Methods of joining metallic protective layers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8777090
  • Patent Number
    8,777,090
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 21, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 15, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
In various embodiments, protective layers are bonded to a steel layer and connected by a layer of unmelted metal powder produced by cold spray.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Tantalum is a highly corrosion resistant, bio-friendly metal. As a result it finds wide use in reactors, heat exchangers, piping and the like in the chemical and pharmaceutical processing industries. Because tantalum is very expensive often the structural components used in this equipment are made up of a steel or stainless steel section for strength purposes that is clad with a thin sheet of tantalum to prevent interaction with the process fluid. In order for the tantalum sheet to provide corrosion protection for a whole vessel many such sheets must be joined together into a single impermeable piece. Many techniques have been used but all of them are costly, have severe deficiencies, and cause the cost of the basic tantalum clad steel section to be higher than necessary. This invention provides a low cost, chemical resistant, material and manpower efficient means of joining the tantalum sheets together.


Cold spray or kinetic spray (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,302,414, 6,502,767 and 6,759,085) is an emerging industrial technology that is being employed to solve many industrial manufacturing challenges (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,924,974, 6,444,259, 6,491,208 and 6,905,728). Cold spray employs a high velocity gas jet to rapidly accelerate powder particles to high velocity such that when they impact a surface the particles bond to the surface to form an integral, well bonded and dense coating. The cold spraying of tantalum powders onto a variety of substrates (including steel) has been suggested (see, e.g., “Analysis of Tantalum Coatings Produced by the Kinetic Spray Process,” Van Steenkiste et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 13, number 2, June 2004, pages 265-273; “Cold spraying—innovative layers for new applications,” Marx et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 15, number 2, June 2006, pages 177-183; and “The Cold Spray Process and Its Potential for Industrial Applications,” Gartner et al, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, volume 15, number 2, June 2006, pages 223-232). This is all accomplished without having to heat the tantalum powder to a temperature near or above its melting point as is done with traditional thermal spray processes. The fact that dense coatings can be formed at low temperatures present many advantages. Such advantages include reduced oxidation, high density deposits, solid state compaction, the lack of thermally induced stresses and particularly, in this case, the lack of substrate heating. This is critical because at elevated temperatures, such as in a molten Ta weld pool, Ta can dissolve the elemental components of steels and stainless steels with the result that brittle and non corrosion resistant phases form in the tantalum.


As mentioned above, tantalum is a preferred corrosion resistant material in industries that process chemically aggressive liquids. Because of tantalum's high cost rather than being used as a thick structural member, it is frequently used in thin layers as a protective cladding on steel or stainless steel. Many techniques have been developed to attach tantalum clad to the substrate material such as high temperature brazing (U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,104), low temperature soldering (U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,981), diffusion bonding (U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,203), explosive bonding (U.S. Pat. No. 4,291,104), and flouroelastomers (U.S. Pat. No. 4,140,172).


The fabrication problem becomes difficult and expensive however when the individually clad components must be joined together to form a fully functional vessel such as a process reactor. The clad must be fused together to prevent the process liquid from contacting the steel, the steel must also be fused to provide strength to the entire structure. Dissolution of the steel into the tantalum during either fusion process would immediately destroy the desirable properties of tantalum. Thus, all high temperature fusion processes require and use elaborate joint designs and fabrication techniques in order to prevent the tantalum from reaction with the steel during the fusion process.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,073,427 solves the problem of joining the sheets by providing a machined groove around the entire perimeter of all of the structural parts to be joined. The structural steel is then welded and a machined tantalum batten is inserted in the groove to isolate the tantalum from the steel when the tantalum is welded. The tantalum sheet can then be bent flat (it has to be bent up initially to allow insertion of the batten) and the final tantalum weld performed. Further due to the high temperatures involved purge holes must be provided in the steel element to allow for the introduction of inert gases to protect the final tantalum weld.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,629 provides a similar approach except that three battens are used, one steel and two tantalum battens. This approach requires two welds as well as multiple purge holes drilled in the steel backing sheet.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,946 attempts to improve on the above processes by providing a wide single batten that completely fills the gap between the two tantalum sheets and then double welding a tantalum closure across the top of the tantalum sheets. All of the references discussed so far are done so in terms of joining flat sections. The problems become far more difficult when welding rings to rings to form long vessels, or domes to rings to provide a pressure closure or even vessel penetrations for piping. Bending the tantalum sheet in a circular pattern, then bending 90 degrees out of the plane of the circle, inserting the batten and bending the two tantalum sheets flat again is time consuming and difficult.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,062 describes a process using a plasma arc spray overlay to cover the contaminated weld of the tantalum protective layer. First the steel is welded to itself and then the tantalum is welded to itself. Because the tantalum is in intimate contact with the steel, the steel contaminates the tantalum weld and the corrosion resistance of the weld is greatly reduced. A high temperature plasma arc spray is used to provide a protective layer of tantalum over the contaminated weld. Because these joints are used on large structures they usually must be made in air, thus the hot plasma arc causes both the tantalum sheet and the tantalum powder to oxidize due to the plasma's very high temperature. The result is a porous, lamellar structure in the deposit that is high in oxygen content. The porosity and porous grain boundaries greatly reduce the corrosion resistance by percolation effects and the high oxygen content results in a less ductile (than the tantalum sheet) deposit that is prone to cracking and can fail during operation. Additionally, because the coating is put down hot, and because the coefficient of thermal expansion for tantalum is almost double that of steel, as the structure cools the brittle plasma spray deposit is put in a state of tensile stress, a stress that potentially can lead to cracking and failure of the coating.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,002 describes a method of spray joining articles. The patent indicates that cold spray as well as the many types of hot spray forming techniques (such as plasma and twin wire arc spraying) could be used. However, the method is severely limited in that at least one of the articles must be a spray formed steel article and the sprayed particles must be steel particles. Clearly this method is used for making structural steel joints involving at least one steel component. In the invention described below the structural steel joint is provided by traditional welding techniques. In fact there is no desire or requirement that the sprayed material join to the steel. In the present invention, the cold sprayed material, in this case tantalum, is used to join the tantalum surface coating and to provide an impermeable corrosion resistant layer of tantalum between two or more co-existing Ta sheets.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,402 is even more limited in that it describes a method for repairing spray formed steel tooling. It too requires a steel spray formed part on which a steel spray formed coating will be used to fill a region which has been damaged or somehow eroded away. Additionally, once the spray forming is complete, the spray formed filler is melted and fused using conventional electric welding processes. The purpose of the invention below is to avoid heating and especially melting of the tantalum during the joining processes.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the tantalum clad sections before joining.



FIG. 2 shows the sections joined together.



FIG. 3 shows another embodiment of the invention where a lap joint is used.



FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of the invention where a double lap joint is used.



FIG. 5 is a micrograph of a cross section of a tantalum cold sprayed joint that has been etched to reveal prior particle boundaries.



FIG. 6 shows the same cross section as shown in FIG. 5 after annealing at 1150° C. for one and a half hours.





DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is broadly directed to a process for joining tantalum clad steel structures comprising:

    • a) providing a first tantalum clad section, said first tantalum clad section comprising a tantalum layer over a steel layer, with a bonding layer optionally therebetween, with a portion of said steel layer in an edge region not being covered by said tantalum layer or said bonding layer,
    • b) providing a second tantalum clad section, said second tantalum clad section comprising a tantalum layer over a steel layer, with a bonding layer optionally therebetween, with a portion of said steel layer in an edge region not being covered by said tantalum layer or said bonding layer,
    • c) locating said steel edge regions adjacent each other,
    • d) welding the steel edge regions together,
    • e) cold spraying a tantalum powder onto the welded edge regions and over the tantalum layers adjacent said edge regions thereby joining the tantalum clad steel sections.


The invention is also directed to a tantalum weld or joint, wherein the weld or joint is formed by cold spraying tantalum powder and consists of elongated tantalum powder particles, elongated normal to the direction of the spray direction, and wherein the powdered particles have a random crystallographic orientation. The invention is also directed to a tantalum weld or joint, wherein the weld or joint is formed by cold spraying tantalum powder followed by heat treatment and consists of equiaxed grains of approximately the same size as or smaller than the sprayed powder and wherein the grains have a random crystallographic orientation.


In one embodiment, a double sided lap joint may be used, although a single sided lap joint may be employed as well.


In one preferred embodiment, each tantalum clad section is produced by cold spraying tantalum powder directly onto the respective steel layer in a pattern such that a portion of each steel layer in an edge region is not sprayed and is thus left exposed. This embodiment does, not require the use of a bonding layer.


Local failures can develop in tantalum clad vessels and do occur frequently. A local failure is when the bulk of the cladding is fine, but a small crack or pinhole may have developed in the clad. This can result from a manufacturing defect (e.g., a gouged tantalum layer, a weld defect or an inclusion), a local hot spot or improper process chemistry. The normal procedure is to enter the vessel, cut out the defect and then weld a patch on top. Of course in doing this there is the risk of overheating the tantalum layer and oxidizing it or causing an undesirable reaction with the steel below the weld. Although not a part of this invention, cold spray could be used to repair these defects without incurring any of the risks just mentioned.


As used herein, the term “steel” is intended to include both steel and stainless steel.


This invention, the cold welding of the tantalum sheet using cold spray technology, forms a high density, low cost, corrosion resistant joint free from the deleterious phase mentioned above. It further allows the joining of clad steel parts where the tantalum clad to steel bonding agent is a low melting temperature solder, brazing material or even a structural adhesive.


By following the present invention, the tantalum layer and the steel substrate require no special machining to provide locations for the insertion of protective battens, since battens are not used. Obviously, machining of battens or other protective strips is not required.


In the preferred embodiment, the protective cladding can be simply cut with either a straight or beveled edge such that the desired amount of steel substrate is left exposed prior to bonding of the cladding to the plate. This eliminates the many folding and unfolding operations used with cladding that must be joined by elevated temperature processes such as welding. A separate bonding or brazing layer may or may not be present depending on how the tantalum is bonded to steel. The clad sections may simply be placed together and the structural steel butt welded to form a single unit. The resultant seam is then filled, and cold welded together by cold spraying tantalum powder into the seam and over the edges of the tantalum clad layer.


Because the cold spray process is done at low temperatures, there is no harmful dissolution of the steel into the cold sprayed tantalum joint. The tantalum joint is fully dense with no porosity or oxygen pick up which would impair the joints performance. Furthermore, there are no thermally induced stresses at the joint after fabrication that could lead to separation, buckling or cracking. Stress is an issue with all high temperature joining processes due to the large differences in thermal expansion between tantalum (LCTE=6.5×10−6 cm (cm° C.)−1 and steel (LCTE=11.7×10−6 cm (cm° C.)−1 In fact to completely eliminate thermal stress during operation, the spraying could be done while the components are held at operational temperatures of less than 250° C.


The present invention also raises the potential for greatly decreasing the cost of the basic tantalum clad steel component. Since the joining of the tantalum layer is done at low temperatures, there is no potential for burn through of the cladding as with high temperature processes that melt the clad to form a fusion joint. Thus, reliable cold joining on tantalum cladding of very low thicknesses is possible. By following the present invention, it is possible to use thickness of the tantalum clad as low as about 0.005 inches (preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.040 inches, more preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.020 inches, and most preferably from about 0.005 inches to about 0.010 inches). This can result in the use of substantially thinner cladding and a proportionate cost savings when compared to welding techniques that require substantially thicker cladding for reliable “in the field” welds (normal welding techniques require that the clad be around 0.02 inches, while explosive bonding requires thicknesses of 0.04 inches).


Since the process operates at relatively low temperatures, low cost techniques can be employed to bond the clad to the steel substrate, such as using structural adhesives and non-noble metal low temperature solders. Both of these approaches eliminate the need for large high temperature (˜1000° C.) vacuum furnaces, the attendant energy and labor costs of heating large structural pieces to high temperature and the use of expensive noble metal brazes or silver solders. Structural adhesives decompose around 300° C. and low temperature solders melt around 400° C. The need to weld, i.e., exceed the melting point of tantalum (2998° C.), or to use plasma arc spray (the lowest temperatures are typically in excess of 3000° C.) precludes the use of low temperature bonding of the cladding to the steel since the high temperature process for the clad to clad joint would destroy the bond. Cold spray does not have this problem and could be used to join an entirely new class of low cost clad materials. Most tantalum process applications operate at temperatures of less than 250° C. and thus allow for the use of the above discussed bonding agents.


As is known in the art, various gas/powder velocities can be used in the cold spray process. Generally these velocities are in the range of from 300 to 2,000 meters/second. It is generally advantageous for the powder particles to be available in an amount in the stream, which guarantees a flow rate density of the particles from 0.01 to 100 grams/(second cm2) preferably from 0.01 grams/(second cm2) up to 20 grams/(second cm2) and most preferably from of 0.05 grams/(second cm2) up to 17 grams/(second cm2). The flow rate density is calculated according to the formula F=m/[(π/4)*D2] with F=flow rate density, D=nozzle diameter in cm and m=powder delivery rate (in grams per second).


Generally, a stable gas such as nitrogen, or an inert gas such as argon or helium is used as the gas with which the metal powder forms the gas/powder mixture.


Finally, the process may be used to join many types of metals used as protective cladding such as niobium, titanium, zirconium, molybdenum and tungsten.


In the Figures, the same numbers are used to identify the same element. In FIG. 1, two sections, 1 and 2, are placed adjacent each other. Each section has a tantalum layer 3, over a steel layer 4, with a bonding or brazing layer 5 therebetween. Each section has a portion (6 and 7) of the steel layer that is not covered (these exposed sections are only identified by number in FIG. 1—but are shown in each figure). In the left hand section, the portion is exposed via a beveled edge 8, while in the right section, the portion is exposed via a straight edge 9. The beveled edge embodiment is generally preferred.


Processes for the production of tantalum clad steel are known in the art. If desired, tantalum could be cold sprayed onto the steel (thus eliminating the need for a bonding or brazing layer). The spray configuration could be such that edge portions of the steel would be left uncoated. Alternatively, portions of the tantalum layer and, if present, the bonding or brazing layer could be removed to expose the steel edge portions.


As shown in FIG. 2, the exposed portions of the steel are welded 10 and a tantalum powder, 11, is sprayed over the welded edges as well over the tantalum layer adjacent to the exposed portions.



FIG. 3 shows a single lap weld (12). This approach has the advantage of requiring less Ta powder to make the weld (there is no gap to fill) but has the disadvantage that once the steel structure is welded, the larger (upper) piece of tantalum has to be bent and hammered down flat over the lower (smaller) piece of tantalum (another labor operation).



FIG. 4 shows another embodiment wherein a double lap weld (15) is employed. This approach eliminates the bending and hammering operation required by the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, but does use more powder and requires a tantalum batten, 13, to fill the gap formed by the exposed steel portions and a tantalum sheet, 14, to join the two tantalum sections.


To simulate the joining of two tantalum clad steel plates in a reactor vessel, a 0.020″ thick tantalum sheet was bonded to a nominal ⅜″ steel plate, using a high temperature, silver-copper eutectic braze (Bag-8, commercially available from Lucas Milhaupt of Cudahy Wis.). Then a groove was milled approximately 0.022″ deep and nominally 0.20″ wide down the length of the tantalum cladding to simulate the gap that would be left between the tantalum sheets after welding of the steel plate. Next using nitrogen gas preheated to 600° C. at a stagnation pressure of 3 MPa, tantalum powder 15-30 microns in size (Amperit #151, special grade, commercially available from H.C. Starck Inc.) was deposited. Standoff distance of the nozzle was 30 mm and the powder feed rate was approximately 50 g/min. A cold sprayed weld of approximately 0.040 to 0.060″ thick was used to coat the steel, and seal the gap between the tantalum cladding. The cold sprayed tantalum completely filled the gap between the two sheets providing a continuous protective layer of tantalum over both the steel and the tantalum sheet. The cold spray nozzle or gun used was a Kintetiks 4000 commercially available from Cold Gas Technology GmbH, Ampfing, Germany.


While it is well known that sheet tantalum will provide an impervious, protective barrier, this is not always true of powder based coatings. In order for the powder based coating to be protective, it must not only in itself resist corrosive attack but it must also be sufficiently dense (with no interconnected porosity) to prevent percolation by the acids through the coating. Typically for a coating to prevent percolation via interconnected porosity, the coating must be greater than 95% dense. In the tests conducted, the cold sprayed tantalum coating densities were typically greater than 97.5%.


To further prove the impervious nature of the coating, an approximate 0.015″ thick tantalum coating was sprayed on nominal 2″×2″ mild steel sheet. The same process parameters and equipment used above were used to make these coatings, with the exception that the final coating was approximately 0.014″ thick. The tantalum coated side of the steel was then exposed to a 20% hydrochloric acid solution maintained at 70° C. for a period of 4 weeks. When compared to a tantalum sheet that was exposed to the same acid for the same period of time, the cold sprayed tantalum coating resisted the acid as well as the tantalum sheet. In fact in both cases the measured corrosion rates for both the sheet and the coating were less than 0.01 mm/year. After exposure to the acid test, porosity was almost nonexistent, was certainly not interconnected and the coating acted as an impervious barrier to the acid as is evidenced by the complete lack of corrosion build up between the coating and the steel.


Further, the cold sprayed joint is unique in that it produces no heat affected zone (“HAZ”) around the weld compared to thermally induced fusion processes. HAZ is well known and understood by those skilled in the art. In thermally induced fusion bonding, the practice is to carefully minimize potential deleterious effects associated with the HAZ such as excessive directional and crystallographically preferred grain growth. FIG. 5 is a micrograph of a cross section of a tantalum cold sprayed joint that has been etched to reveal the prior particle boundaries (“PPB”). The powder that was used in the spray process was made by the hydride/dehydride process which produces a blocky approximately equiaxed powder (defined as powder having an aspect ratio of approximately 1). The PPBs in FIG. 5 are not equiaxed. In fact they are typically elongated in shape with an aspect ratio of 2 to 3 normal to the direction of spray (it is expected that in the future, as higher gas velocities and higher particle and gas temperatures are used, aspect ratios up to 6 may be obtained). Additionally by using electron beam back scattered diffraction (“EBSD”), it can be shown that the crystallographic orientation of the weld material is completely random. The combined properties of the complete absence of a HAZ with elongated shaped grains, normal to the direction of spray, having a completely random crystallographic orientation are a unique characteristic of a cold sprayed joint.


There may be some circumstances in which it is desirable to heat treat an as sprayed joint post spraying either to relieve some of the mechanical stresses or to improve interparticle bond strength. This heat treatment can result in recrystallization which results in equiaxed grains of approximately the same size as the original powder particles. FIG. 6 is a micrograph of the same joint as shown in FIG. 5 that has been annealed at 1150° C. for 1.5 hours. The new equiaxed grains retain the near perfect random crystallographic orientation displayed in the original as sprayed structure as can be shown by EBSD analysis. Again the joint has a unique structure of fine, non-directional equiaxed grains that have a random crystallographic orientation.


While certain procedures have been illustrated or described herein, it will be recognized that variations can be used without departing from the basic teachings herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method of joining metallic structures, the method comprising: explosive bonding first and second protective layers to an underlying steel layer such that a portion of the steel layer is exposed therebetween; andthereafter, cold spraying a metal powder over and in contact with (i) the exposed portion of the steel layer and (ii) the first and second protective layers to form a layer of unmelted metal powder that (a) directly connects the first and second protective layers and (b) is bonded to the exposed portion of the steel layer and the first and second protective layers to form an integral coating thereon, thereby forming a joined metallic structure.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second protective layers each comprise at least one of tantalum, niobium, titanium, zirconium, molybdenum, or tungsten.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second protective layers are not welded together before cold spraying the metal powder.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second protective layers are substantially resistant to at least one of acid or corrosion.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the steel layer underlies substantially all of the first and second protective layers.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein after cold spraying the layer of unmelted metal powder is substantially free of oxygen.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the first and second protective layers is bonded directly to the steel layer.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein a thickness of at least one of the first or second protective layers ranges between approximately 0.005 inches and approximately 0.02 inches.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein a thickness of at least one of the first or second protective layers ranges between approximately 0.005 inches and approximately 0.01 inches.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the layer of unmelted metal powder comprises elongated particles having a random crystallographic orientation.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the layer of unmelted metal powder has a density greater than approximately 95%.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the layer of unmelted metal powder has a density greater than approximately 97.5%.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising annealing the layer of unmelted metal powder for at least one of relieving mechanical stress or improving interparticle bond strength.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the annealing recrystallizes at least a portion of the layer of unmelted metal powder.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the annealing is performed at a temperature greater than approximately 1150° C.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the steel layer comprises stainless steel.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein after cold spraying the layer of unmelted metal powder and the first and second protective layers are substantially free of impurities diffused therein from the steel layer.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, further comprising: forming a vessel comprising the joined metallic structure; andexposing the vessel to a corrosive fluid, the first and second protective layers and the layer of unmelted metal powder protecting the underlying steel layer from corrosion.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the vessel comprises a reactor, a heat exchanger, or a pipe.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/343,113, filed on Jan. 4, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/184,665, filed on Jul. 18, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,113,413, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/638,625, filed on Dec. 13, 2006, now abandoned, the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (239)
Number Name Date Kind
3436299 Halek et al. Apr 1969 A
3990784 Gelber Nov 1976 A
4011981 Danna et al. Mar 1977 A
4073427 Keifert et al. Feb 1978 A
4135286 Wright et al. Jan 1979 A
4140172 Corey Feb 1979 A
4202932 Chen et al. May 1980 A
4209375 Gates et al. Jun 1980 A
4291104 Keifert Sep 1981 A
4349954 Banks Sep 1982 A
4425483 Lee et al. Jan 1984 A
4459062 Siebert Jul 1984 A
4508563 Bernard et al. Apr 1985 A
4510171 Siebert Apr 1985 A
4537641 Albrecht et al. Aug 1985 A
4722756 Hard Feb 1988 A
4731111 Kopatz et al. Mar 1988 A
4818629 Jenstrom et al. Apr 1989 A
4915745 Pollock et al. Apr 1990 A
4964906 Fife Oct 1990 A
5061527 Watanabe et al. Oct 1991 A
5091244 Biornard Feb 1992 A
5242481 Kumar Sep 1993 A
5269899 Fan Dec 1993 A
5270858 Dickey Dec 1993 A
5271965 Browning Dec 1993 A
5302414 Alkhimov et al. Apr 1994 A
5305946 Heilmann Apr 1994 A
5330798 Browning Jul 1994 A
5392981 Makowiecki et al. Feb 1995 A
5428882 Makowiecki et al. Jul 1995 A
5466355 Ohhashi et al. Nov 1995 A
5565071 Demaray et al. Oct 1996 A
5580516 Kumar Dec 1996 A
5612254 Mu et al. Mar 1997 A
5676803 Demaray et al. Oct 1997 A
5679473 Murayama et al. Oct 1997 A
5687600 Emigh et al. Nov 1997 A
5693203 Ohhashi et al. Dec 1997 A
5726410 Fukushima et al. Mar 1998 A
5738770 Strauss et al. Apr 1998 A
5795626 Gabel et al. Aug 1998 A
5836506 Hunt et al. Nov 1998 A
5859654 Radke et al. Jan 1999 A
5863398 Kardokus et al. Jan 1999 A
5954856 Pathare et al. Sep 1999 A
5955685 Na Sep 1999 A
5972065 Dunn et al. Oct 1999 A
5993513 Fife Nov 1999 A
6010583 Annavarapu et al. Jan 2000 A
6030577 Commandeur et al. Feb 2000 A
6071389 Zhang Jun 2000 A
6136062 Loffelholz et al. Oct 2000 A
6139913 Van Steenkiste et al. Oct 2000 A
6165413 Lo et al. Dec 2000 A
6171363 Shekhter et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176947 Hwang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189663 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197082 Dorvel et al. Mar 2001 B1
6245390 Baranovski et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258402 Hussary et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261337 Kumar Jul 2001 B1
6267851 Hosokawa Jul 2001 B1
6283357 Kulkarni et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294246 Watanabe et al. Sep 2001 B1
6328927 Lo et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331233 Turner Dec 2001 B1
6408928 Heinrich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409897 Wingo Jun 2002 B1
6409965 Nagata et al. Jun 2002 B1
6432804 Nakata et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444259 Subramanian et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464933 Popoola et al. Oct 2002 B1
6478902 Koenigsmann et al. Nov 2002 B2
6482743 Sato Nov 2002 B1
6491208 James et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497797 Kim Dec 2002 B1
6502767 Kay et al. Jan 2003 B2
6521173 Kumar et al. Feb 2003 B2
6558447 Shekhter et al. May 2003 B1
6582572 McLeod Jun 2003 B2
6589311 Han et al. Jul 2003 B1
6623796 Van Steenkiste Sep 2003 B1
6669782 Thakur Dec 2003 B1
6722584 Kay et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723379 Stark Apr 2004 B2
6725522 Ivanov et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743343 Kida et al. Jun 2004 B2
6743468 Fuller et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749002 Grinberg et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749103 Ivanov et al. Jun 2004 B1
6759085 Muehlberger Jul 2004 B2
6770154 Koenigsmann et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773969 Lee et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780458 Seth et al. Aug 2004 B2
6855236 Sato et al. Feb 2005 B2
6872425 Kaufold et al. Mar 2005 B2
6872427 Van Steenkiste et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875324 Hara et al. Apr 2005 B2
6896933 Van Steenkiste et al. May 2005 B2
6905728 Hu et al. Jun 2005 B1
6911124 Tang et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915964 Tapphorn et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919275 Chiang et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924974 Stark Aug 2005 B2
6946039 Segal et al. Sep 2005 B1
6953742 Chen et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962407 Yamamoto et al. Nov 2005 B2
6992261 Kachalov et al. Jan 2006 B2
7041204 Cooper May 2006 B1
7053294 Tuttle et al. May 2006 B2
7067197 Michaluk et al. Jun 2006 B2
7081148 Koenigsmann et al. Jul 2006 B2
7101447 Turner Sep 2006 B2
7108893 Van Steenkiste et al. Sep 2006 B2
7128988 Lambeth Oct 2006 B2
7143967 Heinrich et al. Dec 2006 B2
7146703 Ivanov Dec 2006 B2
7153453 Abe et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163715 Kramer Jan 2007 B1
7164205 Yamaji et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170915 McDonald Jan 2007 B2
7175802 Sandlin et al. Feb 2007 B2
7178744 Tapphorn et al. Feb 2007 B2
7183206 Shepard Feb 2007 B2
7192623 Andre et al. Mar 2007 B2
7208230 Ackerman et al. Apr 2007 B2
7244466 Van Steenkiste et al. Jul 2007 B2
7278353 Langan et al. Oct 2007 B2
7314650 Nanis Jan 2008 B1
7316763 Hosokawa et al. Jan 2008 B2
7335341 Van Steenkiste et al. Feb 2008 B2
7399335 Shekhter et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402277 Ayer et al. Jul 2008 B2
7479299 Raybould et al. Jan 2009 B2
7514122 Kramer Apr 2009 B2
7550055 Le et al. Jun 2009 B2
7582846 Molz et al. Sep 2009 B2
7618500 Farmer et al. Nov 2009 B2
7635498 Sakai et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644745 Le et al. Jan 2010 B2
7652223 Tanase et al. Jan 2010 B2
7670406 Belashchenko Mar 2010 B2
7811429 Landgraf et al. Oct 2010 B2
7815782 Inagawa et al. Oct 2010 B2
7901552 Pavloff Mar 2011 B2
7910051 Zimmermann et al. Mar 2011 B2
7951275 Tsukamoto May 2011 B2
8002169 Miller et al. Aug 2011 B2
8043655 Miller et al. Oct 2011 B2
8197661 Nanis Jun 2012 B1
8197894 Miller et al. Jun 2012 B2
8448840 Miller et al. May 2013 B2
20010054457 Segal et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020112789 Jepson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112955 Aimone et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030023132 Melvin et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030052000 Segal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030175142 Milonopoulou et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030178301 Lynn et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030190413 Van Steenkiste et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030219542 Ewasyshyn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030232132 Muehlberger Dec 2003 A1
20040065546 Michaluk et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076807 Grinberg et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040126499 Heinrich et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040202885 Seth et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040262157 Ford et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050084701 Slattery Apr 2005 A1
20050120957 Kowalsky et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142021 Aimone et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147150 Wickersham et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050147742 Kleshock et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050153069 Tapphorn et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050155856 Oda Jul 2005 A1
20050220995 Hu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050252450 Kowalsky et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060006064 Tepman Jan 2006 A1
20060011470 Hatch et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060021870 Tsai et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060027687 Heinrich et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060032735 Aimone et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060042728 Lemon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060045785 Hu et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060090593 Liu May 2006 A1
20060121187 Haynes et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060137969 Feldewerth et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060175198 Vermeersch et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060207876 Matsumura et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060251872 Wang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060266639 Le et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060289305 White Dec 2006 A1
20070012557 Hosokawa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070089984 Gaydos et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070116886 Refke et al. May 2007 A1
20070116890 Adams et al. May 2007 A1
20070172378 Shibuya et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183919 Ayer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070187525 Jabado et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070196570 Gentsch et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070240980 Chu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070241164 Barnes et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070251814 Beele et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070251820 Nitta et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070289864 Ye et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070289869 Ye et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080028459 Suh et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080041720 Kim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080063889 Duckham et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080078268 Shekhter et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080145688 Miller et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080171215 Kumar et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080173542 Neudecker et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080216602 Zimmermann et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080271779 Miller et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090004379 Deng et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010792 Yi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090159433 Neudecker et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090173626 Duckham et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090214374 Ivanov Aug 2009 A1
20090239754 Kruger et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090291851 Bohn et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100000857 Tonogi et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100015467 Zimmermann et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100055487 Zimmermann et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100061876 Miller et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100084052 Farmer et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086800 Miller et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100136242 Kay et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100172789 Calla et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189910 Belashchenko et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100246774 Lathrop Sep 2010 A1
20100252418 McCabe et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272889 Shekhter et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110127162 King et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132534 Miller et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110297535 Higdon et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110300396 Miller et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110303535 Miller et al. Dec 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
2482287 Oct 2002 CA
0074803 Mar 1983 EP
1066899 Jan 2001 EP
1350861 Oct 2003 EP
1398394 Mar 2004 EP
1413642 Apr 2004 EP
1452622 Sep 2004 EP
1715080 Oct 2006 EP
2121441 Dec 1983 GB
2394479 Apr 2004 GB
54067198 May 1979 JP
3197640 Aug 1991 JP
06346232 Dec 1994 JP
11269639 Oct 1999 JP
01131767 May 2001 JP
03301278 Oct 2003 JP
2166421 May 2001 RU
WO-02070765 Sep 2002 WO
WO-03062491 Jul 2003 WO
WO-2004074540 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2005073418 Aug 2005 WO
WO-2005079209 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2006117145 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007001441 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2008063891 May 2008 WO
WO-2008089188 Jul 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
“Cold Gas Dynamic Spray CGSM Apparatus,” Tev Tech LLC, available at: http://www.tevtechllc.com/cold—gas.html (accessed Dec. 14, 2009).
“Cold Spray Process,” Handbook of Thermal Spray Technology, ASM International, Sep. 2004, pp. 77-84.
Ajdelsztajn et al., “Synthesis and Mechanical Properties of Nanocrytalline Ni Coatings Producted by Cold Gas Dynamic Spraying,” 201 Surface and Coatings Tech. 3-4, pp. 1166-1172 (Oct. 2006).
Gärtner et al., “The Cold Spray Process and it Potential for Industrial Applications,” 15 J. of Thermal Sprsy Tech. 2. pp. 223-232 (Jun. 2006).
Hall et al., “The Effect of a Simple Annealing Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Cold-Sprayed Aluminum,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 233-238 (Jun. 2006).
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2006/003967 dated Nov. 6, 2007 (15 pages).
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/062434, dated Nov. 10, 2009 (21 pages).
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2006/003969, mailed dated Nov. 6, 2007 (13 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/087214, mailed Mar. 23, 2009 (13 pages).
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/081200 dated Sep. 1, 2009 (17 pages).
IPRP in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/080282, dated Apr. 7, 2009 (15 pages).
Irissou et al., “Review on Cold Spray Process and Technology: Part I—Intellectual Property,” 17 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 4, pp. 495-516 (Dec. 2008).
Karthikeyan, “Cold Spray Technology: International Status and USA Efforts,” ASB Industries, Inc. (Dec. 2004).
Li et al., “Effect of Annealing Treatment on the Microstructure and Properties of Cold-Sprayed Cu Coating,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 206-211 (Jun. 2006).
Marx et al., “Cold Spraying—Innovative Layers for New Applications,” 15 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 177-183 (Jun. 2006).
Morito, “Preparation and Characterization of Sintered Mo—Re Alloys,” 3 J. de Physique 7, Part 1, pp. 553-556 (1993).
Search Report in European Patent Application No. 09172234.8. dated Jan. 29, 2010 (7 pages).
Stoltenhoff et al., “An Analysis of the Cold Spray Process and its Coatings,” 11 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 4, pp, 542-550 (Dec. 2002).
Van Steenkiste et al., “Analysis of Tantalum Coatings Produced by the Kinetic Spray Process,” 13 J. of Thermal Spray Tech. 2, pp. 265-273 (Jun. 2004).
Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 09172234.8, mailed Jun. 16, 2010 (3 pages).
Kosarev et al., “Recently Patent Facilities and Applications in Cold Spray Engineering,” Recent Patents on Engineering, vol. 1 pp. 35-42 (2007).
Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 07843733.2, mailed Nov. 30, 2010 (9 pages).
English Translation of Office Action mailed Feb. 23, 2011 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880023411.5 (4 pages).
Examination Report in European Patent Application No. 08755010.9, mailed Sep. 16, 2011 (3 pages).
Examination Report in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,736,876, mailed Feb. 29, 2012 (4 pages).
Tapphorn et al., “The Solid state Spray Forming of Low-Oxide Titanium Components,” JOM, p. 45-47 (1998).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130264013 A1 Oct 2013 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13343113 Jan 2012 US
Child 13848404 US
Parent 13184665 Jul 2011 US
Child 13343113 US
Parent 11638625 Dec 2006 US
Child 13184665 US