaged valve. In a traditional valve replacement operation, the damaged leaflets are typically excised and the annulus sculpted to receive a replacement prosthetic valve.


A surgical prosthetic heart valve typically comprises a support structure (such as a frame, ring and/or stent) with a valve assembly deployed therein. The support structure is often rigid, and can be formed of various biocompatible materials, including metals, plastics, ceramics, etc. Two primary types of heart valve replacements or prostheses are known. One is a mechanical-type heart valve that uses a ball and cage arrangement or a pivoting mechanical closure supported by a base structure to provide unidirectional blood flow, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,025 to Stobie, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,719,790 to Brendzel, et al., the entire disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference. The other is a tissue-type or “bioprosthetic” valve having flexible leaflets supported by a base structure and projecting into the flow stream that function much like those of a natural human heart valve and imitate their natural flexing action to coapt against each other and ensure one-way blood flow.


In tissue-type valves, a whole xenograft valve (e.g., porcine) or a plurality of xenograft leaflets (e.g., bovine pericardium) can provide fluid occluding surfaces. Synthetic leaflets have been proposed, and thus the term “flexible leaflet valve” refers to both natural and artificial “tissue-type” valves. In a typical tissue-type valve, two or more flexible leaflets are mounted within a peripheral support structure that usually includes posts or commissures extending in the outflow direction to mimic natural fibrous commissures in the native annulus. The metallic or polymeric “support frame,” sometimes called a “wireform” or “stent,” has a plurality (typically three) of large radius cusps supporting the cusp region of the flexible leaflets (e.g., either a whole xenograft valve or three separate leaflets). The ends of each pair of adjacent cusps converge somewhat asymptotically to form upstanding commissures that terminate in tips, each extending in the opposite direction as the arcuate cusps and having a relatively smaller radius. Components of the valve are usually assembled with one or more biocompatible fabric (e.g., Dacron® polyethylene terephthalate (PET)) coverings, and a fabric-covered sewing ring is provided on the inflow end of the peripheral support structure.


One example of the construction of a flexible leaflet valve is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,766 to Huynh, et al. (issued Jul. 1, 2003), in which the exploded view of FIG. 1 thereof illustrates a fabric-covered wireform 54 and a fabric-covered support stent 56 on either side of a leaflet subassembly 52. The contents of U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,766 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Other examples of valve and related assemblies/systems are found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,084,268, which issued Apr. 18, 1978; U.S. Pat. No. 7,137,184, which issued on Nov. 21, 2006; U.S. Pat. No. 8,308,798, filed Dec. 10, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 8,348,998, filed Jun. 23, 2010; and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0065729, filed Jun. 23, 2011; the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.


Sometimes the need for complete valve replacement may arise after a patient has already had an earlier valve replacement for the same valve. For example, a prosthetic heart valve that was successfully implanted to replace a native valve may itself suffer damage and/or wear and tear many years after initially being implanted. Implanting the prosthetic heart valve directly within a previously-implanted prosthetic heart valve may be impractical, in part because the new prosthetic heart valve (including the support structure and valve assembly) will have to reside within the annulus of the previously-implanted heart valve, and traditional prosthetic heart valves may not be configured to easily receive such a valve-within-a-valve implantation in a manner which provides secure seating for the new valve while also having a large enough annulus within the new valve to support proper blood flow therethrough.


Some attention has been paid to the problem of implanting a new valve within an old valve. In particular, the following disclose various solutions for valve-in-valve systems: U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0076548 A1 to Konno, filed Sep. 19, 2008; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,613,765 to Bonhoeffer, filed Jul. 7, 2011.


Despite certain advances in the valve-in-valve area, there remains a need to quickly identify physical characteristics of a previously implanted heart valve, including whether a previously implanted surgical valve is suitable for a valve-in-valve procedure.


SUMMARY

The present application solves a number of problems related to identification of prosthetic heart valves post-implant. The heart valves have an indicator thereon visible from outside the body by an external imager, post-implant. The indicator communicates the size or orifice diameter of the surgical valve, and may also show that the valve has the capacity for post-implant expansion. It can also communicate other information, such as any combination of the manufacturer and/or model of the valve, the type of bioprosthetic tissue or other material used to make the leaflets, and the valve's compatibility with other types of valves. The indicator may be an alphanumeric symbol and/or other symbol or symbols that represent, for example, the valve size number and/or other characteristic.


The present application discloses specific modifications to existing surgical valves that enable manufacturers to rapidly produce a valve which accommodates valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures. Specifically, some embodiments disclosed in the present application include retrofitting or modifying components within existing types of surgical valves to enable post-implant expansion.


In one embodiment of the present application, a prosthetic heart valve comprises an internal support frame defining a flow orifice therethrough and wherein the internal support frame is adapted for post-implant expansion. A plurality of flexible leaflets attaches to the support frame so as to extend across the flow orifice and come together within the orifice and provide one-way flow therethrough. The prosthetic heart valve further includes a valve-type indicator that provides information about a characteristic of the heart valve and is visible using an external imager. The valve-type indicator may signify the capability of the support frame for post-implant expansion of the orifice.


The prosthetic heart valve preferably has a labeled valve size, and the valve-type indicator comprises a valve-size indicator that denotes the labeled valve size and is visible or readable using an external imager. For example, the valve-size indicator comprises a numerical value that equals the labeled valve size in millimeters. In one embodiment, the internal support frame comprises a structural component that shows up as a positive image on the external imager, and the valve-type indicator is formed by one or more voids integrated into the structural component that show up as negative images on the external imager. For instance, the structural component of the internal support frame may be a generally tubular band that is adapted for post-implant expansion. In some embodiments, the valve-type indicator is integrated into a structural component to provide a positive image, for example as part of a band, stent, and/or wireform.


In another embodiment, the valve-type indicator comprises an indicator element that shows up as a positive image on the external imager mounted to a structural component of the prosthetic heart valve that is not clearly visible to the external imager so that the valve-size indicator shows in contrast to the structural component on the external imager. For example, the structural component comprises a soft sealing ring surrounding an inflow end of the heart valve, and the indicator element is mounted to the sealing ring.


In one aspect, the prosthetic heart valve further includes an expandable tubular frame attached to an inflow end of the internal support frame on which the valve-size indicator is located. In such a configuration, the expandable tubular frame may have a series of circumferential and axial struts, wherein an upper strut is shaped with peaks and valleys around its periphery, and the valve-type indicator is integrated into the frame as a tag below the upper strut and along one of the axial struts. The expandable tubular frame is desirably metallic and is formed by laser cutting with the tag being the same material as the frame and formed during the laser cutting process.


In another embodiment, a prosthetic heart valve disclosed herein comprises an internal support frame defining a flow orifice therethrough, and a plurality of cusps that curve toward the inflow end separated by commissures. The support frame comprising an annular element disposed at an inflow end of the support frame that undulates so as to have peaks and valleys, with the peaks corresponding to the commissures of the support frame. A plurality of flexible leaflets attach to the support frame and extend across the flow orifice so as to come together within the orifice and ensure one-way flow therethrough, each of the leaflets attaching at a peripheral edge along the cusps and commissures of the support frame. An indicator is located on the annular element, for example, on at least one of the peaks or on at least one of the valleys of the annular element, that denotes a valve type and is visible or readable using an external imager.


In one form, the annular element includes a single expandable segment formed by overlapping free ends located at one of the cusps of the support frame. Preferably, there are identical indicators provided on each of the peaks in the middle of each valley around the annular element. The prosthetic heart valve has a labeled valve size, and the valve-type indicator may comprise a numerical value that equals, or a non-numeric symbol representative of, the labeled valve size in millimeters. The annular element desirably comprises a generally tubular metallic band that shows up as a positive image on the external imager, and the valve-type indicator is formed by one or more voids integrated into the band which show up as negative or positive images on the external imager.


The heart valve may further include an expandable tubular frame attached to an inflow end of the internal support frame on which a second valve-type indicator is located. The expandable tubular frame may comprise a series of circumferential and axial struts, wherein an upper strut is shaped with peaks and valleys around its periphery, and the valve-type indicator is integrated into the frame as a tag below the upper strut and along one of the axial struts.


Some embodiments provide a prosthetic heart valve, comprising: an internal support frame defining a flow orifice therethrough, the internal support frame is adapted for post-implant expansion; a plurality of flexible leaflets attached to the support frame and extending across the flow orifice and coming together within the orifice to define one-way flow therethrough; and a valve-type indicator that provides information about a characteristic of the heart valve, the valve-type indicator readable using an external imager.


Some embodiments provide a prosthetic heart valve, comprising: an internal support frame defining a flow orifice therethrough, the internal support frame defining a plurality of cusps that curve toward the inflow end separated by commissures, the support frame comprising an annular element disposed at an inflow end of the support frame that undulates so as to have peaks and valleys, with the peaks corresponding to the commissures of the support frame; a plurality of flexible leaflets attached to the support frame and extending across the flow orifice and coming together within the orifice to ensure one-way flow therethrough, each of the leaflets attaching at a peripheral edge along the cusps and commissures of the support frame; and an indicator comprising at least one feature in annular element at least a portion of the indicator having a radiopacity different from the radiopacity of the annular element, the indicator indicating a valve type and visible using an external imager. At least a portion of the annular element can be radiopaque, with the indicator including at least one opening extending through the at least one radiopaque portion of the annular element.


Some embodiments provide a method for replacing a prosthetic valve in need thereof, the method comprising: reading a valve-type indicator of a first prosthetic valve, selecting a second prosthetic valve based on the information read, and deploying the second prosthetic valve in the first prosthetic valve. Optionally, the method includes expanding a diameter of the first prosthetic valve prior to, contemporaneously with, or simultaneously with deploying the second prosthetic valve.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1E are perspective and cutaway views of an exemplary surgical prosthetic heart valve of the present application having inner structural bands adapted for post-implant expansion and having valve-size indicators on an internal component visible from outside the body;



FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of an exemplary surgical prosthetic heart valve of the present application;



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of an image of a prosthetic heart valve of the prior art as seen using an X-ray or other imager from outside the body in the same orientation as FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 is a schematic image similar to that of FIG. 3 of a prosthetic heart valve of the present application having valve-size indicators on an internal frame component that are visible from outside the body using an X-ray or other imager;



FIGS. 5A-5D are elevational views of different outer support bands for use in the valve of FIGS. 1A-1E with valve-size indicators thereon in various locations, the bands having overlapping free ends held together by a frictional sleeve to enable post-implant expansion;



FIG. 6A is an elevational view of an alternative outer support band having a symbolic valve-size indicator thereon at one of the cusps of the band, and FIG. 6B is a key chart for decoding the meaning of the symbolic valve-size indicator;



FIG. 7 is an elevational view of a still further outer support band having a plurality of holes formed around its circumference whose number equals the valve size in millimeters;



FIG. 8A is an elevational view of another outer support band having a symbolic valve-size indicator thereon at one of the commissures, and FIG. 8B is a key chart for decoding the meaning of the symbolic valve-size indicator;



FIG. 9A is another outer support band having a symbolic valve-size indicator thereon at one of the commissures, and FIG. 9B is a key chart for decoding the meaning of the symbolic valve-size indicator;



FIG. 10 is an elevational view of a still further outer support band having a plurality of holes provided on one of the cusps whose number symbolizes a particular valve size;



FIGS. 11A and 11B show support bands each having a single geometric symbol formed in at least one of the cusps that symbolizes a particular valve size;



FIG. 12 is a still further outer support band having a radiopaque coating thereon in a pattern that symbolizes a particular valve size;



FIGS. 13A-13C are perspective views of a further prosthetic heart valve support band indicated for post-implant expansion and having overlapping free ends held together by a frictional sleeve, and FIG. 13D shows the expansion of the overlapping free ends;



FIG. 14A is a perspective view of an inner core member of an exemplary sewing ring showing strips of radiopaque material exploded therefrom they can be incorporated into the sewing ring to indicate valve size, and FIG. 14B is a schematic top view as seen using an X-ray or other imager from outside the body of the valve having the radiopaque strips as indicated in FIG. 14A;



FIGS. 15A-15C are perspective and elevational views, some cutaway and phantom, of an exemplary prosthetic heart valve of the present application having an expandable lower frame with valve-size indicators thereon; and



FIG. 16 is a perspective view of the lower frame with valve-size indicators of FIGS. 15A-15C.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

The prosthetic heart valves described herein each include an internal (meaning incorporated into the valve itself as opposed to being a supplemental element) stent or frame that is generally tubular in shape and defines a flow orifice area through which blood flows from an inflow end to an outflow end. Alternatively, the shape of the internal stent can be oval, elliptical, irregular, or any other desired shape. The valves preferably include flexible leaflets that selectively allow for fluid flow therethrough. Thus, the flow orifice area is alternatively open and closed via movement of leaflets. The heart valves may also include an outer or peripheral sewing or sealing ring formed of soft, suture-permeable material, which is typically used as an anchor to secure the valve to a native annulus, but can also be primarily for sealing against paravalvular leaking.


As referred to herein, the prosthetic heart valves used in accordance with the devices and methods of the invention may include a wide variety of different configurations, such as a prosthetic heart valve having one or more bioprosthetic tissue leaflets (e.g., bovine or porcine), a synthetic heart valve having polymeric leaflets, and in general any that are configured for replacing a native or previously implanted prosthetic heart valve. The prosthetic heart valves described herein are typically used for replacement of aortic, mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic valves, but may also be used as a venous valve. These replacement prosthetic heart valves can also be employed to functionally replace stentless bioprosthetic heart valves.


In a preferred embodiment, internal valve stents or support frames disclosed herein have “expandable segments” that enable post-implant expansion. This can occur from the expandable segment rupturing, plastically stretching, and/or elastically elongating. Thus, an “expandable segment” means a location on the stent that enables it to enlarge in diameter, such as when a balloon is inflated within the stent. Examples include weak points which can rupture, thinned areas that rupture or stretch, accordion-like structures that elongate elastically or plastically, breaks in the stent that are held together with a breakable member such as a suture, weak link, or spot weld, and various other means. The term, “expandable segment” thus encompasses each and every one of these alternatives. For example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/136,318, filed Dec. 20, 2013, and U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2010/0076548 A1 and 2011/0264207 A1 disclose various embodiments of expandable valves, the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.



FIGS. 1A-1E are perspective and cutaway views of an exemplary prosthetic heart valve 20 of the present application oriented around a presumed flow axis 22. The heart valve 20 comprises a plurality of (usually three) flexible leaflets 24 supported partly by an undulating wireform 26 as well as by a structural stent 28 (FIG. 1E). The combination of the wireform 26 and the structural stent 28 define a support frame for the leaflets 24. The wireform 26 may be formed from a suitably elastic metal, such as a Co—Cr—Ni alloy (e.g., Elgiloy® alloy), while the structural stent 28 may be metallic, plastic, or a combination of the two. As seen best in FIG. 1B, the support structure of the wireform 26 and stent 28 define an undulating periphery of alternating commissures 32 and cusps 34 to which the leaflets 24 are secured. As seen in FIG. 1D, outer tabs 30 of adjacent leaflets 24 extend between adjacent wires at the commissures of the wireform 26 and wrap around a portion of the structural stent 28. This construction, covered with cloth and secured with sutures, forms the commissures 32 of the valve that project in an outflow direction along the flow axis 22. Each commissure 32 is located intermediate two arcuate cusps 34 that curve toward the inflow direction. A soft sealing or sewing ring 36 circumscribes an inflow end of the prosthetic heart valve 20 adjacent to and just radially outward from the cusps 34 and may be used to secure the valve to a native annulus, such as with sutures. The wireform 26 and structural stent 28 are visible in the cutaway views, and are normally covered with a polyester fabric as shown to facilitate assembly and to reduce direct blood exposure after implant.



FIG. 1E shows the inner structural stent 28, which in the illustrated embodiment includes an assembly of two concentric annular bands: an outer band 40 surrounding and in contact with an inner band 42. Although the indicators described herein can be utilized in a number of different prosthetic heart valves, the illustrated structural stent 28 is that used in a particular line of heart valves; namely, pericardial heart valves manufactured by Edwards Lifesciences of Irvine, Calif. For example, the Perimount® heart valves that utilize pericardial leaflets 24 features an inner stent 28 much like that shown in FIG. 1E. The annular support bands 40, 42 are relatively thin in a radial dimension as compared to an axial dimension, and have coincident lower edges that undulate axially up and down around the circumference. The outer band 40 exhibits three truncated peaks between three downwardly curved valleys, while the inner band 42 has generally the same shape but also extends upward at commissure posts 44. The downwardly curved valleys defined on both bands 40, 42, as seen in FIG. 1E, are typically termed cusps 46. Many commercial prosthetic heart valves include support frames with annular elements and those of skill in the art would understand that they could be modified to include the indicators of the present application.


In the exemplary Perimount® valves, the outer band 40 is metallic (such as Elgiloy® Co—Cr—Ni alloy) and is formed from an elongated strip of metal curved to the generally circular shape and having free ends that are welded together. In contrast, the inner band 42 is formed of a biocompatible polymer such as polyester (PET) or Delrin® polyacetal that may be molded, and also may be formed as a strip, circularized, and welded or bonded closed (not shown). Both the outer and inner bands 40, 42 typically feature a series of through holes that register with each other so that the assembly can be sewn together. The wireform 26 and the commissure posts 44 of the inner band 42 provide flexibility to the commissures of the valve, which reduces stress on the bioprosthetic material of the leaflets 24. The inflow end or base of the valve 20 surrounded by the sewing ring 36, however, comprises the relatively rigid circular portions of the structural stent 28. The combination of the metallic outer and plastic inner bands 40, 42 presents a relatively dimensionally stable circumferential base to the valve, which is beneficial for typical uses. These same characteristics of the structural stent 28 that provide good stability for the surgical valve resist post-implant expansion of the valve, however. Consequently, the structural stent 28 may be modified to facilitate expansion thereof for use in a valve-in-valve procedure.


The ability of a previously implanted prosthetic heart valve to expand is not always known. Indeed, the procedure is relatively new, and therefore most implanted valves have not been designed for radial expansion. Moreover, expandable valves that are now more frequently implanted may not be easily identified by a surgical team considering a valve-in-valve procedure. Although notes of each patient's surgery are taken at the time of each procedure, poor record-keeping, a lack of communication between doctors and hospitals, patient relocations to different states and even countries, the presence of an emergency, and other factors may make those records unavailable to a subsequent surgical team years later. Indeed, even information as seemingly straightforward as the size of the previously implanted prosthetic heart valve may not be readily available, and imaging from outside the body may not provide a precise determination of the valve size.


Consequently, the present application provides various solutions for easily identifying surgical heart valves in terms of size and type. In a preferred embodiment, at least the size of the heart valve is indicated on a component thereof in a manner that is visible from outside the body, post-implant. As used herein, “visible” includes the senses of “readable,” “visualizable,” “detectable,” and “interpretable.” For instance, FIG. 1E shows a size indicator 50 formed in each of the cusps 46 of the outer band 40. The valve-size indicator 50 may be formed by cutting holes or voids through the radiopaque outer band 40 (a negative or positive image), or by forming a band of non-radiopaque material and adding radiopaque indicators (a positive image). In some examples, all or a part of the indicator is defined by a thinner and/or a thicker region of the outer band, for example, by cutting or machining a design into but not through the outer band. The thickness variations are selected to provide a sufficient change in the radiopacity of the band to permit visualization of the indicator from outside the body. Some alternatives include through openings as well as thickness variations. Various alternative designs and encoding schemes are described below. The size indicator 50 in this example comprises the numeric characters “21” indicating that the valve orifice size is 21 mm. Heart valve sizes have been standardized for many years into millimeter increments starting at 19 mm and going up to 31 or 33 mm for larger patients. The present application describes valve-size indicators that follow this convention, although it should be understood that other sizing conventions may be used and thus the application should not be considered limited to these odd-millimeter-size increments. As for the term, “valve size,” each prosthetic heart valve has a labeled size (e.g., between 19 and 33 mm in 2 mm increments) that denotes the valve size, and is of a particular valve model, such as a mitral valve of a particular type, which the valve packaging reflects.


Components within the prosthetic heart valves can also be coded so that they indicate whether the valve is expandable or not. It should be understood, however, that the valve-size indicators may also be used for non-expandable valves, as well as those that are capable of post-implant expansion. Any subsequent valve surgery benefits from knowledge of the size of the previously-implanted heart valve. Additional information on the previously-implanted valve, such as the manufacturer and/or model of the valve, and the valve's compatibility with other types of valves is also beneficial and can be encoded on the prosthetic heart valve as well.



FIGS. 2-4 illustrate the benefits of providing an indicator such as valve size on the surgical valve. Although different types of indicators are contemplated, for simplicity, only valve-size indicators will be described below. It is to be understood, however, that indicators that provide identifying information of any kind are part of the invention described herein. FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of an assembled surgical valve 60, which could be the exemplary valve 20 shown in FIGS. 1A-1E, but also represents a surgical valve without any indicators. That is, embodiments of the surgical valve 20 of the present application desirably have size indicators on one or more internal components that are visible using imaging but not to the naked eye. Of course, this does not preclude adding a radiopaque valve-size indicator to the exterior of the valve, but certain internal components as described herein are better suited for placement of the indicators. For example, integrating the indicators with structural elements of the valve permits a similar assembly procedure as for a non-indicator valve, as well as maintaining a similar part-count. Incorporating the indicators internally also does not materially affect the hemodynamics of the valve. Indeed, a valve-size indicator on the exterior of the valve that is visible to the naked eye is not precluded either, though such would not necessarily show up under imaging, post-implant.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of an image of a prosthetic heart valve of the prior art as seen using an X-ray or other imager from outside the body in the same orientation as FIG. 2. The X-ray imager identifies those components within the heart valve, typically metallic, that block the X-ray spectrum radiation. In the embodiment shown, which is a surgical heart valve similar to that described above, the X-ray imager reveals an internal wireform 62 and a support band 64. Portions that block the X-ray beam will show up darker than other portions. The prior art valve of FIG. 3 has no size identifiers thereon, and thus a surgeon viewing the image would need to make an educated guess as to the particular valve size. Given that valves are produced with orifice sizes in only two millimeter increments, the task is somewhat difficult.



FIG. 4, on the other hand, is a screen shot of an X-ray image of the prosthetic heart valve 20 of FIGS. 1A-1E. Again the X-ray imager illuminates both the wireform 26 and outer band 40, however the valve-size indicators 50 also appear. That is, the indicators 50 comprise the numeral “21” which have been cut into each of the three cusps 46 of the band 40. Because the indicators 50 are provided at all three cusps, they is conveniently visible from different orientations. A surgeon can thus easily identify the valve size, 21 mm, and proceed accordingly. As will be described below, additional features may be provided on the radiopaque components of the prosthetic heart valve 20 that indicate its expandability and that would show up on an X-ray image as seen in FIG. 4.


The term “imager” for use from outside the body (“external imager”) to detect the indicators includes any device capable of visualizing discrete elements inside the body from the outside, in general any device used in the fields of radiology that can produce such images. These fields include X-ray imaging or fluoroscopy which sees reflected X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, medical ultrasonography or ultrasound, and nuclear medicine functional imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography. The term “imager” also includes devices or systems that include at least one component that is disposed within a patient's body, for example, an ultrasound emitter.


As mentioned, various alternatives of the valve-size indicators are described herein. FIGS. 5A-5D are elevational views of outer support bands for use in the valve of FIGS. 1A-1E with valve-size indicators thereon in various locations. FIG. 5A shows the outer band 40 described above having the valve-size indicators 50 on all three of the cusps 46 thereof. Again, the valve-size indicators 50 comprise the “21” cut through the thickness of the metallic band 40 so that its image will show up in negative on X-ray in contrast with the dark “positive” reflected portions of the rest of the band. It should be noted that while the same indicator, in this case the valve size “21” mm, is shown at all three locations, different indicators can be used as well. Thus, different symbols providing different types of identifying information can be provided in the three different locations along the band. It should be understood that indicators may be located anywhere along the band and not only at the cusps and/or commissures, and that the band may include any number of indicators.


The outer band 40 comprises two overlapping free ends 66 held together by a frictional sleeve 68. This is one possible embodiment permitting expansion of the band 40, and thus the entire valve 20. More detail about this arrangement will be provided below. It should be noted however that the inner band 42 (FIG. 1E) also preferably includes an expansion feature at the same location where the outer band expands. Examples of suitable expansion features for the inner band include structures that expand or are easily ruptured. For example, as shown in FIG. 1E, the inner band 42 features a break point such as a notch 69 located at one cusp of 46 of the band structure. The notch 69 represents a reduced cross-sectional area that can be broken or stretched by applying sufficient outward expansion force from within. For example, a balloon used to expand a secondary prosthetic valve within the surgical valve can provide sufficient outward force to cause the inner band 42 to rupture or stretch at the notch 69. The material of the inner band 42 may be relatively brittle so that excessive tensile forces cause the notch 69 to break, or the material can be more ductile which permits the notch 69 to plastically stretch in the manner of taffy.



FIGS. 5B and 5C illustrate alternative outer bands 70, 72, respectively, which have single size indicators 74, 76 thereon. In the former case, a single size indicator 74 in the form of the numeral “21” is cut into one of the cusps 76 of the band 70. In the latter instance, the single size indicator 77 has been relocated to one of the truncated commissures 78 of the band 72. The valve-size indicators 74, 76 may be placed in either position, though slightly more material is available at the commissures 78. Furthermore, the size indicator 76 in the band 72 is cut entirely through the thickness of the band, and can function simultaneously as a substitute for the holes or openings 80 that are normally provided at the commissures to attach the outer band to an inner band with suture. FIG. 5D illustrates a band 82 similar to that shown in FIG. 5C, but where there are valve-size indicators 84 at each of the truncated commissures 86.



FIG. 6A illustrates a still further example of an outer support band 90 having a symbolic valve-size indicator 92 located at one of the cusps 94. In this case, the valve-size indicator 92 comprises a pair of geometric shapes cut into the band 90 that together indicate the valve size. FIG. 6B illustrates an exemplary key chart for decoding the meaning of the symbolic valve-size indicator 92 that would be provided along with the valve, and made available for use by surgeons seeking to decode the indicator, for example, on a webpage or other readily accessible location. For example, the first column of the key chart matches various geometric shapes with single digits, and corresponds to both the first or left indicator symbol and the digit in the first position of the valve size number. Likewise, the second column corresponds to the second or right indicator symbol and the digit in the second position of the valve size number. In the illustrated embodiment, the left indicator symbol is a circle, and the right indicator symbol is a square. Therefore, the digit in the first position of the valve size number corresponding to the circle is 2, and the digit in the second position of the valve size number corresponding to the square is 1, so that the indicated valve size is “21” or 21 mm. Using relatively large and simple geometric shapes that can be easily distinguished from one another upon imaging may be preferable to numeric characters which sometimes are subject to ambiguity (e.g., distinguishing a “1” from a “7”). Other schemes for encoding information are used in other embodiments, for example, a palindromic scheme that reads the same in either direction. In other schemes, the encoding is selected so that a string of characters read backwards is not mapped to the representation for a different size.


The term “voids” refers to numbers, holes, geometric or other symbols formed or cut into the radiopaque support bands described herein, or other radiopaque internal elements of a valve support frame. By cutting the void into an otherwise solid element, the indicator will show up as a negative image when visualized through an external imager. For example, the numeric characters “21” shown in the band 40 of FIG. 5A or the geometric shapes formed in the band 90 of the FIG. 6A comprise voids in the otherwise solid outer profile of the bands. Positive images may also be generated as well using appropriately shaped cut-outs. Some embodiments use a combination of positive and negative images, for example, to encode different types of information, and/or to unambiguously differentiate a first digit from a second digit.



FIG. 7 shows another outer support band 96 having a plurality of holes 98 formed around its circumference whose number equals the valve size in millimeters. That is, counting the number of holes or openings 98 provides the valve size. In the illustrated embodiment, although not all are shown, there are 23 holes such that the valve sizes 23 mm. The existing holes 99 at the commissures for attaching the bands together are desirably included in the count to avoid confusion. In any scheme, the openings need not be disposed equidistantly around the band. For example, some in some schemes, the positions around the band are assigned hierarchies, each of which is are filled before the next level. For example, in one scheme, the three positions at the commissures are filled first, followed by positions clockwise of the commissures, etc., so that the openings are grouped into three sets that can differ by at most 1 opening. Such a scheme facilitates determination of the precise number of openings.



FIG. 8A illustrates a further variation of outer support band 100 having a symbolic indicator 102 thereon at one of the commissures 104. In this instance, patterns of geometric shapes are cut that incorporate one of the existing suture holes to represent each size. FIG. 8B is a key chart for decoding the meaning of the symbolic valve-size indicator 102. In the illustrated embodiment, the pattern includes a square and two circles, which corresponds to 21 mm.



FIG. 9A is a still further outer support band 110 having a symbolic indicator 112 located at one of the commissures 114. In this embodiment, patterns of dots and dashes (similar to Morse code) again incorporating one of the existing suture holes are used to represent each valve size. FIG. 9B is a key chart for decoding the meaning of the symbolic valve-size indicator 112. The shapes cut into the commissure 114 included a dash and two dots, which corresponds to a size of 21 mm. The use of dashes and dots may be easier to decipher rather than trying to discern the different geometric shapes as in FIG. 8A.


In FIG. 10, an outer support band 120 features a plurality of holes 122 provided on one of the cusps whose number symbolizes a particular valve size. Although not shown, a key chart could be provided to decode the symbol. However, typically heart valves start at 19 mm and go up by 2 mm increments, and thus the convention of using one dot for 19, two for 21, etc., may become well-understood. Therefore, the symbol shown, two holes 122, corresponds to about size of 21 mm, or the second smallest valve size. Likewise, three holes would correspond to a valve size of 23 mm, and so on. As discussed above, the hole or openings need not be adjacent, for example, may be distributed and/or grouped for more rapid identification.



FIGS. 11A and 11B show support bands 130, 140, respectively, each having a single geometric symbol formed in at least one of the cusps that symbolizes a particular valve size. In particular, the band 130 in FIG. 11A features a symbol 132 in the form of a circle which might indicate a valve size of 19 mm, while the band 132 in FIG. 11B features a symbol 134 in the form of the square which might indicate a valve size of 21 mm. Again, a key chart might be provided, or the symbols may become generic in the industry such that surgeons will quickly recognize their meaning.



FIG. 12 illustrates an outer support band 150 having a radiopaque coating 152 thereon in a pattern that symbolizes a particular valve size. In the illustrated embodiment, the coating 152 extends entirely around the band 150 except for two gaps 154 that separate a single strip 156 from the rest of the coating. The number of gaps 154 indicates the valve size, in a similar manner to the number of holes 122 provided in the band 120 of FIG. 10. That is, the two gaps 154 in the illustrated embodiment correspond to a valve size of 21 mm, while a single gap would correspond to a smaller valve size of 19 mm and three gaps to 23 mm. In this embodiment, the material of the band 150 would not be intrinsically radiopaque, as opposed to the other bands described which are preferably metallic. For example, the band 150 might be formed of a relatively rigid polymer to provide the strength needed, but which does not show up on X-ray.



FIGS. 13A-13C are perspective views of further prosthetic heart valve support bands capable of post-implant expansion with indicators thereon for both size and expansion capability. FIG. 13A shows a support band 160 having numerical valve-size indicators 162 at each cusp 164, and one or more symbols 166 visible using external imaging and indicating the capability for expansion at each commissure 168. In the illustrated embodiment the symbols 166 comprise a series of three holes that incorporate the existing suture hole that joins the inner and the outer bands together. This scheme permits a surgeon contemplating a replacement operation to quickly confirm that a valve-in-valve procedure is a possibility, and also confirm the existing implanted valve size.



FIG. 13B shows an outer band 170 having small depressions or concavities 172 formed at the peaks of the truncated commissures, which is distinct from the regular convex peaks such as those seen at the commissures of the bands described elsewhere herein. The concavities 172 indicate the capacity for valve expansion, post-implant. This alteration takes advantage of the relatively large surface area of the outer band 170 in the commissure areas without affecting valve function.


Finally, in FIG. 13C, a support band 180 again has the size indicators around its circumference so as to be readily identifiable in the body, post-implant, by external imaging. In contrast to the band 160, the support band 180 features an arcuate upwardly convex slot 182 at each commissure. Again, this indicator 182 may be easily visualized using external imaging, and clearly indicates to a surgeon that this particular valve is expandable and suitable for a valve-in-valve procedure.



FIG. 13D shows in detail the interaction between two overlapping free ends 190, 192 located at one cusp of any of the bands described herein that slide with respect to one another and permit expansion of the corresponding heart valve. The free ends 190, 192 are substantially rectangular in shape and one resides radially within and against the other. A sleeve 194 surrounds the free ends 190, 192 and holds them radially together. The sleeve 194 desirably comprises polyester (e.g., PET) shrink wrap tubing, or may be an elastic material, such as silicone rubber, and is shown transparent to illustrate the mating free ends 190, 192. The two free ends 190, 192 may slide apart a predetermined distance while still being overlapping. The flexible sleeve 194 provides a minimum amount of friction but generally serves to maintain alignment of the free ends 190, 192. Each of the free ends 190, 192 further includes a circumferentially-oriented slot 196 that stops short of the terminal ends and provides a pathway for fluid flow. The slots 196 extend farther outward from the sleeve 194 so that fluid can always enter the spaces within the sleeve. During storage, the slots 196 permit flow of a fluid between the overlapping free ends 190, 192 to allow for sterilization. With regard to break strength, the sleeve configuration in FIG. 13A-13B may require an average breaking pressure of about 1.2 atm, and within a range of from about 0.5 atm to about 2.0 atm. Further, the sleeve 194 may be biodegradable to maintain alignment of the two free ends 190, 192 for a period after implant and to then degrade to permit easy expansion of the band.


It should be noted here that the valve-type indicator, described herein as identifying an expandable valve, can also be used to provide further valve type information. For instance, the indicator may show what type of bioprosthetic tissue or other material is used in the valve, the valve manufacturer and/or model, the valve's compatibility with other valves, etc. Consequently, the term “valve type” refers to any valve-specific information, not just whether the valve is capable of expansion.



FIG. 14A is a perspective view of an inner core member 200 of an exemplary sewing ring for use in a heart valve as described herein with strips of radiopaque material 202 shown exploded above that can be incorporated into the sewing ring to indicate valve size. In the illustrated embodiment, the strips of radiopaque material 202 are provided in a single elongated strip 204, and two relatively short strips 206. By assembling these strips 204, 206 against the core member 200, which is typically covered with a biocompatible fabric prior to assembly with the rest of the heart valve, they can be visualized using external imaging to indicate the valve size. For example, FIG. 14B is a schematic top view as seen using an X-ray or other imager from outside the body of the valve having the radiopaque strips 204, 206 as indicated in FIG. 14A. The strips 204, 206 show up dark surrounding the similarly dark metallic components of the valve (annular), and can be interpreted to determine the valve size. For instance, the two short strips 206 create three gaps 208 around the sewing ring which might represent a valve size of 23 mm (one gap equals 19 mm, two gaps equal 21 mm, etc.). Alternatively, radiopaque beads can be used as indicators. This embodiment represents numerous other ways in which the valve size can be coded into the valve using any of the internal valve components, whether intrinsically radiopaque or not. Some embodiments use a combination of radiopaque strips or beads in the sewing ring and cutouts in the band, which permits encoding additional information and/or redundant encoding of more important information.



FIGS. 15A-15C illustrate a further surgical prosthetic heart valve 220 of the present application having an expandable lower frame 222 with valve-type indicators 224 disposed thereon. The heart valve 220 includes an upper valve portion 226 connected to the lower frame 222. The valve-type indicators 224 may be on the upper valve portion 226 or lower frame 222, or both. In a preferred embodiment, the heart valve 220 and the frame 222 are capable of expansion to enable a valve-in-valve procedure as described elsewhere herein. The lower frame 222 is designed to expand during the original implant of the valve 220, while both the valve portion 226 and the frame 222 expand during a subsequent valve-in-valve procedure. That is, the upper valve portion 226 is not intended to expand and functions much like a typical non-collapsible/non-expandable surgical valve during original implant and functioning, but include features that permit a limited amount of expansion when subjected to large radial, outward forces from within, such as from expanding a balloon. The lower frame 222 may be made of a plastically-expandable material such as stainless steel or cobalt-chromium alloy, or a self-expandable material such as nitinol.


The upper valve portion 226 desirably includes a peripheral internal support frame, partially shown in the cutaway of FIG. 15B, which defines three upstanding commissure posts 230 alternating with three arcuate cusps 232. The commissure posts 230 project in an outflow direction and support outer edges of three flexible leaflets 234, shown in FIG. 15B but removed in FIG. 15A for clarity. The leaflets 234 are desirably separate bioprosthetic leaflets; for instance being cut from sheets of treated bovine pericardium, and each features an arcuate cusp edge that attaches along one of the arcuate cusps of the support frame, and two commissure edges or tabs that attach up adjacent commissure posts 230. A free edge 236 of each leaflet is suspended between the adjacent commissure posts 230 and comes into contact, or coapts, with the free edges of the other leaflets in the flow orifice defined within the peripheral support frame to form the one-way flow valve.


In a preferred embodiment, the support frame is defined partly by an undulating wireform 240 that defines the commissure posts 230 and extends around a generally tubular area and a structural stent 242 that may comprise annular bands; the parts similar to those shown at 62 and 64 in FIG. 3. The wireform 240 may be formed from a suitably elastic metal, such as a Co—Cr—Ni alloy, for example, Elgiloy® alloy, while the structural stent 242 may be metallic, plastic, or a combination of the two. As seen in FIG. 15B, outer tabs 244 of adjacent leaflets 234 extend underneath the wireform 240 and wrap around a portion of the structural stent 242 at the commissure posts 230. A soft sealing or sewing ring 246 circumscribes an inflow end of the prosthetic heart valve 130 and is typically used to secure the valve to a native annulus such as with sutures. The wireform 240 and structural stent 242 of the support frame are partially visible in the cutaway of FIG. 15B, and are normally covered with a polyester fabric 248 to facilitate assembly and to reduce direct blood exposure after implant.


The prosthetic heart valve 220 is considered a “hybrid” type in that it includes the upper valve portion 226 constructed similar to typical surgical valves, with a relatively stable diameter that is not normally intended to be compressed or expanded, while the connected lower frame 222 is expandable to help in anchoring the valve in place. One specific commercial prosthetic heart valve that is constructed in this manner is one which is sold in conjunction with the Edwards Intuity® valve system from Edwards Lifesciences of Irvine, Calif. The Edwards Intuity® valve system comprises a “hybrid” valve incorporating a surgical Perimount®-like valve with a stainless steel lower frame structure. In contrast to a typical Edwards Intuity® valve, however, the valve portion 226 is modified in any of the manners described herein to permit post-implant expansion for use in a valve-in-valve procedure. Further, the heart valve 220 includes a size indicator to facilitate such a procedure.


With specific reference to FIG. 16, which illustrates the lower frame 222 in perspective, the lower frame 222 includes a plurality of circumferential row struts connected by a series of spaced axial column struts. Specifically, an upper or outflow row strut 250 extends continuously around a periphery of the frame 222, and preferably follows a gently undulating path so as to match a similar shape of the underside of the upper valve portion 226. As seen in FIG. 15C, three peaks 251 along the upper row strut 250 correspond to the locations of the commissures 230 of the valve 220, where the stent 242 rises upward as well. In general, the lower frame 222 attaches to an inflow end of the upper valve portion 226, and preferably directly to the internal support frame or to fabric covering the internal support frame. The lower frame 222 is generally tubular in the drawings, and on deployment, expands to be somewhat frustoconical with the free end farthest from the upper valve portion 226 expanding outward but the end closest remaining about the same diameter. Optionally, the lower frame is pre-crimped into a generally conical shape with the free end having a smaller diameter than the upper row strut 250, which is not substantially radially compressed.


The upper row strut 250 includes a plurality of eyeholes 252, evenly spaced apart in the illustrated embodiment, and located just below the top edge thereof that are useful for securing the frame 222 to the fabric of the underside of the valve portion 226, for example, using suture. A series of axial column struts 254 depend downward from the upper row strut 250, and specifically from each of the eyeholes 252, and connect the upper row strut to two lower row struts 256. The lower row struts 256 circumscribe the frame 222 in zig-zag patterns, with an inverted “V” shape between each two adjacent column struts 254. The lower row struts 256 preferably extend horizontally, and the length of the column struts 254 thus varies with the undulating upper row strut 250.


As mentioned above, the lower frame 222 may be plastically expanded, such as by balloon expansion, and may be formed of stainless steel or cobalt-chromium alloy, for example. In a typical Edwards Intuity® valve, the upper row strut 250 is generally ring-like without capacity for expansion. In the illustrated frame 222, on the other hand, a series of spaced notches 260 are provided that permit expansion. That is, circumferential segments of the strut 250 are interrupted by the V-shaped notches 260 which permits a limited amount of expansion, for example, about 3 mm in diameter, to accommodate a supplemental expandable valve to be inserted and expanded therein.


In addition, a number of valve-type indicators 224 are integrated into the frame 222 at locations around its circumference, such as three valve-size indicators. In the illustrated embodiment, the valve-size indicators 224 comprise small plate-like tags inscribed with the numerical valve size in mm, for example 21 mm in the illustrated embodiment. The use of any combination of alphanumeric characters and/or symbols that signify size and/or other features of the valve is contemplated. The frame 222 may be laser cut from a tubular blank, with the plate-like size indicators 224 left connected to one more of the struts. As shown, the size indicators 224 are located just below the peaks 251 of the undulating upper row strut 250, connected between the corresponding eyehole 252 and the descending column strut 254. There are thus three size indicators 224 spaced about 120° apart around the frame 222. The illustrated location beneath the peak 251 provides additional space between the upper row strut 250 and the adjacent lower row strut 256. Further, the frame 222 typically has more real estate in which to place the size indicators 224 than the bands of the valve portion 226. The inscribed or cutout valve size numerals are sufficiently large to be visualized with X-ray, Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE), or other imaging technique. In one embodiment, the valve size numerals are from about 1.5 mm to about 2 mm in height, for example, about 1.75 mm.


It should be understood that instead of the numerical valve-size indicators cut into the tags, any of the above-referenced size indicators may also be used in the same place. It is especially useful where the indicators are integrated into existing structures rather than being separate add-ons that require a separate attachment step. This not only reduces assembly time and cost, but also ensures the indicators are located at the ideal location for visualization, without requiring an alignment procedure. For instance, the various indicators disclosed herein are laser cut or stamped into the respective metallic parts, or distinguished by providing reflective coatings and the like on the parts.


Note that there are many variations of the above-described embodiments, including numerous combinations of the various embodiments, all of which are in the scope of the invention. For instance, the various numeric and symbolic indicators of valve size or valve type could be provided as radiopaque additions to the sewing ring, or in general mixed and matched as deemed necessary. Also, a particular support structure could have any combination of the above-discussed expandable portions.


As previously described, the at least one size indicator can be made of any suitable material, e.g., radiopaque or radiopaque impregnated material. The radiopaque material selected for this purpose may be biocompatible. Such materials include stainless steel, tungsten, tantalum, platinum, gold, barium silicate, as well as alloys such as cobalt-chromium (e.g., Elgiloy® alloy) or high-performance nickel alloys (e.g., Hastelloy® alloys).


Various processes exist for forming the radiopaque markers from such materials. In some embodiments, an etching process can be used to create the articles of the markers. This process may be a photo etching process whereby a photo-resistive coating is applied as a mask to a light-sensitive polymer plate. Light is projected onto the plate and the plates are then washed to remove the photo-resistive material that was used as the mask. An additional washing step may then be used to chemically remove the portion of the metal that was exposed to the light. In other embodiments, the photo-resistive coating and the exposed metal can be removed in one washing step. Other similar etching processes may be used as are known to those skilled in the art.


Another mechanism for creating the radiopaque articles for use in the described markers involves punching the articles from a sheet of radiopaque material. For instance, a ribbon of material may be fed into a die set having male and female portions that stamp out the characters. With a punching process, any rough edges and/or burrs generated thereby may need to be removed, polished, or cleaned.


Yet another technique for producing the radiopaque articles involves using a laser cutting technique, as mentioned. Laser cutting can produce very tight tolerances and smooth edges, aiding readability of small radiopaque markers. Some materials, however, may be expensive or difficult to process using this technique. In particular, this technique may be expensive at higher volume production levels.


Still another option for creating the radiopaque articles involves a sintering process. According to this technique, powdered radiopaque material mixed with glue is pressed into a form and baked until all of the glue has been dissipated and the radiopaque particles bind together. This type of process creates a porous structure which may more readily adhere to the molecules of a polymer used during a subsequent molding process, with the degree to which the polymer is received by the pores being dependent upon molecular size of the polymer.


Metal injection molding can also be used to create the radiopaque articles. In this scenario, a radiopaque powder or slurry is injected under pressure into a mold. The powder or slurry is then baked until the radiopaque particles bind one to another. As with sintering, this may produce a relatively more porous radiopaque article.


A prosthetic valve may lose effectiveness or fail for any number of reasons, for example, stenosis, pannus growth, regurgitation, and/or mechanical failure. Under such circumstances, replacement may be desirable. One option is to remove the failing prosthetic valve, for example, surgically, and to implant a new prosthetic valve in its place, Another option is to perform what-is-known as a valve-in-valve procedure in which a new valve is implanted into the failing valve without removal thereof. Where the new valve is a transcatheter valve, the procedure may be performed using minimally invasive procedures that are less traumatic to the patient. Although the failing valve is not actually removed, the procedure is often referred to as a “replacement” because the new prosthetic valve replaces the function of the failing valve.


An embodiment of a method for replacing a first prosthetic valve in need thereof with a second prosthetic valve includes reading a valve-type indicator of the first prosthetic valve, selecting a second prosthetic valve based on the information read, and deploying the second prosthetic valve in the first prosthetic valve. The first prosthetic valve includes any prosthetic valve including a valve-type indicator, including any of the embodiments described herein. The valve-type indicator can be of any type or combination of types described herein, for example, size, expandability, make, model, or any other information desired. The valve-type indicator is read, imaged, or visualized as described above.


Optionally, a diameter of the first prosthetic valve is expanded, for example, either immediately before, contemporaneously with, or simultaneously with the deployment with the second prosthetic valve. In some examples, the first prosthetic valve is expanded mechanically, for example, using a balloon, before the second prosthetic valve is deployed. In other examples, the deployment of second prosthetic valve itself expands the diameter of the first prosthetic valve. In some embodiments, the second prosthetic valve is a transcatheter heart valve, for example, a balloon expandable or self-expandable transcatheter heart valve. Optionally, the second valve is expanded post-deployment to improve engagement between the first valve and the second valve.


While the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it will be understood that various changes and additional variations may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention or the inventive concept thereof. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or device to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed herein, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of deploying a second prosthetic heart valve within a first prosthetic heart valve previously implanted in a patient's body, comprising: using an external imager, viewing a valve-type indicator of a first prosthetic heart valve implanted in the patient, the valve-type indicator signifying the capability of the first prosthetic heart valve for post-implant expansion;deploying a second prosthetic heart valve within the first prosthetic heart valve; andexpanding the second prosthetic heart valve within the first prosthetic heart valve to cause a diameter of the first prosthetic heart valve to expand.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the valve-type indicator further indicates one of the group selected from: valve size, valve make, or valve model.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve has a labeled valve size, and the valve-type indicator further indicates the labeled valve size.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the valve-type indicator comprises a numerical value that equals the labeled valve size in millimeters.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the external imager is selected from one of the group consisting of: X-ray imaging, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, medical ultrasonography or ultrasound, and positron emission tomography.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve has an internal support frame defining a flow orifice therethrough, wherein the internal support frame is adapted for post-implant expansion, and the first prosthetic heart valve has a plurality of flexible leaflets attached to the support frame and extending across the flow orifice and coming together within the orifice to define one-way flow therethrough.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the internal support frame comprises a structural component that shows up as a positive image on the external imager, and the valve-type indicator is formed by one or more voids integrated into the structural component which show up as negative images on the external imager.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the structural component of the internal support frame comprises a generally tubular band with a diameter that is expandable post-implant.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve further includes an expandable tubular frame attached to an inflow end of the internal support frame on which the valve-type indicator is located.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve has a soft sealing ring surrounding an inflow end, and the valve-type indicator is mounted to the sealing ring.
  • 11. A method of deploying a second prosthetic heart valve within a first prosthetic heart valve previously implanted in a patient's body, comprising: using an external imager, viewing a valve-type indicator of a first prosthetic heart valve implanted in the patient, the first prosthetic heart valve having a first functional diameter as implanted, the valve-type indicator signifying the capability of the first prosthetic heart valve for post-implant expansion;mechanically expanding the first prosthetic heart valve to a larger second non-functional diameter; anddeploying a second prosthetic heart valve within the first prosthetic heart valve.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the valve-type indicator further indicates one of the group selected from: valve size, valve make, or valve model.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve has a labeled valve size, and the valve-type indicator further indicates the labeled valve size.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the valve-type indicator comprises a numerical value that equals the labeled valve size in millimeters.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the external imager is selected from one of the group consisting of: X-ray imaging, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, medical ultrasonography or ultrasound, and positron emission tomography.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve has an internal support frame defining a flow orifice therethrough, wherein the internal support frame is adapted for post-implant expansion, and the first prosthetic heart valve has a plurality of flexible leaflets attached to the support frame and extending across the flow orifice and coming together within the orifice to define one-way flow therethrough.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the internal support frame comprises a structural component that shows up as a positive image on the external imager, and the valve-type indicator is formed by one or more voids integrated into the structural component which show up as negative images on the external imager.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the structural component of the internal support frame comprises a generally tubular band with a diameter that is expandable post-implant.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve further includes an expandable tubular frame attached to an inflow end of the internal support frame on which the valve-type indicator is located.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, wherein the first prosthetic heart valve has a soft sealing ring surrounding an inflow end, and the valve-type indicator is mounted to the sealing ring.
  • 21. The method of claim 11, wherein the second prosthetic heart valve is expanded post-deployment to improve engagement between the first prosthetic heart valve and the second prosthetic heart valve.
  • 22. The method of claim 11, wherein the deployment of the second prosthetic heart valve itself expands the diameter of the first prosthetic heart valve.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/579,402, filed Sep. 29, 2016, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/745,287, filed Jun. 19, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,504,566, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/015,290, filed Jun. 20, 2014, the entire contents all of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (366)
Number Name Date Kind
3143742 Cromie Aug 1964 A
3320972 High et al. May 1967 A
3371352 Siposs et al. Mar 1968 A
3546710 Shumakov et al. Dec 1970 A
3574865 Hamaker Apr 1971 A
3755823 Hancock Sep 1973 A
3839741 Haller Oct 1974 A
3997923 Possis Dec 1976 A
4035849 Angell et al. Jul 1977 A
4078468 Civitello Mar 1978 A
4079468 Liotta et al. Mar 1978 A
4084268 Ionescu et al. Apr 1978 A
4106129 Carpentier et al. Aug 1978 A
4172295 Batten Oct 1979 A
4217665 Bex et al. Aug 1980 A
4218782 Rygg Aug 1980 A
4259753 Liotta et al. Apr 1981 A
RE30912 Hancock Apr 1982 E
4340091 Skelton et al. Jul 1982 A
4343048 Ross et al. Aug 1982 A
4364126 Rosen et al. Dec 1982 A
4388735 Ionescu et al. Jun 1983 A
4441216 Ionescu et al. Apr 1984 A
4451936 Carpentier et al. Jun 1984 A
4470157 Love Sep 1984 A
4490859 Black et al. Jan 1985 A
4501030 Lane Feb 1985 A
4506394 Bedard Mar 1985 A
4535483 Klawitter et al. Aug 1985 A
4566465 Arhan et al. Jan 1986 A
4605407 Black et al. Aug 1986 A
4626255 Reichad et al. Dec 1986 A
4629459 Ionescu et al. Dec 1986 A
4680031 Alonso Jul 1987 A
4687483 Fisher et al. Aug 1987 A
4705516 Barone et al. Nov 1987 A
4725274 Lane et al. Feb 1988 A
4731074 Rousseau et al. Mar 1988 A
4778461 Pietsch et al. Oct 1988 A
4790843 Carpentier et al. Dec 1988 A
4851000 Gupta Jul 1989 A
4863470 Carter Sep 1989 A
4888009 Lederman et al. Dec 1989 A
4914097 Oda et al. Apr 1990 A
4960424 Grooters Oct 1990 A
4993428 Arms Feb 1991 A
5010892 Colvin et al. Apr 1991 A
5032128 Alonso Jul 1991 A
5037434 Lane Aug 1991 A
5147391 Lane Sep 1992 A
5163955 Love et al. Nov 1992 A
5258023 Reger Nov 1993 A
5316016 Adams et al. May 1994 A
5326370 Love et al. Jul 1994 A
5326371 Love et al. Jul 1994 A
5332402 Teitelbaum Jul 1994 A
5360014 Sauter et al. Nov 1994 A
5360444 Kusuhara Nov 1994 A
5376112 Duran Dec 1994 A
5396887 Imran Mar 1995 A
5397351 Pavcnik et al. Mar 1995 A
5423887 Love et al. Jun 1995 A
5425741 Lemp et al. Jun 1995 A
5431676 Dubrul et al. Jul 1995 A
5449384 Johnson Sep 1995 A
5449385 Religa et al. Sep 1995 A
5469868 Reger Nov 1995 A
5488789 Religa et al. Feb 1996 A
5489296 Love et al. Feb 1996 A
5489297 Duran Feb 1996 A
5489298 Love et al. Feb 1996 A
5500016 Fisher Mar 1996 A
5533515 Coller et al. Jul 1996 A
5549665 Vesely et al. Aug 1996 A
5562729 Purdy et al. Oct 1996 A
5571215 Sterman et al. Nov 1996 A
5573007 Bobo, Sr. Nov 1996 A
5578076 Krueger et al. Nov 1996 A
5584803 Stevens et al. Dec 1996 A
5618307 Donlon et al. Apr 1997 A
5626607 Malecki et al. May 1997 A
5628789 Vanney et al. May 1997 A
5693090 Unsworth et al. Dec 1997 A
5695503 Krueger et al. Dec 1997 A
5713952 Vanney et al. Feb 1998 A
5716370 Williamson, IV et al. Feb 1998 A
5728064 Burns et al. Mar 1998 A
5728151 Garrison et al. Mar 1998 A
5735894 Krueger et al. Apr 1998 A
5752522 Murphy May 1998 A
5755782 Love et al. May 1998 A
5766240 Johnson Jun 1998 A
5800527 Jansen et al. Sep 1998 A
5814097 Sterman et al. Sep 1998 A
5814098 Hinnenkamp et al. Sep 1998 A
5824064 Taheri Oct 1998 A
5824068 Bugge Oct 1998 A
5840081 Andersen et al. Nov 1998 A
5848969 Panescu et al. Dec 1998 A
5855563 Kaplan et al. Jan 1999 A
5855601 Bessler et al. Jan 1999 A
5855801 Lin et al. Jan 1999 A
5861028 Angell Jan 1999 A
5891160 Williamson, IV et al. Apr 1999 A
5895420 Mirsch, II et al. Apr 1999 A
5902308 Murphy May 1999 A
5908450 Gross et al. Jun 1999 A
5919147 Jain Jul 1999 A
5921934 Teo Jul 1999 A
5921935 Hickey Jul 1999 A
5924984 Rao Jul 1999 A
5935163 Gabbay Aug 1999 A
5957949 Leonhardt et al. Sep 1999 A
5972004 Williamson, IV et al. Oct 1999 A
5984959 Robertson et al. Nov 1999 A
5984973 Girard et al. Nov 1999 A
6010531 Donlon et al. Jan 2000 A
6042554 Rosenman et al. Mar 2000 A
6042607 Williamson, IV et al. Mar 2000 A
6048362 Berg Apr 2000 A
6066160 Colvin et al. May 2000 A
6074418 Buchanan et al. Jun 2000 A
6081737 Shah Jun 2000 A
6099475 Seward et al. Aug 2000 A
6106550 Magovern et al. Aug 2000 A
6110200 Hinnenkamp Aug 2000 A
6117091 Young et al. Sep 2000 A
6126007 Kari et al. Oct 2000 A
6162233 Williamson, IV et al. Dec 2000 A
6168614 Andersen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176877 Buchanan et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197054 Hamblin, Jr. et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217611 Klostermeyer Apr 2001 B1
6231561 Frazier et al. May 2001 B1
6241765 Griffin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245102 Jayaraman Jun 2001 B1
6264611 Ishikawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283127 Sterman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287339 Vazquez et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290674 Roue et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312447 Grimes Nov 2001 B1
6312465 Griffin et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328727 Frazier et al. Dec 2001 B1
6350282 Eberhardt Feb 2002 B1
6371983 Lane Apr 2002 B1
6375620 Oser et al. Apr 2002 B1
6402780 Williamson, IV et al. Jun 2002 B2
6425916 Garrison et al. Jul 2002 B1
6440164 Di Matteo et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454799 Schreck Sep 2002 B1
6458153 Bailey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468305 Otte Oct 2002 B1
6491624 Lotfi Dec 2002 B1
6582462 Andersen et al. Jun 2003 B1
6582464 Gabbay Jun 2003 B2
6585766 Huynh et al. Jul 2003 B1
6613087 Healy et al. Sep 2003 B1
6652578 Bailey et al. Nov 2003 B2
6682559 Myers et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685739 DiMatteo et al. Feb 2004 B2
6730118 Spenser et al. May 2004 B2
6733525 Yang et al. May 2004 B2
6764508 Roehe et al. Jul 2004 B1
6767362 Schreck Jul 2004 B2
6773457 Ivancev et al. Aug 2004 B2
6786925 Schoon et al. Sep 2004 B1
6790229 Berreklouw Sep 2004 B1
6790230 Beyersdorf et al. Sep 2004 B2
6805711 Quijano et al. Oct 2004 B2
6893459 Macoviak May 2005 B1
6893460 Spenser et al. May 2005 B2
6908481 Cribier Jun 2005 B2
6939365 Fogarty et al. Sep 2005 B1
7011681 Vesely Mar 2006 B2
7025780 Gabbay Apr 2006 B2
7070616 Majercak et al. Jul 2006 B2
7097659 Woolfson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101396 Artof et al. Sep 2006 B2
7137184 Schreck Nov 2006 B2
7147663 Berg et al. Dec 2006 B1
7153324 Case et al. Dec 2006 B2
7195641 Palmaz et al. Mar 2007 B2
7201771 Lane Apr 2007 B2
7201772 Schwammenthal et al. Apr 2007 B2
7238200 Lee et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247167 Gabbay Jul 2007 B2
7252682 Seguin Aug 2007 B2
7261732 Justino Aug 2007 B2
7333013 Berger Feb 2008 B2
RE40377 Williamson, IV et al. Jun 2008 E
7422603 Lane Sep 2008 B2
7474223 Nycz et al. Jan 2009 B2
7513909 Lane et al. Apr 2009 B2
7556647 Drews et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569072 Berg et al. Aug 2009 B2
7998151 St. Goar et al. Aug 2011 B2
8075536 Gray et al. Dec 2011 B2
8784481 Alkhatib et al. Jul 2014 B2
8845720 Conklin Sep 2014 B2
8998981 Tuval et al. Apr 2015 B2
9089422 Ryan et al. Jul 2015 B2
20010039435 Roue et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039436 Frazier et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041914 Frazier et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041915 Roue et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049492 Frazier et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020020074 Love et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026238 Lane et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032481 Gabbay Mar 2002 A1
20020058995 Stevens May 2002 A1
20020123802 Snyders Sep 2002 A1
20020138138 Yang Sep 2002 A1
20020151970 Garrison et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020188348 DiMatteo et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198594 Schreck Dec 2002 A1
20030014104 Cribier Jan 2003 A1
20030023300 Bailey et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023303 Palmaz et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030036795 Andersen et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040792 Gabbay Feb 2003 A1
20030055495 Pease et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055496 Cal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030105519 Fasol et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030109924 Cribier Jun 2003 A1
20030114913 Spenser et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130729 Paniagua et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149478 Figulla et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167089 Lane Sep 2003 A1
20030236568 Hojeibane et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040019374 Hojeibane et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040034411 Quijano et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044406 Woolfson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040106976 Bailey et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122514 Fogarty et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122516 Fogarty et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040167573 Williamson et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167619 Case et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040186563 Lobbi Sep 2004 A1
20040186565 Schreck Sep 2004 A1
20040193261 Berreklouw Sep 2004 A1
20040206363 McCarthy et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210304 Seguin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210307 Khairkhahan Oct 2004 A1
20040225355 Stevens Nov 2004 A1
20040236411 Sarac et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040260389 Case et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260390 Sarac et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010285 Lambrecht et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027348 Case et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033398 Seguin Feb 2005 A1
20050043760 Fogarty et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043790 Seguin Feb 2005 A1
20050060029 Le et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065594 DiMatteo et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065614 Stinson Mar 2005 A1
20050075584 Cali Apr 2005 A1
20050075713 Biancucci et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050075717 Nguyen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050075718 Nguyen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050075719 Bergheim Apr 2005 A1
20050075720 Nguyen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050075724 Svanidze et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080454 Drews et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050096738 Cali et al. May 2005 A1
20050137682 Justino Jun 2005 A1
20050137686 Salahieh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137687 Salahieh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137688 Salahieh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137690 Salahieh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137692 Haug et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137695 Salahieh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050159811 Lane Jul 2005 A1
20050165479 Drews et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050182486 Gabbay Aug 2005 A1
20050192665 Spenser et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203616 Cribier Sep 2005 A1
20050203617 Forster et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203618 Sharkawy et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216079 MaCoviak Sep 2005 A1
20050222674 Paine Oct 2005 A1
20050234546 Nugent et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240263 Fogarty et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251252 Stobie Nov 2005 A1
20050261765 Liddicoat Nov 2005 A1
20050283231 Haug et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060008497 Gabbay Jan 2006 A1
20060025857 Bergheim et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052867 Revuelta et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058871 Zakay et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058872 Salahieh et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074484 Huber Apr 2006 A1
20060085060 Campbell Apr 2006 A1
20060095125 Chinn et al. May 2006 A1
20060122634 Ino et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149360 Schwammenthal et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060154230 Cunanan et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167543 Bailey et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060195184 Lane et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195185 Lane et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195186 Drews et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060207031 Cunanan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060259136 Nguyen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271172 Tehrani Nov 2006 A1
20060271175 Woolfson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276813 Greenberg Dec 2006 A1
20060287717 Rowe et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287719 Rowe et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010876 Salahieh et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016285 Lane et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016286 Herrmann et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016288 Gurskis et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070043435 Seguin et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070078509 Lotfy Apr 2007 A1
20070078510 Ryan Apr 2007 A1
20070100440 Figulla et al. May 2007 A1
20070129794 Realyvasquez Jun 2007 A1
20070142906 Figulla et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142907 Moaddeb et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150053 Gurskis et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156233 Kapadia et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162103 Case et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162107 Haug et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162111 Fukamachi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179604 Lane Aug 2007 A1
20070185565 Schwammenthal et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198097 Zegdi Aug 2007 A1
20070203575 Forster et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203576 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070213813 Von Segesser et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225801 Drews et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233237 Krivoruchko Oct 2007 A1
20070238979 Huynh et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239266 Birdsall Oct 2007 A1
20070239269 Dolan et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239273 Allen Oct 2007 A1
20070255398 Yang et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260305 Drews et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265701 Gurskis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270944 Bergheim et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282436 Pinchuk Dec 2007 A1
20070288089 Gurskis et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080033543 Gurskis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039934 Styrc Feb 2008 A1
20080071369 Tuval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080119875 Ino et al. May 2008 A1
20080154356 Obermiller et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080228263 Ryan Sep 2008 A1
20080319543 Lane Dec 2008 A1
20090036903 Ino et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090138079 Tuval et al. May 2009 A1
20090156928 Evans et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090192591 Ryan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192599 Lane et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090264989 Bonhoeffer et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100049313 Alon et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100168839 Braido et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185277 Braido et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100249923 Alkhatib et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100298931 Quadri et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110034802 Shrivastava et al. Feb 2011 A1
20120065503 Rogers et al. Mar 2012 A1
20140163673 Bruchman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140343670 Bakis et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150018944 O'Connell et al. Jan 2015 A1
20160296324 Bapat et al. Oct 2016 A1
20180021554 Nebosky et al. Jan 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
0125393 Nov 1984 EP
0143246 Jun 1985 EP
1239795 Dec 2006 EP
H1189940 Apr 1999 JP
1116573 Jul 1985 SU
1697790 Dec 1991 SU
9213502 Aug 1992 WO
9742871 Nov 1997 WO
2009106545 Sep 2009 WO
2010019781 Feb 2010 WO
2012018779 Feb 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
International Search Report from corresponding PCT case No. PCT/US2015/036806 dated Oct. 1, 2015.
Japanese Office Action for Appl No. 2016-533519 dated Dec. 19, 2016.
Bapat, et al., “Fluoroscopic Guide to an Ideal Implant Position for Sapien XT and CoreValve During a Valve-in-Valve Procedure”, Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 11, 2013, Published by Elsevier Inc., London, United Kindgom, 9 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190167422 A1 Jun 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62015290 Jun 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 29579402 Sep 2016 US
Child 16270849 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14745287 Jun 2015 US
Child 29579402 US