Tantalum is a highly corrosion resistant, bio-friendly metal. As a result it finds wide use in reactors, heat exchangers, piping and the like in the chemical and pharmaceutical processing industries. Because tantalum is very expensive often the structural components used in this equipment are made up of a steel or stainless steel section for strength purposes that is clad with a thin sheet of tantalum to prevent interaction with the process fluid. In order for the tantalum sheet to provide corrosion protection for a whole vessel many such sheets must be joined together into a single impermeable piece. Many techniques have been used but all of them are costly, have severe deficiencies, and cause the cost of the basic tantalum clad steel section to be higher than necessary. This invention provides a low cost, chemical resistant, material and manpower efficient means of joining the tantalum sheets together.
Cold spray or kinetic spray (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,302,414, 6,502,767 and 6,759,085) is an emerging industrial technology that is being employed to solve many industrial manufacturing challenges (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,924,974, 6,444,259, 6,491,208 and 6,905,728). Cold spray employs a high velocity gas jet to rapidly accelerate powder particles to high velocity such that when they impact a surface the particles bond to the surface to form an integral, well bonded and dense coating. The cold spraying of tantalum powders onto a variety of substrates (including steel) has been suggested (see, e.g., “Analysis of Tantalum Coatings Produced by the Kinetic Spray Process,” Van Steenkiste et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 13, number 2, June 2004, pages 265-273; “Cold spraying—innovative layers for new applications,” Marx et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 15, number 2, June 2006, pages 177-183; and “The Cold Spray Process and Its Potential for Industrial Applications,” Gärtner et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 15, number 2, June 2006, pages 223-232). This is all accomplished without having to heat the tantalum powder to a temperature near or above its melting point as is done with traditional thermal spray processes. The fact that dense coatings can be formed at low temperatures present many advantages. Such advantages include reduced oxidation, high density deposits, solid state compaction, the lack of thermally induced stresses and particularly, in this case, the lack of substrate heating. This is critical because at elevated temperatures, such as in a molten Ta weld pool, Ta can dissolve the elemental components of steels and stainless steels with the result that brittle and non corrosion resistant phases form in the tantalum.
As mentioned above, tantalum is a preferred corrosion resistant material in industries that process chemically aggressive liquids. Because of tantalum's high cost rather than being used as a thick structural member, it is frequently used in thin layers as a protective cladding on steel or stainless steel. Many techniques have been developed to attach tantalum clad to the substrate material such as high temperature brazing (U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,104), low temperature soldering (U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,981), diffusion bonding (U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,203), explosive bonding (U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,104), and flouroelastomers (U.S. Pat. No. 4,140,172).
The fabrication problem becomes difficult and expensive however when the individually clad components must be joined together to form a fully functional vessel such as a process reactor. The clad must be fused together to prevent the process liquid from contacting the steel, the steel must also be fused to provide strength to the entire structure. Dissolution of the steel into the tantalum during either fusion process would immediately destroy the desirable properties of tantalum. Thus, all high temperature fusion processes require and use elaborate joint designs and fabrication techniques in order to prevent the tantalum from reaction with the steel during the fusion process.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,073,427 solves the problem of joining the sheets by providing a machined groove around the entire perimeter of all of the structural parts to be joined. The structural steel is then welded and a machined tantalum batten is inserted in the groove to isolate the tantalum from the steel when the tantalum is welded. The tantalum sheet can then be bent flat (it has to be bent up initially to allow insertion of the batten) and the final tantalum weld performed. Further due to the high temperatures involved purge holes must be provided in the steel element to allow for the introduction of inert gases to protect the final tantalum weld.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,629 provides a similar approach except that three battens are used, one steel and two tantalum battens. This approach requires two welds as well as multiple purge holes drilled in the steel backing sheet.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,946 attempts to improve on the above processes by providing a wide single batten that completely fills the gap between the two tantalum sheets and then double welding a tantalum closure across the top of the tantalum sheets. All of the references discussed so far are done so in terms of joining flat sections. The problems become far more difficult when welding rings to rings to form long vessels, or domes to rings to provide a pressure closure or even vessel penetrations for piping. Bending the tantalum sheet in a circular pattern, then bending 90 degrees out of the plane of the circle, inserting the batten and bending the two tantalum sheets flat again is time consuming and difficult.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,062 describes a process using a plasma arc spray overlay to cover the contaminated weld of the tantalum protective layer. First the steel is welded to itself and then the tantalum is welded to itself. Because the tantalum is in intimate contact with the steel, the steel contaminates the tantalum weld and the corrosion resistance of the weld is greatly reduced. A high temperature plasma arc spray is used to provide a protective layer of tantalum over the contaminated weld. Because these joints are used on large structures they usually must be made in air, thus the hot plasma arc causes both the tantalum sheet and the tantalum powder to oxidize due to the plasma's very high temperature. The result is a porous, lamellar structure in the deposit that is high in oxygen content. The porosity and porous grain boundaries greatly reduce the corrosion resistance by percolation effects and the high oxygen content results in a less ductile (than the tantalum sheet) deposit that is prone to cracking and can fail during operation. Additionally, because the coating is put down hot, and because the coefficient of thermal expansion for tantalum is almost double that of steel, as the structure cools the brittle plasma spray deposit is put in a state of tensile stress, a stress that potentially can lead to cracking and failure of the coating.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,002 describes a method of spray joining articles. The patent indicates that cold spray as well as the many types of hot spray forming techniques (such as plasma and twin wire arc spraying) could be used. However, the method is severely limited in that at least one of the articles must be a spray formed steel article and the sprayed particles must be steel particles. Clearly this method is used for making structural steel joints involving at least one steel component. In the invention described below the structural steel joint is provided by traditional welding techniques. In fact there is no desire or requirement that the sprayed material join to the steel. In the present invention, the cold sprayed material, in this case tantalum, is used to join the tantalum surface coating and to provide an impermeable corrosion resistant layer of tantalum between two or more co-existing Ta sheets.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,402 is even more limited in that it describes a method for repairing spray formed steel tooling. It too requires a steel spray formed part on which a steel spray formed coating will be used to fill a region which has been damaged or somehow eroded away. Additionally, once the spray forming is complete, the spray formed filler is melted and fused using conventional electric welding processes. The purpose of the invention below is to avoid heating and especially melting of the tantalum during the joining processes.
The present invention is broadly directed to a process for joining tantalum clad steel structures comprising:
The invention is also directed to a tantalum weld or joint, wherein the weld or joint is formed by cold spraying tantalum powder and consists of elongated tantalum powder particles, elongated normal to the direction of the spray direction, and wherein the powdered particles have a random crystallographic orientation. The invention is also directed to a tantalum weld or joint, wherein the weld or joint is formed by cold spraying tantalum powder followed by heta treatment and consists of equiaxed grains of approximately the same size as or smaller than the sprayed powder and wherein the grains have a random crystallographic orientation.
In one embodiment, a double sided lap joint may be used, although a single sided lap joint may be employed as well.
In one preferred embodiment, each tantalum clad section is produced by cold spraying tantalum powder directly onto the respective steel layer in a pattern such that a portion of each steel layer in an edge region is not sprayed and is thus left exposed. This embodiment does, not require the use of a bonding layer.
Local failures can develop in tantalum clad vessels and do occur frequently. A local failure is when the bulk of the cladding is fine, but a small crack or pinhole may have developed in the clad. This can result from a manufacturing defect (e.g., a gouged tantalum layer, a weld defect or an inclusion), a local hot spot or improper process chemistry. The normal procedure is to enter the vessel, cut out the defect and then weld a patch on top. Of course in doing this there is the risk of overheating the tantalum layer and oxidizing it or causing an undesirable reaction with the steel below the weld. Although not a part of this invention, cold spray could be used to repair these defects without incurring any of the risks just mentioned.
As used herein, the term “steel” is intended to include both steel and stainless steel.
This invention, the cold welding of the tantalum sheet using cold spray technology, forms a high density, low cost, corrosion resistant joint free from the deleterious phase mentioned above. It further allows the joining of clad steel parts where the tantalum clad to steel bonding agent is a low melting temperature solder, brazing material or even a structural adhesive.
By following the present invention, the tantalum layer and the steel substrate require no special machining to provide locations for the insertion of protective battens, since battens are not used. Obviously, machining of battens or other protective strips is not required.
In the preferred embodiment, the protective cladding can be simply cut with either a straight or beveled edge such that the desired amount of steel substrate is left exposed prior to bonding of the cladding to the plate. This eliminates the many folding and unfolding operations used with cladding that must be joined by elevated temperature processes such as welding. A separate bonding or brazing layer may or may not be present depending on how the tantalum is bonded to steel. The clad sections may simply be placed together and the structural steel butt welded to form a single unit. The resultant seam is then filled, and cold welded together by cold spraying tantalum powder into the seam and over the edges of the tantalum clad layer.
Because the cold spray process is done at low temperatures, there is no harmful dissolution of the steel into the cold sprayed tantalum joint. The tantalum joint is fully dense with no porosity or oxygen pick up which would impair the joints performance. Furthermore, there are no thermally induced stresses at the joint after fabrication that could lead to separation, buckling or cracking. Stress is an issue with all high temperature joining processes due to the large differences in thermal expansion between tantalum (LCTE=6.5×10−6 cm (cm ° C.)−1 and steel (LCTE=11.7×10−6 cm (cm ° C.)−1 In fact to completely eliminate thermal stress during operation, the spraying could be done while the components are held at operational temperatures of less than 250° C.
The present invention also raises the potential for greatly decreasing the cost of the basic tantalum clad steel component. Since the joining of the tantalum layer is done at low temperatures, there is no potential for burn through of the cladding as with high temperature processes that melt the clad to form a fusion joint. Thus, reliable cold joining on tantalum cladding of very low thicknesses is possible. By following the present invention, it is possible to use thickeness of the tantalum clad as low as about 0.005 inches (preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.040 inches, more preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.020 inches, and most preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.010 inches). This can result in the use of substantially thinner cladding and a proportionate cost savings when compared to welding techniques that require substantially thicker cladding for reliable “in the field” welds (normal welding techniques require that the clad be around 0.02 inches, while explosive bonding requires thicknesses of 0.04 inches).
Since the process operates at relatively low temperatures, low cost techniques can be employed to bond the clad to the steel substrate, such as using structural adhesives and non-noble metal low temperature solders. Both of these approaches eliminate the need for large high temperature (˜1000° C.) vacuum furnaces, the attendant energy and labor costs of heating large structural pieces to high temperature and the use of expensive noble metal brazes or silver solders. Structural adhesives decompose around 300° C. and low temperature solders melt around 400° C. The need to weld, i.e., exceed the melting point of tantalum (2998° C.), or to use plasma arc spray (the lowest temperatures are typically in excess of 3000° C.) precludes the use of low temperature bonding of the cladding to the steel since the high temperature process for the clad to clad joint would destroy the bond. Cold spray does not have this problem and could be used to join an entirely new class of low cost clad materials. Most tantalum process applications operate at temperatures of less than 250° C. and thus allow for the use of the above discussed bonding agents.
As is known in the art, various gas/powder velocities can be used in the cold spray process. Generally these velocities are in the range of from 300 to 2,000 meters/second. It is generally advantageous for the powder particles to be available in an amount in the stream, which guarantees a flow rate density of the particles from 0.01 to 100 grams/(second cm2) preferably from 0.01 grams/(second cm2) up to 20 grams/(second cm2) and most preferably from of 0.05 grams/(second cm2) up to 17 grams/(second cm2). The flow rate density is calculated according to the formula F=m/[(π/4)*D2] with F=flow rate density, D=nozzle diameter in cm and m=powder delivery rate (in grams per second).
Generally, a stable gas such as nitrogen, or an inert gas such as argon or helium is used as the gas with which the metal powder forms the gas/powder mixture.
Finally, the process may be used to join many types of metals used as protective cladding such as niobium, titanium, zirconium, molybdenum and tungsten.
In the Figures, the same numbers are used to identify the same element. In
Processes for the production of tantalum clad steel are known in the art. If desired, tantalum could be cold sprayed onto the steel (thus eliminating the need for a bonding or brazing layer). The spray configuration could be such that edge portions of the steel would be left uncoated. Alternatively, portions of the tantalum layer and, if present, the bonding or brazing layer could be removed to expose the steel edge portions.
As shown in
To simulate the joining of two tantalum clad steel plates in a reactor vessel, a 0.020″ thick tantalum sheet was bonded to a nominal ⅜″ steel plate, using a high temperature, silver-copper eutectic braze (Bag-8, commercially available from Lucas Milhaupt of Cudahy Wis.). Then a groove was milled approximately 0.022″ deep and nominally 0.20″ wide down the length of the tantalum cladding to simulate the gap that would be left between the tantalum sheets after welding of the steel plate. Next using nitrogen gas preheated to 600° C. at a stagnation pressure of 3 MPa, tantalum powder 15-30 microns in size (Amperit #151, special grade, commercially available from H.C. Starck Inc.) was deposited. Standoff distance of the nozzle was 30 mm and the powder feed rate was approximately 50 g/min. A cold sprayed weld of approximately 0.040 to 0.060″ thick was used to coat the steel, and seal the gap between the tantalum cladding. The cold sprayed tantalum completely filled the gap between the two sheets providing a continuous protective layer of tantalum over both the steel and the tantalum sheet. The cold spray nozzle or gun used was a Kintetiks 4000 commercially available from Cold Gas Technology GmbH, Ampfing, Germany.
While it is well known that sheet tantalum will provide an impervious, protective barrier, this is not always true of powder based coatings. In order for the powder based coating to be protective, it must not only in itself resist corrosive attack but it must also be sufficiently dense (with no interconnected porosity) to prevent percolation by the acids through the coating. Typically for a coating to prevent percolation via interconnected porosity, the coating must be greater than 95% dense. In the tests conducted, the cold sprayed tantalum coating densities were typically greater than 97.5%.
To further prove the impervious nature of the coating, an approximate 0.015″ thick tantalum coating was sprayed on nominal 2″×2″ mild steel sheet. The same process parameters and equipment used above were used to make these coatings, with the exception that the final coating was approximately 0.014″ thick. The tantalum coated side of the steel was then exposed to a 20% hydrochloric acid solution maintained at 70° C. for a period of 4 weeks. When compared to a tantalum sheet that was exposed to the same acid for the same period of time, the cold sprayed tantalum coating resisted the acid as well as the tantalum sheet. In fact in both cases the measured corrosion rates for both the sheet and the coating were less than 0.01 mm/year. After exposure to the acid test, porosity was almost nonexistent, was certainly not interconnected and the coating acted as an impervious barrier to the acid as is evidenced by the complete lack of corrosion build up between the coating and the steel.
Further, the cold sprayed joint is unique in that it produces no heat affected zone (“HAZ”) around the weld compared to thermally induced fusion processes. HAZ is well known and understood by those skilled in the art. In thermally induced fusion bonding, the practice is to carefully minimize potential deleterious effects associated with the HAZ such as excessive directional and crystallographically preferred grain growth.
There may be some circumstances in which it is desirable to heat treat an as sprayed joint post spraying either to relieve some of the mechanical stresses or to improve interparticle bond strength. This heat treatment can result in recrystallization which results in equiaxed grains of approximately the same size as the original powder particles.
While certain procedures have been illustrated or described herein, it will be recognized that variations can be used without departing from the basic teachings herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/848,404, filed on Mar. 21, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/343,113, filed on Jan. 4, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,448,840, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/184,665, filed on Jul. 18, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,113,413, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/638,625, filed on Dec. 13, 2006, now abandoned, the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3436299 | Halek et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3990784 | Gelber | Nov 1976 | A |
4011981 | Danna et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4050133 | Cretella et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4059442 | Bernard | Nov 1977 | A |
4073427 | Keifert et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4135286 | Wright et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4140172 | Corey | Feb 1979 | A |
4141127 | Cretella et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4202932 | Chen et al. | May 1980 | A |
4209375 | Gates et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4291104 | Keifert | Sep 1981 | A |
4349954 | Banks | Sep 1982 | A |
4425483 | Lee et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4435483 | Ahslund et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4459062 | Siebert | Jul 1984 | A |
4483819 | Albrecht et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4508563 | Bernard et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4510171 | Siebert | Apr 1985 | A |
4537641 | Albrecht et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4688691 | Christian | Aug 1987 | A |
4722756 | Hard | Feb 1988 | A |
4731111 | Kopatz et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4818629 | Jenstrom et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4905886 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4915745 | Pollock et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923531 | Fisher | May 1990 | A |
4964906 | Fife | Oct 1990 | A |
4983269 | Wegmann | Jan 1991 | A |
5061527 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5091244 | Biornard | Feb 1992 | A |
5147125 | Austin | Sep 1992 | A |
5160534 | Hiraki | Nov 1992 | A |
5242481 | Kumar | Sep 1993 | A |
5269899 | Fan | Dec 1993 | A |
5270858 | Dickey | Dec 1993 | A |
5271965 | Browning | Dec 1993 | A |
5302414 | Alkhimov et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305946 | Heilmann | Apr 1994 | A |
5330798 | Browning | Jul 1994 | A |
5392981 | Makowiecki et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5428882 | Makowiecki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5466355 | Ohhashi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5554889 | Shin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5565071 | Demaray et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5580516 | Kumar | Dec 1996 | A |
5612254 | Mu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5676803 | Demaray et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679473 | Murayama et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687600 | Emigh et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693203 | Ohhashi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726410 | Fukushima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738770 | Strauss et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766544 | Kemp | Jun 1998 | A |
5795626 | Gabel et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5836506 | Hunt et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5859654 | Radke et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863398 | Kardokus et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5954856 | Pathare et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955685 | Na | Sep 1999 | A |
5972065 | Dunn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993513 | Fife | Nov 1999 | A |
6010583 | Annavarapu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030577 | Commandeur et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6071323 | Kawaguchi | Jun 2000 | A |
6071389 | Zhang | Jun 2000 | A |
6136062 | Loffelholz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139913 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165413 | Lo et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171363 | Shekhter et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176947 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189663 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197082 | Dorvel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6238456 | Wolf et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245390 | Baranovski et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258402 | Hussary et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261337 | Kumar | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267851 | Hosokawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269536 | Balliett | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283357 | Kulkarni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294246 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328927 | Lo et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331233 | Turner | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6408928 | Heinrich et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409897 | Wingo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409965 | Nagata et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413578 | Stowell et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432804 | Nakata et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444259 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464933 | Popoola et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478902 | Koenigsmann et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482743 | Sato | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491208 | James et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497797 | Kim | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502767 | Kay et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521173 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6558447 | Shekhter et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582572 | McLeod | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589311 | Han et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589377 | Vodermayer et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592935 | Leonardi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6623796 | Van Steenkiste | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635219 | Wen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6669782 | Thakur | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6722584 | Kay et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723379 | Stark | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725522 | Ivanov et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743343 | Kida et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6743468 | Fuller et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748902 | Boesch et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749002 | Grinberg et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749103 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6759085 | Muehlberger | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770154 | Koenigsmann et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773969 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780458 | Seth et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6855236 | Sato et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872425 | Kaufold et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872427 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875324 | Hera et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6896933 | Van Steenkiste et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905728 | Hu et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911124 | Tang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915964 | Tapphorn et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919275 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924974 | Stark | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946039 | Segal et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953742 | Chen et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962407 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6992261 | Kachalov et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7041204 | Cooper | May 2006 | B1 |
7053294 | Tuttle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066375 | Bolser | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067197 | Michaluk et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081148 | Koenigsmann et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101447 | Turner | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108893 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128988 | Lambeth | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143967 | Heinrich et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146703 | Ivanov | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153453 | Abe et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163715 | Kramer | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7164205 | Yamaji et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170915 | McDonald | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175802 | Sandlin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178744 | Tapphorn et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183206 | Shepard | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192623 | Andre et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208230 | Ackerman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7244466 | Van Steenkiste | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7278353 | Langan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7314650 | Nanis | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7316763 | Hosokawa et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335341 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351450 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7399335 | Shekhter et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7399355 | Szymanski et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402277 | Ayer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7479299 | Raybould et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7504008 | Doan et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514122 | Kramer | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7550055 | Le et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7582846 | Molz et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618500 | Farmer et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635498 | Sakai et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644745 | Le et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651658 | Aimone et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7652223 | Tanase et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7670406 | Belashchenko | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7794554 | Aimone et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811429 | Landgraf et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815782 | Inagawa et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7871563 | Acker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901552 | Pavloff | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910051 | Zimmermann et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7951275 | Tsukamoto | May 2011 | B2 |
8002169 | Miller et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8022169 | Way et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8043655 | Miller et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8082768 | Hidaka et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8113413 | Miller et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8173206 | Boutwell et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187720 | Choi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197661 | Nanis | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8197894 | Miller et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226741 | Shekhter et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8246903 | Miller et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8448840 | Miller et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8491959 | Miller et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8703233 | Miller et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8715386 | Shekhter et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734896 | Volchko et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8777090 | Miller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8883250 | Miller et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8961867 | Miller et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20010054457 | Segal et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020041819 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020066770 | James et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090464 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112789 | Jepson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112955 | Aimone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020168466 | Tapphorn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030019326 | Han et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023132 | Melvin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030052000 | Segal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030082297 | Wolkers et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121777 | Sato et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030175142 | Milonopoulou et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178301 | Lynn et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190413 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030219542 | Ewasyshyn et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232132 | Muehlberger | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040037954 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065545 | Takahashi | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040065546 | Michaluk et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076807 | Grinberg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107798 | Hirata et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126499 | Heinrich et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141870 | Michaluk et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202885 | Seth et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040262157 | Ford et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050084701 | Slattery | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120957 | Kowalsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142021 | Aimone et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147150 | Wickersham et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147742 | Kleshock et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153069 | Tapphorn et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050155856 | Oda | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199739 | Kuroda et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220995 | Hu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252450 | Kowalsky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060006064 | Tepman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011470 | Hatch et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011740 | Bosio | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021870 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060027687 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032735 | Aimone et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032737 | Liehr | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042728 | Lemon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060045785 | Hu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060090593 | Liu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121187 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129941 | Hollemans | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060137969 | Feldewerth et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060175198 | Vermeersch et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207876 | Matsumura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060251872 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266639 | Le et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289305 | White | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070012557 | Hosokawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089984 | Gaydos et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116886 | Refke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116890 | Adams et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125646 | Young et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070172378 | Shibuya et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183919 | Ayer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187525 | Jabado et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196570 | Gentsch et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070240980 | Chu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241164 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251814 | Beele et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070251820 | Nitta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269608 | Saito et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289689 | Sugimoto et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289864 | Ye et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289869 | Ye et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080028459 | Suh et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041720 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063889 | Duckham et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078268 | Shekhter et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080110746 | Kardokus et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080145688 | Miller et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171215 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173542 | Neudecker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216602 | Zimmermann et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080271779 | Miller et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090004379 | Deng et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010792 | Yi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022616 | Acker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090159433 | Neudecker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090173626 | Duckham et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090214374 | Ivanov | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090239754 | Kruger et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090291851 | Bohn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100000857 | Tonogi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015467 | Zimmermann et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100055487 | Zimmermann et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061876 | Miller et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084052 | Farmer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086800 | Miller et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100136242 | Kay et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172789 | Calla et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189910 | Belashchenko et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100246774 | Lathrop | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252418 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272889 | Shekhter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110127162 | King et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132534 | Miller et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110256013 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110297535 | Higdon et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300396 | Miller et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110303535 | Miller et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000594 | Ivanov et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017521 | Botke | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120061235 | Feldman-Peabody | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120251714 | Miller et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291592 | Shekhter et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120315387 | Miller et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130081943 | Loewenthal et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130081944 | Dary et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130082033 | Volchko et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130156967 | Michaluk et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130264013 | Miller et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130302519 | Miller et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130337159 | Miller et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20150034477 | Miller et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2482287 | Oct 2002 | CA |
100364618 | Jan 2008 | CN |
104040020 | Sep 2014 | CN |
10253794 | Jun 2004 | DE |
0074803 | Mar 1983 | EP |
0212929 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0484533 | May 1992 | EP |
0774315 | May 1997 | EP |
0911426 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1066899 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1138420 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1314795 | May 2003 | EP |
1350861 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1382720 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1398394 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1413642 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1452622 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1200218 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1556526 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1639620 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1672175 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1715080 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1728892 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2135973 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2145976 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2206804 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2278045 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2328701 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2706129 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2818577 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2121441 | Dec 1983 | GB |
2394479 | Apr 2004 | GB |
54067198 | May 1979 | JP |
59-20470 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-230967 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-100177 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63-35769 | Sep 1988 | JP |
63-227774 | Sep 1988 | JP |
64-15353 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1-98359 | Apr 1989 | JP |
3197640 | Aug 1991 | JP |
4-323366 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-15915 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-232580 | Sep 1993 | JP |
6-144124 | May 1994 | JP |
6-158300 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6-346232 | Dec 1994 | JP |
06346232 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-228966 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10-275887 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-69637 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-256323 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11-269637 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11269639 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-312484 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-256843 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-98359 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-107228 | Apr 2001 | JP |
01131767 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-123267 | May 2001 | JP |
2003-201561 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-226966 | Aug 2003 | JP |
03301278 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004-523653 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-307969 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-29858 | Feb 2005 | JP |
3-108347 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-095886 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-232580 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-052440 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-144124 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-161161 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007-076705 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-146281 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-169464 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-540823 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009-221543 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2013-224495 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2015-505907 | Feb 2015 | JP |
10-0683124 | Feb 2007 | KR |
10-2008-0006624 | Jan 2008 | KR |
10-2010-0108673 | Oct 2010 | KR |
2166421 | May 2001 | RU |
9319220 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9633294 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9837249 | Aug 1998 | WO |
0006793 | Feb 2000 | WO |
01012364 | Feb 2001 | WO |
02064287 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02070765 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-03062491 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03106051 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03106733 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004009866 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004076706 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004074540 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004114355 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005073418 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005084242 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2005079209 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006117144 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006117145 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006129941 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007001441 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008033192 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008042947 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2008063891 | May 2008 | WO |
2008081585 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008089188 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009012278 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2012074609 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Examination Report received for Canadian Application No. 2,736,876, mailed on Jan. 23, 2013, 3 pages. |
Examination Report received for Chinese Application No. 2007800364699, mailed on Sep. 7, 2010, 9 pages (6 Pages of English Translation & 3 pages of Official Copy). |
Examination Report received for Japanese Application No. 2010-506677, mailed on Jun. 26, 2012, 10 pages (6 Pages of English Translation & 4 pages of Official Copy). |
Examination Report received for Japanese Application No. 2011-526142, mailed on Feb. 13, 2013, 12 pages (7 pages of English Translation & 5 pages of Official copy). |
Examination Report received for European Application No. 07843733.2 mailed on Oct. 11, 2013, 4 pages. |
Examination Report received for European Patent Application No. 09813462.0, mailed on Oct. 1, 2013, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 13184639.6, mailed on Feb. 10, 2014, 6 pages. |
Examination Report received for European Patent Application No. 09813462.0, mailed on Feb. 6, 2014, 4 pages. |
Examination Report received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-232394, mailed on Jan. 27, 2014, 9 pages of English Translation only. |
Examination Report received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-232394 mailed on Sep. 24, 2013, 8 pages of English Translation only. |
Kwon et al., “Particle Behavior in Supersonic Flow During the Cold Spray Process”, Metals and Materials International, vol. 11, No. 5, 2005, pp. 377-381. |
Examination Report received for Korean Application No. 10-2009-7025319 mailed on Dec. 2, 2013, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation & 3 pages of Official Copy). |
International Search Report received for PCT International Serial No. PCT/JP2012/057434, mailed on Jun. 19, 2012, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Search Report). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/057434,mailed on Apr. 10, 2014, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/069401, mailed on Jun. 26, 2014, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/069401, mailed on Mar. 20, 2013, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance Received for Korean Patent Application No. KR 10-2009-0094709, mailed on Jul. 29, 2014, 3 pages (1 page of English Translation & 2 pages of official copy). |
Extended European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 09813462.0, mailed on Mar. 8, 2013, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 14166073.8, mailed on Dec. 3, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Cold Gas Dynamic Spray CGSM Apparatus,” Tev Tech LLC, available at: http://www.tevtechllc.com/cold—gas.html (accessed Dec. 14, 2009). |
“Cold Spray Process,” Handbook of Thermal Spray Technology, ASM International, Sep. 2004, pp. 77-84. |
Ajdelsztajn et al., “Synthesis and Mechanical Properties of Nanocrytalline Ni Coatings Producted by Cold Gas Dynamic Spraying,” 201 Surface and Coatings Tech. 3-4, pp. 1166-1172 (Oct. 2006). |
Gärtner et al., “The Cold Spray Process and its Potential for Industrial Applications,” 15 J. of Thermal Sprsy Tech. 2, pp. 223-232 (Jun. 2006). |
Hall et al., “The Effect of a Simple Annealing Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Cold-Sprayed Aluminum,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 233-238 (Jun. 2006). |
Hall et al., “Preparation of Aluminum Coatings Containing Homogeneous Nanocrystalline Microstructures Using the Cold Spray Process,” JTTEES 17:352-359. |
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2006/003967, dated Nov. 6, 2007 (15 pages). |
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/062434, dated Nov. 10, 2009 (21 pages). |
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2006/003969, mailed dated Nov. 6, 2007 (13 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/087214, mailed Mar. 23, 2009 (13 pages). |
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/081200, dated Sep. 1, 2009 (17 pages). |
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/080282, dated Apr. 7, 2009 (15 pages). |
Irissou et al., “Review on Cold Spray Process and Technology: Part I—Intellectual Property,” 17 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 4, pp. 495-516 (Dec. 2008). |
Karthikeyan, “Cold Spray Technology: International Status and USA Efforts,” ASB Industries, Inc. (Dec. 2004). |
Li et al., “Effect of Annealing Treatment on the Microstructure and Properties of Cold-Sprayed Cu Coating,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 206-211 (Jun. 2006). |
Marx et al., “Cold Spraying Innovative Layers for New Applications,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 177-183 (Jun. 2006). |
Morito, “Preparation and Characterization of Sintered Mo-Re Alloys,” 3 J. de Physique 7, Part 1, pp. 553-556 (1993). |
Search Report in European Patent Application No. 09172234.8, dated Jan. 29, 2010 (7 pages). |
Stoltenhoff et al., “An Analysis of the Cold Spray Process and its Coatings,” 11 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 4, pp. 542-550 (Dec. 2002). |
Van Steenkiste et al., “Analysis of Tantalum Coatings Produced by the Kinetic Spray Process,” 13 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 265-273 (Jun. 2004). |
Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 09172234.8, mailed Jun. 16, 2010 (3 pages). |
Kosarev et al., “Recently Patent Facilities and Applications in Cold Spray Engineering,” Recent Patents on Engineering, vol. 1 pp. 35-42 (2007). |
Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 07843733.2, mailed Nov. 30, 2010 (9 pages). |
English Translation of Office Action mailed Feb. 23, 2011 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880023411.5 (4 pages). |
Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 08755010.9, mailed Sep. 16, 2011 (3 pages). |
Examination Report in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,736,876, mailed Feb. 29, 2012 (4 pages). |
Tapphorn et al., “The Solid-State Spray Forming of Low-Oxide Titanium Components,” JOM, p. 45-47 (1998). |
Examination Report Received for Japanese Patent App. No. 2013-266839 mailed on Oct. 22, 2014, 7 pages (4 pages of English Translation & 3 pages of Official copy). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140311669 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13848404 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14293643 | US | |
Parent | 13343113 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13848404 | US | |
Parent | 13184665 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 13343113 | US | |
Parent | 11638625 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 13184665 | US |